Republicans Figured Out How To Stall Biden’s Agenda; Joe Manchin…

It seems to me that W.E.B. DuBois’s state­ment, “Either America will destroy igno­rance or igno­rance will destroy the United States,” takes on more res­o­nance today than at any oth­er time since he made that statement.
What does it say about the coun­try’s state when the wife of the most senior mem­ber of the Supreme court is a major play­er in the dis­in­for­ma­tion QAnnon con­spir­a­cy movement?
At the bare min­i­mum, it pos­es a seri­ous con­flict of inter­est that Ginny Thomas would be a major play­er in right-wing caus­es, some of which are so out of the main­stream they ought to be under Federal eyeballs.
It bears men­tion­ing that Clarence Thomas, an unapolo­getic right-wing judge, in his three decades on the Supreme Court, has ruled con­sis­tent­ly in sup­port of Republican causes.
Regardless of a Judge’s pol­i­tics, it is hard to rec­on­cile that a judge would be as par­ti­san as Clarence Thomas has been. Even the much-vaunt­ed and idol­ized Antonin Scalia, the stan­dard of right-wing jurispru­dence, at times vot­ed with the most lib­er­al wing of the court. Not so with the insuf­fer­able Clarence Thomas.
Among some of the most eye­brow-rais­ing things that Clarence Thomas has done has been the dis­sent­ing & con­cur­ring opin­ions he has writ­ten and joined.

Clarence Thomas' wife spreading Biden misinformation on Facebook - Business Insider
Clarence & Ginny Thomas
  • He dis­sent­ed when the court inval­i­dat­ed the con­vic­tion of a black man tried six times for the same crime by the same pros­e­cu­tor with juries that were either all white or near­ly all white.
  • He called for over­turn­ing Gideon v. Wainwright, the 1963 land­mark deci­sion requir­ing that crim­i­nal defen­dants, too poor to pay for a lawyer, be pro­vid­ed an attor­ney paid for by the government.
  • In anoth­er first, he called for over­turn­ing the 1964 land­mark free­dom-of-the-press deci­sion New York Times v. Sullivan, which set in place stan­dards to make it more dif­fi­cult for pub­lic fig­ures to sue for libel with­out proof that false­hoods were know­ing­ly published.

According to (npr​.org), Clarence Thomas’s dis­sent­ing opin­ion on that land­mark deci­sion was not joined by a sin­gle mem­ber of the 9‑member court, but that it lined up con­ve­nient­ly with the world­view of Donald Trump.
The late Justice Antonin Scalia did not have such a purist view (NPR posit­ed); unlike Thomas, he did believe in prece­dent. As he famous­ly put it, “I am an orig­i­nal­ist, but I’m not a nut.”

God bless each of you,’ Ginni Thomas wrote in a Facebook post to sup­port the attempt­ed takeover of the Capitol.
In one post, she shared “LOVE” to the MAGA crowd, offer­ing sup­port and sug­gest­ing oth­ers tune in to the riot. In anoth­er Facebook sta­tus, she stat­ed, in most­ly all caps, “God bless each of you stand­ing up or pray­ing!”ImageThis is not her first time in the spot­light for sup­port­ing racism. ( theGrio) report­ed Mrs. Thomas request­ed the may­or of Clifton, Virginia, to remove a Black Lives Matter ban­ner in the town. Would you please remove the BLM sign from Clifton?” Thomas wrote to Holloway accord­ing to (theGrio). “As lead­ers of this com­mu­ni­ty, you should be smarter than pro­mot­ing such a group as this, who uses race to foment chaos to desta­bi­lize the nation.”Image

But Clarence and Ginny Thomas’s con­flicts of inter­est are only the tip of the ice­berg when it comes to what the polit­i­cal right is allowed to get away with, even while pon­tif­i­cat­ing about the fideli­ty of pub­lic bod­ies and institutions.
Economic con­ser­vatism and fideli­ty to the con­sti­tu­tion are only impor­tant when Republicans are out of office.
As soon as Joe Biden won the 2020 elec­tion, it struck me that Republicans would return to the tired old fis­cal con­ser­vatism argu­ments to harass the new Administration.
They found their man in West Virginia to dilute the Democratic pow­er in the Senate; that man is Joe ManchinJoe Manchin has not flinched from play­ing ball in servi­tude to Mitch McConnell and the right-wing agen­da, declar­ing oppo­si­tion to the Biden eco­nom­ic stim­u­lus’s size, a view in direct oppo­si­tion to his own Governor’s, and declar­ing his oppo­si­tion to a key Biden nom­i­nee to head the Office Of Management & Budget.
That is not all; anoth­er clear sign that Manchin does not sup­port the Democratic agen­da is his pub­lic oppo­si­tion to elim­i­nat­ing the Fillibuster.
Manchin told CNN that he would oppose his par­ty’s effort to get rid of the fil­i­buster, a stall tac­tic fre­quent­ly used by the Senate’s minor­i­ty par­ty, requir­ing 60 votes in the cham­ber to over­come. “That’s bull­shit,” Manchin said.
When asked about the Democratic push to elim­i­nate the fil­i­buster, he not­ed that he opposed the Democratic effort in 2013 to elim­i­nate the fil­i­buster on most pres­i­den­tial nominees.
This means that to get the most basic aspect of his agen­da passed, Biden will have to seek buy-in from Republicans, usu­al­ly Mitt Romney, Susan Collins, or Lisa Murkowski, even on his cab­i­net nom­i­nees, essen­tial­ly ren­der­ing the idea that a pres­i­dent is enti­tled to his cab­i­net moot.
Who needs Republicans when there are Democrats like Joe Manchin?

It did not take long, with over half a mil­lion dead as a result of Donald Trump’s neg­li­gence and com­plic­i­ty for COVID-19, unem­ploy­ment claims sky­rock­et­ing, and peo­ple in seri­ous need of relief, Republicans en-masse has a seri­ous prob­lem with the Joe Biden $1.9 Trillion COVID relief plan, but had no prob­lem with Donald Trump’s $2.3 Trillion give­away to the rich­est 1% who did not need for it.
To add insult to injury, Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, is against the pack­age’s size and con­tent while his Republican Governor is lob­by­ing for the bil­l’s pas­sage that would vast­ly ben­e­fit res­i­dents of that state.
Additionally, Manchin is opposed to Joe Biden’s choice to lead the White House Office of Management and Budget, Neera Tanden, because of sup­posed mean tweets she made as pres­i­dent of the Center for American Progress, a think tank aligned with the Democratic establishment.
It is laugh­able that Manchin wants to be a power­bro­ker in the 50 – 50 sen­ate; he choos­es the pres­i­den­t’s cab­i­net pick and a woman of col­or, no less, as the hill on which he wants to take a stand. The hyp­ocrite did not utter a sin­gle syl­la­ble in oppo­si­tion to Donald Trump’s tweets that dis­par­aged and demeaned every per­son who did not bow down to him.
Both Mitt Romney of Utah and Susan Collins of Maine have indi­cat­ed that nei­ther of them will be sup­port­ing Tanden’s nomination.

Rally Will Mark Tipping Point for Trump-Manchin Relationship - Roll Call
Donald Trump & Joe Manchin. Manchin is try­ing to carve out a power­bro­ker posi­tion for him­self, one which ben­e­fits his ruby-red state of West Virginia at the expense of hold­ing the entire Democratic agen­da hostage.

As if by some strange comedic joke by the Universe, Josh Hawley and Raphael Cruz are mem­bers of the Senate’s Judiciary Committee. The Judiciary com­mit­tee is this week attend­ing to the nom­i­na­tion of pres­i­dent Joe Biden’s nom­i­nee for Attorney General of the United States.
To hear Josh Hawley and Raphael Cruz, the Senate point men for Trump’s big lie, “stop the steal,’ ask ques­tions of Merrick Garland when they both should be locked away in Federal jail cells await­ing tri­al for sedi­tious activ­i­ties, has been just too much for me to stomach.
In a nation of laws, nei­ther Josh Hawley nor Raphael Cruz would have the oppor­tu­ni­ty, much less the temer­i­ty, to ask Judge Garland ques­tions on the issues of fideli­ty to law and the con­sti­tu­tion. Hawley and Cruz are co-con­spir­a­tors, in my hum­ble view, but the laws in America only work against the poor and pow­er­less, and so they get to sit in judg­ment of peo­ple with char­ac­ter. I almost said the framers must be turn­ing in their graves, then I stopped myself.….their behav­ior was noth­ing to brag about either, so there is that.
And so we laugh at the spec­ta­cle of the crim­i­nals ques­tion­ing the judge, Wisconsin Republican Senator Ron Johnson, putting into the record a let­ter sup­pos­ed­ly writ­ten to him by some right-wing hack, detail­ing how the Trump insur­rec­tion crowd was peace­ful and friend­ly until they were pro­voked and assault­ed by the capi­tol police.
The American peo­ple vot­ed in extra­or­di­nary num­bers to repu­di­ate Donald Trump, his hate­ful & racist poli­cies; true to form as they did in President Obama’s first term, Democrats are fail­ing to force­ful­ly apply the same strength and for­ti­tude Republicans employ when they are in power.
The steps Republicans are tak­ing to make vot­ing expo­nen­tial­ly more dif­fi­cult across mul­ti­ple states are designed to negate the con­se­quences of whites becom­ing a minor­i­ty by 2045. If Democrats con­tin­ue to allow this to hap­pen, America will sink into despo­tism, the next strong­man to occu­py the White House (Josh Hawley), or whomev­er already has a blue­print on what to do to get there.
In the end, preser­va­tion of white pow­er in white men’s hands is what all this is about, that includes what Ginny Thomas and her hus­band are doing, to what Joe Manchin is doing in stop­ping peo­ple of col­or from hold­ing pow­er­ful posi­tions in the American government.
It is time to restore a key ele­ment of the Voting Rights Act, stalled in the con­gress to hon­or civ­il rights icon John Lewis.
Democrats have no excuse not to move this leg­is­la­tion to a vote imme­di­ate­ly; let the nation see which Republican vote against it, then use the results against them in 2022.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Golfer Tiger Woods Hospitalized After Serious Car Crash…

Tiger Woods is in surgery after suf­fer­ing “mul­ti­ple leg injuries” in a car crash in Los Angeles, California.

The LA County Sheriff’s Department said that it “respond­ed to a sin­gle-vehi­cle rollover” acci­dent in which the “vehi­cle sus­tained major damage”.

American Woods, 45, had to be “extri­cat­ed from the wreck” by fire­fight­ers and paramedics.

Woods’ agent Mark Steinberg said: “He is cur­rent­ly in surgery and we thank you for your pri­va­cy and support.”(BBCSPORTS)

The LA County Sheriff’s Department said that it “respond­ed to a sin­gle-vehi­cle rollover” acci­dent in which the “vehi­cle sus­tained major dam­age”. The 15-time golf major cham­pi­on, 45, had to be “extri­cat­ed from the wreck” by fire­fight­ers and para­medics. Woods’ agent Mark Steinberg said: “He is cur­rent­ly in surgery and we thank you for your pri­va­cy and sup­port.” Steinberg con­firmed the detail about the American hav­ing sus­tained “mul­ti­ple leg injuries”. Woods was at the Riviera Country Club in LA at the week­end as host of the Genesis Invitational tournament.

A state­ment from the LA County Sheriff’s Department said it respond­ed to the crash “on the bor­der of Rolling Hills Estates and Rancho Palos Verdes” on Tuesday morn­ing local time.
It added: “Mr Woods was extri­cat­ed from the wreck with the ‘jaws of life’ by Los Angeles County fire­fight­ers and para­medics, then trans­port­ed to a local hos­pi­tal by ambu­lance for his injuries.”
The LA County Fire Department said:“Units dis­patched at 07:22 and found a sin­gle-vehi­cle rollover. One adult male was assist­ed out of the vehi­cle and trans­port­ed to a local area hos­pi­tal in seri­ous con­di­tion. World num­ber three Justin Thomas is one of Woods’ best friends on the tour and expressed con­cern for his com­pa­tri­ot. “I’m sick to my stom­ach,” Thomas said. “You know, it hurts to see one of your… clos­est friends get in an acci­dent. “Man, I just hope he’s all right. Just wor­ry for his kids, you know. I’m sure they’re strug­gling.” A state­ment from PGA Tour com­mis­sion­er Jay Monahan said: “We are await­ing fur­ther infor­ma­tion when he comes out of surgery. “On behalf of the PGA Tour and our play­ers, Tiger is in our prayers and will have our full sup­port as he recovers.”

