Providence, Rhode Island, police released body camera video after a man who was handcuffed by officers died.
The footage is from one of several officers who responded to a call around 12:30 a.m. ET Friday about a man, identified as Joseph Ventre, 34, screaming in the middle of the street.
When the video begins, Ventre is heard yelling. Two other officers are already on the scene.
The three police officers walk around a chain-link fence to a grassy field, where Ventre is seen rolling around on the ground.
Several minutes pass before officers approach Ventre and try to calm him down. Paramedics and several other officers have just arrived at this point in the video.
“Buddy, relax your body,” one officer says. “Relax your body, you’re OK.”
Ventre yells out indiscernible words and at one point tells the officer his name is David.
One of the officers suggests they handcuff Ventre in the front. Instead, they try to direct him toward the paramedics but Ventre is still rolling on the ground.
Eventually, several officers attempt to handcuff him. After a short struggle, Ventre is placed in cuffs and lifted onto a stretcher.
The Providence Police Department said that Ventre was pronounced dead at the hospital just before 2 a.m.
According to a police press release, Ventre was “possibly under the influence of narcotics.” He was placed in handcuffs “to prevent injuries and for the safety of rescue personnel,” the department said, noting his “erratic behavior.”
“The subject continued to refuse to comply with police commands and after a minor struggle, the subject was placed on a stretcher and into the Providence Fire Department rescue where PFD personnel began to perform CPR,” police said.
The identities of the officers involved have not been released. The case remains under investigation.
Despite its many faults, The United States of America has served as a template in many instances to a kind of world order that has arguably served the peace and tranquility of the planet to some degree. Sure, America’s policies under different administrations have arguably also been antithetical to the said peace and tranquility as well. For example, in recent times, America’s ill-advised foray into the nation of Iraq, its policy of propping up the Shah of Iran, its comical invasion of Grenada, the continued embargo against the Cuban nation, and its support for the apartheid systems in South Africa and Israel are only a few of the policies that run counter to America’s stated goals of peace through the democratic process.
On the other hand, I don’t believe that freedom-loving people anywhere would have a problem with America’s entry into the second world war or its stance against the burgeoning Soviet threat before the eventual fall of the Soviet empire. The long and short of this debate is that the US is the longest standing democratic nation, one that many smaller, more vulnerable nations looked to for support to remain out of the clutches of despotism and dictatorship. It is for those reasons that what the Republican party is doing to the American democratic process is so horrifying. Changing racial dynamics has forced the Republican party to become a fascist party with no interest in governing. Instead, the party is solely focused on finding ways to rig the electoral process to gain an unfair advantage. They have decided to attack voting rights on all fronts; of course, the United States Supreme Court Republican majority made that possibility a lot easier in its 2013 decision in Shelby County Alabama Vs. Holder in which the court stripped away section 4 (B), a major portion of the landmark 1965 voting rights act.
The court’s actions opened up a new wave of voter suppression legislation by the Republican legislatures, primarily in Republican-run states. The new voter restrictions are so egregious that it is a criminal offense to give someone standing in a voting line a drink of water in Georgia. But, of course, the other side of that coin is that the same laws remove drop boxes, close most polling places in heavily African-American communities, lessen voting by mail, demands strict ID’s at polling places, limits voting on Sunday, a day African-Americans have traditionally used to vote after Church, and a slew of other voter intimidation methods aimed laser-like at Black and brown people, including having aggressive poll-watchers close to people of color casting the votes. Many in the civil rights community, including Stacy Abrams, have dubbed the new laws Jim crow 2.0, in reference to the jim crow laws passed after reconstruction. Those laws literally subjected the newly liberated African-American population to another iteration of enslavement.
But the voter suppression laws are only a small part of it; the Republican attacks are aimed at immigration as well as abortion, long-held cultural issues that the Republican party attached itself to but cannot articulate a sane reason for. Republicans champion an anti-abortion platform, but the truth is that as far as the party and its Lilly white voter base are concerned, they do no care a rats ass about black and brown babies. In fact, the party hopes that fewer black and brown babies are born. Their position on offering SNAP and other benefits to needy mothers’ of those babies of color as soon as they are born gives credence to the fact that they do not care about babies of color. The position of the Republican’s anti-abortion crusade is best summed up in the words of former Iowa Republican congressman Steve King, “we cannot build our civilization with other people’s babies.” The idea is to overturn Roe V Wade and force more white women to have babies… in their minds, the white race faces extinction because not enough white babies are being born; additionally, the co-mingling of the races is seen as an extensional threat to the purity of the Caucasian race… These are the dark crevasses in which the Republican party resides today.
Limiting and, if possible, ending immigration is self-explanatory; as Donald Trump said, “why do we need these people from these shit-hole countries,” speaking of black countries, “why can’t we get people from Norway”? Norway’s population is overwhelmingly white. After Democratic President Lyndon Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights and the 1965 Voting Rights acts into law, the unmistakable mad dash by whites to the Republican party is a well-documented part of American history. Fifty-six (56) years after the voting rights act became law, the American South is still rock-solid Republican, with parts of the midwest and mountain states following suit. Republicans running for President can bank on winning all of the southern states before a single vote is cast. Republican trickle-down economic policies have kept citizens in those states impoverished; as have been proven, all but one of the fifteen poorest states in the union are run by Republicans, yet the voters in those states vote on wedge issues like immigration and abortion decade after decade then claim that they are victims because immigrants are taking their jobs.
In the 92 Presidential elections, Democrat Bill Clinton won his home state of Arkansas. In 2000 Al Gore Clinton’s vice president won his home state of Tennessee; he would go on to lose the presidential election to George Bush, the Republican, in a controversial election in which the United States Supreme Courts stopped the recount in the state of Florida and declared Bush the winner. George Bush’s brother Jeb Bush was the Republican governor of Florida at the time.…..Democracy is working for you! In the 2020 presidential elections between the Russian agent Donald Trump and Joe Biden, former vice president to President Barack Obama, voter turnout was historic. Trump’s MAGA crowd convinced that he was some (messiah) sent by their god, turned out in droves, no Republican presidential candidate before Trump managed to turn out 75 million to the polls.
But Trump’s MAGA army in all its fascist displays, with flags, and other symbols of [idolatry] was no match for the silent majority that turned out to repudiate the Russian plant and make Joe Biden the 46th president of the United States. Russian plant? You damn right, Donald Trump has done everything that Putin wanted him to do. He has used the power of the presidency to advance every wish on Putin’s list to destabilize the United States, and the world, starting with toking racial divisions in the United States, which his hander Putin knows weakens America. not make America great. Here is a list compiled by CNN on what Donald Trump meant to Vladimir Putin.
(1) Trump has repeatedly praised Putin. (2)Trump hired Manafort to run his campaign. (3)Trump suggested Russia can keep Crimea. (4) Trump aides softened the GOP platform on Ukraine. (5) Trump made light of Russian hacking. (6)Trump capitalized on Russian meddling to win. (7)Trump denied that Russia interfered in 2016. (8) Trump’s transition undermined Russian sanctions. (9)Trump was open to lifting Russian sanctions. (10)Trump refused to say Putin is a killer. (11)Trump mulled returning spy bases to Russia. (12)Trump gave Russia classified intelligence. (13)Trump criticized and alienated NATO allies. (14)Trump was reluctant to sign Russian sanctions. (15)Trump proposed a cyber unit with Russia. (16) Trump proposed a cyber unit with Russia. (17)Trump thanked Putin for expelling US diplomats. (18)Trump eased sanctions on Deripaska. (19)Trump congratulated Putin on his sham election. (20)Trump balked at sanctions for Skripal poisoning. (21)Trump nixed US statement about Russian war. (22Trump praised pro-Russian leaders in Europe. (23)Trump didn’t publicly condemn the Russian attack. (24 Trump defended Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. (25Trump asked allies to let Russia back in the G7. (26)Trump’s Syria withdrawal gave Putin a boost. (27)Trump repeated Kremlin talking points on ISIS. (28Trump spread Russian myths about Ukraine. (29)Trump temporarily froze US aid for Ukraine. (30)Trump smeared US ambassador to Ukraine (31)Trump considered visiting Putin on Russian soil. (32)Trump gave Putin a PR victory on Covid-19. (33Trump invited Russia to the 2020 G7 summit. (34) Trump directed the CIA to share intel with Russia. (35)Trump ignored warnings of Russian bounties. (36)Trump called the Russian bounty story a ‘hoax’. (37)Trump never raised Russian bounties with Putin. (38)Trump ordered US troops out of Germany.
