Police Federation Claps-back At Terrence Williams Deceit…

PUBLISHER’S NOTE:

The self-appoint­ed elites in Jamaica have always been high­ly offend­ed by the pow­ers of the police. They nev­er rec­on­ciled the idea of peo­ple from the poor­er caste hav­ing the pow­er to restrict their move­ment and free­dom.
If you under­stand that after the nation was hand­ed over to black & mul­la­to rule, the new­ly empow­ered for­mer down­trod­den, instan­ta­neous­ly became the new over­lords, (a new­ly mint­ed Bourjois‘).
Once we rec­on­cile that, we begin to bet­ter under­stand the ani­mos­i­ty between uptown and the police.
The con­sis­tent crit­i­cisms that the JCF was designed by the colo­nial mas­ters to con­trol blacks.
The con­sis­tent harp­ing about how the JCF was designed to sup­press the peo­ple after the Paul Bogle led Morant Bay Rebellion & there­fore anti­thet­i­cal and inher­ent­ly anti-Jamaican. 

That screed has always been based on the fact that the JCF was put togeth­er by the British, & that the pow­ers of the police were con­sis­tent with how polic­ing pow­ers were sup­posed to be autho­rized.
Those pow­ers were anti­thet­i­cal to the rigid caste sys­tem that devel­oped imme­di­ate­ly after the for­mer house slaves became the new [Massas].
The new Massas did not want a group of peas­ants from the under­class hav­ing such pow­ers.
An imme­di­ate crack appeared between those who enforced the rule of law & the new rulers who want­ed a clear under­stand­ing that the young nation’s laws would under no cir­cum­stances apply to them or any­one in their caste.
It is for those pur­pos­es that the unscrupu­lous politi­cians in the coun­try and those oth­ers who believed the laws ought not to apply to them were nev­er com­fort­able with the pow­ers of the police.

The police were instru­men­tal in the for­ma­tion of (INDECOM), The sup­posed Independent Commission Of Investigations, that was formed under the lead­er­ship and with the work of the JLP’s Bruce Golding.
The agency was sup­posed to be an answer to ram­pant Police abuse and acts of crim­i­nal­i­ty, much of which was true there­fore arguably jus­ti­fy­ing the cre­ation of the agency.
However, INDECOM pre­sent­ed to ene­mies of the police a gold­en oppor­tu­ni­ty to sock it to the police, that they had always held in pure and unadul­ter­at­ed contempt.

The Act would be so oner­ous that it would lit­er­al­ly take away the fun­da­men­tal right mem­bers of the force had against self-incrim­i­na­tion.
The framers of the Act knew that the law was bad for the police, they knew that it would ulti­mate­ly be bad for crime in the coun­try as well.
However they did not care, the law offered them the oppor­tu­ni­ty to kick the police in the ass and at the same time give them­selves an exten­sion to con­tin­ue to live their lives as over­lords in the crime-rid­den soci­ety that Jamaica had become.
The poor­er parts of the pop­u­la­tion are always the most vul­ner­a­ble, and also the most gullible. With the unscrupu­lous & com­plic­it media pum­mel­ing them day and night about the evils of the police, the stage was set for the Jamaica that exist today .
A crime-rid­den pseu­do law­less & almost ungovern­able society.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Jamaican police Detective cor­po­ral, busi­ness­man, researcher, and blog­ger. 
He is a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog chatt​-​a​-box​.com. 
He’s also a con­trib­u­tor to sev­er­al web­sites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs free of charge, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est pod­cast all free to you of course.

INDECOM’s Power-grab Appropriately Slapped Aside…(Video Inside)

It real­ly was­n’t just about who has pow­ers to arrest who, for an out­sider like myself it seemed rather strange that the head of an over­sight agency would sit down with groups call­ing them­selves human rights groups, yet they nev­er seemed to care about the right law-abid­ing cit­i­zens have to life.
Terrence Williams start­ed with an agen­da that was obvi­ous from the start.
This hum­ble writer wrote dozens of arti­cles call­ing for William’s fir­ing, call­ing for the repeal of the Act, not because police and oth­er agen­cies don’t need over­sight but because Terrence Williams was a tox­ic and insid­i­ous force that would cause more harm than good.
He has.

YouTube player




In the end, Terrence William’s tenure has been char­ac­ter­ized by court action between INDECOM & the JCF. Court action between INDECOM & the JDF. Court action between INDECOM & the Director of Public Prosecution.
Terrence Williams was a force unto him­self and it was bad for Jamaica.
There is no ques­tion that police need over­sight. Terrence Williams was the anthe­sis of what is need­ed.
Because of what Terrence Williams and INDECOM rep­re­sent, the nation is expe­ri­enc­ing a rapid­ly neg­a­tive cul­tur­al shift.
Every arrest had to be done by force because every­one now wants to fight the police.
Williams will be remem­bered as a glo­ry hound who spent his time like a leech to the tax-pay­ers and gave them noth­ing but grief in return.
INDECOM and Williams became the crim­i­nal under­world great­est friend, not because Williams or his agency are com­mit­ting crimes, but because it’s mis­sion has been twist­ed and con­vo­lut­ed to the extent it only aid­ed the nation’s worst actors.
That is an even greater crime .….….
We have learned that the lit­tle Napoleon has stat­ed that he will leave the agency by July, this is a clear indi­ca­tion that it was all about him­self. As long as he could­n’t have his way he want­ed no part of it.
I would like to know the day he will be demit­ting office I would like to beat some old pans behind him as he leaves and then throw a real­ly big par­ty.
He nev­er was any good and we saw straight through him.
Bye Felicia.…

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Jamaican police Detective cor­po­ral, busi­ness­man, researcher, and blog­ger. 
He is a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog chatt​-​a​-box​.com. 
He’s also a con­trib­u­tor to sev­er­al web­sites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs free of charge, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est pod­cast all free to you of course.

Grave Abuse By American Police Is Creating A Very Dangerous Environment…

People can be real­ly dif­fi­cult to deal with and we have seen some real­ly sil­ly actions from peo­ple as they decide to vio­late stay at home orders.
If we are to be fair, how­ev­er, it has been a long time that peo­ple have been asked to stay locked up in their homes, unless they are going out to shop for food or oth­er neces­si­ties like get­ting med­ica­tions.
On the oth­er hand, restau­rants are allowed to stay open as long as they deliv­er curb­side or to cus­tomers’ homes. Autoparts stores are allowed to remain open and so are con­ve­nience stores, laun­dro­mats (I guess the virus does­n’t get trans­mit­ted in laun­dro­mats) [drip­ping with sar­casm].
Other busi­ness­es like banks, liquor stores, and lit­er­al­ly every­thing else is allowed to stay open, albeit that own­ers of those estab­lish­ments may decide on what kinds of phys­i­cal-dis­tanc­ing method­olo­gies to employ.

A small busi­ness own­er in New York State myself, I too was forced to close my elec­tron­ics busi­ness, as well as my bar­ber­ing estab­lish­ment.
Other small busi­ness-peo­ple with sim­i­lar type busi­ness­es, includ­ing nail salons, hair­dress­ing par­lors, & small retail estab­lish­ments, and even church­es have also been ordered close.
In this regard, the gov­ern­ment seems to be pick­ing win­ners and losers. Some types of busi­ness­es are allowed to keep oper­at­ing while oth­ers are forced to close with­out any help from either the state or fed­er­al gov­ern­ment.
At the same time, nei­ther the state nor the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment is pro­vid­ing any relief for the loss of rev­enue for the peri­od that we have been ordered to close in order to avoid spread­ing or facil­i­tat­ing the spread of COVID19.
So while the media & oth­er elites gab about the need to stay at home there are peo­ple who can­not afford to stay at home sim­ply because they are not able to work from home.



HERE ISCLIP OF AN INCIDENT ONNEW YORK CITY STREET INVOLVING AFRICAN-AMERICAN CITIZENS & NYPD COPS. REMEMBER THIS IS ALL ABOUT DISTANCING.

HERE’S IS ANOTHER..


The scenes we see play­ing out across the coun­try tell a sor­did tale of the two Americas that per­sist despite the rhetoric you hear to the con­trary.
On the one hand, there are the Black peo­ple being dealt with by police in the most ham-fist­ed fash­ion for dar­ing to be on the streets, and on the oth­er we see white peo­ple pick­ing up their guns and demon­strat­ing raw pow­er of dis­sent. In those instances, there are either no police around or they dare not inter­vene.
This is the sec­ond in a two-part series that have writ­ten in as many days. They are designed to wake the author­i­ties up to the real­i­ty that the nation is fast becom­ing a tick­ing time bomb.
The bla­tant dis­re­gard that une­d­u­cat­ed racist police are exhibit­ing for peo­ple of col­or will have dis­as­trous con­se­quences for the coun­try.
Even amidst the insid­i­ous racial divide, there are peo­ple of dif­fer­ent races who are just about seen all that they will take from the police. 

WHAT SOCIAL DISTANCING?
OBSERVE THE DIFFERENCE.

OH, THIS IS EVEN BETTER, THSE ARE PRIVILEGED CAUCASIANS, SEE ANY COPS MUCH LESS ANY COPS EVEN DARING TO TOUCH ANYONE? ME NEITHER 

YouTube player

THIS ONE IS NOT EVEN ON THE STREETS, THIS IS INSIDE THE MICHIGAN STATEHOUSE: WHERE ARE THE RAMBO COPS NOW?

YouTube player


There is a defi­ance brew­ing in the black com­mu­ni­ty because they see the con­tin­ued dis­par­i­ties in law enforce­ment. Some are quick to ask why don’t they just fol­low the law?
The answer to that is rather sim­ple, enforce the laws fair­ly, just­ly and equi­tably and with respect and peo­ple will oblige.
The con­tin­u­a­tion of phys­i­cal and ver­bal abuse of cit­i­zens by police who are paid with their tax dol­lars should not and will not con­tin­ue into per­pe­tu­ity.
Individually and col­lec­tive­ly those police depart­ments must know that they will not be able to mur­der forty-five mil­lion black peo­ple.
The police are for all intents and pur­pos­es the most dan­ger­ous ene­my to the African-American community.

YouTube player

So in states like New York they tell peo­ple to stay in, and well,.…… don’t wor­ry about pay­ing your mort­gage, just let them take your damn house, or don’t pay any rent, home­less­ness is not so bad.[sarcasm] The tragedy is that the peo­ple in the media real­ly have no idea what that feels like, many of them are able to work from home. I real­ly do not both­er respond­ing to the politi­cians they are such liars I don’t expect any­thing from them. For the peo­ple who real­ly needs to get back to work like myself.…..nah not the heav­i­ly armed mili­tias that are defy­ing orders just for polit­i­cal point scor­ing, the present stand­off that is brew­ing with author­i­ties is real.
The prob­lem like always in America, the gov­ern­ment wades in to black and brown com­mu­ni­ties with heavy-ham­fist­ed police tac­tics while stand­ing down in white and Jewish com­mu­ni­ties.
The unde­ni­able fact is that this pan­dem­ic like lit­er­al­ly every oth­er top­i­cal issues play out with police depart­ments demon­strat­ing why black and brown com­mu­ni­ties are prob­a­bly bet­ter off with police services.

America long became a police state, the truth is that the gov­ern­ment used the black and brown com­mu­ni­ty as guinea pigs to means-test its war­rior cops.
White peo­ple did not care because it was only those oth­er peo­ple who were dying. Only those oth­er (less­er) peo­ple who were get­ting assault­ed and abused.
Now it’s every­body, but guess what they already mil­i­ta­rized the police depart­ments, passed the [patri­ot act] and have the stooges on the Supreme Court rub­ber stamp what they did.
By the time the white peo­ple wake up to the real­i­ty that their free­doms are all gone and stop the fool­ish Republican, Democrat, left, right non­sense, it will be too late. In fact, it may already be too late.
Just like they split inden­tured whites from enslaved blacks dur­ing slav­ery they are still using col­or and pol­i­tics to divide us and we fall for it every time.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Jamaican police Detective cor­po­ral, busi­ness­man, researcher, and blog­ger. 
He is a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog chatt​-​a​-box​.com. 
He’s also a con­trib­u­tor to sev­er­al web­sites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs free of charge, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est pod­cast all free to you of course.

The Culture Of American Police Aggression Is A Systemic Policy, Not Random Acts…

Day after day, case after case, the pat­tern is the same, police lit­er­al­ly attack and bru­tal­ly assault and mur­der mem­bers of the pub­lic (usu­al­ly black or brown peo­ple), a sham inves­ti­ga­tion is done by the very depart­ment from which the attack­ers come, and an even­tu­al pro­nounce­ment, some­times sev­er­al months or years lat­er, “the actions of our offi­cers were with­in depart­ment poli­cies and there­fore jus­ti­fi­able.“
That is, if they even both­er to release a report. It is one of the strangest of para­dox­es; the cit­i­zens whose tax dol­lars pay for police ser­vices are lit­er­al­ly serfs and peas­ants to the police depart­ments and unions.
In some states, they try to pull the wool over the peo­ple’s eyes by cre­at­ing a façade. The idea is to have inves­ti­ga­tions of police crimes done by anoth­er police agency, and they do so to give the appear­ance of fair­ness.
So the idea is to con­vince the pub­lic that the inves­ti­ga­tions are total­ly fair, impar­tial & uncor­rupt­ed as if the police don’t still do them.
If you believe that, please con­tact me; I have a few bridges for sale.
The cul­ture of mur­der & vis­cous assaults per­sists & con­tin­ues because they are gen­er­al­ly con­fined to black cit­i­zens and are large­ly car­ried out by white cops.

Daniel Donovan (Republican pros­e­cu­tor) bla­tant­ly and will­ful­ly botched the Eric Garner mur­der case to aid NYPD killer cop Daniel Pantaleo.


Police tam­per with, destroy & plant evi­dence, intim­i­date wit­ness­es, and con­duct them­selves as if they are over­lords. The rights of black & brown cit­i­zens are like a mat under their feet to be tram­pled on; the con­sti­tu­tion­al rights of black cit­i­zens mean noth­ing to most of them.
Whenever you see anoth­er video in which police attack and bru­tal­ize a mem­ber of the pub­lic, or worse, bru­tal­ly mur­der an unarmed man, look at your US sen­a­tor who autho­rized and re-autho­rized the Patriot Act.
Take a look at your Governor who has a clus­ter of state troop­ers sur­round­ing him or her; he or she does not care whether you live or die. What they care about are the police Unions that endorse their cam­paigns and deliv­er blocks of cop-vote; they dare not evoke the ire of those police unions.
If you do not accept my prof­fer, google the NYPD police benev­o­lent asso­ci­a­tion.
Take a look at the pros­e­cu­tors who are friend­ly with the cops that they are lit­er­al­ly unable to bring charges against them. This is so even when they mur­der cit­i­zens of a cer­tain race in plain sight of wit­ness­es, and the mur­der is cap­tured on record­ing devices.
That is why Daniel Pantaleo, an NYPD cop, mur­dered Eric Garner, an inno­cent man. Yet the cor­rupt, moral­ly bank­rupt Staten Island dis­trict attor­ney, Daniel M. Donovan empan­eled a grand jury of white Staten Islanders to hear the evi­dence.
A grand jury is basi­cal­ly a cir­cus, as the pan­el mem­bers only hear what the pros­e­cu­tor wants them to hear.
Staten Island is a bed­room com­mu­ni­ty for cops and fire­fight­ers, many of whom have basi­cal­ly had the job hand­ed down to them from gen­er­a­tion to gen­er­a­tion.
Asking these peo­ple to find that one of their own mur­dered a black cit­i­zen is an exer­cise in futil­i­ty.
Yet that is what Daniel M. Donovan did. The evi­dence he placed before the pan­el was evi­dence to result in a return ver­dict of no indict­ment rather than one that ordered an indictment.

According to a New York Times report, two wit­ness­es said they heard a sergeant tell the offi­cers to ease up as they held Mr. Garner down on the side­walk. “Let up,” a beau­ty store man­ag­er, Rodney Lee, recalled hear­ing the sergeant say that day. “You got him already.” For min­utes as Mr. Garner lay on the ground, he was not giv­en oxy­gen by the respond­ing emer­gency med­ical per­son­nel from Richmond University Medical Center.
Despite the moun­tain of evi­dence, the cor­rupt District Attorney sent the case to a Staten Island grand jury rather than indict the mur­der­ous NYPD gang­sters who mur­dered in plain sight for the world to see.
The Eric Garner case was just one of the hun­dreds of thou­sands of cas­es in which police sim­ply mur­dered inno­cent unarmed cit­i­zens, and there were zero con­se­quences.
There is no offi­cial account­ing for the thou­sands of peo­ple police kill in the United States each year. The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) has no idea how many peo­ple are actu­al­ly mur­dered by the thou­sands of police depart­ments across the coun­try.
Police depart­ments have no oblig­a­tion to report to the (FBI) the num­ber of peo­ple they kill each year.
Whatever account­ing is being done today is done by a few media hous­es like the Washington Post and the Guardian. 


Over the last sev­er­al years, the killings have been brought to the fore due to cell phone cam­eras in the hands of ordi­nary cit­i­zens & social media plat­forms. Despite the killings and abuse hap­pen­ing in plain sight, Police & their unions, Prosecutors, and Judges have insist­ed that the gen­er­al pub­lic sus­pend real­i­ty and embrace the fan­tas­ti­cal non­sense that you should not trust your own eyes.
Unless, of course, the evi­dence you are wit­ness­ing is sup­posed to incrim­i­nate a mem­ber of the pub­lic, or worse yet, if the alleged offend­er is African-American, then you must revert to san­i­ty and believe your eyes or, worse, accept the police ver­sion of events.
So whether you wit­ness this hap­pen­ing while you are on the street or worse, see­ing them kick down your neigh­bor’s door and com­mit mur­der, Or whether you just hap­pen to see it on a social media plat­form, please under­stand that it is hap­pen­ing with the silent acqui­es­cence of all of your elect­ed offi­cials from top to bot­tom.
Police depart­ments are mere arms of state and local gov­ern­ments. State and local leg­is­la­tures have the pow­er to make laws that pro­tect cit­i­zens from the rav­ages of crime, includ­ing from the crim­i­nals who wear a badge and gun but are far more dan­ger­ous to the cit­i­zen’s exis­tence than those with­out badges.
It is up to them to rein in the out-of-con­trol crim­i­nals they have unleashed on the pop­u­lace. If you want to change how your com­mu­ni­ty is policed, vote only for can­di­dates who believe in your rights and not in a police state.
It also fol­lows that you must vet those can­di­dates run­ning for elect­ed office if they have the back­ing of major police unions; guess what?
They will not have your inter­est at heart.

https://​youtu​.be/​l​5​V​F​y​F​e​o​P​l​s​?​t=4

On Nov. 4, 2016, two plain­clothes cops from the Euclid Police Department in the state of Ohio, Kyle Flagg & Vashon Williams, approached Lamar Wright with guns drawn while he was using a cell phone and sit­ting in his car. Wright, who had recent­ly had stom­ach surgery and was using a colosto­my bag at the time, ini­tial­ly thought he was being car­jacked.
Yelling and curs­ing at the motorist, the two thug cops then assault­ed mis­ter Wright. The body cam­era video shows them approach­ing the car and yelling at Mr. Wright to get out of the vehi­cle. The white thug then grabbed Mister Wright’s arm.
Wright can be heard in the video say­ing the offi­cer is hurt­ing his arm. Seconds lat­er, offi­cers use a stun gun and pep­per spray on him. Wright then exits the car and lies face down on the ground.
After the assault, they pro­ceed­ed to pile on a slew of charges to try and jus­ti­fy their bla­tant assault on an inno­cent unarmed, and sick cit­i­zen.
They also pro­ceed­ed to search his car with­out ask­ing for his con­sent.
A year lat­er, the charges which could not be sub­stan­ti­at­ed were all dropped.
Mister Wright filed a civ­il rights law­suit which claimed that the two crim­i­nals in uni­form filed false reports and charged him with resist­ing arrest and oth­er offenses.

Here is what the Euclid Mayor had to say about the vio­lent and fraud­u­lent arrest and abuse of an inno­cent man.
“As Mayor and Public Safety Director, it is my respon­si­bil­i­ty to ensure that the Euclid Police Department serves the pub­lic pro­fes­sion­al­ly, cour­te­ous­ly, and con­sci­en­tious­ly. The fine men and women of the Euclid Police Department con­stant­ly strive to main­tain the high­est lev­el of pro­fes­sion­al­ism and ser­vice to the pub­lic. I have, and will con­tin­ue to take the nec­es­sary steps to sup­port these efforts on behalf of the city of Euclid’s res­i­dents, busi­ness own­ers, and vis­i­tors.“
According to Wright’s team of attor­neys, mis­con­duct in the Euclid Police Department has been repeat­ed­ly exposed in the media and caught on cam­era. “There is no jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for this lev­el of force and vio­lence against an unarmed, com­pli­ant civil­ian. And on top of the unjus­ti­fied, unpro­voked attacks, EPD offi­cers have also filed false crim­i­nal charges against these indi­vid­u­als in an effort to cov­er up their own mis­con­duct,” said attor­ney Jacqueline Greene.

Black man sues Ohio town over alleged police violence | Daily Mail ...
Richard Hubbard 111 after Euclid gang­ster cop Michael Amiott beat him,

As if the Mayor’s state­ments weren’t offen­sive enough, Mister Wright’s case was thrown out by a judge who ruled that the cops were jus­ti­fied in their actions. Mr. Wright’s attor­neys appealed the rul­ing. We are yet to learn what has hap­pened to that appeal.
As bad as that was, in the same depart­ment, anoth­er white cop who repeat­ed­ly punched a black motorist over a minor traf­fic infrac­tion was fired by the very same Mayor.
Michael Amiott, a white cop, repeat­ed­ly punched Richard Hubbard III dur­ing a traf­fic stop. The assault was so egre­gious that the may­or fired Amiott.
The police union appealed the fir­ing, and an unelect­ed arbi­tra­tor gave Amiott his job back. Mister Hubbard’s lawyers were furi­ous.
Mr. Hubbard, Ms. Tirado, and I are all very dis­ap­point­ed that an unelect­ed arbi­tra­tor has usurped the author­i­ty of the duly elect­ed may­or of the City of Euclid and rein­stat­ed a rogu­ish police offi­cer with a doc­u­ment­ed his­to­ry of insub­or­di­na­tion and a pat­tern of using exces­sive force upon most­ly African-American arrestees,” McNeal wrote in an email to CNN. Hubbard’s Lawyers said.

https://​youtu​.be/​y​w​m​r​q​w​L​L​K​J​E​?​t​=36

In August 2016, Amiott “lost his tem­per” at the scene of an arrest and used his gun as an “impact weapon” to sub­due a sus­pect, accord­ing to his Euclid police per­son­nel file.
Before join­ing the Euclid force, he had to resign from a neigh­bor­ing police depart­ment after mak­ing a false state­ment in a police report, accord­ing to a Mentor Police Department inter­nal inves­ti­ga­tion report.
“It is trou­bling that any­one would see it pru­dent to place such an indi­vid­ual back into a posi­tion where he can again abuse his author­i­ty and do vio­lence to cit­i­zens under col­or of law.” The lawyers for Hubbard stat­ed.
The brazen assaults and unpro­voked mur­ders you are wit­ness­ing at the hands of police are not just a thing about bad police offi­cers.
It is a sys­temic and thor­ough­ly thought-out pol­i­cy of state-spon­sored oppres­sion of African-American peo­ple, from slav­ery through the igno­ble peri­od of black codes dur­ing recon­struc­tion. From Jim Crowe to the present day, these are state-insti­tut­ed poli­cies aimed at keep­ing the black pop­u­la­tion in check. It includes elect­ed offi­cials at all lev­els.
Police are mere pawns, usu­al­ly une­d­u­cat­ed thugs who do what they are told to do; most only have a high school edu­ca­tion.
Your prob­lem is not with them; your prob­lem lies with the peo­ple you idol­ize and place in high elect­ed office.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Problem Trooper Tases 15-year-old Kid On ATV Killing Him…

A for­mer Michigan state troop­er was sen­tenced to at least five years in prison Monday for caus­ing the death of a 15-year-old Detroit boy who crashed an all-ter­rain vehi­cle after he was shot with a Taser. Judge Margaret Van Houten said Mark Bessner, a lawyer and expe­ri­enced offi­cer, used poor judg­ment when he fired the immo­bi­liz­ing device from the pas­sen­ger seat of a mov­ing patrol car. He was con­vict­ed of invol­un­tary manslaugh­ter after a sec­ond tri­al in April. ‘You abused the pub­lic’s trust. … It is the few offi­cers like you who have caused the dis­trust of police offi­cers that plagues our com­mu­ni­ty in Detroit, the state of Michigan and through­out the coun­try,’ the judge said.

Damon Grimes, 15
15-year-old Damon Grimes

'He slowed down. We tased him, and he crashed out,' Trooper Bessner (circled left) says over the radio in the initial aftermath of the ATV crash that killed Grimes in 2017
He slowed down. We tased him, and he crashed out,’ Trooper Bessner (cir­cled left) says over the radio in the ini­tial after­math of the ATV crash that killed Grimes in 2017

The max­i­mum penal­ty is 15 years in prison, but Bessner will be eli­gi­ble for parole after five. He quit the state police after the August 2017 inci­dent. Bessner and a part­ner were patrolling a Detroit neigh­bor­hood when Damon Grimes, drove an ATV near their car and popped a ‘wheel­ie.’ The white troop­ers turned around and pur­sued the black teen. As they got clos­er, Bessner deployed the Taser, which releas­es stain­less steel barbs. Grimes crashed into a parked pick­up truck, flipped over, and died. Bessner said he believed the boy had a gun in his waist­band, but Grimes was unarmed

Bessner apologized to Grimes' family ad asked for a lenient sentence for himself

During Bessner’s sec­ond tri­al, his defense attor­ney claimed Grimes’ ATV was in poor con­di­tion and that the 22-year vet­er­an was in fear for his life because the teen had tak­en one of his hands off the han­dle­bars as if reach­ing for a weapon. ‘A child is a ter­ri­ble thing to lose,’ an aunt, Helen Stinson, read from an impact state­ment writ­ten by Damon’s par­ents. ‘To sit at the table and see his emp­ty chair. To look at his emp­ty bed­room has become more than we can bear.’

Damon's parents said in a written statement that seeing their son's empty room is unbearable to them

Damon’s par­ents said in a writ­ten state­ment that see­ing their son’s emp­ty room is unbear­able to them In their let­ter, Monique Grimes and John Hughes implored Bessner to think of their dead son when his own chil­dren expe­ri­ence mile­stone moments that Damon has been deprived of, like their first kiss, their high school grad­u­a­tion and their first day at col­lege, report­ed The Detroit News. Bessner acknowl­edged the ‘tragedy’ and turned to the fam­i­ly to apol­o­gize. He said he wished he could step into a ‘time machine’ and change what hap­pened. ‘It is a no-win sit­u­a­tion for the police out there,’ said Bessner, who added that it’s impos­si­ble to per­form per­fect­ly. Bessner appealed to the judge for lenien­cy so that he could return home to his five-year-old daugh­ter, adding that while he under­stands the Grimes fam­i­ly’s anger, he hopes that the court ‘will not be dri­ven by anger,’ report­ed WXYZ.

Judge Van Houten replied that while he would be able to com­mu­ni­cate with his daugh­ter on the phone while in prison, the Grimes fam­i­ly will nev­er get to speak to Damon again. Two months before Grimes’ death, an arbi­tra­tor had cleared Bessner of mis­con­duct in how he used his Taser while chas­ing a crime sus­pect in a dif­fer­ent inci­dent. State police want­ed to sus­pend him for 10 days.During Bessner's second trial, his defense attorney claimed Grimes' ATV (pictured overturned on the ground) was in poor condition

During Bessner’s sec­ond tri­al, his defense attor­ney claimed Grimes’ ATV (pic­tured over­turned on the ground) was in poor con­di­tion His first tri­al end­ed in a mis­tri­al in October 2018 after Bessner tes­ti­fied in his own defense. He told jurors that the inci­dent was a ‘blur’ and he believed his life was ‘absolute­ly’ in jeop­ardy. When he learned that Grimes was only a teenag­er Bessner said he was ‘shocked’, call­ing it a ‘ter­ri­ble tragedy’. ‘All I could think of was that this fam­i­ly … had lost their son and all I could think of was my daugh­ter and what they must be going through,’ Bessner said on the stand. ‘And (all) I could think of (was) what hap­pens now? What do we do now?’ “I can’t imag­ine what it would be like to lose a child,” he said, turn­ing back to look at the Grimes fam­i­ly which spoke on the deceased teen’s behalf moments ear­li­er. “I under­stand their anger, the anger at me — but judge I hope this court will not be dri­ven by anger.” 

Watch Rancho Cordova Cop Pummel 14-year-old Black Boy…

A Rancho Cordova police offi­cer beat this 14-year-old boy, his crime?
hav­ing in his pos­ses­sion a cig­a­rette prod­uct. Not mar­i­jua­na, even though hav­ing mar­i­jua­na in small; quan­ti­ties would not have been a crime. The 14-year-old boy was in pos­ses­sion of a sweet tobac­co product.

https://​www​.face​book​.com/​B​l​a​c​k​L​i​v​e​s​M​a​t​t​e​r​S​a​c​/​v​i​d​e​o​s​/​3​0​1​1​1​9​6​6​0​5​6​3​0​2​5​3​/​?​t=2



Now here is the new chief of police’s state­ments after first sug­gest­ing that the boy was respon­si­ble because he apol­o­gized for his actions.
Remember the kid is 14-years-old. These days one can get access to CBD prod­ucts here online.

https://​www​.face​book​.com/​f​r​e​e​d​o​m​m​e​d​i​a​c​a​n​a​d​a​/​v​i​d​e​o​s​/​6​2​4​4​2​1​8​0​4​8​2​6​9​6​6​/​?​t=0
https://​www​.face​book​.com/​w​o​k​e​v​i​d​e​o​/​v​i​d​e​o​s​/​2​7​8​6​3​3​4​8​6​4​9​0​2​15/

Here is what hap­pened in Austin Texas just days ago. As Austin PD cops mur­der a man who had his arms raised when they decid­ed to esca­late the sit­u­a­tion, first shoot­ing him with some kind of non-lethal weapon, he got in the car and begun to dri­ve away when they opened up with a rifle killing him.

Talking About Obeying The Law Is Not Sexy…

If you write to impact per­cep­tions it may be a good idea to write about things that peo­ple want to talk about or things that excite them. That is if you want to be lis­tened to by your tar­get audi­ence. If you are sell­ing books, for exam­ple, writ­ing to enter­tain may be the way to go.
If you cater to a social media audi­ence and care much about likes, com­ments & enter­tain­ment, smut & gos­sip is the way to go.
So if you are writ­ing about the way the rule of law pro­tects us all, while law- enforce­ment offi­cers are break­ing the laws they are sworn to uphold, it is only nor­mal that one would expect blow­back from the pub­lic who reads what you write.
In today’s world, politi­cians and pow­er­ful well-con­nect­ed peo­ple com­mit crimes and they often times escape the long arm of the law. It is extreme­ly dif­fi­cult to con­vince the aver­age per­son that play­ing by the rules is in his best inter­est. It is dou­bly dif­fi­cult when he sees those who break the laws seem­ing­ly grow­ing in leaps and bounds when he seems to be stuck in a rut.


If your tar­get audi­ence is in Jamaica, you can for­get pleas­antries when you talk about how impor­tant it is that peo­ple obey the nation’s laws.
Sometimes it appears that there are only a few of us Jamaicans who both­er, or even dare to put our­selves out there to defend the rule of law.
This is so because cor­rup­tion runs so ram­pant through­out so many cells of nation­al life. I par­tic­u­lar­ly admire Garth Rattarary a med­ical doc­tor who has con­sis­tent­ly writ­ten, not only about the rule of law, but in defense of the police when it prob­a­bly isn’t in his best inter­est to do so. So why do we always write about obey­ing laws and reduc­ing crime?
Well, for me it is rather sim­ple, a ris­ing tide rais­es all boats. If I could snap my fin­ger and get all Jamaicans to under­stand how crime makes every­one poor­er, I would.
In 2017 [ukessay​.com], wrote; The num­ber of mur­ders and oth­er vio­lence caus­es Jamaica to have one of the high­est crime rates in the world. Police sta­tis­tics in Jamaica have shown that since the year 1999 Jamaica’s crime rate has steadi­ly risen. In 2005, accord­ing to International sta­tis­tics, Jamaica was the “Murder Capital of the World”. There has been a tremen­dous increase in the rate of homi­cides and shoot­ings, ille­gal drugs, arms and ammu­ni­tion, rape and car­nal abuse which con­tin­ues to neg­a­tive­ly impact the country’s social and eco­nom­ic growth.




Simply put, when vio­lent crime sta­tis­tics are so high invest­ments head the oppo­site direc­tion. If there is no invest­ment the bulk of the hir­ing is left up to the gov­ern­ment. The gov­ern­ment can only hire so many peo­ple with­out a tax base to sup­port salaries and ben­e­fits.
A vibrant pri­vate sec­tor allows for the gov­ern­ment to put in place much-need­ed infra­struc­ture, a low-crime soci­ety is attrac­tive to peo­ple look­ing for safe places to invest and live.
In Jamaica’s case, there are hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars left in the US, UK, Canada belong­ing to Jamaicans who would like to return to their home­land with those resources but are afraid because of the excep­tion­al­ly high crime rate.
The idea that Jamaica’s future is lit­er­al­ly in its own hands is cer­tain­ly not a cliché. Fix the crime and you begin to see pros­per­i­ty.
Keep the crime and you slide deep­er & deep­er into pover­ty.
The fact that the Island’s lead­ers of both polit­i­cal par­ties con­tin­ue to pussy­foot with crim­i­nals is lost on no one.
The nation’s lead­ers live lav­ish lifestyles, fan­cy homes in exclu­sive areas, replete with police body­guards.
Violence hard­ly pen­e­trates their lit­tle bub­bles. The cor­rupt crim­i­nal friend­ly sys­tem that keeps them in pow­er is built on crime.
They have no inter­est in the whole­sale erad­i­ca­tion of crime, doing so removes the foun­da­tion of their existence.

So for those of us who both­er to talk this way about crime, we do so in spite of the poten­tial blow­back.
We do not do it for likes or for pop­u­lar­i­ty. We real­ly do so because we fun­da­men­tal­ly believe that with­out the rule of law and a fair, just and equi­table sys­tem of gov­ern­ment, we are all at risk and the qual­i­ty of our lives is both reduced and deval­ued. It is in the best inter­est of all when the best prac­tices are observed.
As Black peo­ple, we have a vest­ed stake in the equi­table and just dis­pen­sa­tion of jus­tice. After all, in the over four hun­dred years that our ances­tors have been forced to engage in servi­tude in the west­ern world, we have been vic­tims of the laws being used in a dis­crim­i­na­to­ry fash­ion against us.
It is impor­tant to also rec­on­cile that this par­lia­men­tary sys­tem, and the pre­sent­ing of evi­dence in order to appear at a just con­clu­sion, was also tak­en from Africa along with our ances­tors.
Unfortunately for us, we have not ben­e­fit­ted from the equi­table dis­pen­sa­tion of jus­tice when we are not in con­trol.
So when we have con­trol, it is imper­a­tive that we both observe our own laws and that we equi­tably dis­pense jus­tice to all our people.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Jamaican police Detective cor­po­ral, busi­ness­man, researcher, and blog­ger. 
He is a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog chatt​-​a​-box​.com. 
He’s also a con­trib­u­tor to sev­er­al web­sites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs free of charge, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est pod­cast all free to you of course.

25-Year Old Black Man Killed While Jogging Because He “Looked Like A Suspect” — No Charges Filed!

Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year old unarmed Black man from Brunswick Georgia, was report­ed­ly shot and killed by two white men as he jogged through their neigh­bor­hood. The inci­dent hap­pened back in February, but no charges have yet been filed.
It was February 23rd to be exact when 64-year old Gregory McMichael and his 34-year old son Travis report­ed­ly grabbed their shot­gun and fol­lowed Ahmaud in their truck after they saw him run past them. Both claimed that Ahmaud “looked like a sus­pect” in a string of rob­beries in the area.

Gregory, who is a retired inves­ti­ga­tor in the District Attorney’s office, said he asked Ahmaud to “stop” so they could talk. The sit­u­a­tion esca­lat­ed, and lat­er there was an alleged strug­gle with the McMichael’s. Ahmaud was shot at least twice.
Some wit­ness­es said Ahmaud, who was wear­ing a white t‑shirt on that day, was only exer­cis­ing. However, a 911 call from a near­by neigh­bor ear­li­er that day report­ed a Black man in a white t‑shirt who is “run­ning right now” from a house that was under con­struc­tion. Brunswick NAACP pres­i­dent Rev. John Davis Perry II said the shoot­ing is “trou­bling,” caus­ing oth­er peo­ple in the area to express con­cerns about the com­mu­ni­ty and racial profiling.

Meanwhile, a pros­e­cu­tor argued that the father and son who killed Ahmaud were jus­ti­fied due to the citizen’s arrest statute in Georgia. Travis, who was actu­al­ly hold­ing the shot­gun, is said to have act­ed out of self-defense.
The pros­e­cu­tor, who has since been recused from the case due to a pos­si­ble con­flict of inter­est, not­ed that Ahmaud had a crim­i­nal record. In 2018, he was con­vict­ed of shoplift­ing and vio­lat­ing pro­ba­tion, and he was indict­ed for report­ed­ly tak­ing a hand­gun to a high school bas­ket­ball game.
Neither Gregory or Travis McMichael have yet been charged or arrest­ed in con­nec­tion to the killing. Another pros­e­cu­tor from a dif­fer­ent coun­ty will deter­mine whether the case should be pre­sent­ed to a grand jury.

We can’t do any­thing because of this coro­na stuff,” Arbery’s moth­er Wanda Cooper told the New York Times. “We thought about walk­ing out where the shoot­ing occurred, just doing a lit­tle march, but we can’t be out right now.”

Austin Cops Murder Unarmed Man On Camera, (video)

The dai­ly reck­less, & wan­ton use of dead­ly force by American cops all across the coun­try con­tin­ues. Police depart­ments are allowed to inves­ti­gate them­selves, result­ing in a total lack of trust between the pub­lic and the depart­ments.
Their inves­ti­ga­tions gen­er­al­ly end up with what­ev­er atroc­i­ty they com­mit­ted being ruled with­in depart­men­tal guide­lines.
Even when they com­mit mur­der, local and fed­er­al pros­e­cu­tors gen­er­al­ly refuse to pros­e­cute them, the log­ic being that they are the very same peo­ple pros­e­cu­tors rely on to gath­er evi­dence and help to pros­e­cute mem­bers of the gen­er­al pub­lic when they run afoul of the law.
Judges give their tes­ti­mo­ny much more cre­dence than an aver­age per­son giv­ing evi­dence, even as there is a nev­er-end­ing list of videos show­ing cops plant­i­ng evi­dence on inno­cent cit­i­zens and in their con­struc­tive pos­ses­sion.
On the rare occa­sion that American cops are pros­e­cut­ed, they gen­er­al­ly ask for a bench tri­al. A bench tri­al is one in which evi­dence is heard by a judge with­out a jury and a ver­dict is arrived at by the same judge.
Hardly are police offi­cers ever con­vict­ed when they receive a bench tri­al.
Across the coun­try judges, pros­e­cu­tors and police are gen­er­al­ly indis­tin­guish­able in tone. Police unions are major donors to the cam­paigns of elect­ed judges and where applic­a­ble, that of pros­e­cu­tors of their choice as well. This cre­ates a con­flict, but no one bells the cat, so it per­sists.
The aver­age cit­i­zen faces a stiff uphill climb to get a fair shake when the police are the crim­i­nals.
When the vic­tim of police crimes is black or brown, jus­tice is often just a pipe dream.




In addi­tion to the awe­some pow­ers they are giv­en, includ­ing to take life, they are also giv­en a spe­cial lay­er of pro­tec­tion that most oth­er cat­e­gories of work­ers do not have. That extra shield is called [Qualified immu­ni­ty]. Qualified immu­ni­ty pro­tects a gov­ern­ment offi­cial from law­suits alleg­ing that the offi­cial vio­lat­ed a plain­tiff’s rights, only allow­ing suits where offi­cials vio­lat­ed a “clear­ly estab­lished” statu­to­ry or con­sti­tu­tion­al right.
Qualified immu­ni­ty is not immu­ni­ty from hav­ing to pay mon­ey dam­ages, but rather an immu­ni­ty from hav­ing to go through the costs of a tri­al at all. Accordingly, courts must resolve qual­i­fied immu­ni­ty issues as ear­ly in a case as pos­si­ble, prefer­ably before dis­cov­ery.
(Law​.cor​nel​.edu)
Doctors have to pay for insur­ance so too are lawyers forced to have insur­ance against mal­prac­tice.
Literally, every pro­fes­sion­al must have insur­ance except the police. Yet when police offi­cers betray their oaths, and on the rare occa­sions that they are held account­able for their crimes, the finan­cial cost is borne by the very same aggriev­ed tax­pay­ing public.


Because there is a need to keep the for-prof­it pris­ons and jails full. And because of America’s insti­tu­tion­al­ized built-in racism which tar­gets poor black and brown peo­ple for over-polic­ing and sub­se­quent mass incar­cer­a­tion, nei­ther the states nor the Federal gov­ern­ment will lift a fin­ger to rein in the reck­less killings of inno­cent unarmed peo­ple by out of con­trol rene­gade police.
Additionally, all across the coun­try, police depart­ments have become a hotbed of white nation­al­ism and bare­ly below the sur­face tox­ic racism against peo­ple fo col­or. Well over a decade ago the FBI warned about this trend. President Barack Obama’s Justice Department took some active steps to cur­tail some of the killings and ille­gal activ­i­ties. Many depart­ments were forced to enter into con­sent decrees with the Justice Department led by Eric Holder, to insti­tute a change in poli­cies and pro­to­cols.
The Trump jus­tice depart­ment, begin­ning with for­mer Alabama’s Republican US Senator Jeff Sessions, and now William Barr, has since dis­con­tin­ued most of those con­sent decrees. In addi­tion to that, Trump him­self has encour­aged police to be more aggres­sive and vio­lent toward the peo­ple they come in con­tact with.
When you arrest them and place your hand on top of their heads before they enter the car, don’t be so nice, you can remove your hand,” Trump told a bunch of cheer­ing cops.
To their cred­it, a few Police chiefs pushed back against Trump’s dan­ger­ous state­ments, they reit­er­at­ed that they would con­tin­ue to ensure that their depart­ments pro­tect the rights of all citizens.

In June of 2016 writ­ing for com​plex​.com Sara David in an arti­cle titled;
[The Supreme Court Sets a Dangerous Precedent By Ruling That Cops Can Break the Law] said, a divid­ed U.S. Supreme Court ruled that in some cas­es, evi­dence of a crime can be used against a defen­dant even if police obtained it ille­gal­ly. According to the Associated Press, the 5 – 3 deci­sion drew “heat­ed dis­sents from lib­er­al jus­tices who warned that the out­come would encour­age police to vio­late people’s rights.” The rul­ing comes in a case in which South Salt Lake City Police Department nar­cotics detec­tive Douglas Fackrell stopped defen­dant Joseph Edward Strieff in 2006. Fackrell sus­pect­ed Strieff of being involved in drug activ­i­ty, but didn’t actu­al­ly have “rea­son­able sus­pi­cion,” which is required by the U.S. Constitution for inves­ti­ga­to­ry stops.

In her dis­sent Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote stri­dent­ly;
The Court today holds that the dis­cov­ery of a war­rant for an unpaid park­ing tick­et will for­give a police officer’s vio­la­tion of your Fourth Amendment rights. Do not be soothed by the opinion’s tech­ni­cal lan­guage: This case allows the police to stop you on the street, demand your iden­ti­fi­ca­tion, and check it for out­stand­ing traf­fic war­rants — even if you are doing noth­ing wrong. If the offi­cer dis­cov­ers a war­rant for a fine you for­got to pay, courts will now excuse his ille­gal stop and will admit into evi­dence any­thing he hap­pens to find by search­ing you after arrest­ing you on the war­rant. Because the Fourth Amendment should pro­hib­it, not per­mit, such mis­con­duct, I dissent.

The Atlantic reports that dur­ing ques­tion­ing, Fackrell “relayed Strieff’s per­son­al infor­ma­tion to a police dis­patch­er — a rou­tine prac­tice dur­ing police stops — and learned Strieff had an out­stand­ing traf­fic war­rant.” The detec­tive then arrest­ed Strieff based on that war­rant, and found a small amount of metham­phet­a­mine on his per­son; Strieff was charged and con­vict­ed for unlaw­ful pos­ses­sion. On Fackrell, U.S. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her pop­u­lar dis­sent, “In his search for law­break­ing, the offi­cer in this case him­self broke the law.”

In her wis­dom, the learned Associate Justice Sotomayor was right on the mon­ey. quote, Do not be soothed by the opinion’s tech­ni­cal lan­guage:
Since then police across the coun­try has been on a ram­page, stop­ping motorist and even pedes­tri­ans, demand­ing their Identification. There are count­less videos of some of those encoun­ters on social media plat­forms in which peo­ple walk­ing down the streets are stopped and iden­ti­fi­ca­tions demand­ed from them by the police.
Failure to slav­ish­ly and prompt­ly hand over your iden­ti­fi­ca­tion to these over­lords gets the pre­dictable response, “you are ham­per­ing my inves­ti­ga­tion”. There was no inves­ti­ga­tion, to begin with, but the ille­gal fourth amend­ment infringe­ment based on no crime, is now deemed to be a law­ful inves­ti­ga­tion with which cit­i­zens must com­ply, or risk arrest, being bad­ly beat­en or killed.
Well, there is your Supreme court for you, a court many peo­ple see as their last resort for jus­tice.
The same court that ruled slav­ery was legal. Jim crow was legal. Separate but equal was legal. Black peo­ple were only 35 of a human being. Interracial mar­riage was ille­gal. Affirmed cit­i­zens unit­ed, (cor­po­ra­tions are peo­ple). Will not inter­vene to save an inno­cent con­demned man’s life because his brief was not filed in time.

THE DAILY RECKLESS & WANTON USE OF DEADLY  FORCE BY AMERICAN RAMBO COPS CONTINUES UNCHECKED.
THEIR UNLAWFUL AND UNCONSCIONABLE USE OF LETHAL FORCE  PLACES NOT JUST THE LIVES OF PEOPLE UNDER THEIR SCRUTINY IN DANGER, BUT ALSO THE LIVES OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

The may­or of Austin, Texas, says he’s “dis­turbed” by a video he has seen of the fatal shoot­ing of a man by an Austin police offi­cer as the man drove away from police. 
Mayor Steve Adler says in a state­ment Monday that 42-year-old Mike Ramos does not appear to be threat­en­ing, but was fatal­ly shot and that “there are many questions.” 

Austin police chief Brian Manley said Monday that he under­stands com­mu­ni­ty con­cerns about the shoot­ing and that police, the dis­trict attor­ney, and oth­er agen­cies are inves­ti­gat­ing while offer­ing con­do­lences to Ramos’ family. 

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Jamaican police Detective cor­po­ral, busi­ness­man, researcher, and blog­ger. 
He is a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog chatt​-​a​-box​.com. 
He’s also a con­trib­u­tor to sev­er­al web­sites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs free of charge, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est pod­cast all free to you of course.

China’s Money Comes With Chains To The Ankle Of Africans & Others…

I think it was for­mer President George W Bush years ago who referred to the People’s Republic of China as a world pow­er com­pa­ra­ble to the United States.
The Chinese leader coy­ly down­played the pres­i­den­t’s char­ac­ter­i­za­tion with faux humil­i­ty, “China is still a poor devel­op­ing coun­try mis­ter pres­i­dent we are still strug­gling to find ways to feed our 1.3 bil­lion people”[pharaprased]
Anyone fooled by that faux humil­i­ty must not have been pay­ing atten­tion.
Since Richard Nixon added some warmth to the dor­mant rela­tion­ship that exist­ed between the United States and China with a vis­it in 1972, China has emerged as a pow­er­house on the world stage, trans­form­ing its econ­o­my into a pow­er­house as a result of its mas­sive man­u­fac­tur­ing infra­struc­ture.
Today China stands as prob­a­bly the great­est exam­ple of Capitalism’s poten­tial to shape and improve peo­ple’s lives.
China’s emer­gence from pover­ty to the sec­ond-largest econ­o­my in the world hap­pened the fastest of any econ­o­my in record­ed history.



In 2002 speak­ing at Tsinghua University President George W Bush said; Thirty years ago this week, an American President arrived in China on a trip designed to end decades of estrange­ment and con­front cen­turies of sus­pi­cion. President Richard Nixon showed the world that two vast­ly dif­fer­ent gov­ern­ments could meet on the grounds of com­mon inter­est, in the spir­it of mutu­al respect. Some of the erro­neous pic­tures of America are paint­ed by oth­ers. 

My friend, the Ambassador to China, tells me some Chinese text­books talk of Americans of “bul­ly­ing the weak and repress­ing the poor.” Another Chinese text­book, pub­lished just last year, teach­es that spe­cial agents of the FBI are used to “repress the work­ing peo­ple.” Now, nei­ther of these is true — and while the words may be left­overs from a pre­vi­ous era, they are mis­lead­ing and they’re harm­ful.
I dis­agreed might­i­ly with the way Bush ascend­ed to the pres­i­den­cy, I also dis­agreed with almost every pol­i­cy Bush stood for and the sec­ond para­graph of his state­ments above was no excep­tion.
But that is hard­ly the intent of this arti­cle.
(See link to full speech from President George W Bush in chi­na in 2002;https://​georgew​bush​-white​house​.archives​.gov/​n​e​w​s​/​r​e​l​e​a​s​e​s​/​2​0​0​2​/​0​2​/​2​0​0​2​0​2​2​2​.​h​tml)

In the years since that speech, China has emerged on the world stage ful­ly flushed with cash. They have aggres­sive­ly invest­ed in upgrad­ing their mil­i­tary, and have advanced soft pow­er across the globe through loans and infra­struc­tur­al projects that should cause raised eye­brows to every­one con­cerned.
But China’s approach has not always been one of soft pow­er, for exam­ple in parts of Africa.….. yea Africa, China’s actions have been tan­ta­mount to that of a loan shark engag­ing in Usury tac­tics. That has drawn con­dem­na­tion from some quar­ters as well as strong­ly-word­ed state­ments of cau­tion to oth­er nations to be wary of chi­na’s mon­e­tary entreat­ments.
Full dis­clo­sure, this writer has crit­i­cized two such warn­ings toward Jamaica my home coun­try, one com­ing from the sec­re­tary of state Mike Pompeo & the oth­er from the US Ambassador to Jamaica Donald Tapia.
My desire to see 20st-cen­tu­ry infra­struc­ture in my home­land may have inspired my cha­grin at the Americans, for dar­ing to issue warn­ings to Jamaica about China.
I also feel strong­ly that if the Americans cared enough they could have helped coun­tries like Jamaica that have been friend­ly to the United States with low-inter­est loans, some­thing which would have been in the best inter­est of the United States as it relates to Immigration.

Just today the respect­ed Wall Street Journal report­ed: Beijing state giants take con­trol of Djibouti’s trad­ing gate­way at an ocean-going cross­roads between Asia and Europe.
In March of this year [ft​.com] report­ed: Beyond the Belt and Road infra­struc­ture projects, thou­sands of entre­pre­neurs from China are also set­ting up on the con­ti­nent. This is cer­tain­ly not good.
https://​www​.ft​.com/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​9​f​5​7​3​6​d​8​-​1​4​e​1​-​1​1​e​9​-​a​5​8​1​-​4​f​f​7​8​4​0​4​5​24e.
In ear­ly March of 2018 the web­site Quartz report­ed; Last year, with more than $1 bil­lion in debt to China, Sri Lanka hand­ed over a port to com­pa­nies owned by the Chinese gov­ern­ment. Now Djibouti, home to the US military’s main base in Africa, looks about to cede con­trol of anoth­er key port to a Beijing-linked com­pa­ny, and the US is not hap­py about it.
In 2018 the well regard­ed Guardian web­site asked the ques­tion; China in Africa win-win or new colo­nial­ism?
Read the sto­ry here; https://​www​.the​guardian​.com/​c​i​t​i​e​s​/​2​0​1​8​/​j​u​l​/​3​1​/​c​h​i​n​a​-​i​n​-​a​f​r​i​c​a​-​w​i​n​-​w​i​n​-​d​e​v​e​l​o​p​m​e​n​t​-​o​r​-​a​-​n​e​w​-​c​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ism

There are thou­sands of arti­cles detail­ing the pit­falls of nav­i­gat­ing the mine­field of accept­ing Chinese mon­ey. Sufficing to say this ought to have been com­mon knowl­edge to every­one includ­ing your hum­ble ser­vant who is like every­one else, prone to mak­ing deci­sions based on emo­tions.
I beg your for­give­ness.
Beijing “encour­ages depen­den­cy using opaque con­tracts, preda­to­ry loan prac­tices, and cor­rupt deals that mire nations in debt and under­cut their sov­er­eign­ty, deny­ing them their long-term, self-sus­tain­ing growth,” said US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on March 6. 2018. ”Chinese invest­ment does have the poten­tial to address Africa’s infra­struc­ture gap, but its approach has led to mount­ing debt and few, if any, jobs in most coun­tries,” he added.
In January 2018 when a Le Monde inves­ti­ga­tion exposed that the Chinese-financed and con­struct­ed African Union build­ing in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia had been bugged by Beijing, the out­cry was mut­ed. Microphones were found hid­den in desks and walls, and data from the AU com­put­er net­work was trans­ferred back to Shanghai servers night­ly for over five years, since the building’s open­ing in 2012.

China has long sur­passed the United States as the largest trad­ing part­ner with Africa. The African con­ti­nent with it’s 1.216 bil­lion peo­ple pre­sent­ed a wealth of oppor­tu­ni­ties for the United States as it relates to trade. Racism and oth­er nefar­i­ous con­sid­er­a­tions on the part of the Americans enabled China to enter the space and cement itself on a con­ti­nent rife with oppor­tu­ni­ties but des­per­ate­ly in need of help.
Although Kenya and Ethiopia were the only two African nations among the 30 coun­tries sign­ing eco­nom­ic and trade agree­ments at the Belt and Road Forum (Barf) in Beijing in May of 2017, China has been busy on the con­ti­nent. The flag­ship Belt and Road project is Kenya’s 290-mile rail­way from the cap­i­tal, Nairobi, to the port city of Mombasa, which opened to the pub­lic last year.
As African nations take advan­tage of China’s entreaties mon­e­tar­i­ly, it is impor­tant that African lead­ers ensure that cor­rup­tion and graft do not once again plunge the con­ti­nent into anoth­er dark peri­od of col­o­niza­tion.
African peo­ple all across the globe sim­ply can­not afford to jump from the fry­ing pan into the fire.
The last time the ene­my arrived on the con­ti­nent they came with guns, it lit­er­al­ly took five hun­dred years of slav­ery and the worst kind of inhu­man­i­ty for Africans to emerge from those dark days.
African peo­ple can ill-afford to allow anoth­er ene­my to come in this time with cash in hand, build­ing high­ways and ports that they will nev­er be able to afford. It is anoth­er form of enslave­ment & this ene­my has demon­strat­ed that like the last it has no heart.
Negotiate .….……

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Jamaican police Detective cor­po­ral, busi­ness­man, researcher, and blog­ger. 
He is a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog chatt​-​a​-box​.com. 
He’s also a con­trib­u­tor to sev­er­al web­sites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs free of charge, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est pod­cast all free to you of course.

Black Grandmother Denied Test 4 Times Before Dying From Coronavirus

Detroit, MI — Deborah Gatewood, a 63-year old health care work­er from Michigan, has died due to com­pli­ca­tions of the coro­n­avirus after she was report­ed­ly denied a test mul­ti­ple times from the very hos­pi­tal where she worked.

Gatewood, who worked at Beaumont Hospital for 31 years, report­ed­ly showed COVID-19 symp­toms, includ­ing cough and fever, in the third week of March. “They [Beaumont] sent her home say­ing you are show­ing signs of COVID-19,” Kaila Corrothers, Gatewood’s daugh­ter, told FOX 2 Detroit. “So they were con­firm­ing that she most like­ly had COVID, but they did not test her.” Gatewood report­ed­ly vis­it­ed the ER four times and request­ed to be test­ed, but was told to just rest at home and take cough med­i­cine. Her con­di­tion con­tin­ued to wors­en until she was found unre­spon­sive in bed.

She was tak­en by ambu­lance to Sinai-Grace Hospital in Detroit where she was test­ed pos­i­tive for the virus. After bat­tling extreme­ly high fever and devel­op­ing bilat­er­al pneu­mo­nia, she sad­ly died. Corrothers expressed her dis­ap­point­ment with Beaumont Hospital, say­ing they have neglect­ed her mother’s severe con­di­tion. “The fact that she got infect­ed by doing the job she did for 31 years and she couldn’t get tak­en care of by her own fam­i­ly, mean­ing Beaumont, it’s sad. It is dis­heart­en­ing, to say the least,” she said. Meanwhile, Beaumont Hospital has yet to com­ment on the par­tic­u­lar case but said, “As patients come to Beaumont for care dur­ing this pan­dem­ic, we are doing every­thing we can to eval­u­ate, triage and care for patients based on the infor­ma­tion we know at the time. We grieve the loss of any patient to COVID-19 or any oth­er illness.”

.….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….

Atlanta Mother of Twin Boys Dies From Coronavirus at 36-Years Old


Atlanta, GA — Brent Green, a 36-year old African American moth­er of twins who had no known under­ly­ing con­di­tions, has died due from coro­n­avirus. Her fam­i­ly believes she start­ed get­ting sick after going to the gro­cery store to buy food for her children.

She was hap­py, going around doing every­thing that she need­ed to do,” Linda Green, Brent’s moth­er told WSTV about her. She was a respon­si­ble employ­ee work­ing for a rep­utable com­pa­ny in Atlanta and a lov­ing moth­er to 12-year old twin boys. However, a few days after a trip to the gro­cery store, she began hav­ing a headache and short­ness of breath. She was hos­pi­tal­ized, where she test­ed pos­i­tive for COVID-19. Her con­di­tion ini­tial­ly seemed to be get­ting bet­ter, but it even­tu­al­ly turned to the worse.

Her moth­er had a chance to speak to her for the last time and told her, “Fight baby and do every­thing you can to come back to me.” She remem­bered Brent respond­ed, “‘I love you too mama.’ Those were the last words I heard come out of my daughter’s mouth.” Linda Green want­ed to share her daughter’s expe­ri­ence to serve as a les­son to oth­ers to take the coro­n­avirus seri­ous­ly. “Please do all the things you can to fight this dis­ease and not be among each oth­er and take it light­ly,” Green said. “If you con­tin­ue to mis­lead and think that this is not for real, you will not see the peo­ple that you love (again).”

Teen Killed His Family Because They Were Against His Black Girlfriend

Midland, VA — Levi Norwood, a 17-year old white teen, alleged­ly killed his moth­er and broth­er because he believed they were racist for dis­ap­prov­ing of his Black girl­friend. His father recent­ly died after alleged­ly com­mit­ting sui­cide. Levi alleged­ly shot and killed his 34-year old moth­er, Jennifer Norwood, and 6‑year old broth­er, Wyatt, last February inside their home in Fauquier County, Virginia. He then alleged­ly wait­ed for his 37-year old father, Joshua Norwood, to come home and shot him in the head, injur­ing him. Levi fled the scene with a stolen car and went to North Carolina where he was found shoplift­ing at a Target store. He was arrest­ed and is being held at a region­al juve­nile deten­tion cen­ter await­ing tri­al. Most recent­ly, his father was found dead inside their home. Authorities said no foul play is sus­pect­ed and believed he com­mit­ted sui­cide. His cause and man­ner of death have yet been con­firmed by the med­ical exam­in­er. Their rel­a­tives believed Joshua killed him­self because “his pain was so deep, and he saw no oth­er way out,” Joshua’s aunt, Rebecca Norwood, wrote on Facebook, accord­ing to the Washington Post. “He told me he died the night his wife and lil boy were killed and he was just an emp­ty shell of a per­son.” After his death, Joshua was crit­i­cized when his appar­ent racist behav­ior sur­faced on his Facebook. He and his wife were alleged­ly against their son hav­ing a rela­tion­ship with a Black girl.



DETAILED STORY AS CARRIED BY THE WASHINGTON POST.

Father of Va. teen accused of killing his mom and broth­er is found dead in same house;

By Ian Shapira and Michael E. Miller April 21, 2020 at 6:30 p.m. EDT
His moth­er begged him not to give up. But two months after his wife and 6‑year-old son were killed and his old­er son was charged with mur­der, Joshua Norwood saw only one way for­ward, he told his moth­er, Ginny, on Monday. “He said for me not to be sor­ry, be hap­py because he would be with Jen and Wyatt,” Ginny Norwood wrote on her Facebook page.
Joshua hung up and wrote one last mes­sage. “He sent me a text and said, ‘I love you’ and that he need­ed to be with them,” Ginny wrote. Then Joshua returned to the liv­ing room of his Northern Virginia ranch home. It was there, on Valentine’s Day, that he had dis­cov­ered the bod­ies of Jennifer Norwood, 34, and Wyatt, 6. And it was there, at 3:30 p.m. Monday, that Fauquier County sheriff’s deputies dis­cov­ered Joshua’s body. They were called to the house by his moth­er, who lives in Maine.

My boy, my only boy, My son Joshua killed him­self a cou­ple hours ago,” Ginny wrote on Facebook. Her son suf­fered trau­ma to his upper body, but no foul play is sus­pect­ed, the Fauquier County Sheriff’s Office said. An offi­cial cause of death will not be declared until an autop­sy is com­plet­ed, said James Hartman, a spokesman for the sheriff’s office. He declined to pro­vide fur­ther details. The death marks the lat­est tragedy in the Norwood fam­i­ly. Levi, a 17-year-old junior at Liberty High School, has been charged with first-degree mur­der in the killings of his moth­er and broth­er.
Joshua’s aunt, Rebecca Norwood, wrote on Facebook that he had tak­en his life because “his pain was so deep, and he saw no oth­er way out.” “He told me he died the night his wife and lil boy were killed and he was just an emp­ty shell of a person.”

A month after the deaths of his wife and son, Joshua Norwood filed a peti­tion to restore his gun rights. According to his peti­tion, he had been invol­un­tar­i­ly admit­ted to a facil­i­ty or ordered to manda­to­ry out­pa­tient treat­ment in the Richmond area from March 11 to March 13. He was sched­uled for a hear­ing on Tuesday in Fauquier County General District Court, but the pro­ceed­ing was pushed back to May 11 because of the coro­n­avirus pan­dem­ic, accord­ing to court records and the court clerk. “He was real­ly upset that police had tak­en his guns,” said one acquain­tance who had spo­ken to him in recent weeks. “He want­ed to be able to pro­tect him­self, now that he was alone.” In a pre­vi­ous inter­view with The Washington Post, Joshua Norwood described com­ing home with a bou­quet of flow­ers for his wife about 6 p.m. on Valentine’s Day. When he opened the door to their brick house on Elk Run Road, a gun­shot rang out from the base­ment, and the bul­let grazed his head, he said. Norwood, who often car­ried a gun, fired back, and his assailant fled the house.

The father found his wife and youngest son fatal­ly shot and lying under blan­kets in the liv­ing room. It wasn’t until the next day that he learned the alleged cul­prit was his old­er son. “Every day for the rest of my life,” he said, “I’m going to wake up, look in the mir­ror, and I’m going to have a scar down my face, my head, as a mem­o­ry of the worst day of my life, when my fam­i­ly got tak­en away.” Eventually, Levi was tracked down in North Carolina, arrest­ed and returned to Northern Virginia. He is being held at a region­al juve­nile deten­tion cen­ter, await­ing tri­al. It’s unclear how his father’s death will affect his case. Scott Hook, Fauquier County’s commonwealth’s attor­ney, declined to com­ment. In the after­math of the killings, Joshua Norwood had come under scruti­ny for his own behav­ior, fac­ing accu­sa­tions that he was a racist who object­ed to his son’s hav­ing a black girl­friend. His Face­book page fea­tured a well-known say­ing by white suprema­cist David Lane: “We must secure the exis­tence of our race, and a future for white chil­dren.” The Southern Poverty Law Center describes Lane as “one of the most impor­tant ide­o­logues of con­tem­po­rary white supremacy.”

Norwood appears to have made dozens of posts on the white suprema­cist web­site Stormfront. And the acquain­tance, who met Norwood on Stormfront and last spoke to him ear­li­er this month, said Norwood was wor­ried the police inves­ti­ga­tion would reveal his white suprema­cist ties. “He didn’t want any infor­ma­tion com­ing out taint­ing his rep­u­ta­tion or embold­en­ing his son’s defense case,” accord­ing to the acquain­tance, who spoke on the con­di­tion of anonymi­ty to avoid asso­ci­a­tion with Stormfront. But Norwood insist­ed in February that he was not a white suprema­cist. He said he could not remem­ber why he pro­mot­ed Lane’s max­im on Facebook. Levi Norwood’s girl­friend has not returned mes­sages from The Post, and her par­ents have declined inter­view requests.

Behind The Toxic Racism In America Hides White Women In Plain Sight…

Their fin­ger­prints are all over every act of bar­barism that has ever been vis­it­ed on inno­cent black Americans. From induc­ing enslaved men to engage in sex­u­al encoun­ters with them and when caught cry­ing rape.
From cry­ing rape when enslaved men denied them sex­u­al favors.
From the Tulsa Riots to Rosewood, From the Emit Till mur­der to Susan Smith and every case in between, white wom­en’s fin­ger­prints have been all over the mur­der of inno­cent black peo­ple, par­tic­u­lar­ly black men.
Today, they would rather pay their last pen­ny to help save the life of a stray dog than show a sin­gle iota of empa­thy to a mur­dered black child.
The lack of empa­thy is noth­ing new; white women have always embarked on the sys­tem­at­ic killing of black chil­dren whom they chose to beat to death for the most minor child infrac­tion dur­ing slavery.

One of the issues that have been pushed to the back­burn­er as COVID ‑19 dom­i­nates the news is the issue of racism and the part white women play in it.
It can­not be lost on any­one that since Donald Trump ascend­ed to the Presidency, he has made no bones about being the most open­ly white nation­al­ist racists to occu­py the White House in our life­time.
We all knew that even among the best of them, if we can appro­pri­ate­ly use the term [best]to describe degen­er­a­cy, Republican or Democrat, at best, they were all rabid racists.

ABRAHAM LINCOLN SIGNED THE EMANCIPATION DECLARATION INTO LAW.

Yet still, here was Republican Abraham Lincoln, in a let­ter to pub­lish­er Horace Greeley of the New York Tribune;
I would save the Union. I would save it the short­est way under the Constitution. The soon­er the nation­al author­i­ty can be restored; the near­er the Union will be “the Union as it was.” If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slav­ery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slav­ery, I do not agree with them. My para­mount object in this strug­gle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slav­ery. If I could save the Union with­out free­ing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by free­ing all the slaves I would do it, and if I could save it by free­ing some and leav­ing oth­ers alone I would also do that. What I do about slav­ery, and the col­ored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I for­bear, I for­bear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less when­ev­er I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more when­ev­er I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to cor­rect errors when shown to be errors, and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

LYNDON JOHNSON SIGNED BOTH THE CIVIL AND VOTING RIGHTS ACTS INTO LAW.

Yet still, here was Democrat Lyndon Johnson: A crass & boor­ish spec­i­men. Some his­to­ri­ans believe Johnson to date has been the worst of the lot of them and may, to date, be the most revolt­ing ever to attain the pres­i­den­cy.
The National Post​.com argues Lyndon Johnson has been the most vul­gar pres­i­dent to date, As the world awaits the next nasty utter­ance from Donald Trump, one can only mar­vel at how his­to­ry itself has end­ed up in (lan­guage alert!) — a “shit­hole.” Amid the chron­ic shock and hor­ri­fied reac­tions, peo­ple have become blind to the fact that he is not (yet) the most dis­gust­ing U.S. pres­i­dent in liv­ing mem­o­ry. That title actu­al­ly belongs to a Texan Democrat, Lyndon B. Johnson, a howl­ing, flat­u­lent tor­men­tor of women whose cussing and racism remain breath­tak­ing today. And if you’re offend­ed by Trump’s lev­el of vul­gar­i­ty, you real­ly — real­ly — don’t want to read any fur­ther.
A record­ed 1964 tele­phone con­ver­sa­tion with Jack Valenti touched on Johnson’s elec­toral chances in Texas for an upcom­ing pres­i­den­tial race: Said Johnson, “I think I can take every Mexican in the state and every n — -r in the state.” “All they (the vot­ers) ever hear at elec­tion time is n — -r, n — -r, n — -r!”. Speaking of appoint a black jurist to the court Johnson went on, When I appoint a n — -r to the bench, I want every­one to know he’s a n — -r.”

So we have estab­lished that racism is as much a social con­struct in America, as accept­ed & prac­ticed, as American as apple pie.
One of the false beliefs relat­ed to race is the idea that the face of racism in America is that of white males, and this could not be fur­ther from the truth. As I have writ­ten sev­er­al times over the last cou­ple of years, in par­tic­u­lar when the issue of Donald Trump’s racism comes up for dis­cus­sion, white women have used the safe­ty of hid­ing behind their white men, even as they per­pet­u­ate and indulge in the most vicious forms of racism.
In the three years that Donald Trump has been President of the United States, a real phe­nom­e­non has tak­en shape. One that many peo­ple have found cute names for. Some peo­ple have even found this phe­nom­e­non amus­ing; unfor­tu­nate­ly, because the result can result in death, it is absolute­ly no laugh­ing mat­ter.
It is a mat­ter of white women call­ing the police on black peo­ple for engag­ing in the most mun­dane activ­i­ties that we all engage in, in our dai­ly lives.