Woods was involved in a car crash in November 2009 which even­tu­al­ly led to admis­sions of infi­deli­ty and the break­down of his mar­riage. He then took a break from golf but returned short­ly after­ward. Following five wins in 2013, Woods start­ed just 24 events in the next four years because of chron­ic back pain and mul­ti­ple surg­eries. In 2017 Woods was arrest­ed on sus­pi­cion of dri­ving under the influ­ence when he was found asleep at the wheel of his car. He lat­er plead­ed guilty to reck­less dri­ving. He had five pre­scrip­tion drugs in his sys­tem as he recov­ered from the spinal fusion surgery that ulti­mate­ly gave him a sec­ond golf­ing career. Woods end­ed an 11-year wait for a major title when he won the Masters at Augusta in 2019.
He joint­ly holds the record for most PGA Tour wins at 82 with Sam Snead and is three behind Jack Nicklaus’ mark of 18 major titles. Woods recent­ly said he had hoped to play in this year’s Masters in April after hav­ing a fifth back surgery in January. 

He end­ed 2019 sixth in golf’s world rank­ings but is now 50thBBC golf cor­re­spon­dent Iain Carter told BBC Radio 5 Live: “Tiger Woods has had this extra­or­di­nary life which has had such mas­sive highs on the golf course but some extra­or­di­nary lows in his per­son­al life. “This is now a very seri­ous sit­u­a­tion for his career. “He was on American tele­vi­sion on Sunday. A lot of observers were con­cerned at how hes­i­tant he was about the nature of the progress that was being made in terms of his recov­ery and whether or not he would be fit for the Masters. “All thoughts of that now go com­plete­ly out of the win­dow and are no longer a priority.”

No, Obama Did Not Mail Checks To Black People But Here Is What He Did In His First Term

Speaking specif­i­cal­ly to cer­tain fac­tions with­in the Black com­mu­ni­ty that President Obama did noth­ing for the Black com­mu­ni­ty, please watch the Senate judi­cia­ry com­mit­tee hear­ings of Judge Merrick Garland for Attorney General.
The attack on the Obama admin­is­tra­tion’s Justice Department by cer­tain Republicans Raphael Cruz, John Cornyn, and oth­ers, and on for­mer Attorney General Eric Holder is a tes­ta­ment to Obama’s com­mit­ment to the Black community.
For the fee­ble-mind­ed who con­tin­ue to expect that a Black President’s great­ness is how many checks he mailed out to them, please be edu­cat­ed on the facts.
I have always believed that President Obama’s great­est accom­plish­ments relat­ed to the Black com­mu­ni­ty have been what he could do in the Holder Justice Department.
As part of shak­ing up the entrenched racial dis­par­i­ties, then-Attorney General Eric Holder, was held in con­tempt of Congress by an antag­o­nis­tic Republican-con­trolled Senate that hat­ed what the AG was doing.
Then-Attorney General Holder also had his name on the supreme court deci­sion Holder vs. Shelby County Alabama, leg­is­la­tion in which the Supreme court evis­cer­at­ed sec­tions of the vot­ing rights Act.
When we jux­ta­pose what President Obama did, with Judge Garland’s ques­tion­ing by Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, a crys­tal clear image emerges of where Republicans stand on the rights of African-Americans.

I had a rather con­tentious con­ver­sa­tion with a young Jamaican preach­er, who claims to be a Republican over the week­end. He want­ed to know what polit­i­cal par­ty I sup­port­ed; I answered cer­tain­ly not the lying Republican cult that rep­re­sents hat­ed and divi­sion, that lies as a mat­ter of course, and wants to destroy Democracy.
He claimed to oppose the Democrats because of the 1994 Violent Crime and Law Enforcement Act, oth­er­wise, known as the Clinton Crime bill). In typ­i­cal Jamaican fash­ion, the young preach­er act­ed under the belief that those who speak the loud­est were the ones who are right.
His style of com­mu­ni­cat­ing was ask­ing a ques­tion with­out allow­ing for an answer. Asking what he thought was a knock-out ques­tion was more than a ques­tion; it was the point for him.
When con­front­ed with doc­u­men­tary evi­dence that the 90’s crime bill was sought by black law-mak­ers, black cler­gy, sup­port­ed by both polit­i­cal par­ties, and was a response to the ram­pant killings in the Black com­mu­ni­ty, he did not want to see the evidence.
As I said before, ask­ing the ques­tion was his point, because I had pre­emp­tive­ly dis­armed him of the abil­i­ty to use Religion and hatred of Gays as a rea­son to lash out against the Obama administration.

In my pro­fes­sion­al capac­i­ty, I have the high hon­or of inter­act­ing with peo­ple of vary­ing polit­i­cal stripes. I under­stand, even though I’m afraid I have to dis­agree, with a white per­son who votes Republican, because he/​she sees that par­ty as a pro­tec­tor of his/​her white privilege.
I am baf­fled by the ques­tion, “what did Obama do for the Black com­mu­ni­ty” com­ing from Black Americans?
Considering that (a) Presidents can send leg­is­la­tion up to the Hill, but that Presidents do not pass leg­is­la­tion, (b) Presidents have to be pres­i­dent for all the peo­ple, not just some peo­ple, © that Obama faced blan­ket­ed Republican oppo­si­tion to every pol­i­cy posi­tion he pro­posed, even poli­cies they pre­vi­ous­ly sup­port­ed, that Obama only had a Democratic House for two of the eight years he was in office, what was he sup­posed to do differently?
The Gentleman asked me, what exact­ly Obama had done in the eight years he was in office. I direct­ed him to the fol­low­ing infor­ma­tion and end­ed the conversation.

OBAMA’s FIRST TERM RECORD

1. Ordered all fed­er­al agen­cies to under­take a study and make rec­om­men­da­tions for ways to cut spending
2. Ordered a review of all fed­er­al oper­a­tions to iden­ti­fy and cut waste­ful spend­ing and practices
3. Instituted enforce­ment for equal pay for women
4. Beginning the with­draw­al of US troops from Iraq
5. Families of fall­en sol­diers have expens­es cov­ered to be on hand when the body arrives at Dover AFB
6 Ended media black­out on war casu­al­ties; report­ing full information
7. Ended media black­out on cov­er­ing the return of fall­en sol­diers to Dover AFB; the media is now per­mit­ted to do so pend­ing adher­ence to respect­ful rules and approval of fall­en soldier’s family
8. The White House and fed­er­al gov­ern­ment are respect­ing the Freedom of Information Act
9. Instructed all fed­er­al agen­cies to pro­mote open­ness and trans­paren­cy as much as possible
10. Limits on lobbyist’s access to the White House
11. Limits on White House aides work­ing for lob­by­ists after their tenure in the administration
12. Ended the pre­vi­ous stop-loss pol­i­cy that kept sol­diers in Iraq/​Afghanistan longer than their enlist­ment date
13. Phasing out the expen­sive F‑22 war plane and oth­er out­dat­ed weapons sys­tems, which weren’t even used or need­ed in Iraq/​Afghanistan
14. Removed restric­tions on embry­on­ic stem-cell research
15. Federal sup­port for stem-cell and new bio­med­ical research
16. New fed­er­al fund­ing for sci­ence and research labs
17. States are per­mit­ted to enact fed­er­al fuel effi­cien­cy stan­dards above fed­er­al standards
18. Increased infra­struc­ture spend­ing (roads, bridges, pow­er plants) after years of neglect
19. Funds for high-speed, broad­band Internet access to K‑12 schools
20. New funds for school construction
21 The prison at Guantanamo Bay is being phased out
22. US Auto indus­try res­cue plan
23. Housing res­cue plan
24. $789 bil­lion eco­nom­ic stim­u­lus plan
25. The pub­lic can meet with fed­er­al hous­ing insur­ers to refi­nance (the new plan can be com­plet­ed in one day) a mort­gage if they are hav­ing trou­ble paying
26. US finan­cial and bank­ing res­cue plan
27. The secret deten­tion facil­i­ties in Eastern Europe and else­where are being closed
28. Ended the pre­vi­ous pol­i­cy; the US now has a no tor­ture pol­i­cy and com­plies with the Geneva Convention standards
29. Better body armor is now being pro­vid­ed to our troops
30. The mis­sile defense pro­gram was being cut by $1.4 bil­lion in 2010
31. Restarted the nuclear non­pro­lif­er­a­tion talks and build­ing back up the nuclear inspec­tion infrastructure/​protocols
32. Reengaged in the treaties/​agreements to pro­tect the Antarctic
33. Reengaged in the agreements/​talks on glob­al warm­ing and green­house gas emissions
34. Visited more coun­tries and met with more world lead­ers than any pres­i­dent in his first six months in office
35. Successful release of US cap­tain held by Somali pirates; autho­rized the SEALS to do their job
36. US Navy increas­ing patrols off the Somali coast
37. Attractive tax write-offs for those who buy hybrid automobiles
38. Cash for clunk­ers pro­gram offers vouch­ers to trade in fuel inef­fi­cient, pol­lut­ing old cars for new cars; stim­u­lat­ed auto sales
39. Announced plans to pur­chase a fuel-effi­cient American-made fleet for the fed­er­al government
40. Expanded the SCHIP pro­gram to cov­er health care for 4 mil­lion more children
41. Signed nation­al ser­vice leg­is­la­tion; expand­ed nation­al youth ser­vice program
42. Instituted a new pol­i­cy on Cuba, allow­ing Cuban fam­i­lies to return home to vis­it loved ones
43. Ended the pre­vi­ous pol­i­cy of not reg­u­lat­ing and label­ing car­bon diox­ide emissions
44. Expanding vac­ci­na­tion programs
45. Immediate and effi­cient response to the floods in North Dakota and oth­er nat­ur­al disasters
46. Closed off­shore tax safe havens
47. Negotiated deal with Swiss banks to per­mit US gov­ern­ment to gain access to records of tax evaders and criminals
48. Ended the pre­vi­ous pol­i­cy of offer­ing tax ben­e­fits to cor­po­ra­tions who out­source American jobs; the new pol­i­cy is to pro­mote in-sourc­ing to bring jobs back
49.. Ended the pre­vi­ous prac­tice of pro­tect­ing cred­it card com­pa­nies; in place of it are new con­sumer pro­tec­tions from the cred­it card industry’s preda­to­ry practices
50. Energy pro­duc­ing plants must begin prepar­ing to pro­duce 15% of their ener­gy from renew­able sources
51. Lower drug costs for seniors
52. Ended the pre­vi­ous prac­tice of for­bid­ding Medicare from nego­ti­at­ing with drug man­u­fac­tur­ers for cheap­er drugs; the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment now real­izes hun­dreds of mil­lions in savings
53. Increasing pay and ben­e­fits for mil­i­tary personnel
54. Improved hous­ing for mil­i­tary personnel
55. Initiating a new pol­i­cy to pro­mote fed­er­al hir­ing of mil­i­tary spouses
56. Improved con­di­tions at Walter Reed Military Hospital and oth­er mil­i­tary hospitals
57 Increasing stu­dent loans
58. Increasing oppor­tu­ni­ties in the AmeriCorps program
59. Sent envoys to the Middle East and oth­er parts of the world that had been neglect­ed for years; reen­gag­ing in mul­ti­lat­er­al and bilat­er­al talks and diplomacy
60. Established a new cyber­se­cu­ri­ty office
61. Beginning the process of reform­ing and restruc­tur­ing the mil­i­tary 20 years after the Cold War to a more mod­ern fight­ing force; this includes new pro­cure­ment poli­cies, increas­ing size of the mil­i­tary, new tech­nol­o­gy, and cyber units and oper­a­tions, etc.
62. Ended pre­vi­ous pol­i­cy of award­ing no-bid defense contracts
63. Ordered a review of hur­ri­cane and nat­ur­al dis­as­ter preparedness
64. Established a National Performance Officer charged with sav­ing the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment mon­ey and mak­ing fed­er­al oper­a­tions more efficient
65. Students strug­gling to make col­lege loan pay­ments can have their loans refinanced
66. Improving ben­e­fits for veterans
67. Many more press con­fer­ences and town halls and much more media access than pre­vi­ous administrations
68. Instituted a new focus on mort­gage fraud
69. The FDA is now reg­u­lat­ing tobacco
70. Ended pre­vi­ous pol­i­cy of cut­ting the FDA and cir­cum­vent­ing FDA rules
71. Ended pre­vi­ous prac­tice of hav­ing White House aides rewrite sci­en­tif­ic and envi­ron­men­tal rules, reg­u­la­tions, and reports
72. Authorized dis­cus­sions with North Korea and pri­vate mis­sion by Pres. Bill Clinton to secure the release of two Americans held in prisons
73. Authorized dis­cus­sions with Myanmar and mis­sion by Sen. Jim Web to secure the release of an American held captive
74. Making more loans avail­able to small businesses
75. Established inde­pen­dent com­mis­sion to make rec­om­men­da­tions on slow­ing the costs of Medicare
76. Appointment of first Latina to the Supreme Court
77. Authorized construction/​opening of addi­tion­al health cen­ters to care for veterans
78. Limited salaries of senior White House aides; cut to $100,000
79. Renewed loan guar­an­tees for Israel
80. Changed the failing/​status quo mil­i­tary com­mand in Afghanistan
81. Deployed addi­tion­al troops to Afghanistan
82. New Afghan War pol­i­cy that lim­its aer­i­al bomb­ing and pri­or­i­tizes aid, devel­op­ment of infra­struc­ture, diplo­ma­cy, and good gov­ern­ment prac­tices by Afghans
83. Announced the long-term devel­op­ment of a nation­al ener­gy grid with renew­able sources and clean­er, effi­cient ener­gy production
84. Returned mon­ey autho­rized for refur­bish­ment of White House offices and pri­vate liv­ing quarters
85. Paid for redec­o­ra­tion of White House liv­ing quar­ters out of his own pocket
86. Held first Seder in White House
87. Attempting to reform the nation’s health­care sys­tem, which is the most expen­sive in the world yet leaves almost 50 mil­lion with­out health insur­ance and mil­lions more underinsured
88. Has put the ball in play for com­pre­hen­sive immi­gra­tion reform
89. Has announced his inten­tion to push for ener­gy reform
90. Has announced his inten­tion to push for edu­ca­tion reform

Did I men­tion he passed health care reform?
I have no idea what the char­ac­ter­is­tics of a great American President are; what I do know is that, all things con­sid­ered, Barack Obama comes pret­ty damn close, in my opinion.
It is pret­ty easy to crit­i­cize our own, who have done things we could nev­er dream of doing, while sup­port­ing those who would rather see us back on the plantation.
We all have a right to sup­port who and what­ev­er we want to under the law. But when we chose to dis­par­age a per­son or a polit­i­cal par­ty to jus­ti­fy our shame­ful actions, we should at least get our facts straight.
Truth does still matter.

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Caught, Lying Raphael Threw His Daughter Under The Bus…

We talk about this often, the peo­ple who vote for the Republican par­ty, in the red states, despite the lies the par­ty tells them, despite the votes they take against their voter’s interests.
Voters in red states con­tin­ue to vote for the par­ty, which gives tax breaks to the rich­est Americans but refus­es to give them the most basic relief when they need it.
Republican lead­er­ship in Texas turned their backs on fed­er­al mon­ey that would expand Medicaid in the state ben­e­fit­ing mil­lions of peo­ple unable to get health care.
Texas is now under severe cold weath­er; peo­ple are dying from cold, car­bon monox­ide poi­son­ing, and strug­gling to find clean drink­ing water. Fires rage while fire depart­ments revert to archa­ic truck­ing of water to try to put out blazes because the water in the hydrants is frozen solid.
Why has Texas a state that talks about seced­ing in such des­per­ate shape? Texas Republicans are wed­ded to the oil indus­try, which is basi­cal­ly their bosses.
Powerful oil boss­es do not want fed­er­al reg­u­la­tors telling them that they must adopt com­mon-sense guide­lines, so they refused to be attached to the nation­al grid. The grid failed, and now there is no backup.

This grand­stand­ing fraud Raphael Cruz fled to Mexico while the poor in his state freeze to death. These are the fraud that makes up the Republican sedi­tion­ist polit­i­cal party.

Despite their suf­fer­ing, come elec­tion time, vot­ers in Texas will once again vote for the plu­to­crats who con­tin­ue to demon­strate to them that they do not matter.
And while we are on the sub­ject, what about the fraud­u­lent Raphael Cruz? Lying Raphael loves to grand­stand and talk about the con­sti­tu­tion. He loves to grand­stand about the love of coun­try and the American peo­ple, but its huck­ster was on a plane to Cancun as soon as a lit­tle hard time arrived.
When the lying fraud was spot­ted in Cancun relax­ing, he high­tailed it back to Texas and threw his daugh­ter on the bus, claim­ing that he took the voca­tion because of her. What a fraud.

The remark­able thing, is that the New York Times obtained text mes­sages made by Raphael’s wife, Heid Cruz, pro­mot­ing the trip. According to the Huffington Post, the report con­tra­dict­ed Cruz’s flim­sy claim that he was mere­ly grant­i­ng his daugh­ters’ wish for a vaca­tion with their friends and was accom­pa­ny­ing them when the fam­i­ly jet­ted off to Cancun this week. He lat­er con­ced­ed he had planned to stay through the week­end, but Heidi Cruz’s mes­sages to pals seemed to indi­cate a grander getaway. 
“Anyone can or want to leave for the week?” Cruz, a man­ag­ing direc­tor at Wall Street bank Goldman Sachs, wrote in a group text. “We may go to Cancún.” She men­tioned a Wednesday after­noon depar­ture and a Sunday return from a stay at the posh Ritz-Carlton on the beach, where she said she has lodged “many times,” accord­ing to The Times.

YouTube player

No one begrudges any­one a vaca­tion, but Raphael Cruz is not only a pub­lic ser­vant; he is a self-pro­mot­ing grandiose per­fec­tion­ist, who pre­tends to love the coun­try more than oth­er Americans. His respon­si­bil­i­ty to the peo­ple across the state of Texas who vot­ed him into office, and who deserve rep­re­sen­ta­tion at this crit­i­cal junc­ture, deserved more than what that self-aggran­diz­ing fraud gave. When the chips were down, he ran away to the com­forts of a five-star vaca­tion spot leav­ing his peo­ple to fend for themselves.
Imagine the hoopla that blovi­at­ing idiot would have cre­at­ed if a high-lev­el Democratic politi­cian from that state had done the same thing?

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Jamaica Loses A Treasure In The Passing Of Reggae Icon U‑Roy…

YouTube player

His name was Ewart Beckford but to the tens of thou­sands of us who grew up on his toast­ing, no one knew who Ewart Beckford was, to us he was Daddy Roy, or U‑Roy.
The art of toast­ing began with DJs talk­ing over the record play­ing on the sound sys­tems, today we know the toast­er as Disc Jockeys (DJs).
To young dance hall goers like myself, Daddy Roy was the best of the best, the crème de la crème of dance­hall disc jockeys.

YouTube player

I will leave the com­ments to those who knew him inti­mate­ly, suf­fic­ing to say that his music was the sound­track to many of our lives.
He will for­ev­er be rec­og­nized as one of the great­est of Jamaica’s musi­cal pio­neers. He is irre­place­able and will be sad­ly missed.

YouTube player

Cry Me A River…

I want­ed to wait for a while before say­ing any­thing about the pass­ing of one of the most vapid­ly tox­ic fig­ures to influ­ence our nation­al discourse.
I speak of Rush Limbaugh, the insid­i­ous big­ot who passed away days ago at 70 after a bat­tle with lung can­cer. But the hypocrisy of the media in not describ­ing Limbaugh in the way he deserves, prompt­ed me to break my silence.
Despite the hate, misog­y­ny, and xeno­pho­bia that Limbaugh rep­re­sent­ed, the main­stream media gush­es over him as if he was some­one who left a lega­cy of good.
God is still work­ing on me, so I still pray that he con­tin­ues to lead me onto the path he wants me to trod, like the new tes­ta­ment teach­ings, which ask me to be of pious sup­pli­can­cy. One who turns the oth­er cheek when my ene­my spite­ful­ly assaults me, love them, and be good to them?
Or fol­low the Old Testament teach­ings, hon­or­ing war­riors like David who asked God to deliv­er his ene­mies into his hands, slew them, and progressed.
Rush Limbaugh must be remem­bered for what he tru­ly was, a can­cer. But we must also take note of those who enabled him, The media hous­es that gave him the plat­form to spew the garbage he did, so that they could rake in the prof­its from his decades of preach­ing hate.

Criticize me all you want, but since he is not fin­ished with me yet, I will shed not one drop of tear for an insuf­fer­able big­ot whose pass­ing left the world a bet­ter place today, than it was before he died.
I refuse to play nice to a glo­ri­fied clown who used the pub­lic air­waves to sow hatred and divi­sion, turn­ing neigh­bors against neigh­bors, mak­ing Americans see their fel­low Americans not as peo­ple who dis­agree on prin­ci­ple, but as ene­mies to be reviled and hat­ed. If refus­ing to be def­er­en­tial to that kind of insid­i­ous trash is a vice, col­or me the new viceroy.
Rush Limbaugh built an empire on hatred and divi­sion; at the very best, Rush Limbaugh was noth­ing more than a dem­a­gogue with a micro­phone, a wannabe come­di­an who was every­thing but fun­ny. It was no sur­prise that Donald Trump rose to the pres­i­den­cy on the hatred and divi­sion that Limbaugh per­pet­u­at­ed and promulgated.
It was no sur­prise that Trump, anoth­er racial dem­a­gogue saw fit to bestow the pres­i­den­tial medal of free­dom on Limbaugh. So much for the val­ue of those going forward.

Limbaugh died, leav­ing a mas­sive for­tune, report­ed­ly to the tune of $600 mil­lion, derived from spread­ing hatred for every­one who was­n’t white and male. He could­n’t take a pen­ny with him, nei­ther could it save him, which brings to mind, Matthew 16-26, Yeshua asked, what good it is for a man to gain the whole world but lose his soul?
Limbaugh is gone, nev­er to be heard from again, but the seeds of hatred and divi­sion he left behind will be hard to erase, if ever at all. His seeds of hatred all but splin­tered the coun­try, pit­ting broth­ers against broth­ers, sis­ter against sis­ter, par­ents against chil­dren, chil­dren against their par­ents, and neigh­bor against neigh­bor. Again here we see the word of God man­i­fest­ing right in front of our eyes, in plain sight, yet we ignore it.
Mark 13 ‑12, “Brother will betray broth­er to death, and a father his child. Children will rebel against their par­ents and have them put to death.

Rush Limbaugh’s life was about stir­ring up hatred and divi­sion, sow­ing lies and dis­cord; it result­ed in the rise of the king of lies and dis­in­for­ma­tion to the high­est exec­u­tive office, and we have seen how that turned out.
Limbaugh’s cam­paign of deceit includ­ed spread­ing lies that Barack Obama was not an American. He told his lis­ten­ers that the Affordable Care Act (Obama Care) would result in death pan­els; they gob­bled it up. He argued with a black caller to his show, telling him quote; “take that bone out of your nose and call me back.”
He asked his lis­ten­ers if they ever noticed that all com­pos­ite sketch­es of want­ed crim­i­nals looked like the Reverend Jesse Jackson. He invit­ed a guest on-air who sang “Barack, the Magic Negro” to the tune of “Puff, the Magic Dragon.” In 2016, he read an essay on air that a well-known white suprema­cist had penned.
He labeled Feminist women ‘Feminazis’. While speak­ing about the geno­cide of America’s indige­nous peo­ples, Limbaugh said, “Holocaust 90 mil­lion Indians? Only 4 mil­lion left? They all have casi­nos; what’s to com­plain about?”(salon)

Limbaugh fre­quent­ly mir­rored white nation­al­ist talk­ing points when dis­cussing Latino immi­grants, whom he described as lazy and depen­dent on the gov­ern­ment. He called migrants at America’s south­ern bor­der an “inva­sion.” He den­i­grat­ed Gays and Lesbians,’ the best way to stop the spread of the virus was to “not ask anoth­er man to bend over and make love at the exit point,” he asserted.
This guy was noth­ing but a blight, a poi­son, can­cer to the body politic, one that metas­ta­sized and inex­orable result­ed in Donald Trump and, worse, the storm­ing of the nation’s citadel of leg­isla­tive power.
The death of this guy is a bless­ing; no one should pre­tend to show def­er­ence to such a vile crea­ture, know­ing with­out a shad­ow of a doubt that the world is a bet­ter place today, than it was with him here.
We were all vic­tims of his hate; those who dis­agreed with his vile doc­trine, and those who agreed with him are equal vic­tims who now need redemption.
May God save their souls before it becomes too late for them too.?

.

