Portia Touts PNP Accomplishments, Tells JLP ‘shut Up’

Portia Simpson Miller
Portia Simpson Miller

KINGSTON, Jamaica – President of the People’s National Party Portia Simpson Miller appar­ent­ly left no stones unturned dur­ing her address at the 77th PNP annu­al con­fer­ence as she reeled off the accom­plish­ments of her admin­is­tra­tion since tak­ing office.

The par­ty leader and prime min­is­ter detailed what she called progress in edu­ca­tion, econ­o­my, health, labour and sev­er­al oth­er sec­tors while speak­ing to the faith­ful at the National Arena in Kingston, today.

She used the plat­form to send a clear mes­sage to the Opposition, Jamaica Labour Party, and in no uncer­tain terms told them to “shut up” because the PNP’s record shows per­for­mance, man­age­ment and leadership.

I hear some peo­ple say noth­ing is hap­pen­ing, we are not gen­er­at­ing employ­ment. What were you doing when you held the posi­tion that I am now in?” Simpson Miller charged.

Among the achieve­ments list­ed, was the cre­ation of 60,000 jobs under the Jamaica Emergency Employment Programme (JEEP).

I will be the first to tell you that the employ­ment lev­els are not yet where we want them to be, there are still too many per­sons unem­ployed, includ­ing our youth,” said Simpson Miller. “One thing is clear, we are mov­ing in the right direction.”

The par­ty pres­i­dent said the PNP is secur­ing a bet­ter future for Jamaica.

She insist­ed that busi­ness con­fi­dence has improved, while also prais­ing Finance Minister Dr Peter Phillips for his han­dling of the econ­o­my. Simpson Miller said the coun­try is attract­ing for­eign direct investment.

…Those who say we are doing noth­ing, come talk to me, because when you were here, you left noth­ing for us to show that you did,” she continued.

Simpson-Miller charged: “Don’t talk to us about progress. Don’t talk to us about work. We are work­ers, we are per­form­ers; we get the job done.”

The par­ty pres­i­dent said in her more than 90-minute pre­sen­ta­tion that the par­ty stands on its record of per­for­mance and renews its mis­sion to move Jamaica “for­ward, onward and upward”.

If it is a moun­tain, we have climbed it,” a jubi­lant Simpson Miller said. “If it is a riv­er, we have crossed it.

If it is a test, we have passed it,” she con­tin­ued. “If it is a race, we have won it and when I call it, we will win it!”
Portia touts PNP accom­plish­ments, tells JLP ‘shut up’

Paul Krugman: GOP Debate Proves Candidates Are Liars Living In “world Of Fantasy And Fiction”

Paul Krugman (Credit: Reuters/Tim Shaffer)
Paul Krugman (Credit: Reuters/​Tim Shaffer)

New York Times colum­nist Paul Krugman argued Friday that all the GOP debate on Wednesday proved is that the cur­rent field of Republican can­di­dates is dan­ger­ous­ly out of touch with real­i­ty, and is more than will­ing to lie about it in order to win an elec­tion. By way of proof, he not­ed that the only can­di­date who didn’t spout “eco­nom­ic fan­tasies” was Donald Trump, and the only one seemed “remote­ly sen­si­ble” on for­eign pol­i­cy was Rand Paul — both of whom aren’t elec­table for a host of oth­er rea­sons. Indeed, he said, the entire field should be “scary” not just to Democrats, but to mod­er­ate Republicans, because it’s impos­si­ble to tell what they actu­al­ly believe.

The real rev­e­la­tion,” Krugman wrote,

was the way some of the can­di­dates went beyond expound­ing bad analy­sis and ped­dling bad his­to­ry to mak­ing out­right false asser­tions, and prob­a­bly doing so know­ing­ly, which turns those false asser­tions into what are tech­ni­cal­ly known as “lies.”

For exam­ple, Chris Christie assert­ed, as he did in the first G.O.P. debate, that he was named U.S. attor­ney the day before 911. It’s still not true: His selec­tion for the posi­tion wasn’t even announced until December.

Mr. Christie’s men­dac­i­ty pales, how­ev­er, in com­par­i­son to that of Carly Fiorina, who was wide­ly hailed as the “win­ner” of the debate…
Read more here :Fantasies and Fictions at G.O.P. Debate

Why The Outrage That Trump Did Not Repudiate Racist Turd? Trump Started It..

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton

Left wing Media is up in arms today because an inbred igno­ra­mus asked Donald Trump at an event in new Hampshire.
“We have a prob­lem in this coun­try, it’s called Muslims. We know our cur­rent pres­i­dent is one, “You know he’s not even American, birth cer­tifi­cate man , “But any­way, we have train­ing camps grow­ing where they want to kill us. That’s my ques­tion. When can we get rid of them?”
Despite the inces­sant drum­beat about Trump not fol­low­ing John McCain’s lead in denounc­ing racist igno­rance there is some­thing which is lost in all of the noise.
Of course Trump did not denounce it , he start­ed it but despite the praise for John McCain he missed a great oppor­tu­ni­ty to be a great American himself.
When con­front­ed by a racist igno­rant woman at a Minnesota event who said “I can’t trust Obama. I have read about him and he’s not, he’s not uh — he’s an Arab.
McCain respond­ed “No, ma’am. He’s a decent fam­i­ly man [and] cit­i­zen that I just hap­pen to have dis­agree­ments with on fun­da­men­tal issues and that’s what this cam­paign’s all about. He’s not [an Arab].”
Even though many saw that moment as a mag­nan­i­mous McCain moment, John McCain missed an oppor­tu­ni­ty to be big. If McCain believed as we are told that America was built by peo­ple who fled reli­gious per­se­cu­tion how could he not tell her that there is noth­ing in the American Constitution which pre­cludes Muslims or any oth­er Religious prac­ti­tion­er from run­ning for President.
In fact the only two require­ments is that the can­di­date reach­es the age of 35 years of age and was born in the United States.
Even on born in the United States stip­u­la­tion there are nuances, McCain him­self the son of a Navy Admiral was born in the Panama Canal zone. Ted Cruz anoth­er left wing loon was born in Canada. Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican pres­i­den­tial can­di­date, was actu­al­ly born in Canada. But because his moth­er was a U.S. cit­i­zen, he is con­sid­ered a nat­ur­al-born cit­i­zen as well, and is there­fore eli­gi­ble to run for pres­i­dent. Cruz was born in 1970 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. His fam­i­ly lat­er moved to Texas, when he was 4.
Even if Obama was born out­side the United States which he was­n’t why would his American cit­i­zen moth­er not qual­i­fy for the same rights as a Ted Cruz?
The igno­rant Right nev­er miss­es an oppor­tu­ni­ty to tie itself into knots as they try to add legit­i­ma­cy to the illegitimate.

YouTube player


Ever since Barack Obama took to the nation­al polit­i­cal stage the cel­lar-dwellers of the Republican Right have attacked his Blackness and his very right to com­pete for the Presidency of the United States. Unfortunately even some Democrats har­bor some of the same resent­ments when he seri­ous­ly chal­lenged Hillary Clinton and it appeared she would be beat­en for the demo­c­ra­t­ic Nomination in 2008.
Hillary Clinton is now crit­i­ciz­ing Donald trump for not repu­di­at­ing the cave dweller who asked the ques­tion as John McCain did in 08 ‚iron­i­cal­ly when under pres­sure dur­ing the pri­maries in 08 the very same Hillary said “he is a chris­t­ian,.….….…. as far as I know”!!!
Again in March of 2008 in answer to a 60 min­utes ques­tion­er Steve Kroft, “You don’t believe that Senator Obama’s a Muslim?” Kroft asked.
Clinton answered “Of course not. I mean, that’s, you know, there is no basis for that. You know, I take him on the basis of what he says. And, you know, there isn’t any rea­son to doubt that,” .
Hillary Clinton had a chance there and then to stamp out that hatred direct­ed at anoth­er Democrat she did­n’t, she allowed polit­i­cal expe­di­en­cy to dic­tate her response and as such she has no author­i­ty to denounce Donald Trump.
Donald Trump will nev­er be the President of these United States let’s get that straight. The major­i­ty of Americans are decent evolved peo­ple who have long got­ten over racist ten­den­cies. Of course that major­i­ty is bol­stered by the coali­tion Barack Obama pieced togeth­er in 2008 .
That coali­tion includ­ed African-Americans-Hispanics, young peo­ple, Union work­ers, women. Jews, Asians and others.

Donald Trump
Donald Trump

Barack Obama is a suc­cess­ful two-term pres­i­dent whether they like it or not. The nasty xeno­pho­bic racism which was unearthed and unleashed on the American elec­toral process was intro­duced By Sarah Palin , Donald trump and oth­ers in the birther move­ment. Let’s thank Senator John McCain for that as well.
Since then President Obama has made pub­lic his long form birth cer­tifi­cate which silenced all of the crit­ics and doubters with the excep­tion of the intel­lec­tu­al turds like Palin Trump and the imbe­cile who posed the ques­tion to Trump.
Barack Obama was forced to show his papers. It was the same as dur­ing slav­ery when free black men were forced to show their free­dom papers to slave-catch­ers who would some­times destroy those papers and vio­lent­ly arrest them and return them to bondage.
Donald trump Sarah Palin and the igno­rant Right are mod­ern day slave catch­ers whose rel­e­vance is tied to pan­der­ing to the moron­ic and un-edu­cat­ed with­out whom they are noth­ing. As it was back in slav­ery , slave catch­ers were unim­por­tant whites with no pow­er their only sense of author­i­ty came from abus­ing blacks.

Of course Trump has a lot of mon­ey but his nar­cis­sis­tic cam­paign of “me” reveals a rather inse­cure shell of a man who needs to be told that he is loved, that he mat­ter. Putting down the achieve­ments of oth­ers, he believes enhances his own statute. His inco­her­ent dis­joint­ed sen­tences usu­al­ly end with the ques­tion “right”? An indi­ca­tion that he con­stant­ly needs to be validated.
As such I believe it is a waste of time to talk about Donald Trump at length. We have seen his kind before just ask pres­i­dent Rudolph Giuliani .……

Rudolph Giuliani
Rudolph Giuliani

Empty Seats Not A Good Look For Party Leader.….