There seems to be an invig­o­rat­ed awak­en­ing in white women and an ener­gized spir­it to engage in bla­tant racism since Donald Trump took office. However, it can­not all be laid at Trump’s feet, no mat­ter how repug­nant he is.
We have all seen the videos of white women call­ing the police to arrest black peo­ple bar­be­cu­ing in the park. Studying in a com­mon area in a col­lege dorm. Sitting in a Starbucks cof­fee shop. In Cleveland, Huntington Bank apol­o­gized after an employ­ee called the police on a black man try­ing to cash his pay­check. Shopping at a CVS and using a coupon. Alison Ettel was filmed as she called the police on an 8‑year-old black girl sell­ing water with­out a per­mit. A white neigh­bor called the police on 12-year-old Reggie Fields as he was cut­ting grass in his neigh­bor­hood as part of his sum­mer busi­ness. Last sum­mer, Jaequan Faulkner, 13, opened a hot dog stand hop­ing to raise mon­ey to buy clothes. It was report­ed for not hav­ing a per­mit. In October, a Brooklyn woman was cap­tured in a viral video appear­ing to call 911 and claim­ing a young boy had groped her inside a deli. The footage shows young chil­dren cry­ing as she’s mak­ing the alleged call to the police, who nev­er show up. The woman was lat­er con­front­ed with sur­veil­lance footage con­firm­ing the boy nev­er groped her. On social media, users dubbed her “Cornerstore Caroline.“
It goes on and on, play­ing golf, stay­ing at an AirB&B, nap­ping on a couch, vis­it­ing the pool, run­ning a busi­ness, mak­ing a white woman sus­pi­cious, mak­ing a white woman uneasy, I could go on all day.

For some peo­ple who have nev­er lived in black skin in America, these things may seem pret­ty run-of-the-mill. There is noth­ing run of the mill about these racist calls to the police, and they are designed to use the police to kill the object of their hatred.
The bru­tal­i­ty and vio­lent ten­den­cies of police who kill black peo­ple are old­er than apple pie, com­ing from as far back as slav­ery.
No, there was noth­ing called police offi­cers dur­ing slav­ery; back then, they were over­seers on the plan­ta­tions and, even­tu­al­ly, slave patrols who ran down enslaved peo­ple flee­ing bondage in search of free­dom.
The sheer bar­barism of that era, in which slave patrols would have dogs lit­er­al­ly eat the flesh from run-away peo­ple, beat and muti­late them, is still evi­dent today.
Police still use dogs to muti­late black peo­ple who are already sub­dued, beat, and ulti­mate­ly mur­der them, even though they are unarmed and offer no resis­tance.
On the con­trary, white ser­i­al killers are treat­ed with the soft­est touch­es. They are gen­er­al­ly well pro­tect­ed, includ­ing being tak­en to get fast food after they mas­sa­cred mul­ti­ple inno­cent people.

The web­site (face2​faceafrica​.com) suc­cinct­ly writes, “What escapes many peo­ple is that the whim­si­cal killing of enslaved Blacks in the U.S. dur­ing slav­ery, and even after by white folks with­out puni­tive con­se­quence is based on laws passed by white politi­cians, who hap­pened to be plan­ta­tion own­ers as well. One such devi­ous law is the Casual Killing Act of 1669 which declared it legal to kill a slave while cor­rect­ing because mal­ice could not be pre­sumed. The “casu­al killing of slaves” says that if a slave dies while resist­ing his mas­ter, the act will not be pre­sumed to have occurred with “prepensed mal­ice.
Does the penul­ti­mate & last lines ring a bell? Let us look at those two lines again, [if a slave dies while resist­ing his mas­ter, the act will not be pre­sumed to have occurred with “prepensed mal­ice.”]
Now, do you see it?
When you see a bunch of mur­der­ous cops beat­ing the hell out of a black per­son while six of them are sit­ting on him/​her, yelling “stop resist­ing” over and over again, the idea is to jus­ti­fy killing that per­son.
As long as they yell out, stop “resist­ing,” no mat­ter what crimes they com­mit there­after will be deemed jus­ti­fied when they inves­ti­gate them­selves.
These con­di­tions are not new; they were cod­i­fied into laws and form part of the fab­ric of insti­tu­tion­al­ized racism built into the American body politic.
The new real­i­ty is this, “If a black per­son dies while resist­ing his new mas­ter [the police], the act will not be pre­sumed to have occurred with “prepensed mal­ice.”]
Now google the name Eric Garner. Walter Scott. Laquan McDonald. Michael Brown. Philando Castille. John Crawford. Sandra Bland. Miles Hall. Alton Sterling. Amadou Diallo. Sean Bell. .….….….

(Killedbypolice​.net) reports that though there are proven meth­ods that have result­ed in few­er deaths at the hands of police, only a few police depart­ments have adopt­ed them.
One of the strate­gies that I believe would be of much help is the duty to inter­vene if anoth­er offi­cer uses exces­sive force.
The fact that they have not adopt­ed these mea­sures and, in par­tic­u­lar, hold­ing oth­er cops account­able sends a strong mes­sage that there is no inten­tion to stop the killer dogs from mur­der­ing inno­cent peo­ple of col­or.
You pay their salaries through your tax­es; they kill you and serve their own racist interests.

But the laws passed to make it no big deal to kill black peo­ple were actu­al­ly passed to pro­tect white women who would mali­cious­ly beat and kill black chil­dren.
The cry­ing that we now see when white women are caught in bla­tant acts of racism or when they ille­gal­ly offend a black per­son is noth­ing new. White women have always been at the cen­ter of the bar­barism unleashed against inno­cent black cit­i­zens.
Whether it be the hor­rif­ic mur­der of Emmitt Till, the Tulsa Riots, to Susan Smith, who killed her chil­dren and blamed a black man, engag­ing in hor­rif­ic acts of racism and revert­ing to the lit­tle damsel in dis­tress has been their modus Operandi as long as this igno­ble sys­tem has exist­ed.
Sure the men pro­vide the mus­cle but behind the mus­cle are the devi­ous, dev­il­ish brains that have fer­til­ized racism and allowed it to con­tin­ue to grow.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Virginia Pastor Who Defied Social Distancing Has Died After Contracting COVID-19

Nationwide: Bishop Gerald O. Glenn, the 66-year old pas­tor and founder of New Deliverance Evangelistic Church in Chesterfield, Virginia, has report­ed­ly died from COVID-19. He alleged­ly defied warn­ings to avoid reli­gious gath­er­ings and still con­tin­ued to preach that “God is larg­er than this dread­ed virus” before con­tract­ing the coronavirus.

When author­i­ties start­ed to advise social dis­tanc­ing, Glenn still appar­ent­ly held in-per­son church ser­vices and said he would keep preach­ing “unless in jail or the hos­pi­tal.” A day after his ser­mon on March 22, the state offi­cial­ly banned all gath­er­ings of 10 peo­ple or more.
A few days after, Glenn test­ed pos­i­tive of COVID-19. He was tak­en to the hos­pi­tal where his con­di­tion con­tin­ued to wors­en even with a ven­ti­la­tor. He sad­ly died of COVID-19 on April 11, church offi­cials announced on Facebook.

Moreover, his 65-year old wife, Mother Marcietia Glenn, their daugh­ter, Mar-Gerie Crawley, and 2 oth­er fam­i­ly mem­bers have test­ed pos­i­tive for the coro­n­avirus. Meanwhile, Church mem­bers held a vig­il to mourn the death of Bishop Glenn. Senator Tim Kane of Virginia also expressed his grief on his death.
“My heart sinks as I learn this morn­ing that Bishop Gerald Glenn, pas­tor of New Deliverance Evangelistic Church, died yes­ter­day from COVID-19,” Kaine wrote on Twitter the day after his death. “He was a friend and pil­lar of Richmond faith com­mu­ni­ty. May all do as much for so many.”

When Misogynistic Dancehall Artistes Are Your Role-models…

It is not easy to look at the street events in our coun­try and not walk away hav­ing thrown your hands in the air say­ing, “I give up, I just give up”.
It is hard not to become dis­il­lu­sioned at the lev­el of deep-seat­ed igno­rance and unadul­ter­at­ed law­less­ness, for no rea­son oth­er than to be total imbe­ciles.
But we still have to har­bor hope that some­how, there is a silent major­i­ty that does not show up at those street events, scant­i­ly clad, if at all, bod­ies gyrat­ing to the ear-bust­ing crescen­do of what now pass­es for music, the lyrics of which helped to shape the degen­er­a­cy we are expe­ri­enc­ing today.
The insipid crass­ness should nev­er be con­strued to be a prod­uct of the ghet­to only, or to be con­fined geo­graph­i­cal­ly to the under­served areas below cross­roads.
In fact, much of the Bhutto behav­ior that crept into the broad­er nation­al dis­course, and has now become main­stream, was intro­duced by the old dirty dish tow­els that were turned into table cloths overnight.

My grand aunt who raised me (Mamma) [God rest her won­der­ful soul] always told me that if you dress up a pig and put the best clothes on that pig and put it in a church it does not make the pig a Christian it makes the church a pig­pen.
You could dress up a pig all you want and put lip­stick on it, but a pig is still a pig. Given a chance, it defaults right back to rolling around in the mud. That is why it makes no sense to give pearls to swine.
Okay, Mike real­ly?, Enough with the pig metaphors, you are a pork eater, you can­not be on cow’s back and still a cuss cow, man.
I know right, but you see the Bhutto behav­ior in the parliament,& that in and of itself gives license to hood­lums in the ghet­tos uptown and down­town to act with the sense of rabid law­less­ness we are witnessing.

The desire to be liked, the desire to be pop­u­lar, the desire to be seen as a man of the peo­ple has lit­er­al­ly shaped the way the news gets report­ed, it shapes how top­i­cal issues are dis­cussed, and it even influ­ences some of the same dishrags turned table­cloths to bring the nas­ti­ness into the high­est seats of deci­sion-mak­ing and acad­e­mia.
Gangstas who glo­ri­fy misog­y­ny, mur­der & muti­la­tion are revered, cel­e­brat­ed, and exalt­ed, made into earth­ly gods, they are now thought-shapers and influ­encers.
Faith and fam­i­ly are replaced with nihilism & a total dis­re­gard for tra­di­tion­al norms that pre­vi­ous­ly served as guardrails to keep anar­chy and chaos at bay.

The trou­ble is that we can nev­er get back to where we were. In order to get back to where we were, much less a bet­ter place than where we were, would require lead­ers with guts and moral for­ti­tude. Not just to inspire, but to make the hard deci­sions to adopt & draft the right poli­cies and make them into law.
It would require par­ents wor­thy of the title [“PARENT”], not just peo­ple capa­ble of engag­ing in ani­mal­is­tic cop­u­la­tion pro­duc­ing new life as a con­se­quence, real par­ents anchored in God, fam­i­ly & coun­try.
Where can those peo­ple be found in this Serengeti of mad­ness?
Hey, actions have con­se­quences, it is a sim­ple con­cept to under­stand.
Here’s a thought, when Jamaicans leave the coun­try and go to oth­er coun­tries there are approx­i­mate­ly three out­comes. (a) We assim­i­late, inte­grate, and adapt to our adopt­ed coun­try’s way of life, ie fol­low their laws, work, get an edu­ca­tion & thrive. (b) Bitch about how we hate our adopt­ed coun­try, but play by their damn rules and thrive. © Do as we please, break their laws.….….….…you know the rest.

Look we Jamaicans are cut from a dif­fer­ent cloth, we are a rebel­lious peo­ple who do not take kind­ly to being told what we can and can­not do.
Our peo­ple are large­ly from the Ibo, Ashanti & Cormmantie tribes. Some his­to­ry books now reveal that the enslaved peo­ple who end­ed up in Jamaica were the enslaved Africans who did not suc­cumb or adapt to being enslaved.
The his­to­ry of the so-called Maroons and the bat­tles they waged to force the British from Jamaica bears tes­ta­ment to our fear­less free & indomitable spir­its.
Nevertheless, just being rebel­lious and ungovern­able in 2020 is a pre­scrip­tion for dis­as­ter. The con­se­quences of mak­ing dance­hall artistes role mod­els, instead of ele­vat­ing our doc­tors, nurs­es, teach­ers, police offi­cers have borne bit­ter fruits and the coun­try is now reap­ing those bit­ter fruits. It is nev­er a good thing when the tail wags the dog.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Jamaican police Detective cor­po­ral, busi­ness­man, researcher, and blog­ger. 
He is a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog chatt​-​a​-box​.com. 
He’s also a con­trib­u­tor to sev­er­al web­sites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs free of charge, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est pod­cast all free to you of course.

Group Of Black Women Doctors Bring Free COVID-19 Test Kits To Underserved Neighborhoods

Philadelphia, PA — Dr. Ala Stanford and oth­er African American doc­tors (most­ly women) from Pennsylvania have launched the Black Doctors COVID-19 Consortium to pro­vide free mobile coro­n­avirus test­ing to under­served com­mu­ni­ties in hopes to pre­vent fur­ther spread of the virus, espe­cial­ly among Black people.

Dr. Stanford, who is a pedi­atric sur­geon, owns a pri­vate prac­tice and a Black-owned med­ical con­sult­ing firm called REAL Concierge Medicine. She is also on staff at Abington-Jefferson Hospital in Hatfield Township. She says she launched the ini­tia­tive because she want­ed to do some­thing about the increas­ing num­bers of cas­es and deaths relat­ed to COVID-19 in com­mu­ni­ties where Afriacn Americans live.

Initially, she cre­at­ed and uploaded a video try­ing to dis­prove the myth that African Americans were resis­tant to COVID-19. But even though some were wor­ried that if they had the virus, they couldn’t get tested.

That’s when she decid­ed to form Black Doctors COVID-19 Consortium with her col­leagues in the med­ical field as well as church­es in the Black com­mu­ni­ties in Philadelphia. Having some test­ing kits on hand, Stanford and the oth­er doc­tors “put our sup­plies togeth­er and we went out to the com­mu­ni­ty,” she told WHYY.

Those who want to be test­ed can sign up for an appoint­ment online. The group is test­ing any­one, par­tic­u­lar­ly in under­served com­mu­ni­ties, who has coro­n­avirus symp­toms or known con­tact with some­one who test­ed positive.

They have set up a GoFundMe page to raise funds to pro­vide COVID-19 test­ing, advo­ca­cy, and edu­cate Black peo­ple about the coro­n­avirus dis­ease. It has so far raised more than $25,000 of its $50,000 goal.

One Country Two Different Enforcement Regimes

So every one of you is just going to sit there and pre­tend that you do not see that when it comes to the enforce­ment of the laws in America the rules only apply to black people?

Crowd in Texas chants f“ire Fauci”,again hard­ly any­one has a mask on and there cer­tain­ly are no police enforc­ing the law against these white anarchists.


I mean come on now, I would under­stand if this hap­pened in a red state with a red state Republican Governor, but last time I checked the state of Michigan had a Democratic Governor.

In Michigan, white Trump sup­port­ers defy the orders of the Democratic Governor and staged armed protests, many with­out masks on, there were no cops in sight.


How then are we to rec­on­cile the bla­tant dis­par­i­ties in the way the laws are enforced when white peo­ple stand in defi­ance of the laws as when blacks demon­strate against state-spon­sored terrorism?

Protesters demon­strate against stay-at-home orders that were put in place due to the COVID-19 out­break, Friday, April 17, 2020, in Huntington Beach, Calif. (AP Photo/​Mark J. Terrill)

They say a pic­ture is worth a thou­sand words so we’ll let the pic­tures speak for them­selves. What’s impor­tant to appre­ci­ate how­ev­er, is that in every instance that there are defi­ant white pro­tes­tors who are open­ly break­ing the laws, they are gen­er­al­ly heav­i­ly armed and there are no cops in sight. Where there may be a cop in sight they are there mere­ly as observers, or in may instances as was report­ed in Charlottesville racist march in which a young woman was mur­dered the cops seemed to be active cheer­lead­ers to the pre­vail­ing anarchy.

Locked and loaded they stand in defi­ance of state man­dat­ed orders so social dis­tance and stay at home. (no cops in sight)

In fact, this is not about the stay at home orders as a result of the COVID ‑19 virus over the last sev­er­al weeks.
This was what hap­pened when the FBI tried to arrest law­break­ers in the Bundy Ranch standoff. 

13 Apr 2014, Nevada, USA — Protester Eric Parker from cen­tral Idaho aims his weapon from a bridge next to the Bureau of Land Management’s base camp where seized cat­tle, that belonged to ranch­er Cliven Bundy, are being held at near Bunkerville, Nevada April 12, 2014. U.S. offi­cials end­ed a stand-off with hun­dreds of armed pro­test­ers in the Nevada desert on Saturday, call­ing off the gov­ern­men­t’s roundup of cat­tle it said were ille­gal­ly graz­ing on fed­er­al land and giv­ing about 300 ani­mals back to ranch­er Bundy who owned them. REUTERS/​Jim Urquhart (UNITED STATES — Tags: POLITICS ANIMALS BUSINESS CRIME LAW CIVIL UNREST) — Image by © JIM URQUHART/​Reuters/​Corbis

Cliven Bundy’s dis­pute with the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment dates to 1993, when Bundy began to graze his cat­tle on pub­lic land while “know­ing­ly refus[ing]” to pay fees or obtain the prop­er per­mits, accord­ing to the com­plaint. The fees were report­ed­ly as low as $1.35 per cow per month. 

Armed mil­i­tants defied the FBI to come & arrest them

In 1998, a fed­er­al court ordered Bundy to remove his cat­tle and began levy­ing fines against him, but the sit­u­a­tion did not come to a head until more than a decade lat­er, when the US Bureau of Land Management made plans to seize 1,000 of Bundy’s cattle.

law-enforce­ment arrayed to arrest Cliven Bundy

Cliven Bundy, the father of Malheur nation­al wildlife refuge occu­piers Ammon and Ryan Bundy, was even­tu­al­ly charged with six fed­er­al crimes stem­ming from his con­fronta­tion with the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment in 2014.
The charges, filed on the same day that the final four occu­piers of Malheur sur­ren­dered to law enforce­ment offi­cials and one day after his arrest in Portland, Oregon, marked a stun­ning turn in a two-decades-long dis­pute over Bundy’s ille­gal graz­ing of cat­tle on fed­er­al land.

WHERE BLACK PEOPLE STAND UP FOR THEIR RIGHTS THE SCENES ARE DIFFERENT

Scenes from Ferguson Missouri after white cop Darren Wilson mur­dered teenag­er Michael Brown


These are the scenes that play out when Black peo­ple protest or demand jus­tice. Not only does the area become a war zone but they are beat­en shot and have all types of state-sanc­tioned abuse heaped on them.

Ferguson was a ver­i­ta­ble war zone



These are indomitable images that will for­ev­er sear the soul of the nation for per­pe­tu­ity.
Ever won­dered what this kid is going to grow up think­ing about his country?

One Year After the Ferguson Protests, Just a Few Reforms Have ...

Third day of protests set over police acquittal in St. Louis - AOL ...
Defiance


A police riot


Military arma­ments arrayed against Black American cit­i­zens demon­strat­ing for the right to peace­ful exis­tence from police violence


Imani Duncan Demands More For The Poor, Where Were Her Daddy And His Friends?

I saw this post on Facebook and I could not pass this one up. I am going to break a car­di­nal rule I have, which is to lim­it my com­ments on par­ty pol­i­tics and only to speak on top­i­cal issues as I see them.
Look, the coro­na virus has dis­rupt­ed all of our lives, and I know and share in the pain of those who are hav­ing a hard time find­ing the basics like food and clean drink­ing water.
In fact, it has been for that rea­son that I wrote an arti­cle just today speak­ing to those issues.
But when peo­ple talk about the poor and needy from the tip of their tongues as a means to gain polit­i­cal mileage or trac­tion, it infu­ri­ates me to no end.
When they demand that Government do the impos­si­ble with­out the req­ui­site resources, they are ask­ing for the myth­i­cal equiv­a­lent of spin­ning straw into gold, an impos­si­bil­i­ty.
Please lis­ten to Imani Duncan the daugh­ter of Donald Keith Duncan, who was born to priv­i­lege and we will dis­cuss afterwards.

I am at a loss as to where Government is sup­posed to get the resources to do these things when the PNP was in office for 2212 years and did not move to reg­u­lar­ize the econ­o­my.
Twenty-two and one-half years and many of those infor­mal earn­ers could have been brought under some type of tax com­pli­ance umbrel­la which would have pro­vid­ed some degree of sol­ven­cy or fall­back reserve funds for the gov­ern­ment to resort to in times like these.
If you do not pay any tax­es, where is the mon­ey to come from to do the hand­ing out?
I am just as con­cerned as any­one else about the peo­ple who are liv­ing from one meal to the next, and let me has­ten to say, but for the grace of God, we would all be so liv­ing.
Nevertheless, the admin­is­tra­tion has been in office under four years, what more could this admin­is­tra­tion have done in the time it has been in office?

DK rejects blame | Lead Stories | Jamaica Gleaner
Imani & har puppa

The hypocrisy of these pseu­do-com­mu­nists is not only galling, it is incom­pre­hen­si­bly iron­ic.
For the twen­ty-two and one-half years that the PNP had total con­trol of the coun­try, Jamaica under­went a trans­for­ma­tion­al neg­a­tive meta­mor­pho­sis from which it is still reel­ing. Add that change to the peri­od between 1972 to 1980 and a more trans­par­ent pic­ture emerges as to why Jamaica is where it is today, mired in pover­ty, crime and per­pet­u­al beg­ging.
If the People’s National Party was a busi­ness, it would have been defunct, gone bel­ly-up from the 1970s.
The com­bined admin­is­tra­tions of Michael Manley, Percival Patterson and Portia Simpson Miller of which Imani Duncan’s dad­dy Donald Keith Duncan was an inte­gral part, plun­dered the nation’s cof­fers, destroyed the pro­duc­tive sec­tor, destroyed tourism and the min­ing sec­tor, over­saw the dete­ri­o­ra­tion of the Island’s colo­nial infra­struc­ture and watched and cheered the destruc­tion of our val­ued Jamaican cul­ture, and the expan­sion of transna­tion­al crim­i­nal­i­ty, to the point many liv­ing in the dias­po­ra have unfor­tu­nate­ly sworn off return­ing to their Island home.

The shred­ding of our tra­di­tion­al and cul­tur­al norms, the destruc­tion of the Island’s busi­ness sec­tor, includ­ing the destruc­tion of the nation­al air­line through the padding of the staff with PNP cronies who nev­er did a days work. The destruc­tion of the nation­al Bus ser­vice through the same rack­et of padding the work­force with polit­i­cal hacks who received pay­ment for no work done. Awarding con­tracts to polit­i­cal hacks who nev­er did a day’s work in their lives.
After twen­ty-two & one-half years the PNP left Jamaica far worse than when they took over the coun­try from Edward Seaga in 1988.
How dare these lit­tle mis­in­formed, mise­d­u­cat­ed neo­phytes dare come to social media about poor peo­ple when they grew up fat from the slop at the feed­ing trough of hard-work­ing Jamaicans?

As a mem­ber of the PNP from as far back as Michael Manley’s days, what has DK Duncan done to alle­vi­ate the suf­fer­ing of the Island’s poor?
How dare his lit­tle enti­tled daugh­ter come to the peo­ple pre­tend­ing that she knows or under­stands their pain?
Caring is all about show­ing me what you have done, it has noth­ing to do with talk­ing when you are sit­ting on the side­lines.
Hopefully, the Jamaican peo­ple will be smart enough to dis­card your faux con­cern and see it for what it tru­ly is pan­der­ing to the fears and emo­tion­al pain in order to gain lever­age polit­i­cal­ly.
Shame on you, but you are seek­ing polit­i­cal office, you lot are shame­less narcissists.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Jamaican police Detective cor­po­ral, busi­ness­man, researcher, and blog­ger. 
He is a black achiev­er hon­oree, and pub­lish­er of the blog chatt​-​a​-box​.com. 
He’s also a con­trib­u­tor to sev­er­al web­sites.
You may sub­scribe to his blogs free of charge, or sub­scribe to his Youtube chan­nel @chatt-a-box, for the lat­est pod­cast all free to you of course.