THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES.

mb
mb

There are many fic­tion­al nar­ra­tions which may ade­quate­ly depict my Country Jamaica none comes clos­er in my mind how­ev­er than the Hans Christian Andersen classic.
THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES.

Many years ago there was an Emperor so exceed­ing­ly fond of new clothes that he spent all his mon­ey on being well dressed. He cared noth­ing about review­ing his sol­diers, going to the the­atre, or going for a ride in his car­riage, except to show off his new clothes. He had a coat for every hour of the day, and instead of say­ing, as one might, about any oth­er ruler, “The King’s in coun­cil,” here they always said. “The Emperor’s in his dress­ing room.” In the great city where he lived, life was always gay. Every day many strangers came to town, and among them one day came two swindlers. They let it be known they were weavers, and they said they could weave the most mag­nif­i­cent fab­rics imag­in­able. Not only were their col­ors and pat­terns uncom­mon­ly fine, but clothes made of this cloth had a won­der­ful way of becom­ing invis­i­ble to any­one who was unfit for his office, or who was unusu­al­ly stupid.

Those would be just the clothes for me,” thought the Emperor. “If I wore them I would be able to dis­cov­er which men in my empire are unfit for their posts. And I could tell the wise men from the fools. Yes, I cer­tain­ly must get some of the stuff woven for me right away.” He paid the two swindlers a large sum of mon­ey to start work at once. They set up two looms and pre­tend­ed to weave, though there was noth­ing on the looms. All the finest silk and the purest old thread which they demand­ed went into their trav­el­ing bags, while they worked the emp­ty looms far into the night. “I’d like to know how those weavers are get­ting on with the cloth,” the Emperor thought, but he felt slight­ly uncom­fort­able when he remem­bered that those who were unfit for their posi­tion would not be able to see the fab­ric. It could­n’t have been that he doubt­ed him­self, yet he thought he’d rather send some­one else to see how things were going. The whole town knew about the cloth’s pecu­liar pow­er, and all were impa­tient to find out how stu­pid their neigh­bors were.

I’ll send my hon­est old min­is­ter to the weavers,” the Emperor decid­ed. “He’ll be the best one to tell me how the mate­r­i­al looks, for he’s a sen­si­ble man and no one does his duty bet­ter.” So the hon­est old min­is­ter went to the room where the two swindlers sat work­ing away at their emp­ty looms. “Heaven help me,” he thought as his eyes flew wide open, “I can’t see any­thing at all”. But he did not say so. Both the swindlers begged him to be so kind as to come near to approve the excel­lent pat­tern, the beau­ti­ful col­ors. They point­ed to the emp­ty looms, and the poor old min­is­ter stared as hard as he dared. He could­n’t see any­thing, because there was noth­ing to see. “Heaven have mer­cy,” he thought. “Can it be that I’m a fool? I’d have nev­er guessed it, and not a soul must know. Am I unfit to be the min­is­ter? It would nev­er do to let on that I can’t see the cloth.” “Don’t hes­i­tate to tell us what you think of it,” said one of the weavers. “Oh, it’s beau­ti­ful ‑it’s enchant­i­ng.” The old min­is­ter peered through his spec­ta­cles. “Such a pat­tern, what col­ors!” I’ll be sure to tell the Emperor how delight­ed I am with it.” “We’re pleased to hear that,” the swindlers said. They pro­ceed­ed to name all the col­ors and to explain the intri­cate pat­tern. The old min­is­ter paid the clos­est atten­tion, so that he could tell it all to the Emperor. And so he did.

The swindlers at once asked for more mon­ey, more silk and gold thread, to get on with the weav­ing. But it all went into their pock­ets. Not a thread went into the looms, though they worked at their weav­ing as hard as ever. The Emperor present­ly sent anoth­er trust­wor­thy offi­cial to see how the work pro­gressed and how soon it would be ready. The same thing hap­pened to him that had hap­pened to the min­is­ter. He looked and he looked, but as there was noth­ing to see in the looms he could­n’t see any­thing. “Isn’t it a beau­ti­ful piece of goods?” the swindlers asked him, as they dis­played and described their imag­i­nary pat­tern. “I know I’m not stu­pid,” the man thought, “so it must be that I’m unwor­thy of my good office. That’s strange. I must­n’t let any­one find it out, though.” So he praised the mate­r­i­al he did not see. He declared he was delight­ed with the beau­ti­ful col­ors and the exquis­ite pat­tern. To the Emperor he said, “It held me spell­bound.” All the town was talk­ing of this splen­did cloth, and the Emperor want­ed to see it for him­self while it was still in the looms. Attended by a band of cho­sen men, among whom were his two old trust­ed offi­cials-the ones who had been to the weavers-he set out to see the two swindlers. He found them weav­ing with might and main, but with­out a thread in their looms. “Magnificent,” said the two offi­cials already duped. “Just look, Your Majesty, what col­ors! What a design!” They point­ed to the emp­ty looms, each sup­pos­ing that the oth­ers could see the stuff. “What’s this?” thought the Emperor. “I can’t see any­thing. This is ter­ri­ble! Am I a fool? Am I unfit to be the Emperor? What a thing to hap­pen to me of all peo­ple! — Oh! It’s very pret­ty,” he said. “It has my high­est approval.” And he nod­ded appro­ba­tion at the emp­ty loom. Nothing could make him say that he could­n’t see anything.

His whole ret­inue stared and stared. One saw no more than anoth­er, but they all joined the Emperor in exclaim­ing, “Oh! It’s very pret­ty,” and they advised him to wear clothes made of this won­der­ful cloth espe­cial­ly for the great pro­ces­sion he was soon to lead. “Magnificent! Excellent! Unsurpassed!” were bandied from mouth to mouth, and every­one did his best to seem well pleased. The Emperor gave each of the swindlers a cross to wear in his but­ton­hole, and the title of “Sir Weaver.” Before the pro­ces­sion the swindlers sat up all night and burned more than six can­dles, to show how busy they were fin­ish­ing the Emperor’s new clothes. They pre­tend­ed to take the cloth off the loom. They made cuts in the air with huge scis­sors. And at last they said, “Now the Emperor’s new clothes are ready for him.” Then the Emperor him­self came with his noblest noble­men, and the swindlers each raised an arm as if they were hold­ing some­thing. They said, “These are the trousers, here’s the coat, and this is the man­tle,” nam­ing each gar­ment. “All of them are as light as a spi­der web. One would almost think he had noth­ing on, but that’s what makes them so fine.” “Exactly,” all the noble­men agreed, though they could see noth­ing, for there was noth­ing to see.“If Your Imperial Majesty will con­de­scend to take your clothes off,” said the swindlers, “we will help you on with your new ones here in front of the long mirror.”

The Emperor undressed, and the swindlers pre­tend­ed to put his new clothes on him, one gar­ment after anoth­er. They took him around the waist and seemed to be fas­ten­ing some­thing — that was his train-as the Emperor turned round and round before the look­ing glass. “How well Your Majesty’s new clothes look. Aren’t they becom­ing!” He heard on all sides, “That pat­tern, so per­fect! Those col­ors, so suit­able! It is a mag­nif­i­cent out­fit.” Then the min­is­ter of pub­lic pro­ces­sions announced: “Your Majesty’s canopy is wait­ing out­side.” “Well, I’m sup­posed to be ready,” the Emperor said, and turned again for one last look in the mir­ror. “It is a remark­able fit, isn’t it?” He seemed to regard his cos­tume with the great­est inter­est. The noble­men who were to car­ry his train stooped low and reached for the floor as if they were pick­ing up his man­tle. Then they pre­tend­ed to lift and hold it high. They did­n’t dare admit they had noth­ing to hold. So off went the Emperor in pro­ces­sion under his splen­did canopy. Everyone in the streets and the win­dows said, “Oh, how fine are the Emperor’s new clothes! Don’t they fit him to per­fec­tion? And see his long train!” Nobody would con­fess that he could­n’t see any­thing, for that would prove him either unfit for his posi­tion, or a fool. No cos­tume the Emperor had worn before was ever such a com­plete suc­cess. “But he has­n’t got any­thing on,” a lit­tle child said. “Did you ever hear such inno­cent prat­tle?” said its father. And one per­son whis­pered to anoth­er what the child had said, “He has­n’t any­thing on. A child says he has­n’t any­thing on.” “But he has­n’t got any­thing on!” the whole town cried out at last.The Emperor shiv­ered, for he sus­pect­ed they were right. But he thought, “This pro­ces­sion has got to go on.” So he walked more proud­ly than ever, as his noble­men held high the train that was­n’t there at all. http://​ander​sen​.sdu​.dk/​v​a​e​r​k​/​h​e​r​s​h​o​l​t​/​T​h​e​E​m​p​e​r​o​r​s​N​e​w​C​l​o​t​h​e​s​_​e​.​h​tml

The moral of the sto­ry could eas­i­ly be attrib­uted to the Emperor’s haugh­ti­ness only, but we squan­der the greater mes­sage of the hypocrisy of all of the play­ers except the inno­cent lit­tle child who was uncon­strained by pre­ten­tious idio­cy. “He has­n’t any­thing on” !
For years I have been writ­ing much like that lit­tle child uncon­strained by hyp­o­crit­i­cal idio­cy that the crime sit­u­a­tion in Jamaica is get­ting worse in all fair­ness there have been a few oth­er uncon­strained lit­tle chil­dren like myself who have been will­ing to take a chance and risk being labeled unfit for our posi­tions a down­right fool or both.

As the mur­ders become more grue­some the peo­ple dou­ble down in their idio­cy , after all no one wants to be seen as unwor­thy of the posi­tion they hold no one wants to dis­agree with the con-men/­women and hus­tlers that what Jamaica needs is a revised sense of com­mu­ni­ty and a respon­si­bil­i­ty of each and every Jamaican to look out for each oth­er by say­ing to crim­i­nals “no not in my com­mu­ni­ty”.
Instead they kow-tow to the con artistes from Jamaicans for Justice, the Peace Management Unit , Families against State Terrorism, The Bar Association, The Council for Human Rights and the pha­lanx of (weavers ), I mean con-artiste who teach them that all crim­i­nals are crim­i­nals because they can­not find work. That Gangsters stand­ing on the cor­ners are not Gangsters who belong in jail, they are mere­ly cor­ner-crews and the pre­ten­tious peo­ple pre­tend­ed acqui­esced , they went along with the lies , even though they knew that each and every one of those gang­sters stand­ing on the cor­ners were dan­ger­ous killers, rapists and extortionists.
They went ahead with it because the con-artistes con­vinced them that not believ­ing it made them unwor­thy, mere fools.

Balfour Gordon
Balfour Gordon

So while Carolyn Gomes stacked away inter­na­tion­al recog­ni­tion and copped the Order of the Nation for cre­at­ing more hatred for the police who make life liv­able in the King’s domain Her pro­tégée Horace Levy the oth­er weaver is pro­mot­ed to con­tin­ue the decep­tion which is the JFJ.
Why should we not believe the (weavers) whoops I meant con-men-women after all they are smart and we are smart . Why would we let on that we know that the demo­niz­ing of our police force was counter pro­duc­tive, That INDECOM is a farce and a crime enhance­ment unit designed so Terrence Williams and his band of weavers can eat a food too?

No we can’t do that because we would be looked at and labeled a fool or unworthy.
I am eter­nal­ly grate­ful for the hon­esty and the inno­cent nature of the lit­tle child who had no con­cept of pre­tense, who did not need to cur­ry favor with esteemed ego-mani­a­cal narcissists.

204826

As the Emperor con­tin­ue in his naked­ness a Honover cou­ple was tak­en from their home along with a fam­i­ly mem­ber they were shot and dumped in bush­es the mur­der­ers drove their vehi­cle back to their home and ran­sacked it telling the cou­ple’s minor child that his par­ents would be home soon>
Neither 56-year-old Balfour ‘Fire Bird’ Gordon, a bus oper­a­tor , nor his wife Aleth Brown Gordon, 45, will ever be return­ing home to their son.
They are mere sta­tis­tics, just two more lives snuffed out as if they nev­er existed.

In the mean­time the Emperor(Jamaica) con­tin­ue on it’s mer­ry way because after all This pro­ces­sion has got to go on.” So Jamaica walk more proud­ly than ever, as it’s noble­men hold high the train that isn’t there at all.

