They really do not care what you think, they are going to do. what they feel like doing, to hell with you and your protest.
By Dylan Lovan
A Louisville police officer who fired the fatal shot that killed Breonna Taylor has a new job in law enforcement in a county northeast of the city. The Carroll County Sheriff’s Office on Saturday confirmed the hiring of Myles Cosgrove, who was fired from the Louisville Metro Police Department in January 2021 for violating use-of-force procedures and failing to use a body camera during the raid on Taylor’s apartment, WHAS-TV reported.
Cosgrove
About a dozen people showed up in downtown Carrolton Monday morning to protest his hiring, holding signs and chanting, “Cosgrove has got to go.” “I think he should be in jail,” said Haley Wilson, a 24-year-old resident of the small Kentucky town near the Ohio River. Investigators said that Cosgrove fired 16 rounds into the apartment after Taylor’s front door was breached during a narcotics raid on March 13, 2020. Thinking an intruder was breaking in, Taylor’s boyfriend fired a shot from a handgun at the officers. Officer Jonathan Mattingly was struck in the leg, and the officers returned fire, killing Taylor in her hallway.
An FBI investigation determined that Cosgrove and Mattingly struck Taylor, a 26-year-old Black woman and that Cosgrove likely fired the fatal shot. Neither officer was charged by a 2020 state grand jury in Taylor’s death, and a two-year investigation by the FBI also cleared Cosgrove and Mattingly of any charges.
The FBI probe found that other superior officers had crafted a faulty drug warrant that contained false information about Taylor. U.S. Attorney Merrick Garland said in August that the officers who went to Taylor’s apartment with the warrant “were not involved in drafting the warrant affidavit and were not aware that it was false.”
Robert Miller, chief deputy in Carroll County, pointed out that Cosgrove was cleared by the state grand jury when speaking of his hiring at the small Kentucky sheriff’s department.
In November, the Kentucky Law Enforcement Council voted not to revoke Cosgrove’s state peace officer certification. That meant he could apply for other law enforcement jobs in the state.
Brett Hankison, an officer who fired shots but didn’t hit anybody during the raid, was found not guilty by a jury of wanton endangerment charges. But he still awaits trial on federal civil rights charges for his actions during the raid, as do two other officers who were involved in obtaining the warrant. A third officer pleaded guilty to conspiracy in the crafting of the warrant.
Days ago, I wrote about the pandemic of police killings in the United States sitting numbers that ought to straighten the spine of conscientious people everywhere. Race relations are not getting better in the United States; in fact, they are getting worse, according to the data trends. At the center of this problem stands one government agency that has taken it upon itself to be the guardian of white supremacy, speaking of the police. The police are not the only government agency through which racism is dispensed to people of color in the United States. Racism is in every fiber, every pore of America. It is part of the DNA of the nation; nevertheless, the Police is the agency that interacts with members of our community with guns and the power to kill us. https://mikebeckles.com/biased-use-of-force-by-american-police-forces-despicable-and-shameful/
We are having a continuing discussion on this important issue.
Police brutality in the United States is the unwarranted or excessive and often illegal use of force against civilians by U.S. police officers. Forms of police brutality have ranged from assault and battery (e.g., beatings) to mayhem, torture, and murder. Some broader definitions of police brutality also encompass harassment (including false arrest), intimidation, and verbal abuse, among other forms of mistreatment.
Americans of all races, ethnicities, ages, classes, and genders have been subjected to police brutality. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, for example, poor and working-class whites expressed frustration over discriminatory policing in northern cities. At about the same time, Jewish and other immigrants from southern and eastern Europe also complained of police brutality against their communities. In the 1920s many urban police departments, especially in large cities such as New York and Chicago, used extralegal tactics against members of Italian-immigrant communities in efforts to crack down on organized crime. In 1943 officers of the Los Angeles Police Department were complicit in attacks on Mexican Americans by U.S. servicemen during the so-called Zoot Suit Riots, reflecting the department’s history of hostility toward Hispanics (Latinos). Regular harassment of homosexuals and transgender persons by police in New York Cityculminated in 1969 in the Stonewall riots, which were triggered by a police raid on a gay bar; the protests marked the beginning of a new era of militancy in the international gay rights movement. And in the aftermath of the 2001 September 11 attacks, Muslim Americans began to voice complaints about police brutality, including harassment and racial profiling. Many local law-enforcement agencies launched covert operations of questionable legality designed to surveil and infiltrate mosques and other Muslim American organizations in an effort to uncover presumed terrorists, a practice that went unchecked for at least a decade.
Notwithstanding the variety among groups that have been subjected to police brutality in the United States, the great majority of victims have been African American. In the estimation of most experts, a key factor explaining the predominance of African Americans among victims of police brutality is antiblack racism among members of mostly white police departments. Similar prejudices are thought to have played a role in police brutality committed against other historically oppressed or marginalized groups.
Whereas racism is thought to be a major cause of police brutality directed at African Americans and other ethnic groups, it is far from the only one. Other factors concern the unique institutional culture of urban police departments, which stresses group solidarity, loyalty, and a “show of force” approach to any perceived challenge to an officer’s authority. For rookie officers, acceptance, success, and promotion within the department depend upon adopting the attitudes, values, and practices of the group, which historically have been infused with anti-black racism. (britannica.com)
Whether a society is democratic or totalitarian, it needs a body to enforce the laws or decrees. We call those who do the enforcing ‑the police. No matter how disgusted we are with the police and want them gone, whatever they are replaced with will carry out the same functions. So essentially, we would be replacing the police with a new police of sorts. So it is reasonable to say some policing body is necessary, whether to enforce the laws in a democracy or to suppress the population in an autocracy. I went to lengths to establish the foregone because we live in a society where truth and common sense are in short supply. Critiquing what some people worship means you are anti-that body. Not that I care about their inability to think critically or their willful ignorance. https://mikebeckles.com/massive-expansion-of-the-police-state-enhanced-by-black-democrats-and-others/
Police are killing people at an alarming rate in the United States. Each year the number of people police kill is higher than the previous year. The Federal Government has not demanded that the 18,000-plus police departments across the country report to it the people they kill. The Congress, with Republican majorities in the House and Senate at varying times, will not pass legislation making it mandatory for police to report the number of people they kill each year accurately. Notwithstanding, as a result of public outcry and demand for accountability, various Organizations and News Organizations have started keeping county, using death records, etc, to present to the people an idea of the body count each year. In 2021, there were 1,048 police fatal shootings. In 2022, there were 1,096 fatal police shootings. As of March 27, 2023, 238 people were killed at the hands of police, 30 of the Black, according to [statista.com]. https://mikebeckles.com/american-police-pose-existential-threat-to-young-men-of-color-study/
The University of Illinois Chicago estimates conservatively 250,000 civilian injuries are caused by law enforcement officers annually. In the U.S., during a given year, an estimated 1 million civilians experience police threat of or use of force resulting in a conservative estimate of 85,000 non-fatal injuries requiring hospital treatment and 600‑1000 deaths. Both Black/African-Americans and Hispanics/Latinos are twice as likely to experience the threat of or use of force during police-initiated contact (Bureau of Justice Statistics). Based on CDC data, Black African-Americans are more than twice as likely to be killed and almost 5‑times more likely to suffer an injury requiring medical care at a hospital compared to white non-Hispanics. Black males comprise 6.1 percent of the US population but 24.9 percent of all persons killed by police. https://mikebeckles.com/police-union-confirm-why-defunding-the-police-is-sound-policy/
Fatal police shootings of unarmed Black people in the US are more than three times as high as of Whites, according to the Journal of Epidemiology and community health. Many of the people shot and killed by American police are unarmed. As is expected, unarmed blacks are killed at an alarmingly higher rate than whites. Having looked at the circumstances that precede many of the shootings, particularly of Black citizens, several experts have said decisively that they could be avoided. Those sentiments echo what I have written time and again. Police are committing murder and are getting away with it because Prosecutors and Courts continue to (a) move the goalpost as to what’s lawful and (b) pull the wool over the eyes of the families of murdered victims. I totally get the seriousness of each encounter that involves guns. Nevertheless, police officers have been killing people unnecessarily by (a) escalating rather than de-escalating minor or non-issues and (b) by continuing to shoot victims after they are rendered lifeless and then pretending to render first aid to the corpse after they cuff the already dead person. As I have repeatedly said in previous articles, having been taught that the public is an enemy and that their only focus is to go home to their families has turned minority communities into veritable battlefields for police to exact vengeance on the poor and defenseless.
