The PNP’s Contribution, Divisiveness, Envy ‚racial Animus…

STEP UP THE PROGRESS !

Progress for whom ?
Over the years the People’s National Party has had Jamaicans fooled using catchy phras­es and jingles.
Which leads us to ask just how stu­pid are Jamaicans really?
Michael Manley’s cam­paign against Edward Seaga was one of the most divi­sive cam­paigns waged in the his­to­ry of our young Nation. In fact it could rea­son­ably be argued that it was dur­ing Michael Manley’s divi­sive for­ay into Jamaican pol­i­tics that the chasm which exist today developed.

Edward Seaga..
Edward Seaga..

MY FATHER BORN YA !!!
Michael Manley waged a vis­cous and vis­cer­al cam­paign against the JLP’s Edward Seaga who was born on 28 May 1930, in Boston, Massachusetts, to Philip George Seaga and Erna (née Maxwell), Seaga’s par­ents returned to Jamaica with Edward when the boy was three months old. [wikipedia].
George Nooks a reg­gae singer and PNP sup­port­er penned and made pop­u­lar a song titled ‘my father born ya’ which became the National anthem for the PNP in it’s racist cam­paign against Edward Seaga.
Never mind that Michael Manley’s grand­fa­ther T.A.S. Manley was the son of a white Anglo-Saxon trad­er who migrat­ed from Yorkshire England.

There was noth­ing in the Jamaican Constitution which pre­clud­ed or barred Seaga from rep­re­sen­ta­tion­al pol­i­tics because of his American birth. Remember Seaga’s par­ents returned to their native Jamaica when their son was a mere three months old.
The Constitution appro­pri­ate­ly bars a for­eign nation­al with alle­giance to a for­eign Country from hold­ing polit­i­cal office in Jamaica.
This did not apply to Edward Seaga a Jamaica. Yet Michael Manley and his Party did not care they divid­ed the coun­try along par­ty lines, racial lines and along eco­nom­ic lines.
HOLNESS’S HOUSEPRODUCT OF ENVY MANLEY SOWED…..

Jamaica's coat of arms. Out of many one people.
Jamaica’s coat of arms.
Out of many one people.

Jamaica has always been a melt­ing pot of dif­fer­ent peo­ple of all dif­fer­ent back­grounds. One of the defin­ing char­ac­ter­is­tics of Jamaicans regard­less of eth­nic­i­ty , is our vehe­mence about our Jamaican-ness.
None of the unique­ness of our vehe­ment Jamaican-ness mat­tered to Michael Manley he was pre­pared to win at all cost.
Edward Phillip George Seaga was paint­ed and depict­ed as an un-Jamaican inter­lop­er who should not be trusted.
Every neg­a­tive con­no­ta­tion was attached to Seaga with a view to mak­ing him less Jamaican than the major­i­ty black African pop­u­la­tion, or not Jamaican at all.

The PNP dis­sem­i­nat­ed lies and pro­pa­gan­da which claimed that Seaga was a tool of the Central Intelligence Agency . He was spo­ken of pejo­ra­tive­ly as ‘Spyaga’, despite the fact that Seaga had invest­ed more time and effort toward the devel­op­ment of Jamaica and it’s cul­ture in ways Manley could only dream of .

The char­ac­ter assas­si­na­tion lev­eled against Bruce Golding and lit­er­al­ly every oth­er mem­ber of the JLP deserv­ing or not, has always been the ‘modus operan­di’ of the People’s National Party.
When a par­ty has noth­ing sub­stan­tive to offer it cre­ates diver­sions intend­ed to inflame passions.

It is with­ing that con­text that we must assim­i­late this brouha­ha sur­round­ing Andrew Holness’s home. Recently I wrote that Jamaica is head­ed in the direc­tion of the 70’s .
JAMAICA HEADING BACK TO THE DARK DAYS OF THE 1970’S…

It was that very same spir­it of envy which char­ac­ter­ized Manley’s reign which Andrew Holness is being forced to address.
This notion that peo­ple who work hard , plan and suc­ceed are wicked cap­i­tal­ists is still alive in Jamaica. The idea is that those who suc­ceed should give half of what they have to lazy peo­ple who look to Government for hand­outs, is alive and well. In fact they no longer want half they sim­ply kill and take what they want.
Hence the mur­der sta­tis­tics to a cer­tain degree.
The idea of cast­ing doubt on suc­cess, or that suc­cess­ful peo­ple derived what they have through less than hon­est means is reprehensible.
Either way the PNP is not the par­ty to be point­ing fingers.
It’s Integrity Commission a mis­nomer is in need of an integri­ty overall.

Now that Holness have revealed his sources of fund­ing for his project, let see if Portia Simpson Miller Percival Patterson , Peter Phillips and oth­ers will divulge the source of their incred­i­ble wealth.
Either way it may not mat­ter to an une­d­u­cat­ed elec­torate whose inter­est is focused large­ly on the very next meal .
This is the lega­cy of the People’s National Party. This is the endur­ing and indeli­ble stink this Party has on embed­ded in Jamaica.

Holness Answers.…

Opposition Leader Andrew Holness.
Opposition Leader Andrew Holness.

Opposition Leader Andrew Holness last night respond­ed to ques­tions about his house posed by the rul­ing People’s National Party (PNP), dis­clos­ing what he described as “an unprece­dent­ed amount of per­son­al finan­cial affairs” and stat­ing that he was doing so “in the inter­est of trans­paren­cy and integri­ty” as a pub­lic figure.

At the same time Holness, the leader of the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP), fired back nine ques­tions at the PNP and Finance Minister Dr Peter Phillips, say­ing that they need to pro­vide answers “for the sake of com­plete­ness and transparency”.
Here is the full text of Holness’s statement:

My fel­low Jamaicans,

Recently the People’s National Party, name­ly the min­is­ter of finance, has politi­cised my per­son­al affairs.

As a pub­lic fig­ure, I have a duty to ensure that my affairs meet legal and eth­i­cal stan­dards, recog­nis­ing as well that we are now in an elec­tion cam­paign, where there is a con­cert­ed effort by the PNP to dis­tract from the plans that the Jamaica Labour Party has put for­ward in our 10-Point Plan for the ben­e­fit and pros­per­i­ty of the peo­ple of Jamaica.

I will answer these ques­tions, but first, for the sake of com­plete­ness and trans­paren­cy, we, too, have ques­tions to ask Dr Phillips and the PNP:

1. Dr Phillips, as a par­lia­men­tar­i­an earn­ing prac­ti­cal­ly the same salary as the Leader of the Opposition, how did you afford the house you present­ly live in, which is val­ued at mul­ti­ple times your salary?

2. Were you a part of the Cabinet of Jamaica which cre­at­ed FINSAC, and which took away the prop­er­ty of many hard-work­ing Jamaicans and dec­i­mat­ed the entre­pre­neur­ial class?

3. If the answer to ques­tion 2 is yes, did you acquire any of the prop­er­ties tak­en over by FINSAC, or ben­e­fit in any­way whatsoever.

