Why Republicans Have Given Up On Governing And Have Reverted To Culture Wars…

Despite its many faults, The United States of America has served as a tem­plate in many instances to a kind of world order that has arguably served the peace and tran­quil­i­ty of the plan­et to some degree.
Sure, America’s poli­cies under dif­fer­ent admin­is­tra­tions have arguably also been anti­thet­i­cal to the said peace and tran­quil­i­ty as well.
For exam­ple, in recent times, America’s ill-advised for­ay into the nation of Iraq, its pol­i­cy of prop­ping up the Shah of Iran, its com­i­cal inva­sion of Grenada, the con­tin­ued embar­go against the Cuban nation, and its sup­port for the apartheid sys­tems in South Africa and Israel are only a few of the poli­cies that run counter to America’s stat­ed goals of peace through the demo­c­ra­t­ic process.

On the oth­er hand, I don’t believe that free­dom-lov­ing peo­ple any­where would have a prob­lem with America’s entry into the sec­ond world war or its stance against the bur­geon­ing Soviet threat before the even­tu­al fall of the Soviet empire.
The long and short of this debate is that the US is the longest stand­ing demo­c­ra­t­ic nation, one that many small­er, more vul­ner­a­ble nations looked to for sup­port to remain out of the clutch­es of despo­tism and dictatorship.
It is for those rea­sons that what the Republican par­ty is doing to the American demo­c­ra­t­ic process is so horrifying.
Changing racial dynam­ics has forced the Republican par­ty to become a fas­cist par­ty with no inter­est in gov­ern­ing. Instead, the par­ty is sole­ly focused on find­ing ways to rig the elec­toral process to gain an unfair advantage.
They have decid­ed to attack vot­ing rights on all fronts; of course, the United States Supreme Court Republican major­i­ty made that pos­si­bil­i­ty a lot eas­i­er in its 2013 deci­sion in Shelby County Alabama Vs. Holder in which the court stripped away sec­tion 4 (B), a major por­tion of the land­mark 1965 vot­ing rights act.

The court’s actions opened up a new wave of vot­er sup­pres­sion leg­is­la­tion by the Republican leg­is­la­tures, pri­mar­i­ly in Republican-run states.
The new vot­er restric­tions are so egre­gious that it is a crim­i­nal offense to give some­one stand­ing in a vot­ing line a drink of water in Georgia. But, of course, the oth­er side of that coin is that the same laws remove drop box­es, close most polling places in heav­i­ly African-American com­mu­ni­ties, lessen vot­ing by mail, demands strict ID’s at polling places, lim­its vot­ing on Sunday, a day African-Americans have tra­di­tion­al­ly used to vote after Church, and a slew of oth­er vot­er intim­i­da­tion meth­ods aimed laser-like at Black and brown peo­ple, includ­ing hav­ing aggres­sive poll-watch­ers close to peo­ple of col­or cast­ing the votes.
Many in the civ­il rights com­mu­ni­ty, includ­ing Stacy Abrams, have dubbed the new laws Jim crow 2.0, in ref­er­ence to the jim crow laws passed after recon­struc­tion. Those laws lit­er­al­ly sub­ject­ed the new­ly lib­er­at­ed African-American pop­u­la­tion to anoth­er iter­a­tion of enslavement.

But the vot­er sup­pres­sion laws are only a small part of it; the Republican attacks are aimed at immi­gra­tion as well as abor­tion, long-held cul­tur­al issues that the Republican par­ty attached itself to but can­not artic­u­late a sane rea­son for.
Republicans cham­pi­on an anti-abor­tion plat­form, but the truth is that as far as the par­ty and its Lilly white vot­er base are con­cerned, they do no care a rats ass about black and brown babies.
In fact, the par­ty hopes that few­er black and brown babies are born. Their posi­tion on offer­ing SNAP and oth­er ben­e­fits to needy moth­ers’ of those babies of col­or as soon as they are born gives cre­dence to the fact that they do not care about babies of color.
The posi­tion of the Republican’s anti-abor­tion cru­sade is best summed up in the words of for­mer Iowa Republican con­gress­man Steve King, “we can­not build our civ­i­liza­tion with oth­er peo­ple’s babies.”
The idea is to over­turn Roe V Wade and force more white women to have babies… in their minds, the white race faces extinc­tion because not enough white babies are being born; addi­tion­al­ly, the co-min­gling of the races is seen as an exten­sion­al threat to the puri­ty of the Caucasian race… These are the dark crevass­es in which the Republican par­ty resides today.

Limiting and, if pos­si­ble, end­ing immi­gra­tion is self-explana­to­ry; as Donald Trump said, “why do we need these peo­ple from these shit-hole coun­tries,” speak­ing of black coun­tries, “why can’t we get peo­ple from Norway”?
Norway’s pop­u­la­tion is over­whelm­ing­ly white.
After Democratic President Lyndon Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights and the 1965 Voting Rights acts into law, the unmis­tak­able mad dash by whites to the Republican par­ty is a well-doc­u­ment­ed part of American history.
Fifty-six (56) years after the vot­ing rights act became law, the American South is still rock-sol­id Republican, with parts of the mid­west and moun­tain states fol­low­ing suit.
Republicans run­ning for President can bank on win­ning all of the south­ern states before a sin­gle vote is cast. Republican trick­le-down eco­nom­ic poli­cies have kept cit­i­zens in those states impov­er­ished; as have been proven, all but one of the fif­teen poor­est states in the union are run by Republicans, yet the vot­ers in those states vote on wedge issues like immi­gra­tion and abor­tion decade after decade then claim that they are vic­tims because immi­grants are tak­ing their jobs.

In the 92 Presidential elec­tions, Democrat Bill Clinton won his home state of Arkansas. In 2000 Al Gore Clinton’s vice pres­i­dent won his home state of Tennessee; he would go on to lose the pres­i­den­tial elec­tion to George Bush, the Republican, in a con­tro­ver­sial elec­tion in which the United States Supreme Courts stopped the recount in the state of Florida and declared Bush the winner.
George Bush’s broth­er Jeb Bush was the Republican gov­er­nor of Florida at the time.…..Democracy is work­ing for you!
In the 2020 pres­i­den­tial elec­tions between the Russian agent Donald Trump and Joe Biden, for­mer vice pres­i­dent to President Barack Obama, vot­er turnout was historic.
Trump’s MAGA crowd con­vinced that he was some (mes­si­ah) sent by their god, turned out in droves, no Republican pres­i­den­tial can­di­date before Trump man­aged to turn out 75 mil­lion to the polls.

But Trump’s MAGA army in all its fas­cist dis­plays, with flags, and oth­er sym­bols of [idol­a­try] was no match for the silent major­i­ty that turned out to repu­di­ate the Russian plant and make Joe Biden the 46th pres­i­dent of the United States.
Russian plant?
You damn right, Donald Trump has done every­thing that Putin want­ed him to do. He has used the pow­er of the pres­i­den­cy to advance every wish on Putin’s list to desta­bi­lize the United States, and the world, start­ing with tok­ing racial divi­sions in the United States, which his han­der Putin knows weak­ens America. not make America great.
Here is a list com­piled by CNN on what Donald Trump meant to Vladimir Putin.

(1) Trump has repeat­ed­ly praised Putin.
(2)Trump hired Manafort to run his campaign.
(3)Trump sug­gest­ed Russia can keep Crimea.
(4) Trump aides soft­ened the GOP plat­form on Ukraine.
(5) Trump made light of Russian hacking.
(6)Trump cap­i­tal­ized on Russian med­dling to win.
(7)Trump denied that Russia inter­fered in 2016.
(8) Trump’s tran­si­tion under­mined Russian sanctions.
(9)Trump was open to lift­ing Russian sanctions.
(10)Trump refused to say Putin is a killer.
(11)Trump mulled return­ing spy bases to Russia.
(12)Trump gave Russia clas­si­fied intelligence.
(13)Trump crit­i­cized and alien­at­ed NATO allies.
(14)Trump was reluc­tant to sign Russian sanctions.
(15)Trump pro­posed a cyber unit with Russia.
(16) Trump pro­posed a cyber unit with Russia.
(17)Trump thanked Putin for expelling US diplomats.
(18)Trump eased sanc­tions on Deripaska.
(19)Trump con­grat­u­lat­ed Putin on his sham election.
(20)Trump balked at sanc­tions for Skripal poisoning.
(21)Trump nixed US state­ment about Russian war.
(22Trump praised pro-Russian lead­ers in Europe.
(23)Trump did­n’t pub­licly con­demn the Russian attack.
(24 Trump defend­ed Soviet inva­sion of Afghanistan.
(25Trump asked allies to let Russia back in the G7.
(26)Trump’s Syria with­draw­al gave Putin a boost.
(27)Trump repeat­ed Kremlin talk­ing points on ISIS.
(28Trump spread Russian myths about Ukraine.
(29)Trump tem­porar­i­ly froze US aid for Ukraine.
(30)Trump smeared US ambas­sador to Ukraine
(31)Trump con­sid­ered vis­it­ing Putin on Russian soil.
(32)Trump gave Putin a PR vic­to­ry on Covid-19.
(33Trump invit­ed Russia to the 2020 G7 summit.
(34) Trump direct­ed the CIA to share intel with Russia.
(35)Trump ignored warn­ings of Russian bounties.
(36)Trump called the Russian boun­ty sto­ry a ‘hoax’.
(37)Trump nev­er raised Russian boun­ties with Putin.
(38)Trump ordered US troops out of Germany.

Yes, he is a Russian Agent, if it walks like and duck and quacks like a duck it is a .….. Russian agent, that is what he is and has been, the Muller inves­ti­ga­tions nev­er fer­ret­ed out that truth so that the trai­tor could be unearthed and exposed in full view for the American peo­ple to see. So he gets to con­tin­ue his illic­it and trea­so­nous cam­paign against the United States in order to enrich himself.
Unfortunately, the entire Republican par­ty is will­ing to destroy the repub­lic because Donald Trump is able to gal­va­nize a sol­id forty per­cent 40% of the white pop­u­lace in a way that no oth­er Republican since Ronald Reagan has been able to do.
In his usu­al bum­bling, inart­ful, style Lindsay Graham said it; ” the Republican Party can­not con­tin­ue with­out for­mer President Donald Trump’. Simply put, they believe they need that block of white griev­ance to win elections.
They would rather tear down over two hun­dred years of demo­c­ra­t­ic rule and replace it with despo­tism facil­i­tat­ed by a half-baked idiot who could­n’t even make it big despite his dad­dy’s millions.
It is all about retain­ing white hege­mon­ic control.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Liz Cheney Is Not Your Friend

Every now and then a few writ­ers get it right. We see events occur and peo­ple jump on the band­wag­on cre­at­ing false nar­ra­tive for the pub­lic that exists only in the minds of the writer or commentator.
The feud between Liz Chaney and the Republican Party is being sold to the gen­er­al pub­lic as an indi­ca­tion that Chaney is a paragon of virtue and conscience.
I wrote a short blog push­ing back against this notion, since then a few writ­ers have begun to come to the same con­clu­sion. My short com­men­tary was not one that had a run­ning nar­ra­tive of proof as to why Liz Chaney’s fall­out with the racist Republican sedi­tion­ist cau­cus should not be seen as an indi­ca­tion that she is vir­tu­ous. I sim­ply want­ed to debunk that the­o­ry period.

»»»»»»»»>

By John Nichols.

Just because she’s not get­ting along with Trump and Kevin McCarthy doesn’t make the cur­rent Cheney any less of a vit­ri­ol-spew­ing extrem­ist. She’s a rigid­ly right-wing Republican who got on the wrong side of a pow­er strug­gle with her fel­low rigid­ly right-wing Republicans.
The House Republican Conference chair is tus­sling with for­mer President Donald Trump, and that is now all but cer­tain to get her tossed from the num­ber three posi­tion in the party’s clown show of a cau­cus. The expla­na­tion for her per­ilous cir­cum­stance is sim­ple enough: What was once a par­ty where the name “Cheney” had a lot of sway is now a par­ty where the only name that has any sway is “Trump.”

The fact the Cheney’s not get­ting along with Trump and House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy has some lib­er­als think­ing rather too gen­er­ous­ly about the rep­re­sen­ta­tive from Wyoming.

All of a sud­den, com­men­ta­tors are giv­ing Cheney props. Headlines tell us, “Liz Cheney choos­es truth over pow­er — a lone­ly path in Trump’s GOP,” and “The effort to dump Liz Cheney is the con­se­quence of a par­ty that lost its way.” President Biden fist-bumped with her on the night of his address to Congress. House Democrats are chok­ing out com­pli­ments for Cheney.