Restructuring May Not Require As Much Money As Some Believe :it’s About The Will To Get It Done But Where Is The Leadership..

mb
mb

Yesterday I wrote about the risk to which younger members of the Jamaican Police force are being exposed because of the systematic failure of the gazetted ranks. I had some pretty awesome feed back on that blog.
One of the uplifting thing about the responses I received was that they came from former colleagues, people who actually understood in a real way what exactly we are talking about because they lived those very same experiences.
Actors in speaking after receiving their academy awards always pay homage to the people who go out and watch their movies but they are particularly moved that the recognition came from the Academy which is made of their peers, people who knows what it takes for them to bring the characters they play to life.
So too is articulating an argument in support for the rule of law and policing and being supported by others who have experienced what you have experienced , face the guns and even been shot.
You are mindful of the people who empathize with your point of view but the only people who truly can say I totally get what you are saying are your former comrades.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​m​a​k​e​-​d​a​m​n​-​a​r​r​e​s​t​-​a​u​t​h​o​r​i​ty/

In the same breadth I total­ly under­stand how some peo­ple can see noth­ing redemp­tive about police offi­cers or the job they do when all of their expe­ri­ences with offi­cers neg­a­tive , all of what they hear are neg­a­tive .The inces­sant neg­a­tive imagery of offi­cers mak­ing an ugly arrest , or forced to use lethal force is not some­thing which engen­ders mushy feel­ings towards officers.
The inci­dents where an offi­cer steps um and risks his life for a total stranger is nev­er doc­u­ment­ed those nev­er make the news.
On the fate­ful night I was shot on Blackwood Terrace in Kingston 8 I did not go there because I want­ed to hang out . I went there because a man I had nev­er seen report­ed a threat against his life and so we accom­pa­nied him home after tak­ing his report.
He failed to tell me the full sto­ry ‚had he been up front with me I assure you I would not have tak­en a bul­let that night and nei­ther would he.
Instead he divulged what he deemed expe­di­ent, it almost cost us both our lives.
Those sto­ries sel­dom ever gets told , yet they hap­pen every day.
It’s easy to miss the impor­tant work offi­cers do which allows peo­ple to do what they do and get on with their lives. In a coun­try like ours with all of the forces com­pet­ing for the stage of denounce­ment, it is dou­bly dif­fi­cult to find empa­thy for those who run toward the bul­lets when every­one runs for cover.

Following on what I wrote yes­ter­day I want to fol­low up with with a short syn­op­sis of what I believe is a pat­tern of sys­tem­at­ic fail­ure of the rank and file by mem­bers of the gazetted ranks. For the casu­al observ­er the mem­bers of the force who are above the rank of Inspector up to the Commissioner of police are mem­bers of the gazetted ranks .
(They are con­sid­ered civ­il ser­vants ) They are the offi­cers who wear the kha­ki-col­ored uni­forms and the black caps. Inspectors wear the kha­ki-col­ored uni­forms but wear the cap with the red band around it like the reg­u­lar cops. The Inspector Rank is by and large the bridge between the foot sol­diers and the Gazetted civ­il ser­vice officers.

As the police force has suf­fered scathing crit­i­cisms over the decades there is a cer­tain pre­dis­po­si­tion on the part of the Jamaican pop­u­lace to be for­giv­ing or even def­er­en­tial to the gazetted ranks of the force while lev­el­ing the most blis­ter­ing assault against the low­er ranks.
This par­tic­u­lar def­er­ence may very well be a part of the Jamaican cul­ture to be def­er­en­tial to peo­ple with pow­er (the big man culture).
Members of the gazetted ranks are not labeled (police bway) They are ref­er­eed to as (Supe or Boss”. They are nev­er labelled (jankru, duty police bway, licky- licky police ) you catch my drift !
Yet I have nev­er seen s**t flow upstream.

When a team fail it is always the fail­ure of lead­er­ship which must be held to account. Some say well what about not hav­ing the right players?
The quick answer to that ques­tion is who chose the play­ers? It is always a fail­ure of lead­er­ship when things go wrong . The Jamaica Constabulary Force is a case study in that sys­tem­at­ic fail­ure of leadership.

The com­mon excuse on the part of politi­cians of both polit­i­cal stripes is that what­ev­er ails the Jamaican soci­ety is the fault of the police.
The com­mon excuse on the part of the gazetted ranks of the JCF is that what­ev­er ails the soci­ety is the fault of the rank and file, not theirs.
It’s a clas­sic case of the tail wag­ging the dog syn­drome . Lets be clear there are sys­tem­at­ic and struc­tur­al prob­lems plagu­ing the police depart­ment which need finan­cial resources , how­ev­er some of those prob­lems may be addressed with a dis­ci­plined com­mon sense approach which include lead­er­ship , account­abil­i­ty and goal-ori­en­ta­tion, and not nec­es­sar­i­ly money.

Police officers not dressed or equipped to respond to serious crime serves no useful purpose...
Police offi­cers not dressed or equipped to respond to seri­ous crime serves no use­ful purpose…

(1)THE DEPARTMENT CAN START AT THE BEGINNING
The depart­ment sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly dropped the ball for years on antecedent reports. Rather than cre­ate a cadre of offi­cers who have top clear­ance to go out and deal with antecedent (back-ground checks) reports , it relied on the sub-offi­cer in charge of the area in which the poten­tial force appli­cant resided.
The assump­tion made in using that method was that those sub-offi­cers would be in the best posi­tion to know the full and true char­ac­ter of the applicant.
The prob­lem with that assump­tion is that most of those antecedent reports by these low­er to mid­dle man­agers were done from miss Mary’s bar stool.
In the end I’m not say­ing that good qual­i­ty peo­ple weren’t recruit­ed into the force but as the Nation became more cor­rupt the pool of good qual­i­ty can­di­dates dried up.
The effects of those bar-stool antecedent reports have been very evi­dent over the last three decades.

Outdated training techniques which have no bearing on modern policing challenges must be disbanded and replaced with real-time techniques
Outdated train­ing tech­niques which have no bear­ing on mod­ern polic­ing chal­lenges must be dis­band­ed and replaced with real-time techniques

(2)TRAINING.
The train­ing of the Island’s police offi­cers have not kept pace with the sophis­ti­ca­tion with which crime has evolved . Considering that Jamaica is one of the world’s most vio­lent and mur­der­ous nations.
The Police high com­mand does­n’t even seem to under­stand those com­plex­i­ties much less pre­pared should such a com­plex sit­u­a­tion present itself which cer­tain­ly will giv­en time.
The gen­er­al con­sen­sus is that offi­cers are unsure how to effect a sim­ple arrest. Set aside the INDECOM Act which is a dan­ger­ous crime-enhance­ment law, offi­cers are more and more less inclined to even help their col­league to secure a vio­lent sus­pect because they do not want to go through an inves­ti­ga­tion for doing exact­ly what they are sworn to do.
Simple take-down tech­niques , quick­ly secur­ing the sus­pect with swift and decid­ed author­i­ty and remov­ing the sus­pect from the hos­tile envi­ron­ment which is now wher­ev­er any group of Jamaican con­verge to watch a poten­tial arrest.
Officers who fail to assist their col­leagues in effect­ing a law­ful arrest must face severe dis­ci­pline which should include removal from the streets and retraining.

(3) SUPERVISION.
Younger offi­cers must be super­vised at all times a patrol or group of offi­cers oper­at­ing on a raid or spot check must be super­vised by a com­pe­tent sub-offi­cer or gazetted offi­cer who has street creds . The force is top heavy with kha­ki-clad offi­cers what are they occu­pied with in offices why are they not on the streets?
Police work is done on the streets , that is where they ought to be .
Whenever mem­bers of the senior corps of the force are on the streets from the rank of Inspector up I want to see them prop­er­ly armed with batons, guns and oth­er para­pher­na­lia of policing .
What is the pur­pose of the swag­ger cane or oth­er cane, and the stu­pid book in hand and no weapon? What are they there for if they are not there to do police work?

These images do not engender trust in these recruits ability to tackle dangerous situations..
These images do not engen­der trust in these recruits abil­i­ty to tack­le dan­ger­ous situations..

(4) TACTICS..
The police depart­ment must now devel­op a tac­ti­cal field man­u­al which specif­i­cal­ly spells out how each and every sit­u­a­tion is to be dealt with under exist­ing laws.
The JCF now has it’s own lawyers, the field com­man­ders (if the force have any com­pe­tent ones) should be called in to work with the depart­men­t’s lawyers to devel­op strate­gies with­ing exist­ing laws . Those strate­gies should then be incor­po­rat­ed into the train­ing Academy’s cur­ricu­lum and be part of each divi­sion­al and area com­mand train­ing continuüm.
If the depart­ment does not have com­pe­tent tac­ti­cal strate­gists it should seek help form peo­ple who know how. The Tivoli Gardens Inquiry should inform that deci­sion with clar­i­ty and dispatch.
Crime is an evolv­ing con­cept so too must Policing be. The police-high com­mand can­not be about fol­low­ing behind politi­cians and point­ing fin­gers at the rank and file for fail­ures which are the senior cor­p’s. On that basis the senior corp of offi­cers must meet reg­u­lar­ly to map out con­ceiv­able strate­gies on poten­tial even­tu­al­i­ties and devel­op work­able answers to those sce­nar­ios and put effec­tive plans in place to acti­vate and exe­cute said respons­es with max­i­mum alacrity and effectiveness.

Dressing up for show will not do anything about the nation's crime statistics in a positive way. There are more than enough gazetted officers to go into the streets and guide the young officers , ...If they know how?
Dressing up for show will not do any­thing about the nation’s crime sta­tis­tics in a pos­i­tive way.
There are more than enough gazetted offi­cers to go into the streets and guide the young offi­cers , …If they know how?

(5) ACCOUNTABILITY.
If you can’t real­ly mea­sure it you can­not fix it.
The JCF Must now move to a (COMPSTAT) Computer Statistics type account­abil­i­ty and approach to crime.
Most mod­ern police depart­ments have moved to this type of polic­ing which iden­ti­fies spikes in crim­i­nal activities .
This process requires high rank­ing police depart­ment lead­ers to iden­ti­fy spikes in crimes using com­par­a­tive sta­tis­tics and address those spikes through the use of tar­get­ed enforcement.
Anything else is tan­ta­mount to a dog chas­ing it’s tail . The police depart­ment can­not be about putting out fires wher­ev­er they flare-up with­out a spe­cif­ic plan of action.
The JCF has always been a com­pla­cent low-think­ing force which falls back to it’s com­pla­cen­cy as soon as there is a lull.
There must now be an approach which includes the process of con­sol­i­da­tion on every gain.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​t​a​n​g​l​e​d​-​w​e​b​-​w​o​ve/

Recently the Commissioner of police addressed the issue of pro­mo­tion in response to state­ments made by Robert Montague’s Minister of National Security .
The com­mis­sion­er char­ac­ter­ized the issue as a vexed issue after the Minister cor­rect­ly said that if some­one was not pro­mot­ed then the thing to do was to call that per­son in and explain why he/​she passed the req­ui­site exams and was not promoted.
I had a good laugh at this one in par­tic­u­lar , in my day one had to be of good con­duct, pass the exam and be up to stan­dard in apply­ing first aid which was deter­mined by a writ­ten test as well as sit­ting in on actu­al first aid tech­nique sessions.
Despite those pre-req­ui­sites it was com­mon place to see younger peo­ple who just left the acad­e­my some­times who haven’t even sat an exam but sits in an office pro­mot­ed over the peo­ple work­ing their ass­es of day on night to secure the country.

In this charged environment senior officers must be present with younger officers. But must be appropriately armed , not there for show . Seniro cops including the commissioner of police are Constables, it time they recognize that fact.
In this charged envi­ron­ment senior offi­cers must be present with younger offi­cers.
But must be appro­pri­ate­ly armed , not there for show .
Senior cops includ­ing the com­mis­sion­er of police are Constables, it’s time they rec­og­nize that fact.

This par­tic­u­lar prac­tice caused good intel­li­gent street savvy cops to exit the depart­ment while they pro­mote the polit­i­cal trolls, the incom­pe­tent news-car­ri­ers, brown-nosers, and those who slept with their boss­es to posi­tions way above their capabilities.
I con­stant­ly hear from younger offi­cers about being led by gazetted offi­cers who have zero clue about what they are doing.
Some of these lead­ers come from the sit­u­a­tions I laid out and oth­ers come from the merged ISCF.
One young man who recent­ly left the force told me of instances where the com­mand­ing offi­cer had no idea how to com­plete a charg­ing infor­ma­tion to place a sus­pect before the courts.
Those are most­ly the peo­ple exe­cut­ing polic­ing strate­gies on the Island .
Many have argued for the dis­band­ment of the JCF , I make no such argu­ment. Jamaican police offi­cer must always be Jamaicans we can do a bet­ter job with what is already there ‚it require lead­er­ship on the part of the senior corp .
Unfortunately that lead­er­ship is lack­ing because with the excep­tion of maybe a few cas­es most of the peo­ple who occu­py those posi­tions did not receive those advance­ments on mer­it and there­in lie the problem.
Stop blam­ing the young offi­cers the chick­ens have sim­ply come home to roost , it’s always the coach­es fault . Blaming the play­ers is pathet­ic and smacks of the basic inabil­i­ty to under­stand leadership.

Make The Damn Arrest With Authority.….

January 1982 I entered the police train­ing school on the back of a police truck, I was excit­ed about becom­ing a police offi­cer, hav­ing decid­ed against going to Mico Teachers college .
My sojourn at Port Royal was one of excite­ment but also one of dis­ap­point­ment as the group of us around fifty plus was not a full com­ple­ment which would be enough to make up a grad­u­at­ing class.
So it was weeks before we took the oath of office despite the fact that we were effec­tive­ly seen as agents of the state and was sub­ject to the dic­tates of the staff.
Not only was the num­ber of us insuf­fi­cient we lat­er real­ized that we would be the last batch of recruits ever to set foot as police trainees at the Port Royal facility.
Police train­ing was to be removed to the for­mer Jamaica School of Agriculture at Twickenham Park and we were to be the ones doing the heavy lift­ing of remov­ing the school into the new facil­i­ty which would become the Police Academy.
It was iron­ic because as a high school stu­dent I decid­ed I would attend the Jamaica School of Agriculture after I was giv­en a free trip to the school by my Agriculture teacher mis­ter Bascoe.
I nev­er real­ized I would receive train­ing at the same facil­i­ty but for a whole oth­er discipline.
Months lat­er a full com­ple­ment of recruits arrived and we com­menced train­ing. December of 1982 one hun­dred and five of us passed out as pro­ba­tion­ary con­sta­bles. We would hold the dis­tinct hon­or of being the very first batch to com­mence train­ing and pass out at the police academy.