4. Did mem­bers of the Cabinet that cre­at­ed FINSAC acquire prop­er­ties tak­en over by FINSAC.

5. Do the answers to ques­tions 2, 3 and 4 explain your unwill­ing­ness to com­plete and release the FINSAC report?

6. Do you own or have a ben­e­fi­cial inter­est in a house in Beverly Hills?

7. Are there mem­bers the Cabinet who have off­shore companies?

8. Will you declare any assets you have overseas?

9. Will the offi­cers of the PNP, includ­ing your­self, tes­ti­fy and come clean about Trafigura?

The above ques­tions are per­ti­nent to the elec­torate, par­tic­u­lar­ly those relat­ing to Finsac. Those who lost their prop­er­ties due to Government pol­i­cy have a right to know if their min­is­ters of Government ben­e­fit­ed from their loss.

Now, I will take the oppor­tu­ni­ty to dis­pose of the smear cam­paign and innu­en­does of illic­it fund­ing ini­ti­at­ed by the PNP.

Upon becom­ing a min­is­ter, and also hav­ing regard to the fact that I had a young fam­i­ly, I took legal and account­ing advice as to how I should struc­ture my per­son­al affairs.

Consequent on that advice I incor­po­rat­ed an inter­na­tion­al busi­ness com­pa­ny in St Lucia.

This course of action is com­mon prac­tice, par­tic­u­lar­ly for estate plan­ning pur­pos­es. The name of the com­pa­ny, ADMAT, is a com­bi­na­tion of the names of my two sons Adam and Matthew.

I am the sole direc­tor of the com­pa­ny and the com­pa­ny has three share­hold­ers being my sons and myself.

The com­pa­ny was reg­is­tered in 2008 and declared to the Integrity Commission that year.

Everything I own is phys­i­cal­ly in Jamaica.

In late 2010, I start­ed nego­ti­a­tions to pur­chase a piece of land to con­struct my fam­i­ly home.

In January 2011, I made the first of four pay­ments on the land.

Payments were com­plet­ed in August 2011.

The title was trans­ferred in July 2011. At the time of sign­ing I did not write any state­ment say­ing, “signed while on a vis­it to Jamaica”.

Funds from my accounts at JMMB and Stocks and Securities were used to finance the pur­chase of the property.

In September 2012, we began prepa­ra­tion of the site for con­struc­tion, which involved exca­va­tion of boul­ders and frag­men­ta­tion of rocks.

The result­ing stones from this process were used to con­struct retain­ing, fac­ing and bound­ary walls. This ini­tial phase was financed from my sav­ings, salary and sup­pli­ers’ cred­it of approx­i­mate­ly $3.8 million.

This ini­tial phase cost approx­i­mate­ly $8.6 million.

The sec­ond phase was the actu­al erec­tion of the struc­ture, this hap­pened dur­ing 2013 at a cost of approx­i­mate­ly $35 mil­lion which was financed by a $10 mil­lion home improve­ment loan from Scotiabank, a $3 mil­lion mort­gage from Jamaica National, and supplier’s cred­it of approx­i­mate­ly $15.6 mil­lion. My wife, being a real estate devel­op­er, has estab­lished cred­it lines for the sup­ply of con­struc­tion and build­ing mate­r­i­al and equip­ment rental. The sup­pli­ers’ cred­it came from this source.

In 2014 we com­plet­ed all major con­struc­tion and in that year spent approx­i­mate­ly $9 mil­lion financed by salary, sav­ings and supplier’s credit.

In 2015, there was no sig­nif­i­cant con­struc­tion activ­i­ty as the project was sub­stan­tial­ly complete.

To date, the total cost of land prepa­ra­tion, con­struc­tion and land­scap­ing is approx­i­mate­ly $52 mil­lion spent over a peri­od of four years, financed by sav­ings, salary, bank loans, and supplier’s credit.

Currently I am ser­vic­ing debt repay­ments to the banks and to suppliers.

All of this has been declared in my annu­al integri­ty reports which have been filed with­in the statu­to­ry time frame.

My report for the year 2015 will be filed by March 31, 2016 as required by law.

So, in the inter­est of trans­paren­cy and integri­ty in pub­lic life, I have dis­closed an unprece­dent­ed amount of per­son­al finan­cial affairs. Furthermore, our Government will be com­mit­ted to trans­paren­cy. In the com­ing days we will be pub­lish­ing the Jamaica Labour Party’s plan to address corruption.

I have now met the demands of the People’s National Party. I look for­ward to debat­ing Mrs Simpson Miller soon. Story orig­i­nat­ed here : Holness answers

Holness’s House A Product Of Envy Manley Sowed.….

1725162_10205433897906528_7234427120561380515_n

There were steps tak­en by Michael Manley’s Socialist régime of the 70’s which are direct­ly impact­ing Jamaica over four decades lat­er . These steps have had tremen­dous con­se­quence, and are still impact­ing the con­tem­po­rary body-politic.

MOBILIZATION

The People’s National Party mas­tered the art of mobi­liz­ing in the 70’s. One of Michael Manley’s strengths was his abil­i­ty to bring peo­ple along with him on his ideas.
Not just that, Manley was able to mobi­lize his par­ty, from the high­est placed func­tionary to the least edu­cat­ed grass-roots sup­port­er to buy into what he was selling.
Among the left­ists lead­ers who dot­ted the land­scape of the time, from Latin-America , the Caribbean, to the dis­tant shores of Africa ‚no Leader was more gift­ed in mobi­liz­ing the masses.
With soar­ing rhetoric and his deep bari­tone deliv­ery Manley ignit­ed the down-trod­den mass­es of Jamaica the Caribbean and around the Globe.
Today Jamaicans and parts of the Caribbean still think of Michael Manley as a Messiah who came with a mes­sage of Self-reliance and self-deter­mi­na­tion for the poor­er class of peo­ple large­ly peo­ple of African Ancestry.
A detailed non-biased look at this per­cep­tion how­ev­er yields much more than that which meets the eyes.
The results how­ev­er would have to be con­sid­ered by an edu­cat­ed elec­torate capa­ble of sift­ing through the pro­pa­gan­da with a view to har­vest­ing poten­tial nuggets of value.
When the entire­ty of the pros and the cons are con­sid­ered objec­tive­ly, the rhetoric may not match the facts.
Hans Christian Andersen’s “Pied-Piper of Hamlin” did free the Town of rats but he also led the entire town’s chil­dren away. Those chil­dren were nev­er seen again.
Some Jamaicans did gain a degree of free­dom from the shack­les of men­tal Colonialism but the inno­cence , peace, and progress the coun­try lost has not been seen since.
You do the math.

PROPOGANDA

The PNP under­stood that whomev­er con­trolled the mes­sage con­trolled the masses.
Michael Manley and the PNP went about politi­ciz­ing exist­ing Media-hous­es of the day and cre­at­ing oth­ers for the pur­pose of mass indoctrination.
The Jamaica Broadcasting Corporation, (JBC) , Radio and Television for all intents and pur­pos­es became arms of the PNP.
Under Manley the Jamaica Daily News was cre­at­ed , a now defunct news­pa­per which was com­plete­ly ded­i­cat­ed to indoc­tri­nat­ing the mass­es with the Governing PNP’s agenda.
The Jamaica Information Service(JIS), anoth­er Government Medium was politi­cized and used in the most vul­gar ways to dis­sem­i­nate PNP propaganda.

