Cop Fired Two Years Ago For Assaulting 14-year-old Boy Given His Job Back By Arbitrator…

Even though American police are some of the most vio­lent and dan­ger­ous any­where in the world, they clear­ly are not near­ly vio­lent enough for some Independent Arbitrators who review actions tak­en against vio­lent cops and have the pow­er to deter­mine whether they get their jobs back or not, if fired.
Independent Arbitrators means a neu­tral and impar­tial arbi­tra­tor (i) who is list­ed on the American Arbitration Association’s nation­al ros­ter of arbi­tra­tors, (ii) who has not had and does not have any past, cur­rent or poten­tial busi­ness, pro­fes­sion­al, or per­son­al rela­tion­ship with any of the par­ties involved in the arbi­tra­tion pro­ceed­ings which would inter­fere with the exer­cise of inde­pen­dent judg­ment in car­ry­ing out their respon­si­bil­i­ties as an arbi­tra­tor, and (iii) whose con­duct is guid­ed by the Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes.
The sad real­i­ty for aggriev­ed indi­vid­u­als, fam­i­lies, and com­mu­ni­ties that have borne the brunt of police vio­lence this def­i­n­i­tion is not worth the paper it is written.
In far too many cas­es, the so-called inde­pen­dent arbi­tra­tors who review cas­es of police abuse gen­er­al­ly end up sid­ing with the police, even though they rep­re­sent a clear and present dan­ger to the com­mu­ni­ties they policed.
What’s worse is that in more cas­es than not, they get to return to police com­mu­ni­ties that no longer want their ser­vice or wish to see them as author­i­ty fig­ures in those communities.
We report­ed on this case where a Sacramento Sheriff’s deputy roughed up a 14-year-old boy two years ago, result­ing in the fir­ing of the deputy. Now an arbi­tra­tor has ruled that the deputy’s fir­ing was too harsh, so the Sheriff was forced to give the ex-deputy his job back.
This mon­ster now has the pow­er and the back­ing to do more harm, and he can now kill the inno­cent based on a sin­gle arbi­tra­tor that is behold­en to the police.

Arbitrator Gives Job Back to California Deputy Captured on Video Beating 14-Year-Old Boy, Says Termination Was Too Harsh

Arbitrator Gives Job Back to California Deputy Captured on Video Beating 14-Year-Old Boy, Says Termination Was Too Harsh“The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office will com­ply with the man­date of the inde­pen­dent arbi­tra­tor and inte­grate Deputy Fowell back into the orga­ni­za­tion,” a state­ment from the sheriff’s office said in part.

The rein­state­ment sparked out­rage in the activist com­mu­ni­ty. Local NAACP pres­i­dent Betty Williams said she is “pissed” about the deci­sion to bring him back into law enforcement.

I’m pissed,” Williams said. “This is basi­cal­ly a slap in the face to the com­mu­ni­ty that he is back.” 

She con­tin­ued, “How can we trust your law enforce­ment when you know you have an offi­cer who did some­thing like this and you bring him back to that same com­mu­ni­ty and you ask us to trust you? That is absolute­ly a slap in the face.”

The alter­ca­tion between the offi­cer and the teen was cap­tured in a 15-sec­ond cell­phone video in April 2020 and went viral caus­ing mil­lions to chime in, includ­ing then-Sen. Kamala Harris, who called the deputy’s actions “a hor­rif­ic abuse of power.”

In the clip of the detain­ment, Fowell is seen grab­bing the back of Tufono’s neck, push­ing his face into the ground, and punch­ing the teen three times in his arm. The clip does not show what led up to the inci­dent or what hap­pened after.

A per­son claim­ing to be Tufono’s sis­ter post­ed on Twitter, “My baby broth­er who is 14 years old. All of this over a swish­er there’s more footage but I wasn’t able to upload it all. Please repost, we just want jus­tice for my baby!“He was charged with ‘resist­ing arrest.’ But what was he even being arrest­ed for?? For hav­ing a swish­er? & they end­ed up let­ting him go so what was all of this for?? Smh he was left with scratch­es and chest pains! this was so unnec­es­sary!” she wrote.

The offi­cer approached the young man after he asked a stranger for some tobacco. 

And that’s when the cop pulled up,” Tufono said at the time. “And he asked me what was that in my hand. And I had gave him, as soon as he asked me that, I just gave it to him.”

He said ini­tial­ly he was not coöper­a­tive, say­ing that was his “mis­take.”

Two years ago, after the alter­ca­tion, the teen’s aunt Leata Tufono said at a press con­fer­ence that he was emo­tion­al­ly and phys­i­cal­ly scarred, ABC 10 reports.

The deputy was ter­mi­nat­ed by the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office after a pro­fes­sion­al stan­dards unit inves­ti­gat­ed his engage­ment with the 14-year-old, deter­min­ing he went too far when detain­ing him.

Fowell’s attor­ney William Creger filed his appeal on his client’s behalf in October 2020, claim­ing his ter­mi­na­tion was unwarranted.

The sheriff’s office was enti­tled to take Deputy Fowell out of the pub­lic spot­light for a while,” the lawyer said. “The arbi­tra­tor said (Fowell) didn’t do every­thing per­fect­ly, he could’ve han­dled it in a dif­fer­ent way … but it didn’t need to rise to the lev­el of termination.”

An arbi­tra­tor deter­mined he was unjust­ly fired, rul­ing his employ­ment should be restored.

Touting acco­lades like the offi­cer being named the 2019 “Employee of the Quarter” for the force and lat­er the same year receiv­ing the life-sav­ing medal for his sav­ing a lit­tle girl’s life by using CPR, the lawyer argued Fowell’s exem­plary law enforce­ment record was instru­men­tal in the deci­sion in his favor.

Much of the details of his restora­tion to the police force are not pub­lic. Fowell is con­sid­ered a “peace offi­cer” under California law and their records are pro­tect­ed and not available.

According to a recent amend­ment approved by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Sept. 30, 2021, relat­ing to peace offi­cers, “peace offi­cer per­son­nel records and spec­i­fied records main­tained by any state or local agency, or infor­ma­tion obtained from these records” are to be kept “con­fi­den­tial” and not “dis­closed in any crim­i­nal or civ­il pro­ceed­ing except by discovery.

Tufano’s attor­ney John Burris said in a state­ment, “It rais­es real safe­ty con­cerns for the client who’s been ner­vous about this offi­cer and hopes that he doesn’t have the chance to see him.”

At the end of the day, I hope the offi­cer has been retrained on how to deesca­late sit­u­a­tions, par­tic­u­lar­ly when he’s deal­ing with teenagers who are involved with minor trans­gres­sions,” the lawyer said. 

His con­duct, in this case, was over the top and clear­ly did not give con­sid­er­a­tion that this was a young person.”

The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office has not released any fur­ther state­ments on Fowell’s rehiring.


%d