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

PM Announces Earlier Curfew Amid COVID-19 Spike

Prime Minister Andrew Holness announced that Jamaica’s nation­al cur­few would start at 8 p.m., effec­tive Wednesday, February 10.
The mea­sure will remain in effect for a peri­od of at least two weeks.
The announce­ment came short­ly after Jamaica record­ed six con­sec­u­tive days of record-high COVID-19 cases.
Mr. Holness said the sit­u­a­tion is seri­ous, a cause for con­cern, and requires a gov­ern­ment response. Mr. Holness also not­ed the effect the cur­few will have on the econ­o­my, saying:
“If the num­bers set­tle, then we will go back to either 9 or 10 [p.m]. It is not the objec­tive of the gov­ern­ment to kill commerce.
“We do this very reluc­tant­ly but hav­ing great regard to the fact that if we don’t act, now, we could over­whelm our health sys­tem, which leads to either greater problems.”
The gath­er­ing lim­it has also been reduced from 15 per­sons to 10.
Check out more sto­ries here @ ( https://​jablogz​.com/​2​0​2​1​/​0​2​/​p​m​-​a​n​n​o​u​n​c​e​s​-​e​a​r​l​i​e​r​-​c​u​r​f​e​w​-​a​m​i​d​-​c​o​v​i​d​-​1​9​-​s​p​i​ke/ )

Federal Court Gives NYC Green Light To Release Police Disciplinary Records. Police Unions Are Predictably Mad

By Zack Linly

Cops real­ly seem to hate the idea of police dis­ci­pli­nary records being made pub­lic. If a civil­ian has a crim­i­nal record, courts, poten­tial employ­ers, renters and oth­ers would be able to access that infor­ma­tion through the sim­plest of back­ground checks, but for some rea­son, police offi­cers appear to think that putting on the uni­form should shield them from such scruti­ny. “If you’ve done noth­ing wrong, you have noth­ing to wor­ry about,” is log­ic that only seems to apply to peo­ple on the receiv­ing end of police work, not so much for offi­cers themselves.

On Tuesday, a fed­er­al appeals court in New York dealt a blow to police unions by, well, rul­ing in favor of police trans­paren­cy and account­abil­i­ty by allow­ing for NYC to release “hun­dreds of thou­sands of police dis­ci­pli­nary records, a major mile­stone in a long and bit­ter polit­i­cal bat­tle to open the records to pub­lic scruti­ny,” the New York Times reports.

Mayor Bill de Blasio didn’t give a spe­cif­ic time­frame for when the records would be made pub­lic, but he said, “We look for­ward to releas­ing this data,” and that his office would “seek clar­i­ty” from the court as to when the process of releas­ing those records could begin.

Police offi­cers and “back the blue” enthu­si­asts are going to feel how­ev­er they’re going to feel about the rul­ing — which also extends to fire­fight­ers and cor­rec­tions offi­cers — but for activists, civ­il lib­er­ties groups and any­one else who thinks hav­ing access to a police officer’s report card is ben­e­fi­cial to soci­ety, this is, at the very least, a small victory.

From the Times:

For decades, the dis­ci­pli­nary records of police offi­cers in New York were shield­ed from pub­lic dis­clo­sure by the state’s civ­il rights law. Then, in June, the State Legislature repealed the sec­tion of the law, known as 50‑a, that had kept such records confidential.

The repeal was part of a pack­age of leg­isla­tive changes aimed at reduc­ing police mis­con­duct in the wake of the killing of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police offi­cers, which had ignit­ed nation­wide protests against police brutality.

For the past sev­en years, we’ve fun­da­men­tal­ly changed how we police our city, strength­en­ing the bonds between com­mu­ni­ties and the offi­cers who serve them,” Mr. de Blasio said in a state­ment on Tuesday.

Now, we can go even fur­ther to restore account­abil­i­ty and trust to the dis­ci­pli­nary process,” he said. “Good rid­dance to 50‑a.”

Of course, the unions that sued to keep police bru­tal­i­ty police records sealed aren’t hap­py with the Tuesday rul­ing and they, appar­ent­ly, are not will­ing to give up the fight for police to be able to do what­ev­er the fuck they want with­out the pub­lic know­ing shit police privacy.

Today’s rul­ing does not end our fight to pro­tect our mem­bers’ safe­ty and due process rights,” Hank Sheinkopf, a spokesper­son for the coali­tion of unions, said.

More from the Times:

The order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld a low­er-court rul­ing and addressed com­plaints raised by the unions, includ­ing the fear that the dis­clo­sures could height­en the risks for police officers.

We ful­ly and unequiv­o­cal­ly respect the dan­gers and risks police offi­cers face every day,” the pan­el said. “But we can­not say that the District Court abused its dis­cre­tion when it deter­mined that the unions have not suf­fi­cient­ly demon­strat­ed that those dan­gers and risks are like­ly to increase because of the city’s planned disclosures.”

Again, if cops are going to argue — with­out suf­fi­cient evi­dence — that pub­lic view­ing of their records puts them at risk, then that ener­gy should be kept for everyone’s records. But we need to know about the back­grounds of teach­ers, politi­cians, coun­selors, physi­cians, retail work­ers, servers, babysit­ters, blind dates — lit­er­al­ly any­one who wants to do any­thing that affects the gen­er­al pub­lic. So why not police?

If polic­ing is such an impor­tant job, then police trans­paren­cy is just as impor­tant as it is for every­one else.

(Story orig­i­nat­ed at the root)

Make No Mistake About It, What Drives Them Is Hatred, Period!

American racial seg­re­ga­tion was not a thing until white planters real­ized that the Black enslaved pop­u­la­tion and the white bonds peo­ple and the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion of poor whites who lived around plan­ta­tions large and small, oper­at­ed peace­ably togeth­er. This was a prob­lem that was anti­thet­i­cal to their long-term goals.
Divide and con­quer were established.
Perhaps the best char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of that peri­od I have seen is from (Conditions of Antebellum Slavery) by PBS.
Fully 34 of Southern whites did not even own slaves; of those who did, 88% owned 20 or few­er. Whites who did not own slaves were pri­mar­i­ly yeo­man farm­ers. Practically speak­ing, the insti­tu­tion of slav­ery did not help these people.[sic] I’m afraid I have to dis­agree that they did not ben­e­fit, nev­er­the­less let us continue.
And yet, many non-slave-own­ing white Southerners iden­ti­fied with, and defend­ed the insti­tu­tion of slav­ery. Though many resent­ed the large slave­hold­ers’ wealth and pow­er, they aspired to own slaves them­selves, and join the priv­i­leged Ranks’. Also, slav­ery gave the poor white farm­ers a group of peo­ple to feel supe­ri­or to.
(They may have been poor, but they were not slaves, and they were not black. They gained a sense of pow­er sim­ply by being white). The pow­er and priv­i­lege they gained would become a sig­nif­i­cant cur­ren­cy that prob­a­bly exceeds any oth­er deriv­a­tive form they could have acquired, hence my dis­agree­ment with the quote.

Vice President Kamala Harris

Having some­one to feel supe­ri­or to.”, ele­ments of that men­tal manip­u­la­tion still guides the think­ing of many whites today.
The con­tin­u­a­tion of that mind­set has con­tin­ued to impov­er­ish whites across the South and oth­er parts of the coun­try, while those not so con­strained by racial hatred have been mak­ing phe­nom­e­nal strides, includ­ing recent­ly formed immi­grant communities.
Nowhere is this more evi­denced than in the so-called red states, or should I say the for­mer slave states? Poorer, than the rest of the nation, yet they con­tin­ue to vote their col­or instead of for poli­cies that would ben­e­fit them and inex­orably empow­er and lift them out of poverty.
As they do so, first-gen­er­a­tion Americans soar to pow­er and lead­er­ship posi­tions, even with­in their own Republican party.
Colin Powell, for­mer four-star General, chair­man of the joint chiefs, for­mer sec­re­tary of state, Nicky Haley, for­mer Governor of South Carolina. Bobby Jindal, for­mer Governor of Louisiana, Alejandro Mayorkas Homeland Security Secretary, et al. But none more con­se­quen­tial than the ground­break­ing Kamala Harris, first woman, the first woman of col­or to be Vice President of the United States.
The list is long and var­ied; it is not con­fined to those well known polit­i­cal­ly; first-gen­er­a­tion Americans are mak­ing huge strides in tech­nol­o­gy, busi­ness, med­i­cine, and many oth­er areas, tak­ing full advan­tage of the American expe­ri­ence, the American oppor­tu­ni­ties, despite the bar­ri­ers and challenges…

Instead of chang­ing course, chang­ing their mind­set from the mis­in­for­ma­tion fed them, many whites con­tin­ue down the path of hatred and griev­ance. The immi­grants are tak­ing their jobs; “Oh, so you did­n’t both­er going to col­lege, but the tech-engi­neer took your job?
The sense of hatred is so pal­pa­ble that they chose a failed con-man to be their pres­i­dent rather than an immi­nent­ly qual­i­fied woman. Make no mis­take about it; what dri­ves them is hatred, period!
They are vora­cious con­sumers of mis­in­for­ma­tion, which con­firms their hatred and inse­cu­ri­ties. Racial dem­a­gogues like the recent­ly deceased Rush Limbaugh made tons of mon­ey feed­ing them the hatred he knew they would clam­or for. They elect­ed Donald Trump anoth­er dem­a­gogue, and he want­ed them to know that he could out racist- the vilest racists.
Wherever racist caus­es were, Trump made sure to sup­port them. In the end, Donald Trump bestowed upon Rush Limbaugh the pres­i­den­tial medal of freedom.
The deep affec­tion they feel and declare for Donald Trump has noth­ing to do with Trump’s per se. What they hon­or and adore is that some­one in a posi­tion of pow­er sup­ports the cause.
For them, an unabashed racist dem­a­gogue who does­n’t have the com­mon sense to know bet­ter, or the intel­lec­tu­al matu­ri­ty to want to do bet­ter was exact­ly what they want­ed all along. If he were ever to stop being that, they would dump him in a minute.
Even as the world moves on, leav­ing them behind, they cling to the mis­guid­ed ideas of white supe­ri­or­i­ty plant­ed in the heads of their ances­tors hun­dreds of years ago to keep them in check.
Today, they see their worth in their whiteness.
And so, in their world of blind­ness, a one-eyed racial­ist is the per­fect choice to be king.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

A Long History Of Turning A Blind Eye To White Terrorism While Killing Black Freedom Fighters.…

I am not going to speak to the lies Republicans told them­selves that they were the par­ty of law & order; every­one knew that was a lie. What I will do is try to do a lit­tle expose‘ on Republican lies and hypocrisy.
For decades Republicans like Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Herbert Walker Bush, and Donald Trump ran as law and order candidates.
You may have noticed that I left out George Bush, who served two terms between 2000 & 2008. To his cred­it, George Bush did not make any claim to be much of any­thing but a goof­ball, at least not until the attacks of September 2001. Thereafter, Bush made him­self a wartime pres­i­dent; those wars are still in effect today.

J Edgar Hoover

The Republican claim of being the law & order par­ty was what is called a dog whis­tle. If you under­stand that bru­tal­iz­ing, lock­ing away, and killing blacks has been gov­ern­ment pol­i­cy after the so-called eman­ci­pa­tion dec­la­ra­tion, you begin to under­stand bet­ter, how run­ning as a law & order can­di­date means bru­tal­iz­ing, lock­ing away, and killing African-Americans.
It is cod­ed lan­guage to whites, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the South, what kind of pub­lic offi­cial they will be. Some Republican can­di­dates for pres­i­dent, irre­spec­tive of where they are from, launch their pres­i­den­tial cam­paigns from the deep South.
It was no sur­prise then, that the most igno­rant racist to run and occu­py the pres­i­den­cy in mod­ern his­to­ry ran as a law & order candidate.
No oth­er American war has been waged with more sav­agery and fer­vor than the FBI’s war against African-Americans. and black civ­il-rights lead­ers under Director J Edgar Hoover.
Hoover’s para­noia that America would be attacked and destroyed by com­mu­nists and gays is well doc­u­ment­ed, but his racist obses­sion with civ­il rights lead­ers was even more chilling.

Hoover and his FBI waged a relent­less war against the Black Panthers and oth­er civ­il rights orga­ni­za­tions and their mem­bers includ­ing Dr. Martin Luther King.

