Obama Agrees: Current Uncompromising, Angry Mood Of GOP Started With Sarah Palin …

mmb

August 31st 2015 I wrote a lengthy Article titled TRUMP’S RISECONTINUATION OF WHAT PALIN BROUGHT TO THE PROCESS
In that arti­cle I spoke at length of the fright­en­ing rhetoric which had all of a sud­den crept into the polit­i­cal dis­course with a degree of anger we had not heard before.

I went on to say it was dur­ing the elec­tion peri­od of 2008 and the intro­duc­tion of Sarah Palin onto the American polit­i­cal scene that the filthy racist under­bel­ly of America’s race prob­lem came to the fore. For the first time a cer­tain seg­ment of the American pop­u­la­tion believed that the citadel of white suprema­cy they built was about to be tak­en over by a black man with a fun­ny sound­ing name.

Whether McCain was pushed to select Palin a rabid divi­sive racist we may nev­er know. Whether McCain knew just how ran­cid and cor­ro­sive her rhetoric would be toward the African-American Democratic can­di­date we may nev­er know either. But note the time the Tea-Party rose to promi­nence and judge for yourself.
I believe those old enough to remem­ber the 2008 Elections doesn’t need a reminder of the Xenophobic, igno­rant, Racist cam­paign Sarah Palin waged on behalf of John McCain’s candidacy.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​t​r​u​m​p​s​-​r​i​s​e​-​a​-​c​o​n​t​i​n​u​a​t​i​o​n​-​o​f​-​w​h​a​t​-​p​a​l​i​n​-​b​r​o​u​g​h​t​-​t​o​-​t​h​e​-​p​r​o​c​e​ss/

John McCain’s deci­sion to chose Sarah Palin unleashed a brand of racial­ly polar­ized pol­i­tics no one in my gen­er­a­tion or younger had ever seen before .
In a doc­u­ment titled Partisan Polarization and the Rise of the Tea Party Movement Professor Alan I. Abramowitz Department of Political Science Emory University wrote .
The Tea Party move­ment has attract­ed enor­mous atten­tion from jour­nal­ists, can­di­dates, and elect­ed offi­cials since it first appeared on the U.S. polit­i­cal scene in ear­ly 2009. However, there has been con­sid­er­able dis­agree­ment among polit­i­cal observers about the num­bers and moti­va­tions of those par­tic­i­pat­ing in Tea Party protests, the preva­lence of racist sen­ti­ments among Tea Party activists, the role played by wealthy indi­vid­u­als, con­ser­v­a­tive groups and media fig­ures in foment­ing these protests, and the poten­tial long-term impact of the move­ment (Judis 2010; Crabtree 2010; Parker 2010; Scarborough 2010).

President Barack Obama
President Barack Obama

In a rather reveal­ing Article pub­lished in the New York Daily news Monday October 3rd, President Barack Obama spoke to exact­ly this truth.
Said the President.

I see a straight line from the announce­ment of Sarah Palin as the vice pres­i­den­tial nom­i­nee to what we see today in Donald Trump, the emer­gence of the Freedom Caucus, the tea par­ty and the shift in the cen­ter of grav­i­ty for the Republican Party,”.
“Whether that changes, I think, will depend in part on the out­come of this elec­tion, but it’s also going to depend on the degree of self-reflec­tion inside the Republican Party,” “There have been at least a cou­ple of oth­er times that I’ve said con­fi­dent­ly that the fever is going to have to break, but it just seems to get worse.”
“It might not have been rep­re­sen­ta­tive of Republicans across the coun­try, but it meant that John Boehner or Mitch McConnell had to wor­ry about that mood inside their par­ty that felt that, ‘No, we should­n’t coöper­ate with Obama, we should­n’t coöper­ate with Democrats.’ That it rep­re­sents com­pro­mise, weak­ness and that the broad­er char­ac­ter of America is at stake, regard­less of what­ev­er pol­i­cy argu­ments might be made,” 

Palin
Palin


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/obama-current-angry-mood-gop-started-sarah-palin-article‑1.2815652

The President is cor­rect, we believed this to be true from the moment Senator McCain chose Palin. It’s as if some­one had opened up a pan­do­ra box releas­ing an evil Genie emerg­ing with it, a swarm of destruc­tive Locusts none of which could be put back into the bottle.
The President has con­sis­tent­ly said he expect the fever to break soon­er or lat­er. Thus far the fever seem to be get­ting worse,even though Palin has demon­strat­ed that she was by far a total­ly unfit per­son to be a heart­beat from the presidency.
Even though Palin has proven her irrel­e­vance the dam­age has been done. Whether or not Trump becomes President the tox­i­c­i­ty Palin released into the polit­i­cal envi­ron­ment is here to stay.
Just goes to show that one fool can make many. Or prob­a­bly more appro­pri­ate­ly awak­en a lot more.

Breaking Point: America Approaching A Period Of Disintegration, Argues Anthropologist Peter Turchin

TOPICS: AGES OF DISCORD, AGES OF DISCORD: A STRUCTURAL-DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF AMERICAN HISTORY,AMERICAN HISTORY, ANTHROPOLOGY, BOOKS, EDITOR’S PICKS, ELECTIONS 2016, OUR PICKS: BOOKS, PETER TURCHIN, U.S. HISTORY, , , ,

Breaking point: America approaching a period of disintegration, argues anthropologist Peter TurchinUnrest in Charlotte, NC, September 20, 2016. (Credit: Reuters/​Adam Rhew)

As the 2016 cam­paign reach­es fever pitch, the more heat there is and the less light is shed. Which is why evo­lu­tion­ary anthro­pol­o­gist Peter Turchin’s new book comes as such a breath of fresh air. “Ages of Discord: A Structural-Demographic Analysis of American History” is not about this year’s pres­i­den­tial elec­tion, per se, but it’s a quan­tum leap for­ward in illu­mi­nat­ing the dis­in­te­gra­tive trends that America has expe­ri­enced over the last sev­er­al decades that are cur­rent­ly dri­ving our politics.

Everything from sky­rock­et­ing inequal­i­ty and polit­i­cal grid­lock to white work­ing class angst and the rise of mass shoot­ings and oth­er trou­bling signs of our times — these are all inter­con­nect­ed reflec­tions of where America is in a cyclic his­tor­i­cal process: social inte­gra­tion fol­lowed by dis­in­te­gra­tion, dis­cord and vio­lence. Turchin and oth­ers have observed this pat­tern repeat­ed­ly in civ­i­liza­tions from ancient Rome and ear­ly Chinese dynas­ties up to the present day.

Here are two sum­ma­ry snap­shots of these long-term cycles from the book, the first from Europe:

European Cycles

Then from China: Read more here: http://​www​.salon​.com/​2​0​1​6​/​1​0​/​0​1​/​b​r​e​a​k​i​n​g​-​p​o​i​n​t​-​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​-​a​p​p​r​o​a​c​h​i​n​g​-​a​-​p​e​r​i​o​d​-​o​f​-​d​i​s​i​n​t​e​g​r​a​t​i​o​n​-​a​r​g​u​e​s​-​a​n​t​h​r​o​p​o​l​o​g​i​s​t​-​p​e​t​e​r​-​t​u​r​c​h​in/

Vultures Are Not Offended By The Stench Of Rotting Carcasses..

mmb
As the nation’s murder rate contine to gallop toward what could be unprecedented amounts of dead Jamaicans this year the security forces are trying to do the best they can.
They are placing their bodies between the marauding gunmen running around with the most sophisticated high powered weapons and the Jamaican people many of whom are totally undeserving of the risks they take.
It’s important that as the calls go out for a limited state of emergency we recognize that those calling for it from certain sectors of the country are only doing so because their bottom line is being threatened. Their concerns are not based on the loss of life but on the potential loss of dollars.

As more and more Jamaicans brave­ly raise their heads amidst the con­stant bar­rage of igno­rant bark­ing and obfus­ca­tion in sup­port of INDECOM, sup­port­ers of the irra­tional ‚poor­ly thought-out law are get­ting more des­per­ate as they seek to find legit­i­ma­cy for this irra­tional crim­i­nal sup­port­ing law.
Amidst the noise is a TRUMPIAN[sic] refusal on the part of the Island’s most stri­dent anti-police sup­port­ers to see facts as facts .
An Orwellian refusal to face the bleak real­i­ty that this bad law and it’s lead­er­ship’s media whor­ing is embold­en­ing the Island’s killers.

As we look on in hor­ror at the unchecked mur­der and may­hem, the streets reduced to wild west shootouts with­out fear of the police it becomes clear by the day that those who stand in stub­born oppo­si­tion to facts are indeed part of the problem.
At some point in time dur­ing this dis­course we have to begin the unsa­vory task of extrap­o­lat­ing from the smoke-screen and igno­rant push-back that many Jamaicans who pass as decent peo­ple are sup­port­ers of criminals.
This is true of Jamaicans both at home and abroad.

I can­not imag­ine any­one who would rea­son­ably be opposed to police oversight .
As a Jamaican who love my coun­try, not because of what I can derive from it but because I have already giv­en to it I sup­port over­sight of the Police department.
Oversight how­ev­er can­not be adver­sar­i­al to the point that offi­cers are exposed to finan­cial ruin , the loss of their careers, or being set up by man­u­fac­tured wit­ness­es which invari­ably lands them in prison.

These mercenaries are not even concerned about showing their faces with these weapons. Why would they not care except that they know they are protected?
These mer­ce­nar­ies are not even con­cerned about show­ing their faces with these weapons.
Why would they not care except that they know they are protected?

This is not about just sup­port of police which we must do in a demo­c­ra­t­ic safe soci­ety. It is about the future direc­tion of the country,.
Will we stand silent­ly by and allow those who would ben­e­fit from a failed crim­i­nal state to shout us down.
For my part I will not spend a sin­gle minute of my time mak­ing a dis­tinc­tion between the false par­al­lel of stand­ing up for the rule of law and cor­rup­tion in the police department.

I stand with the rule of law because there is a bina­ry choice between sid­ing with the rule of law and our police officers(even in their imper­fec­tion) and sup­port­ing the maraud­ing killers who are killing with impuni­ty with­out consequence.
The choice is clear , either one sup­port the police, and con­tin­ue to demand a real fix of the depart­ment or we throw our sup­port behind the killers in the old adage of join­ing them because we can­not beat them.

