Panel Discussion On Race And Police Violence In The US

YouTube player

Days ago, I wrote about the pan­dem­ic of police killings in the United States sit­ting num­bers that ought to straight­en the spine of con­sci­en­tious peo­ple everywhere.
Race rela­tions are not get­ting bet­ter in the United States; in fact, they are get­ting worse, accord­ing to the data trends.
At the cen­ter of this prob­lem stands one gov­ern­ment agency that has tak­en it upon itself to be the guardian of white suprema­cy, speak­ing of the police.
The police are not the only gov­ern­ment agency through which racism is dis­pensed to peo­ple of col­or in the United States. Racism is in every fiber, every pore of America. It is part of the DNA of the nation; nev­er­the­less, the Police is the agency that inter­acts with mem­bers of our com­mu­ni­ty with guns and the pow­er to kill us. https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​b​i​a​s​e​d​-​u​s​e​-​o​f​-​f​o​r​c​e​-​b​y​-​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​n​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​f​o​r​c​e​s​-​d​e​s​p​i​c​a​b​l​e​-​a​n​d​-​s​h​a​m​e​f​ul/

We are hav­ing a con­tin­u­ing dis­cus­sion on this impor­tant issue. 


Police bru­tal­i­ty in the United States
 is the unwar­rant­ed or exces­sive and often ille­gal use of force against civil­ians by U.S. police offi­cers. Forms of police bru­tal­i­ty have ranged from assault and bat­tery (e.g., beat­ings) to may­hem, tor­ture, and mur­der. Some broad­er def­i­n­i­tions of police bru­tal­i­ty also encom­pass harass­ment (includ­ing false arrest), intim­i­da­tion, and ver­bal abuse, among oth­er forms of mistreatment.

Americans of all races, eth­nic­i­ties, ages, class­es, and gen­ders have been sub­ject­ed to police bru­tal­i­ty. In the late 19th and ear­ly 20th cen­turies, for exam­ple, poor and work­ing-class whites expressed frus­tra­tion over dis­crim­i­na­to­ry polic­ing in north­ern cities. At about the same time, Jewish and oth­er immi­grants from south­ern and east­ern Europe also com­plained of police bru­tal­i­ty against their com­mu­ni­ties. In the 1920s many urban police depart­ments, espe­cial­ly in large cities such as New York and Chicago, used extrale­gal tac­tics against mem­bers of Italian-immi­grant com­mu­ni­ties in efforts to crack down on orga­nized crime. In 1943 offi­cers of the Los Angeles Police Department were com­plic­it in attacks on Mexican Americans by U.S. ser­vice­men dur­ing the so-called Zoot Suit Riots, reflect­ing the department’s his­to­ry of hos­til­i­ty toward Hispanics (Latinos). Regular harass­ment of homo­sex­u­als and trans­gen­der per­sons by police in New York Citycul­mi­nat­ed in 1969 in the Stonewall riots, which were trig­gered by a police raid on a gay bar; the protests marked the begin­ning of a new era of mil­i­tan­cy in the inter­na­tion­al gay rights move­ment. And in the after­math of the 2001 September 11 attacks, Muslim Americans began to voice com­plaints about police bru­tal­i­ty, includ­ing harass­ment and racial pro­fil­ing. Many local law-enforce­ment agen­cies launched covert oper­a­tions of ques­tion­able legal­i­ty designed to sur­veil and infil­trate mosques and oth­er Muslim American orga­ni­za­tions in an effort to uncov­er pre­sumed ter­ror­ists, a prac­tice that went unchecked for at least a decade.

Notwithstanding the vari­ety among groups that have been sub­ject­ed to police bru­tal­i­ty in the United States, the great major­i­ty of vic­tims have been African American. In the esti­ma­tion of most experts, a key fac­tor explain­ing the pre­dom­i­nance of African Americans among vic­tims of police bru­tal­i­ty is antiblack racism among mem­bers of most­ly white police depart­ments. Similar prej­u­dices are thought to have played a role in police bru­tal­i­ty com­mit­ted against oth­er his­tor­i­cal­ly oppressed or mar­gin­al­ized groups.

Whereas racism is thought to be a major cause of police bru­tal­i­ty direct­ed at African Americans and oth­er eth­nic groups, it is far from the only one. Other fac­tors con­cern the unique insti­tu­tion­al cul­ture of urban police depart­ments, which stress­es group sol­i­dar­i­ty, loy­al­ty, and a “show of force” approach to any per­ceived chal­lenge to an officer’s author­i­ty. For rook­ie offi­cers, accep­tance, suc­cess, and pro­mo­tion with­in the depart­ment depend upon adopt­ing the atti­tudes, val­ues, and prac­tices of the group, which his­tor­i­cal­ly have been infused with anti-black racism. (bri​tan​ni​ca​.com)

Biased Use Of Force By American Police Forces Despicable And Shameful…

YouTube player

Whether a soci­ety is demo­c­ra­t­ic or total­i­tar­i­an, it needs a body to enforce the laws or decrees. We call those who do the enforc­ing ‑the police. No mat­ter how dis­gust­ed we are with the police and want them gone, what­ev­er they are replaced with will car­ry out the same func­tions. So essen­tial­ly, we would be replac­ing the police with a new police of sorts.
So it is rea­son­able to say some polic­ing body is nec­es­sary, whether to enforce the laws in a democ­ra­cy or to sup­press the pop­u­la­tion in an autocracy.
I went to lengths to estab­lish the fore­gone because we live in a soci­ety where truth and com­mon sense are in short sup­ply. Critiquing what some peo­ple wor­ship means you are anti-that body. Not that I care about their inabil­i­ty to think crit­i­cal­ly or their will­ful igno­rance. https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​m​a​s​s​i​v​e​-​e​x​p​a​n​s​i​o​n​-​o​f​-​t​h​e​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​s​t​a​t​e​-​e​n​h​a​n​c​e​d​-​b​y​-​b​l​a​c​k​-​d​e​m​o​c​r​a​t​s​-​a​n​d​-​o​t​h​e​rs/

Police are killing peo­ple at an alarm­ing rate in the United States. Each year the num­ber of peo­ple police kill is high­er than the pre­vi­ous year. The Federal Government has not demand­ed that the 18,000-plus police depart­ments across the coun­try report to it the peo­ple they kill. The Congress, with Republican majori­ties in the House and Senate at vary­ing times, will not pass leg­is­la­tion mak­ing it manda­to­ry for police to report the num­ber of peo­ple they kill each year accu­rate­ly. Notwithstanding, as a result of pub­lic out­cry and demand for account­abil­i­ty, var­i­ous Organizations and News Organizations have start­ed keep­ing coun­ty, using death records, etc, to present to the peo­ple an idea of the body count each year.
In 2021, there were 1,048 police fatal shoot­ings. In 2022, there were 1,096 fatal police shoot­ings. As of March 27, 2023, 238 peo­ple were killed at the hands of police, 30 of the Black, accord­ing to [sta​tista​.com]. https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​n​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​p​o​s​e​-​e​x​i​s​t​e​n​t​i​a​l​-​t​h​r​e​a​t​-​t​o​-​y​o​u​n​g​-​m​e​n​-​o​f​-​c​o​l​o​r​-​s​t​u​dy/

The University of Illinois Chicago esti­mates con­ser­v­a­tive­ly 250,000 civil­ian injuries are caused by law enforce­ment offi­cers annually.
In the U.S., dur­ing a giv­en year, an esti­mat­ed 1 mil­lion civil­ians expe­ri­ence police threat of or use of force result­ing in a con­ser­v­a­tive esti­mate of 85,000 non-fatal injuries requir­ing hos­pi­tal treat­ment and 600‑1000 deaths. Both Black/African-Americans and Hispanics/​Latinos are twice as like­ly to expe­ri­ence the threat of or use of force dur­ing police-ini­ti­at­ed con­tact (Bureau of Justice Statistics). Based on CDC data, Black African-Americans are more than twice as like­ly to be killed and almost 5‑times more like­ly to suf­fer an injury requir­ing med­ical care at a hos­pi­tal com­pared to white non-Hispanics.
Black males com­prise 6.1 per­cent of the US pop­u­la­tion but 24.9 per­cent of all per­sons killed by police. https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​u​n​i​o​n​-​c​o​n​f​i​r​m​-​w​h​y​-​d​e​f​u​n​d​i​n​g​-​t​h​e​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​i​s​-​s​o​u​n​d​-​p​o​l​i​cy/

Fatal police shoot­ings of unarmed Black peo­ple in the US are more than three times as high as of Whites, accord­ing to the Journal of Epidemiology and com­mu­ni­ty health.
Many of the peo­ple shot and killed by American police are unarmed. As is expect­ed, unarmed blacks are killed at an alarm­ing­ly high­er rate than whites.
Having looked at the cir­cum­stances that pre­cede many of the shoot­ings, par­tic­u­lar­ly of Black cit­i­zens, sev­er­al experts have said deci­sive­ly that they could be avoid­ed. Those sen­ti­ments echo what I have writ­ten time and again. Police are com­mit­ting mur­der and are get­ting away with it because Prosecutors and Courts con­tin­ue to (a) move the goal­post as to what’s law­ful and (b) pull the wool over the eyes of the fam­i­lies of mur­dered victims.
I total­ly get the seri­ous­ness of each encounter that involves guns. Nevertheless, police offi­cers have been killing peo­ple unnec­es­sar­i­ly by (a) esca­lat­ing rather than de-esca­lat­ing minor or non-issues and (b) by con­tin­u­ing to shoot vic­tims after they are ren­dered life­less and then pre­tend­ing to ren­der first aid to the corpse after they cuff the already dead person.
As I have repeat­ed­ly said in pre­vi­ous arti­cles, hav­ing been taught that the pub­lic is an ene­my and that their only focus is to go home to their fam­i­lies has turned minor­i­ty com­mu­ni­ties into ver­i­ta­ble bat­tle­fields for police to exact vengeance on the poor and defenseless.

They are also trained to con­tin­ue to shoot until a threat is neu­tral­ized. However, the courts have made it abun­dant­ly clear that it is not the pre­rog­a­tive of courts to Monday- morn­ing-quar­ter­back what police do in the heat of the moment.
This has opened up a pan­do­ra’s box of sub­jec­tive abuse.
The objec­tive stan­dard is now the sub­jec­tive stan­dard of every cop with a bad atti­tude and entrenched racial animus.
The con­se­quence has been dev­as­tat­ing for the Black com­mu­ni­ty; not only that cops esca­late minor infrac­tions or no infrac­tion at all to jus­ti­fy lethal force, but with the bar­bar­ic esca­la­tion of lethal force they use long after the sub­ject of their ire is down or dead.
Here are just a cou­ple of the cas­es of which I refer.
Despite what the Police, their unions, their sup­port­ers, and the com­plic­it cor­po­rate media tell you, these are unmit­i­gat­ed acts of depraved indif­fer­ence to human life.