They are also trained to continue to shoot until a threat is neutralized. However, the courts have made it abundantly clear that it is not the prerogative of courts to Monday- morning-quarterback what police do in the heat of the moment. This has opened up a pandora’s box of subjective abuse. The objective standard is now the subjective standard of every cop with a bad attitude and entrenched racial animus. The consequence has been devastating for the Black community; not only that cops escalate minor infractions or no infraction at all to justify lethal force, but with the barbaric escalation of lethal force they use long after the subject of their ire is down or dead. Here are just a couple of the cases of which I refer. Despite what the Police, their unions, their supporters, and the complicit corporate media tell you, these are unmitigated acts of depraved indifference to human life. (1) In the early hours of February 4, 1999, an unarmed 23-year-old Guinean student named Amadou Diallo was gunned down by NYPD cops who fired a hail of 41 bullets at him; 19 of those bullets hit and killed him. Amadou Diallo had committed no crime. Diallo was Black.
(2) On August 9, 2014, police officer Darren Wilson shoots and kills Michael Brown, an unarmed Black teenager, in Ferguson, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. Protests and riots ensue in Ferguson and soon spread across the country. Darren Wilson fired 12 shots at Michael Brown, six of which hit and killed him. Michael Brown was Black.
(3 On October 20, 2014, in Chicago, Illinois. Jason Van Dyke, a cop, fired a hail of bullets at Laquan McDonald, a 17-year-old boy walking down the street allegedly with a knife in his hand. The 17-year-old was shot 16 times as he walked away from police. The Chicago Police Department and then Mayor Rahm Emanuel saw the video of the murder yet kept it from the public for over a year until a judge ordered them to release it. Laquan McDonald was Black.
(4) An unarmed Sean Bell was shot and killed in Queens, NY by members of the New York City Police Department on the morning of November 25, 2006. Sean Bell was murdered on the very day he was to marry his fiancé. The cops fired over 50 bullets into Bell’s car, claiming they heard someone say, ‘yo, get my gun,’ as Bell and his friends left a nightclub. They also lied that there was a fourth man in Bell’s car who might have fled with the phantom gun. There was no mention of a fourth person with Sean Bell and his two friends. New York Daily News columnist Juan Gonzalez reported that in the hours immediately after the shooting, there was no mention of a fourth man in police calls, and no search was launched for the alleged armed man. Sean Bell was Black.
(5) June 2022 Akron, Ohio Police fired 90 plus bullets at a fleeing 27-year-old Jayland Walker, who they say refused to stop during a traffic stop. Walker was hit with 46 bullets, according to the coroner. April 2023, a white grand jury returned a no true bill, meaning that no cop would be held accountable for the slaughter of Jayland Walker. Walker was slaughtered, but he did not have a gun. Police later claimed that there was a gun in his car, which meant nothing, even if he had a gun in his car. He was slaughtered without a gun in his hand. Needless to say, Jaylan Walker is Black.
Here is an important bit of information that certain politicians, prosecutors, judges, and police do not want you to know the level of force that police use to subdue a suspect should be proportional to the force used by the subject. A fleeing suspect not shooting at police or someone else poses no risk or danger to police or the public and, therefore, cannot be lawfully gunned down by police. Killing a fleeing person is not only unlawful, but it is also blatantly immoral and a grotesque act of sub-human bloodlust. Every bullet fired after that first one that caused a suspect to fall to the ground is an act of murder. But in America, it has become the norm for a single Black man to be gunned down by police, sustaining more bullets than it takes to kill a fully grown elephant. The disrespectful thing about it is that they fundamentally believe we are too stupid to see that they have merely switched from wearing sheets to murder us and have donned police uniforms to do it.
On the other hand, violent white mass murderer like Dylan Roof was taken in alive and fed a fast food lunch by adoring cops. The Buffalo, New York shooter Payton Gendron was taken alive with no scratch on him. David Depape was arrested alive after a violent home invasion and attack on Paul Pelosi, the husband of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in San Fransisco, California.
A 21-year-old white man is accused of using a Smith & Wesson semiautomatic rifle to kill seven people and injure more than 30 during a Fourth of July parade in Highland Park, Illinois. A cellphone video of his arrest shows the controlled actions of police following the carnage to take him into custody safely.
The FBI recently released a report on active shooter incidents that occurred in 2021, noting that the gunmen were killed by police in 14 of the 61 incidents. In 30 cases, the gunmen were apprehended — most at another location after the shooting — and four of those incidents ended when armed and unarmed civilians engaged with the shooter to stop the threat.
.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com. Check out Mike’s Podcast on Youtube @ mikebeckles
Sixteen-year-old Ralph Yarl shot by an 84-year-old white man after he mistakenly went to the man’s house intending to pick up his younger sibling brothers.
Ralph Yarl made national headlines after the teen was shot and wounded on April 13 when he rang the doorbell of the wrong house in Kansas City, Missouri. A parent asked the teenager to pick up his younger twin siblings.
Ralph had made an error common in Kansas City, driving to a house on Northeast 115th Street instead of Northeast 115th Terrace, a block away. He pressed the doorbell and waited outside the front door for what felt like a long time; he told the police later. Andrew Lester, who had just gone to bed, got up and opened the inside door while holding a revolver, according to a probable cause statement from investigators. Lester told a police officer after the shooting that he saw a Black male “pulling on the exterior storm door handle.” This was one of the few areas of disagreement: When interviewed by a detective, Ralph said he only rang the doorbell and did not pull on the door.
Andrew Lester prepares to leave court after pleading not guilty in the shooting of 16-year-old Ralph Yarl.
Within moments, Lester began shooting through the glass of the exterior storm door; afraid that a break-in was in progress, he told the police. Ralph was shot in the head and then in the arm. “Don’t come around here,” he remembers Lester saying, according to a detective. He got up and ran away, trying to elude more gunshots; he told the police. (From the New York Times)
Cheerleaders leaving practice were shot after getting in wrong car, teen says…
Two Texas cheerleaders were shot, and one of them critically injured, early Tuesday after one girl mistakenly got into the wrong car in a grocery store parking lot. Police arrested Pedro Tello Rodriguez Jr., 25, with deadly conduct, a third-degree felony, in what they called “an altercation … in the parking lot of HEB” in which “multiple shots were fired into a vehicle.”One of the victims was identified by her coach as Payton Washington, an 18-year-old high school senior and cheerleader for the Round Rock Independent School District near Austin. Washington “sustained serious injuries” when she was shot in the back and one leg, police said. She was transported to a hospital by helicopter and is in critical condition. The young women thought they had gotten into the wrong car, believing they were entering their friend’s car, according to the reporting.