Andrew Holness Leader opposition JLP
Andrew Holness
Leader oppo­si­tion JLP

Leader of the Political oppo­si­tion Jamaica Labor Party (JLP) Andrew Holness spoke at a sparse­ly attend­ed event recent­ly at the Medgar Evers College in new York city.
The Jamaica Gleaner glee­ful­ly pre­vi­ous­ly report­ed that the event was a JLP show which was sparse­ly attend­ed then was forced to retract the lie after the facts of who put on the event emerged.
Notwithstanding, Holness obvi­ous­ly was not amused when he turned up to speak and saw the small audi­ence wait­ing to hear him speak.
Holness report­ed­ly said quote“I’m obvi­ous­ly look­ing to see more people,”.

The event held in part­ner­ship with the Medgar Evers College and the Proud Jamaica Foundation kick-start­ed what , con­fer­ence direc­tor, Marcia Meikle-Naughton said is a lead­er­ship sum­mit series.
A video of the event which sur­faced on social media which this pub­li­ca­tion will not fea­ture because of the poor qual­i­ty did show a sparse­ly pop­u­lat­ed room at the time the video was recorded.

This ought to be a learn­ing expe­ri­ence for Andrew Holness. Comrades would not have allowed Portia Simpson Miller or any of their top offi­cers to walk into a sit­u­a­tion like this which could cast that Official in a less than pos­i­tive light.
The Labor Party still has not learned the val­ue of pop­ulism and inclu­sion of the com­mon man in what they are doing. Clearly they still do not under­stand the impor­tance of perceptions.

Even though the event was booked as a Leadership Summit[sic] (what­ev­er that means), Holness and his advanced peo­ple (assum­ing there are any), ought to have used the oppor­tu­ni­ty to demand that as part of his show­ing to speak, con­fer­ence orga­niz­ers fill the hall with peo­ple friend­ly to the labor par­ty and it’s principles.
In this busi­ness of pol­i­tics optics are crit­i­cal in shap­ing perceptions.
The Grammys, Oscars, Tony’s and oth­er events use seat fillers to ensure that their events send the cor­rect message.
Holness advance peo­ple will have to under­stand that each event he is asked to attend and address is an oppor­tu­ni­ty to show­case his lead­er­ship skills as well as to impress those he address­es that he is a leader wor­thy of their time and attention.

Opposition Wants PM To Address Crime At PNP Conference

SMITH… if crime problem is not corrected, the economy will be going nowhere
SMITH… if crime prob­lem is not cor­rect­ed, the econ­o­my will be going nowhere

THE Opposition Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) has called on Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller to speak to the nation about the esca­lat­ing crime sit­u­a­tion when she address­es the pub­lic ses­sion of the People’s National Party’s (PNP) 77th Annual Conference in Kingston on Sunday.

We haven’t heard from the prime min­is­ter [who] is the chair­man of the secu­ri­ty coun­cil and she, in her own right, ought to be speak­ing to the nation and giv­ing the cit­i­zen some lev­el of com­fort. I heard the chair­man of the PNP at a press con­fer­ence recent­ly, say­ing that at the PNP’s con­fer­ence this com­ing Sunday [we will have] the prime min­is­ter speak­ing to a great extent on the econ­o­my. Well I’m demand­ing of her to speak to the crime sit­u­a­tion in Jamaica, because if that is not cor­rect­ed the econ­o­my will be going nowhere,” Opposition spokesper­son on nation­al secu­ri­ty, Derrick Smith stat­ed at a press con­fer­ence at the JLP’s Belmont Road, Kingston head­quar­ters yesterday.

Smith said the nation­al secu­ri­ty min­istry must also give the coun­try a sta­tus report on the effec­tive­ness of the crime-fight­ing strate­gies that have been announced over the past few months. This, he said, should include infor­ma­tion on the get-the-guns cam­paign and the use of CCTV in some town centres.

We have not been hear­ing from the min­is­ter. Last year at this time he was gloat­ing about the 16 per cent decrease over the pre­vi­ous years and speak­ing to smart polic­ing. Well, I would like to hear what he has to say about the type of polic­ing that we are expe­ri­enc­ing now,” which he described as “hor­ren­dous”.

The Opposition spokesman also demand­ed an update on the results being reaped under the var­i­ous pieces of leg­is­la­tion, such as the anti-gang laws, which were pushed through Parliament as a part of the con­di­tion­al­i­ties of the Government’s deal with the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Read more here :Opposition wants PM to address crime at PNP conference

West Kingston Calm Now Lets Apply Some Simple Common Sense Techniques To Crime Fighting…

Commissioner of Police Dr Carl Williams
Commissioner of Police Dr Carl Williams

Police Commissioner Dr. Carl Williams issued a state­ment to res­i­dents of West Kingston that crime is under control.
Speaking at a press con­fer­ence at his Old Hope Road offices Commissioner Williams said. “I am ask­ing all law abid­ing cit­i­zens for their patience as we con­tin­ue with the cur­fews and cor­don and search oper­a­tions to get the crim­i­nals from their midst,”.
The top cop point­ed to increased coöper­a­tion between res­i­dents and his offi­cers cit­ing what he char­ac­ter­ized as a non exis­tence of any such coöper­a­tion initially.
The Commissioner encour­aged offi­cers on patrol to inter­act with res­i­dents with­in the com­mu­ni­ties. Pointing to heavy police/​military deploy­ment in the com­mu­ni­ties Williams said this has had a calm­ing effect on the west Kingston communities.

The Commissioner must know how­ev­er that mere­ly flood­ing the streets of these inner cities com­mu­ni­ties with offi­cers is not sus­tain­able for the long run . Residents of these war torn com­mu­ni­ties are no strangers to these heavy deploy­ments which tend to sup­press the blood-let­ting for a few day after which the secu­ri­ty forces leave and it’s back to the sta­tus quo.

This can­not be laid at the feet of Commissioner Williams and his offi­cers alone. As impor­tant as it is to take these com­mu­ni­ties and hold them, it is impor­tant that the Government and NGO’s get involved in these com­mu­ni­ties to offer hope and direc­tion for young peo­ple who can­not find jobs.
Unfortunately the Administration is deaf­en­ing­ly silent as we allud­ed to in anoth­er arti­cle just today despite the rash of killings plagu­ing the country.
Despite the lack of polit­i­cal lead­er­ship on crime it is impor­tant that the police adopt mea­sures on their own to min­i­mize the num­ber of crimes and the trau­ma­tiz­ing effects it is hav­ing on the Island’s residents.

In order to flood a com­mu­ni­ty with cops and mem­bers of the mil­i­tary they have to be pulled from some­where, this means that though the JCF is not ful­ly staffed the addi­tion­al help from the Military in spe­cial sit­u­a­tions great­ly alle­vi­ates the man­pow­er shortage.
So it seem that some of these prob­lems can be solved with more care­ful plan­ning and a lit­tle ingenuity.
Many years ago we were able to keep crime in check in Saint Andrew North using sim­ple yet inge­nious tech­niques . Yes we had a great team of offi­cers at the Constant Spring ‚Maverly, Red Hills, Stony Hill,and Lawrence Tavern police sta­tions . I speak about these offi­cer yet I have nev­er actu­al­ly named them . It is only appro­pri­ate that I try to doc­u­ment some of these offi­cers with whom I was priv­i­leged to serve.
Many of these offi­cers have left the depart­ment as I did , some stayed and are in senior man­age­ment posi­tions , some have retired and trag­i­cal­ly we have lost some of our friends.

A section of Cassava piece a community right next to the constant Spring Police station..
A sec­tion of Cassava piece a com­mu­ni­ty right next to the con­stant Spring Police station..

That team includ­ed Deputy Superintendent Anthony Hewitt. Detective Inspector Noël Asphall. Detective Sergeant Gerald Wallace. Detective Sergeant Donald Mc’Innis. Detective Sergeant Barrington Campbell. Detective sergeant Harding. Detective Corporal Tracey. Detective cor­po­ral Colin Pinnock. Detective cor­po­ral Morgan. Detective Corporals Leroy Hanson. Brimroy Garwood .Wilford Gayle. Green. Devon Watkis. Dean Taylor. Ellison. Dadrick Henry. Altamoth(Parra) Campbell. George Henry. Lynval Henry . Spy Henry . Élan Powell. Allan Campbell. George Henry. Yasmin Ankle. Michael Beckles. Constables Dathan Henry. Foster. Foster. Allen Gauntlet .Francis. Webber . Skully. Francis. Errol McLeish.

A Norbrook home upper St Andrew..
A Norbrook home (upper St Andrew)..

To the offi­cers who served with us whom I omit­ted it does not mean you were any less impor­tant the years have tak­en their toll it has been 24 years since we worked togeth­er. The list of offi­cers named here were scat­tered over the sta­tions named in the St, Andrew north Police Division who worked assid­u­ous­ly and tena­cious­ly to con­tain crime with next to no resources.
One of the chal­lenges for us at the Constant Spring sta­tion was the fact that we we had two extremes in our police respon­si­bil­i­ties. Cassava Piece, Red Hills Road, White Hall avenue, Ackee-Walk , Grants Pen, Grants Pen Gully and Barbican were some of the depressed com­mu­ni­ties which ringed the Constant Spring Station to the south East and west while the upscale com­mu­ni­ties of Barbican Heights, Cherry Gardens, Norbrook, and sim­i­lar neigh­bor­hoods fell with­in our sphere of respon­si­bil­i­ty to the north and north east.

(illustration)Understanding where resources are needed is crucial in deterring criminal activity..
(illustration)Understanding where resources are need­ed is cru­cial in deter­ring crim­i­nal activity..

We were tasked with pro­tect­ing the poor­est of the poor as well as the rich­est and most impor­tant peo­ple at the same time, at best we had three cars. We learned to find ways to use sim­ple tech­niques to solve prob­lems. I take cred­it for a sim­ple board with a map of our area of respon­si­bil­i­ty, we used col­ored pins to rep­re­sent dif­fer­ent cat­e­gories of crime . This allowed us to con­cen­trate our resources in the areas where they were need­ed most with resound­ing suc­cess. This of course was done because we had a ter­rif­ic group of ded­i­cat­ed officers

I urge the Commissioner to apply crit­i­cal think­ing to solv­ing some of the prob­lems fac­ing the Jamaican peo­ple. Nothing will endear the police to the Jamaica peo­ple again as solv­ing the crime problem .
The police Commissioner will have to find ways to do so with no help from the Administration in Jamaica House. The present Administration sim­ply does not under­stand the effects of crime on soci­ety or is too heav­i­ly immersed in it . Either way Jamaica los­es . I say it’s the latter.

