WAS INDEPENDENCE WORTH IT? Part 2 :

This is the sec­ond in a series of blogs I will write on the ques­tion of whether it was worth it for Jamaica to have gained its Independence from Britain, its for­mer colo­nial occupier .

The first short blog was mere­ly a ques­tion that dealt briefly with the hunger and hard­ship issue which is so much a part of dai­ly life in Jamaica, I was almost moved to tears on read­ing the com­ments of an elder­ly lady in the Jamaican Gleaner, on the occa­sion of the approach of the last hurricane.She told the on site reporter that she was only able to pur­chase a can­dle and lighter, she was unable to pur­chase a sin­gle item of food , or even a gal­lon of drink­ing water , the most basic of neces­si­ties that are required to sus­tain life dur­ing and after a nat­ur­al disaster.

This par­tic­u­lar lady touched my heart as I remem­bered the after­math of hur­ri­cane Gilbert and the des­per­a­tion that ensued, when drink­ing water was a scarce com­mod­i­ty, most of us end­ed up in Cherry gar­dens , lin­ing up in that com­mu­ni­ty, at a life sav­ing artery of water that seemed to have come out of nowhere​.It is an accept­ed real­i­ty that the very poor will always be here with us , or at least we are resigned to those realities,Jesus is report­ed in the Bible to have accept­ed those real­i­ties when he famous­ly told his dis­ci­ples quote“the poor will always be here with us ‚“end quote,but does it mean that peo­ple should go to bed with­out food, or as is in the case of this lady, fac­ing an impend­ing nat­ur­al dis­as­ter ‚should she face it with­out any sur­vival tools in place?.

You may ask , Mike what the hell does all this have to do with Jamaica’s Independence?, well, I think it is impor­tant for us to talk about these things with­in the con­text of where we were 50 years ago , as against where we are today , almost a half a cen­tu­ry after we were forced to let go of the prover­bial apron strings. I feel it is impor­tant for us to stop for a while and mea­sure the progress we have made, if any , iden­ti­fy what we did right, what we did wrong, and chart a course for­ward com­men­su­rate with the chang­ing real­i­ties of this new century.

The result of a recent study pub­lished in the Jamaica dai­ly Gleaner indi­cat­ed that a major­i­ty of Jamaicans are of the view they were bet­ter off under the Colonial dic­tates of Britain.That posi­tion has to be looked at with­in the con­text of where each indi­vid­ual is in their life ‚and the con­text in which the per­son answered the ques­tion, say for exam­ple on the press­ing issue of crime and vio­lence, it would be pre­ma­ture to jump on any­one who argue they were bet­ter off under colo­nial rule, from that perspective.

In the Old Testament the chil­dren of Israel report­ed­ly rebelled against Moses and his broth­er Aaron ‚in the desert when they had no water, even though they had wit­nessed the mir­a­cles God per­formed in order to release them from the Pharaoh’s clutch­es, they were instead guid­ed by their imme­di­ate needs , which was tan­ta­mount to , yes we saw all of that but we are humans and we have no water,The chil­dren of Israel rebelled over water , food, and every­thing they could com­plain about , and like Jamaicans of today ‚they argued they were bet­ter off under the Pharaoh’s oppres­sive rule, choos­ing to for­get hun­dreds of years of abuse in order to sat­is­fy the urgent needs of now.

Well for those of us who insist the Bible is an out­dat­ed book of fables, I am not a PhD, nei­ther am I an archeologist,not a his­to­ri­an, not even a the­olo­gian so I can present no sci­en­tif­ic data to back up my Biblical quotes, how­ev­er if you are one who scoff at Jesus freaks like me, there may still be a val­ue in the sto­ry of the chil­dren of Israel ‘trek from Egypt, to the land of Palestine , a jour­ney which should have tak­en them 11 days took them 40 year, because they kept their eyes on the past rather than embrace the prospect of the future, they even­tu­al­ly lost their way .Subsequently not one who had set out from Egypt set foot in the land of Palestine.

One does not have to sac­ri­fice his or her intel­lect or sci­en­tif­ic edu­ca­tion, in order to appre­ci­ate the sim­ple par­al­lels that are inher­ent in the two sto­ries . Until next time.

mike beck­les:

have your say: