As America Tears Itself Apart Internally China & Russia Parades New Alliance…

YouTube player

The United States is arguably the most pow­er­ful nation in the his­to­ry of the world. There have been pow­er­ful empires in the dis­tant past and near mod­ern history. 
The Mongols, Ottoman, Spanish, Roman, Russian and British empires read­i­ly come to mind. However, in terms of raw pow­er, glob­al reach, and the abil­i­ty to destroy human­i­ty, no oth­er empire has come close.
According to the Institute for pol­i­cy stud­ies, the world spent over $2 tril­lion on mil­i­taries for the first time in 2021. Of those 2 tril­lion dol­lars, the United States spent more than the next nine (9) coun­tries combined.
That expen­di­ture on defense rep­re­sents 39 per­cent of the world’s mil­i­tary spending.
If mil­i­tary spend­ing were the only cal­cu­lus that defines secu­ri­ty, the United States would have noth­ing to wor­ry about because it has dom­i­nat­ed defense spend­ing since the fall of the Soviet Union.
In fact, some have argued that Ronald Reagan helped to accel­er­ate the fall of the for­mer Soviet Empire by accel­er­at­ing mil­i­tary spend­ing here at home.
That may have some truth, as the Soviets did not have the econ­o­my to sus­tain the mas­sive mil­i­tary buildup that the Americans had ini­ti­at­ed. The Soviet Union became a top-heavy brass mon­ster on legs of clay, so it collapsed.

This is not an image of peace, but an image of defi­ance, rep­re­sent­ing a new alliance deter­mined to reshape inter­na­tion­al borders.

The United States, with its bloat­ed mil­i­tary bud­gets, along with the rest of the west­ern world, can arro­gant­ly pre­tend that this alliance between China and Russia is noth­ing to wor­ry about. Still, deep down, they under­stand what Xi’s vis­it means.
Long before Vladimir Putin invad­ed and annexed Crimea, politi­cians and talk­ing heads in the United States arro­gant­ly made the case that Russia was a weak region­al pow­er with an econ­o­my the size of Italy’s.
The state­ment was­n’t nec­es­sar­i­ly all wrong. Russia’s econ­o­my is about that of Italy’s, but they nev­er both­ered to men­tion that Russia has the world’s largest nuclear arse­nal. That is the game chang­er, and even as they sought to min­i­mize the pow­er of Vladimir Putin and Russia, Putin invad­ed and annexed Crimea.
When Putin amassed his mil­i­tary on the Ukrainian bor­der, they made the same pre­dic­tions, ‘this was only a show of force.’ ‘Putin will not invade.’ Until he did.
Vladimir Putin may have mis­cal­cu­lat­ed to some degree, arguably a con­se­quence of bad intel­li­gence and bad advice, which gen­er­al­ly affect total­i­tar­i­an lead­ers who sur­round them­selves with yes-men and lackeys.
Nevertheless, a year and a month after Russian Tanks rolled over the bor­der into Ukraine, the war still rages; large­ly because of help from the Americans and oth­er west­ern pow­ers, Ukraine has some­how man­aged to stay in the fight.
Even so, much of Ukraine has been reduced to rubble.
Putin still has not con­quered the nation of Ukraine, but nei­ther has Ukraine been able to expel Russian forces despite west­ern help.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, and Chinese President Xi Jinping toast dur­ing their din­ner at The Palace of the Facets, a build­ing in the Moscow Kremlin, Russia, Tuesday, March 21, 2023. (Pavel Byrkin, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

It is fair to say that the United States and NATO are not engaged in a full-scale war with Russia. Still, no one can deny that they are fight­ing a proxy war with the same region­al pow­er with the weak econ­o­my they ridiculed. Despite mil­i­tary help and mas­sive eco­nom­ic sanc­tions, a year lat­er they have not forced Russia to back down. Additionally, the rigid sanc­tions the west­ern nations imposed against the Russian econ­o­my have not achieved the imme­di­ate results they hoped to see.
Instead, Russia has forged new alliances with Iran, China, and oth­ers in defi­ance of west­ern help toward Ukraine. Militaries do not fight wars the way they are used to, so man­pow­er is not as impor­tant as it used to be. Nevertheless, human resources are still an impor­tant part of war­fare today.
The United States had a pop­u­la­tion of 331.9 mil­lion (2021). China had a pop­u­la­tion of 1.412 bil­lion (2021). Russia had a pop­u­la­tion of 143.4 mil­lion (2021). Iran had a pop­u­la­tion of 87.92 mil­lion (2021). And North Korea’population was 25.97 mil­lion (2021)
These are the nations that the world needs to pay atten­tion to as this new align­ment begins to take shape and as China and Russia assert their alliance and power.


If the Americans learned any­thing, they should have learned from the many lost wars. From Korea to Vietnam to Iraq, and the dis­as­trous with­draw­al that fol­lowed the Vietnamese and Afghan conflicts.
During the three years of the Korean con­flict, the Americans failed to rec­og­nize that it was not only fight­ing the North Koreans but the Chinese military.
The demil­i­ta­rized zone that sep­a­rates the two Koreas is a tes­ta­ment to the fact that the United States did not win that conflict.
The North Koreans, between June 25, 1950 – July 27, 1953, were able to stave off the pow­er­ful American mil­i­tary and South Korea with the help of light Chinese infantry units result­ing in the stale­mate that has been in effect for sev­en decades.
In the 1950’s China was an impov­er­ished so-called third-world nation. Today, China stands mighty as it fooled the west­ern world into think­ing it was a behe­moth but one dis­in­ter­est­ed in world affairs. Consequently, the world moved its man­u­fac­tur­ing to China, mak­ing that nation a rich and pow­er­ful play­er on the world stage.
China mod­ern­ized its mil­i­tary, includ­ing its nuclear forces, and went around the world build­ing new alliances using dol­lars as opposed to the west­ern pow­ers who believed alliances were built using bullets.

Instead of under­stand­ing the immi­nent threat posed by this bur­geon­ing alliance between China, Russia, and oth­er play­ers like Iran and South Korea, the United States is embroiled in divi­sion, racial ani­mus, and hatred.
No sin­gle nation can out-mil­i­ta­rize the United States, but they do not need to. America is destroy­ing itself from the inside with Russian dis­in­for­ma­tion and pro­pa­gan­da insert­ed in its eco-sys­tem and the racial seg­re­ga­tion that has char­ac­ter­ized America’s DNA from its founding.
Instead of cel­e­brat­ing its diver­si­ty, America is weak­en­ing itself along racial, gender,s sex­u­al, reli­gious, and oth­er defin­ing lines.
In that regard, America is its own worst enemy.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

New Evidence Seems To Show Rasheem Carter’s Case Was Indeed Murder…

YouTube player

We brought his case to your atten­tion some time ago; here are some new devel­op­ments, accord­ing to root​.com. Everyone knows that in the United States, there are so-called sun­down towns in which black peo­ple are mur­dered sole­ly based on the col­or of their skin. It hap­pened all through­out America’s his­to­ry it is hap­pen­ing today.
In these god­for­sak­en places pop­u­lat­ed with hea­thens, mur­der peo­ple for their skin col­or; what pass­es for law enforce­ment is usu­al­ly com­plic­it in the killings or are the ones who com­mit the murders.
It should sur­prise no one then that the sher­if­f’s depart­ment has cre­at­ed a nar­ra­tive of an ani­mal attack on this young man.
The sad real­i­ty is that based on the emerg­ing evi­dence, ani­mals did attack Rasheeem Carter, two-legged animals.
Why would a per­fect­ly sane young man text his moth­er that he was being chased by white men hurl­ing racial slurs
if he was­n’t?
Oh, by the way, I bet you have not seen or heard this case men­tioned on main­stream media(mb)


https://mikebeckles.com/a‑black-man-was-found-dead-after-he-told-his-mother-he-was-being-chased-police-said-theres-no-reason-to-suspect-foul-play/

The fam­i­ly of Rasheem Carter, a 25-year-old who was alleged­ly mur­dered in the woods of Mississippi, have start­ed try­ing to unlock the mys­tery his hor­ri­fy­ing death. The fam­i­ly told Insider he was last seen on video “run­ning for his life,” though the sheriff’s office debunked their claim. Carter went miss­ing in October 2022 just after send­ing a text to his moth­er, Tiffany, say­ing a truck­load of white men were chas­ing him.

His moth­er recalled the text say­ing, “Me and the own­er of this com­pa­ny are not see­ing eye to eye… If any­thing hap­pens to me [he] is respon­si­ble for it… he got these guys want­i­ng to kill me.”
She also said her son was work­ing at a weld­ing facil­i­ty in order to make enough mon­ey to reopen his seafood restau­rant fol­low­ing its clo­sure dur­ing the pan­dem­ic. However, she said for some rea­son he fled from his cur­rent work in fear for his life. One month lat­er, his remains (sev­ered head, ver­te­brae and spinal cord) were found scat­tered in the woods. The med­ical examiner’s office couldn’t even deter­mine the cause of Carter’s death because his remains were already decom­pos­ing, per CBS42.
Though the Smith County Sheriff’s Department pre­vi­ous­ly killed the notion of foul play being a fac­tor in the inci­dent and even the the­o­ry Carter was being chased, one cryp­tic pho­to con­vinces the fam­i­ly that mal­ice was involved.

Deer cam­era footage still of Rasheem Carter in the woods on October 2, 2022, when his moth­er report­ed him missing.

The moth­er of the 25-year-old man whose remains were found a month after he dis­ap­peared told Insider on Wednesday that the wildlife cam­era image of her son shows that “some­thing was wrong” and that he was “run­ning for his life.”

You could see there are bruis­es on him,” Carter’s moth­er, Tiffany Carter, told Insider of the October 2, 2022 image with a time stamp of 4:32 p.m. “When I see that pic­ture, I know my son was some­where strug­gling, some­where run­ning for his life.”

Investigators pro­vid­ed the image to Rasheem’s fam­i­ly for ver­i­fi­ca­tion about a week before his remains were found on November 2, 2022, just south of Taylorsville, Mississippi, in a wood­ed area, about 300 yards away from where he was seen in the pho­to, accord­ing to Tiffany and police.

Rasheem’s cousin, Tarsha Clark, told Insider she believes Rasheem was “hid­ing” at the time the image was captured.

The more we learn about the case, the stranger it gets. And the “ani­mal attack” the­o­ries from the sheriff’s office don’t seem as con­vinc­ing.

Robbery At Sovereign Plaza Portmore Results In 3 Security Guards Shot…

YouTube player

This was the wild west scene at the Sovereign Plaza in Portmore St Catherine on Sunday that result­ed in three secu­ri­ty offi­cers being shot.

These aban­doned vehi­cles are believed to be the ones used by the gun­men in the dar­ing day­light attack on the secu­ri­ty team.
It is impor­tant to rec­on­cile that while these events are unfold­ing in our coun­try, there are politi­cians seek­ing high office and high­ly placed Judges who oppose stiff penal­ties for these mon­sters who con­tin­ue to prey on the innocent.
These are the killers that the nation’s chief jus­tice and the oppo­si­tion par­ty care about.

The con­di­tion of the injured secu­ri­ty offi­cers is not known at this time.

Why Is The Opposition Leader Opposed To Tougher Penalties For Violent Criminals?

YouTube player

A Little Travel Blogging/​This Time Panama…

YouTube player

In July 2022, I went on a fam­i­ly trip to the coun­try of Panama. It was fas­ci­nat­ing from start to fin­ish. Here are some images I brought back.
I love to take out my cam­era and cap­ture some of the scenes; truth be told, I no longer use a reg­u­lar cam­era because my kids shamed me into using my iPhone instead. I hope my boys are proud of them­selves because these pic­tures look like they were tak­en using an old iPhone 7 plus.
They were.
Full dis­clo­sure, I was forced to ditch my 7plus just days ago as it had reached the end of the road and sim­ply refused to con­nect calls anymore.

On the way to our hotel.
Where we stayed.
Not too shabby
A quite moment.

Heading to the vil­lage of the indige­nous people.

And we are there


Bargin hunt­ing

Me pos­ing

And our guide to the village.

I was impressed with the knowl­edge of all of the peo­ple we inter­act­ed with. The Panamanians we inter­ract­ed with seemed to take great pride in their coun­try and were well-versed in its history.
This remind­ed me of the guides at the Bob Marley Museum in my own Jamaica, awe­some, informed delight­ful and super informed.

mm

A Black Man Was Found Dead After He Told His Mother He Was Being Chased. Police Said There’s ‘no Reason’ To Suspect Foul Play.

Rasheem Carter’s mother said that before he disappeared in October, he called in a panic to say white men were chasing him in trucks and hurling racial slurs.
_​_​_​_​note
By Melissa Chan

The fam­i­ly of a Black man who was found dead in Mississippi after he warned his moth­er that he was being chased by white men hurl­ing racial slurs demand­ed a fed­er­al inves­ti­ga­tion Monday after local author­i­ties said they had “no rea­son” to sus­pect foul play in the man’s death. Rasheem Carter, 25, was report­ed miss­ing Oct. 2 after his moth­er said he had sought help from police and fran­ti­cal­ly called her to say white men in three trucks were pur­su­ing him. That was the last day Carter’s fam­i­ly heard from him. On Nov. 2, author­i­ties said they found his remains in a wood­ed area south of Taylorsville, Mississippi. In a state­ment on Facebook a day lat­er, the Smith County Sheriff’s Department said it had “no rea­son to believe foul play was involved” though the case was under investigation.

Rasheem Carter
Rasheem Carter.Courtesy Tiffany Carter

On Monday, Carter’s loved ones and their attor­ney Ben Crump slammed local author­i­ties for stonewalling them for more than four months and for the ini­tial deter­mi­na­tion, say­ing they believe Carter was the vic­tim of a bru­tal hate crime. “This was a nefar­i­ous act. This was an evil act,” Crump said at a news con­fer­ence. “Somebody mur­dered Rasheem Carter, and we can­not let them get away with this.”

Rasheem Carter with his mother Tiffany Carter at his college graduation
Rasheem Carter with his moth­er, Tiffany Carter, at his col­lege grad­u­a­tion in 2016.Courtesy Tiffany Carter

Crump urged the Justice Department on Monday to take over the inves­ti­ga­tion as a civ­il rights case as he revealed pho­tographs of Carter’s skele­tal remains, includ­ing his skull and some ver­te­brae. “This was not a nat­ur­al death,” Crump said. “This rep­re­sents a young man who was killed.” Crump told reporters that he believes Carter’s head was sev­ered from his body and that his spinal cord was found in anoth­er loca­tion away from his head. “There is noth­ing nat­ur­al about this. It screams out for jus­tice,” Crump said. “What we have is a Mississippi lynch­ing.” Carter’s front teeth were miss­ing from the top and bot­tom rows, which Carter’s fam­i­ly said could indi­cate that he was assault­ed before he died. It’s unclear what prompt­ed author­i­ties to search the wood­ed area or what led them to deter­mine ini­tial­ly that foul play was not sus­pect­ed. The Smith County Sheriff’s Department did not reply to requests for comment.

The Laurel Police Department, which put out Carter’s miss­ing per­son­’s report, worked on the case ear­ly on after Carter’s fam­i­ly asked for assis­tance, Chief Tommy Cox told NBC News. But Cox said that Carter had not con­tact­ed his depart­ment for help before he went miss­ing, and that the Laurel Police Department hand­ed its inves­ti­ga­tion over to Smith County once it was clear it was out­side of its juris­dic­tion. Cox said his depart­ment pulled some phone records and may have inter­viewed some of Carter’s co-work­ers, but he declined to elab­o­rate fur­ther. “We tried to put our­selves in their shoes. It didn’t hurt us to do a lit­tle bit of work on it,” Cox said. “We did what we con­sid­ered to be the right thing. And then when it became obvi­ous which juris­dic­tion would be the lead, we turned it over to them.” The Mississippi Bureau of Investigation, which is assist­ing the sher­iff in its probe, said Carter’s autop­sy was com­plet­ed on Feb. 2 but declined to com­ment fur­ther, cit­ing the “open and ongo­ing inves­ti­ga­tion.” The FBI is not cur­rent­ly involved in the case, an agency spokesper­son said. Three mem­bers of Carter’s fam­i­ly said author­i­ties told them wild ani­mals may have torn his body apart.

Smith coun­ty Sheriff Joel Houston

He was in so many dif­fer­ent pieces,” said Yokena Anderson, a cousin to Carter’s moth­er, Tiffany Carter. “They want­ed to tell us that he went there and fell dead and the ani­mals were feed­ing off him.” But Carter’s moth­er said that her son was lucid about the threats he faced dur­ing their final phone calls, and that he was not under the influ­ence of drugs or alco­hol and had no his­to­ry of men­tal ill­ness. She had doubts her son’s death was an acci­dent even before she saw where his remains were found. “When I went on the scene, the Holy Spirit hit me and said this is foul play,” she said. “I knew then some­body had done some­thing to him.” Carter, a welder from Fayette, Mississippi, was in Taylorsville, about 100 miles away from home, work­ing a short-term con­tract­ing gig. His moth­er said he was sav­ing mon­ey to re-open his seafood restau­rant, which closed dur­ing the pan­dem­ic and which was named after his 7‑year-old daugh­ter, Cali.

Rasheem Carter with his daughter Cali
Rasheem Carter with his daugh­ter Cali, now 7.Courtesy Tiffany Carter

That was his goal,” she said. “That was why he went back out to work.” But while he was at the job site in October, Carter had a dis­agree­ment with at least one co-work­er and fled, fear­ing for his life, his moth­er said. “He said, ‘I got these men try­ing to kill me,’ ” Carter’s moth­er recalled him say­ing. She advised Carter to go to the near­est police sta­tion for help but even­tu­al­ly lost con­tact with him. Carter’s fam­i­ly and friends led their own search par­ties until his remains were dis­cov­ered. “I nev­er imag­ined going on liv­ing with­out my child,” Tiffany Carter said. “When I lost my son, I lost a part of me.” Carter’s loved ones said he worked hard to pro­vide for his daugh­ter, paid for her pri­vate school tuition and made his friends and fam­i­ly proud. “He kept all his promis­es,” Cali’s moth­er, Justiss White, said. “He called every day. They stayed on the phone for hours like teenagers. Every day, she brings him up.” Tiffany Carter pledged to con­tin­ue fight­ing for answers. “They thought this was going to be a child no one cared any­thing about,” she said. “They’re clear­ly mis­tak­en. Because he was somebody.

After facing backlash, Mississippi sheriff now says he hasn’t ruled out foul play in Rasheem Carter’s death.

By Melissa

A Mississippi sher­iff said Tuesday that he has not ruled out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of mur­der in the case of Rasheem Carter, months after ini­tial­ly say­ing there was “no rea­son” to sus­pect foul play in the Black man’s death. Carter, 25, was found dead last fall after he warned his moth­er that he was being chased by white men hurl­ing racial slurs. In an inter­view with NBC News, Smith County Sheriff Joel Houston defend­ed his ear­ly deter­mi­na­tion, say­ing no evi­dence at the time point­ed to homi­cide. But he said his depart­ment is still wait­ing on search war­rants to rule more defin­i­tive­ly. For the first time, the sher­iff revealed key aspects of the inves­ti­ga­tion, includ­ing the department’s process of rul­ing out poten­tial sus­pects. The inter­view came one day after Carter’s loved ones and their attor­ney Ben Crump slammed author­i­ties for stonewalling them for more than four months and accused the police of cov­er­ing up what they believe was a bru­tal hate crime. “Nothing is being swept under the rug,” Houston said Tuesday. “There’s noth­ing to hide.”

Rasheem Carter
Rasheem Carter.Courtesy Tiffany Carter

Carter was report­ed miss­ing on Oct. 2, after his moth­er said he had sought help from police and fran­ti­cal­ly called her to say white men in three trucks were pur­su­ing him. That was the last day Carter’s fam­i­ly heard from him. On Nov. 2, author­i­ties said they found his remains in a wood­ed area south of Taylorsville, Mississippi. In a state­ment on Facebook a day lat­er, the Smith County Sheriff’s Department said it had “no rea­son to believe foul play was involved,” though the case was under inves­ti­ga­tion. Carter’s loved ones and fam­i­ly attor­ney were dis­mayed by that swift deci­sion by the sher­iff and urged the Justice Department to take over the inves­ti­ga­tion as a civ­il rights case dur­ing a news con­fer­ence Monday. “This was a nefar­i­ous act. This was an evil act,” Crump said. “Somebody mur­dered Rasheem Carter, and we can­not let them get away with this.” The sher­iff said Tuesday that his depart­ment ini­tial­ly said that no foul play was sus­pect­ed to ease pub­lic con­cern after find­ing no ear­ly evi­dence that Carter had been chased. “It was just let­ting the local or gen­er­al pub­lic know that at this time no one else is believed to be involved,” he said. “It does seem to have caused unnec­es­sary headache, but we only have what the evi­dence tells us. At that time, the evi­dence didn’t sug­gest anything.”

Carter, a welder from Fayette, Mississippi, was in Taylorsville, about 100 miles away from home, work­ing a short-term con­tract­ing gig. His moth­er, Tiffany Carter, said he was sav­ing mon­ey to reopen his seafood restau­rant, which closed dur­ing the pan­dem­ic and which was named after his 7‑year-old daugh­ter, Cali. “That was his goal,” she said. “That was why he went back out to work.” But while he was at the job site in October, Carter had a dis­agree­ment with at least one co-work­er and fled, fear­ing for his life, his moth­er said. “He said, ‘I got these men try­ing to kill me,’” Carter’s moth­er recalled him say­ing. She advised Carter to go to the near­est police sta­tion for help but even­tu­al­ly lost con­tact with him. On Tuesday, the sher­iff said his depart­ment inter­viewed “every­body involved” with Carter’s last job, includ­ing four to five peo­ple Carter had men­tioned to his moth­er as pos­si­ble threats. Houston said police “ruled them out” after deter­min­ing through phone records and GPS coor­di­nates that their devices were near­ly 100 miles away from Taylorsville at anoth­er job site when Carter was last seen alive. The sher­iff said Carter’s col­leagues and super­vi­sor men­tioned in their inter­views that Carter “had not been him­self” for about a week before he went miss­ing. “They said his whole demeanor had changed. They weren’t sure what was going on,” Houston said. “They just said he kept to him­self more. He usu­al­ly joked around, and in the last week or so they weren’t able to do that.”

Houston said Carter had “a cou­ple of ver­bal alter­ca­tions” with at least one co-work­er. But the sher­iff did not say what the dis­agree­ment was about or whether the alter­ca­tion prompt­ed Carter’s behav­ior change. Carter was last seen cap­tured on a pri­vate landowner’s game cam­era out in the woods on Oct. 2 after 4:30 p.m., Houston said, adding that he was the only per­son spot­ted in the footage. The sher­iff said the prop­er­ty own­er passed the image along to police when he found out about it in mid-October. Houston said it took about two weeks to search sev­er­al hun­dred acres, using cadav­er dogs. Along with Carter’s scat­tered remains, author­i­ties found inside his blue jeans some cash, bank cards, a driver’s license, a vape and a phone charg­er, though they nev­er recov­ered his phone. The sher­if­f’s depart­ment has sub­mit­ted a search war­rant to Google to deter­mine whether any devices pinged in the area where Carter’s remains were found around the time he went miss­ing. “It’s a last-straw-type deal to deter­mine if any­one else was with him or not,” he said. “It’s not uncom­mon to use this tool.” However, the process has been going on since mid-November, Houston said, and the depart­ment has had to revise, nar­row down and resub­mit their request sev­er­al times, includ­ing most recent­ly last week. Houston said that he wel­comes the Justice Department’s involve­ment and that he wants jus­tice for Carter’s fam­i­ly “just as much as the fam­i­ly does.” The Carters dis­agree. Three mem­bers of the fam­i­ly said author­i­ties told them wild ani­mals may have torn his body apart. “He was in so many dif­fer­ent pieces,” said Yokena Anderson, a cousin to Carter’s moth­er. “They want­ed to tell us that he went there and fell dead and the ani­mals were feed­ing off him.” Carter’s moth­er said that her son was lucid about the threats he faced dur­ing their final phone calls and that he was not under the influ­ence of drugs or alco­hol and had no his­to­ry of men­tal ill­ness. “I just know what my son told me,” she said Tuesday. “I don’t believe any­thing they say. It’s lies after lies.”

Please, I Don’t Want To Die.’ Elk Grove Police Body-cam Video Captures Fatal Shooting

YouTube player

Here again, is a situation in which a little more talking and a little less bravado would have potentially resulted in a far better outcome. Instead, a [female cop], and it’s usually how it gets started, decided to show that she can do the job, so she escalates a situation in which the man experiencing an episode is surrendering to police from all accounts.
But she decided to deploy a taser on a complying subject, and that is where things fell apart.
Not only is the episodic man dead they almost killed an innocent person in a narrow hotel hallway.
Why would a police officer in his right mind be so reckless with a firearm? Maybe it is time that the guns are taken away from them.
How reckless is this?(mb)
YouTube player

Newly released body­cam footage shows that Booker T. Pannell III put his hands up and said, “Please, please, I don’t want to die” before Elk Grove police offi­cers chased him down a hotel hall­way and shot him Feb. 21. Pannell was pro­nounced dead at a hos­pi­tal lat­er that night. He was 40. In a brief phone con­ver­sa­tion, his father — who shares his son’s name — said, “He was a good per­son. He was a good man. That’s all I can say right now.” The Elk Grove Police Department on Friday night released footage from body-worn cam­eras and a hotel secu­ri­ty cam­era. An inves­ti­ga­tion into the offi­cers’ use of force is ongo­ing. Pannell died dur­ing a con­tin­ued local and nation­al reck­on­ing with polic­ing prac­tices fueled by fatal encoun­ters with law enforce­ment. In January, the death in Memphis, Tennessee, of Tyre Nichols, a Black man who grew up in Sacramento, renewed scruti­ny of police vio­lence; five offi­cers face sec­ond-degree mur­der charges for Nichols’ beat­ing death.
Mapping Police Violence and local news cov­er­age show that police killed six peo­ple in use of force inci­dents in Sacramento County last year. Internal and out­side inves­ti­ga­tors have not deter­mined whether offi­cers fol­lowed prop­er pro­to­cols the night Pannell died.

What led up to Booker Pannell’s death?

According to the video, some­one called police Feb. 21 to report a car­jack­ing near Shana Way and Whitelock Parkway. Dispatch received the report at 10:32. In the 911 excerpt in the video, the caller asks police to come to her house. “My hus­band had an alter­ca­tion with his friend, and the friend took our car,” the caller says. “And he pulled a gun out on my hus­band.” An offi­cer went to the house to take a state­ment from the hus­band. In the footage, the hus­band calm­ly emerges and speaks to the offi­cer. He explains, “My friend and his girl­friend came by, and I was asleep. And long sto­ry short, he was hav­ing some type of side effects or what­ev­er — I think he was on meth. So he was out here with his girl­friend … he’s been para­noid, say­ing the cops is look­ing into drones, stuff like that. So I said, look, let me take you to the hospital.
He said he was start­ing to dri­ve to the hos­pi­tal with his friend, Pannell, and turned on his blink­er to make a left turn on Whitelock when the friend said, “You in on it, too.” He said his friend start­ed scream­ing, and said, “They’re com­ing to get me.” He said Pannell pulled out his gun, point­ed it at him, and then point­ed it at his own head. The hus­band fled the car. He told the offi­cer, “I thought he was gonna kill me.” Around 11:40 p.m., the video says, offi­cers went to the Holiday Inn Express on Stockton Boulevard and Laguna Boulevard, right off Highway 99. A hotel employ­ee had report­ed a dis­tur­bance. A very short clip of secu­ri­ty footage from the Holiday Inn shows a man in the lob­by lean­ing over the front desk; that footage has no audio. When police arrived, they saw the car that had been report­ed stolen sit­ting emp­ty in the Holiday Inn park­ing lot. They deter­mined Pannell was the man in the lob­by. In the video, four offi­cers walk through the auto­mat­ic slid­ing doors of the lob­by and three imme­di­ate­ly raise their guns. One hol­sters her weapon and switch­es to a taser. Body-worn cam­era footage shows the offi­cers shout­ing at Pannell: “Hands up.” He puts his hands up. Multiple offi­cers then yell, “Get on the ground” mul­ti­ple times, and one of the offi­cers directs them, “One per­son talk.” Pannell says some­thing inaudi­ble, then seems to say, “There’s peo­ple try­ing to kill me.” A female offi­cer shouts, “You will be tased; get on the ground.”

Taser fired, then shots

Multiple offi­cers shout more com­mands at Pannell. He keeps his hands stiffly raised out in front of him. Pannell says, “I don’t want to die. Please, please. I don’t want to die. Listen, please. Please.” In response, the female offi­cer shouts, “Taser, taser, taser,” and deploys it. The inter­ac­tion from the moment that the slid­ing door opened to the moment that the offi­cer deployed her taser last­ed 35 sec­onds. It’s unclear whether the taser actu­al­ly hit Pannell. In the video, he runs away from the offi­cers and they chase him down a hall­way. In the footage from the chase, it’s dif­fi­cult to see what hap­pens. One offi­cer says, “He’s run­ning, he has a gun.” An offi­cer fires his weapon five times down the hotel hall­way. The video says offi­cers saw Pannell hold the gun to his own head as he was run­ning away. By the time the offi­cer fires the first shot, a lit­tle over a minute has elapsed since they entered the hotel. “Stop mov­ing!” one offi­cer shouts down the hall­way. Outside the exit door, which has shat­tered glass like­ly caused by the gun­fire, a bystander is lying on the ground. Officers shout, “Let me see your hands! Hands!” Pannell is lying on the ground, a few feet far­ther away. The bystander shak­i­ly rais­es his hands. “Are you shot?” an offi­cer asks the bystander. (The video says the bystander was not hit by a bul­let.) When the offi­cers approach Pannell, they see that he has two gun­shot wounds — in the leg and the head. As a male offi­cer holds one of Pannell’s arms, the female offi­cer takes away his gun. The video says that police offi­cers found one spent shell cas­ing out­side the hotel that matched the ammu­ni­tion in Pannell’s gun; they con­clud­ed that he fired only one shot, out­side the hotel, after police start­ed shoot­ing at him. Text in the video says it is uncer­tain whether the head wound was from the police officer’s gun, or whether Pannell killed him­self as police were chas­ing him. A coroner’s report is still pend­ing. The Elk Grove Police Department said it released the video before the inves­ti­ga­tion into the inci­dent was con­clud­ed “in the inter­est of trans­paren­cy with the com­mu­ni­ty we serve.” They pub­lished the video on YouTube Friday evening, post­ing a link to Twitter at 7:15 p.m.

Stiffer Penalties Do Nothing To Deter Criminals/​What Idiot Would Say That?

YouTube player

LAPD Cop Found Liable For Protester’s Injury In $375,000 Verdict

LOS ANGELES, CA - DECEMBER 08: Deon Jones, 29, a man who was shot in the face and badly injured by a LAPD projectile round during protests this summer and is now suing the city, photographed at his apartment in downtown, on Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2020 in Los Angeles, CA. (Gary Coronado / Los Angeles Times) **Story is embargoed until the lawsuit is filed Wednesday, 12/9, so photos should not post before story.**
Deon Jones was shot in the face and injured by an LAPD pro­jec­tile round dur­ing protests in 2020. (Gary Coronado /​Los Angeles Times)

For the record:
7:32 a.m. March 11, 2023: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this arti­cle said that at a protest on May 30, 2020, in the Fairfax dis­trict of Los Angeles, a police car was sev­er­al blocks away from Deon Jones. The car was across the street from Jones.

In the first ver­dict of its kind since mass protests swept Los Angeles in 2020, a fed­er­al jury on Thursday found an LAPD offi­cer per­son­al­ly liable, for shoot­ing a pro­test­er in the face with a pro­jec­tile — award­ing the man $375,000.

The ver­dict fol­lowed a find­ing by the jury that the offi­cer, Peter Bueno, vio­lat­ed pro­test­er Deon Jones’ civ­il rights.

Jones lis­tened with his head bowed as a judge read the jury’s deci­sion in a Santa Ana court­room. Afterward, he said it was “a good day.”

This vic­to­ry isn’t just mine. It is for all the folks who his­tor­i­cal­ly have went out and protest­ed,” Jones said. “It sends a mes­sage that … law enforce­ment can­not bru­tal­ize folks.”

Bueno stared straight ahead as the ver­dict was read. His attor­ney, Janine Jeffery, declined to com­ment afterward.

LAPD offi­cers have rarely been held account­able for force used dur­ing the mass protests against police bru­tal­i­ty after the mur­der of George Floyd, despite hun­dreds of alle­ga­tions of exces­sive force lodged with the department.

The jury issued its deci­sion after a week of tes­ti­mo­ny in which Jones and Bueno offered stark­ly dif­fer­ent descrip­tions of the chaot­ic scene where the shoot­ing, which was only par­tial­ly cap­tured on video, occurred.

Jones, who suf­fered mul­ti­ple facial frac­tures when he was hit with the hard-foam pro­jec­tile, accused Bueno of fir­ing indis­crim­i­nate­ly into crowds in vio­la­tion of depart­ment pol­i­cy, and of dis­re­gard­ing the clear dan­ger that posed to peace­ful pro­test­ers like him.

Jones’ attor­ney, Orin Snyder, said he hoped the case would deter sim­i­lar force by LAPD offi­cers in the future.

Bueno, assigned to work as a “cov­er” offi­cer that day, described fir­ing only at spe­cif­ic indi­vid­u­als in the crowd who posed a threat to him and oth­er offi­cers. He denied shoot­ing Jones, and Jeffery ques­tioned whether Jones’ injuries were from a police pro­jec­tile at all

The eight-mem­ber jury delib­er­at­ed for about four hours Wednesday after­noon. The jurors recon­vened Thursday morn­ing and delib­er­at­ed for under an hour, com­ing back with their ver­dict in Jones’ favor short­ly after 9 a.m.

The jury ruled that Bueno had vio­lat­ed Jones’ 4th Amendment rights against unrea­son­able search­es and seizures by law enforcement.

It reject­ed oth­er claims that Bueno had dis­crim­i­nat­ed against Jones and that he had vio­lat­ed Jones’ 1st Amendment rights.

The jury first award­ed Jones $250,000 to com­pen­sate for his pain, suf­fer­ing and asso­ci­at­ed finan­cial loss­es since the shoot­ing. It then heard addi­tion­al argu­ments as to whether it should award Jones addi­tion­al “puni­tive” dam­ages, as pun­ish­ment for Bueno.

Jeffery asked the jury to be fair to Bueno, a 27-year depart­ment vet­er­an who she said is “going to con­tin­ue to pro­tect and serve” as a mem­ber of the LAPD.

Snyder said Bueno vio­lat­ed the trust placed in police offi­cers and should be held accountable.

When things get chaot­ic on the streets of Los Angeles,” he said, “that’s when we need police to be at their best.”

After delib­er­at­ing fur­ther, the jury award­ed Jones anoth­er $125,000.

How the dam­ages will be paid remained unclear Thursday.

The city may choose to indem­ni­fy Bueno and cov­er his costs, but Jeffery said there was “no guar­an­tee” of that giv­en the com­po­si­tion of the L.A. City Council, which includes fierce crit­ics of the LAPD and its response to the protests.

The tri­al, which focused on Jones’ alle­ga­tions against Bueno, was the first phase of a broad­er law­suit that Jones filed. Future pro­ceed­ings will con­sid­er Jones’ alle­ga­tions that the LAPD and the city of L.A. were neg­li­gent in their over­sight of offi­cers dur­ing the protests, and could result in more dam­ages to be paid out by taxpayers.

Jones’ win in court stands out for sev­er­al reasons.

Few indi­vid­ual offi­cers have been dis­ci­plined by the LAPD for actions tak­en dur­ing the 2020 protests, despite the hun­dreds of alle­ga­tions of exces­sive force and oth­er mis­con­duct, accord­ing to LAPD data reviewed by The Times.

A half-dozen pro­test­ers have agreed to end their own lit­i­ga­tion against the city in exchange for cash set­tle­ments that did not include any acknowl­edg­ment of wrong­do­ing by offi­cers or the city.

Jones had turned down a set­tle­ment offer from the city. It turned out to be less than what he was award­ed Thursday.

He told his lawyers that he want­ed to hold Bueno account­able for shoot­ing him, and the city and the LAPD account­able for allow­ing exces­sive force against pro­test­ers. He want­ed them to be found in the wrong and not to silence him using tax­pay­er dollars.

Jones, 31, who is Black and works in enter­tain­ment and brand con­sult­ing, was wound­ed dur­ing a mas­sive May 30, 2020, demon­stra­tion in the Fairfax dis­trict. Activists had gath­ered to decry the mur­der of Floyd by police in Minneapolis and the killings of oth­er Black Americans in police custody.

The Times pub­lished an arti­cle two weeks lat­er out­lin­ing Jones’ and oth­er pro­test­ers’ claims that police beat them with batons and shot them with pro­jec­tiles with­out jus­ti­fi­ca­tion, which prompt­ed an inter­nal inves­ti­ga­tion by the LAPD that result­ed in no dis­ci­pline for Bueno.

Jones filed his law­suit in December 2020.

Over the span of two days on the wit­ness stand, Jones recount­ed the sequence of events, telling jurors he felt a moral duty to join oth­ers protest­ing injus­tice at Pan Pacific Park.

When oth­er pro­test­ers set a police car on fire across the street, he and a friend wor­ried that offi­cers would respond with force and moved to the park­ing lot of a near­by Trader Joe’s.

Jones was livestream­ing the scene with his phone when he noticed an offi­cer, whom he lat­er iden­ti­fied as Bueno, point­ing a weapon in his direc­tion. Jones said he turned his face to avoid being struck head-on, and the round struck him in the cheek.

Jones tes­ti­fied that he suf­fered severe emo­tion­al dis­tress and lost job oppor­tu­ni­ties due to his facial injuries.

The hurt that you feel because of what hap­pened to you. The flash­backs that you have because of what hap­pened to you. The dreams that you have because of what hap­pened to you,” Jones told jurors. “If I’m being hon­est, it just flat-out hurts. It’s hurt­ful. It hurts. It’s some­thing — I didn’t do any­thing wrong.”

The top­ic of Black Lives Matter and the world­wide move­ment against racial injus­tice that fol­lowed Floyd’s death only occa­sion­al­ly sur­faced dur­ing the trial.

Both Jeffery and Bueno paint­ed a pic­ture for the jury of an out-of-con­trol crowd that pelt­ed offi­cers with rocks and bot­tles. Jeffery showed video and still images of a squad car on fire and oth­ers with win­dows bro­ken and cov­ered with anti-police graffiti.

It was chaos out there. I mean, there was peo­ple throw­ing rocks, bot­tles,” Bueno tes­ti­fied. “They were vio­lent. People com­ing up to us, they were hostile.”

Bueno admit­ted that fir­ing a 40-mil­lime­ter hard-foam pro­jec­tile at a per­son­’s head could cause seri­ous injury and that the weapon was­n’t intend­ed for fir­ing into a crowd.

He said he was fir­ing at a “spe­cif­ic tar­get” — an uniden­ti­fied per­son who emerged from the crowd and threw a water bot­tle that land­ed at his feet.

He recount­ed how, after he worked more than 20 hours the day before, he and his pla­toon were ordered to respond to the area of South Fairfax Avenue and West 3rd Street.

He blamed a faulty on/​off switch for his body cam­era being off for 4½ of the six hours that he was on duty that day.

Bueno remains assigned to the LAPD’s Metropolitan Division, an élite unit that, among oth­er duties, han­dles crowd control.

Jones’ friend Niara Hill broke down in tears on the stand while recount­ing the moments before and after Jones was shot.

After spend­ing most of the day togeth­er at the protest, Hill said, the two of them were briefly sep­a­rat­ed. She was about 10 feet away when a pro­test­er with­in “touch­ing dis­tance” of Jones hurled a water bot­tle in the direc­tion of an offi­cer who was hold­ing a green 40-mil­lime­ter pro­jec­tile launch­er, she said.

Moments lat­er, that offi­cer fired at Jones, she said.

Later, Jeffery asked Hill whether her social media posts about the case were for publicity.

Hill said no.

I want­ed peo­ple to know that there were police offi­cers who were shoot­ing peo­ple in the face with rub­ber bul­lets,” she said.

In clos­ing remarks, Snyder said that Jones and Hill thought they were doing the right thing by head­ing to the park­ing lot after con­fronta­tions between some pro­test­ers and police turned vio­lent on 3rd Street.

They did the right thing and removed them­selves from the tumult of the street. They did what every par­ent would want them to do. They sought safe­ty,” Snyder said. “And this is an irony in this case: This is where the police want­ed peo­ple to go.”

The only defense wit­ness, LAPD tac­ti­cal flight offi­cer Chad Zipperman, tes­ti­fied that from his van­tage point aboard a depart­ment heli­copter, the sit­u­a­tion on the ground had spi­raled out of con­trol. He esti­mat­ed that at one point, the crowd around Bueno and Jones had swelled to 2,000 to 3,000 peo­ple, some of whom swarmed and van­dal­ized an MTA bus.

The vast major­i­ty of the crowd that lin­gered was vio­lent,” he testified.

Jeffery seized on what she deemed were dis­crep­an­cies in Jones’ descrip­tion of the offi­cer who fired the 40-mil­lime­ter round and of the extent of his injuries. She showed the jury mes­sages from Jones to his friends in the days and weeks after the inci­dent, telling them he was phys­i­cal­ly OK.

Jones tes­ti­fied that he was nev­er diag­nosed with a trau­mat­ic brain injury by a physi­cian, say­ing it was because he lacked health insur­ance at the time.

Jeffery also argued that there was­n’t enough evi­dence to show that her client shot Jones, or that Jones was even shot — sug­gest­ing that he may have been injured in oth­er ways dur­ing the protest.

Snyder accused Bueno and Jeffery of try­ing to dis­tract the jury by tar­nish­ing Jones’ name with­out ever explain­ing why Bueno had fired his weapon — “just attack­ing, attack­ing, attack­ing these young peo­ple who came here to share their truth.”

After the award was announced, both Snyder and Jones said their sights were now set on the sec­ond part of the case and hold­ing the city and the LAPD account­able, too.

This sto­ry orig­i­nal­ly appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Jury Sent A Strong Message In Rights Violation Case, Will A Judge Reduce The Verdict?

You sim­ply have to see this sto­ry. The details are so far-fetched that it tram­ples every façade America has as a free soci­ety where black peo­ple can go about their busi­ness with­out fear of the government.
I have said this before and will con­tin­ue to state this fact. The great­est threat to any Black per­son in the United States is the police.
A black per­son walk­ing or dri­ving down any road or high­way faces the great­est dan­ger from America’s race sol­diers, the police.
The behav­ior of these cops if allowed to stand, would cre­ate a prece­dent that would make it a crime for any per­son to pull up to any place and sit in their car. There was absolute­ly no rea­son that the cop did not walk away except that he saw a black woman and her two daugh­ters, and he decid­ed that he would uni­lat­er­al­ly vio­late their rights and strip them of their dignity.
But the tragedy is not just with their out­ra­geous actions, which should have got­ten them fired and crim­i­nal­ly charged; it is that they were pro­mot­ed and kept on the job to com­mit more rights vio­la­tions cost­ing the tax­pay­ers count­less mil­lions and poten­tial­ly killing inno­cent peo­ple. This should send a chill down the spine of every black man who calls him­self a man and has a wife and chil­dren; I know I do. Do you watch your wife being vio­lat­ed for absolute­ly no reason?
To top it all, they inves­ti­gat­ed them­selves and found they had done noth­ing wrong.
Watch the video below.

YouTube player

Jury awards Black family $8.25 million in wrongful detention by deputies at California Starbucks

A fed­er­al jury award­ed a moth­er and her two daugh­ters $8.25 mil­lion after they were unlaw­ful­ly searched and hand­cuffed by Alameda County sher­if­f’s deputies at a Castro Valley Starbucks on their way to tak­ing one of the young women to a col­lege math test in Berkeley. The women were not phys­i­cal­ly harmed by law enforce­ment, but the dol­lar amount of the award sig­nals that the jurors felt the fam­i­ly’s con­sti­tu­tion­al rights had been stripped because of their skin color. 

Starbucks in Castro Valley, Calif​.Google

I think that every­body rec­og­nizes we all have implic­it bias,” their attor­ney, Craig Peters of San Francisco, said in an inter­view on Monday. “I have it. You have it. We’ve all got it. These offi­cers are no dif­fer­ent. And so, sub­con­scious­ly, there was some­thing going on that made them unrea­son­ably sus­pi­cious of this fam­i­ly. I think that if this same sce­nario hap­pened and these were white women, it would have played out very dif­fer­ent­ly.” The ver­dict was reached on March 1 fol­low­ing a two-day civ­il tri­al before U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup in San Francisco. A jury delib­er­at­ed for 16 hours before award­ing the moth­er and daugh­ters this unprece­dent­ed amount from the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office.

Specifically, the jury found Deputy Steven Holland liable for $2.7 mil­lion to their moth­er, Aasylei Loggervale, and $2 mil­lion apiece to her daugh­ters, Aaottae Loggervale, then 17, and Aasyeli Hardege-Loggervale, then 19. The jury also found then-Deputy Monica Pope liable for $750,000 to both daugh­ters and that Alameda County is liable for the actions of its deputies. It’s pos­si­ble the judge could low­er the award if the coun­ty con­vinces him to do so. But noth­ing has been filed in court to indi­cate that so far. Neither the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office nor Kevin Gilbert, the attor­ney rep­re­sent­ing the coun­ty, respond­ed for com­ment on Monday. Both Holland and Pope have since been pro­mot­ed. The civ­il tri­al, also lit­i­gat­ed by attor­neys Joseph May and Brian Gearinger, alleged false arrest, inva­sion of pri­va­cy, neg­li­gence, and vio­la­tions of the 1st, 4th, and 14th Amendments. The Loggervales declined to be inter­viewed. Their sto­ry has nev­er been pub­licly told before, and some of their rel­a­tives don’t even know what hap­pened to them or that they won a mas­sive jury amount. But they tes­ti­fied dur­ing the tri­al, and jurors found sided with their account, stem­ming from an encounter on Sept. 20, 2019.

Black mom and two daughters are awarded $8.25m after arrest on suspicion of car theft
Steven Holland

That’s when moth­er Aasylei Loggervale, who is a tax pre­par­er, and her two daugh­ters were sit­ting in their rent­ed Cadillac out­side of Starbucks in Castro Valley. The trio, all of whom are Black, were at the end of their dri­ve from Nevada. They were parked in a dis­abled spot, and were at the cof­fee shop ear­ly to take Aasylei Hardge-Loggervale to a sta­tis­tics test in Berkeley on time. She was attend­ing com­mu­ni­ty col­lege and was plan­ning on trans­fer­ring her cred­its to UCLA. Two deputies, Holland and Pope, were on patrol at the time and approached the rent­ed Cadillac. They told the Loggervale fam­i­ly that they were inves­ti­gat­ing car bur­glar­ies com­mit­ted by uniden­ti­fied Black men. But in fact, one police report shows that the sus­pects were iden­ti­fied as one Black man and one Latino man, Peters said. At first, the Loggervales thought they were being warned about the break-ins and they were grateful. 

But that feel­ing quick­ly soured when the deputies began ques­tion­ing the moth­er about whether she was legal­ly able to park in a dis­abled spot, despite her hav­ing a vis­i­ble plac­ard in her car win­dow. The deputies also demand­ed to see the elder Loggervale’s iden­ti­fi­ca­tion, which she declined to pro­vide. Under the 4th Amendment, cit­i­zens have the right to be free from unrea­son­able search­es, which includes being asked for ID if an offi­cer can’t artic­u­late that a per­son has com­mit­ted a crime. “Ms. Loggervale did not want to engage fur­ther with defen­dants because as a Black per­son, she feared the encounter could result in seri­ous phys­i­cal harm or death to her and/​or her daugh­ters,” the orig­i­nal civ­il suit stat­ed. Still, the deputies arrest­ed the women, put them in the back of their patrol car and searched their trunk. 

pic-for-lisa.png

The deputies then claimed that one of the daugh­ters com­mit­ted “bat­tery” when she opened the car door and struck Holland. But the video pre­sent­ed in court showed that when she tried to open the car door to exit, the deputy pushed it closed on her. Video tak­en by the daugh­ters, as well as body cam­era video from the sher­if­f’s office, showed how the stop esca­lat­ed into ten­sion and tears. “What am I being detained for?” the elder Loggervale asked. “I’m informed I can’t go to the restroom.” Holland respond­ed: “Sit in the car, or you’re going in hand­cuffs.” Mother and daugh­ters repeat­ed­ly asked what they were being detained for. They nev­er received an answer. “You have to tell me what you’re detain­ing me for,” the elder Loggervale is heard say­ing. “I do not,” said Deputy Keith Leeper, who had also showed up at the scene. The deputies placed the fam­i­ly in the back of the patrol car, where they were held for about 70 min­utes. They’re heard cry­ing. Loggervale kept ask­ing to use the restroom.
Eventually, the fam­i­ly was let go. None was charged with any crime. During the tri­al, the deputies tes­ti­fied about their ver­sion of events, and how they were out inves­ti­gat­ing car bur­glar­ies. They insist­ed that they were in the right. “The offi­cers would have been well-served to sort of take a good hard look at what had hap­pened and just acknowl­edge some of it,” Peters said. “But instead, they kind of dou­bled down on try­ing to shade facts to try and make this sit­u­a­tion seem not as bad as it was, try to raise some doubt, you know, attack­ing the women.”

Black mom and two daughters are awarded $8.25m after arrest on suspicion of  car theft
Monica Pope

An Internal Affairs inves­ti­ga­tion found that the deputies did noth­ing wrong, accord­ing to Peters. Both Holland and Pope are now sergeants. “I think what makes me upset is that the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office did­n’t take the ini­tia­tive to cor­rect what to me seems like such an easy thing to have cor­rect­ed ear­ly on,” Peters said. “And instead, they want­ed to sweep it under the rug.” Peters said no one in the sher­if­f’s office seemed to say, “we need to fix this, let’s talk to this fam­i­ly, apol­o­gize, say, ‘Hey, we were wrong, we’re work­ing on this,’ do some retrain­ing. That would have been the respon­si­ble thing to do.” An analy­sis of exces­sive force and wrong­ful death police pay­outs from 2015 to 2020 by KTVU revealed that Alamada County has paid out the most of any law enforce­ment agency in the Bay Area dur­ing that time peri­od. The top two awards, before the Loggervale’s, were for $5.5 mil­lion and $5 mil­lion, respec­tive­ly, stem­ming from injuries and the death of a 20-year-old Fremont man. As for Aasylei Hardge-Loggervale, she made it to her math test that day, 40 min­utes late. She is about to grad­u­ate UCLA this year. But her life, and her sis­ter’s and moth­er’s lives, will nev­er be the same. “They worked hard,” Peters said. “And then this hap­pens and it just shakes your foun­da­tion about the place you live in. I hope that they can recov­er that at some point, but I sus­pect they won’t. I sus­pect that to some extent for the rest of their life, every time they see police offi­cers, every time they’re in a Starbucks park­ing lot, they’re going to remem­ber this.”(foxla)

Police Footage Shows Barrage Of Gunfire That Killed 25-year-old

Many white peo­ple are desen­si­tized to police vio­lence against peo­ple of col­or. Others say just do as they say in a cold, cal­cu­lat­ed way that is devoid of under­stand­ing that police are not oper­at­ing with­in the laws but, from what we say dai­ly, are oper­at­ing as occu­pa­tion­al forces in our communities.
Ant to be fair, some con­sci­en­tious white peo­ple under­stand that what is hap­pen­ing is not polic­ing but mur­der under the col­or of law.
On the oth­er hand, when it comes to defund­ing police depart­ments and using the mon­ey for oth­er com­mu­ni­ty uses, and hold­ing police account­able the white pop­u­la­tion, Republicans and Democrats once again coa­lesce around the con­struct of policing.
This writer is a strict law and order per­son who spent a decade in law enforce­ment. Nevertheless, I can­not remain silent and pre­tend that what police are doing under the col­or of the law is not murder.
It pains my heart to see police offi­cers snuff­ing out the life of peo­ple, using pre­tex­tu­al stops as jus­ti­fi­ca­tion to abuse and mur­der citizens.
As I have said, white dis­in­ter­est in police vio­lence and mur­der of black peo­ple and oth­er peo­ple of col­or is a dan­ger­ous strategy.
If we are not vig­i­lant in con­trol­ling the peo­ple we give pow­er to, they will use it against us, who gave it to them in the first place.
No one is safe if police can sim­ply shout ‘gun’, and sum­mar­i­ly exe­cute a per­son in the safe place of their car, home, or any oth­er place.
Whether black or white, we are all one race of people.….the human race. The illic­it tak­ing of inno­cent life in the United States by police is a can­cer that threat­ens us all. (mb)

First, they came for the social­ists, and I did not speak out — because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade union­ists, and I did not speak out — because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out — because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.
—Martin Niemöller

25-year-old Chase Allan

Police in Farmington, Utah, released body cam­era footage Wednesday that cap­tured the bar­rage of gun­fire which killed a 25-year-old man dur­ing a traf­fic stop last week. Chase Allan was pulled over by Farmington police on March 1 at around 3:20 p.m. near a post office after an offi­cer spot­ted an ille­gal license plate — a plac­ard with a flag — on Allan’s blue BMW, Farmington police Chief Eric Johnsen said dur­ing a press con­fer­ence Wednesday. During the press con­fer­ence, Johnsen told reporters that offi­cers start­ed to shoot after they saw Allan reach down, but also said that it is unclear exact­ly what hap­pened in those brief sec­onds because the body cam­er­a’s view is unclear.An image taken from police body camera shows police officers aiming at the car of 25-year-old Chase Allan. Allan was killed by police during a traffic stop on March 1, 2023.   / Credit: Farmington City Police Department, via AP

The footage — a com­pi­la­tion video of five body-worn police cam­eras and a sin­gle dash­board cam­era — shows a police car fol­low­ing Allan’s BMW into a park­ing lot. The offi­cer parks behind Allan’s car walks over to it, and taps on the dri­ver’s win­dow. Allan cracks open the win­dow while hold­ing a cell­phone. “The rea­son you were stopped today is there is no reg­is­tra­tion on your vehi­cle,” the offi­cer tells Allan in the video. “I don’t need reg­is­tra­tion and I don’t answer ques­tions,” Allan replies. “Alrighty,” the offi­cer says, and then pro­ceeds to call back­up. The offi­cer and Allan go back and forth about why he was pulled over, before the offi­cer tells Allan he is “detained and not free to leave.” He then con­tin­ues to ask for iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. Allan can be heard cit­ing what he claims are legal argu­ments for his refusal to pro­vide one. “I under­stand what you are say­ing,” the offi­cer replies. “But you are law­ful­ly required to iden­ti­fy yourself.”

Farmington police chief Eric Johnsen

More argu­ing ensues before Allan hands the offi­cer a pass­port. The offi­cer then orders Allan to step out of the vehi­cle. At this point, the video shows oth­er offi­cers have arrived at the scene. Allan is seen refus­ing to step out of the car. He is still wear­ing his seat­belt and hold­ing his cell phone. “I am not required to,” Allan tells the police. The body­cam footage then stops and high­lights what police allege is a “hol­ster on Mr. Allan’s hip.” The hol­ster is “flex­ing upward,” as seen through the dri­ver’s win­dow, police said. Allan, wear­ing a kha­ki coat and a truck­er hat, still refus­es to step out when anoth­er offi­cer warns him that if he does­n’t com­ply, “we’re going to break the win­dow and pull you out.” Allan is then seen trans­fer­ring his cell phone from his left hand to his right hand as an offi­cer opens the dri­ver’s door. The police video then stops to high­light what it claims is Allan’s right hand mov­ing toward the hol­ster. As anoth­er offi­cer wear­ing a beanie leans into the front seat and tries to get Allan, one of the offi­cers yells, “gun! gun! gun!”

The police offi­cer slams the door shut, and five offi­cers are seen draw­ing their guns and rapid­ly fir­ing sev­er­al rounds at the BMW. An offi­cer then yells, “cease fire,” and the shoot­ing stops. The offi­cers pull Allan’s body out of the car. The footage again stops to high­light an “emp­ty” hol­ster on his hip. The video then shows a gun on the floor, par­tial­ly vis­i­ble under the mat of the dri­ver’s seat. The five offi­cers involved in the shoot­ing have not been iden­ti­fied. “I feel like they deserve pri­va­cy right now,” Johnsen said Wednesday. Allan’s fam­i­ly has accused the police of “bru­tal mur­der,” say­ing they have been “stonewalled” by the depart­ment, accord­ing to a state­ment released to local media last week. Allan’s fam­i­ly said he was “study­ing law the last few years and was a patri­ot doing what he could to defend the peo­ple’s free­dom and lib­er­ty in his com­mu­ni­ty,” accord­ing to the Salt Lake Tribune. Four of the five offi­cers have been with Farmington police for between sev­en and eight months, and the fifth offi­cer is a 12-year vet­er­an of the depart­ment, Johnsen said. The sta­tus of the offi­cers was not clear, but Johnsen said he was down 20% of his force and thanked oth­er police depart­ments for help­ing with dai­ly oper­a­tions. Allan’s fam­i­ly has said the offi­cer who pulled him over “request­ed mul­ti­ple oth­er offi­cers to the scene a cou­ple of blocks pri­or to the stop,” accord­ing to the Salt Lake Tribune. At the press con­fer­ence, Johnsen dis­put­ed the fam­i­ly’s state­ment. “I want to point out there has been a state­ment, an alle­ga­tion made that back-up was called for before this, that is absolute­ly untrue,” the police said. “It’s a trag­ic end­ing to what start­ed out as an every­day traf­fic stop,” Johnsen said.

Vast Majority Of Jamaican Police Shootings Justified, Despite Lack Of Non-lethal Tools

YouTube player

Testifying before the Parliament Internal and External Affairs Committee Deputy Indecom Commissioner Hamish Campbell, In response to the PNP’s Lisa Hanna’s ques­tion, why most offi­cers involved in fatal shoot­ings were not charged, respond­ed, “.A great major­i­ty of the [police] shoot­ings, to use an American term, are ‘law­ful but awful.’
Not sure where Hamish Campbell saw that char­ac­ter­i­za­tion, but first, I would like to address Lisa Hanna’s ques­tion of why most cops are not charged when they are engaged in police-relat­ed shootings.
Was her ques­tion a real ques­tion? Did she ask the ques­tion for the edi­fi­ca­tion of the pub­lic? It is dif­fi­cult to tell when one under­stands the igno­rance and pom­pos­i­ty of these so-called leg­is­la­tors, but I will let this one slide.
Before I go any fur­ther, I would like to high­light what the Bucky mas­sa said. 

The vast major­i­ty of offi­cers are not charged because the shoot­ings are legitimate.
Before we move for­ward, how­ev­er, let us dis­sect this issue to gain some clar­i­ty. As a writer who opines on the issue of police vio­lence dai­ly, it is impor­tant to appre­ci­ate the dynam­ic dif­fer­ences between Jamaican polic­ing and what pass­es for polic­ing across the United States.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​3​5​1​727 – 2/

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​d​e​f​u​n​d​-​t​h​e​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​s​o​u​n​d​-​p​r​i​n​c​i​p​le/

Literally every issue in the United States is col­ored by race, polic­ing chief among those issues. Jamaican polic­ing is free from racial bag­gage. Some would argue that there is clas­sism in Jamaican polic­ing. However, the lack of sup­port Jamaican cops receive from the polit­i­cal lead­er­ship makes it less like­ly that offi­cers would engage in clas­sism in per­form­ing their duties in Jamaica. In the United States, the police are backed up by the courts, the leg­is­la­tures, and the exec­u­tive, not to men­tion the vast major­i­ty of the white population.
Jamaican police vio­lence must also be con­tex­tu­al­ized, ie that the nation has a high rate of vio­lence, is a world leader in homi­cides and is a coun­try with an inor­di­nate amount of ille­gal weapons in the hands of vio­lent criminals.
It is impos­si­ble to rule out that there are strains of extra­ju­di­cial killings due to the judi­cia­ry’s refusal to fol­low the laws relat­ed to vio­lent criminals.
Hamish Campbell then went on: “So the use of force has been nec­es­sary, and the indi­vid­ual offi­cer is con­cerned for his own life or safe­ty of him­self or anoth­er.” “But what is hap­pen­ing for a lot of these cas­es, the tac­tics and approach could be dif­fer­ent in some of the cir­cum­stances because, once a police offi­cer draws the gun, there is almost an inevitabil­i­ty about what will hap­pen; he will cer­tain­ly use it and result­ing in death and injury.”

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​u​n​i​o​n​-​c​o​n​f​i​r​m​-​w​h​y​-​d​e​f​u​n​d​i​n​g​-​t​h​e​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​i​s​-​s​o​u​n​d​-​p​o​l​i​cy/

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​c​a​n​n​o​t​-​r​i​d​-​t​h​e​m​s​e​l​v​e​s​-​o​f​-​t​h​e​-​r​a​c​i​s​m​-​e​m​b​e​d​d​e​d​-​i​n​-​t​h​e​i​r​-​p​s​y​c​h​es/

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​n​a​j​e​e​-​s​e​a​b​r​o​o​k​s​-​d​e​d​i​c​a​t​e​d​-​h​i​s​-​l​i​f​e​-​t​o​-​r​e​d​u​c​i​n​g​-​v​i​o​l​e​n​c​e​-​i​n​-​h​i​s​-​c​o​m​m​u​n​i​t​y​-​t​h​e​n​-​h​e​-​w​a​s​-​k​i​l​l​e​d​-​b​y​-​p​o​l​i​ce/

YouTube player

Most of the research and writ­ings I have done have cen­tered on American police, one of the obser­va­tions I have made is that the defund the police call is legit­i­mate because cops should not be han­dling men­tal health calls. Simply put, we ask police offi­cers to do too much. In the United States, cops are asked to do far less than in Jamaica, yet they are giv­en far more to get the job done. Still, across the United States, police offi­cers resort to lethal vio­lence in many sit­u­a­tions where a dif­fer­ent approach would have suf­ficed with less trau­mat­ic results.
And so, I have argued that a police offi­cer should not strive to be only law­ful but should also be moral­ly jus­ti­fied in their use of force, par­tic­u­lar­ly in uti­liz­ing lethal force.
An offi­cer should not use lethal force because the law will exon­er­ate him; his con­science should also exon­er­ate him.
There are non-lethal tools that will reduce police shoot­ings, Tasers and even nets to cor­ral a per­son expe­ri­enc­ing a men­tal episode. Under no cir­cum­stances should a per­son expe­ri­enc­ing a men­tal episode become a vic­tim of police bullets.
In the same breath, it is crit­i­cal­ly impor­tant to rec­on­cile in Jamaica that the police do not have enough tools to avoid using lethal force in such cir­cum­stances as with indi­vid­u­als expe­ri­enc­ing men­tal episodes or who are con­sid­ered mad.
Many police offi­cers have been seri­ous­ly injured and killed try­ing to avoid using lethal force on vio­lent street peo­ple, some of whom had already seri­ous­ly wound­ed civilians.
Politicians liv­ing in lit­tle bub­bles in Jamaica who would ask sil­ly ques­tions would be bet­ter-served read­ing instead of pon­tif­i­cat­ing on sub­jects they do not know about.
INDECOM has come a long way since the days of dem­a­goguery under Terrence Williams; thank God he crawled under a rock, hope­ful­ly nev­er to be heard from again.
Police do need over­sight. I am hap­py to see that the agency is evolv­ing by pub­lish­ing facts and mak­ing rec­om­men­da­tions on how it feels the pub­lic may be bet­ter served. In the same breath, those who make pol­i­cy must rec­og­nize that there is a big dif­fer­ence between those who sit and ana­lyze after the fact and those who actu­al­ly face the dangers.
We know that com­mon sense and the abil­i­ty to crit­i­cal-think are in short sup­ply in many who pass for legislators.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Najee Seabrooks Dedicated His Life To Reducing Violence In His Community. Then He Was Killed By Police.

YouTube player
AT THIS POINT WORDS JUST CANNOT SUFFICE. IF WE ARE NOT AT CRITICAL MASS, I DON’T KNOW WHEN WE WILL GET TO THE TIPPING POINT WHERE ASPEOPLE, WE SAY NO MORE. NO PERSON GOING THROUGH MENTAL DISTRESS DESERVES TO BE KILLED BY POLICE
Marquise Francis National Reporter
Community activist Najee Seabrooks. (Paterson Healing Collective)

More than four days after Najee Seabrooks was shot and killed by Paterson police dur­ing a men­tal health cri­sis, his loved ones expressed out­rage at a vig­il Tuesday evening in Seabrooks’s home­town of Paterson, N.J. In a trag­ic twist of irony, the 31-year-old father of a lit­tle girl worked as a vio­lence inter­ven­tion activist to keep the most at-risk youth in his com­mu­ni­ty safe, but became a vic­tim of vio­lence him­self. “He did every­thing he could to serve his peo­ple,” Seabrooks’s best friend, Terrance Drakeford, said at the event, held out­side the offices of the Paterson Healing Collective (PHC), a group ded­i­cat­ed to pro­vid­ing sup­port for sur­vivors of vio­lence, where the two worked togeth­er. Upwards of 300 mem­bers of the com­mu­ni­ty and con­stituents from anti-vio­lence groups statewide gath­ered as tem­per­a­tures dropped to bone-chill­ing lev­els. Following the prayer vig­il, the group marched two blocks down the street to City Hall to hold a sec­ond demon­stra­tion on the steps out­side where city lead­ers were meet­ing to dis­cuss how the city would move forward.

Residents of Paterson, N.J., and anti-vio­lence activists from around the region gath­er on the steps of Paterson City Hall on Tuesday in sup­port of Seabrooks. (Marquise Francis/​Yahoo News)

There was anger, frus­tra­tion and pas­sion ema­nat­ing from atten­dees as speech­es inter­twined with chants of “Justice for Najee,” “No jus­tice, no peace,” and “Stop police bru­tal­i­ty in the Black com­mu­ni­ty.” “We want jus­tice,” Drakeford said. “We want what­ev­er that comes with this.”

The shooting

The shoot­ing last Friday fol­lowed a stand­off between Seabrooks and police that last­ed more than four hours, accord­ing to Paterson Press. Police had respond­ed to calls of a men­tal­ly dis­turbed per­son in his home, and when they arrived at the scene Seabrooks had alleged­ly bar­ri­cad­ed him­self inside the apart­ment. After pro­longed nego­ti­a­tions, police claim, Seabrooks let offi­cers into his homeand then charged at them with a knife. According to the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office, two offi­cers fired their weapons at Seabrooks, strik­ing him. He was lat­er pro­nounced dead at St. Joseph’s Regional Medical Center in Paterson. On Wednesday, the attor­ney general’s office released the names of the offi­cers who deployed their weapons: Anzore Tsay and Jose Hernandez. Both were mem­bers of the emer­gency response team. Officials say they could not deploy their Tasers because Seabrooks had bro­ken pipes in the apart­ment and start­ed a small fire that left sig­nif­i­cant amounts of water on the floor, mak­ing the use of the elec­tri­cal device too dan­ger­ous. “The police was here for hours try­ing to calm him down and bring him out of the apart­ment, but he decid­ed to turn the apart­ment on fire,” Councilman Luiz Velez told NBC New York. Paterson police did not respond to sev­er­al requests for com­ment from Yahoo News.

Seabrooks, cen­ter, with his friend Terrance Drakeford, left, and an uniden­ti­fied man at a Paterson street fes­ti­val. (Paterson Healing Collective)

But those who knew Seabrooks best are skep­ti­cal of the police account of what hap­pened and are urg­ing the imme­di­ate release of body cam­era record­ings of the inci­dent so the pub­lic can see for them­selves what took place. “We want full trans­paren­cy, the names of all the offi­cers released and body cam­era footage released,” Seabrooks’s broth­er Eli Carter said Tuesday. Seabrooks had con­tact­ed mem­bers of the PHC dur­ing his cri­sis, but police refused to let them inter­vene. Law enforce­ment said they could not allow civil­ians to involve them­selves in cri­sis pre­ven­tion and shot Seabrooks only after he wield­ed a knife and moved toward the offi­cers. Officials told Paterson Press that one of Seabrooks’s rel­a­tives who works as a police offi­cer in anoth­er city was brought to the scene to try to deesca­late the sit­u­a­tion. “I keep play­ing Friday over and over in my head,” Liza Chowdhury, project direc­tor of the PHC, said Tuesday, fight­ing back tears. “Police refused to let us inter­vene despite help­ing more than 250 res­i­dents through­out this city. I plead­ed with them, and I know if they let us inter­vene he would still be alive. … He called us to help.” Teddie Martinez, vio­lence inter­ven­tions coör­di­na­tor for the PHC, said he also plead­ed with police to allow him to help on Friday, but to no avail. “We train the offi­cers [on deesca­la­tion tac­tics], and how iron­ic they didn’t let us help,” Martinez said. “All I said was, ‘Let me see his face and I’ll go.’ They want­ed to make it their show.”

A demon­stra­tion in Paterson on Tuesday in sup­port of Seabrooks. (Marquise Francis/​Yahoo News)

.…

A demonstration in Paterson in support of Najee Seabrooks
A demon­stra­tion in Paterson on Tuesday in sup­port of Seabrooks. (Marquise Francis/​Yahoo News)

The state attor­ney general’s office is cur­rent­ly inves­ti­gat­ing the shoot­ing. “Any loss of life is a tragedy, and we express our deep­est con­do­lences to the fam­i­ly, loved ones and friends, and col­leagues of the dece­dent,” Dan Prochilo, a spokesper­son for the attor­ney general’s office, told Yahoo News. “Our office is com­mit­ted to thor­ough­ly, fair­ly and inde­pen­dent­ly inves­ti­gat­ing fatal police encoun­ters.” Prochilo added that the office will make all infor­ma­tion avail­able, includ­ing video, when the inves­ti­ga­tion is com­plete. Paterson Mayor André Sayegh has been qui­et since Friday’s shoot­ing, accord­ing to local res­i­dents. On Saturday he issued his only state­ment on the inci­dent, wel­com­ing the attor­ney general’s review and say­ing that “prayers and con­do­lences are with Mr. Seabrook’s [sic] fam­i­ly, friends and our impact­ed com­mu­ni­ty.” When con­tact­ed by Yahoo News, his office shared the same state­ment, adding that it had “no fur­ther com­ment at this time.” During one of the speech­es Tuesday night, an attendee shout­ed, “Where is the may­or? He knocked on my door to vote for him dur­ing elec­tion time, but I don’t see him here!

Community distrust in Paterson leadership

For many crit­ics in the com­mu­ni­ty already on edge fol­low­ing Seabrooks’s killing, each pass­ing day with no addi­tion­al infor­ma­tion only adds to the angst and frus­tra­tion. “In Memphis, they fired the cops with­in two weeks,” Larry Hamm, chair­man of the People’s Organization for Progress, a social jus­tice advo­ca­cy group, said, ref­er­enc­ing Tyre Nichols, the 29-year-old Black man fatal­ly beat­en by Memphis police fol­low­ing a traf­fic stop in January. “If they had let the Paterson Healing Collective inter­vene, he would be alive today.” How many Black men need to be killed before they take us seri­ous­ly?” Councilman Michael Jackson said before enter­ing a City Council meet­ing where only 20 res­i­dents were allowed inside.

Seabrooks was shot and killed by Paterson police last Friday. (Marquise Francis/​Yahoo News)

The Black Lives Matter chap­ter in Paterson has pre­sent­ed a list of demands for the city, which include the imme­di­ate release of police body cam­era footage of the inci­dent and plac­ing the offi­cers involved in the shoot­ing on admin­is­tra­tive leave. The group, spear­head­ed by leader Zellie Thomas, also demands a restruc­tur­ing of the city’s police depart­ment that would include cre­at­ing a civil­ian com­plaint review board to inves­ti­gate alle­ga­tions of police wrong­do­ing in addi­tion to invest­ing more mon­ey in com­mu­ni­ty groups that give Paterson res­i­dents pos­i­tive out­lets. “We have to open up people’s eyes that police offi­cers are not the only solu­tion to crises,” Thomas told Yahoo News, not­ing that conver­sa­tions about actu­al change come to a halt once the con­ver­sa­tion about the real­lo­ca­tion of police fund­ing comes up. The Paterson Police Department rep­re­sents more than 16% of the city’s bud­get, receiv­ing more than $43 mil­lion last year, which is more than dou­ble the per­cent­age that New York City allo­cates to its police depart­ment.

History of Paterson police violence

Seabrooks’s death isn’t the first case in which Paterson police have come under scruti­ny for their han­dling of peo­ple hav­ing a men­tal health cri­sis. In January 2019, 27-year-old Jameek Lowery died after con­sum­ing ille­gal drugs and express­ing feel­ings of “para­noia” before being repeat­ed­ly struck by police offi­cers try­ing to restrain him on an ambu­lance gur­ney. A law­suit filed by Lowery’s fam­i­ly cites at least three oth­er instances — two of them fatal — since 2012 in which Paterson police shot indi­vid­u­als expe­ri­enc­ing men­tal health episodes. There was also the death of 25‑year-old Thelonious McKnight, who was killed in late 2021 while flee­ing police. Hamm believes that the issue of race can­not be ignored. Paterson has just over 157,000 res­i­dents, made up of 87% Black and Hispanic res­i­dents and 8% white res­i­dents, accord­ing to the lat­est cen­sus data. Meanwhile, 1 in 3 Paterson offi­cers are white, while about 62% are Black or Hispanic. “There is a dif­fer­ent way that they treat Black peo­ple in dis­tress from white peo­ple in dis­tress,” Hamm said. Michael Mitchell, an assis­tant pro­fes­sor of African American stud­ies and crim­i­nol­o­gy at the College of New Jersey, told Yahoo News that the need for trans­paren­cy is urgent. “It is no secret that the Paterson Police Department is inun­dat­ed in a legit­i­ma­cy cri­sis due to the city’s tox­ic cop cul­ture,” he said in an email, point­ing to a recent Paterson police cor­rup­tion case. “Therefore, the urgency in releas­ing pub­licly the body-worn cam­era footage from the police emer­gency respon­ders involved can­not be over­stat­ed. A time lag in trans­paren­cy only exac­er­bates com­mu­ni­ty dis­trust in the insti­tu­tion pub­licly fund­ed to pro­tect and serve them.”

Police intervention with mental health crises under scrutiny

While many men­tal health advo­cates believe that offi­cers need addi­tion­al train­ing to deal with indi­vid­u­als expe­ri­enc­ing men­tal health crises, oth­er advo­cates say police should not be involved at all unless the per­son is armed and an imme­di­ate threat to oth­ers. They say police are sim­ply unqual­i­fied to han­dle the nuances of such sit­u­a­tions. In New Jersey, Mitchell notes, the pilot pro­gram ARRIVE Together, which pairs police with men­tal health pro­fes­sion­als dur­ing cri­sis calls, is show­ing promise, and Gov. Phil Murphy recent­ly announced a $10 mil­lion invest­ment in expand­ing the pro­gram statewide. “It is crit­i­cal that police agen­cies and offi­cers under­stand and oper­ate under the recog­ni­tion that you can­not respond to every per­son the same,” Mitchell said. “There can be no ‘one size fits all’ approach to polic­ing, espe­cial­ly when deal­ing with indi­vid­u­als expe­ri­enc­ing a men­tal health cri­sis.” Last year a three-dig­it National Suicide Prevention Lifeline num­ber, 988, offi­cial­ly launched, allow­ing any­one wit­ness­ing or expe­ri­enc­ing a men­tal health cri­sis to call, text or chat to talk to some­one. But a Yahoo News report found that many states did not have the resources to staff and sup­port the line adequately.

Najee Seabrooks
Najee Seabrooks. (Courtesy of the Paterson Healing Collective)

Over the last few years, sev­er­al cities, includ­ing New York, Chicago and Denver, have launched pro­grams that replace police response with men­tal health emer­gency respon­ders and have seen suc­cess. But crit­ics argue that the move­ment exists in far too few places and is expand­ing far too slow­ly. In Paterson, progress on the imple­men­ta­tion of a task force has been incon­sis­tent at best. Mayor Sayegh intro­duced a cit­i­zens’ de-esca­la­tion task force in December 2021, but, accord­ing to Thomas, the group has nev­er met and has not rolled out a sin­gle new reg­u­la­tion. “This task force was sup­posed to be able to research best prac­tices and best poli­cies for offi­cers to be equipped with de-esca­la­tion prac­tices and poli­cies, and over a year lat­er, that de-esca­la­tion task force still has not met,” Thomas said. “What if that task force had met and was already research­ing some of the things we are propos­ing now and imple­ment­ed it? It could have saved his life.”

Seabrooks’s legacy

According to those who knew him best, Seabrooks will be remem­bered by the com­mu­ni­ty as some­one who would do any­thing for those in need. His fam­i­ly start­ed a GoFundMe to cov­er funer­al expens­es and cre­ate a trust fund for his daugh­ter. His moth­er, Melissa Carter, told the CBS News local affil­i­ate in New York that her son loved his city so much that he gave of him­self in spite of his own per­son­al cir­cum­stances. “He planned toy give­aways, he donat­ed, he had home­less dri­ves,” Carter said. “All he want­ed to do was help the community.”

_​_​_​_​_​

mmm

Police Officer Raped Two Women While On Job In Tulare County. He’s Been Sentenced

A Tulare County police offi­cer was sen­tenced Tuesday for a series of rapes he did while on duty, includ­ing one in uni­form, pros­e­cu­tors said. Oscar Robles, 30, raped two dif­fer­ent vic­tims between April 2017 and January 2018, threat­en­ing to use his offi­cial pow­ers as a Woodlake offi­cer to arrest them if they did not sub­mit to the sex­u­al assault, the Tulare County District Attorney’s Office said.


Oscar Robles

He was sen­tenced to 10 years and eight months in prison on Tuesday, pros­e­cu­tors said. The DA filed 12 felony counts in 2018 against Robles, accus­ing him of sex­u­al assault of two vic­tims while under col­or of author­i­ty, wit­ness intim­i­da­tion, dis­suad­ing a wit­ness, false impris­on­ment, and assault by a peace offi­cer. The inves­ti­ga­tion began Sept. 11, 2018, after deputies patrolling near Visalia came across a man and a woman walk­ing, inves­ti­ga­tors said. The woman said a Woodlake police offi­cer had sex­u­al­ly assault­ed her. A sec­ond woman was soon found who said the same thing hap­pened to her. In one assault, Robles was in uni­form, inves­ti­ga­tors said. Robles, in April 2017, was involved in an offi­cer-involved shoot­ing in Woodlake that left a man paralyzed.

Absent A Cohesive And United Awakening African-Americans In Grave Danger…

YouTube player

The United States is a Republican-run coun­try with breaks for Democratic exec­u­tive lead­er­ship when the vot­ers are tired or dis­sat­is­fied with Republican lead­er­ship at the top.
Ultimately, how­ev­er, the coun­try is ruled by Republican poli­cies at the state lev­el leg­isla­tive­ly and book­end­ed by the Supreme Court on the oth­er end.
The man­i­fes­ta­tion of this is evi­dent in even good poli­cies cre­at­ed and enact­ed in the best of times for Democrats, à la, laws like the Affordable Care Act enact­ed under the pop­u­lar Democrat Obama come under con­tin­u­ous assault by Republicans and was saved the last time by Republican John McCain, in his now famous thumbs down vote.
Other Democratic ini­tia­tives passed under exi­gent cir­cum­stances dur­ing Democratic lead­er­ship have also come under increased Republican assault and have either been repealed by Congress or destroyed by the Supreme Court.


In 2016 while a pop­u­lar Democrat, Barack Obama, was in the white house, the John Roberts Supreme Court evis­cer­at­ed the 1965 Voting Rights Act passed under anoth­er Democratic President, Lyndon Johnson, in its (Shelby County V Holder) decision.
On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, over­rul­ing an ear­li­er deci­sion, Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of Commerce (Austin), that allowed pro­hi­bi­tions on inde­pen­dent expen­di­tures by corporations.
The deci­sion (cit­i­zens unit­ed) was a crush­ing blow to the work of many, includ­ing the late Republican US Senator from Arizona, John McCain, and for­mer Democratic US Senator Russ Feingold and oth­ers, to stem the flood of dark mon­ey into polit­i­cal campaigns.
The Roberts court ruled that large cor­po­ra­tions are peo­ple, and there­fore they were allowed to flood polit­i­cal cam­paigns with end­less streams of cash, drown­ing out the voic­es of the lit­tle man.
On Friday, June 24, 2022, the John Roberts Supreme Court over­turned Roe v. Wade, the land­mark piece of leg­is­la­tion that made access to abor­tion the law of the land. This leg­is­la­tion has been in effect since 1972. 


Many in the pun­dit­ry class bemoaned that fla­grant act of raw judi­cial pow­er as unprece­dent­ed, rep­re­sent­ing the first time in mod­ern his­to­ry that the court had rolled back rights that gen­er­a­tions of Americans had pre­vi­ous­ly enjoyed.
That assess­ment was incor­rect and flawed. The court had only six (6) years ear­li­er destroyed the fire­wall around vot­ing rights in the Shelby County V Holder deci­sion, there­by allow­ing a flood of anti-vot­ing laws all across Republican-run states.
Years ago, hav­ing noticed some of the trends emerg­ing from the polit­i­cal right, I com­ment­ed to some asso­ciates and fam­i­ly mem­bers that Black Americans were in deep per­il of being returned to slavery.
My asser­tions were based two-fold, (1) the anti-black pos­ture adopt­ed by the Republican par­ty and (2) the sense a large part of the African-American com­mu­ni­ty seemed to have that the civ­il rights fights were won and over with.
The prob­lem with hav­ing that sense of com­fort is that the peo­ple teach­ing their chil­dren to hate are doing so with a renewed sense of urgency based large­ly on their sense of enti­tle­ment, griev­ance, fear, and their dwin­dling pop­u­la­tion numbers.
As a con­se­quence, African-Americans adopt­ing a pos­ture that all is well are in grave dan­ger of hav­ing all the gains they were hand­ed by their ances­tors reversed.


Black his­to­ry is being removed from schools and Universities. Teachers risk los­ing their jobs and even going to prison for teach­ing the truth about black his­to­ry, that black peo­ple were here Hundreds of years before the Europeans.
African-Americans are forced to pay huge poll tax­es to secure the right to vote. Long lines mean that vot­ers in urban areas must stand in lines for up to 8 hours to vote.
Standing in line for 6 – 8 hours is a full work­day. It is a poll tax. White vot­ers in sub­ur­ban and rur­al areas are not forced to under­go those indig­ni­ties to exer­cise their franchise.
The Continuation and esca­la­tion of police bru­tal­i­ty and mur­der against African-Americans are a man­i­fes­ta­tion of a process cre­at­ed from slav­ery to keep Blacks in their place.
Even as I write this arti­cle, state leg­is­la­tures are work­ing assid­u­ous­ly to degrade the will of vot­ers in urban areas by remov­ing pow­ers from pro­gres­sive Mayors and Prosecutors and hand­ing them to Republican governors.
They will not stop until they return all Black peo­ple to chains on cor­po­rate plan­ta­tions (farms).