After serv­ing the force for rough­ly 10 years I decid­ed in 1991 it was best if I left as I did not like the direc­tion in which it appeared to be head­ing. At the time my boss at the CIB office at Constant Spring Noël Asphall, a man I loved and had the utmost respect for told me he was sad to see me go but if he was my age he would have done the very same thing.
I real­ized there and then that my deci­sion to exit the force at that time was indeed the cor­rect deci­sion, one I have not regret­ted since.
The present Assistant Commissioner of police in charge of crime Élan Powell served under mis­ter Asphall’s lead­er­ship as well as oth­er senior offi­cers of the depart­ment SSP Colin Pinnock, ACP Devon Watkiss, and others.

Many oth­er for­mer mem­bers of that cadre of offi­cers who made up the Constant Spring CIB office have left as I have, and a cou­ple has not fared as well as they ought to, nev­er­the­less I believe that that group of detec­tives was arguably the best ever assem­bled any­where in Jamaica in the his­to­ry of the JCF .
We pro­duced results. Not ever offi­cer was per­fect, in fact, none of us were, what we learned was to make each piece of the puz­zle work as a cohe­sive unit for the bet­ter­ment of the office, the results were astounding.
There are many unsung heroes whose names I will nev­er for­get , men like Donald McKinnis, Barrington Campbell, Altamont (Parra) Campbell, Jerry Wallace, Tracy, Little wicked Henry, Dadrick Henry, (Ellison deceased) Hanson, Scully, Allan Campbell, Dacres, Marc Foster, Allen Gauntlet ‚Ankle, Artel Morgan, George Henry, Dawes, and others.

We under­stood the val­ue and the con­cept of “Esprit the corp”, as police detec­tives we knew quite well that we depend­ed on each oth­er to be the eyes behind each oth­er. Looking out for the safe­ty of our fel­low offi­cers could only be a bad thing if it emanat­ed from the intel­lec­tu­al ghetto.
We were con­fi­dent that the offi­cer behind us was not a part of any crim­i­nal gang, he or she was not aligned to any crim­i­nal enter­prise which would cause him/​her to put a bul­let in the back of our indi­vid­ual heads.
As I said we weren’t per­fect but we under­stood the weak­ness­es and frail­ties inher­ent in each oth­er. It came as no sur­prise that on the night a cow­ard attacked and shot me in my hip on Blackwood Terrace off Red Hills Road a recent trans­plant the detec­tive cor­po­ral who had recent­ly arrived from Spanish Town to join the office ran away out of fear.
None of the core group of offi­cers would have shown such cow­ardice. Ultimately though shot, I pre­vailed against the cow­ard­ly punk and removed anoth­er weapon from the streets in 1988.

I nev­er received a tele­phone call from the Commissioner of Police Herman Rickets, nei­ther did I receive any com­mu­ni­ca­tion from the police fed­er­a­tion. It did not require much more for me to real­ize that the police agency was not one in which I want­ed to remain.
Despite the sev­er­al com­men­da­tions which would come lat­er my mind was made up that the police force would not be a career for me.

Fast for­ward to the 90’s and the 2000’s between the entrenched Government of the day and the crim­i­nal lob­by­ists the police were incred­i­bly indoc­tri­nat­ed from the acad­e­my into believ­ing that “Esprit de corps” was a bad thing.
Young recruits were indoc­tri­nat­ed into believ­ing that their core func­tion was to respect the rights of crim­i­nals, not place them in cus­tody where they belong.
At the same time there was zero empha­sis in the pub­lic space on edu­cat­ing the pub­lic about the respect it must have for the rule of law. There was no edu­ca­tion that the offi­cers who enforced the law must be respect­ed. Most impor­tant­ly, there were no new laws enact­ed which made it a felony pun­ish­able with seri­ous prison time for assault­ing a police officer.

The reverse was done, as was the case when I served up to the ear­ly 90’s, activist judges (you’ve guessed it from the intel­lec­tu­al ghet­to, would sum­mar­i­ly dis­miss assault and resist­ing arrest charges against even the most hos­tile crim­i­nals. This in and of itself forced offi­cers to be more aggres­sive in pro­tect­ing them­selves because nei­ther the leg­is­la­ture nor the courts would.
The peri­od of the 1990’s to ear­ly 2000 was a peri­od which saw crime esca­late to unprece­dent­ed lev­els cul­mi­nat­ing in over 1600 homi­cides for the sin­gle year of 2005.
This did not hap­pen overnight.
The PNP admin­is­tra­tion which held pow­er for an unprece­dent­ed 1412 years did noth­ing about crime. Percival James Patterson the Prime min­is­ter for most of that peri­od a lawyer by trade, pret­ty much gave crim­i­nals (carte blanch) a blank check, to do what­ev­er they want­ed, the nar­ra­tive which emanat­ed from that peri­od in Jamaican his­to­ry was “run wid it , any­thing a any­thing”.

It was a tac­it sup­port and endorse­ment for peo­ple to go out and do what­ev­er they want­ed to do while the admin­is­tra­tion went ahead wrecked the econ­o­my and pil­laged the nation’s coffers.
It has been com­mon knowl­edge that the major­i­ty of the Jamaican peo­ple pre­fer when the PNP forms the Government because they are allowed to do as they please.
They under­stand that a PNP Government does not care a rat’s ass about putting crim­i­nals in jail, it’s free­dom to do what­ev­er they want.
To this day some of the nations most vio­lent crim­i­nal gangs are affil­i­at­ed with the par­ty. Arresting well-con­nect­ed king­pins in Jamaica whether PNP or JLP can only be under­tak­en by the United States of America.
Not only did Patterson not do a damn thing about the crime rate he nev­er made a red cent avail­able to train a sin­gle detec­tive for almost a whole decade.
The Police hier­ar­chy attest­ed to that fact. That was the peri­od when the very nature of our coun­try changed. The cul­ture changed. The peo­ple changed. It was the time dur­ing which our coun­try expe­ri­enced unprece­dent­ed lev­els of homi­cides and became the num­ber one mur­der cap­i­tal of the world.
A dubi­ous dis­tinc­tion which occurred under the PNP’s stewardship.

Is the PNP sole­ly respon­si­ble for the nation’s woes?
Absolutely not but that par­ty has con­trolled pow­er for most of the time since Independence they have a larg­er share of the blame. It was under their watch that a Pediatric Doctor was able to effec­tive­ly change the way our nations streets and by-ways are policed. The result, thou­sands more dead, maimed and mutilated.
No per­son in their right mind would want a police state in which agents of the state abuse the rights of cit­i­zens, or are not held account­able when they break the laws. For the dura­tion of the ten years I served I made a con­scious effort to be cour­te­ous as much as I could to the peo­ple with whom I inter­act­ed. It was not always pos­si­ble to be cour­te­ous and kind to all peo­ple. Some make it impos­si­ble to be kind and cour­te­ous to them.
Whenever those occa­sions arose those were dealt with with the full force of the laws.
Despite safe­guards against police abuse, the police must have the pow­er to go after crim­i­nals wher­ev­er they are whether, in a shack in Majestic Gardens or sit­ting in Jamaica house, no one is big­ger than the law.

At the time they inti­mat­ed they intend­ed to mod­ern­ize the JCF I was ecsta­t­ic that a mod­ern police force in Jamaica would be a dri­ving eco­nom­ic engine for our coun­try’s development.
I believed that the sin­gle largest imped­i­ment to the Island’s growth was the bur­geon­ing crime sit­u­a­tion, it remains so today despite what appears to be blind­ness by both polit­i­cal par­ties. It’s not that the par­ties are blind to this fact, both have func­tionar­ies who are criminals.
What I failed to take into account is that more peo­ple with degrees did not mean a mod­ern police force or a bet­ter police force.
The very same spe­cial treat­ment for some, nepo­tism, polit­i­cal advance­ments and the oth­er non-mer­it based advance­ment prac­tices would remain.
Out of that came a younger cadre of offi­cers who did not see a future for them­selves in the depart­ment, nei­ther did they have the option to leave as some of us had done earlier.

Graft, cor­rup­tion, and gross-crim­i­nal con­duct result­ed in a bad­ly thought out, bad­ly researched piece of leg­is­la­tion which was intend­ed to cor­ral dirty cops.
The inde­pen­dent com­mis­sion of Investigations(INDECOM)the dar­ling of the crim­i­nal class was born.
At the heart of the Act was the desire to sup­pos­ed­ly curb what was char­ac­ter­ized as extra-judi­cial police killings. To its cred­it, the INDECOM Act result­ed in few­er killings by police but not some­thing which law-abid­ing cit­i­zens can celebrate.
Nevertheless, INDECOM and its sup­port­ers point to the drop in police killings as a sign that their meth­ods are indeed bear­ing fruits.The nar­cis­sis­tic over­ly ambi­tious com­mis­sion­er Terrence Williams use those sta­tis­tics to dri­ve home his point while demand­ing more pow­er to go after mem­bers of the police force.
What they do not both­er to men­tion is that while police killings had dropped, crim­i­nals have gone on a killing spree, hav­ing a free hand to do as they please with­out any fear of the police who are scared to do their jobs.

The more edu­cat­ed police brass are not shy about giv­ing inter­views from behind their nice desks in their ful­ly air-con­di­tioned offices replete with mod­ern com­put­ers. Despite the infu­sion of mod­ern ameni­ties the crime rate con­tin­ues to gal­lop out of control.
Nowadays it is clear the coun­try is in seri­ous trou­ble much more than the peo­ple real­ize. The police whether through lack of effec­tive train­ing or fear, are unable to effect a sim­ple arrest.
Every arrest becomes a major spec­ta­cle with crowds jeer­ing and threat­en­ing the arrest­ing officer/s.Most shock­ing­ly are the cas­es where one or two officer/​s strug­gle with a sus­pect who is vio­lent­ly resist­ing while one or more offi­cers stand by total­ly disinterested.

Am I to believe that the kha­ki-clad offi­cers bound behind their desks do not peruse social-media? Are you telling me they do not see these egre­gious acts of assault being vis­it­ed on the younger men of the depart­ment? Are they blind to these acts of indis­ci­pline when offi­cers fail to sup­port each oth­er in effect­ing arrests?
How can they not see the dan­ger to the younger offi­cers who are in most instances sur­round­ed by vio­lent crowds egging on the sus­pects even as these young offi­cers car­ry out their law­ful duties?
What kind of police force throws it’s own to the wolves and the rav­en­ous dogs which now seem to make up the Jamaican society?
Where is the com­mis­sion­er of police?
Where is the police fed­er­a­tion on this.?

It’s only a mat­ter of time before some­one grabs a cop’s gun and seri­ous­ly wound or kill offi­cers as they do their jobs.
Oh wait, it recent­ly hap­pened in front of the Olympic Gardens Police sta­tion, though slight­ly dis-sim­i­lar, the very sta­tion in which sev­er­al offi­cers lost their lives to maraud­ing ter­ror­ists in the 1980’s.
Every sus­pect wants to engage in a fight with cops, what are the cops going to do about it? They can be heard say­ing yu can’t du mi nut­ten, yu can’t shoot mi”.
They know that the INDECOM Act is a crime enhance­ment law and they are tak­ing full advan­tage of it.
The senior Officers from those at 103 Old Hope Road right on down are quite will­ing to throw them to the wolves for a glass of rum. And the Federation is worse than a neutered mon­grel, much bark no bite.
Nevertheless, the police must take some of the blame, every police offi­cer is trained in effec­tive­ly han­dling a bel­liger­ent suspect.
It’s rather simple …

SEQUENCE

(1) You are under arrest place your hands behind your back!
Suspect refuses.
(2) Physically grab him/​her, to the ground you go,( every offi­cer on scene involved), if enough offi­cers, oth­ers make sure that bystanders main­tain a safe dis­tance for offi­cer safety.
(3) Quickly cuff and place sus­pect in the vehicle.
(4) Any per­son who active­ly got in the way of, inter­fered with or coun­seled the accused to resist must then be sub­ject­ed to 1 – 2 & 3.
Use force com­men­su­rate with resis­tance. The laws are clear you have the right to do your jobs with­out being attacked or hurt.
Do your job cor­rect­ly and if they want it to give them the phone num­ber to INDECOM.
Make the damn arrest with author­i­ty they will know you are not play­ing around.

Murdered: Anti-Government Protestor Seen Being Beaten And Stomped Has Died In Hospital.…

The male pro­test­er who was seen being bru­tal­ly beat­en by Kenyan riot police dur­ing a protest in Nairobi on Monday, has died in hos­pi­tal. The unnamed man was pic­tured flee­ing from a build­ing as a police­man in riot gear first beat him with a wood­en baton, before fol­low­ing him into the street, kick­ing him as he lay on the ground, before appear­ing to stamp on his head. Shocking scenes of vio­lence erupt­ed on Monday as police fired tear gas to break up demon­stra­tions urg­ing elec­toral reforms ahead of the gen­er­al elec­tions next year.  http://​www​.dai​ly​mail​.co​.uk/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​-​3​5​9​4​9​4​4​/​A​n​t​i​-​g​o​v​e​r​n​m​e​n​t​-​p​r​o​t​e​s​t​e​r​-​s​e​e​n​-​k​i​c​k​e​d​-​s​t​a​m​p​e​d​-​K​e​n​y​a​n​-​r​i​o​t​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​p​h​o​t​o​g​r​a​p​h​s​-​s​h​o​c​k​e​d​-​w​o​r​l​d​-​d​i​e​d​-​h​o​s​p​i​t​a​l​.​h​tml 

The man is seen running out of a building as he is chased by baton-wielding police officers during a protest staged by supporters of the opposition Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (CORD) against Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) in downtown Nairobi, Kenya Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3594944/Anti-government-protester-seen-kicked-stamped-Kenyan-riot-police-photographs-shocked-world-died-hospital.html#ixzz48wiIS1QZ Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
The man is seen run­ning out of a build­ing as he is chased by baton-wield­ing police offi­cers dur­ing a protest staged by sup­port­ers of the oppo­si­tion Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (CORD) against Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) in down­town Nairobi, Kenya.

