NYPD To Pay Largest Protester Settlement Ever For Abuses During George Floyd Uprising…

YouTube player

To many, this may seem like jus­tice for the peo­ple bru­tal­ized and abused by the blue mili­tia oper­at­ing the New York City. But how is this jus­tice? The mis­cre­ants who com­mit­ted those crim­i­nal acts did so in full view of many peo­ple and know­ing full well that they were like­ly being video-record­ed. It did not stop them from com­mit­ting the acts for which the tax-pay­ing res­i­dents of the city are now on the hook.
Why do they com­mit crim­i­nal acts against their boss­es, the peo­ple who employ them to keep them safe?
They act with impuni­ty because they know they will not per­son­al­ly face crim­i­nal or civ­il liability.
Freedom is what the Government says it is. Freedom is nev­er free but is watered and nour­ished by every gen­er­a­tion. Therefore, each gen­er­a­tion must under­stand and com­mit to the fun­da­men­tals of main­tain­ing a just and equi­table soci­ety, not a police state.

In Search of Liberty’, a right-wing web­site, has the fol­low­ing on its page. (Had the American Revolution failed, each of them, (the founders) would have faced exe­cu­tion – and the loss of all their prop­er­ty, which would have con­demned their wives and chil­dren to a life of pover­ty. It was a remark­able gam­ble, because most of the Founding Fathers were already wealthy, suc­cess­ful men. They didn’t rebel against England for per­son­al enrich­ment; they rebelled because they tru­ly believed that the loss of free­dom was worse than death.
How iron­ic that even though these men sac­ri­ficed every­thing for their free­dom, as artic­u­lat­ed by this site, they all believed in the total enslave­ment and dis­en­fran­chise­ment of Black Americans.

You will nev­er know how much it has cost my gen­er­a­tion to pre­serve your free­dom. I hope you will make a good use of it.”
-John Adams

Remember democ­ra­cy nev­er lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and mur­ders itself. There nev­er was a democ­ra­cy yet, that did not com­mit suicide.”
-John Adams

The lib­er­ties of our coun­try, the free­dom of our civ­il con­sti­tu­tion, are worth defend­ing against all haz­ards: And it is our duty to defend them against all attacks.”
-Samuel Adams

A gen­er­al Dissolution of Principles & Manners will more sure­ly over­throw the Liberties of America than the whole Force of the Common Enemy.”
-Samuel Adams

They who would give up an essen­tial lib­er­ty for tem­po­rary secu­ri­ty, deserve nei­ther lib­er­ty or security.”
-Benjamin Franklin

Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by oth­er men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of God and nature.”
-Benjamin Franklin

I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country.”
-Nathan Hale

There is a cer­tain enthu­si­asm in lib­er­ty that makes human nature rise above itself, in acts of brav­ery and heroism.”
-Alexander Hamilton

If the rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the peo­ple betray their con­stituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exer­tion of that orig­i­nal right of self-defense which is para­mount to all pos­i­tive forms of government.”
-Alexander Hamilton

We have all one com­mon cause; let it, there­fore, be our only con­test, who shall most con­tribute to the secu­ri­ty of the lib­er­ties of America.”
-John Hancock

I know not what course oth­ers may take; but as for me, give me lib­er­ty or give me death!”
-Patrick Henry

Thomas JeffersonThe pol­i­cy of American gov­ern­ment is to leave its cit­i­zens free, nei­ther restrain­ing them nor aid­ing them in their pursuits.”
-Thomas Jefferson

A sacred respect for the con­sti­tu­tion­al law is the vital prin­ci­ple, the sus­tain­ing ener­gy of a free government.”
-Thomas Jefferson

Educate and inform the whole mass of the peo­ple… They are the only sure reliance for the preser­va­tion of our liberty.”
-Thomas Jefferson

To pre­serve lib­er­ty, it is essen­tial that the whole body of peo­ple always pos­sess arms, and be taught alike, espe­cial­ly when young, how to use them…”
-Richard Henry Lee

