National Collegiate Championship Football :two Quarterbacks, Two African-Americans.…

Alabama QB Jalen Hurts
Clemson’s , Deshaun Watson.

Its easy in the excite­ment of National col­le­giate foot­ball finals to miss a very impor­tant fact.
Both quar­ter­backs in this high­ly antic­i­pat­ed foot­ball game are African-American. Neither ESPN the sport­ing world’s medi­um , or any of the oth­er net­works will both­er to high­light this lit­tle fact.

What you will hear much about is the genius of Alabama’s coach Nick Saban (much deserved ) and Clemson“s Dabo Swinney.
We are not in the busi­ness of pre­dict­ing win­ners and losers in col­lege football .
Neither do we begrudge these two fan­tas­tic head-coaches.
But since they won’t both­er to expand or expound on this lit­tle fact, even the black ana­lysts, sheesh , par­tic­u­lar­ly the black analysts >
So we just though we would bring this lit­tle nugget up.

We just thought that you will hear the names of these two out­stand­ing young ath­letes a lot. But no no one will both­er to tell you that in the big wide world of American col­le­giate foot­ball these two stand­outs just hap­pen to be black.
Enjoy the game .……

Boyne: Tired Of Writing About Crime, Join The Line Brother.….

Ian Boyne’s Article of Sunday January 9th 2017.

I am tired of writing about crime. I keep saying the same things over and over. The majority of Jamaicans have no need to be convinced of the commonsensical things which I say, but our élite dominates traditional media discourse on the issue, and our politicians are in terror of them the way ordinary citizens are in terror of gunmen.
The politicians don’t have the guts and courage of leadership to take the tough decisions which they need to make to send a signal to criminals because talk-show hosts, articulate, well-spoken defense attorneys and other human rights fundamentalists will clobber them if they dare to act decisively and tough. Every prime minister and minister of national security knows that once he starts talking tough or takes strong action to make life harder for criminals, defense attorneys will be on every talk-show and every prime-time television newscast to make hysterical, histrionic claims of repression and denial of human rights.
Yet our journalists, columnists and civil society activists have the gall to be making calls for the Government to ‘do something now’ and to ‘act decisively’ to deal with crime and to “tame the crime monster. They talk about a whole menu of things which need to be done to fight crime. But examine them carefully. Not one would have any effect on murder today or next week. Listen to their recommendations again and ask, ‘which one would make criminals think twice about killing today?’.
Yes, I agree with all the human rights activists about the social and structural changes which are needed to fight crime sustainably. But what strategies can halt the horrific daily spate of murders? When will we have all the money to effect all the grand social and economic transformation needed to do all the things which the social justice model demands?
What irks me is not that these human rights fundamentalists are stressing the long-term things which need to be done. I have no disagreement with them. My problem is when these same persons harshly criticise the Government for not doing something now, when nothing they are proposing can have any practical effect on crime now. Nothing. Only one bleeding heart columnist has had the honesty to say plainly that there is nothing that can be done right now to halt crime, and we just have to invest the time and resources to get it right.
I respect that kind of forthright admission. He does not annoy me. But it is those who are writing editorials, columns and who are on talk shows demanding that Government ‘do something about this crime now!’ whose reasoning repels me. The only anti-crime measures which can have an immediate effect on crime deterrence must involve some curtailment of civil liberties enjoyed in normal times. We are not in normal times.
It seems that that is dawning on our prime minister. In his new year’s message he said something very significant. I just hope he has the courage to carry it through, after the predictable voices in the defense bar get on early morning, mid-morning, afternoon and night-time talk-shows and newscasts to blast him.
He said: “I believe the Jamaican people are now prepared and expectant of firm and decisive action in breaking the neck of the crime monster once and for all.”
Mr Prime Minister, they have been ready for a long, long time. It is our élite which has not been ready, using sophistry and obfuscation to escape the crystal clear conclusions: We are at war with criminals and we have to craft anti-crime strategies to fit that war.
The prime minister has now told us that, “I have been around the country and everywhere I go the cry is the same, deal with the criminals. I no longer detect an ambivalence.” There was never any ambivalence with the people, Mr Prime Minister. The problem is with our élite, who are as out of touch with the people’s everyday realities as the American élite was with working class and grassroots people in in their country, resulting in that shock defeat to their Democratic candidate.
Our traditional media, like the American traditional media, are out of touch with grassroots fears, concerns and views. These ordinary Jamaicans are seen as just ‘panicking’, after ‘revenge’ and not being sophisticated or enlightened enough to understand the intricacies of human rights issues.
We have a prime minister who is social media savvy and who is directly in touch with multiple tens of thousands of people through those platforms. His thinking is not just influenced by what traditional media discourse is. While I know he remains sensitive to that, he is acutely aware of a broader constituency; a constituency whose interests don’t converge with those of the defense bar.
I was happy to hear the prime minister announce that “we will be creating the legislative environment to support the establishment of the rule of law in communities where it is absent and to separate criminals from communities they have captured.” He went on to say: “We will be creating under this framework, zones where the security forces and other Government agencies will be able to conduct special long-term operations in high crime areas, including extensive searches for guns and contraband.” Excellent!
Expect to hear defense lawyers on every talk show and to see editorials and columns inveighing in Manichean terms about an approaching Apocalypse and the end of democracy and human rights in Jamaica. If the prime minister is not prepared to press ahead despite that; if he displays the fear which has crippled others from decisive, tough action, he will back away from whatever he announces as soon as he does.
The power of the media/​defense bar élite has to be resisted. The courage of Andrew Holness’ leadership will be severely tested on this issue of security. Peter Bunting used to boast about how curfews had declined under his watch. There must be more curfews, searches and detentions in areas of high criminality. Certain people who nobody dares testify against and who can afford the highest-priced criminal lawyers must be taken off the streets and detained. You could say until you are blue that it is because my children will not be scraped up. That diversionary argument won’t detain me.
People in inner-city communities know that there are certain criminals who are well-known but whom nobody can testify against in a court of law. These guys can hire the best attorneys to defend them or to get them on bail where they can kill more people.
Let them and their attorneys protest; let all the editorial writers, columnists and commentators come out in unison against the measures you are coming with, prime minister, have the guts to implement them in the interest of Jamaica and its future. Don’t be intimidated by élite lawyers with uptown diction and impeccable media connections. The people are not listening to them. The people know better. They don’t have safe uptown houses . The prime minister said in his new year’s address that he was confident that this year “will be the breakthrough year in bringing the crime monster under control, while respecting the human rights of every citizen” . I am for respecting human rights. I am not calling for extra-judicial killings or police abuses.
But I am calling for locking down certain communities, locking away certain known crime perpetrators; going into homes without search warrants and stopping vehicles on the road. Curtail some of my civil liberties in the interest of all. You can’t have human rights if there is not a viable state. We cannot allow Jamaica to become a failed state and to let our prospects for economic growth evaporate before our eyes because our politicians and chattering classes are cowards. Enough is enough!
.….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….…
mb

Thanks Ian Boyne. I have always believed that ulti­mate­ly things will come to a boil, that soon­er or lat­er peo­ple’s eyes will be opened to the neg­a­tive con­se­quences of crime on their lives .
More and more non-police Jamaicans are com­ing to that crit­i­cal mass and it’s encouraging.

For years I have writ­ten and writ­ten and writ­ten about this sem­i­nal issue.
For years I have spo­ken to the fact that there are a bunch of self-appoint­ed Elites who shape pub­lic per­cep­tion about what is done about crime.
For years I point­ed out to the Jamaican peo­ple who actu­al­ly suf­fer from crime , that it is them and their fam­i­ly mem­bers whom are the vic­tims of crime.
I spoke specif­i­cal­ly about where they may be found , I char­ac­ter­ized them as those who live above Cross-Roads. But that does not ade­quate­ly describe where they may be found. They are in the media hous­es,(move yu toe Boyne) they can be found in the Island’s Bar asso­ci­a­tion, (the crim­i­nal lawyers who sur­vive from crime).They are at the University of the West Indies,(Mutty Perkins labeled it the intel­lec­tu­al ghet­to).The Norman Manley law school being the epic-cen­ter of the indoc­tri­na­tion, as well as the over­all cam­pus which has always been a ground-zero of left­ist ideology.

These soci­etal vul­tures are mas­ter pontificates.
They carved out a place for them­selves which effec­tive­ly posi­tions them­selves as moral supe­ri­ors. They under­stand that pover­ty and bad gov­er­nance breeds crime.
The per­fect envi­ron­ment for them to operate.
Taking the sides of crim­i­nals secures them in their abil­i­ties to make a liv­ing from the blood-shed,while shield­ing them from the blood-let­ting as a result of the stance they take.

The trail lawyers were always under­stood to be just an uptick above the vul­tures which tear the car­cass from the corpse of the inno­cent slaugh­tered on the Serengeti.
They like the Vultures are quite con­tent to wait on the lions/​lionesses , after which they swoop down to pick up the pieces left over by the killers.
It the new breed of Vultures, (jankru) which have tak­en over the narrative.
Those whom have dri­ven fear into Politicians, and police , pre­vent­ing them from doing what must be done to reclaim the streets from the mind­less killers.

IT DIDN’T TAKE LONG AS WE EXPECTED

We knew it would­n’t be long before these local jankru, I’m sor­ry vul­tures swooped down as they are wont to do when­ev­er any­one dare step up in a away which will dis­rupt their food..
The ink on Boyne’s Article had­n’t dried before they swooped down.
In case you are won­der­ing who they are, here is what appeared in the Gleaner on Monday morn­ing , the very next day.

.….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….…
Courtesy of the dai­ly Gleaner.

