Bunting’s Incompetence:

Peter Bunting spent most of his time thrash­ing Police Officers while his par­ty was in oppo­si­tion . He attend­ed many func­tions where he berat­ed the police force. As shad­ow min­is­ter for nation­al secu­ri­ty, he did­n’t both­er to spend time devel­op­ing a strat­e­gy that would fur­ther the process of crime sup­pres­sion and elim­i­na­tion in the coun­try of 2.7 mil­lion peo­ple . In fact, Bunting was in the fore­front of his lead­er’s brigade that now forms the gov­ern­ment, they vot­ed not to give the secu­ri­ty forces the time and pow­ers they need­ed to con­sol­i­date the gains after they lib­er­at­ed Tivoli Gardens.

Photo cour­tesy of the Jamaica Observer.

Yesterday Peter Bunting told the coun­try that his par­ty, the People’s National par­ty will win a sig­nif­i­cant por­tion of the parish coun­cil seats in local gov­ern­ment elec­tions con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly due in March.

Why is this important ?

Peter Bunting just hap­pen to be the coun­try’s nation­al secu­ri­ty min­is­ter. As we pre­dict­ed when his par­ty was returned to office after a short 4 year stint in oppo­si­tion, crime would head right back upwards . Word on the streets is, and always was, that his par­ty is high­ly tol­er­ant of crime. People feel they can run with what­ev­er they are into, “eat a food”. After Tivoli Gardens was annexed to Jamaica, crime trend­ed south­ward to the tune of 40% over the cor­re­spond­ing peri­od of pre­vi­ous year/​s. Jamaica record­ed an aver­age of 1600 mur­ders annu­al­ly up to the time of the Tivoli take-back. Crime trend­ed down and remained at 40 % low­er untill The PNP took office. Now it is far from com­fort­ing that we could crow about a 40% reduc­tion in crime when we have 1600 homi­cides report­ed each year . On the one hand it is great that 640 less Jamaicans have been killed whilst on the oth­er it is heart rend­ing that 960 peo­ple were slaugh­tered, in a coun­try with a pop­u­la­tion of only 2.7 mil­lion people.

Bunting yes­ter­day announced that 165 Jamaicans have been slaugh­tered since the start of this year. That 165 homi­cides, is over a peri­od of 51 days. That num­ber trans­lates into an aver­age of 3.24 Jamaicans killed dai­ly as far as police knows. Anyone who know Jamaica will prob­a­bly argue that those num­bers rep­re­sent the tip of the iceberg.

Today we are told that the gov­ern­ment of Portia Simpson Miller wants to bring crime down to first world lev­els by 2017.

WHAT ARE CRIME LEVELS OF FIRST WORLD COUNTRIES ?

Switzerland is a first world coun­try : In 2010 Switzerland record­ed 53 homi­cides, pop­u­la­tion at the time 7,554,661.

The United States is a first world coun­try: in 2010 The United States record­ed 14,748 homi­cides, pop­u­la­tion at the time 308,745,538.

During the late 1980 to ear­ly 1990’s the United States saw as much as 24,000 homi­cides at the zenith of the drug wars, since then crime has trend­ed down­wards to 14,748 in 2010.

I picked these two coun­tries because if we take out the dis­par­i­ty in pop­u­la­tion size they rep­re­sent two coun­tries most peo­ple would argue are sta­ble coun­tries where peo­ple want to live.

So which first world coun­try is the gov­ern­ment of Miller refer­ring to? The year 2017 is 5 years away , at the rate of an annu­al 1,600 homi­cides, are they sug­gest­ing that they are will­ing to see 8,000 peo­ple slaugh­tered before they take action?

This gov­ern­ment is the epit­o­me of incom­pe­tence. Not only do they give crim­i­nals the feel­ing that with them any­thing goes, they actu­al­ly cement that mind­set by hav­ing no plan to com­bat crime. Those who argue that this mind­set is not preva­lent on the streets are disin­gen­u­ous and the truth is not in them. Any per­son may car­ry out their own gener­ic poll to ver­i­fy these facts on the streets of any city , in any vil­lage in the country.

Like any­one else police offi­cers are enti­tled to their polit­i­cal views, how­ev­er many serv­ing mem­bers of the JCF joined the licky licky mass­es and vot­ed this incom­pe­tence into being , sub­se­quent­ly they share in the con­tin­ued destruc­tion of our coun­try , even as for­mer rigid dic­ta­tor­ships are shak­ing off the man­tle of polit­i­cal oppres­sion and embrac­ing free­dom and the promise of the twen­ty first century.

%d