(1) In the ear­ly hours of February 4, 1999, an unarmed 23-year-old Guinean stu­dent named Amadou Diallo was gunned down by NYPD cops who fired a hail of 41 bul­lets at him; 19 of those bul­lets hit and killed him. Amadou Diallo had com­mit­ted no crime. Diallo was Black.


(2) On August 9, 2014, police offi­cer Darren Wilson shoots and kills Michael Brown, an unarmed Black teenag­er, in Ferguson, Missouri, a sub­urb of St. Louis. Protests and riots ensue in Ferguson and soon spread across the coun­try. Darren Wilson fired 12 shots at Michael Brown, six of which hit and killed him. Michael Brown was Black.


(3 On October 20, 2014, in Chicago, Illinois. Jason Van Dyke, a cop, fired a hail of bul­lets at Laquan McDonald, a 17-year-old boy walk­ing down the street alleged­ly with a knife in his hand. The 17-year-old was shot 16 times as he walked away from police. The Chicago Police Department and then Mayor Rahm Emanuel saw the video of the mur­der yet kept it from the pub­lic for over a year until a judge ordered them to release it. Laquan McDonald was Black.


(4) An unarmed Sean Bell was shot and killed in Queens, NY by mem­bers of the New York City Police Department on the morn­ing of November 25, 2006. Sean Bell was mur­dered on the very day he was to mar­ry his fiancé.
The cops fired over 50 bul­lets into Bell’s car, claim­ing they heard some­one say, ‘yo, get my gun,’ as Bell and his friends left a night­club. They also lied that there was a fourth man in Bell’s car who might have fled with the phan­tom gun.
There was no men­tion of a fourth per­son with Sean Bell and his two friends.
New York Daily News colum­nist Juan Gonzalez report­ed that in the hours imme­di­ate­ly after the shoot­ing, there was no men­tion of a fourth man in police calls, and no search was launched for the alleged armed man. Sean Bell was Black.

(5) June 2022 Akron, Ohio Police fired 90 plus bul­lets at a flee­ing 27-year-old Jayland Walker, who they say refused to stop dur­ing a traf­fic stop. Walker was hit with 46 bul­lets, accord­ing to the coroner.
April 2023, a white grand jury returned a no true bill, mean­ing that no cop would be held account­able for the slaugh­ter of Jayland Walker.
Walker was slaugh­tered, but he did not have a gun. Police lat­er claimed that there was a gun in his car, which meant noth­ing, even if he had a gun in his car. He was slaugh­tered with­out a gun in his hand.
Needless to say, Jaylan Walker is Black.

Here is an impor­tant bit of infor­ma­tion that cer­tain politi­cians, pros­e­cu­tors, judges, and police do not want you to know the lev­el of force that police use to sub­due a sus­pect should be pro­por­tion­al to the force used by the subject.
A flee­ing sus­pect not shoot­ing at police or some­one else pos­es no risk or dan­ger to police or the pub­lic and, there­fore, can­not be law­ful­ly gunned down by police. Killing a flee­ing per­son is not only unlaw­ful, but it is also bla­tant­ly immoral and a grotesque act of sub-human bloodlust.
Every bul­let fired after that first one that caused a sus­pect to fall to the ground is an act of mur­der. But in America, it has become the norm for a sin­gle Black man to be gunned down by police, sus­tain­ing more bul­lets than it takes to kill a ful­ly grown elephant.
The dis­re­spect­ful thing about it is that they fun­da­men­tal­ly believe we are too stu­pid to see that they have mere­ly switched from wear­ing sheets to mur­der us and have donned police uni­forms to do it.

On the oth­er hand, vio­lent white mass mur­der­er like Dylan Roof was tak­en in alive and fed a fast food lunch by ador­ing cops.
The Buffalo, New York shoot­er Payton Gendron was tak­en alive with no scratch on him.
David Depape was arrest­ed alive after a vio­lent home inva­sion and attack on Paul Pelosi, the hus­band of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in San Fransisco, California.

A 21-year-old white man is accused of using a Smith & Wesson semi­au­to­mat­ic rifle to kill sev­en peo­ple and injure more than 30 dur­ing a Fourth of July parade in Highland Park, Illinois. A cell­phone video of his arrest shows the con­trolled actions of police fol­low­ing the car­nage to take him into cus­tody safely.

The FBI recent­ly released a report on active shoot­er inci­dents that occurred in 2021, not­ing that the gun­men were killed by police in 14 of the 61 inci­dents. In 30 cas­es, the gun­men were appre­hend­ed — most at anoth­er loca­tion after the shoot­ing — and four of those inci­dents end­ed when armed and unarmed civil­ians engaged with the shoot­er to stop the threat.

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.
Check out Mike’s Podcast on Youtube @ mikebeckles

Who Exactly Are The Good Guys With Guns As People Are Being Shot Just Because?

YouTube player

Sixteen-year-old Ralph Yarl shot by an 84-year-old white man after he mis­tak­en­ly went to the man’s house intend­ing to pick up his younger sib­ling brothers.

Ralph Yarl made nation­al head­lines after the teen was shot and wound­ed on April 13 when he rang the door­bell of the wrong house in Kansas City, Missouri.
A par­ent asked the teenag­er to pick up his younger twin siblings.

Ralph had made an error com­mon in Kansas City, dri­ving to a house on Northeast 115th Street instead of Northeast 115th Terrace, a block away. He pressed the door­bell and wait­ed out­side the front door for what felt like a long time; he told the police lat­er. Andrew Lester, who had just gone to bed, got up and opened the inside door while hold­ing a revolver, accord­ing to a prob­a­ble cause state­ment from investigators.
Lester told a police offi­cer after the shoot­ing that he saw a Black male “pulling on the exte­ri­or storm door han­dle.” This was one of the few areas of dis­agree­ment: When inter­viewed by a detec­tive, Ralph said he only rang the door­bell and did not pull on the door. 

Andrew Lester pre­pares to leave court after plead­ing not guilty in the shoot­ing of 16-year-old Ralph Yarl.


Within moments, Lester began shoot­ing through the glass of the exte­ri­or storm door; afraid that a break-in was in progress, he told the police. Ralph was shot in the head and then in the arm. “Don’t come around here,” he remem­bers Lester say­ing, accord­ing to a detec­tive. He got up and ran away, try­ing to elude more gun­shots; he told the police. (From the New York Times)

Cheerleaders leav­ing prac­tice were shot after get­ting in wrong car, teen says…

Two Texas cheer­lead­ers were shot, and one of them crit­i­cal­ly injured, ear­ly Tuesday after one girl mis­tak­en­ly got into the wrong car in a gro­cery store park­ing lot.
Police arrest­ed Pedro Tello Rodriguez Jr., 25, with dead­ly con­duct, a third-degree felony, in what they called “an alter­ca­tion … in the park­ing lot of HEB” in which “mul­ti­ple shots were fired into a vehi­cle.”One of the vic­tims was iden­ti­fied by her coach as Payton Washington, an 18-year-old high school senior and cheer­leader for the Round Rock Independent School District near Austin. Washington “sus­tained seri­ous injuries” when she was shot in the back and one leg, police said. She was trans­port­ed to a hos­pi­tal by heli­copter and is in crit­i­cal condition.
The young women thought they had got­ten into the wrong car, believ­ing they were enter­ing their friend’s car, accord­ing to the reporting. 

Police in Elgin, Texas say 25-year-old Pedro Tello Rodriguez Jr. faces a third-degree felony count of dead­ly con­duct after an ear­ly-morn­ing shoot­ing in an H‑E-B park­ing lot. Elgin Police Department.


After real­iz­ing their mis­take, they exit­ed the car and then went into the right car, upon which Rodriquez approached them, they attempt­ed to apol­o­gize for the mis­take, but he respond­ed with gun­fire. “He pulled out a gun, and then he just start­ed shoot­ing at all of us, one young lady said.

Woman Shot Dead in New York After Pulling Into Wrong Driveway: Police says…

Kevin Monahan fired into the car, killing Kaylin Gillis.

Kaylin Gillis was in a car with three friends look­ing for anoth­er friend’s house in the rur­al area of Hebron, New York, on Saturday night when they mis­tak­en­ly turned down the wrong driveway.
After the vehi­cle had been in the dri­ve­way for a “very short time,” Kevin Monahan came out of the res­i­dence and fired two shots as the group of friends was exit­ing the prop­er­ty, police said. One of the shots struck Gillis.
Monahan has been charged with sec­ond-degree mur­der.

These are only a few of the events that occurred over the last few days in this cul­ture of racial ani­mus and guns. But it rep­re­sents only an infin­i­tes­i­mal and minute per­cent­age of the killings. It does not include the almost dai­ly mass shoot­ings inside church­es and oth­er places of wor­ship, schools, Gyms, night­clubs, movie the­aters, hair salons, Bars, and every­where peo­ple congregate.
This does not include the oth­er shoot­ings that occur each day that are not con­sid­ered mass events.
The polit­i­cal right has said that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. That did not help the stu­dents in Uvalde, Texas, as the so-called good guys with the guns and bul­let­proof vests hid while the shoot­er mas­sa­cred tiny children.
Who are the good guys with guns?
Is Kevin Monahan a good guy?
Is Pedro Tello Rodriguez a good guy with a. gun?
What about Andrew Lester? Is he a good guy with a. gun?

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.
Subscribe to Mike’s Podcast @ Mikebeckles- on Youtube.

787.5M Settlement For Lies, FAUX Settles With Dominion/​Justice Is Not Dead…

YouTube player

They will go on sling­ing lies and dis­in­for­ma­tion, but every time that they defame some­one, they should be tak­en to court until they are shut down. In fact, every pen­ny that the dis­in­for­ma­tion cor­po­ra­tion made should be tak­en away from them and donat­ed to char­i­ties and peo­ple they slan­dered. (mb)

»»>

Fox News and its par­ent com­pa­ny Fox Corp. have struck a deal avert­ing a tri­al in the block­buster defama­tion suit filed by the elec­tion-tech com­pa­ny Dominion Voting Systems over spu­ri­ous claims of fraud in the 2020 pres­i­den­tial race.

