Too Many Cops, With Not Enough To Do Leads To Incidents Like These…

YouTube player

After Minneapolis cop Derek Chauvin and his cohorts lynched George Floyd, calls to defund the police were loud and clear across the coun­try. Those calls were just then as they are just now, but con­trary to what many peo­ple tell them­selves, the United States is not a demo­c­ra­t­ic nation where the gov­ern­ment is respon­sive to the peo­ple’s demands.
So the cor­po­rate media, whol­ly owned and con­trolled by the pow­er­ful one per­cent, went into over­drive to sell the right-wing Republican talk­ing point that defund­ing the police state is tan­ta­mount to sup­port­ing crim­i­nals. Democrats, too, cleaved to the Republican per­spec­tive out of fear of being brand­ed anti-police.
But I hard­ly speak of the Democratic par­ty because of its weak­ness. Republicans set a far-right agen­da; Democrats cre­ate a lite version.

I have always harkened to the old Jamaican say­ings; as I got old­er, they became more and more mean­ing­ful. In this case, I will refer to two of them, ‘the dev­il finds work for idle hands, and’ too many cooks spoil the broth.’
There are far too many police offi­cers in the United States, large­ly because the wealthy one per­cent who own the cor­po­rate media want it that way. Consequently, the mid­dle class, which has been social­ized into believ­ing that more and more police are nec­es­sary for their safe­ty, is always will­ing to be taxed to pay for more and more cops to pro­tect the inter­est of the super-rich.

Disney owns ABC. Paramount Entertainment owns CBS. NBC is a divi­sion of COMCAST, and So is MSNBC. FOX is owned by the super-wealthy Rupert Murdoch. Warner Brothers owns CNN. Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post, and Bezos owns the mar­ket­ing behe­moth Amazon. We can go down the list of major opin­ion influ­encers, and the result is the same: they are all owned by the wealth­i­est and most pow­er­ful peo­ple, includ­ing social media sites.
In the greater scheme of things, your indi­vid­ual rights are of lit­tle sig­nif­i­cance, par­tic­u­lar­ly when the courts are asked to adju­di­cate indi­vid­ual rights against those of the state or pow­er­ful inter­ests. In those sce­nar­ios, indi­vid­ual rights are lost most of the time.
The major­i­ty of Americans, includ­ing African Americans who have suf­fered under the yolk of police oppres­sion for hun­dreds of years, still believe the police are their protectors.


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police have no spe­cif­ic oblig­a­tion to pro­tect. In its 1989 deci­sion in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, the jus­tices ruled that a social ser­vices depart­ment had no duty to pro­tect a young boy from his abu­sive father. In 2005’sCastle Rock v. Gonzalesa woman sued the police for fail­ing to pro­tect her from her hus­band after he vio­lat­ed a restrain­ing order and abduct­ed and killed their three chil­dren. Justices said the police had no such duty.
Most recent­ly, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld a low­er court rul­ing that police could not be held liable for fail­ing to pro­tect stu­dents in the 2018 shoot­ing that claimed 17 lives at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.
Almost to a man, every last one of those par­ents most like­ly har­bored the belief in what they char­ac­ter­ize as their police depart­ment: that they are sup­posed to be pro­tect­ed by the police.
That their police depart­ment that they fund will pro­tect their chil­dren in their classrooms.
It is a sure bet to imag­ine that every sin­gle one of those par­ents who are salaried receives their pay­check after the gov­ern­ment removes tax­es that pay for ser­vices such as fund­ing the police. Those who oper­ate busi­ness­es also must pay tax­es, and even those who do not work also pay some kind of tax, includ­ing sales tax that goes to fund­ing police and oth­er services.
Yet, accord­ing to the judi­cia­ry, even though cit­i­zens do not have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to opt out of fund­ing the bloat­ed police state, they have no right to pro­tec­tion from it.

So, if the police have no duty to pro­tect cit­i­zens, what is their role? As I inti­mat­ed ear­li­er, they are there to pro­tect prop­er­ty and to extract rev­enue from the mass­es. I read an arti­cle years ago in which the author opined that if Americans were smart enough to cal­cu­late just how much tax­es they pay as opposed to how lit­tle they receive from it, there would be anoth­er war of inde­pen­dence. The vast major­i­ty of the just under one mil­lion cops from the almost 18,000 depart­ments that police the 320 mil­lion of us are out pulling over and tick­et­ing motorists for what­ev­er they choose to lie about.
I always warned my boys to avoid hav­ing to pay what I called stu­pid tax: traf­fic offens­es. These days, it is impos­si­ble to avoid that tax; it isn’t a stu­pid tax any­more. Cops sim­ply make up a lie on the tick­et, and even if a judge sees through the lie and dis­miss­es the tick­et, you are still stuck with court costs.
The need to gen­er­ate rev­enue is so great that cops will do any­thing to gin up arrests to fill jail cells in fur­ther­ance of the prison indus­tri­al com­plex. Some munic­i­pal­i­ties depend on traf­fic tick­et rev­enue to fund large parts of their bud­get. So when the police see no traf­fic infrac­tion, they invent them. Usually, the poor­est peo­ple are forced to bear the brunt of this insid­i­ous corruption.

It is for those rea­sons that cops in Mississippi arrest­ed a 10-year-old Black boy who was arrest­ed and placed in a cell for reliev­ing him­self in a park­ing lot. Quantavious Eason was detained and tak­en to a police sta­tion in Senatobia after an offi­cer spot­ted him uri­nat­ing behind a car out­side a law office last month while his moth­er was get­ting advice on hous­ing issues. LaToya Eason ques­tioned if her son’s race influ­enced offi­cers’ deci­sion to take him away in a police car and place him in a cell for almost an hour. “Would you have put a white child in a cage? If it had been a white child, he prob­a­bly wouldn’t have even been stopped,” she told a news con­fer­ence this week. She said the boy had seen a sign say­ing there were no toi­lets for pub­lic use inside the law office, but he des­per­ate­ly need­ed to go.
Read the full sto­ry here. https://​news​.yahoo​.com/​f​a​m​i​l​y​-​d​e​m​a​n​d​-​m​i​s​s​i​s​s​i​p​p​i​-​c​o​p​s​-​f​i​r​e​d​-​1​5​0​0​1​1​2​7​2​.​h​tml

.…

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

%d