343E25AE00000578-0-image-m-47_1463495017158

The Lie Surrounding The Death Penalty.……

mb
mb

One of the things peo­ple who believe in the rule of law has allowed the crim­i­nal cod­dling bleed­ing-heart talk­ing heads to get away with is the con­tin­ued lie that “the death penal­ty is not the answer”.
The peo­ple who acqui­esce to crim­i­nal con­duct have done a ter­rif­ic job of mis­in­form­ing the pub­lic on why we should do noth­ing about the scourge of crime because crime is def­i­nite­ly a prod­uct of pover­ty, inequal­i­ty and want. This bunch of cocka­mamie has been allowed to stand because those of us who have fought in the trench­es against mur­der­ers rapists and thieves know quite well that there is pre­cious lit­tle truth to those assertions.
So before we pro­ceed fur­ther lets ask the ques­tion ” The death penal­ty is not the answer to what ?

Jamaicans always want­i­ng to show the world just how advanced they are has con­sis­tent­ly been on the fore­front of these con­ver­sa­tions regard­ing the death penal­ty . Unfortunately Jamaica has one of the high­est per-capi­ta mur­der rates in the entire world. In the year 2005 Jamaica peaked as the coun­try with the high­est mur­der rate on plan­et earth. Since then the homi­cide num­bers has sub­sided some but have remained ter­ri­fy­ing­ly high when com­pared to the rest of the world, includ­ing coun­tries active­ly engaged in civ­il wars./
So the debate rages and the prog­nos­ti­ca­tors con­tin­ue to make the false argu­ment that “the death penal­ty is not the answer” .
Hence my ques­tion to that mis­lead­ing pre­sump­tion, “not the answer to what”?
Recently one Jamaica prog­nos­ti­ca­tor wrote an exhaus­tive Article in the Jamaica Daily Gleaner titled “The death penal­ty is not the answer!
In the Article he cit­ed research data from the United States a nation which active­ly and vig­or­ous­ly track and pun­ish crim­i­nals to the full extent of the law.
A mas­sive nation of 308 mil­lion peo­ple with the death penal­ty still being enforced today in the major­i­ty of the fifty (50) states.

He argued that A study performed in the United States of America in 2008 found that 88 per cent of the nation’s leading criminologists did not believe that the death penalty is an effective deterrent. Subsequently, a report released in 2012 by the National Research Council of the National Academies, based on a review of more than three decades of research, concluded that studies claiming a deterrent effect on murder rates from the death penalty are fundamentally flawed.
The report read: “The committee concludes that research to date on the effect of capital punishment on homicide is not informative about whether capital punishment decreases, increases, or has no effect on homicide rates. Therefore, the committee recommends that these studies not be used to inform deliberations requiring judgments about the effect of the death penalty on homicide.”
Indeed, in that country, states that have death-penalty laws do not have lower crime or murder rates than states without such laws, and states that have abolished capital punishment show no significant changes in either crime or murder rates.
Apart from the absence of convincing evidence demonstrating deterrence, capital punishment presents several other issues. The death penalty violates the right to life. When a person takes the life of another, one may claim that they have forfeited their right to live, a view held by many.
Unfortunately, the death penalty is also discriminatory, and is often used against the most vulnerable in society, including the poor, the illiterate and people with mental disabilities.
http://​jamaica​-glean​er​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​c​o​m​m​e​n​t​a​r​y​/​2​0​1​6​0​5​1​6​/​m​i​c​h​a​e​l​-​a​b​r​a​h​a​m​s​-​d​e​a​t​h​-​p​e​n​a​l​t​y​-​n​o​t​-​a​n​s​wer

In the United States any­one may com­mis­sion a report to say any­thing he/​she wants. I may com­mis­sion a report which will bol­ster my claim that the sky is green instead of blue. One sim­ply needs moti­va­tion and money.
So when a report comes out mak­ing a cer­tain claim the very first ques­tion which must be asked is, who com­mis­sioned that report?
Most reports are tai­lored to sup­port the point of view of those who com­mis­sioned said report.
To some­one liv­ing out­side the United States it may appear that such research data are irrefutable gospel, to oth­ers they are junk science .
The data to which the writer refers and to which the lib­er­al blue states with­in the United States sub­scribe is indeed a ter­rif­ic met­ric that the death penal­ty does work.
Those blue states in which the death penal­ty is not prac­ticed are the most vio­lent states with the high­est mur­der rates and indeed the states in which the most vio­lent crimes are committed.

It’s impor­tant to note that even in the states where the death penal­ty is not prac­ticed there are tough non-lethal laws such as the Rico statutes, as well as oth­ers like the Rockefeller three strikes laws in New York State which effec­tive­ly removes crim­i­nals from the streets for good where they may not harm inno­cent peo­ple anymore.
It’s is naïveté’and or mali­cious to use sta­tis­tic gleaned from a coun­try like the United States to make an argu­ment for Jamaica in which law enforce­ment is large­ly non-exis­tent and where the laws actu­al­ly are geared toward the pro­tec­tion of crim­i­nals at the expense of the innocent.

Many of the homi­cides in Jamaica are being com­mit­ted by offend­ers who have mul­ti­ple killings under their belt. In fact killing has become so fash­ion­able it is a part of the pop culture.Young men are revered for “mak­ing dup­py” a col­lo­qui­al term for some­one who has tak­en human life.
Many have killed over a dozen peo­ple and have paid no price for their actions.
If these men are caught, tried and exe­cut­ed how can any­one make the argu­ment that their demise has no impact on crime when they have no pos­si­bil­i­ty of return­ing to kill again?

The argu­ments about the way the death penal­ty as it is being applied in the United States are argu­ments which goes to fair­ness, the equi­table and just appli­ca­tion of the law and not the death penal­ty itself.
Those con­ver­sa­tions are not argu­ments against the death penal­ty, they ought to be about deal­ing with racism and inequal­i­ty wher­ev­er they may exist,.
How does one know what the mur­der fig­ures would be in Texas a state in which the death penal­ty is car­ried out with utter dis­patch? Could be much high­er , or not!
Conversely how does one know what the mur­der fig­ures would be in New York a lib­er­al state in which the death penal­ty is not used?Could be low­er or not!
The answer is that no one knows.
So when we argue that the death penal­ty does not work , lets estab­lish that it does work against those who would kill over and over as is the case in Jamaica where there are so many mass mur­der­ers walk­ing the streets with no fear of ever being held accountable.

It’s about time some­one push back against that lib­er­al lie .
The death penal­ty is not a panacea to stomp­ing out crime, noth­ing is .The real­i­ty is that it’s one more tool in the tool-box which should nev­er be discarded.
As a famous General once said “when you go to war take all your weapons , use them and go home” (Colin Powell, for­mer chair­man of the joint chiefs and for­mer sec­re­tary of state of the United States of America).
I am tired of the grand­stand­ing and the pos­tur­ing on crime by arm­chair gen­er­als and key-board prog­nos­ti­ca­tors whom have nev­er faced the busi­ness end of a gun.

The Jamaica Human Rights Gravy Train.……

mb
mb
Remarkably ‚as the killings continue in Jamaica the very same old hustlers move around like deck chairs on the sinking Titanic to “eat a food”.
Our country has always been a nation of hustlers God bless us . ‘I guess the safest thing to do with the criminals in Jamaica is to join them if you can’t beat them.
Frankly if I had my way of really fixing this Jamaican crime situation my approach would land me in the Hague.

How many groups are there now that have sprung up over the years sup­pos­ed­ly ded­i­cat­ed to the cause of human rights? Seriously this is big busi­ness almost as big as the funer­al par­lor busi­ness, extor­tion and the legal crim­i­nal defense industry.
I seri­ous­ly can­not name them ‚Amnesty International is there, Jamaicans for jus­tice, fam­i­lies against state ter­ror­ism, the inter American coun­cil on human rights, the peace man­age­ment unit and on and on .….
I seri­ous­ly haven’t begun to scratch the sur­face, it’s a major busi­ness crime defense is, fun­ni­ly they bitch and com­plain when their sor­ry crim­i­nal lov­ing behinds get turned around when they try to vis­it oth­er islands.

Horace Levy
Horace Levy

If these cheap hus­tlers spent a frac­tion of the ener­gy they expend in defend­ing crim­i­nals into edu­cat­ing them to obey the laws and help­ing law enforce­ment what a real par­adise the Island would be.
Carolyn Gomes had her fling at it, in the end she walked away with incred­i­ble fame and a National hon­or to boot.
In 2008, Gomes received the pres­ti­gious United Nations Prize in the Field of Human Rights…
Not want­i­ng to miss an oppor­tu­ni­ty to hon­or those who active­ly enhances the cause of crim­i­nals on the Island the Government bestowed on her the Order of Jamaica.
Carolyn Gomes would lat­er resign in dis­grace after the crim­i­nal sup­port­ing Agency JFJ she head­ed inap­pro­pri­ate­ly dis­trib­uted homo­sex­u­al and oth­er sex­u­al­ly explic­it mate­ri­als to a num­ber of pri­vate chil­dren’s homes.

Carolyn Gomes
Carolyn Gomes

So much for those awards , they were nev­er worth crap anyway.
As for the Order of Jamaica those are hand­ed out to polit­i­cal hacks, friends and par­ty loyalists.

It’s true you can’t make this stuff up, most of these black run nations all oper­ate much the same way, under­neath the thin lay­er of veneer, (like that which exist in Jamaica) they are no bet­ter than the despots in sub-Saharan Africa.

Before her Flo O’Connor made a name for her­self all at help­ing out the lit­tle folks and ah yes, keep­ing a watch­ful eye on the evil Babylon”.
It’s a fool who does the same thing while expect­ing a dif­fer­ent result. If demo­niz­ing police and cozy­ing-up to crim­i­nals has­n’t brought an end to the blood-shed since the 70’s why would they still believe that approach will work today.

It’s remark­able how they all start off demo­niz­ing the police, nev­er speak­ing out against the vile crea­tures who cal­lous­ly take life with unre­strained barbarism.
Horace Levy weaseled his way to the feed­ing trough pre­tend­ing to be a peace-mak­er as head of the so-called Peace-man­age­ment unit.
Such irony , what would they do if the idiots who kill each oth­er over pol­i­tics or turf or what­ev­er rea­sons they kill each oth­er for , sim­ply stop ?
What would these par­a­sit­i­cal vul­tures do ?

Earl Witter
Earl Witter

Am I say­ing that Human Rights advo­ca­cy is a nui­sance or not a noble endeav­or? I believe most peo­ple who know me will read­i­ly say of course not !
What I believe how­ev­er is this.
There are no greater human rights than the right to life , lib­er­ty and the abil­i­ty to be secure in one’s per­son. I also believe one of the great­est imped­i­ment to those aspi­ra­tions of any peo­ple is the con­stant threat of vio­lent death by maraud­ing killers who have absolute­ly no regard for the sanc­ti­ty of life much less any­thing else.
On that basis soci­ety must cor­ral those sav­ages using all avail­able means.

Getting caught up in the fin­ery of advanced soci­eties which years pre­vi­ous did the hard work of lay­ing the ground-work for their sta­ble soci­eties is stu­pid­i­ty and” fal­la fashin”, (good old Jamaican vernacular).
The val­ue sys­tem which rules Jamaica has brought immense hard­ships to the Island, its time to dis­card the ide­ol­o­gy which comes out of that place up in Mona , the ide­ol­o­gy which gets con­sum­mat­ed in the lit­tle Kiwanis and Rotary clubs where they get to act out their fan­tasies as they com­mu­ni­cate in alien accents.
Most Jamaicans do not live that way, and do not even have access to these lit­tle enclaves of the pen­ny mil­lion­aire elit­ist class.
Yet they are the ones dying in num­bers while the self appoint­ed elites act as lord supe­ri­or over the peasantry .
It’s time for this to come to an end.…..

The Tangled Web They Wove…

mb
mb
My friend brought to my attention this morning the comments of Dr Carl Williams Commissioner of Police as he addressed the 73rd Annual Joint Central Conferences of the Jamaica Police Federation at the Hilton Rose Hall Resort and Spa in St James on Wednesday.
Dr.-Carl-Williams Commissioner of Police
Dr.-Carl-Williams
Commissioner of Police

Said Dr Williams : “People who have sat their exams and who have passed should be con­sid­ered before we add more peo­ple to the pool”.
Isn’t he the Commissioner of Police?
Anyway !