Hold up, people!
Read the sto­ry at the Nation(https://​www​.then​ation​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​p​o​l​i​t​i​c​s​/​l​i​z​-​c​h​e​n​e​y​-​t​r​u​mp/

Republicans Are Not In “disarray”: They’re United In Their Assault On American Democracy

By Chauncey Devega

There’s no seri­ous con­flict with­in the Republican Party. Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney are being purged for disloyalty

The hope ped­dlers, stenog­ra­phers of cur­rent events, pro­fes­sion­al cen­trists, and too many oth­er mem­bers of the main­stream American news media have a new obses­sion. They keep telling the American peo­ple that the Republican Party is in the midst of a “civ­il war,” is in “dis­ar­ray,” is “tear­ing itself apart” or expe­ri­enc­ing a “cri­sis of mean­ing” and fight­ing for its so-called soul. Unfortunately, none of that is true. These are com­fort­ing and self-grat­i­fy­ing sto­ries, fueled by a des­per­ate desire for a return to sup­posed polit­i­cal nor­mal­cy and busi­ness as usu­al. Such fables are also col­ored by no small amount of lib­er­al schaden­freude and a desire to give the American peo­ple — espe­cial­ly the mil­lions who vot­ed Donald Trump out of office — a sense of reward and accomplishment

Joe Biden is pres­i­dent of the United States. The Democrats also have con­trol of Congress — by a ten­u­ous and razor-thin mar­gin. But the Republican Party and the larg­er right-wing move­ment remain large­ly uni­fied in their effort to over­throw America’s mul­tira­cial democracy.

It’s true that Sen. Mitt Romney was booed last week at the Republican state con­ven­tion in Utah. It’s also true that Rep. Liz Cheney and oth­er Republicans who vot­ed to impeach Trump for his crimes against the United States are being cen­sured and oth­er­wise attacked by mem­bers of their own par­ty. But those are not illus­tra­tions of frat­ri­cide or dis­ar­ray with­in the Republican Party. Instead, they are exam­ples of the way right-wing and oth­er extrem­ist polit­i­cal move­ments con­sol­i­date pow­er by purg­ing dis­sent­ing voic­es with­in their ranks.
Read the sto­ry at Salon. https://​www​.salon​.com/​2​0​2​1​/​0​5​/​0​6​/​r​e​p​u​b​l​i​c​a​n​s​-​a​r​e​-​n​o​t​-​i​n​-​d​i​s​a​r​r​a​y​-​t​h​e​y​r​e​-​u​n​i​t​e​d​-​i​n​-​t​h​e​i​r​-​a​s​s​a​u​l​t​-​o​n​-​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​n​-​d​e​m​o​c​r​a​cy/

Kamala ; “America Not Racist Country”, Wait What?

I nev­er cared about Liz Chaney, the rock-sol­id right-wing daugh­ter of grumpy old fart Dick Chaney Bush 43rd vice pres­i­dent. I mean, nei­ther was I a fan of the father; I thought that there was nev­er a bet­ter case to be made for a man who was more deserv­ing of the name, ‘Dick.’
Ok, that was prob­a­bly a cheap shot, but there is some­thing to be said about the grav­i­tas of a guy who was hired to do a vice-pres­i­den­tial can­di­date search and end­ed up choos­ing himself.
If you are not fol­low­ing my drift, in the cam­paign lead­ing up to the 2000 pres­i­den­tial elec­tions, the Bush cam­paign hired [Dick] Chaney to find a suit­able can­di­date to run on the tick­et with old Georgie boy.
Chaney searched and found himself.
We all knew how that turned out as old Dick was instru­men­tal in egging on his boss to enter the sov­er­eign nation of Iraq under pretenses.

Liz Chaney is no hero for stand­ing up to the Republican lie that the Democrats stole the 2020 elections.
Liz Chaney deserves no acco­lade for not going with the Trump delu­sions; I believe some­where in what she is doing is a cal­cu­lus that her posi­tion will turn out to ben­e­fit her.
Liz Chaney per­pet­u­ates the lie that the Democratic ini­tia­tive which pro­tects peo­ple from the pan­dem­ic restores the econ­o­my, reforms the police, and fix­ing America’s infra­struc­ture, is socialism.
Give me a damn break. I thought those were the things the gov­ern­ment was sup­posed to do?
She has done noth­ing that Senator Mitt Romney has­n’t done; she has­n’t done any­thing that Illinois rep­re­sen­ta­tive Adam Kinsigner has­n’t done. She has­n’t done any­thing that Justin Amash has­n’t done.
Liz Chaney is the num­ber three per­son in the Republican House lead­er­ship cau­cus, which is in and of itself tes­ta­ment that Liz Chaney deserves no plaudits.

KAMALA HARRIS AMERICA IS NOTRACIST COUNTRY

Oh, what a dif­fer­ence a few months make. Newly elect­ed Vice President of the United States Kamala Harris was asked whether she thought the United States is a racist country.
In typ­i­cal lib­er­al wishy-washy fash­ion, Harris retreat­ed from her for­mer posi­tion that America is indeed a racist coun­try, say­ing the fol­low­ing; “America is not a “racist coun­try,” but the nation must “speak the truth” about its his­to­ry with racism.”
Wait, what the f**k? What the hell does that even mean?
Harris was respond­ing to Black-skin folk US Senator uncle Tim/​Tom Scott of South Carolina who claimed that America is not a racist coun­try, even as he spoke about his fears, hav­ing being pulled over mul­ti­ple times by police for no oth­er rea­son than that he was a black man.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​w​h​y​-​d​o​-​r​e​p​u​b​l​i​c​a​n​s​-​h​a​t​e​-​b​l​a​c​k​-​p​e​o​p​le/

The com­mon thread that seems to guide both Tim Scott and Kamala Harris’s posi­tion, even from dif­fer­ent ends of the spec­trum, is that both of them man­aged to find a way to get to the top, which means that American racism has ended.
No mat­ter how hard you try to hold a bunch of ful­ly blown bal­loons under­wa­ter, a few will escape to the top; it is just the nat­ur­al order of things.
The hypocrisy of both Scott & Harris speaks to the greater issue of some black American mem­o­ry lapse as soon as they reach the top, until, of course, they are pushed back down the lad­der they try to claim their black card.
In a blog post last week, I addressed Tim Scott’s coon­ery; I will not rehash those comments.
But most who pay atten­tion to polit­i­cal cam­paigns will remem­ber Kamala Harris’s attack on Joe Biden when she famous­ly told him dur­ing one of the pres­i­den­tial debates that she was one of the lit­tle girls who ben­e­fit­ted from bussing, some­thing she said Biden opposed.
How can a rea­son­able per­son, much less a black per­son, claim that America is not a racist coun­try when racism is built into every stra­tum of society?
America’s racism was the tem­plate for Hitler’s treat­ment of the prac­ti­tion­ers of Judaism in Germany.
America’s racism was the tem­plate for South Africa’s apartheid sys­tem; It is the tem­plate for the apartheid sys­tem prac­ticed in the State of Israel today against the Palestinian people.
In every fiber of the American body-politic, racism is intri­cate­ly woven in with the implic­it desire of mak­ing it dif­fi­cult for peo­ple of col­or to have upward mobility.
The idea that because a few have made it America’s racist past is .….…a thing of the past is what guid­ed the US Supreme courts 2013 deci­sion in Shelby County Alabama Vs. Holder when the court gut­ted sec­tion 4 (b) of the 1965 vot­ing rights act.
The court’s log­ic was that the racist prac­tices of the past are in the past, and there­fore there was no fur­ther use for sec­tion 4(b).
Of course, as soon as the court hand­ed down that deci­sion, states run by Republicans embarked on vot­er sup­pres­sion laws only before seen dur­ing the peri­od after reconstruction.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Transforming The JCF, The Only Metric That Matters Is Results.

This is what passed for a police sta­tion in Portland, and this is not the worst case.

A legit­i­mate point could be made that the Andrew Holness-led Government has pro­vid­ed more ameni­ties to the police than pre­vi­ous administrations.
I do not have the pre­cise dol­lar amounts, nei­ther do I have the num­bers nec­es­sary to deci­sive­ly account for infla­tion in those dol­lar amounts today as opposed to yesteryear.
However, with the advent of social media and a savvy admin­is­tra­tion that under­stands the val­ue of social media and optics, we can clear­ly see that some improve­ments are being made.
If the idea is to trans­form the JCF into a show­piece, I under­stand the polit­i­cal optics. But, on the oth­er hand, I hard­ly believe that the Jamaican peo­ple who are law-abid­ing care about fan­cy titles and optics while their loved ones are being gunned down and see­ing their killers walk around scot-free.

Shady Grove police sta­tion in Lluidas Vale, St Catherine

New Police Stations, com­put­ers, and oth­er ameni­ties are all pos­i­tives that should be lauded.
On the oth­er hand, lets us tem­per the acco­lades. Let us under­stand that the gov­ern­men­t’s pri­ma­ry duty is to keep the pop­u­la­tion safe.
Unfortunately, for decades, the JCF has been the bas­tard child of gov­ern­ment work­ers. Officers have been asked to work in the most dilap­i­dat­ed and unsan­i­tary con­di­tions. In con­trast, oth­er work­ers have been bet­ter treat­ed, giv­en new offices with state-of-the-art ameni­ties as a mat­ter of course.
A case in point is the new plush offices cre­at­ed for INDECOM, an agency that takes none of the risk police offi­cers are forced to take but were giv­en the best con­di­tions to do what­ev­er they do. They are gov­ern­ment work­ers deserv­ing of no greater respect than our hard-work­ing police officers.
We should not be in the busi­ness of heap­ing acco­lades on politi­cians for doing what they are elect­ed to do.
On that note, I ask police offi­cers, past and present, not to look at these issues through a polit­i­cal lens but to see issues affect­ing polic­ing and the secu­ri­ty of our coun­try through the lens of impar­tial police officers.
One of the much-par­rot­ted nar­ra­tives we hear is that the police depart­ment is being transformed.
Good!!!

WHAT EXACTLY DOES TRANSFORMATION MEAN FOR THIS GOVERNMENT

Transformation is good, but what is the force being trans­formed from and into?
Supplying the police force with cars and motor­cy­cles is not a trans­for­ma­tion; that is com­pa­ny policy.
The police need to have cars, motor­cy­cles, and oth­er means of trans­porta­tion to do their jobs effectively.
On the one hand, the Prime Minister has been caus­tic against the police depart­ment and how it does busi­ness; one fact remains, despite his attacks, the police depart­ment was vast­ly more effec­tive than it is today in every sta­tis­ti­cal category.
The much-maligned ways ‘things were done’ reaped rewards that this new force can only hope to accom­plish. Let me be clear; it has nev­er been that our offi­cers were unable to han­dle the vio­lence pro­duc­ers; it has always been the polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence that has always hob­bled law enforce­ment in Jamaica. It is not that the force of today can­not han­dle the vio­lence pro­duc­ers; the same prob­lem of pol­i­tics in overt and covert ways still hin­ders crime-fight­ing on the Island.
In the past, politi­cians like the Prime Minister, his National Security Minister Horace Chang, and cer­tain­ly the so-called jus­tice min­is­ter Delroy Chuck have been imped­i­ments to the police doing their jobs effectively.
The admin­is­tra­tion can cre­ate new squads and slap­ping on them new fan­cy-sound­ing names like “rapid response teams, but the real­i­ty is that the prime min­is­ter and his team are not recre­at­ing the wheel they maligned and demo­nized; they are squads.
The Mobile reserve had a rapid response team from as far back as the 1970s and ’80s. Then, it was called the Honda squad; yup, it was a squad then, the rapid response team today is a squad...
So they can malign the old ways, the old squads, but I am here to say slap­ping a new fan­cy name to a group of guys on motor­cy­cles and pre­tend­ing that it means that you are trans­form­ing the force is laughable.”
I am very sup­port­ive of a trans­formed JCF.
One of the rea­sons that have impact­ed the high attri­tion rate from the JCF has been the incom­pe­tence and cow­ardice of the Force’s lead­er­ship and the under­ly­ing prob­lems of polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence in the Force’s operations.
As I applaud the gov­ern­ment for chang­ing the face of police sta­tions and sup­ply­ing the police with uni­forms and oth­er accou­ter­ments of the trade, it is impor­tant to rec­on­cile that unless the depart­ment gets the leg­isla­tive help, train­ing, and sup­port it needs to root out vio­lent offend­ers, it will be for nothing.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Why Body Cameras Can Still Fail To Hold Police Accountable

By Nathalie Baptist

On April 21, while attempt­ing to serve a war­rant, North Carolina police shot and killed Andrew Brown Jr., a 42-year-old Black man in Elizabeth City. The entire inci­dent was record­ed, since the offi­cers involved were wear­ing body cam­eras. But actu­al­ly see­ing the footage of the shoot­ing has been a chal­lenge for Brown’s fam­i­ly, lawyers, and the wider public.

Body-worn cam­eras are intend­ed to pro­vide trans­paren­cy into polic­ing. But they stop being a tool to pro­tect the pub­lic from police bru­tal­i­ty when the only peo­ple who end up with pro­tec­tion appear to be the cops who did the shoot­ing, as seems to be the case with the offi­cers who killed Brown. Body cam­era laws vary by state, but in North Carolina, local courts have author­i­ty over releas­ing footage. After the shoot­ing, a North Carolina state judge ruled that Brown’s fam­i­ly could see the entire tape with­in 10 days, but there would be no release to the gen­er­al pub­lic. In fact, Superior Court Judge Jeff Foster ordered the depart­ment to blur the faces and name tags of the police offi­cers involved. “The release at this time would cre­ate a seri­ous threat to the fair, impar­tial and order­ly admin­is­tra­tion of jus­tice,” he said in his rul­ing.