Police in Elgin, Texas say 25-year-old Pedro Tello Rodriguez Jr. faces a third-degree felony count of deadly conduct after an early-morning shooting in an H‑E-B parking lot.Elgin Police Department.
After realizing their mistake, they exited the car and then went into the right car, upon which Rodriquez approached them, they attempted to apologize for the mistake, but he responded with gunfire. “He pulled out a gun, and then he just started shooting at all of us, one young lady said.
Woman Shot Dead in New York After Pulling Into Wrong Driveway: Police says…
Kevin Monahan fired into the car, killing Kaylin Gillis.
Kaylin Gillis was in a car with three friends looking for another friend’s house in the rural area of Hebron, New York, on Saturday night when they mistakenly turned down the wrong driveway. After the vehicle had been in the driveway for a “very short time,” Kevin Monahan came out of the residence and fired two shots as the group of friends was exiting the property, police said. One of the shots struck Gillis. Monahan has been charged with second-degree murder.
These are only a few of the events that occurred over the last few days in this culture of racial animus and guns. But it represents only an infinitesimal and minute percentage of the killings. It does not include the almost daily mass shootings inside churches and other places of worship, schools, Gyms, nightclubs, movie theaters, hair salons, Bars, and everywhere people congregate. This does not include the other shootings that occur each day that are not considered mass events. The political right has said that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. That did not help the students in Uvalde, Texas, as the so-called good guys with the guns and bulletproof vests hid while the shooter massacred tiny children. Who are the good guys with guns? Is Kevin Monahan a good guy? Is Pedro Tello Rodriguez a good guy with a. gun? What about Andrew Lester? Is he a good guy with a. gun?
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com. Subscribe to Mike’s Podcast @ Mikebeckles- on Youtube.
They will go on slinging lies and disinformation, but every time that they defame someone, they should be taken to court until they are shut down. In fact, every penny that the disinformation corporation made should be taken away from them and donated to charities and people they slandered. (mb)
»»>
Fox News and its parent company Fox Corp. have struck a deal averting a trial in the blockbuster defamation suit filed by the election-tech company Dominion Voting Systems over spurious claims of fraud in the 2020 presidential race.
Judge Eric M. Davis of the Delaware Superior Court announced the settlement from the bench on Tuesday afternoon ahead of the trial’s scheduled start.
The parties settled for $787,500,000 — about half of Dominion’s original $1.6 billion ask.
The amount “represents vindication and accountability,” said Dominion lawyer Justin Nelson. “Lies have consequences.”
Dominion CEO John Poulos told reporters, “Fox has admitted to telling lies about Dominion that caused enormous damage to my company, our employees and the customers that we serve. Nothing can ever make up for that. Throughout this process, we have sought accountability,” he said. “Truthful reporting in the media is essential to our democracy.”
Fox News released a statement shortly after a settlement was announced.
Electing Blacks to positions of power does not guarantee change. Hiring more Blacks and Hispanics to be cops does not improve the broken culture of what passes for politics and policing in America. A significant amount of data bears that out, corrupt cops and repreg=hensible politicians come in all colors, and so do judges and everyone else. Hello Clarence Tom-Azz. (mb)
The story By Akela Lacy of the Intercept.
The Minnesota attorney general took over a murder case from Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty, a fellow reformer. She accused him of playing politics.
PROGRESSIVESREJOICEDLAST year when Democrat Keith Ellison won a tight reelection race for Minnesota attorney general against a police-backed opponent who attacked him as being “soft on crime.”
In the same election cycle, Ellison’s ally Mary Moriarty won election as Hennepin County attorney, installing a reform-minded prosecutor in Minneapolis about three years after the city’s police murdered George Floyd. Moriarty, previously the chief public defender for Hennepin County, took office in January and implemented reforms with a focus on correcting failures in the juvenile justice system.
Now, three months into their terms, Ellison and Moriarty are no longer on the same side of the reform platform they once shared.
Late last month, Moriarty’s office issued new guidance on prosecuting children, which was designed to keep as many kids as possible out of the adult criminal system. Before issuing the guidance, Moriarty’s office chose not to charge two teenage brothers accused of murder as adults.
Last week, Ellison’s office intervened in the juvenile murder case. His office described the juvenile charges as “inappropriate” and requested that the governor take the case away from Moriarty’s office and assign it to him. Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who was reelected along with Ellison and Moriarty last November, assigned the case to Ellison on Thursday — pitting the two would-be reformers against each other.
A source involved in the jurisdictional dispute, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive private deliberations, said Ellison told Moriarty he needed to appear tough on crime for his next reelection campaign. “The Attorney General denies having said that or anything like it,” said Ellison spokesperson John Stiles.
In southeast Oklahoma, the sheriff of McCurtain County, one of his investigators and a county commissioner are accused by a newspaper of discussing killing a local reporter and lamenting that modern justice no longer includes hanging Black people. The explosive accusations were published this week in the McCurtain Gazette-News. According to the newspaper, Sheriff Kevin Clardy, investigator Alicia Manning and District 2 Commissioner Mark Jennings were part of an impromptu discussion after the March 6 meeting of the county Board of Commissioners. The Gazette reported that it is in possession of the full audio recording of the discussion. The FBI and the Oklahoma Attorney General’s Office also have copies of the recording, according to the newspaper.
A portion of the audio recordings was released online over the weekend, and while the audio matched some of the quoted material in the story, The Oklahoman could not identify who the speakers were in the recordings. None of the allegedly recorded individuals could immediately be reached for comment. Chris Willingham is the reporter for the Gazette who was discussed in the recordings. He is also the author of the article. Willingham declined to comment on the story, citing ongoing litigation between himself and the sheriff’s office. During the discussion, which was recorded without the trio knowing, the Gazette reported Manning saying she needed to take some packages to a shipping center near the newspaper’s office.
Hundreds gather to demand the resignation of the county officials. However, this is nothing new; it is the way law enforcement has been central to the maintenance, proliferation, and perpetuation of racism in America. Including killing and concealing people’s bodies, which they hate and consider their enemies.
“Oh, you’re talking about you can’t control yourself?” Jennings allegedly said. In response, Manning allegedly said: “Yeah, I ain’t worried about what he’s gonna do to me. I’m worried about what I might do to him. My papaw would have whipped his ass, would have wiped him and used him for toilet paper … if my daddy hadn’t been run over by a vehicle, he would have been down there.” Jennings replied that his 86-year-old father, in response to an opinion published in the newspaper, once “started to go down there and just kill him,” according to the Gazette. “I know where two big, deep holes are here if you ever need them,” Jennings allegedly said. Clardy, the sheriff, allegedly said he had the equipment. “I’ve got an excavator,” Clardy is accused of saying during the discussion.
Well, these are already pre-dug,” Jennings allegedly said. Jennings allegedly talked about knowing hitmen in Louisiana who could “cut no (expletive) mercy.” A brief discussion about assaulting local judges followed, according to the Gazette. Jennings, the commissioner, then discussed how many people might run for sheriff, according to the newspaper story. “They don’t have a goddamn clue what they’re getting into,” he said. “Not this day and age. I’m going to tell you something — if it was back in the day, when Alan Marston would take a damned Black guy and whoop their (expletive) and throw them in the cell, I’d run for (expletive) sheriff.” Clardy responded by saying, “Yeah, it’s not like that no more,” the newspaper reported. Jennings then said Black people have more rights than others, according to the Gazette.