Every sec­ond wast­ed talk­ing about oth­er things allows the mur­der­ous killers to be more estab­lished , more emboldened.
There is strong well arrayed oppo­si­tion to Jamaica ever becom­ing a coun­try of laws.
They are not who you think they are , they are pow­er­ful, they are monied, and they wield incred­i­ble polit­i­cal power.
They do not all stand on the cor­ner Guinness under one armpit , pants down their back­sides crush­ing weed in their palm.
Many of them are dressed in suits , they live in upscale neigh­bor­hoods and you refer to them as sir and look up to them as leaders.

Lord knows the Jamaican police need over­sight like pret­ty much every police depart­ment any­where. Placing the pow­er of life and death in the hands of any human being must be sub­ject to rig­or­ous scruti­ny . Yet those who risk life and limb for our safe­ty deserve every bit of sup­port we can give and they deserve cer­tain lat­i­tude to do the job we ask them to do.

This is the rea­son I have sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly called for the repeal of the INDECOM act.
Re-Debating every aspect of the act then reau­tho­riz­ing a bet­ter law which pro­tects police from friv­o­lous pros­e­cu­tion. A bet­ter law which inves­ti­gates impar­tial­ly and with­out ran­cor abus­es of pow­er by mem­bers of the secu­ri­ty forces will ulti­mate­ly result in a regen­er­a­tion of trust between decent law-abid­ing cit­i­zens and their police.
In that Law should be civ­il reme­dies for mem­bers of the secu­ri­ty forces who have been wrong­ful­ly accused.
In that law should be clear crim­i­nal penal­ties for those who would seek to wrong­ful­ly incrim­i­nate hard work­ing officers.

http://www.japarliament.gov.jm/attachments/341_The%20Independent%20Commission%20of%20Investigation%20Act,%202010,.pdf

The INDECOM Act is a knee-jerk law thrown togeth­er to bring police to heel with zero con­sid­er­a­tion for the hard work­ing police offi­cers and mem­bers of the Island’s mil­i­tary who brave all for the country.
What kind of coun­try shows no respect for mem­bers of it’s secu­ri­ty forces but gives a National hon­or to a lying agi­ta­tor who open­ly sup­port and defend crime syn­di­cates and flood kinder­garten and grade schools with homo­sex­u­al porno­graph­ic literature?

This is an exis­ten­tial fight. Jamaicans bury their heads to their own detri­ment. For those of you who are able to see through the smoke and obfus­ca­tion, events of 2010 in which mer­ce­nar­ies chal­lenged the state will be a cake-walk com­pared to what’s to come if exist­ing trends are allowed to remain.
There are many who are quite sat­is­fied with things the way they are .
Sorry to say it but pigs will not argue about mud , and Vultures are not offend­ed by stench of rot­ting carcasses.
You decide.

Read and share..

Major Crime Leaders In Jamaica Are Indistinguishable From Major Players In Both Political Parties.

mmb

The head­lines in the Jamaica DailyGleaner this morn­ing spoke vol­umes today Thursday September 29th.
♦ Support grow­ing for lim­it­ed state of emergency.
♦Cops con­fi­dent in war against MoBay thugs — We have a lot of assets, but there could always be more, says Commish.
♦Montague: We are reap­ing the whirl­wind — Security min­is­ter cites social decay as he out­lines response to St James violence.
♦Last Chance’ — Stakeholders Warn Of Business, Tourism Fallout If Crime Not Curbed Next Month.
♦Queen Ifrica’s Grim Picture Of Montego Bay.
♦Editorial | Attack The Emergency With Emergency.
♦Devon Dick| Visit from a gunman?
♦Letter Of The Day | Stop The Speeches And Start Hunting.

These were the leads on the dig­i­tal ver­sion of the Daily Gleaner . Remarkably as the crim­i­nals push the enve­lope of what they can get away with the dither­ing and the sense of pre­tence continues.
Front and cen­ter to the debate of the exis­ten­tial threat faced by the nation and the ever slid­ing scale of what’s accept­able, is the talk about rights.

I fun­da­men­tal­ly respect the right of each and every one of those peo­ple to be dead right.
To those peo­ple, each and every one of you I do not advo­cate for you , I do not assume to speak on your behalf.
Now to the silent major­i­ty of ordi­nary Jamaicans like my fam­i­ly mem­bers and friends who have no con­nec­tion to crim­i­nals and their nefar­i­ous activ­i­ties I share your pain.
For the fam­i­lies of the police offi­cers and mem­bers of our nation’s mil­i­tary who are not involved in crim­i­nal­i­ty , I share your pain.
There is noth­ing I could pos­si­bly tell you that you do not already know. Nevertheless it is still impor­tant that you be remind­ed that you have the pow­er in your hands .How you uti­lize that pow­er is up to you.

Over the years you have seen the lev­el of crime in our coun­try grad­u­al­ly esca­late on a con­tin­u­ous upward tra­jec­to­ry . What you have not seen is a less­ing of those levels.
Regardless of what your polit­i­cal or oth­er lead­ers tell you, crime is not get­ting better.
The goal-post is being con­tin­u­al­ly moved on the lev­els of crim­i­nal con­duct. The Envelope is being pushed on what the crim­i­nal under­world is allowed to get away with.
Simply put, your elect­ed lead­ers , your busi­ness lead­ers, and even some of your reli­gious lead­ers are lying to you.
Political lead­ers are still putting guns into the hands of the young people.
Political lead­ers have turned their backs and allowed guns and ammu­ni­tion to flood the Island through Haiti and oth­er points of ori­gin with­out lift­ing a fin­ger to do any­thing about it.

Do not be fooled about what is hap­pen­ing even in the tourism sec­tor there is only an out­cry when their bot­tom-line is imperiled.
The steps being tak­en sup­pos­ed­ly in your inter­est are designed to pla­cate you rather than to solve the problems.
Your polit­i­cal lead­ers have no inten­tion of solv­ing crime in Jamaica . Look at the pro­lif­ic rise and expan­sion of the gar­risons in our coun­try, ask your­selves whether the PNP or the JLP is inter­est­ed in solv­ing the crime Problem in our country.
I point you to a Devon Dick Column in Thursday’s Daily Gleaner , read and decide for yourselves.

Crime is big busi­ness in our coun­try , it is, and has been ger­mane to who gets elect­ed to polit­i­cal office for decades. Business lead­ers from top to bot­tom bring in con­tra­band and stiff the coun­try of much need­ed revenue.
The Customs depart­ment has been a cesspool of graft , theft, and cor­rup­tion for decades. Lowly cus­tom offi­cers have owned some of the most pres­ti­gious homes and dri­ven lux­u­ry cars on their stipend salaries. No one both­ered to demand to know from what sources are those rev­enues derived. Jamaicans return­ing to the Island knows quite well where they get the mon­ey from.
Governments of both polit­i­cal par­ties com­mit the most egre­gious frauds and acts of cor­rup­tion, sub­ject­ing yet unborn gen­er­a­tions to lives of debt and impoverishment.
In response to your out­cry they empow­er a Contractor General law but gave the office no pow­er to pros­e­cute them. The con­trac­tor gen­er­al can bark all he wants, your thiev­ing politi­cians laugh with total dis­dain know­ing full well they are untouchable..

Literally every Government agency is a bureau­crat­ic cesspool of graft and extor­tion and a maze-like morass of incom­pe­tence . The RJD, Motor vehi­cle depart­ment. Passport depart­ment, every­thing depends on indi­vid­u­als abil­i­ty to pay or more appro­pri­ate­ly their abil­i­ty to be extorted.
No pub­lic sec­tor depart­ment is free from Corruption, Nepotism, and Extortion.
None !!!!
As such, lit­er­al­ly every pri­vate sec­tor enti­ty, every non gov­ern­men­tal orga­ni­za­tion has been taint­ed to some degree with the cor­ro­sive taint of graft , theft, and corruption.
What did you , all of you expect was going to hap­pen to your police department?
Did you think for a moment they would be the only pub­lic sec­tor work­ers untouched by the corruption?
Did you real­ly believe they cre­at­ed INDECOM to root out police cor­rup­tion? Or are you now rec­og­niz­ing that it was just anoth­er attempt at hol­low­ing out the already inef­fec­tu­al police department?
Look at the num­bers of cor­rupt cops suc­ces­sive Commissioners of police have root­ed out on their own, using the tools they have at their disposal.
Examine the num­bers of dirty cops the CCRB removed while they were the pri­ma­ry over­sight author­i­ty along with the depart­men­t’s own inter­nal mechanisms.
Now jux­ta­pose those num­bers with what INDECOM has accom­plished com­men­su­rate with it’s sup­posed mandate.

By INDECOM’s own admis­sion most of the cas­es it has sup­pos­ed­ly inves­ti­gat­ed result­ed in a con­clu­sion that offi­cers act­ed properly.
A cur­so­ry cost ben­e­fit analy­sis shows that resources used to fund INDECOM and the Public defend­er’s office could be bet­ter used to fund and improve the police’s inves­tiga­tive capabilities.
Which would reveal who the major orga­nized crime fig­ures are.
The major crime lead­ers in our coun­try to a large degree are indis­tin­guish­able from the major polit­i­cal play­ers in both polit­i­cal parties.
Therein ladies and gen­tle­men is the crux of your problem.

Like and share..

In Light Of The Mounting Dead Bodies We Have Begun A Countdown Until Terrence Williams Is Fired…

Prime Minister Andrew Holness
Prime Minister Andrew Holness

Terrence Williams
Terrence Williams

MISTER PRIME MINISTER IT IS NOT OUTSIDE YOUR POWER, FIRE TERRENCE WILLIAMS AND SAVE THE LIVES OF THE INNOCENT JAMAICANS BEING MURDERED.
THE COUNTDOWN BEGINS NOW !!!

Until The Prime Minister Fires Terrence Williams He Is Responsible For Every Innocent Life Lost To Marauding Criminals ..

mmb

The single most topical issue dominating the news in Jamaica is crime. It has become such a grave concern that it now dominates all the news cycles and the media stories literally.
The single most oft-used term this writer has used to describe the fuel to the Island’s crime situation is the decision-makers’ pretentious nature.

Today we learned that a new tac­ti­cal police unit would be head­ing to Montego Bay to work toward elim­i­nat­ing the main per­pe­tra­tors of vio­lence in the crime-rav­aged city, accord­ing to the police.
Not exact­ly sure why this infor­ma­tion would be giv­en to crim­i­nals, how­ev­er accord­ing to the police hier­ar­chy, this team is dif­fer­ent from the oth­er for­ma­tions that are on the ground work­ing with the mil­i­tary to restore law and order to the city.
The police high com­mand announced, “This team has not hit the road since the 2010 oper­a­tion in west Kingston, and it has been giv­en the duty to tar­get the ‘big fishes”.
If my mem­o­ry serves me well, I believe the last time these police offi­cers were called on to risk life and limb for our coun­try, Portia Simpson Miller brought David Simmons from Barbados to dem­a­gogue, dis­re­spect, demean and seek to incrim­i­nate them.

David-Simmons
David-Simmons

Most impor­tant­ly, when the Nation finds itself engulfed in a pick­le, it turns to the police and mil­i­tary to bail it out from the clutch­es of the maraud­ing gang­sters while the Elitist deci­sion-mak­ers and oth­er shit for brains, sit in their gat­ed com­mu­ni­ties and pon­tif­i­cate about alleged breach­es of human rights.
Just yes­ter­day, there was a con­sta­ble in the news who clear­ly seemed to be hav­ing men­tal issues. According to the media, the offi­cer attempt­ed to jump from a build­ing in the town of Mandeville.

Vendolyn Cameron-Powell
Vendolyn Cameron-Powell

Shockingly, yet not sur­pris­ing­ly, the com­mand­ing offi­cer for the parish, Superintendent Vendolyn Cameron-Powell, in response to the inci­dent, respond­ed that the obvi­ous­ly dis­traught con­sta­ble is “known to cre­ate excite­ment when he becomes dissatisfied.”
It’s tough to grasp that any super­vi­sor in this day and age would be this crass, uncar­ing, or unlearned. However, it does not sur­prise me one bit; this is why I have had noth­ing but utter dis­dain for this police depart­men­t’s hierarchy.
However, that was not all; she went to cement fur­ther her own dis­qual­i­fi­ca­tion and lack of fit­ness for the job she holds.
Quote: “He is not suit­able to car­ry out the duties and respon­si­bil­i­ties of the Jamaica Constabulary Force. “He is not a fit can­di­date for (this) kind of job.”

Once again, the Jamaican state is in a ter­ri­ble state.
Once again, the Jamaican state has mem­bers of the mil­i­tary and the police force, putting their lives on the line in defense of the nation while oth­ers are in their beds at night.
Once again, the Police and the sol­diers go in and give all for their coun­try. They do not ask for much, and they are giv­en nothing.
Neither the Prime Minister nor the Leader of the Opposition nor any of the talk­ing heads in either of the polit­i­cal par­ties have moved to give the police the cov­er and the guar­an­tees they need to go in and do the job they are asked to do.

Just Yesterday, I spoke direct­ly to the Jamaican Prime Minister in this very medi­um. I implored him to be great, like Hugh Lawson Shearer the great Labor Party Prime Minister who stepped up to the plate when duty called. He did so to ensure that our nation was guar­an­teed the secu­ri­ty it need­ed and our coun­try was bet­ter for it.
The great­est imped­i­ment to crime-fight­ing in Jamaica is not the crim­i­nals who pull the trig­ger; it is the peo­ple who ben­e­fit from crime. Criminal Lawyers, and those who ben­e­fit from the pletho­ra of fringe groups who are sup­pos­ed­ly in the busi­ness of look­ing out for human rights abus­es.

Terrence Williams (right) commissioner of the Independent Commission of Investigations (INDECOM), Hamish Campbell, (centre) IDECOM's assistant commissioner and Dave Lewis, INDECOM's director of complaints central region at a Gleaner Editors' Forum last Friday. (Source: jamaicagleaner.com)
Terrence Williams (right), com­mis­sion­er of the Independent Commission of Investigations (INDECOM), Hamish Campbell, (cen­ter), IDECOM’s assis­tant com­mis­sion­er, and Dave Lewis, INDECOM’s direc­tor of com­plaints cen­tral region.

National secu­ri­ty is the num­ber one pri­or­i­ty of any Government. Only in secure envi­ron­ments are the oth­er func­tions of gov­ern­ment best realized.
Once again, anoth­er Jamaican Administration is lean­ing heav­i­ly on the nation’s secu­ri­ty forces for its own survival.
Yet the Administration has not offered a sin­gle guar­an­tee to these brave, unselfish men and women who risk their lives. They get no guar­an­tees that they won’t be per­se­cut­ed and hound­ed to the point of los­ing their san­i­ty because of a tax­pay­er-fund­ed agency.

Remarkable, the com­mis­sion­er of Police, Dr. Carl Williams, is now awak­en­ing from his slum­ber and rec­og­niz­ing what I have said since the begin­ning of the INDECOM law. Speaking to Jamaican Media, the timid Williams echoed what he heard from his own offi­cers that they were unwill­ing to engage because of Terrence Williams’s persecution.

I went out to St James on the week­end, and the police offi­cers told me that they have an excel­lent rela­tion­ship with the local INDECOM offi­cers, but the prob­lem is what is direct­ed from INDECOM headquarters.”
“We are not daunt­ed, because this is a call­ing and not just a job. We have tak­en an oath to make sure the safe­ty and secu­ri­ty of the peo­ple of Jamaica, and we go out to work every day to do just that, INDECOM or no INDECOM,”
Williams stat­ed.

This medi­um takes great pride in call­ing out com­mis­sion­er Williams and is proud that he is seem­ing­ly begin­ning to get some guts.
Officers on the ground have repeat­ed­ly com­plained to this writer. They have con­firmed to Jamaican media their fear of doing their jobs only to be per­se­cut­ed for years, los­ing their careers, and end­ing up in finan­cial ruin…

If that police­man is sus­pend­ed, he gets no pay; if he’s inter­dict­ed, a por­tion of his salary is cut,” police­men tell the media.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​j​a​m​a​i​c​a​-​w​i​l​l​-​i​n​v​a​r​i​a​b​l​y​-​a​d​o​p​t​-​c​o​l​o​m​b​i​a​s​-​m​o​d​e​l​-​e​r​a​d​i​c​a​t​e​-​m​u​r​d​e​r​-​s​c​o​u​r​ge/

Simply put, Terrence Williams must be fired for crime to be addressed as it should be. He is an ego-mani­a­cal nar­cis­sist who is being allowed to sin­gle-hand­ed­ly enhance the deaths of hun­dreds of Jamaicans to sat­is­fy his ego while cre­at­ing a name for him­self, at the expense of tax­pay­ers — this along with a hor­rif­ic crim­i­nal empow­er­ment law.
No sin­gle per­son should be allowed this lev­el of pow­er in a democ­ra­cy. No per­son should head any agency which is answer­able to no one.
This obser­va­tion is not unique to this writer; oth­er Jamaicans have spo­ken out about this, includ­ing Damion Crawford, Peter Bunting and others.
This fias­co has to come to an end.
Thus far in the parish of Saint James, over two hun­dred peo­ple have lost their lives. The Prime Minister, the Honorable Andrew Holness can­not pre­tend that he has­n’t heard. He can­not pre­tend he does not see the numbers.
Consequently, for every per­son who is killed because the secu­ri­ty forces are too scared for their legal secu­ri­ty to go after the killers, the Prime Minister must take respon­si­bil­i­ty for their spilled blood.
Unless there are enough guar­an­tees giv­en to police and sol­diers going into that war zone by this gov­ern­ment, that they will not become vic­tims of ego-mani­a­cal and nar­cis­sis­tic witch hunts.
Guarantees that they will not be scape­goats and maligned after they have silenced the guns of the Island’s urban mer­ce­nar­ies as they were after 2010.
Then my advice to each mem­ber of the secu­ri­ty forces is “shoul­der arms.”

Read and share.….

Special Police Tactical Team Deployed To Crime-Plagued MoBay

A spe­cial police tac­ti­cal team has been deployed to Montego Bay, St James with a man­date to tar­get the main per­pe­tra­tors of vio­lence in the crime-rav­aged city.

This team has not hit the road since the 2010 oper­a­tion in west Kingston and it has been giv­en the duty to tar­get the ‘big fish­es’ who are the ones with the mon­ey to buy the high-priced, high-pow­ered weapons which we are see­ing in the hands of the crim­i­nals,” a senior police offi­cer told The Gleaner a short while ago. “This team is dif­fer­ent from the oth­er for­ma­tions that are on the ground work­ing with the mil­i­tary to restore law and order to the city. The team is going to get the major play­ers,” added the cop. Police Commissioner Dr Carl Williams is slat­ed to tour some of the more crime-rav­aged com­mu­ni­ties in and around Montego Bay today before host­ing a media brief­ing where he is expect­ed to announce addi­tion­al plans to reduce the mur­ders in St James. http://​jamaica​-glean​er​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​1​6​0​9​2​8​/​j​u​s​t​-​s​p​e​c​i​a​l​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​t​a​c​t​i​c​a​l​-​t​e​a​m​-​d​e​p​l​o​y​e​d​-​c​r​i​m​e​-​p​l​a​g​u​e​d​-​m​o​bay

Jamaica Will Invariably Have To Adopt Colombia’s Model To Eradicate The Murder Scourge ..

mmb

JAMAICA IS HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON TOURISM FOR ITS SURVIVAL, YET THE VERY HEART OF THE TOURISM HUB, MONTEGO BAY, HAS FOR YEARS BEENWILDWILD WEST .

The Island’s Prime Minister Andrew Holness vis­it­ed Montego Bay and spoke to cit­i­zens a cou­ple days ago he also met with secu­ri­ty per­son­nel in the parish who gave him first-hand brief­ing of the chal­lenges they face. The Prime Minister sub­se­quent­ly released a state­ment in which he said the following .

We don’t have a switch to turn off crime … . The strate­gies we are putting in place will take some time to bear fruit, but we are work­ing with the great­est speed and alacrity to ensure the results bear fruit,”. “There is a need for leg­isla­tive reform to empow­er our police – and mil­i­tary in sup­port of the police – leg­is­la­tion that is rel­e­vant and applic­a­ble to the crime sit­u­a­tion we face.

I humbly sub­mit to the Prime Minister and indeed the entire Nation that this fight is an exis­ten­tial fight. If the events of 2010 in Tivoli Gardens have not con­vinced you that there are enough guns, ammu­ni­tion and the will to effec­tive­ly chal­lenge the author­i­ty of the state I do not know what will.

There is a series present­ly avail­able on Netflix which tells the sto­ry of Colombia’s war with nar­co traf­fick­ers. It depicts the pow­er and ruth­less­ness of the Colombian drug lords in that exis­ten­tial fight that nation had with deter­mined nar­co traf­fick­ers. I sug­gest the Prime Minister , the Minister of National Security sit down and take a look at that series.
Otherwise they may do a sim­ple Google search which will reveal what the Colombian peo­ple did to break the back of that threat, sav­ing their nation from becom­ing a Narco state.