Brown joins an ever-grow­ing list of high-pro­file deaths caught on police cam­eras. But, in many cas­es, instead of pro­vid­ing account­abil­i­ty, the cam­eras have most­ly served as the con­duit for a seem­ing­ly end­less and trau­ma­tiz­ing stream of police vio­lence. In the short clip that the victim’s fam­i­ly was allowed to see, they say that Brown had his hands on the steer­ing wheel as police fired bul­lets into his car. They called it not just a police shoot­ing but “an exe­cu­tion.”

I start­ed writ­ing about police shoot­ings and body cam­eras back in 2015 when the devices were her­ald­ed as one neat trick to fix polic­ing. Six years lat­er, the par­al­lels are strik­ing. Back then, after a string of high pro­file shoot­ings includ­ing Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri and Walter Scott in North Charleston, South Carolina, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment pro­vid­ed local police depart­ments with mil­lions of dol­lars to out­fit their law enforce­ment offi­cers with body cams. “The impact of body-worn cam­eras touch­es on a range of out­comes that build upon efforts to mend the fab­ric of trust, respect, and com­mon pur­pose that all com­mu­ni­ties need to thrive,” then Attorney General Loretta Lynch said.

But it quick­ly became clear that police body cam­eras wouldn’t trans­form polic­ing in the ways the Obama admin­is­tra­tion had intend­ed. In 2016, after Baton Rouge, Louisiana, police offi­cers shot and killed Alton Sterling, both cops who were on the scene said their body cam­eras “fell off.” That same year, a Washington, DC, police offi­cer sim­ply didn’t turn on his cam­era until after he shot Terrence Sterling. In oth­er instances, police depart­ments have delayed releas­ing the tape alto­geth­er, which leaves the pub­lic and the victim’s loved ones to spec­u­late on what happened.

It some­times seems as if the mere pres­ence of body footage becomes so threat­en­ing that it can inspire an exces­sive police response. When police depart­ments and local offi­cials agree to release videos of police killings, they often use it as a weapon. This week in Elizabeth City, a most­ly-Black town of approx­i­mate­ly 17,000 peo­ple, a num­ber of demon­stra­tors demand­ed to see the video that depict­ed Brown’s final moments. In response, the may­or declared a state of emer­gency, set a cur­few for 8:00pm each night, and the police appeared at the peace­ful protests wear­ing full riot gear.

Body cams did not cre­ate police account­abil­i­ty for the same rea­son that many pre­vi­ous attempts of reform have failed: The rank and file in the depart­ments resist change. As my col­league Laura Thompson report­ed ear­li­er this month, cops fre­quent­ly ignore new reforms, such as restric­tions on neck restrains and no-knock war­rants. In the after­math of George Floyd’s death a year ago in May, there have been many calls and pro­pos­als for reform­ing the police, includ­ing a com­pre­hen­sive bill intro­duced by the Democrats. The use of body cams holds a promi­nent place in all these pro­pos­als. But it turns out, body cam­eras are only as use­ful as police allow them to be.

Why Do Republicans Hate Black People ?

Continue read­ing

Critics Decry New Oklahoma Law That Protects Drivers Who ‘unintentionally’ Run Over Or Kill Protesters

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt signed a bill into law last week that offers legal pro­tec­tions for dri­vers who “unin­ten­tion­al­ly” kill or injure pro­test­ers if they are attempt­ing to “flee the scene.” House Bill 1674, which passed last week thanks to over­whelm­ing Republican sup­port, also makes it a mis­de­meanor offense to obstruct a road­way. The new law was passed in response to Black Lives Matter demon­stra­tions that took place in Oklahoma and much of the coun­try last sum­mer in response to the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police. “The 1st Amendment gives us the right to peace­ably assem­ble, not unlaw­ful­ly assem­ble,” GOP state Rep. Kevin West, a spon­sor of the bill, told Yahoo News in an email. “The lan­guage [in H.B. 1674] gives equal pro­tec­tion to law­ful pro­test­ers as well as law-abid­ing cit­i­zens who get caught up in dan­ger­ous, unlaw­ful sit­u­a­tions.” Under the new law, any­one who obstructs a pub­lic road or high­way faces a mis­de­meanor charge pun­ish­able by up to a year in coun­ty jail and/​or a fine rang­ing from $100 to $5,000. Also, any dri­ver who “unin­ten­tion­al­ly” hits a demon­stra­tor with a car is grant­ed civ­il and crim­i­nal lia­bil­i­ty pro­tec­tion for injuries caused, includ­ing death, while “flee­ing from a riot.”

Police officers
Police offi­cers mon­i­tor­ing a crowd of pro­test­ers in Tulsa, Okla., on June 20, 2020. (Brendan Smialowski/​AFP via Getty Images)

The bill’s lan­guage was inspired by an inci­dent last sum­mer in Tulsa in which the dri­ver of a pick­up truck drove through a crowd of peo­ple on Interstate 244 who were protest­ing Floyd’s death. The col­li­sion left sev­er­al peo­ple injured and one per­son par­a­lyzed from the waist down. The dri­ver of the pick­up truck, who had his fam­i­ly with him in the car, how­ev­er, was not charged. “The kids cow­ered in the back seat because they feared for their lives,” Sen. Rob Standridge, a Republican who authored H.B. 1674, told AP. “That’s what this bill is about.” “Hopefully every­thing qui­ets down around the coun­try, and this bill won’t be need­ed for any­body, but if things come to Oklahoma like have been hap­pen­ing, this will pro­tect some folks,” Standridge added in a record­ed video. Stitt and Standridge did not reply to Yahoo News’ request for com­ment. Similar bills are being pushed through Republican-led state­hous­es in oth­er parts of the coun­try. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis signed an immu­ni­ty-grant­i­ng bill into law ear­li­er this month, and a mea­sure in Iowa is work­ing its way through the Legislature.

While pro­po­nents of the bill say H.B. 1674 will pro­tect those trapped by riots or demon­stra­tions, crit­ics believe the bill great­ly threat­ens Oklahomans’ right to peace­ful­ly protest and that it will dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly affect Black peo­ple because it offers vague dis­cre­tion to dri­vers to assess whether a demon­stra­tion con­sti­tutes a threat. For Dr. Tiffany Crutcher, an Oklahoma native whose twin broth­er, Terence, was shot and killed by a Tulsa police offi­cer in September 2016 dur­ing a traf­fic stop, this bill is deeply per­son­al. H.B. 1674 “attacks and silences our right to assem­ble and protest and let our voic­es be heard,” Crutcher, exec­u­tive direc­tor of the Terence Crutcher Foundation, told Yahoo News in a video interview.

Protestors
A demon­stra­tion in Tulsa in response to the police shoot­ing of Terence Crutcher. (Sue Ogrocki/​AP/​File)

It means so much to me because my twin broth­er … was killed by a white police offi­cer … and we had to take it to the streets to demand that jus­tice be served,” she said. “Because of our right to march down the streets and our right to assem­ble, we were able to force the dis­trict attor­ney to indict [Officer] Betty Shelby with­in the first week.” Shelby was charged with manslaugh­ter in Terence’s killing but was lat­er acquit­ted. Tiffany Crutcher believes bills like these con­tin­ue to put Black America in a “state of emer­gency.” “This bill was cre­at­ed in retal­i­a­tion for what took place for us shut­ting down high­ways and mak­ing them incon­ve­nient for just a moment [last sum­mer],” she said. For many peo­ple, H.B. 1674 brings to mind the death of Heather Heyer, a white woman who was killed after a man rammed his car into a crowd of coun­ter­pro­test­ers at an Aug. 12, 2017, “Unite the Right” ral­ly in Charlottesville, Va. James Alex Fields Jr. was even­tu­al­ly charged and con­vict­ed of first-degree mur­der, but crit­ics note that if a law sim­i­lar to Oklahoma’s had been in place in Virginia at the time, he might have not faced any consequences.

Andrew Porwancher, a pro­fes­sor of legal his­to­ry at the University of Oklahoma, said he is con­cerned that the new law goes too far. “H.B. 1674 might appear to be a win for con­ser­v­a­tives, but its pro­vi­sions could be employed against right-wing activists in the future,” Porwancher said in an email to Yahoo News. “Your best shot at pre­serv­ing your own free­dom of speech tomor­row is to pro­tect the speech of your oppo­nents today.” In response to the new law, the American Civil Liberties Union issued a state­ment call­ing it an effort to “[tram­ple] the rights and lib­er­ties of Oklahomans in favor of those with the most pow­er and access.” The group believes the leg­is­la­tion is meant to dis­cour­age peo­ple from protest­ing alto­geth­er. “There is no ques­tion that this leg­is­la­tion chills free speech,” Nicole McAfee, direc­tor of pol­i­cy and advo­ca­cy at the ACLU of Oklahoma, told Yahoo News. “It remind­ed me who the Legislature thinks has a right to be afraid.”

A police offi­cer con­fronts pro­test­ers at a demon­stra­tion in Tulsa. (Amanda Voisard for the Washington Post via Getty Images)

McAfee said the Oklahoma Legislature too often cre­ates laws out of iso­lat­ed inci­dents, like the pick­up truck encounter on Interstate 244, with­out con­sid­er­ing the larg­er impli­ca­tions. “We know the pow­er of protest and pub­lic account­abil­i­ty in mov­ing folks to action, and bills like this not only put our democ­ra­cy in a frag­ile place, but laws like these put our insti­tu­tions in a dan­ger­ous place as well,” she said. But pro­po­nents of the law feel it pro­tects every­one involved. Don Spencer, pres­i­dent of the Oklahoma 2nd Amendment Association, has been advo­cat­ing for laws like H.B. 1674 since February. “If you’re unlaw­ful­ly block­ing a road­way for the intend­ed pur­pose of pos­si­bly doing dam­age, to scare peo­ple, to harm peo­ple,” Spencer warned in a record­ed video ear­li­er this year, “you could be trod­den on with the car tires.” “There are mul­ti­ple ways to protest law­ful­ly and have your voic­es heard, but attack­ing motorists who have noth­ing to do with the protest or what is being protest­ed is not some­thing that should be allowed,” West, the state rep­re­sen­ta­tive, said. H.B. 1674 will take effect on Nov. 1. Until then, the ACLU and oth­er grass­roots orga­ni­za­tions, like the Terence Crutcher Foundation, are try­ing to fig­ure out their next course of action. For Kathryn Schumaker, a pro­fes­sor affil­i­at­ed with the University of Oklahoma’s Institute for the American Constitutional Heritage, the new law takes the state back to a shame­ful era in its his­to­ry and ignores the issues at the cen­ter of the protests. “Civil rights pro­test­ers were his­tor­i­cal­ly described as ‘out­side agi­ta­tors’ who only want­ed to stir up trou­ble,” she told Yahoo News. “In my view, this law seeks to dis­tract from the mes­sage that pro­test­ers are try­ing to communicate.”

We Have Every Right To Police Body Cams That Are Paid For With Our Tax Dollars…

YouTube player

The more you get a chance to look at the American crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem, the more you see just how slant­ed it is against peo­ple of col­or. A clos­er look opens up a bird’s eye view of the col­lu­sion between police, dis­trict attor­neys, judges, and all of the play­ers through­out the sec­tor. It gives a clear­er view of how the sys­tem col­ludes to pro­tect police, the foot sol­diers of white supremacy.
Why would a leg­is­la­ture decide that police body cam­era footage is not pub­lic record? The cam­eras are pur­chased with tax dol­lars. Those dol­lars come from the pub­lic. The police are paid and retained by the pub­lic. Tax dol­lars finance those salaries and benefits.
A leg­is­la­ture in North Carolina decid­ed that the very devices that were agreed upon as a nec­es­sary tool to hold police account­able are not a pub­lic record is direct evi­dence that the states will do any­thing to cov­er up police crimes.
Never mind what they tell you about com­pro­mis­ing investigations.
There are times that it may be impor­tant to pre­serve the iden­ti­ty of peo­ple who may be caught up in those record­ings; how­ev­er, the idea that the pub­lic has no right as a blan­ket pol­i­cy to what they paid for is an attempt at pro­tect­ing police, even when they have bro­ken the law.
The gov­ern­ment should not be in the busi­ness of pro­tect­ing rogue agents of the state, not just police offi­cers, but all pub­lic employ­ees should be held up to the high­est standards.

ON ANOTHER NOTE

(L‑R) Gregory McMichael, Travis McMichael, and William “Roddie” Bryan, Jr.

Federal pros­e­cu­tors indict­ed the three men accused of killing Ahmaud Arbery on hate crime and attempt­ed kid­nap­ping charges, the Department of Justice announced Wednesday.
Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man, was out for a jog near Brunswick, Georgia, on February 23, 2020, when he was chased down in a truck by three men and fatal­ly shot. Two of the three men — Gregory and Travis McMichael — claimed to be con­duct­ing a cit­i­zen’s arrest and act­ed in self-defense. A third man, William “Roddie” Bryan Jr., who record­ed a video of Arbery’s death, alleged­ly hit Arbery with his truck after he joined the McMichaels in the chase. All three men were charged with one count of inter­fer­ence with rights and with one count of attempt­ed kid­nap­ping, accord­ing to a news release from the Justice Department.