Yes, he is a Russian Agent, if it walks like and duck and quacks like a duck it is a .….. Russian agent, that is what he is and has been, the Muller investigations never ferreted out that truth so that the traitor could be unearthed and exposed in full view for the American people to see. So he gets to continue his illicit and treasonous campaign against the United States in order to enrich himself. Unfortunately, the entire Republican party is willing to destroy the republic because Donald Trump is able to galvanize a solid forty percent 40% of the white populace in a way that no other Republican since Ronald Reagan has been able to do. In his usual bumbling, inartful, style Lindsay Graham said it; ” the Republican Party cannot continue without former President Donald Trump’. Simply put, they believe they need that block of white grievance to win elections. They would rather tear down over two hundred years of democratic rule and replace it with despotism facilitated by a half-baked idiot who couldn’t even make it big despite his daddy’s millions. It is all about retaining white hegemonic control.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
Every now and then a few writers get it right. We see events occur and people jump on the bandwagon creating false narrative for the public that exists only in the minds of the writer or commentator. The feud between Liz Chaney and the Republican Party is being sold to the general public as an indication that Chaney is a paragon of virtue and conscience. I wrote a short blog pushing back against this notion, since then a few writers have begun to come to the same conclusion. My short commentary was not one that had a running narrative of proof as to why Liz Chaney’s fallout with the racist Republican seditionist caucus should not be seen as an indication that she is virtuous. I simply wanted to debunk that theory period.
»»»»»»»»>
By John Nichols.
Just because she’s not getting along with Trump and Kevin McCarthy doesn’t make the current Cheney any less of a vitriol-spewing extremist. She’s a rigidly right-wing Republican who got on the wrong side of a power struggle with her fellow rigidly right-wing Republicans. The House Republican Conference chair is tussling with former President Donald Trump, and that is now all but certain to get her tossed from the number three position in the party’s clown show of a caucus. The explanation for her perilous circumstance is simple enough: What was once a party where the name “Cheney” had a lot of sway is now a party where the only name that has any sway is “Trump.”
The fact the Cheney’s not getting along with Trump and House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy has some liberals thinking rather too generously about the representative from Wyoming.
All of a sudden, commentators are giving Cheney props. Headlines tell us, “Liz Cheney chooses truth over power — a lonely path in Trump’s GOP,” and “The effort to dump Liz Cheney is the consequence of a party that lost its way.” President Biden fist-bumped with her on the night of his address to Congress. House Democrats are choking out compliments for Cheney.
There’s no serious conflict within the Republican Party. Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney are being purged for disloyalty
The hope peddlers, stenographers of current events, professional centrists, and too many other members of the mainstream American news media have a new obsession. They keep telling the American people that the Republican Party is in the midst of a “civil war,” is in “disarray,” is “tearing itself apart” or experiencing a “crisis of meaning” and fighting for its so-called soul. Unfortunately, none of that is true. These are comforting and self-gratifying stories, fueled by a desperate desire for a return to supposed political normalcy and business as usual. Such fables are also colored by no small amount of liberal schadenfreude and a desire to give the American people — especially the millions who voted Donald Trump out of office — a sense of reward and accomplishment
I never cared about Liz Chaney, the rock-solid right-wing daughter of grumpy old fart Dick Chaney Bush 43rd vice president. I mean, neither was I a fan of the father; I thought that there was never a better case to be made for a man who was more deserving of the name, ‘Dick.’ Ok, that was probably a cheap shot, but there is something to be said about the gravitas of a guy who was hired to do a vice-presidential candidate search and ended up choosing himself. If you are not following my drift, in the campaign leading up to the 2000 presidential elections, the Bush campaign hired [Dick] Chaney to find a suitable candidate to run on the ticket with old Georgie boy. Chaney searched and found himself. We all knew how that turned out as old Dick was instrumental in egging on his boss to enter the sovereign nation of Iraq under pretenses.
Liz Chaney is no hero for standing up to the Republican lie that the Democrats stole the 2020 elections. Liz Chaney deserves no accolade for not going with the Trump delusions; I believe somewhere in what she is doing is a calculus that her position will turn out to benefit her. Liz Chaney perpetuates the lie that the Democratic initiative which protects people from the pandemic restores the economy, reforms the police, and fixing America’s infrastructure, is socialism. Give me a damn break. I thought those were the things the government was supposed to do? She has done nothing that Senator Mitt Romney hasn’t done; she hasn’t done anything that Illinois representative Adam Kinsigner hasn’t done. She hasn’t done anything that Justin Amash hasn’t done. Liz Chaney is the number three person in the Republican House leadership caucus, which is in and of itself testament that Liz Chaney deserves no plaudits.
KAMALAHARRISAMERICAISNOT A RACISTCOUNTRY
Oh, what a difference a few months make. Newly elected Vice President of the United States Kamala Harris was asked whether she thought the United States is a racist country. In typical liberal wishy-washy fashion, Harris retreated from her former position that America is indeed a racist country, saying the following; “America is not a “racist country,” but the nation must “speak the truth” about its history with racism.” Wait, what the f**k? What the hell does that even mean? Harris was responding to Black-skin folk US Senator uncle Tim/Tom Scott of South Carolina who claimed that America is not a racist country, even as he spoke about his fears, having being pulled over multiple times by police for no other reason than that he was a black man.
The common thread that seems to guide both Tim Scott and Kamala Harris’s position, even from different ends of the spectrum, is that both of them managed to find a way to get to the top, which means that American racism has ended. No matter how hard you try to hold a bunch of fully blown balloons underwater, a few will escape to the top; it is just the natural order of things. The hypocrisy of both Scott & Harris speaks to the greater issue of some black American memory lapse as soon as they reach the top, until, of course, they are pushed back down the ladder they try to claim their black card. In a blog post last week, I addressed Tim Scott’s coonery; I will not rehash those comments. But most who pay attention to political campaigns will remember Kamala Harris’s attack on Joe Biden when she famously told him during one of the presidential debates that she was one of the little girls who benefitted from bussing, something she said Biden opposed. How can a reasonable person, much less a black person, claim that America is not a racist country when racism is built into every stratum of society? America’s racism was the template for Hitler’s treatment of the practitioners of Judaism in Germany. America’s racism was the template for South Africa’s apartheid system; It is the template for the apartheid system practiced in the State of Israel today against the Palestinian people. In every fiber of the American body-politic, racism is intricately woven in with the implicit desire of making it difficult for people of color to have upward mobility. The idea that because a few have made it America’s racist past is .….…a thing of the past is what guided the US Supreme courts 2013 decision in Shelby County Alabama Vs. Holder when the court gutted section 4 (b) of the 1965 voting rights act. The court’s logic was that the racist practices of the past are in the past, and therefore there was no further use for section 4(b). Of course, as soon as the court handed down that decision, states run by Republicans embarked on voter suppression laws only before seen during the period after reconstruction.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
This is what passed for a police station in Portland, and this is not the worst case.
A legitimate point could be made that the Andrew Holness-led Government has provided more amenities to the police than previous administrations. I do not have the precise dollar amounts, neither do I have the numbers necessary to decisively account for inflation in those dollar amounts today as opposed to yesteryear. However, with the advent of social media and a savvy administration that understands the value of social media and optics, we can clearly see that some improvements are being made. If the idea is to transform the JCF into a showpiece, I understand the political optics. But, on the other hand, I hardly believe that the Jamaican people who are law-abiding care about fancy titles and optics while their loved ones are being gunned down and seeing their killers walk around scot-free.
Shady Grove police station in Lluidas Vale, St Catherine
New Police Stations, computers, and other amenities are all positives that should be lauded. On the other hand, lets us temper the accolades. Let us understand that the government’s primary duty is to keep the population safe. Unfortunately, for decades, the JCF has been the bastard child of government workers. Officers have been asked to work in the most dilapidated and unsanitary conditions. In contrast, other workers have been better treated, given new offices with state-of-the-art amenities as a matter of course. A case in point is the new plush offices created for INDECOM, an agency that takes none of the risk police officers are forced to take but were given the best conditions to do whatever they do. They are government workers deserving of no greater respect than our hard-working police officers. We should not be in the business of heaping accolades on politicians for doing what they are elected to do. On that note, I ask police officers, past and present, not to look at these issues through a political lens but to see issues affecting policing and the security of our country through the lens of impartial police officers. One of the much-parrotted narratives we hear is that the police department is being transformed. Good!!!
Transformation is good, but what is the force being transformed from and into? Supplying the police force with cars and motorcycles is not a transformation; that is company policy. The police need to have cars, motorcycles, and other means of transportation to do their jobs effectively. On the one hand, the Prime Minister has been caustic against the police department and how it does business; one fact remains, despite his attacks, the police department was vastly more effective than it is today in every statistical category. The much-maligned ways ‘things were done’ reaped rewards that this new force can only hope to accomplish. Let me be clear; it has never been that our officers were unable to handle the violence producers; it has always been the political interference that has always hobbled law enforcement in Jamaica. It is not that the force of today cannot handle the violence producers; the same problem of politics in overt and covert ways still hinders crime-fighting on the Island. In the past, politicians like the Prime Minister, his National Security Minister Horace Chang, and certainly the so-called justice minister Delroy Chuck have been impediments to the police doing their jobs effectively. The administration can create new squads and slapping on them new fancy-sounding names like “rapid response teams, but the reality is that the prime minister and his team are not recreating the wheel they maligned and demonized; they are squads. The Mobile reserve had a rapid response team from as far back as the 1970s and ’80s. Then, it was called the Honda squad; yup, it was a squad then, the rapid response team today is a squad... So they can malign the old ways, the old squads, but I am here to say slapping a new fancy name to a group of guys on motorcycles and pretending that it means that you are transforming the force is laughable.” I am very supportive of a transformed JCF. One of the reasons that have impacted the high attrition rate from the JCF has been the incompetence and cowardice of the Force’s leadership and the underlying problems of political interference in the Force’s operations. As I applaud the government for changing the face of police stations and supplying the police with uniforms and other accouterments of the trade, it is important to reconcile that unless the department gets the legislative help, training, and support it needs to root out violent offenders, it will be for nothing.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
On April 21, while attempting to serve a warrant, North Carolina police shot and killed Andrew Brown Jr., a 42-year-old Black man in Elizabeth City. The entire incident was recorded, since the officers involved were wearing body cameras. But actually seeing the footage of the shooting has been a challenge for Brown’s family, lawyers, and the wider public.