Amidst Speculation About National Elections Jamaican Murderers Continue On A Tear.…

Amidst spec­u­la­tion and fer­vor sur­round­ing the pos­si­bil­i­ty of General Elections in Jamaica pos­si­bly by the end of this year is the omi­nous and con­stant stream of dai­ly murders.
The next Jamaican gen­er­al elec­tion is con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly due between 29 December 2016 (the day of the pre­vi­ous elec­tion in 2011) and 16 April 2017 (with­in three months of the date of the first sit­ting of the new Parliament on 17 January 2012).
Despite the length of time still to go experts and Election watch­ers are excit­ed­ly watch­ing for signs that the next National polls may be clos­er than we think.
One indi­ca­tor of this immi­nence is the sight­ing of Portia Simpson Miller on pub­lic plat­forms . Addressing the annu­al con­fer­ence of her South West St Andrew con­stituen­cy the Jamaican Prime Minister said “I hear them say that I am miss­ing in action, all who say that I am miss­ing in action, why them nev­er say the same thing when the JLP (Jamaica Labour Party) hav­ing their prob­lems? I don’t have any prob­lems in my par­ty, I am the leader and I lead from in front, not behind”.

 I am the leader and I lead from in front, not behind".
I am the leader and I lead from in front, not behind”.

To the aver­age observ­er this state­ment means lit­tle but to those steeped in Jamaican polit­i­cal tra­di­tions this may mean elec­tions are near or worse case, the sea­son has start­ed and it will be a long campaign.
The Jamaican Prime Minister is a prod­uct of Garrison Politics which has metas­ta­sized and is now an inte­gral part of the Jamaican Political land­scape. Garrison Politics is the prac­tice of the polit­i­cal par­ties to use scarce pub­lic funds to cre­ate zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sions . Zones of par­ty loy­al­ists who vote for the par­ty which doles out the free­bies. In many cas­es par­ty loy­al­ists receive free hous­ing in select com­mu­ni­ties, they pay no prop­er­ty tax­es, and are afford­ed pay­checks for work they nev­er do.
This prac­tise has had dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences for the Jamaican econ­o­my it has balka­nized, trib­al­ized and polar­ized the nation’s pol­i­tics over the ensu­ing decades since Independence and cost thou­sands of lives.

The Jamaican Prime Minister’s par­ty is not the only vil­lain, her par­ty has sim­ply been bet­ter at it. However the Prime Minister brings to the stage a sense of parochial­i­ty and crass­ness that many Jamaicans at home and in the dias­po­ra would like to see exit the stage. Many Jamaicans believe the Prime Minister is not only unqual­i­fied but gross­ly unfit to serve as the high­est elect­ed offi­cial based on those char­ac­ter­is­tics. All across the coun­try the rash of mur­ders con­tin­ue unabat­ed. The Police are pow­er­less to do any­thing about it and the Prime Minister now back in the spot­light from hiber­na­tion pre­tends that all is well. Maybe it’s time the Prime Minister remove those ridicu­lous sun­glass­es so she can see what every­one else sees hap­pen­ing to the once proud and thriv­ing Island.

CRIME

The Police report that the major­i­ty of killings and oth­er seri­ous crimes are now being com­mit­ted out­side the Kingston and St. Andrew Metropolitan area and Spanish Town the tra­di­tion­al mur­der hotspots. There are sev­er­al fac­tors at play which makes this pos­si­ble. The cre­ation of Highways link­ing the Kingston Metropolitan Region to the rest of the coun­try makes access and egress to and from the rest of the coun­try a breeze. Many of these crimes are being com­mit­ted by men on high pow­ered motor­cy­cles. The nation’s crim­i­nals are not stu­pid they are aware that the great­est con­cen­tra­tion of law enforce­ment assets are bun­dled in Kingston and Saint Andrew. They also know that soft­er tar­gets exist out­side Kingston and so the chance of them get­ting appre­hend­ed are next to zero. It appears that as far as mur­ders are con­cerned nowa­days the Police sim­ply show up and car­ry out the motion. It does not appear that there is any sig­nif­i­cant head­way being made in Investigating and bring­ing crim­i­nals to jus­tice. It is a fright­en­ing prospect when one con­sid­ers the amount of mur­der­ers walk­ing the streets of Jamaica with absolute­ly no fear they will ever be brought to jus­tice. In instance after instance we see the Police oper­at­ing in the pub­lic and they seem unsure and unpre­pared to deal with the prob­lems they are faced with. This is not lost on the crim­i­nal under­world. For a decade dur­ing the 1990’s, by the (JCF’s) own admis­sion the Percival Patterson Administration did not make a sin­gle dol­lar avail­able to train detec­tives. Many sober watch­ers of the coun­try’s crime sit­u­a­tion will tell you that was the peri­od dur­ing which the Police depart­ment lost con­trol of crime.”

COMMUNITY POLICING

A policeman engages students of Central High School in May Pen as part of community policing efforts.
A police­man engages stu­dents of Central High School in May Pen as part of com­mu­ni­ty polic­ing efforts.

There are no sub­sti­tutes for good com­mu­ni­ty polic­ing and impec­ca­ble detec­tive work these two com­po­nents are key to the suc­cess of any depart­ment. Corruption .Perceived Corruption. Politics. Nepotism. Low com­pen­sa­tion. Lack of Leadership from the high com­mand and the Political direc­torate and incom­pe­tence are only some of the issues plagu­ing and hin­der­ing the JCF’s abil­i­ty to ade­quate­ly arrest the run­away crime rate.
As I have said before It is crit­i­cal that Police Officers use their dis­cre­tion in going about their duties how­ev­er there is a clear line of demar­ca­tion which offi­cers in uni­form should not cross. No Police Department allows it’s offi­cers in uni­form to behave in ways which are anti­thet­i­cal to the depart­men­t’s rules. Police offi­cers sub­se­quent­ly must under­stand that even as they strive for ways to con­nect with the com­mu­ni­ties they serve they must remain vig­i­lant that they do not bring the depart­ment to a place where the very peo­ple they chose to impress have to look down in order to see them . The notion that a police depart­ment in cri­sis will endear itself to a pub­lic which cel­e­brates an over­turned patrol car, by engag­ing in “coon­ery and buf­foon­ery “is symp­to­matic of an intel­lec­tu­al defi­cien­cy and a rot which have per­me­at­ed some seg­ments of the soci­ety includ­ing ex-mem­bers. It is bela­bor­ing the point to say Police depart­ments do well when they embrace com­mu­ni­ty Policing.

As a small busi­ness own­er I was real­ly unhap­py when my city dis­con­tin­ued the prac­tice of hav­ing patrol offi­cers stop in to busi­ness­es and say “hi” to store own­ers. I thought the pre­vi­ous out­reach and cama­raderie we shared with our offi­cers were spe­cial and wor­thy of our depart­ment and the over 30,000 res­i­dents who live in my city.
Not once how­ev­er did I see a sin­gle offi­cer hav­ing to Become a disc jock­ey or a danc­ing gyrat­ing clown to earn our respect.

Young people of Steer Town in St. Ann receive support from the police as they march against drug abuse, gang violence and other social ills last Saturday ...
Young peo­ple of Steer Town in St. Ann receive sup­port from the police as they march against drug abuse, gang vio­lence and oth­er social ills ..

Ending a dance or event which refus­es to abide by the Town and Community Act should not have to be done because a cop gets on stage and join in the event. If and when we find our­selves at that point it means that the Police depart­ment has lost it’s effectiveness.
Police doing their jobs effec­tive­ly can­not be through clown­ing, it is done with coör­di­nat­ed back­up, offi­cers com­ing to the assis­tance of fel­low offi­cers and com­ing fast . That is the best way to ensure that cit­i­zens obey the laws and the offi­cers tasked with enforc­ing them.
let me be clear there is absolute­ly no mer­it to the argu­ments that no mat­ter what offi­cers do as long as you slap the title police com­mu­ni­ty rela­tions on it it’s okay. That philo­soph­i­cal sin­gle mind­ed­ness is exact­ly why the depart­ment finds itself inef­fec­tive and ineffectual.
The police is under­stand­ably unsure and ten­ta­tive. This places their lives at seri­ous risk. Almost dai­ly there are inci­dents of offi­cers forced to back down from crowds of peo­ple who quick­ly gath­er around and hin­ders the arrest of offend­ers. In some cas­es this involves a female offi­cer who offer lit­tle or no help to her male coun­ter­part. In oth­er cas­es attempts to effect an arrest becomes a night­mare because offi­cers are ten­ta­tive and uncer­tain how to effec­tive­ly arrest an offender.

The Church and Corporal Marlando Gordon (right) engages residents of Prospect Crossing in song and dance. Occasion was a stop in the area during a peace march throughout ...
The Church and Corporal Marlando Gordon (right) engages res­i­dents of Prospect Crossing in song and dance. Occasion was a stop in the area dur­ing a peace march throughout …

This again is a cri­sis of lead­er­ship. Criminals and their sup­port­ers are like Predators. Sharks can detect a sin­gle drop of blood in the ocean from long dis­tances away. Criminals can sense fear and uncer­tain­ty in police offi­cers. We need to bring back the deci­sive­ness and assertive­ness in our offi­cers. Jamaican crim­i­nals are not get­ting kinder they are get­ting more cal­lous more bru­tal. The police depart­ment must have offi­cers who are not afraid to enforce the laws deci­sive­ly. That is at the heart of the prob­lem. This whole idea of danc­ing police offi­cers , police offi­cer as disc jock­eys, and police offi­cers dag­ger­ing in uni­form is tes­ta­ment not to the chang­ing times but the idio­cy of pro­po­nents. Of course offi­cers can engage the pub­lic and have loads of fun in uni­form, there is how­ev­er a line which they should not cross. There is a clear line between being pop­u­lar and the class clown.

Masked Men Murder 3 In Hanover

Main Street Lucea Hanover.
Main Street Lucea Hanover.