The Commissioner of Police was respond­ing to the can­did asser­tions put forth by the Minister of National Security Robert Montague. Montague said “There must be a sys­tem where after you have passed your exams and you don’t get pro­mot­ed after a peri­od, the per­son must be called in and told what are their faults, or short­com­ings,”.
Hmm ‚oh well that’s a nov­el idea[sic].
It was then that the Commissioner revealed that of all per­sons who have request­ed to see him, about 95 per cent of the issues have to do with promotion.
No s**t , why is that such a “vexed issue”, in your opin­ion Commissioner ‚to bor­row your term?

Anyway the good­ly Commissioner of Police went on to say ‚“As the min­is­ter said, it is unfair for peo­ple who have done their exams to come back and do it again. And that is why no exams have tak­en place this year, because we have to ensure that no oth­er bright stars come and get 98 per cent and eclipse all the good hard-work­ing stal­warts who have been wait­ing for a long time,”.
Really Commissioner Williams, when did you receive this epiphany?
This has been an age old prob­lem, a “vexed issue”, long before you joined the depart­ment, your obser­va­tion would have been legit­i­mate had you made them from the time you joined up to the rank of deputy com­mis­sion­er but once you occu­py the big office you have lost that right to criticize.
What have you done about it , the buck stops with you?

There has nev­er been a bet­ter or pur­er sys­tem of pro­mot­ing peo­ple to lead­er­ship posi­tions than a mer­it-based-sys­tem.
Advancing peo­ple using any oth­er met­ric is bound to end up with dis­as­trous consequences.
Nepotism, who you know, polit­i­cal hench­men, brown-nos­ing, news car­ry­ing, sleep­ing with the boss and reduc­ing them­selves to yard-boys have been only a few of the qual­i­ties nec­es­sary for advance­ments in the JCF.
The hard work­ing stal­warts and those with abil­i­ties to crit­i­cal think were nev­er endear­ing qual­i­ties with­in the JCF.

The JCF has an extra­or­di­nar­i­ly high attri­tion rate, there are sev­er­al fac­tors which are con­tribut­ing that race for the door. Top of the list are poor remu­ner­a­tions, lack of advance­ment which could poten­tial­ly com­pen­sate for poor remu­ner­a­tions, lack of sup­port leg­isla­tive­ly and polit­i­cal among others.
As a past mem­ber who actu­al­ly exit­ed the depart­ment after only ten years I under­stood quite well those chal­lenges and still today have a serv­ing mem­ber of my fam­i­ly who has been stuck at the rank of sergeant for over 15 years. Recently I asked him why do you stay in such an ungrate­ful agency , risk­ing your life for such an ingrate population ?
He shrugged and smiled.

Over the years I argued that the Jamaican peo­ple deserved a big­ger bang than that which they get for their buck. I believed then that the nation deserved to get more for the mon­ey it puts into train­ing offi­cers only to see them snapped up by oth­er nations and their police depart­ments where they shine with exem­plary brilliance.
Today I do not make the same argu­ments , I believe the nation deserves what it gets. There is no respect for the rule of law. There is too much active sup­port for crim­i­nals. There are too many peo­ple who are will­ing to side with crim­i­nals, includ­ing the judges whose jobs it is to put crim­i­nals in prison.
On that basis I active­ly sup­port mem­bers of the JCF leav­ing as I did, so they may secure a future and live out their dreams as so many for­mer offi­cers of the depart­ment has done.
I am yet to deter­mine whether there has been an audit done to deter­mine the cost of train­ing an offi­cer only to see so many of them head for the door.
If some of the struc­tur­al breach­es are plugged maybe ‚just maybe the attri­tion rate may be reduced.

The former Special Constabulary Force annual Commandant's Parade
The for­mer Special Constabulary Force annu­al Commandant’s Parade

MERGER

Some of the struc­tur­al issues plagu­ing the depart­ment are of the depart­men­t’s own cre­ation. I broach this sub­ject with the great­est of sen­si­tiv­i­ty and caution.
I know many of our com­rades from the for­mer Island spe­cial con­stab­u­lary are some of the finest pro­fes­sion­als, hard work­ing and dedicated.
With that said it would be naïve to assume that mere­ly bring­ing the ISCF into the JCF pure­ly for numer­i­cal rea­sons would not have neg­a­tive con­se­quences, par­tic­u­lar­ly if the JCF was unpre­pared to retrain them.

Let me has­ten to say that a large num­ber of can­di­dates who served and are still serv­ing in the JCF who were nev­er mem­bers of the ISCF were them­selves sub-stan­dard candidates.
I make this com­ment with the great­est of respect for the ser­vice of the mem­bers of the for­mer ISCF.
Bringing over to the JCF the mem­bers of the ISCF with­out retrain­ing, and fur­ther­more allow­ing them to main­tain the rank they had was anoth­er move which Stevie Wonder could have seen would have had dis­as­trous con­se­quences ‚the least of which is the pro­mo­tion log-jam which that ill-informed aspect of the merg­er exacerbated.

Regardless of one’s emo­tion­al lean­ing on this, the prac­ti­cal ques­tion remain­ing is whether it was a pru­dent move to bring offi­cers of the Auxiliary and make them super­vi­sors in the reg­u­lar force?
Simply put it amounts to the tail wag­ging the dog. Every mem­ber of the ISCF who wished to join the JCF should have been offered the oppor­tu­ni­ty to go to the train­ing acad­e­my and qual­i­fy to be a reg­u­lar police offi­cer, fail­ing which they should have been giv­en a sev­er­ance pay and allowed to go their way.
It would not have been the first time that a set of work­ers were told their ser­vices as it exist were no longer needed.
Good busi­ness deci­sions should nev­er hinge on loy­al­ty to or emo­tion­al attachments.
At the time of the merg­er I remained silent because I did not want to be accused of advo­cat­ing for peo­ple los­ing their jobs because of any num­ber of dredged up reasons.
Regardless, I opined to close friends that doing a merg­er pure­ly for the sake of numer­i­cal strength con­flict­ed with the forces stat­ed goal of modernization.
The chick­ens are sim­ply com­ing home to roost.

Jamaicans Fear Retribution In Turks And Caicos

THE Jamaican rep­u­ta­tion for being tough and fear­less when going after their goals, no mat­ter where in the

world they are, seems to apply every­where else but the Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI). A large num­ber of Jamaicans inter­viewed here speak force­ful­ly about the dis­crim­i­na­tion they are fac­ing from TCI author­i­ties. But with­out excep­tion, they asked not to be iden­ti­fied because of fear of ret­ri­bu­tion. “If you pub­lish my name this morn­ing, my work per­mit will be revoked by this evening,” said a Jamaican who left St Catherine three years ago to work in the thriv­ing real estate busi­ness in this British-run arch­i­pel­ago. “I’m obvi­ous­ly exag­ger­at­ing the speed, but you get the point. They might just decide not to renew my per­mit when it expires in less than a year’s time,” he said, insist­ing: “Remember not to call my name.”

Said anoth­er Jamaican who has been liv­ing for sev­en years in the TCI: “I try to keep on good terms with my TCI co-work­ers because they have a ten­den­cy of report­ing you to their Government, if you have a high­er posi­tion than them, that you are occu­py­ing a posi­tion that they are qual­i­fied for.

The thing that both­ers me is that those TCI peo­ple mak­ing the com­plaints don’t qual­i­fy for the posi­tions they are quar­relling about. They just don’t like to see a for­eign­er, espe­cial­ly a Jamaican, over them. They want to cut you down.

Others I have met have said the same thing. You bet­ter bet their author­i­ties will act on their com­plaints. I wish our author­i­ties in Jamaica were like that — act­ing on our complaints.”

Asked if she had made any com­plaints to the Jamaican author­i­ties, she said no, adding that she was unsure whether that would help and might only “expose me to reper­cus­sions here…The Jamaican con­sul here is well estab­lished in busi­ness and it might not be fair to ask him to jeop­ar­dise his wel­fare in the TCI.”

Several Jamaicans said their com­pa­tri­ots usu­al­ly stand out where they work because of a high­er work eth­ic, not­ing that some TCI cit­i­zens, or Belongers as they are called, don’t prove them­selves to be good workers.

Very often you see that as soon as they have some mon­ey they take off, many to the United States, and only return to work when the mon­ey is fin­ished. Employers pre­fer us Jamaicans because we are reli­able. We don’t give one-hour notice when we can’t make it to work and cause pres­sure to be on our co-work­ers,” said a Jamaican who lives in Grand Turk, the cap­i­tal. “We wouldn’t last long any­way.” Read more here: http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​J​a​m​a​i​c​a​n​s​-​f​e​a​r​-​r​e​t​r​i​b​u​t​i​o​n​-​i​n​-​T​u​r​k​s​-​a​n​d​-​C​a​i​c​o​s​_​6​0​777

We Are Dealing With A Generation Of Vipers

Sergeant Raymond Wilson, the tough-talk­ing chair­man of the Jamaica Police Federation, is again rais­ing con­cerns about the nation’s resolve to bat­tle law­less­ness, espe­cial­ly gun vio­lence, which is mak­ing the job of the police increas­ing­ly difficult.

While address­ing yes­ter­day’s open­ing day of the Federation’s 73rd annu­al joint cen­tral con­fer­ence, which is being held at the Hilton Rose Hall Resort and Spa in Montego Bay, St James, Wilson raised ques­tions about sev­er­al mat­ters relat­ed to crime, includ­ing the nation’s luke­warm response to law­less­ness, the vast num­ber of ille­gal guns on the street and the hid­den hands financ­ing crime and violence.

Gone are the days when you could rest assured that a gun­man would not harm a child or a woman, but we want to ask the ques­tion, when will we wake up and realise that we are deal­ing with a gen­er­a­tion of vipers?” ques­tioned Wilson.

When will we wake up and see that this gen­er­a­tion of vipers may require a sim­i­lar harsh response to what they are doing to our law-abid­ing cit­i­zens and our hard-work­ing police officers?”

He added: “When will we wake up and face the real­i­ty that guns nuh mek a Jamaica, bul­lets are not man­u­fac­tured here, yet as soon as we seize two guns off the street, there is a dou­ble dose for us to go and look for again.”

Pointing out that most gun­men are aver­age Jamaicans who can hard­ly afford to buy a meal, Wilson said the time has come for the nation to sit down and start the dis­cus­sion as to how to get to the root cause of crime and those financ­ing it. http://​jamaica​glean​er​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​l​e​a​d​-​s​t​o​r​i​e​s​/​2​0​1​6​0​5​1​2​/​w​i​l​s​o​n​-​w​e​-​a​r​e​-​d​e​a​l​i​n​g​-​g​e​n​e​r​a​t​i​o​n​-​v​i​p​ers

Portia’s Talkative Politburo/

mb
mb
It’s logical to conclude that if the People’s National party attached the same diligence, sense of focus and accountability to Governance it applies to agitating and criticizing the Government the party would be the party which formed the Government.

Former Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller has also found her tongue which should not come as a shock­er to any­one who know the long-time mem­ber of par­lia­ment and for­mer Prime Minister.
Mr’s Miller was nev­er one to shy away from lash­ing her detrac­tors with her tongue. In fact in one unhinged tirade on a cam­paign stage in Half-Way-Tree Saint Andrew she once warned oppo­nents not to draw her tongue quote: ” cause this gurl nu trou­ble unuh”.
But in Mrs Miller’s defense she always cau­tioned those who would crit­i­cize her not to draw her tongue before she unleash­es her ver­bal tirade on them.
Furthermore while she was Prime Minister she did say she would­n’t “talk har­self outa affice”.

Mr’s Miller was speak­ing to the nov­el idea the man who beat her had . Bruce Golding decid­ed that he want­ed to be a leader who actu­al­ly speak to the peo­ple through his week­ly Jamaica House radio call in show. Yea what the hell was he think­ing? look how he turned out.
Ha, so the good­ly Mrs Miller decid­ed nev­er to talk her­self out of office.
But for those pesky Reporters and cit­i­zens she would still be Prime Minister.

The 31-mem­ber coun­cil of spokesper­sons and a nine-deputy com­ple­ment, have been pret­ty busy offer­ing opin­ions and crit­i­ciz­ing every­thing the 3‑month-old Holness Government does.
The coun­try does need a focused and vig­i­lant oppo­si­tion but it kin­da seem hyp­o­crit­i­cal of the coun­cil of spokesper­sons that all of a sud­den every­one is inter­est­ed in advo­cat­ing for the peo­ple and hav­ing bet­ter ideas about just how things ought to be done.
I mean if the ideas the Council have were so good why is the par­ty on the out­side look­ing in ?
It’s rea­son­able to say that the ideas of the PNP has not worked so well for the coun­try over the last 32 years of PNP rule .
Maybe the par­ty should step aside and go fig­ure out a new path for­ward for itself and the coun­try. I recent­ly heard one autop­sy report which sug­gest­ed that the par­ty moved away from it’s social­ist values.
Practically speak­ing I believe the par­ty has not moved far enough from it’s social­ist roots.

The brand of social­ism being espoused by the grass­roots of the par­ty has already evis­cer­at­ed the mid­dle class and destroyed hope for those at the bot­tom of the ladder.
The redis­tri­b­u­tion­ist ide­ol­o­gy which dec­i­mat­ed the econ­o­my and the pro­duc­tive sec­tor since the 1970’s still is being felt today amidst the hoopla about where the Island’s econ­o­my is posited.
If the Post Mortem is that the par­ty strayed from it’s core prin­ci­ples and that was the rea­son for it’s defeat, the island must brace itself for more of the same from the par­ty which seem inca­pable of under­stand­ing that failed social­ists poli­cies of the 70’s are not going to be sav­ing grace for the 21st century.