Public Defender Arlene Harrison Henry, a defence lawyer and human-rights activist, says the proposal by influential journalist Ian Boyne for Prime Minister Andrew Holness to curtail the rights of Jamaicans to address crime should be rejected for its ‘unlawfulness’. Boyne, in his column in The Sunday Gleaner yesterday, branded rights advocates, defence lawyers, and members of the media as elites “who harshly criticise the Government for not doing something now when nothing they are proposing can have any practical effect on crime now”.
Harrison Henry
I am calling for locking down certain communities, locking away certain known crime perpetrators; going into homes without search warrants and stopping vehicles on the road. Curtail some of my civil liberties in the interest of all. You can’t have human rights if there is not a viable State,” he wrote, urging Holness to ‘resist’ efforts to undermine plans to address the crime problem this year. However, Harrison Henry said those suggestions should be rejected. “Mr Boyne’s aim is for the reduction of crime, and that is laudable. The methods he has prescribed, however, have already been tried, tested and proved not to work. So let us not forget that Tivoli Gardens incursion in 2010.”
She argued that some of the old methods included the Suppression of Crime Act of 1974 that was repealed in 1993 after yielding little results except for the alleged abuses of citizens’ rights. Tied to that is the creation of various special police units over the years that earned the wrath of rights campaigners for their actions. “At the risk of being regarded by Boyne as one of the human-rights fundamentalists, what we’re saying is that crime-fighting measures will not succeed if people’s rights are disregarded. Crime is a societal problem and it cannot be solved without the full involvement of communities.”
Atkinson
Jamaican authorities are struggling to contain crime, particularly murders — the key indicator. About 1,350 people were murdered last year, 11 per cent more than 2015. That’s a rate of about 45 homicides per 100,000 of the population. Rights campaigner Horace Levy said the figure is high, but the “nonsense” proposed by Boyne will not do anything to address the problem. “It simply has not worked. For decades, we’ve been doing that. It’s absolute rubbish! Absolute rubbish!” Levy said. “And, we in the civil society, and I’m sure the Jamaican Bar Association, will also be involved in it, will fight any attempt to bring back this business of barging into peoples’ houses without search warrants and limiting their right to bail. I’m disappointed in Boyne because he usually writes good sense,” added Levy, the executive director of Jamaicans for Justice.
Levy
On the issue of searching houses without warrants, Patrick Atkinson, defence lawyer and former attorney general, said Boyne should volunteer his house first. “I would like them to start by going in and locking down his community, and stop and search his car, and going into his house without a warrant. Since he’s willing to do that, let them start there,” he said. “It is just a recycled diatribe that occurs every time that there is a crime spike. When you have these spikes in crimes, they call on police to stop it. They call on lawyers to be silent. They feel it necessary to dismiss lawyers by referring to them as high-priced lawyers, as if that is some kind of a crime. They don’t speak about high-priced doctors or high-priced journalists. If you’re a lawyer, nobody has a clue what your fees are and that people somehow, by hiring lawyers, it facilitates them committing crime. It is all nonsense.
To stop crime is really not the police’s job,” said Atkinson. “The police are there primarily to go and investigate crimes that have been committed.” His successor in the attorney general’s chambers, Marlene Malahoo-Forte, renewed the debate about rights and crime last May when she told the Parliament that “fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed to Jamaicans may have to be abrogated, abridged or infringed” to address crime. Holness noted in his New Year’s Day message that legislative changes were coming, but gave no specifics. The public defender, meanwhile, said her office was prepared to fight any unlawful proposal.

»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

These are not the only entrenched crim­i­nal sup­port­ing peo­ple on the Island. Neither are the Organizations they rep­re­sent the total­i­ty of the myr­i­ad insti­tu­tions which does so. Some are even tax-pay­er fund­ed ‚yet active­ly engages in and enhances crime on the Island.
This has been par for the course in the over 50 years since the British hand­ed the coun­try after 1962.

I’m glad Ian Boyne used term “ELITES” to describe them, he sim­ply for­get to add “wannabe”.
Criminal lawyers live off crime. Human rights peo­ple eat a food off alle­ga­tions of state abuse. The very office of pub­lic defend­er is a con­tra­dic­tion, it should be scrapped , the pub­lic defend­er’s office is actu­al­ly the DPP. What has that lit­tle creep Levy done out­side leech­ing and mooching? In what oth­er coun­try out­side the worlds num­ber one crim­i­nal par­adise Jamaica, would these despi­ca­ble mis­cre­ants even have a say in nation­al secu­ri­ty policy?

Two issues arise when­ev­er these vul­tures open their despi­ca­ble pie-holes.
(1) They demo­nize any­one who dis­agree with their views, and can­on­ize those with whom they agree.
(2) They nat­u­ral­ly default to using the word “unlaw­ful”, as soon as there is a sug­ges­tion to get tough with criminals.
We know these peo­ple are leech­es , we know they are parasites .
What these damn fools do not real­ize is that all that is need­ed, is to change the laws and what they per­ceive to be unlaw­ful now becomes lawful.

How dumb do they think the aver­age peo­ple are?
In Jamaica there two groups of peo­ple , there are decent good peo­ple who are vic­tim­ized by crime then there are the crim­i­nals and their cabal of sup­port­ers which include these jankru Elitists.

The peo­ple of Colombia rose up against crime, they chose not to become a narco-state.
They rose up against Pablo Escobar, the Medellin car­tel and the Cali Cartel.
But they also rose up on those who for years sup­port­ed the criminals .
That time is fast approach­ing in Jamaica.
There are some in Jamaica who must receive vis­i­ta­tions if our coun­try is to improve .
Our coun­try must move from a crim­i­nal sup­port­ing state con­trolled by Liberal talk­ing heads. In order to get there some of these” jankrus” who feed off the car­cass of our coun­try­men must be removed.

Read,comment,share.….…

Tivoli Gardens Enquiry My Most Discouraging Moment As A Police Officer — DCP Hinds

War had lit­er­al­ly been declared on Jamaica by the crim­i­nal ele­ments in the peri­od just before May 24, 2010 when the secu­ri­ty forces con­duct­ed what they said was a nec­es­sary oper­a­tion in Tivoli Gardens, Kingston.

Many Jamaicans will remem­ber that before the May 24, 2010 oper­a­tion, per­son­nel at the Denham Town Police Station were attacked by gun­men, that heav­i­ly armed crim­i­nals from across Jamaica had assem­bled in Tivoli; that these crim­i­nals had bar­ri­cad­ed and for­ti­fied Tivoli Gardens; that women had marched dressed in immac­u­late white clothes stat­ing emphat­i­cal­ly that they would die for their leader Christopher ‘Dudus’ Coke, that the Darling Street and Hanna Town police sta­tions had been razed and that two police offi­cers were bru­tal­ly slain on Sunday May 23 on Mountain View Avenue in St Andrew Eastern.

The after­math of the secu­ri­ty forces oper­a­tion saw over 60 peo­ple being killed and, after some­time, Coke was even­tu­al­ly cap­tured and then extra­dit­ed to the United States to stand tri­al on a num­ber of charges. He was found guilty and is now serv­ing time in a US prison.

A Commission of Enquiry head­ed by for­mer Barbados Attorney General Sir David Simmons, with Professor Anthony Harriott and retired Supreme Court Justice Hazel Harris as the oth­er two com­mis­sion­ers, was estab­lished to assess events lead­ing to events dur­ing the secu­ri­ty forces’ oper­a­tion, events after the oper­a­tion, and to make rec­om­men­da­tions. The com­mis­sion­ers heard tes­ti­mo­ny from vic­tims, the police, the army, var­i­ous spe­cial­ists, and in the end made three major rec­om­men­da­tions: one — that an apol­o­gy be made to the Tivoli Gardens com­mu­ni­ty; two — spe­cial pay­ments be made to affect­ed mem­bers of Tivoli Gardens; and three — that known gar­risons be de-gar­risoned over time.

In prob­a­bly his last major inter­view before join­ing the ranks of retired police offi­cers on Tuesday of this week, Deputy Commissioner of Police Glenmore Hinds told the Jamaica Observer that peo­ple, con­ve­nient­ly or oth­er­wise, quick­ly for­get the cir­cum­stances and events lead­ing to the secu­ri­ty forces’ oper­a­tion in Tivoli Gardens on May 24, 2010.

My most dis­cour­ag­ing moment as a police offi­cer who served for over 40 years was the out­come of the Tivoli inquiry, for the sim­ple rea­son that I felt that all the evi­dence was not prop­er­ly under­stood by the coun­try and the com­mis­sion­ers, and I think to a large extent, we, the secu­ri­ty forces, have not been treat­ed fairly.

I sup­pose the pas­sage of time could very well impair people’s mem­o­ries to recall events, but I remem­ber well the events lead­ing up to when the police and mil­i­tary went into Tivoli Gardens, and at the time there was no doubt that the coun­try was lit­er­al­ly tak­en over by criminals.

I have nev­er seen such pal­pa­ble fear on the faces of Jamaicans than on Sunday, May 23, 2010 when police­men were being killed, police­men and women were being attacked at police sta­tions. It was a most daunt­ing peri­od for us and the country.

I believe up to this day that the coun­try owes a debt of grat­i­tude to the secu­ri­ty forces because, in my opin­ion, the secu­ri­ty forces res­cued Jamaica, and I say so with­out any pos­si­ble hint of con­tra­dic­tion that we act­ed in the best inter­ests of the coun­try as we were on the brink of col­lapse,” an emo­tive Hinds told the Sunday Observer. http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​T​i​v​o​l​i​-​G​a​r​d​e​n​s​-​e​n​q​u​i​r​y​-​m​y​-​m​o​s​t​-​d​i​s​c​o​u​r​a​g​i​n​g​-​m​o​m​e​n​t​-​a​s​-​a​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​o​f​f​i​cer — DCP-Hinds_85923

So That No One Could Buy Or Sell Unless He Had The Mark .….

mb

Revelation 13:16 – 18 

V(16 )And the sec­ond beast required all peo­ple small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their fore­head, 17so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark — the name of the beast or the num­ber of its name. 18Here is a call for wis­dom: Let the one who has insight cal­cu­late the num­ber of the beast, for it is the num­ber of a man, and that num­ber is six hun­dred sixty-six.…(Berean Study Bible)>

In the din of every­day life it is easy to miss God’s voice. Those who trust in him and believe his words are sacro­sanct must do their very best to go to their pri­vate places, or quite spaces, even when total­ly strapped to the ham­ster-wheel of life’s dai­ly grind.

God speaks to us as long long as we are will­ing to lis­ten. He is able to do that in tiny moments of his choos­ing because he is God Almighty.
I can lay no claim to being an obe­di­ent lis­ten­er who waits for him to speak through his Holy Spirit to my heart , yet in his grace and mer­cy, in his infi­nite wis­dom and awe­some kind­ness he some­times choos­es the least qual­i­fied , the least like­ly , the least wor­thy through whom to com­mu­ni­cate his word.

Telling of his grace and good­ness can­not always come from an esteemed pul­pit, but from wher­ev­er we are , reach­ing the peo­ple we can reach, in what­ev­er way we can. So that his Kingdom may be glo­ri­fied. I am one of those unqual­i­fied, unwor­thy, unlike­ly servants.
That must have been the way Jonah felt when he decid­ed to ignore the Lords call to trav­el to Nineveh to warn the peo­ple of God’s immi­nent wrath which was to come.
Jonah in his lim­it­ed wis­dom and human flesh had no use for the Ninevites, he believed they were utter­ly deserv­ing of what­ev­er God was about to vis­it on them. In his eyes they were wicked peo­ple who deserved every bit of what was to come.

It’s such a beau­ti­ful , won­der­ful thing to be com­fort­ed in the knowl­edge that God does not har­bor the thoughts we har­bor, does not hate the way we hate. In fact the only thing he hates is the sin in us . Even though we sin he for­gives us while still hold­ing us in his lov­ing arms.
Though unde­serv­ing we still ben­e­fit from his uncon­di­tion­al love, his unend­ing forgiveness.

REVELATION.….