HANOVER, Jamaica – Three men were report­ed­ly shot dead last night in Lucea, Hanover.

Reports reach­ing OBSERVER ONLINE are that the three were at a shop in First Hill short­ly before 11:00pm when masked men walked up and fired shots. The iden­ti­ties of the men have not yet been ascer­tained. The police’s Corporate Communications Unit (CCU) con­firmed the inci­dent but said they were unable to pro­vide details at this time. See Jamaica Observer for more on this sto­ry :Masked men mur­der 3 in Hanover

The Media Made This F**king Monster: How Phony Objectivity Helped Create Donald Trump

(Credit: Reuters/Gary Cameron/AP/John Minchillo)
(Credit: Reuters/​Gary Cameron/​AP/​John Minchillo)

As the élite media casts about for ways to under­stand and explain the rise of Donald Trump, they may find out­size his­tor­i­cal prece­dents (as Politico did when it asked 13 his­to­ri­ans to name “the clos­est antecedent to Trump”), or cite Richard Hofstadter’s “Paranoid Style” (as the New Yorker, CNN and Salon did — even while TNR’s Jeet Heerwarned against Hofstadter’s influ­en­tial mis­read­ing of pop­ulism to explain him), or sim­ply scratch their heads in won­der. But if the media — espe­cial­ly the dom­i­nant élite media — real­ly wants to know who’s respon­si­ble for Trump’s rise, one place they should start look­ing is right in their bath­room mir­rors. I know, I know. Trump is a clown­ish fig­ure far removed from the sort of seri­ous­ness they strive to cul­ti­vate. Surely they can’t be blamed for him, right?

Wrong. Here’s why: As Congress returns, there’s a loom­ing threat of yet anoth­er gov­ern­ment shut­down. Once unthink­able, then dis­as­trous when Gingrich intro­duced them, shut­down threats have become a part of nor­mal pol­i­tics in the Obama era, thanks in large part to “bal­anced” jour­nal­ism, which has helped to reframe them as nor­mal, if per­haps a lit­tle bit risky — and there­fore, a bit tit­il­lat­ing. With a large part of the GOP buy­ing into this fan­ta­sy view of how pol­i­tics works, they were at first con­tent to vent their hatred pri­mar­i­ly on President Obama and con­gres­sion­al Democrats, but now their anger has widened to the entire polit­i­cal class — which is actu­al­ly well deserved, in a way. But it’s not just the GOP politi­cians who egged them on who are to blame — the “bal­anced” media played a star­ring role as well.

Shutdowns are not the only aspect of this sto­ry — there’s the dra­mat­ic increase in the use of the fil­i­buster, for exam­ple — but they are arguably the most extreme form that destruc­tive obstruc­tion­ism can take. They are also one of the most dra­mat­ic — and vir­tu­al­ly unprece­dent­ed pri­or to the 1990s. They also involve a kind of psy­cho­log­i­cal regres­sion, back to a more imma­ture state. After all, the essen­tial nature of the shut­down is a refusal to engage in nor­mal give-and-take, the sort of thing most of us learn in kinder­garten, if not before. As one indi­ca­tion of this, poll­sters even took to ask­ing the pub­lic who was act­ing more adult or more like a “spoiled child.” When the whole polit­i­cal sys­tem gets pulled for years in the direc­tion of gov­ern­ment-by-tem­per-tantrum — and the media treats it as per­fect­ly nor­mal — it real­ly should not be so sur­pris­ing when an intem­per­ate blowhard like Trump sud­den­ly shows up to steal the show.

The “bal­anced” media has pro­mot­ed this dys­func­tion around gov­ern­ment shut­downs in at least three dis­tinct ways: First, the media presents the shut­down shorn of his­tor­i­cal con­text, with no indi­ca­tion of how rad­i­cal, nov­el or one-sided it is, or of how it relates to a broad­er range of relat­ed rad­i­cal and nov­el right-wing strate­gies, or to the dra­mat­ic under­ly­ing right­ward shift of the GOP in Congress (House/​Senate) since 1980. This has the effect of dra­mat­i­cal­ly reduc­ing the cost of intro­duc­ing new, desta­bi­liz­ing and down­right destruc­tive polit­i­cal strategies.

Second, the media adopts a “bal­anced” approach to report­ing on the prospects of a shut­down, and the shut­down itself. It seeks to place blame on both sides (see, for exam­ple the Media Matters research report, “What The Media’s False Equivalence Misses About the Government Shutdown Threat“), regard­less of how inac­cu­rate this is. This false­ly bal­anced report­ing works in favor of the absolute worst actors — always giv­ing them the “ben­e­fit of the doubt,” and against those who are most pub­lic-mind­ed, adopt­ing a stance of jad­ed cyn­i­cism, regard­less of whether they’ve done any­thing to deserve it. Third, the media “bal­ances” any resid­ual neg­a­tiv­i­ty that the shut­down per­pe­tra­tors might be left with sto­ries intend­ed to cast the oth­er par­ty — the Democrats – in an equal­ly bad light. The media’s months-long obses­sion over prob­lems with the Obamacare web­site filled this func­tion perfectly.

Although it began even ear­li­er, shut­down talk began to flower imme­di­ate­ly after the 2010 midterms, and ramped up through a series of threats, and near-shut­downs over the next two-plus years (see detailed time­line here), until Republicans final­ly did shut the gov­ern­ment down for two weeks in October 2013, over a doomed attempt to defund Obamacare before it could go into effect. The pub­lic reac­tion was extreme­ly neg­a­tive, even though the media’s “bal­anced” cov­er­age strove to give Obama and the Democrats an equal amount of blame (some rel­e­vant head­lineshere). At the time, I wrote a sto­ry iden­ti­fy­ing “nine dis­tinct bod­ies of evi­dence”con­tra­dict­ing the “both sides did it” narrative:

(1) The long­stand­ing GOP fix­a­tion on shut­ting down the government.

(2) The GOP’s cre­ation of the shut­down cri­sis by block­ing the bud­get rec­on­cil­i­a­tion process.

(3) The emer­gence and evo­lu­tion of the inco­her­ent Ted Cruz/​Tea Party plan to force a shut­down over ‘Obamacare’.

(4) The record of promi­nent Republican politi­cians and oth­ers who repeat­ed­ly warned against forc­ing a gov­ern­ment shutdown.

(5) The con­trary his­tor­i­cal record of some Republicans down­play­ing the sever­i­ty of the shutdown.

(6) The record of dras­tic Democratic bud­get con­ces­sions embod­ied in the “clean con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion” which House Republicans rejected.

(7) The polling evi­dence that only GOP base vot­ers are opposed to polit­i­cal com­pro­mise — and are indif­fer­ent to crisis.

(8) Evidence that GOP base intran­si­gence dri­ves policy.

(9) The frame­work of American leg­isla­tive history.

There were sto­ries here and there in the press touch­ing on all of the above, but because of the ide­o­log­i­cal­ly dri­ven com­mit­ment to “bal­ance,” they were kept iso­lat­ed and atom­ized, nev­er con­sol­i­dat­ed into a coher­ent pic­ture of what was actu­al­ly going on at the time. And for good rea­son: the GOP want­ed a shut­down, and the pub­lic over­whelm­ing­ly did not.

Going into the shut­down, a Quinnipiac poll released on Oct. 1 found American vot­ers reject­ing it by more than a 3 – 1 land­slide: 72 – 22 per­cent. While Gallup had record­ed a very mod­est peak of con­gres­sion­al approval for the year at 19 per­cent in ear­ly September, before the shut­down dra­ma began, it dropped to 11 per­cent in ear­ly October in the mid­dle of the shut­down, and 9 per­cent in ear­ly November—the low­est lev­el ever record­ed by Gallup in 39 years of polling the measure.

Even with the intense ger­ry­man­der­ing that the GOP has imple­ment­ed after the 2010 midterms, there was some seri­ous talk that they could lose con­trol of the House in the 2014 midterms as a result. But imme­di­ate­ly after the shut­down end­ed, atten­tion shift­ed to severe prob­lems with the Obamacare web­site, and with­in a few weeks, the media man­aged to “bal­ance” things out so thor­ough­ly that few can even recall how bad­ly dam­aged the GOP was as a result of the shutdown.

To rem­e­dy that, let’s turn to a Huffington Post sto­ry, “Meet The 37 House Republicans Who Could Lose Their Jobs for Shutting Down the Government,” which offers a win­dow onto how the nation respond­ed that has been entire­ly erased from pub­lic mem­o­ry. It’s worth quot­ing at some length:

Numerous polls have shown that a major­i­ty of Americans assign a larg­er share of blame for the shut­down to con­gres­sion­al Republicans, who tried to tie gov­ern­ment fund­ing pro­vi­sions to defund­ing the Affordable Care Act….

Fifty-four per­cent of Americans now oppose Republican con­trol of the House, accord­ing to a CNN-ORC poll released on Monday. And a series of pollscom­mis­sioned by pro­gres­sive advo­ca­cy group Moveon​.org and con­duct­ed by Public Policy Polling released in batch­es over the last sev­er­al days indi­cate Democrats may have enough momen­tum to take back the House.

Democrats only need to lock up 17 addi­tion­al seats in the November 2014 midterm elec­tions to secure a House major­i­ty. The new polls show the recent gov­ern­ment shut­down may cause as many as 37 Republicans to lose their House seats next year.

PPP poll­sters sur­veyed 61 Republican-held con­gres­sion­al dis­tricts around the coun­try from Oct. 1 through Oct. 18. They con­clud­ed that “Democrats not only have an oppor­tu­ni­ty to take back the House of Representatives next year, but that they could win a siz­able major­i­ty if vot­er anger over the shut­down car­ries into 2014.”

According to a PPP memo released on Monday:

Republicans will like­ly find this third round of sur­veys to be the most alarm­ing yet, giv­en that the new results show sub­stan­tial Republican vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty in many dis­tricts that were not even sup­posed to be close. Incumbent Republicans trail gener­ic Democrats in 15 of the 25 dis­tricts we most recent­ly sur­veyed. This means gener­ic Democrats lead in 37 of 61 dis­tricts polled since the begin­ning of the gov­ern­ment shutdown.