Body-worn cameras are intended to provide transparency into policing. But they stop being a tool to protect the public from police brutality when the only people who end up with protection appear to be the cops who did the shooting, as seems to be the case with the officers who killed Brown. Body camera laws vary by state, but in North Carolina, local courts have authority over releasing footage. After the shooting, a North Carolina state judge ruled that Brown’s family could see the entire tape within 10 days, but there would be no release to the general public. In fact, Superior Court Judge Jeff Foster ordered the department to blur the faces and name tags of the police officers involved. “The release at this time would create a serious threat to the fair, impartial and orderly administration of justice,” he said in his ruling.
Brown joins an ever-growing list of high-profile deaths caught on police cameras. But, in many cases, instead of providing accountability, the cameras have mostly served as the conduit for a seemingly endless and traumatizing stream of police violence. In the short clip that the victim’s family was allowed to see, they say that Brown had his hands on the steering wheel as police fired bullets into his car. They called it not just a police shooting but “an execution.”
I started writing about police shootings and body cameras back in 2015 when the devices were heralded as one neat trick to fix policing. Six years later, the parallels are striking. Back then, after a string of high profile shootings including Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri and Walter Scott in North Charleston, South Carolina, the federal government provided local police departments with millions of dollars to outfit their law enforcement officers with body cams. “The impact of body-worn cameras touches on a range of outcomes that build upon efforts to mend the fabric of trust, respect, and common purpose that all communities need to thrive,” then Attorney General Loretta Lynch said.
But it quickly became clear that police body cameras wouldn’t transform policing in the ways the Obama administration had intended. In 2016, after Baton Rouge, Louisiana, police officers shot and killed Alton Sterling, both cops who were on the scene said their body cameras “fell off.” That same year, a Washington, DC, police officer simply didn’t turn on his camera until after he shot Terrence Sterling. In other instances, police departments have delayed releasing the tape altogether, which leaves the public and the victim’s loved ones to speculate on what happened.
It sometimes seems as if the mere presence of body footage becomes so threatening that it can inspire an excessive police response. When police departments and local officials agree to release videos of police killings, they often use it as a weapon. This week in Elizabeth City, a mostly-Black town of approximately 17,000 people, a number of demonstrators demanded to see the video that depicted Brown’s final moments. In response, the mayor declared a state of emergency, set a curfew for 8:00pm each night, and the police appeared at the peaceful protests wearing full riot gear.
Body cams did not create police accountability for the same reason that many previous attempts of reform have failed: The rank and file in the departments resist change. As my colleague Laura Thompson reported earlier this month, cops frequently ignore new reforms, such as restrictions on neck restrains and no-knock warrants. In the aftermath of George Floyd’s death a year ago in May, there have been many calls and proposals for reforming the police, including a comprehensive bill introduced by the Democrats. The use of body cams holds a prominent place in all these proposals. But it turns out, body cameras are only as useful as police allow them to be.
Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt signed a bill into law last week that offers legal protections for drivers who “unintentionally” kill or injure protesters if they are attempting to “flee the scene.” House Bill 1674, which passed last week thanks to overwhelming Republican support, also makes it a misdemeanor offense to obstruct a roadway. The new law was passed in response to Black Lives Matter demonstrations that took place in Oklahoma and much of the country last summer in response to the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police. “The 1st Amendment gives us the right to peaceably assemble, not unlawfully assemble,” GOP state Rep. Kevin West, a sponsor of the bill, told Yahoo News in an email. “The language [in H.B. 1674] gives equal protection to lawful protesters as well as law-abiding citizens who get caught up in dangerous, unlawful situations.” Under the new law, anyone who obstructs a public road or highway faces a misdemeanor charge punishable by up to a year in county jail and/or a fine ranging from $100 to $5,000. Also, any driver who “unintentionally” hits a demonstrator with a car is granted civil and criminal liability protection for injuries caused, including death, while “fleeing from a riot.”
Police officers monitoring a crowd of protesters in Tulsa, Okla., on June 20, 2020. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)
The bill’s language was inspired by an incident last summer in Tulsa in which the driver of a pickup truck drove through a crowd of people on Interstate 244 who were protesting Floyd’s death. The collision left several people injured and one person paralyzed from the waist down. The driver of the pickup truck, who had his family with him in the car, however, was not charged. “The kids cowered in the back seat because they feared for their lives,” Sen. Rob Standridge, a Republican who authored H.B. 1674, told AP. “That’s what this bill is about.” “Hopefully everything quiets down around the country, and this bill won’t be needed for anybody, but if things come to Oklahoma like have been happening, this will protect some folks,” Standridge added in a recorded video. Stitt and Standridge did not reply to Yahoo News’ request for comment. Similar bills are being pushed through Republican-led statehouses in other parts of the country. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis signed an immunity-granting bill into law earlier this month, and a measure in Iowa is working its way through the Legislature.
While proponents of the bill say H.B. 1674 will protect those trapped by riots or demonstrations, critics believe the bill greatly threatens Oklahomans’ right to peacefully protest and that it will disproportionately affect Black people because it offers vague discretion to drivers to assess whether a demonstration constitutes a threat. For Dr. Tiffany Crutcher, an Oklahoma native whose twin brother, Terence, was shot and killed by a Tulsa police officer in September 2016 during a traffic stop, this bill is deeply personal. H.B. 1674 “attacks and silences our right to assemble and protest and let our voices be heard,” Crutcher, executive director of the Terence Crutcher Foundation, told Yahoo News in a video interview.
A demonstration in Tulsa in response to the police shooting of Terence Crutcher. (Sue Ogrocki/AP/File)
“It means so much to me because my twin brother … was killed by a white police officer … and we had to take it to the streets to demand that justice be served,” she said. “Because of our right to march down the streets and our right to assemble, we were able to force the district attorney to indict [Officer] Betty Shelby within the first week.” Shelby was charged with manslaughter in Terence’s killing but was later acquitted. Tiffany Crutcher believes bills like these continue to put Black America in a “state of emergency.” “This bill was created in retaliation for what took place for us shutting down highways and making them inconvenient for just a moment [last summer],” she said. For many people, H.B. 1674 brings to mind the death of Heather Heyer, a white woman who was killed after a man rammed his car into a crowd of counterprotesters at an Aug. 12, 2017, “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Va. James Alex Fields Jr. was eventually charged and convicted of first-degree murder, but critics note that if a law similar to Oklahoma’s had been in place in Virginia at the time, he might have not faced any consequences.
Andrew Porwancher, a professor of legal history at the University of Oklahoma, said he is concerned that the new law goes too far. “H.B. 1674 might appear to be a win for conservatives, but its provisions could be employed against right-wing activists in the future,” Porwancher said in an email to Yahoo News. “Your best shot at preserving your own freedom of speech tomorrow is to protect the speech of your opponents today.” In response to the new law, the American Civil Liberties Union issued a statement calling it an effort to “[trample] the rights and liberties of Oklahomans in favor of those with the most power and access.” The group believes the legislation is meant to discourage people from protesting altogether. “There is no question that this legislation chills free speech,” Nicole McAfee, director of policy and advocacy at the ACLU of Oklahoma, told Yahoo News. “It reminded me who the Legislature thinks has a right to be afraid.”
A police officer confronts protesters at a demonstration in Tulsa. (Amanda Voisard for the Washington Post via Getty Images)
McAfee said the Oklahoma Legislature too often creates laws out of isolated incidents, like the pickup truck encounter on Interstate 244, without considering the larger implications. “We know the power of protest and public accountability in moving folks to action, and bills like this not only put our democracy in a fragile place, but laws like these put our institutions in a dangerous place as well,” she said. But proponents of the law feel it protects everyone involved. Don Spencer, president of the Oklahoma 2nd Amendment Association, has been advocating for laws like H.B. 1674 since February. “If you’re unlawfully blocking a roadway for the intended purpose of possibly doing damage, to scare people, to harm people,” Spencer warned in a recorded video earlier this year, “you could be trodden on with the car tires.” “There are multiple ways to protest lawfully and have your voices heard, but attacking motorists who have nothing to do with the protest or what is being protested is not something that should be allowed,” West, the state representative, said. H.B. 1674 will take effect on Nov. 1. Until then, the ACLU and other grassroots organizations, like the Terence Crutcher Foundation, are trying to figure out their next course of action. For Kathryn Schumaker, a professor affiliated with the University of Oklahoma’s Institute for the American Constitutional Heritage, the new law takes the state back to a shameful era in its history and ignores the issues at the center of the protests. “Civil rights protesters were historically described as ‘outside agitators’ who only wanted to stir up trouble,” she told Yahoo News. “In my view, this law seeks to distract from the message that protesters are trying to communicate.”
The more you get a chance to look at the American criminal justice system, the more you see just how slanted it is against people of color. A closer look opens up a bird’s eye view of the collusion between police, district attorneys, judges, and all of the players throughout the sector. It gives a clearer view of how the system colludes to protect police, the foot soldiers of white supremacy. Why would a legislature decide that police body camera footage is not public record? The cameras are purchased with tax dollars. Those dollars come from the public. The police are paid and retained by the public. Tax dollars finance those salaries and benefits. A legislature in North Carolina decided that the very devices that were agreed upon as a necessary tool to hold police accountable are not a public record is direct evidence that the states will do anything to cover up police crimes. Never mind what they tell you about compromising investigations. There are times that it may be important to preserve the identity of people who may be caught up in those recordings; however, the idea that the public has no right as a blanket policy to what they paid for is an attempt at protecting police, even when they have broken the law. The government should not be in the business of protecting rogue agents of the state, not just police officers, but all public employees should be held up to the highest standards.
ONANOTHERNOTE
(L‑R) Gregory McMichael, Travis McMichael, and William “Roddie” Bryan, Jr.
Federal prosecutors indicted the three men accused of killing Ahmaud Arbery on hate crime and attempted kidnapping charges, the Department of Justice announced Wednesday. Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man, was out for a jog near Brunswick, Georgia, on February 23, 2020, when he was chased down in a truck by three men and fatally shot. Two of the three men — Gregory and Travis McMichael — claimed to be conducting a citizen’s arrest and acted in self-defense. A third man, William “Roddie” Bryan Jr., who recorded a video of Arbery’s death, allegedly hit Arbery with his truck after he joined the McMichaels in the chase. All three men were charged with one count of interference with rights and with one count of attempted kidnapping, according to a news release from the Justice Department.
Police released footage of the events leading up to the death of a Latino man in Alameda, California, showing officers kneeling on the man’s back and shoulder until he became unresponsive. The video contradicts officials’ original account of the incident. Mario Gonzalez, a 26-year-old Latino man, died on the morning of April 19 after what police claimed was a “scuffle” and “physical altercation” as they attempted to restrain him, followed by a “medical emergency.” But body camera footage released on Tuesday afternoon after an outcry from Gonzalez’s family and the public did not show him being violent or fighting officers at any point. Instead, in the video, officers approached Gonzalez, who was standing alone in a park with some bottles of alcohol in a basket. Gonzalez calmly spoke with officers for nearly nine minutes before they attempted to place his hands behind his back. Police pinned him facedown on the ground and at least two officers appeared to get on top of his back, one kneeling on his shoulder, for about five minutes until Gonzalez became unresponsive. Police said Gonzalez died at the hospital, but the video showed that he had stopped breathing on-site and that one officer declared “no pulse” shortly after officers began CPR.
Three officers involved have been placed on paid administrative leave. In a press conference earlier on Tuesday, members of Gonzalez’s family, who had privately viewed the footage, said Gonzalez was “compliant and they continued to pin him down.” “Alameda police officers murdered my brother Mario,” Gonzalez’s brother Gerardo said, noting that his brother was in the park “not bothering anyone” and that “at no point was he violent.” “Everything we saw in that video was unnecessary,” he added. “APD took a calm situation and made it fatal.” “Police killed my brother in the same manner that they killed George Floyd,” he said. In the video, Gonzalez could be heard groaning under the weight of the police officers on top of him while he continued to respond to their questions about his name and birth date.
“Please don’t do it,” Gonzalez said at one point, and then: “I’m sorry,” followed by screams and groans. One officer answered: “I forgive you.” The police report made no mention of officers kneeling on Gonzalez’s back for minutes until he lost consciousness. Similarly, when Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin murdered Floyd last year, police had described the death as a “medical incident,” neglecting to mention that Chauvin had kneeled on Floyd’s neck for nine minutes as Floyd repeatedly said he couldn’t breathe. The Alameda County Sheriff’s Office and District Attorney’s Office are conducting investigations into Gonzalez’s death. City officials have hired an outside investigator to do so as well. The Gonzalez family is demanding an entirely independent investigation and that the officers be identified, fired and prosecuted. Their attorney Julia Sherwin is an expert in restraint asphyxiation and was a consultant in Chauvin’s prosecution. At Tuesday’s press conference, Gonzalez’s mother, Edith Arenales, said that Gonzalez had a four-year-old son and took care of his younger 22-year-old brother, who was autistic.
“They broke my family for no reason,” Arenales said, adding that she “cannot sleep.” She said even if her son was drunk, “they don’t have the right to kill him. We’re humans.” This story is courtesy of )Huffpost)
Attorneys for the family of Andrew Brown Jr., at an emotional Tuesday morning news conference in Elizabeth City, said a private autopsy showed that he died when Pasquotank County sheriff’s deputies fired a “kill shot to the back of the head.” Brown, 42, was killed outside his home in Elizabeth City last Wednesday as deputies were serving search and arrest warrants relating to felony drug charges. After hearing the autopsy results, Brown’s son Khalil Ferebee discouraged violence Tuesday as he addressed the crowd of more than 100 people that stood outside the public safety building downtown. “To my pops … yesterday, I said he was executed,” Ferebee said. “This autopsy report showed me that was correct.” The autopsy also showed an additional four gunshot wounds to Brown’s arm.“That wasn’t enough?” Ferebee said. “They’re going to shoot him in the back of the head? … That’s not right at all.
“Man, stuff gotta change. It’s really gotta change for real.” The press conference drew angry shouts from spectators, especially when mothers of other police violence victims spoke.“All Black men are not terrorists,” said Tamika Thatch of High Point, whose son was killed in a church in November. Motioning to Brown’s son, she said, “If his daddy killed them, he would never walk the streets again. We need to hold them to the same accountability. They need to be locked up today. Yesterday. Last week.” Elizabeth City officials on Tuesday announced an 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew in the town starting Tuesday night. Members of the New Black Panther Party from Washington, D.C., stood in the parking lot for the news conference and called Brown’s death an “assassination” and sought the immediate release of the footage.
.….
Members of the New Black Panther Party from Washington DC and Raleigh chapters rally as attorneys for the family of Andrew Brown Jr. hold a press conference outside the Pasquotank County Public Safety building Tuesday, April 27, 2021 to announce results of the autopsy they commissioned, which they said showed five bullet wounds including one to the back of the head. They accused Pasquotank County officials of hiding information and keeping justice from being served in Elizabeth City. Travis Long TLONG@NEWSOBSERVER.COM Read more here: https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article250973724.html#storylink=cpy
As attorney Ben Crump spoke, some members called him a “boot-licking ambulance chaser,” insisting the streets would get justice. And while Khalil urged against violence, attorney Bakari Sellers said calls for peace are not the family’s responsibility“If we want calm, if we want justice,” Sellers said, “that onus is not on the family. That onus is on people who are hiding information.”
Attorneys for the family of Andrew Brown Jr., including Harry Daniels, center, and Ben Crump take questions from reporters during a press conference outside the Pasquotank County Public Safety building Tuesday, April 27, 2021 to announce results of the autopsy they commissioned, which they said showed five bullet wounds including one to the back of the head. They accused Pasquotank County officials of hiding information and keeping justice from being served in Elizabeth City. Travis Long TLONG@NEWSOBSERVER.COm A PRIVATEAUTOPSYREPORT
Sellers said the family arranged an independent autopsy, “because the medical report we got just said, ‘shot to the head,’ and we wanted to make sure that it was clearly denoted that he was shot in the back of the head.” Attorneys Wayne Kendall and Crump described the details of the autopsy report with diagrams showing five bullet wounds, with the fatal shot killing Brown within minutes, they said. It caused him to lose control of his vehicle and crash into a tree, they said.
A tear rolls down Eric Garner’s mother, Gwen Carr’s face as attorneys for the family of Andrew Brown Jr. hold a press conference outside the Pasquotank County Public Safety building Tuesday, April 27, 2021 to announce results of the autopsy they commissioned, which they said showed five bullet wounds including one to the back of the head. They accused Pasquotank County officials of hiding information and keeping justice from being served in Elizabeth City. Travis Long TLONG@NEWSOBSERVER.COM Read more here: https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article250973724.html#storylink=cpy.
The bullet went into the base of his neck and “perforated and penetrated his skill and his brain,” Crump said. Chantel Cherry-Lassiter, an Elizabeth City attorney who has worked with the family, said it was “an assassination of this unarmed black man.” “That is painful,” Lassiter said. “We are tired. Mothers are tired. Sisters are tired. Fathers are tired. Communities are tired.” Family members of Andrew Brown Jr. were shown only 20 seconds of footage from one of many body-worn cameras from the day he was killed, at the Pasquotank County Public Safety building in Elizabeth City, N.C. on Monday, April 26, 2021
Also Tuesday, the FBI said that it has opened a federal civil rights investigation into Brown’s death. The FBI will work with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina and the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice. “As this is an ongoing investigation, we cannot comment further,” FBI spokeswoman Shelley Lynch said. North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein tweeted support Tuesday for the State Bureau of Investigation’s work on the case. “A number of people have asked me to take over this prosecution. I want to clarify that under North Carolina law, the District Attorney, not the Attorney General, controls the prosecution of criminal cases,” Stein tweeted. “For my office to play a role in the prosecution, the District Attorney must request our assistance. My office has reached out to District Attorney Andrew Womble to offer that assistance, which he has acknowledged.