So this morn­ing before going to work I was tak­ing a show­er as I always do each day, and out of nowhere his voice spoke to my heart “you like to write, how about writ­ing some­thing for me”?
How about telling those with whom you inter­act that my words are true today as they were yes­ter­day, as they will be for ever­more”?

Wow” !
The Book of Revelation Chapter 13 Verses 16 – 18 was revealed to me.
I found it stun­ning that God would want me to write about that to the maybe four peo­ple who would poten­tial­ly be inter­est­ed in any­thing I have to say. Usually my wife and maybe two of my friends.

According to for​tune​.com, for the first time ever, shop­pers are going to the web for most of their purchases.

An annu­al sur­vey by ana­lyt­ics firm comScore (SCOR, ‑0.97%) and UPS(UPS, +0.20%) found that con­sumers are now buy­ing more things online than in stores. The sur­vey, now in its fifth year, polled more than 5,000 con­sumers who make at least two online pur­chas­es in a three-month peri­od. According to results, shop­pers now make 51% of their pur­chas­es online, com­pared to 48% in 2015 and 47% in 2014.

According to the web­site Forbes​.com, Amazon ruined the Holidays for retailers.
As the own­er of a small elec­tron­ic busi­ness I know all too well what that feels like. Before this mad rush to shop online, I under­stood the mad rush toward the large box-stores dur­ing the hol­i­day season.
As Black Friday images emerged show­ing throngs of peo­ple lin­ing up for deals in sub-zero tem­per­a­tures, com­pa­nies like Amazon has made it much eas­i­er to pur­chase online insu­lat­ing shop­pers from the madness.

Amazon is now ask­ing the Government to approve drone licenc­ing which would essen­tial­ly allow the mega retail­er to deliv­er same day to it’s customers.
If approved this will cer­tain­ly deal a death knell to many mega stores, not to men­tion small mom and pop estab­lish­ments which are just bare­ly hang­ing on for survival.

According to CNNmoney​.com ‚In a sign of how dra­mat­i­cal­ly the retail shop­ping land­scape is chang­ing, Macy’s is clos­ing 100 of its stores nation­wide. Macy’s (M) announced the clo­sures Thursday. They rep­re­sent about 15% of all Macy’s depart­ment stores. The icon­ic retail­er did not dis­close the loca­tions of stores, but said most of them will be shut down in ear­ly 2017.

For instance, Walmart (WMT)announced plans in January to shut down 269 stores this year and just this week, inked a $3.3 bil­lion deal to acquire Amazon rival Jet​.com. Sports Authority, once the nation’s largest sport­ing goods retail­er, is shut­ting all 450 of its stores after fil­ing for bank­rupt­cy. Other tra­di­tion­al retail­ers such as Target(TGT), JC Penney (JCP), Kmart, Sears (SHLD) and Kohl’s(KSS) have also pulled the plug on hun­dreds of stores in recent months. It’s a grim pic­ture for retail store work­ers — there have been around 44,000 retail lay­offs announced so far this year alone, accord­ing to Challenger, Gray & Christmas data. Walmart’s clo­sures alone impact­ed 16,000 work­ers. Macy’s clo­sures come amid a sixth-straight quar­ter­ly decline in sales. However, sales fell less than feared and the com­pa­ny said it’s “encour­aged” by recent sales trends. Wall Street applaud­ed the dra­mat­ic store clo­sures, send­ing the stock surg­ing 17%, its best day since 2008.

Last night I need­ed to pur­chase a lap­top bag for my wife, so after work I drove to K‑Mart, they usu­al­ly have stuff like that right?
Wrong, the store seemed like they were on the verge of clos­ing down.
I drove across the street to Radio Shack, they are small­er , with stores gen­er­al­ly the size of my small busi­ness . They did not look much bet­ter than K‑Mart , just small­er more orga­nized but of course they did not have any either.
So I went a few miles up the road in anoth­er direc­tion to Staples , only to see total dark­ness where Staples once stood, it had closed.

I Inquired from staff at a large store next door which is kin­da like a dol­lar store filled with chachkies, “what hap­pened to Staples” ? They told me they moved to where Office Depot once was before they closed down.
So I got back into my car and drove the few miles down Route 9 south. The store was there like she said, but stocked sur­pris­ing­ly sparsely.
I was the only cus­tomer except a lady get­ting some copies made.
I found a few lap­top cas­es and grabbed one for Cheryl, I was through driving.

A friend who owns a petrol sta­tion laments to me that he is pay­ing humon­gous sums of mon­ey to the Banks through their mer­chant ser­vices divi­sions which han­dles cred­it card processing.
This I under­stood well, more and more peo­ple are opt­ing for the fast con­ve­nience of credit/​debit card use over cash, my cus­tomers being no exception.
He tells me the bulk of his cus­tomers who stop for gas uses a deb­it or cred­it card. His estab­lish­ment also hous­es a con­ve­nient store as well, thats where his prof­its come from as there are real­ly not much mar­gins on gaso­line sales.
However he went on to say that even if the cus­tomers are not fill­ing up their tanks but are get­ting a cup of cof­fee, they still plunk down a debit/​credit card.
Turning them away is not an option .

http://​www​.ken​rag​gio​.com/​K​R​P​N​-​E​B​o​r​d​e​r​s​.​htm

To the young Generation X’ers this is cool, clut­ter-free way of doing busi­ness, a cash­less society.
But a cash­less soci­ety has it’s downsides.
For instance the Banks are get­ting expo­nen­tial­ly rich­er as they cut into the mea­ger prof­its of retail­ers who have no choice but to accept cred­it card and deb­it cards.
This forces more and more small busi­ness to close as they are unable to turn a profit.(And the rich shall be rich­er and the poor poorer)
Credit/​debit cards get lost they are prone to being com­pro­mised. Hackers are able to hack into large hold­ing servers steal­ing mil­lions of credit/​debit card infor­ma­tion which ren­ders own­ers pen­ni­less and at fur­ther risk.

So with peo­ple lit­er­al­ly look­ing to shop online which dras­ti­cal­ly reduces com­pe­ti­tion for large cor­po­ra­tions, and the legal ten­der already proven vul­ner­a­ble and eas­i­ly com­pro­mised whats next?
V(16 )And the sec­ond beast required all peo­ple small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their fore­head, 17so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark — the name of the beast or the num­ber of its name.

The human specie will do pre­cious lit­tle to halt it’s own march toward it’s ulti­mate con­clu­sion. In fact human­i­ty is glee­ful­ly rush­ing to it’s des­tiny, unwit­ting­ly ‚ful­fill­ing Biblical Prophecy in the process.
Even so, Isaiah 55:11New King James Version (NKJV)11 So shall My word be that goes forth from My mouth; It shall not return to Me void, But it shall accom­plish what I please, And it shall pros­per in the thing for which I sent it.

Please read , leave a com­ment and def­i­nite­ly share.

Holness Finally Speak Out On Crime//

Finally, Andrew Holness has start­ed to fig­ure it out , we won’t take any cred­it for inces­sant­ly beat­ing the drums on this issue , suf­fic­ing to say tak­ing con­trol of the crime sit­u­a­tion in our coun­try is of para­mount con­cern to this medium.

Robert Reich: No Democrat Should Go Near Trump’s Inauguration, Even Former Presidents.…

In a nor­mal elec­tion, a pres­i­den­tial inau­gu­ra­tion would be a cel­e­bra­tion of our democ­ra­cy whether your side won or lost, and an exam­ple of the country’s bedrock faith in the peace­ful tran­si­tion of pow­er. It should be amply clear by now that the elec­tion of 2016 was no nor­mal election.

As a result, for­mer labor sec­re­tary Robert Reich thinks a Democratic boy­cott of Trump’s swear­ing in is entire­ly appro­pri­ate. And that includes for­mer pres­i­dents. On Wednesday, Reich wrote a Facebook post argu­ing that any­one who attends the Jan. 20 event — unless they are protest­ing — is giv­ing tac­it sup­port to a man who broke all demo­c­ra­t­ic norms dur­ing the cam­paign and con­tin­ues to show zero remorse for doing so, in short, a “dan­ger­ous demagogue.”

The post was appar­ent­ly prompt­ed by a call the Berkeley pro­fes­sor received from a politi­cian he respects about attend­ing. Maybe it was one of the Clintons, giv­en the some­what shock­ing rev­e­la­tion on Tuesday that the Clintons were invit­ed, as were oth­er for­mer pres­i­dents and their wives, and would attend.

Here is Reich’s post in its entirety:

I got a call this morn­ing from a politi­cian I respect who told me he was attend­ing Trump’s inau­gu­ra­tion not because he backs Trump but because he believes in pro­mot­ing uni­ty over par­ti­san­ship and sup­port­ing a peace­ful tran­si­tion of power.

I told him that’s why politi­cians of both par­ties nor­mal­ly attend an inau­gu­ra­tion. But the issue here has noth­ing to do with par­ti­san­ship or a nor­mal tran­si­tion of pow­er. It’s not mat­ter of Democrat ver­sus Republican, or left ver­sus right.

The issue here is how for­mer pres­i­dents and oth­er politi­cians should respond to some­one who has shown him­self to be a dan­ger­ous demagogue.

Donald Trump became pres­i­dent by lying, demean­ing women, den­i­grat­ing racial and eth­nic minori­ties, deny­ing intel­li­gence reports of for­eign inter­ven­tion in our elec­tion, excus­ing vio­lence against oppo­nents, and under­min­ing the free­dom and inde­pen­dence of the press. And since being elect­ed he’s held ral­lies and issued tweets in which he’s con­tin­ued to tell big lies, retal­i­ate against crit­ics, call oppo­nents “ene­mies,” avoid press con­fer­ences and dis­miss con­flicts of finan­cial interest.

I told him that, in my view, attend­ing Trump’s inau­gu­ra­tion gives tac­it sup­port and approval to some­one who pos­es a clear and present dan­ger to our democracy.

What do you think? Read more here : http://​www​.salon​.com/​2​0​1​7​/​0​1​/​0​5​/​r​o​b​e​r​t​-​r​e​i​c​h​-​n​o​-​d​e​m​o​c​r​a​t​-​s​h​o​u​l​d​-​g​o​-​n​e​a​r​-​t​r​u​m​p​s​-​i​n​a​u​g​u​r​a​t​i​o​n​-​e​v​e​n​-​f​o​r​m​e​r​-​p​r​e​s​i​d​e​n​t​s​_​p​a​r​t​n​er/

What Happens When The Criminals Are The Ones Making The Laws.…

mb

I’ve thought long and hard about what process would effec­tive­ly dis­rupt the safe­ty net which allows Jamaican politi­cians to be arrogant,non-productive and crim­i­nal even.
In some demo­c­ra­t­ic coun­tries well orches­trat­ed grass-roots cam­paigns are able to dis­lodge politi­cians who are lying snivel­ing, self-serv­ing snakes like 99.99% of those in Jamaica.