Michael Manley
Michael Manley

MALIGNING

Under Michael Manley Jamaicans who worked hard and acquired mate­r­i­al pos­ses­sions were maligned and made out to be greedy Capitalists who did not deserve to have the pro­ceeds of their labor.
Manley and the PNP active­ly taught poor Jamaicans that they were enti­tled to have half of what­ev­er their neigh­bors owned as part of his Socialist philosophy.
Jamaica was for­ev­er changed because of this, many Jamaicans who had inher­it­ed some mate­r­i­al pos­ses­sions and oth­ers who ben­e­fit­ed through the sweat of their brows feared for their lives and they fled in droves.
Manley’s brig­ands moved into their homes, a move which lit­er­al­ly ghet­toized once pris­tine neigh­bor­hoods. This is a trend which Jamaica has not been able to reverse.
Many Jamaicans were killed for no oth­er rea­son than that they had mate­r­i­al possessions.
That rapa­cious men­tal deprav­i­ty is pret­ty much par for the course in con­tem­po­rary Jamaica, where peo­ple are sum­mar­i­ly slaugh­tered, even when their assailants need not take their lives.
Just recent­ly an elder­ly cou­ple who returned to the Island became vic­tims of that depravity.
The ongo­ing debat­ed about a house the leader of the Opposition Labor Party Andrew Holness has under con­struc­tion is anoth­er exam­ple of the depraved envy which char­ac­ter­ize the very core of the PNP.
It is incom­pre­hen­si­ble and shock­ing­ly cyn­i­cal that the PNP would ques­tion any­one’s integrity.
The PNP has been a can­cer­ous cesspool of cor­rup­tion which has sucked the life-blood from the once thriv­ing Island, reduc­ing it to a waste-land of beg­gars and mur­der­ous blood-thirsty demons.
I have no idea where Holness sourced the fund­ing for the house he is build­ing. Neither do I know where Portia Simpson Miller earned the sup­posed US$20 mil­lion she is worth.
Neither have intel­li­gent Jamaicans above” cur­ry goat and Red-stripe Beer” learned the where­abouts of bil­lions of dol­lars which have dis­s­a­peared in the litany of scan­dals under the cur­rent PNP administration.

PATRONAGE
Manley’s machis­mo on behalf of the down-trod­den should not be con­sumed with­out a full under­stand­ing of cap­tured homes and prop­er­ties, their own­ers hav­ing fled out of fear for their lives.
Let’s bring some per­spec­tive to this cha­rade which has metas­ta­sized for too long. Let’s push back against the revi­sion­ist historians.
Jamaica is enjoy­ing the bit­ter fruits of Manley’s labor.
Whatever good was derived from Manley’s tenure must be mea­sured against the neg­a­tives which emanat­ed after.
Open your minds and think.

Ted Cruz Fair Weather Constitutionalist

1725162_10205433897906528_7234427120561380515_n

President Barack Obama
President Barack Obama

Every President has a Constitutional duty and a respon­si­bil­i­ty to appoint jus­tices to the Supreme Court as well as oth­er courts in the Federal sys­tem when­ev­er vacan­cies occur.
Elections have con­se­quences, becom­ing President of the United States is a big deal . As Vice President Joe Biden would say it ” this is a big f*****g deal”.
Every President has the right to his/​her agen­da, that includes appoint­ing suit­able jus­tices to fill vacan­cies in the fed­er­al court system.
No jurist is ever big­ger that the process. No President has more pow­er than another .
In fact President Obama who has replaced two asso­ciate jus­tices to the supreme court has done an out­stand­ing job in select­ing Sonia Sotomayer and Helena Kagan who were both con­firmed by the senate.

antonin-scalia-horizontal-from-apjpg-f92b9dd7a8843b1e

RIGHT WING HYPOCRISY

It is stun­ning ‚yet not sur­pris­ing to hear Ted Cruz and the oth­er Cuban Marco Rubio , two Republican can­di­dates for President imme­di­ate­ly demand that the next President(not Obama) appoint a suc­ces­sor to Antonin Scalia who recent­ly passed away.
For the record Antonin Scalia fought tooth and nail to dis­man­tle every sin­gle piece of leg­is­la­tion which would seek to reverse over four hun­dred years of racial injus­tice in America.
Lets be clear , despite the plat­i­tudes and the hand wring­ing you will hear from the lame stream media going for­ward, to include so called Democrats, Antonin Scalai rep­re­sent­ed exact­ly what is wrong with America.

President Obama in his role as the leader of the coun­try came out and paid trib­ute to Scalia as he was expect­ed to, (God bless him he is a bet­ter man than I am). The President said he would ful­fill his con­sti­tu­tion­al duties by appoint­ing a suc­ces­sor to Scalia in due course.
For the sake of clar­i­ty what I find dis­gust­ing about Ted Cruz and to a less­er extent the oth­er Hispanic Marco Rubio , is the length to which they will go to pre­tend they are more American than every­one else.
Ted Cruz runs on the notion that no oth­er can­di­date is as Con- ser­v­a­tive as he is , in fact sev­er­al of the oth­er can­di­dates have crit­i­cized him and label­ing him a liar.
Cruz’s own law pro­fes­sor from Harvard called him out for being a fair weath­er con­sti­tu­tion­al­ist. Everything is only as good as Ted Cruz say it is. No one is as con­ser­v­a­tive as Ted Cruz . The guy is an ego-mani­ac and a nar­cis­sist , that makes him dangerous.
Is it any won­der that this guy want to car­pet-bomb oth­er coun­tries into submission?

Ted Cruz
Ted Cruz

Ted Cruz is run­ning to be President of the United States of America, Barack Obama is the twice-elect­ed President of the United States of America. Neither Ted Cruz nor the rest of the right-wing noise machine gets to deter­mine whether the President appoint a suc­ces­sor to Scalia or not . That is the con­sti­tu­tion­al per­og­a­tive of the President of the United States and not a self cen­tered Republican Senator from Texas.

Ted Cruz Leads Republicans’ Rush To Demand Justice Scalia’s SCOTUS Replacement Be Named By Next POTUS, Not Obama

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is interviewed by The Associated Press, Thursday, July 26, 2012, at the Supreme Court in Washington. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is inter­viewed by The Associated Press, Thursday, July 26, 2012, at the Supreme Court in Washington. (AP Photo/​Haraz N. Ghanbari)

News of Justice Antonin Scalia’s death is just begin­ning to rever­ber­ate across the polit­i­cal world this evening, as the 79-year-old’s pass­ing at a West Texas resort on Saturday was con­firmed a short time ago by the New York Times.

Doing away with any attempt to appear even remote­ly respect­ful and seiz­ing upon the obvi­ous polit­i­cal earth­quake that is the pass­ing of the Supreme Court’s most con­ser­v­a­tive jus­tice in the final year of President Obama’s pres­i­den­cy, Ted Cruz got naked­ly polit­i­cal in his reac­tion to Scalia’s death, tweet­ing that Americans “owe it” to Scalia and our­selves to block Obama from nom­i­nat­ing a successor:
Ted Cruz leads Republicans’ rush to demand Justice Scalia’s SCOTUS replace­ment be named by next POTUS, not Obama

PNP’s Refusal To Participate In Debates A Massive Con-job…

12002824_10204945833425221_401427015886358774_n

The debates com­mis­sion in Jamaica has announced that debates between the lead­ers of the two major polit­i­cal par­ties sched­uled for Tuesday February 16th has been called off.
The debates com­mis­sion took the action because the People’s National Party failed to respond con­firm­ing it’s par­tic­i­pa­tion in the debates.
In the mean­time the PNP has attached pre­con­di­tions to it’s par­tic­i­pa­tion in the debates, which has noth­ing to do with the debates.