Case Overload Choking Coroner’s Court

THE island’s spe­cial coro­ner William Campbell says his office needs more resources in order to speed up the dis­pos­al rate of cas­es as the cur­rent two to three per month is not enough to address the back­log in the system.

According to the spe­cial coro­ner, at any giv­en time his office is han­dling 300 to 400 cas­es. He said although police fatal shoot­ings have fall­en “dra­mat­i­cal­ly” mov­ing from approx­i­mate­ly 21 per month to eight per month, there remains a high rate of shoot­ings and the resul­tant back­log. The Office of the Special Coroner was set up in 2009 to specif­i­cal­ly deal with inquests aris­ing from inci­dents where per­sons have died vio­lent­ly or sud­den­ly while inter­act­ing with the police, mil­i­tary and oth­er agents of the State. The office works close­ly with the Independent Commission of Investigations (INDECOM).

Campbell said in 2007 there were 272 per year (21 per month); 158 for the first nine months of 2008; 258 or about 21 per month for 2013; 115 or nine per month for 2014; while 101 or eight police shoot­ings per month were record­ed for 2015 and referred to the coro­ner. “But even with that fall, we still have sub­stan­tial back­logs. The dis­pos­al rate by way of pub­lic inquest is not more than two to three per month [so] you’re talk­ing about 30 a year. But the rate of cas­es [sent to the coro­ner] are going up not by 30 per year but by 100 per year, so we have to have more resources to have a faster rate of dis­pos­al,” he said. Campbell was speak­ing at a stake­hold­er forum last Friday host­ed by the Registrar General’s Department to out­line the steps that fam­i­lies should take from the time some­one dies until their death is registered.

He not­ed that some cas­es can be dis­posed of under Section 14 of the Coroner’s Act, which says that: if “… no fur­ther light would be thrown upon the case by hold­ing an inquest it shall be law­ful for the appro­pri­ate coro­ner in his dis­cre­tion to abstain from hold­ing an inquest”. But he argued that most cas­es that come to the spe­cial coro­ner can­not be dis­posed of in that man­ner, and require “fur­ther light to be thrown” on them. “Most of the cas­es that I have seen require a pub­lic inquest,” he stat­ed. Explaining why the Office of the Special Coroner was estab­lished, Campbell point­ed out that from 1983 to 2010, there were more than 5,000 police fatal shoot­ings, and a pile-up of cas­es. “It was felt (then) that the num­ber of deaths was trou­bling enough to require spe­cial atten­tion,” he remarked, empha­sis­ing that he was nei­ther ascrib­ing blame nor jus­ti­fi­ca­tion, but sim­ply out­lin­ing the facts.

Campbell said the vast major­i­ty of cas­es that end up in the Special Coroner’s Court are police shoot­ings. “They’re the ones who inter­act most fre­quent­ly with the pub­lic, so that’s not abnor­mal,” he said. INDECOM boss Terrence Williams told a 2013.
Read more here: http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​C​a​s​e​-​o​v​e​r​l​o​a​d​-​c​h​o​k​i​n​g​-​C​o​r​o​n​e​r​-​s​-​C​o​u​r​t​_​6​0​418

Death Is A Business In Jamaica Maybe The People Do Not Want An End To Crime.…..

mb
mb
A person feeling ill generally seek medical attention. A medical professional (doctor)then diagnose what ails the person, then counsels the individual on treatment methods.
It’s up to the party feeling ill to decide whether to trust the recommendations of the Doctor or get a second or even a third opinion. Generally there may be variations in the treatment methods but if the initial examination was done properly the diagnosis seldom change. Even though different doctors may have differing opinions on the prognosis.
Simply put, if you have cancer , you have cancer, you may decide whether you want Kemo- therapy, try a holistic natural approach or sit and wait to die.

The same is true for a coun­try expe­ri­enc­ing the rav­ages of crime. It may chose to pur­sue the same path it has always cho­sen for itself, which has not changed a sin­gle thing, engage in rad­i­cal change , or sim­ply sit and wait to be destroyed by it.
The prob­lems which per­sist­ed twen­ty five years ago when I was a young Jamaican cop are the prob­lems of today mul­ti­plied ten-fold.
The very same peo­ple who told peo­ple who called into their radio talk shows to com­plain about police to stone the police sta­tions are the very same peo­ple offer­ing up excus­es and jus­ti­fi­ca­tions for the Island’s inor­di­nate crime num­bers over two decades later.

According to some sta­tis­ti­cal esti­mates 30.1% of the country’s peo­ple were aged between 0 and 14. In addi­tion, 62.3% were between 15 and 64 years of age while 7.6% of the pop­u­la­tion of Jamaica were aged 65 and over in 2011.
This gen­er­al­ly means that the major­i­ty of the pop­u­la­tion are younger peo­ple who came of age in the post-inde­pen­dence era. This means a large seg­ment of the pop­u­la­tion has no con­cept of a Jamaica of rel­a­tive peace and tranquility.

It comes as lit­tle sur­prise then that the less­er edu­cat­ed peo­ple would not ful­ly respect the soci­etal norms and dic­tates of say the 1960’s when the coun­try was a more cere­bral and pleas­ant place.
Those who could be con­sid­ered edu­cat­ed are prob­a­bly more indoc­tri­nat­ed than edu­cat­ed. The sources of their edu­ca­tion hav­ing been insti­tu­tions of indoc­tri­na­tion in how not to respect social order.

All things con­sid­ered the polit­i­cal philoso­phies which have dom­i­nat­ed the coun­try’s polit­i­cal land­scape for the greater part of the time since it’s sup­posed inde­pen­dence from Great Britain has been pop­ulist lib­er­al dog­ma . Ironically even as the coun­try’s strat­a­gems prove inef­fec­tive in cur­tail­ing crime the brain-dead ide­o­log­i­cal pup­pet-mas­ters dou­ble-down refus­ing to change.
They cling to failed ide­olo­gies which has brought noth­ing but ruina­tion and chaos as they grasp des­per­ate­ly at ways to con­vince oth­ers that life is not so bad.
That oth­er places have crime, that peo­ple from oth­er nations have no right say­ing Jamaica is not a pleas­ant par­adise but an extreme­ly vio­lent place.

The Jamaica Umbrella Group of Churches some of the few able to see through the haze of gan­ga-smoke , alco­hol and deca­dence said in a statement.
Quote :  In recent weeks, Jamaica has wit­nessed the grue­some mur­ders of busi­ness­man Trevor Meikle, Corporal Judith Williams and United States mis­sion­ar­ies Harold Nichols and Randy Hentzel. “The JUGC extends deep­est sym­pa­thy and con­do­lences to their fam­i­lies and friends, mem­bers of the Jamaica Constabulary Force, the peo­ple of Albion Mountain, St Mary, and the peo­ple of the United States. The groups of church­es pray that God’s pres­ence and com­fort will under-gird these loved ones in this dif­fi­cult time.” The JUGC, in a release yes­ter­day, said that it has tak­en note of how life has become very cheap to some peo­ple and that con­tract killing speaks to the depth of deprav­i­ty and moral bank­rupt­cy that are being expe­ri­enced in the minds of people”.(Source jamaicaobserver)

Former Minister of National Security Peter Bunting also called for divine inter­ven­tion as a means to fix­ing the Island’s crime prob­lem dur­ing his sojourn as Minister. The present Minister of National Security Robert Montague too invoked divine inter­ven­tion as a means to fix­ing the problem.
I won’t tell any­one what to believe but if pray­ing is all you do it’s not enough.
Even as I per­son­al­ly wel­come the Church’s input into the dis­course I owe it to them to explain that pray­ing to God to fix our prob­lems is exact­ly not the way to go about seek­ing solu­tions for our problems.
In fact pray­ing and see­ing no result is destruc­tive as it relates to bring­ing new con­verts to the faith.
God estab­lished this world on prin­ci­ples, cause-effect, action-con­se­quence, neg­a­tive-pos­i­tive. As my Pastor suc­cinct­ly puts it han­dle the things you can han­dle and the things you can’t han­dle ask God to han­dle those.
When we can’t han­dle them God will. He sim­ply won’t han­dle what we clear­ly can but refus­es to.

Moses lead­ing the chil­dren of Israel out of Egypt was caught between the red sea and Pharaoh’s army . Moses decid­ed to kneel and pray, a sil­ly strat­e­gy with an advanc­ing army com­ing up in a hur­ry. God com­mand­ed Moses to get up and cast his rod across the red sea, accord­ing to the Bible the ocean opened up and the peo­ple passed through .
Whether one believe those accounts or not , metaphor­i­cal­ly the mes­sage remain the same. We have to do for ourselves.
Literally every mir­a­cle (not mag­ic) that Jesus wrought was inclu­sive of par­tic­i­pa­tion from the ben­e­fi­cia­ry of the miracle.
♦Go fill up the Jars with water.( before they were turned into wine).
♦Go show your­self to the Priest.
♦Go wash thy­self in the Jordan River , (this one required much faith as the Jordan riv­er was extreme­ly dirty at the time).
♦Pick up thy bed and walk.
♦Stretch forth thy hand.
♦Go thy way and sin no more.
♦Bring me the loaves and the fish.
Jamaica has the means to elim­i­nate most of the heinous crime plagu­ing the Island, the peo­ple choose to avoid doing any­thing about and so they must and will con­tin­ue to pay the price.

LOADED: This man was loaded with liquor at the funeral service for the four family members killed in a motor vehicle accident, in Clarendon, in June 2006. - File (obits.com photo)
LOADED: This man was loaded with liquor at the funer­al ser­vice for the four fam­i­ly mem­bers killed in a motor vehi­cle acci­dent, in Clarendon, in June 2006. — File
(obits​.com photo)

Denial, faux-patri­o­tism, ratio­nal­iz­ing, nuanc­ing, hair-split­ting, lying, false-par­al­lel­ing, justifying,equivocating, none of these actions will change the situation .
The fact is that there are too many peo­ple involved in eat­ing a food from crime.
As such speak­ing out about it will always bring howls of con­dem­na­tion from cer­tain quar­ters .We don’t all want the same thing. Jamaicans have an ingrained love affair with crim­i­nal behav­ior. The cul­ture has become increas­ing­ly tol­er­ant and acqui­es­cent to the crim­i­nal way of life as the pop­u­la­tion gets younger.

Politicians, police, cler­gy, judges Lawyers and every­one in between are heav­i­ly invest­ed in crime , it has become an eco­nom­ic reality.
People depend on mur­der to send their chil­dren to school. An entire sub-cul­ture has emerged out of the blood-drenched soil . Funerals are not somber occa­sions as they once were , they are oppor­tu­ni­ties to show­case the lat­est hair­styles and fashion.
Bands make mon­ey at funer­al celebration[sic]. Funeral par­lors have sprung up in num­bers , almost par­al­lel­ing church­es and rum-bars.
Carpenters, Masons, Sound-sys­tem, and the mul­ti­tude of ven­dors who show up at funer­al sites like vul­tures feed­ing on a carcass.
Such are the realities .…..

The web­site obitz​.com in an arti­cle said quote :In Jamaica we’ve noticed that funer­als are increas­ing­ly becom­ing cen­tres for enter­tain­ment and rev­el­ry. Dance-hall lyrics are recit­ed in pro­ces­sions, and at some ceme­ter­ies the lat­est dance­hall music is played from mas­sive speak­ers. In some respects this is not dis­sim­i­lar to the jazz funer­als in New Orleans, where the band accom­pa­nies the mourn­ers to the ceme­tery. But most of the lyrics in the Jamaican pop­u­lar cul­ture nei­ther have rel­e­vance to the Bible nor pre­tend to man­i­fest a the­o­log­i­cal dimen­sion. http://​www​.obit​s​ja​maica​.com/​t​r​a​d​i​t​i​o​n​s​/​j​a​m​a​i​c​a​n​_​f​u​n​e​r​a​l​_​t​r​a​d​i​t​i​ons

According to world population review Jamaica is a small island, but it makes up for its size with a high population density in comparison with much of the rest of the world. The total surface area here is just 10,991 square kilometres (4,244 square miles) and this makes Jamaica the 166th largest nation on earth, when it comes to geographical area. For every square mile of Jamaican territory, however, there is an average of 252 people here, which converts to 656 per square mile and makes it the 49th most densely populated country in the world. 39% of Jamaica’s residents live in parish capitals, according to the 2011 census, and the population of the Kingston Metropolitan Area (KMA) and all parish capitals was 1.04 million, which is a 5% increase since 2001. KMA alone has 88% of the parishes of St Andrew and Kingston.

The Élite in Jamaica can­not be unaware of these facts so as many includ­ing this writer wring our hands at the con­tin­ued shed­ding of blood there may very well be a plan by the pow­er­ful elites in Jamaica to con­trol pop­u­la­tion den­si­ty by doing noth­ing about it as a way at solv­ing pop­u­la­tion density.

Anita Alvarez Wants To Be Taken Off Laquan McDonald Murder Case

CHICAGO (CBS) — In a sur­prise rever­sal Thursday, Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez asked to recuse her­self and her office from the mur­der case against the Chicago police offi­cer who fatal­ly shot 17-year-old Laquan McDonald in October 2014.

Alvarez also asked for a spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor in the mur­der case against Chicago Police Officer Jason Van Dyke. She had pre­vi­ous­ly defend­ed her han­dling of the McDonald case, and crit­i­cized calls for a spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor. She defend­ed the amount of time it took to file charges, say­ing she was work­ing along­side the FBI and fed­er­al pros­e­cu­tors to thor­ough­ly inves­ti­gate the shoot­ing and build a “metic­u­lous case” against Van Dyke.