In a February 11th arti­cle, the Daily Beast, Jeffery Ogbar wrote; (On March 8, 1971, an anti-war activist group, the Citizens’ Commission to Investigate the FBI, broke into an FBI office in Media, Pennsylvania where they dis­cov­ered a cache of clas­si­fied doc­u­ments, many bear­ing the cryp­tic code “COINTELPRO.”
They leaked the doc­u­ments to the press. On March 24, 1971, The Washington Post ran a cov­er sto­ry on the FBI’s vast pro­gram in 1956 to neu­tral­ize sus­pi­cious per­sons and orga­ni­za­tions. Although ini­tial­ly formed to tar­get the Communist Party U.S.A., it was quick­ly expand­ed to include a wide range of groups con­sid­ered “sub­ver­sive.” No seg­ment had been as cen­tral to COINTELPRO oper­a­tions as civ­il rights activists. However, a broad­er scope of the FBI’s actions was unknown until Congressional hear­ings five years lat­er. What came to light was excep­tion­al­ly chill­ing — seeped in its own racism, with­out any checks or bal­ances, the FBI devot­ed more resources to harm­ing the Civil Rights move­ment than any oth­er task in its purview.)

J Edgar Hoover recruit­ed blacks to infil­trate civ­il rights orga­ni­za­tions, includ­ing Earnest Withers, a cel­e­brat­ed pho­tog­ra­ph­er who had access to pri­vate meet­ings of the move­ment. Whithers then duti­ful­ly report­ed back to Hoover on what he had learned. William O’Neil, a pet­ty crim­i­nal, was recruit­ed and used to infil­trate the Black Panther Party.
O’Neil’s treach­ery result­ed in the FBI & local police report­ed­ly assas­si­nat­ing the 21-year-old Fred Hampton as he lay sleep­ing, alleged­ly drugged, by the same William O’Neil on the direc­tive of his han­dlers in the FBI.
While ter­ror­ism has been a part of American cul­ture from the begin­ning of this exper­i­ment, it was nev­er viewed as a prob­lem because the ter­ror was direct­ed at the peo­ple America despised and hated.
For those rea­sons, the Ku Klux Klan is not a ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tion, but Republicans want the splin­tered Anti-Fascist pro­tes­tors (ANTIFA) des­ig­nat­ed a Terrorist group.

William O’Neil

Asked about actions in help­ing the FBI to set up and assas­si­nate Fred Hampton, Oniel said the following;
I didn’t feel like I had done any­thing. I didn’t walk in there with guns. I didn’t shoot him. FBI didn’t do it. I felt some­what like I was betrayed. I felt like if any­one should have known it was going to be a raid that morn­ing, I should have known, also. I felt like I could have been caught in that raid. I was there that night, and I felt like if I’d have laid down, I prob­a­bly would have been a vic­tim, so I felt betrayed, I felt like, I felt like I was expend­able. I felt like, like per­haps I was on the wrong side. Yeah, yeah, I had my mis­giv­ings. I’m not going to, I, no, I’m not going to sit here now and take respon­si­bil­i­ty for the raid, you know, I’m not going to do that. I didn’t pull the trig­ger. I didn’t issue the war­rant. I didn’t put the guns in the apart­ment. So I’m not going to take respon­si­bil­i­ty for that, but I do feel like I was betrayed. I felt like I should have known the raid was com­ing down. I felt like it was prob­a­bly exces­sive. You know, I felt like it was a sur­gi­cal strike, you know, and I was real­ly angry for quite a few days. Quite a few days.
O’Neil would die in 1990 as he ran across the Eisenhower express­way on Dr. King’s birth­day. The med­ical exam­in­er ruled his death a sui­cide. I guess the uni­verse does pay attention.

Image result for Ernest Withers,
Withers report­ed­ly vio­lat­ed the trust of lead­ers like Dr. King, who gave him unen­cum­bered access to move­ment plans and activities.

No one knows exact­ly how many black peo­ple the Klan mur­dered through­out its his­to­ry, pos­si­bly hun­dreds of thou­sands con­sid­er­ing that Klansmen were/​are judges, police offi­cers, gro­cers, farm­ers, bankers, and every oth­er cat­e­go­ry of workers.
The killings were made through lynch­ings, shoot­ings, bomb­ings, and oth­er heinous acts, includ­ing James Byrd Jr’s drag­ging death in Jasper, Texas, over two decades ago.
We do not know how many may have been killed because they saw the wrong Doctor, the wrong nurse, was arrest­ed by the wrong cop,( lit­er­al­ly every cop was the wrong cop)eating at the wrong restaurant?
Organizations that have done far less have been des­ig­nat­ed Terrorist groups. Yet, in the United States, white ter­ror is such an accept­ed real­i­ty that there is no Federal Domestic ter­ror statute.

The Klan’s activ­i­ties con­tin­ue today, despite the third Ku Klux Klan Act, Civil Rights Act of 1871, or Force Act of 1871. With the pas­sage of the Third Force Act, pop­u­lar­ly known as the Ku Klux Act, Congress autho­rized President Ulysses S. Grant to declare mar­tial law, impose heavy penal­ties against ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tions, and use mil­i­tary force to sup­press them; Klux Klan (KKK). (History​.com)
In 1882, the U.S. Supreme Court declared the Ku Klux Act uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, but by that time, Reconstruction had end­ed, and much of the KKK had fad­ed away, or so they thought.
That was then; no one believes today that the Ku Klux Klan has fad­ed away. However, the Klan is the least of America’s wor­ries at the moment; the FBI and oth­er intel­li­gence agen­cies have repeat­ed­ly warned that domes­tic white suprema­cist groups pose the gravest dan­ger to America’s nation­al security.

Ron Johnson

Since there has been no sense of urgency to deal with home­grown ter­ror­ism, white ter­ror­ism has flour­ished in the United States. Using the Constitution’s lan­guage on local mili­tias and the 2nd amend­ment, which pro­tects gun rights, vio­lent racist mili­tias have been allowed to expand their oper­a­tions across the country.
Their sup­port­ers in Congress have been able to oper­ate out in the open, by pre­tend­ing to be gun-rights advo­cates; when they are tru­ly full-fledged white suprema­cist supporters.
It has been that sup­port for white suprema­cist ter­ror groups why capi­tol insur­rec­tion­ists could storm the US Capitol and parade the racist flag of white supremacy.
For those rea­sons, Wisconsin US Senator Ron Johnson declared that the Capitol mob were not armed insur­rec­tion­ists.
Never mind that five of their own peo­ple died, one police offi­cer was killed and scores more seri­ous­ly injured by the nean­derthal horde who were armed with guns, base­ball bats, hock­ey sticks, flag­poles, chem­i­cal irri­tants, and oth­er weapons.
The hypocrisy of Ron Johnson and oth­ers like him should not be allowed to slide. These clowns declare police jus­ti­fied in using lethal force on unarmed peo­ple of col­or. Still, when it comes to the rag­ing lunatic mob of white trai­tors, they make excus­es and triv­i­al­ize the seri­ous­ness of their crimes.

Timothy McVeigh

Violent white suprema­cists mili­tia groups have not been treat­ed with the seri­ous­ness they should be; this led to killing many peo­ple, whites includ­ed. Timothy McVeigh, a mil­i­tary vet­er­an, destroyed the Edward R Murrow Federal build­ing in 1995, killing 168 Americans and injur­ing 680 oth­ers. The bomb­ing remains the dead­liest act of domes­tic ter­ror­ism in US history.
Timothy McVeigh was even­tu­al­ly exe­cut­ed, but the dam­age was already done. Killing him could not unring the bell.
Investigators have report­ed that a dis­pro­por­tion­ate num­ber of those arrest­ed after the Capitol breach of January 6th, 2021 were either past or serv­ing mil­i­tary and police members.
The cod­dling of vio­lent white extrem­ist indi­vid­u­als and groups con­tin­ues to result in the mur­der of inno­cent Americans of all stripes.
In the 2019 El Paso mas­sacre, the white shoot­er, a 21-year old from Allen, Texas, claimed in a man­i­festo that he was act­ing to pro­tect whites in America from “cul­tur­al and eth­nic replace­ment” brought on by “the Hispanic inva­sion of Texas.”He alleged­ly allowed peo­ple who did not look like Mexicans to go free; then, he sum­mar­i­ly mas­sa­cred those who were the ene­mies in his mind.

[The shooter’s alt-right writ­ings includ­ing excerpts and names of indi­vid­u­als and groups who claim to be fight­ing against the “Great Replacement,” as one of their lead­ers calls the pur­port­ed threat of “white geno­cide” around the world. Followers of this con­spir­a­cy the­o­ry aim to cre­ate a neo-fas­cist “eth­nos­tate” where at least 90 per­cent of inhab­i­tants are white. Their pro­posed pro­gram will be car­ried out by dra­con­ian bor­der enforce­ment mea­sures that will deter future migra­tion, mass depor­ta­tions, the revo­ca­tion of birthright cit­i­zen­ship, and purg­ing non­white chil­dren (who rep­re­sent the great­est threat to the dis­ap­pear­ance of the white race). According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, mas­sacres like the one in El Paso are part of a strat­e­gy these extrem­ist groups call “accel­er­a­tionism,” the idea that the delib­er­ate spread of ter­ror is nec­es­sary to elim­i­nate non-whites from this country.](Texas Observer)
The white suprema­cist group, the Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, and the pha­lanx of oth­er Neo-Nazi losers all sub­scribe to this racist ide­ol­o­gy, and in Congress, there is sup­port for it.
In many State Legislatures across the coun­try, draft leg­is­la­tion and laws passed reflect those xeno­pho­bic and racist ide­olo­gies. Proponents of those laws may not open­ly declare their intent when draft­ing and pass­ing such leg­is­la­tion, but we know their intentions.

The chal­lenge now for author­i­ties is how to deal with the mon­ster they allowed to grow because they did not think that these ter­ror­ists would endan­ger them.
Law-enforce­ment offi­cers, some of whom are mem­bers and sym­pa­thiz­ers of white nation­al­ists groups, played foot­sie with their mem­bers. Believing they had found allies against the hat­ed black peo­ple strug­gling for free­dom from police vio­lence and insti­tu­tion­al­ized racism man­i­fest­ed through bru­tal and mur­der­ous police departments.
Many were unwit­ting­ly duped by the so-called back the blue cam­paign they waged against Black Lives Matter pro­tes­tors, peace­ably protest­ing for racial justice.
It was a strate­gic ruse designed to pla­cate and paci­fy police, many of whom are anti-black, to begin with. When the rub­ber meets the road, they made it clear that they did not care about the blue, par­tic­u­lar­ly if the blue would not allow them to achieve their blood lust.

.

.

.SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Arizona Police Caught Saying They Should Have Brutalized BLM Protesters

YouTube player

OFFICERS EXPRESSED REGRET OVER NOT STOMPING AND GASSINGGROUP OF PEOPLE ARRESTED FOR PROTESTING IN OCTOBER.

Officers in Phoenix, Arizona were caught via their own body cam­eras dis­cussing regret over fail­ing to com­mit acts of bru­tal­i­ty against Black Lives Matter pro­test­ers dur­ing arrests last October. After arrest­ing 18 mem­bers of BLM, three Arizona offi­cers sat in a squad car ques­tion­ing why “they hadn’t tram­pled the group and doused them in pep­per spray,” accord­ing to The Washington Post. “Why didn’t we just stomp on them when they were leav­ing?” one offi­cer can be heard ask­ing. Another offi­cer said they should, “just gas them and let them run like crazy.” Arizona Police Chief Jeri Williams promised “swift and deci­sive dis­ci­pli­nary action,” and described the offi­cers involved as dis­re­spect­ful. Williams has so far not revealed what that dis­ci­pline may look like.

According to The Post, just hours after the body-cam footage was released, the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office announced that it would dis­miss charges against 15 of the pro­test­ers who were arrest­ed on October 17, 2020. The pro­test­ers were fac­ing a num­ber of charges, includ­ing riot­ing, aggra­vat­ed assault with a dead­ly weapon, and resist­ing arrest. Phoenix pros­e­cu­tors also filed gang-relat­ed charges against the pro­test­ers. An offi­cer explained that, although they were not in a gang, the pro­test­ers faced gang charges because they chant­ed “all cops are b — — ,” and most of them wore black and car­ried umbrellas.

Chief Williams said the depart­ment is going to under­go reform in order to pre­vent anoth­er inci­dent like this one from occur­ring again. “I have been and will con­tin­ue to be an advo­cate of the amaz­ing work done in this depart­ment each day,” she said in a state­ment. “However, I know that unpro­fes­sion­al, dis­re­spect­ful, and inap­pro­pri­ate behav­ior from even one of our offi­cers tar­nish­es the badge, but more impor­tant­ly, it hurts the com­mu­ni­ty we have sworn to protect.”

YA!!!