♦In the first instance Prime Minister Simpson-Miller refus­es to par­tic­i­pate in the debates unless Opposition leader Andrew Holness apol­o­gize to her for refer­ring to her as the “biggest con artist Jamaica has ever seen”. Additionally she has threat­ened legal action against the Opposition leader claim­ing she has been dam­aged by his characterization.
♦ What the pub­lic may not know is that it was Miller who referred to the Opposition Leader’s 10-point plan as “con-job”,which pre­cip­i­tat­ed the Opposition Leader’s response.
♦ The Finance Minister Peter Phillips not to be out­done demand­ed that Opposition Leader Holness divulge the source/​s of fund­ing for his house which is under con­struc­tion in the Saint Andrew Community of Beverly Hills.
Both of these excus­es are ridicu­lous red-her­rings which has zero to with debat­ing the issues ger­mane to the future of the Island . Notwithstanding, this posi­tion tak­en by the PNP demon­strates a “don’t care, drunk with pow­er, atti­tude and the dis­dain with which it holds the Jamaican electorate”. 

If the PNP has ques­tions about the leader of the Opposition’s ethics, a debate stage is exact­ly the place to air those griev­ances and allow the Jamaican peo­ple to decide.
It rings hol­low that Prime Minister Simpson-Miller who refused to speak to the Press for the four years she has been in Jamaica House would now con­tend the reason/​s she is refus­ing to debate the leader of the oppo­si­tion is about things the oppo­si­tion leader should do, or has­n’t done.
The facts are clear , the Prime Minister has presided over a cor­rupt régime which has been plagued with graft, gross incom­pe­tence, neg­li­gence and ram­pant corruption.
It is insult­ing to the elec­torate that the incom­pe­tent and and clue­less Simpson-Miller would be allowed to hide behind PNP cre­at­ed smoke-screens and get away with it.
Much less be reward­ed with a sec­ond term.
Jamaica is not Simpson Miller’s pri­vate Property nei­ther is it the pri­vate domain of the PNP and it’s gang-land affiliates .
As such, Miller must forth­with attend the debates and answer ques­tions or resign.
What this cheeky and bla­tant dis­re­spect for the process reveals is that Jamaica is a Banana Republic which is ruled by third rate semi-lit­er­ates who have no respect for the rule of law.
Peel back the thin lay­er of veneer and the Sub-Saharan style fief­dom is exposed . Our Country is being run like a gang­land enclave ruled by threats, intim­i­da­tion and violence.

Debates are nei­ther about Holness nor Miller .They are about the peo­ple. Debates are job interviews , .
No can­di­date or par­ty seek­ing office should have the pow­er or indeed the free­dom to say I am not debat­ing with­out con­se­quence> No can­di­date for a job can say to his/​her prospec­tive employ­er I am not inter­view­ing for the job just trust me. It is the most bla­tant dis­dain that a rag-tag polit­i­cal cult can so dis­re­gard the intel­li­gence of the elec­torate by attach­ing pre­con­di­tions to answer­ing ques­tions the media would pose on the peo­ple’s behalf. This is an affront to the dig­ni­ty of the process which can­not stand.

Debates Commission Says Tuesday’s Political Debate Called Off…

Holness and Miller
Holness and Miller

KINGSTON, Jamaica – The Jamaica Debates Commission (JDC) in a media release Friday evening said that they have writ­ten to the Peoples’ National Party (PNP) not­ing that in the absence of a response to its let­ter of February 11, it is no longer able to com­mit to orga­niz­ing and stag­ing the first in a series of polit­i­cal debates on Tuesday, February 16. The JDC said they wrote to the par­ty ask­ing it to re-con­sid­er its deci­sion not to par­tic­i­pate in three debates ahead of the February 25th election.

In their let­ter they say that they indi­cat­ed that if the first debate were to take place on Tuesday, the JDC need­ed three clear days in order to mobilise it teams to ensure the stag­ing of a qual­i­ty pro­duc­tion and asked for a response by 5:00 pm today. The JDC let­ter con­clud­ed: “As we have not received a response as at the time of writ­ing, we wish to advise that the JDC can no longer com­mit to orga­niz­ing and stag­ing the first debate on Tuesday, February 16.

Nonetheless, the JDC remains open to stag­ing the three debates begin­ning lat­er in the week pro­vid­ed an agree­ment can be reached with the JLP to that effect. The same con­di­tion – three clear days before the live broad­cast of the first debate – would remain in place. We should note that giv­en the posi­tion of both polit­i­cal par­ties over the course of our nego­ti­a­tions that the last sev­er­al days ahead of the elec­tion should be reserved for their clos­ing cam­paign events, any deci­sion to debate — if this were to prove nec­es­sary – between Sunday February 21 and Tuesday February 23, must be a mutu­al deci­sion of both polit­i­cal parties…”
http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​l​a​t​e​s​t​n​e​w​s​/​D​e​b​a​t​e​s​-​C​o​m​m​i​s​s​i​o​n​-​s​a​y​s​-​T​u​e​s​d​a​y​-​s​-​p​o​l​i​t​i​c​a​l​-​d​e​b​a​t​e​-​c​a​l​l​e​d​-​off

What Is The JLP’s Path To Victory ?

12002824_10204945833425221_401427015886358774_n

With National Elections only 13 days away it is interesting to know what path the Jamaica Labor Party has to a victory .

On December 29th 2011 National Elections were held in Jamaica .
Before the night was too far gone it became clear that Simpson Miller and the People’s National Party would form the next Government.
Though Elections were not con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly due until September of 2012, Andrew Holness the sit­ting Prime Minister sought his own mandate.
It was a deci­sion which will be in the mind of Holness forever.
The JLP received a one sided drubbing.
In a 44 to 19 shel­lack­ing the jad­ed , tired and out of ideas PNP was returned to pow­er, much to the sur­prise of many includ­ing the PNP itself.
It is still believed that the PNP’s pop­ulist embrace of Gays and Lesbians was the cat­a­lyst which decid­ed the elec­tions in the PNP’s favor.

It begs the ques­tion then “what pop­ulist mes­sage has the JLp which will erase a 25-seat deficit and give the par­ty a one seat majority”?
Jamaican vot­ers are known to be hard-core in their polit­i­cal beliefs, switch­ing their vote only when their per­son­al pantries and cup­boards are emp­ty of food.
This obser­va­tion may not be the most char­i­ta­ble and may even be seen as dis­re­spect­ful of the electorate.
I chal­lenge dis­senters to point to Jamaican vot­ers vot­ing the inter­est of the coun­try over par­ty and their bellies.

The rul­ing PNP has mas­tered the art of pop­ulist pol­i­tics since Jamaica became an Independent Nation[sic].
Michael Manley was a mas­ter of it,Portia and the par­ty acolytes have con­tin­ued that trend.
It was no sur­prise to see Portia Simpson Miller on the Party’s plat­form in Half-Way-Tree Square cham­pi­oning the pos­si­bil­i­ty of gan­ja legalization.
These are huge­ly pop­ulist issues which has tremen­dous res­o­nance for the mass­es many of whom use the weed.
The JLP did not get out front on this issue, so the ques­tion is,“what is the plan to erase the deficit”?