In short, the GOP had severe­ly dam­aged itself, and stood a very real chance of los­ing con­trol of the House in the 2014 midterms. The shut­down strat­e­gy had proved itself to be a dis­as­ter. It should have thor­ough­ly dis­cred­it­ed all who had argued for it, and all the think­ing that led to it. That’s the clear les­son that should have been drawn. But then the “bal­anced” media got to work, and all the the above was swift­ly negat­ed — not just for­got­ten — by media’s “bal­anced” shift of atten­tion to the prob­lems with the Obamacare website.

To be clear, those prob­lems were absolute­ly real — but they were also clear­ly tech­ni­cal prob­lems, rather than prob­lems of pol­i­cy or polit­i­cal phi­los­o­phy. The polit­i­cal media, how­ev­er, treat­ed the GOP’s gov­ern­ment shut­down and the Obama administration’s web­site prob­lems as vir­tu­al mir­ror images of one anoth­er — an act of nar­ra­tive cre­ation that became a self-ful­fill­ing prophe­cy. The short-term result of that was that it pro­tect­ed the GOP from suf­fer­ing any con­se­quences for the shut­down. In the 2014 midterms, this meant not only hold­ing the House, but tak­ing over the Senate as well.

Karma, how­ev­er, is a bitch. The long-term results are now show­ing up in the form of the Trump campaign’s dom­i­nance, and the crum­bling of more “main­stream” “respon­si­ble” con­ser­v­a­tives — not just Jeb Bush, but the entire suite of gov­er­nors and ex-gov­er­nors, who’ve aver­aged a total of just 27 per­cent in the last five polls tracked at Huffington Post, com­pared to 50 per­cent for Trump, Carson and Fiorina, the three can­di­dates who’ve nev­er held office before. If the GOP elec­torate has large­ly reject­ed expe­ri­enced politi­cians in favor of these three — and Trump most of all — then a very good part of the rea­son is that they’ve repeat­ed­ly been promised suc­cess through con­fronta­tion, force of will and puri­ty of inten­tion, and they’ve been repeat­ed­ly frus­trat­ed instead.

The par­ty itself and its var­i­ous allies are part­ly to blame for this, of course. In the time­line linked to above, Think Progress noted:

In November of 2010, GOP lead­ers infor­mal­ly polled the incom­ing fresh­man and were sur­prised to dis­cov­er that “all but four of them said they would vote against rais­ing the ceil­ing, under any cir­cum­stances.” This response was the result of what the Washington Post described as a “nat­ur­al out­growth of a years-long effort” by GOP recruiters to build a new major­i­ty with uncom­pro­mis­ing anti-tax, anti-spend­ing can­di­dates and it effec­tive­ly ham­strung Republican lead­ers from accept­ing any kind of bud­getary com­pro­mise from the Obama administration.

But the media is respon­si­ble as well, with its insis­tence on a false and mis­lead­ing form of “bal­ance,” which gave Republicans an enor­mous edge in the short run, but nev­er enough to actu­al­ly achieve the impos­si­ble goals they had promised their base. The “bal­anced” media nev­er point­ed out the dis­con­nect —in the short run, that would have helped the Democrats, so of course we couldn’t have that. So, instead, this “bal­anced” cov­er­age removed all cost for the GOP’s extrem­ism: They didn’t have to be for any­thing, they could just be against, and not suf­fer any con­se­quence for the pain they caused. But, at the same time, they didn’t accom­plish any of the impos­si­ble things they had promised.

Which is why Donald Trump is so pop­u­lar now. He ben­e­fits both from the base’s unre­al­is­ti­cal­ly raised expec­ta­tions, and from the leadership’s fail­ure to meet them. The “bal­anced” media deserves a good deal of cred­it for both.

They should be forced to take a bow.
Story emanat­ed here : The media made this f**king mon­ster: How pho­ny objec­tiv­i­ty helped cre­ate Donald Trump

Bernie Sanders Blasts MSNBC And Comcast For Canceling Ed Schultz

Sen. Bernie Sanders blasted MSNBC and Comcast for canceling Ed Schultz and removing one of the few voices for working Americans from television. In a statement Sen. Sanders (I-VT) said:
Sen. Bernie Sanders blast­ed MSNBC and Comcast for can­cel­ing Ed Schultz and remov­ing one of the few voic­es for work­ing Americans from tele­vi­sion.
In a state­ment Sen. Sanders (I‑VT) said:
Sen. Bernie Sanders blast­ed MSNBC and Comcast for can­cel­ing Ed Schultz and remov­ing one of the few voic­es for work­ing Americans from tele­vi­sion. In a state­ment Sen. Sanders (I‑VT) said:

We live in a time when much of the cor­po­rate media regards pol­i­tics as a base­ball game or a soap opera. Ed Schultz has treat­ed the American peo­ple with respect by focus­ing on the most impor­tant issues impact­ing their lives. He has talked about income and wealth inequal­i­ty, high unem­ploy­ment, low wages, our dis­as­trous trade poli­cies and racism in America.

I am very dis­ap­point­ed that Comcast chose to remove Ed Schultz from its line­up. We need more peo­ple who talk about the real issues fac­ing our coun­try, not fewer.

At a time when a hand­ful of large, mul­ti-nation­al cor­po­ra­tions own our major media out­lets, I hope they will allow voic­es to be heard from those who dis­sent from the cor­po­rate agenda.

It is rare to see a sit­ting U.S. Senator blast a net­work for a pro­gram­ming deci­sion, but it is also rare that a net­work makes such a bla­tant­ly pro-cor­po­rate deci­sion as the one that MSNBC has made. The can­ce­la­tion of Ed Schultz means that one of the only pop­ulist voic­es for blue col­lar lib­er­al­ism will be tak­en off the air. The deci­sion to replace Schultz’s voice with that of NBC News Political Director Chuck Todd made MSNBC’s new direc­tion obvious.

They don’t get much more cor­po­rate than Chuck Todd. MSNBC could have replaced Schultz with a wide vari­ety of jour­nal­ists, but the net­work inten­tion­al­ly chose to replace an anti-cor­po­rate voice with a man who owes his career to not rock­ing the boat and doing the bid­ding of his cor­po­rate bosses.

Who is going to stand up to the cor­po­ra­tions and speak out for work­ers on tele­vi­sion after Schultz is gone? Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes are off doing their intel­lec­tu­al wonk thing that doesn’t pay much atten­tion to the con­cerns of ordi­nary work­ing peo­ple. The rest of the MSNBC line­up that isn’t named Joe Scarborough is rumored to up for can­ce­la­tion. The voice of Ed Schultz is going by Chuck Todd and his band of Republican guests who spout Beltway talk­ing points.

The real issues are going to get even less expo­sure as MSNBC has decid­ed that cor­po­rate prof­its are more impor­tant than an hon­est media. Story Originated here :Bernie Sanders Blasts MSNBC and Comcast For Canceling Ed Schultz

We Said This Would Be The Next Step..

12002824_10204945833425221_401427015886358774_n

We have been talk­ing about this Pope Francis . Not just about his American vis­it but his teach­ings and com­ments since his ascen­dan­cy to the Papacy. We make our obser­va­tions in the con­text of Biblical teach­ings and more impor­tant­ly Biblical Prophesy.
We believe it is impor­tant that we observe the Books of Daniel and Revelation as the very words of these the penul­ti­mate and ulti­mate books of the Bible are unfold­ing in front our very eyes today
We also look at this Pope in the con­text of the debate rag­ing on the issue so called “mar­riage equality” .
We believe and as such we have artic­u­lat­ed that in the con­text the next assault on the Church of Jesus Christ will be that the Powers of the Beast will go after hous­es of wor­ship demand­ing that they pay tax­es. We have argued we believe that that will be the next front in this war being waged against the Church of God.
Do not be con­fused when we say the Church of God . We do not believe the Catholic Church is of the Lord. We do not believe the Catholic Church is rep­re­sen­ta­tive of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Conversely we believe the Beast of the Books of Daniel and Revelation are not what many Christians believe it to be. Many Christians may very well be sur­prised to find that the very place to which they are run­ning is not a place of refuge against the calami­ty to come but may very well be the head of that calamity.
The Lord Commands us not to be deceived by the Beast. But to come out of Babylon which is the fall­en Church. 
Could it be that the fall­en Church , the very place to which many will run will be the very place from which we should run?
We have argued that after Gays and Lesbians are allowed to legal­ly get mar­ried the next front would be the strip­ping away of the tax-exempt sta­tus from Churches which refus­es to mar­ry Gays and Lesbians in their Sanctuaries , It will how­ev­er come under the guise that they refuse to take care of the poor.

Obama and Francis
Obama and Francis

After all many will agree with that con­cept right ? Who does­n’t believe the poor should be the bene­fac­tor of our largess? But see the dev­il will nev­er come and say I am the dev­il he comes in dis­guise as a do-good­er look­ing out for the poor. 
How else to deceive but gain your confidence? 
As the argu­ment goes Kim Davis the Kentucky clerk should fol­low the law and issue those mar­riage licences to homo­sex­u­al cou­ples against her chris­t­ian beliefs because of course it is the law right?
We said they will take the Churches tax-exempt next>
And then they will begin lock­ing up the few Pastors who dare to refuse to mar­ry gays in their churches.

SO WHAT DOES THE PONTIFF FEEL SHOULD HAPPEN NOW ?

Francis
Francis

On the eve of his vis­it to the United States, Pope Francis blast­ed reli­gious insti­tu­tions who are exploit­ing tax loop­holes to make mon­ey instead of help­ing the needy. In an inter­view with a Portuguese Catholic broad­cast­er, the Pope dis­cussed the need for Christians to fight the temp­ta­tion of the ‘God of mon­ey’, into which many reli­gious insti­tu­tions often fall. He then called out those insti­tu­tions that have opt­ed to enter into the hos­pi­tal­i­ty indus­try while exploit­ing a legal loop­hole to keep from pay­ing tax­es on their busi­ness enter­prise oper­at­ing under the guise of doing “God’s work.”

Some reli­gious orders say ‘No, now that the con­vent is emp­ty we are going to make a hotel and we can have guests, and sup­port our­selves that way, or make mon­ey.’ Well, if that is what you want to do, then pay tax­es! A reli­gious school is tax-exempt because it is reli­gious, but if it is func­tion­ing as a hotel, then it should pay tax­es just like its neigh­bor. Otherwise it is not fair business.”

