Louisville Police Officially Fire 2 Detectives For Their Roles In Fatal Shooting Of Breonna Taylor

LOUISVILLE, Ky. – The Louisville Metro Police Department has offi­cial­ly fired two detec­tives and sanc­tioned oth­ers for their actions sur­round­ing the raid that left Breonna Taylor, 26, dead in her apartment.

Detectives Myles Cosgrove and Joshua Jaynes, who were fired Tuesday, are the lat­est detec­tives the depart­ment has ter­mi­nat­ed in con­nec­tion with the fatal police shoot­ing of Taylor.

A third detec­tive, Brett Hankison, was fired in June for “blind­ly” fir­ing 10 rounds into her apartment.

Cosgrove, who the FBI con­clud­ed fired the shot that killed Taylor, vio­lat­ed pro­ce­dures for use of force, and fail­ing to use a body cam­era dur­ing the March 13 search warrant.

Jaynes, mean­while, the offi­cer who secured the search war­rant for Taylor’s apart­ment, was found in vio­la­tion of depart­ment pol­i­cy for truth­ful­ness and search war­rant preparation.
Read more here; https://​www​.usato​day​.com/​n​e​ws/

Real New Yorkers Knew A Fake When They Saw It, Fuhgeddaboudit.

To maintain a smokescreen of wealth, business savvy, intelligence, and know-how, Donald J Trump designed a devious strategy. If you can’t make it, fake it.
That strategy has been a strategy, not novel to Trump. It is a strategy that has been used by every cheap hustler, pimp, and drug-dealer.

Donald Trump report­ed­ly paid some­one to take his SATs. There are reports he did not actu­al­ly earn the degree he brags about from the Wharton School of Business. His ardent fight to keep his tran­scripts pri­vate feeds the nar­ra­tive that the man we know to be an actu­al dunce, is in fact a ver­i­fi­ably a dunce.
He antic­i­pates well, the ques­tions that will be asked about him, and so he assigns the things he is guilty of to whomev­er he deems as his ene­my at any giv­en time.
He demand­ed to see the col­lege tran­scripts of the immi­nent­ly qual­i­fied Barack Obama, even as he moved heav­en and earth to hide his. But there was nev­er any doubt about Trump’s ignorance.
Trump loves to talk about his Generals, until, of course, he real­izes that [his gen­er­als] can­not, and will not, sup­port a coup to keep him in pow­er against the Constitution’s dictates.
When it came time to serve in the mil­i­tary, Donald Trump, like so many of the priv­i­leged young men of his era, opt­ed to lie about his health to avoid mil­i­tary ser­vice. He claimed that he had bone-spurs. He was giv­en defer­ment after defer­ment, while prin­ci­pled patri­ots like Mohammed Ali went to prison.
As a sup­posed busi­ness­man, Trump has been an abject fail­ure, declar­ing a report­ed six (6) busi­ness bankruptcies.
In the decades that pre­ced­ed his ascen­den­cy to the US Presidency, Donald Trump posi­tioned him­self as a suc­cess­ful busi­ness tycoon in the cen­ter of New York’s Manhattan. The media played along with Trump’s gold­en ‑boy per­sona, even as peo­ple he did busi­ness with were left hold­ing the bag of their own bank­rupt­cies as he avoid­ed pay­ing them for work done on his behalf.

In the high soci­ety of Manhattan’s busi­ness and social cir­cles, Donald Trump’s fraud­u­lent gold­en-boy, mis­ter won­der­ful, car­ni­val-show was not lost on the real blue blood.
USA Today once said this of Trump, “Though he is the scion of a wealthy real estate fam­i­ly, the city’s old aris­toc­ra­cy nev­er quite accept­ed Trump. In a trib­al city, Donald Trump has no real tribe”.
The American Prospect writes, “Trump knows only too well that New York’s aris­to­crats have always looked down on him as crass and vul­gar, and he respond­ed to their con­tempt by becom­ing more crass and vul­gar than any­one could have imagined.
The blue blood nev­er accept­ed Donald J Trump, chalk it up to snob­bery, chalk it up to the idea that they know a fake gold coin when they see one.
Even then, the gullible main­stream media fawned over the wannabe emper­or who con­vinced him­self that the fake fin­ery he spun for him­self was enough to cov­er up his nakedness.
It did not!
“In the end, at least 73% of New Yorkers city­wide vot­ed against their home­town can­di­date in elec­tion 2020.
In Manhattan, where Trump lived before becom­ing pres­i­dent, every sin­gle vot­ing dis­trict went for Joe Biden.
Real New Yorkers have no prob­lem see­ing through a fake pimp or a fake gang­land wannabe.
One thing about real New Yorkers, they know the real deal.
Fuhgeddaboudit.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 
He’s con­tributed to sev­er­al websites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est videos.

No Surprise, 7 Bullets To The Back Is No Big Deal, Jacob Blake Cop To Face Zero Charges

Jacob Blake will nev­er walk again, his body sav­aged by sev­en (7) bul­lets from a white cop’s gun to his back.

The cop who shot Jacob Blake in the back a total of sev­en times, crip­pling him from the waist down, will face zero charges. Rusten Sheskey, the white Kenosha Wisconsin cop, shot 27-year-old Jacob a total of sev­en times as the accost­ed Blake, who walked away from them, opened the door to his car, and leaned into the vehicle.
No gun was found in the vehi­cle, even though the pub­lic was told that Blake had a knife in the vehicle.
In America, the police can mur­der any­one, more so black cit­i­zens, using any num­ber of irra­tional rea­sons, and are guar­an­teed to face no penalty.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​c​o​p​-​w​h​o​-​s​h​o​t​-​j​a​c​o​b​-​b​l​a​k​e​-​7​-​t​i​m​e​s​-​i​n​-​t​h​e​-​b​a​c​k​-​i​d​e​n​t​i​f​i​ed/

Blake suf­fered injuries to his arm, kid­ney, liv­er, and spinal cord, accord­ing to Patrick Salvi Jr., one of his attorneys.
“He had a bul­let go through some or all of his spinal cord, at least one bul­let. He has holes in his stom­ach,” Salvi said last August. “He had to have near­ly his entire colon and small intestines removed.”
Rusten Shekesky the trig­ger ‑man cop who pumped sev­en (7) bul­lets into the back of Jacob Blake
From his hos­pi­tal bed in August of 2020, Blake shared a video mes­sage with his supporters.
“Your life and not only just your life, your legs — some­thing that you need to move around, to move for­ward in life — can be tak­en like this, man,” he said, snap­ping his fingers.

Butch Stewart Dead

Butch Stewart per­son­i­fied what it means to hus­tle and achieve the full­ness of where one’s tal­ent can take any­one will­ing to try.
Today, as Jamaicans, we all mourn the pass­ing of this titan who demon­strat­ed what hard work and deter­mi­na­tion could accom­plish, even when we come from hum­ble beginnings.
Mr. Stewart’s fam­i­ly did not reveal the cause of the death of this great patriarch.

The Jamaica Observer, one of Gordon Butch Stewart’s cre­ations, explained; [Stewart, who is also chair­man of the Jamaica Observer, will be most remem­bered for his mul­ti­ple award-win­ning Sandals and Beaches Resorts, which helped to estab­lish the Caribbean, espe­cial­ly Jamaica, as a world-class tourist des­ti­na­tion. As a sales­man with an irre­sistible pitch, he built Appliance Traders Limited on some of the top brand names in the world; dreamed that he could con­quer the world of tourism, and built Sandals that today rates among the most lux­u­ri­ous hotel chains in the world; launched a news­pa­per that changed Jamaican jour­nal­ism; and bought an air­line that car­ried the hope and pride of a nation – the lit­tle piece of Jamaica that flies – but which defied his con­sid­er­able genius in the face of polit­i­cal shenanigans.]

Jamaica is worse off for the pass­ing of Gordon Butch Stewart.….

A Nation Remain Disinterested As A Dictator And His Minions Desperately Seeks To Destroy It

From the moment that he descend­ed the esca­la­tor at his gaudy 5th avenue tow­er in Manhattan, Trump’s enablers have made them­selves explain­ers for his big­otry, xeno­pho­bia, racism, sex­ism, and oth­er vile traits.
Born in Queens to a mul­ti-mil­lion­aire father, Donald Trump was always used to hav­ing things his way.
He was nev­er forced to find his own way, and through a life of priv­i­lege, he basi­cal­ly had every­thing hand­ed to him.
His con­sis­tent assault on the American demo­c­ra­t­ic process, though aid­ed by a now fas­cist right-wing Republican par­ty, is mere­ly par for a spoiled fail­ure who nev­er accom­plished any­thing worth­while on his own.
Lies, dis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­hon­esty, dem­a­goguery, or erect­ing huge build­ings with mon­ey bor­rowed under pre­tens­es are not virtues.

Before he was elect­ed pres­i­dent, Donald Trump was asked whether he would hon­or the results if he lost the pres­i­den­tial elec­tions; he nev­er answered that fun­da­men­tal ques­tion so per­ti­nent for a democracy.
The big­ots vot­ed for him anyway.
Let me say this to the apol­o­gists who would have you believe that not all of the peo­ple who vot­ed for the racist dem­a­gogue are racists. If you know some­one is racist and you cast a vote for him, you are sup­port­ing racism. If you are sup­port­ing racism, you are, by def­i­n­i­tion, a racist.
Let’s put those lies and white­s­plain­ing to rest.
He was again asked the same ques­tion repeat­ed­ly before the 2020 elec­tions, “would you hon­or the results of the elec­tions should you lose”? One would have thought that hav­ing occu­pied the pres­i­den­cy, the quack would rec­og­nize the office’s impor­tance, both on the world stage, and to the Republic.…..The least he would say was, “we’ll see.”
Despite refus­ing to adhere to one of the most fun­da­men­tal prin­ci­ples of the demo­c­ra­t­ic process, Trump was elect­ed to the pres­i­den­cy to move on grace­ful­ly after defeat.
More than enough big­ot­ed whites in the United States put a dan­ger­ous igno­ra­mus, a known racial arson­ist, into the presidency.
The lies that they want­ed some­one who would shake things up, were just that, a smoke­screen for want­i­ng to empow­er a white suprema­cist to push back at the coun­try’s chang­ing racial demographics.
Those of you who con­tin­ue to won­der at the rabid and sup­port this dem­a­gogue receives, not fac­ing the facts of the fore­gone is to your detriment.
Donald Trump and his father’s big­otry was a mat­ter of record that was not hid­den from those who vot­ed for him in 2016; it was not hid­den from the larg­er num­ber of them who turned out to vote to keep Donald Trump in pow­er in 2020.
Many of them were so ashamed of the votes they were about to cast, or that they had cast, they lied to poll­sters, they lied to their own friends and fam­i­ly mem­bers out of shame. Just not enough shame to not empow­er an igno­rant fas­cist tyrant.
Polling is not a dying art. Pollsters were not over­sam­pling Democratic vot­ers. Trump sup­port­ers had [con­vert­ed] to an oth­er­world Orwellian dystopia of lies and dis­in­for­ma­tion. Anything to main­tain white suprema­cy and enti­tle­ment in America, even to the detri­ment of the Republic.