Judge Eric M. Davis of the Delaware Superior Court announced the set­tle­ment from the bench on Tuesday after­noon ahead of the tri­al’s sched­uled start.

The par­ties set­tled for $787,500,000 — about half of Dominion’s orig­i­nal $1.6 bil­lion ask.

The amount “rep­re­sents vin­di­ca­tion and account­abil­i­ty,” said Dominion lawyer Justin Nelson. “Lies have consequences.”

Dominion CEO John Poulos told reporters, “Fox has admit­ted to telling lies about Dominion that caused enor­mous dam­age to my com­pa­ny, our employ­ees and the cus­tomers that we serve. Nothing can ever make up for that. Throughout this process, we have sought account­abil­i­ty,” he said. “Truthful report­ing in the media is essen­tial to our democracy.”

Fox News released a state­ment short­ly after a set­tle­ment was announced.

We acknowl­edge the Court’s rul­ings find­ing cer­tain claims about Dominion to be false,” the state­ment said. “This set­tle­ment reflects FOX’s con­tin­ued com­mit­ment to the high­est jour­nal­is­tic stan­dards. We are hope­ful that our deci­sion to resolve this dis­pute with Dominion ami­ca­bly, instead of the acri­mo­ny of a divi­sive tri­al, allows the coun­try to move for­ward from these issues.”
Read the full sto­ry here:https://​www​.npr​.org/​2​0​2​3​/​0​4​/​1​8​/​1​1​7​0​3​3​9​1​1​4​/​f​o​x​-​n​e​w​s​-​s​e​t​t​l​e​s​-​b​l​o​c​k​b​u​s​t​e​r​-​d​e​f​a​m​a​t​i​o​n​-​l​a​w​s​u​i​t​-​w​i​t​h​-​d​o​m​i​n​i​o​n​-​v​o​t​i​n​g​-​s​y​s​t​ems

Behind Keith Ellison’s Tough-on-crime Turn…

YouTube player

Electing Blacks to posi­tions of pow­er does not guar­an­tee change. Hiring more Blacks and Hispanics to be cops does not improve the bro­ken cul­ture of what pass­es for pol­i­tics and polic­ing in America.
A sig­nif­i­cant amount of data bears that out, cor­rupt cops and repreg=hensible politi­cians come in all col­ors, and so do judges and every­one else. Hello Clarence Tom-Azz. (mb)

The sto­ry
By Akela Lacy of the Intercept.

The Minnesota attor­ney gen­er­al took over a mur­der case from Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty, a fel­low reformer. She accused him of play­ing politics.

PROGRESSIVES REJOICED LAST year when Democrat Keith Ellison won a tight reelec­tion race for Minnesota attor­ney gen­er­al against a police-backed oppo­nent who attacked him as being “soft on crime.”

In the same elec­tion cycle, Ellison’s ally Mary Moriarty won elec­tion as Hennepin County attor­ney, installing a reform-mind­ed pros­e­cu­tor in Minneapolis about three years after the city’s police mur­dered George Floyd. Moriarty, pre­vi­ous­ly the chief pub­lic defend­er for Hennepin County, took office in January and imple­ment­ed reforms with a focus on cor­rect­ing fail­ures in the juve­nile jus­tice system.

Now, three months into their terms, Ellison and Moriarty are no longer on the same side of the reform plat­form they once shared.

Late last month, Moriarty’s office issued new guid­ance on pros­e­cut­ing chil­dren, which was designed to keep as many kids as pos­si­ble out of the adult crim­i­nal sys­tem. Before issu­ing the guid­ance, Moriarty’s office chose not to charge two teenage broth­ers accused of mur­der as adults.

Last week, Ellison’s office inter­vened in the juve­nile mur­der case. His office described the juve­nile charges as “inap­pro­pri­ate” and request­ed that the gov­er­nor take the case away from Moriarty’s office and assign it to him. Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who was reelect­ed along with Ellison and Moriarty last November, assigned the case to Ellison on Thursday — pit­ting the two would-be reform­ers against each other.

The affair has become a tense point in what was once a round­ly promis­ing tra­jec­to­ry for reforms in Minnesota. In 2022, Ellison endorsed Moriarty, who, like him, faced a police-backed oppo­nent. And Ellison’s pop­u­lar­i­ty was pro­pelled in part by his han­dling of the pros­e­cu­tion of the cops who killed Floyd, and his cam­paign for reelec­tion cel­e­brat­ed his record on reform.

A source involved in the juris­dic­tion­al dis­pute, who request­ed anonymi­ty to dis­cuss sen­si­tive pri­vate delib­er­a­tions, said Ellison told Moriarty he need­ed to appear tough on crime for his next reelec­tion cam­paign. “The Attorney General denies hav­ing said that or any­thing like it,” said Ellison spokesper­son John Stiles.

Ellison also has a tour planned for this spring to pro­mote his upcom­ing book on end­ing the cycle of police vio­lence. Some Minnesota polit­i­cal oper­a­tives sus­pect he’s mulling a run for governor.
Read the full sto­ry here: https://​thein​ter​cept​.com/​2​0​2​3​/​0​4​/​1​3​/​m​i​n​n​e​s​o​t​a​-​k​e​i​t​h​-​e​l​l​i​s​o​n​-​j​u​v​e​n​i​l​e​-​m​u​r​d​er/

Oklahoma Sheriff, Commissioner, Accused Of Discussing Killing A Reporter And Returning To Black Hangings

YouTube player

In south­east Oklahoma, the sher­iff of McCurtain County, one of his inves­ti­ga­tors and a coun­ty com­mis­sion­er are accused by a news­pa­per of dis­cussing killing a local reporter and lament­ing that mod­ern jus­tice no longer includes hang­ing Black peo­ple. The explo­sive accu­sa­tions were pub­lished this week in the McCurtain Gazette-News. According to the news­pa­per, Sheriff Kevin Clardy, inves­ti­ga­tor Alicia Manning and District 2 Commissioner Mark Jennings were part of an impromp­tu dis­cus­sion after the March 6 meet­ing of the coun­ty Board of Commissioners. The Gazette report­ed that it is in pos­ses­sion of the full audio record­ing of the dis­cus­sion. The FBI and the Oklahoma Attorney General’s Office also have copies of the record­ing, accord­ing to the newspaper.

A por­tion of the audio record­ings was released online over the week­end, and while the audio matched some of the quot­ed mate­r­i­al in the sto­ry, The Oklahoman could not iden­ti­fy who the speak­ers were in the record­ings. None of the alleged­ly record­ed indi­vid­u­als could imme­di­ate­ly be reached for com­ment. Chris Willingham is the reporter for the Gazette who was dis­cussed in the record­ings. He is also the author of the arti­cle. Willingham declined to com­ment on the sto­ry, cit­ing ongo­ing lit­i­ga­tion between him­self and the sher­if­f’s office. During the dis­cus­sion, which was record­ed with­out the trio know­ing, the Gazette report­ed Manning say­ing she need­ed to take some pack­ages to a ship­ping cen­ter near the newspaper’s office.

YouTube player

More than a hundred people gathered outside the McCurtain County Sheriff's Office Monday, April...
Hundreds gath­er to demand the res­ig­na­tion of the coun­ty offi­cials. However, this is noth­ing new; it is the way law enforce­ment has been cen­tral to the main­te­nance, pro­lif­er­a­tion, and per­pet­u­a­tion of racism in America. Including killing and con­ceal­ing peo­ple’s bod­ies, which they hate and con­sid­er their enemies.

Oh, you’re talk­ing about you can’t con­trol your­self?” Jennings alleged­ly said. In response, Manning alleged­ly said: “Yeah, I ain’t wor­ried about what he’s gonna do to me. I’m wor­ried about what I might do to him. My papaw would have whipped his ass, would have wiped him and used him for toi­let paper … if my dad­dy hadn’t been run over by a vehi­cle, he would have been down there.” Jennings replied that his 86-year-old father, in response to an opin­ion pub­lished in the news­pa­per, once “start­ed to go down there and just kill him,” accord­ing to the Gazette. “I know where two big, deep holes are here if you ever need them,” Jennings alleged­ly said. Clardy, the sher­iff, alleged­ly said he had the equip­ment. “I’ve got an exca­va­tor,” Clardy is accused of say­ing dur­ing the discussion.

Well, these are already pre-dug,” Jennings alleged­ly said. Jennings alleged­ly talked about know­ing hit­men in Louisiana who could “cut no (exple­tive) mer­cy.” A brief dis­cus­sion about assault­ing local judges fol­lowed, accord­ing to the Gazette. Jennings, the com­mis­sion­er, then dis­cussed how many peo­ple might run for sher­iff, accord­ing to the news­pa­per sto­ry. “They don’t have a god­damn clue what they’re get­ting into,” he said. “Not this day and age. I’m going to tell you some­thing — if it was back in the day, when Alan Marston would take a damned Black guy and whoop their (exple­tive) and throw them in the cell, I’d run for (exple­tive) sher­iff.” Clardy respond­ed by say­ing, “Yeah, it’s not like that no more,” the news­pa­per report­ed. Jennings then said Black peo­ple have more rights than oth­ers, accord­ing to the Gazette.

Black Man Gets 70 Years For Spitting On Cop, Cops Who Murder Blacks Walk Free Without Charge

YouTube player

The Lubbock jury was urged to con­sid­er a sen­tence that would “send a mes­sage” to Larry Pearson — who had pri­or con­vic­tions for ongo­ing fam­i­ly vio­lence and aggra­vat­ed rob­bery — and society.

A pros­e­cu­tor said she is mak­ing an exam­ple out of a Texas man who received a 70-year sen­tence for spit­ting on a police offi­cer dur­ing an arrest.

Jurors in Lubbock County hand­ed the lengthy sen­tence to Larry Pearson, 36, on Tuesday after find­ing him guilty of two counts of harass­ing a pub­lic ser­vant the day before. According to the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, typ­i­cal prison sen­tences for harass­ing a pub­lic ser­vant range from two to 10 years.

However, Pearson’s two pri­or felony con­vic­tions — for aggra­vat­ed rob­bery and con­tin­u­ous fam­i­ly vio­lence in 2009 and 2019, respec­tive­ly — increased the range of his penal­ty to 25 years to life in prison

Texas man 70 years spit on officers
Larry Pearson (cen­ter), 36, received a 70-year prison sen­tence after being con­vict­ed of harass­ing a pub­lic ser­vant when he spat on police offi­cers in Lubbock County, Texas, dur­ing his arrest last spring. (Photo: Screenshot/YouTube.com/Everything Lubbock)

We asked [the jury] to just con­sid­er the life that he’d been lead­ing,” pros­e­cu­tor Jessica Gorman said, the Avalanche-Journal reported.