This state­ment from the leader of the Catholic Church is part of his con­tin­u­ing call for the Church to set an exam­ple and cre­ate change in what he has con­tin­u­ous­ly referred to as a “bad and unjust eco­nom­ic sys­tem,” that con­tin­ues to max­i­mize prof­its at the expense of the masses.

The Vatican
The Vatican

In Italy, which the Pope is using as a lit­mus test for the rest of the world, the Church owns more than 100,000 build­ings with an esti­mat­ed worth exceed­ing $10 bil­lion. In 2013 the Italian Church start­ed pay­ing tax­es on those facil­i­ties which are sole­ly com­mer­cial, but still avoid tax­a­tion on any build­ing that con­tains a chapel. In America, it is esti­mat­ed that church­es would gen­er­ate $83.5 bil­lion in annu­al tax rev­enue if the exemp­tion was lift­ed on the ir $600 bil­lion in un-taxed properties.

We hate to say we told you so but even I am sur­prised at how quick­ly this sug­ges­tion came behind my pre­dic­tions. The truth is the Coming of our Lord Jesus Christ is clos­er than we think . The Children of the Lord must under­stand and not be deceived . It is impor­tant that Christians see these events hap­pen­ing dai­ly and under­stand what they mean going forward.
If you do not know the Lord find a Bible preach­ing Church which teach­es end time Gospel . Find a Church which is in the busi­ness of prepar­ing Souls for God’s kingdom. 

Science And God.

The greatness of a very creative and loving God is all around us ...
The great­ness of a very cre­ative and lov­ing God is all around us …

One of con­tem­po­rary man’s great­est idio­cy once he has been exposed to a lit­tle edu­ca­tion is the belief that the new knowl­edge he is exposed to reveals the non-exis­tence of God.
Hence he begins a cru­sade against his Creator while he strug­gles might­i­ly yet unsuc­cess­ful­ly to come up with a plau­si­ble alter­na­tive expla­na­tion for his mis­er­able existence.
Some Education can do that to a fool.
Noted Apologist Dr. Ravi Zachariah in com­ment­ing on this idio­cy , point­ed out that Liberalism in the Halls of acad­e­mia have turned knowl­edge into an Anti-God phe­nom­e­non in recent times.
Dr. Zachariah point­ed to the fact that his­tor­i­cal­ly the ‚most edu­cat­ed peo­ple were the most Religious until recent­ly when Liberalism invad­ed Academic spaces advanc­ing a view that sci­ence dis­proves God.
Unfortunately for these hea­thens Science and God are not mutu­al­ly exclu­sive. Science explains God’s great­ness not dis­prove his existence.

It’s “Party Business” When Trouble Brews In PNP, “chaos And Crisis Of Leadership” When It’s The JLP..

Lloyd B Smith MP (pnp) central St. Jamaes
Lloyd B Smith
MP (pnp) cen­tral St. James

Lloyd B Smith out in St. James cen­tral, Raymond Pryce out in St Elizabeth, Dr Lynvale Bloomfield in Portland Eastern, Lisa Hanna in per­il up there in St. Ann, and Damion Crawford in St Andrew for the PNP . Gregory Mair out in NE St. Catherine for the JLP. Additionally there are count­less oth­er squab­bles brew­ing in both Political par­ties. In a Democracy this could be con­strued to mean the demo­c­ra­t­ic elec­toral process is at play and the voice of the peo­ple are being heard.
Not so in Jamaica for either Party.

Raymond Pryce
Raymond Pryce

The only con­stant in all of this is that it is rea­son­able to con­strue that nation­al elec­tions are not too far away. Some elec­tion watch­ers have pre­dict­ed the Country may see nation­al elec­tions before the end of this year.
When attempt­ing a seri­ous cri­tique of Jamaica’s polit­i­cal real­i­ty one has to do so from the most base per­spec­tive. This is true because every­thing done polit­i­cal­ly in Jamaica is done for the most base self-serv­ing rea­sons. People are not forced out because the par­ties want to purge non-per­form­ing dead-wood from their ranks. People are purged because oth­er peo­ple in posi­tions of pow­er want them out for their own rea­sons. The ulti­mate sin in Jamaican pol­i­tics is mem­bers with minds of their own. 

Having an inde­pen­dent mind is a no no. You nev­er crit­i­cize the par­ty no mat­ter how wrong it’s poli­cies are. Speaking out is polit­i­cal suicide.

Damion Crawford
Damion Crawford

Lloyd B Smith a for­mer JLP mem­ber who went over to the PNP spoke out recent­ly against cor­rup­tion with­in the par­ty. Smith ought to have know that crit­i­ciz­ing the PNP was polit­i­cal sui­cide par­tic­u­lar­ly as a mem­ber who does not have “deep roots” in the par­ty, a kind of nice term die-hards use pejo­ra­tive­ly to style non-orig­i­nal-cult mem­bers of the PNP like Smith.

Lisa Hanna
Lisa Hanna

Patrick Atkinson the Attorney General also tran­si­tioned to the PNP after con­test­ing nation­al elec­tions on the JLP tick­et twice. Atkinson bolt­ed then bolt­ed to the PNP in 2007 where life has been peach since .Politics is all about grasp­ing the moment, seiz­ing the oppor­tu­ni­ty and noth­ing to do with ser­vice. Recently Joan Gordon Webley jumped the Labor ship and sought mem­ber­ship in the Governing PNP.
Comrades feel­ing invad­ed by the hordes[sic] of laborites jump­ing ship as Donald Trump feels about Mexicans invad­ing the US south­ern bor­der, howled in con­dem­na­tion at the influx of laborites to their cult. As a result Webley is now in lim­bo her appli­ca­tion to join the par­ty was decid­ed against by the National Executive Council of the PNP which sent her appli­ca­tion back to the exec­u­tive for reconsideration.
Does that migra­tion of laborites mean they have giv­en up on the JLP ever assum­ing office again? Or does it mean they have final­ly sur­ren­dered to the nar­ra­tive that “Jamaica a PNP coun­try”?
Or maybe both ?

Gregory Mair
Gregory Mair

People’s National Party del­e­gates have also shown Raymond Pryce the door and the Nation’s first elect­ed Rastafarian Damion Crawford is in per­il up there East Rural St. Andrew.
Crawford may be in dan­ger for doing the unthink­able hav­ing words of sup­port for the Jamaican Police. However his stri­dent cri­tique of (inde­com) may be the rea­son the Party is being nudged to remove him. At least for Crawford this may be big­ger than the parochial­ism of PNP trib­al pol­i­tics , but may even come from more pow­er­ful forces out­side the coun­try who are major sup­port­ers of (inde­com).
One thing is notice­able though were the Labor Party expe­ri­enc­ing this lev­el of dis­uni­ty, there would be major glee that nar­ra­tive being that the Labor par­ty has come apart at the seams. Not so when the PNP goes through it’s pains , it’s just inter­nal business. 
Maybe Jamaica real­ly is “PNP country” !!

Deejay Cop Facing Charges Of Misconduct

The cop who was cap­tured on video clash­ing with a civil­ian dee­jay, at a dance he was assigned to lock off, is now fac­ing a probe by the Police High Command. The cop, who was seen in his uni­form belt­ing out dance­hall lyrics much to the delight of thepatrons, has been hauled up by his supe­ri­ors who have expressed con­cern about his behaviour.
His supe­ri­ors were alert­ed to his dee­jay­ing exploits via a video which was post­ed on social media last week. The video has been viewed more than 50,000 times. His impromp­tu per­for­mance was reward­ed as patrons includ­ing chil­dren were seen throw­ing mon­ey at him as he showed off his lyri­cal prowess. He is fac­ing inter­nal charges of mis­con­duct and solic­it­ing mon­ey and could be slapped with at least five oth­er charges.

YouTube player

It Was Never About Rights, It’s About Getting Dissenters To Bow To The Gay Agenda …

Kentucky County Clerk Kim Davis returned to work today after spend­ing 5 days in jail. A Federal Judge ruled Davis was in con­tempt of his order to grant mar­riage licens­es to gay and les­bian couples.
Miss Davis a devout Christian refus­es to acqui­esce to the demands, argu­ing doing so would vio­late her con­science. Kim Davis the Rowan County Clerk is opposed to gay and les­bian mar­riage based on her Christian faith. This morn­ing Davis tear­ful­ly stood in front of her offices and issued a state­ment say­ing she would not inter­fere if her deputies issued licens­es to same-sex cou­ples, but she would not autho­rize those licenses.
“To affix my name or author­i­ta­tive title on a cer­tifi­cate that autho­rizes mar­riage that con­flicts with God’s def­i­n­i­tion of mar­riage as a union between one man and one woman vio­lates my deeply held reli­gious con­vic­tions and con­science,” Davis said dur­ing a brief state­ment after arriv­ing at her office. “For me, this would be an act of dis­obe­di­ence to my God.”..
It is impor­tant to note in light of the grow­ing sup­port for homo­sex­u­al lifestyle that at the time Kim Davis ran for pub­lic office the law of the land was that mar­riage was between one man and one woman as it has been ordained by God for thou­sands of years. Of course this was before the Supreme Court took it upon itself to usurp God’s author­i­ty with it’s earth­ly authority..
As we have repeat­ed­ly said in this pub­li­ca­tion, this demon­ic issue was and is nev­er about mar­riage or equal­i­ty. Neither is it about mar­riage equal­i­ty. It is about the per­se­cu­tion of Christians for their belief in God. This is big­ger than a mere con­tem­po­rary issue. It is inher­ent­ly the ful­fil­ment of Scriptures in front our very eyes. Unfortunately many includ­ing those who are sup­posed to be pro­tect­ing the flock are woe­ful­ly unpre­pared , ill-equipped and in some cas­es blind to what’s happening.