The Lubbock jury was urged to consider a sentence that would “send a message” to Larry Pearson — who had prior convictions for ongoing family violence and aggravated robbery — and society.
A prosecutor said she is making an example out of a Texas man who received a 70-year sentence for spitting on a police officer during an arrest.
Jurors in Lubbock County handed the lengthy sentence to Larry Pearson, 36, on Tuesday after finding him guilty of two counts of harassing a public servant the day before. According to the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, typical prison sentences for harassing a public servant range from two to 10 years.
However, Pearson’s two prior felony convictions — for aggravated robbery and continuous family violence in 2009 and 2019, respectively — increased the range of his penalty to 25 years to life in prison
Larry Pearson (center), 36, received a 70-year prison sentence after being convicted of harassing a public servant when he spat on police officers in Lubbock County, Texas, during his arrest last spring. (Photo: Screenshot/YouTube.com/Everything Lubbock)
“We asked [the jury] to just consider the life that he’d been leading,” prosecutor Jessica Gorman said, the Avalanche-Journal reported.
Gorman emphasized that the sentence would not have been as substantial for someone with no criminal history.
“But I think the reason for that enhancement being the law is if you’re going to choose to live a life of crime and to be a criminal, you can do that around other criminals in prison and not in a free society with law-abiding people,” she said.
According to the Avalanche-Journal, a Lubbock police report detailed how a woman flagged down an officer in northeast Lubbock in April 2022 to report Pearson, who was a passenger in her car, for domestic abuse.
The report noted that the victim had “multiple visible injuries” on her face as she informed the officers that Pearson had a weapon — which turned out to be an airsoft gun — and had hit her several times
The unidentified woman claimed Pearson stopped assaulting her when they reached the nearby intersection after he saw a police car. After passing it, Pearson threatened her again, she said. “You know you have an a– whooping coming,” he reportedly warned her before punching her again, for the third time, in her face.
Pearson allegedly became angry that officers arrested him rather than the victim after backup arrived, prompting him to kick at their vehicle doors. Gorman said he spat at authorities when they opened the door to order him to stop kicking.
Pearson reportedly continued to spit and resist after being taken to the Lubbock County Detention Center.
During the final arguments of the sentencing phase of Pearson’s trial, KLBK News reported, prosecutor Gorman urged the jury to consider a punishment that would “send a message” to him and society.
Defense attorney Jim Shaw told the jury that the sentence was inflicted for a “simple misdemeanor” in a situation that “got out of control.” Gorman, however, disagreed. “In Texas, if you’ve been to prison multiple times, two consecutive times and then you commit another felony that’s a third degree or higher, you’re what’s called a ‘habitualized criminal,’” Gorman contended, the Avalanche-Journal reported, “where your minimum is 25 years.”
Houston Teen Dragged Out of Car and Violently Arrested While Helping Friend Stuck In Parking Lot Without Gas.
The Harris County Sheriff’s Office announced last week that several of its deputies are under investigation in connection with their conduct during the arrests of two Houston-area high school football players this month. Video of the incident was shared on social media last week and sparked accusations that the deputies used excessive force during the arrests. According to a statement released by the HCSO, the department is launching a probe to see if “any policies and procedures were violated” during the arrest.
Harris County Sheriff deputies drag teens out of a car. (Photo: Sarmad Faiz/Twitter video screenshot)
The video, shot this month in what appeared to be a shopping center parking lot, showed officers arresting Seth Palumbo, a football player at Langham Creek High School in suburban Houston, after he’d apparently been called by teammate Kristopher Willis when Willis ran out of gas, local station ABC 13 reported. Willis had just left school when he ran out of gas and called his two friends to come to help him. “As my friends pulled up, I gave them the bottles I had so they can fill it up with gas so I can make it to the gas station,” Willis told the station. Willis stated that at that time about three or four police units appeared and pulled them over. It is not clear whether Willis and Palumbo’s cars were in the roadway at this point. One video shot by a passenger in Palumbo’s car shows a deputy pulling Palumbo out of his car. The teen is seen shouting that he didn’t do anything as the deputy is dragging him out the car.
In what looks like chaos, the deputy is pulling the senior around and then slamming him on the ground. Other deputies surround the car and even try to stop the arrest from being filmed by Willis, who whipped out his cellphone to record from another angle. The one passenger recording in the car is told to exit the vehicle before his phone is taken. His phone is then placed camera-down by the deputy, obstructing any video for the remainder of the recording. The deputies arrested and originally charged both seniors, Willis and Palumbo, in the altercation. They were also taken to jail. Willis was charged with a misdemeanor count of impeding a roadway. Palumbo faced one count of assaulting a peace officer, a felony charge. On Friday, April 14, a judge failed to find probable cause for Palumbo’s assault charge, leading to its dismissal. In his first interview after the incident, the young man took issue with the deputies being called “peace officers.”
“I feel like police are really supposed to be peace officers. I feel like he just did a lot of aggravation. He wasn’t really trying to be peaceful. I feel like we don’t need people like that in the community,” ABC 13 reported Palumbo said after the judge’s decision. Willis’ misdemeanor was not dropped, and his parents, an elementary school principal (mom) and a high school math teacher (dad) plan to take action after feeling outraged by the turn of events. “I really think the police should be held accountable the same way they are holding my son accountable for a crime he did not commit,” said Kristopher Willis Sr. Willis Sr. actually originally posted the videos on Facebook.
Attorney Antuan Johnson, the lawyer representing the Willis family, said he applauds the young men for not cowering to the badges and shutting off their phones. “The only reason we are here is that he had the courage to get out the phone and record, and by that, we were able to see what happened,” Johnson said. The HCSO released a statement regarding the video and said, “After reviewing the videos, we are investigating the incident to determine if any policies and procedures were violated.” Adding its office has temporarily reassigned a deputy to a different area “pending the outcome of the investigation.” “We take these matters seriously and will ensure a thorough investigation is completed in a timely manner,” the statement said. “Our deputies are held to the highest standard of professionalism, and any employee whose conduct does not align with departmental policies will be held accountable for their actions.”(from Yahoo news)
To add insult to injury, the Harris County Sherrif’s office issued in red form response to the families. Why does the public care about department policies? Each person should be held to the same standard under the law in a democratic society. So no one should care about department policy , if the Sheriff’s thugs broke the laws, they should be vigorously arrested and prosecuted as any other person. Why are they not arrested for assault and kidnapping is the question.? (mb)
Like Ralph Yarl’s parents, Patience Gaye moved to the United States from Liberia to escape violence before starting a family.
That was years ago. But on Sunday, she marched alongside at least 200 people in Kansas City’s Northland at a peaceful protest in support of Ralph, a 16-year-old who was shot and critically wounded Thursday after he went to the wrong house to pick up his younger twin brothers, according to family.
Ralph is a junior at Staley High School. Friends said he’s talked of going to Stanford after he graduates.
Gaye, 33, a long-time family friend to Ralph’s parents, is pregnant with her first child, and filled with a new fear as she watches Ralph’s struggle to recover from his injuries.
“How do you protect a Black kid?” she asked. “… What are we supposed to do now? We left our countries because we don’t want to be killed. That’s why we left. They came to America for a better life. How is this a better life?”
Police Chief Stacey Graves said Sunday the police department is working to make sure the investigation moves as quickly as it can so the case can be presented to the Clay County prosecutor.
Police have not identified the person who shot Ralph.