Gorman empha­sized that the sen­tence would not have been as sub­stan­tial for some­one with no crim­i­nal history.

But I think the rea­son for that enhance­ment being the law is if you’re going to choose to live a life of crime and to be a crim­i­nal, you can do that around oth­er crim­i­nals in prison and not in a free soci­ety with law-abid­ing peo­ple,” she said.

According to the Avalanche-Journal, a Lubbock police report detailed how a woman flagged down an offi­cer in north­east Lubbock in April 2022 to report Pearson, who was a pas­sen­ger in her car, for domes­tic abuse.

The report not­ed that the vic­tim had “mul­ti­ple vis­i­ble injuries” on her face as she informed the offi­cers that Pearson had a weapon — which turned out to be an air­soft gun — and had hit her sev­er­al times

The uniden­ti­fied woman claimed Pearson stopped assault­ing her when they reached the near­by inter­sec­tion after he saw a police car. After pass­ing it, Pearson threat­ened her again, she said. “You know you have an a– whoop­ing com­ing,” he report­ed­ly warned her before punch­ing her again, for the third time, in her face.

Pearson alleged­ly became angry that offi­cers arrest­ed him rather than the vic­tim after back­up arrived, prompt­ing him to kick at their vehi­cle doors. Gorman said he spat at author­i­ties when they opened the door to order him to stop kicking.

Pearson report­ed­ly con­tin­ued to spit and resist after being tak­en to the Lubbock County Detention Center.

During the final argu­ments of the sen­tenc­ing phase of Pearson’s tri­al, KLBK News report­ed, pros­e­cu­tor Gorman urged the jury to con­sid­er a pun­ish­ment that would “send a mes­sage” to him and society.

Defense attor­ney Jim Shaw told the jury that the sen­tence was inflict­ed for a “sim­ple mis­de­meanor” in a sit­u­a­tion that “got out of con­trol.” Gorman, how­ev­er, dis­agreed. “In Texas, if you’ve been to prison mul­ti­ple times, two con­sec­u­tive times and then you com­mit anoth­er felony that’s a third degree or high­er, you’re what’s called a ‘habit­u­al­ized crim­i­nal,’” Gorman con­tend­ed, the Avalanche-Journal report­ed, “where your min­i­mum is 25 years.”

Police Are Supposed To Be Peace Officers’

YouTube player

Houston Teen Dragged Out of Car and Violently Arrested While Helping Friend Stuck In Parking Lot Without Gas.

The Harris County Sheriff’s Office announced last week that sev­er­al of its deputies are under inves­ti­ga­tion in con­nec­tion with their con­duct dur­ing the arrests of two Houston-area high school foot­ball play­ers this month. Video of the inci­dent was shared on social media last week and sparked accu­sa­tions that the deputies used exces­sive force dur­ing the arrests.
According to a state­ment released by the HCSO, the depart­ment is launch­ing a probe to see if “any poli­cies and pro­ce­dures were vio­lat­ed” dur­ing the arrest.

Harris County Deputies Under Investigation for Rough Arrest
Harris County Sheriff deputies drag teens out of a car. (Photo: Sarmad Faiz/​Twitter video screenshot)

The video, shot this month in what appeared to be a shop­ping cen­ter park­ing lot, showed offi­cers arrest­ing Seth Palumbo, a foot­ball play­er at Langham Creek High School in sub­ur­ban Houston, after he’d appar­ent­ly been called by team­mate Kristopher Willis when Willis ran out of gas, local sta­tion ABC 13 report­ed.
Willis had just left school when he ran out of gas and called his two friends to come to help him. “As my friends pulled up, I gave them the bot­tles I had so they can fill it up with gas so I can make it to the gas sta­tion,” Willis told the sta­tion. Willis stat­ed that at that time about three or four police units appeared and pulled them over. It is not clear whether Willis and Palumbo’s cars were in the road­way at this point. One video shot by a pas­sen­ger in Palumbo’s car shows a deputy pulling Palumbo out of his car. The teen is seen shout­ing that he didn’t do any­thing as the deputy is drag­ging him out the car.

In what looks like chaos, the deputy is pulling the senior around and then slam­ming him on the ground. Other deputies sur­round the car and even try to stop the arrest from being filmed by Willis, who whipped out his cell­phone to record from anoth­er angle. The one pas­sen­ger record­ing in the car is told to exit the vehi­cle before his phone is tak­en. His phone is then placed cam­era-down by the deputy, obstruct­ing any video for the remain­der of the record­ing. The deputies arrest­ed and orig­i­nal­ly charged both seniors, Willis and Palumbo, in the alter­ca­tion. They were also tak­en to jail. Willis was charged with a mis­de­meanor count of imped­ing a road­way. Palumbo faced one count of assault­ing a peace offi­cer, a felony charge. On Friday, April 14, a judge failed to find prob­a­ble cause for Palumbo’s assault charge, lead­ing to its dis­missal. In his first inter­view after the inci­dent, the young man took issue with the deputies being called “peace officers.”

I feel like police are real­ly sup­posed to be peace offi­cers. I feel like he just did a lot of aggra­va­tion. He wasn’t real­ly try­ing to be peace­ful. I feel like we don’t need peo­ple like that in the com­mu­ni­ty,” ABC 13 report­ed Palumbo said after the judge’s deci­sion. Willis’ mis­de­meanor was not dropped, and his par­ents, an ele­men­tary school prin­ci­pal (mom) and a high school math teacher (dad) plan to take action after feel­ing out­raged by the turn of events. “I real­ly think the police should be held account­able the same way they are hold­ing my son account­able for a crime he did not com­mit,” said Kristopher Willis Sr. Willis Sr. actu­al­ly orig­i­nal­ly post­ed the videos on Facebook.

Attorney Antuan Johnson, the lawyer rep­re­sent­ing the Willis fam­i­ly, said he applauds the young men for not cow­er­ing to the badges and shut­ting off their phones. “The only rea­son we are here is that he had the courage to get out the phone and record, and by that, we were able to see what hap­pened,” Johnson said. The HCSO released a state­ment regard­ing the video and said, “After review­ing the videos, we are inves­ti­gat­ing the inci­dent to deter­mine if any poli­cies and pro­ce­dures were violated.”
Adding its office has tem­porar­i­ly reas­signed a deputy to a dif­fer­ent area “pend­ing the out­come of the investigation.”
“We take these mat­ters seri­ous­ly and will ensure a thor­ough inves­ti­ga­tion is com­plet­ed in a time­ly man­ner,” the state­ment said. “Our deputies are held to the high­est stan­dard of pro­fes­sion­al­ism, and any employ­ee whose con­duct does not align with depart­men­tal poli­cies will be held account­able for their actions.”(from Yahoo news)

To add insult to injury, the Harris County Sherrif’s office issued in red form response to the fam­i­lies. Why does the pub­lic care about depart­ment poli­cies? Each per­son should be held to the same stan­dard under the law in a demo­c­ra­t­ic society.
So no one should care about depart­ment pol­i­cy , if the Sheriff’s thugs broke the laws, they should be vig­or­ous­ly arrest­ed and pros­e­cut­ed as any oth­er per­son. Why are they not arrest­ed for assault and kid­nap­ping is the ques­tion.? (mb)

How Do You Protect A Black Kid?’ Protesters Demand Justice In Shooting Of Ralph Yarl, 16

YouTube player

Like Ralph Yarl’s par­ents, Patience Gaye moved to the United States from Liberia to escape vio­lence before start­ing a family.

That was years ago. But on Sunday, she marched along­side at least 200 peo­ple in Kansas City’s Northland at a peace­ful protest in sup­port of Ralph, a 16-year-old who was shot and crit­i­cal­ly wound­ed Thursday after he went to the wrong house to pick up his younger twin broth­ers, accord­ing to family.

Ralph is a junior at Staley High School. Friends said he’s talked of going to Stanford after he graduates.

Gaye, 33, a long-time fam­i­ly friend to Ralph’s par­ents, is preg­nant with her first child, and filled with a new fear as she watch­es Ralph’s strug­gle to recov­er from his injuries.

How do you pro­tect a Black kid?” she asked. “… What are we sup­posed to do now? We left our coun­tries because we don’t want to be killed. That’s why we left. They came to America for a bet­ter life. How is this a bet­ter life?”

Police Chief Stacey Graves said Sunday the police depart­ment is work­ing to make sure the inves­ti­ga­tion moves as quick­ly as it can so the case can be pre­sent­ed to the Clay County prosecutor.

Police have not iden­ti­fied the per­son who shot Ralph.

Rally participants stopped in front of a house in the Northland where 16-year-old Ralph Yarl was shot Thursday.
Rally par­tic­i­pants stopped in front of a house in the Northland where 16-year-old Ralph Yarl was shot Thursday.

A stellar human-being’

Meara Mitchell, a teacher of Ralph’s for sev­er­al years, called his shoot­ing “incom­pre­hen­si­ble.”

She described him Sunday as a “stel­lar human-being” with a “qui­et fortitude.”

Of her many stu­dents, Ralph’s work eth­ic and love and kind­ness for oth­ers makes him stand out. He’s duti­ful to his fam­i­ly, she said, and he impressed her every day in his aca­d­e­mics and his inter­ac­tions with his peers.

He is the utmost exam­ple of how you want a young man to car­ry him­self in this world,” she added.

Nicole Bryan, 17, one of Ralph’s class­mates and friends, said she met Ralph in sev­enth grade. They’re both in the band where he plays bass clar­inet and she plays bassoon.

Ralph Yarl
Ralph Yarl

When they first met, he cor­rect­ed her on her instru­ment, and helped her become bet­ter. He still push­es her to achieve her best, Nicole said.

She said Ralph has talked about study­ing chem­i­cal engi­neer­ing in col­lege. He’s a whiz at sci­ence and math, but his pas­sion is music, Nicole said. He’s won numer­ous awards for his aca­d­e­mics and his musi­cian­ship, she said.

He’s bril­liant,” she said.

Justice is the key’

Paul Yarl, Ralph’s father, is qui­et like his son. He stood near the back of the long line of peo­ple chant­i­ng about love and jus­tice as they stood in the street in front of the yard of the man who alleged­ly shot Ralph.

I’m just here to show my grat­i­tude for all the love and sup­port,” said Yarl, who trav­eled to Kansas City from Indianapolis after the shooting.