It will be of lit­tle avail to the peo­ple that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so volu­mi­nous that they can­not be read, or so inco­her­ent that they can­not be under­stood; if they be repealed or revised before they are pro­mul­gat­ed, or under­go such inces­sant changes that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what it will be tomorrow.”
-James Madison

Democracy is the most vile form of gov­ern­ment. … democ­ra­cies have ever been spec­ta­cles of tur­bu­lence and con­tention; have ever been found incom­pat­i­ble with per­son­al secu­ri­ty or the rights of prop­er­ty: and have in gen­er­al been as short in their lives as the have been vio­lent in their deaths.”
-James Madison

Nothing so strong­ly impels a man to regard the inter­ests of his con­stituents, as the cer­tain­ty of return­ing to the gen­er­al mass of the peo­ple, from whence he was tak­en, where he must par­tic­i­pate in their burdens.”
-George Mason

The end of the gov­ern­ment being the good of mankind points out its great duties: it is above all things to pro­vide for the secu­ri­ty, the qui­et, the hap­py enjoy­ment of life, lib­er­ty, and property.”
-James Otis Jr.

It is the duty of the patri­ot to pro­tect his coun­try from its government.”
-Thomas Paine

Those peo­ple who will not be ruled by God will be ruled by tyrants.”
-William Penn

George WashingtonIf the free­dom of speech is tak­en away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”
-George Washington

The preser­va­tion of the sacred fire of lib­er­ty, and the des­tiny of the Republican mod­el of Government, are just­ly con­sid­ered as deeply, per­haps as final­ly staked, on the exper­i­ment entrust­ed to the hands of the American people.”
-George Washington

The Constitution is the guide which I will nev­er abandon.”
-George Washington

Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not clus­ter, and what has hap­pened once in 6,000 years, may not hap­pen again. Hold on to the Constitution, because if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anar­chy through­out the world.”
-Daniel Webster

Before a stand­ing army can rule, the peo­ple must be dis­armed; as they are in almost every king­dom of Europe. The supreme pow­er in America can­not enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the peo­ple are armed, and con­sti­tute a force supe­ri­or to any band of reg­u­lar troops that can be, on any pre­tense, raised in the United States.”
-Noah Webster

I won­der how these men would have respond­ed to whats hap­pen­ing today.(mb)

NEW YORK CITY reached a his­toric set­tle­ment this week on behalf of more than 1,300 peo­ple who were attacked by police while protest­ing the police killing of George Floyd in 2020.
The plain­tiffs claimed that the New York Police Department vio­lat­ed pro­test­ers’ civ­il and con­sti­tu­tion­al rights by mak­ing mass arrests, using exces­sive force, mis­us­ing pep­per spray, and using a tac­tic called ket­tling to trap and arrest pro­test­ers ahead of an imposed curfew. 
The pro­posed set­tle­ment will pay out $13 mil­lion to 1,380 pro­test­ers — about $10,000 per per­son — the largest total pay­out to pro­test­ers in a class action suit in the United States, accord­ing to the plain­tiffs. The set­tle­ment did not impose any reforms on the NYPD.

Of course not. Taxpayers foot the bill, and the thugs con­tin­ue as if noth­ing happened.

What the suit means for polic­ing will depend on how New Yorkers and the city respond, said Gideon Oliver, an attor­ney for the plain­tiffs. “Judged by that yard­stick, this is a huge vic­to­ry,” Oliver said. “But whether or not it changes police prac­tices is anoth­er sto­ry, and depends on how New Yorkers — and the city gov­ern­ment — react. “We can’t let the police count this win for pro­test­ers as just anoth­er cost of doing busi­ness,” he said, “as they have so many times in the past.” 
The set­tle­ment comes four months after anoth­er major set­tle­ment between the city and Floyd pro­test­ers in March that paid a record $7 mil­lion to more than 300 peo­ple. In both cas­es, foren­sic recon­struc­tionof the events played a key role in win­ning the set­tle­ments. Several oth­er major cities have paid out large set­tle­ments to pro­test­ers in recent law­suits aid­ed by foren­sic recon­struc­tion. Between late May and ear­ly June 2020, at the height of the move­ment for racial jus­tice sparked by Floyd’s killing, pro­test­ers advo­cat­ing against police mis­con­duct were met with extreme forms of police abuse. “Thousands exer­cised their con­sti­tu­tion­al rights to protest and were met with vio­lence and indis­crim­i­nate arrests by the NYPD,” the plain­tiffs said in a Thursday press release. 

We can see repeat­ed­ly, city after city, sit­u­a­tion after sit­u­a­tion, that the police are strate­gi­cal­ly, sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly vio­lat­ing our civ­il rights.”

It’s great when we can use tech­nol­o­gy to our ben­e­fit because we know it’s been used against us so often,” Savitri Durkee, a plain­tiff in the suit, told The Intercept. “Unfortunately, we can’t just rely on sun­shine and the pub­lic inter­est to see what’s going on.” She added, “We can see repeat­ed­ly, city after city, sit­u­a­tion after sit­u­a­tion, that the police are strate­gi­cal­ly, sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly vio­lat­ing our civ­il rights.” Plaintiffs in the case not­ed that police had respond­ed to oth­er protests, includ­ing “Blue Lives Matter” and pro-police demon­stra­tions, with­out using the force dis­played against racial jus­tice pro­test­ers. “In oth­er words, it is the mes­sage of the protest that deter­mines whether Defendants will respond with vio­lent tac­tics and indis­crim­i­nate mass arrests,” the plain­tiffs wrote in their suit. 

SHORTLY AFTER THE suit was filed in 2021, the city moved to dis­miss the case, argu­ing that the protests had passed and that the city had already made changes at the NYPD and imple­ment­ed oth­er reforms rec­om­mend­ed in the wake of the protests. In July 2021, a judge dis­missed parts of the com­plaint that sin­gled out city offi­cials but grant­ed oth­ers, allow­ing the case to move for­ward. The suit relied on thou­sands of videos from more than 80 loca­tions, includ­ing footage from police body cam­eras and heli­copter sur­veil­lance. The del­uge of video was sort­ed, ana­lyzed, and recon­struct­ed by SITU Research, a group that does visu­al inves­ti­ga­tions relat­ed to injus­tices and civ­il lib­er­ties. SITU Research has worked on a hand­ful of recent cas­es that relied on foren­sic recon­struc­tion and result­ed in major set­tle­ments for pro­test­ers. While set­tle­ments for class action plain­tiffs in cas­es of police bru­tal­i­ty have been com­mon through­out recent his­to­ry, more recent set­tle­ments paid to pro­test­ers have bro­ken state and nation­al records. The grow­ing size and fre­quen­cy of set­tle­ments has drawn atten­tion to the finan­cial bur­den that police mis­con­duct places on pub­lic coffers. 

The shift, how­ev­er, is unlike­ly to have a major impact on police con­duct with­out broad­er insti­tu­tion­al changes to polic­ing, said Brad Samuels, direc­tor at SITU Research. “While this set­tle­ment and the amounts paid to pro­test­ers does rep­re­sent an impor­tant form of redress, our larg­er goal remains endur­ing change in polic­ing — not just in New York City but across the United States,” Samuels said. “One thing I am cer­tain of is that sur­veil­lance alone, whether in the hands of the state or its cit­i­zen­ry, will not be the agent of mean­ing­ful change. While it was clear­ly impact­ful to have ample video doc­u­men­ta­tion in this case, we need to con­tin­u­al­ly and crit­i­cal­ly assess how we are using these tools and to what ends. I am con­vinced there is much more that can be done.” 

While this set­tle­ment and the amounts paid to pro­test­ers does rep­re­sent an impor­tant form of redress, our larg­er goal remains endur­ing change in policing.” 
For the pro­test­ers behind the suit, the pay­out was a wel­come first step but left much work to be done to address police mis­con­duct and shore up the right to protest. “This doesn’t begin to address the injus­tice. It just gives us a lit­tle bit more lee­way to address the injus­tice,” said Durkee, the plain­tiff. “The prob­lem we are protest­ing stands. It is exact­ly how it was three years ago. All this set­tle­ment does is thaw a lit­tle bit the chill that has lain over the protest move­ment since.

(Credit the Intercept)

%d