The elec­tions have been over for almost two months now. If Trump’s behav­ior in the Presidency teach­es us any­thing, any despot can over­throw any sys­tem with sup­port in the right places.
If the Republicans that swore an oath to the Constitution were hon­or­ing their oath, if they were not jock­ey­ing to demon­strate feal­ty to an une­d­u­cat­ed cir­cus clown, Donald Trump would have been seen as the true igno­rant moran that he real­ly is.
Whether the cir­cus planned for January 6th man­ages to over­turn the free and fair elec­tions of November 3rd, 2020, poten­tial­ly cat­a­pult­ing the nation into a sec­ond civ­il war is yet to be seen.
Regardless of the out­come, it is clear that the Republican par­ty can no longer be trust­ed to guard the world’s old­est democracy.
Over 30% of the 330 mil­lion peo­ple in the coun­try are Trump loy­al­ists who do not believe in the demo­c­ra­t­ic process if it does not mean they have total gov­ern­ment control.
This is how coun­tries slip fur­ther and fur­ther into despo­tism. When duly elect­ed lead­ers like Josh Hawley of Missouri, Raphael Cruz of Texas, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, James Lankford of Oklahoma, and the oth­er morons in the Senate added to the duti­ful serfs in the house Republican cau­cus are will­ing to do the bid­ding of a tyrant; it pulls the nation ever clos­er to going over the brink into despotism.
The next tyrant who comes along will have a tem­plate to fol­low, and a bet­ter under­stand­ing of what to tweak to achieve his or her ends.
A more edu­cat­ed and savvy wannabe tyrant like Josh Hawley will have an eas­i­er time orches­trat­ing the demise of the American exper­i­ment as we know it.
Way to go, Missouri, vote out the rea­soned and sane Claire McCaskill and replace her with an anti-demo­c­ra­t­ic, self-pro­mot­ing Seditionist.

If you believe that this is just Trump being Trump on his way out the door, you are just as delu­sion­al as those who say all we can do is pray.
Donald Trump and his Republican cohorts’ attempt to over­turn the elec­tions has prece­dent; it hap­pened before; that is what they want to pull off on Wednesday, December 6th.
What ought to catch the atten­tion of every sin­gle one of the 330 mil­lion Americans regard­less of their polit­i­cal affil­i­a­tion or none at all is the fact that all liv­ing Defense Secretaries, Democrat & Republican, signed a let­ter cau­tion­ing the Military not to allow Trump to use the Military to fur­ther his goals through mar­tial law.
According to [Slate]; In an unprece­dent­ed cri­tique of a sit­ting pres­i­dent, all of the 10 liv­ing for­mer sec­re­taries of defense — from five admin­is­tra­tions, Democratic and Republican — have warned that the time for chal­leng­ing the 2020 elec­tion results has passed, that order­ing the U.S. armed forces to resolve dis­putes would be “dan­ger­ous, unlaw­ful and uncon­sti­tu­tion­al,” and that those who issue or exe­cute such orders “would be account­able” and pos­si­bly face “crim­i­nal penal­ties” for “the grave con­se­quences of their actions on our republic.”The state­ment, released Sunday night as a Washington Post op-ed, indi­cates that not only left-lean­ing con­spir­a­cy the­o­rists but sev­er­al top denizens of the nation­al secu­ri­ty estab­lish­ment are con­cerned President Donald Trump might try to take dras­tic action — even mil­i­tary action — to reverse his clear loss to Joe Biden and extend his grip on power.
According to two for­mer offi­cials involved in the state­ment, none of the 10 sig­na­to­ries believe Trump could suc­cess­ful­ly pull off a coup. They’re con­vinced the Joint Chiefs of Staff would dis­obey any such effort as an “unlaw­ful order.” However, senior offi­cers inside the Pentagon, who are said to be alarmed by Trump’s recent behav­ior, have told some of the for­mer sec­re­taries that they great­ly appre­ci­ate the statement’s message.

The ques­tion that must be asked is, “what do these for­mer high­ly ‑placed for­mer sec­re­taries know that we don’t, that would cause them to issue such a warning?
Those of you who haven’t yet absorbed the mind-alter­ing drug of Trumpism will recall how the Republicans dis­par­aged President Barck Obama for alleged­ly bow­ing to the Saudi King.….….….….… That was a pres­i­den­tial sin that would destroy the Republic. Not the clear and present dan­ger today, of a sociopath who des­per­ate­ly wants to save him­self from crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tion, that he is will­ing to burn the coun­try down to save himself.
As a large por­tion of the House Republican cau­cus elect­ed mem­bers and some in the Senate embark on a mis­sion to over­turn the free and fair elec­tions that made Joe Biden President-Elect, it must be not­ed that every sin­gle one of them is high­ly con­ver­sant that Biden won fair and square.
On that basis, it must be acknowl­edged that every one of them has signed on to and will par­tic­i­pate in that exer­cise instead of the exist­ing sys­tem of gov­ern­ment they took an oath to protect.
As I argued ear­li­er, if noth­ing else, this era has laid bare the fault lines and the sys­tem’s weak­ness­es that have guid­ed America and the rest of the free world since the end­ing of the sec­ond world war.

Speaking of the sec­ond world war, the past always offers us an oppor­tu­ni­ty to learn and grow and not repeat those mis­takes, even as it improves the good.
The Nazi Party’s mete­oric rise to pow­er began in 1930, when it attained 107 seats in Germany’s par­lia­ment, the Reichstag. In July 1932, the Nazi Party became the largest polit­i­cal par­ty in the Reichstag with 230 representatives.
In the final years of the Weimar Republic (1930 to 1933), the gov­ern­ment ruled by emer­gency decree because it could not attain a par­lia­men­tary major­i­ty. Political and eco­nom­ic insta­bil­i­ty, cou­pled with vot­er dis­sat­is­fac­tion with the sta­tus quo, ben­e­fit­ted the Nazi Party.
As a result of the Nazis’ mass sup­port, German pres­i­dent Paul von Hindenburg appoint­ed Hitler chan­cel­lor on January 30, 1933. His appoint­ment paved the way for the Nazi dic­ta­tor­ship after Hindenburg’s death in August 1934.
Before the Great Depression in Germany in 1929 – 1930, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (or Nazi Party for short) was a small par­ty on the rad­i­cal right of the German polit­i­cal spec­trum. (ency​lo​pe​dia​.ush​mm​.org).
The destruc­tion the Nazi par­ty wrought on Jewish prac­ti­tion­ers, the Germany Nation, and the rest of the world is one for the ages.
All great empires of the past found ways to self-destruct. What we see today may be the pre­cur­sor to anoth­er world­wide conflragation.

.

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 
He’s con­tributed to sev­er­al websites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est videos.

Attorneys For Gregory And Travis McMichael Request That Ahmaud Arbery Not Be Called A ‘Victim’ In Court

By Zack Linly

Recent motions filed by attor­neys for Gregory and Travis McMichael — the father and son accused of chas­ing down and fatal­ly shoot­ing Ahmaud Arbery near Brunswick, Ga., on February 23, 2020 — appear to have one agen­da in mind: Remove all indi­ca­tions of Arbery’s very human­i­ty. In the motions filed on Dec. 30 and 31, not only are the McMichaels’ attor­neys try­ing to ban pho­tos that show Arbery pic­tured with, well, any­one, includ­ing fam­i­ly and oth­er loved ones, but they don’t want Arbery referred to as a vic­tim — despite the fact that he so clear­ly was one.
CBS 46 reports that the defense attor­neys don’t want jurors to hear the word “vic­tim” attached to Arbery’s name because “due process requires min­i­mal injec­tion of error or prej­u­dice into these pro­ceed­ings,” accord­ing to the motion.

Use of terms such as ‘vic­tim’ allows the focus to shift to the accused rather than remain on the proof of every ele­ment of the crimes charged,” the attor­neys wrote. The lawyers who may or may not pos­sess souls also wrote that the “bur­den of the pros­e­cu­tion should not be alle­vi­at­ed, min­i­mized or dimin­ished with the use of loaded words which imply that the pros­e­cu­tion has met its bur­den of proof that the crimes alleged have actu­al­ly been committed.”

OK fine: So the lawyers don’t want the VICTIM to be called a VICTIM because the jury shouldn’t be remind­ed that a VICTIM was VICTIMized with­out proof of the VICTIMization of the obvi­ous VICTIM hav­ing been estab­lished. But the ridicu­lous motions go even fur­ther than that.

Read the full sto­ry here. https://​www​.the​root​.com/​a​t​t​o​r​n​e​y​s​-​f​o​r​-​g​r​e​g​o​r​y​-​a​n​d​-​t​r​a​v​i​s​-​m​c​m​i​c​h​a​e​l​-​r​e​q​u​e​s​t​-​t​h​a​t​-​1​8​4​5​9​8​4​491

Supreme Court’s Qualified Immunity, A Death-warrant On Black Americans

YouTube player

Before I say what I will, let me first say this, what­ev­er you will tell me about how dif­fi­cult Policing is, how offi­cers have to make life and death deci­sions in sec­onds. I know. I have been there. And I did it all.
Glad I got that out of the way.

The American courts are par­tial­ly cul­pa­ble for the impuni­ty with which the nation’s police offi­cers use lethal force, begin­ning with the Supreme Court’s shield, known as [qual­i­fied immunity].
Consequently, low­er courts have all but giv­en police carte blanch to do as they please in the process of enforc­ing the laws.
Local pros­e­cu­tors are sup­posed to pros­e­cute offend­ers, regard­less of who they are when they break the laws. They, in large mea­sure, have all but giv­en up on pros­e­cut­ing killer cops. Instead, they have become tax-pay­er fund­ed lawyers that defend cops from being pros­e­cut­ed. This they do through a series of meth­ods, includ­ing pre­sent­ing only excul­pa­to­ry evi­dence to empan­eled grand juries with a view toward results of ‘no true bill”, non-indictments.
Even in cas­es where the evi­dence is clear as day, pros­e­cu­tors twist them­selves into pret­zels to explain why they can­not indict the kkk ‑killers in uniform.
When pros­e­cu­tors act as defense lawyers to cor­rupt and mur­der­ous cops, they don’t need to hire defense attor­neys. The peo­ple are forced to pay pros­e­cu­tors to defend when they should be prosecuting.
The final bar­ri­er to police account­abil­i­ty is police unions. Contrary to the grip­ing about them, how­ev­er, the unions are not near­ly as pow­er­ful as the politi­cians would have us believe. They pre­tend to have no lever­age in chang­ing how police behave because the unions pro­tect dirty, killer cops.
It is a lie. An employ­ee can­not hold an employ­er to ran­som. The sad real­i­ty is that Police unions help fund the cam­paigns of judges, pros­e­cu­tors, and politi­cians and all the way up the food chain.
It isn’t easy to move deci­sive­ly against the peo­ple who fund your polit­i­cal cam­paign. So the politi­cians dither around the edges, but noth­ing sub­stan­tive gets done to change police behavior.
Even if you set aside the fore­gone, Legislatures can throw out the rules and enact new laws that remove police unions from hav­ing a say in how police offi­cers are disciplined.
In fact, police unions should only have a say in pay and work­ing con­di­tions, not whether police offi­cers who com­mit crimes are allowed to get away with mur­der. Legislatures have it in their pow­er to change those real­i­ties; their close ties to the police unions stand in the way.