So many peo­ple showed up Sunday because, Yarl said, what hap­pened was obvi­ous­ly wrong.

Ralph was asked by a par­ent to pick up his broth­ers from an address on 115th Terrace, accord­ing to the fam­i­ly and a state­ment from the Kansas City Police Department. Instead he went to a res­i­dence in the 1100 block of 115th Street.

Family said a man at the house opened the door, saw Ralph and shot him in the head. When Ralph fell to the ground, fam­i­ly said the man shot him again.

Ralph got up and ran from the prop­er­ty, but he had to ask at three dif­fer­ent homes before some­one helped him, fam­i­ly added. Kansas City police offi­cers said they respond­ed to the area around 10 p.m.

Graves said Sunday that the home­own­er who alleged­ly shot Ralph after the teen arrived at the wrong house was tak­en into cus­tody Thursday and placed on a 24-hour hold.

In order to arrest some­one, Graves said law enforce­ment needs a for­mal vic­tim state­ment, foren­sic evi­dence and oth­er infor­ma­tion for a case file to be com­plet­ed. Because of the teen’s injuries, Graves said police haven’t been able to get a vic­tim state­ment yet.

Ralph Yarl
Ralph Yarl

Yarl said he hasn’t had the chance to talk to the prosecutor’s office, but he is hop­ing for answers soon.

Justice is the key. I guess the same rea­son why most peo­ple are here. Justice. Peace. I’m with them. I don’t want any­thing spe­cial. I just want jus­tice,” Yarl said.

In the mean­time, the fam­i­ly remains focused on Ralph’s healing.

Ralph’s aunt, Faith Spoonmore, start­ed a GoFundMe on Sunday to raise mon­ey for Ralph’s med­ical bills and oth­er expenses.

Even though he is doing well phys­i­cal­ly, he has a long road ahead men­tal­ly and emo­tion­al­ly,” she wrote on the online fundrais­er before join­ing Sunday’s protest.

The fam­i­ly will be rep­re­sent­ed by Ben Crump, a civ­il rights attor­ney who rep­re­sent­ed fam­i­lies in sev­er­al high-pro­file cas­es includ­ing Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, as well as Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor and George Floyd.

They also will be rep­re­sent­ed by Lee Merritt, a Texas-based civ­il rights attor­ney who has pre­vi­ous­ly rep­re­sent­ed the fam­i­ly of Cameron Lamb, who was fatal­ly shot by KCPD detec­tive Eric DeValkenaere in 2019.

Stay off my yard’

As pro­test­ers chant­ed and prayed in front of the home where Ralph was shot, some neigh­bors joined in the demon­stra­tion while oth­ers watched from their porch­es or lawn chairs.

Get out of the yard,” some­one shout­ed as the crowd swelled on the street in front of the home where the shoot­ing hap­pened. The road is pub­lic prop­er­ty; lawns are not.

That over there is a lot of hate,” Spoonmore told Sunday’s crowd in response to the com­ment, before look­ing over those encir­cling her and say­ing: “This is a lot of love.”

Ralph was shot in the Northland, a name for the Kansas City neigh­bor­hoods north of the Missouri River whose vot­ers tend to be more con­ser­v­a­tive than in oth­er parts of the city limits.

Police have not iden­ti­fied the shoot­er or his race. They said they are still inves­ti­gat­ing whether the shoot­ing was racial­ly motivated.

Ralph Yarl
Ralph Yarl

Councilman Kevin O’Neill, District 1 at-large, joined the crowd at the protest Sunday. He was among many Northlanders there.

He said while he doesn’t yet know all the facts, the whole sit­u­a­tion is still sad and seems like “poor judgment.”

I hate that the Northland always seems to get labeled and this isn’t who the Northland is, and it’s very dis­ap­point­ing,” he said of the shooting.

He said the Northland is often seen as “a bas­tion of white.” But he said Sunday’s turnout, which includ­ed peo­ple from all ages, races and back­grounds, tru­ly rep­re­sents the increas­ing diver­si­ty of the Northland.

He said it’s filled with many cul­tures and religions.

People look at things and just make their visions what they want to, but that’s not what it is. We’ve got some great peo­ple in the Northland.”

He not­ed that there appear to be cam­eras on the out­side of the prop­er­ty, so he’s hop­ing there will even­tu­al­ly be defin­i­tive proof of what happened.

And hope­ful­ly that comes back and there is jus­tice for the fam­i­ly,” he said.

Robyn Tuwei, who uses the pro­nouns they/​them, has lived just down the block from the shoot­ing for a decade.

Up until recent­ly, they felt it was a very safe neigh­bor­hood for their fam­i­ly to call home. But there have been changes. They’ve noticed the sound of more loud gun­shots and firecrackers.

Tuwei’s spouse is Black and their chil­dren are mixed race. Recently, they’ve had M‑80 fire­works thrown at their house, they said. They report­ed the inci­dents to police but they still don’t know who is throw­ing them or why.

Lately, it’s not felt super wel­com­ing, so I can’t say that I was sur­prised, but it is dis­hearherten­ing,” said Tuwei, who is a teacher in the local school dis­trict, as well as an equi­ty advocate.

Since the “unfath­omable” shoot­ing, Tuwei and their spouse have already talked of chang­ing the ways their chil­dren spend time out­doors. They often take walks as a fam­i­ly, but they will no longer be walk­ing past the home where Ralph was shot. When their 13-year-old son wants to vis­it a friend on that street, they will be dri­ving him, even though it’s only a brief walk.

It’s not con­sid­ered safe any­more for us,” Tuwei said. “Not until (the shoot­er is) in jail, behind bars.“(From Yahoonews​.com)

NYPD Chief Of Department Jeffrey Maddrey Hit With Abuse Of Authority Charges By NYC Police Watchdog

YouTube player

Every day aver­age American cit­i­zens face these cor­rupt actors, and they com­plain if they are lucky to sur­vive the encounter with them. Their com­plaints usu­al­ly have to be made to the very same cor­rupt Agency, albeit anoth­er depart­ment cre­at­ed to give the illu­so­ry effect of trans­paren­cy and impar­tial­i­ty. Complaints are gen­er­al­ly ruled unfound­ed or unsubstantiated.
On the odd occa­sion that the evi­dence of wrong­do­ing is so over­whelm­ing that it can­not be ignored, the offend­er gets a slap on the wrist; as you will see in the case below that the vic­to­ry to the abused par­ty is a pyrrhic one.
New York City has a Civilian Complain Review Board (CCRB) that is man­dat­ed to inves­ti­gate abus­es by the 36,000-plus police depart­ment; some­how however,the cre­ators the body for­got to give the board pow­er to pun­ish offenders.
So the board­’s find­ings have to be sub­mit­ted back to the Police Commissioner for action. In case you are won­der­ing why American police offi­cers act with such impuni­ty, won­der no more; they act with impuni­ty because they have near blan­ket immunity.
There are those who believe that adding more offi­cers of col­or will change the behav­ior of police, but that is far from the case. In California, the LA Sheriff”s office is pop­u­lat­ed heav­i­ly with Hispanics, and that depart­ment is plagued with out­right crim­i­nal gangs oper­at­ing in that depart­ment under the col­or of law.
In Miami, Florida, the Miami police depart­ment is also heav­i­ly Cuban American, and that depart­ment is prob­a­bly one of the worst in the country.
The cops who mur­dered Tyre Nichols in Tennesee were all black, and so was Mister Nichols. In inci­dent after inci­dent, we see police of all races act­ing in ways more unlaw­ful and out­ra­geous than ordi­nary civil­ian criminals.
In almost all cas­es, there are oth­er offi­cers stand­ing around or engag­ing in crim­i­nal con­duct against civil­ian mem­bers of the pub­lic, yet no one inter­venes to stop the crim­i­nal conduct.
Where are the sup­posed good cops?
So the issue is not about just the race or col­or of police these days. The very con­struct of polic­ing in the United States is so bad­ly bro­ken that it can­not be repaired; it has to be dis­man­tled and reimag­ined. They are not about to do that, so the pub­lic will con­tin­ue to be at the mer­cy of these undis­ci­plined state actors. (mb)

.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»>
By Thomas Tracy New York Daily News.

NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey in Queens on April 14, 2023. (Theodore Parisienne/​for New York Daily News)

Police watch­dogs hit the NYPD’s high­est-rank­ing uni­formed offi­cer with an abuse of author­i­ty charge for inter­ven­ing in the deten­tion of a retired cop accused of threat­en­ing a group of teens with a gun.
The Civilian Complaint Review Board said Saturday it had sub­stan­ti­at­ed the charge against NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey. Under CCRB guide­lines, “sub­stan­ti­at­ed” means the board believes there is “suf­fi­cient cred­i­ble evi­dence” that Maddrey “com­mit­ted the alleged act with­out legal jus­ti­fi­ca­tion. It’s now up to Police Commissioner Keechant Sewell to deter­mine Maddrey’s penal­ty. If Sewell impos­es a penal­ty, Maddrey could refuse to accept it, trig­ger­ing a dis­ci­pli­nary hear­ing, offi­cials said.

Maddrey was accused of show­ing up at the 73rd Precinct sta­tion­house on Nov. 24, 2021 fol­low­ing a clash between retired NYPD Officer Krythoff Forrester and three teens in Brownsville.
Police had tak­en Forrester into cus­tody after the teens stat­ed he had chased them with a gun after they struck a secu­ri­ty cam­era at his family’s store­front busi­ness with a bas­ket­ball. Forrester used to work with Maddrey and began drop­ping his name to arrest­ing offi­cers, accord­ing to The City, which first report­ed the charges. A short time lat­er, Maddrey, who was chief of the NYPD’s Community Affairs Division at the time, and Brooklyn North Deputy Chief Scott Henderson showed up at the sta­tion­house. Within a few hours, Forrester was let go with­out charges. Forrester was then sent home, offi­cials said.

An NYPD spokesman said at the time that Maddrey ordered a full inves­ti­ga­tion, but Forrester was let go after the teens’ alle­ga­tions couldn’t be con­firmed. The department’s Internal Affairs Bureau also inves­ti­gat­ed alle­ga­tions that Maddrey ordered Forrester cut loose, but found no wrong­do­ing. When asked about the inci­dent in March, Mayor Adams backed Maddrey’s inter­ven­tion, claim­ing Maddrey had “han­dled it appro­pri­ate­ly.” The CCRB deci­sion coun­ters the NYPD probe. “After care­ful­ly review­ing the evi­dence, the full board delib­er­at­ed this case and sub­stan­ti­at­ed mis­con­duct against Chief Maddrey,” Arva Rice, inter­im chair of the CCRB said in a state­ment Saturday. Working off the NYPD’s dis­ci­pli­nary matrix, which out­lines penal­ties for accused abus­es, the CCRB rec­om­mend­ed Maddrey receive a com­mand dis­ci­pline, which comes with a max­i­mum loss of 10 vaca­tion days, CCRB offi­cials said. MK Kaishian, the attor­ney rep­re­sent­ing the three teens, called for Maddrey’s resignation.

NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey speaks to the media in Brooklyn on April 13, 2023. (Gardiner Anderson/​for New York Daily News)

She said Maddrey “lever­aged his pow­er to spring a for­mer col­league who had ter­ror­ized chil­dren with a gun, but he allowed those same chil­dren to be vil­i­fied and dis­cred­it­ed in the media by his allies in the after­math of his mis­con­duct.” “It is essen­tial that oth­er con­crete steps are tak­en to address Chief Maddrey’s con­duct, which has been defend­ed by police and oth­er influ­en­tial actors in NYC pre­cise­ly because selec­tive enforce­ment is a fea­ture of a sys­tem that serves the pow­er­ful at the expense of all oth­ers,” Kaishian said. Maddrey ran afoul of police depart­ment rules in 2017, when he was docked 45 vaca­tion days for fail­ing to report an inci­dent in a Queens park where he waved off respond­ing offi­cers who saw an alleged lover point a gun at him. That case was brought by inter­nal NYPD inves­ti­ga­tors, with­out CCRB involvement.

Aside from the case involv­ing the Brownsville teens, Maddrey has been inves­ti­gat­ed four times by the CCRB dur­ing his decades-long police career, city records show. All four cas­es involved accu­sa­tions of abuse of force. None of the cas­es were sub­stan­ti­at­ed. Emails to both Maddrey and the NYPD for com­ment were not imme­di­ate­ly returned. Since being made police com­mis­sion­er last year, Sewell has reduced, set aside or ignored hun­dreds of police mis­con­duct penal­ties rec­om­mend­ed by the Civilian Complaint Review Board, accord­ing to crim­i­nal jus­tice advo­cates and a study con­duct­ed by the Legal Aid Society. In a mes­sage to police offi­cers in December, Sewell said she has reject­ed CCRB dis­ci­pline rec­om­men­da­tions more often than oth­er recent police com­mis­sion­ers, claim­ing that some of the police watch­dog group’s rul­ings were “man­i­fest­ly unfair” to officers.

HUNDREDS TURN OUT TO DENOUNCE TEXAS REPUBLICANS’ “VIGILANTE DEATH SQUADS POLICY

YouTube player

HUNDREDS OF TEXANS con­verged on the cap­i­tal this week to oppose a new state-led secu­ri­ty force that would enlist civil­ians to track and cap­ture undoc­u­ment­ed people.
In a hear­ing that stretched into the wee hours of the morn­ing Wednesday, the Texas House of Representatives heard tes­ti­mo­ny from first-gen­er­a­tion col­lege stu­dents, undoc­u­ment­ed activists, par­ents, and chil­dren about the inher­ent dan­gers of House Bill 20. The author of the con­tro­ver­sial pro­pos­al, Republican Rep. Matt Schaefer, mean­while, was grilled by his Democratic coun­ter­parts over his bill’s log­i­cal and con­sti­tu­tion­al implications.

In his most exten­sive pub­lic defense of his bill to date, Schaefer, the founder and chair of the arch-con­ser­v­a­tive Texas Freedom Caucus, col­lapsed the issues of fen­tanyl over­dos­es and migra­tion, ignor­ing facts and evi­dence to argue that migrants are respon­si­ble for a wave of death and suf­fer­ing that exceeds the worst episodes of nation­al trau­ma in mod­ern American his­to­ry. Pointing to nation­al over­dose sta­tis­tics, he described “a scale of death far greater than Pearl Harbor, the attacks on 911, or the total­i­ty of the Vietnam War.”

So much fen­tanyl is com­ing across the bor­der, it’s unre­al,” the Texas law­mak­er said before pro­ceed­ing to con­flate and mis­rep­re­sent sev­er­al issues regard­ing migra­tion and drugs.

As fed­er­al offi­cials, bor­der researchers, and jour­nal­ists have doc­u­ment­ed ad nau­se­am, most fen­tanyl ille­gal­ly traf­ficked into the United States comes through U.S. ports of entry, often in vehi­cles dri­ven by U.S. cit­i­zens; accord­ing to U.S. Sentencing Commission data cit­ed in Wednesday’s hear­ing, 86 per­cent of defen­dants con­vict­ed of smug­gling fen­tanyl through ports of entry are U.S. citizens.

YouTube player

Migrants, on the oth­er hand, over­whelm­ing­ly cross the bor­der between ports of entry, thanks to suc­ces­sive bipar­ti­san poli­cies that have made admis­sion at the ports — includ­ing pur­suit of asy­lum claims — all but impos­si­ble. Customs offi­cers who work the ports where most of the drugs are cross­ing are dis­tinct from the Border Patrol agents who work between them, under­min­ing a cen­tral argu­ment Schaefer made that Mexican orga­nized crime uses migrants to pull away U.S. offi­cials who would oth­er­wise be inter­cept­ing drug flows.

Many of them are com­ing here just for a bet­ter life and make won­der­ful neigh­bors,” Schaefer said of the migrants them­selves, but “some of them are crim­i­nals — rapists, gang mem­bers, MS-13.” To address the threat, Schaefer has pro­posed the “Border Protection Unit,” a new secu­ri­ty force com­posed of law enforce­ment per­son­nel and pri­vate indi­vid­u­als alike, answer­ing direct­ly to the gov­er­nor in a mis­sion to “arrest, detain, and deter indi­vid­u­als cross­ing the border.”Read the full sto­ry here: https://​thein​ter​cept​.com/​2​0​2​3​/​0​4​/​1​4​/​h​u​n​d​r​e​d​s​-​t​u​r​n​-​o​u​t​-​t​o​-​d​e​n​o​u​n​c​e​-​t​e​x​a​s​-​r​e​p​u​b​l​i​c​a​n​s​-​v​i​g​i​l​a​n​t​e​-​d​e​a​t​h​-​s​q​u​a​d​s​-​p​o​l​i​cy/

Republicans Only Have Love For One Amendment In The Bill Of Rights…

YouTube player

The First Amendment pro­vides sev­er­al rights pro­tec­tions: to express ideas through speech and the press, to assem­ble or gath­er with a group to protest or for oth­er rea­sons, and to ask the gov­ern­ment to fix prob­lems. It also pro­tects the right to reli­gious beliefs and prac­tices. It pre­vents the gov­ern­ment from cre­at­ing or favor­ing a religion.

Republicans hate every­thing in the Bill of Rights except for the 2nd Amendment, the right to bear Arms.
They hate that ordi­nary American cit­i­zens are free to express their ideas through free speech and the rights guar­an­teed the Press. Except if the press report­ing is def­er­en­tial and slant­ed, like FUAX news and the wide net­work of right-wing dis­in­for­ma­tion organs through­out the country.
They oppose the teach­ing of American his­to­ry. Desantis is remov­ing the teach­ing of African-American his­to­ry in Florida’s high schools and col­leges. They are burn­ing books that they dis­agree with and much more.

The Second Amendment pro­tects the right to keep and bear arms.

This they agree with. They believe in unbri­dled access to guns of all types, includ­ing assault-style weapons that have been used in the almost dai­ly mas­sacres of American citizens.

  • US has 120.5 firearms per 100 res­i­dents, report finds
  • The only coun­try with more civil­ian-owned firearms than people(Bloomberg)
    There are a report­ed 400-plus mil­lion guns in the hands of Americans. However, those weapons are con­cen­trat­ed in the hands of only about 32% of the peo­ple, large­ly white Republicans.

The Third Amendment pre­vents the gov­ern­ment from forc­ing home­own­ers to allow sol­diers to use their homes. Before the Revolutionary War, laws gave British sol­diers the right to take over pri­vate homes.

Republicans are for the rich and pow­er­ful, so it is not a stretch to under­stand their sup­port for laws like immi­nent domain that allows the Government to appro­pri­ate the prop­er­ty of cit­i­zens under the guise that it is for the com­mon good. They have sup­port­ed even large cor­po­ra­tions forcibly acquir­ing the prop­er­ty of cit­i­zens using immi­nent domain as justification.

The Fourth Amendment bars the gov­ern­ment from unrea­son­able search and seizure of an indi­vid­ual or their pri­vate property.

House Republicans subpoena former prosecutor in Trump case – The Denver Post
Gym Jordon(sic) a new iter­a­tion of Joe McCarthy

Republicans are for the police state as long as it does not apply to them. They are com­fort­able with Police abus­ing the rights of poor Black Americans by forcibly enter­ing their homes and motor­cars with­out legal jus­ti­fi­ca­tion. They have no prob­lem with gov­ern­men­tal pow­er as long as it does not affect them.

The Fifth Amendment pro­vides sev­er­al pro­tec­tions for peo­ple accused of crimes. It states that seri­ous crim­i­nal charges must be start­ed by a grand jury. A per­son can­not be tried twice for the same offense (dou­ble jeop­ardy) or have prop­er­ty tak­en away with­out just com­pen­sa­tion. People have the right against self-incrim­i­na­tion and can­not be impris­oned with­out due process of law (fair pro­ce­dures and trials.

The Fifth Amendment is one of the rights most Americans have come to depend on against Government over­reach and abuse. Notwithstanding, Republicans like Donald Trump do not believe these rights should extend to peo­ple of color.
He want­ed the Central Park five exe­cut­ed, even though it turned out they were all inno­cent of the charges against them.
Republicans like Sarah Huckabee Sanders have just signed into law sweep­ing changes to parole laws in the state of Arkansas. 

The Sixth Amendment pro­vides addi­tion­al pro­tec­tions to peo­ple accused of crimes, such as the right to a speedy and pub­lic tri­al, tri­al by an impar­tial jury in crim­i­nal cas­es, and to be informed of crim­i­nal charges. Witnesses must face the accused, and the accused is allowed his or her own wit­ness­es and to be rep­re­sent­ed by a lawyer.