In 72 Hungry Jamaicans scared of Communism boot­ed Manley from office.
By 88 with filled bel­lies and the Cold war over they returned Manley to power.
For an unprece­dent­ed 1412 years they watched as Patterson and his cronies sold off every­thing. Crime climbed to astro­nom­i­cal lev­els. The econ­o­my lurched from cri­sis to cri­sis and the cur­ren­cy became a worth­less piece of crap.
In that time the very nature of our coun­try changed . Our coun­try was changed from a mod­el in the Caribbean and indeed the world to a pariah.
In many cas­es even CARICOM States do not want Jamaicans in their countries.

Under immense pres­sure, hunger , crime , despair and depri­va­tion Jamaicans turned to Orette Bruce Golding on September 11th 2007.
The JLP was returned to power.
But just barely.
Despite a col­laps­ing world econ­o­my Audley Shaw and the JLP kept the Jamaican cur­ren­cy sta­ble despite the absence of an IMF deal.
Notwithstanding, the elec­torate returned the PNP to pow­er despite the fact that the par­ty had noth­ing to offer but more despair crime and pover­ty for every­one except it’s elites and gang­land affiliates.

It’s nev­er enough to assume that over­all suf­fer­ing for aver­age Jamaicans will cause them to turn to the oth­er party.
The PNP has an intri­cate net­work of affil­i­ates from the grass-roots to the most sophis­ti­cat­ed areas of the soci­ety ready to go to bat for the PNP .
It is no won­der that Peter Phillips is the sup­posed man of the year.
It is no won­der that the Private sec­tor Organization makes state­ments in sup­port of the Administration.
It is no won­der that for the most part the media hous­es are organs for the party.
Every aspect of nation­al life has been cor­rod­ed with the cor­ro­sive ten­ta­cles of the Governing People’s National Party.

In lieu of the fore­gone it is almost a safe bet to con­clude that unless the Labor Party knows some­thing the rest of us are not privy to, the PNP will be returned to pow­er come February 25th.
I hope for the future of our coun­try that I am proven wrong but I doubt that very much.
The JLP was nev­er forced to seri­ous­ly defend seats in parish­es like Saint Thomas, St Catherine, Hanover, Clarendon, Portland, Trelawny, and to some degree Manchester.
It is dif­fi­cult to see how the JLP intend to win this elec­tion if it has to defend stren­u­ous­ly in these parishes.
How did these parish­es become com­pet­i­tive parish­es in which the PNP has won and won big?
That’s the issue to consider !
But then again what the hell do I know?

Jamaica Heading Back To The Dark Days Of The 1970’s…

1725162_10205433897906528_7234427120561380515_n

As the tra­di­tion­al car­ni­val spec­ta­cle of elec­tion time cam­paign­ing kicks into high gear, Jamaicans fill the high­ways and byways in auto­mo­bile car­a­vans criss-cross­ing the Island in seem­ing rivers of green and orange bodies.
Yet under­neath the car­ni­val atmos­phere are more sin­is­ter events occur­ring which eludes the die-hard laborites and kum­reds[sic] with the excep­tion of those pulling the strings.

The Island’s Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller rose from the poor­er class through affil­i­a­tions and patron­age to occu­py the high­est elect­ed polit­i­cal office in the Island’s par­lia­men­tary demo­c­ra­t­ic system.
Miller climbed through the rough and tum­ble pol­i­tics which char­ac­ter­ize the Manley régime of the 70’s ‚the lethar­gic ret­ro­grade and cor­rup­tion filled reign of Percival James Patterson to cul­mi­nate in that lega­cy being hand­ed off to her.
Through it all many peo­ple have come to know Portia as a less than qual­i­fied per­son to lead the coun­try , but also to real­ize just how pow­er­ful patron­age pol­i­tics is in the island nation of 2.8 million.

NO DEBATES?
Throughout Miller’s career var­i­ous descrip­tive words have been used to describe her that are far from com­pli­men­ta­ry. Her con­duct in pub­lic to those in the know, has been far from exem­plary and in many case could be ade­quate­ly described as abra­sive and the behav­ior of a crass virago.
It is on this basis that it is stun­ning that Miller would have the gall to threat­en legal action against Andrew Holness the Opposition leader for refer­ring to her as the biggest con-artist the coun­try ever had.
It was Miller who labeled Holness’s 10-point plan as a con job.

This bla­tant attempt at intim­i­da­tion from Miller and her legal team is par­tic­u­lar­ly hyp­o­crit­i­cal con­sid­er­ing Miller’s his­to­ry of call­ing Holness Enemy of the state and a pletho­ra of oth­er unsa­vory names.
Despite this hypocrisy there is more.
Portia Simpson Miller intends to use the legal sys­tem as anoth­er tool of the PNP to quite dis­sent on the Island.
Between the thugs in the street and the Courts on the oth­er end it appears Jamaica is head­ing once again to the dark days of the 70’s when Michael Manley locked up almost the entire polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion and death squads sum­mar­i­ly exe­cut­ed any­one dar­ing to stand with the oppo­si­tion par­ty in public.

HERE’S THE ISSUE.
The leader of the Opposition was asked to respond to the Prime Minister’s com­ments about his pro­posed 10-point-plan which she referred to as a con.
The Opposition Leader responded .
Quote: “The prime min­is­ter is the biggest con artist Jamaica has ever seen,”.
This is what she is suing about, accord­ing to her kum­red lawyer Bert Samuels.

YouTube player

NO ONE CAN REDUCE PORTIA IN THE PUBLIC’S EYE , SHE HAS DONE THAT QUITE EFFECTIVELY ON HER OWN.

The prime min­is­ter is demand­ing: “… a suit­ably word­ed apol­o­gy, approved by our client be pub­lished on Television Jamaica, in the Jamaica Observer and The Gleaner and that our client be paid dam­ages com­men­su­rate with her sta­tion in life local­ly and inter­na­tion­al­ly, along with his (her attor­ney) legal costs.”
They also claim Miller is dimin­ished in the eyes of well mean­ing mem­bers of the society.
Note to Bert etal, you should be ashamed to file this despi­ca­ble brief as a so-called respect­ed mem­ber of the bar. When was Miller ever ele­vat­ed in the eyes of the pub­lic (not PNP)?
What you and well mean­ing mem­bers of the soci­ety should be con­cerned about is not the lega­cy of a char­la­tan but the hijack­ing of our democracy .
Threatening not to debate the leader of the oppo­si­tion based on Faux indig­na­tion reveal to the world that Miller is a less than qual­i­fied cow­ard­ly oppor­tunist who will do any­thing , includ­ing dimin­ish our demo­c­ra­t­ic process to hold onto power.

This medi­um hold no brief for Holness but it is a despi­ca­ble yet trans­par­ent attempt on the part of the sit­ting Prime Minister to avoid fac­ing the nation, using the legal process as a cam­paign tool .
As an offi­cer of the Court Samuels and the oth­er Attorneys should hang their heads in shame . It is vast­ly more impor­tant to work toward improv­ing our fledg­ling democ­ra­cy than to engage in this bla­tant un-demo­c­ra­t­ic act. You should hang your col­lec­tive heads in shame.

Congressional Black Caucus To Endorse Hillary Clinton

The Congressional Black Caucus in the US Congress is set to endorse Hillary Clinton as the Democratic Choice for President of the United States.
The Congressional Black Caucus polit­i­cal arm is geared at elect­ing Democrats to office accord­ing to Congressman Gregory Meeks of Queens New York.
This medi­um is unsure about this endorse­ment, and the tim­ing of it time in light of the fact that Democrats have not earned Black votes nor own it.
With all of the killings of unarmed peo­ple by police and oth­er mal­adies plagu­ing the Black com­mu­ni­ty the Democratic par­ty has been silent.
We will have much more to say after the endorsement.