Trump’s Problems Will Supersede His Desire To Run Again…

Yesterday I teased out a prelude to what I would be writing about today; I took the liberty to posit that Donald J Trump will not be competing for the presidency again, even though he will continue to pretend to be a major player in the Republican party in the future.

Separate and apart from the poten­tial legal entan­gle­ment that Donald Trump may be fac­ing in Georgia and New York, there is still a lot we don’t know that may come out of the jus­tice depart­ment after a new DOJ head is sworn in and all the evi­dence that William Barr sup­pressed is looked at with a crit­i­cal eye.
From all indi­ca­tions, Trump’s prop­er­ties are not doing well finan­cial­ly; in fact, some reports indi­cate some of his prop­er­ties are bleed­ing cash pro­fuse­ly. Many of the sweet deals that Trump had, for exam­ple, with New York City, have dried up as the de Blasio Administration has stopped doing busi­ness with Trump.
Trump will find it dif­fi­cult to find banks will­ing to do busi­ness with him going for­ward, and those that did are try­ing des­per­ate­ly to extri­cate them­selves from him.
In the hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars that will become due in the next year or two, Trump has mas­sive loans. Those loans were per­son­al­ly guar­an­teed. Donald Trump is no longer in office, and so Banks will be less hes­i­tant about going after him and his prop­er­ties to retrieve their money.

Soon enough, there will be an avalanche of law­suits fac­ing Trump, and he will find him­self fend­ing them off left, right, and cen­ter. The Fulton County District Attorney had indi­cat­ed that she had opened a probe to deter­mine whether Donald Trump broke Georgia’s elec­tion laws when he called the Secretary of State demand­ing that he find him the votes he need­ed to over­turn the results in that state and declare him the winner.
In New York, Trump is under probe for poten­tial tax law vio­la­tions; there are alle­ga­tions that Donald Trump inflat­ed his assets’ val­ue to secure bet­ter loans.
Additionally, Trump faces poten­tial felony charges for the insur­rec­tion he insti­gat­ed on January 6th. He also faces legal jeop­ardy for defama­tion for his lying attacks on the Dominion, the mak­er of vot­ing machines used only in one coun­ty in California.

Conventional wis­dom would sug­gest that Trump would like­ly seek elec­tive office to get the pow­er posi­tion back to ward off some of the legal chal­lenges he faces. However, it was the same ele­va­tion to the pow­er posi­tion that exposed him to all of the legal woes he now faces.
The poten­tial chal­lenges he faces may have had some­thing to do with his refusal to relin­quish pow­er after los­ing the 2020 elections.
It was always my view that he want­ed to remain in office at all costs, hop­ing that most of those legal obsta­cles would dis­ap­pear based on the statute of lim­i­ta­tions laws. Donald Trump, the [win­ner] (sic), man­aged to lose the pres­i­den­cy, the US House & the US Senate, all in the space of a four-year term. As evi­denced in his sen­ate floor dia­tribe after he vot­ed to acquit him of his crimes, Mitch McConnell’s pal­pa­ble anger at him speaks volumes.
The idea that Donald Trump is a win­ner is a real­i­ty only to those with their heads buried deep in the sands of unreality.
The num­ber one ques­tion for Trump is whether to run and not make it fur­ther than the Republican pri­maries and be round­ly repu­di­at­ed again?
For the Republican par­ty itself, the par­ty also has to self-exam­ine; Republican vot­ers are flee­ing the par­ty in droves, as report­ed by Republican offi­cials across the coun­try, includ­ing in crit­i­cal states for the Republicans like Georgia and Arizona.

Probably the most sig­nif­i­cant blow to Donald Trump is that he has been de-plat­formed by Twitter and Facebook. Twitter has per­ma­nent­ly banned him.
Without the abil­i­ty to sow dis­cord and dem­a­gog­ic lies using social media, Donald Trump is noth­ing. Trump was nev­er about any­thing sub­stan­tive; his entire life from child­hood to the present day has been one big lie. Without the estab­lished plat­forms from which to spout lies and hatred, Donald Trump is an insignif­i­cant troll that has been a colos­sal failure.
I believe that giv­en a few months, the bit­ter taste of Donald Trump will begin to fade from our col­lec­tive psy­che and none too soon.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Why Donald Trump Will Not Run For The Presidency Ever Again

In my next arti­cle, I will explain why I believe Donald Trump will not run for the pres­i­den­cy ever again, putting to rest the fears Democrats and oth­ers har­bor that he could return to the pres­i­den­cy maybe as soon as 2024.

UPDATE

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​t​r​u​m​p​s​-​p​r​o​b​l​e​m​s​-​w​i​l​l​-​s​u​p​e​r​s​e​d​e​-​h​i​s​-​d​e​s​i​r​e​-​t​o​-​r​u​n​-​a​g​a​i​n​/​?​f​b​c​l​i​d​=​I​w​A​R​0​f​U​i​p​6​a​7​t​C​Y​D​y​t​O​v​7​E​M​0​-​0​M​K​7​y​c​l​V​J​p​P​U​Q​F​9​K​V​q​n​0​1​Y​s​3​h​P​o​Y​6​M​F​D​y​Stg

Trump Offered No Policy That Would Change Their Lives, He Offered Rhetoric That Massaged Their Racist Grievances. 

YouTube player

Republicans do not play by the rules of the game.
We have a nation, albeit a mighty coun­try, now in decline, because one polit­i­cal par­ty has tak­en the posi­tion that the prin­ci­ples on which the repub­lic was formed are no longer sus­tain­able in main­tain­ing white suprema­cy as a bedrock. Therefore it can­not and will not adhere to the estab­lished rules that have guid­ed the Republic for almost two and one-half centuries.
My friend made an excel­lent point today. “How can mem­bers of the Republican cau­cus advance the argu­ment that the sec­ond impeach­ment of Donald Trump was uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, when the body itself answered that ques­tion in the affir­ma­tive, it is con­sti­tu­tion­al to try Donald Trump after he is out of office.
In prac­ti­cal terms, Donald Trump was impeached while he was in office. It was then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell who refused to call the Senate back into ses­sion to hold the trial.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​t​h​e​-​p​o​l​i​t​i​c​a​l​-​r​i​g​h​t​-​i​s​-​d​r​i​v​e​n​-​b​y​-​h​a​t​r​e​d​-​o​f​-​m​u​l​t​i​c​u​l​t​u​r​a​l​i​sm/

It is the height of hypocrisy and lies that mem­bers of the Republican cau­cus would then turn around and make the fraud­u­lent argu­ment that Trump was out of office, and there­fore he is out­side the sen­ate’s scope. The vote on the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of whether the tri­al could pro­ceed is now prece­dent for the ages.
Republicans can­not have their cake and eat it too.
Rules by which the coun­try oper­ates can­not only apply to Democrats while Republicans do as they please. Those kinds of games can­not be allowed to continue.
Mitch Mcconnell and his cau­cus pulled off the same fraud­u­lent stunt when they refused to give advice and con­sent to seat Judge Merrick Garland using rules they dredged up, then turned right around and dis­card­ed them, then fill two supreme court seats as a result of that act of deception.

https://mikebeckles.com/a‑race-war-evident-long-before-the-capitol-siege/

As soon as they had a Republican in the white house, those same rules were thrown out, and a Republican hack was seat­ed in one-quar­ter of the eight months, which was the length of time between when Obama nom­i­nat­ed Merrick Garland and the elec­tions of 2016.
It is time for the Democratic Party to start play­ing hardball.
If the Democratic Party refus­es to stand up for the major­i­ty of the American peo­ple against this insur­gency of deceit and decep­tion by a white minor­i­ty, it will find itself fac­ing the prospect of an insur­gent par­ty emerg­ing on its left flank.
A seri­ous look at the Republican Senators who vot­ed to let Donald Trump off the hook a sec­ond time, reveals that because of the two US sen­a­tors per state rule, the major­i­ty of the American peo­ple are being gov­erned and ruled by the white minor­i­ty in fly­over country.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​t​r​u​m​p​-​d​o​e​s​-​n​o​t​-​h​o​l​d​-​r​e​p​u​b​l​i​c​a​n​s​-​t​o​-​r​a​n​s​o​m​-​t​h​e​y​-​n​e​e​d​-​h​i​m​-​t​o​-​g​a​l​v​a​n​i​z​e​-​h​a​t​e​-​i​n​-​a​m​e​r​i​ca/

Let there be no mis­take about what’s at stake here; the dark dis­in­for­ma­tion and lies that have cloud­ed America in the five years since Donald Trump ful­ly emerged on the polit­i­cal scene were designed specif­i­cal­ly to wage war on truth to strength­en America’s racist past.
From the moment that Donald Trump and his wife start­ed the birther cam­paign against Candidate Obama in 2008, along with the oth­er bot­tom-feed­ing crus­taceans in the Republican par­ty, to the video pre­sen­ta­tions by his lawyers in his sec­ond impeach­ment tri­al, the visu­al mes­sag­ing and ver­bal tropes were decid­ed­ly anti-black and pro-white supremacy.
One notable thing that became evi­dent long before Donald Trump was elect­ed President was the emer­gence of new peo­ple into the polit­i­cal process.
The main­stream media report­ed this phe­nom­e­non; pun­dits could not decide what it would mean for the 2016 pres­i­den­tial cycle.
As the process dragged on, it became clear­er that those peo­ple were flock­ing to Donald Trump’s cam­paign ral­lies; in many instances, while Hillary Clinton was absent from the cam­paign trail, Trump was every­where he could land his jet with the word Trump embla­zoned across it, there he would have large rau­cous, racist ral­lies, where he would juice them up with incen­di­ary rhetoric then encour­age them to beat up peo­ple that did not look like them, or oppos­es their point of view.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​t​r​u​m​p​s​-​s​e​c​o​n​d​-​i​m​p​e​a​c​h​m​e​n​t​-​a​n​o​t​h​e​r​-​i​t​e​r​a​t​i​o​n​-​o​f​-​h​a​r​m​-​r​e​p​u​b​l​i​c​a​n​s​-​w​i​l​l​-​i​n​f​l​i​c​t​-​o​n​-​t​h​e​-​n​a​t​i​on/

Those peo­ple were white, old­er, large­ly work­ing-class, bear­ing a whole litany of griev­ances. They talked about edu­ca­tion and sci­ence as if they were things to be shunned. They talked about racist account­abil­i­ty as peo­ple speak­ing their minds.
Trump’s out­ward­ly vul­gar racism did not cause them to recoil; it gal­va­nized them into a cult, that even the unin­tel­li­gent Trump knew he could manip­u­late in what­ev­er way he chooses.
Trump then bragged that he could shoot some­one on [fifth avenue] and not lose a sin­gle vote. That arro­gance would cause Donald Trump to com­mit yet untold crimes against the coun­try and untold indi­vid­u­als. It would lead him to the dubi­ous dis­tinc­tion of being the only pres­i­dent to be impeached twice. (nev­er mind in a sin­gle term).
The vot­er base Trump quick­ly put togeth­er with his inflam­ma­to­ry racist, xeno­pho­bic, anti-immi­grant rhetoric was old­er; many admit­ted to reporters that they had not vot­ed in years before Trump’s emergence.
Trump’s mes­sage of mak­ing America great again was not new; it was one that Republican pres­i­den­tial can­di­dates as far back as Richard Nixon had used in their cam­paigns. But com­ing from Donald Trump it took on new mean­ing, Donald Trump did and said every­thing to cause them to believe he was the first white pres­i­dent, the most open­ly racist per­son to ever seek the presidency.
That was no easy task, most of the men who had pre­vi­ous­ly been pres­i­dent, Democrats, and Republicans alike, lit­er­al­ly became President because they were vile racists.
Outside of that, Trump’s rhetoric was wag­ing trade wars on China, ban­ning Muslims, law, and order, and oth­er caus­tic issues were, in fact, the cod­ed lan­guage of white supremacy.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​i​n​-​a​-​d​e​m​o​c​r​a​c​y​-​w​h​e​r​e​-​u​n​-​i​n​d​i​c​t​e​d​-​c​o​-​c​o​n​s​p​i​r​a​t​o​r​s​-​s​e​r​v​e​-​a​s​-​j​u​r​o​rs/