YouTube player

Video Shows Police Kneeled On Mario Gonzalez’s Back For 5 Minutes Before He Died

Police released footage of the events lead­ing up to the death of a Latino man in Alameda, California, show­ing offi­cers kneel­ing on the man’s back and shoul­der until he became unre­spon­sive. The video con­tra­dicts offi­cials’ orig­i­nal account of the inci­dent. Mario Gonzalez, a 26-year-old Latino man, died on the morn­ing of April 19 after what police claimed was a “scuf­fle” and “phys­i­cal alter­ca­tion” as they attempt­ed to restrain him, fol­lowed by a “med­ical emer­gency.” But body cam­era footage released on Tuesday after­noon after an out­cry from Gonzalez’s fam­i­ly and the pub­lic did not show him being vio­lent or fight­ing offi­cers at any point. Instead, in the video, offi­cers approached Gonzalez, who was stand­ing alone in a park with some bot­tles of alco­hol in a bas­ket. Gonzalez calm­ly spoke with offi­cers for near­ly nine min­utes before they attempt­ed to place his hands behind his back. Police pinned him face­down on the ground and at least two offi­cers appeared to get on top of his back, one kneel­ing on his shoul­der, for about five min­utes until Gonzalez became unre­spon­sive. Police said Gonzalez died at the hos­pi­tal, but the video showed that he had stopped breath­ing on-site and that one offi­cer declared “no pulse” short­ly after offi­cers began CPR.

YouTube player

Three offi­cers involved have been placed on paid admin­is­tra­tive leave. In a press con­fer­ence ear­li­er on Tuesday, mem­bers of Gonzalez’s fam­i­ly, who had pri­vate­ly viewed the footage, said Gonzalez was “com­pli­ant and they con­tin­ued to pin him down.” “Alameda police offi­cers mur­dered my broth­er Mario,” Gonzalez’s broth­er Gerardo said, not­ing that his broth­er was in the park “not both­er­ing any­one” and that “at no point was he vio­lent.” “Everything we saw in that video was unnec­es­sary,” he added. “APD took a calm sit­u­a­tion and made it fatal.” “Police killed my broth­er in the same man­ner that they killed George Floyd,” he said. In the video, Gonzalez could be heard groan­ing under the weight of the police offi­cers on top of him while he con­tin­ued to respond to their ques­tions about his name and birth date.

Please don’t do it,” Gonzalez said at one point, and then: “I’m sor­ry,” fol­lowed by screams and groans. One offi­cer answered: “I for­give you.” The police report made no men­tion of offi­cers kneel­ing on Gonzalez’s back for min­utes until he lost con­scious­ness. Similarly, when Minneapolis police offi­cer Derek Chauvin mur­dered Floyd last year, police had described the death as a “med­ical inci­dent,” neglect­ing to men­tion that Chauvin had kneeled on Floyd’s neck for nine min­utes as Floyd repeat­ed­ly said he couldn’t breathe. The Alameda County Sheriff’s Office and District Attorney’s Office are con­duct­ing inves­ti­ga­tions into Gonzalez’s death. City offi­cials have hired an out­side inves­ti­ga­tor to do so as well. The Gonzalez fam­i­ly is demand­ing an entire­ly inde­pen­dent inves­ti­ga­tion and that the offi­cers be iden­ti­fied, fired and pros­e­cut­ed. Their attor­ney Julia Sherwin is an expert in restraint asphyx­i­a­tion and was a con­sul­tant in Chauvin’s pros­e­cu­tion. At Tuesday’s press con­fer­ence, Gonzalez’s moth­er, Edith Arenales, said that Gonzalez had a four-year-old son and took care of his younger 22-year-old broth­er, who was autistic.

They broke my fam­i­ly for no rea­son,” Arenales said, adding that she “can­not sleep.” She said even if her son was drunk, “they don’t have the right to kill him. We’re humans.” This sto­ry is cour­tesy of )Huffpost)

Andrew Brown’s Autopsy Shows ‘kill Shot To The Back Of The Head,’ (family Attorney)…

YouTube player

Attorneys for the fam­i­ly of Andrew Brown Jr., at an emo­tion­al Tuesday morn­ing news con­fer­ence in Elizabeth City, said a pri­vate autop­sy showed that he died when Pasquotank County sheriff’s deputies fired a “kill shot to the back of the head.”
Brown, 42, was killed out­side his home in Elizabeth City last Wednesday as deputies were serv­ing search and arrest war­rants relat­ing to felony drug charges.
After hear­ing the autop­sy results, Brown’s son Khalil Ferebee dis­cour­aged vio­lence Tuesday as he addressed the crowd of more than 100 peo­ple that stood out­side the pub­lic safe­ty build­ing down­town. “To my pops … yes­ter­day, I said he was exe­cut­ed,” Ferebee said. “This autop­sy report showed me that was correct.”
The autop­sy also showed an addi­tion­al four gun­shot wounds to Brown’s arm.“That wasn’t enough?” Ferebee said. “They’re going to shoot him in the back of the head? … That’s not right at all.

Man, stuff got­ta change. It’s real­ly got­ta change for real.”
The press con­fer­ence drew angry shouts from spec­ta­tors, espe­cial­ly when moth­ers of oth­er police vio­lence vic­tims spoke.“All Black men are not ter­ror­ists,” said Tamika Thatch of High Point, whose son was killed in a church in November.
Motioning to Brown’s son, she said, “If his dad­dy killed them, he would nev­er walk the streets again. We need to hold them to the same account­abil­i­ty. They need to be locked up today. Yesterday. Last week.”
Elizabeth City offi­cials on Tuesday announced an 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. cur­few in the town start­ing Tuesday night.
Members of the New Black Panther Party from Washington, D.C., stood in the park­ing lot for the news con­fer­ence and called Brown’s death an “assas­si­na­tion” and sought the imme­di­ate release of the footage.

.….

Members of the New Black Panther Party from Washington DC and Raleigh chap­ters ral­ly as attor­neys for the fam­i­ly of Andrew Brown Jr. hold a press con­fer­ence out­side the Pasquotank County Public Safety build­ing Tuesday, April 27, 2021 to announce results of the autop­sy they com­mis­sioned, which they said showed five bul­let wounds includ­ing one to the back of the head. They accused Pasquotank County offi­cials of hid­ing infor­ma­tion and keep­ing jus­tice from being served in Elizabeth City. Travis Long TLONG@​NEWSOBSERVER.​COM
Read more here: https://​www​.new​sob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​l​o​c​a​l​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​2​5​0​9​7​3​7​2​4​.​h​t​m​l​#​s​t​o​r​y​l​i​n​k​=​cpy

As attor­ney Ben Crump spoke, some mem­bers called him a “boot-lick­ing ambu­lance chas­er,” insist­ing the streets would get jus­tice. And while Khalil urged against vio­lence, attor­ney Bakari Sellers said calls for peace are not the family’s responsibility“If we want calm, if we want jus­tice,” Sellers said, “that onus is not on the fam­i­ly. That onus is on peo­ple who are hid­ing information.”

Attorneys for the fam­i­ly of Andrew Brown Jr., includ­ing Harry Daniels, cen­ter, and Ben Crump take ques­tions from reporters dur­ing a press con­fer­ence out­side the Pasquotank County Public Safety build­ing Tuesday, April 27, 2021 to announce results of the autop­sy they com­mis­sioned, which they said showed five bul­let wounds includ­ing one to the back of the head. They accused Pasquotank County offi­cials of hid­ing infor­ma­tion and keep­ing jus­tice from being served in Elizabeth City. Travis Long TLONG@​NEWSOBSERVER.​COm A PRIVATE AUTOPSY REPORT

Sellers said the fam­i­ly arranged an inde­pen­dent autop­sy, “because the med­ical report we got just said, ‘shot to the head,’ and we want­ed to make sure that it was clear­ly denot­ed that he was shot in the back of the head.”
Attorneys Wayne Kendall and Crump described the details of the autop­sy report with dia­grams show­ing five bul­let wounds, with the fatal shot killing Brown with­in min­utes, they said. It caused him to lose con­trol of his vehi­cle and crash into a tree, they said.

A tear rolls down Eric Garner’s moth­er, Gwen Carr’s face as attor­neys for the fam­i­ly of Andrew Brown Jr. hold a press con­fer­ence out­side the Pasquotank County Public Safety build­ing Tuesday, April 27, 2021 to announce results of the autop­sy they com­mis­sioned, which they said showed five bul­let wounds includ­ing one to the back of the head. They accused Pasquotank County offi­cials of hid­ing infor­ma­tion and keep­ing jus­tice from being served in Elizabeth City. Travis Long TLONG@​NEWSOBSERVER.​COM
Read more here: https://​www​.new​sob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​l​o​c​a​l​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​2​5​0​9​7​3​7​2​4​.​h​t​m​l​#​s​t​o​r​y​l​i​n​k​=​cpy.

The bul­let went into the base of his neck and “per­fo­rat­ed and pen­e­trat­ed his skill and his brain,” Crump said. Chantel Cherry-Lassiter, an Elizabeth City attor­ney who has worked with the fam­i­ly, said it was “an assas­si­na­tion of this unarmed black man.” “That is painful,” Lassiter said. “We are tired. Mothers are tired. Sisters are tired. Fathers are tired. Communities are tired.” Family mem­bers of Andrew Brown Jr. were shown only 20 sec­onds of footage from one of many body-worn cam­eras from the day he was killed, at the Pasquotank County Public Safety build­ing in Elizabeth City, N.C. on Monday, April 26, 2021

Also Tuesday, the FBI said that it has opened a fed­er­al civ­il rights inves­ti­ga­tion into Brown’s death. The FBI will work with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina and the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice. “As this is an ongo­ing inves­ti­ga­tion, we can­not com­ment fur­ther,” FBI spokes­woman Shelley Lynch said. North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein tweet­ed sup­port Tuesday for the State Bureau of Investigation’s work on the case.
“A num­ber of peo­ple have asked me to take over this pros­e­cu­tion. I want to clar­i­fy that under North Carolina law, the District Attorney, not the Attorney General, con­trols the pros­e­cu­tion of crim­i­nal cas­es,” Stein tweet­ed. “For my office to play a role in the pros­e­cu­tion, the District Attorney must request our assis­tance. My office has reached out to District Attorney Andrew Womble to offer that assis­tance, which he has acknowledged.

Lassiter was allowed to view a 20-sec­ond snip­pet of the video on Monday with Brown’s son Ferebee and Ferebee’s moth­er, Mia Ferebee. Lassiter said the video showed Brown was shot mul­ti­ple times while he sat in his vehi­cle with his hands on the steer­ing wheel, call­ing it “an exe­cu­tion.” Lassiter said she watched the video more than 10 times, tak­ing notes. “I didn’t sleep very well last night,” she said Tuesday. “I had night­mares. The images from that video stayed with me.” Though the fam­i­ly has seen the 20 sec­onds of body-worn cam­era footage, it has not been released pub­licly, despite pres­sure from law­mak­ers and civ­il rights lead­ers. Law enforce­ment agen­cies can­not release offi­cers’ body cam­era footage, so it’s up to a judge in this case, per North Carolina law.

Lassiter said the family’s legal team believes that detec­tives had been observ­ing Brown for a year, in part through the use of a cam­era mount­ed to a pole near his house. Attorneys have said offi­cials should release footage from that cam­era in addi­tion to offi­cers’ body cam­eras and a dash cam­era in a police van. Protesters have been march­ing in Elizabeth City night­ly since Brown’s shoot­ing, some­times for hours, always with dis­tanced police escorts. On Monday night, near­ly every restau­rant down­town was closed. More than 200 peo­ple marched through down­town that evening demand­ing offi­cials “Release the tape!” The News & Observer report­ed. Elizabeth City remains in a state of emer­gency, which was declared in antic­i­pa­tion of protests sur­round­ing the body-cam footage. Lassiter said Tuesday that despite the occa­sion­al busi­ness in town that has board­ed up its win­dows this week, the march­es and protests have been peace­ful. “That’s how you know, if some­thing hap­pens, if there is vio­lence, it’s not us,” Lassiter said. During Monday night’s march, Mallory Thornton of Durham used a bull­horn to call chants, and at least twice stopped to chal­lenge police offi­cers block­ing traf­fic for the crowd.

At one inter­sec­tion, Thornton and the crowd stopped and faced an offi­cer sit­ting in her car and from 20 feet away, shout­ed, “Say his name: Andrew Brown! Say his name: Andrew Brown.” The offi­cer remained in her car but appeared to laugh, and Thornton said, “It’s not fun­ny, sis­ter. That could have been your broth­er.” Seven Pasquotank County sheriff’s deputies were placed on leave fol­low­ing Brown’s death. And three oth­ers resigned, but a spokesper­son has said the res­ig­na­tions weren’t linked to the shoot­ing. Officials have not pub­licly released the names or the race of the deputies who shot Brown.( Credit ;the​new​sob​serv​er​.com) for this story.

Under What Circumstances Could This Be Good Policing?

