Nations Not Hamstrung By Over-reaching Human Rights Advocacy Are Economic Models For The World…

The idea that decisive crime fighting initiatives are synonymous with breaching Human Rights is a falsehood perpetuated by those who make a living from high crime rates and a constant state of confrontation between Police and citizens.
Mourning UTech stu­dent who was murdered.

♦The Office of the Public Defender♦ The Independent Jamaica Council for Human Rights♦Jamaicans for Justice ♦Families against state Terrorism♦Peace Management Unit♦Amnesty International♦ Ministry of Justice ♦Attorney Generals Office ♦Etc.…..Etc.…Etc.….

These are just of few of the Agencies and Government Departments oper­at­ing in Jamaica sup­pos­ed­ly look­ing out for the inter­est and Human Rights of Jamaicans.
These bod­ies are sin­gu­lar­ly focused on the rights of those who say they have been aggriev­ed by agents of the state.

Grief-strick­en mourn­ers dis­cov­ered that miss­ing stu­dent of the Green Pond High School was murdered…

WHO LOOK OUT FOR THE INTEREST OF VICTIMS?

I may be wrong, as such I wel­come feed­back which will edu­cate me about exist­ing NGO’s in place which is geared at help­ing vic­tims of crime.
I have no quar­rel with gen­uine efforts to help peo­ple who have been vic­tim­ized by the Government or its agents.
For years the actions of both polit­i­cal par­ties on the Jamaican peo­ple have been trau­mat­ic and wor­thy of redress.
God knows all of us aver­age peo­ple need all of the help we can get when seek­ing redress from pow­er­ful Governments and their Agents.

No one is immune…

We can­not ignore the fact that there has been no effort, at least that I have seen, insti­tut­ed to aid vic­tims of crime.
I believe fun­da­men­tal­ly that aid­ing those who through no fault of their own, have been vic­tim­ized by crime, is a far more noble cause than fight­ing to ensure that killers are treat­ed with care, as stip­u­lat­ed by des­ig­nat­ed Internationally based Liberal Agencies.

We await with gen­uine inter­est the new set of crime fight­ing ini­tia­tives to be announced by the Prime Minister.
Nevertheless, we remain deeply skep­ti­cal that any­thing announced will have any sub­stan­tive pos­i­tive result unless the police are unshack­led and empow­ered to go after crim­i­nals wher­ev­er they are.

There are more than enough process­es in place to ensure that police offi­cer who acts out­side the bounds of the laws are prosecuted.
I actu­al­ly believe that the degree to which the police is shack­led is a dri­ving force in the rapid growth and vicious­ness of the crimes being com­mit­ted on the most vulnerable.
It’s full time that this Administration sends a strong mes­sage to crim­i­nals that their actions will not be tolerated.
Anything else will sim­ply be a capit­u­la­tion to the vis­cous mur­der­ers who con­tin­ue to take inno­cent lives with impunity.

This is what Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas Director at Amnesty International, had to say about our coun­try awhile back.
Police shoot­ings are gen­er­al­ly attrib­uted to a “tough on crime” approach, but often dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly tar­get poor com­mu­ni­ties where vic­tims have lit­tle recourse.”
In the very same state­ment, Amnesty said this. “Jamaica has one of the world’s high­est mur­der rates and is rife with gang vio­lence.”

Amnesty International and oth­er Groups which take on the role of advo­cat­ing for human rights are able to research and report on what they see around the Globe.
Neither of these Internationally based Agencies has any impact on leg­is­la­tion out­side the broad­er frame­work of the Geneva Conventions and oth­er Treaties in the west­ern nations, Agency, even in which they are based or from which they emanate.

Jamaica should not allow Amnesty International or anAgency, or any Treaty to pre­vent it from doing what is it’s core function.
That is pro­vid­ing secu­ri­ty in the Jamaican state.
The fact that an International Human Rights Agency can ver­bal­ize the fact that(1) Jamaica has one of the high­est crime rate in the world and is rife with gang violence.

Then (2) argue that the very same vio­lent gang affil­i­at­ed young men” have lit­tle recourse to their lives of vio­lent crimes” when tar­get­ed by police crackdown.
This state­ments have vin­di­cat­ed my argu­ments that these agen­cies do not care about crime. Neither do they care about crime victims.
Obviously what they care about is main­tain­ing pres­sure on poor nations so that they are forced to hands off vio­lent crime, effec­tive­ly keep­ing their economies strug­gling and depen­dent on their larg­er more pow­er­ful patrons.

Not even babies are exempt from the brutish onslaught of the Island’s murderers.

It is impor­tant to under­stand that these Agencies are based in the United States and Great Britain.
Having lived in the United States for over 25 year I am hard pressed to see a sit­u­a­tion in which Amnesty International , the Inter American Commission for Human Rights, or any oth­er Agency have once placed them­selves in the fight African-Americans have with unlaw­ful police killing of unarmed black men.

They have no pow­er in America, they should have no pow­er to dic­tate laws in Jamaica . Their advo­ca­cy in to ensure the con­tin­ued finan­cial depen­den­cy on the larg­er patron states , ie the United States, England etal.
It is a part of the world order which is geared at keep­ing small­er states with peo­ple of col­or finan­cial­ly dependent.
They can only guar­an­tee failed economies in crime rid­den soci­eties. Failed economies mean per­pet­u­al depen­den­cy on larg­er pow­er­ful states for loans.
These loans are attached to strin­gent aus­ter­i­ty mea­sures which in turn fur­ther impov­er­ish­es debtor states.
And the cycle continues.

The poor­est Nations with the high­est inci­dents of crime have the most vocal, most pow­er­ful Human Rights advocacy.
Nations which take their own futures in their own hands by dis­card­ing the views of these agen­cies have done very well for them­selves and in many cas­es are eco­nom­ic mod­els for the rest of the world.
The ques­tion is, when will Jamaicans real­ize that the very peo­ple sup­pos­ed­ly look­ing out for their well-being are the peo­ple keep­ing them in poverty.

%d