For instance, Columbus, Ohio cop Adam Coy, was allowed to remain in the depart­ment for 19-years, despite a report­ed his­to­ry of com­plaints and issues with exces­sive force dur­ing his time with the police department.
Coy, who is white, was only fired on Monday after he mur­dered Andre Hill, a 46-year-old African-American man, whom he ordered out of his car.
Hill was sit­ting in his parked car in the garage of a home where he is known, and was report­ed­ly expected.
Andre Hill was wear­ing a Black Lives Matter t‑shirt at the time he was mur­dered by Coy. He had no weapons, and did noth­ing to trig­ger the bar­rage of bul­lets Adam Coy sent his way, snuff­ing out his life.
Ask your­selves, whether a white, mid­dle-aged man would have been ordered from his car, much less mur­dered by police who weren’t even sent to inter­act with him?
This ques­tion is one that I have asked on numer­ous occa­sions, and have answered myself. That answer is an unequiv­o­cal no!
A white Andre Hill would have been deemed to have a right to be where he was. Nothing would have caused his death at the hands of Adam Coy, includ­ing his skin col­or, or what he was wearing.
Adam Coy fired his ser­vice weapon (a) because he [believed] there would be no con­se­quence for killing Andre Hill. (b)Adam Coy fired his weapon because he had no respect for the black life of Andre Hill.
© Neither Adman Coy, nor the female cop with him admin­is­tered life-sav­ing first aid. Why was this you ask? They placed [no] val­ue on the life of Andre Hill.

YOU DECIDE WHETHER THESE ARE PROTECTORS OF THE PUBLIC OR CRIMINALLY COMPLICIT MURDERERS?

YouTube player

When the stan­dard for the use of dead­ly force is the irra­tional deci­sion-mak­ing of seri­ous­ly flawed indi­vid­u­als, these are the results. When poor­ly trained racists are allowed to kill, then galling­ly claim that they thought the per­son had a gun, these are the results. When cops, who time and again abuse the very cit­i­zens they are sworn to pro­tect, and are allowed to remain as police offi­cers, and in many cas­es are reward­ed with pro­mo­tions, what incen­tive do they have to stop mur­der­ing inno­cent citizens?
The tragedy inher­ent in these killings, is the mealy-mouthed respons­es of the politi­cians in both polit­i­cal par­ties. When asked to respond to these crimes against human­i­ty, they default to the canned praise of police BS; the major­i­ty of our police offi­cers are decent, hard-work­ing peo­ple who lay their lives on the line to pro­tect all of us”.
What unadul­ter­at­ed bull­shit by the way? No one asked them to join, they joined because they want­ed the job, they have every respon­si­bil­i­ty to fol­low the laws, not break them.
Rather than force­ful­ly respond­ing to the crimes of the mur­der­ers in uni­form., the polit­i­cal hacks engage in canned praise for the killers.
It is incom­pre­hen­si­ble that in the world’s old­est democ­ra­cy, agents of the state can sum­mar­i­ly take the lives of some cit­i­zens using irra­tional argu­ments, “I thought he had a gun” or “I feared for my life.”
If you kill some­one because you could not wait to see if they had a gun, you are basi­cal­ly say­ing that police have the legal right to mur­der any cit­i­zen as long as they can­not see the per­son­’s hands.
If you have such irra­tional fears, you have no busi­ness being a police offi­cer. Many of you who read this arti­cle will ques­tion these asser­tions; you are free to do so; nev­er­the­less, the very dis­re­spect­ful words of Adam Coy toward the shot and dying Andre Hill speaks volumes.
The offi­cer’s lack of action to stop the bleed­ing of the wound­ed Andre Hill, speaks direct­ly to their lack of respect for his humanity.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 
He’s con­tributed to sev­er­al websites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est videos.

2nd Officer Involved In Andre Hill Shooting Said She ‘Did Not Observe Any Threats’ Before Shooting Started

By Zack Linly

The Dec 22 shoot­ing of 47-year-old Andre Hill in Columbus, Ohio, is arguably among the most reck­less acts of police bru­tal­i­ty we’ve seen this year — and that’s say­ing a lot. As the inves­ti­ga­tion into the inci­dent — in which a white police offi­cer opened fire on a Black man who was stand­ing in a garage clear­ly hold­ing a cell­phone, repeat­ed­ly shout­ed at him to “put your fuck­ing hands out to the side” while he was lying on the ground shot and then failed to pro­vide med­ical help — con­tin­ues, new details have emerged. Those details include the sec­ond offi­cer on the scene report­ing that she “did not observe any threats” from Hill that would prompt an offi­cer to shoot in the first place.

ABC News reports that Officer Amy Detwiler, who arrived at the scene after now-for­mer offi­cer Adam Coy, the one who fired the shots and was sub­se­quent­ly fired for incom­pe­tence and “gross neglect of duty,” said she saw Hill walk away from a car when she arrived in response to a non-emer­gency call involv­ing an SUV left idling.

Adam Coy left Andre Hill right

As The Root pre­vi­ous­ly report­ed, Coy didn’t have his body cam­era on until after the shoot­ing, but because the cam­eras have a func­tion that records 60 sec­onds of “look back” footage, video footage of the shoot­ing was record­ed and recent­ly released by the police depart­ment. No audio could be heard before the shots were fired, but Detwiler’s report to inves­ti­ga­tors sheds some light on what pre­ced­ed the shooting.

From ABC:

Detwiler didn’t see any inter­ac­tion between Hill and Coy, but said Coy told her Hill had walked into a next-door garage.

After the offi­cers crossed over to the garage they saw Hill, with Detwiler telling inves­ti­ga­tors “she felt Mr. Hill may need assis­tance to enter the res­i­dence,” accord­ing to her interview.

Coy asked Hill in a “nor­mal tone of voice” to exit the garage and Hill com­plied but with­out respond­ing, Detwiler said.

As Hill walked out, Detwiler “did not observe any threats from Mr. Hill,” nor did she see a gun, the inter­nal affairs report said.

Officer Detwiler stat­ed Officer Coy observed a firearm and yelled, ‘There’s a gun in his oth­er hand, there’s a gun in his oth­er hand!’” the report said. “Officer Detwiler heard gun­fire at this moment.”

No gun was found at the scene, police said.

A few gen­tle reminders: First, this all came from a call to police about a truck left run­ning in the street. Second, Hill approached offi­cers after he was ordered to do so and was hold­ing his cell­phone in the air with the screen lit up and fac­ing the offi­cers — mean­ing he was going far out of his way to show he wasn’t armed or pre­sent­ing any kind of threat, but he was still shot all the same. Third, despite the spot­light on police bru­tal­i­ty and sys­temic racism in polic­ing that has been in place since the death of George Floyd, a lot of cops seem to not be get­ting the mes­sage. Lastly, as we pre­vi­ous­ly report­ed, Coy is no rook­ie cop. He’s a 19-year police vet­er­an with dozens of mis­con­duct com­plaints — includ­ing exces­sive force alle­ga­tions — in his per­son­nel file.Coy is still under crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion and hope­ful­ly, he will be charged in Hill’s death, but his fir­ing should have come long ago. Hill should still be alive today.

Violent White Terrorists Continue To Get A Pass, No Matter Haw Many They Slaughter…

The nation­al silence at the well-planned, well-exe­cut­ed Christmas Morning RV bomb­ing in Nashville, Tennessee, is strik­ing. The entire inci­dent and the com­plex­i­ty of the act itself, has fad­ed away with 2020 like a bad mem­o­ry as if it nev­er happened.
But the real­i­ty is that it did hap­pen. (Anthony Quinn Warner, a white male, did rig a vehi­cle with explo­sives, and he did det­o­nate it in a major metrop­o­lis, alleged­ly killing him­self in the process. That ought to dri­ve ter­ror into the hearts of the nation, but it has­n’t, because Anthony Quinn Warner just hap­pen to be a white male.
Stop just for a minute and think about the media feed­ing fren­zy that would be in high gear today, had the bomber being iden­ti­fied as Jamal Muhammed?
Forget about the gullible cor­po­rate media for a sec­ond and imag­ine the lan­guage that would be com­ing out of the House and Senate, Republicans and Democrats alike.
Many politi­cians would be call­ing for bomb­ings, and in all like­li­hood, war plans would have been on the table for airstrikes on the Nation to which the bomber may have had some ties, no evi­dence needed.
Think this state­ment is hyper­bol­ic? Please explain the ratio­nale for the attack on Iraq?

So how does a nation man­age this bi-polar response to actions that amount to the same thing? Sources famil­iar with the Nashville bomb inves­ti­ga­tion told the media that author­i­ties are look­ing into evi­dence that Anthony Quinn Warner was inter­est­ed in var­i­ous con­spir­a­cy the­o­ries, includ­ing some involv­ing “lizard peo­ple.” Authorities believe Warner also spent time hunt­ing for alien life forms in a near­by state park.
So there you have it, folks, the poor guy is just a para­noid whack-job with men­tal issues, that ought to put every­thing to rest, right?
Have you noticed that for the most part, when­ev­er these white ter­ror­ists exact harm on the nation using vio­lence, they all seem to have three names? Just a thought!
More shock­ing than the fact that there is silence from the White House to the lit­tle house on Main street, is the sad real­i­ty that these acts are not even seen as acts of terror.
Many in the Republican Party, includ­ing William Barr, Michael Flynn, and oth­ers, want­ed Demonstrators peace­ably demon­strat­ing against police vio­lence to be charged with Sedition against the United States. For these same clowns, the com­plex pre­med­i­tat­ed act of build­ing and det­o­nat­ing an explo­sive device in a major American City does not rise to sedition.
If Republicans believe that Anthony Quinn Warner is an American ter­ror­ist, we are yet to hear it from them.
In fair­ness, the Democrats are just as silent as their Republican and Media contemporaries.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 
He’s con­tributed to sev­er­al websites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est videos.

Former Republican Senator Now Voices What We Suggested Weeks Ago…

On December 16th, 2020, I wrote and pub­lished the fol­low­ing arti­cle in which I sug­gest­ed that it was now time for a new polit­i­cal par­ty in the United States. I argued it was the right time because the Republican Party has become a full-blown Fascist Party that can no longer be trust­ed to look after the Democratic Republic.
In light of the Lincoln Project’s posi­tions, a group of for­mer Republicans who saw the par­ty they love leave them behind, I went as far as to sug­gest that maybe the Lincoln Project should orga­nize and become an alter­na­tive polit­i­cal par­ty to what the Republican par­ty has devolved into.
The true nature of the dan­ger the present Republican Party pos­es to the United States’ well­be­ing can­not be over­stat­ed. Despite those dan­gers, the main­stream media has not prop­er­ly artic­u­lat­ed what’s at stake in a way that the American peo­ple can ful­ly appreciate.
Neither has the weak and feck­less Democratic Party.

HERE IS THE ARTICLE

Now that the Republican Party has demonstrated that it can no longer be trusted to see to the wellbeing of American Democracy; and now that it has become a full-blown autocratic party; now that far-right fringe groups like Qanon and other white supremacist groups like the proud boys and others have taken up residence in the party; and now that the party has all but decided that democracy is antithetical to its goals, there must be a change.

Donald Trump did not cre­ate the nas­ti­ness that now defines the Republican Party; as a dem­a­gogue, he took full advan­tage of it. Ever since Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil and Voting Rights into law and whites ran away from the Democratic Party and took up res­i­dence in the Republican Party, the par­ty has exem­pli­fied itself as the polit­i­cal par­ty for white resent­ment and white grievance.
Despite the hoopla about their good­ness, most white Americans have nev­er been com­fort­able with black Americans enjoy­ing the same rights and priv­i­leges they so sum­mar­i­ly enjoy.
Doctor King spoke about their shock when they saw peo­ple being beat­en on the so-called bloody Sunday on the Edmund Pettus bridge. Still, when it came time to take action against the insti­tu­tion­al­ized racism that made what the police did pos­si­ble, they backed away.
Dr. King; “Like the nation, Negro and white, trem­bled with out­rage at police bru­tal­i­ty in the South, police mis­con­duct in the North was ratio­nal­ized, tol­er­at­ed, and usu­al­ly denied,” he wrote. Leaders in Northern and Western states “wel­comed me to their cities, and show­ered praise on the hero­ism of Southern Negroes. Yet when the issues were joined con­cern­ing local con­di­tions, only the lan­guage was polite; the rejec­tion was firm and unequiv­o­cal.

President Barack Obama spoke to whites’ pan­ic on his ascen­den­cy to the pres­i­den­cy of the United States.
Brack Obama; “My very pres­ence in the White House trig­gered a deep-seat­ed panic.”
At the risk of sound­ing parochial, they have some nerve, slaves built that damn house, but I digress.
One of the most notable things that Donald Trump banged the drums on as he held his super spread­er cam­paign events across the coun­try with his legions of faith­ful sheep [flock­ing] to them ador­ing­ly, was high­light­ing to his racist fol­low­ers that Kamala Harris should nev­er be the first female President of the United States.
There is a cred­i­ble argu­ment to be made for America’s inabil­i­ty to rec­on­cile that women are not intel­lec­tu­al­ly infe­ri­or to men, and there­fore are equipped to take on any task, includ­ing being pres­i­dent of the United States.
That aside, Senator Kamala Harris, half black, half Indian her­itage, was not the pres­i­den­tial can­di­date; Joe Biden was. Nevertheless, Trump played up Joe Biden’s age, mak­ing the case to his hate­ful fol­low­ers that Biden was like­ly to drop dead at any minute, leav­ing Kamala to become President of the United States.
The main­stream media refus­es to acknowl­edge these truths, even as they pre­tend that they have no clue what is behind the lunatic denial of the Joe Biden/​Kamala Harris win.
On the same day that the Electoral College con­firmed the White House vic­to­ry of Joe Biden, retir­ing Rep. Paul Mitchell of Michigan told lead­ing Republicans that he was leav­ing the GOP and becom­ing an Independent for the final days of his Congressional career, fed up with President Donald Trump’s nev­er-end­ing effort to sub­vert Biden’s victory.

Look, this guy was going to leave any­way, so his deci­sion to become an inde­pen­dent was no pro­file in courage, nei­ther does it make him a paragon of virtue. Like so many oth­er Republicans who bowed to Trumpism and left the stage out of fear of the wrath of Trump’s legions of racist trolls, Mitchell’s action’s are tan­ta­mount to throw­ing a wild punch at a bul­ly that miss­es every­thing, then cov­er­ing one’s face and cow­er­ing in fear wait­ing for the beat­down that is sure to follow.
He gets no point from me.
Don’t let the door hit you, where the Good Lord — — — . Anyway.
To the extent that Paul Mitchell, Jeff flake, Justin Amash, Will Herd, et al. had some degree of patri­o­tism, and to the extent that leav­ing the stage was the only option open to them, then I guess their exit from pol­i­tics is a sign that pol­i­tics is for the worst actors, at least on the Republican side.
The Republican purge has been a years-long process that has left all but the [dregs], Kevin McCarthy, Jim Jordon, Matt Gaetz, Steve Scalise, and oth­ers. The kind we wit­nessed attach their names to a sedi­tious law­suit seek­ing to over­turn the results of a fair and legit­i­mate Presidential elec­tion. One in which Joe Biden and Kamala Harris not only won the pop­u­lar vote by over sev­en mil­lion votes, but won the elec­toral col­lege by a land­slide, even by their dear leader’s stan­dards, it was the same elec­toral col­lege win Donald Trump had with the help of the Russians in 2016, minus the val­i­da­tion of a pop­u­lar vote win.
In 2016 Donald Trump sup­pos­ed­ly won 306 elec­toral votes against 232 for for­mer Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Back then, Trump claimed that he won a land­slide despite los­ing the pop­u­lar vote. Hillary Clinton won the pop­u­lar vote by over three mil­lion votes but lost the election.
In 2020 Joe Biden won the same 306 elec­toral votes, but he had to win more than sev­en (7) mil­lion more votes than Donald Trump to win the election.
The time has come, and gone for the elec­toral col­lege to be done away with.

The American exper­i­ment bare­ly with­stood the first attempt of this kind to destroy it. Almost half of the elect­ed Republican mem­bers of the United States House of Representatives demon­strat­ed that they do not believe in Democracy.
There were no doubt mem­bers of the upper cham­ber were as well, also will­ing to par­tic­i­pate in the Coup’ d’etat against America.
Like a servile lap­dog, Texas United States Senator Raphael Cruz sig­naled his will­ing­ness to argue the case to over­turn the elec­tions before the Supreme Court on behalf of Trump. In a coun­try in which the rule of law is tru­ly sacro­sanct, Raphael Cruz would not only be kicked out of the Senate; he would be dis­barred from prac­tic­ing law. One of the first steps about being an offi­cer of the court, which all lawyers are, is that the per­son has good char­ac­ter. Where is Raphael Cruz’s character?
Raphael Cruz and the min­ions in the low­er house were will­ing to destroy the American exper­i­ment in sup­port of a dem­a­gog­ic despot.
This time it was half of the elect­ed Republicans; the next time, what remains as the Republican par­ty will en masse com­mit trea­son against America in def­er­ence to the next dic­ta­tor that comes along.

For those rea­sons, and the cor­nu­copia of oth­er rea­sons that this Republican par­ty can­not be trust­ed to pro­tect the demo­c­ra­t­ic process, then the time has come for an alter­na­tive con­ser­v­a­tive par­ty to emerge. One that is fun­da­men­tal­ly focused on the preser­va­tion of the demo­c­ra­t­ic process as the Democrats are.
The American exper­i­ment has two polit­i­cal par­ties that the American vot­ers alter­nate in and out of pow­er at all gov­ern­ment levels.
The effec­tive func­tion­ing of that process requires that both polit­i­cal par­ties respect the process, con­cedes when each los­es, recal­i­brate and come back to the table with bet­ter ideas.
The Republican par­ty no longer believes in that process. It has become a school­yard bul­ly that picks up its ball and goes home, even when it has struck out.
Given an elec­torate with the appro­pri­ate intel­lec­tu­al matu­ri­ty lev­els, the Republican par­ty would nev­er again hold power.
The seri­ous­ness of the sit­u­a­tion mer­its a new polit­i­cal par­ty to save America from the Republicans, and the unin­formed vot­ers who elect them to office.
The Lincoln Project has demon­strat­ed that mon­ey and savvy, can effec­tu­ate desired out­comes. It may be time for the Lincoln Project to become a polit­i­cal party.

FORMER REPUBLICAN SENATOR AND DEFENSE SECRETARY WILLIAM COHEN CALL FOR NEW POLITICAL PARTY

A for­mer Republican sen­a­tor and defense sec­re­tary has sug­gest­ed it may be time for mod­er­ate con­ser­v­a­tives to form a new polit­i­cal par­ty as he launched a with­er­ing attack on the law­mak­ers sup­port­ing Donald Trump’s bid to over­turn the elec­tion result.

William Cohen, who rep­re­sent­ed Maine before tak­ing up the defense role in the Clinton admin­is­tra­tion in 1997, said there is now “a real divi­sion” with­in the GOP and com­pared Mr Trump’s back­ers in Congress to cir­cus ele­phants try­ing to please their “ring­mas­ter”.

His com­ments came after Missouri sen­a­tor Josh Hawley announced that he will chal­lenge Congress’s cer­ti­fi­ca­tion of pres­i­dent-elect Joe Biden’s elec­tion vic­to­ry on 6th January.

Despite los­ing both the elec­toral col­lege and pop­u­lar vote, Mr Trump and his legal team con­tin­ue to insist that the elec­tion was “rigged”. But the Trump team is yet to present any cred­i­ble evi­dence that mass vot­er fraud took place on elec­tion day.

A num­ber of Republicans in the House of Representatives have declared that they would chal­lenge Mr Biden’s vic­to­ry when Congress meets to cer­ti­fy the result next week.

Senator Hawley’s announce­ment made him the first GOP law­mak­er in the sec­ond cham­ber to voice sup­port for the defeat­ed pres­i­den­t’s efforts to sub­vert democracy.

Announcing his deci­sion, Mr Hawley claimed that Pennsylvania did not fol­low state elec­tion laws and said the “unprece­dent­ed effort of mega cor­po­ra­tions” like Facebook and Twitter inter­fered with the elec­tion to sup­port pres­i­dent-elect Biden. He also urged Congress to inves­ti­gate alle­ga­tions of vot­er fraud.

Crucially, Mr Hawley’s back­ing means that both the House and the Senate will now be forced to debate the results of at least one state and vote on whether to accept Mr Biden’s win.

It will not change the out­come of the elec­tion, but it sets up a sce­nario that Senate major­i­ty leader Mitchell McConnell want­ed to avoid, say­ing it would be high­ly dam­ag­ing for the party.

Speaking to CNN on Thursday, Mr Cohen, 80, sug­gest­ed that “maybe it’s time for a new par­ty”, when asked about the state of the GOP and the pow­er Mr Trump con­tin­ues to exert over it.

[A par­ty] that abides by the rule of law, abides by bal­anced bud­get oppor­tu­ni­ties, fis­cal respon­si­bil­i­ty. A par­ty that is faith­ful to the peo­ple of this coun­try who vote to elect them,” a vis­i­bly annoyed Mr Cohen added.

Mr Cohen also lashed out at those Congressional Republicans embold­en­ing Mr Trump’s bid to frus­trate the will of the American peo­ple, sug­gest­ing they will be for­ev­er indebt­ed to a pres­i­dent who “can­not be satisfied”.

The cur­rent occu­pant of the White House is a ring­mas­ter, and what he expects to do is to snap his whip and all the ele­phants jump on the chairs,” he said.

What they have to under­stand, those who are so eager to sup­port this effort to over­turn the vote…what they have to under­stand is that he is going to con­tin­ue to snap the whip whether he is in office or out of office.”

He added: “And every time they are going to have to sit on that stool in order to sat­is­fy him and his supporters”.