Here’s Why Black People Should Think Twice Before Voting For Hillary Clinton

Michelle Alexander has questioned what the Clintons have done to deserve such devotion among black voters. BRAD BARKET VIA GETTY IMAGES
Michelle Alexander has ques­tioned what the Clintons have done to deserve such devo­tion among black vot­ers.
BRAD BARKET VIA GETTY IMAGES

Michelle Alexander, the author Of “The New Jim Crow,” outlines the presidential candidate’s support for some questionable policies.

WASHINGTON — Hillary Clinton has the black vote in her hands.

Eighty per­cent of black Democratic vot­ers intend­ed to cast their bal­lots for the 2016 pres­i­den­tial can­di­date in August 2015 — and not much has changed since then. But with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I‑Vt.) becom­ing a seri­ous oppo­nent for Clinton in the race to the Democratic nom­i­na­tion, many African-Americans are ask­ing if the for­mer Secretary of State real­ly deserves the black vote. Author and legal schol­ar Michelle Alexander doesn’t think so. What have the Clintons done to earn such devo­tion? Did they take extreme polit­i­cal risks to defend the rights of African Americans?” the author of The New Jim Crow asks in a new essay for The Nation. “Did they coura­geous­ly stand up to right-wing dem­a­goguery about black com­mu­ni­ties? Did they help ush­er in a new era of hope and pros­per­i­ty for neigh­bor­hoods dev­as­tat­ed by dein­dus­tri­al­iza­tion, glob­al­iza­tion, and the dis­ap­pear­ance of work?”

Alexander skill­ful­ly pos­es these ques­tions before tak­ing a deep dive into Clinton’s past.

African-American vot­ers con­sis­tent­ly tend to sup­port Democrats, but they also arelike­ly to be old­er. Many black vot­ers are less famil­iar with Sanders, who attracts a lot of young vot­ers, and his val­ues. Clinton also totes cov­et­ed endorse­ments fromfor­mer Attorney General Eric Holder, Trayvon Martin’s moth­er Sybrina Fulton, activist groups, unions and black cler­gy mem­bers. It doesn’t hurt that black peo­ple dote on President Bill Clinton’s time in office either.

What a lot of black vot­ers aren’t aware of, how­ev­er, is how the 1994 Violent Crime and Law Enforcement Act of his pres­i­den­cy helped mass incar­cer­a­tion become more effi­cient with the “three strikes” imple­men­ta­tion, a pro­vi­sion that imposed life sen­tences on any­one con­vict­ed of a vio­lent felony after two or more pri­ors. Former President Clinton also signed into law the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act, which gut­ted wel­fare. He repealed the Glass-Steagall Act in 1996 — a Depression-era bank­ing law that kept dif­fer­ent kinds of bank­ing insti­tu­tions sep­a­rate — which, arguably, led to the 2008 hous­ing cri­sis and dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly affect­ed black homeowners.

Alexander, who touched on mass incar­cer­a­tion and wel­fare in her piece, says Clinton must be judged by her hus­band’s record on this because, in a way, it’s her his­to­ry too.

Some might argue that it’s unfair to judge Hillary Clinton for the poli­cies her hus­band cham­pi­oned years ago. But Hillary wasn’t pick­ing out chi­na while she was first lady. She brave­ly broke the mold and rede­fined that job in ways no woman ever had before. She not only cam­paigned for Bill; she also wield­ed pow­er and sig­nif­i­cant influ­ence once he was elect­ed, lob­by­ing for leg­is­la­tion and oth­er mea­sures. That record, and her state­ments from that era, should be scru­ti­nized. In her sup­port for the 1994 crime bill, for exam­ple, she used racial­ly cod­ed rhetoric to cast black chil­dren as ani­mals. “They are not just gangs of kids any­more,” she said. “They are often the kinds of kids that are called ‘super-preda­tors.’ No con­science, no empa­thy. We can talk about why they end­ed up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel.”

Clinton, who endorsed her husband’s crime poli­cies as recent­ly as 2012, hasdis­tanced her­self from the ide­ol­o­gy, but her Ready for Hillary PAC did receive$133,246 from prison lob­by­ists. See more here:  http://​www​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​e​n​t​r​y​/​h​i​l​l​a​r​y​-​c​l​i​n​t​o​n​-​b​l​a​c​k​-​v​o​t​e​r​s​_​u​s​_​5​6​b​a​7​9​7​f​e​4​b​0​8​f​f​a​c​1​2​3​2​8f0

The Bot Bombs.…

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Marco Rubio may have to “dis­pel with” his hope of seiz­ing the Republican pres­i­den­tial nomination.

The Florida sen­a­tor enjoyed a burst of momen­tum after some­how claim­ing a third-place vic­to­ry in the Iowa cau­cus­es, and hap­pi­ly watched as GOP offi­cials and donors began to ral­ly around his pres­i­den­tial bid. Rubio’s cam­paign believed that a top-tier fin­ish in the New Hampshire pri­ma­ry would put him in a posi­tion to be the estab­lish­ment favorite who would appeal to mod­er­ates and take on insur­gent can­di­dates like real estate mogul Donald Trump and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.

But Rubio’s dis­ap­point­ing fifth-place fin­ish in the Granite State on Tuesday evening, behind Trump, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, Cruz, and for­mer Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, put that dream on hold.

It’s unclear whether a sin­gle fac­tor led to Rubio’s dis­ap­point­ing loss in New Hampshire, but it may have been his unusu­al­ly shaky per­for­mance in Saturday’s Republican pres­i­den­tial debate, when he walked into a brick wall named Chris Christie — an error Rubio acknowl­edged on Tuesday night.

Our dis­ap­point­ment tonight is not on you, it’s on me,” Rubio told sup­port­ers in New Hampshire, draw­ing a sharp con­trast with his con­fi­dent pos­ture after Iowa.

I did not do well on Saturday night,” he added. “But lis­ten to me: That will nev­er hap­pen again.” Read more here: The bot bombs

El Duce’ Giuliani Attacks Beyonce.…

Beyonce and her dancers during super bowl 50...
Beyonce and her dancers dur­ing super bowl 50…

Who is sur­prised by any­thing this one dimen­sion­al rel­ic has to say?
I mean seri­ous­ly does this guy sit around the tele­vi­sion watch­ing to see what Black peo­ple are going to say and do?
It appears that El Duce Rudolph Giuliani believes only white peo­ple have a right to opinions.
He obvi­ous­ly believes as does count­less oth­ers that any­one, not a white Anglo-Saxon has no right to free speech or any free­doms not grant­ed to them by Caucasians.
What plan­et is this fool liv­ing on?
They real­ly think this world is theirs, and peo­ple’s rights are their’s to determine.

YouTube player

Breitbart: Kissing The Ring: Bernie Sanders Breaks Bread With Al Sharpton..

Sanders meets with Sharpton on Wednesday..
Sanders meets with Sharpton on Wednesday..

Even after winning big in New Hampshire,needs to prove that he can win Democrats in the south, particularly the African-American voters who supported President Obama.

Sanders’ first step was to meet pub­licly with Rev. Al Sharpton in New York City, and impor­tant ring kiss­ing step to spread his appeal.

