Paul Krugman: Republicans Are Stripping Our Freedoms One By One

Americans are creeping along the road to serfdom, yoked to corporate employers.”

This arti­cle orig­i­nal­ly appeared on AlterNet.

Paul Krugman

America, as Paul Krugman writes in his Monday col­umn, is sup­pos­ed­ly “an open soci­ety, in which every­one is free to make his or her own choic­es about where to work and how to live.”

This idea of free­dom is our favorite myth, and it’s one con­ser­v­a­tives love to trot out when argu­ing for gut­ting the social safe­ty net. Getting cru­cial help like health insur­ance or minor assis­tance pay­ing for gro­ceriess, they rea­son, makes a per­son less free.

In prac­tice, the con­ser­v­a­tive def­i­n­i­tion of free­dom means free­dom for cor­po­ra­tions to under­pay their work­ers, enforce non-com­pete agree­ments pre­vent­ing near­ly 30 mil­lion from ever get­ting a new job if they quit, and deny the sick­est among us life-sav­ing health care. Not to men­tion, Krugman writes, “the mil­lions of Americans bur­dened down by heavy stu­dent and oth­er debt.”

The New York Times colum­nist argues “that we’re get­ting less free as time goes by,” espe­cial­ly when com­pared to European coun­tries: “The Gallup World Survey asks res­i­dents of many coun­tries whether they feel that they have ‘free­dom to make life choic­es’; the U.S. doesn’t come out look­ing too good, espe­cial­ly com­pared with the high free­dom grades of European nations with strong social safe­ty nets.”

The non-com­pete agree­ments are par­tic­u­lar­ly egre­gious. Krugman writes: “almost one in five American employ­ees is sub­ject to some kind of non­com­pete clause. There can’t be that many work­ers in pos­ses­sion of valu­able trade secrets, espe­cial­ly when many of these work­ers are in rel­a­tive­ly low-pay­ing jobs. For exam­ple, one promi­nent case involved Jimmy John’s, a sand­wich chain, basi­cal­ly try­ing to ban its for­mer fran­chisees from work­ing for oth­er sand­wich makers.”

Employers know that there are many trade secrets to be pro­tect­ed. But what com­pa­nies will nev­er admit is that these agree­ments are “less about pro­tect­ing trade secrets than they are about tying work­ers to their cur­rent employ­ers, unable to bar­gain for bet­ter wages or quit to take bet­ter jobs.”

Healthcare too, is anoth­er way in which Americans are yoked to their jobs, unable to advance sim­ply because they’d lose their abil­i­ty to see a doc­tor. Until the Affordable Care Act went into effect, “there was basi­cal­ly only one way Americans under 65 with pre-exist­ing con­di­tions could get health insur­ance: by find­ing an employ­er will­ing to offer coverage.”

Then Obamacare was cre­at­ed, and despite its flaws, for the first time there was flex­i­bil­i­ty and afford­able care avail­able even to those with pre-exist­ing con­di­tions. Instead of sup­port­ing its busi­ness and job-cre­at­ing pos­si­bil­i­ties and mak­ing improve­ments to pre­vent the kind of pre­mi­um increas­es and oth­er chal­lenges the law faces today, the Tea Party under­mined it at every turn. It remains baf­fling how a par­ty that extolls the virtues of entre­pre­neur­ship and inno­va­tion worked over­time to sab­o­tage a law that encour­ages just that. With Trump in office, and the Republicans’ new plan on the table, the threats only get worse.

Instead of liv­ing up to our rep­u­ta­tion as the land of the free, Americans are, Krugman con­cludes, “actu­al­ly creep­ing along the road to serf­dom, yoked to cor­po­rate employ­ers the way Russian peas­ants were once tied to their mas­ters’ land.” Even worse, “peo­ple push­ing them down that road are the very peo­ple who cry ‘free­dom’ the loudest.”
Read the full col­umn here.

%d