If you pre­vi­ous­ly ignored the atroc­i­ties that American police com­mit every day against black peo­ple, I get it.
If, how­ev­er, the Derek Chauvin killing of George Floyd did not spur some­thing inside you.…..you, my dear sir/​madam, may be desen­si­tized to the violence.
I get how you could say, ‘why both­er? It’s not affect­ing me’. I total­ly get that the sheer bru­tal­i­ty of it is too much to watch if you don’t have to. I mean, how many of us haven’t scrolled past the fly-infest­ed mouths of the scrawny near-dead peo­ple in the Sudan and Darfur? We tell our­selves that view­ing those images is counter-pro­duc­tive; they live too far away, there is noth­ing we can do? But are we real­ly telling the truth, or are we sim­ply try­ing to con­vince our­selves that we can­not change it?
Many years ago, my friend “Dillo,” a man I went to the police acad­e­my with, served in the Jamaica Constabulary Force with, asked me as we chat­ted in the Bronx, “how can you crit­i­cize the police and we were such no-non­sense police officers”?
I remind­ed Dillo of that con­ver­sa­tion as we chat­ted a few weeks ago. Dillo lives in Maryland and I in New York; we laughed as we reliv­ed those moments. I respond­ed to his ques­tion with one of my own, ” Dillo, did we do any of the things these cops are doing”?
Dillo looked me dead in the eyes that beau­ti­ful sum­mer day as we sat in his father’s yard, “you are right; I hate it when you are right.”
Our con­ver­sa­tion that day was over two decades ago; at the time, there were no cell phone cam­eras, sto­ries of police abus­es were per­son­al sto­ries that were relayed word of mouth, sto­ries of per­son­al pain, indi­vid­ual sto­ries that hard­ly got men­tioned in the news­pa­pers or on tele­vi­sion. When the media did both­er to car­ry a sto­ry of police abuse, they came with heavy loads of pro-police pro­logue; they were san­i­tized by a media that felt it had to pay homage to police even in the face of their most egre­gious crimes.
Television and cable chan­nels were inun­dat­ed with cop shows; we all remem­ber the cop shows that glo­ri­fied law enforce­ment and dem­a­gogued the bad guys.
It just fol­lowed that nine­ty per­cent of the time, the cops were white, and the bad guys were black. Sure we all watched and enjoyed Magnum PI, Miami Vice, and the litany of oth­er cop shows, what we failed to real­ize, .….…yes even us blacks, at that time was the indoc­tri­na­tion val­ue of those tele­vi­sion shows that solid­i­fied in our minds what Hollywood want­ed us to mem­o­rize, white equals good, black equals bad.

HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF POLICE WORST INSTINCTS; ON WHAT PLANET COULD THIS BE JUSTIFIED OR OKAY?

YouTube player

Some argue that American Policing is [not bro­ken]; they say it is work­ing exact­ly as it was intend­ed to. I con­cur with that point of view. However, the brand of polic­ing that is occur­ring across the United States is so hor­rif­ic that there is no hope of resus­ci­tat­ing it. It is fun­da­men­tal­ly anti­thet­i­cal to the auton­o­my and dig­ni­ty of African-Americans.
The idea that offi­cers may exer­cise dis­cre­tion when deal­ing with the elder­ly, or infirm, peo­ple with men­tal issues, under­age kids, peo­ple under the influ­ence of alco­hol or drugs does not apply any­more. Far too often, we see police show up to deal with sim­ple sit­u­a­tions and make the mat­ter expo­nen­tial­ly worse because of their frag­ile egos.
Far too many cops are robot­ic oppres­sors who ele­vate shit­ty traf­fic stops they orches­trate, they then goad and intim­i­date and final­ly end up abus­ing the motorist, usu­al­ly peo­ple of col­or, to gain felony arrests or worse, the dri­ver ends up dead at the hands of police for hav­ing com­mit­ted no crime, no offense.
Tasers are used to exact pun­ish­ment for con­tempt of cop, guns for lit­tle girls with knives, for a black man who dares to offend bul­lets to the back is the accept­ed punishment.
The American cop is now judge, jury, and exe­cu­tion­er, the judi­cial sys­tem mere­ly rub­ber-stamp the atrocities.
The police are not the only part of the equa­tion that’s rot­ten; it runs the gamut from the low-lev­el cops on the beat all the way to the leg­is­la­ture, the Governor’s man­sions, and all the way to the top at the fed­er­al lev­el. See; https://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​L​a​r​r​y​_​K​r​a​s​ner.
The cor­po­rate media does lit­tle or no report­ing on police mis­con­duct across the United States, save and except for the snip­pets flashed across their tele­vi­sion screens for a few sec­onds, before mov­ing on to oth­er fluff pieces. Nowadays, they are forced to report on the inci­dents of police vio­lence not out of jour­nal­is­tic pru­dence but out of necessity.
The pub­lic’s atten­tion is focused on social media nowa­days; there, events are uploaded in real-time, gar­ner­ing mil­lions of eyeballs.
But for inde­pen­dent report­ing from cit­i­zen jour­nal­ists, in the lynch­ing of George Floyd and the brav­ery and pres­ence of 17-year-old Darnella Frazier, the world would nev­er get to see what the police are doing. PBS has done good report­ing of late notice­ably in its project (Philly DA), speak­ing of District Attorney Larry Krasner.
Other pub­lic report­ing orga­ni­za­tions and blogs have now begun to focus on the prob­lem. Still, noth­ing has been more effec­tive than the cit­i­zen jour­nal­ists who have stood their ground and record­ed with their mobile phones.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

California Deputy Shoots Black Man Within A Minute

THEY KILL BECAUSE THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH IT, NOT BECAUSE IT IS RIGHT OR EVEN NECESSARY.

A white sheriff’s deputy in the San Francisco Bay Area shot and killed a Black man in the mid­dle of a busy inter­sec­tion about a minute after try­ing to stop him on sus­pi­cion of throw­ing rocks at cars last month, the new­ly released video showed.
Graphic body cam­era footage show­ing Deputy Andrew Hall shoot­ing Tyrell Wilson, 33, with­in sec­onds of ask­ing him to drop a knife was released Wednesday, the same day pros­e­cu­tors charged Hall with manslaugh­ter and assault in the fatal shoot­ing of an unarmed Filipino man more than two years ago. The charges came a day after for­mer Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin was con­vict­ed of killing George Floyd, a Black man whose death last May helped spark a nation­al reck­on­ing over racial injus­tice and police brutality.
The new video in California shows Hall call­ing out to Wilson and walk­ing toward him on March 11 as Wilson walked away. Wilson even­tu­al­ly turns to face the deputy, hold­ing a knife, and says, “Touch me and see what’s up.”
As they stand in the inter­sec­tion, Hall asks him three times to drop the knife as Wilson motions toward his face, say­ing, “Kill me.” Hall shoots once, and Wilson drops to the ground as dri­vers watch and record video.

The entire con­fronta­tion last­ed about a minute. An attor­ney for Wilson’s fam­i­ly released anoth­er video Thursday tak­en by some­one who stopped at the inter­sec­tion. “It doesn’t seem like he was doing any­thing,” some­one says. After Hall shoots Wilson, which can be clear­ly seen in the video, anoth­er per­son says, “Oh, my God. … This dude just got shot and killed, bro.” Attorney John Burris said Hall was unnec­es­sar­i­ly aggres­sive toward Wilson, who was not caus­ing any prob­lems and was back­ing away from the deputy before he was shot with­out warn­ing. “This is a home­less man, he’s walk­ing away, mind­ing his own busi­ness. He’s basi­cal­ly say­ing go away, leave me alone,” Burris said. “You felt com­pelled to kill him.” Contra Costa County Sheriff David Livingston said the videos show Wilson was threat­en­ing Hall and was pos­si­bly throw­ing rocks at dri­vers. “He did threat­en Officer Hall,” Livingston said. “And he did start advanc­ing toward Officer Hall in the mid­dle of a major inter­sec­tion. Officers are forced to make split-sec­ond deci­sions to pro­tect them­selves and the pub­lic, and that’s what hap­pened here.” Hall worked for the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office, which was con­tract­ed by the city of Danville to pro­vide polic­ing ser­vices. Prosecutors have faced inten­si­fy­ing out­cry after Wilson’s death, with crit­ics say­ing they took too long to make a deci­sion in the 2018 killing that Hall car­ried out. The deputy shot 33-year-old Laudemar Arboleda nine times dur­ing a slow-mov­ing car chase.

Burris, who also is rep­re­sent­ing Arboleda’s fam­i­ly, said that if pros­e­cu­tors had act­ed more quick­ly in the Arboleda case, Wilson might still be alive. Burris said both men were men­tal­ly ill. The Contra Costa County dis­trict attorney’s office said it charged Hall with felony vol­un­tary manslaugh­ter and felony assault with a semi-auto­mat­ic firearm in Arboleda’s death. “Officer Hall used unrea­son­able and unnec­es­sary force when he respond­ed to the in-progress traf­fic pur­suit involv­ing Laudemer Arboleda, endan­ger­ing not only Mr. Arboleda’s life but the lives of his fel­low offi­cers and cit­i­zens in the imme­di­ate area,” District Attorney Diana Becton said in a news release.
Hall’s attor­ney, Harry Stern, said pros­e­cu­tors pre­vi­ous­ly deemed the deputy’s use of force in the 2018 case jus­ti­fied, “giv­en the fact that he was defend­ing him­self from a lethal threat. The tim­ing of their sud­den rever­sal in decid­ing to file charges seems sus­pect and overt­ly polit­i­cal.” Deputies slow­ly pur­sued Arboleda through the city of Danville after some­one report­ed a sus­pi­cious per­son in November 2018. The sheriff’s depart­ment video shows Hall stop­ping his patrol car, get­ting out, and run­ning toward the sedan dri­ven by Arboleda. Hall opened fire and kept shoot­ing as Arboleda’s car passed by, strik­ing him nine times. Hall tes­ti­fied at an inquest that he was afraid Arboleda would run him over. The dis­trict attorney’s office says Wilson’s shoot­ing is being investigated.

Ignore The Murder Stats, Anderson’s Performance Is About Other Measurables…

Now that a sim­ple release of the infor­ma­tion has addressed the vex­ing issue of the police com­mis­sion­er’s salary, it begs anoth­er question.
What exact­ly are the rea­sons that these kinds of infor­ma­tion are not avail­able to the pub­lic through cod­i­fied laws?
Other ques­tions include the pow­er giv­en to the Office of the Service Commission (OCS) to decide out­side the peo­ple’s say-so, whether the infor­ma­tion is released to the public.
On its face, it appears that we are not a coun­try of laws but one in which the tax­pay­ers are mere serfs; the lumpen that pro­duces the resources through their hard work, but which gets no say in the decision-making.
The Salaries of the Commissioner of Police, oth­er Senior Officers of the JCF, and oth­er pub­lic ser­vants, should not be a secret. If not for the amount they are paid, (of course, the pub­lic pre­vi­ous­ly had no idea how much), but for account­abil­i­ty and mea­sur­a­bil­i­ty. The secre­cy around those con­tract details and the reluc­tance to release those details to the tax-pay­ing pub­lic were not hall­marks of a demo­c­ra­t­ic society.
Jamaicans have always need­ed to know just how much the nation’s top secu­ri­ty offi­cials are being paid, and cor­rect­ly so. Even when not for­mal­ly edu­cat­ed, the peo­ple are ful­ly edu­cat­ed in their under­stand­ing of the need for account­abil­i­ty on this all-impor­tant issue of nation­al security.
Jamaicans, even the least for­mal­ly edu­cat­ed, under­stand the cost of vio­lent crime, the trau­ma it pro­duces to fam­i­lies and vic­tims who are left behind to pick up the pieces. This is so, even though not every­one may ful­ly appre­ci­ate the eco­nom­ic and soci­etal cost crime impos­es on the nation.
Consequently, the job per­for­mance of the Commissioner of police has always been tied to the crime sta­tis­tics; in fact, every sin­gle Commissioner of Police has been hired and fired sole­ly based on the crime sta­tis­tics. This is not a nov­el con­cept, it is the met­ric used across the board even in devel­oped soci­eties. What else is there?
Since com­mis­sion­er Antony Anderson was hired the nation has been kept in the dark about the terms of his con­tract. This is cer­tain­ly not Anderson’s fault, it goes to a lack of laws and accountability.
But at the end of Anderon’s first con­tract peri­od and the begin­ning of anoth­er, it can­not be that a small bunch of elites alone gets to decide whether Anderson did a good job, or gets to change the met­ric of mea­sure­ment pre­vi­ous­ly used to decide suc­cess and fail­ure, we do not live in a dictatorship.

It is hard­ly the amount that the Commissioner is paid. The $18 mil­lion pay pack­age is hard­ly a block­buster salary, (if the num­ber giv­en is cor­rect); you can nev­er trust what they tell you in Jamaica; it has to be about his performance.
It is the barom­e­ter that all ser­vants of the pub­lic are mea­sured by. Performance is what pri­vate-sec­tor employ­ees are mea­sured by; it is what gov­ern­men­tal admin­is­tra­tions are mea­sured by.
The shock­ing real­i­ty is that we are now being told that Antony Anderson should not be judged by the same stan­dards that oth­ers before him were, but we should not wor­ry about the num­ber of dead bod­ies; we should focus on oth­er things that they in their infi­nite wis­dom decree as per­for­mance indicators.
Local media report­ed that Gordon Shirley, who heads the ser­vice com­mis­sion, says that the com­mis­sion has month­ly meet­ings with the police com­mis­sion­er that deal with the force’s per­for­mance and Anderson’s own role.
Professor Gordon Shirley is a for­mer head of the University of the West Indies UWI). Another so-called secu­ri­ty expert[sic] Professor Anthony Clayton, you guessed it .….. from the UWI chimed in that quote; “The grav­i­ty of the crime prob­lem, linked to issues such as poor par­ent­ing and socio-eco­nom­ic and polit­i­cal fac­tors, means com­mis­sion­ers like Anderson face an uphill task and could jus­ti­fy even more pay for the for­mer nation­al secu­ri­ty advisor.”
So true, but what about account­abil­i­ty? No men­tion of the crime sta­tis­tics but a case for even bet­ter pay for Anderson.
Why were the for­mer mem­bers who slaved their entire adult lives in the JCF not giv­en the same def­er­ence and understanding?