Polling those peo­ple result­ed in results that were far from what was real­ly hap­pen­ing at the time. Clinton led in the polls, but Trump sup­port­ers lied, and their lies skewed polling results. Despite the evi­dence of Trump’s misog­y­ny, they turned their heads away and laughed it off as, quote; “a noth­ing burger.”
Right-wing Christian Conservative preach­ers who pre­vi­ous­ly stood in pompous unright­eous judg­ment over every­thing President Obama stood for, were all of a sud­den servile sup­pli­cants to a phi­lan­der­ing racist pussy-grab­ber who had unpro­tect­ed sex with a pros­ti­tute while his wife was home with the young child she had just giv­en birth to.
Suddenly, the racist apos­tates, Hagee, Graham, Robertson, and the oth­er right-wing heretics, were all in with the New York con-man who was going to save America.
But it was the yard signs which gave it away for me. Driving from New York through the back­roads of route 81 down to South Carolina. All through (Hicksville) Trump yard signs lit­tered lit­er­al­ly every yard.
Yard signs are prob­a­bly the least sci­en­tif­ic of mea­sure­ments to get a feel for the peo­ple’s pulse, but are prob­a­bly the most effec­tive at cap­tur­ing pub­lic sen­ti­ment. People do not have signs they dis­agree with on their prop­er­ty; it sim­ply does­n’t happen.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​a​b​u​s​e​-​o​f​-​o​f​f​i​c​e​-​g​r​a​h​a​m​-​h​i​t​-​w​i​t​h​-​f​o​r​m​a​l​-​e​t​h​i​c​s​-​c​o​m​p​l​a​i​n​t​-​a​m​i​d​-​a​l​l​e​g​a​t​i​o​n​s​-​o​f​-​e​l​e​c​t​i​o​n​-​m​e​d​d​l​i​ng/

The final vote in the sec­ond sen­ate tri­al of Donald Trump, 57 – 43, was not enough to con­vict and pre­vent him from hold­ing pub­lic office ever again; it fell 10 short of the two-thirds needed.
The 43 Republican sen­a­tors who vot­ed not to con­vict Trump are part of the lead­er­ship rep­re­sent­ing 38% of America. The 57 who vot­ed to con­vict him rep­re­sents 61% of the coun­try experts tell us. The Majority who want­ed Donald Trump to be held account­able lost to the white minor­i­ty who live in small rur­al states. That white minor­i­ty has a dis­pro­por­tion­ate rep­re­sen­ta­tion in the United States senate.
As a free­lance writer, I have point­ed to this dis­par­i­ty of rep­re­sen­ta­tion in America due to two US sen­a­tors’ sys­tem per state. That dis­parate sys­tem allows the views and demands of 38% of the pop­u­la­tion to take prece­dent over the over­whelm­ing major­i­ty of voters.
Winning pres­i­den­tial elec­tions are a heavy lift for Democrats; the par­ty won the pop­u­lar vote in every Presidential elec­tion since 2000. Speaking of the 2000 elec­tions, Democrats won the pop­u­lar vote but lost the elec­toral col­lege vote to George Bush, (with the help of a Republican supreme court).
Hillary Clinton gar­nered more than five mil­lion more votes than Trump, still, she lost the pres­i­den­cy due to a sys­tem designed to drown out the voic­es of the mass­es to the ben­e­fit of the few.
It required that Biden get more than 7‑million more votes than Donald Trump received in 2016 to gar­ner the same amount of elec­toral col­lege votes Trump did.
Those dis­pro­por­tion­al­i­ties tilt the play­ing field heav­i­ly in favor of Republicans. Despite those legs up, Republicans con­tin­ue to attack the demo­c­ra­t­ic process with wave after wave of vot­er sup­pres­sion tac­tics aimed specif­i­cal­ly at wip­ing out the black vote.
Donald Trump and his syco­phants like to brag that 70-mil­lion peo­ple vot­ed for him, they say no oth­er sit­ting Republican pres­i­dent could get that many votes, as if 80 plus mil­lion peo­ple did not vote to repu­di­ate him.
Nothing turned out Trump vot­ers more than the issue of remov­ing con­fed­er­ate stat­ues from pub­lic spaces, hold­ing racists account­able, end­ing police killings of racial minorities.
Those are the things that gal­va­nized them, not Trump, Donald Trump only offered a bul­ly pul­pit for those ideas.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​-​w​i​l​l​-​n​o​t​-​f​i​n​d​-​1​7​-​r​e​p​u​b​l​i​c​a​n​-​s​e​n​a​t​o​r​s​-​t​o​-​p​r​o​t​e​c​t​-​t​h​e​-​c​o​n​s​t​i​t​u​t​i​o​n​-​f​r​o​m​-​e​n​e​m​i​e​s​-​f​o​r​e​i​g​n​-​a​n​d​-​d​o​m​e​s​t​ic/

Every Republican mem­ber of the United States House and Senate knew exact­ly what Donald Trump was try­ing to do from he start­ed label­ing the Press, ‘ene­my of the state’. They knew what he was up to before he was elect­ed when asked if he would con­cede if he lost the 2016 elec­tions, and he replied he would have to see.
They knew what he was up to after he was elect­ed and was run­ning for reelec­tion and was asked the same ques­tion, and he respond­ed that if he did not win, it meant that the elec­tions were rigged.
They knew what he was doing when he start­ed bad mouthing the elec­tions before they began.
When he start­ed attack­ing ear­ly vot­ing, when he attacked mail-in vot­ing. When he attacked the “bal­lots,” When he placed Dejoy over the postal ser­vice and start­ed dis­man­tling the infra­struc­ture to slow down mail deliv­ery, they all knew what he was doing when he built a moun­tain of lies to deflect from his hatred, racism, and crimes.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​-​b​a​r​e​l​y​-​d​o​d​g​e​d​-​a​-​b​u​l​l​e​t​-​n​e​x​t​-​t​i​m​e​-​t​h​e​-​t​r​a​i​t​o​r​s​-​w​i​l​l​-​n​o​t​-​f​a​il/

They were aware of what he was doing when he decap­i­tat­ed the Defense depart­ment. They knew what he was doing when he placed hacks in pow­er posi­tions even after he had lost the 2020 elec­tions. They knew what he was doing when he called elec­tion offi­cials and demand­ed that they find him votes to over­turn the cer­ti­fied results. They were aware of his plans when he cre­at­ed doubt about the vote count in large­ly black cities and coun­ties. They were com­plic­it when he left Mar‑a Lago before Christmas to return to the White House. They knew what was up when he packed the courts from ear­ly in his pres­i­den­cy. They were aware of his plans when William Barr left the DOJ. They knew damn well what his plans were when he par­doned Michael Flynn and oth­er crim­i­nals and had Flynn advis­ing him to declare mar­tial law to steal the elec­tions.
They saw him juice up the lunatic mob with lies and mis­in­for­ma­tion. They saw him direct the mob at the con­gress with the expressed intent of decap­i­tat­ing the Legislative branch and his own vice pres­i­dent.
More than all, they heard Mike Pompeo repeat­ed­ly told jour­nal­ists that Trump would be inau­gu­rat­ed for a sec­ond term, even after the elec­tions were decid­ed. What did Mike Pompeo know, and when did he know it?
Every one of them knew that Trump intend­ed to over­throw the American gov­ern­ment sys­tem to make him­self king. Not a sin­gle one of them lift­ed a fin­ger to stop it.
They did not do any­thing to stop him because it served the ends of white suprema­cy, a cause to which all of the Republicans are inex­tri­ca­bly linked.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Judge Denies Motion To Rearrest Kyle Rittenhouse And Raise Bond Over False Address Filed In Court

By Zack Linly

Kyle Rittenhouse is await­ing tri­al for fatal­ly shoot­ing two peo­ple and seri­ous­ly injur­ing a third with a rifle he couldn’t legal­ly car­ry. His mul­ti­ple charges include two felony counts of inten­tion­al homi­cide. Regardless of how one feels about the cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing the Aug. 25 shoot­ing in Kenosha, Wis., there’s no deny­ing that, on paper, he appears to be the kind of crim­i­nal Americans would have no prob­lem con­demn­ing even before he’s found guilty. Except, Rittenhouse is white, looks like the kid next door (to white peo­ple), and is an American’s American — mean­ing he loves cops, guns, vig­i­lante “jus­tice,” and, well, America.

This is why Rittenhouse quick­ly raised funds to pay his $2 mil­lion bail and why he thought noth­ing of hit­ting a bar fresh off his release and hang­ing out with local white suprema­cists. It’s why Rittenhouse was like­ly con­fi­dent that vio­lat­ing court orders by leav­ing the court with a false address would be no big deal — and it’s why he was absolute­ly right about that.
The Washington Post reports that dur­ing a vir­tu­al hear­ing on Thursday, Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder denied the motion by pros­e­cu­tors to have Rittenhouse rear­rest­ed for vio­lat­ing the terms of his release and raise his bond by $200,000.
From the Post:

Schroeder acknowl­edged that the 18-year old had failed to keep the court apprised of his res­i­dence but dis­agreed with Assistant District Attorney Thomas C. Binger’s argu­ments, not­ing that Rittenhouse’s release con­di­tions require only that the defen­dant pro­vide the court with his address, not that he actu­al­ly reside there.

To issue a war­rant now for a defen­dant that has appeared at every hear­ing would be break­ing the law, and I’m not going to do it,” Schroeder said, adding that he lacked the author­i­ty to issue the kind of war­rant Binger requested.
“Rittenhouse’s release con­di­tions require only that the defen­dant pro­vide the court with his address, not that he actu­al­ly resides there.”

Bruh, WHAT?

What kind of “whites only” bail con­di­tions are these that allow some­one charged in mul­ti­ple homi­cides to give the court any old address while the defen­dant lives wher­ev­er the hell he pleases?

You know what? Never mind; I’ve been writ­ing about “two Americas” since Rittenhouse first became news. According to the Post, dur­ing the Thursday hear­ing — which includ­ed state­ments by Gaige Grosskreutz, the man who sur­vived being shot by Rittenhouse; and John Huber, the father of Anthony Huber, one of the vic­tims who died — Schroeder did order Rittenhouse’s attor­neys to pro­vide the court with a cur­rent address, say­ing it would be kept secret from every­one except the judge, court clerk, and sher­iff. His attor­neys pre­vi­ous­ly argued their client left the address the court had on file because of “numer­ous death and oth­er threats based on the events of August 25, 2020, in the City of Kenosha, Wisconsin,” accord­ing to CNN.

HERE IS THE WAY THE SAME JUDGE RESPONDED TOCASE INVOLVINGYOUNG BLACK MALE CHARGED WITHLESSER CRIME
https://​www​.kenoshanews​.com/​j​u​d​g​e​-​n​o​-​d​i​s​m​i​s​s​a​l​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​n​-​a​c​c​u​s​e​d​-​o​f​-​f​i​r​i​n​g​-​g​u​n​-​a​f​t​e​r​-​f​i​g​h​t​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​_​2​4​b​c​4​a​f​a​-​6​370 – 5683-a1a3-f4246e4c1302.html

More from the Post:

During the hour-long hear­ing, which was at times con­tentious, Schroeder attempt­ed to head off sev­er­al argu­ments that veered too close to the polit­i­cal back-and-forth that has gripped the case. He stressed that he was try­ing to be as fair as pos­si­ble to every­one involved.

This case is not going to be decid­ed by demon­stra­tors of one type or anoth­er,” he said.

Yeah, let’s hope America’s blind­ness doesn’t actu­al­ly decide this case to white crim­i­nal­i­ty. If the han­dling of Rittenhouse up until now is any indi­ca­tion of how he’ll be treat­ed when tried, I won’t be hold­ing my breath that his sto­ry ends in con­se­quences for his actions.

Altamoth Parro Campbell Freed Of All Charges..

Retired DSP Altermoth “Parro” Campbell has been freed of all charges laid against him by a Constable who pep­per-sprayed him dur­ing a traf­fic stop in 2019.
Mister Campbell was rep­re­sent­ed by Attorney Law Bert SamuelS. With this acquit­tal, there is the pos­si­bil­i­ty of a law­suit against the arrest­ing offi­cer, the Commissioner of Police, the Government (the Attorney General, the Ministry of National Security, and the Ministry of Justice).
Breaking news . More to come.

The Govt’s Inability To Stop Traffic Infractions Shows It Is Incapable Of Ending The Killings…

As the admin­is­tra­tion in Kingston buries its head in the sand on the exis­ten­tial issue of crime, even mat­ters of basic safe­ty, seem to be out­side of the abil­i­ties and scope of the peo­ple tasked with the nation’s secu­ri­ty and safety.
A sto­ry caught my eyes in one of the local dailies today. Some res­i­dents of the west­ern tourist town of Negril in Westmoreland are demand­ing that medi­ans that were placed on the Norman Manley Boulevard,(rolling eyes at the idea of anoth­er edi­fice named after the Manleys), be removed forth­with. The medi­ans were placed there to reduce speed­ing that has been caus­ing crash­es on the strip.
The res­i­dents and their mouth­pieces argue that the medi­ans are now dam­aged by speed­ing motorists and are now, adding to the rea­sons seri­ous crash­es occur on that strip of roadway.