In a state­ment after Thursday’s hear­ing in the case, Alvarez said she decid­ed remove her­self and her office from the case to avoid any unnec­es­sary delays in the case, and to ensure one spe­cif­ic pros­e­cu­tor han­dles the case all the way to tri­al. Alvarez lost her bid for re-elec­tion in the Democratic pri­ma­ry in March. Her even­tu­al suc­ces­sor won’t be elect­ed until November, and won’t be sworn in until December.

My pri­ma­ry goal in bring­ing a charge of First Degree Murder in this case is and always has been about seek­ing jus­tice for Laquan McDonald. Today I believe that I am ful­fill­ing this oblig­a­tion by request­ing that the court turn this case over to a spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor,” she said. “I believe that the results of the recent elec­tion and the impend­ing tran­si­tion of this office make this the best and most respon­si­ble decision.”

Cook County Judge Vincent Gaughan said he would not rule on requests for a spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor until June 2.

Two peti­tions have been filed seek­ing to replace Alvarez in the case, cit­ing her close ties to the Fraternal Order of Police, the union that rep­re­sents Chicago police offi­cers. One peti­tion was filed by a group of civ­il rights attor­neys and activists, the oth­er was filed by Rev. Jesse Jackson.

Critics have said Alvarez is behold­en to the police union, and has failed to ade­quate­ly pros­e­cute cas­es of police mis­con­duct and corruption.

Alvarez stressed she does not believe there is any con­flict of inter­est that would pre­vent her office from han­dling the case.

Locke Bowman, one of the attor­neys seek­ing a spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor, said they were sur­prised and “very grat­i­fied” to learn Alvarez is seek­ing to with­draw from the case.

Defense attor­ney Dan Herbert said he’s pre­pared to take the case to tri­al, no mat­ter who the pros­e­cu­tors might be.

While it doesn’t change any of our strat­e­gy going for­ward, it cer­tain­ly will impact the case in cer­tain regards. We’re going to bring in a new pros­e­cut­ing crew, who pre­sum­ably does not have any knowl­edge about the case, who’s going to have to get up to speed. There’s a lot of doc­u­ments in this case. There’s a lot of witnesses.”

Meantime, Gaughan announced a spe­cial secu­ri­ty plan would be in place for future hear­ings in the case against Van Dyke, after his attor­neys asked to have him excused from rou­tine sta­tus hear­ings due to death threats, racial slurs, and harass­ment as he’s entered and exit­ed the Leighton Criminal Courthouse in the past.

Van Dyke is free on $1.5 mil­lion bail as he awaits tri­al for first-degree mur­der in McDonald’s death. He has been sus­pend­ed with­out pay.

Gaughan did not pro­vide any details on the secu­ri­ty plan, and held off rul­ing on Van Dyke’s request to be excused from rou­tine sta­tus hear­ings, but thanked Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart for work­ing out extra secu­ri­ty mea­sures when Van Dyke will be in court.

The judge said he worked out the secu­ri­ty plan with pros­e­cu­tors, defense attor­neys, and the sheriff’s office last week.

It’s just uncon­scionable to think that we could com­pel an indi­vid­ual to appear at a court date with­out pro­vid­ing for that person’s secu­ri­ty,” Gaughan said. “Mob rule will not hap­pen in this courtroom.”

Van Dyke is charged with first-degree mur­der in McDonald’s death, and his attor­neys had asked Gaughan to allow the offi­cer to skip sta­tus hear­ings in the case, cit­ing death threats, racial slurs, and large crowds of pro­test­ers when he has attend­ed past hearings.

The officer’s attor­neys have said Van Dyke’s life has been threat­ened, his father has been “phys­i­cal­ly bat­tered,” and a fam­i­ly vehi­cle has been “smashed” at pre­vi­ous court appear­ances, and the offi­cer should be excused from attend­ing sta­tus hear­ings in the case to pro­tect his safety.

There are rea­son­able grounds to believe that Defendant’s per­son­al safe­ty has been jeop­ar­dized by his atten­dance at pre­vi­ous court appear­ances and there is rea­son­able appre­hen­sion that the Defendant will con­tin­ue to encounter the same lev­el of expo­sure to per­son­al harm in the future,” Van Dyke’s attor­neys wrote in their motion seek­ing to allow Van Dyke to skip some court dates.

Cook County pros­e­cu­tors opposed Van Dyke’s request to be excused from attend­ing sta­tus hear­ings, not­ing cour­t­house protests have died down. They said allow­ing Van Dyke to miss court when oth­er defen­dants charged with vio­lent crimes must show up for every hear­ing would cre­ate a “slip­pery slope,” and cre­ate the appear­ance of spe­cial treatment.

Prosecutors have argued Van Dyke has not demon­strat­ed any cred­i­ble threat to his safe­ty, not­ing he has not alleged that he has been per­son­al­ly attacked, or that any­one yelling threats has been armed.

While ver­bal threats and taunts may cre­ate an uncom­fort­able pas­sage to and from the cour­t­house, mere words do not jeop­ar­dize defendant’s per­son­al safe­ty, and there­fore do not neces­si­tate defendant’s absence from court appear­ances,” pros­e­cu­tors wrote.

Herbert said Cook County pros­e­cu­tors first sug­gest­ed pos­si­ble pro­tec­tion by Cook County Sheriff’s deputies in their oppo­si­tion to Van Dyke’s request to be excused from attend­ing sta­tus hear­ings, which typ­i­cal­ly deal with rou­tine pro­ce­dur­al matters.

For most of his court appear­ances, Van Dyke has need­ed to run a gant­let of angry pro­test­ers when he has appeared at the Leighton Criminal Courthouse. However, at his two most recent court appear­ances, no pro­test­ers showed up as Van Dye attend­ed court.

The release of police dash­cam video show­ing Van Dyke shoot­ing 17-year-old Laquan McDonald 16 times in October 2014 prompt­ed a series of angry protests across the city, and led to a U.S. Justice Department inves­ti­ga­tion of the Chicago Police Department’s poli­cies and prac­tices regard­ing the use of force.
http://​chica​go​.cbslo​cal​.com/​2​0​1​6​/​0​5​/​0​5​/​o​f​f​i​c​e​r​-​c​h​a​r​g​e​d​-​w​i​t​h​-​m​u​r​d​e​r​-​o​f​-​l​a​q​u​a​n​-​m​c​d​o​n​a​l​d​-​w​a​n​t​s​-​e​x​t​r​a​-​s​e​c​u​r​i​t​y​-​a​t​-​c​o​u​rt/

Cop Held For Policewoman’s Murder

THE Police High Command said yes­ter­day that a police­man and a civil­ian have been tak­en into cus­tody in rela­tion to the death of police cor­po­ral Judith Williams, who was gunned down while wait­ing at a bus stop in east­ern Kingston, last week Thursday.

In addi­tion, it said sev­er­al peo­ple, includ­ing police per­son­nel, have been inter­viewed and state­ments col­lect­ed. The police, how­ev­er, did not say if the two in cus­tody would be charged, say­ing that the inves­ti­ga­tion was at a sen­si­tive stage.

Senior inves­ti­ga­tors from the Kingston Eastern Police Division who are lead­ing the probe say they are work­ing around the clock to con­duct a thor­ough inves­ti­ga­tion,” the high com­mand said. “The police are com­mit­ted to pro­vid­ing time­ly and accu­rate updates on this inves­ti­ga­tion as it pro­gress­es,” it said.

Prime Minister Andrew Holness and National Security Minister Robert Montague on Monday visited Bryden Street in east Kingston to meet the relatives of slain Woman Corporal Judith Williams. (Jamaica Star picture)
Prime Minister Andrew Holness and National Security Minister Robert Montague on Monday vis­it­ed Bryden Street in east Kingston to meet the rel­a­tives of slain Woman Corporal Judith Williams.
(Jamaica Star photo)

In the mean­time, the police have slapped down dis­cus­sions on the case mak­ing the rounds on social media. “Several aspects of the infor­ma­tion mak­ing the rounds on social media are inac­cu­rate and are, at best, spec­u­la­tive, and no cre­dence should be giv­en to them,” said the high command.
An appeal was, mean­while, made for peo­ple with infor­ma­tion that can assist in the inves­ti­ga­tion to con­tact the Kingston Eastern Police at 928‑4200, Crime Stop at 311, the police 119 emer­gency num­ber or the near­est police sta­tion. Information may also be giv­en anony­mous­ly using the Ministry of National Security’s Stay Alert App that can be down­loaded via the Google Playstore.

There have been spec­u­la­tions that the death of Corporal Williams, who was assigned to the Office of the Police Commissioner, was a con­tract killing linked to a court case.

In the after­math of the killing, the Jamaica Police Federation, which rep­re­sents rank and file mem­bers of the con­stab­u­lary, renewed its call for spe­cial trans­porta­tion be pro­vid­ed for police­men and women to and from work. http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​C​o​p​-​h​e​l​d​-​f​o​r​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​w​o​m​a​n​-​s​-​m​u​r​d​e​r​_​6​0​167

Part #2 Of Mike’s Audio Blog On Hanging.…

Why Is The (jutc) Losing Money When It Can’t Meet The Demand For Seats/

mb
mb

The Jamaica Urban Transport Company (JUTC) in a release yes­ter­day from it’s out­go­ing man­ag­ing direc­tor Colin Campbell said it had no prob­lem with the man­age­ment audit ordered by the min­is­ter of Transport Mike Henry.
Said Campbell : “Nothing is wrong with it. It’s a new team com­ing in and they would want to see the sys­tem that was employed by us, to see if we are doing things in the best way. A man­age­ment audit is dif­fer­ent from a finan­cial audit — it’s just to exam­ine the processes”.

Hum um , why not a finan­cial audit?
If the com­pa­ny is bleed­ing mon­ey would­n’t a finan­cial audit be the way to go to deter­mine the extent of the bleeding?
Why is there bleeding?
Then do a man­age­ment audit to see whether the plans in place are effec­tive (which they could­n’t be in light of the oper­a­tional failures).
Then rem­e­dy that man­age­ment failure?

jutc-buses
jutc-bus­es

It was just this week that the Minister Mike Henry said that the com­pa­ny was in urgent need of “gov­ern­ment sup­port”, and that the audit is aimed at iden­ti­fy­ing crit­i­cal oper­a­tional issues that are impact­ing efficiency.
No,no,no Mike Henry you go look at the mon­ey first not the people.
When you iden­ti­fy how much the com­pa­ny is los­ing ‚then you look at the why.
After that trust me the “who” will fall into place.
Said Henry in his release, “the JUTC needs 305 new bus­es over the next two years to meet the demand for seats, but only 30 can be pro­vid­ed in this year’s budget”.

Jamaican Railway
Jamaican Railway .….

This makes me laugh !!!!
This is what hap­pens when you have politi­cians run­ning com­pa­nies. The head of the board is the for­mer Jamaica Labor Party Member of Parliament Gregory Mair. from North East Saint Catherine my neck of the woods.
The out­go­ing Managing Director is Colin Campbell a People’s National Party functionary.
You get the pic­ture now ?
This is why Tax-pay­ers mon­ey is always going down the tube, par­ty polit­i­cal hacks run­ning com­pa­nies and head­ing boards.

Former Jamaica Omnibus Service, Buses
Former Jamaica Omnibus Service, Buses

Could this be the rea­son why the new Minister has­n’t ordered a finan­cial audit which would be far more sensible ?
Could it be because they real­ly don’t want to get to the truth as it is a cook­ie-jar for both par­ties much the same way Air Jamaica was which led to it’s demise?
If there is a demand for more seats which the com­pa­ny is inca­pable of fill­ing why is the com­pa­ny los­ing money?
Secondly why are tax­pay­ers expect­ed to keep throw­ing good mon­ey at bad man­age­ment .….….……or worse?
If the com­pa­ny can­not meet the demand for seats how in heav­en’s name is it loos­ing money?
The colos­sal mis­man­age­ment of the long defunct Jamaica OmniBus Service (JOS) should be a crash course in how to destroy a com­pa­ny . Yet it seem noth­ing has been learned from the fail­ures of the (JOS) nor the Jamaica Railway Corporation.

Former Air-Jamaica airbus...
Former Air-Jamaica airbus…

As a small busi­ness own­er I have to oper­ate my busi­ness and make it prof­itable. I must meet oper­a­tional expens­es and turn a prof­it in order to stay in business .
If I am unable to do that I must fold the busi­ness as there is no Government bail-out > Why should tax­pay­ers con­tin­ue to fund these black holes which are pri­vate kit­ties for a lot of con­nect­ed people?

Business is finding a need and filling that need, period..

Disregard every con­vo­lut­ed crap you ever heard and focus on that fact, it is demand which fuels sup­ply, oth­er­wise it’s the cre­ation of goods and ser­vices which peo­ple are inclined to buy into.
If there is demand for bus ser­vice over and above what the com­pa­ny can pro­vide yet the com­pa­ny is los­ing mon­ey the prob­lem is incom­pe­tent leadership .
Or worse.
Part of man­age­men­t’s respon­si­bil­i­ty is to find fund­ing source/​s which allows the com­pa­ny to build out it’s ser­vice, of course with strate­gic growth and prof­it fore­cast which takes into account poten­tial mar­ket hiccups.