Mr Cohen also called on a num­ber of more mod­er­ate Republicans includ­ing Mitt Romney (Utah), Susan Collins (Maine) and Ben Sasse (Nebraska) to do every­thing in their pow­er to oppose the sen­a­tors back­ing Mr Trump.

Mr Sasse was one of those Republicans who called out Mr Hawley’s move to delay cer­ti­fy­ing the Congress vote as he urged his col­leagues not to fol­low suit.

Writing on Facebook, he said: “The pres­i­dent and his allies are play­ing with fire. They have been ask­ing — first the courts, then state leg­is­la­tures, now the Congress — to over­turn the results of a pres­i­den­tial election.

They have unsuc­cess­ful­ly called on judges and are now call­ing on fed­er­al office­hold­ers to inval­i­date mil­lions and mil­lions of votes. If you make big claims, you had bet­ter have the evi­dence. But the pres­i­dent does­n’t and nei­ther do the insti­tu­tion­al arson­ist mem­bers of Congress who will object to the elec­toral col­lege vote.”

Mr Trump wel­comed Mr Hawley’s sup­port. “America is proud of Josh and the many oth­ers who are join­ing him,” he tweet­ed yes­ter­day. “The USA can­not have fraud­u­lent elec­tions!”( Story orig­i­nat­ed at Yahoo news)

Republicans In Red & Blue States Continue To Vote Against Their Best Interest…

There are a mil­lion and one rea­sons why Senate major­i­ty leader Mitch McConnell ought to have been removed by the vot­ers in Kentucky last November.
Alas, the major­i­ty of the vot­ers in that state, as in many oth­er states across the coun­try, con­tin­ue to elect Republicans, who in turn enact poli­cies that ben­e­fit the very rich at the expense of the very peo­ple who vot­ed for them.
It is an age-old prob­lem; the down-bal­lot suc­cess­es of the Republican Party in the last elec­tions were just the lat­est iter­a­tion of Republican par­ty vot­ers’ cog­ni­tive dissonance.
I will [not] attempt to out­line Mitch McConnell’s sins here suf­fic­ing to say that if you have been fol­low­ing pol­i­tics and are fair-mind­ed, you can relate to exact­ly what the Senior US Senator from the Bluegrass State stands for.
On November 3rd, 2008, Barack Obama, a young first-term sen­a­tor from the great state of Illinois, was declared President-elect of the United States.
Immideateltly there­after, Mitch McConnell declared that his sole pur­pose as Majority leader of the United States Senate was to make the new pres­i­dent-elect a one-term president.
Mitch McConnell did exact­ly that, obstruct that is. Despite his and the Republican’s best efforts, how­ev­er, Barack Obama was a suc­cess­ful two-term pres­i­dent.. One of his most igno­ble and dis­hon­or­able acts as major­i­ty leader of the sen­ate under President Obama was, of course, his refusal to give Obama’s supreme court pick of Judge Merrick Garland a meet­ing, much less a hear­ing that would have placed him on the Supreme Court, in the seat vacat­ed by the deceased Antonin Scalia.

Food lines in Texas

Mitch McConnell has nev­er seen a tax cut that would ben­e­fit his wealthy back­ers that he was not glee­ful to bring to the sen­ate’s floor. He had no prob­lem bring­ing to the Senate floor and pass­ing Trump’s tax cut that fur­ther enriched the very rich.
However, the coun­try is now in the deep throes of a pandemic.
Over 341 thou­sand Americans have so far died. Literally, every per­son in America now knows some­one who has either been infect­ed or died from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Additionally, the nation faces a seri­ous eco­nom­ic down­turn, one like no one alive has ever seen before.
Donald Trump, who nev­er cared about the poor, has sud­den­ly decid­ed that he wants hun­gry, near home­less Americans to have a $2’000 check from the gov­ern­ment. No one in their right mind believes that Trump actu­al­ly cares enough about any­one not named Trump, to want them to have $2’000.

In fact, there is ample evi­dence that Donald Trump only wants the larg­er $2’000 amount than the $600 num­ber his trea­sur­er sec­re­tary nego­ti­at­ed with both Republicans and Democrats because he knows it won’t pass.
If Trump real­ly want­ed Americans to have a $2’000 check, he would have had Steven Mnuchin nego­ti­ate to have that amount sent to the American people.
Donald Trump con­ve­nient­ly wait­ed until after the $600 amount was decid­ed on, then there­after decid­ed he would not sign the bill into law — –Of course, he then signed the bill he said he would not sign.
He then went ahead and demand­ed a $2’000 check he knew Moscow Mitch would not bring to the Senate floor as a stand-alone bill to be vot­ed on.
Trump has no inter­est in gov­ern­ing out­side of enrich­ing him­self, so it does not mat­ter how many Americans are dying from COVID-19, or are on the brink of star­va­tion; his sup­port for a $2’000 pay­out to the peo­ple is sole­ly designed to cur­ry favor with the pop­u­la­tion he wants on his side in his bid to pull off a coup in America.
Mitch McConnell does­n’t care either, so he attach­es the mea­sure to two oth­er mea­sures he knows Democrats can­not sup­port, and so the bill is all but dead.

The trag­ic irony is that the peo­ple who will suf­fer the most are the ones who came out in droves and re-elect­ed Mitch McConnell last November. They also elect­ed and reelect­ed Republicans down-bal­lot across the length and breadth of the country.
Amidst the noise and hog­wash fed you by the main­stream media are the facts that they won’t both­er to divulge.
White Americans will vote against their own moth­er if the abil­i­ty to coa­lesce around racial griev­ance and white suprema­cy is on the ballot.
They rose against President Barack Obama’s push to have the wealth­i­est Americans pay a lit­tle more in tax­es, dur­ing his pres­i­den­cy. They came out with pitch­forks, tiki-torch­es, and the most despi­ca­ble posters depict­ing the pres­i­dent as every­thing but human.
Obama want­ed those earn­ing more than half a mil­lion each year to pay a lit­tle more in tax­es. Those in the mid­west who came out against the idea, and across the south were earn­ing some­where between $38’000 & $48’000.
They came out to fight a war that was not theirs to fight.
At the time, those actu­al­ly earn­ing half a mil­lion and more annu­al­ly, told the President that they would be hap­py to pay a lit­tle more in taxes.

The same was true of the afford­able care act (ACA) intend­ed to help [them], the most vul­ner­a­ble, the poor­est, and those in par­tic­u­lar, with what is char­ac­ter­ized as pre­ex­ist­ing health conditions.
Republicans know­ing just how stu­pid and racist their vot­ers are, attached Obama’s name to the leg­is­la­tion; this auto­mat­i­cal­ly became poi­son to their voters.
Republican elect­ed offi­cials knew just how easy it was to turn their vot­ers on a dime. All they had to do is appeal to their racist hatred, and they will mil­i­tate against drink­ing water, which is crit­i­cal to their abil­i­ty to survive.
Republicans and Mitch McConnell do not care whether they live or die as long as they can give tax cuts to their rich puppetmasters.
Republican recip­i­ents of the ACA, told Journalists that they did not want Obama Care, they were hap­py with their Affordable Care health care.[sic]
Those who were pay­ing atten­tion knew that those upris­ings were not organ­ic grass­roots move­ments by peo­ple who felt their way of life threat­ened; it was a well-orches­trat­ed cam­paign fund­ed by über-wealthy bil­lion­aire broth­ers Charles and David Koch.
David Koch is now dead, but his old­er sib­ling Charles now wants for­give­ness for what they did with their wealth.
The hatred poor whites have for oth­er races is work­ing to keep them impov­er­ished. Today they no longer work as over­seers on the plan­ta­tion in the tra­di­tion­al sense; they are no longer oper­at­ing under the moniker [slave catch­ers]; they are now called police officers.
Unfortunately, their men­tal­i­ty is the same as it was four-plus hun­dred years ago.

Which brings us to the ques­tion of why these peo­ple con­tin­ue to mil­i­tate against their own self-interest?
From time to time, I write about the his­to­ry of whites who came to America as (inden­tured ser­vants), anoth­er name for slaves.
The dif­fer­ence between the white European inden­tured ser­vants, and the African peo­ple brought into bond­ed servi­tude, is that they had com­mit­ted no crimes.
The act of kid­nap­ping and enslav­ing them was a crime against human­i­ty and remains so today, with­out ade­quate mea cul­pa, resti­tu­tion, and commupence.
The white inden­tured ser­vants were, in fact, the worst crim­i­nal offend­ers in Europe, Murderers, Rapists, Child-moles­ters, who were giv­en the option of being ban­ished to the colonies or be executed.
Naturally, they chose the Colonies.
The prac­tice of dump­ing them in America, con­tin­ued up until the end of the civ­il war. Other nations were pop­u­lat­ed by them as well, Australia and New Zealand. Wherever they went, the death and destruc­tion they brought with them is a mat­ter of his­tor­i­cal record.
Their venge­ful actions against the enslaved African peo­ple are no mys­tery; they were depraved crim­i­nals, end of the story.
Convinced by the plan­ta­tion own­ers that they were supe­ri­or because of their white skin, they exact­ed untold geno­cide on the black enslaved peo­ple in their capac­i­ty as over­seers and slave catchers.
The Planters fear­ing that the two groups of slaves would be too much for them to han­dle, came up with the bril­liant idea to divide them up based on race.
They con­vinced them that they would some­day be free and own plan­ta­tions and be rich as well. That idea is now a part of their DNA; they con­tin­ue to believe in the fal­la­cy that if the rich man is giv­en enough, some will fall from his table, and they will ben­e­fit. That con­cept has all but ensured that the rich have got­ten rich­er and the poor poorer.

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 
He’s con­tributed to sev­er­al websites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est videos.

Columbus’ Policing Problem Goes Deeper Than The Shooting Of Andre Hill

By Aviva Shen

On Monday evening, the Columbus Department of Public Safety announced it has fired the police offi­cer who killed Andre Hill, an unarmed Black man, last week. The white Ohio offi­cer, Adam Coy, was found to have used unrea­son­able force, failed to turn on his body cam­era, and declined to admin­is­ter first aid after he shot Hill.

Coy was respond­ing to a non-emer­gency call about a man sit­ting in his car, yet he showed up with his gun drawn. Hill, 47, was vis­it­ing a friend’s house and had stopped in the garage. Coy ordered him to come out of the garage, so Hill turned around and walked toward Coy with his phone in his hand. Though Coy didn’t turn on his cam­era until after the shoot­ing, a 60-sec­ond play­back fea­ture cap­tured the shoot­ing with­out audio. That footage showed Coy shoot­ing Hill with­in 10 sec­onds of approach­ing him. The oth­er offi­cer on the scene told inves­ti­ga­tors that she did not think Hill posed a threat.

It was the city’s sec­ond police killing of a Black man in the span of a few weeks. A sheriff’s deputy who once said his job was to “hunt peo­ple” killed Casey Goodson Jr. out­side his own home on Dec. 4, trig­ger­ing nation­wide protests. While Goodson’s death wasn’t cap­tured on cam­era, the footage of Hill’s death was so trans­par­ent­ly damn­ing that with­in days, the may­or, city coun­cil mem­bers, and the police chief had all called for Coy’s fir­ing. “Officer Coy’s han­dling of this run is not a ‘rook­ie’ mis­take as a result of neg­li­gence or inad­ver­tence, but the deci­sions … and actions tak­en were reck­less and delib­er­ate,” Police Chief Tom Quinlan wrote in his rec­om­men­da­tion last week.