Cognitive dis­so­nance, I guess!
So, here we have a sit­u­a­tion in which the medi­ans were dam­aged by the same speed­ing motorists who refuse to adhere to the road traf­fic act’s dic­tates. The same motorists who con­tin­ue to crash and kill oth­er motorists and pas­sen­gers they trans­port, mak­ing demands that the reme­dies applied, be removed.
The clue­less mem­ber of Parliament, some­one named Morland Wilson, stu­pid­ly joined the call to remove the medians.
The Member of Parliament had this to say, quote; “In December, I got reports of four acci­dents as a result of the medi­ans. And when I say as a result – vehi­cle, lit­er­al­ly, dri­ve up on the medi­ans. Some turned over, some lost con­trol and hit walls and oth­er cars and pedes­tri­ans. So, it is hor­ri­ble.”
You can­not make these things up. This was the state­ment from a sup­posed leader of our country.
No mis­ter mem­ber of par­lia­ment, the cause of the crash­es can­not be attrib­uted to the medi­ans; they are direct­ly a result of speed­ing motorists.

Morland Wilson

We can­not keep mov­ing the goal­post of account­abil­i­ty so that we may appease law­break­ers. We are fail­ing the coun­try; we are march­ing the coun­try into a failed state, status.
Just an aside for the mem­ber of par­lia­ment mis­ter Wilson, there is a dif­fer­ence between what is con­sid­ered an acci­dent and what is con­sid­ered a crash.
Accident; an unfor­tu­nate inci­dent that hap­pens unex­pect­ed­ly and unin­ten­tion­al­ly, typ­i­cal­ly result­ing in dam­age or injury.
Crash; this hap­pens because of actions of one or more dri­vers through one or more events, i.e., speed­ing, reck­less and care­less dri­ving, speed­ing, drunk dri­ving, etc.
Therefore, it fol­lows that for the most part, these [crash­es] are result­ing in the death of cit­i­zens because of one or more of the caus­es I laid out in the def­i­n­i­tion of [crash].
The medi­ans were placed in the road­ways to slow down dri­vers, instead of abid­ing by the new rules, the speed­ers con­tin­ued speed­ing, dam­ag­ing the infra­struc­ture and snuff­ing out more lives.
The response from the res­i­dents and the mem­ber of par­lia­ment is noth­ing if not dystopian.

I am remind­ed of a joke my friend’s wife shared with me, (sor­ry Jackie, I had to bor­row this one). She loves pork, and so she had a meal of pork and rice, she devel­oped a stom­ach ache. She knew the pork caused her stom­ach ache, but she stopped eat­ing rice.
Common sense dic­tates that the peo­ple know what is caus­ing the crashes,(speeding), not the medi­ans placed there, not the medi­ans that the same speed­ing motorists now damage.
The mem­ber of par­lia­ment can­not be that dumb that he does­n’t under­stand that sim­ple con­cept. But, tak­ing stricter action to rein in these law­less motorists would be a bridge too far, so they want the medi­ans removed, and their polit­i­cal rep­re­sen­ta­tive concurs.
Why are you writ­ing about parochial mat­ters like medi­ans in roadways?
Well, small things grow into big things; if we can­not stop motorists from speed­ing on a sin­gle strip of the road­way, how in God’s name can this same admin­is­tra­tion and police force stop crime on this Island?
Think about it!

Outside the obvi­ous ques­tion of the Westmoreland, police inabil­i­ty to take dras­tic steps against those motorists, lies the even deep­er issue of this admin­is­tra­tion back­ing away from tak­ing action to stop crim­i­nals. Choosing instead, to back away from the lawbreakers.
It is stu­pid to do the same things and expect a dif­fer­ent result, but that is only accept­able in ordi­nary peo­ple. When we elect lead­ers to rep­re­sent us, we expect that they will make mis­takes; what we do not expect, is to see our lead­ers make mis­takes, fail to rec­og­nize those mis­takes, and worse, refus­ing to reme­di­ate those mis­takes out of arrogance.
This Administration can no longer pre­tend that its poli­cies on crime are work­ing. We knew they would not work; there is a full body of work in this medi­um out­lin­ing why they would not work.
Nevertheless, the Prime Minister exer­cised his pre­rog­a­tive and embarked on his fools mission.
We had no pow­er to stop him, so we were forced to wait for the con­se­quences; sad­ly, the results are many dead Jamaicans. As a for­mer offi­cer who walked those streets, path­ways, and alley­ways, I had seen the gory bod­ies laid bare as the blood dried in the dust on the sidewalks.
We did not need to see those dead bod­ies, the Prime Minister & his cab­i­net did, Andrew Holness, Horace Chang, Delroy Chuck, the cabal of crim­i­nal rights activists, et al. .…. oh, let us not for­get Tony Anderson[sic].

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

In A Democracy Where Un-indicted Co-conspirators Serve As Jurors.

After the Japanese attack on the US Naval base at Pearl Harbor in 1941, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt deliv­ered a speech to the nation,” this is a day that will live in infamy,” Rosevelt boomed.
On February 9th, 2021, the United States Senate answered a fun­da­men­tal ques­tion: Can a pres­i­dent be impeached and tried after leav­ing office?
The answer to that ques­tion has been resound­ing­ly answered by that body, “yes.”
In a [bipar­ti­san] vote, the Senate vot­ed 56 to 44 to, make it clear that a pres­i­dent may be tried by the sen­ate even after he leaves office.
This day will be ref­er­enced for hun­dreds of years to come, should this democ­ra­cy sur­vive this inces­sant Republican assault.
The nation is almost assured sur­vival. Democracy, not so much if what we are wit­ness­ing is allowed to take hold.

This is Josh Hawley, US Senator from Missouri, who was the first to object to Biden’s win.

There needs to be a clear under­stand­ing of the facts; there are no dif­fer­ences between House and Senate Republicans and the white mili­tias and neo-nazis run­ning around hurt­ing peo­ple. The Republican par­ty is the proud boys; it is QAnon, it is every­thing the nation wit­nessed on January 6th.
Some hold out hope that now that this non­sen­si­cal process con­sti­tu­tion­al ques­tion has been answered, maybe Republican sen­a­tors will be forced to look at the com­pelling evi­dence sup­port­ing a Trump conviction.
To the folks hold­ing out that hope, I ask, “why do you think we were forced to live through this fraud­u­lent ques­tion? Do you think for one moment that Republicans had any doubt that the sen­ate had the author­i­ty to try Donald Trump”?

Donald Trump arriv­ing in Florida greet­ed by one of his Cuban lap­dogs Marco Rubio.

Another Republican, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, joined five of his Republican col­leagues, Mitt Romney, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Pat Toomey, & Ben Sasse, who vot­ed with all 50 Democratic Senators to over­ride the con­sti­tu­tion­al ques­tion of whether Trump may be tried by the sen­ate now that he is out of office.
Cassidy’s come to Jesus moment, as artic­u­lat­ed by him, seemed to have been cen­tered on the clar­i­ty of the case the house man­agers out­lined, instead of the non­sense idea that the sen­ate can­not try a pres­i­dent after he has demit­ted office.

The crim­i­nal Donald Trump and one of his lap­dogs Raphael Cruz

No one should be fooled by that moment of clar­i­ty that Cassidy expe­ri­enced; it should nev­er be con­strued as a moment of awak­en­ing for Republicans.
In January, Rand Paul forced a Senate vote to declare the tri­al of Donald Trump uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. That vote failed, and so the case was allowed to pro­ceed. However, the record num­ber of Republican Senate votes declar­ing the poten­tial tri­al uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, is prob­a­bly the best met­ric of mea­sur­ing where today’s Republican par­ty is.
Mitch McConnell spoke out aggres­sive­ly against Donald Trump’s par­tic­i­pa­tion on the sen­ate floor; McConnell said Trump was respon­si­ble for incit­ing the insurrection.
On February 9th Mitch McConnell vot­ed that the sen­ate tri­al of Donald Trump for incit­ing the insur­rec­tion was uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. At least his vote said so.
House minor­i­ty leader Kevin McCarthy chas­tised Donald Trump for incit­ing the insur­rec­tion on the house floor; he lat­er jet­ted to Florida to lick Donald Trump’s boots and be pho­tographed with him.
Lyn Cheney, the #3 house Republican, was forced to endure a vote to retain her lead­er­ship role. Cheneys Crime was that she laid the blame for the insur­rec­tion square­ly at Trump’s feet.

Image result for lindsey graham'
If ever there was a mem­ber of Congress for whom the word despi­ca­ble applies, it is Lindsay Graham

Republican Senators have demon­strat­ed that they do not care about the Constitution. It has long been argued that the founders cre­at­ed the Senate to counter the more rash, impul­sive house members.
House mem­bers are allowed two-year terms; Senators have six-year terms.
The think­ing is that the six-year-term, in a way, insu­lates Senators from some polit­i­cal back­lash, kind of like how Federal judges get life­time tenure. Republicans under Mitch McConnell’s lead­er­ship have destroyed every­thing the Senate is sup­posed to rep­re­sent. They packed courts with dis­qual­i­fied hacks, cor­rupt­ed the exec­u­tive, and reduced the Senate to a disgrace.

In the end, the tox­i­c­i­ty Mitch McConnell cre­at­ed and orches­trat­ed will do more harm to America than any sin­gle American offi­cial has ever man­aged to inflict in the his­to­ry of the repub­lic. Yes, more than Joe McCarthy.

Rand Paul
In recent times Republicans in the Senate abdi­cat­ed their oath by block­ing evi­dence that may have proven that Supreme Court nom­i­nee Brett Kavanaugh was not the choir boy they made him out to be. Senate Republicans’ con­tempt for the rule of law and process was on full dis­play in that fraud­u­lent hearing.
It was again on dis­play when they refused to con­vict Donald Trump in the first impeach­ment tri­al. Even with the great pre­pon­der­ance of evi­dence against Donald Trump, they vot­ed to acquit.
The words of one Republican Senator were most telling. Senator Susan Collins told the media that quote, “the pres­i­dent has learned his les­son’. In Senator Collins’s world, impeach­ment was the rem­e­dy; there was no need for any oth­er treat­ment, even though the con­sti­tu­tion is very clear on the ques­tion of removal.
Senator Collins was wrong, as she has been on so many oth­er occa­sions on Donald Trump issues.
That fail­ure result­ed in the January 6th insur­rec­tion; it result­ed in the Confederate bat­tle flag fly­ing in the Capitol rotunda.
Ron Johnson
Had Senate Republicans done their duty to the con­sti­tu­tion, Donald Trump, the most crim­i­nal pres­i­dent in the Republic’s his­to­ry, would have been removed. If Donald Trump were removed, the events on January 6th, 2021, would not have occurred.
At the end of this his­toric and infa­mous sec­ond impeach­ment tri­al of Donald Trump, it is safe to say that Republicans will not con­vict nor bar him from ever hold­ing Federal office for the crimes he committed.
Please make no mis­take about it; a twice acquit­ted Donald Trump will unleash a move­ment that this gov­ern­ment sys­tem will not sur­vive. The self­ish and self-serv­ing nature of Republican Senators will be the unrav­el­ing and ulti­mate undo­ing of this great Republic.
Tommy Tuberville, this is what pass­es for a Republican Senator these days.


On that note, House man­agers mak­ing the case against Donald Trump in front of the Senate should basi­cal­ly make the case to the American vot­ers. After all, mem­bers of the Republica cau­cus sit­ting in that cham­ber judg­ing Trump’s guilt or inno­cence are them­selves co-conspirators. 

Josh Hawley of Missouri, Raphael Cruz of Texas, James Lankford of Okholoma, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Steve Daines of Montana, John Kennedy of Louisiana, Marsha Blackburn of Tennesse, Mike Braun of Indiana, Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, Roger Marshall of Kansas, Bill Hagerty of Tennesse, Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, and two-thirds of House Republicans are all respon­si­ble for spread­ing and main­tain­ing the lie that the elec­tions were stolen from Trump.
They are essen­tial­ly unin­dict­ed co-con­spir­a­tors, yet they are asked to sit as jurors to deter­mine whether Trump is guilty of incit­ing a rag­ing insur­rec­tion­ist mob to attack the Capitol.
These men and women sit­ting as jurors can­not be expect­ed to vote to con­vict Donald Trump; they agreed with every­thing that happened.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.