Taking every sin­gle expen­di­ture imag­in­able in oper­at­ing an air­line the bot­tom line result is thin prof­it mar­gins even in the best of times. Airlines through the years, have earned a net prof­it between one and two per­cent accord­ing to (Airlineeconomics).
All things con­sid­ered strict con­sid­er­a­tion must be giv­en to how many per­sons are hired per air­plane in the fleet, this is crit­i­cal. It is the dif­fer­ence between sol­ven­cy and insolvency.
Can it be said that Air Jamaica was oper­at­ed this way? I think not !
If the very same prin­ci­ple is applied to the for­mer Railway cor­po­ra­tion, the for­mer Jamaica Omnibus Service and now the Jamaica Urban Transport Corporation, can the author­i­ties see why these enti­ties have been huge caul­drons of waste, loss and corruption?

Numbers do not lie, enti­ties of this nature can­not be places where polit­i­cal patron­age , nepo­tism and chi­canery rule yet prof­it is expected.
The deci­sion must be to oper­ate as real busi­ness or let the peo­ple know that the JUTC will be just anoth­er waste­ful mon­ey pit like all of the oth­er attempts at pub­lic trans­porta­tion which pre­ced­ed it.

How Did We Arrive At This Place/

The Jamaican Government has announced that through much con­sul­ta­tions with it’s Trinidadian coun­ter­parts about the vex­ing issue of the alleged treat­ment of Jamaicans vis­it­ing Trinidad a solu­tion of sorts have been arrived at.
Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade Senator Kamina Johnson Smith, told the House Wednesday that there will now be a des­ig­nat­ed area retro­fit­ted to pro­vide dig­ni­fied and pri­vate accom­mo­da­tion for per­sons required to stay overnight, who are going to be returned to Jamaica.

I real­ly see how this could be a cause célèbre consid­er­a­tion the depths to which our coun­try has sunken. Economically , moral­ly, but equal­ly as impor­tant in how we are per­ceived as a people.
If I’m not mis­tak­en I believe the quar­rel start­ed between the twin Island Republic and Jamaica over not just the treat­ment of Jamaicans when they vis­it that nation but the fact that they are not allowed free access accord­ing to the revised treaty-of-Chaguaramas which guar­an­tees cit­i­zens free access through­out mem­ber states.
Notwithstanding the CARICOM treaty ‚mem­ber states have a right to say no to cit­i­zens from mem­ber states who have not sat­is­fied cer­tain cri­te­ria , eg being able to sup­port them­selves while vis­it­ing, the like­ly-hood they will engage in crim­i­nal con­duct etc.

Myrie (adapted)
Myrie (adapt­ed)

Increasingly Jamaicans have come under scruti­ny while seek­ing to take advan­tage of the free­dom to trav­el through­out the CARICOM region. Jamaican nation­als have filed griev­ances after alleged mal-treat­ment in Barbados as well as Trinidad and Tobago.
So far Barbados has been forced to pay com­pen­sato­ry dam­ages to one Jamaican in rela­tion to those treatments.
Shanique Myrie was award­ed dam­ages in the sum of US$38,000 by the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) after she filed a law­suit claim­ing she was sub­ject­ed to a dehu­man­iz­ing cav­i­ty search by a female immi­gra­tion offi­cer at Grantley Adams International Airport, locked in a filthy room overnight and deport­ed to Jamaica in March 2011.
Myrie alleged that while she was being assault­ed ‚“I asked her who she was and she said ‘I am your worst night­mare’. She then said ‘All you (exple­tive) Jamaicans come here to do is either steal peo­ple’s man or bring drugs here,” Myrie recount­ed. Myrie told the Observer that the immi­gra­tion offi­cer removed her iden­ti­fi­ca­tion tag before com­mit­ting the act.

She said I hate these (exple­tive) Jamaicans,” Myrie said.

Trinidad has claimed that they have a right to turn back Jamaicans whom they believe are going to over­stay their wel­come or whom they believe will engage in ille­gal activ­i­ties . It is incred­i­bly dif­fi­cult to argue against Trinidad’s asser­tions when there are approx­i­mate­ly over 16,000 Jamaicans in that coun­try who have over­stayed their allot­ted time.

The for­mer min­is­ter of nation­al secu­ri­ty of Trinidad and Tobago assert­ed that there was noth­ing in the CARICOM treaty which super­sedes his coun­try’s Constitution. On that basis he argued his coun­try has the right to enforce their laws.
It is dif­fi­cult to argue with that as well…Whether jus­ti­fi­able or not the per­cep­tion among CARICOM states is that Jamaicans are peo­ple who have a vio­lent dis­po­si­tion and a pre­dis­po­si­tion to engage in crim­i­nal conduct.
I won­der how they arrived at those conclusions?

So as the new Administration pats itself on the back and the for­mer shuf­fles up to be in the pho­to-shoot, I remind Jamaicans that noth­ing has changed as it regards how they will be treat­ed in the twin Island Republic. What they have basi­cal­ly agreed to is to pro­vide toi­lets and a place to pos­si­bly sit while they wait to ship you out on the next avail­able flight…
How the hell did we arrive at this place?

Conflating Crime In Jamaica With Crime In Any American State Is Grossly Ignorant…

mb
mb
Leading up to it’s forced separation from Great Britain and a brief period up to the early 1970’s Jamaica experienced it’s greatest period of peace and prosperity. Sure there were problems with racial and class inequality, poverty, and the raft of problems which plague most countries . As a matter of fact those problems still persist, no not just in Jamaica but in America, Canada, Great Britain, France, Germany , Japan, and most of the developed societies across the Globe, so Jamaica has no monopoly on social or societal ills.
To some degree those problems are transcendent in all societies and may have to be addressed by every generation into perpetuity.

What the Island did not have was ram­pant and whole­sale mur­der of Jamaicans by Jamaicans. Jamaica has always been a soci­ety as long as I remem­ber, wary of author­i­ty. A coun­try with a sup­posed free spir­it and a more than ordi­nary dis­re­gard for estab­lished laws and norms.
Flouting laws is not frowned on in Jamaica it is a prac­tice which brings endear­ment and fame.
The Island’s peo­ple have always had a deep affec­tion for fig­ures who defy author­i­ty , infa­mous fig­ures like Three-fin­ger-Jack, Rigen, Natty Morgan, Coppa, Sandokan, Duddus, Zeeks, Dog-Paw, and the long litany of oth­er immoral mur­der­ing scump-bags which have formed part of the Island’s pop culture.

There is a sick per­vert­ed desire to align with, or live vic­ar­i­ous­ly through the most despi­ca­ble of these life forms even when their ulti­mate objec­tives are anti­thet­i­cal to the good of the coun­try, which is always.
What pass­es for Media on the Island glee­ful­ly engages in the glo­ri­fi­ca­tion and pro­mo­tion of those who do the most harm to the Island’s cul­ture and well-being.
Much of what pass­es for music these days is noth­ing more than mur­der lyrics laced with praise and ado­ra­tion for depraved murderers.
The media active­ly cheer-leads the clown pro­ces­sion as the Island slides deep­er and deep­er into rot , much like the fic­tion­al Hans Christian Andersen’s pied Piper led the chil­dren away nev­er to be seen again.

It is in that envi­ron­ment that the report­ed 1000 to over 1600 homi­cides occur each year while pompous Jamaicans nuance and come up with laugh­able met­rics to demon­strate to the world that the Island is not a dan­ger­ous place to live.
People who are dis­mayed are char­ac­ter­ized as “hav­ing a shaky grasp” of the Island’s crime sit­u­a­tion. Others obsti­nate­ly and unin­tel­li­gent­ly talk about crime being in America as well, as if crime in America makes crime in Jamaica defensible.

These self appoint­ed elit­ists have ran out of ratio­nale in the defense of crime, one per­son remarked on social media that crime is quote ‘out of con­trol” yet in the next line he pro­ceed­ed to tell me that crime is only cen­tered in small pock­ets of the Island.
That insane­ly sil­ly and inane state­ment defines the mind­set which has been Jamaican’s all along. Crime is only a Kingston thing, then it was Spanish Town thing, Then it was Montego Bay , Then it’s May Pen, .……
They make these absurd and ridicu­lous state­ments while holed up in homes which look more like pris­ons than places where peo­ple actu­al­ly live. I can’t tell you how many homes I have been in over the years where the own­ers have grill for­ti­fi­ca­tions sep­a­rat­ing room from room.
“Yea mon Jamaica nice no raas”.

Oh while we are on that note, I have heard many Jamaicans com­plain that when they return home they are treat­ed like for­eign­ers . I have also seen a cer­tain degree of that creep­ing into the ver­bal dis­course as well .
There is a mis­guid­ed notion that one has to live on the Island to be a patriot.
I guess that teach­ing is the lat­est bit of gob­bledy­gook to come out of the University Of the West Indies.
Where is Wilmott Mutty Perkins when he is needed?
Where on plan­et Earth is geog­ra­phy the defin­ing char­ac­ter­is­tic in Patriotism? What an absurd con­cept? Who died and made these nit-wits God?

I recall when my grand­dad would invite peo­ple who had noth­ing to eat to come to our lands, they would leave with their don­key laden with bread­fruits , avo­ca­do pears, Jack-fruits, oranges and oth­er good­ies . Those pro­duce would end up in the Linstead mar­ket where they were sold . My grand­fa­ther did not care about the protes­ta­tions from friends who told him to sell the pro­duce to the peo­ple because they were sell­ing it and mak­ing mon­ey. My grand-dad did not care, he believed peo­ple should not go hungry.

My grand­fa­ther’s men­tal­i­ty was that which char­ac­ter­ized our small towns and vil­lages once upon a time. Our small Country was a Conservative Christian Nation which believed that it took a vil­lage to raise a child. That is the way I was raised, hav­ing to be respect­ful to every­one , because every­one had the right to dis­ci­pline the chil­dren , includ­ing Mister Wilson’s wiry lit­tle grand-son.

Don’t recite to me sta­tis­tics about killings in American cities or school shoot­ings as if they jus­ti­fy the insane shed­ding of blood in Jamaica.
The United States is approx­i­mate­ly 3,794,101 sq mi. This is equiv­a­lent to 9,826,675 km². The pop­u­la­tion at present is around 308 mil­lion people.
Jamaica is approx­i­mate­ly 4,411 square miles with a pop­u­la­tion of 2.7 mil­lion people.
When we con­sid­er crime com­par­i­son and seek to con­flate the two coun­tries and their crime sit­u­a­tions we must first under­stand the geog­ra­phy , then we must con­sid­er the effi­cien­cy of law-enforce­ment response when they are needed.
The state of California alone , one of the largest states and one with high­er crime sta­tis­tics as of 2008 had 509 law enforce­ment agen­cies employ­ing 79,431 sworn police offi­cers, about 217 for each 100,000 residents.

I had one real­ly smart per­son tell me this morn­ing that crime in Clarendon for exam­ple is con­fined to the areas around May Pen. He went on to tell me that “if yu jus passin thru di man dem nah gu jus shoot yu su”. Oh thank Jesus I am eter­nal­ly grate­ful for that.
Any way I remind­ed him that over twen­ty five years ago I was active­ly engaged in being air­lift­ed to places in Clarendon like Hayes, Savannah , Kraal, Lionel Town and envi­rons to put down upsurges in crime. He respond­ed that those areas are around May Pen. You real­ly can­not make these things up.
My response to him was that I under­stood his point, as long as you bur­row your­self in a hole away from civ­i­liza­tion you are okay to a cer­tain degree.…

I write fre­quent­ly about the affin­i­ty of Jamaicans to explain crime away or to make state­ments which could eas­i­ly be con­strued as sup­port­ive of crime. The fact is that not always are they sup­port­ive of crime but they believe no one should crit­i­cize any­thing Jamaican .
That includes crime.
They stead­fast­ly and unwit­ting­ly hold to the sil­ly notion that crit­i­ciz­ing Jamaica’s crime sit­u­a­tion is crit­i­ciz­ing Island Jamaica or brand Jamaica. There is no brand Jamaica if these crime num­bers are not addressed as a mat­ter of priority.
The parish of Clarendon Jamaica’s third largest parish is a mere 1,196 square km, not square miles mind you.…
In real terms a healthy man can stand at one cor­ner and piss over the entire parish[sic] .…There are no safe havens in an Island that infin­i­tes­i­mal much less a parish for that matter.
If no one was going to “kill yu su” why on earth are lit­er­al­ly all the house grilled like prisons?
Why are tourists being large­ly con­fined to all inclu­sive des­ti­na­tions, lit­er­al­ly cut­ting out aver­age Jamaicans from the ben­e­fits of the tourists vis­it­ing our Island?
Lets dis­pense with the blovi­at­ing bull‑s**t and face the stark real­i­ty that the Island has a seri­ous and bur­geon­ing crime problem.
Denying it only helps those engaged in or ben­e­fit­ing from crime, peo­ple are not fools. Putting beau­ti­ful wall-paper over a ter­mite infest­ed wood­work is not going to fix the ter­mite infes­ta­tion. Soon the whole damn struc­ture will be com­ing down .
The only per­sons fooled by this con­sis­tent deni­a­bil­i­ty and faux pro-Jamaican aggran­dize­ment are those so engaged .

Suggesting that it’s okay to live in such a small space with the atten­dant homi­cide num­bers is insane­ly juve­nile. Seeking to con­flate those crime stats with crime stats from any American state is just high­lights the lack of knowl­edge of the vast­ness of the American space and the effec­tive­ness of her law enforce­ment responses.