Lassiter was allowed to view a 20-second snippet of the video on Monday with Brown’s son Ferebee and Ferebee’s mother, Mia Ferebee. Lassiter said the video showed Brown was shot multiple times while he sat in his vehicle with his hands on the steering wheel, calling it “an execution.” Lassiter said she watched the video more than 10 times, taking notes. “I didn’t sleep very well last night,” she said Tuesday. “I had nightmares. The images from that video stayed with me.” Though the family has seen the 20 seconds of body-worn camera footage, it has not been released publicly, despite pressure from lawmakers and civil rights leaders. Law enforcement agencies cannot release officers’ body camera footage, so it’s up to a judge in this case, per North Carolina law.
Lassiter said the family’s legal team believes that detectives had been observing Brown for a year, in part through the use of a camera mounted to a pole near his house. Attorneys have said officials should release footage from that camera in addition to officers’ body cameras and a dash camera in a police van. Protesters have been marching in Elizabeth City nightly since Brown’s shooting, sometimes for hours, always with distanced police escorts. On Monday night, nearly every restaurant downtown was closed. More than 200 people marched through downtown that evening demanding officials “Release the tape!” The News & Observer reported. Elizabeth City remains in a state of emergency, which was declared in anticipation of protests surrounding the body-cam footage. Lassiter said Tuesday that despite the occasional business in town that has boarded up its windows this week, the marches and protests have been peaceful. “That’s how you know, if something happens, if there is violence, it’s not us,” Lassiter said. During Monday night’s march, Mallory Thornton of Durham used a bullhorn to call chants, and at least twice stopped to challenge police officers blocking traffic for the crowd.
At one intersection, Thornton and the crowd stopped and faced an officer sitting in her car and from 20 feet away, shouted, “Say his name: Andrew Brown! Say his name: Andrew Brown.” The officer remained in her car but appeared to laugh, and Thornton said, “It’s not funny, sister. That could have been your brother.” Seven Pasquotank County sheriff’s deputies were placed on leave following Brown’s death. And three others resigned, but a spokesperson has said the resignations weren’t linked to the shooting. Officials have not publicly released the names or the race of the deputies who shot Brown.( Credit ;thenewsobserver.com) for this story.
If you previously ignored the atrocities that American police commit every day against black people, I get it. If, however, the Derek Chauvin killing of George Floyd did not spur something inside you.…..you, my dear sir/madam, may be desensitized to the violence. I get how you could say, ‘why bother? It’s not affecting me’. I totally get that the sheer brutality of it is too much to watch if you don’t have to. I mean, how many of us haven’t scrolled past the fly-infested mouths of the scrawny near-dead people in the Sudan and Darfur? We tell ourselves that viewing those images is counter-productive; they live too far away, there is nothing we can do? But are we really telling the truth, or are we simply trying to convince ourselves that we cannot change it? Many years ago, my friend “Dillo,” a man I went to the police academy with, served in the Jamaica Constabulary Force with, asked me as we chatted in the Bronx, “how can you criticize the police and we were such no-nonsense police officers”? I reminded Dillo of that conversation as we chatted a few weeks ago. Dillo lives in Maryland and I in New York; we laughed as we relived those moments. I responded to his question with one of my own, ” Dillo, did we do any of the things these cops are doing”? Dillo looked me dead in the eyes that beautiful summer day as we sat in his father’s yard, “you are right; I hate it when you are right.” Our conversation that day was over two decades ago; at the time, there were no cell phone cameras, stories of police abuses were personal stories that were relayed word of mouth, stories of personal pain, individual stories that hardly got mentioned in the newspapers or on television. When the media did bother to carry a story of police abuse, they came with heavy loads of pro-police prologue; they were sanitized by a media that felt it had to pay homage to police even in the face of their most egregious crimes. Television and cable channels were inundated with cop shows; we all remember the cop shows that glorified law enforcement and demagogued the bad guys. It just followed that ninety percent of the time, the cops were white, and the bad guys were black. Sure we all watched and enjoyed Magnum PI, Miami Vice, and the litany of other cop shows, what we failed to realize, .….…yes even us blacks, at that time was the indoctrination value of those television shows that solidified in our minds what Hollywood wanted us to memorize, white equals good, black equals bad.
Some argue that American Policing is [not broken]; they say it is working exactly as it was intended to. I concur with that point of view. However, the brand of policing that is occurring across the United States is so horrific that there is no hope of resuscitating it. It is fundamentally antithetical to the autonomy and dignity of African-Americans. The idea that officers may exercise discretion when dealing with the elderly, or infirm, people with mental issues, underage kids, people under the influence of alcohol or drugs does not apply anymore. Far too often, we see police show up to deal with simple situations and make the matter exponentially worse because of their fragile egos. Far too many cops are robotic oppressors who elevate shitty traffic stops they orchestrate, they then goad and intimidate and finally end up abusing the motorist, usually people of color, to gain felony arrests or worse, the driver ends up dead at the hands of police for having committed no crime, no offense. Tasers are used to exact punishment for contempt of cop, guns for little girls with knives, for a black man who dares to offend bullets to the back is the accepted punishment. The American cop is now judge, jury, and executioner, the judicial system merely rubber-stamp the atrocities. The police are not the only part of the equation that’s rotten; it runs the gamut from the low-level cops on the beat all the way to the legislature, the Governor’s mansions, and all the way to the top at the federal level. See; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Krasner. The corporate media does little or no reporting on police misconduct across the United States, save and except for the snippets flashed across their television screens for a few seconds, before moving on to other fluff pieces. Nowadays, they are forced to report on the incidents of police violence not out of journalistic prudence but out of necessity. The public’s attention is focused on social media nowadays; there, events are uploaded in real-time, garnering millions of eyeballs. But for independent reporting from citizen journalists, in the lynching of George Floyd and the bravery and presence of 17-year-old Darnella Frazier, the world would never get to see what the police are doing. PBS has done good reporting of late noticeably in its project (Philly DA), speaking of District Attorney Larry Krasner. Other public reporting organizations and blogs have now begun to focus on the problem. Still, nothing has been more effective than the citizen journalists who have stood their ground and recorded with their mobile phones.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
A white sheriff’s deputy in the San Francisco Bay Area shot and killed a Black man in the middle of a busy intersection about a minute after trying to stop him on suspicion of throwing rocks at cars last month, the newly released video showed. Graphic body camera footage showing Deputy Andrew Hall shooting Tyrell Wilson, 33, within seconds of asking him to drop a knife was released Wednesday, the same day prosecutors charged Hall with manslaughter and assault in the fatal shooting of an unarmed Filipino man more than two years ago. The charges came a day after former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of killing George Floyd, a Black man whose death last May helped spark a national reckoning over racial injustice and police brutality. The new video in California shows Hall calling out to Wilson and walking toward him on March 11 as Wilson walked away. Wilson eventually turns to face the deputy, holding a knife, and says, “Touch me and see what’s up.” As they stand in the intersection, Hall asks him three times to drop the knife as Wilson motions toward his face, saying, “Kill me.” Hall shoots once, and Wilson drops to the ground as drivers watch and record video.
The entire confrontation lasted about a minute. An attorney for Wilson’s family released another video Thursday taken by someone who stopped at the intersection. “It doesn’t seem like he was doing anything,” someone says. After Hall shoots Wilson, which can be clearly seen in the video, another person says, “Oh, my God. … This dude just got shot and killed, bro.” Attorney John Burris said Hall was unnecessarily aggressive toward Wilson, who was not causing any problems and was backing away from the deputy before he was shot without warning. “This is a homeless man, he’s walking away, minding his own business. He’s basically saying go away, leave me alone,” Burris said. “You felt compelled to kill him.” Contra Costa County Sheriff David Livingston said the videos show Wilson was threatening Hall and was possibly throwing rocks at drivers. “He did threaten Officer Hall,” Livingston said. “And he did start advancing toward Officer Hall in the middle of a major intersection. Officers are forced to make split-second decisions to protect themselves and the public, and that’s what happened here.” Hall worked for the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office, which was contracted by the city of Danville to provide policing services. Prosecutors have faced intensifying outcry after Wilson’s death, with critics saying they took too long to make a decision in the 2018 killing that Hall carried out. The deputy shot 33-year-old Laudemar Arboleda nine times during a slow-moving car chase.
Burris, who also is representing Arboleda’s family, said that if prosecutors had acted more quickly in the Arboleda case, Wilson might still be alive. Burris said both men were mentally ill. The Contra Costa County district attorney’s office said it charged Hall with felony voluntary manslaughter and felony assault with a semi-automatic firearm in Arboleda’s death. “Officer Hall used unreasonable and unnecessary force when he responded to the in-progress traffic pursuit involving Laudemer Arboleda, endangering not only Mr. Arboleda’s life but the lives of his fellow officers and citizens in the immediate area,” District Attorney Diana Becton said in a news release. Hall’s attorney, Harry Stern, said prosecutors previously deemed the deputy’s use of force in the 2018 case justified, “given the fact that he was defending himself from a lethal threat. The timing of their sudden reversal in deciding to file charges seems suspect and overtly political.” Deputies slowly pursued Arboleda through the city of Danville after someone reported a suspicious person in November 2018. The sheriff’s department video shows Hall stopping his patrol car, getting out, and running toward the sedan driven by Arboleda. Hall opened fire and kept shooting as Arboleda’s car passed by, striking him nine times. Hall testified at an inquest that he was afraid Arboleda would run him over. The district attorney’s office says Wilson’s shooting is being investigated.
