Justice Ministry To Renew Discussions With Police Over Improving Security For Prosecutors

Justice Minister, Senator Mark Golding is asserting that his ministry will have to redouble efforts to find a solution to meet the security needs of prosecutors, in collaboration with the police force.
Justice Minister, Senator Mark Golding is assert­ing that his min­istry will have to redou­ble efforts to find a solu­tion to meet the secu­ri­ty needs of pros­e­cu­tors, in col­lab­o­ra­tion with the police force.

Justice Minister, Senator Mark Golding, says his min­istry is to renew dis­cus­sions with the Jamaica Constabulary (JCF) aimed at improv­ing the secu­ri­ty of judi­cial offi­cers includ­ing prosecutors. 

He gave the update in a state­ment yes­ter­day in which he con­demned Wednesday’s attack on a deputy direc­tor of pub­lic pros­e­cu­tions as she arrived at the Spanish Town Courthouse in St Catherine.

Arising from the inci­dent, DPP Paula Llewellyn, called for greater secu­ri­ty to be put in place to pro­tect pros­e­cu­tors and sup­port staff.

The Justice Minister says the gov­ern­ment owes it to pros­e­cu­tors to ensure they are able to do their work with­out being exposed to unac­cept­able risks.

As a result, he said Permanent Secretary in the Justice Ministry, Carol Palmer, has been tasked to renew dis­cus­sions with the Police High Command to see what else can be done to improve security.

Palmer said the issue of secu­ri­ty for pros­e­cu­tors remains a con­cern and she will con­tin­ue dia­logue with the Police High Command in an attempt to find a last­ing solution.

Senator Golding is assert­ing that his min­istry will have to redou­ble efforts to find a solu­tion to meet the secu­ri­ty needs of pros­e­cu­tors, in col­lab­o­ra­tion with the police force.

Meanwhile, the Permanent Secretary said every effort is being made to relo­cate a num­ber of cour­t­hous­es and the Spanish Town cour­t­house is high on the list.

Palmer indi­cat­ed that the Ministry has already iden­ti­fied prop­er­ty in Central Village on the out­skirts of Spanish Town, St Catherine, for the relo­ca­tion of the Spanish Town Courthouse.

However, she says the min­istry is await­ing fund­ing to pro­ceed with the con­struc­tion of the new facility.

It is report­ed that the female Deputy DPP was in the process of remov­ing files from her car out­side the cour­t­house when a man approached and demand­ed money.

She com­plied and the man left.Story orig­i­nat­ed here :Justice Ministry To Renew Discussions With Police Over Improving Security For Prosecutors

John Boehner Was Really Bad At His Job. Now Things Are About To Get Epically Worse

House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio listens during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 13, 2015. The House debates and votes for final passage on NSA Surveillance legislation, known as the USA Freedom Act. The measure seeks to codify President Barack Obama's proposal to end the NSA's collection of domestic calling records. It would allow the agency to request certain records held by the telephone companies under a court order in terrorism investigations. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) (Credit: AP)
House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio lis­tens dur­ing a news con­fer­ence on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 13, 2015. The House debates and votes for final pas­sage on NSA Surveillance leg­is­la­tion, known as the USA Freedom Act. The mea­sure seeks to cod­i­fy President Barack Obama’s pro­pos­al to end the NSA’s col­lec­tion of domes­tic call­ing records. It would allow the agency to request cer­tain records held by the tele­phone com­pa­nies under a court order in ter­ror­ism inves­ti­ga­tions. (AP Photo/​Susan Walsh) (Credit: AP)

Yesterday, House Speaker John Boehner was his usu­al weepy self as Pope Francis spoke to a joint meet­ing of Congress. Boehner, a Catholic, had invit­ed three popes to address Congress, and Francis final­ly took him up on the offer — a first in U.S. his­to­ry. So it wasn’t that sur­pris­ing to see Boehner, in the back­ground, leak­ing like a water faucet in dis­re­pair. Only now, we can see those tears in a dif­fer­ent light, as Boehner announced his stun­ning res­ig­na­tion from Congress, effec­tive at the end of October.

There’s lit­tle doubt that the prox­i­mal cause of Boehner leav­ing is the GOP’s inter­nal fight over whether to do anoth­er gov­ern­ment shut­down — this time, aimed at defund­ing Planned Parenthood, an orga­ni­za­tion that (at 45 per­cent) is cur­rent­ly viewed about three more favor­ably than Congress.
11th-CD-NoCarolina

But it’s equal­ly clear the push to oust Boehner has bub­bling for some time, though char­ac­ter­is­ti­cal­ly not with much method or dis­ci­pline. In late July, North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows sur­prised every­one with a motion to vacate the chair, which Politico described as “an extra­or­di­nar­i­ly rare pro­ce­dur­al move that rep­re­sents the most seri­ous expres­sion of oppo­si­tion to Boehner’s speak­er­ship,” going on to note:

GOP lead­ers were tak­en com­plete­ly by sur­prise. Meadows, a sec­ond-term Republican, hadn’t even asked for a meet­ing with Boehner or oth­er top Republicans to air his gripes.

Boehner had faced a chal­lenge to his lead­er­ship before, but not in his most recent elec­tion. So the ebbs and flows of oppo­si­tion have remained rel­a­tive­ly opaque, aid­ed by a gen­er­al­ly incu­ri­ous press. Rachel Maddow rep­re­sents a dis­tinct­ly dis­cor­dant view, hav­ing repeat­ed­ly run seg­ments argu­ing that “John Boehner is bad at his job.”But it can be argued that Maddow is wrong to blame Boehner for prob­lems that are much big­ger than the office he holds, or even the GOP House caucus.

Indeed, viewed through an insti­tu­tion­al lens, Boehner’s trou­bles go back much fur­ther, encom­pass­ing the all three of his GOP pre­de­ces­sors. In 1998, Newt Gingrich resigned as Speaker, and from Congress, after the GOP lost seats in mid-term elec­tions after intense­ly pur­su­ing a Clinton impeach­ment agen­da. Just days after the elec­tion, CNN report­ed, “Faced with a brew­ing rebel­lion with­in the Republican Party over the dis­ap­point­ing midterm elec­tion, House Speaker Newt Gingrich made the stun­ning deci­sion Friday to step down not just from the speak­er­ship but also from Congress.”

Gingrich’s replace­ment, Louisiana’s Bob Livingston, resigned just over a month lat­er [video], before even tak­ing office, after his own extra-mar­i­tal affairs were revealed by Hustler pub­lish­er Larry Flynt. Amazingly, Livingston, who had been part of Gingrich’s lead­er­ship team devot­ed to hound­ing Clinton from office, said in his remarks, “I want so very much to paci­fy and cool our rag­ing tem­pers and return to an era when dif­fer­ences were con­fined to the debate, and not a per­son­al attack or assas­si­na­tion of character.”

Livingston’s delib­er­ate­ly low-key suc­ces­sor, Dennis Hastert, had some trou­bles in office, but man­aged to sur­vive with dig­ni­ty and rep­u­ta­tion rea­son­ably intact through eight years of lead­er­ship — the longest tenure ever for a Republican — until Democrats retook the House in the 2006 mid-terms. It was only this year that he was crim­i­nal­ly charged for lying to fed­er­al agents and evad­ing finan­cial report­ing require­ments, report­ed­ly as part of an attempt to con­ceal sex­u­al mis­con­duct with a minor, which in turn raised new doubts about his han­dling of sim­i­lar prob­lems in the Mark Foley affair, just pri­or to the 2006 election.

At one lev­el, this record speaks to a lack of per­son­al moral­i­ty — a key GOP hob­by horse for at least the past half cen­tu­ry, if not vir­tu­al­ly for­ev­er. But more deeply, it high­lights the inher­ent dan­gers stirred up by run­ning polit­i­cal cam­paigns as moral cru­sades, which sim­ply can­not be sus­tained as a means of gov­ern­ment in a sec­u­lar, plu­ral­is­tic sys­tem. The attempt to demo­nize Planned Parenthood as evil incar­nate involves spec­tac­u­lar lev­els of fraud and decep­tion. Such decep­tion may be sus­tain­able with­in the bub­ble of the GOP base, dri­ving the lat­est mania which appears to have exhaust­ed Boehner’s endurance, but it can­not pre­vail in the poli­ty at large, unless the élite media are ful­ly on board — as they were in attack­ing ACORN, orsell­ing the Iraq War—but not for this fight.
Story orig­i­nat­ed here : http://​www​.salon​.com/​2​0​1​5​/​0​9​/​2​5​/​j​o​h​n​_​b​o​e​h​n​e​r​_​w​a​s​_​r​e​a​l​l​y​_​b​a​d​_​a​t​_​h​i​s​_​j​o​b​_​n​o​w​_​t​h​i​n​g​s​_​a​r​e​_​a​b​o​u​t​_​t​o​_​g​e​t​_​e​p​i​c​a​l​l​y​_​w​o​r​se/

Noam Chomsky: The GOP Is A Radical Insurgency; It’s Not A Political Party

Jewish-American scholar and activist Noam Chomsky talks during his meeting with Palestinian youth activists in Gaza City, Friday, Oct. 19, 2012. Chomsky crossed from Egypt yesterday for his first visit to Gaza. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)
Jewish-American schol­ar and activist Noam Chomsky talks dur­ing his meet­ing with Palestinian youth activists in Gaza City, Friday, Oct. 19, 2012. Chomsky crossed from Egypt yes­ter­day for his first vis­it to Gaza. (AP Photo/​Adel Hana)

MIT Professor Noam Chomsky recent­ly gave his assess­ment of the Republican race for the White House with for­mer real­i­ty-TV star Donald Trump lead­ing the pack after a speech at New York’s The New School this week­end and the renowned polit­i­cal thinker sur­mised that the Grand Olé Party has become too extreme to still be con­sid­ered a legit­i­mate American polit­i­cal party.

“Republicans have just drift­ed off the spec­trum,” Chomsky declared in response to a ques­tion about what the “antics” of Trump say about American exceptionalism.

Noting the remark­ably sim­i­lar hawk­ish blus­ter against the Iran nuclear deal from sup­pos­ed­ly “seri­ous” can­di­date Jeb Bush and recent­ly depart­ed (from the cam­paign trail, not life) hope­ful Scott Walker, Chomsky said the Republican 2016 field is “off the spec­trum of not only inter­na­tion­al opin­ion, but even rel­a­tive sanity.”

I think we should rec­og­nize that the oth­er can­di­dates are not that dif­fer­ent,” from Trump, Chomsky offered. “If you take a look at — just take a look at their views. You know, they tell you their views, and they’re astonishing.”

Chomsky went on to cite a 2013 essay by con­ser­v­a­tive Norm Ornstein and Brooking’s fel­low Thomas Mann decry­ing the devo­lu­tion of the Republican Party to a “rad­i­cal insurgency”:

You can tell that even by the votes. I mean, any issue of any com­plex­i­ty is going to have some diver­si­ty of opin­ion. But when you get a unan­i­mous vote to kill the Iranian deal or the Affordable Care Act or what­ev­er the next thing may be, you know you’re not deal­ing with a polit­i­cal party.

In a recent inter­view with Indian mag­a­zine, Frontline, Chomsky iden­ti­fied the GOP’s race-bait­ing and big­ot­ed pan­der­ing to cap­ture an ever shrink­ing nativist elec­torate as the cause for why the Republican pres­i­den­tial pri­maries have become “spec­ta­cles remote from the main­stream of mod­ern society”:

It is impor­tant to bear in mind that the Republicans have long aban­doned the pre­tense of func­tion­ing as a nor­mal par­lia­men­tary par­ty. Rather, they have become a “rad­i­cal insur­gency” that scarce­ly seeks to par­tic­i­pate in nor­mal par­lia­men­tary pol­i­tics, as observed by the respect­ed con­ser­v­a­tive polit­i­cal com­men­ta­tor Norman Ornstein of the right-wing American Enterprise Institute. Since Ronald Reagan, the lead­er­ship has plunged so far into the pock­ets of the very rich and the cor­po­rate sec­tor that they can attract votes only by mobi­liz­ing sec­tors of the pop­u­la­tion that have not pre­vi­ous­ly been an orga­nized polit­i­cal force, among them extrem­ist evan­gel­i­cal Christians, now prob­a­bly the major­i­ty of Republican vot­ers; rem­nants of the for­mer slave-hold­ing States; nativists who are ter­ri­fied that “they” are tak­ing our white Christian Anglo-Saxon coun­try away from us; and oth­ers who turn the Republican pri­maries into spec­ta­cles remote from the main­stream of mod­ern soci­ety — though not the main­stream of the most pow­er­ful coun­try in world history.

Story orig­i­nat­ed here : Noam Chomsky: The GOP is a rad­i­cal insur­gency; it’s not a polit­i­cal party

Wow ” This May Be A Damn Good Tool In The Fight Against Crime In Jamaica

The theft of a Motorcycle from a Police Station would nor­mal­ly evoke scorn and dis­dain by Jamaicans who hate every­thing about Police. However the theft of a motor­cy­cle from the Junction police sta­tion in St Elizabeth Jamaica did not gar­ner the nor­mal diar­rhea of dis­dain­ful com­ments from them this time, the fact is that police vehi­cles have been swiped from Police precincts all across the Globe.

Supt of Police Landford Salmon
Supt of Police Landford Salmon

In the mean­time accord­ing to some reports Supt of Police Landford Salmon has tak­en the deci­sion to sus­pend all dance par­ties and round robins in the Parish until the person/​s who stole the Motorcycle return it to the station.
I must say that it’s kin­da sad that the Police are forced to resort to mea­sures like these to bring about the return of the motorcycle.
It says the police real­ly has no intel­li­gence sources . And it says the police have no idea who took it. That aside, as a young detec­tive I have told peo­ple to return stolen mer­chan­dize to a cer­tain spot or else.….…..
One case involved a stolen Kawasaki motor­cy­cle which turned up on Knutsford Boulevard in New Kingston.
The sec­ond instance was when a fur­ni­ture fac­to­ry at the cor­ner of Grant’s Pen Avenue and Morgan Lane was bro­ken into and emp­tied of every piece of furniture.
I vis­it­ed the cor­ner grabbed a cer­tain guy and told him the fur­ni­ture bet­ter turn up in a place where I can find them in a cou­ple of hours or else.….…

Of course after return­ing to the sta­tion I received a phone call and yes an open lot in Grants Pen became an open air fur­ni­ture store.
Not only was the fur­ni­ture returned but I received addi­tion­al infor­ma­tion on one man who decid­ed to try his luck and not return his ill-got­ten din­ing Room furniture.
Because he was well know to me he prob­a­bly expect­ed that I would look the oth­er way. I did look away as he was sen­tenced to two years for receiv­ing stolen property.

Today Superintendent Salmon prob­a­bly does­n’t have the pow­er to deliv­er on or else .…..
God knows there are more than enough shit-heads who pon­tif­i­cate about rights and what’s legal yet they are duplic­i­tous­ly and con­spic­u­ous­ly silent as the blood of the inno­cent flows unchecked.
But he still has the pow­er to deny per­mits for dances and round robins and I salute him for rec­og­niz­ing that it is in his hands to use. There ought to be some degree of col­lec­tive respon­si­bil­i­ty for this out­ra­geous degree of crim­i­nal­i­ty on the Island.

Assistant Commissioner of Police i/c crime Elan Powell
Assistant Commissioner of Police i/​c crime Élan Powell

I just watched a video of my good friend Assistant Commissioner of Police in charge of crime Élan Powell talk about his mur­der clear-up rate. Powell said over 450 peo­ple has been charged with mur­der since the begin­ning of the year. He stat­ed that the Department is bring­ing 45% of mur­der­ers to jus­tice . He promis­es to do even bet­ter by bring­ing the mur­der clear-ups to 51% by year’s end, even as he bemoans the fact that his clear-ups does not get into the media narrative.

As much as I am aware of the chal­lenges fac­ing ACP Élan Powell and his offi­cers, it gives me the chills to think that 55% of the peo­ple who actu­al­ly kill oth­er human beings as well as their asso­ciates, includ­ing those who con­tract the trig­ger-men are actu­al­ly walk­ing around with­out consequence.
Over 800 Jamaicans have been killed since the begin­ning of the year.
The Police have pre­cious lit­tle with which to fight crime and Jamaicans love to par­ty at the same time no one has a Constitutional right to hold dance par­ties and round robin tour­na­ments. I applaud Superintendent Salmon for his forth­right resolve in tak­ing this action, he will prob­a­bly bow to pres­sure soon , more than like­ly by the very peo­ple above him.

He may not be able to do it (ad infini­tum) but it is cer­tain­ly a brave move from this officer .
Cynics be damned.

Russia Moves Into Syria

Russia is shipping massive quantities of offensive weapons, materiel and soldiers to Syria
Russia is ship­ping mas­sive quan­ti­ties of offen­sive weapons, matériel and sol­diers to Syria

Russia is ship­ping mas­sive quan­ti­ties of offen­sive weapons, matériel and sol­diers to Syria.

The mas­sive Condor flights car­ry­ing all kinds of sup­plies now arrive twice a day through Iran and Iraq into Bassel Al-Assad International Airport out­side the port city of Latakia. The car­go is for Russian sol­diers, not Syrian gov­ern­ment forces, but is seen as a build-up to aid Bashar Assad’s embat­tled régime.

The defense offi­cial, briefed on the lat­est satel­lite pho­tos of the Syrian coast­line, said: “This is the largest deploy­ment of Russian forces out­side the for­mer Soviet Union since the col­lapse of the USSR.”

The only thing sur­pris­ing about this is that it took so long.

Syria has been a Russian client state since the 1970s. The rea­son for its orig­i­nal alliance with Soviet Russia is obvi­ous enough. The Arab Socialist Baath Party was a nat­ur­al ally of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Syria’s take on sec­u­lar­ism and social­ism isn’t as severe as Soviet Russia’s, but Syria was ide­o­log­i­cal­ly much clos­er to Russia than to, say, Sweden. That was for damn sure.

And Russia want­ed prox­ies and influ­ence wher­ev­er it could get them even if the ide­o­log­i­cal over­lap was just par­tial. It still does. All great pow­ers and aspir­ing great pow­ers and used-to-be great pow­ers are inter­est­ed in prox­ies and influ­ence wher­ev­er they can get them.

Russia has what is some­times referred to as its only Mediterranean naval base in Syria’s medi­um-sized city of Tartus, but it’s not much more than a gas sta­tion and repair shop. Russia’s big war­ships won’t even fit there. It’s not par­tic­u­lar­ly impor­tant. What mat­ters far more to Russia is its influ­ence in the world, which is still dras­ti­cal­ly down from the great and ter­ri­ble days of the Soviet Union.

Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, of course, wants all the help he can get at this late date. He has been get­ting it from Iran and Hezbollah all along, and from Russia at least diplo­mat­i­cal­ly. He’d cer­tain­ly take help from the United States at this point. He want­ed help from the United States at the very begin­ning. That’s why he char­ac­ter­ized the upheaval in Syria as a war against ter­ror­ism long before a sin­gle ISIS or Nusra fight­er fired a shot, back when it was just him against unarmed pro­test­ers demand­ing some kind of polit­i­cal reform.

Assad might even take help from the Israelis at this point. Not that the Israelis would lift a fin­ger to assist Hezbollah’s co-patron and co-armor­er. That won’t hap­pen under any circumstances.

So here comes dad­dy Russia, rid­ing to the res­cue of its old total­i­tar­i­an client.

Maybe the Russians will go ahead and smash ISIS. Maybe they’ll do the dirty work that has the West so fatigued. Maybe they’ll do every­body a favor.

The result won’t be pret­ty, how­ev­er. Soviet Russia did every­body a favor when it smashed through the east­ern front of Hitler’s Nazi régime, but Poland sure paid the price. As did a lot of oth­er coun­tries in Europe.

The Wall Street Journal isn’t hap­py about this at all.

For 70 years American Presidents from both par­ties have sought to thwart Russian influ­ence in the Middle East. Harry Truman forced the Red Army to with­draw from north­ern Iran in 1946. Richard Nixon raised a nuclear alert to deter Moscow from resup­ply­ing its Arab clients dur­ing the Yom Kippur War in 1973. Even Jimmy Carter threat­ened mil­i­tary force to pro­tect the Persian Gulf after the 1979 Soviet inva­sion of Afghanistan.

America wasn’t quite as burned out then.

We’re all tired of try­ing to fix a part of the world that refused to be fixed, but nature abhors a vacuum.
Story orig­i­nat­ed here: Russia moves into syria

10 Guns Seized, 8 Arrested In 24 Hours – Police

(file photo)
(file pho­to)

KINGSTON, Jamaica – Police offi­cers con­tin­ue to strength­en their oper­a­tional capa­bil­i­ties under the ‘Get the Guns’ cam­paign, which has led to the seizure of 10 firearms, 159 rounds of ammu­ni­tion and the arrest of eight peo­ple in the last 24 hours.

Police attached to the Hope Bay sta­tion have report­ed that at about 5:00 pm on Tuesday, an oper­a­tion was car­ried out at premis­es in Shrewsbury dis­trict, Portland, which result­ed in the seizure of a 12-gauge Remington shot­gun. No one was arrest­ed in con­nec­tion with the find.

In Westmoreland, about 5:30 pm, law­men in Cornwall Mountain seized a Smith and Wesson 9mm pis­tol and 31 rounds of ammu­ni­tion dur­ing an oper­a­tion, while a shot­gun was seized in Wedderburn dis­trict, Bethel Town, after law­men respond­ed to a dis­pute. One man was arrest­ed in con­nec­tion with the find in Cornwall Mountain.

On Wednesday, offi­cers in the Green Island area of Hanover car­ried out a tar­get­ed oper­a­tion in River Head Road, Logwood between 4:30 am and 8:30 am. During this oper­a­tion, a Mossberg 12-gauge shot­gun, a Taurus 9mm pis­tol and 90 assort­ed rounds of ammu­ni­tion were seized.

Five males along with a female were sub­se­quent­ly tak­en into custody.

Then an oper­a­tion was con­duct­ed in Salt Spring, St James, which led to the seizure of two Browning 9mm pis­tols, one Arcus 9mm pis­tol, three mag­a­zines, 14 9mm rounds, and a note­book con­tain­ing iden­ti­ty infor­ma­tion of peo­ple liv­ing in the United States of America.

One man was tak­en into cus­tody in con­nec­tion with that find.

Over in Trelawny, law­men con­tin­ued to make head­way in remov­ing ille­gal weapons from our streets, with the seizure of two Astra 9mm pis­tols and 24 9mm rounds while on oper­a­tion in Litchfield.

The Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) has renewed their appeal to cit­i­zens to col­lab­o­rate with the police on the ‘Get the Guns’ ini­tia­tive, which is geared towards remov­ing ille­gal weapons from the hands of crim­i­nals in Jamaica.

The JCF said that rewards will be offered to peo­ple who pro­vide infor­ma­tion that lead to the seizure of ille­gal guns and ammunition.

The pub­lic is also being asked to call Crime Stop at 311 or 811, police 119 emer­gency num­ber or the near­est police sta­tion to report ille­gal activ­i­ties in their com­mu­ni­ties. The police say cit­i­zens may also sub­mit tips and infor­ma­tion using the Stay Alert App from Google play store. Story orig­i­nat­ed here: 10 guns seized, 8 arrest­ed in 24 hours – Police

Bye Bye Boehner.…

President Obama and Boehner
President Obama and Boehner

John Boehner is set to resign the Speakership of the House and his seat in Congress. Boehner will resign in the face of oppo­si­tion with­in his own party.
Boehner’s speak­er­ship has been a colos­sal fail­ure of leadership.
Throughout Obama’s Presidency Boehner did not stand for Governance he allowed the Right wing hate machine to block and hin­der the President’s agenda.
In the end Boehner will be remem­bered for not stand­ing for any­thing. As such he was des­tined to go this way. 
He will be remem­bered as the speak­er of Government shutdowns.
I can­not recall any oth­er time in my life­time when a Speaker of the House has pur­sued a more acri­mo­nious rela­tion­ship with a sit­ting President.
On issue after issue, Immigration, ISIS, Budget issues , Israel Foreign pol­i­cy in gen­er­al, John Boehner has been the most vir­u­lent oppo­nent of Obama.
In the end John Boehner com­mit­ted the ulti­mate sin of invit­ing Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu to address the Congress in oppo­si­tion to the President’s Iran deal with­out inform­ing the President.
This action was a mas­sive depar­ture from estab­lished protocol.
Boehner knew that Netanyahu was opposed to the deal being nego­ti­at­ed between the P5 plus 1. He knew that Netanyahu had a less than cor­dial rela­tion­ship with the sit­ting President Barack Obama .
As such what Boehner did was to side with a Foreign head of state over his own President.

In the days and weeks to come there will be much dis­cus­sion on this unex­pect­ed move by Boehner. Predictably the mass of the con­ver­sa­tion will be geared toward bur­nish­ing and san­i­tiz­ing the record and tenure of John Boehner.
Unfortunately for those who will spend their time in such endeav­ors we live in the infor­ma­tion age. Thanks to Google. Bing Yahoo. and oth­er search engines Boehner’s every action is a mat­ter of pub­lic record.
Nevertheless they will spend much time telling you that what you saw and read is not real­ly what you saw and read.
They will try to con­vince you that your eyes are lying to you.
John Boehner was par­tic­u­lar­ly dis­ap­point­ing because he did not come from wealth. In this pub­li­ca­tion we made know our feel­ing on Boehner on sev­er­al occasions.
He had a chance to side with the poor on issue after issue , instead he chose to stand with the wealthy and powerful.
This writer will shed not a sin­gle tear to see the back of John Boehner.
Interestingly those who will be in line to suc­ceed him will most like­ly be far worse than John Boehner ever was.
Remarkable.!!

THE ANTICHRIST, THE IMAGE, AND THE MARK OF THE BEAST

THE ANTICHRIST, THE IMAGE, AND THE MARK OF THE BEAST

B. L. Cocherell
B. L. Cocherell

One of the major events to occur just before the return of Christ as Conquering King is the appear­ance of an indi­vid­ual called the Antichrist. Most peo­ple who have stud­ied the per­son­al­i­ty and deeds of this indi­vid­ual have total­ly mis­un­der­stood the essen­tial fac­tors asso­ci­at­ed with this person.

Many view the Antichrist, the image, the mark of the Beast, and the Beast’s alliance of nations as things that will be eas­i­ly rec­og­nized as evil and sin­is­ter. The real­i­ty is that the Antichrist and his reli­gious sys­tem of gov­ern­ment will look like the great­est and most won­der­ful reli­gious, polit­i­cal, and eco­nom­ic sys­tem the world has ever seen. The leader of this alliance of nations will appear as a dynam­ic and charis­mat­ic indi­vid­ual who will lead his alliance of nations and the world into a time of unpar­al­leled peace and prosperity.

A Great Deception

Jesus said that the decep­tion sur­round­ing the Antichrist will be so clever that only the elect of God will rec­og­nize him and under­stand his true intent and purpose:

And they that dwell on the earth shall won­der, whose names have not been writ­ten in the book of life from the foun­da­tion of the world, see­ing the beast, that it was a thing, and is not and yet now is” (Rev.17:8 Para.). See also Dan.12:9 – 10; Rev.1:1 – 8.

All oth­ers on earth will be deceived into think­ing that this per­son is indeed a sav­ior of human­i­ty. Therefore, it is extreme­ly impor­tant to be able to rec­og­nize some of the char­ac­ter­is­tics and pow­ers that this per­son may exhib­it as he impos­es his will on the world. One must real­ize that deceived peo­ple do not know that they are deceived, and that a per­son will remain deceived unless they dili­gent­ly and hon­est­ly put forth the effort to search for and accept truth. No one on earth is immune to being deceived or caus­ing decep­tion. In fact, the Bible says that the whole world has been deceived except for the elect of God. The truth is that, there is not a per­son alive who knows every bib­li­cal truth in exact detail. Therefore, no one can total­ly rely upon anoth­er per­son for their under­stand­ing of God’s word. This is why the elect are instruct­ed to study to show them­selves approved before God and to work out their own sal­va­tion in fear and trem­bling. See 2.Tim.2:14 – 16; Eph.2:12 – 13.

1015414_634410961116267230-1

Who is the Antichrist?

First let us remove some of the mys­tique about the name Antichrist. Simply put the Antichrist is an indi­vid­ual who is against the true Christ and/​or is attempt­ing to pass him­self off as the true Christ. In either case this indi­vid­ual is in oppo­si­tion to God the Father and Jesus Christ and their teach­ings. The Antichrist is the same dynam­ic and charis­mat­ic indi­vid­ual described else­where in the Bible as the Beast who is the leader of a pow­er­ful reli­gious gov­ern­men­tal sys­tem that con­trols an alliance of nations called the Beast. The Antichrist is the indi­vid­ual who has absolute author­i­ty, pow­er, and con­trol over all reli­gious, philo­soph­i­cal, eco­nom­ic, and polit­i­cal aspects of peo­ple who live under his control.

It is very impor­tant to under­stand that this indi­vid­ual called the Antichrist and the Beast is not Satan the Devil, but is in Satan’s ser­vice and is a rep­re­sen­ta­tive of Satan’s demon­ic spir­i­tu­al gov­ern­ment, just like the False Prophet (Rev.16:13; 20:10). The Bible clear­ly states that Satan the Devil is a mas­ter at the art of decep­tion: “He is that old ser­pent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceives the whole world” (Rev. 12:9). He has been a liar from the very begin­ning (Jn.8:44). The Antichrist is one of his most cleaver decep­tions of all time, which will deceive all but the elect of God.

Signs and Miracles

The Antichrist, who is the leader of the alliance of nations called the Beast, will ascend to pow­er accom­pa­nied by super­nat­ur­al signs and mir­a­cles and will be accept­ed as a god in the flesh by most peo­ple on earth. Notice what Jesus says about the false christs and prophets who will pre­cede his arrival as King of kings and Lord of lords.

Matthew 24:23 – 31 Paraphrased

Then if any­one says to you, Behold, here is the Christ; or, Here he is! Do not believe it. For false christs will rise up, and false prophets. And they will give great signs and won­ders, so as to lead astray, if pos­si­ble, even the elect. Behold, I tell you before­hand. Then if they say to you, Behold, he is in the wilder­ness; do not go out. Behold, he is in the inner rooms; do not believe” (vs.23 – 26). See also Mk.13:21 – 22.

1365011306_7972_revelation_churches

Throughout the cen­turies, many false Messiahs and false prophets have come and gone. During the time of trou­ble, at the end of the age, reli­gious decep­tion will be so intense that the only ones who will not be deceived are the elect of God who dili­gent­ly fol­low the true God. In the fol­low­ing scrip­tures Jesus describes the major events that will accom­pa­ny his arrival on earth. Jesus says that his return will not be a silent or incon­spic­u­ous occur­rence; it will be as light­ning, which is always accom­pa­nied by a loud thun­der­ous noise:

For as light­ing comes out of the east and shines as far as the west so also will be the com­ing of the Son of man” (v27).

Jesus also describes the cat­a­clysmic celes­tial events that will take place before his return and the gath­er­ing of the elect:

And imme­di­ate­ly after the afflic­tion of those days the sun will be dark­ened, and the moon will not give her light, and the stars will fall from the heav­en, and the pow­ers of the heav­ens will be shak­en. And then the sign of the Son of man will appear in the heav­ens. And then all the tribes of the land will wail. And they will see the Son of man com­ing on the clouds of heav­en with pow­er and much glo­ry. And he will send his angels with a great sound of a trum­pet, and they will gath­er his elect from the four winds; from one end of the heav­ens to the oth­er” (vs.29 – 31).

The signs that pre­cede Christ’s return are awe­some events that will occur in the heav­ens. The sun will become dark (Mk.13:24 – 26), the moon will not reflect sun­light to the earth, and the stars (Greek ‘aster’) will be moved out of their orbits. These signs will be appar­ent to every­one on earth. When Jesus returns in all his glo­ry and pow­er, his very pres­ence will dis­rupt the phys­i­cal uni­verse. See Ex.19:16 – 18; 24:17; Isa.13:9 – 13; 24:1 – 5; Joel 2:10 – 12, 30; Hag.2:6 – 7.

Every per­son alive on earth at the time of Christ’s return will be aware of these events that will occur in the heav­ens. Most peo­ple will be ter­ri­fied and fear for their lives. Some will be ter­ri­fied because they know that Christ is return­ing to destroy them, and oth­ers will be in fear because they think that the world is com­ing to an end. The mag­ni­tude of the events that will accom­pa­ny Christ’s return will be far from secret or silent; they will be ter­ri­fy­ing! All of the scrip­tures that speak of the appear­ance of the Beast leader and his Beast alliance of nations tell us that he will arrive before the events that pre­cede Christ’s com­ing. He will be alive as Christ pours destruc­tion upon the earth and its inhab­i­tants for their great wicked­ness and rebel­lion against God.

John, Peter, and Paul

The apos­tles John, Paul, and Peter warned of teach­ers and prophets who would come teach­ing here­sies and they fore­told that many peo­ple would fol­low these peo­ple and their lies. At the time John, Paul, and Peter were inspired to write their let­ters, most of the elect of God thought that the return of Christ was immi­nent. Because this was not the case, the things these apos­tles said con­cern­ing peo­ple and con­di­tions that would exist just before the return of Christ were most­ly prophetic.

John

At the close of the first age of the church and before he was shown the things that per­tained to the end of the age, the apos­tle John spoke about those who opposed Christ and what he taught about his rela­tion­ship to God the Father and the elect chil­dren of God. As we review what John says about the Antichrist, notice that he says the Spirit of God resid­ing with­in the chil­dren of God will sep­a­rate a child of God from the world, make a child of God sin­less, and reveal those who oppose and reject Christ and the Father:

Young ones, it is the last time: and as you have heard that the Antichrist shall come, even now there are many antichrists; where­by we know that it is the last time. They went out from us, but were not a part of us, if they had been one of us, they would have con­tin­ued with us. But they went out that it should be known that they were not a part of us”(1.Jn.2:18 – 19 Para.).

John speaks of a prophe­cy that those to whom he was writ­ing already knew about. He tells the elect of God that the ful­fill­ment of this prophe­cy was already in progress at that time. He goes on to say that those who were against Christ at that time were nev­er true sons of God, and that they had revealed their true nature and pur­pose by leav­ing the true body of Christ.

And you have an anoint­ing from the Holy One, and you know all things. I did not write to you because you did not know the truth, but because you do know it, and because no lie is of the truth” (1.Jn.2:20 – 21 Para.).

John con­firms that those who have the spir­it of God have the knowl­edge and abil­i­ty to dis­cern truth from error in spir­i­tu­al mat­ters, and that those who are liars and deceivers will be known by those who have the spir­it of God with­in them, because the spir­it of God reveals truth. See Jn.14:17, 15:26, 16:12 – 13; 1.Cor.2:12 – 13.

Because the spir­it of God reveals truth, it is extreme­ly impor­tant that each child of God dur­ing the end of this age lis­ten very care­ful­ly to what the spir­it says con­cern­ing the Antichrist and his reli­gion and gov­ern­men­tal system.

Who is a Liar?

Those who oppose Christ do not teach the truth con­cern­ing Jesus as the Creator God and Savior of human­i­ty. These peo­ple also deny the indi­vid­u­al­i­ty of the Father and the Son and they are liars in the eyes of God. The scrip­tures clear­ly show that the Antichrist will not teach the truth of God, but he will teach a lie:

Who is the liar, but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son. Every one that denies the Son does not have the Father. The one who con­fess­es the Son, tru­ly has the Father also” (1.Jn.2:22 – 23 Para.).

The tru­ly con­vert­ed of the first age of the church under­stood exact­ly what John was say­ing con­cern­ing the Father, Christ, and the spir­it of God, because they were taught the mys­ter­ies con­cern­ing the plan of God by the apos­tles. However, this knowl­edge was lost when the ear­ly church dis­ap­peared short­ly after the apos­tle John’s death. See our study papers about the spir­it of God and Christ that resides with­in the elect of God and our stud­ies con­cern­ing the demise of the ear­ly church.

The Seed

Everyone being begot­ten of God [the Father] does not sin, because his [the Father’s] seed [spir­it of God] abides in him, and he is not able to sin, because he has been born of God. By this the chil­dren of God and the chil­dren of the Devil are revealed: Everyone fail­ing to prac­tice right­eous­ness or love his broth­er is not of God” (1.Jn.3:9 – 10 Para.).

It is impos­si­ble to under­stand what John is say­ing here, unless one under­stands that the spir­it of God with­in a child of God keeps them in a sin­less con­di­tion before God the Father. As long as a child of God is seek­ing to live a right­eous life and does not will­ful­ly and habit­u­al­ly prac­tice sin, no sin is imput­ed to him. It is this same spir­it of God that reveals to the elect of God who is and who is not of God. One of the major signs of the Antichrist/​Beast is that he is a sin­ner accord­ing to the bib­li­cal def­i­n­i­tion of sin; there­fore, it is nec­es­sary for all who are called of God to ful­ly under­stand what sin is and is not, so that they will not be deceived by the Antichrist or his state reli­gion which is led by the False Prophet.

Good and Evil Spirits

In the first three vers­es of 1. John, chap­ter 4, John speaks of test­ing for evil influ­ence and he shows that a major key in this test­ing process is the under­stand­ing that Christ’s spir­it resides with­in the chil­dren of God:

Beloved, do not believe every spir­it, but test the spir­its, whether they are from God; for many false prophets have gone forth into the world. By this know the spir­it of God: Every spir­it that acknowl­edges that Jesus has come in the flesh is from God. And every spir­it which does not acknowl­edge that Jesus has come in the flesh is not from God: and this is the antichrist which you heard is com­ing, and now is already in the world” (1.Jn.4:1 – 3 Para.). See also 2.Jn.v.7; Matt.24:4 – 5.

Almost all oppo­si­tion to God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the chil­dren of God comes from the evil influ­ence of spir­it-beings. Therefore, it is extreme­ly impor­tant for God’s chil­dren to be able to dis­cern the dif­fer­ence between a good and an evil spir­i­tu­al influ­ence. John says that a child of God can deter­mine if a spir­it (i.e., a spir­it being or spir­i­tu­al influ­ence) is from God or not. If a spir­it acknowl­edges that Christ has come in the flesh, it is good. If this acknowl­edg­ment is not made, this spir­it or spir­i­tu­al influ­ence is evil and it is in oppo­si­tion to God the Father and Jesus Christ.

On the sur­face it seems that the for­mu­la John gives to deter­mine the char­ac­ter of a spir­it-being or spir­i­tu­al influ­ence is sim­ple and direct, and it is. However, the key to under­stand­ing John’s instruc­tions is to under­stand what he means when he says, “Jesus Christ has come in the flesh.” Most peo­ple will admit that the per­son Jesus lived and was a reli­gious leader. Some will acknowl­edge that he was a prophet, and some will acknowl­edge him as the prophet­ic Savior of human­i­ty. However, very few tru­ly under­stand or will acknowl­edge him as the Creator God who became the Savior, died, was res­ur­rect­ed, and now lives in the flesh of the chil­dren of God. Another impor­tant iden­ti­fy­ing sign of the Antichrist is that he will not acknowl­edge that Christ has come in the flesh in the same man­ner as the scrip­tures teach.

Peter

But there were false prophets also among the peo­ple, even as there shall be false teach­ers among you, who shall priv­i­ly bring in damnable here­sies, even deny­ing the Lord that bought them, and bring upon them­selves swift destruc­tion. And many [the major­i­ty of peo­ple] shall fol­low their per­ni­cious ways; by rea­son of whom the way of truth shall be evil spo­ken of” (2.Pet.2:1 – 2 KJV).

There are many things that peo­ple con­sid­er to be truth; how­ev­er, what God reveals as the way of truth is not what most peo­ple believe as truth. It is God’s way of truth that most peo­ple hate and ridicule. A num­ber of prophe­cies tell us that the Antichrist will speak blas­phe­mous things against God and his teachings.tawww_300

Paul

2. Corinthians 11:3 – 4; 13 – 15

But I fear, lest by any means, as the ser­pent deceived Eve through his sub­tle­ty, so your minds should be cor­rupt­ed from the sim­plic­i­ty that is in Christ. If any­one comes preach­ing anoth­er Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if you receive anoth­er spir­it [an evil, lying spir­it], which you have not received, or a dif­fer­ent gospel, than the one you accept­ed” (vs.3 – 4 Para.).

During the life­time of the apos­tle Paul, those who opposed Jesus Christ were preach­ing anoth­er Jesus and anoth­er gospel. This same false Jesus and mes­sage is still being preached and taught today. The Antichrist as the leader of the Beast alliance of nations will exist just before Christ’s return and he will pro­mote him­self as a sav­ior of human­i­ty, but he will have his own decep­tive good news mes­sage for humanity.

For such are false apos­tles, deceit­ful work­ers, trans­form­ing them­selves into the apos­tles of Christ. And no mar­vel; for Satan him­self is trans­formed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his min­is­ters also be trans­formed as min­is­ters of right­eous­ness; whose end shall be accord­ing to their works” (vs.13 – 15 KJV).

Although vers­es 13 – 15 speak of those who are coun­ter­feit min­is­ters of Christ, the same basic con­cepts apply to the Antichrist/​Beast, the False Prophet, and those who are in ser­vice to them as their representatives.

The Man of Sin

2.Thessalonians 2:3 – 11 Paraphrased

Do not let any­one deceive you in any way: because that day will not come unless there first comes a falling away [depar­ture from the faith], and the man of sin is revealed, who is the son of perdi­tion” (v3).

An inter­est­ing thing about this man of sin is that Paul also calls him the son of perdi­tion. The word trans­lat­ed into English as ‘perdi­tion’ is from the Greek word ‘apoleia’ which refers to an ever­last­ing state of tor­ment in this con­text. The Bible clear­ly shows that wicked humans will have their life ter­mi­nat­ed with fire. No human is going to be tor­ment­ed in the lake of fire for­ev­er; there­fore, the being who inhab­its the phys­i­cal body of the Man of Sin (Son of Perdition) is not human. It is a spir­it-being who will try to deceive peo­ple into believ­ing that he is a god-being.

Deception and Arrogance

This is the one who oppos­es and exalts him­self over every­thing being called God, or object of wor­ship; and he is to sit in the tem­ple of God, as God; in order to show that he is a god” (v4).

In his arro­gance, this pow­er­ful spir­it-being mas­querad­ing as a human will des­e­crate the tem­ple of the true God in Jerusalem by enter­ing into it and sit­ting there in defi­ance of the true God in order to prove to the world that he is indeed a god, and that the true God is no god.

Do you not remem­ber, that, I told you these things when I was with you? And now you know the thing hold­ing him [Man of Sin/​Son of Perdition/​Antichrist] back from being revealed. For the mys­tery of law­less­ness already works: only he is hold­ing back [being held back] now, until it comes out of the midst” (vs.5 – 7).

Paul had already talked with them about the Antichrist and told them that this indi­vid­ual was being restrained from com­ing out of the mid­dle of some­thing. The thing that this indi­vid­ual comes out of, accord­ing to visions of Daniel and the apos­tle John, is the alliance of nations sym­bol­ized by the beast that came out of the sea. Therefore, it is very clear that wher­ev­er this pow­er­ful and fierce beast-like alliance of nations is locat­ed in the end of the age, the Antichrist will be there as its supreme leader.

And then the law­less one [Man of Sin/​Son of Perdition/​Antichrist] will be revealed, whom the Lord will con­sume with the spir­it of his mouth, and he will be brought to noth­ing by the bright­ness of his [Christ’s] com­ing” (v8).

Christ will remove this law­less indi­vid­ual from pow­er when he comes to rule the earth. This is the same evil spir­it men­tioned in Daniel 7:11 who will have his phys­i­cal body destroyed and will be cast into a lake of fire in his spir­it form.

His [the Antichrist’s] com­ing is accord­ing to the work­ing of Satan with all pow­er and mir­a­cles and lying won­ders, And all deceit of unright­eous­ness of those being lost; because they did not receive the love of the truth in order for them to be saved. And because of this God will send to them, a work­ing of error, for them to believe a lie” (vs.9 – 11).

Based on God’s word, those whom God has called to sal­va­tion should know the dif­fer­ence between good and evil; how­ev­er, many have already been delud­ed by a false Christianity and many will be deceived by Satan’s Antichrist and his reli­gious and polit­i­cal sys­tem of government.

Paul gives a dire warn­ing not to allow one’s love for the truth of God to erode. Make no mis­take, the mes­sage of the Antichrist and Satan’s reli­gious and polit­i­cal sys­tem is not truth; it is great decep­tion designed to destroy one’s oppor­tu­ni­ty to enter the Family and Kingdom of God. His mir­a­cles, signs, and won­ders will not be from the Sovereign God; they will be from Satan the Devil and are designed to deceive humanity.

The major­i­ty of peo­ple will believe the Antichrist’s mes­sage and his great super­nat­ur­al works, think­ing that they are a part of God’s plan for the sal­va­tion of human­i­ty; how­ev­er, just the oppo­site will be true.

Ten Religious Deceptions

It is high­ly like­ly that the Antichrist will come as a sav­ior of human­i­ty and attempt to coun­ter­feit some or all of the things that are proph­e­sied about the com­ing of the true Messiah. Listed below are ten things he may do to attempt to deceive humanity:

  1. Demonstrate that he is the prophet­ic descen­dant of King David who is sup­posed to come to rule the world as described in Psalm 2
  2. Send a false Elijah to speak of his com­ing (Mal.4:5, 6).
  3. Appear to glo­ri­ous­ly return in the flesh after being fatal­ly wounded(Matt.25:31, 32; Acts 1:11; Rev.1:7).
  4. Return in the clouds of heav­en accom­pa­nied by oth­er beings (1.Thes.3:13; 2.Thes.1:7).
  5. Attempt to make Jerusalem the cap­i­tal of his world-rul­ing gov­ern­ment (Isa.11 & 12).
  6. Establish his rule with decep­tive mir­a­cles and won­ders (Psa.69).
  7. Attempt to make an alliance of nations out of the mod­ern ten tribes of Israel and the Jewish nation of Israel (Ezk.37).
  8. Institute his own inter­pre­ta­tion of the Mosaic Law (Isa.66: 22,23).
  9. Proclaim that he has come to bring world pros­per­i­ty (Isa.11;12).
  10. Proclaim that he has come to bring world peace (Psa.96;98).

These are all things that would add valid­i­ty to his claims in the reli­gious cir­cles of qua­si-Christians and Jews. The Antichrist may attempt to coun­ter­feit some or all of the real prophet­ic signs of the return of Christ as King of kings and Lord of lords, in order to deceive these peo­ple and accom­plish his goal of world dom­i­na­tion for his mas­ter Satan the Devil.

Because Satan appears as a glo­ri­ous right­eous angel and his evil ser­vants mim­ic this same false right­eous­ness (2.Cor.11:14 – 15), the appear­ance of the Antichrist will fool those who do not under­stand the true mean­ing of the scrip­tures that speak about the return of Christ and the estab­lish­ment of the Kingdom of God on earth.

Because the cen­tral focus of Satan’s plan is to deceive peo­ple into giv­ing their alle­giance and wor­ship to him, his ser­vant the Antichrist will claim to be god in the flesh (2.Thes.2:4). Another ser­vant of Satan, the False Prophet, will force those who are under the con­trol of the Beast’s alliance of nations to wor­ship the Antichrist/​Beast and his image; there­by, they will actu­al­ly be wor­ship­ing Satan the Devil by proxy.

There is lit­tle doubt that on the sur­face Satan’s reli­gious and gov­ern­men­tal sys­tem under the lead­er­ship of the Antichrist and the False Prophet will look very good to most peo­ple. This is why they will be very unhap­py when they see it being destroyed by Jesus Christ (Rev.18:4 – 20).new-world-order

HOW TO IDENTIFY THE ANTICHRIST

This sec­tion shows a num­ber of ways by which any­one who under­stands the wor­ship sys­tem of the true God will be able to iden­ti­fy the Antichrist and his wor­ship system.

Oppressive Rule and Forced Idolatry

Although Jesus Christ and the elect of God will rule from Jerusalem with a rod of iron and exer­cise judge­ment upon the rebel­lious nations of the world (Rev. 12:5), the Kingdom of God will not be cru­el or oppres­sive, nor will Jesus or those who serve him force any­one to wor­ship God by bow­ing down before an image or rep­re­sen­ta­tion of him­self or God the Father.

God the Father’s Worship System

The scrip­tures clear­ly show that, after Jesus Christ returns, he will estab­lish his Father’s true wor­ship sys­tem. Conversely, the Antichrist and the False Prophet will oppose any attempt of the Jews or any­one else to wor­ship God as instruct­ed under his covenant with nation­al Israel and the elect of God. See Jer.31:30 – 37 and our stud­ies con­cern­ing the var­i­ous covenants and the com­mand­ed obser­vances of God.

In regard to the Father’s wor­ship sys­tem, there are some bib­li­cal facts that will help one to under­stand God’s new agree­ment with nation­al Israel:

The prophe­cies of Ezekiel and Zechariah clear­ly show that, dur­ing Christ’s rule, a tem­ple wor­ship sys­tem with a priest­hood and ani­mal sac­ri­fices will exist in Jerusalem and will be offi­ci­at­ed over by the male descen­dants of Zadok who is descend­ed from Eleazar, Aaron’s third son. See Ezk.40 – 46; Zech.14:16 – 20.

  • The sac­ri­fi­cial sys­tem con­tained with­in the agree­ment with nation­al Israel and the rest of human­i­ty will be per­formed in a way that is sim­i­lar to how it was per­formed under the first agree­ment with Israel.
  • The com­mand­ed obser­vances and holy con­vo­ca­tions of God will be observed by all the peo­ple on earth.

The Antichrist will do just the oppo­site of what the Creator God promis­es to do when he returns as the Messiah to insti­tute a new agree­ment with nation­al Israel. The Antichrist will stop the Jews from sac­ri­fic­ing at the tem­ple in Jerusalem and will attempt to change and/​or elim­i­nate the com­mand­ed obser­vance and holy con­vo­ca­tions of God.

THE IMAGE OF THE BEAST

In order to under­stand the wor­ship of the image of the Antichrist/​Beast we need to keep in mind that the Antichrist/​Beast and the reli­gious leader (the False Prophet) of the alliance of nations are both ser­vants of Satan the Devil and are both com­mit­ted to the goal of sub­ject­ing all human­i­ty to his absolute control.

The Wounded Head

And I saw one of its heads as if it had been wound­ed to death; and its fatal wound was healed. And the earth admired the beast. And wor­shiped the drag­on who gave author­i­ty to the beast, say­ing, Who is like the beast? Who is able to make war with it?” (Rev.13:3 – 4 Para.).

After the Beast alliance of nations has been solid­i­fied, its pow­er base has been estab­lished, and the Antichrist/​Beast has secured his posi­tion of author­i­ty as the undis­put­ed leader of this alliance, some­thing extra­or­di­nary will hap­pen to either this alliance of nations or its leader. One or the oth­er will sus­tain a fatal wound.

The cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing the death and res­ur­rec­tion of the alliance of nations or the Antichrist/​Beast will be an incred­i­bly decep­tive event. When peo­ple see this res­ur­rec­tion they will be aston­ished and believe that the Antichrist/​Beast is a god in the flesh.

Editor’s Note:

It is dif­fi­cult at this point in time to deter­mine exact­ly what or who the head in Revelation 13:3 sym­bol­izes, because the heads of the beast rep­re­sent both a sys­tem of gov­ern­ment as well as the evil spir­its who con­trol the sys­tem through indi­vid­u­als. What is impor­tant to rec­og­nize is that an extra­or­di­nary event will occur sur­round­ing the fatal wound of either the Antichrist/​Beast or the Beast’s alliance of nations. When this hap­pens, the leader of the state reli­gion who is the False Prophet will ini­ti­ate and enforce the wor­ship of Satan the Devil (the drag­on) through the Antichrist/​Beast and his sys­tem of government.

A State Religion

And I saw anoth­er beast com­ing up out of the earth; and it had two horns like a lamb, but spoke like a drag­on. And it exe­cutes all the author­i­ty of the first beast before it. And it makes the earth and those dwelling in it to wor­ship the first beast, that was healed of its dead­ly wound” (Rev.13:11 – 12 Para.).

There are a num­ber of impor­tant things revealed in vers­es 11 – 12 con­cern­ing the rela­tion­ship between the Beast alliance of nations, its supreme leader (the Antichrist/​Beast), and its reli­gious leader (the False Prophet):

♦The two horns like a lamb are sym­bol­ic of reli­gious authority.

  • Its reli­gious teach­ings and poli­cies are that of Satan the Devil, because it speaks like the dragon.
  • The sec­ond beast is sym­bol­ic of an evil state reli­gion and its leader.

Supernatural Power

And it [the False Prophet] does great signs and even makes fire to come down out of heav­en upon the earth before men ” (Rev.13:13 Para.).

It is impor­tant to under­stand that the False Prophet and the reli­gious sys­tem that he leads will have tremen­dous super­nat­ur­al pow­ers with which to deceive peo­ple and counter the super­nat­ur­al works that the elect of God will be doing as they pro­claim God the Father’s good news message.

And it [the False Prophet] deceives those dwelling on the earth, because of the signs which were giv­en to it before the beast; say­ing to those on the earth to make an image of the beast who has the wound of the sword, and lived. And it was giv­en author­i­ty to give a spir­it to the image of the beast, so that the image of the beast could speak, and might cause as many as would not wor­ship the image of the beast to be killed” (Rev.13:14 – 15 Para.).

The False Prophet has an image made that is either sym­bol­ic of the alliance of nations (the beast), its leader (the Beast), or both. This reli­gious leader empow­ers the image so that it has the abil­i­ty to speak. Then, he forces peo­ple to wor­ship it or suf­fer death for dis­obe­di­ence. This enforced wor­ship is rem­i­nis­cent of king Nebuchadnezzar’s forced wor­ship of the image that he had made.

There are many rea­sons why intel­li­gent peo­ple will wor­ship this image. The first is that if any­one does not wor­ship it they will be killed. The sec­ond is that peo­ple will actu­al­ly believe that the image is a god, a rep­re­sen­ta­tion of their god (Antichrist/​Beast), or a method through which they may com­mu­ni­cate with their god (who is real­ly Satan the Devil).

It is inter­est­ing that, when one care­ful­ly reads Daniel 3:1 – 30, it appears that only the lead­ers of the peo­ple were com­pelled to wor­ship Nebuchadnezzar’s image. However, in John’s vision, it seems that every­one under the con­trol of the beast alliance of nations must wor­ship the image.

The Plagues and the Image

And the rest of the men which were not killed by these plagues yet repent­ed not of the works of their hands, that they should not wor­ship dev­ils, and idols of gold, and sil­ver, and brass, and stone, and of wood: which nei­ther can see, nor walk” (Rev.9:20 KJV).

One of the rea­sons that Christ pours out plagues upon human­i­ty is to bring them to the real­iza­tion that they are rebelling against God as they prac­tice their idol wor­ship, and that they must stop this prac­tice and wor­ship the true God.

Anyone who seri­ous­ly stud­ies the Bible should under­stand that the forced wor­ship of the image(s) of the Antichrist/​Beast con­sti­tutes idol­a­try. Upon see­ing or hear­ing of this forced idol­a­try, the elect of God should under­stand that this alliance of nations and its wor­ship sys­tem is indeed the Beast of the books of Daniel and Revelation.

THE MARK AND NAME OF THE BEAST

Many who study the Book of Revelation are over­ly con­cerned with know­ing exact­ly what the mark and the name of the Beast is and how one will receive this mark and name. However, this infor­ma­tion is not essen­tial for sal­va­tion from eter­nal death. It real­ly does not mat­ter whether the mark or name is a com­put­er chip implant, a tat­too, or some oth­er thing. The impor­tant thing is to be able to rec­og­nize the Antichrist/​Beast and his state reli­gion and gov­ern­men­tal sys­tem for what it is.

It must be clear­ly under­stood that those who are called of God can­not accept the mark or give their alle­giance to the Beast so that they can par­tic­i­pate in the eco­nom­ic ben­e­fits of the Beast sys­tem, because this autho­riza­tion requires a reli­gious com­mit­ment to wor­ship the image of the Beast.

THE MARK, NAME, AND NUMBER

And the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the freemen and the slaves, allow it [the Antichrist’s state reli­gion] to give them a mark on their right hand, or on their fore­heads: so that none can buy or sell, except they have the mark, or the name of the beast, or the num­ber of its name. Here is wis­dom. Let him hav­ing rea­son count the num­ber of the beast: for it is the num­ber of a man; and its num­ber is six hun­dred and six­ty-six” (Rev.13:16 – 18 Para.).

Throughout his­to­ry, many who have stud­ied the Bible and sec­u­lar his­to­ry have tried to deter­mine the name of the indi­vid­ual that is rep­re­sent­ed by the num­ber 666. The num­ber 666 is even record­ed as being asso­ci­at­ed with king Solomon and the amount of gold that he received as trib­ute dur­ing the height of his reign (1.Kgs.10:14; 2.Chron.9:13). There seems to be no end to the indi­vid­u­als and things that have been found to have this numer­i­cal ref­er­ence attached to them.

Even though the num­ber 666 can be attached to peo­ple, places, and things in the past, present, and future, is a full under­stand­ing of the prophet­ic num­ber 666 nec­es­sary before the appear­ance of the Antichrist and his reli­gious and polit­i­cal form of gov­ern­ment? Actually, it is more impor­tant to under­stand the prophet­ic events sur­round­ing the Antichrist and to be pre­pared to be loy­al to God and his way of life to the very end.1_6713

People have assumed that, because verse 18 says that the num­ber 666 is the num­ber of a man, this num­ber can only be attached to an indi­vid­ual. The real­i­ty is that in the Greek lan­guage, “the num­ber of a man” can also mean “a human num­ber” or “a num­ber of human­i­ty”. Although the num­ber 666 may very well iden­ti­fy a spe­cif­ic indi­vid­ual, it may also iden­ti­fy and be asso­ci­at­ed with the Beast’s sys­tem of reli­gion and gov­ern­ment. The num­ber 666 could very well rep­re­sent the apex of human per­fec­tion, because under the lead­er­ship of the Antichrist/​Beast, the mag­nif­i­cent reli­gious, gov­ern­men­tal, and eco­nom­ic sys­tem of the beast alliance of nations will appear to be the best sys­tem ever devised.

In the study of the numer­i­cal sym­bol­ism of the Bible, the num­ber 6 is clear­ly asso­ci­at­ed with human­i­ty; there­fore, the num­ber 666 appears to be the num­ber of human­i­ty. Because God the Father allows an evil glob­al sys­tem to exist before his Son’s return, the num­ber 666 could very well be viewed in the con­text of the entire reli­gious, eco­nom­ic, and gov­ern­men­tal sys­tem that is led by the Antichrist who is in the ser­vice of Satan (2.Thes 2:4).

WHAT IS INNAME?

It is well known in bib­li­cal and rab­bini­cal teach­ings that the phrase, “in the name of,” is used to con­nect the one hav­ing author­i­ty to the one from whom the author­i­ty comes. It is also used to con­nect a teacher with the author­i­ty and respect of his own teacher. Therefore, it is log­i­cal to assume that this same mean­ing is attached to the name of the Beast and its reli­gious gov­ern­men­tal sys­tem. The same asso­ci­a­tion will exist between the Antichrist/​Beast and those hav­ing its name or mark. See our study paper con­cern­ing the phrase “in the name of,” for details about those who have the name of God the Father and Jesus Christ.

A Sign of Allegiance

Refusal to take the mark of the Antichrist con­sti­tutes rebel­lion against him and his reli­gious and gov­ern­men­tal sys­tem, and this will not be tol­er­at­ed. All who are found guilty of this type of rebel­lion will be put to death. Everyone must com­ply with the wor­ship sys­tem that the Antichrist will insti­tute through the False Prophet, and they must wor­ship the image of the Beast. In addi­tion, every­one will have to reg­is­ter with the sys­tem and receive the mark or name of the Beast. Without the iden­ti­fy­ing mark, a per­son will not be able buy or sell or par­tic­i­pate in the eco­nom­ic sys­tem of the Antichrist’s alliance of nations. Therefore, the mark or name of the beast is a sign of one’s alle­giance to this evil per­son and his reli­gious gov­ern­men­tal system.

It is obvi­ous that there will be many unde­sir­able phys­i­cal con­se­quences for not accept­ing this mark. For those who wor­ship the true God, the threat of phys­i­cal pun­ish­ment and hard­ships for not accept­ing the mark are min­i­mal com­pared to the loss of eter­nal life for accept­ing it.

Only Two Options

And the third angel fol­lowed them, say­ing with a loud voice, If any man wor­ship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his fore­head, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out with­out mix­ture into the cup of his indig­na­tion; and he shall be tor­ment­ed with fire and brim­stone in the pres­ence of the holy angels, and in the pres­ence of the Lamb: And the smoke of their tor­ment ascends for ever and ever: and they shall have no rest day or night, who wor­ship the beast and his image, and who­ev­er receives the mark of his name” (Rev.14:9 – 11 KJV).

When the mark of the Antichrist/​Beast is insti­tut­ed, there are only two options that a per­son who is liv­ing with­in the geo­graph­i­cal areas con­trolled by the beast sys­tem will have con­cern­ing the tak­ing of this mark. Either one takes the mark and wor­ships and serves the Beast and his image, or one does not take the mark and does not wor­ship the Beast and his image. Anyone who are in the sit­u­a­tion of mak­ing a choice con­cern­ing the mark must con­sid­er the following:

If one does not wor­ship the Beast and his image, he will be per­se­cut­ed and prob­a­bly killed. If one does wor­ship the Beast, God will per­se­cute him and prob­a­bly kill him. And if a child of God wor­ships the Beast and his image, he will lose his eter­nal life. Most of the world will be deceived by the pow­er and charis­ma of the Antichrist/​Beast and the obvi­ous ben­e­fits of his reli­gious sys­tem of gov­ern­ment. Therefore, most will will­ing­ly wor­ship his image, and take his mark that will sig­ni­fy their alle­giance to him and his sys­tem of gov­ern­ment. This will be espe­cial­ly easy to do because the death penal­ty will hang over the heads of any who refuse to wor­ship him and take his mark. Although the prospect of one sur­viv­ing the refusal to wor­ship the image and take the mark seems min­i­mal, there is hope for those who place their trust in the true God and seek his pro­tec­tion. See Rev.3:7 – 13; 7:1 – 17; 12:6, 14 – 16.

God’s Punishment

And I heard a great voice out of the tem­ple say­ing to the sev­en angels, Go your ways, and pour out your vials of the wrath of God upon the earth. And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noi­some and griev­ous sore upon the men that had the mark of the beast, and upon them which wor­shiped his image” (Rev.16:1 – 2 KJV).

Remember that, dur­ing the rule of the Antichrist and his reli­gious sys­tem, the peo­ple of God will be pro­claim­ing the true gospel and Jesus Christ will be send­ing dev­as­tat­ing plagues upon those who take part in the Antichrist’s alliance of nations and have his mark and wor­ship his image.

And the beast was tak­en, and with him the false prophet that wrought mir­a­cles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that had wor­shiped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burn­ing with brim­stone” (Rev.19:20 KJV).

The two evil spir­its that enforce the wor­ship of the image and the mark­ing of those who con­sent to be marked as a sign of their alle­giance to Satan’s sys­tem of wor­ship and gov­ern­ment will be cast into a lake of fire after the return of Jesus Christ.

The Victorious Elect

And I saw anoth­er sign in heav­en, great and mar­velous, sev­en angels hav­ing the sev­en plagues; for in them is filled up the wrath of God. And I saw as it were a sea of glass min­gled with fire: and them that had got­ten the vic­to­ry over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the num­ber of his name, stand on the sea of glass, hav­ing the harps of God” (Rev.15:1 – 2 KJV).

Those who are called of God to sal­va­tion dur­ing the ter­ri­fy­ing times of the Antichrist’s rule and remain true to their great call­ing will receive tremen­dous rewards in the Kingdom of God:

And I saw thrones, and they that sat upon them, and judge­ment was giv­en to them: and I saw the souls of them that were behead­ed for the wit­ness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not wor­shiped the beast, nei­ther his image, nei­ther had received his mark upon their fore­heads or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thou­sand years” (Rev.20:4 Para.).

The Important Names

During the end of the age, there are two extreme­ly impor­tant names that will have a more dra­mat­ic impact on the lives of the chil­dren of God than the name or mark of the Antichrist/​Beast. These are the names of the Father and his Son. Notice what is said about these two names:

And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on mount Zion, and with him an hun­dred forty and four thou­sand, hav­ing his Father’s name writ­ten in their fore­heads” (Rev.14:1 KJV).

There are only a cer­tain num­ber of peo­ple that will have the name of the Father writ­ten in their fore­heads when Christ returns.

And to the angel [mes­sen­ger] of the church in Philadelphia write; These things says he [Jesus Christ] that is holy, he that is true, he that has the key of David, he that opens, and no man shuts; and shuts, and no man opens; I know your works: behold, I have set before you an open door, and no man can shut it: for you have a lit­tle strength, and have kept my word, and have not denied my name ” (Rev.3:7 – 8 Para.).

Notice the empha­sis upon hav­ing kept Christ’s word and not deny­ing Christ’s name. It is for this rea­son that God will empow­er and use those of the Philadelphia church to per­form a great work for him in the end of the age.

SUMMARY

Although it is extreme­ly impor­tant to be able to rec­og­nize the Antichrist, his image and mark, the False Prophet, and the reli­gious gov­ern­men­tal sys­tem which they admin­is­ter for Satan the Devil when they appear on the worlds scene, it is even more impor­tant for one to be com­mit­ted to mak­ing the right deci­sions con­cern­ing one’s alle­giance to God the Father.

By B. L. Cocherell and Charles E. Barrett

File b2w11 707

Police Fatal Shootings Down: Crime Up..up..up.

12002824_10204945833425221_401427015886358774_n

Some Jamaican Business Leaders want the Police and (indecom)to coöper­ate in pro­tect­ing the coun­try from crim­i­nals. Generally the Country’s Business lead­ers do not get involved except when they think their bot­tom line is in danger.
Recently some busi­ness lead­ers spoke out against what they believed was a Jockeying between Investigators of the Police Department and those from (inde­com) to estab­lish who has super­sed­ing author­i­ty at scenes of crime.
The answer is sim­ple (inde­com) is not the police depart­ment tasked with crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tions and as such it has no author­i­ty to take over a crime scene. Even if the Police killed some­one dur­ing the com­mis­sion of a crime the Police still have the author­i­ty to con­tin­ue the inves­ti­ga­tions as they nor­mal­ly would.
The over­sight Agency’s role is to look for impro­pri­ety if there are alle­ga­tions of impro­pri­ety. That how­ev­er does not give that body super­sed­ing author­i­ty over police, worse case sce­nario is that they share the scene.
The Private sec­tor had all the time in the world to lob­by at the time the (inde­com) Act was being debat­ed . The body chose to remain silent, though the effec­tive­ness of the Police in deal­ing with crime on the island direct­ly affects their bot­tom line.
It is rea­son­able to con­strue that their mealy-mouthed appeal for the police and (inde­com) to work togeth­er is relat­ed to dwin­dling bot­tom lines as crim­i­nals over­run the country.
Ever the cyn­ic, I do not believe the pri­vate sec­tor is par­tic­u­lar­ly con­cerned about who has super­sed­ing author­i­ty at scenes of crime.

Offices of the police commissioner..
Offices of the police commissioner..

The (inde­com) Act was a bad law not because the Police do not need over­sight. Lord knows some of the Island’s cops need much more than over­sight in my esti­ma­tion. So that’s not the issue. It’s a bad law because it was not researched, or debat­able prop­er­ly so that the law could snag dirty cops while expos­ing false alle­ga­tions of police mis­con­duct by those with an axe to grind.
We have said repeat­ed­ly in this pub­li­ca­tion that the law is bad because it does not ful­fil the man­date which is required. It empow­ers a nar­cis­sist to abuse the pow­ers of the Act, and ulti­mate­ly send crime sta­tis­tics through the roof .
There should be no ques­tion about who has super­sed­ing author­i­ty at crime scenes.
If an (inde­com) inves­ti­ga­tor breach­es a crime scene tape he/​she should prompt­ly be arrest­ed and charged for breach­ing and poten­tial­ly con­t­a­m­i­nat­ing that crime scene.
In a real democ­ra­cy of course where Bills are prop­er­ly thought-out and debat­ed before they are passed into Laws this could not stand. A bad law is worse than no law at all and that is what the (inde­com) Act is, a bad law.

(Indecom) Investigators should not be at a shoot­ing scene unless there are alle­ga­tions of police impropriety.
This is a piece of leg­is­la­tion which was passed by a bunch of morons which will have debil­i­tat­ing con­se­quences for the fore­see­able future until the morons decide to repeal , rethink, and reau­tho­rize it.

The JCF says it has adopt­ed a pol­i­cy of advis­ing INDECOM of every shoot­ing result­ing in death or injury to any per­son which involves mem­bers of the force, whether or not mis­con­duct is estab­lished. However, the force says that the prac­tice has placed its inves­ti­ga­tors at a dis­ad­van­tage to prop­er­ly process/​investigate crime scenes, “as INDECOM inves­ti­ga­tors are under­tak­ing every such scene with­out estab­lish­ing that there is mis­con­duct on the part of the secu­ri­ty forces”.

Officers converge on a crime scene in east kingston
Officers con­verge on a crime scene in east kingston

The JCF said that the Act is not clear as to whom or at what point it is deter­mined that there is an inci­dent, and that the issue is fur­ther com­pli­cat­ed by sec­tion 10 of the Act, which pro­vides for INDECOM to receive and inves­ti­gate com­plaints from per­sons who allege that the con­duct of a mem­ber of the secu­ri­ty forces result­ed in acts includ­ing death, injury, sex­u­al assault, dam­age to prop­er­ty, “or any­thing which, in the opin­ion of the com­mis­sion­er [of INDECOM] is an abuse of the rights of a cit­i­zen”. The JCF also com­plained that the INDECOM Act empow­ers the com­mis­sion­er to give direc­tives to the com­mis­sion­er of police, who is oblig­ed to imple­ment these rec­om­men­da­tions for the preser­va­tion of an inci­dent scene and oth­er mat­ters. It said that the fact is that in many cir­cum­stances, the direc­tives of INDECOM is rel­a­tive to oper­a­tional direc­tives to the police com­mis­sion­er. “Any such instruc­tion of INDECOM con­flicts with the pow­er of the com­mis­sion­er of police under sec­tion 3 (2) of the Constabulary Force Act, which states that the com­mis­sion­er (of police) has sole oper­a­tional com­mand and super­in­ten­dence of the force,” the JCF sub­mit­ted. The JCF also sug­gest­ed that the INDECOM Act must be amend­ed to make it clear that it does not con­flict the pro­vi­sions of the Constabulary Force Act.

In its sub­mis­sion, the JDF said that the Act pro­vides INDECOM with pow­ers, such as that of a Supreme Court judge, that are beyond those required for inves­ti­ga­tions and has been inter­pret­ed to bypass some of the estab­lished checks and bal­ances to assure fair­ness. “The Act devi­ates from inter­na­tion­al and local prece­dent and caus­es con­flict with the Defence Act, there­by hav­ing a severe neg­a­tive impact on the dis­ci­pli­nary and admin­is­tra­tive pro­ce­dures of the JDF,” the JDF submitted.

Trrence Williams
Trrence Williams

Yesterday September 23rd, Commissioner of the Independent Commission of Investigations (inde­com) Terrence Williams is report­ing that the num­ber of police shoot­ings which end in death is falling. He dis­closed that up to three years ago, fatal shoot­ings by the police aver­aged 250 per year, with the num­ber falling sig­nif­i­cant­ly to 129 in 2014. For the first half of this year, the num­ber stood at 50. Williams explained that there has been some improve­ment in the coöper­a­tion between the inves­tiga­tive body and the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF), which has result­ed in less use of exces­sive and dead­ly force by the police dur­ing their oper­a­tions. “It is not that the police must not use force to defend them­selves, and to defend us, but that use of force must be rea­son­able and pro­por­tion­ate,” Williams said.
What Williams did not both­er to say is that Crime has gone up expo­nen­tial­ly. Which is not sur­pris­ing once one under­stands what is ulti­mate­ly impor­tant to (inde­com) and those who sup­port the Act in its present form. The fact is that any unlaw­ful killing the police does deval­ues us all . We should nev­er be com­fort­able ever, that agents of the state’s kills an inno­cent per­son in our names.
And so we are forced to bal­ance the need to secure our com­mu­ni­ties from dan­ger­ous blood thirsty crim­i­nals while doing all we can to ensure that those we ask to do the job do so in a way that is not anti­thet­i­cal to our val­ues and the fun­da­men­tal human rights of everyone.

That is no easy task but it must be done. What we must nev­er do how­ev­er is to ham­strung those we ask to pro­tect us with their lives . Neither should we empow­er those who are quite con­tent to slide in the blood of offi­cers to fame and power.

Spirit Of ‘Africa’s Che Guevara’ Found In Burkina Faso Uprising

 Thomas Sankara
Thomas Sankara

OUGADOUGOU, Burkina Faso — In the ear­ly hours of a night in 1987, one of Africa’s youngest lead­ers, Thomas Sankara, was mur­dered and qui­et­ly and quick­ly buried in a shal­low grave.

Now, the man wide­ly believed to be behind it, Burkina Faso’s pres­i­dent, has watched as his par­lia­ment was set ablaze by furi­ous pro­test­ers who want him gone.

Many of the pro­test­ers say the his­to­ry of the slain 1980s leader part­ly inspired them to rise against Blaise Compaore, who has been in pow­er for 27 years and was try­ing, by a vote in par­lia­ment, for anoth­er five.

Though some see Sankara as an auto­crat who came to office by the pow­er of the gun, and who ignored basic human rights in pur­suit of his ideals, in recent years he has been cit­ed as a rev­o­lu­tion­ary inspi­ra­tion not only in Burkina Faso but in oth­er coun­tries across Africa.

In the weeks before the cur­rent chaos, Al Jazeera spoke to peo­ple in the cap­i­tal, Ouagadougou, and found many who pre­dict­ed that Sankara’s mem­o­ry, and Compaore’s attempt to seek anoth­er five-year term, may soon spark an uprising.

Thumbnail image for Burkina Faso's president resigns amid wave of violent unrest

Burkina Faso’s president resigns amid wave of violent unrest

Statement comes just hours after Blaise Compaore had seem­ing­ly vowed to stay in pow­er as head of tran­si­tion­al government.

At the time of his assas­si­na­tion Sankara was just 37 and had ruled for only four years.

But his poli­cies and vision are still cher­ished both by some locals who were around when he was in pow­er and, sig­nif­i­cant­ly, by many young peo­ple who were born since his death.

His killing was the the fifth coup since the nation won inde­pen­dence from France and the main ben­e­fi­cia­ry was Compaore, who quick­ly took his place.

Until that night, the two had often been referred to as best friends.

Although there is less pover­ty now than back then, a grow­ing num­ber of Burkinabés had, in recent years, start­ed to feel that Sankara’s nation­al­iza­tion poli­cies may have made the per­pet­u­al­ly arid nation a more pros­per­ous and self-reliant place than it is today.

Sankara want­ed a thriv­ing Burkina Faso, rely­ing on local human and nat­ur­al resources as opposed to for­eign aid,” said retired pro­fes­sor of eco­nom­ics, Noël Nébié.

And start­ing with agri­cul­ture, which rep­re­sents more than 32 per cent of the coun­try’s GDP and employs 80 per­cent of the work­ing pop­u­la­tion, he smashed the eco­nom­ic élite who con­trolled most of the arable land and grant­ed access to sub­sis­tence farm­ers. That improved pro­duc­tion mak­ing the coun­try almost self-sufficient.”

Naming a nation

Initially known as the Republic of Upper Volta, after the riv­er, in 1984 Sankara changed the coun­try’s name to Burkina Faso, mean­ing Land of the Upright People, and he soon made that name the sym­bol of his nation­al­iza­tion crusade.

Some say the fact he authored his nation’s name has kept his mem­o­ry alive.

When you wake up in the morn­ing and you remem­ber you are a Burkinabe, you auto­mat­i­cal­ly recall the per­son who thought up that local name and stamped it on us,” said Ishmael Kaboré, a 47-year-old lawyer in Ouagadougou.

At first, peo­ple felt the name Burkina Faso was odd, awk­ward and far from the mod­ern and for­eign names oth­er coun­tries were bear­ing in Africa.

But they real­ized after his death that Sankara want­ed to give us a unique and spe­cial iden­ti­ty that tells our his­to­ry and depicts our character.”

Sankara was a deter­mined pan-Africanist, whose for­eign poli­cies were large­ly cen­tered on anti-impe­ri­al­ism. His gov­ern­ment spurned for­eign aid and tried to stamp out the influ­ence of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank in the coun­try by adopt­ing debt reduc­tion poli­cies and nation­al­iz­ing all land and min­er­al wealth.

Self-suf­fi­cien­cy and land reform poli­cies were designed to fight famine, a nation­wide lit­er­a­cy cam­paign was launched, and fam­i­lies were ordered to have their chil­dren vaccinated.

Some fam­i­lies used to keep their chil­dren in hid­ing on the arrival of vac­ci­na­tors for reli­gious or rit­u­al rea­sons, and that prac­tice was sab­o­tag­ing our efforts,” said Fatoumata Koulibaly, assis­tant cam­paign direc­tor at the coun­try’s health min­istry under Sankara.

But when Sankara came he took a strong stand against it, which helped in the vac­ci­na­tion of close to three mil­lion chil­dren against menin­gi­tis, yel­low fever and measles, etc.”

Vaccination has been com­mon prac­tice in Burkina Faso since then, she said.

Anger bubbles up

Sankara was often referred to as “Africa’s Che Guevara” because he reg­u­lar­ly quot­ed, and said he drew inspi­ra­tion from, the world famous rev­o­lu­tion­ary leader. Sankara was also a good friend of for­mer Ghanaian pres­i­dent, and fel­low rev­o­lu­tion­ary, Jerry Rawlings.

Even for his most ardent of sup­port­ers it is impos­si­ble to know whether, if Sankara had not been killed, life would have been bet­ter, and some argue that it would not have.

But many peo­ple told Al Jazeera they believed things would be bet­ter today if he was still alive, and that sen­ti­ment is part­ly respon­si­ble for Thursday’s events.

Young peo­ple who were not alive dur­ing Sankara’s admin­is­tra­tion are begin­ning to look back more at that peri­od because some­thing is wrong in the coun­try today,” 23-year-old University of Ouagadougou stu­dent, Ibrahim Sanogo, said.

Sankara was not just fight­ing impe­ri­al­ism for the sake of pol­i­tics but he want­ed the Burkinabe peo­ple to devel­op them­selves and their land and rely essen­tial­ly on them­selves instead of the West.

Today, all the young grad­u­ates are dream­ing to trav­el abroad to do odd jobs because of lack of employ­ment oppor­tu­ni­ties here.”

Compaore, though, has had some suc­cess. The min­ing indus­try has seen a boost in recent years, with the cop­per, iron and man­ganese mar­kets all improv­ing. Gold pro­duc­tion shot up by 32 per­cent in 2011 at six sites, accord­ing to fig­ures from the mines min­istry, mak­ing Burkina Faso the fourth-largest gold pro­duc­er in Africa.

Growth is run­ning at sev­en per­cent. But per capi­ta income stands at just $790, and local peo­ple say the stan­dard of liv­ing is very poor for most. Corruption and elit­ism are a prob­lem, they say, with any wealth only in the hands of the few.

Those World Bank and IMF fig­ures are seen only on paper and not in the pock­ets of the Burkinabes,” said Seydou Yabré, an inde­pen­dent rur­al devel­op­ment expert.

Only very few peo­ple are enjoy­ing the wealth of the coun­try. If you vis­it homes, or trav­el to the hin­ter­lands, you will expe­ri­ence an appalling lev­el of poverty.”

Eerie prediction

Perhaps Sankara’s anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign and exem­plary mod­est lifestyle could have forced wealth to trick­le down if he had been left alive to lead, Yabré thought.

Sankara was Africa’s most down-to-earth pres­i­dent then. He lived in a small, mod­est house, rode a bicy­cle and had $350 in his account at the time of his death,” Yabré said.

He was also con­test­ed with­in his inner cir­cle because he nev­er want­ed his army col­leagues to embez­zle pub­lic funds and lead a flam­boy­ant lifestyle.”

Famously — and eeri­ly — just a week before his death, per­haps sens­ing what was to come, Sankara said: “While rev­o­lu­tion­ar­ies as indi­vid­u­als can be mur­dered, you can­not kill ideas.”

Burkina Faso’s progress over the past 20 years was large­ly due to its sta­bil­i­ty, many observers say, but, as was made clear when a crowd of the coun­try’s peo­ple con­verged on the par­lia­ment intent on destruc­tion, an anger left to fes­ter can take that away in an instant.

Sankara had many ene­mies because he wrest­ed priv­i­leges from loot­ers in favour of the poor,” Yabré said. “Maybe he did this too rad­i­cal­ly and with­in too short a time.”
Read more here.Spirit of ‘Africa’s Che Guevara’ found in Burkina Faso uprising

Burkina President Says He’s Back In Charge

Gen. Gilbert Diendere says he is willing to negotiate but is waiting outcome of summit of West African regional leaders
Gen. Gilbert Diendere says he is will­ing to nego­ti­ate but is wait­ing out­come of sum­mit of West African region­al leaders

Burkina Faso inter­im pres­i­dent Michel Kafando, who was tak­en hostage dur­ing a coup last week, said on Wednesday he was back in pow­er and had restored a civil­ian tran­si­tion­al gov­ern­ment. However, it was unclear who was real­ly in charge after the rebellion’s leader attend­ed a state function.

I have returned to work,” Kafando told jour­nal­ists at the for­eign min­istry in Ouagadougou.“The tran­si­tion is back and at this very minute is exer­cis­ing the pow­er of the state.”

At about the same time, around 3 miles away, coup leader General Gilbert Diendere appeared at the air­port, backed by a con­tin­gent of his pres­i­den­tial guard, to wel­come region­al lead­ers arriv­ing to try to nego­ti­ate an end to the crisis.

Burkina Faso’s mil­i­tary stepped up pres­sure on Diendere and his sol­diers in recent days to cede pow­er, threat­en­ing to dis­arm them by force if nec­es­sary. It said it had reached an agree­ment with mem­bers of Diendere’s force overnight.

While troops loy­al to the gov­ern­ment were not vis­i­ble on the streets of Ouagadougou Wednesday, pres­i­den­tial guard sol­diers back­ing Diendere main­tained their posi­tions at the nation­al tele­vi­sion head­quar­ters, despite the deal that required them to be con­fined to bar­racks to avoid clashes.

The head of pro­to­col for the pres­i­den­cy, present at the air­port, told Reuters that an offi­cial cer­e­mo­ny dur­ing which pow­er would be hand­ed back to the tran­si­tion­al author­i­ties was sched­uled for lat­er on Wednesday. Until then, he said Diendere would remain in charge.

Leaders from Nigeria, Senegal, Niger, Togo, Benin and Ghana were due to arrive, under­lin­ing region­al con­cern for a coun­try that was less that a month away from Oct. 11 elec­tions when the rebelling sol­diers raid­ed the cabinet.

They were due to meet the coup lead­ers and tran­si­tion­al author­i­ties to nego­ti­ate a final set­tle­ment to restore the civil­ian government.

One by one, Diendere extend­ed a full state wel­come to each arriv­ing leader, greet­ing them on a red car­pet and stand­ing beside them as a mil­i­tary band played their nation­al anthems.

The October elec­tion was meant to restore Burkina Faso to democ­ra­cy after last year’s over­throw of long­time ruler Blaise Compaore by massed crowds protest­ing against his plans to extend his rule.

Diendere is the for­mer spy chief and right-hand man of Compaore.

Compaore’s over­throw had made Burkina Faso a bea­con for demo­c­ra­t­ic aspi­ra­tions in Africa, where vet­er­an rulers in coun­tries from Rwanda to Congo Republic are seek­ing to scrap con­sti­tu­tion­al term limits.:Read more here :Burkina pres­i­dent says he’s back in charge

Some Images From Francis’ Visit To Washington Dc.

President Obama ,first Lady Michelle Obama and their two daughters greets the Pope ..
President Obama ‚first Lady Michelle Obama and their two daugh­ters greet the Pope ..
President Obama ,first Lady Michelle Obama and their two daughters greets the Pope ..
President Obama ‚first Lady Michelle Obama and their two daugh­ters greet the Pope ..
The Pope and the Prez ..
The Pope and the Prez ..
A light moment between the Pope and the Prez....
A light moment between the Pope and the Prez.…
A little on the windy side...
A lit­tle on the windy side…
The Pope greets the kids...
The Pope greets the kids…
Excited Nuns and other well-wishers wait patiently to catch a glimpse of the Pontiff..
Excited Nuns and oth­er well-wish­ers wait patient­ly to catch a glimpse of the Pontiff..
Enroute to getting some much needed rest maybe.
Enroute to get­ting some much need­ed rest maybe.

Cowardly Brutality Exposed: The Viral Video That Should Change The Israel/​Palestine Debate Forever

YouTube player

It’s no won­der that this video clip went viral ear­li­er this month. It shows a masked Israeli sol­dier throw­ing a sob­bing Palestinian child to the ground, hold­ing him in a head­lock, squash­ing him, and then grap­pling with an assort­ment of women and girls as he tries — and ulti­mate­ly fails — to wrest the ter­ri­fied boy away from his mother.

Those few moments of footage revealed for all the world to see the sor­did real­i­ty of Israel’s every­day war against the Palestinian peo­ple. An army that is equipped and osten­si­bly pre­pared to take on oth­er armies — but that was last test­ed against a real army over four decades ago — con­tin­ues to be unleashed against a large­ly defense­less civil­ian pop­u­la­tion. And it con­tin­ues to fail abysmal­ly at its assigned task of bring­ing that pop­u­la­tion under con­trol and break­ing its will to resist. Indeed, in polit­i­cal terms, the end­ing of the video is as instruc­tive as the begin­ning: as the child is final­ly freed, the Israeli sol­dier, stripped of his coward’s face­mask, is forced igno­min­ious­ly to slink away, defeat­ed — though not before sul­len­ly and gra­tu­itous­ly fling­ing a part­ing stun-grenade into the faces of the child and his fam­i­ly, hav­ing, for all his bru­tal­i­ty, accom­plished pre­cise­ly nothing.

The scene sums up on a small scale the past decades of Israeli vio­lence, and it cap­tures the les­son that the Israelis seem inca­pable of get­ting into their heads once and for all: that the sheer capac­i­ty for brute force — at which they admit­ted­ly excel — does not, in itself, trans­late into polit­i­cal gain, and can, indeed, back­fire polit­i­cal­ly to pro­duce the oppo­site result from what was intend­ed: courage instead of fear; stead­fast­ness instead of col­lapse; defi­ance instead of submission.

One would have thought that the video would have occa­sioned some cir­cum­spec­tion, or at least awk­ward silence, among Israelis and what remains of their rapid­ly thin­ning fan club in the U.S., but no — of course not. Israel’s min­is­ter of cul­ture took to the media to declare that the army’s open-fire reg­u­la­tions ought to be changed to offi­cial­ly per­mit shoot­ing unarmed Palestinians in order “to put an end to the humil­i­a­tion.” Better, then, for the sol­dier to have gunned the fam­i­ly down in cold blood than to have failed to snatch their 12-year-old. Such are the choic­es to which Israel now finds itself reduced.

Meanwhile, the usu­al sus­pects on lone­ly late-night blogs and scarce­ly read third- and fourth-rate web­sites tried to recu­per­ate the tat­tered rem­nants of Israel’s dig­ni­ty by trot­ting out their cus­tom­ary clum­sy attempts at char­ac­ter assas­si­na­tion, in this case accus­ing the child’s father, Bassem Tamimi — a com­mu­ni­ty orga­niz­er at the fore­front of Nabi Saleh’s week­ly demon­stra­tions — of run­ning a “mas­ter­class” on polit­i­cal manip­u­la­tion and even a “media empire.” How, they ask in feigned shock, could a father put his chil­dren at such risk? (Note that they are, as always, more inter­est­ed in the rep­re­sen­ta­tion than in the real­i­ty, about which they have noth­ing to say.)

The answer, of course, is that Bassem did not choose the risk; the risk came to him and to his fam­i­ly. They did not choose to live under occu­pa­tion; the occu­pa­tion was imposed on them. They did not choose to have their vil­lage, Nabi Saleh in the West Bank, encir­cled by Jewish colonies implant­ed there in defi­ance of inter­na­tion­al law. They did not choose to lose more than half of their village’s land to decades of fur­ther ille­gal land-grabs by those colonies in pur­suit of a naked­ly racist project of colo­nial appro­pri­a­tion. They did not choose to be sur­round­ed by heav­i­ly armed for­eign fan­ta­sists who, claim­ing to be in direct com­mu­ni­ca­tion with their god, reg­u­lar­ly wreak hav­oc on Palestinian lives. They did not choose to be encir­cled and cut off from the world by a net­work of ditch­es, gates, walls, road­blocks and check­points manned by the Israeli army in order to pro­tect the very same fan­ta­sists who steal their land, defile their water wells and burn their olive groves to the ground.

I asked Bassem Tamimi about the choic­es that he felt were avail­able to him and his fam­i­ly. He summed it up very sim­ply: When you live under this kind of trans-gen­er­a­tional mil­i­tary occu­pa­tion, he said, the only choice you have is whether to sub­mit to the occu­pa­tion, yield­ing to it your land, your home, your lib­er­ty, your con­science — or to refuse its arbi­trary dic­tates, its end­less lita­nies of thou-shalt-nots, and to resist it by what­ev­er means are avail­able to you. Like the over­whelm­ing major­i­ty of Palestinians, Bassem and his fel­low vil­lagers choose to resist non­vi­o­lent­ly, by protest­ing and by doc­u­ment­ing the nature of their every­day lives to a world that is final­ly begin­ning to sit up and pay atten­tion on a large scale (as the viral spread of this video demon­strates). And above all by per­sist­ing, refus­ing to give up and dis­ap­pear into the obliv­ion of cold anony­mous silence to which the Israelis would con­sign the entire Palestinian peo­ple as they go on col­o­niz­ing their land.

As for chil­dren, not only does the occu­pa­tion not spare them, it tar­gets them direct­ly on a dai­ly basis: if not at protest march­es then at check­points; if not at check­points then at school; if not at school then in their beds at home. And so they too, Bassem points out, have to learn to be strong, or be rolled over by the occu­pa­tion before they are even able to walk.

Clearly, indeed, this isn’t just about Bassem and his fam­i­ly. Throughout the occu­pied ter­ri­to­ries, Israel’s war on the Palestinians has inevitably meant a war on Palestinian chil­dren. Sometimes this takes the form of out­right vio­lence, as in last summer’s assault on Gaza, when, through its utter­ly indis­crim­i­nate bom­bard­ment of dense­ly packed neigh­bor­hoods, Israel killed 2,205 Palestinians, the vast major­i­ty of them civil­ians, among them 521 chil­dren. Such episodes of out­right vio­lence are not the norm, how­ev­er, and Israel’s war pri­mar­i­ly takes the form of its sys­tem­at­ic occu­pa­tion and suf­fo­ca­tion of every­day life — its impo­si­tion of an array of rules, per­mits, cur­fews, road­blocks, check­points, walls, tun­nels and gates hem­ming in and par­a­lyz­ing the Palestinian pop­u­la­tion in order to facil­i­tate the growth and devel­op­ment of Jewish colonies in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Accompanying this rigid array of pro­hi­bi­tions and restric­tions are mid­night raids into Palestinian towns — the Israeli army burst­ing into fam­i­ly homes in the mid­dle of the night and snatch­ing sleep­ing peo­ple from their beds. According to the United Nations Office for the Coördination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN OCHA), the Israeli army con­ducts an aver­age of 79 such raids a week: 11 each night.
Read more here :Cowardly bru­tal­i­ty exposed: The viral video that should change the Israel/​Palestine debate forever

JLP Blasts PNP Too … Says Comrades Took Prosperity Tagline Domain

Massive crowd of Jamaica Labor Party supporters at the National Arena...
Massive crowd of Jamaica Labor Party sup­port­ers at the National Arena…

It appears that the deci­sion by the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) to buy an Internet domain name with the words ‘Portia Simpson Miller’ is part is a polit­i­cal tit-for-tat.

According to the JLP, the People’s National Party had first pur­chased a domain with the Labourites’ cam­paign slo­gan ‘from pover­ty to prosperity’.

The JLP says the PNP bought the Internet domain namewww​.FromPovertytoProsperity​.com on August 24.

The JLP has released a state­ment con­demn­ing the actions of the PNP.

The JLP state­ment uses many of the very same words and phras­es cit­ed in an ear­li­er release from the PNP bash­ing the Labourites for buy­ing the domain namewww​.por​ti​asimp​son​miller​.com.

According to the JLP, it is a cow­ard­ly act of des­per­a­tion to gain trac­tion and rel­e­vance to dri­ve traf­fic to the PNP’s failed policies.

A JLP supporter blows a vuvuzela. - photos by Ian Allen/Photographer
A JLP sup­port­er blows a vuvuzela. — pho­tos by Ian Allen/​Photographer

READ: PNP upset as JLP buys Portia Simpson Miller Internet domain

The par­ty views the PNP’s actions as immoral and uneth­i­cal and reflec­tive of a par­ty that is bank­rupt of ideas that will use the immense pop­u­lar­i­ty of the Poverty to Prosperity tag to seek to shore up its flag­ging brand”, said a JLP spokesper­son in a statement.

The JLP release con­tin­ued: “Fresh on the heels of a dis­mal con­fer­ence on the week­end, the Prime Minister has now clear­ly resort­ed to “pig­gy­back­ing” on the inter­na­tion­al­ly and local­ly rep­utable tagline in order to get an audience.”

The JLP said the tagline ‘From Poverty to Prosperity’ was first used by Prime Minister Bruce Golding in 2011 and then by Opposition Andrew Holness in his Budget pre­sen­ta­tion and oth­er con­tri­bu­tions by mem­bers in 2014 and 2015.

Government MP Dayton Campbell recent­ly used the slo­gan in Parliament and has claimed pub­licly that the JLP was seek­ing to cap­i­talise on it. Story orig­i­nat­ed here:JLP Blasts PNP Too … Says Comrades Took Prosperity Tagline Domain

John Boehner’s Outrageous Plan To Help A Foreign Leader Undermine Obama

“I think anyone who is going to establish a Palestinian state and to evacuate territory is giving radical Islam a staging ground against the State of Israel,”
“I think any­one who is going to estab­lish a Palestinian state and to evac­u­ate ter­ri­to­ry is giv­ing rad­i­cal Islam a stag­ing ground against the State of Israel,”

House Speaker John Boehner has invit­ed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak to a joint ses­sion of Congress in February, on the top­ic of Iran. On the sur­face, this might seem inno­cent enough. Israel is a close American ally. Surely he should be wel­come in Congress, par­tic­u­lar­ly to dis­cuss an issue that con­cerns his country.

On the sur­face, Netanyahu’s speech will be about oppos­ing Obama’s nuclear talks with Iran and sup­port­ing Republican-led sanc­tions meant to blow up those talks.

But there’s more than meets the eye here. Netanyahu is play­ing a game with US domes­tic pol­i­tics to try to under­mine and pres­sure Obama — and thus steer US for­eign pol­i­cy. Boehner wants to help him out. By reach­ing out to Netanyahu direct­ly and set­ting up a vis­it with­out the knowl­edge of the White House, he is under­min­ing not just Obama’s poli­cies but his very lead­er­ship of US for­eign pol­i­cy. The fact that Netanyahu is once again med­dling in American pol­i­tics, and that a US polit­i­cal par­ty is sid­ing with a for­eign coun­try over their own pres­i­dent, is extreme­ly unusu­al, and a major break with the way that for­eign rela­tions usu­al­ly work.

Netanyahu is trying to actively undermine Obama and unseat the Democrats

Throughout Obama’s tenure, he has clashed with Netanyahu. That is no secret, and it’s noth­ing new for American and Israeli lead­ers to dis­agree, some­times very pub­licly. But Netanyahu, begin­ning in May 2011, adopt­ed a new strat­e­gy to try to deal with this: using domes­tic American pol­i­tics as a way to try to push around Obama.

During a trip that month to Washington, Netanyahu pub­licly lec­tured Obama at a press con­fer­ence and then gave a speech to Congress slam­ming the pres­i­dent. That speech, also host­ed by Republicans, received many stand­ing ova­tions for Netanyahu’s fin­ger-wag­ging crit­i­cism of Obama.

At first it appeared that Netanyahu was mere­ly try­ing to steer Obama’s for­eign pol­i­cy in a direc­tion that he, Netanyahu, pre­ferred. Obama want­ed Netanyahu to freeze Israeli set­tle­ment growth in the West Bank, for exam­ple; Obama has also sought, in his sec­ond term, to reach a nuclear deal with Iran that Netanyahu earnest­ly believes is a bad idea.

Netanyahu’s first respon­si­bil­i­ty is to Israel’s nation­al inter­ests, not to Obama, so it makes sense that he would push for poli­cies that he thinks are good for Israel.

But in 2011 Netanyahu start­ed going a step fur­ther, and appeared to be work­ing to active­ly remove Obama from pow­er. During the 2012 elec­tion cycle, Netanyahu and his gov­ern­ment were increas­ing­ly crit­i­cal of Obama and sup­port­ive of Republicans, includ­ing pres­i­den­tial can­di­date Mitt Romney, for whom he at times appeared to be active­ly cam­paign­ing. Netanyahu’s crit­i­cisms of Obama were so point­ed that some of Obama’s oppo­nents cut a cam­paign ad out of them. It became a joke with­in Israel that Netanyahu saw him­self not as the leader of a sov­er­eign coun­try, but as the Republican sen­a­tor from Israel.

But try­ing to unseat a for­eign leader is not a joke, espe­cial­ly when that for­eign leader is fund­ing your mil­i­tary and guar­an­tee­ing your nation’s security.

Netanyahu’s gov­ern­ment ramped down this strat­e­gy after Obama won; he even gave Obama the world’s most awk­ward con­grat­u­la­tions speech. But through­out Obama’s sec­ond term he has once again grad­u­al­ly esca­lat­ed from try­ing to influ­ence Obama to active­ly under­min­ing both the pres­i­dent and his par­ty. The new Israeli ambas­sador to the US for months would not even both­er to meet with National Security Advisor Susan Rice, yet held many meet­ings with Republican fundrais­er Sheldon Adelson. Israel’s for­eign pol­i­cy, in oth­er words, was more focused on under­min­ing the American lead­er­ship than work­ing with it.

Republicans, aware that Americans are sup­port­ive of Israel, have urged on Netanyahu’s anti-Obama cam­paign since it began in 2011. Inviting him to speak to Congress that year was shrewd domes­tic pol­i­tics, and it will be shrewd leg­isla­tive pol­i­tics next month when Netanyahu pub­licly sup­ports the GOP’s sanc­tions efforts.

This makes sense with­in the nar­row scope of domes­tic pol­i­tics — if you can use some­thing to con­vince vot­ers your par­ty and its poli­cies are a bet­ter choice than your oppo­nents, you use it, even if that some­thing is a for­eign head of state. But mem­bers of Congress are pur­port­ed­ly sup­posed to put their coun­try before their par­ty, and sid­ing with a for­eign leader over your own pres­i­dent does­n’t seem to do that. Neither does cheer­ing a for­eign leader when he lam­basts the pres­i­dent of the United States.

More to the point, it was a real­ly sig­nif­i­cant breach when some con­ser­v­a­tives sup­port­ed Netanyahu’s implic­it lob­by­ing on behalf of the Romney cam­paign. If a for­eign coun­try wants to unseat your pres­i­dent, that is gen­er­al­ly con­sid­ered an out­ra­geous breach. But Netanyahu has been invit­ed in, and with the 2016 pres­i­den­tial elec­tions ramp­ing up it appears like­ly he will be invit­ed in once more to implic­it­ly run against the Democrats.

This speaks, in a very real sense, to just how extreme polit­i­cal polar­iza­tion has become in Washington.

This sort of practice is bad for America’s ability to conduct foreign policy

To be very clear, this is not just a breach of pro­to­col: it’s a very real prob­lem for American for­eign pol­i­cy. The Supreme Court has cod­i­fied into law the idea that only the pres­i­dent is allowed to make for­eign pol­i­cy, and not Congress, because if there are two branch­es of gov­ern­ment set­ting for­eign pol­i­cy then America effec­tive­ly has two for­eign policies.

The idea is that the US gov­ern­ment needs to be a sin­gle uni­fied enti­ty on the world stage in order to con­duct effec­tive for­eign pol­i­cy. Letting the pres­i­dent and Congress inde­pen­dent­ly set their own for­eign poli­cies would lead to chaos. It would be extreme­ly con­fus­ing for for­eign lead­ers, and for­eign publics, who don’t always under­stand how domes­tic American pol­i­tics work, and could very eas­i­ly mis­read which of the two branch­es is actu­al­ly set­ting the agen­da. (This con­fu­sion, by the way, is exact­ly what some Republicans are hop­ing to cre­ate in Iran with new sanctions.)

Republicans who never rises and clay for their own President gives Netanyahu several standing ovations
Republicans who nev­er ris­es and clap for their own President gives Netanyahu sev­er­al stand­ing ovations

This could also allow a for­eign coun­try to play those two branch­es off of each oth­er. That’s in part what Netanyahu is attempt­ing to do here, and it’s work­ing. The Obama admin­is­tra­tion did not even find out about Netanyahu’s planned vis­it to Washington until Boehner announced it. The Republicans are attempt­ing to run a for­eign pol­i­cy that’s sep­a­rate from the actu­al, offi­cial US for­eign policy.

One more anti-Obama speech from Netanyahu on the floor of Congress is not going to break US for­eign pol­i­cy, of course. But it’s trou­bling that Republicans are will­ing to breach such an impor­tant prin­ci­ple for some pret­ty mod­est short-term gains.
See orig­i­nal sto­ry here:John Boehner’s out­ra­geous plan to help a for­eign leader under­mine Obama

My Goodness Take A Deep Breath PNP , It’s The 21st Century …

Patterson One of the chief architects of the nation's decline still pulls the strings from behind the scenes..
Patterson
One of the chief archi­tects of the nation’s decline still pulls the strings from behind the scenes..

The peo­ple’s National Party is chomp­ing at the bit in anger at the fact that some­one or a group of per­sons alleged­ly aligned or a part of the Opposition Jamaica Labor Party has pur­chased the domain name (www​.por​ti​asimp​son​miller​.com,).
The People’s National Party obvi­ous­ly now in cam­paign mode is extreme­ly angry at this sim­ple act of cap­i­tal­ism. The par­ty sees this most for­ward think­ing act of cap­i­tal­ism and crit­i­cal think­ing as Quote,” a cow­ard­ly act of des­per­a­tion to gain trac­tion and rel­e­vance to dri­ve traf­fic to the JLP’s own website”.
Whew !!
That was not the extent of it how­ev­er in a scathing attack on the Jamaica Labor Party the PNP said “The par­ty views the JLP’s actions as immoral and uneth­i­cal and reflec­tive of a par­ty that is bank­rupt of ideas that will use the immense pop­u­lar­i­ty of the prime min­is­ter to seek to shore up its flag­ging brand,” the release said.

Fresh on the heels of a dis­mal tour in the United States, the Opposition Leader has now clear­ly resort­ed to ‘pig­gy­back­ing’ on the inter­na­tion­al­ly and local­ly rep­utable name of the par­ty leader and prime min­is­ter in order to get an audience,”.
Oh my good­ness, real­ly? Okay in the inter­est of full dis­clo­sure I am a lit­tle more par­tial to the Labor par­ty’s poli­cies than that of the PNP but real­ly ? I have con­sis­tent­ly said that the PNP does not under­stand the mechan­ics of a mar­ket econ­o­my and as such the peo­ple are pay­ing a very high price for it.
The lack of under­stand­ing cre­ates a sit­u­a­tion in which busi­ness­es can­not thrive as a result of old and archa­ic Socialist Policies from the sev­en­ties which were enact­ed by econ­o­my killer Michael manley.
Four decades lat­er the Jamaican econ­o­my strug­gles along because the peo­ple are large­ly too enam­ored with promis­es and jin­gles to under­stand that Socialism kills their oppor­tu­ni­ty for a bet­ter life.

High crime rates, low eco­nom­ic activ­i­ty, High infla­tion , low pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, low employ­ment, high brain drain, I could go on and on , these are the symp­toms of an econ­o­my built to serve Government rather than the peo­ple. There is not a sin­gle suc­cess­ful nation with ide­o­log­i­cal-social­ism as its foun­da­tion prin­ci­ple. Four decades after the débâ­cle of the Manley years the PNP is still stuck with the ridicu­lous spec­ta­cle of clenched fists and call­ing each oth­er com­rades. Ironically not even the Russians do any­more, they have grad­u­at­ed to the con­cepts (win or lose) of the mar­ket economy.

It is scary to think that the PNP would make a big deal out of such a sim­ple act which out­flanked them as a party .
The advance pur­chase of domain names is one of the old­est tricks since domain names became a com­mod­i­ty. Some can­di­dates run­ning for President in the United States have had to buy back their own names from some young enter­pris­ing kid with a com­put­er in his par­ents base­ment. Welcome to the 21st century !
The tragedy is not the mind­less com­ments com­ing out of the PNP on this most insignif­i­cant and sim­ple issue but that they are not con­ver­sant with these sim­ple acts of the 21st century.

How can they lead when sim­ple things like the advance pur­chase of a domain name (any­one’s name) be seen as a big deal rather than a slick move which out­flanked them?
After being in polit­i­cal obliv­ion for many years Bruce Golding was able to eke out a vic­to­ry over the PNP because the Labor Party under­stood how to use the pow­er of technology.
One very effec­tive piece of video mon­tage was par­tic­u­lar­ly dam­ag­ing to Portia and the PNP then . Maybe it’s time the Labor Party dou­ble down on using tech­nol­o­gy to appeal to the peo­ple since the PNP is still stuck in the stone age.

YouTube player

JLP’s Purchase Of Website In PM’s Name Upsets PNP

'm not missing in action, Portia declares ... says she has no problems in the PNP
‘m not miss­ing in action, Portia declares … says she has no prob­lems in the PNP

KINGSTON, Jamaica – Officials with­in the Opposition Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) have report­ed­ly pur­chased the domain name www​.por​ti​asimp​son​miller​.com, upset­ting the rul­ing People’s National Party (PNP).

The PNP in a release this morn­ing char­ac­ter­ized the move as a cow­ard­ly act of des­per­a­tion to gain trac­tion and rel­e­vance to dri­ve traf­fic to the JLP’s own website.

The par­ty views the JLP’s actions as immoral and uneth­i­cal and reflec­tive of a par­ty that is bank­rupt of ideas that will use the immense pop­u­lar­i­ty of the prime min­is­ter to seek to shore up its flag­ging brand,” the release said.

Fresh on the heels of a dis­mal tour in the United States, the Opposition Leader has now clear­ly resort­ed to ‘pig­gy­back­ing’ on the inter­na­tion­al­ly and local­ly rep­utable name of the par­ty leader and prime min­is­ter in order to get an audi­ence,” the PNP expressed.

Both par­ties are cur­rent­ly in cam­paign mode as talks of a gen­er­al elec­tion lat­er this year fill the air.

The PNP recent­ly held its annu­al con­fer­ence, where Party Leader and Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller tout­ed the record of nine passed IMF tests while list­ing accom­plish­ments of 60,000 jobs under the Jamaica Emergency Employment Programme (JEEP).

Meanwhile, the JLP says it is oil­ing its elec­tion machin­ery and is ready for the oppor­tu­ni­ty to give all Jamaicans the chance to live in a coun­try where they all can live, work, do busi­ness and raise chil­dren in prosperity.
See sto­ry here:JLP’s pur­chase of web­site in PM’s name upsets PNP

Where There Is No Vision The People Perish

As the People’s National Party wraps up it’s 77th annu­al con­fer­ence yes­ter­day there appeared to be no change in the excite­ment and fer­vor in the vot­ers as they glee­ful­ly attend­ed the con­fer­ence decked out in par­ty colors.
I spoke to a pub­lic sec­tor work­er recent­ly who is a sup­port­er of the Opposition Jamaica Labor Party (JLP) he resigned­ly pre­dict­ed that the PNP will be returned to pow­er when­ev­er the Prime Minister decides to call National Elections. Ahast I asked him how he arrived at that opin­ion with the present state of affairs in the country?
He told me with calm detach that despite all the neg­a­tives in the coun­try there is no outrage.

Nation Arena overflows at the PNP's 77th annual General conference
Nation Arena over­flows at the PNP’s 77th annu­al General conference

Jamaica has had some tur­bu­lent upheavals dur­ing times of hard­ship and uncer­tain­ty. During the sev­en­ties peo­ple ran in droves from the coun­try tak­ing their wealth , their busi­ness­es and their exper­tise at the urg­ing of left­ist Prime Minister Michael man­ley. Even though it was counter intu­itive many peo­ple to this day still see the lat­er apolo­getic Michael Manley as a great leader of epic pro­por­tions. Never mind that after the colos­sal screwup of the Island’s econ­o­my Manley tak­ing a hia­tus of sorts, then came back and apol­o­gized . Many saw noth­ing wrong with the irrepara­ble harm Manley did to the country.
Additionally, some Caribbean polit­i­cal relics for­mer cahoots of Manley who were more con­cerned with ide­o­log­i­cal social engi­neer­ing than the wel­fare of the peo­ple, still believe he was a great leader.

Which brings us to present day and the fright­en­ing decline in every mea­sur­able met­ric of the stan­dard of liv­ing of Jamaicans. My friend argues that no mat­ter how expen­sive food and oth­er basic neces­si­ties are the peo­ple are con­tent. Which caused me to won­der are the peo­ple con­tent , or are they (1) resigned to their fate, or (2) do not know they deserve better?
If for noth­ing else would­n’t the malaise. cor­rup­tion, crime, deval­u­a­tion, infla­tion and gen­er­al sense of dys­func­tion cause peo­ple to want change?

Michael Manley
Michael Manley

Between 1972 and 1980 things got bad in Jamaica , real­ly bad. Then

Edward Seaga
Edward Seaga

Leader of the Opposition Edward Seaga launched his cam­paign on the theme (DELIVERANCE IS NEAR) to retake the coun­try from the rav­ages of the so called demo­c­ra­t­ic Socialism a social exper­i­ment gone bad.
Today the very same ves­tiges of Democratic Socialism which cre­at­ed the largest brain drain of any small nation are still in place yet the peo­ple like Sheep to the slaugh­ter march duti­ful­ly to the beat of the same drums which destroyed the nation’s econ­o­my between 1972 and 1980.

Patterson One of the chief architects of the nation's decline still pulls the strings from behind the scenes..
P J Patterson
One of the chief archi­tects of the nation’s decline still pulls the strings from behind the scenes..
despite failure by every metric the people are jubilant in support at the 77th annual general conference
Despite fail­ure by every met­ric the peo­ple are jubi­lant in sup­port at the 77th annu­al gen­er­al conference