According to the Gleaner, Howard Mitchell, who was among the crit­ics of the OSC’s deci­sion to ini­tial­ly block access to the con­tract, and Rear Admiral Lewin sup­port­ed the prin­ci­ple of dis­clo­sure but cau­tioned against reveal­ing the per­for­mance tar­gets. “Targets are going to be a slid­ing thing. You’ve got to appre­ci­ate that cir­cum­stances and con­di­tions change, and those things can have an effect on tar­gets,” Lewin said, adding that he did not recall nego­ti­at­ing his terms of ref­er­ence with the per­ma­nent sec­re­tary dur­ing his tenure. “One has to be real­is­tic and care­ful about tar­gets. I know what peo­ple will imme­di­ate­ly think about is the num­ber of mur­ders and shoot­ings. You don’t want to get into a posi­tion that the first thing you try to do is cre­ate dif­fer­ent squads because you are being pushed. It’s not just a ques­tion of sta­tis­tics,” said the for­mer commissioner.
“It is not a ques­tion of sta­tis­tics”? What is it about? Dead bod­ies do not count?
The sad real­i­ty is that Antony Anderson has friends in high places, some­thing many of the for­mer top cops did not have, even though they may have attend­ed the same putrid pool of intel­lec­tu­al dishonesty.
His friends are now ask­ing the Jamaican peo­ple to ignore the sole met­ric that defines per­for­mance and focus instead on a non-dis­tin­guish­able met­ric defined by them.
The gall of such a the­o­ry is stun­ning in its capri­cious­ness. In a recent report on his tenure, the Gleaner reports that Anderson not­ed mur­der reduc­tions in com­mu­ni­ties where SOEs were declared, the arrest of 167 gang­sters, and a clear-up rate (when the police charge a sus­pect), mov­ing from 39 per­cent in 2019 to 53 per­cent in 2020.
To a for­mer mem­ber like this writer, using the clear-up rate as a per­for­mance mark­er for the com­mis­sion­er is the equiv­a­lence of a drown­ing man clutch­ing at straws. If the clear-up rate is to define any­one’s suc­cess it ought to go to the detec­tives and oth­er offi­cers who remove vio­lent crim­i­nals from the streets, not the CP.
The truth is that using the stats from areas where SOEs were declared is decep­tive and dis­hon­est. Crime does go down in areas in which SOEs are declared, but they spike in oth­er areas as crime pro­duc­ers move to oth­er turfs.
Never before has a police com­mis­sion­er been judged because crime went down in a sin­gle area. The Police com­mis­sion­er is head of secu­ri­ty for the entire coun­try, not for areas in which SOEs are declared.
This attempt to dis­tort the nar­ra­tive on Anderson’s behalf is almost laugh­able in its weakness.
Absent from these dis­cus­sions are the views of the career offi­cers who have come up through the ranks, past and present.
We now have a police force that is ful­ly con­trolled by the views of left­ist elites from the University of the West Indies.
Success is what they say it is; ignore the dead bodies.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Democrats Overly Justified In Adding Four Justices To The Supreme Court

SO MUCH FOR ROBERTSBALLS AND STRIKES’, THE COURT THAT BEARS HIS NAME ISRIGHT-WING RUBBER-STAMP THAT NEEDS TO BE BALANCED OUT.

Some pro­gres­sives made a case for adding jus­tices to the Supreme Court even before the 2020 elec­tions. The log­ic being that in 2016 after right-wing con­ser­v­a­tive jurist Antonin Scalia tran­si­tioned and President Barack Obama nom­i­nat­ed then appeals court Merrick Garland, Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell blocked Garland’s advance­ment to the high­est court.
Before Scalia’s pass­ing, the court’s make­up was slant­ed Republican, by virtue of the pres­i­dent who nom­i­nat­ed them to the court.
Conservatives Chief Justice John Roberts. Clarence Thomas. Samuel Alito. Anthony Kennedy. Antonin Scalia Conservative.
Liberals, Stephen Breyer. Sonia Sotomayor. Elena Kagan. Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Replacing Antonin Scalia with a mod­er­ate like the now Attorney General Merrick Garland would have tilt­ed the courts 5 – 4 major­i­ty to the Democrats, some­thing Mitch McConnell would do any­thing to stop. And so he refused to meet with judge Garland, refused to hold hear­ings to move Garland’s nom­i­na­tion for­ward, and sub­se­quent­ly, judge Garland was denied an up or down vote, as is the rule in the advice and con­sent role of the United States Senate.

Mitch McConnell

Bitch McConnell claimed that it was an elec­tion year, and the vot­ers should decide which pres­i­dent chose Scalia’s replacement.
That was not a rule; it was a McConnell rule. Donald Trump found his way into the Presidency, and he placed Neil Gorsuch on the court instead of Judge Garland. Kennedy then retired (how con­ve­nient), and he report­ed­ly rec­om­mend­ed that Brett Kavanaugh be his replace­ment. Kavanaugh was on the court.
And then some­thing hap­pened that lib­er­als, Democrats, and even inde­pen­dents feared; on September 18th, 2020, at age 87, Ruth Bader Ginsburg transitioned.
The Presidential elec­tions were to be held on November 3, 2020; nev­er­the­less, despite less than two months from the pres­i­den­tial elec­tions, Mitch McConnell changed the rules again and decid­ed that he would ram through Amey Coney Barrett, and placed her on the court.
The call from some Progressive quar­ters to place four addi­tion­al jus­tices on the court to bal­ance what Mitch McConnell has done is not only moral­ly jus­ti­fied; it is legal­ly permissible.
President Biden did not promise to add jus­tices to the court; he said in typ­i­cal wishy-washy Democratic fash­ion, how­ev­er, that he would con­vene a com­mis­sion to study the issue.

John Roberts

In the mean­time, the lop­sided 6 – 3 con­ser­v­a­tive court has steadi­ly gone about dis­man­tling set­tled laws. Even as far back as 2013, Chief Justice John Roberts joined Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Kennedy in strik­ing down sec­tion 4(b) of the land­mark 1965 Voting Rights Act.
As a Reagan Administration aide John Roberts was long opposed to the rights of African-Americans to vote. John Roberts knew that by strik­ing down the vot­ing rights act, he was open­ing the door for a mas­sive Republican assault on the vot­ing rights of African-Americans. But this was one of the life­long goals of John Roberts.
Roberts claimed that there are no Republican or Democratic Judges; they only call balls and strikes Roberts said, smil­ing. Isn’t it fun­ny how these guys are con­fi­dent that they are vast­ly intel­lec­tu­al­ly supe­ri­or to every­one else?
The sad real­i­ty is that most of the court’s deci­sions under John Roberts have been 5 – 4 deci­sions straight par­ty lines. So much for balls and strikes.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg wrote scathing dis­sents against the Republica major­i­ty’s rul­ings while she was alive, so too has jus­tice Elena Kagan, but jus­tice Sonia Sotomayor an Obama nom­i­nee, has been point­ed in her dis­sent­ing opin­ions, and she did not hold back in her dis­sent to the deci­sion writ­ten by none oth­er than Brett Kavanaugh in the case Mississippi Vs. Jones.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday made it eas­i­er for states to impose sen­tences of life in prison with­out parole on juve­nile offend­ers, rul­ing against a Mississippi man con­vict­ed of killing his grand­fa­ther at age 15 in a case test­ing the Constitution’s Eighth Amendment ban on cru­el and unusu­al punishment.

Brett Kavanaugh

In a 6 – 3 rul­ing, the jus­tices reject­ed argu­ments by the inmate, Brett Jones, that his sen­tence of life in prison with no chance of parole vio­lat­ed the Eighth Amendment because the judge in his tri­al had not made a sep­a­rate find­ing that he was per­ma­nent­ly incor­ri­gi­ble. The court’s six con­ser­v­a­tive jus­tices were in the major­i­ty, with the three lib­er­al mem­bers dissenting.
So there you have it, balls and strikes; all of the con­ser­v­a­tives cow­ards lined up and decid­ed that it is per­fect­ly okay for kids who com­mit crimes as chil­dren should have no recourse to redemp­tion regard­less of what they have accom­plished in rehabilitation.
Kavanaugh, whose very exis­tence on the court was made pos­si­ble because the indis­cre­tions he was alleged to have com­mit­ted as a young­ster in col­lege, were not allowed by Trump to be inves­ti­gat­ed by the FBI, was the man who penned the deci­sion of the majority.
I guess only young white men are [enti­tled] to redemp­tion? Oh, come on, Mike, is this new to you?
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the dis­sent­ing opin­ion for the three lib­er­als on the court.
Below is an extract from that opinion.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

A Glimpse At The Astonishing Amount Of Unarmed Black People Police Have Been Killing…

Among the many things that will be said about the con­vic­tion of Derek Chauvin is that this is a sem­i­nal moment, this is a water­shed moment, this is a defin­ing moment, this is a moment of intro­spec­tion for police departments.
No, it isn’t.
All this ver­dict rep­re­sents is a case so cold-blood­ed in its bar­barism (that [the] jury), not an all-white one in some oth­er cor­ner of Minnesota, could not turn its back, know­ing that the world was watching.
It does not mean that America is any clos­er to a reck­on­ing on race; it does not mean that American law enforce­ment will be any more judi­cious with the use of force in com­mu­ni­ties of color.
Built into how police behave in com­mu­ni­ties of col­or (black communities)is an innate belief that res­i­dents of those com­mu­ni­ties are dif­fer­ent and there­fore unde­serv­ing of respect.
The gen­er­al per­cep­tion by far too many non-Black Americans is that African-Americas have a duty to wait until they decide what mea­sure of human­i­ty they should enjoy (if any). It is an arro­gant per­cep­tion that would con­demn Black peo­ple to accept a per­ma­nent state of sec­ond-class cit­i­zen­ship, even after over four hun­dred years of geno­cide and oppression.
Not all police offi­cers who work in Black neigh­bor­hoods are bad peo­ple; how­ev­er, it does mean that there is an unde­ni­ably wide chasm between the world-views of the two groups. The con­se­quences of those two com­pet­ing views get played out in the con­stant police killings of inno­cent Blacks.

Police offi­cers do not oper­ate with near­ly the same care when inter­act­ing with African-Americans as they do when deal­ing with whites.
A Black com­plainant calls the police about an alter­ca­tion with some­one white, which usu­al­ly results in police treat­ing the black caller as the offend­er and the white as the vic­tim when they arrive. Their first instinct is to go to the white per­son to get his/​her ver­sion of events, and there­after their reac­tions are shaped by the offend­er’s side of the story.
Police units in pre­dom­i­nant­ly black neigh­bor­hoods are prepped that the cit­i­zens are bar­bar­ians unwor­thy of respect.
The vast major­i­ty of police calls are [not] calls about the com­mis­sion of crimes.
For exam­ple, a recent­ly released dis­patch by the New Haven, Connecticut police shows that less than 4.4% of calls to their 911 sys­tem were for calls about assault, gun­fire, rob­bery, rape, stab­bing, mur­der, or per­son shot.
Over a whop­ping 95.6% of those calls were for ser­vice that requires no vio­lence and does not include the need for violence.
The ques­tion then remains, why are armed agents of the state being sent to these calls?
In June 2020, a New York Times arti­cle titled (How Do the Police Actually Spend Their Time?) asked, “what share of polic­ing is devot­ed to han­dling vio­lent crime? Perhaps not as much as you might think. A hand­ful of cities post data online show­ing how their police depart­ments spend their time. The share devot­ed to han­dling vio­lent crime is very small, about 4 percent.

Despite the killings and assaults, and the con­vic­tion of Chauvin, I doubt seri­ous­ly whether police offi­cers are say­ing,’ geez, I got­ta show more respect to the black peo­ple I come across”.
I doubt­ed whether the cop who put four bul­lets into the body of 16-year old Ma’Khia Bryant would have shot a young white girl even though she had a knife and, in all prob­a­bil­i­ty, may have stabbed the oth­er girl with it.
Again I ask do you use lethal force because you know you will get away with it, or do you use it because you are con­vinced that it is your only option?
The idea being pop­u­lar­ized by police depart­ments is that [force] means dead­ly force. This is not true; there are vary­ing degrees of force; this is why offi­cers are equipped with batons, pep­per-spray tasers, and guns.
The lev­el of force that police use should only be enough to sub­due an unruly sub­ject. That force does not have to be equal to the lev­el of resis­tance com­ing from an offend­er; it can be greater but just enough to gain control.
For exam­ple, after George Floyd was hand­cuffed, the police offi­cers had no legal author­i­ty to keep him on the ground with their knees on his neck and back.
The lev­el of force applied does [not]have to be lethal; force does not go from zero to a hun­dred. The offi­cer who shot 16-year old Ma’Khia Bryant had every right to use force to stop her from stab­bing anoth­er per­son; whether he made the right deci­sion when he decid­ed to go to lethal force as the first option is the issue?

