JCF Begins Special Operation To Restore Order In Townships

KINGSTON, Jamaica — The Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) today began a spe­cial ini­tia­tive to restore order in pub­lic spaces, with spe­cial empha­sis on May Pen in Clarendon, and Linstead and Spanish Town in St Catherine.

In a release a short while ago, the police say the oper­a­tions being con­duct­ed will focus on mar­kets and bus parks and aim to: tar­get peo­ple involved in extor­tion, restore order, reduce con­ges­tion caused by ille­gal vend­ing, ille­gal park­ing and pro­vide a reas­sur­ing pres­ence in the pub­lic spaces. http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​l​a​t​e​s​t​n​e​w​s​/​J​C​F​-​b​e​g​i​n​s​-​s​p​e​c​i​a​l​-​o​p​e​r​a​t​i​o​n​-​t​o​-​r​e​s​t​o​r​e​-​o​r​d​e​r​-​i​n​-​t​o​w​n​s​h​ips

Holness Quickly Running Out Of Political Capital To Deal Effectively With Crime…

mb

Jamaica hab enuff law, wi nu need nu more law .

That’s a view many Jamaicans have when the ques­tion of crime comes up.
There is not much truth to that how­ev­er. Most of our nation’s laws were writ­ten before the Island gained Independence from Britain.
Those laws were writ­ten to deal effec­tive­ly with the issues of the day.
The puni­tive com­po­nents in those laws, both cus­to­di­al and oth­er­wise, reflect­ed the val­ue placed on things and mon­ey and the val­ues of the time.

Over the years the lack of teeth has fos­tered a dis­re­spect for our laws , a process which was bound to result an increase in crime.
And it has.
Times change , back in the 70’s there was no inter­net so there was no need to have laws gov­ern­ing the internet.
There were not many reports of child traf­fick­ing, now there are, so there is a need for laws to deal with those.
That is not to say that the lack of teeth in our laws is sole­ly respon­si­ble for the dra­mat­ic esca­la­tion of crim­i­nal­i­ty since 1962 to today.
The list of fac­tors which forms that per­fect storm is well know and has been described and debat­ed ad nauseam

The prob­lem is not that Jamaicans can­not obey laws. It’s non­sen­si­cal to assume or sug­gest also that Jamaicans have a propen­si­ty or a pre­dis­po­si­tion toward com­mit­ting crimes.
Despite the large amounts of Jamaicans sent back to the Island through the depor­ta­tion process, the vast major­i­ty of our peo­ple who immi­grate to oth­er coun­tries are law abid­ing. So we have estab­lished that as a peo­ple we can obey laws.
We have demon­strat­ed arguably, that we do not have any gene in us which makes us com­mit crimes over and above any oth­er group­ing of people.

These are some of the trap­pings of greed.
Excess of the worst order which has been fuel­ing the Island mur­der rate…

SO WHAT IS IT ABOUT US ?

Before we get to the answer to that ques­tion , lets toss out pover­ty as a decid­ing factor .
Many impov­er­ished nations have far less crime than Jamaica per capi­ta . Cuba,one such coun­try ‚is locat­ed just 90 miles off our shore.
All across Asia and Africa peo­ple live in far greater pover­ty than most Jamaicans are exposed to.
Yet they record sig­nif­i­cant­ly less homi­cide that Jamaica does . Even coun­tries which are far larg­er and much more pop­u­lous record sig­nif­i­cant­ly less crime.

The notion that we can close down the pris­ons and sim­ply pro­vide jobs for every­one and we will some­how be able to sleep with our doors unlocked, or as in Jamaica’s case leave some of the grill for­ti­fi­ca­tions unlocked is sim­ply stupid.
Would there be a less­en­ing of crime if every­one has a job?
Probably?
But not as much as some would like to have you believe.
Which brings us to why , why is there so much crime in Jamaica?

GREED, ENVY, WANTING TO LIVE ABOVE THEIR MEANS , AND SYSTEM WHICH DOES NOT PUNISH CRIMINALS !!!

A peo­ple who pro­mote gang­sters , demo­nizes police offi­cers, and nur­ture and give aid and com­fort to crim­i­nals have no busi­ness expect­ing to live free from crime.
Post a com­ment to social media which dogs police offi­cers, or glo­ri­fies gang­sters , sit back and watch.
Like flies to feces they con­verge diss­ing the cops and glo­ri­fy­ing the gangsters.

Is our coun­try now a coun­try of major­i­ty crim­i­nals then?
Hard to tell, but if Transparency International is to be believed, we may have passed that tip­ping point long ago.
According to Transparency International Jamaica is ranked 83 out of 176 coun­tries; falling 14 places in the coun­try rankings.
In 2015, Jamaica ranked 69 out of 168 coun­tries. Jamaica’s CPI score is 39 out of 100… falling two points from its 2015 score of 41.
The Corruption Prevention Index ranks 176 coun­tries on a scale of 0 to 100.
Zero rep­re­sents ‘Highly Corrupt’ while 100 rep­re­sents ‘Very Clean’.

After an unprece­dent­ed 14 12 years in office the PNP estab­lished a course for Jamaica.
That course was set and main­tained by Percival James Patterson and con­tin­ued by Portia Simpson Miller. That is not to say these two mis­cre­ants who served as Prime Minister, dur­ing that peri­od were the only ones respon­si­ble for the Nations path as a crime state.
Edward Seaga and lit­er­al­ly every oth­er politi­cians who entered the Parliament have con­tributed immense­ly to the present situation.

There is how­ev­er, a more seri­ous com­po­nent to whats hap­pen­ing in Jamaica. The human rights lob­by has gained incred­i­ble trac­tion over the way things gets done to the point nei­ther par­ty has the balls to deal seri­ous­ly with crime out of fear of their wrath.
The prob­lem for what­ev­er law abid­ing Jamaicans who still remain is that crime works for the mul­ti nation­al cor­po­ra­tions which keeps the econ­o­my afloat.
It also work for the local econ­o­my . Just look at the eco­nom­ic activ­i­ty which has emerged from the kill culture.
Security com­pa­nies. Funeral par­lors. Grave dig­gers. Musical bands. Masons. Sound sys­tems. Carpenters and cof­fin mak­ers are just of few which are expe­ri­enc­ing eco­nom­ic boon from the mur­der mayhem.

Not only does an imme­di­ate removal of all zinc fences present a safer envi­ron­ment it will be dra­mat­i­cal­ly be more aes­thet­i­cal­ly pleasing.

Nevertheless it’s the Multi National Corporations which lend mon­ey to coun­tries like Jamaica with strin­gent eco­nom­ic caveats and Usury type inter­est rates which dic­tates our policies.
They are also the ones who fund the human rights groups ‚which by the way are lit­tle more than trea­so­nous agi­ta­tors in many regards.
In the large west­ern nations ‚the homes coun­tries of the human rights agi­ta­tors, the US, Canada and Britain these agen­cies absolute­ly no power.
Lenders like the IMF the Paris Club and oth­er agen­cies which loan mon­ey to Jamaica and oth­er devel­op­ing coun­tries like our know darn well that the eco­nom­ic poli­cies they demand we adhere to inevitably lead to social unrest.

If we are able to get out act togeth­er and become eco­nom­ic sus­tain­able why would we need them?
Who would they lend to?
So now you begin to under­stand why the Inter American com­mis­sion for human rights is very pow­er­ful and influ­en­tial in small debtor nations like Jamaica, but nev­er sees a prob­lem with police killing unharmed peo­ple of col­or for no rea­son in America?
The soon­er we begin to under­stand that our prob­lems are ours to fix the way we see fit and not as some for­eign enti­ty dic­tates the bet­ter off we will be.

A tra­di­tion­al Jamaican ten­e­ment yard with a zinc fence stands in the Rema ghet­to com­mu­ni­ty of Kingston June 16, 2008. An esti­mat­ed 30 – 45% of the rough­ly 950,000 pop­u­la­tion of Kingston live in over­crowd­ed inner-city com­mu­ni­ties like Rema.

As a coun­try we must start by repeal­ing the inde­com act, the Bruce Golding Trojan horse to the coun­try. Begin the process of chang­ing the laws to reflect the times.
For the short term a sim­ple ban and an order to remove all zinc fences with­ing a cer­tain time, fail­ing which the Government removes them, is a start toward reduc­ing crime.
Any replace­ment wall should not be more than five feet high but may be enhanced with barbed wire or or oth­er par­ti­tion mate­r­i­al through which the police can see.
These are sim­ple yet effec­tive meth­ods Government can take right now toward reduc­ing crime in the short run while lay­ing the ground­work toward seri­ous and sus­tain­able crime reduction/​elimination which must begin now.

Human Rights Is About Protecting Innocent Victims:not About Securing The Safety Of Murderers.…

mb

It is not merely enough to be outraged. It is not merely enough to be saddened at what is happening. It is not merely enough even to weep over what is happening. Outrage calls for action! You gotta do something about it if you’re outraged.”(Fellowship Tabernacle Pastor Merrick Al Miller.)
Stephan McLaren

The occa­sion was the funer­al ser­vice for 17-year-old Calabar High School stu­dent Stephan McLaren who was stabbed to death on New Year’s Day on Hagley Park Road in St Andrew, after leav­ing a party.
It was report­ed that while walk­ing with a group of friends, McLaren stopped along the way indi­cat­ing that he want­ed to urinate.
One of his friends said soon after he rushed to them say­ing he was stabbed.