In the United States this is becom­ing less and less pos­si­ble because of the process of ger­ry­man­der­ing. This process essen­tial­ly redraws con­gres­sion­al dis­tricts to include vot­ers loy­al to the par­ty with con­trol of the Congress.
The result is con­gres­sion­al rep­re­sen­ta­tives who are intran­si­gent in their refusal to do the nation’s busi­ness, giv­ing them cov­er to pur­sue their own agendas.
Ultimately vot­ers lose their voic­es in this process and are sub­ject­ed to the dic­tates of their polit­i­cal party.
It is sim­i­lar to the cre­ation of gar­risons in Jamaica in which peo­ple loy­al to the two polit­i­cal par­ties are giv­en free homes and much more free­bies in return for their life­long alle­giance, depend­ing on which is in power.
It’s a form of slav­ish servi­tude which strips peo­ple of their voic­es and ulti­mate­ly their dignity.

JAMAICA

How does one expose politi­cians for the lying decep­tive frauds they are when the peo­ple who elect­ed them to office have reduced them­selves to mere sheep to be herd­ed by the very same politicians?

Such is the state of our beloved Jamaica, there is no appeal­ing to the peo­ple’s intel­lect, there is no alert­ing the mass­es to the dan­gers inher­ent in the trust they place in the hands of politicians.
Some nations have checks and bal­ances which offers a degree of pro­tec­tion against some abuse by politi­cians, Jamaica is not one such country.

It’s extreme­ly dif­fi­cult to con­vince a peo­ple whom are deemed to be 84% cor­rupt that their Government of either polit­i­cal par­ty, is not act­ing in their best interest.
It’s lit­er­al­ly impos­si­ble to con­vince them that crime is ulti­mate­ly a destruc­tive force in their lives when they eat and live from the pro­ceeds of crime.
How do you tell them that the very laws which are sup­pos­ed­ly designed for their pro­tec­tion are designed by peo­ple who are sup­port­ers of mur­der­ers and pur­vey­ors of seri­ous crimes, and in some case are active­ly com­mit­ting crimes themselves?

Politicians of both polit­i­cal par­ties have found a will­ing com­pli­ant scape­goat for their trans­gres­sions, that scape­goat is known as the police high command.
Whether it was thir­ty years ago or today, Whether they were pro­mot­ed to senior ranks through long ser­vice, news-car­ry­ing, sleep­ing up the ranks, being yard boys, etc . Or through mer­i­to­ri­ous ser­vice and edu­ca­tion, their cow­ardice is the very same pal­pa­ble cowardice.

They allow them­selves to be used as tem­plates, barom­e­ter for whats wrong in the coun­try by both polit­i­cal par­ties. They accept drinks and pats on the back and look the oth­er way while politi­cians com­mit all kinds of crimes with­out accountability.
Ask your­selves this question.
Why have the American Government revoked the visas of some politi­cians, essen­tial­ly pre­vent­ing them from enter­ing the United States?
A coun­try which believes in the rule of law gets the rule of law . Countries with eth­i­cal lead­ers can­not have bad police depart­ments because they ensure there are safe­guards in place to trip up bad offi­cers and pro­tect good ones.
They ensures that the law applies to each and every cit­i­zen and not just the poor­er class.

Corruption is rife in the coun­try, at the high­est lev­els of the Government cor­rup­tion is the rule, not the exception.
That explain the rea­son why they tie the hands of the police while pre­tend­ing to care about human rights.
Please do not talk to me about human rights abuse by police. A gov­ern­ment which cares about peo­ple puts in place the req­ui­site frame­work for an effi­cient police depart­ment which is pro­fes­sion­al , car­ing and competent.
That’s how the cen­tral issue of basic pro­tec­tion of human rights is guaranteed.
Not by tying the hands of police and empow­er­ing criminals.

Human rights are guar­an­teed when we mod­ern­ize our law enforce­ment agen­cies and ensure that the rule of law is sacrosanct.
Placing the rights of crim­i­nals over that of their vic­tims is stu­pid or inher­ent­ly calculative.
I am inclined to believe the lat­ter is true in my country.
To hell with the dead vic­tims , let us ensure that no one place a scratch on the mur­der­ing scums when they are caught.
Minister Montague you say a lot of sil­ly things , God bless you , I believe your heart is in the right place even if you have no idea where that place is.
In your zeal to ensure that “crim­i­nals run weh“please con­sult your col­league Delroy Chuck, and oth­ers , then ask the mem­bers on the Opposition bench­es whether they share your dream that crim­i­nals should run weh?

You see Minister Montague, there­in lies the prob­lem. Because in the high­est places of our coun­try, Jamaica’s crim­i­nals have entrenched allies.
And that’s a real problem.
We under­stand some indict­ments are com­ing in that Caricell débâcle,we also under­stand some visas have already been tak­en away.
Maybe more is to come stay tuned.

Read, like com­ment and share.…

Much Revealed In Montague’s Statements.…

mb

Excerpts of Robert Montague’s statements made at the Annual Devotional Exercise staged by the constabulary at the Police Commissioner’s Office.
Robert Montague nation­al secu­ri­ty minister.

Whoever is the next com­mis­sion­er, and who­ev­er is the next assis­tant com­mis­sion­er will have to sign a con­tract with per­for­mance stan­dards and timelines.”
“Every mem­ber going for­ward now who is going to the high com­mand [will] have to sign a con­tract. You have to resign from your reg­u­lar ser­vice and sign a con­tract, or don’t take the pro­mo­tion, so you have a choice.”
“As the min­is­ter, I am held account­able by the pub­lic of Jamaica,” he said, adding that the police com­mis­sion­er is the per­son who has oper­a­tional respon­si­bil­i­ty for deal­ing with crime, “so he or she has to come to the table with a plan”.
“We don’t hear that over 700 men and women in the force have a first degree, we don’t hear that 320 serv­ing men and women have a master’s degree, some have two. We don’t hear that five mem­bers of the force are cur­rent­ly writ­ing their dis­ser­ta­tion for PhDs, and we don’t hear that 20 mem­bers are attor­neys-at-law, and then they tell me that there is nobody com­pe­tent in the force to lead? Run wey wid dat!”
http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​N​e​w​-​c​o​m​m​i​s​h​-​m​u​s​t​-​p​r​o​v​i​d​e​-​p​e​r​f​o​r​m​a​n​c​e​-​t​a​r​g​ets – says-Montague_85511

IF YOU UNDERSTAND ACCOUNTABILITY AND PERFORMANCE YOU MUST BE STUNNED BY THIS.

You are prob­a­bly as stunned as I am at this statement.
On the face of it the idea of a poten­tial com­mis­sion­er of police com­ing to the job with­out a crime fight­ing strat­e­gy of his/​her own is absolute­ly stunning.

It is shock­ing at least to me, that a poten­tial can­di­date for the Nations top cop would be hired with­out a strate­gic plan on how to deal com­pre­hen­sive­ly with crime.

So what was the cri­te­ria for hir­ing pre­vi­ous com­mis­sion­ers of police?
Additionally, what were the pre­req­ui­sites for pro­mot­ing peo­ple to senior lead­er­ship posi­tions , out­side the nor­mal, nepo­tism, friends, yard-boys, sleep­ing with the boss, news-car­ry­ing, long ser­vice, yes men/​women etc?
For years I made the case that the so-called police high com­mand is large­ly an over-bloat­ed use­less bureau­cra­cy with no clear per­for­mance standards.
I believe the Minister’s state­ments bore that out succinctly.

For years after leav­ing the Police depart­ment I have writ­ten exten­sive­ly on best prac­tices which I believed, and still do, should enhance the process of good lead­er­ship in the JCF and good polic­ing on the streets.
It is utter­ly dis­heart­en­ing to me , to now hear that there was­n’t even a strate­gic vision by pre­vi­ous com­mis­sion­ers of police.
At least by inference.

At the risk of flog­ging a dead horse I must divest the esteemed Minister of National Security of the notion that peo­ple with PhD ‘s and mul­ti­ple grad­u­ate degrees trans­late into good cops.
Education is absolute­ly great, but a cop must want to be a cop, not a lawyer or any­thing else. People hav­ing grad­u­ate degrees does not nat­u­ral­ly trans­late into good lead­ers , much less good cops.
It may only mean they can’t find oth­er voca­tions in Jamaica’s lim­it­ed work environment.

One has to assume that a com­mis­sion­er of police who comes to the job with­out his own crime fight­ing plan will not be effec­tive exe­cut­ing some­one else’s plan , a plan he does not believe in, or more shock­ing­ly, a plan which does not exist.
There is an old say­ing “if you don’t know where you are going you are already there”.
PhD’s and oth­er degrees are not panaceas for effec­tive­ly deal­ing with the Island’s crime prob­lem. If they were, the prob­lem would have been fixed with the hir­ing of Carl Williams.

As I have stat­ed repeat­ed­ly in this medi­um, Former NYPD com­mis­sion­er William Bratton is a tem­plate of effec­tive cop/​commissioner.
He nev­er had a degree, through­out his career he did mul­ti­ple cours­es ger­mane to his cho­sen profession.
He was a beat cop who start­ed out on the streets of Boston Massachusetts.
He was a cop’s cop , a man who want­ed to be a cop. Not a cop who want­ed to be a Dr or Lawyer.
Sure these are noble parts of the puz­zle , but being a good police offi­cer does not hinge on any of that.
Jamaica needs good police offi­cers, good mid­dle man­agers, and a good com­mis­sion­er of police who under­stands Jamaica’s unique polic­ing complexities.
Not a Commissioner and a cadre of fan­cy dressed wall-flow­ers who nev­er made an arrest but use their posi­tions to make life dif­fi­cult for their juniors instead of pro­vid­ing men­tor-ship and leadership.

Jamaica’s crime prob­lem can­not and will not be solved by the police alone.
Government and civ­il soci­ety can­not hide like cow­ards from the part they too must play in solv­ing this puzzle.
Norman Manley once said “there can be no real vic­to­ry with­out a few bro­ken skulls” .
Jamaicans will inevitably come to real­ize that you first secure and ren­der a scene safe before you care for casualties.
Yes we must be mind­ful of human rights abus­es , but we can nev­er suc­cess­ful­ly do so unless we neu­tral­ize those who would do harm to the innocent.
I am not sug­gest­ing that cit­i­zens rights be sac­ri­ficed on the altar of crime fight­ing. The two are cer­tain­ly not mutu­al­ly exclusive.
I am mere­ly sug­gest­ing that if the nation is seri­ous about the exis­ten­tial threat crime pos­es , its loy­al­ties ought to lie with the police depart­ment, flawed though it is.
It will be a work in progress, Jamaicans must real­ize that it is the dirty cor­rupt Governments they tol­er­at­ed for decades which led to cor­rup­tion in the police department.
Jamaica will have sig­nif­i­cant­ly less crime when the peo­ple allow them­selves to be gov­erned by the rule of law and not the rule of the jungle.
It’s all in their hands.

JCF Rank And File Should Reject A MoU Even Before It Is Released , It Is Intended To Recommit Them To Crime Fighting Without Addressing Their Real Concerns.…

mb
Since the creation of (indecom)the supposed independent commission of investigations which is tasked with investigating alleged improprieties by members of the police , military and correctional department I have been in opposition to it because it is fundamentally flawed.

Over the years I have writ­ten more about this than any oth­er sub­ject mat­ter impact­ing the Island of Jamaica.
No one is naïve enough to believe that the afore­men­tioned Government agen­cies do not need to be prop­er­ly monitored.
What I have con­sis­tent­ly said is that these agen­cies are the three agen­cies staffed by the aver­age per­son com­ing from the rur­al parish­es. In oth­er words these offi­cers are from the poor­er dark­er class of Jamaicans . They are being scape­goat­ed to cov­er up for the incred­i­ble cor­rup­tion and fail­ings of the Island’s two polit­i­cal par­ties which are mere­ly two crim­i­nal gangs.

No one can deny that mem­bers of all three branch­es of the secu­ri­ty forces have done immea­sur­able harm to their respec­tive agen­cies. It is equal­ly unde­ni­able that by their actions they cre­at­ed the need for oversight.
What can­not be laid at their feet is the gross incom­pe­tence and cal­lous dis­re­gard with which the elit­ists design­ers of the (inde­com act) went about draft­ing a bill that they knew would be dis­as­trous to mem­bers of the secu­ri­ty forces.

It would be a stretch to assume that those elit­ist archi­tects of the law had the intel­lec­tu­al capac­i­ty which would have allowed them to fore­see the unin­tend­ed con­se­quences the law would have on the lives of inno­cent Jamaicans.
Unfortunately for Jamaicans they end­ed up with a law which is so destruc­tive that major crimes includ­ing homi­cides has gone through the roof.
I hate to sound cav­a­lier in my char­ac­ter­i­za­tion , each sta­tis­tic is a human life lost.
Unfortunately for the police they have seen a marked increase in assaults on their per­sons to include lethal assaults.
The end result of the (inde­com) fias­co is that the elit­ist who run the apple cart has proven their point. There is a marked decrease in police shootings.

There is no deny­ing that . Officers are well aware that the law is pro­tec­tive of crim­i­nals. They are also aware that the intent of the law was exact­ly to ren­der them impo­tent in the exe­cu­tion of their duties. They are not clue­less to the fact that the crim­i­nals are in Gordon House , more so than down in grass yard.
What the Government and (inde­com) tells you though is that the law is work­ing . The ques­tion is “work­ing for whom”? The police, not total­ly dumb have sim­ply refused to be hauled before a crim­i­nal sup­port­ing agency , to be maligned and incrim­i­nat­ed by a Napoleonic egomaniac.
An ego­ma­ni­ac who want­ed a high court job but did not get one. An ego­ma­ni­ac who want­ed to be DPP but did not get that job either.
So his crony Bruce Golding , sup­port­ed by Seaga, James Robertson,Portia Simpson Miller, Delroy Chuck and a bunch of oth­ers came up with the (inde­com) débâcle.

If the Elites want to have a supe­ri­or police force over and above that which exist , let them give guns to (inde­com) and let them deal with the killers since they can do a bet­ter job of appre­hend­ing them with­out shoot­ing them.

The fact that these crea­tures sup­port­ed the law should send a seri­ous shiv­er down the spines of decent law abid­ing Jamaicans, not cause them to feel comforted.
What they will nev­er do is attest, much less admit, to the fact that less crim­i­nals are get­ting killed by police while more inno­cent Jamaicans are get­ting killed by criminals.
So when the Jamaican Government of either side tell you that (inde­com) is a suc­cess believe them, just under­stand that they are telling you that the lives of the blood­thirsty killers are more valu­able than yours.
If you fail to rec­og­nize that, then you are more stu­pid than they think you are.

Years ago peo­ple rose up en-mass dur­ing Barack Obama’s first term when he sug­gest­ed that Americans earn­ing half a mil­lion dol­lars or more should pay a lit­tle more in taxes.
The T‑Party was born, peo­ple came out in the mid-west­ern region of the coun­try , lit­er­al­ly with pitch forks and guns to protest the President’s pro­pos­al. Experts revealed that the medi­an income in those areas was around forty thou­sand dol­lars annually.
Not a sin­gle per­son earn­ing the half a mil­lion dol­lar was out there demon­strat­ing, it was the poor peo­ple out mil­i­tat­ing against their own self interest.
Yes kin­da like the coal-min­ers who vot­ed Trump and now are pet­ri­fied of los­ing their Obama care.
They nev­er even knew or both­ered to find out who was behind the T‑party façade.
Funding the T‑Party are two of the rich­est men in America, Charles and his broth­er David Koch , mul­ti bil­lion­aire own­ers of Koch Industries. Men who called them­selves Libertarians but are rather greedy Industrialists who do not mind destroy­ing the plan­et so they can stack up zeros on their bank accounts while pay­ing work­ers next to noth­ing for their labor.

Its nev­er the so called upper class who are being mur­dered in the streets, its nev­er they who are being mur­dered in their homes.
Terrence Williams and (indecom)are about the pro­tec­tion of the sta­tus quo.
When was the last time you heard one of the elit­ist get­ting shot?
Yet it is always the poor­er class mil­i­tat­ing for these shack­les on police.
You know why?
Because poor peo­ple believe in crime , they see crime as a means to an end they fig­ure they can ben­e­fit from crime regard­less of the consequences.
Unfortunately they nev­er stop to think that ulti­mate­ly crime dimin­ish­es and impov­er­ish­es all except a select few.

So now the Island’s clue­less Minister of nation­al secu­ri­ty dis­clos­es that the sug­gest­ed and much antic­i­pat­ed Memorandum Of Understanding which is sup­posed to alle­vi­ate the con­cerns of the secu­ri­ty forces will be signed as a part­ing gift to out­go­ing com­mis­sion­er of police Carl Williams.

Said Montague: “We are mov­ing to com­plete the MoU with INDECOM and the JCF and I want to have it signed before the sixth, in hon­or of Dr Carl Williams. That is my going away gift to him.”
“Understand clear­ly that INDECOM is part of the leg­isla­tive frame­work of the land. It is a stand­ing com­mis­sion of Parliament, it is not going any­where. So don’t do any­thing bad, you have noth­ing to fear.”
The nerve of this buf­foon !!!

So even though the details of this sup­posed MoU has not yet been made pub­lic we are told that lawyers will be pro­vid­ed for offi­cers hav­ing to deal with (inde­com), big whoopie !!!
You are still at risk of being per­se­cut­ed for doing your job but we will add anoth­er lay­er of our friends to this eat-a-food débâ­cle.
In essence your ass may still go to jail for shoot­ing the punk shoot­ing at you but at least we pro­vid­ed you with a third rate legal defender.

The fact that the Government, or whomev­er, the select par­lia­men­tary com­mit­tee which over­sees the (inde­com) débâ­cle agreed that there is a need for a MoU is proof that what I have stat­ed over the years is exact­ly cor­rect. What offi­cers still serv­ing has said is exact­ly correct.
Here’s the facts which they will nev­er tell you or concede.
(1) A poten­tial MoU is a con­ces­sion that the law is inher­ent­ly flawed.
(2) Hearing of the prob­lems as out­lined by DCP Novelette Grant awhile back, one mem­ber of the par­lia­men­tary com­mit­tee hear­ing tes­ti­monies argued ‚“maybe the prob­lems (inde­com) pos­es can­not be fixed with a Memorandum of understanding”.
(3)If there is an intel­li­gent assess­ment which con­cludes that there needs to be a bridge between the two agen­cies. And if the con­clu­sions are that at the bare min­i­mum there needs to be a fix , albeit an insuf­fi­cient MoU ‚why not con­cede that the law was not ade­quate­ly dis­cussed , debat­ed , and craft­ed before enactment?
(4) And in lieu of the fore­gone, why not pass a law repeal­ing the (inde­com act) then get down to the busi­ness of redo­ing the act?
Only this time cre­ate a law which serves the pur­pose of pro­tect­ing inno­cent cit­i­zens from state abuse while allow­ing our law-enforce­ment agen­cies to do their jobs with­out the specter of prison hang­ing over their heads?

A Memorandum of Understanding is not a fix to a bad law, it will not encour­age a sin­gle cop to go after a man with a gun and risk get­ting shot while risk­ing prison for doing what he swore to do.
Neither will it pre­vent a sin­gle embold­ened crim­i­nal from rethink­ing his mur­der­ous ways.
So whats the point of a MoU?
I’ll tell you, it is an appease­ment smoke-screen, intend­ed to re-com­mit offi­cers to expos­ing them­selves to per­se­cu­tion for going after crim­i­nals with no change in the law, but offers up the per­cep­tion of cov­er to cops which is mere­ly a mirage.
One which says we won’t change this bad law but when you get indict­ed by it we will pro­vide you with a third rate lawyer who does­n’t give a shit about you.
Sure bad cops should be pros­e­cut­ed, what we do not need is the per­se­cu­tion of good police officers.

The rank and file of the police depart­ment must reject this affront to their intel­lect even before they see it .
It will retain the dia­bol­i­cal (inde­com act) while blow­ing smoke up their ass­es when they get indicted.
The law is inher­ent­ly bad , repeal it, no more lives needs being lost because peo­ple are too arro­gant to say we fucked up.

So Much Needs Changing If There Is To Be A Different Direction In Jamaica’s Crime Situation…

mb

Excerpts from the speech Deputy Commissioner of Police Novelette Grant gave to worshipers at the Boulevard Baptist Church in St Andrew.

Please, don’t look to me to cre­ate the world in sev­en days. I nev­er claimed to have that pow­er … . And I will not be work­ing any mir­a­cles, except that mir­a­cle comes from the peo­ple of Jamaica to renew their hearts and their minds and atti­tudes to become our broth­er’s keep­er in the truest sense of the word, by fol­low­ing the exam­ple of the Samaritan,” Grant told wor­shipers at the Boulevard Baptist Church in St Andrew.

As we see the pos­si­bil­i­ties of 2017, stand with your nation [and] pray for renew­al of spir­it in our­selves and in our broth­ers and sis­ters and let our lights shine, please, in cul­ti­vat­ing an atti­tude of grat­i­tude,”.

I am com­mend­ing to you, though, that you prac­tice show­ing appre­ci­a­tion for those who serve, for those who pro­tect, and for the ulti­mate sac­ri­fice that they are asked to make on our behalf and for the fam­i­lies who sup­port them, who enable them; because this was Christmas and many of us were nev­er able to be with our fam­i­lies. We were out. On Christmas Day, I was out, and they were, work­ing, work­ing, work­ing, and all they get is cuss, cuss, cuss. So can you tell them ‘thanks’ when you see them, and encour­age them?