Ephesians 6:12

For we wres­tle not against flesh and blood, but against prin­ci­pal­i­ties, against pow­ers, against the rulers of the dark­ness of this world, against spir­i­tu­al wicked­ness in high places.
This morn­ing Media hous­es were glee­ful­ly report­ing that a Lesbian cou­ple had announced their inten­tion to show up for a mar­riage licence.
How con­ve­nient ? 
Why on the very day Kim Davis decid­ed to return to work? Why announce their inten­tions? Why not show up and do what oth­er cou­ples do when seek­ing a mar­riage licence? 
Because the idea is to show Kim Davis bro­ken and sub­dued and humil­i­at­ed. They broad­cast their inten­tions to show up because that is exact­ly what the Gay Agenda is about. It is about get­ting Christians and oth­er dis­senters to bow down or be humil­i­at­ed as nean­derthal relics of a less than intel­li­gent time. les­bian cou­ple — Shannon Wampler and Carmen Collins were not there just for the piece of paper which ulti­mate­ly will con­demn them they were there to show Kim Davis and Christians across the Globe where the arrow is trend­ing and County Clerk Brian Mason was more than hap­py to sell his soul for a moment in the spotlight.

Revelation 13:16 – 18 

Also it caus­es all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the fore­head, so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the num­ber of its name. This calls for wis­dom: let the one who has under­stand­ing cal­cu­late the num­ber of the beast, for it is the num­ber of a man, and his num­ber is 666.
God says in Revelation 18:4 ‘come out of her My peo­ple.’ (Babylon) . Some Christians believes Babylon in the book of Revelation is a city, and God says in Revelation 18:4 ‘come out of her My peo­ple.’ But these Christians sin­cere though they are,misunderstand what Babylon is in Revelation. Babylon in the book of Revelation is not a city it’s the fall­en church.God warns his peo­ple to come out of this fall­en church, so they don’t share in her sins.
As this Gay agen­da unfolds in front our eyes and is being rammed down our throats the head of the Catholic Church[sic] says “who am I to judge” ? If the Catholic Pontiff both­ered to read the Bible he would under­stand that call­ing sin, sin is not judg­ing. He would know it is exact­ly what Jesus said we should do even as we show love to our fel­low sinners.


If the Pontiff was clear on Biblical teach­ings and not the wor­ship of the Virgin Mary he would know that it is exact­ly the duty of the Church to point to a path of moral clar­i­ty rather than mud­dy the water which leads to life eternal.
It is exact­ly what the Lord God com­man­deth when he tell us to come out of Babylon . This is the Pontiff who tells his Bishops to absolve peo­ple of their sins. Who is the Pope or his Bishops to absolve any­one of sin. God alone has the pow­er to remove sin not some ele­vat­ed tool of Satan.
Pope Benedict silent­ly went into obscu­ri­ty because he did not sup­port the agen­da of Homosexuals. We wrote in this very pub­li­ca­tion that the rea­son he was forced out was exact­ly because he would not allow him­self to be a tool for this satan­ic prac­tice. In 600 years no oth­er Pontiff had resigned until Joseph Ratzinger (Benidict XVI) stepped aside which made way for Francis.

Catholics and non-Catholics alike are glee­ful at the lib­er­al­ism of Francis , whose poli­cies are more in tune with con­tem­po­rary cul­ture. Rather than stand­ing on the prin­ci­ples of chris­t­ian teach­ings Francis has sig­nalled a rev­o­lu­tion­ary path many see as anti­thet­i­cal to the teach­ings of Jesus Christ. As such catholics and non-catholics are sali­vat­ing glee­ful­ly that this indeed is their Pope.Image result for pope francis

FRANCIS
He has con­tra­dict­ed the teach­ings of past popes.
♦ He has praised a chil­dren’s book pro­mot­ing homo­sex­u­al coupling.
♦ He has defend­ed homosexuality.
♦ He has seem­ing­ly advo­cat­ed for cul­tur­al relativism.
♦ He has encour­aged more lib­er­al aca­d­e­m­ic tra­di­tions sup­port­ed by many Jesuits.
♦ He has soft­ened church rules regard­ing divorce and remarriage
Read more here :22 Pope Francis Statements Proving He’s a Leftist. 

The Protestant faith has been duplic­i­tous­ly silent , not want­i­ng to attract atten­tion even as Christians are being per­se­cut­ed for their faith. The church is silent because it does not want to be be irrel­e­vant, out­dat­ed, or to lose it’s tax-exempt status.
I warn the silent Pastors that the next Kim Davis will be you. This is not a move­ment about Homosexuals being togeth­er. Gays have engaged in their homo­sex­u­al lifestyle for thou­sands of years.
This is about your faith. This is about your abil­i­ty to stand up to the pow­ers of Satan (earth­ly gov­ern­ment) and say I will not denounce my faith in order to fit in.
Silence will not change that , Satan will not cease his attacks sim­ply because the Church cow­ers and hide in fear. Satan wants the total destruc­tion of your faith . Hence the word of God (Psa. 119:11). The duty of God’s chil­dren is to hide His Word in their hearts.
The next line of attack will be against the Pastors who shy away from Kim Davis . Some have even argued that because she was mar­ried sev­er­al times she does not fit the bill of a per­fect stan­dard bear­er for this stance.
Says who? Throughout Biblical his­to­ry God used peo­ple oth­ers scoffed at to car­ry out his plan. Who are you to decide that her mar­riages make her unfit to be a stan­dard bear­er. God used tax col­lec­tors, for­mer pros­ti­tutes, and oth­er lay peo­ple to ful­fill his pur­pose , his will be done.

Shannon Wampler and Carmen Collins walked into Kim Davis’ office not just to get a mar­riage license, they walked in to show Kim Davis they have the pow­er of the American Federal Government behind them, they glee­ful­ly chat­ted away with those who share their beliefs while the acquient clerk took care of the Devil’s business.
The next chap­ter in this episode will be that the Churches will be asked to mar­ry Gays. Some of the Pastors will val­i­date the Devil’s work in the house of the Lord. Those of you who remain silent hop­ing that not get­ting involved will save you are in for a rude awak­en­ing. If you refuse you will first lose tax-exempt sta­tus , you will be black­list­ed and even­tu­al­ly forced to either mar­ry them or go to Jail , oh yes it’s the law right?
They will make the very same argu­ments that the Church has no right to dis­crim­i­nate. They will say you Pastors are nean­derthal big­ots who refuse to fol­low the laws. They will say you are stand­ing on anti­quat­ed prin­ci­ples which are stymieing the evo­lu­tion of their Utopian Gay society. 

The Church is so much a part of the world that there is no dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion between the world and the Church . The lord chal­lenges us to come out of Babylon . The Christian Church is no stranger to per­se­cu­tion , hold on there is much more com­ing . This is the begin­ning of the great falling away as fore­told by Scripture. Choose ye this day whom he shall serve.
Daniel 7:25
He will speak against the Most High and oppress his holy peo­ple and try to change the set times and the laws. The holy peo­ple will be deliv­ered into his hands for a time, times and half a time.
Daniel 8:25
He will cause deceit to pros­per, and he will con­sid­er him­self supe­ri­or. When they feel secure, he will destroy many and take his stand against the Prince of princes. Yet he will be destroyed, but not by human power.
Daniel 11:36
“The king will do as he pleas­es. He will exalt and mag­ni­fy him­self above every god and will say unheard-of things against the God of gods. He will be suc­cess­ful until the time of wrath is com­plet­ed, for what has been deter­mined must take place.

Worship Songs..

Nowadays it’s almost impos­si­ble to hear good old Christian Hymns/​songs, songs which just caused unsaved to get up out of their seats and walk up to the Altar so that their lives may be altered. In many cas­es tears stream­ing down their faces.
Whatever hap­pened to the good old songs we loved ?
I know , I know these are con­tem­po­rary times but has God changed ? Do we sim­ply throw out every­thing old and good for every­thing. new? We can enjoy the new songs at the same time we remem­ber the old can’t we? I believe so.

YouTube player

YouTube player

What Happened To Non-violent Arrests ?

Retired Tennis-star James Blake
Retired Tennis-star James Blake

On Wednesday September 9th Harvard edu­cat­ed retired ten­nis star James Blake 35 was lean­ing against a mir­rored beam out­side a hotel in Midtown Manhattan, his hands clasped as he wait­ed to be tak­en to a cor­po­rate appear­ance at the United States Open when he was bum-rushed and thrown to the ground by white plain-clothes NYPD offi­cer 38-year-old James Frascatore.
Mister Blake sus­tained bumps and bruis­es from his rough encounter with Frascatore he has been doing the media cir­cuit at their invi­ta­tion, to shed light on what real­ly hap­pened to him .
Since then the NYPD has released video footage of the encounter which showed Frascatore rough-hous­ing a star­tled and com­pli­ant Blake. 
Even more dam­ag­ing for Frascatore and the NYPD is the Department’s own acknowl­edge­ment (1) That the encounter was a Sting oper­a­tion gone bad. The NYPD alleges the sting was aimed at an alleged cred­it card scam­mer who resem­bles James Blake. More impor­tant­ly (2) That James Frascatore has a his­to­ry of abu­sive behav­ior to the pub­lic in the four years since he joined the NYPD from Florida. There is no men­tion whether he had a his­to­ry of abu­sive behav­ior while being a police offi­cer in the State of Florid. What we do know is that there are present­ly two civ­il actions in the Courts against Frascatore since he joined the NYPD.

James Frascatore
James Frascatore

The New York Times reports that In 2012, a Queens man said, Officer James Frascatore pulled him over for a bro­ken tail­light, opened his car door and punched him three times in the mouth, unpro­voked. The fol­low­ing year, anoth­er Queens res­i­dent claimed, Officer Frascatore punched him in the stom­ach sev­er­al times out­side a bode­ga and called him a racial epi­thet. Both inci­dents involved black men.
The Times report indi­cat­ed that Jamaes Frascatore’s his­to­ry of exces­sive force com­plaints, includ­ing at least three filed against him with the Civilian Complaint Review Board in 2013, revealed a pat­tern of res­i­dents claim­ing they were detained with­out expla­na­tion and mis­treat­ed despite com­ply­ing. It also led some lawyers and res­i­dents to crit­i­cize the Police Department for not pun­ish­ing him before he was involved in anoth­er rough arrest.
The report detailed instance after instance in which Frascatore and his cronies assault­ed and abused cit­i­zens and lied about it in police reports. In one case he report­ed that he was bit­ten on the hand by one man he arrest­ed, yet expert tes­ti­mo­ny revealed the cut on his hand was con­sis­tent with him punch­ing the sus­pect in the mouth as the sus­pect­ed main­tained. Despite all of these alle­ga­tions of abuse and instances of lying Officer James Frascatore was still work­ing the streets and allowed to con­tin­ue the pat­tern of rough abu­sive behavior.