.

.


.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Cops Thirteen To Nineteen Weeks Of Training Better Paid Than Teachers With Seven To Eight Years Of College…

YouTube player

A teacher in Louisiana and Mississippi makes around forty to fifty thou­sand dol­lars( $40.000 to $50.000) annu­al­ly. Usually, that per­son must com­plete four years of under­grad­u­ate stud­ies, then anoth­er two years of post-grad­u­ate work, depend­ing on the per­son­’s sched­ule to earn a mas­ter’s degree…
Some Masters’s pro­grams can be com­plet­ed in less than two years if the stu­dent goes to school full-time, but it can also take more time. So on aver­age, it takes about six years to get to the lev­el of becom­ing a Teacher.
During the course of those stud­ies, a young per­son can rack up stu­dent loan debts of nine­ty to a hun­dred thou­sand dollars.
A police recruit spends an aver­age of 13 to 19 weeks in an acad­e­my. During train­ing, a police cadet is paid a salary; the salary will depend on the city, town, or munic­i­pal­i­ty where the cadet is being trained.
Teachers are some­times forced to use their own mon­ey to pur­chase crit­i­cal sup­plies to help their stu­dents. This is despite the low salaries they are paid. No one becomes any­thing with­out teach­ers, yet teach­ers are not giv­en the com­pen­sa­tion and respect they deserve.
Young peo­ple are [not] lin­ing up to be teach­ers and for good rea­sons. Factors impact­ing teacher reten­tion include heavy work­load, low pay, and esca­lat­ing liv­ing costs, with some 80% of sur­vey respon­dents say­ing it was dif­fi­cult to find afford­able hous­ing close to where they teach. Many also cit­ed a lack of sup­port from dis­trict administrators.

Officers receive a full start­ing salary while train­ing at a police acad­e­my. In most cas­es, the police acad­e­my is a six-month train­ing peri­od, includ­ing the NYPD and LAPD, in which you are trained in the law, how to use a weapon, and how to con­duct your­self as an offi­cer of the law. Once you suc­cess­ful­ly grad­u­ate police acad­e­my, you will like­ly get a bump in salary. Depending on the police depart­ment where you work, this salary bump can be as much as $2,000 or $3,000 more than what you earned while training.
The Los Angeles Police Department, for exam­ple, starts new recruits at $67,546 a year. In Philadelphia, recruits in the police acad­e­my earn $56,227, while in Austin, Texas, cadets receive $50,000 in base salary. Police cadets can also enroll in the department’s health care plan. They become eli­gi­ble for employ­er- and self-fund­ed retire­ment-plan­ning options, such as a pen­sion, 401k, or a 457b deferred retire­ment sav­ings plan. During your first year of ser­vice, you also get paid vaca­tion days and paid sick leave.
If you have a col­lege degree, or even col­lege cred­its, at the time of hire. There can be many oth­er incen­tives, depend­ing on the police force. In Austin, for exam­ple, you may be eli­gi­ble for an addi­tion­al $100 per month if you have an asso­ci­ate’s degree or $220 month­ly if you have a bach­e­lor’s degree. If you’re bilin­gual, expect an extra $175 per month in pay in Austin, Texas.
A cop in Suffolk coun­ty New York makes a base salary of $149,162; work­ing over­time, that cop can make expo­nen­tial­ly more than a US Senator.
Factors impact­ing teacher reten­tion include heavy work­load, low pay, and esca­lat­ing liv­ing costs, with some 80% of sur­vey respon­dents say­ing it was dif­fi­cult to find afford­able hous­ing near where they teach. Many also cit­ed a lack of sup­port from dis­trict administrators.

Some police salaries are so out­ra­geous that some peo­ple are begin­ning to speak out in dis­gust. On one social media site, one such dis­gust­ed per­son wrote.
MS of Science from Harrisburg University of Science and Technology (Graduated 2020). Police & Firefighters in California are the high­est com­pen­sat­ed in the entire world. Whoever tells you that is not true they are prob­a­bly talk­ing about the low­er cost of liv­ing cities of California. Here’s an exam­ple of a police offi­cer in San Mateo, California. He joined the force in May 2019, and his total com­pen­sa­tion for 2020 was 221KGoogle engi­neers in the first three years don’t bring this kind of mon­ey. I work a salary job, have an advanced degree, and live in San Mateo; I don’t bring this kind of mon­ey home. This is INSANE. The high­est-paid cop in Oakland made 640K a year, more than the President of the USOf course, cops will be cocky and dis­re­spect­ful when you pay them like CA does, walk­ing with a gun and a bul­let­proof vest and mak­ing 3 – 4 times the nation­al aver­age. Police are so out of real­i­ty that $250 (min­i­mum tick­et in Bay Area) might seem like not a lot of mon­ey, espe­cial­ly since they live on 200K+ income. People sym­pa­thize with cops (like I used to) as they believe their “hard job” is not appre­ci­at­ed and they don’t get paid enough. No way should a police offi­cer should get more than a sol­dier on the bat­tle­field thou­sands of miles away from home.

THE SO-CALLED DANGER LEVEL

Workplace safe­ty is very impor­tant in all indus­tries. Avoiding acci­dents and fatal­i­ties is a huge con­sid­er­a­tion for all busi­ness­es, from small pri­vate­ly-owned com­pa­nies to large nation­wide cor­po­ra­tions. Positions like teach­ing and admin­is­tra­tion have fatal­i­ty rates just slight­ly above zero because mis­takes in these indus­tries rarely result in phys­i­cal con­se­quences. The world’s most dan­ger­ous jobs are on the oth­er end of the spec­trum. These jobs bear a far greater sta­tis­ti­cal risk of phys­i­cal injury and death. (fac​ty​.com)

25 Most Dangerous Jobs
  1. Logging work­ers. Fatal injury rate: 111 per 100,000 workers. …
  2. Aircraft pilots and flight engi­neers. Fatal injury rate: 53 per 100,000 workers. …
  3. Derrick oper­a­tors in oil, gas, and mining. …
  4. Roofers. …
  5. Garbage col­lec­tors. …
  6. Ironworkers. …
  7. Delivery dri­vers. 
  8. Farmers
  9. fire­fight­ing supervisors
  10. Power line­men
  11. Agricultural work­ers
  12. Crossing guards
  13. Crane oper­a­tors
  14. Construction helpers
  15. Landscaping super­vi­sors
  16. Highway main­te­nance workers
  17. Cement masons
  18. Small engine mechanics
  19. Supervisors of Mechanics
  20. Heavy vehi­cle mechanics
  21. Grounds main­te­nance workers
  22. cops
  23. Maintenance work­ers
  24. Construction work­ers
  25. Mining machine operators
This study was done with data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries. They stud­ied pro­fes­sions with min­i­mum employ­ment of 50,000 work­ers to find the 25 most dan­ger­ous jobs among 263 total pro­fes­sions in the study. The fatal­i­ty rate was nor­mal­ized by adjust­ing the num­ber of fatal­i­ties by employ­ment in each pro­fes­sion. (facil​i​ties​.udel​.edu)
So that you have an idea when you hear cops, their unions, and their enablers com­plain about the dan­ger­ous job they have, you have some perspective.
Why both­er going to col­lege for sev­en or more years to get qual­i­fied to become a teacher? Take on $90.000 in debt when you can go into a police acad­e­my for 13 to 19 weeks and start receiv­ing a salary and all kinds of ben­e­fits immediately.
The empha­sis is clear­ly not on edu­cat­ing our youth; it is about giv­ing them the least edu­ca­tion­al oppor­tu­ni­ties so that they can con­tin­ue to become fod­der for the prison indus­tri­al complex.
.
.
.
.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

White Car Salesman Makes Video Of Him Urinating On A Black Woman’s Driver’s License She Left Behind After A Test Drive

A video has gone viral across social media that shows a car sales­man uri­nat­ing on a Black woman’s driver’s license. “I feel so vio­lat­ed,” Leah Jefferson wrote in a Facebook post. “I’m lit­er­al­ly shak­ing, scared and sick to my stom­ach.” The Milwaukee native con­tin­ued to explain her out­rage in her post. On Feb. 26, Jefferson vis­it­ed NH Auto Sales LLC in Kenosha, Wisconsin, to view a 2004 Honda Civic. In the post, Jefferson men­tioned she decid­ed to test dri­ve the car. The 19-year-old claimed she spoke with the car sales­man, Ryan Slaven, before com­ing to the lot. Jefferson recalled giv­ing her driver’s license to Slaven in the lengthy post. “Upon get­ting the keys I had to trade my ID in which I did in front of my friends mom and a ran­dom lady,” she wrote.

After a 30-minute test dri­ve, Jefferson attempt­ed to nego­ti­ate the price with the sales­man but ulti­mate­ly decid­ed against the vehi­cle. After leav­ing the deal­er­ship, she real­ized she had left her ID behind and con­tact­ed Slaven, offer­ing him a $5 Cash App trans­ac­tion to return her iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. Unfortunately, the car sales­man stat­ed he didn’t have her ID and “wouldn’t return to the office until Monday.” The post White Car Salesman Makes Video Of Him Urinating On A Black Woman’s Driver’s License She Left Behind After A Test Drive appeared first on Blavity. Jefferson admit­ted she was a lit­tle upset but under­stood. She end­ed the sto­ry by reveal­ing she received a shock­ing video through Instagram lat­er that evening. “My LICENSE, my state ID that is my prop­er­ty that I need. The guy in the bub­ble vest is his asso­ciate or boss; they sell cars togeth­er. STAY AWAY!!!!!!!!! I feel so vio­lat­ed dawg, my fam­i­ly address is list­ed in big prints where they lay and sleep and night. DO WHAT YOU NEED TO DO WITH THIS ONE,” she wrote. Jefferson shared screen­shots of Slaven’s Facebook pro­file, the car lot infor­ma­tion and the video a Snapchat user sent her.

The appalling video shows a man hold­ing Jefferson’s license say­ing, “This is what hap­pens … when you say stu­pid s**t to us.” While the men’s iden­ti­ties in the video are uncon­firmed, Jefferson believed Slaven and a cowork­er were hold­ing the license and record­ing the inci­dent. Another voice is heard in the back­ground, direct­ing the man to place the license on the bumper. The man places the ID on the back bumper of a beige-col­ored pick­up truck with a Wisconsin license plate that reads SG3539. Once the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion card is on the bumper, he uri­nates on it. The video clos­es with an image of a Trump Hotel door­mat. The Kenosha Police Department announced it is inves­ti­gat­ing the inci­dent on its Facebook page. The state­ment began: “KPD is aware of a dis­gust­ing act of dis­re­spect towards a person’s prop­er­ty, a video of which is being wide­ly shared on social media. We have been in con­tact with the vic­tim and are work­ing with that per­son on the inves­ti­ga­tion.” The state­ment con­tin­ued: “KPD is also aware that this video has been viewed, a lot! We are aware of the threats being made to the imma­ture cul­prits and their busi­ness. While we can under­stand that view­ing this video caus­es emo­tion­al reac­tions, we can­not and will not tol­er­ate any acts of vio­lence towards those respon­si­ble or asso­ci­at­ed with the busi­ness or the busi­ness itself.” There have been no reports of arrests made since the video became pub­lic. On Thursday, KPD issued anoth­er Facebook state­ment announc­ing it had referred mis­de­meanor charges to the Kenosha County District Attorney’s Office for “two adult men asso­ci­at­ed with the video” for crim­i­nal dam­age to prop­er­ty, dis­or­der­ly con­duct, theft, and unlaw­ful use of com­put­er­ized com­mu­ni­ca­tions sys­tems. However, author­i­ties said they would not “name the sus­pects until they are for­mal­ly charged.”(Yahoonews.com)