Prime Minister Andrew Holness
Prime Minister Andrew Holness

Mister Prime Minister I sup­port­ed your can­di­da­cy for the high­est elect­ed office in our coun­try . At this time I sup­port the work you are doing . You have demon­strat­ed an under­stand­ing of what needs to be done . I also under­stand that there are strong forces arrayed against a change in our coun­try which are quite com­fort­able with the sta­tus quo.
Mister Prime Minister, I am sure that you are more con­ver­sant with what is occur­ring on the ground than most, includ­ing this writer. You live there , you receive brief­in­gs, you see it on tele­vi­sion. It is up to you to change this.

It won’t be easy I under­stand that. At the risk of sound­ing grandiose I am speak­ing direct­ly to you because I am aware that you and some well placed peo­ple in your admin­is­tra­tion do take a peek at this lit­tle medi­um from time to time.
I implore you to get rid of INDECOM.
It is a bad law which was poor­ly thought through, you know it, many in your Administration know it, and an ever increas­ing plu­ral­i­ty of the Jamaican peo­ple are com­ing to that realization.

Terrence Williams
Terrence Williams

Mister Prime Minister I know that you under­stand that I am absolute­ly not advo­cat­ing for unfet­tered polic­ing with no over­sight . I have a his­to­ry of advo­cat­ing for strong over­sight of police but it can­not be an adver­sar­i­al over­sight deter­mined to have gotcha moments of police offi­cers who go out and risk their lives for your life and that of all of our citizens.
Mister Prime Minister the future of our coun­try can­not be mort­gaged on the ego of a sin­gle per­son or even a small group of elites who are hell bent on a destruc­tive path of social engi­neer­ing which has been tried and proven to fail, not just in our coun­try but in others.

Finally Prime Minister Holness, I do believe you are crit­i­cal­ly aware that your growth agen­da can­not and will not be suc­cess­ful in an atmos­phere of mur­der and may­hem. Someone will have to bell the cat . If not you then who?
You do not want to pre­side over the ash­es of our coun­try . Make no mis­take if this regres­sion is not halt­ed with deci­sive action and soon, that will be the result.
This is not the first time that this kind of threat has emerged in our coun­try . It was anoth­er great Labor Party Prime Minister, the Rt Honorable Hugh Lawson Shearer who placed his boot-heels on that monster.
You too can be great , if not for your­self , for the yet unborn chil­dren, for the future of our coun­try. It’s up to you. You must send Terrence Williams pack­ing and empow­er the police to go after the murderers.
The world is watching !!!

Giuliani: I’d Skip Next Debates If I Were Trump..

Donald Trump should skip the next two debates unless he gets spe­cial guar­an­tees from the mod­er­a­tors, for­mer New York may­or and top Trump advis­er Rudy Giuliani told reporters after the debate. Lester Holt, the NBC News anchor who mod­er­at­ed the debate, should be “ashamed of him­self,” Giuliani said after the debate. He said Holt was wrong to attempt to fact-check Trump on the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of stop-and-frisk and his claimed oppo­si­tion to the Iraq War​.Read more: http://​www​.politi​co​.com/​s​t​o​r​y​/​2​0​1​6​/​0​9​/​g​i​u​l​i​a​n​i​-​t​r​u​m​p​-​d​e​b​a​t​e​s​-​2​2​8​7​5​6​#​i​x​z​z​4​L​S​v​Q​p​fgj

Stop Pussy-footing Around Crime.….

mmb

military vehicle in Glendevon, St James Gleaner photo...
mil­i­tary vehi­cle in Glendevon, St James
Gleaner pho­to…

We don’t have a switch to turn off crime … . The strate­gies we are putting in place will take some time to bear fruit, but we are work­ing with the great­est speed and alacrity to ensure the results bear fruit,”. “There is a need for leg­isla­tive reform to empow­er our police — and mil­i­tary in sup­port of the police — leg­is­la­tion that is rel­e­vant and applic­a­ble to the crime sit­u­a­tion we face.

Those words were uttered by Jamaica’s Prime Minister who is also the Minister of defense accord­ing to the Island’s con­sti­tu­tion. The Prime Minister has my sym­pa­thy, not because of any polit­i­cal alle­giance but because he has a full plate . He has an agen­da which he ran on to turn around the lives of the 2.8 mil­lion Jamaicans. His mantra being from pover­ty to prosperity.

Police Commissioner Dr Carl Williams (left); Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Clinton Moore (second left), the officer in charge of the Montego Hills police station; DSP Marlon Nesbeth (centre), the commanding officer for St James; and Assistant Commissioner of Police Warren Clarke (right) in dialogue with Prime Minister Andrew Holness during his tour of crime-plagued Montego Bay, St James, yesterday. Gleaner photo.
Police Commissioner Dr Carl Williams (left); Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Clinton Moore (sec­ond left), the offi­cer in charge of the Montego Hills police sta­tion; DSP Marlon Nesbeth (cen­tre), the com­mand­ing offi­cer for St James; and Assistant Commissioner of Police Warren Clarke (right) in dia­logue with Prime Minister Andrew Holness dur­ing his tour of crime-plagued Montego Bay, St James, yes­ter­day.
Gleaner pho­to.

The Prime Minister has a full plate unlike his pre­de­ces­sor who seemed to have del­e­gat­ed all of her core func­tions to min­ions whom were large­ly inter­est­ed only in stuff­ing their pock­ets with the con­tents of the till.
Nevertheless , the Prime Minister has a duty despite his many oth­er func­tions to address the Nation’s gal­lop­ing mur­der rate. It seem that with the best efforts of the secu­ri­ty forces and the rel­a­tive­ly inane lead­er­ship of his National secu­ri­ty Minister no one has any idea how to stop the bleed­ing literally.

When The Police Are Constrained Crime Increases Placing The Lives Of Everyone In Jeopardy

On Monday some­one asked me on a social media plat­form what I would do dif­fer­ent­ly if it was my job to bring crime to man­age­able lev­els. I had no time to respond in a way which would have made sense on that plat­form giv­en the time I had. So I referred him to my web­site, I did so not because I need­ed the hits but because over the years I have artic­u­lat­ed a raft of ideas which must be addressed if we are to gain con­trol of crime.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​r​e​v​a​m​p​r​e​-​d​o​-​r​e​-​a​u​t​h​o​r​i​z​e​-​i​n​d​e​c​om/

Many crit­ics have said some of my pro­pos­als can­not work because of Jamaican laws.
To those I ask who made the laws?
Most of the Nation’s laws were made at a time when peo­ple weren’t gun­ning down groups of peo­ple, or slit­ting the throats of infants.
They are archa­ic , out­dat­ed and they sim­ply have no deter­rent effect. They need to go.

REPEAL AND REPLACE THE INDECOM ACT: Part 2.

There can be no place in the search for solu­tions where police are poor­ly trained, poor­ly super­vised, poor­ly sup­port­ed and are allowed to go out and kill peo­ple indiscriminately.

I have no inter­est in spend­ing my time debat­ing the fore­gone so I high­light­ed it just for that reason.
Many Jamaicans can harken back to the days when 300 homi­cides annu­al­ly was a ter­ri­fy­ing propo­si­tion for us . Today the small Island of 2.8 mil­lion peo­ple expe­ri­ence between 1000 and 1600 annu­al­ly. Our police force had many prob­lems not the least of which was Corruption♦ Poor-train­ing♦ Poor super­vi­sion♦ Unlawful Political inter­fer­ence♦ Pathetic lead­er­ship♦ Poor remu­ner­a­tions♦ Lack of respect for our offi­cers♦ Lack of respect for the rule of law and a range of oth­er problems.

What the Island need­ed then was lead­er­ship and a decid­ed pol­i­cy of non-tol­er­ance toward crime and those who com­mit them. As a police offi­cer then I absolute­ly thought that 300 homi­cides annu­al­ly was way too much and that it rep­re­sent­ed a par­a­digm shift which if not addressed would lead to where we are today . Guess what we are there.
Instead of invest­ing heav­i­ly in mod­ern­iz­ing our police depart­ment the polit­i­cal class made the deci­sion to take the coun­try in a dif­fer­ent direction.
They gut­ted the police force , using some mem­bers as their per­son­al gophers , removed fund­ing for detec­tive train­ing while expo­nen­tial­ly work­ing to facil­i­tate the gar­ri­son culture.
lotto

Despite the tremen­dous harm both polit­i­cal par­ties did to the Police depart­ment and by exten­sion our country,the sin­gle great­est crime enhance­ment step ever tak­en in our nation’s his­to­ry was the cre­ation of INDECOM as an over­sight agency to mon­i­tor the JDF /​JCF/​and the Corrections department.
Jamaica’s crim­i­nals are no fools , many are incred­i­bly smart young men who decid­ed on a life of crime after real­iz­ing that the penal­ty for crim­i­nal behav­ior is so insignif­i­cant that not engag­ing in it is almost silly.
Many have attend­ed some of the most pres­ti­gious high schools these are young men who could be any­thing they put their minds to giv­en the oppor­tu­ni­ty. It is no won­der how­ev­er that each year more and more exec­u­tive posi­tions both in the pub­lic and pri­vate sec­tors are being filled by women . Simply put Jamaica’s young women are going to schools , young men are leav­ing and enter­ing the lucra­tive busi­ness of crime.

One thing is cer­tain the much bal­ly­hooed mod­ern­iza­tion of the police depart­ment has not done a darn thing to change any­thing for the bet­ter if the actions of the offi­cers on the streets and the crime sta­tis­tics are any­thing to go by.
Before the Island begin to bend the arc of crime, it must come to a point of “no mas” the infa­mous quote of a beat­en Roberto Duran as Sugar Ray Leonard pep­pered him with unan­swered blows on November 25, 1980 .

Like a dope addict who ulti­mate­ly comes to the real­iza­tion that the next nee­dle up his arm will be his last and says “I need help” . The Island can get to that space, or it can con­tin­ue with the bull­shit nar­ra­tive that it is a nation on the cusp of first world sta­tus if only it con­tin­ue to pretend.
Jamaica can con­tin­ue to pre­tend it is actu­al­ly on a path to pros­per­i­ty or it can rec­og­nize that with a pop­u­la­tion of approx­i­mate­ly 2.8 mil­lion people,it con­tin­ues to have a high homi­cide rate (36÷100,000), which places it among the high­est (per capi­ta) nation­al homi­cide rates in the world.
It is esti­mat­ed that because of youth crime, Jamaica los­es US$4.3 mil­lion in poten­tial invest­ment each year while a fur­ther US$95 mil­lion, which would flow into Jamaica through tourism, goes else­where. The Island also spends more than US$529 mil­lion (J$46.5 bil­lion) every year as a direct pub­lic and pri­vate cost to fight crime.