Rally participants stopped in front of a house in the Northland where 16-year-old Ralph Yarl was shot Thursday.
‘A stellar human-being’
Meara Mitchell, a teacher of Ralph’s for several years, called his shooting “incomprehensible.”
She described him Sunday as a “stellar human-being” with a “quiet fortitude.”
Of her many students, Ralph’s work ethic and love and kindness for others makes him stand out. He’s dutiful to his family, she said, and he impressed her every day in his academics and his interactions with his peers.
“He is the utmost example of how you want a young man to carry himself in this world,” she added.
Nicole Bryan, 17, one of Ralph’s classmates and friends, said she met Ralph in seventh grade. They’re both in the band where he plays bass clarinet and she plays bassoon.
Ralph Yarl
When they first met, he corrected her on her instrument, and helped her become better. He still pushes her to achieve her best, Nicole said.
She said Ralph has talked about studying chemical engineering in college. He’s a whiz at science and math, but his passion is music, Nicole said. He’s won numerous awards for his academics and his musicianship, she said.
“He’s brilliant,” she said.
‘Justice is the key’
Paul Yarl, Ralph’s father, is quiet like his son. He stood near the back of the long line of people chanting about love and justice as they stood in the street in front of the yard of the man who allegedly shot Ralph.
“I’m just here to show my gratitude for all the love and support,” said Yarl, who traveled to Kansas City from Indianapolis after the shooting.
So many people showed up Sunday because, Yarl said, what happened was obviously wrong.
Ralph was asked by a parent to pick up his brothers from an address on 115th Terrace, according to the family and a statement from the Kansas City Police Department. Instead he went to a residence in the 1100 block of 115th Street.
Family said a man at the house opened the door, saw Ralph and shot him in the head. When Ralph fell to the ground, family said the man shot him again.
Ralph got up and ran from the property, but he had to ask at three different homes before someone helped him, family added. Kansas City police officers said they responded to the area around 10 p.m.
Graves said Sunday that the homeowner who allegedly shot Ralph after the teen arrived at the wrong house was taken into custody Thursday and placed on a 24-hour hold.
In order to arrest someone, Graves said law enforcement needs a formal victim statement, forensic evidence and other information for a case file to be completed. Because of the teen’s injuries, Graves said police haven’t been able to get a victim statement yet.
Ralph Yarl
Yarl said he hasn’t had the chance to talk to the prosecutor’s office, but he is hoping for answers soon.
“Justice is the key. I guess the same reason why most people are here. Justice. Peace. I’m with them. I don’t want anything special. I just want justice,” Yarl said.
In the meantime, the family remains focused on Ralph’s healing.
Ralph’s aunt, Faith Spoonmore, started a GoFundMe on Sunday to raise money for Ralph’s medical bills and other expenses.
“Even though he is doing well physically, he has a long road ahead mentally and emotionally,” she wrote on the online fundraiser before joining Sunday’s protest.
The family will be represented by Ben Crump, a civil rights attorney who represented families in several high-profile cases including Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, as well as Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor and George Floyd.
They also will be represented by Lee Merritt, a Texas-based civil rights attorney who has previously represented the family of Cameron Lamb, who was fatally shot by KCPD detective Eric DeValkenaere in 2019.
‘Stay off my yard’
As protesters chanted and prayed in front of the home where Ralph was shot, some neighbors joined in the demonstration while others watched from their porches or lawn chairs.
“Get out of the yard,” someone shouted as the crowd swelled on the street in front of the home where the shooting happened. The road is public property; lawns are not.
“That over there is a lot of hate,” Spoonmore told Sunday’s crowd in response to the comment, before looking over those encircling her and saying: “This is a lot of love.”
Ralph was shot in the Northland, a name for the Kansas City neighborhoods north of the Missouri River whose voters tend to be more conservative than in other parts of the city limits.
Police have not identified the shooter or his race. They said they are still investigating whether the shooting was racially motivated.
Ralph Yarl
Councilman Kevin O’Neill, District 1 at-large, joined the crowd at the protest Sunday. He was among many Northlanders there.
He said while he doesn’t yet know all the facts, the whole situation is still sad and seems like “poor judgment.”
“I hate that the Northland always seems to get labeled and this isn’t who the Northland is, and it’s very disappointing,” he said of the shooting.
He said the Northland is often seen as “a bastion of white.” But he said Sunday’s turnout, which included people from all ages, races and backgrounds, truly represents the increasing diversity of the Northland.
He said it’s filled with many cultures and religions.
“People look at things and just make their visions what they want to, but that’s not what it is. We’ve got some great people in the Northland.”
He noted that there appear to be cameras on the outside of the property, so he’s hoping there will eventually be definitive proof of what happened.
“And hopefully that comes back and there is justice for the family,” he said.
Robyn Tuwei, who uses the pronouns they/them, has lived just down the block from the shooting for a decade.
Up until recently, they felt it was a very safe neighborhood for their family to call home. But there have been changes. They’ve noticed the sound of more loud gunshots and firecrackers.
Tuwei’s spouse is Black and their children are mixed race. Recently, they’ve had M‑80 fireworks thrown at their house, they said. They reported the incidents to police but they still don’t know who is throwing them or why.
“Lately, it’s not felt super welcoming, so I can’t say that I was surprised, but it is dishearhertening,” said Tuwei, who is a teacher in the local school district, as well as an equity advocate.
Since the “unfathomable” shooting, Tuwei and their spouse have already talked of changing the ways their children spend time outdoors. They often take walks as a family, but they will no longer be walking past the home where Ralph was shot. When their 13-year-old son wants to visit a friend on that street, they will be driving him, even though it’s only a brief walk.
“It’s not considered safe anymore for us,” Tuwei said. “Not until (the shooter is) in jail, behind bars.“(From Yahoonews.com)
Every day average American citizens face these corrupt actors, and they complain if they are lucky to survive the encounter with them. Their complaints usually have to be made to the very same corrupt Agency, albeit another department created to give the illusory effect of transparency and impartiality. Complaints are generally ruled unfounded or unsubstantiated. On the odd occasion that the evidence of wrongdoing is so overwhelming that it cannot be ignored, the offender gets a slap on the wrist; as you will see in the case below that the victory to the abused party is a pyrrhic one. New York City has a Civilian Complain Review Board (CCRB) that is mandated to investigate abuses by the 36,000-plus police department; somehow however,the creators the body forgot to give the board power to punish offenders. So the board’s findings have to be submitted back to the Police Commissioner for action. In case you are wondering why American police officers act with such impunity, wonder no more; they act with impunity because they have near blanket immunity. There are those who believe that adding more officers of color will change the behavior of police, but that is far from the case. In California, the LA Sheriff”s office is populated heavily with Hispanics, and that department is plagued with outright criminal gangs operating in that department under the color of law. In Miami, Florida, the Miami police department is also heavily Cuban American, and that department is probably one of the worst in the country. The cops who murdered Tyre Nichols in Tennesee were all black, and so was Mister Nichols. In incident after incident, we see police of all races acting in ways more unlawful and outrageous than ordinary civilian criminals. In almost all cases, there are other officers standing around or engaging in criminal conduct against civilian members of the public, yet no one intervenes to stop the criminal conduct. Where are the supposed good cops? So the issue is not about just the race or color of police these days. The very construct of policing in the United States is so badly broken that it cannot be repaired; it has to be dismantled and reimagined. They are not about to do that, so the public will continue to be at the mercy of these undisciplined state actors. (mb)
.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»> By Thomas Tracy New York Daily News.
NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey in Queens on April 14, 2023. (Theodore Parisienne/for New York Daily News)
Police watchdogs hit the NYPD’s highest-ranking uniformed officer with an abuse of authority charge for intervening in the detention of a retired cop accused of threatening a group of teens with a gun. The Civilian Complaint Review Board said Saturday it had substantiated the charge against NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey. Under CCRB guidelines, “substantiated” means the board believes there is “sufficient credible evidence” that Maddrey “committed the alleged act without legal justification. It’s now up to Police Commissioner Keechant Sewell to determine Maddrey’s penalty. If Sewell imposes a penalty, Maddrey could refuse to accept it, triggering a disciplinary hearing, officials said.
Maddrey was accused of showing up at the 73rd Precinct stationhouse on Nov. 24, 2021 following a clash between retired NYPD Officer Krythoff Forrester and three teens in Brownsville. Police had taken Forrester into custody after the teens stated he had chased them with a gun after they struck a security camera at his family’s storefront business with a basketball. Forrester used to work with Maddrey and began dropping his name to arresting officers, according to The City, which first reported the charges. A short time later, Maddrey, who was chief of the NYPD’s Community Affairs Division at the time, and Brooklyn North Deputy Chief Scott Henderson showed up at the stationhouse. Within a few hours, Forrester was let go without charges. Forrester was then sent home, officials said.
An NYPD spokesman said at the time that Maddrey ordered a full investigation, but Forrester was let go after the teens’ allegations couldn’t be confirmed. The department’s Internal Affairs Bureau also investigated allegations that Maddrey ordered Forrester cut loose, but found no wrongdoing. When asked about the incident in March, Mayor Adams backed Maddrey’s intervention, claiming Maddrey had “handled it appropriately.” The CCRB decision counters the NYPD probe. “After carefully reviewing the evidence, the full board deliberated this case and substantiated misconduct against Chief Maddrey,” Arva Rice, interim chair of the CCRB said in a statement Saturday. Working off the NYPD’s disciplinary matrix, which outlines penalties for accused abuses, the CCRB recommended Maddrey receive a command discipline, which comes with a maximum loss of 10 vacation days, CCRB officials said. MK Kaishian, the attorney representing the three teens, called for Maddrey’s resignation.
NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey speaks to the media in Brooklyn on April 13, 2023. (Gardiner Anderson/for New York Daily News)
She said Maddrey “leveraged his power to spring a former colleague who had terrorized children with a gun, but he allowed those same children to be vilified and discredited in the media by his allies in the aftermath of his misconduct.” “It is essential that other concrete steps are taken to address Chief Maddrey’s conduct, which has been defended by police and other influential actors in NYC precisely because selective enforcement is a feature of a system that serves the powerful at the expense of all others,” Kaishian said. Maddrey ran afoul of police department rules in 2017, when he was docked 45 vacation days for failing to report an incident in a Queens park where he waved off responding officers who saw an alleged lover point a gun at him. That case was brought by internal NYPD investigators, without CCRB involvement.
Aside from the case involving the Brownsville teens, Maddrey has been investigated four times by the CCRB during his decades-long police career, city records show. All four cases involved accusations of abuse of force. None of the cases were substantiated. Emails to both Maddrey and the NYPD for comment were not immediately returned. Since being made police commissioner last year, Sewell has reduced, set aside or ignored hundreds of police misconduct penalties recommended by the Civilian Complaint Review Board, according to criminal justice advocates and a study conducted by the Legal Aid Society. In a message to police officers in December, Sewell said she has rejected CCRB discipline recommendations more often than other recent police commissioners, claiming that some of the police watchdog group’s rulings were “manifestly unfair” to officers.
HUNDREDSOFTEXANS converged on the capital this week to oppose a new state-led security force that would enlist civilians to track and capture undocumented people. In a hearing that stretched into the wee hours of the morning Wednesday, the Texas House of Representatives heard testimony from first-generation college students, undocumented activists, parents, and children about the inherent dangers of House Bill 20. The author of the controversial proposal, Republican Rep. Matt Schaefer, meanwhile, was grilled by his Democratic counterparts over his bill’s logical and constitutional implications.
In his most extensive public defense of his bill to date, Schaefer, the founder and chair of the arch-conservative Texas Freedom Caucus, collapsed the issues of fentanyl overdoses and migration, ignoring facts and evidence to argue that migrants are responsible for a wave of death and suffering that exceeds the worst episodes of national trauma in modern American history. Pointing to national overdose statistics, he described “a scale of death far greater than Pearl Harbor, the attacks on 9⁄11, or the totality of the Vietnam War.”
“So much fentanyl is coming across the border, it’s unreal,” the Texas lawmaker said before proceeding to conflate and misrepresent several issues regarding migration and drugs.
As federal officials, border researchers, and journalists have documented ad nauseam, most fentanyl illegally trafficked into the United States comes through U.S. ports of entry, often in vehicles driven by U.S. citizens; according to U.S. Sentencing Commission data cited in Wednesday’s hearing, 86 percent of defendants convicted of smuggling fentanyl through ports of entry are U.S. citizens.
Migrants, on the other hand, overwhelmingly cross the border between ports of entry, thanks to successive bipartisan policies that have made admission at the ports — including pursuit of asylum claims — all but impossible. Customs officers who work the ports where most of the drugs are crossing are distinct from the Border Patrol agents who work between them, undermining a central argument Schaefer made that Mexican organized crime uses migrants to pull away U.S. officials who would otherwise be intercepting drug flows.
The First Amendment provides several rights protections: to express ideas through speech and the press, to assemble or gather with a group to protest or for other reasons, and to ask the government to fix problems. It also protects the right to religious beliefs and practices. It prevents the government from creating or favoring a religion.
Republicans hate everything in the Bill of Rights except for the 2nd Amendment, the right to bear Arms. They hate that ordinary American citizens are free to express their ideas through free speech and the rights guaranteed the Press. Except if the press reporting is deferential and slanted, like FUAX news and the wide network of right-wing disinformation organs throughout the country. They oppose the teaching of American history. Desantis is removing the teaching of African-American history in Florida’s high schools and colleges. They are burning books that they disagree with and much more.
TheSecond Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms.
This they agree with. They believe in unbridled access to guns of all types, including assault-style weapons that have been used in the almost daily massacres of American citizens.
US has 120.5 firearms per 100 residents, report finds
The only country with more civilian-owned firearms than people(Bloomberg) There are a reported 400-plus million guns in the hands of Americans. However, those weapons are concentrated in the hands of only about 32% of the people, largely white Republicans.
The Third Amendment prevents the government from forcing homeowners to allow soldiers to use their homes. Before the Revolutionary War, laws gave British soldiers the right to take over private homes.
Republicans are for the rich and powerful, so it is not a stretch to understand their support for laws like imminent domain that allows the Government to appropriate the property of citizens under the guise that it is for the common good. They have supported even large corporations forcibly acquiring the property of citizens using imminent domain as justification.
The Fourth Amendment bars the government from unreasonable search and seizure of an individual or their private property.
Gym Jordon(sic) a new iteration of Joe McCarthy
Republicans are for the police state as long as it does not apply to them. They are comfortable with Police abusing the rights of poor Black Americans by forcibly entering their homes and motorcars without legal justification. They have no problem with governmental power as long as it does not affect them.