Now that a simple release of the information has addressed the vexing issue of the police commissioner’s salary, it begs another question. What exactly are the reasons that these kinds of information are not available to the public through codified laws? Other questions include the power given to the Office of the Service Commission (OCS) to decide outside the people’s say-so, whether the information is released to the public. On its face, it appears that we are not a country of laws but one in which the taxpayers are mere serfs; the lumpen that produces the resources through their hard work, but which gets no say in the decision-making. The Salaries of the Commissioner of Police, other Senior Officers of the JCF, and other public servants, should not be a secret. If not for the amount they are paid, (of course, the public previously had no idea how much), but for accountability and measurability. The secrecy around those contract details and the reluctance to release those details to the tax-paying public were not hallmarks of a democratic society. Jamaicans have always needed to know just how much the nation’s top security officials are being paid, and correctly so. Even when not formally educated, the people are fully educated in their understanding of the need for accountability on this all-important issue of national security. Jamaicans, even the least formally educated, understand the cost of violent crime, the trauma it produces to families and victims who are left behind to pick up the pieces. This is so, even though not everyone may fully appreciate the economic and societal cost crime imposes on the nation. Consequently, the job performance of the Commissioner of police has always been tied to the crime statistics; in fact, every single Commissioner of Police has been hired and fired solely based on the crime statistics. This is not a novel concept, it is the metric used across the board even in developed societies. What else is there? Since commissioner Antony Anderson was hired the nation has been kept in the dark about the terms of his contract. This is certainly not Anderson’s fault, it goes to a lack of laws and accountability. But at the end of Anderon’s first contract period and the beginning of another, it cannot be that a small bunch of elites alone gets to decide whether Anderson did a good job, or gets to change the metric of measurement previously used to decide success and failure, we do not live in a dictatorship.
It is hardly the amount that the Commissioner is paid. The $18 million pay package is hardly a blockbuster salary, (if the number given is correct); you can never trust what they tell you in Jamaica; it has to be about his performance. It is the barometer that all servants of the public are measured by. Performance is what private-sector employees are measured by; it is what governmental administrations are measured by. The shocking reality is that we are now being told that Antony Anderson should not be judged by the same standards that others before him were, but we should not worry about the number of dead bodies; we should focus on other things that they in their infinite wisdom decree as performance indicators. Local media reported that Gordon Shirley, who heads the service commission, says that the commission has monthly meetings with the police commissioner that deal with the force’s performance and Anderson’s own role. Professor Gordon Shirley is a former head of the University of the West Indies UWI). Another so-called security expert[sic] Professor Anthony Clayton, you guessed it .….. from the UWI chimed in that quote; “The gravity of the crime problem, linked to issues such as poor parenting and socio-economic and political factors, means commissioners like Anderson face an uphill task and could justify even more pay for the former national security advisor.” So true, but what about accountability? No mention of the crime statistics but a case for even better pay for Anderson. Why were the former members who slaved their entire adult lives in the JCF not given the same deference and understanding?
According to the Gleaner, Howard Mitchell, who was among the critics of the OSC’s decision to initially block access to the contract, and Rear Admiral Lewin supported the principle of disclosure but cautioned against revealing the performance targets. “Targets are going to be a sliding thing. You’ve got to appreciate that circumstances and conditions change, and those things can have an effect on targets,” Lewin said, adding that he did not recall negotiating his terms of reference with the permanent secretary during his tenure. “One has to be realistic and careful about targets. I know what people will immediately think about is the number of murders and shootings. You don’t want to get into a position that the first thing you try to do is create different squads because you are being pushed. It’s not just a question of statistics,” said the former commissioner. “It is not a question of statistics”? What is it about? Dead bodies do not count? The sad reality is that Antony Anderson has friends in high places, something many of the former top cops did not have, even though they may have attended the same putrid pool of intellectual dishonesty. His friends are now asking the Jamaican people to ignore the sole metric that defines performance and focus instead on a non-distinguishable metric defined by them. The gall of such a theory is stunning in its capriciousness. In a recent report on his tenure, the Gleaner reports that Anderson noted murder reductions in communities where SOEs were declared, the arrest of 167 gangsters, and a clear-up rate (when the police charge a suspect), moving from 39 percent in 2019 to 53 percent in 2020. To a former member like this writer, using the clear-up rate as a performance marker for the commissioner is the equivalence of a drowning man clutching at straws. If the clear-up rate is to define anyone’s success it ought to go to the detectives and other officers who remove violent criminals from the streets, not the CP. The truth is that using the stats from areas where SOEs were declared is deceptive and dishonest. Crime does go down in areas in which SOEs are declared, but they spike in other areas as crime producers move to other turfs. Never before has a police commissioner been judged because crime went down in a single area. The Police commissioner is head of security for the entire country, not for areas in which SOEs are declared. This attempt to distort the narrative on Anderson’s behalf is almost laughable in its weakness. Absent from these discussions are the views of the career officers who have come up through the ranks, past and present. We now have a police force that is fully controlled by the views of leftist elites from the University of the West Indies. Success is what they say it is; ignore the dead bodies.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
SOMUCHFORROBERTS ’ BALLSANDSTRIKES’, THECOURTTHATBEARSHISNAMEIS A RIGHT-WINGRUBBER-STAMPTHATNEEDSTOBEBALANCEDOUT.
Some progressives made a case for adding justices to the Supreme Court even before the 2020 elections. The logic being that in 2016 after right-wing conservative jurist Antonin Scalia transitioned and President Barack Obama nominated then appeals court Merrick Garland, Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell blocked Garland’s advancement to the highest court. Before Scalia’s passing, the court’s makeup was slanted Republican, by virtue of the president who nominated them to the court. Conservatives Chief Justice John Roberts. Clarence Thomas. Samuel Alito. Anthony Kennedy. Antonin Scalia Conservative. Liberals, Stephen Breyer. Sonia Sotomayor. Elena Kagan. Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Replacing Antonin Scalia with a moderate like the now Attorney General Merrick Garland would have tilted the courts 5 – 4 majority to the Democrats, something Mitch McConnell would do anything to stop. And so he refused to meet with judge Garland, refused to hold hearings to move Garland’s nomination forward, and subsequently, judge Garland was denied an up or down vote, as is the rule in the advice and consent role of the United States Senate.
Mitch McConnell
Bitch McConnell claimed that it was an election year, and the voters should decide which president chose Scalia’s replacement. That was not a rule; it was a McConnell rule. Donald Trump found his way into the Presidency, and he placed Neil Gorsuch on the court instead of Judge Garland. Kennedy then retired (how convenient), and he reportedly recommended that Brett Kavanaugh be his replacement. Kavanaugh was on the court. And then something happened that liberals, Democrats, and even independents feared; on September 18th, 2020, at age 87, Ruth Bader Ginsburg transitioned. The Presidential elections were to be held on November 3, 2020; nevertheless, despite less than two months from the presidential elections, Mitch McConnell changed the rules again and decided that he would ram through Amey Coney Barrett, and placed her on the court. The call from some Progressive quarters to place four additional justices on the court to balance what Mitch McConnell has done is not only morally justified; it is legally permissible. President Biden did not promise to add justices to the court; he said in typical wishy-washy Democratic fashion, however, that he would convene a commission to study the issue.