As I have said before in numer­ous arti­cles the coun­try did not get to this stage in a day and it will take much time to reverse what is hap­pen­ing in our coun­try today.
We can­not reverse peo­ple fight­ing our police offi­cers in a day but we can put in place seri­ous penal­ties for assault­ing our police officers.
We can put in place seri­ous penal­ties for police offi­cers who step out­side the laws to abuse and kill peo­ple unjustly.

208693_sld1

We can invest in the cre­ation of an inves­tiga­tive bureau which is staffed with well trained offi­cers of integri­ty, while leg­is­lat­ing real penal­ties for vio­lent crimes.
We can reverse the pol­i­cy of jail­ing pre­di­al thieves, putting them instead to work clean­ing up our Cities and towns or work­ing for their vic­tims as pay­ment for their crimes.
This will free up prison spaces for vio­lent felons.
We can begin an edu­ca­tion cam­paign to get adults to respect the rule of law while telling them what the penal­ties are for offending .

Most impor­tant­ly repeal the INDECOM act now !!!!!
Assign the INDECOM bud­get, and the Public defend­er’s bud­get to train­ing and equip­ping the police depart­ment, improv­ing the office of DPP and hir­ing more judges from the pros­e­cu­tion side of the fence.
Most impor­tant­ly is truth in sen­tenc­ing for vio­lent crimes . Truth in sen­tenc­ing must come after a total revamp­ing of the penal­ties for vio­lent penal­ties and replac­ing them with life with­out parole where applicable.

To my friend who asked what I would do , I did not answer you because I do not have time to back and forth on social media . If the Government , any Government is seri­ous about deal­ing with those blood thirsty crim­i­nals this is how it will be done . It will not be achieved by pussy-foot­ing around and treat­ing crim­i­nals with def­er­ence. It will be accom­plished when we adopt a zero tol­er­ance pol­i­cy toward crim­i­nal­i­ty in this a zero sum game.

Rules Which Disqualified Previous Presidential Candidates Out The Door.…

mmb

After decades of building up Donald Trump as a legitimate businessman who took his father’s construction business and made it an empire, and framing Hillary Clinton as one half of a pair of pathological disgusting untrustworthy liars the media gets it’s moment in the sun.

PRIZE FIGHT

For months the media has been sell­ing the first pres­i­den­tial debate as a prize fight , they have gone as far as to tell view­ers it will be the most watched event in the his­to­ry of television.
At the end of it all Neilsen will tell just how many house­holds tuned in for the spec­ta­cle. Ironically the nar­ra­tive is baked in. Hillary Clinton is a patho­log­i­cal liar who can­not be trust­ed because she used a pri­vate serv­er . [sic] The nar­ra­tive is that Clinton is viewed as some­one who can­not be trusted.
The polit­i­cal­ly neu­tral Politico has point­ed out that Donald Trump tells a lie every three min­utes and fif­teen sec­onds , over a five hour period.

There have been so much about Donald Trump which has dis­qual­i­fied him from the pres­i­den­cy yet none of it seem to mat­ter to vot­ers accord­ing to the polls. Which caus­es us to won­der whether the require­ments for the pres­i­den­cy has­n’t already changed this elec­tion cycle.
MSNBC’s Craig Melvin this morn­ing asked Jack Kingston a for­mer Georgia Congressman and a Trump sup­port­er, whether the Moderator has a respon­si­bil­i­ty to fact check can­di­dates who lie dur­ing this debate?
Not sur­pris­ing Kingston said no, mod­er­a­tors should not be in the busi­ness of fact check­ing the can­di­dates on the lies they tell. A female Clinton sur­ro­gate on the same pro­gram said absolute­ly yes , they should be .
Why would any­one seek­ing the pres­i­den­cy want to lie about pol­i­cy posi­tions or about their oppo­nen­t’s record? That I believe is the defin­ing issue in this debate .

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton

Now here is what I find trou­bling . It was the job of the Press to guard our democ­ra­cy unless that too has changed as well this cycle.
Debate mod­er­a­tors are jour­nal­ists, how is it that it is not the guardians of our democ­ra­cy’s job to fact check lying politi­cians seek­ing the world’s most pow­er­ful office?
Presidential debates are job inter­views. Candidates seek­ing the pres­i­den­cy should be prepar­ing and study­ing up on pol­i­cy posi­tions and that of their oppo­nents with a view to being able to appro­pri­ate­ly debate the issues.
They should not be seek­ing to lie and get away with lying their way to the nuclear codes.
Why would the media be ask­ing lying politi­cians and their sur­ro­gates whether can­di­dates caught lying should be called out as CNN’s Candy Crowley called Mitt Romney out in 2012? It is their job to do so why would the media cede that most crit­i­cal of func­tion to either polit­i­cal par­ty? Is there any won­der that the sys­tem is this corrupt?
In the last gen­er­al elec­tions Mitt Romney insist­ed that President Obama had not called the Benghazi attack an “act of ter­ror” for 14 days. Crowley cor­rect­ly fact checked Romney that Obama had indeed used the term “act of ter­ror” dur­ing remarks at The White House the day after the attack.
Candy Crowley was right , Mitt Romney was wrong end of story.
However it did not stop the usu­al bar­rage of attacks on Ms Crowley from the polit­i­cal right for doing what her pro­fes­sion trained her to do , get to the truth.

There is no point in lit­i­gat­ing the neg­a­tives of Donald Trump. They are far too many, they are far too dis­tinct, they are far too dis­qual­i­fy­ing. A vot­er who claim that he or she is still unde­cid­ed about who they are vot­ing for at the top of the tick­et is a lying Trump voter.
There is a bina­ry choice between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, bar­ring some unfore­seen event one of these two peo­ple will be the next pres­i­dent of the United States. Gary Johnson will not be nei­ther will Jill Stein.
There is a hid­den vote out there for Donald Trump I believe, despite the work President Barack Obama has done to return this coun­try to a sound foot­ing there is an ele­ment out there that is pre­pared to reg­is­ter a protest vote against him.
Hillary Clinton’s neg­a­tives also plays into that somehow.
Sure Donald Trump’s neg­a­tives are as stink as a Skunk but they are pre­pared to destroy every­thing by vot­ing for him because he is white and male. They will vote for him with­out admit­ting that they did. The equiv­a­lent of break­ing skin while wash­ing their hands of the blood . Being able to say I did not vote for him when s**t heads south.
That is the chal­lenge for Hillary Clinton.

Donald J Trump
Donald J Trump

In a nut­shell this pres­i­den­tial cam­paign may be summed up with­in the con­text of Ted Cruz’s recent endorse­ment of Donald Trump . Cruz said he does not get mad eas­i­ly but when some­one mess­es with his wife and his fam­i­ly he pulls the gloves off.
During the Republican pri­maries Donald Trump made neg­a­tive state­ments about Heidi Cruz’s appear­ance. He also said that Cruz’s father may have been involved with Lee-Harvey Oswald in the killing of President John F Kennedy. This infu­ri­at­ed Cruz to the point that at the Republican Convention Cruz took to the stage and asked vot­ers to vote their con­science rather than ask them to vote for Donald Trump.

Despite all of that, last week in a lengthy face­book post Ted Cruz said he would be vot­ing for Trump. Cruz’s capit­u­la­tion can only be seen for what it was, a craven ‚cal­cu­lat­ed attempt to posi­tion him­self for anoth­er run at the pres­i­den­cy in either 2020 or 2024.
Country be damned it’s all about per­son­al ambitions.

Clueless Montague Responds Weakly To Soldiers Pointed Concern..

mmb

A young mem­ber of the Jamaica Defence Force told Robert Montague the Minister of National Security , if he should take on a gun­man who threat­ens him with a weapon he will have to face INDECOM with attor­neys for up to four years.

Montague said the mat­ter was brought into focus last night as he gave a moti­va­tion­al talk to a group of sol­diers head­ing to St. James to help con­tain crime there, accord­ing to Jamaican media. It’s impor­tant to under­stand the con­text in which the sol­dier made his views known to the minister.
The Island is awash in crime , mur­der is on a con­stant north­ward spi­ral and author­i­ties have not demon­strat­ed they pos­sess the balls to do what is nec­es­sary to fix the problem.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​2​7​7​971 – 2/

Responding to the sol­dier’s com­ment the clue­less Montague respond­ed Quote:
“I am one who is a sup­port­er of INDECOM, I am one who believes that we still can work hard­er to get the police fatal shoot­ings down, but there comes a time when the cir­cum­stances dic­tate: when the State is threat­ened, the State has to respond in like manner.”

Many of my PNP read­ers will sali­vate at the fact that I refer to Montague as clue­less. The Laborites will do what they always do cas­ti­gate and label me a PNP shill, as if I care.
Montague showed utter igno­rance of what polic­ing entails in respond­ing to the sol­dier’s con­cern by argu­ing that when the state is threat­ened it has to respond in like manner.

Why Would Jamaica’s Security Forces Stick Their Necks Out .….….…

Each and every mem­ber of the secu­ri­ty forces have a respon­si­bil­i­ty over and above all else to pro­tect their own lives. They owe it to them­selves and their fam­i­lies to return home after every shift.
Even though they oper­ate as agents of the state, their bod­ies are not the prop­er­ty of the state. An attack on any of them must be seen as an attack on the state, but over and above that each attack on a mem­ber of the secu­ri­ty forces is an indi­vid­ual attack which must be dealt with individually.
Use of force has to be weighed by each offi­cer so forced . It must com­port with Jamaican law and should also square with that offi­cers moral com­pass. Use of force must be with­in the remit of the indi­vid­ual offi­cer which is enshrined in Jamaican law and the JCF’s use of force policy.
That is why the col­lec­tive label­ing of all police shoot­ings as extra judi­cial killings, is lan­guage of crim­i­nals and their sup­port­ers and not that of intel­li­gent informed people.
As the author­i­ties dither and con­tin­ue the embrace of pre­ten­tious pos­tures and poli­cies of advanced soci­eties the bul­let rid­dled bod­ies con­tin­ue to pile up.

WAR ON JAMAICAN POLICE FOR DOING THEIR JOBS:

Remarkably, it took a sol­dier, and a young one at that, to artic­u­late what most past and present cops and many well think­ing Jamaicans already knew . That the INDECOM law is a shack­le and a crime enhance­ment law.
This writer have been sound­ing that alarm since it’s inception.
Ironically it is not the mem­bers of the Jamaica Defense Force which faces and deals with the brunt of the crime and the resul­tant dan­ger which comes from enforc­ing the laws it is the police department.
Yet the incom­pe­tent posers who make up the hier­ar­chy of the police force are silent . Silent as Terrence Williams uses the media as a whore seek­ing to extract all she can from a com­pli­ant John. Williams uses the media to under­mine the police depart­ment and the rule of law, in the process empow­er­ing the crim­i­nal under­world and cre­at­ing a fer­tile breed­ing ground for young criminals.