The Fifth Amendment provides several protections for people accused of crimes. It states that serious criminal charges must be started by a grand jury. A person cannot be tried twice for the same offense (double jeopardy) or have property taken away without just compensation. People have the right against self-incrimination and cannot be imprisoned without due process of law (fair procedures and trials.
The Fifth Amendment is one of the rights most Americans have come to depend on against Government overreach and abuse. Notwithstanding, Republicans like Donald Trump do not believe these rights should extend to people of color. He wanted the Central Park five executed, even though it turned out they were all innocent of the charges against them. Republicans like Sarah Huckabee Sanders have just signed into law sweeping changes to parole laws in the state of Arkansas.
The Sixth Amendment provides additional protections to people accused of crimes, such as the right to a speedy and public trial, trial by an impartial jury in criminal cases, and to be informed of criminal charges. Witnesses must face the accused, and the accused is allowed his or her own witnesses and to be represented by a lawyer.
Their Fascist messiah Donald Trump facing a 34-count felony indictment filed by the New York City District Attorney’s office is asking a court for a cooling off period as another case, this time a civil rape case, is getting ready for trial. His accuser is entitled to a speedy resolution in this matter as the alleged aggrieved and injured party. In this case, Trump is asking to slow things down, arguably he believes, as he has always telegraphed, that he can drag court cases out to frustrate his opponents. His calculus is his hope that he will once again become president, whereupon the latter case will never see the light of day.
The Seventh Amendment extends the right to a jury trial in Federal civil cases. This amendment is particularly important for poor defendants, particularly people who are in the minority. Imagine getting a federal judge appointed by Donald Trump in a bench trial. This is an important amendment.
The Eighth Amendment bars excessive bail and fines and cruel and unusual punishment.
This amendment gives some cover to minorities accused of crimes. In most cases, they are unable to afford the exorbitant bail that unethical racist judges would impose. Republicans have long railed against the amendment.
The Ninth Amendment states that listing specific rights in the Constitution does not mean that people do not have other rights that have not been spelled out.
This is one of the rights in the Bill of Rights that Police departments and their officers, and their Republican supporters need to be reminded of on a regular basis.
The Tenth Amendment says that the Federal Government only has those powers delegated in the Constitution. If it isn’t listed, it belongs to the states or to the people.
This may be one amendment they are not too opposed to. They have consistently railed against the federal government beginning with Nixon, more so with Ronald Reagan and other states’ rights proponents like Newt Gingrich and the entire modern Republican party. Understand, of course, that when they advocate for more rights for the states and less federal intervention, they are advocating for the right to brutalize and do as they please to Black citizens as they have done for hundreds of years.
The Bill of Rights: How Did it Happen?
Writing the Bill of Rights
The amendments James Madison proposed were designed to win support in both houses of Congress and the states. He focused on rights-related amendments, ignoring suggestions that would have structurally changed the government.
Opposition to the Constitution
Many Americans, persuaded by a pamphlet written by George Mason, opposed the new government. Mason was one of three delegates present on the final day of the convention who refused to sign the Constitution because it lacked a bill of rights.
James Madison and other supporters of the Constitution argued that a bill of rights wasn’t necessary because — “the government can only exert the powers specified by the Constitution.” But they agreed to consider adding amendments when ratification was in danger in the key state of Massachusetts.
Introducing the Bill of Rights in the First Congress
Few members of the First Congress wanted to make amending the new Constitution a priority. But James Madison, once the most vocal opponent of the Bill of Rights, introduced a list of amendments to the Constitution on June 8, 1789, and “hounded his colleagues relentlessly” to secure its passage. Madison had come to appreciate the importance voters attached to these protections, the role that enshrining them in the Constitution could have in educating people about their rights, and the chance that adding them might prevent its opponents from making more drastic changes to it.
Ratifying the Bill of Rights
The House passed a joint resolution containing 17 amendments based on Madison’s proposal. The Senate changed the joint resolution to consist of 12 amendments. A joint House and Senate Conference Committee settled the remaining disagreements in September. On October 2, 1789, President Washington sent copies of the 12 amendments adopted by Congress to the states. By December 15, 1791, three-fourths of the states had ratified 10 of these, now known as the “Bill of Rights.”
Delaware’s Ratification of the Bill of Rights, January 28, 1790
National Archives, General Records of the U.S. Government
Creating the Parchment Bill of Rights
William Lambert and Benjamin Bankson, engrossing clerks for the House and Senate, made 14 handwritten copies of the proposed amendments, which were signed by Speaker of the House Frederick Muhlenberg, Vice President John Adams, Clerk of the House of Representatives John Beckley, and Secretary of the Senate Samuel A. Otis. President George Washington sent a letter enclosing one to each of the 11 existing states and to Rhode Island and North Carolina, which had not yet adopted the Constitution.
In addition to the file copy, the National Archives has Delaware’s copy of the Bill of Rights in its holdings. While most states notified the Federal Government of their ratification of the amendments on a separate document, Delaware chose to apply its certificate of ratification and state seal directly on the parchment they had received.
An 80-year-old man filed a lawsuit this week against an eastern Kansas sheriff’s office for allegedly tasing him without warning after officers pursued him for driving three (3) mph over the speed limit. In his federal lawsuit, John Sigg said a lieutenant with the Iola Police Department in Allen County on April 16, 2021, clocked him driving 38 mph in an area where the speed limit was 35 and decided to give “chase.” Multiple police vehicles followed Sigg for a few minutes as he drove to his family’s car lot, although he did not realize he was “the subject of the pursuit,” his attorney wrote. He parked, got out, and was surrounded by officers from several agencies. Two Chanute police officers pulled their guns on Sigg, according to the lawsuit. Looking “quizzically” at them, he raised his hands, which can be seen in a screenshot of body-camera footage of the incident.
“Get on the f — ing ground,” a now-former deputy with the Allen County Sheriff’s Office yelled, according to the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District of Kansas. Without warning, the deputy used a Taser on Sigg — even though the manufacturer of the TASERX2 warns about using it “on the elderly,” his lawyer wrote. Sigg dropped “like a rock,” his attorney said and cut his head. “Sigg mumbled and was hard to understand,” his Wichita attorney, Randall Rathbun, wrote in the lawsuit. “As officers talked with him on the scene, he indicated that he did not know what was going on and did not feel right.”
Rathbun, who served as the U.S. attorney for the District of Kansas from 1993 to 1996, told The Star that Sigg required a trip to the emergency room to remove the taser probes from his body. “To this day, he can’t believe they did it,” he said. Other cops at the scene knew the deputy used excessive force and “were concerned by his conduct,” the lawsuit alleges. The petition seeks a judgment of $250,000 in actual damages and $250,000 in punitive damages. The sheriff’s office did not return a message seeking comment Tuesday afternoon. Court records show Sigg pleaded guilty to failing to yield to an emergency vehicle after the incident. (from yahoo news)
FBI agents discovered the texts last month after searching the residences and seizing the phones of several Antioch officers amid a probe into allegations of fraud, bribery, drug distribution and civil rights breaches. The names of 17 California-based police officers suspected of using racist epithets, jokes and memes in text conversations are now public information. According to the East Bay Times, Contra Costa County Judge Clare Maier issued a warning before disclosing the names, saying the communications’ foul nature could “incite further hate or racial animus.” However, she contended that the California evidence code should not be used to protect information about the texts, including the Antioch police officers’ identities. Maier said the inflammatory communications started in September 2019 and continued until January 2022, when FBI agents seized the officers’ phones and other items.