Coy racked up a num­ber of com­plaints alleg­ing abuse over his years on the force. But he went large­ly unpun­ished until now. In one case in 2012, cruis­er footage showed him slam­ming a man’s head repeat­ed­ly into the hood dur­ing a drunk dri­ving arrest. The city paid out $45,000 in a civ­il rights set­tle­ment for that assault, accord­ing to the Columbus Dispatch, while Coy was sus­pend­ed for 160 hours as a result.

Adam Coy left Andre Hill right

But Coy is hard­ly the only offi­cer in Columbus with a his­to­ry of vio­lence. There are many offi­cers who have net­ted dozens of exces­sive force com­plaints while keep­ing their jobs; some have been pro­mot­ed. Bureau of Justice sta­tis­tics show Columbus police offi­cers killed about three times more peo­ple than any oth­er depart­ment in Ohio between 2013 and 2019. More than two-thirds of those peo­ple were Black in a city that’s only 29 per­cent Black overall.

This sta­tus quo has per­sist­ed despite evi­dence of per­va­sive mis­con­duct and abuse with­in the city police force. Large protests erupt­ed in 2016 after Officer Bryan Mason killed Tyre King, a 13-year-old Black boy who, accord­ing to an autop­sy report request­ed by his fam­i­ly, was “more like­ly than not” run­ning away when he was shot. Mason had already been impli­cat­ed in 47 reports involv­ing exces­sive force, the Appeal report­ed. He was nev­er fired nor indict­ed for the shoot­ing; the department’s ini­tial response was to tweet a pho­to of a repli­ca of a BB gun King was alleged­ly car­ry­ing at the time. More recent­ly, one Columbus offi­cer on the vice squad was indict­ed for forc­ing women to have sex with him under threat of arrest (he is sep­a­rate­ly fac­ing charges for shoot­ing and killing a woman while on the job). Several Black police offi­cers have also blown the whis­tle on the agency’s cul­ture of racism, retal­i­a­tion, and bullying.It’s a cul­ture that has deep roots. Back in 1999, the Department of Justice found the depart­ment had a pat­tern and prac­tice of racial pro­fil­ing, wrong­ful arrests, lying about civ­il rights vio­la­tions, and exces­sive force. “The offi­cers involved in mis­con­duct many times have a his­to­ry of com­plaints against them, and fail to report accu­rate­ly to their supe­ri­ors what tran­spired in the inci­dent (chang­ing the facts to por­tray the vic­tim as respon­si­ble for the arrest, the use of force, and/​or the search),” the DOJ report not­ed. The city respond­ed to the DOJ law­suit in 2002 by giv­ing police offi­cers more train­ing on racial pro­fil­ing and expand­ing the inter­nal affairs bureau’s abil­i­ty to inves­ti­gate mis­con­duct. But the nature of the com­plaints — alle­ga­tions of racial dis­crim­i­na­tion and false arrests — have remained remark­ably similar.

Part of the prob­lem is that the police union has his­tor­i­cal­ly stood in the way of even mod­est reforms; under the col­lec­tive bar­gain­ing agree­ment, the city can’t even sus­pend an offi­cer unless they clear a high bar. But the city is now try­ing again. Over the protests of the police union, Columbus vot­ers over­whelm­ing­ly approved a mea­sure in November to cre­ate a civil­ian review board and inspec­tor gen­er­al to inves­ti­gate the police. The inde­pen­dent watch­dog agency is mod­eled after sim­i­lar boards in cities like Baltimore and New York, which have had mixed results. Mayor Andrew Ginther shut the police union out of the work­ing group that struc­tured the civil­ian review board, but the city will like­ly still need to nego­ti­ate the scope of the board’s pow­er with the union.

I think law enforcement’s per­spec­tive is very impor­tant, but the FOP is not run­ning this process,” Ginther said in July. “They’re not in charge; they’re not call­ing the shots any­more about how we police.”

The may­or has also pro­posed cut­ting fund­ing for the police, which makes up one-third of the city’s entire bud­get, and allo­cat­ing funds to hire men­tal health and social work­ers instead.

But even just keep­ing Coy off the force might prove dif­fi­cult in the long run. He has the right to appeal the deci­sion through union arbi­tra­tion, and no crim­i­nal charges have been filed against him yet. According to an inves­ti­ga­tion by WOSU, the Columbus pub­lic radio sta­tion, sev­er­al oth­er Columbus police offi­cers have been re-hired in recent years after appeal­ing their fir­ing. It’s a prob­lem that’s plagued police depart­mentsacross the country.

We’re like­ly to see more high-pro­file fir­ings as politi­cians respond to this year’s sus­tained Black Lives Matter protests. President-elect Joe Biden has called for mod­est polic­ing reforms tar­get­ing the “bad apples” in depart­ments. Purging offi­cers like Coy from the force is a com­mon­sense first step. But it won’t fix American polic­ing. Even when local lead­ers and police chiefs call for reform, they face entrenched road­blocks, if not open revolt. Columbus is among the many American cities that have been tin­ker­ing around the edges of their police forces for decades with lit­tle to show for their efforts. Real change can’t hap­pen until we move from sim­ply pun­ish­ing offi­cers like Coy for shoot­ing an unarmed Black man, to keep­ing them from being there in the first place.

Jamaican Govt, Must Step Up And Defend It’s Citizens When They Are Violated…

For those of us who are con­cerned about law­less­ness in Jamaica, and more so, those of us who ven­ture to speak out about the Jamaican author­i­ties fail­ure to pro­tect the nation from crim­i­nals, we must also be pre­pared to defend Jamaica’s sov­er­eign­ty, and our Jamaican nation­als when oth­ers wrong them.
The con­tin­ued deten­tion of four men by American Immigration Authorities must be cause for alarm and out­cry from law-abid­ing peo­ple every­where who believe in the rule of law, and equal treat­ment under the law, be they local or inter­na­tion­al laws.
People and nations respect and fol­low laws when they are con­vinced that all are equal under said laws. No per­son or coun­try should be above the laws, be they local or inter­na­tion­al laws.

Jamaican Attorney Bert Samuels, a part­ner at the law firm Knight, Junor, and Samuels, has every right to be indig­nant about the fir­m’s clients, four Jamaicans who were arrest­ed by the United States Coast Guard under alle­ga­tions that they were a part of a nar­cot­ic smug­gling ring and their boat destroyed.
According to Bert Samuels, the men were ini­tial­ly detained for 73 days between October 11, 2020, and December 23, 2020, after alle­ga­tions that they were found with 150 gal­lons of liq­uid cocaine that turned out to be gasoline.
The men have been acquit­ted of all charges by a Florida Judge, yet they are being held by the US immi­gra­tion offi­cials, and are not allowed to return to their homes in Jamaica.
Being locked up in an immi­gra­tion jail after being exon­er­at­ed in a crim­i­nal court is the same as being pun­ished even though they have been found not guilty in a court of law.

SEE FULL STORY HEREhttp://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​l​a​w​y​e​r​-​q​u​e​s​t​i​o​n​s​-​u​s​-​i​m​m​i​g​r​a​t​i​o​n​-​s​-​h​o​l​d​i​n​g​-​m​e​n​-​c​l​e​a​r​e​d​-​b​y​-​c​o​u​r​t​_​2​1​0​9​4​3​?​p​r​o​f​i​l​e​=​1​373

The attor­ney is well with­in his rights to be pissed at the Jamaican Government for not strong­ly advo­cat­ing for these Jamaican cit­i­zens’ release. According to the attor­ney, the silence from Jamaica’s attor­ney gen­er­al and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the men’s plight has been deafening.
He also [wants to know whether there will be an apol­o­gy to the own­er of the boat, his crew mem­bers and their fam­i­ly; an apol­o­gy to Jamaica, a treaty State; and com­pen­sa­tion for the loss of the ves­sel and its earn­ing capac­i­ty — with­out their clients hav­ing to go through the expense of fil­ing — and com­pen­sa­tion for the vir­tu­al tor­ture of Jamaicans and the tar­nish­ing of their rep­u­ta­tion on the pre­tense that they were involved in a mas­sive cocaine trade].
The United States can­not have one set of rules for itself and anoth­er for every­one else.
Institutions like the United Nations, the International Court Of Justice, and oth­er Organizations that the United States helped to cre­ate have kept the world out of a third world war for 75-years.
Before cre­at­ing those Agencies, there was only a 25-year span between world wars one and two.
If there is going to be con­tin­ued adher­ence to International laws, civ­i­lized nations must all have the con­fi­dence that all nations play by the same rules.
Might, can­not be the deter­mi­nant of right, or we are all doomed.
It is now over to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Jamaican Attorney General to see to these four Jamaicans’ civ­il and human rights.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 
He’s con­tributed to sev­er­al websites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est videos.

It Will Be Interesting To See Who The Nashville Bomber Turns Out To Be

Indications are that inves­ti­ga­tors going through the Nashville blast-scene may now have a per­son or per­sons of inter­est in mind.
The blast — which injured three peo­ple and caused mas­sive dam­age to the city’s down­town area — emanat­ed from a white RV parked on 2nd Avenue at 6.40 am on Christmas morning.
Some ana­lysts the­o­rize that the RV, which broad­cast­ed a record­ed mes­sage warn­ing peo­ple to get away from the area and gave a count­down before the blast occurred, may have been designed to tar­get law-enforcement.
The idea is that as law-enforce­ment is drawn to the area to inves­ti­gate, the RV would det­o­nate, killing them.
The blast report­ed­ly injured sev­er­al people.

At this point, there has been no con­fir­ma­tion from the FBI or local police as to who was involved, whether tis­sue alleged­ly found at the scene was indeed human tis­sue, or who exact­ly may have been involved at this ear­ly stage of the investigations.
White suprema­cist groups have been known to pose the great­est dan­ger to the United States. They are heav­i­ly armed, and well orga­nized. They have demon­strat­ed their desire and capa­bil­i­ties to take inno­cent lives on a grand scale. From Timothy McVeigh in the Okholohama city bomb­ing, to Mother Emanuel, to Kyle Rittenhouse, their goal is to mur­der the innocent.
Despite the clear and present dan­ger they pose, law enforce­ment author­i­ties’ atten­tion, includ­ing local police depart­ments, seems to be focused elsewhere.

How Implicit Bias Is Costing The Lives Of Black Americans, In Other Areas Outside Police Killings…

fAccording to experts, African-Americans are three times more like­ly to die from COVID-19 than their white coun­ter­parts. The Brookings Institution report­ed, “In every age cat­e­go­ry, black peo­ple are dying from Covid at rough­ly the same rate as white peo­ple more than a decade older.”
BBC arti­cle report­ing on the death of an African-American doc­tor in Indianapolis, Indiana, recent­ly, asked the ques­tion, ” Is every­one racist”?
The arti­cle cit­ed a 2015 paper pub­lished in the American Journal of Public Health that found “most health care providers appear to have an implic­it bias in terms of pos­i­tive atti­tudes toward Whites and neg­a­tive atti­tudes toward peo­ple of color.”