YouTube player

Were Sheriff’s deputies jus­ti­fied in shoot­ing Andrew Brown Jr. to death, a Black res­i­dent of Elizabeth City, North Carolina, on Wednesday, April 21st, when they tried to serve him with a search war­rant about 8:40 a.m? Why did they not shoot Alvin Oeltjenbruns a white man, after he hit one cop in the head with a ham­mer and drove away in the video above?
Was a cop jus­ti­fied in killing 12-year-old Tamir Rice imme­di­ate­ly on arrival on the scene as the kid played in the park with his toy gun? What 12-year-old boy has not played cops and rob­bers with their toy gun grow­ing up? Should a child who is play­ing with a toy gun wor­ry about being killed by police?
Was police jus­ti­fied in chok­ing Eric Garner to death for sell­ing loose cig­a­rettes? Was police jus­ti­fied in killing Sandra Blan over not sig­nal­ing a right turn? Was police jus­ti­fied in Firing over twen­ty bul­lets into 23-year-old Sean Bell’s car, killing him on the day he was sup­posed to be mar­ried? Was the police jus­ti­fied in mur­der­ing Amadou Diallo when they fired a total of forty-one bil­lets, end­ing his life for absolute­ly no rea­son? What about the mon­sters who arrived and imme­di­ate­ly killed John Crawford (111)inside a Walmart because he had a rifle? Walmart sells the guns; Crawford was look­ing at the guns?
Was Police jus­ti­fied when they mur­dered Philando Castile inside his car with his girl­friend and her daugh­ter? What about Alton Sterling? Botham Scheme Jean, was the cop jus­ti­fied when he placed sev­en bul­lets into the back of Jacob Blake? Why would a taser not work?
What if they had no guns? Would they not resolve each sit­u­a­tion with­out the use of force?
What we hear these days com­ing from Police Chiefs and cop-apol­o­gists is,” please stop run­ning away from police.” “If only he/​she did not run.”
As a for­mer Police Officer, I did not rel­ish hav­ing to chase down a sus­pect, but I also under­stood that no one wants to lose their free­dom. In the United States, where it has been gov­ern­ment pol­i­cy to crim­i­nal­ize and incar­cer­ate Blacks, why would any­one be sur­prised that peo­ple run away from spend­ing months in for-prof­it jails and pris­ons because they were unable to pay for hav­ing a bro­ken tail-light or mak­ing a turn with­out signaling?
Their ances­tors had no prob­lem with the bru­tal­i­ty, and the muti­la­tion met­ed out to enslaved peo­ple who dared to run away from a life­time of servi­tude and geno­ci­dal abuse. They risked being beat­en to an inch of their lives; count­less were killed, they risked being torn to shreds by the vicious dogs import­ed from Cuba specif­i­cal­ly to hunt them down; still, they ran.
Why would he run away? His mas­ter treat­ed him well”?.
Unless you know the sto­ry .…..shut your mouth.

The war has moved from the provinces of Iraq & Afghanistan to the streets of the United States; the vic­tims are Black & Brown, all unarmed.
It is a ver­i­ta­ble Vietnam wall of bod­ies, the bod­ies of liv­ing breath­ing American cit­i­zens gunned down, run over, elec­tro­cut­ed, choked, beat­en, and oth­er­wise mur­dered by American police.
This list rep­re­sents only some of the vic­tims over the last decade. It is impor­tant that before cam­eras on cell phones and body cam videos, there was no account­ing by police depart­ments when they kill some­one. The Federal Bureau of Investigations had no data­base of the killings because there are no laws com­pelling police depart­ments to report the killings to Federal authorities.
The list below does not account for armed peo­ple. It rep­re­sents unarmed Black people.

Daunte Demetrius Wright, October 27, 2000 — April 11, 2021. Marvin David Scott III, 1995 — March 14, 2021. Patrick Lynn Warren Sr., October 7, 1968 — January 10, 2021.Vincent “Vinny” M. Belmonte, September 14, 2001 — January 5, 2021. Angelo Quinto, March 10, 1990 — December 26, 2020. Andre Maurice Hill, May 23, 1973 — December 22, 2020. Casey Christopher Goodson Jr., January 30, 1997 — December 4, 2020.Angelo “AJ” Crooms, May 15, 2004 — November 13, 2020.Sincere Pierce, April 2, 2002 — November 13, 2020. Marcellis Stinnette, June 17, 2001 — October 20, 2020. Jonathan Dwayne Price, November 3, 1988 — October 3, 2020. Dijon Durand Kizzee, February 5, 1991 — August 31, 2020. Rayshard Brooks, January 31, 1993 — June 12, 2020. Carlos Carson, May 16, 1984 — June 6, 2020. David McAtee, August 3, 1966 — June 1, 2020. Tony “Tony the Tiger” McDade, 1982 — May 27, 2020. George Perry Floyd, October 14, 1973 — May 25, 2020. Dreasjon “Sean” Reed, 1999 — May 6, 2020. Michael Brent Charles Ramos, January 1, 1978 — April 24, 2020. Daniel T. Prude, September 20, 1978 — March 30, 2020. Breonna Taylor, June 5, 1993 — March 13, 2020. Manuel “Mannie” Elijah Ellis, August 28, 1986 — March 3, 2020. William Howard Green, March 16, 1976 — January 27, 2020. John Elliot Neville, 1962 — December 4, 2019. Atatiana Koquice Jefferson, November 28, 1990 — October 12, 2019. Elijah McClain, February 25, 1996 — August 30, 2019. Ronald Greene, September 28, 1969 — May 10, 2019. Javier Ambler, October 7, 1978 — March 28, 2019. Sterling Lapree Higgins, October 27, 1981 — March 25, 2019. Gregory Lloyd Edwards, September 23, 1980 — December 10, 2018. Emantic “EJ” Fitzgerald Bradford Jr., June 18, 1997 — November 22, 2018. Charles “Chop” Roundtree Jr., September 5, 2000 — October 17, 2018. Chinedu Okobi, February 13, 1982 — October 3, 2018. Anton Milbert LaRue Black, October 18, 1998 — September 15, 2018. Botham Shem Jean, September 29, 1991 — September 6, 2018. Antwon Rose Jr., July 12, 2000 — June 19, 2018. Saheed Vassell, December 22, 1983 — April 4, 2018. Stephon Alonzo Clark, August 10, 1995 — March 18, 2018. Dennis Plowden Jr., 1992 — December 28, 2017. Bijan Ghaisar, September 4, 1992 — November 27, 2017. Aaron Bailey, 1972 — June 29, 2017. Charleena Chavon Lyles, April 24, 1987 — June 18, 2017The Fetus of Charleena Chavon Lyles (14−15 weeks), June 18, 2017. Jordan Edwards, October 25, 2001 — April 29, 2017. Chad Robertson, 1992 — February 15, 2017. Deborah Danner, September 25, 1950 — October 18, 2016. Alfred Olango, July 29, 1978 — September 27, 2016. Terence Crutcher, August 16, 1976 — September 16, 2016. Terrence LeDell Sterling, July 31, 1985 — September 11, 2016. Korryn Gaines, August 24, 1993 — August 1, 2016. Joseph Curtis Mann, 1966 — July 11, 2016. Philando Castile, July 16, 1983 — July 6, 2016. Alton Sterling, June 14, 1979 — July 5, 2016. Bettie “Betty Boo” Jones, 1960 — December 26, 2015. Quintonio LeGrier, April 29, 1996 — December 26, 2015. Corey Lamar Jones, February 3, 1984 — October 18, 2015. Jamar O’Neal Clark, May 3, 1991 — November 16, 2015. Jeremy “Bam Bam” McDole, 1987 — September 23, 2015. India Kager, June 9, 1988 — September 5, 2015. Samuel Vincent DuBose, March 12, 1972 — July 19, 2015. Sandra Bland, February 7, 1987 — July 13, 2015. Brendon K. Glenn, 1986 — May 5, 2015. Freddie Carlos Gray Jr., August 16, 1989 — April 19, 2015. Walter Lamar Scott, February 9, 1965 — April 4, 2015. Eric Courtney Harris, October 10, 1971 — April 2, 2015. Phillip Gregory White, 1982 — March 31, 2015. Mya Shawatza Hall, December 5, 1987 — March 30, 2015. Meagan Hockaday, August 27, 1988 — March 28, 2015. Tony Terrell Robinson, Jr., October 18, 1995 — March 6, 2015. Janisha Fonville, March 3, 1994 — February 18, 2015. Natasha McKenna, January 9, 1978 — February 8, 2015. Jerame C. Reid, June 8, 1978 — December 30, 2014. Rumain Brisbon, November 24, 1980 — December 2, 2014. Tamir Rice, June 15, 2002 — November 22, 2014.
Akai Kareem Gurley, November 12, 1986 — November 20, 2014. Tanisha N. Anderson, January 22, 1977 — November 13, 2014. Dante Parker, August 14, 1977 — August 12, 2014. Ezell Ford, October 14, 1988 — August 11, 2014. Michael Brown Jr., May 20, 1996 — August 9, 2014. John Crawford III, July 29, 1992 — August 5, 2014. Tyree Woodson, July 8, 1976 — August 2, 2014. Eric Garner, September 15, 1970 — July 17, 2014. Dontre Hamilton, January 20, 1983 — April 30, 2014. Victor White III, September 11, 1991 — March 3, 2014. Gabriella Monique Nevarez, November 25, 1991 — March 2, 2014. Yvette Smith, December 18, 1966 — February 16, 2014. McKenzie J. Cochran, August 25, 1988 — January 29, 2014. Jordan Baker, 1988 — January 16, 2014. Andy Lopez, June 2, 2000 — October 22, 2013. Miriam Iris Carey, August 12, 1979 — October 3, 2013. Barrington “BJ” Williams, 1988 — September 17, 2013. Jonathan Ferrell, October 11, 1989 — September 14, 2013. Carlos Alcis, 1970 — August 15, 2013. Larry Eugene Jackson Jr., November 29, 1980 — July 26, 2013. Kyam Livingston, July 29, 1975 — July 21, 2013. Clinton R. Allen, September 26, 1987 — March 10, 2013. Kimani “KiKi” Gray, October 19, 1996 — March 9, 2013. Kayla Moore, April 17, 1971 — February 13, 2013. Jamaal Moore Sr., 1989 — December 15, 2012. Johnnie Kamahi Warren, February 26, 1968 — February 13, 2012.Shelly Marie Frey, April 21, 1985 — December 6, 2012. Darnisha Diana Harris, December 11, 1996 — December 2, 2012. Timothy Russell, December 9. 1968 — November 29, 2012. Malissa Williams, June 20, 1982 — November 29, 2012. Noël Palanco, November 28, 1989 — October 4, 2012. Reynaldo Cuevas, January 6, 1992 — September 7, 2012.Chavis Carter, 1991 — July 28, 2012. Alesia Thomas, June 1, 1977 — July 22, 2012. Shantel Davis, May 26, 1989 — June 14, 2012. Sharmel T. Edwards, October 10, 1962 — April 21, 2012. Tamon Robinson, December 21, 1985 — April 18, 2012. Ervin Lee Jefferson, III, 1994 — March 24, 2012. Kendrec McDade, May 5, 1992 — March 24, 2012. Rekia Boyd, November 5, 1989 — March 21, 2012. Shereese Francis, 1982 — March 15, 2012. Jersey K. Green, June 17, 1974 — March 12, 2012. Wendell James Allen, December 19, 1991 — March 7, 2012. Nehemiah Lazar Dillard, July 29, 1982 — March 5, 2012. Dante’ Lamar Price, July 18, 1986 — March 1, 2012. Raymond Luther Allen Jr., 1978 — February 29, 2012. Manual Levi Loggins Jr., February 22, 1980 — February 7, 2012. Ramarley Graham, April 12, 1993 — February 2, 2012. Kenneth Chamberlain Sr., April 12, 1943 — November 19, 2011. Alonzo Ashley, June 10, 1982 — July 18, 2011. Derek Williams, January 23, 1989 — July 6, 2011. Raheim Brown, Jr., March 4, 1990 — January 22, 2011. Reginald Doucet, June 3, 1985 — January 14, 2011. Derrick Jones, September 30, 1973 — November 8, 2010. Danroy “DJ” Henry Jr., October 29, 1990 — October 17, 2010. Aiyana Mo’Nay Stanley-Jones, July 20, 2002 — May 16, 2010. Steven Eugene Washington, September 20, 1982 — March 20, 2010. Aaron Campbell, September 7, 1984 — January 29, 2010. Kiwane Carrington, July 14, 1994 — October 9, 2009. Victor Steen, November 11, 1991 — October 3, 2009. Shem Walker, March 18, 1960 — July 11, 2009. Oscar Grant III, February 27, 1986 — January 1, 2009.