John Roberts
In the meantime, the lopsided 6 – 3 conservative court has steadily gone about dismantling settled laws. Even as far back as 2013, Chief Justice John Roberts joined Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Kennedy in striking down section 4(b) of the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act. As a Reagan Administration aide John Roberts was long opposed to the rights of African-Americans to vote. John Roberts knew that by striking down the voting rights act, he was opening the door for a massive Republican assault on the voting rights of African-Americans. But this was one of the lifelong goals of John Roberts. Roberts claimed that there are no Republican or Democratic Judges; they only call balls and strikes Roberts said, smiling. Isn’t it funny how these guys are confident that they are vastly intellectually superior to everyone else? The sad reality is that most of the court’s decisions under John Roberts have been 5 – 4 decisions straight party lines. So much for balls and strikes. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg wrote scathing dissents against the Republica majority’s rulings while she was alive, so too has justice Elena Kagan, but justice Sonia Sotomayor an Obama nominee, has been pointed in her dissenting opinions, and she did not hold back in her dissent to the decision written by none other than Brett Kavanaugh in the case Mississippi Vs. Jones. The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday made it easier for states to impose sentences of life in prison without parole on juvenile offenders, ruling against a Mississippi man convicted of killing his grandfather at age 15 in a case testing the Constitution’s Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
Brett Kavanaugh
In a 6 – 3 ruling, the justices rejected arguments by the inmate, Brett Jones, that his sentence of life in prison with no chance of parole violated the Eighth Amendment because the judge in his trial had not made a separate finding that he was permanently incorrigible. The court’s six conservative justices were in the majority, with the three liberal members dissenting. So there you have it, balls and strikes; all of the conservatives cowards lined up and decided that it is perfectly okay for kids who commit crimes as children should have no recourse to redemption regardless of what they have accomplished in rehabilitation. Kavanaugh, whose very existence on the court was made possible because the indiscretions he was alleged to have committed as a youngster in college, were not allowed by Trump to be investigated by the FBI, was the man who penned the decision of the majority. I guess only young white men are [entitled] to redemption? Oh, come on, Mike, is this new to you? Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the dissenting opinion for the three liberals on the court. Below is an extract from that opinion.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
Among the many things that will be said about the conviction of Derek Chauvin is that this is a seminal moment, this is a watershed moment, this is a defining moment, this is a moment of introspection for police departments. No, it isn’t. All this verdict represents is a case so cold-blooded in its barbarism (that [the] jury), not an all-white one in some other corner of Minnesota, could not turn its back, knowing that the world was watching. It does not mean that America is any closer to a reckoning on race; it does not mean that American law enforcement will be any more judicious with the use of force in communities of color. Built into how police behave in communities of color (black communities)is an innate belief that residents of those communities are different and therefore undeserving of respect. The general perception by far too many non-Black Americans is that African-Americas have a duty to wait until they decide what measure of humanity they should enjoy (if any). It is an arrogant perception that would condemn Black people to accept a permanent state of second-class citizenship, even after over four hundred years of genocide and oppression. Not all police officers who work in Black neighborhoods are bad people; however, it does mean that there is an undeniably wide chasm between the world-views of the two groups. The consequences of those two competing views get played out in the constant police killings of innocent Blacks.
Police officers do not operate with nearly the same care when interacting with African-Americans as they do when dealing with whites. A Black complainant calls the police about an altercation with someone white, which usually results in police treating the black caller as the offender and the white as the victim when they arrive. Their first instinct is to go to the white person to get his/her version of events, and thereafter their reactions are shaped by the offender’s side of the story. Police units in predominantly black neighborhoods are prepped that the citizens are barbarians unworthy of respect. The vast majority of police calls are [not] calls about the commission of crimes. For example, a recently released dispatch by the New Haven, Connecticut police shows that less than 4.4% of calls to their 911 system were for calls about assault, gunfire, robbery, rape, stabbing, murder, or person shot. Over a whopping 95.6% of those calls were for service that requires no violence and does not include the need for violence. The question then remains, why are armed agents of the state being sent to these calls? In June 2020, a New York Times article titled (How Do the Police Actually Spend Their Time?) asked, “what share of policing is devoted to handling violent crime? Perhaps not as much as you might think. A handful of cities post data online showing how their police departments spend their time. The share devoted to handling violent crime is very small, about 4 percent.
Despite the killings and assaults, and the conviction of Chauvin, I doubt seriously whether police officers are saying,’ geez, I gotta show more respect to the black people I come across”. I doubted whether the cop who put four bullets into the body of 16-year old Ma’Khia Bryant would have shot a young white girl even though she had a knife and, in all probability, may have stabbed the other girl with it. Again I ask do you use lethal force because you know you will get away with it, or do you use it because you are convinced that it is your only option? The idea being popularized by police departments is that [force] means deadly force. This is not true; there are varying degrees of force; this is why officers are equipped with batons, pepper-spray tasers, and guns. The level of force that police use should only be enough to subdue an unruly subject. That force does not have to be equal to the level of resistance coming from an offender; it can be greater but just enough to gain control. For example, after George Floyd was handcuffed, the police officers had no legal authority to keep him on the ground with their knees on his neck and back. The level of force applied does [not]have to be lethal; force does not go from zero to a hundred. The officer who shot 16-year old Ma’Khia Bryant had every right to use force to stop her from stabbing another person; whether he made the right decision when he decided to go to lethal force as the first option is the issue?
Were Sheriff’s deputies justified in shooting Andrew Brown Jr. to death, a Black resident of Elizabeth City, North Carolina, on Wednesday, April 21st, when they tried to serve him with a search warrant about 8:40 a.m? Why did they not shoot Alvin Oeltjenbruns a white man, after he hit one cop in the head with a hammer and drove away in the video above? Was a cop justified in killing 12-year-old Tamir Rice immediately on arrival on the scene as the kid played in the park with his toy gun? What 12-year-old boy has not played cops and robbers with their toy gun growing up? Should a child who is playing with a toy gun worry about being killed by police? Was police justified in choking Eric Garner to death for selling loose cigarettes? Was police justified in killing Sandra Blan over not signaling a right turn? Was police justified in Firing over twenty bullets into 23-year-old Sean Bell’s car, killing him on the day he was supposed to be married? Was the police justified in murdering Amadou Diallo when they fired a total of forty-one billets, ending his life for absolutely no reason? What about the monsters who arrived and immediately killed John Crawford (111)inside a Walmart because he had a rifle? Walmart sells the guns; Crawford was looking at the guns? Was Police justified when they murdered Philando Castile inside his car with his girlfriend and her daughter? What about Alton Sterling? Botham Scheme Jean, was the cop justified when he placed seven bullets into the back of Jacob Blake? Why would a taser not work? What if they had no guns? Would they not resolve each situation without the use of force? What we hear these days coming from Police Chiefs and cop-apologists is,” please stop running away from police.” “If only he/she did not run.” As a former Police Officer, I did not relish having to chase down a suspect, but I also understood that no one wants to lose their freedom. In the United States, where it has been government policy to criminalize and incarcerate Blacks, why would anyone be surprised that people run away from spending months in for-profit jails and prisons because they were unable to pay for having a broken tail-light or making a turn without signaling? Their ancestors had no problem with the brutality, and the mutilation meted out to enslaved people who dared to run away from a lifetime of servitude and genocidal abuse. They risked being beaten to an inch of their lives; countless were killed, they risked being torn to shreds by the vicious dogs imported from Cuba specifically to hunt them down; still, they ran. Why would he run away? His master treated him well”?. Unless you know the story .…..shut your mouth.
The war has moved from the provinces of Iraq & Afghanistan to the streets of the United States; the victims are Black & Brown, all unarmed. It is a veritable Vietnam wall of bodies, the bodies of living breathing American citizens gunned down, run over, electrocuted, choked, beaten, and otherwise murdered by American police. This list represents only some of the victims over the last decade. It is important that before cameras on cell phones and body cam videos, there was no accounting by police departments when they kill someone. The Federal Bureau of Investigations had no database of the killings because there are no laws compelling police departments to report the killings to Federal authorities. The list below does not account for armed people. It represents unarmed Black people.