Terrence Williams
Terrence Williams

This writer is not opposed to police over­sight. This medi­um was cre­at­ed to pass on what I learned as a police offi­cer so that peo­ple may under­stand their respon­si­bil­i­ties in society.
It was designed to speak out against crime and injus­tice wher­ev­er I see it. Regardless of the offend­er’s sta­tus or station.
What I do under­stand how­ev­er, is that when the laws are slant­ed in sup­port of crim­i­nals, when those in posi­tions of pow­er and influ­ence use those posi­tions to fur­ther the cause of crim­i­nal­i­ty and may­hem we have a problem.
It demon­strates that as a nation Jamaica has a seri­ous crime prob­lem which will only be fixed by peo­ple with balls and determination.
Thus far I have not seen that kind of lead­er­ship in our country.

MoBay Mayhem — Thugs Wreaking Murderous Havoc In St James; 2016 Murder Count Approaching 200

Western Bureau:

St James, espe­cial­ly the parish cap­i­tal, Montego Bay, is now gripped by fear and anx­i­ety as gun-tot­ing thugs con­tin­ue to wreak mur­der­ous hav­oc, killing and maim­ing with impuni­ty as the parish’s mur­der count races towards 200 since the start of the year.

I lived through the trib­al war of the 1970s and I have nev­er seen any­thing like this,” a for­mer politi­cian told The Gleaner yes­ter­day short­ly after news broke of anoth­er mur­der in the afflu­ent Ironshore com­mu­ni­ty. “This is past mad­ness! Right now, I am feel­ing so much raw emo­tion that I feel like just scream­ing and bawl­ing out. We can’t take any more of this.”

In yesterday’s inci­dent in Ironshore, which occurred close to the pop­u­lar Blue Diamond Complex, shots report­ed­ly barked for sev­er­al min­utes as gang­sters armed with rifles and hand­guns snuffed out the life of a Glendevon man iden­ti­fied only as ‘Bob’. Several per­sons, who were at the loca­tion, suf­fered non-life-threat­en­ing injuries.

Since the start of this week, there has been a spike in shoot­ings across the parish, result­ing in sev­er­al per­sons being killed. The may­hem is hap­pen­ing despite the cur­rent high-vis­i­bil­i­ty pres­ence of joint police-mil­i­tary patrols across the parish in recent months.

At approx­i­mate­ly 7:20 a.m. on Tuesday, all hell broke loose on Creek Street in down­town Montego Bay when a gun­man opened fire on a bus crammed with school­child­ren. When the shoot­ing sub­sided, it was dis­cov­ered that the dri­ver, Alvin ‘Strive Clarke, had suc­cumbed to mul­ti­ple gun­shot wounds. Two stu­dents from MaldonHigh School were left nurs­ing bul­let wounds.

Later in the day, at approx­i­mate­ly 2:00 p.m., stu­dents and teach­ers at the Glendevon Primary School were forced to take cov­er as war­ring fac­tions trad­ed heavy gun­fire for well over half an hour. Based on reports from the com­mu­ni­ty, the shoot­ing was sparked by the killing of a man in the com­mu­ni­ty on Monday night.

There were also oth­er reports of shoot­ings in com­mu­ni­ties such as Norwood, Tucker, Glendevon, Catherine Mount, Tangle River, and the Cambridge area.

In respond­ing to the ongo­ing vio­lence across the parish, Heroy Clarke, the mem­ber of Parliament for Central St James, made an impas­sioned plea to the thugs to lay down their guns and take up their Bibles with a view to putting their lives in God’s hands.

Remove the guns from your pock­ets and waists and replace them with Bibles so peace can reign again,” urged Clarke. “Also, the lead­er­ship in the com­mu­ni­ties in west­ern Jamaica – pub­lic and pri­vate – must take up the man­tle and step up to the plate and lead from the front, not behind.” Read more here: http://​jamaica​-glean​er​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​l​e​a​d​-​s​t​o​r​i​e​s​/​2​0​1​6​0​9​2​3​/​m​o​b​a​y​-​m​a​y​h​e​m​-​t​h​u​g​s​-​w​r​e​a​k​i​n​g​-​m​u​r​d​e​r​o​u​s​-​h​a​v​o​c​-​s​t​-​j​a​m​e​s​-​2​0​1​6​-​m​u​r​d​e​r​-​c​o​unt

The System Which Is Under Scrutiny Gets To Set The Parameters For That Scrutiny.…

mmb

The Police work for you .
You pay their salaries. You provide the pension plans and health-care for them and their families.
You pay for the precinct houses from which they operate. You pay for the cars they drive. You pay for the dashcam videos in cases where they are provided them.
Yet even though you pay for all of it, you are not entitled to see what is on the video when the videos have information which will show police officers doing what they shouldn’t be doing to citizens like you if North Carolina Republican legislators and Governor Pat McCrory have their way.

The unlaw­ful killing and abuse of black cit­i­zens by some police offi­cers have been a sore issue for­ev­er . Despite the protes­ta­tions of black and brown peo­ple, white peo­ple who con­trol pow­er have large­ly ignored their cries for jus­tice or have sim­ply remained silent.
Some have argued that whites large­ly remain silent because of racist ten­den­cies, also that they are served by the sta­tus quo. Others have argued that whites see police in a dif­fer­ent light because they are policed dif­fer­ent­ly and most cops are white,.
The lat­ter view tends to sup­port the argu­ments of peo­ple of col­or, that there are two sep­a­rate jus­tice sys­tems , one for whites and anoth­er for every­one else.

Taxpayers invest­ment in body and dash­cams were sup­posed to either hold police account­able or exon­er­ate them when they act appro­pri­ate­ly. What the police are now doing through their unions and politi­cians behold­en to them, is to make a deter­mi­na­tion when or if the footage is released at all.
That means the very unjust sys­tem which is under scruti­ny gets to set the para­me­ters for that scrutiny.
For those of us who believed that equip­ping police cruis­ers with dash­cams and offi­cers with body cam­eras would go a long way in remov­ing most of the ambi­gu­i­ty from cas­es where police ver­sion of events dif­fer from that of the pub­lic, we may need to rethink those beliefs.
What both­ers me is why on earth would police depart­men­t’s push for mea­sures which invari­ably will lead to more con­flict with the pub­lic they serve.

Republican gov­er­nor Pat McCrory said the law will strike a bal­ance between improv­ing pub­lic trust in the police and respect­ing the rights of officers.
Respecting the rights of officers?
Officers oper­ate in pub­lic spaces sup­pos­ed­ly on behalf of the pub­lic. What con­ceiv­able right could police have abridged by the release of videos of their actions ?
The answer is none !
It is a red her­ring designed to give police one more lay­er of cov­er to con­tin­ue to bru­tal­ize and kill peo­ple of col­or with­out being held accountable.
If this is allowed to stand the next step will be to make it a crime to film ille­gal behav­ior of police.
More and more states will fol­low North Carolina’s lead in mak­ing it impos­si­ble for police crimes to be uncov­ered when police get to deter­mine whether the pub­lic have a right to see whether they broke the law.
This only makes sense in a par­al­lel uni­verse. The longer police agen­cies get to hold video footage , the more like­ly it is that the pub­lic trust what they even­tu­al­ly release. The more that hap­pens the less trust and con­fi­dence large sawths of the pub­lic have in the police. The longer the police hold video footage the more like­ly it is that those footage will be tam­pered with and altered to sup­port the police ver­sion of events. There is noth­ing demo­c­ra­t­ic or trans­par­ent about this. It is a slow steady march toward a police state in which the pub­lic has no say.

As a for­mer police offi­cer I am not naïve to the claims that releas­ing videos to the pub­lic may com­pro­mise aspects of an inves­ti­ga­tion. I am also mind­ful that evi­dence in cer­tain video record­ings may inflame pas­sions and lead to vio­lence or more vio­lence in cas­es where vio­lent protest has already occurred.
Nevertheless when the total­i­ty of the dis­trust of police is tak­en into con­sid­er­a­tion, the police make a crit­i­cal tac­ti­cal mis­take in not appear­ing to be transparent.
I have long main­tained that demon­strat­ing against police is counter pro­duc­tive. Cops do not make laws , going into the streets may have some emo­tion­al val­ue but beyond that it yields pre­cious lit­tle substantively.
The fact is that a large sec­tion of the pop­u­la­tion care expo­nen­tial­ly more about bro­ken glass than it does bul­let rid­dled bod­ies. On that basis march­ing and protest­ing has zero effect in chang­ing attitudes.
If march­ing and singing was going to change cir­cum­stances they would have changed in the over half a cen­tu­ry since the begin­ning of the civ­il rights movement.
The sem­i­nal issue affect­ing the African-American Community when Dr King lived was police abuse. Over the half a cen­tu­ry since Dr King was mur­dered the sem­i­nal issue affect­ing African-Americans is not pover­ty , or lack of jobs as some so called black lead­ers would have you believe, it is police abuse.

There is a rea­son black and brown peo­ple do not trust the police , there are decades and decades of rea­sons for them not to.
When police get to decide whether video footages are released to the pub­lic which pays them, and pay for the video it reveals an intrin­sic sick sys­tem of the tail wag­ging the Dog.
Laquan Mcdonald was killed walk­ing away from Chicago police, the police refused to release the footage until they were forced to. The even­tu­al release of the video showed that Mcdonald was sum­mar­i­ly exe­cut­ed as he walked away , nev­er­the­less cops on the scene lied that he posed a threat which neces­si­tat­ed them using dead­ly force.
It was basi­cal­ly an assassination.
Walter Scott was sum­mar­i­ly exe­cut­ed In North Charleston, South Carolina as he ran away from a police offi­cer, a civil­ian video revealed that the cop placed a taser beside the body of mis­ter Scott with the intend­ed val­ue of argu­ing Scott attempt­ed to use it on him.
Samuel Dubose was mur­dered in Cincinnati Ohio . The police con­tend­ed that mis­ter Dubose attempt­ed to run him over with his car. Video evi­dence how­ev­er showed that the offi­cer lied that Dubose posed a threat . Importantly as well , oth­er offi­cers on scene cor­rob­o­rat­ed the lie of the cop who mur­dered mis­ter Dubose,
So much for only a few bad apples.
Donald Andrews who oper­at­ed a smoke shop in Schenectady New York became a tar­get of police in that city for no rea­son but that he was a black man oper­at­ing a smoke shop.
Police rou­tine­ly staked out his store and would rou­tine­ly enter the store as part of their sur­veil­lance. On one occa­sion one of the offi­cers was cap­tured on mis­ter Andrews sur­veil­lance video, plant­i­ng crack cocaine on the counter. Not only was that offi­cer crim­i­nal he was stu­pid, it defies log­ic that any­one would believe that a per­son sell­ing crack cocaine would have it on the counter like candy.
According to experts mis­ter Andrews could have received four years for that bit of crack cocaine.