I thought I would high­light these excerpts because Novelette Grant and I were at the Police train­ing Academy at the same time, even though she entered and grad­u­at­ed a few months before the batch of which I was a member.
I am thrilled that a female is being con­sid­ered , even though she will not be the first woman to ever act as com­mis­sion­er of police.
More impor­tant­ly than any­thing else,Novelette Grant spoke to the sac­ri­fice, the chal­lenges offi­cers face dai­ly and the ulti­mate sac­ri­fice they some­times make.

DCP Grant speaks to the stress cops are forced to deal with.
A cops cop , Grant speaks to these chal­lenges like none of her col­leagues in the upper ech­e­lons of the force.

I may be wrong , but to the best of my rec­ol­lec­tion this is the first time I have heard a senior mem­ber of the police high com­mand speak defin­i­tive­ly and explic­it­ly to those chal­lenges and plac­ing respon­si­bil­i­ty in the hands of the Jamaican peo­ple for their own security.
Novelette Grant is an accom­plished police offi­cer, I believe she should be seri­ous­ly con­sid­ered for the role in which she will be thrust.
If Andrew Holness has come to his sens­es and is final­ly pre­pared to take action against the Island killers it is impor­tant that the par­lia­ment get to work lay­ing out a leg­isla­tive frame­work for tak­ing back the streets from the heav­i­ly armed and fear­less killers who con­trol them.

Key to retak­ing our coun­try from the gangs is a repeal of the (inde­com act).
This law has been a colos­sal fail­ure except to empow­er and embold­en crim­i­nals, and feed the ego of a sin­gle indi­vid­ual whose inten­tions are to build a name for himself .
Sure the police must have appro­pri­ate over­sight. But that over­sight can­not be an antag­o­nis­tic encounter which ties the hands of police and kills their morale.
The Act should be repealed and redone the cor­rect way.

The police needs good and fair over­sight. They need prop­er and ade­quate pay and ben­e­fits. More impor­tant­ly they need leg­isla­tive sup­port , which must include judges and pros­e­cu­tors who are on the right side of the rule of law.
This means remov­ing from the hands of these crim­i­nal-friend­ly judges dis­cre­tion in sen­tenc­ing, regard­less of their howls of protest.
If there is ever going to be change in how crim­i­nals behave they can­not have allies on the bench.
Police offi­cers have long com­plained about this prob­lem from a gen­er­a­tion ago . Today it is expo­nen­tial­ly worse than it was in the 80’s and 90’s.

The courts have become a joke, the judges are far more friend­ly to the mass mur­der­ers than they are with the police and that has got to end.
The police high com­mand is also over-bloat­ed. Half of the senior corp of the Constabulary does noth­ing to earn their pay.
They should find oth­er means to make a living.
Wearing a police uni­form with­out car­ry­ing out the func­tions of an offi­cer does not make one a cop.
It’s time to cut out much of the deadwood.

Holness’ 2017 Message…

mb

Everyone deserves the ben­e­fit of the doubt, though not a fan of politi­cians, this writer and this medi­um believes that the Prime Minister , though late in this recog­ni­tion, deserves a chance to make good.
The prime min­is­ter naive­ly believed that there could be sig­nif­i­cant or mea­sur­able growth in an atmos­phere of crime and mayhem.
This medi­um has over the years cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly point­ed out to both the for­mer Administration and and to this new one, that crime is the sin­gle largest imped­i­ment to growth and pros­per­i­ty on the Island.

With mur­ders and oth­er seri­ous crimes on the rise , and the com­mis­sion­er of police out of answers and step­ping down, Holness now seem to have had a come-to-jesus-moment.
To the prime min­is­ter’s sense of recog­ni­tion that there is a prob­lem I say “duh” .
What took you so long to rec­og­nize that the killing of almost two thou­sand Jamaicans each year is untenable.
What took you so long to rec­og­nize that this was not get­ting better?

This crime sit­u­a­tion can­not, and will not be fixed by throw­ing more bod­ies at it . It cer­tain­ly will not be fixed by chang­ing the com­mis­sion­er , even though there was no jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for Carl Williams’ con­tin­ued tenure.
The prime min­is­ter allud­ed to what he saw as a shift in the atti­tude of Jamaicans toward crime.
I find it curi­ous , because what I believe I am hear­ing is that the leader of the nation was wait­ing to hear peo­ple say they have had enough of the killings.

Is that not lead­ing from behind?
Leaders do not spit on their fin­ger and place it in the wind to decide what direc­tion to take.
Leaders lead because it’s the right thing to do. Leaders make deci­sions and take action regard­less of pop­u­lar per­cep­tions and opinions.
There is noth­ing good in the deaths of hun­dreds of peo­ple each year. There is noth­ing defen­si­ble about the rape and abuse of inno­cent women girls and boys.
Taking deci­sive action against depraved rapist and killers does not require a nation­al shift in per­cep­tions of a nation. It requires lead­er­ship from those elect­ed to lead.

Great Job Jamaica…(indecom) Has Been A Terrific Success More Innocents Were Murdered !

mb

Before the inception of the (indecom) act. people of questionable characters , murderers, rapists, and other dangerous criminals were killed in confrontations with police.

A SOCIETY WHICH NO LONGER GRIEVE THE DEAD..

Terrence Williams

Jamaica has since made the deci­sion that it will go the route of a failed state in which the Island is divid­ed into enclaves con­trolled by gangs who trade in guns, drugs , mur­der for hire, extor­tion and lot­to scamming.

Funerals have since tak­en over as a means for peo­ple to survive.
Grave dig­gers make good mon­ey as they are kept busy keep­ing up with the demand for their services.

Bands and sound-sys­tems make mon­ey as they are con­tract­ed to play at wakes , known local­ly as set-ups.

Funeral par­lors make a killing from the macabre cul­ture of death. Word is that some of the own­ers of these estab­lish­ments actu­al con­tribute to the kill-cul­ture as a means of enhanc­ing their bot­tom lines.

Jerk ven­dors and oth­ers sell­ing every­thing imag­in­able adorn the envi­rons of the home in which a descen­dant lived.

The tra­di­tion­al norm of griev­ing the deceased is replaced with a car­ni­val like atmos­phere of deca­dent cel­e­bra­tion and money-making.

In order for this cul­ture of killing to get to this the police had to be ren­dered impotent.
Both polit­i­cal par­ties saw to that through the cre­ation of con­trol, manip­u­la­tion, inter­fer­ence, and over­lay­ing of over­sight it has used to tie the hands of the police.

The pub­lic, nev­er one sold on the rule of law has tak­en on the gris­ly accep­tance of eat­ing and drink­ing from the pro­ceeds of the dead whose blood lay splat­tered on lit­er­al­ly every square yard of the Island’s vil­lages and towns.

So now the police have stopped active­ly engag­ing these blood­thirsty killers because they have no desire to be pur­sued by a lunatic with too much pow­er intent on incrim­i­nat­ing them.
Why should they?
And the peo­ple cheer for the exis­tence of (inde­com), because in a twist­ed way when the police exter­mi­nate the blood thirsty demons who kill the inno­cents busi­ness is bad for the funer­al direc­tor, the sound sys­tem man, the jerk ven­dor, the bands­men, the hand­cart ven­dors and the grave diggers.
Children have to go to school, these peo­ple all depend on the kill cul­ture to survive.
In a way it is a macabre way for a coun­try to devour itself with­out real­iz­ing it.

Sure today is for that per­son but tomor­row it will be some­one else and ulti­mate­ly you!
None of this mat­ters in this crime infest­ed crim­i­nal paradise.
Death is good busi­ness and (inde­com) ensures that the killing of the inno­cent will con­tin­ue . People have to eat.

This year so far over 1300 peo­ple have been mur­dered on this tiny Island of 4411 square miles and 2.8 mil­lion people.
The peo­ple at the top crow like the true vul­tures they are at the dra­mat­ic less­en­ing of mur­der­ers who meet their just deserts at the hand of the police.
But they are deaf­en­ing­ly silent at the over 1300 killed by the demon­ic blood­thirsty gangsters.
Of course (inde­com) is a rag­ing success»>

The Incessant Killings In Jamaica Will Stop When The People Say They Do, Politicians Won’t Do It.

mb
Yesterday’s incident at the Hunts Bay police station in which a gunman thought that he would kill another on the grounds of the Hunts Bay police facility sends several messages.
The Island continue to ignore them at it’s peril.

According to Jamaican media the man who was attacked was report­ing on con­di­tion of his bail agree­ment arrived at after he was charged with murder.
This in and of itself is a huge part of the prob­lem which has dri­ven the Island’s mur­der rate and has helped it to con­tin­ue to metastasize.
It mat­ters not how many peo­ple you are alleged to have killed you are almost assured that the courts will slap some sil­ly con­di­tions to a piece of paper and you will walk out of jail almost immediately.
This bla­tant abuse of the bail act leaves con­sci­en­tious observers who are unafraid of speak­ing out to con­clude that sev­er­al of the Island’s judges are on the take.

On reach­ing the entrance to the sta­tion he was pounced upon by a lone gun­man who opened fire at him. The police offi­cers who were on the com­pound chal­lenged the gun­man and a shootout ensued. The gun­man was shot and injured; he was tak­en to the Kingston Public Hospital, where he was pro­nounced dead.

Separate and apart from the many and var­ied attacks on police sta­tions over the years , is the lack of fear that the crim­i­nal-under­world has, know­ing that the police are not allowed to go after them.
Over the years crim­i­nals attacked the Olympic Gardens Police sta­tion and killed police offi­cers. They have on more than one occa­sion opened fire on the Cross Roads Police Station, Denham Town , Rockfort and many oth­er police sta­tions. Additionally they have burned the Darling Street Police sta­tion and sev­er­al oth­ers to the ground.
Every year sev­er­al police offi­cers are mur­dered on and off duty on the Island.
Every year hun­dreds and hun­dreds of Jamaican cit­i­zens are mur­dered with the slaugh­ter reach­ing crit­i­cal mass in the year 2005 when over two thou­sand homi­cides were report­ed to police.

In 2010 after the Military and Police depart­ment went into the moth­er of all gar­risons , (Tivoli Gardens) to extract want­ed gang­ster Christopher (dudus)Coke , noto­ri­ous gang­land over­lord, hun­dreds of mer­ce­nar­ies took up arms against the state.
In the ensu­ing process lead­ing up to the entry of the secu­ri­ty forces into the com­mu­ni­ty, police offi­cers and mem­bers of the mil­i­tary were mur­dered. Police sta­tions were destroyed, mem­bers of the pub­lic were mur­dered. Heavily armed mem­bers of the crim­i­nal under­world loy­al to Coke through their asso­ci­a­tions and the entreaties he made to them with the promise of mon­ey, open­ly dis­played their weapon­ry as they await­ed the assault of the secu­ri­ty forces.