Since this report came to light NYPD Commissioner Bill Bratton has said race played no part in the treat­ment of James Blake. In the mean­time Frascatore report­ed­ly have final­ly been stripped of his gun and badge. Not sur­pris­ing­ly the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association said Mister Blake’s arrest “was made under flu­id cir­cum­stances where the sub­ject might have fled.”in an attempt to jus­ti­fy the use of force. No rea­son­able per­son both­er to take the NYPD PBA seri­ous­ly anymore.

Working the streets of any big city for police offi­cers is no easy task . People are rude, abra­sive, dis­re­spect­ful, and they are vio­lent, yet police offi­cers must find ways to do their job with­out undu­ly abus­ing or caus­ing harm to the very peo­ple they are sworn to protect.
Police offi­cers must always be remind­ed that their core func­tion is (1) “to pro­tect and serve”. And (2) That even in the worse sit­u­a­tions a per­son is inno­cent until proven guilty in a court of law. Even then, with the addi­tion of sci­en­tif­ic and tech­no­log­i­cal advances to law enforce­ment and crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tions we see that in many instances even some the sys­tem adamant­ly claimed were guilty of heinous crimes have been released from pris­ons, some­times after decades in prison for crimes they did not commit.
With that in mind offi­cers should have some degree of pause even when they are con­vinced they are right about the guilt of an indi­vid­ual. A good cop knows things are not always what they seem.

op who tackled James Blake sued 4 TIMES for excessive force, roughing up suspects during arrests
Cop who tack­led James Blake sued 4 TIMES for exces­sive force, rough­ing up sus­pects dur­ing arrests

If one was to attach some degree of cred­i­bil­i­ty to the state­ment of the PBA that the sit­u­a­tion was flu­id and that the sus­pect they were actu­al­ly pro­fil­ing could have escaped, one would have to be pre­pared to dis­pense with real­i­ty. No sus­pect being the sub­ject of a sting oper­a­tion in New York City is going to escape, so lets dis­pense with that bull. 
Which brings us to this real­i­ty. The Police claim the sus­pect of their inves­ti­ga­tions was involved in a cred­it card fraud essen­tial­ly a white col­lar crime.
What’s wrong with walk­ing up to a sus­pect and sim­ply iden­ti­fy­ing one’s self as police offi­cers and if war­rant­ed telling the sus­pect he/​she is under arrest?
Why does every arrest have to be about throw­ing peo­ple to the ground with groups of cops strad­dling and kneel­ing into an on the suspect?
What’s that about?

James Blake was tak­en down by a sin­gle offi­cer . If the Police are to be believed when they say the sus­pect they were inves­ti­gat­ing might have fled, they would cer­tain­ly not have had a sin­gle offi­cer doing the take-down and even­tu­al arrest. It is time that the NYPD owns when it is wrong and stop dis­re­spect­ing the cit­i­zens they are sworn to pro­tect and serve. People are pre­pared to give police the ben­e­fit of the doubt because offi­cers are human like the rest of us. Lying and obfus­cat­ing cre­ates more enmi­ty and anger , it’s okay to be wrong, some­thing the PBA seem inca­pable of understanding.

CCTV footage: NYPD officer slams tennis star James Blake
CCTV footage: NYPD offi­cer slams ten­nis star James Blake

If I am lean­ing on a build­ing and the police comes up and arrest me by mis­take then releas­es me once they fig­ure I was not the per­son they were look­ing for, as long as they did not abuse me or was dis­re­spect­ful to me I’m good. If I get thrown to the ground, sus­tain bumps and bruis­es and is ver­bal­ly abused in the process, of course I want penance from the offender/​s.
Commissioner Bratton’s insis­tence that their ini­tial sus­pect bore strik­ing resem­blance to James Blake and as such race played no role in the inci­dent may res­onate with police apol­o­gists and racism-deniers, it how­ev­er miss­es anoth­er oppor­tu­ni­ty to rec­og­nize and apply fix­es to a sim­mer­ing problem.
It is not out­side the realm of pos­si­bil­i­ties to imag­ine that if James Blake was a white 35-year-old male just stand­ing around he would not be bum-rushed, tack­led and thrown to the ground. 
Commissioner Bratton and mil­lions of racism deniers do them­selves and the nation a dis­ser­vice when they fail to rec­og­nize or admit that there is a built in dis­re­spect when some in law enforce­ment come in con­tact with black and brown cit­i­zens. The longer he and oth­ers con­tin­ue this cha­rade the longer it con­tin­ues, the more like­ly it is that inno­cent peo­ple con­tin­ue to be hurt by police.

The Inherent Contradiction Of Being A Black Republican.….…

12002824_10204945833425221_401427015886358774_n

I’m no fan of Republican pol­i­tics the Republican par­ty apart from being a den and refuge for racists is also an enclave for hyp­ocrites. Let me has­ten to say this cri­tique is in no way an endorse­ment of Democratic values.
So I just watched Ben Carson famed Nuero-Surgeon give a press con­fer­ence on tele­vi­sion. Carson is the very first Doctor to suc­cess­ful­ly sep­a­rate Siamese twins. He’s a Brilliant man who pro­fess­es his Christian faith and strong affin­i­ty for tra­di­tion­al values.
I must say I was impressed with Carson. I had not both­ered lis­ten­ing to him or any oth­er Republican so far this sil­ly sea­son. On the face of it Carson seemed like a rea­son­able man . He espous­es Family, God and Country (not nec­es­sar­i­ly in that order).In fact Carson speaks elo­quent­ly on some of the very issues we talk about reg­u­lar­ly in this forum regard­ing the black community.
Personal Responsibility.
Respect.
Education.
Religion.
I was par­tic­u­lar­ly thrilled that he spoke decid­ed­ly on the issue of chil­dren being born to unwed moth­ers, link­ing that phe­nom­e­non direct­ly to some of the very stub­born chal­lenges fac­ing the African-American com­mu­ni­ty today. Asked by reporters whether he would meet with “Black-Lives Matter-Activists” ? Carson said he would !
Carson Elaborated, “Black-Lives Matter should include more words includ­ing those being aborted.……
Now do you see why no mat­ter how ratio­nal and sane they sound ini­tial­ly once you let them speak you real­ize that Republicans are all full of crap? Carson came from poor and very hum­ble begin­nings , through hard work and decid­ed appli­ca­tion he rose to become a famed Nuero Surgeon. I am with Carson when he speaks on the issues of per­son­al respon­si­bil­i­ty, edu­ca­tion, and respect . However when Carson uses lan­guage which insu­lates him from white cri­tique , sug­gest­ing that he does not know that what black activists are say­ing is that black lives mat­ter (too) Then Carson show him­self to be just anoth­er pan­der­ing house negro to the Plantation owners.

Carson >“All lives matter” !!!

Ben Carson speak­ing in May of this year said “Black Lives Matter’ move­ment amounts to “polit­i­cal cor­rect­ness going amuck,” argu­ing that the con­ver­sa­tion around police vio­lence against African-Americans should be “a lit­tle more mature.” “If you hire a plumber and he does a bad job, do you say all plumbers are bad? Let’s go out and kill them? I don’t think we do that,” he said on NBC’s “Meet the Press”, reit­er­at­ing an argu­ment that he made in the wake of the Baltimore riots ear­li­er this year. “We need to be a lit­tle more mature, but cer­tain­ly in cas­es where police are doing things that are inap­pro­pri­ate, I think we ought to inves­ti­gate those prompt­ly and jus­tice should be swift.

Ben-Carson Republican candidate for president of the United States..
Ben-Carson
Republican can­di­date for pres­i­dent of the United States..

Okay on this anal­o­gy I am tempt­ed to take back all the nice things I pre­vi­ous­ly said about Carson. Plumbers do not kill peo­ple. If plumbers were killing peo­ple when they are sup­posed to save lives I believe it would be fair to expect peo­ple to have dras­tic neg­a­tive reac­tions to them doing the oppo­site of what they are sup­posed to do. This may be a good time to remind the good­ly Doctor Carson that police are just plumbers of a dif­fer­ent name.
Secondly Carson miss­es the point by a mile when he plays into the nar­ra­tive of those who do not mind the wan­ton and whole­sale killing of black peo­ple. Ben Carson must know that when he says all lives mat­ter he is destroy­ing the very basis of the claim made by black lives mat­ter activists who have read­i­ly con­ced­ed that white lives mat­ter and they want their lives to mat­ter as well. Saying “All lives mat­ter” is a fun­da­men­tal denial of the fact that for many in law enforce­ment the lives of black youth are expend­able, and yes sim­ply does not mat­ter that much.
Carson like oth­er Republicans hyp­o­crit­i­cal­ly talks about Abortion and the sanc­ti­ty of life yet they care pre­cious lit­tle about life out­side the womb. They espouse bud­get cuts which dec­i­mate the most vul­ner­a­ble. They close schools and build jails which ensures the sur­vival and growth of the prison indus­tri­al com­plex. They sup­port the unmit­i­gat­ed lack of restraint or account­abil­i­ty when it comes to police crimes against the black community.

A typical Lilly-white crowd as this one which greeted Mitt Romney's wife in 2012..
A typ­i­cal Lilly-white crowd as this one which greet­ed Mitt Romney’s wife in 2012..

So the ques­tion becomes , why are Republicans sup­port­ing a black man for President of the United States? Presently Carson is polling sec­ond only to Donald Trump the white seg­re­ga­tion­ist car­ni­val bark­er, whose idi­ot­ic rants are start­ing to wear on even some Republicans .
Is it that Republicans can­not gar­ner any cred­i­ble amount of black sup­port but they are inclined to have their own ver­sion of black­ness? A black­ness which par­rots their nar­ra­tive despite the dis­taste­ful racists things they say and do to blacks?
Why not ?
They already have one on the Supreme Court who does their every bid­ding blind­ly. Why not sup­port anoth­er Oreo-Cookie for show?
In the end the Republicans will not nom­i­nate Ben Carson for President . Like their staged blacks at Republican con­ven­tions Ben Carson is just a show­piece which will even­tu­al­ly be tucked away after they have made their point .
It’s always the same with his kind.…