It is incon­ceiv­able that cops have decid­ed to stop tar­get­ing African-American motorists sole­ly based on their skin color.
The way police behave can­not be decou­pled from the foun­da­tion­al prin­ci­ple on which polic­ing was built in the first place. Policing came from slave catch­ing. I sup­pose I sound like a bro­ken record, so be it. Regardless of the fan­cy uni­forms and the ties and all the new accou­ter­ments, police are basi­cal­ly lit­tle more than a blue line that sep­a­rates the races.
They are trained to fire mul­ti­ple bul­lets to stop a 16-year-old girl with a knife but not to fire once at a 61-year-old white male who assault­ed civil­ians, struck a cop in the head with a ham­mer, and drove away, almost killing anoth­er cop.
The lack of respect they feel for African-Americans embold­ens them to kill any black per­son for con­tempt of cop, but han­dle white mass ‑mur­der­ers with respect.
This is not about peo­ple com­mit­ting crimes; it is about peo­ple who are inher­ent­ly racist being trained as police offi­cers and giv­en the pow­er of the states to kill.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Most Officers Never Fire Their Guns. But Some Kill Multiple People — And Are Still On The Job.

In Seattle, one offi­cer’s mul­ti­ple dead­ly encoun­ters offer a win­dow into this lit­tle-under­stood cor­ner of American policing.
The video is brief but dis­turb­ing: Moments after two Seattle police offi­cers kick down an apartment’s front door, a shirt­less man appears on cam­era, lum­ber­ing slow­ly toward them with a 4‑inch switch­blade in his hand.
Inside a near­by bath­room was the man’s bar­ri­cad­ed girl­friend, who had dialed 911 after she said he threat­ened her life and his own. Within 6 sec­onds, the offi­cers opened fire. Ryan Smith, a Black and Latino 31-year-old, was killed in a burst of 10 shots on May 8, 2019, accord­ing to police records.
The offi­cer who pulled the trig­ger first — and fired eight of the bul­lets that killed Smith — was Christopher Myers, 54, who has earned an array of com­men­da­tions in his three decades at the Seattle Police Department, includ­ing offi­cer of the year and a medal of hon­or. He was once her­ald­ed as an offi­cer with an “unbe­liev­able degree of patience” who cared deeply about the peo­ple on his beat.
Myers, who is white, also belongs to a rare but sig­nif­i­cant class of American law enforce­ment offi­cers: He’s used dead­ly force mul­ti­ple times in his career, fir­ing his gun in four sep­a­rate inci­dents in the last 11 years. Three peo­ple were killed in the shoot­ings and one was seri­ous­ly injured. All but one were peo­ple of color.

The Seattle Police Department declined to say whether Myers act­ed appro­pri­ate­ly in each encounter, though offi­cials gave him an award in at least one case. And accord­ing to the inde­pen­dent unit with­in the depart­ment that inves­ti­gates alle­ga­tions of wrong­do­ing, the Office of Police Accountability, only Smith’s killing was referred for review, and there was no find­ing of misconduct.
In an inter­view with NBC News, Myers attrib­uted his repeat­ed use of dead­ly force to a com­bi­na­tion of fac­tors, includ­ing threats posed by armed sus­pects, a will­ing­ness to rush toward dan­ger and a con­fi­dence honed through years of expe­ri­ence and tac­ti­cal train­ing. He denied any racial bias in the shootings.
“I don’t expect any of my calls to esca­late into shoot­ings,” he said, adding: “Unfortunately, some peo­ple don’t yield and some­times force the situation.”
Read the rest of the sto­ry here; https://​www​.nbc​news​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​u​s​-​n​e​w​s​/​m​o​s​t​-​o​f​f​i​c​e​r​s​-​n​e​v​e​r​-​f​i​r​e​-​t​h​e​i​r​-​g​u​n​s​-​s​o​m​e​-​k​i​l​l​-​m​u​l​t​i​p​l​e​-​p​e​o​p​l​e​-​n​1​2​6​4​795

Protesters Rally After Black Man Is Killed By NC Deputies With Search Warrant Read More Here: Https://​www​.new​sob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​s​t​a​t​e​/​n​o​r​t​h​-​c​a​r​o​l​i​n​a​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​2​5​0​8​4​3​0​9​4​.​h​t​m​l​#​s​t​o​r​y​l​i​n​k​=​cpy

THESE SHOOTINGS ARE NOT ISOLATED CASES, THERE ISSYSTEM STRATEGY AFOOT BY WHITE SUPREMACISTS IN POLICE DEPARTMENTS TO SHOW WHO IS BOSS.

A Black man was shot and killed in North Carolina on Wednesday by sheriff’s deputies car­ry­ing out a search war­rant, offi­cials said, an inci­dent that drew nation­al atten­tion and dozens of pro­test­ers to the streets of Elizabeth City.
Nearly 200 peo­ple gath­ered Wednesday night in Elizabeth City to protest the death and call for justice.
Pasquotank County Sheriff Tommy Wooten iden­ti­fied the man as Andrew Brown Jr. News sta­tion WAVY report­ed that fam­i­ly mem­bers said Brown was 40 years old, but pub­lic records show he was 42.
The shoot­ing hap­pened at about 8:30 a.m. in Elizabeth City. Officials pro­vid­ed few details about the shoot­ing, say­ing the State Bureau of Investigation has tak­en over. Officials did not say what the war­rant was for, nor how many shots were fired at Brown. The deputy, who has not been iden­ti­fied, has been placed on admin­is­tra­tive leave, pend­ing the out­come of the SBI’s review, Wooten said.

As ten­sions rose through the city, Wooten said local law enforce­ment agen­cies and the State Highway Patrol came to Elizabeth City on Wednesday “to ensure the safe­ty and pro­tec­tion of the cit­i­zens in our com­mu­ni­ty.” The City Council in Elizabeth City, rough­ly 165 miles north­east of Raleigh, held an emer­gency meet­ing Wednesday evening that became emo­tion­al as coun­cil mem­bers voiced their con­cerns and fears.“There are a lot of peo­ple hurt­ing in our city,” Councilman Gabriel Adkins said at the meet­ing. “We have a lot of hurt people.“I’m afraid. You know, I mean let’s be real. We talk about trans­paren­cy, I’m gonna be trans­par­ent,” Adkins said. “I’m afraid as a Black man walk­ing around this city, dri­ving my car down the road, try­ing to make sure that I’m dri­ving the speed lim­it, try­ing to make sure that I wear my seat belt, try­ing to make sure that do every­thing right.”

NorthCarolinaDeputyShooting (8).JPG
Law enforce­ment inves­ti­gate the scene of a police involved shoot­ing, Wednesday, April 21, 2021, in Elizabeth City, N.C. A North Carolina sher­iff says the deputy who shot and killed a man while serv­ing a search war­rant has been put on leave pend­ing an inves­ti­ga­tion. Pasquotank County Sheriff Tommy Wooten II did not iden­ti­fy the deputy who fired the shot Wednesday. Stephen M. Katz THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT, AP Read more here: https://​www​.new​sob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​s​t​a​t​e​/​n​o​r​t​h​-​c​a​r​o​l​i​n​a​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​2​5​0​8​4​3​0​9​4​.​h​t​m​l​#​s​t​o​r​y​l​i​n​k​=​cpy

Officials repeat­ed­ly empha­sized that it was the Pasquotank Sheriff’s Department and not the Elizabeth City Police Department involved in the shoot­ing. Six deputies and offi­cers stood in front of the door to City Hall, block­ing pub­lic entry. Outside, a group of about 30 pro­test­ers swelled to near­ly 200 while the meet­ing was going on. Protesters took turns with a megaphone.“I grew up with Andrew Brown!” said Deshawn Morris. “I knew him! I knew his fam­i­ly! That man didn’t get his due process today. That could be you tomorrow!
About 7 p.m., coun­cil mem­bers emerged to screams and jeers, strug­gling to be heard. Councilman Darius Horton wore a Black Lives Matter shirt and assured the crowd the inves­ti­ga­tion will con­tin­ue. “If we didn’t have this emer­gency meet­ing, they wouldn’t have had this oppor­tu­ni­ty,” Councilman Michael Brooks said of the pro­test­ers. “If they would stay focused and let the SBI fin­ish the inves­ti­ga­tion. They have to vent right now. Otherwise, we’ll be fine.”During the meet­ing, Adkins remind­ed peo­ple to stay calm and trust the State Bureau of Investigation to “do its job.
Horton said at the meet­ing that offi­cials need to be trans­par­ent about what hap­pened. “We don’t have the infor­ma­tion, but it needs to be put out in the fore­front. The body cam­eras, that needs to be released imme­di­ate­ly,” he said.

Demonstrators talk with Elizabeth City Police Chief Eddie Buffaloe, Jr. out­side the Pasquotank County Public Safety Building in down­town Elizabeth City, NC Wednesday, April 21, 2022. A Pasquotank County sheriff’s deputy shot and killed Andrew Brown Jr., who is Black, on April 21, 2021 in Elizabeth City, North Carolina. Officials say they were exe­cut­ing a search war­rant about 8:30 a.m. on Perry Street. The shoot­ing is under review by the State Bureau of Investigation. Travis Long TLONG@​NEWSOBSERVER.​COM
The Pasquotank deputies involved had body-worn cam­eras, Sheriff Wooten said.
Read more here: https://​www​.new​sob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​s​t​a​t​e​/​n​o​r​t​h​-​c​a​r​o​l​i​n​a​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​2​5​0​8​4​3​0​9​4​.​h​t​m​l​#​s​t​o​r​y​l​i​n​k​=cp

The Pasquotank deputies involved had body-worn cam­eras, Sheriff Wooten said.“We will be trans­par­ent, and we will take the prop­er action based on the find­ings of [the SBI] inves­ti­ga­tion,” he said. He said he did not have a time­line for when the body-worn cam­era footage would be released. The crowd chant­ed “Say his name! Andrew Brown!” and “Hands up! Don’t shoot!” as they marched through down­town after 7 p.m. “We’re deal­ing with issues in our com­mu­ni­ties,” said Rev. Timothy Stallings Sr., lead­ing a prayer. “Personal issues! Stress issues! Life-filled issues! We need our law enforce­ment not to shoot us but to come help us out.” Some of those gath­ered were friends of Brown. “I’ve been know­ing him 30 years, and he wasn’t a vio­lent per­son,” said Daniel Bowser. “He didn’t mess with guns, he didn’t tote no guns. “I don’t care what they put out there, he didn’t deserve to die.” Martha McCullen, an aunt of Brown, told The Associated Press that she raised him after his par­ents died. “The police didn’t have to shoot my baby,” McCullen told The AP. “Andrew Brown was a good per­son. He was about to get his kids back. He was a good father. Now his kids won’t nev­er see him again.”

As the sun went down, about 100 pro­test­ers remained, crowd­ing onto busy Ehringhaus Street, tak­ing knees simul­ta­ne­ous­ly as they blocked traf­fic. They asked for Sheriff Wooten for a pub­lic account­ing of what is known and what will be inves­ti­gat­ed, promis­ing to stay peace­ful and return Thursday. “We are ask­ing for trans­paren­cy, to not have to lis­ten to rumors,” said Keith Rivers, pres­i­dent of the Pasquotank branch of the NAACP. He also said the sher­iff should be reach­ing out to Black lead­ers. “If it was a white man who was shot, would he address the white com­mu­ni­ty?” Elizabeth City offi­cials did not impose a cur­few on Wednesday but said they would con­sid­er one if need­ed. Brown’s death comes less than 24 hours after for­mer Minneapolis police offi­cer Derek Chauvin was con­vict­ed of mur­der in the death of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man. Floyd died after Chauvin kneeled on his neck for more than nine min­utes last May.

His death sparked nation­wide protests call­ing for increased police account­abil­i­ty and changes in the way offi­cers inter­act with Black peo­ple. State Rep. Howard Hunter, whose 5th District seat encom­pass­es Pasquotank County, spoke out Wednesday after­noon. “Understandably so, con­stituents are on the edge and very much dis­trust­ful of police in gen­er­al; and in light of the fact that very lit­tle infor­ma­tion has been released at this time; unfor­tu­nate­ly they may have doubts in the verac­i­ty of infor­ma­tion when released.”

About 200 demon­stra­tors march fol­low­ing an emer­gency city coun­cil meet­ing in Elizabeth City, NC Wednesday, April 21, 2022. A Pasquotank County sheriff’s deputy shot and killed Andrew Brown Jr., who is Black, on April 21, 2021 in Elizabeth City, North Carolina. Officials say they were exe­cut­ing a search war­rant about 8:30 a.m. on Perry Street. The shoot­ing is under review by the State Bureau of Investigation. Travis Long TLONG@​NEWSOBSERVER.​COM
Read more here: https://​www​.new​sob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​s​t​a​t​e​/​n​o​r​t​h​-​c​a​r​o​l​i​n​a​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​2​5​0​8​4​3​0​9​4​.​h​t​m​l​#​s​t​o​r​y​l​i​n​k​=​cpy

Situated in far north­east­ern North Carolina near the Virginia bor­der, Elizabeth City is home to about 18,000 peo­ple, near­ly half of rur­al Pasquotank County’s total pop­u­la­tion. Half of the city’s res­i­dents are Black, com­pared to about 13% statewide, accord­ing to Census Bureau data. Elizabeth City State University, a his­tor­i­cal­ly Black col­lege, can­celed class­es after 3:30 p.m. Wednesday. School offi­cials encour­aged stu­dents and staff to con­tact the coun­sel­ing cen­ter if they are in need of emo­tion­al sup­port. District Attorney Andrew Womble, whose juris­dic­tion spans sev­er­al North Carolina coun­ties, includ­ing Pasquotank, promised a thor­ough inves­ti­ga­tion. “What we are look­ing for at this time will be accu­rate answers and not fast answers,” Womble said.