Dr. Boyce Watkins, Syracuse University Professor and founder of the Your Black World Coalition at the time said that this case is reflec­tive of the slip­pery slope that exists for black men when it comes to the crim­i­nal jus­tice system.

If this is the case where the offi­cer got caught plant­i­ng the drugs, what about all the thou­sands of oth­er cas­es where the offi­cer wasn’t stu­pid enough to do it in a room full of cam­eras,” says Dr. Watkins. “The truth is that these inci­dents are not anom­alies, and are reflec­tive of the cor­rup­tion that exists in a sys­tem that has found black men to be lucra­tive com­modi­ties for the prison indus­tri­al com­plex. It has destroyed our fam­i­lies and must be con­front­ed in its entire­ty.” If police tes­ti­mo­ny is always val­ued above and beyond the defen­dan­t’s, how often do you think this hap­pens? With black men being arrest­ed for drug dis­tri­b­u­tion more than any oth­er group of peo­ple, it prob­a­bly hap­pens more than you know.

For years peo­ple of col­or in city after city across America have com­plained about police fram­ing them and fal­si­fy­ing reports send­ing inno­cent peo­ple away for years on end some­times for life.
The inno­cence project found­ed in 1992 by Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld, mis­sion state­ment says it is a nation­al lit­i­ga­tion and pub­lic pol­i­cy orga­ni­za­tion ded­i­cat­ed to exon­er­at­ing wrong­ful­ly con­vict­ed indi­vid­u­als through DNA test­ing and reform­ing the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem to pre­vent future injustice.
Through Messers Scheck and Neufeld and their team’s effort to date 344 inno­cent indi­vid­u­als have been exon­er­at­ed after serv­ing lengthy peri­ods of time in prison for crimes they did not commit.
In some cas­es indi­vid­u­als have served over three decades in prison, as you may well imag­ine the bulk of those are peo­ple of color.
The work of the inno­cence project is mon­u­men­tal when con­sid­ered against the dif­fi­cult and next to impos­si­ble prospect to get the sys­tem to say it was wrong or even to open up to a sec­ond look after con­vict­ing some­one for a crime they did not commit.

Mike Pence Wants Talk Of Implicit Biases In PD’S Stopped: Bye Bye First Amendment.

mmb

The nation­al Fraternal order of police which endorsed Donald Trump for President of the United States pushed back at Trump on Thursaday for sug­gest­ing that offi­cer Betty Shelby who shot and killed an unarmed Terence Cutcher may have choked.

Speaking at the church of his sup­port­er African-American Pastor Darrell Scott ‚Trump said this.
“I must tell you I watched the shoot­ing in par­tic­u­lar in Tulsa and that man was hands up. That man went to the car, hands up, put his hands on the car, I mean to me it looked like he did every­thing he was sup­posed to do,” said Trump in remarks at a town hall style event address­ing African-American issues in Cleveland Heights, Ohio.

However the police Union which rep­re­sents over 300,00 cops nation­wide pushed back at Trump say­ing quote:
He must be mind­ful of the due process rights and pre­sump­tion of inno­cence accord­ed to all, includ­ing police offi­cers.”
Trump won the sup­port of the Police Union as he would because of his mas­cu­line pro-police stance . No sur­prise there, the Republican par­ty has long been sup­port­ed by the Military and police. Seen large­ly as a kind of Daddy par­ty, sup­pos­ed­ly cater­ing to safe­ty and secu­ri­ty of the nation.
Democrats on the oth­er hand con­verse­ly is seen as the Mommy par­ty, cater­ing to health and well-being , tak­ing care of those unable to take care of themselves.

The state­ment of the police Union though cor­rect struck me as a bit odd.
Many peo­ple of col­or who com­plain about police excess­es would be hap­py to see police apply those same prin­ci­ples when offi­cers inter­act with them and oth­ers like themselves.
They too , each and every­one of them , have a right to due process and the pre­sum­nption of innocence.
Imagine if these same prin­ci­ples were applied to every police vehic­u­lar stop. Every time offi­cers knock on the door to some­one’s home, their cas­tle. Imagine if every instance of inter­ac­tion of offi­cers with the com­mu­ni­ties they serve are char­ac­ter­ized by due process and the pre­sump­tion of inno­cence. Literally most of the prob­lems which exist between police and cit­i­zens would sim­ply cease to exist.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​s​-​p​o​l​i​c​i​n​g​-​p​r​o​b​l​em/

Trump-Pence
Trump-Pence

Imagine if the police start respect­ing the right of all human beings to life lib­er­ty and the pur­suit of hap­pi­ness, as guar­an­teed in the Constitution how dif­fer­ent things would be. Trump’s run­ning mate Mike Pence the sit­ting Governor of Indiana today said the talk about implic­it bias­es in police depart­ments should stop.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution pro­hibits the mak­ing of any law respect­ing an estab­lish­ment of reli­gion, imped­ing the free exer­cise of reli­gion, abridg­ing the free­dom of speech, infring­ing on thefree­dom of the press, inter­fer­ing with the right to peace­ably assem­ble, or pro­hibit­ing the peti­tion­ing for a gov­ern­men­tal redress of griev­ances. It was adopt­ed on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amend­ments that con­sti­tute the Bill of Rights.

In essence Mike Pence wants to cur­tail the first amend­ment con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly guar­an­teed right to free­dom of speech to be abridged and abrogated.
In a Trump-Pence America, peo­ple like this writer could face seri­ous con­se­quences for speak­ing out about implic­it bias­es in police depart­ments which inform behavior.
This is what makes a Trump-Pence Presidency such a dan­ger­ous propo­si­tion for peo­ple of col­or all across America and across the rest of the world.

Betty Shelby Charged With Manslaughter In Terence Crutcher Shooting

Betty Shelby, the Tulsa police offi­cer who shot and killed Terence Crutcher last week, faces a charge of first-degree manslaugh­ter, Tulsa County District Attorney Stephen Kunzweiler announced Thursday. “In the mat­ter of the death of Terence Crutcher, I deter­mined that the fil­ing of the felony crime of manslaugh­ter in the first degree against Tulsa police offi­cer Betty Shelby is war­rant­ed,” Kunzweiler said. An arrest war­rant has been issued for Shelby, whose attor­ney said she opened fire because she feared Crutcher might have been reach­ing for a weapon. Police failed to find a weapon on Crutcher or in the car. http://​www​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​e​n​t​r​y​/​t​e​r​e​n​c​e​-​c​r​u​t​c​h​e​r​-​b​e​t​t​y​-​s​h​e​l​b​y​_​u​s​_​5​7​e​4​4​2​1​9​e​4​b​0​8​d​7​3​b​8​3​0​5​8​4​0​?​s​e​c​t​i​o​n=&

blob:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/0cc6c4bc-0d6c-494b-93a4-b92df69eee5e

America’s Policing Problem.….

mmb

Even under the most ideal conditions the job of policing is challenging.
There is a part of every human being which is opposed to losing it’s freedom, even when we consciously know that we are engaging in activities we have no business engaging in.
Given the most ideal hypothetical situation where race, class and other defining characteristics which influences behavior are non-existent, people would still be opposed to receiving a parking ticket from a police officer. And an officer would probably be more inclined to give a ticket to a male who gives him lip over a sweet old lady who doesn’t .

If we reverse that utopi­an sce­nario and put back in the mix , the defin­ing neg­a­tives of racism, clas­sism, dis­re­spect, as a result or racism or clas­sism the dis­ci­pline which is polic­ing becomes far more prob­lem­at­ic for some.
That seem to be the chal­lenge fac­ing police depart­ments across the United States today.
There are var­i­ous rea­sons giv­en for the fright­en­ing killing of Americans by police with­out hard­ly any offi­cer being held account­able. Even when there seem to be glar­ing evi­dence of wrongdoing.

Whether police are killing more peo­ple than years gone by, or we are see­ing more of these con­fronta­tions because of tech­no­log­i­cal advances remains to be defined.
For peo­ple in the black and brown com­mu­ni­ties, the almost dai­ly killings of unarmed peo­ple by police is what they have been com­plain­ing about for decades.
It is impos­si­ble to tell whether police are killing more peo­ple today because police depart­ments are not required to report to fed­er­al author­i­ties just how many peo­ple lose their lives at their hands each year.
Even today there are no legal require­ment for uni­formed report­ing to the Federal Bureau of Investigations. Nonetheless pri­vate web­sites and oth­er orga­ni­za­tions are begin­ning to track as much as they can, these killings at the hands of police.

According to Eastern Kentucky University and Author Victor E. Kappeler, Ph.D.

The birth and devel­op­ment of the American police can be traced to a mul­ti­tude of his­tor­i­cal, legal and polit­i­cal-eco­nom­ic con­di­tions. The insti­tu­tion of slav­ery and the con­trol of minori­ties, how­ev­er, were two of the more for­mi­da­ble his­toric fea­tures of American soci­ety shap­ing ear­ly polic­ing. Slave patrols and Night Watches, which lat­er became mod­ern police depart­ments, were both designed to con­trol the behav­iors of minori­ties. For exam­ple, New England set­tlers appoint­ed Indian Constables to police Native Americans (National Constable Association, 1995), the St. Louis police were found­ed to pro­tect res­i­dents from Native Americans in that fron­tier city, and many south­ern police depart­ments began as slave patrols. In 1704, the colony of Carolina devel­oped the nation’s first slave patrol. Slave patrols helped to main­tain the eco­nom­ic order and to assist the wealthy landown­ers in recov­er­ing and pun­ish­ing slaves who essen­tial­ly were con­sid­ered property.

It is impor­tant to con­sid­er these facts when we grap­ple with what we see hap­pen­ing today, even though we have come a long way since the days of slave patrols.
In my native Jamaica some experts have point­ed to the fact that the Jamaica Constabulary Force emerged out of the Morant bay rebellion.
They argue that because the force was cre­at­ed to quell the upris­ing of the oppressed mass­es, present day police still approach the task of polic­ing with the same mindset.
Whether there is truth to both sce­nar­ios or not is not up to me to decide . It’s inter­pre­ta­tion has to be with­in the remit of each and every one of us.