In the end the secu­ri­ty forces went in and kicked ass as they should.
Soldiers and police offi­cers lost their lives in the process of annex­ing the then crim­i­nal epic cen­ter Tivoli Gardens ‚to the Island. According to esti­mates some 74 com­bat­ants lost their lives.
Several weapons were recov­ered, but as they could be count­ed on to do, the tough talk­ing mer­ce­nar­ies slith­ered away like the cock­roach­es they are when the sheer force of the secu­ri­ty forces entered the enclave.
The untouch­able state with­in the state was once again part of Jamaica.

The sheer weight of Christopher Coke’s pow­er top­pled Bruce Golding the Labor Member of the Parliament for west­ern Kingston and Prime Minister at the time, and in whose con­stituen­cy Tivoli Gardens lie.
The PNP was swept into pow­er after the demise of Golding. What the PNP did should have rel­e­gat­ed that par­ty to the dust­bin of his­to­ry for­ev­er, but not in Jamaica.

Instead of hon­or­ing the mem­bers of the secu­ri­ty forces and their fam­i­lies for their sacrifice.
Instead of join­ing hands with law abid­ing cit­i­zens and declar­ing once and for all, that from that day onward, Jamaica would eschew polit­i­cal vio­lence as a strat­e­gy toward achiev­ing state power.

The PNP com­mis­sioned and impan­eled an elit­ist pan­el of know-noth­ings to con­duct an expen­sive witch-hunt against the secu­ri­ty forces ‚to see if and where they went wrong, in the process of annex­ing Tivoli Gardens to Jamaica.

Heading the pan­el was David Simmons a Barbadian Jurist who clear­ly came into the process with a chip on his shoul­der and a total dis­dain for the secu­ri­ty forces.
As rep­re­hen­si­ble as Simmons and the oth­er two mon­keys on the pan­el were, they paled in com­par­i­son to the trea­so­nous actions of the PNP and its sad excuse for a leader, the incred­i­bly intel­lec­tu­al­ly chal­lenged Portia Simpson Miller.

There is no evi­dence which sup­ports any the­o­ry that Jamaicans are ungovern­able or inca­pable of gov­ern­ing themselves.
The vast major­i­ty of Jamaicans who move to oth­er coun­tries are hard work­ing , pro­gres­sive mem­bers of their adopt­ed soci­eties, to which they make sig­nif­i­cant and mean­ing­ful pos­i­tive contributions.
Those who stead­fast­ly refuse to adhere to the rule of law which exist in their adopt­ed home­lands find them­selves back on the rock in short order.
The com­mon thread which runs through those adopt­ed coun­tries ‚which just hap­pen to be miss­ing from Jamaica, is the rule of law.

Sure Jamaicans are able to obey and respect laws.
When they are made to.
When penal­ties are attached to break­ing laws , Jamaicans do the right thing like peo­ple from oth­er places.
Jamaica has become a cir­cus in which politi­cians. judges. lawyers. pas­tors and police are on the take.
Our coun­try is on a col­li­sion course with des­tiny , the solu­tions are in the hands of the peo­ple as it was with the Colombian people.
The new­ly installed Prime Minister Andrew Holness reminds me of the vain Emperor in the Hans Christian Andersen’s clas­sic, the “Emperor’s new clothes”.

He believes he will pre­side over a growth agen­da in which crim­i­nals roam the street heav­i­ly armed with weapons capa­ble of snuff­ing out mul­ti­ple lives in a nano second.
He naive­ly envi­sions a pros­per­ous Jamaica in which a large sub-set are allowed to keep their weapon­ry in pover­ty, even as they some­how ignore lav­ish excess of oth­ers liv­ing next door.
In that soci­ety will also exist a Labor par­ty installed Terrence Williams and an agency which stands between law-enforcement .
Effectively ter­ror­iz­ing police offi­cers in the courts which are bought and paid for by the crim­i­nal under­world while pro­tect­ing the mur­der­ous blood-thirsty killers who kill when they feel like it.

Can crime be cor­ralled in Jamaica?
You bet your ass it can be.
But in the same way crim­i­nals burned and destroyed the ves­tiges of pow­er which stood between them and their goals, the good peo­ple remain­ing in Jamaica will have to decide for them­selves what their crit­i­cal mass is.
They will have to decide as the Colombian peo­ple did against the Medellin and Cali Cartels.
It will have to come from the peo­ple. The lead­ers are too taint­ed by cor­rup­tion and the trap­pings of pow­er to care about the pain the mur­ders and rapes cause.

It’s all up to them to decide when enough is enough !!!!

Bye Bye Carl.…..

mb

Measurable per­for­mance is the met­ric used in deter­min­ing suc­cess and of course the lack there­of deter­mines failure.
Truth be told if you are offered a job and you know you do not pos­sess the req­ui­site skills for the job you should have the hon­esty and char­ac­ter to say so .
You should only take a job if you are giv­en the tools to get the job done​.You must say “give me these tools (lay­ing out what­ev­er those tools are), allow me the free­dom and lat­i­tude to get the job done with­out interference”.
If you take a job in which the blame and respon­si­bil­i­ty rests with you , you must be giv­en the tools with which to get the job done. If you fail to ask for the tools and lat­i­tude you need ‚then you make the trag­ic mis­take of tak­ing on a sit­u­a­tion in which you were des­tined to fail.
Common sense must trump raw ambi­tion. If your ambi­tion to hold the office is greater than your desire to suc­ceed then you are respon­si­ble for the fail­ure which occurred on your watch.

Jamaica’s Crime Not Rooted In The Ghettos.…

It came as no sur­prise to me when I learned that Dr Carl Williams, Jamaica’s Police Commissioner had decid­ed to call it quits.
Williams deci­sion comes amidst ris­ing num­bers in mur­der and oth­er seri­ous crimes.
It was no sur­prise because I have per­son­al­ly been call­ing for him to step aside because he had not demon­strat­ed that he had a grasp of whats need­ed to fig­ure out the Island’s bur­geon­ing crime epidemic.

I have no sym­pa­thy for Williams as he exits the stage as oth­er serv­ing and past mem­bers seem to have for him.
My loy­al­ties lie with the near­ly 800 or so offi­cers who leave annu­al­ly after see­ing the total and utter bull­shit that the JCF has become and make the tac­ti­cal and cal­cu­lat­ed deci­sion to leave before it con­sumes them,.
That’s char­ac­ter, that’s bravery.
A man who decides to accept the job to sit atop a shit pile should expect to see turned up noses at the stench ema­nat­ing from him..

Williams lead­er­ship of the JCF may be summed up in one word,“FECKLESS”.
I want­ed to allow a few days to pass before I said any­thing about the com­mis­sion­er’s deci­sion to step aside,I did not want to respond impul­sive­ly even though it was the news I want­ed to hear.
One of my dear friends opined to me that “say what we want, Williams was a clean Commissioner who had good char­ac­ter”.
Incidentally the Commissioner has also report­ed­ly said he is leav­ing with his char­ac­ter intact.
As I said to my friend, it is remark­able if the best thing one can say about William’s, and trum­pet­ed by him, is that he was of good char­ac­ter, then his tenure was an even big­ger flop than any­one imagined.
Saying ice is cold is redun­dant. Saying the fire is hot is no com­pli­ment to fire, fire is sup­posed to be hot.
Police offi­cers are sup­posed to have good char­ac­ter. Good char­ac­ter is not a mea­sure­ment of one’s suc­cess. The office demand­ed it before he was even hired. The office demand that each con­sta­ble so too must have good character.
As chief con­sta­ble it is crit­i­cal that the com­mis­sion­er have impec­ca­ble character.

Carl Williams has been the most emi­nent­ly edu­cat­ed per­son to become com­mis­sion­er of Police on the Island.
What seemed to have slipped by the deci­sion-mak­ers is that supreme­ly edu­cat­ed does not nec­es­sar­i­ly mean the best per­son for the job, or even the most qualified.
But since Jamaica is ‚and has always been a nation with lead­ers with their heads up their col­lec­tive ass­es they do not get that.
I have noth­ing against Williams the man. What I had a prob­lem with is Carl Williams the Commissioner of Police who failed to pro­tect the peo­ple who work under his com­mand from per­se­cu­tion by those who would use their perch­es to build names for themselves.
I am opposed to Carl Williams the com­mis­sion­er who failed to do the things he could do to make the JCF bet­ter and more respect­ed as a law-enforce­ment agency.

Carl Williams did not cre­ate the prob­lems which plague the JCF but he damn sure did­n’t make the force bet­ter in the time he presided over it.
He saw the video clips of police offi­cers being assault­ed in the streets.
He saw the clips of peo­ple in the face of offi­cers with cell phones.
He saw peo­ple who were pro­mot­ed under his watch walk away leav­ing junior offi­cers to strug­gle with offend­ers they are attempt­ing to arrest.
He nev­er did a damn thing to ensure that offi­cers are ade­quate­ly taught the prop­er tech­niques to effect arrests regard­less of protest.
He nev­er made them under­stand that the entire force would stand behind and along­side them when they do their jobs.
He nev­er told them that no fly by night piece of ass-wipe could pre­vent the police from doing their job and whomev­er has a prob­lem with that would find them­selves in cuffs before they fig­ured out what happened.
He saw female offi­cers stand­ing by like win­dow dress­ings as their male coun­ter­part strug­gle to make arrest.
He saw peo­ple step­ping in to take offend­ers being arrest­ed away from young offi­cers doing exact­ly what they are told to do.
Williams did nothing.
Williams said nothing.
Williams changed nothing.

If Carl Williams was a prod­uct of the streets he would have got­ten his ass out of 103 Old Hope Road and get into the streets like Joe Williams and Herman Rickets did and see what the young men are facing.
He would have told crim­i­nals there is no hid­ing place. He would have told them with­out equiv­o­ca­tion, that “we will use what­ev­er force nec­es­sary to bring you to justice”>Or we will bring jus­tice to you .
“You resist we will take you to the ground and we will pile on you until you stop resist­ing”. “you pull a weapon on a cop and you are dead, we will met force with com­men­su­rate force” .
Whether the likes of Terrence Williams and his crim­i­nal lov­ing cronies like it or or not, that what police brass do they stand with their offi­cers until they are proven to be in the wrong.
That is polic­ing, peri­od. It’s not always pret­ty but it does not have to be always ugly, if you break the law we are com­ing after you. That’s what police do. Issuing emp­ty threats only reveal how pathet­ic you are.
Where is Duppy film mis­ter commissioner?
Williams lacked the back­bone and the nec­es­sary under­stand­ing of lead­er­ship to effec­tive­ly lead, and because of that he had to go.