Daunte Demetrius Wright, October 27, 2000 — April 11, 2021. Marvin David Scott III, 1995 — March 14, 2021. Patrick Lynn Warren Sr., October 7, 1968 — January 10, 2021.Vincent “Vinny” M. Belmonte, September 14, 2001 — January 5, 2021. Angelo Quinto, March 10, 1990 — December 26, 2020. Andre Maurice Hill, May 23, 1973 — December 22, 2020. Casey Christopher Goodson Jr., January 30, 1997 — December 4, 2020.Angelo “AJ” Crooms, May 15, 2004 — November 13, 2020.Sincere Pierce, April 2, 2002 — November 13, 2020. Marcellis Stinnette, June 17, 2001 — October 20, 2020. Jonathan Dwayne Price, November 3, 1988 — October 3, 2020. Dijon Durand Kizzee, February 5, 1991 — August 31, 2020. Rayshard Brooks, January 31, 1993 — June 12, 2020. Carlos Carson, May 16, 1984 — June 6, 2020. David McAtee, August 3, 1966 — June 1, 2020. Tony “Tony the Tiger” McDade, 1982 — May 27, 2020. George Perry Floyd, October 14, 1973 — May 25, 2020. Dreasjon “Sean” Reed, 1999 — May 6, 2020. Michael Brent Charles Ramos, January 1, 1978 — April 24, 2020. Daniel T. Prude, September 20, 1978 — March 30, 2020. Breonna Taylor, June 5, 1993 — March 13, 2020. Manuel “Mannie” Elijah Ellis, August 28, 1986 — March 3, 2020. William Howard Green, March 16, 1976 — January 27, 2020. John Elliot Neville, 1962 — December 4, 2019. Atatiana Koquice Jefferson, November 28, 1990 — October 12, 2019. Elijah McClain, February 25, 1996 — August 30, 2019. Ronald Greene, September 28, 1969 — May 10, 2019. Javier Ambler, October 7, 1978 — March 28, 2019. Sterling Lapree Higgins, October 27, 1981 — March 25, 2019. Gregory Lloyd Edwards, September 23, 1980 — December 10, 2018. Emantic “EJ” Fitzgerald Bradford Jr., June 18, 1997 — November 22, 2018. Charles “Chop” Roundtree Jr., September 5, 2000 — October 17, 2018. Chinedu Okobi, February 13, 1982 — October 3, 2018. Anton Milbert LaRue Black, October 18, 1998 — September 15, 2018. Botham Shem Jean, September 29, 1991 — September 6, 2018. Antwon Rose Jr., July 12, 2000 — June 19, 2018. Saheed Vassell, December 22, 1983 — April 4, 2018. Stephon Alonzo Clark, August 10, 1995 — March 18, 2018. Dennis Plowden Jr., 1992 — December 28, 2017. Bijan Ghaisar, September 4, 1992 — November 27, 2017. Aaron Bailey, 1972 — June 29, 2017. Charleena Chavon Lyles, April 24, 1987 — June 18, 2017. The Fetus of Charleena Chavon Lyles (14−15 weeks), June 18, 2017. Jordan Edwards, October 25, 2001 — April 29, 2017. Chad Robertson, 1992 — February 15, 2017. Deborah Danner, September 25, 1950 — October 18, 2016. Alfred Olango, July 29, 1978 — September 27, 2016. Terence Crutcher, August 16, 1976 — September 16, 2016. Terrence LeDell Sterling, July 31, 1985 — September 11, 2016. Korryn Gaines, August 24, 1993 — August 1, 2016. Joseph Curtis Mann, 1966 — July 11, 2016. Philando Castile, July 16, 1983 — July 6, 2016. Alton Sterling, June 14, 1979 — July 5, 2016. Bettie “Betty Boo” Jones, 1960 — December 26, 2015. Quintonio LeGrier, April 29, 1996 — December 26, 2015. Corey Lamar Jones, February 3, 1984 — October 18, 2015. Jamar O’Neal Clark, May 3, 1991 — November 16, 2015. Jeremy “Bam Bam” McDole, 1987 — September 23, 2015. India Kager, June 9, 1988 — September 5, 2015. Samuel Vincent DuBose, March 12, 1972 — July 19, 2015. Sandra Bland, February 7, 1987 — July 13, 2015. Brendon K. Glenn, 1986 — May 5, 2015. Freddie Carlos Gray Jr., August 16, 1989 — April 19, 2015. Walter Lamar Scott, February 9, 1965 — April 4, 2015. Eric Courtney Harris, October 10, 1971 — April 2, 2015. Phillip Gregory White, 1982 — March 31, 2015. Mya Shawatza Hall, December 5, 1987 — March 30, 2015. Meagan Hockaday, August 27, 1988 — March 28, 2015. Tony Terrell Robinson, Jr., October 18, 1995 — March 6, 2015. Janisha Fonville, March 3, 1994 — February 18, 2015. Natasha McKenna, January 9, 1978 — February 8, 2015. Jerame C. Reid, June 8, 1978 — December 30, 2014. Rumain Brisbon, November 24, 1980 — December 2, 2014. Tamir Rice, June 15, 2002 — November 22, 2014. Akai Kareem Gurley, November 12, 1986 — November 20, 2014. Tanisha N. Anderson, January 22, 1977 — November 13, 2014. Dante Parker, August 14, 1977 — August 12, 2014. Ezell Ford, October 14, 1988 — August 11, 2014. Michael Brown Jr., May 20, 1996 — August 9, 2014. John Crawford III, July 29, 1992 — August 5, 2014. Tyree Woodson, July 8, 1976 — August 2, 2014. Eric Garner, September 15, 1970 — July 17, 2014. Dontre Hamilton, January 20, 1983 — April 30, 2014. Victor White III, September 11, 1991 — March 3, 2014. Gabriella Monique Nevarez, November 25, 1991 — March 2, 2014. Yvette Smith, December 18, 1966 — February 16, 2014. McKenzie J. Cochran, August 25, 1988 — January 29, 2014. Jordan Baker, 1988 — January 16, 2014. Andy Lopez, June 2, 2000 — October 22, 2013. Miriam Iris Carey, August 12, 1979 — October 3, 2013. Barrington “BJ” Williams, 1988 — September 17, 2013. Jonathan Ferrell, October 11, 1989 — September 14, 2013. Carlos Alcis, 1970 — August 15, 2013. Larry Eugene Jackson Jr., November 29, 1980 — July 26, 2013. Kyam Livingston, July 29, 1975 — July 21, 2013. Clinton R. Allen, September 26, 1987 — March 10, 2013. Kimani “KiKi” Gray, October 19, 1996 — March 9, 2013. Kayla Moore, April 17, 1971 — February 13, 2013. Jamaal Moore Sr., 1989 — December 15, 2012. Johnnie Kamahi Warren, February 26, 1968 — February 13, 2012.Shelly Marie Frey, April 21, 1985 — December 6, 2012. Darnisha Diana Harris, December 11, 1996 — December 2, 2012. Timothy Russell, December 9. 1968 — November 29, 2012. Malissa Williams, June 20, 1982 — November 29, 2012. Noël Palanco, November 28, 1989 — October 4, 2012. Reynaldo Cuevas, January 6, 1992 — September 7, 2012.Chavis Carter, 1991 — July 28, 2012. Alesia Thomas, June 1, 1977 — July 22, 2012. Shantel Davis, May 26, 1989 — June 14, 2012. Sharmel T. Edwards, October 10, 1962 — April 21, 2012. Tamon Robinson, December 21, 1985 — April 18, 2012. Ervin Lee Jefferson, III, 1994 — March 24, 2012. Kendrec McDade, May 5, 1992 — March 24, 2012. Rekia Boyd, November 5, 1989 — March 21, 2012. Shereese Francis, 1982 — March 15, 2012. Jersey K. Green, June 17, 1974 — March 12, 2012. Wendell James Allen, December 19, 1991 — March 7, 2012. Nehemiah Lazar Dillard, July 29, 1982 — March 5, 2012. Dante’ Lamar Price, July 18, 1986 — March 1, 2012. Raymond Luther Allen Jr., 1978 — February 29, 2012. Manual Levi Loggins Jr., February 22, 1980 — February 7, 2012. Ramarley Graham, April 12, 1993 — February 2, 2012. Kenneth Chamberlain Sr., April 12, 1943 — November 19, 2011. Alonzo Ashley, June 10, 1982 — July 18, 2011. Derek Williams, January 23, 1989 — July 6, 2011. Raheim Brown, Jr., March 4, 1990 — January 22, 2011. Reginald Doucet, June 3, 1985 — January 14, 2011. Derrick Jones, September 30, 1973 — November 8, 2010. Danroy “DJ” Henry Jr., October 29, 1990 — October 17, 2010. Aiyana Mo’Nay Stanley-Jones, July 20, 2002 — May 16, 2010.Steven Eugene Washington, September 20, 1982 — March 20, 2010. Aaron Campbell, September 7, 1984 — January 29, 2010. Kiwane Carrington, July 14, 1994 — October 9, 2009. Victor Steen, November 11, 1991 — October 3, 2009. Shem Walker, March 18, 1960 — July 11, 2009. Oscar Grant III, February 27, 1986 — January 1, 2009.
It is inconceivable that cops have decided to stop targeting African-American motorists solely based on their skin color. The way police behave cannot be decoupled from the foundational principle on which policing was built in the first place. Policing came from slave catching. I suppose I sound like a broken record, so be it. Regardless of the fancy uniforms and the ties and all the new accouterments, police are basically little more than a blue line that separates the races. They are trained to fire multiple bullets to stop a 16-year-old girl with a knife but not to fire once at a 61-year-old white male who assaulted civilians, struck a cop in the head with a hammer, and drove away, almost killing another cop. The lack of respect they feel for African-Americans emboldens them to kill any black person for contempt of cop, but handle white mass ‑murderers with respect. This is not about people committing crimes; it is about people who are inherently racist being trained as police officers and given the power of the states to kill.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
In Seattle, one officer’s multiple deadly encounters offer a window into this little-understood corner of American policing. The video is brief but disturbing: Moments after two Seattle police officers kick down an apartment’s front door, a shirtless man appears on camera, lumbering slowly toward them with a 4‑inch switchblade in his hand. Inside a nearby bathroom was the man’s barricaded girlfriend, who had dialed 911 after she said he threatened her life and his own. Within 6 seconds, the officers opened fire. Ryan Smith, a Black and Latino 31-year-old, was killed in a burst of 10 shots on May 8, 2019, according to police records. The officer who pulled the trigger first — and fired eight of the bullets that killed Smith — was Christopher Myers, 54, who has earned an array of commendations in his three decades at the Seattle Police Department, including officer of the year and a medal of honor. He was once heralded as an officer with an “unbelievable degree of patience” who cared deeply about the people on his beat. Myers, who is white, also belongs to a rare but significant class of American law enforcement officers: He’s used deadly force multiple times in his career, firing his gun in four separate incidents in the last 11 years. Three people were killed in the shootings and one was seriously injured. All but one were people of color.
The Seattle Police Department declined to say whether Myers acted appropriately in each encounter, though officials gave him an award in at least one case. And according to the independent unit within the department that investigates allegations of wrongdoing, the Office of Police Accountability, only Smith’s killing was referred for review, and there was no finding of misconduct. In an interview with NBC News, Myers attributed his repeated use of deadly force to a combination of factors, including threats posed by armed suspects, a willingness to rush toward danger and a confidence honed through years of experience and tactical training. He denied any racial bias in the shootings. “I don’t expect any of my calls to escalate into shootings,” he said, adding: “Unfortunately, some people don’t yield and sometimes force the situation.” Read the rest of the story here; https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/most-officers-never-fire-their-guns-some-kill-multiple-people-n1264795
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.