The ques­tion “are we all racist”? is a fun­da­men­tal ques­tion to con­sid­er as we pon­der the con­se­quences of death and destruc­tion on the black pop­u­la­tion; we already know the reasons.
Inherent in the ques­tion is the dis­tinct pos­si­bil­i­ty that col­or bias­es may have bled-over into, and actu­al­ly may help shape how even black care­givers relate to black peo­ple, as opposed to the way they treat whites. A large per­cent­age of care­givers are actu­al­ly black, which makes the ques­tion even more perplexing.
It is not out of the realm of pos­si­bil­i­ty that the long-held con­cept of white fem­i­nine fragili­ty and white male supe­ri­or­i­ty, [deserv­ing of def­er­ence], may inform how black care­givers relate to whites, instead of how they see their own kind.
There is a lot of anec­do­tal evi­dence that would sug­gest that this is indeed so, even though the sam­pling may not be sci­en­tif­ic, and could arguably be based on the geog­ra­phy of the care insti­tu­tion, etc.
All things con­sid­ered; how­ev­er, the evi­dence is clear across the board; implic­it bias­es affect the way peo­ple of col­or are treat­ed. But that is to be con­sid­ered in every aspect of American life; black lives are far less valu­able than white lives.

On October 17th, 1993, I took my wife to a Bronx teach­ing Hospital to give birth to our son, who we would lat­er name Kodi.
It was a Sunday morn­ing. I dropped her off at the hos­pi­tal entrance, where she was allowed to sit in a wheel­chair and was wheeled in while I went to park my car.
As soon as I entered her room a few min­utes lat­er, I real­ized that much was wrong; she was in extreme pain, which seemed out of the ordinary.
I prompt­ly went to the nurse’s sta­tion and made known my feel­ings known to them, and they made sure to tell me that I was just a stressed-out spouse who was just scared.
Though not con­vinced, I went back to her room, shoul­ders drooped, not sure who was right, they or me.
It did not take long for me to be back at the nurse’s sta­tion once again, to explain to them that some­thing was wrong.
Again they told me that I was pan­ick­ing, all was well, and so again, I went back to my wife’s room.

Well, need­less to say, my sec­ond for­ay to the nurse’s sta­tion was not going to be my last. My third vis­it was a more col­or­ful one that was more befit­ting the streets of Kingston, Jamaica, and of course, it acti­vat­ed a response.
In quick order, they were in the room, and then they want­ed to ush­er me out of the room, but I was going nowhere.
They then hand­ed me a gown and mask, and in less than a minute, the room was filled with Doctors, Nurses, and machines.
My unborn son’s heart had stopped beat­ing by then, so they restart­ed his heart using machines. In their hur­ry to pull him out there­after, they lit­er­al­ly pulled his hip out of place.
Our son was made to wear a brace of an extra dia­per rolled up between his thighs for months to get rid of a click in his hips, due to their apa­thy and negligence.
Was this implic­it bias? Some of the staff mem­bers were black oth­ers were white. Was it just that the staff in this one hos­pi­tal was lethar­gic and unprofessional?
Over the years, I have seen sev­er­al oth­er exam­ples of this kind of behav­ior that could rea­son­ably be viewed in the same light, includ­ing inci­dents that includ­ed my own per­son­al care that has been less than what would nor­mal­ly be expect­ed and oth­ers that were inspiring.
My wife has also com­plained about the care she received, or the care she has not received, in one par­tic­u­lar hos­pi­tal, but how are those com­plaints rat­ed when it is almost impos­si­ble to know whether white patients are treat­ed similarly?

The answer may be in the nation­al data that does indi­cate that black peo­ple are treat­ed dif­fer­ent­ly than whites in care facil­i­ties, even when the care­givers are black?
The real­i­ty is that implic­it bias affects every stra­tum of American soci­ety; there is no rea­son to doubt the data; in fact, it pro­vides the stark con­se­quences of insti­tu­tion­al­ized racism.
The dead bod­ies of black peo­ple con­tin­ue to pile up due to racists poli­cies, whether from an unem­pa­thet­ic health care sys­tem, dis­crim­i­na­to­ry redlin­ing hous­ing poli­cies, or vio­lent police, many of whom itch to pull the trig­ger when­ev­er they see black bodies.
Dr. Susan Moore, 52, passed away at a local hos­pi­tal on Sunday, after com­plain­ing about how she was treat­ed at anoth­er Indianapolis hos­pi­tal, even after telling them that she was a med­ical doctor.
According to the report­ing, Dr. Moore test­ed pos­i­tive for Covid-19 on 29 November and was admit­ted with a high fever while she coughed up blood and strug­gled to breathe. But even as a physi­cian her­self, she said she had strug­gled with get­ting care. Dr. Moore said she had had to plead for antivi­ral Remdesivir dos­es and request a scan of her chest. At one point, the doc­tor report­ed­ly told her she did not qual­i­fy for the drug and that she should go home.
“He made me feel like I was a drug addict,” Dr. Moore said in a Facebook video. “And he knew I was a physi­cian. I don’t take nar­cotics. I was hurting.”
Donald Trump was not cough­ing up blood; nei­ther were any of the white men who got infect­ed at his super-spread­er events; they all qual­i­fied for the best treat­ment; no ques­tions asked.
Would that have hap­pened to a white woman? Would that have hap­pened to a white woman who is a doc­tor? Would the poor­est or lowli­est white woman be treat­ed that way?
No!!!

.

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 
He’s con­tributed to sev­er­al websites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est videos.

Ohio Mayor Urges Firing Of Cop Who Fatally Shot Unarmed Black Man

By Nina Golgowski
Andre Maurice Hill was the sec­ond Black man killed by law enforce­ment this month in the state cap­i­tal of Columbus.

A police offi­cer has been relieved from duty after author­i­ties in Columbus, Ohio, say he fatal­ly shot an unarmed Black man, the sec­ond dead­ly police shoot­ing of a Black man in the city this month. Officer Adam Coy was respond­ing to a non-emer­gency call of some­one repeat­ed­ly turn­ing on and off their vehi­cle in a neigh­bor­hood ear­ly Tuesday morn­ing when he shot 47-year-old Andre Maurice Hill who had walked out of a home’s garage while car­ry­ing a cell phone, police said.
“Mr. Hill was known to the res­i­dents at the home,” Columbus Mayor Andrew Ginther said at a press con­fer­ence Wednesday. “He was expect­ed. He was not an intrud­er, he had not com­mit­ted any crimes.” Ginther said Coy should imme­di­ate­ly be fired from the police department.

Coy was with anoth­er offi­cer at the time of the shoot­ing, but nei­ther had their body-worn cam­eras turned on. Seconds after Hill was shot, both offi­cers turned on their cam­eras but they failed to ren­der first aid or com­fort Hill as he lay dying, Ginther said. Because the cam­eras fea­ture a 60-sec­ond “look back” func­tion, the shoot­ing was caught on video though no audio was obtained, the police depart­ment said.
Ginther blast­ed the offi­cers’ actions and described him­self as deeply dis­turbed by their appar­ent lack of com­pas­sion for Hill in the moments after the shoot­ing. “There were lit­er­al­ly no attempts to ren­der aid to this man who had com­mit­ted no crime. That is a stun­ning dis­re­gard for life and in this case Black life. That is unac­cept­able,” Ginther said. “It is an officer’s duty to not only sum­mon a medic but to ren­der aid. … We are bet­ter than this and we must make sure that every­one is safe.”

Goodson, 23, was shot mul­ti­ple times by a sheriff’s deputy on Dec. 4 as he was about to enter his home, his fam­i­ly has said. It remains unclear what led to the shooting.

Columbus Police Chief Thomas Quinlan, who has called Hill’s death a tragedy, crit­i­cized the offi­cers’ fail­ure to acti­vate their cam­eras pri­or to the shoot­ing. The depart­ment has “invest­ed mil­lions of dol­lars in these cam­eras for the express pur­pose of cre­at­ing a video and audio record of these kinds of encoun­ters,” he said in a state­ment Tuesday. “They pro­vide trans­paren­cy and account­abil­i­ty, and pro­tect the pub­lic, as well as offi­cers, when the facts are in ques­tion.” Quinlan said he ordered Coy to turn in his badge and gun pend­ing the out­come of an inter­nal and crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion, which will be con­duct­ed by the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation. Ginther said that he has asked that the inves­ti­ga­tion also exam­ine whether Hill’s civ­il rights were vio­lat­ed. Coy, a 19-year vet­er­an of the police force, has a his­to­ry of com­plaints of exces­sive force, includ­ing nine filed against him in 2003. Of those com­plaints, four took place in a one-month peri­od, The Columbus Dispatch reported.
In 2012, one such com­plaint led to the city pay­ing a $45,000 set­tle­ment. This fol­lowed Coy repeat­ed­ly bang­ing the head of a drunk dri­ving sus­pect on the hood of a car dur­ing the man’s arrest. Coy was sus­pend­ed 160 hours for that inci­dent, accord­ing to the Dispatch.
This week’s shoot­ing comes a lit­tle more than two weeks after Columbus police respond­ed to the fatal shoot­ing of 23-year-old Casey Goodson by a Franklin County sher­iffs’ deputy.

Goodson, who was also Black, was return­ing to his home from a den­tist appoint­ment with Subway sand­wich­es for mem­bers of his fam­i­ly, includ­ing his grand­moth­er, when he was gunned down on the doorstep, an attor­ney rep­re­sent­ing his rel­a­tives said. The deputy, iden­ti­fied as Jason Meade, had been search­ing the area for “vio­lent offend­ers” with a U.S. Marshals task force when he report­ed see­ing a man with a gun. It’s not clear what led Meade to open fire, how­ev­er. He was not wear­ing a body cam­era and no wit­ness­es to the shoot­ing have come for­ward, author­i­ties said.
Goodson had a car­ry per­mit hold­er and was legal­ly armed at the time of the shoot­ing, police said. He was not sus­pect­ed of hav­ing com­mit­ted any crimes.

What Was Christmas Like For America’s Enslaved People?

For some, it was a rare time of respite; for oth­ers, an oppor­tu­ni­ty for resistance.(writes Farrel Evans for History​.com)

How did Americans liv­ing under slav­ery expe­ri­ence the Christmas hol­i­days? While ear­ly accounts from white Southerners after the Civil War often paint­ed an ide­al­ized pic­ture of own­ers’ gen­eros­i­ty met by grate­ful work­ers hap­pi­ly feast­ing, singing and danc­ing, the real­i­ty was far more complex.

In the 1830s, the large slave­hold­ing states of Alabama, Louisiana and Arkansas became the first in the United States to declare Christmas a state hol­i­day. It was in these Southern states and oth­ers dur­ing the ante­bel­lum peri­od (1812−1861) that many Christmas tra­di­tions—giv­ing gifts, singing car­ols, dec­o­rat­ing homes — firm­ly took hold in American cul­ture. Many enslaved work­ers got their longest break of the year — typ­i­cal­ly a hand­ful of days — and some were grant­ed the priv­i­lege to trav­el to see fam­i­ly or get mar­ried. Many received gifts from their own­ers and enjoyed spe­cial foods untast­ed the rest of the year.