It’s unclear what Al Sharpton can do to help Sanders appeal with African-Americans, but it’s an impor­tant sig­nal that Sanders is eager to be pho­tographed with the promi­nent orga­niz­er and Obama ally. Hillary Clinton’s argu­ment is that Sanders, an old, white man from Vermont, did fine in New Hampshire, but may have a hard time appeal­ing to African-Americans and Hispanics nation­wide. In a cam­paign memo last night respond­ing to Sanders’ crush­ing vic­to­ry in New Hampshire, Clinton’s Campaign Manager Robby Mook looked ahead to the south­ern states and explic­it­ly argued that they favored Clinton.

Hillary Clinton’s ties to both the African American and Hispanic com­mu­ni­ties run deep,”Mook argued in a memo obtained by PBS. “She’s put minor­i­ty com­mu­ni­ties and the issues that mat­ter most to them at the cen­ter of her cam­paign … it’s no mys­tery why she’s received endorse­ments from hun­dreds of key African American and Hispanic elect­ed offi­cials, as well as com­mu­ni­ty and faith lead­ers across the coun­try.” Portions of Clinton’s speech in New Hampshire last night were direct­ed at African-Americans and minori­ties, empha­siz­ing her vis­it to Flint, Michigan to dis­cuss the lead poi­son­ing in the water on Sunday at a Baptist Church. “It isn’t right that the kids I met in Flint on Sunday were poi­soned because their gov­er­nor want­ed to save mon­ey,” she said to sup­port­ers last night. She also explic­it­ly spoke to African-Americans who were wor­ried about their chil­dren being profiled.

We also have to break through the bar­ri­ers of big­otry,” she said. African-American par­ents shouldn’t have to wor­ry that their chil­dren will be harassed, humil­i­at­ed, even shot because of the col­or of their skin.” She also remind­ed sup­port­ers of her ear­ly career at the Children’s Defense Fund, anoth­er nod to the African-American vote. “That’s why I went under­cov­er in Alabama to expose racism in schools. That’s why I worked to reform juve­nile jus­tice in South Carolina,” she said. “And that is why I went to Flint, Michigan, on Sunday.”:Kissing the Ring: Bernie Sanders Breaks Bread With Al Sharpton

Portia Demands Apology From Holness Over Nomination Day Comment Or Else …

Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller has accused Opposition Leader Andrew Holness of defam­ing her on Nomination Day and has writ­ten to

Prime Minster Portia Simpson Miller...
Prime Minster Portia Simpson Miller…

him demand­ing an apology.

The let­ter states that if there is no apol­o­gy with­in the next three days, then Simpson Miller will insti­tute legal pro­ceed­ings against Holness. The Prime Minister con­tends that the com­ments have low­ered her in the esti­ma­tion of right-think­ing mem­bers of soci­ety. Attorney-at-law Bert Samuels of the firm Knight, Junor & Samuels is han­dling the case. The Prime Minister says the defama­tion against her took place in a media inter­view. “Be advised that in an inter­view with mem­bers of the media in your con­stituen­cy on Tuesday the 9th February 2016, Nomination Day your com­ments con­tained alle­ga­tions that were most defam­a­to­ry of our client, ” the let­ter stated.

On that occa­sion, words were used and pub­lished on Television Jamaica’s 7 p.m news­cast on the said Tuesday the 9th February, 2016 which tend­ed to injure, degrade and dis­cred­it the char­ac­ter of our client, expos­ing her to hatred, con­tempt and ridicule and which there­fore tend­ed to low­er her in the esti­ma­tion of right-think­ing mem­bers of soci­ety. “It is our view that ordi­nary, intel­li­gent and unbi­ased per­sons, with the ordi­nary person’s gen­er­al knowl­edge and expe­ri­ence of world­ly affairs would be like­ly to under­stand those words as con­vey­ing that our client was involved in acts cal­cu­lat­ed to deceive or swin­dle the pub­lic. “The pur­pose of this let­ter is to demand that a suit­ably word­ed apol­o­gy, approved by our client be pub­lished on Television Jamaica , in the Jamaica Observer and The Gleaner and that our client be paid dam­ages com­men­su­rate with her sta­tion in life local­ly and inter­na­tion­al­ly, along with his legal costs. The fre­quen­cy of these pub­li­ca­tions must also be approved by our client.”

However, Samuels say such apol­o­gy will not auto­mat­i­cal­ly absolve Holness from an oblig­a­tion to pay dam­ages to his client.Samuels says the let­ter was deliv­ered at 12.41 pm at the Jamaica Labour Party head­quar­ters. Efforts to reach Holness for a com­ment were not suc­cess­ful as calls to his phone went unan­swered and he did not imme­di­ate­ly respond to text mes­sages. Portia Demands Apology From Holness Over Nomination Day Comment Or Else …

SSP McGregor’s Statement Not Helpful To JCF.…

1725162_10205433897906528_7234427120561380515_n

Responding to the Nomination day event in Flankers St James in which a bus trans­port­ing JLP sup­port­ers was sprayed with gun­fire result­ing in the death of at least one person,
(SSP) Steve McGregor Commanding offi­cer for the parish had this to say.
“No per­mis­sion was grant­ed for the moror­cade to pro­ceed through Flankers, “In fact, there were explic­it warn­ings against it,”.
“We are appeal­ing to organ­is­ers and par­ty offi­cials to heed all instruc­tions and warn­ings giv­en in the future,”.

Okaaay !!!
Well there you have it JLP , I guess McGregor told you!!!
According to the report­ing on the ground one per­son was killed in the attack and sev­er­al vehi­cles were dam­aged as well.
Can you imag­ine the Police telling Political can­di­dates where they can and can­not go in any soci­ety oth­er than Jamaica?
Set aside for a moment that the vic­tims in this instance were mem­bers of the JLP . Make them PNP sup­port­ers or whomev­er , where does the police get off telling cam­paigns not to cam­paign , regard­less of neighborhood?

I get the part about cam­paigns not first receiv­ing per­mits before going ahead.
If it’s the law that cam­paigns first receive per­mits before pro­ceed­ing with cer­tain ele­ments of cam­paign­ing then cam­paigns must respect the laws .
I also under­stand that this could be the con­cern of the Commanding officer.
Nevertheless the larg­er issue I believe is that if you remove the green or orange shirts and par­ty para­pher­na­lia Jamaicans have a right to go wher­ev­er they chose in their coun­try with­out the expec­ta­tion of get­ting attacked and killed.

I under­stand that the police are deal­ing with sit­u­a­tions as they have been in our coun­try since inde­pen­dence. That sense of frus­tra­tion was evi­dent in Steve McGregor’s statement.
However as I have said on pre­vi­ous occa­sions the police seem unable to find its way out of a paper-bag.
It is incom­pre­hen­si­ble that the Police is in the busi­ness of telling cam­paigns in 2016 not to go to cer­tain neighborhoods.

Has the police giv­en up on it’s own mis­sion statement ?
(1) Prevention and detec­tion of crime.
(2) Protection of life and property.
(3) Preservation of peace and good order.