The names of 17 Antioch, California police officers are now public as part of an investigation that led to text messages they allegedly sent containing racist jokes, memes and insults. (Photo: Screenshot/YouTube.com/ABC7 News Bay Area)
“I’ve had my eye on Antioch for a long time,” civil rights attorney Adante Pointer said Friday, according to the Times. “This is proof-positive what people who have been watching Antioch already knew — that it is full of officers who do not deserve to wear the badge.” The roster of embattled officers includes Rick Hoffman, the head of the Antioch Police Association. Hoffman — who has frequently criticized Antioch mayor and police reform advocate Lamar Thorpe — is one of at least eight Antioch officers on leave because of the texts. Six other officers whose alleged criminal activity is already being looked at by the FBI — Devon Wenger, Eric Rombough, Andrea Rodriguez, Calvin Prieto, Morteza Amiri and Tim Manly, who has resigned — are also listed. While Maier did not specify what each officer sent out, she described the messages as “deeply disturbing” and directed toward “members of the Black and Hispanic community.” Investigators accused Rombough, Manly and fellow officers Jonathan Adams, Scott Duggar, Joshua Evans, Robert Gerber, Brock Marcotte and Thomas Smith of mentioning four alleged Oakland-based ENT gang members in texts sent over a 10-day period in March 2021, when Antioch police were eavesdropping on the suspects’ phones.
Contra Costa County courts will determine whether or not the messages are sufficient grounds for dropping any charges lodged against people the officers were investigating. That includes anyone the officers mentioned explicitly in the texts and any Black or Latino person investigated or detained, since they might claim they faced discrimination because of their race. “It’s no wonder why the public has lost faith in law enforcement,” said Pointer, the Times reported, “and why we see Black and Brown people overrepresented in the criminal justice system when the people administering it are racist.” The evidence will likely reappear in other criminal trials involving those particular police officers and the other lawmen Maier mentioned: Aaron Hughes, Brayton Milner, John Ramirez and Kyle Smith. The FBI is investigating allegations of fraud, bribery, drug distribution and breaches of civil rights linked to using force within the Antioch and Pittsburg police departments. The agency discovered the officers’ texts last month after executing search warrants at the residences of several officers, arriving at the police station to confiscate phones and other personal belongings.
Michael Rains, the attorney representing Antioch police officers, said he hadn’t received any text messages and is unaware of their alleged content. Racial conflict has been simmering for years in the northern California city of about 100,000 people as gentrification in the western Bay Area uprooted San Francisco, Oakland and Richmond residents and moved them into the deep East Bay. Antioch had a 65 percent white population in 2000. According to census data, the Black population has expanded from 10 to 20 percent during the past two decades, notes the Times, while white inhabitants account for 39 percent, and Latinos or Hispanics make up 34.5 percent of the city’s residents. According to Mayor Thorpe, Antioch’s police department would “absolutely” face staffing challenges because of the number of officers now on leave. “But if that’s what they’re doing (making racist and homophobic texts),” he said, “I don’t want them here.”
This is white mass murderer Connor Sturgeon who massacred five (5) people and wounded nine (9) others at a bank on Monday in a shooting rampage in Louisville, Kentucky while live-streaming the attack.
Connor Sturgeon
This cold barefaced mass killer is being sanitized across the corporate media as a victim who has had multiple concussions; one publication introduced him as a graduate of the University of Alabama. Who the f**k cares? The publication went on to posit that the mass murderer has a master of science degree from the same university. Sturgeon had learned he was going to be fired from the bank and wrote a note for his parents and a friend that he was going to carry out a shooting at the bank, CNN reported. It seems to me like he was a regularly disgruntled worker who was mad he was about to be let go and decided to go postal on his colleagues. What does his bona fides have to do with him carrying out this barbaric act? To add insult to injury, he left a note to his parents and a friend telling them of his malicious intent. That goes to premeditation or mens re.a , guilty mind. Livestreaming his rampage was icing on the cake. Neither his formal education nor sports injury should be mentioned in this savage’s onslaught snuffing out innocent lives.
.…
Murderers are murderers, regardless of their skin color. We will not accept attempts to white-wash the barbarism inherent in white mass murderers being perpetuated by the wholly owned white corporate media. I will not stand in defense of black killers, nor will I stand in agreement with the sanitizing of white ones. Black men who commit murders are characterized as thugs and animals. If a black man who kills a single person is a thug and animal, what is the definition of a white man who does worse by taking more lives? The continued bombardment of our psyche by the fascist white power structure through the corrupt corporate media has gone on for too long. We no longer accept the implicit biases fed to us; we are quite capable of thinking for ourselves. The right-wing attacks on social media apps like Tik Tok, supported by some in the Democrat party, are all about getting back control of the minds of the people and prohibiting the people from getting information to each other without government/corporate input. It is another attack on ‘woke’ something they are desperately afraid of, black people beginning to think for themselves. Well, at least a few of us.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
Two black council members in Tennesee were expelled for protesting in the well of the statehouse.
They were trying to bring attention to the prolific problem of guns wreaking havoc on lives, including small children in their classrooms. Republicans characterized their protest as an insurrection.
Not one of those clowns had anything to say about the real insurrection that their messiah instigated on January 6th, 2021.
My plea to black people is to wake up; if you continue to slumber, you will be awakened in chains back on the plantations.
Every gain accomplished after the 1964 civil rights and the 1965 voting rights acts, including the two named acts, is under attack.
The way-overboard freakout response of the Republican supermajority in that body was dwarfed only by the condescending and racist responses of the individual members of that body as they fired off questions, made allegations, and talked down to the two young elected officials who were their equal. The condescension and the racist snarls were similar only to the white race soldiers who double as police officers when they encounter young black men on America’s streets. The Republican lynch mob all but forgot they were talking to two intelligent, highly competent young men in 2023, not two young men they intended to lynch after church service in bygone years. The blatant Racism, Xenophobia, Transphobia, Islamaphobia, and Homophobia unearthed across the United States is symptomatic of a dying rattlesnake that is still dangerous even with its head chopped off. Book banning, stopping people from voting, changing school and college curricula, and killing people who do not look like them is a losing strategy long-term. This regressive strategy by the political right gains its sustenance from the continued passivity and disinterest of 41.6 million Black people in the United States. Coupled with their over one trillion dollar spending power annually. No other ethnic group with that much power would tolerate what is dished out to African-Americans daily, yet this sleeping giant seems to be more interested in perpetual victimhood.
Some have been so brutalized and beaten down, battered and bruised, that they have thrown in their lot with the tormenters. How else would you characterize the likes of Clarence Tom-Ass, the cooning Tim Scott, or even the sorrily ignorant Herschel Walker, or the bed-wench Candace Owens? Stockholm syndrome? Maybe!!! Or, maybe some people were really created to be doormats, regardless of where groveling gets them for selling their souls. Placing a doormat on your fancy dining table and claiming it is a beautiful tablecloth does not change the fact it is a dirty doormat. There is talk that both young men will be returned to their elected posts. We will await the outcome of that. In the meantime, I hope people are waking up to the reality that they need to get up, go out, and vote in all elections. African-Americans have a habit of only voting in presidential elections in appropriate numbers. Those who toiled were battered and bruised to give them the right to vote should never die in vain because you are too lazy and ignorant to go out and vote. The supermajority in the Tennessee statehouse may be attributable to people not going out to vote, even though gerrymandering and voter suppression are also partially responsible. The Republican party will stop at nothing to retain white supremacy, which includes overthrowing the duly constituted governmental order of the United States. January 6th, 2021 was precedent; they may not fail on the next attempt.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.