Their Fascist mes­si­ah Donald Trump fac­ing a 34-count felony indict­ment filed by the New York City District Attorney’s office is ask­ing a court for a cool­ing off peri­od as anoth­er case, this time a civ­il rape case, is get­ting ready for trial.
His accuser is enti­tled to a speedy res­o­lu­tion in this mat­ter as the alleged aggriev­ed and injured par­ty. In this case, Trump is ask­ing to slow things down, arguably he believes, as he has always telegraphed, that he can drag court cas­es out to frus­trate his oppo­nents. His cal­cu­lus is his hope that he will once again become pres­i­dent, where­upon the lat­ter case will nev­er see the light of day.

The Seventh Amendment extends the right to a jury tri­al in Federal civ­il cases.
This amend­ment is par­tic­u­lar­ly impor­tant for poor defen­dants, par­tic­u­lar­ly peo­ple who are in the minority.
Imagine get­ting a fed­er­al judge appoint­ed by Donald Trump in a bench tri­al. This is an impor­tant amendment.

The Eighth Amendment bars exces­sive bail and fines and cru­el and unusu­al punishment.

This amend­ment gives some cov­er to minori­ties accused of crimes. In most cas­es, they are unable to afford the exor­bi­tant bail that uneth­i­cal racist judges would impose. Republicans have long railed against the amendment.

The Ninth Amendment states that list­ing spe­cif­ic rights in the Constitution does not mean that peo­ple do not have oth­er rights that have not been spelled out.

This is one of the rights in the Bill of Rights that Police depart­ments and their offi­cers, and their Republican sup­port­ers need to be remind­ed of on a reg­u­lar basis.

The Tenth Amendment says that the Federal Government only has those pow­ers del­e­gat­ed in the Constitution. If it isn’t list­ed, it belongs to the states or to the people.

This may be one amend­ment they are not too opposed to. They have con­sis­tent­ly railed against the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment begin­ning with Nixon, more so with Ronald Reagan and oth­er states’ rights pro­po­nents like Newt Gingrich and the entire mod­ern Republican party.
Understand, of course, that when they advo­cate for more rights for the states and less fed­er­al inter­ven­tion, they are advo­cat­ing for the right to bru­tal­ize and do as they please to Black cit­i­zens as they have done for hun­dreds of years.

The Bill of Rights: How Did it Happen?

Writing the Bill of Rights

The amend­ments James Madison pro­posed were designed to win sup­port in both hous­es of Congress and the states. He focused on rights-relat­ed amend­ments, ignor­ing sug­ges­tions that would have struc­tural­ly changed the government. 

Opposition to the Constitution

Many Americans, per­suad­ed by a pam­phlet writ­ten by George Mason, opposed the new gov­ern­ment. Mason was one of three del­e­gates present on the final day of the con­ven­tion who refused to sign the Constitution because it lacked a bill of rights.

James Madison and oth­er sup­port­ers of the Constitution argued that a bill of rights was­n’t nec­es­sary because — “the gov­ern­ment can only exert the pow­ers spec­i­fied by the Constitution.” But they agreed to con­sid­er adding amend­ments when rat­i­fi­ca­tion was in dan­ger in the key state of Massachusetts.

Introducing the Bill of Rights in the First Congress

Few mem­bers of the First Congress want­ed to make amend­ing the new Constitution a pri­or­i­ty. But James Madison, once the most vocal oppo­nent of the Bill of Rights, intro­duced a list of amend­ments to the Constitution on June 8, 1789, and “hound­ed his col­leagues relent­less­ly” to secure its pas­sage. Madison had come to appre­ci­ate the impor­tance vot­ers attached to these pro­tec­tions, the role that enshrin­ing them in the Constitution could have in edu­cat­ing peo­ple about their rights, and the chance that adding them might pre­vent its oppo­nents from mak­ing more dras­tic changes to it.

Ratifying the Bill of Rights

The House passed a joint res­o­lu­tion con­tain­ing 17 amend­ments based on Madison’s pro­pos­al. The Senate changed the joint res­o­lu­tion to con­sist of 12 amend­ments. A joint House and Senate Conference Committee set­tled the remain­ing dis­agree­ments in September. On October 2, 1789, President Washington sent copies of the 12 amend­ments adopt­ed by Congress to the states. By December 15, 1791, three-fourths of the states had rat­i­fied 10 of these, now known as the “Bill of Rights.”

The Bill of Rights: How Was it Made?

Delaware’s Ratification of the Bill of Rights, January 28, 1790

National Archives, General Records of the U.S. Government

Creating the Parchment Bill of Rights

William Lambert and Benjamin Bankson, engross­ing clerks for the House and Senate, made 14 hand­writ­ten copies of the pro­posed amend­ments, which were signed by Speaker of the House Frederick Muhlenberg, Vice President John Adams, Clerk of the House of Representatives John Beckley, and Secretary of the Senate Samuel A. Otis. President George Washington sent a let­ter enclos­ing one to each of the 11 exist­ing states and to Rhode Island and North Carolina, which had not yet adopt­ed the Constitution.

In addi­tion to the file copy, the National Archives has Delaware’s copy of the Bill of Rights in its hold­ings. While most states noti­fied the Federal Government of their rat­i­fi­ca­tion of the amend­ments on a sep­a­rate doc­u­ment, Delaware chose to apply its cer­tifi­cate of rat­i­fi­ca­tion and state seal direct­ly on the parch­ment they had received.

KS Cops ‘chased’ Elderly Man For Driving 3 Mph Over Limit Then Tased Him, Lawsuit Says

YouTube player

An 80-year-old man filed a law­suit this week against an east­ern Kansas sheriff’s office for alleged­ly tas­ing him with­out warn­ing after offi­cers pur­sued him for dri­ving three (3) mph over the speed lim­it. In his fed­er­al law­suit, John Sigg said a lieu­tenant with the Iola Police Department in Allen County on April 16, 2021, clocked him dri­ving 38 mph in an area where the speed lim­it was 35 and decid­ed to give “chase.” Multiple police vehi­cles fol­lowed Sigg for a few min­utes as he drove to his family’s car lot, although he did not real­ize he was “the sub­ject of the pur­suit,” his attor­ney wrote.
He parked, got out, and was sur­round­ed by offi­cers from sev­er­al agencies.
Two Chanute police offi­cers pulled their guns on Sigg, accord­ing to the law­suit. Looking “quizzi­cal­ly” at them, he raised his hands, which can be seen in a screen­shot of body-cam­era footage of the incident.

Get on the f — ing ground,” a now-for­mer deputy with the Allen County Sheriff’s Office yelled, accord­ing to the law­suit filed in the U.S. District of Kansas. Without warn­ing, the deputy used a Taser on Sigg — even though the man­u­fac­tur­er of the TASER X2 warns about using it “on the elder­ly,” his lawyer wrote. Sigg dropped “like a rock,” his attor­ney said and cut his head. “Sigg mum­bled and was hard to under­stand,” his Wichita attor­ney, Randall Rathbun, wrote in the law­suit. “As offi­cers talked with him on the scene, he indi­cat­ed that he did not know what was going on and did not feel right.”

Rathbun, who served as the U.S. attor­ney for the District of Kansas from 1993 to 1996, told The Star that Sigg required a trip to the emer­gency room to remove the taser probes from his body. “To this day, he can’t believe they did it,” he said. Other cops at the scene knew the deputy used exces­sive force and “were con­cerned by his con­duct,” the law­suit alleges. The peti­tion seeks a judg­ment of $250,000 in actu­al dam­ages and $250,000 in puni­tive dam­ages. The sheriff’s office did not return a mes­sage seek­ing com­ment Tuesday after­noon. Court records show Sigg plead­ed guilty to fail­ing to yield to an emer­gency vehi­cle after the inci­dent. (from yahoo news)

Judge Releases Names Of 17 California Cops Accused Of Sending Racist Texts & Memes

YouTube player

FBI agents dis­cov­ered the texts last month after search­ing the res­i­dences and seiz­ing the phones of sev­er­al Antioch offi­cers amid a probe into alle­ga­tions of fraud, bribery, drug dis­tri­b­u­tion and civ­il rights breaches.
The names of 17 California-based police offi­cers sus­pect­ed of using racist epi­thets, jokes and memes in text con­ver­sa­tions are now pub­lic information.
According to the East Bay Times, Contra Costa County Judge Clare Maier issued a warn­ing before dis­clos­ing the names, say­ing the com­mu­ni­ca­tions’ foul nature could “incite fur­ther hate or racial animus.”
However, she con­tend­ed that the California evi­dence code should not be used to pro­tect infor­ma­tion about the texts, includ­ing the Antioch police offi­cers’ iden­ti­ties. Maier said the inflam­ma­to­ry com­mu­ni­ca­tions start­ed in September 2019 and con­tin­ued until January 2022, when FBI agents seized the offi­cers’ phones and oth­er items.

The names of 17 Antioch, California police offi­cers are now pub­lic as part of an inves­ti­ga­tion that led to text mes­sages they alleged­ly sent con­tain­ing racist jokes, memes and insults. (Photo: Screenshot/YouTube.com/ABC7 News Bay Area)

I’ve had my eye on Antioch for a long time,” civ­il rights attor­ney Adante Pointer said Friday, accord­ing to the Times. “This is proof-pos­i­tive what peo­ple who have been watch­ing Antioch already knew — that it is full of offi­cers who do not deserve to wear the badge.” The ros­ter of embat­tled offi­cers includes Rick Hoffman, the head of the Antioch Police Association. Hoffman — who has fre­quent­ly crit­i­cized Antioch may­or and police reform advo­cate Lamar Thorpe — is one of at least eight Antioch offi­cers on leave because of the texts. Six oth­er offi­cers whose alleged crim­i­nal activ­i­ty is already being looked at by the FBI — Devon Wenger, Eric Rombough, Andrea Rodriguez, Calvin Prieto, Morteza Amiri and Tim Manly, who has resigned — are also list­ed. While Maier did not spec­i­fy what each offi­cer sent out, she described the mes­sages as “deeply dis­turb­ing” and direct­ed toward “mem­bers of the Black and Hispanic community.”
Investigators accused Rombough, Manly and fel­low offi­cers Jonathan Adams, Scott Duggar, Joshua Evans, Robert Gerber, Brock Marcotte and Thomas Smith of men­tion­ing four alleged Oakland-based ENT gang mem­bers in texts sent over a 10-day peri­od in March 2021, when Antioch police were eaves­drop­ping on the sus­pects’ phones.