If it has­n’t , how then can the Agency tasked with the pro­tec­tion of inter­nal secu­ri­ty jus­ti­fi­ably tell any Jamaican not to go any place in Jamaica or even 12 miles out to see which falls with­in it’s sphere of responsibility?
Sure I under­stand ‘Risk Assessment?
Sure I under­stand the need to inform poten­tial tar­gets of vio­lent assaults of the threats against them .
Warning tar­gets of threats of vio­lence how­ev­er does not absolve the police of the respon­si­bil­i­ty to pro­tect that tar­get of said intend­ed attack.

SSP McGregor seem to be of the opin­ion that his respon­si­bil­i­ty as Commanding offi­cer is to issue warn­ings to the tar­gets, in this case the JLP.
Many of my for­mer col­leagues crit­i­cize me for being crit­i­cal of the police even despite glar­ing instances of mas­sive incompetence.
Yet they hard­ly seem to pon­der the sub­stance of my points.
Senior Superintendent McGregor said that “police intel­li­gence assets are on the ground con­tin­u­ous­ly mon­i­tor­ing the sit­u­a­tion and that this infor­ma­tion informs deci­sions about the grant­i­ng of per­mis­sion for march­es and motorcades”.

Word of advice to the JCF and SSP McGregor . The sup­posed police intel­li­gence assets on the ground which informs deci­sions about the grant­i­ng of per­mis­sion for march­es and motor­cades should not be used to stop campaigning.
They should be used to weed out the crim­i­nals who would attack inno­cent people.
Regardless of the short­ages the police face, SSP McGregor’s state­ments are exact­ly indica­tive of law enforce­men­t’s fail­ures on the Island because of the depart­men­t’s ret­ro­grade thinking.

No Permission Given For JLP Motorcade Through Flanker — Police

ST JAMES, Jamaica — Head of the St James Division Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Steve McGregor today dis­closed that no per­mis­sion was giv­en for a motor­cade to go through the Flanker com­mu­ni­ty in St James, yes­ter­day. “In fact, there were explic­it warn­ings against it,” SSP McGregor said.
In a state­ment issued by the Corporate Communications Unit on Wednesday, SSP McGregor explained that the warn­ing was nec­es­sary because of height­ened ten­sions in Flanker as a result of the shoot­ing death of two men from the com­mu­ni­ty and the injury of three oth­er peo­ple at a Jamaica Labour Party mass ral­ly in Sam Sharpe Square on Sunday. However, this warn­ing was not heed­ed and one man was yes­ter­day killed and three oth­er peo­ple were injured in Flanker. They were part of a motor­cade on Kodak Street in Flanker. The motor­cade report­ed­ly involved Jamaica Labour Party supporters.
The deceased has not yet been iden­ti­fied but police say some 12 motor vehi­cles were dam­aged in the incident.

SSP McGregor advised that police intel­li­gence assets are on the ground con­tin­u­ous­ly mon­i­tor­ing the sit­u­a­tion and that this infor­ma­tion informs deci­sions about the grant­i­ng of per­mis­sion for march­es and motor­cades. “We are appeal­ing to orga­niz­ers and par­ty offi­cials to heed all instruc­tions and warn­ings giv­en in the future,” SSP McGregor said. In the mean­time, the St James police are again appeal­ing for good sense to pre­vail dur­ing the elec­tion cam­paign season.
Read more here: No per­mis­sion giv­en for JLP motor­cade through Flanker — Police

The People Aren’t Angry ‚Republicans Mad At Obama’s Accomplishments.…

12002824_10204945833425221_401427015886358774_n

As part of the large group of ana­lysts on CNN Tuesday night dis­sect­ing the results of the New Hampshire pri­maries , Philadelphia Democratic Mayor Micheal Nutter repeat­ed the lie “peo­ple are angry” , over and over again.
It was some­what shock­ing to see an elect­ed Democratic offi­cial sit­ting in a tele­vi­sion stu­dio regur­gi­tat­ing the garbage fed him and the rest of us by the very same net­work and oth­ers like it.

People are angry , peo­ple are angry, that’s the media nar­ra­tive of course that goes down pret­ty well with Donald Trumps cam­paign slo­gan of “Let’s make America great again”
Let’s make America great again is an exten­sion of “Let’s take back our Country”.
It’s unclear whether Americans are aware just how the media to which they look for infor­ma­tion is deceiv­ing them? As we pon­der this ques­tion it’s impor­tant to under­stand the fact that what we call the main-stream-media is actu­al­ly a well put togeth­er net­work of pro­pa­gan­da organs owned and oper­at­ed by the rich­est peo­ple in the world.

It’s no won­der that for the most part sub­stan­tive issues are cast to the side while fluff and incon­se­quen­tial issues are front and cen­ter . That’s what the cor­po­rate shills want you to con­sume while they move their agenda.
How do you explain the rise of social media as the enti­ty to which more and more peo­ple, par­tic­u­lar­ly younger peo­ple are look­ing to for their information?
Does any­one believe Donald Trump was a seri­ous can­di­date for President of the United States before the media recy­cled and cir­cu­lat­ed him over and over , foist­ing him onto the con­scious­ness of gullible voters?

Mayor Nutter
Mayor Nutter

It is said if you spin a lie enough times it even­tu­al­ly becomes truth. Republicans run­ning for office over the last sev­er­al cycles have mas­tered the art of lying over and again until the lies become truth. What is astound­ing is when those who posi­tion them­selves as lead­ers with­in the Democratic par­ty actu­al­ly accept the lies and end up repeat­ing them. The notion that peo­ple are angry is a Republican lie cir­cu­lat­ed by a com­plic­it media to gin up anger and rat­ings for the media and pas­sion for the repub­li­cans, which they hope will nul­li­fy Obama’s accomplishments.

So lets quick­ly see whether there is any legit­i­ma­cy to this narrative.
Under Barack Obama over 9 mil­lion jobs cre­at­ed, as against 800 thou­sand jobs being lost each month under Bush.
Vice President Biden in 2008 said ‚“In the last six months of the Bush admin­is­tra­tion, we lost 3.5 mil­lion jobs,” . “As a mat­ter of fact, on that mag­nif­i­cent day … when we were sworn in, before I low­ered my hand that day after tak­ing the oath … we’d already lost over 760,000 jobs that month.”
A politi­co fact check bore out the Vice President’s claims.

Gas was $5 per gal­lon, today gas is less than $2 per gallon.
President Obama did not only save the Auto indus­try he made it stronger than ever.
He restored America’s image abroad.
There were two active wars with no end in sight, today the world con­tin­ue to be a chal­leng­ing place but Obama did not start any new wars.
The econ­o­my implod­ed by the time Obama took office, today the American econ­o­my cre­ates hun­dreds of thou­sands of jobs every month since he took office.
The Housing mar­ket has regained sig­nif­i­cant por­tions of what it lost after the melt-down.
The afford­able Care Act brought health care to mil­lions some­thing sev­er­al pres­i­dents who pre­ced­ed Obama was unable to do.
Wall street has come roar­ing back , with both the Nasdaq and the stock exchange reg­is­ter­ing phe­nom­e­nal gains.

I could go on and on but you get the picture.
So to Mayor Nutter and oth­ers, before you par­rot Republican/​media talk­ing points step back and eval­u­ate your state­ments before you become a mouth­piece of deception.
Barack Obama accom­plished every­thing he did against the great­est intran­si­gence and obstruc­tion any pres­i­dent has every had to con­tend with.
People are not angry, Republicans are mad that Barack Obama is a suc­cess­ful two-term President despite their best efforts at obstruc­tion, pro­pa­gan­da and smear.