What Does Montagues Appointment Say About Administration’s Seriousness About Crime.…

In the same way that the mem­bers of the PNP paid lip ser­vice to crime in office, while active­ly sup­port­ing parts of the crim­i­nal under-world and in some cas­es engag­ing in crim­i­nal activ­i­ty sin­gu­lar­ly and col­lec­tive­ly, the admin­is­tra­tion of Andrew Holness no more intend to do any­thing about crime.
Where else but Jamaica would an agron­o­mist be cho­sen to head a secu­ri­ty apparatus?
I mean seri­ous­ly, what is he going to do grow crime?
Well he cer­tain­ly has.
Why has Holness not come out and cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly denounce crime and throw his unmit­i­gat­ed sup­port behind law-enforcement?
The sim­ple answer is that they have police pro­tec­tion, they believe fun­da­men­tal­ly they can accom­plish their nar­row polit­i­cal goals in the mad­ness of may­hem and mur­der with­out rock­ing the boat.

There is no grey area in this cav­al­cade of mur­der which has so fright­en­ing­ly become a part of Jamaica’s pop­u­lar cul­ture. Either you abhor and con­demn it, or you tac­it­ly sup­port it because it fur­thers your end game.
We know that the entire PNP with the excep­tion of a cou­ple of it’s prin­ci­pals can­not con­demn crime and mur­der, that polit­i­cal par­ty is too far gone, enmeshed in the slimy morass of the Island’s crim­i­nal under­world and corruption.
The Prime Minister has had every oppor­tu­ni­ty to take a prin­ci­pled stance against the scourge of crime. What he has done instead is make the most basic periph­er­al com­ments, effec­tive­ly brush­ing it aside.
As I said before his pick to head the crit­i­cal National Security Ministry spoke vol­umes about his com­mit­ment to the erad­i­ca­tion of crime from the get go.

No knock on Robert Montague he may be a good man, but he is a lousy Minister of National Security , through no fault of his own.
You sim­ply do not ask a butch­er to per­form brain surgery.
How in hell do you do the best job pos­si­ble if you have absolute­ly no train­ing in nation­al secu­ri­ty or have an under­stand­ing of polic­ing and law enforce­ment challenges?
Juxtapose that with a Commissioner of Police who sees his offi­cers under siege in the streets and cow­er in fear of Terrence Williams and you get a fucked up sit­u­a­tion in which crime can only increase.
Carl Williams abdi­ca­tion of his duties to pro­tect the young men and women under his com­mand , by allow­ing them to be wrong­ful­ly per­se­cut­ed is trea­so­nous to them and their families.

In the ensu­ing peri­od lead­ing up the selec­tion of the next per­son set up to fail by the cow­ard­ly and crim­i­nal­ly com­plic­it polit­i­cal struc­ture on the Island, there will be much com­ments com­ing from past mem­bers of the high command.
Many of whom could not inves­ti­gate their way out of a brown paper bag, but wants to be commissioner.
This is not time for car­toon char­ac­ters and clown shows.
I sug­gest those past mem­bers take a seat.
The Police high com­mand is a colos­sal fail­ure, has always been.

Sadly I must con­clude It is time that a Commissioner of police be cho­sen from over­seas, one who is uncon­strained in his abil­i­ties to go after crim­i­nals wher­ev­er they are .Whether they are in Jamaica House , Kings House or any oth­er house.
The Island’s crime epi­dem­ic is made pos­si­ble because some peo­ple have placed them­selves above the laws.
This must come to an end.

Louisville Shopper Hurls Insults At Two Other Women In Racist Tirade, Gets Banned From Mall For Life

A shop­per has been banned from a Louisville mall for life after berat­ing two oth­er women, telling one of them to “go back to wher­ev­er the f – k you come from.” Mayor Greg Fischer apol­o­gized to the women on Wednesday after video of the dis­turb­ing rant at the Jefferson Mall was viewed more than 5 mil­lion times. Renee Buckner, who post­ed the video, told the Courier-Journal that the woman became unhinged when one of the pair sneaked in line at J.C. Penney to add items to the oth­er wom­an’s cart. See more here : http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/louisville-shopper-hurls-racist-insults-women-article‑1.2919050

YouTube player

Five Shot, Two Dead At Party In Kingston

A par­ty pro­mot­er and anoth­er man were shot dead Tuesday on Spanish Town Road in Kingston while three oth­ers were injured in the inci­dent. Dead are 24-year-old Akeem Brown, a pro­mot­er of Denham Town, Kingston and 25- year-old Dane Kerr. Reports from the Hunts Bay police are that about 1:50 am, Brown was at an event when armed men entered the premis­es and opened gun­fire at the crowd. They were tak­en to the hos­pi­tal where Brown and Kerr suc­cumbed to their injuries and the oth­er three men were admit­ted in sta­ble con­di­tion. see more here: http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​F​i​v​e​-​s​hot – two-dead-at-party-in-Kingston

KING: How White Privilege Is Allowing White Men Across The Country To Assault Black Men And Beat The Rap

Sean King

On October 22, 2015 a young men­tal­ly dis­abled high school stu­dent was sex­u­al­ly assault­ed by his class­mates on school prop­er­ty. The 18-year-old vic­tim, who was adopt­ed as a tod­dler, was one of the lone African-American stu­dents in the near­ly all white Dietrich High School in Idaho. John Howard, 18, Tanner Ward, 17, and one oth­er uniden­ti­fied mem­ber of the foot­ball team lured the vic­tim into a school lock­er room, promis­ing him hugs, stripped him, force­ful­ly insert­ed a clothes hang­er into his rec­tum, then kicked it deep­er into his rec­tum — caus­ing inter­nal injuries.

When this case was ini­tial­ly report­ed, and it was announced that John Howard was being charged with felony rape, the pos­si­ble penal­ties were as severe as life in prison. It seemed like some sem­blance of jus­tice was immi­nent. The school super­in­ten­dent inter­viewed 30 wit­ness­es and con­firmed that the teen was sex­u­al­ly assault­ed. Prosecutors agreed with their inves­ti­ga­tion — which also deter­mined that the vic­tim was also called “Kool-Aid,” “chick­en eater,” “water­mel­on,” and even “n — -r” by stu­dents at the school.

In spite of all of this evi­dence, this week John Howard was giv­en the break of his life. Instead of get­ting life in prison for what he did, he won’t be going to jail for 10 years or five years or a year or six months or even a day. Instead, he’s get­ting two years of pro­ba­tion and 300 hours of com­mu­ni­ty ser­vice. With good behav­ior, the judge said his record could be expunged. He’ll also be allowed to do his com­mu­ni­ty ser­vice in his new home in Texas where his fam­i­ly peace­ful­ly relocated.

Tanner Ward, who was said to ini­tial­ly insert the hang­er into the victim’s rec­tum, was ini­tial­ly charged as an adult, but con­ve­nient­ly had his case sent to juve­nile court instead.

KING: Black teen James Means killed by remorse­less white man

How in the hell did this happen?

Not Released (NR) The use of Washington Post images for political advertising or endorsements is not permitted

John McGraw (c.) listens during his hearing on December 14, 2016.

(THE WASHINGTON POST/​THE WASHINGTON POST/​GETTY IMAGES)

How could a man who did some­thing so heinous, so cru­el and dement­ed, so hor­rif­ic and bar­bar­ic, get pro­ba­tion and com­mu­ni­ty ser­vice for it? American jails and pris­ons are full of men and women who did far less and had the prover­bial book thrown at them. For sev­er­al years, I worked full time in pris­ons and youth deten­tion cen­ters all around Georgia and met thou­sands and thou­sands of mid­dle and high school stu­dents who were sen­tenced to hard time in adult pris­ons for far less.

This sen­tence is the liv­ing embod­i­ment of white privilege.

Such is also the case of John Franklin McGraw. At a Donald Trump ral­ly this past March, while Rakeem Jones was being escort­ed out of the ral­ly, sur­round­ed by police, McGraw, who is white, walked right up to Jones, who is black, and through a vicious elbow right to his face, knock­ing him onto the ground.

KING: Pain caused by Dylann Roof makes it impos­si­ble to celebrate

After throw­ing the blow, McGraw, in full view of police, walked right on back to his seat. Even though police wit­nessed the attack, they seemed to have no inter­est what­so­ev­er in arrest­ing McGraw for it. Later, in an inter­view on nation­al tele­vi­sion, McGraw open­ly said of Jones, “the next time we see him, we might have to kill him.” Speaking of the assault, McGraw said “You bet I liked it. Knocking the hell out of that big mouth. We don’t know who he is. He might be with a ter­ror­ist organization.”

John McGraw (l.) is accused of hitting Rakeem Jones (r.) as deputies were removing Jones from the Trump rally.
John McGraw (l.) is accused of hitting Rakeem Jones (r.) as deputies were removing Jones from the Trump rally.

After a bystander’s cell phone video of the attack was released, and a nation­al out­cry for jus­tice fol­lowed, police, days lat­er, locat­ed and charged McGraw with felony assault.

Then, last week, white priv­i­lege struck again. McGraw basi­cal­ly beat it all — in spite of the assault being on cam­era, in front of thou­sands, includ­ing the police, and in spite of his death threat being filmed and aired around the world, the judge had mer­cy on McGraw. He was giv­en “a sus­pend­ed 30-day jail sen­tence and a year on unsu­per­vised probation.”

Normally, as a part of such pro­ba­tion, some­one would have to sur­ren­der their firearms, but the judge also “removed a pro­vi­sion from the pro­ba­tion that would have kept McGraw from own­ing a gun.”

KING: Masked white men harass indige­nous peo­ple in North Dakota

In oth­er words, McGraw pret­ty much got every­thing he want­ed, includ­ing extra pro­vi­sions to keep his guns, in spite of the fact that he threat­ened to kill Jones on nation­al television.

While Rakeem Jones was being escorted out of the rally, surrounded by police, McGraw, who is white, walked right up to Jones, who is black, and through a vicious elbow right to his face, knocking him onto the ground.
While Rakeem Jones was being escorted out of the rally, surrounded by police, McGraw, who is white, walked right up to Jones, who is black, and through a vicious elbow right to his face, knocking him onto the ground.

It’s all so damn ludi­crous. That McGraw even felt the con­fi­dence and peace of mind to go up and assault Jones in front of police, then take his seat, tells us that he knew full well that law enforce­ment and the jus­tice sys­tem would have lit­tle inter­est in hold­ing him account­able for his actions. It turned out, McGraw was absolute­ly correct.

Again, I per­son­al­ly know men and women who are spend­ing hard time in prison right now for doing far less, but McGraw was giv­en break after break after break.

I’ve said it before, and I must say it again — this jus­tice sys­tem is not bro­ken. It’s func­tion­ing just the way it was designed and built to func­tion. It’s fir­ing on all cylin­ders. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/king-white-privilege-white-men-assault-black-men-article‑1.2917496