Contra Costa County courts will deter­mine whether or not the mes­sages are suf­fi­cient grounds for drop­ping any charges lodged against peo­ple the offi­cers were inves­ti­gat­ing. That includes any­one the offi­cers men­tioned explic­it­ly in the texts and any Black or Latino per­son inves­ti­gat­ed or detained, since they might claim they faced dis­crim­i­na­tion because of their race.
“It’s no won­der why the pub­lic has lost faith in law enforce­ment,” said Pointer, the Times report­ed, “and why we see Black and Brown peo­ple over­rep­re­sent­ed in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem when the peo­ple admin­is­ter­ing it are racist.”
The evi­dence will like­ly reap­pear in oth­er crim­i­nal tri­als involv­ing those par­tic­u­lar police offi­cers and the oth­er law­men Maier men­tioned: Aaron Hughes, Brayton Milner, John Ramirez and Kyle Smith.
The FBI is inves­ti­gat­ing alle­ga­tions of fraud, bribery, drug dis­tri­b­u­tion and breach­es of civ­il rights linked to using force with­in the Antioch and Pittsburg police depart­ments. The agency dis­cov­ered the offi­cers’ texts last month after exe­cut­ing search war­rants at the res­i­dences of sev­er­al offi­cers, arriv­ing at the police sta­tion to con­fis­cate phones and oth­er per­son­al belongings.

Michael Rains, the attor­ney rep­re­sent­ing Antioch police offi­cers, said he hadn’t received any text mes­sages and is unaware of their alleged con­tent. Racial con­flict has been sim­mer­ing for years in the north­ern California city of about 100,000 peo­ple as gen­tri­fi­ca­tion in the west­ern Bay Area uproot­ed San Francisco, Oakland and Richmond res­i­dents and moved them into the deep East Bay. Antioch had a 65 per­cent white pop­u­la­tion in 2000. According to cen­sus data, the Black pop­u­la­tion has expand­ed from 10 to 20 per­cent dur­ing the past two decades, notes the Times, while white inhab­i­tants account for 39 per­cent, and Latinos or Hispanics make up 34.5 per­cent of the city’s residents.
According to Mayor Thorpe, Antioch’s police depart­ment would “absolute­ly” face staffing chal­lenges because of the num­ber of offi­cers now on leave. “But if that’s what they’re doing (mak­ing racist and homo­pho­bic texts),” he said, “I don’t want them here.”

.….….…

White Mass Killer Presented As University Grad, Who Suffered Multiple Concussions…

YouTube player

This is white mass mur­der­er Connor Sturgeon who mas­sa­cred five (5) peo­ple and wound­ed nine (9) oth­ers at a bank on Monday in a shoot­ing ram­page in Louisville, Kentucky while live-stream­ing the attack.

Connor Sturgeon

This cold barefaced mass killer is being san­i­tized across the cor­po­rate media as a vic­tim who has had mul­ti­ple con­cus­sions; one pub­li­ca­tion intro­duced him as a grad­u­ate of the University of Alabama.
Who the f**k cares?

The pub­li­ca­tion went on to posit that the mass mur­der­er has a mas­ter of sci­ence degree from the same university.
Sturgeon had learned he was going to be fired from the bank and wrote a note for his par­ents and a friend that he was going to car­ry out a shoot­ing at the bank, CNN reported.
It seems to me like he was a reg­u­lar­ly dis­grun­tled work­er who was mad he was about to be let go and decid­ed to go postal on his col­leagues. What does his bona fides have to do with him car­ry­ing out this bar­bar­ic act?
To add insult to injury, he left a note to his par­ents and a friend telling them of his mali­cious intent. That goes to pre­med­i­ta­tion or mens re.a , guilty mind. Livestreaming his ram­page was icing on the cake.
Neither his for­mal edu­ca­tion nor sports injury should be men­tioned in this sav­age’s onslaught snuff­ing out inno­cent lives.


.…

Murderers are mur­der­ers, regard­less of their skin col­or. We will not accept attempts to white-wash the bar­barism inher­ent in white mass mur­der­ers being per­pet­u­at­ed by the whol­ly owned white cor­po­rate media.
I will not stand in defense of black killers, nor will I stand in agree­ment with the san­i­tiz­ing of white ones.
Black men who com­mit mur­ders are char­ac­ter­ized as thugs and ani­mals. If a black man who kills a sin­gle per­son is a thug and ani­mal, what is the def­i­n­i­tion of a white man who does worse by tak­ing more lives?
The con­tin­ued bom­bard­ment of our psy­che by the fas­cist white pow­er struc­ture through the cor­rupt cor­po­rate media has gone on for too long. We no longer accept the implic­it bias­es fed to us; we are quite capa­ble of think­ing for ourselves.
The right-wing attacks on social media apps like Tik Tok, sup­port­ed by some in the Democrat par­ty, are all about get­ting back con­trol of the minds of the peo­ple and pro­hibit­ing the peo­ple from get­ting infor­ma­tion to each oth­er with­out government/​corporate input.
It is anoth­er attack on ‘woke’ some­thing they are des­per­ate­ly afraid of, black peo­ple begin­ning to think for themselves.
Well, at least a few of us.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Despite Clear Signs Republicans Wants Blacks Back On Plantations, Some Are Even Supporting That Party…

YouTube player
Two black coun­cil mem­bers in Tennesee were expelled for protest­ing in the well of the statehouse.
They were try­ing to bring atten­tion to the pro­lif­ic prob­lem of guns wreak­ing hav­oc on lives, includ­ing small chil­dren in their class­rooms. Republicans char­ac­ter­ized their protest as an insurrection.
Not one of those clowns had any­thing to say about the real insur­rec­tion that their mes­si­ah insti­gat­ed on January 6th, 2021.
My plea to black peo­ple is to wake up; if you con­tin­ue to slum­ber, you will be awak­ened in chains back on the plantations.
Every gain accom­plished after the 1964 civ­il rights and the 1965 vot­ing rights acts, includ­ing the two named acts, is under attack.

The way-over­board freak­out response of the Republican super­ma­jor­i­ty in that body was dwarfed only by the con­de­scend­ing and racist respons­es of the indi­vid­ual mem­bers of that body as they fired off ques­tions, made alle­ga­tions, and talked down to the two young elect­ed offi­cials who were their equal.
The con­de­scen­sion and the racist snarls were sim­i­lar only to the white race sol­diers who dou­ble as police offi­cers when they encounter young black men on America’s streets. The Republican lynch mob all but for­got they were talk­ing to two intel­li­gent, high­ly com­pe­tent young men in 2023, not two young men they intend­ed to lynch after church ser­vice in bygone years.
The bla­tant Racism, Xenophobia, Transphobia, Islamaphobia, and Homophobia unearthed across the United States is symp­to­matic of a dying rat­tlesnake that is still dan­ger­ous even with its head chopped off.
Book ban­ning, stop­ping peo­ple from vot­ing, chang­ing school and col­lege cur­ric­u­la, and killing peo­ple who do not look like them is a los­ing strat­e­gy long-term.
This regres­sive strat­e­gy by the polit­i­cal right gains its sus­te­nance from the con­tin­ued pas­siv­i­ty and dis­in­ter­est of 41.6 mil­lion Black peo­ple in the United States. Coupled with their over one tril­lion dol­lar spend­ing pow­er annually.
No oth­er eth­nic group with that much pow­er would tol­er­ate what is dished out to African-Americans dai­ly, yet this sleep­ing giant seems to be more inter­est­ed in per­pet­u­al victimhood.

Some have been so bru­tal­ized and beat­en down, bat­tered and bruised, that they have thrown in their lot with the tor­menters. How else would you char­ac­ter­ize the likes of Clarence Tom-Ass, the coon­ing Tim Scott, or even the sor­ri­ly igno­rant Herschel Walker, or the bed-wench Candace Owens?
Stockholm syndrome?
Maybe!!!
Or, maybe some peo­ple were real­ly cre­at­ed to be door­mats, regard­less of where grov­el­ing gets them for sell­ing their souls. Placing a door­mat on your fan­cy din­ing table and claim­ing it is a beau­ti­ful table­cloth does not change the fact it is a dirty doormat.
There is talk that both young men will be returned to their elect­ed posts. We will await the out­come of that. In the mean­time, I hope peo­ple are wak­ing up to the real­i­ty that they need to get up, go out, and vote in all elec­tions. African-Americans have a habit of only vot­ing in pres­i­den­tial elec­tions in appro­pri­ate num­bers. Those who toiled were bat­tered and bruised to give them the right to vote should nev­er die in vain because you are too lazy and igno­rant to go out and vote.
The super­ma­jor­i­ty in the Tennessee state­house may be attrib­ut­able to peo­ple not going out to vote, even though ger­ry­man­der­ing and vot­er sup­pres­sion are also par­tial­ly responsible.
The Republican par­ty will stop at noth­ing to retain white suprema­cy, which includes over­throw­ing the duly con­sti­tut­ed gov­ern­men­tal order of the United States.
January 6th, 2021 was prece­dent; they may not fail on the next attempt.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Trump Appointed Judge Further Restrict A Woman’s Right To Choose.(Podcast Inside)

YouTube player

On Friday, a Trump-appoint­ed Federal Judge in the state of Texas, Matthew Kacsmarryk, halt­ed the Food &Drug Administration’s approval of the Abortion pill mifepristone.
The deci­sion was expect­ed for weeks, and so was the deci­sion hand­ed down by the right winger. Following in line with the deci­sion of the right-wingers on the Supreme Court who struck down the almost five decades old Rove V Wade deci­sion that legal­ized a wom­an’s right to choose on Friday, June 24, 2022.

In this fight in which the Republican par­ty and its caved-welling sup­port­ers believe they have a right to dic­tate to peo­ple what to do with their own bod­ies, among oth­er things, I have an idea.
The major­i­ty of the American peo­ple believe that Roe V Wade was improp­er­ly struck down. Yet, the right-wing cabal on the Supreme Court upend­ed almost five decades of prece­dent most Americans alive have enjoyed.
This was the unelect­ed body tak­ing away rights, some­thing the court should be restor­ing to the American people.
That said, how about the women who love dic­ta­tor­ship live in the red states where white men get to con­trol their bod­ies, deter­mine how they spend the wealth their fathers leave them as it was in times past and con­trol all aspects of their lives?
Oh, and while we are at it, how about they are not allowed into Democratic-run states for any reason?
I believe most peo­ple liv­ing in California, Colorado, New York, New Jersey, Washington State, and oth­er Democrat-run states would have no prob­lem not vis­it­ing those red states, now ver­i­ta­ble mini dictatorships.
Sounds unreasonable?
Well, so is the idea of a group of peo­ple in the minor­i­ty deter­min­ing how the major­i­ty live their lives.