But while many enslaved peo­ple par­took in some of these hol­i­day plea­sures, Christmas time could be treach­er­ous. According to Robert E. May, a pro­fes­sor of his­to­ry at Purdue University and author of Yuletide in Dixie: Slavery, Christmas and Southern Memory, own­ers’ fears of rebel­lion dur­ing the sea­son some­times led to pre-emp­tive shows of harsh dis­ci­pline. Their buy­ing and sell­ing of work­ers didn’t abate dur­ing the hol­i­days. Nor did their annu­al hir­ing out of enslaved work­ers, some of whom would be shipped off, away from their fam­i­lies, on New Year’s Day — wide­ly referred to as “heart­break day.”

Still, Christmas afford­ed enslaved peo­ple an annu­al win­dow of oppor­tu­ni­ty to chal­lenge the sub­ju­ga­tion that shaped their dai­ly lives. Resistance came in many ways — from their asser­tion of pow­er to give gifts to expres­sions of reli­gious and cul­tur­al inde­pen­dence to using the rel­a­tive loose­ness of hol­i­day cel­e­bra­tions and time off to plot escapes.

For slave­hold­ers, gift-giv­ing con­not­ed pow­er. Christmas gave them the oppor­tu­ni­ty to express their pater­nal­ism and dom­i­nance over the peo­ple they owned, who almost uni­ver­sal­ly lacked the eco­nom­ic pow­er or means to pur­chase gifts. Owners often gave their enslaved work­ers things they with­held through­out the year, like shoes, cloth­ing and mon­ey. According to Texas his­to­ri­an Elizabeth Silverthorne, one slave­hold­er from that state gave each of his fam­i­lies $25. The chil­dren were giv­en sacks of can­dy and pen­nies. “Christmas day we gave out our dona­tions to the ser­vants, they were much pleased and we were salut­ed on all sides with grins, smiles and low bows,” wrote one Southern planter. In his book The Battle for Christmas, his­to­ri­an Stephen Nissenbaum recounts how a white over­seer con­sid­ered giv­ing gifts to enslaved work­ers on Christmas a bet­ter source of con­trol than phys­i­cal vio­lence: “I killed twen­ty-eight head of beef for the people’s Christmas din­ner,” he said. “I can do more with them in this way than if all the hides of the cat­tle were made into lashes.”

Enslaved peo­ple rarely made rec­i­p­ro­cal gifts to their own­ers, accord­ing to his­to­ri­ans Shauna Bigham and Robert E. May: “Fleeting dis­plays of eco­nom­ic equal­i­ty would have con­tro­vert­ed the [enslaved work­ers] pre­scribed role of child­like depen­den­cy.” Even when they played a com­mon hol­i­day game with their own­ers — where the first per­son who could sur­prise the oth­er by say­ing “Christmas Gift!” received a present — they were not expect­ed to give gifts when they lost.

In some instances, enslaved peo­ple did rec­i­p­ro­cate with gifts to the mas­ters when they lost in the game. On one plan­ta­tion in the Low Country South Carolina, some enslaved house work­ers gave their own­ers eggs wrapped in hand­ker­chiefs. Yet over­all, the one-sided nature of gift-giv­ing between slave­own­ers and those they enslaved rein­forced the dynam­ic of white pow­er and paternalism.

Christmas Vacation and Freedom

For enslaved work­ers, Christmastime rep­re­sent­ed a break between the end of har­vest sea­son and the start of prepa­ra­tion for the next year of pro­duc­tion — a brief sliv­er of free­dom in lives marked by heavy labor and bondage. “This time we regard­ed as our own, by the grace of our mas­ters; and we there­fore used or abused it near­ly as we pleased,” wrote famed writer, ora­tor and abo­li­tion­ist Frederick Douglass, who escaped slav­ery at age 20. “Those of us who had fam­i­lies at a dis­tance were gen­er­al­ly allowed to spend the whole six days [between Christmas and New Year’s Day] in their society.”

Some used these more relaxed hol­i­day times to run for free­dom. In 1848, Ellen and William Craft, an enslaved mar­ried cou­ple from Macon, Georgia, used pass­es from their own­ers dur­ing Christmastime to con­coct an elab­o­rate plan to escape by train and steam­er to Philadelphia. On Christmas Eve in 1854, Underground Railroad icon Harriet Tubman set out from Philadelphia to Maryland’s Eastern Shore after she had heard her three broth­ers were going to be sold by their own­er the day after Christmas. The own­er had giv­en them per­mis­sion to vis­it fam­i­ly on Christmas Day. But instead of the broth­ers meet­ing with their fam­i­lies for din­ner, their sis­ter Harriet led them to free­dom in Philadelphia.

John Kunering

For enslaved peo­ple, resis­tance dur­ing Christmastime didn’t always take the form of rebel­lion or flight in a geo­graph­i­cal or phys­i­cal sense. Often it came in the way they adapt­ed the dom­i­nant society’s tra­di­tions into some­thing of their own, allow­ing for the purest expres­sion of their human­i­ty and cul­tur­al roots. In Wilmington, North Carolina, enslaved peo­ple cel­e­brat­ed what they called John Kunering (oth­er names include “Jonkonnu,” John Kannaus” and “John Canoe”), where they dressed in wild cos­tumes and went from house to house singing, danc­ing and beat­ing rhythms with rib bones, cow’s horns and tri­an­gles. At every stop they expect­ed to receive a gift. “Every child ris­es on Christmas morn­ing to see the John Kannaus,” remem­bered writer and abo­li­tion­ist Harriet Jacobs in her auto­bi­og­ra­phy Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. “Without them, Christmas would be shorn of its great­est attraction.”

These pub­lic dis­plays of joy were not uni­ver­sal­ly loved by all whites in Wilmington, but many encour­aged the activ­i­ties. “It would real­ly be a source of regret, if it were denied to slaves in the inter­vals between their toils to indulge in mirth­ful past times,” said a white ante­bel­lum judge named Thomas Ruffin. For his­to­ri­an Sterling Stuckey, author of Slave Culture, the Kunering reflect­ed deep African roots: “Considering the place of reli­gion in West Africa, where dance and song are means of relat­ing to ances­tral spir­its and to God, the Christmas sea­son was con­ducive to Africans in America con­tin­u­ing to attach sacred val­ue to John Kunering.”

None of the Negroes Was Ever Forgot on That Day’

Enslaved peo­ple had a long mem­o­ry of Christmastime. They remem­bered how they used it to mark time around the plant­i­ng sea­son. They knew they could count on it for a mea­sure of free­dom and relax­ation. Their inabil­i­ty to par­tic­i­pate ful­ly in gift exchange — one of the most basic aspects of the sea­son — helped rein­force their place as men and women who couldn’t ben­e­fit from their labor. Some, like Harriet Tubman and the Crafts, saw it as a time best suit­ed to chal­lenge the whole society.

The adults remem­bered the gifts long after their child­hoods were stolen by this ter­ri­ble insti­tu­tion. “Didn’t have no Christmas tree,” recount­ed a for­mer­ly enslaved man named Beauregard Tennyson, in a WPA inter­view. “But they set up a long pine table in the house and that plank table was cov­ered with presents and none of the Negroes was ever for­got on that day.”

#EatingWhileBlack: An Innocent Black Man Gets Handcuffed While Eating With Family At Virginia Beach Mall

YouTube player

Another day, anoth­er task to add to the ever-grow­ing list of things Black folks can’t do for fear of hav­ing a com­plete­ly unwar­rant­ed and volatile run-in with the police.
On Saturday, Jamar Mackey was enjoy­ing lunch with his fam­i­ly at a food court inside of a local Virginia Beach Mall. Well, that was the case until two Virginia Beach police offi­cers hand­cuffed Mackey with­out explanation.
Visibly and under­stand­ably upset, Mackey and his wife began ques­tion­ing the offi­cers who con­tin­ued to escort Mackey from the food court and out­side of the build­ing. In a video post­ed to Facebook, you can hear Mackey and the woman with him try­ing to get some answers from the offi­cers but to no avail.
“But what did he do?” the woman ques­tioned. “Can you just tell us, we just came with our babies. We don’t even have a Black truck.”

Insider reports that when offi­cers final­ly got out­side, they attempt­ed to explain the sit­u­a­tion to Mackey and his fam­i­ly, who had fol­lowed them out­side to con­tin­ue record­ing. According to police, Mackey and appar­ent­ly his son “matched the descrip­tion” of a per­son they were look­ing for who was sus­pect­ed of using stolen cred­it cards inside the mall. “We got a descrip­tion of some­one who was using stolen cred­it cards, OK?” police explained after final­ly remov­ing the hand­cuffs from off of a now irate Mackey. “That per­son is a Black male with dreads and was wear­ing all black and was with a boy who was wear­ing red, OK?” The cam­era then pans over to anoth­er pair that a dif­fer­ent set of police were also ques­tion­ing on the oth­er side of the mall entrance.

It was a big mis­un­der­stand­ing,” the offi­cer explained. The woman with Mackey respond­ed, “this is so embar­rass­ing” and pro­ceed­ed to ask for the name of the offi­cer and num­ber that she could call to han­dle the mat­ter further.The Virginia Beach Police Department has since launched an inves­ti­ga­tion into the inci­dent and Chief of Police Paul Neudigate said in a statement:
“Certainly, any­one would be upset about being detained for some­thing they didn’t do” said Chief Neudigate. “While the video shows the offi­cer stayed calm and respect­ful through­out the brief encounter, we must ensure the sit­u­a­tion mer­its the response. We are gath­er­ing all the facts to eval­u­ate the inci­dent so we can address the con­cerns peo­ple have raised.”

According to WAVY-TV, the Virginia Beach Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) is also launch­ing an inves­ti­ga­tion and released a state­ment in regards to the inci­dent saying:

The Virginia Beach NAACP strong­ly con­demns the appar­ent racial bias on dis­play in the video clip that has wide­ly cir­cu­lat­ed on social media today. In the midst of a glob­al pan­dem­ic, Virginia Beach police offi­cers – with­out masks or per­son­al pro­tec­tive equip­ment – mis­tak­en­ly detained a Black man who was spend­ing qual­i­ty time with his fam­i­ly. As a Virginia Beach offi­cer stat­ed ‘you have the right to be upset,’ and indeed we are just that: quite upset. Even more alarm­ing, calls from the Virginia Beach NAACP to the Virginia Beach Police Chief remain unan­swered as of Sunday evening. We are demand­ing a meet­ing with the Virginia Beach Police Chief with­in 48 hours. As the police depart­ment has not respond­ed to our inquiries, the Virginia Beach NAACP has launched its own inves­ti­ga­tion into the inci­dent. The NAACP will not rest until every Black cit­i­zen in Virginia Beach can shop, dine, and trav­el with­out being racial­ly pro­filed by our city’s police officers.

The Virginia Beach police chief has since apol­o­gized to Mackey and his fam­i­ly. From the root.