Clearly what is unde­ni­able is the uncon­scious bias­es which informs each offi­cer’s mind­set. Without a doubt, an offi­cer who pulls his/​her weapon in an inner city com­mu­ni­ty and shoots some­one who is unarmed, is informed and influ­enced by pre­con­ceived risks with­in that community.
The bias­es which inform those actions would most cer­tain­ly not be present in an upscale white com­mu­ni­ty. Therein lies the problem.
Within those real­i­ties, not all white offi­cers who end up killing an unarmed black per­son is nec­es­sar­i­ly racist.
In the same way that a Jamaican offi­cer, him­self from the poor­er class, who kills some­one in the ghet­to could rea­son­ably be accused of classism.
It is the per­cep­tion of inher­ent dan­ger, (wrong or right)and in some cas­es lack of respect, which cre­ates the vio­lent con­fronta­tions we see today.

As a young offi­cer patrolling parts of Western Kingston, Arnett Gardens, Waterhouse and oth­er com­mu­ni­ties we con­strued to be dan­ger­ous, my weapon was always at the ready. The same was not true when I patrolled Cherry Gardens and Norbrook.
I was not against peo­ple liv­ing in the inner city com­mu­ni­ties. I was just mind­ful that I was a lot more like­ly to be shot in those com­mu­ni­ties than I was in Cherry Gardens and Norbrook.

Black and brown peo­ple in America’s urban areas com­plain about aggres­sive and even oppres­sive police tac­tics in their com­mu­ni­ties. The police say they are mere­ly arrest­ing peo­ple where crimes are being committed.
There are ele­ments of truth to both arguments .
According to the Washington post .

Whites were about 45 per­cent more like­ly than blacks to sell drugs in 1980, accord­ing to an analy­sis of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth by econ­o­mist Robert Fairlie. This was con­sis­tent with a 1989 sur­vey of youth in Boston. My own analy­sis of data from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health shows that 6.6 per­cent of white ado­les­cents and young adults (aged 12 to 25) sold drugs, com­pared to just 5.0 per­cent of blacks (a 32 per­cent difference).

This part­ly reflects racial dif­fer­ences in the drug mar­kets in black and white com­mu­ni­ties. In poor black neigh­bor­hoods, drugs tend to be sold out­doors, in the open. In white neigh­bor­hoods, by con­trast, drug trans­ac­tions typ­i­cal­ly hap­pen indoors, often between friends and acquain­tances. If you sell drugs out­side, you’re much more like­ly to get caught. Rothwell’s num­bers shoot some holes into some oft-repeat­ed drug war­rior talk­ing points: that peo­ple don’t get arrest­ed for non­vi­o­lent drug crime as much as they used to (false), and that legal­iz­ing and decrim­i­nal­iz­ing cer­tain drugs won’t mag­i­cal­ly solve racial dis­par­i­ties in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem true but it could help.

Essentially, police arrest peo­ple where they see crimes being com­mit­ted in the open.This usu­al­ly leaves the false per­cep­tion that there is mar­gin­al, or no crime in upscale neighborhoods.
The prison pop­u­la­tions shows the dis­par­i­ties and so are the crim­i­nal records of many inner city residents.
Years ago, police in my upstate city of Poughkeepsie patrolled on bikes and walked the streets inter­act­ing with busi­ness own­ers like myself on a per­son­al basis.
The city was able to claw it’s way back from the throes of drug infes­ta­tion and gun vio­lence, result­ing in a burst of new busi­ness­es and occu­pan­cy of build­ings which were once shut­tered, ren­der­ing the city a ver­i­ta­ble ghost town.
We prac­ti­cal­ly knew the names of all of the cops on the department.

All of a sud­den the foot and bike patrols dis­s­a­peared, in their place were cops in cruis­ers glar­ing at peo­ple as if they are aliens.
I asked sev­er­al offi­cers with whom I had become friends over the years,“what hap­pened to com­mu­ni­ty polic­ing”? To a man they all said they were told to write tick­ets and enforce qual­i­ty of life offences.
In oth­er words stop being so darn friend­ly. Community rela­tions be damned what we need are arrests.
Today , save for one Lieutenant on the depart­ment who goes out of his way to be what a police offi­cer should, I have no idea who the peo­ple we pay to police our city are.
That kind of polic­ing is a two-edged sword as experts have said , it cre­ates a chasm between police and the com­mu­ni­ties they are sup­posed to serve. It is prob­lem­at­ic when peo­ple see the peo­ple they pay to pro­tect them as occu­py­ing forces there to oppress and keep them in line.
It is a prob­lem when offi­cers come from out­side the com­mu­ni­ties in which they work and act as over­seers to those com­mu­ni­ties , mak­ing deter­mi­na­tions on their own how they decide to treat people.

A cou­ple days ago I drove west­er­ly on main street in my city of Poughkeepsie. Back on some of the cor­ners are some of the very things which result­ed in the demise of the city years ago. Young men stand­ing around at all times of the day , it does not require a great deal of thought to fig­ure out what they are doing on those corners.
These groups did not con­gre­gate dur­ing the foot and bike patrol days. The short-sight­ed approach of polic­ing from afar will yield seri­ous con­se­quences for my city and it has for count­less oth­er cities which have cre­at­ed mil­i­taries out of local law enforce­ment agen­cies result­ing in adver­sar­i­al rela­tion­ships with the com­mu­ni­ties they are sup­posed to serve.

An ill-informed polit­i­cal can­di­date run­ning for pres­i­dent can argue for stop and frisk as a strat­e­gy to con­tain crime out of igno­rance. It is how­ev­er dan­ger­ous tone-deaf­ness to con­tin­ue to ignore the cries of the oppressed which will have dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences going forward.

Being A Big Black Man May Now Be A Death Sentence.…

mmb
Amidst the wall-to-wall cable news coverage of the terror events in Minnesota , New Jersey and right here at home in New York City , one thing has not slowed down, that is the incessant killing of unarmed black men by police across America.

For those of us who had any train­ing as police offi­cers we recall the rules as it relates to when we could legal­ly dis­charge our weapons, much less at anoth­er human being. We look on in hor­ror at the con­stant pret­zel-type forms police and their apol­o­gists take to jus­ti­fy police killings.

Oh my God, we love our police offi­cers, we love the fact that they run to dan­ger on our behalf. They lit­er­al­ly place their lives on the line when we run in the oth­er direction.
But for the love of God, pre­tend­ing that there is no police prob­lem in America is being tone deaf, or worse, will­ful­ly not car­ing about the pile of dead bodies.
It is a sick dement­ed mind­set which crit­i­cizes a social­ly con­scious Colin Kaepernick for tak­ing a knee while turn­ing a blind uncar­ing eye to the pile of dead black bod­ies each year.
When you do that you lose ratio­nal peo­ple, you lose a place in the dis­cus­sion because you made your­self irra­tional and there­fore irrel­e­vant to the conversation.

The peo­ple who make excus­es for police mis­con­duct have made the deci­sion they do not care about the loss of lives, as such the black com­mu­ni­ty must tune them out as well.
How much is enough, how long will the same nar­ra­tive be used ‚“offi­cer fired because they were in fear for their lives?
The fear in police offi­cers can­not be a death sen­tence for others!

I recalled many years ago when I was a serv­ing police offi­cer, there was much talk that there were instances of extra­ju­di­cial killings by the Jamaican police.
It is impor­tant to under­stand that Jamaica as a nation has been, and still remain a small nation which does not give police offi­cers the sup­port they need to get the job done.
It bears men­tion­ing also that the Island is among the most vio­lent places on earth and is with­in the top five most mur­der­ous places on the planet.
Within that con­text, activists groups began to attach the term extra­ju­di­cial to all police shoot­ings. Even though the Island was expe­ri­enc­ing an aver­age of four mur­ders dai­ly and up to 1600 annu­al­ly , every police shoot­ing was labeled an extra­ju­di­cial shooting.

Each shoot­ing elicit­ed protest action and howls of con­dem­na­tion. Most notably the United States Leahy bill with­drew fund­ing from spe­cial­ized units with­in the JCF as a result of these alle­ga­tions, most of which were unproven.
First spon­sored in the late 1990s by Senator Patrick Leahy (D‑VT), the “Leahy laws” (some­times referred to as the “Leahy amend­ments”) are cur­rent­ly man­i­fest in two places. One is Section 620M of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), as amend­ed, which pro­hibits the fur­nish­ing of assis­tance autho­rized by the FAA and the Arms Export Control Act to any for­eign secu­ri­ty force unit where there is cred­i­ble infor­ma­tion that the unit has com­mit­ted a gross vio­la­tion of human rights.

If the Americans gov­ern­ment care enough to with­draw fund­ing from groups with­in cer­tain mil­i­tary and para­mil­i­tary groups in oth­er coun­tries which are accused of human rights abus­es, why is it pow­er­less to stop what we see hap­pen­ing day in day out right here in America?
Not every shoot­ing is racial shoot­ing, not every shoot­ing is a bad shooting .
But as a police offi­cer who became keen­ly con­scious of the envi­ron­ment and the per­cep­tions sur­round­ing shoot­ings by offi­cers in my time, it can­not be out of the realm of the under­stand­ing of American cops that they must be appro­pri­ate­ly sure before using lethal force.

It can be done and must be done, cit­i­zens can­not be killed because police offi­cers are scared. It can­not be that an offi­cer pulls the trig­ger because she is in fear as is being alleged in the killing of 40-year-old Terence Crutcher in Tulsa Oklahoma. Neither can the per­cep­tion that some­one is a “big bad dude” be a death sen­tence for that person.
This is insan­i­ty, every sane law enforce­ment offi­cer past and present knows these rea­sons giv­en for shoot­ing peo­ple they sus­pect, stretch­es the bound­aries of credulity.

How much longer will it be before police offi­cers are held account­able for killing unarmed cit­i­zens rather that the con­stant twist­ing of the laws to jus­ti­fy their ille­gal actions?
The notion that a per­son can be legal­ly shot and killed by police because that per­son seemed to be putting his hand into a vehi­cle can­not con­tin­ue to stand.
An armed, trained police offi­cer already with gun drawn, can­not sim­ply be allowed to gun down cit­i­zens using those guises.
Did he pull a gun ?
Did you see a gun?.….….….. No one can rea­son­ably argue with an offi­cer who shoots some­one who pulls a gun , but we sim­ply can­not sup­port the unlaw­ful killing of peo­ple based on fears and bias­es with­in peo­ple who are sup­posed to be trained to pro­tect lives.