It becomes almost curi­ous to talk about a sin­gle mur­der in Jamaica with­ing the con­text of the dai­ly mul­ti­ple killings.
The killings are so fre­quent , so fast, and in such num­bers that talk­ing about an indi­vid­ual case makes one seem almost silly.
I am just blown away at the idea that a kid on his way from a par­ty who stopped to uri­nate could be stabbed because some­one believed he had some­thing they want­ed to rob.

Having served a decade in uphold­ing the law on the Island, hav­ing been a voice speak­ing out against the unchecked epi­dem­ic of crime since I left in 91, I am exas­per­at­ed as I know many peo­ple are, about whats happening.
In a no holes barred arti­cle, local jour­nal­ist Ian Boyne expressed sim­i­lar exasperation.
Of course Boyne’s bit­ing nar­ra­tive seemed more direct­ed at the pre­ten­tious know noth­ings and the human rights crowd, than at the killers themselves.

Social media is replete with raw emo­tion­al respons­es from Jamaicans liv­ing, both in the dias­po­ra and at home.
Much of what has changed and has become clear­er, is a dis­tinct thread of anger at the bur­geon­ing cabal of indi­vid­u­als and Organizations which has sprung up in the coun­try pur­port­ing to be defend­ers of human rights.

I am all for human rights , but if I want­ed to be cred­i­ble when I lend my voice to the cause, I believe my pre­oc­cu­pa­tion would be with the indis­crim­i­nate loss of inno­cent lives .
Not about the rights and secu­ri­ty of the killers.
Nevertheless, as is the case with much of what ails Jamaica, bull­shit car­ries the day over commonsense.
Human rights advo­ca­cy in Jamaica is just anoth­er eat a food gravy train and a place to have a mega­phone, con­se­quences be damned.

Rev Merrick Al Miller

Hearing the Reverend Al Miller’s state­ments made me cringe however.
It is not mere­ly enough to be out­raged. It is not mere­ly enough to be sad­dened at what is hap­pen­ing. It is not mere­ly enough even to weep over what is hap­pen­ing. Outrage calls for action! You got­ta do some­thing about it if you’re outraged.”

If only we would fol­low our own advice, take due care about our asso­ci­a­tions and motives.
Being good cit­i­zens in our indi­vid­ual capac­i­ties when no one is looking.
Then when we speak to spe­cial cir­cum­stances our words would have greater resonance.
Jamaicans have fall­en in love with mur­der, like much of the world wrong is right and right is wrong.
It should sur­prise no one that sym­pa­thies are with and for the wel­fare of the killers and not with the victims.
A peo­ple blind with igno­rance will for­ev­er reap the whirl­wind of their actions.
America is about to find that out.

The Only Issue Which Would See Jamaicans Criticize Ninja And Bounty Is That They Offered Some Support To Law Enforcement.…

mb

Two of the Islands most pop­u­lar dance-hall lumi­nar­ies Rodney Pryce o/​c Bounty-kil­la and Desmond Ballentine o/​c Ninjaman teamed up in an event designed to lift the morale and pay a lit­tle com­pli­ment to the Island’s law-enforce­ment offi­cers recently.

In a ses­sion orga­nized to lift the spir­its of the cops the two, whom many believe are unlike­ly sup­port­ers of law enforce­ment ‚declared that fight­ing crime was every­body’s business.
Speaking at the Jamaican con­fer­ence cen­ter both disc jock­eys paid trib­ute to the police , label­ing them “slaves”, because they did not receive the remu­ner­a­tions they deserve for their work.,
Most impor­tant­ly Ninjaman blast­ed the agency “indecom“for it’s aggres­sive per­se­cu­tion of police offi­cers when they go after killers.

Ninja

Said Ninjaman:

I’m com­ing from a bad man point of view. No bad man nuh inna Jamaica again; unuh have a set of crim­i­nals and mur­der­ers deal­ing with. Some peo­ple just tek up gun and turn it on any­one they feel, and if the police catch one of dem and deal wid dem, INDECOM charge dem for it,”.

Said Bounty: “Fighting crime is everybody’s busi­ness and not just the busi­ness of those with direct respon­si­bil­i­ty”.

Bounty

Neither of these two men are with­out sin.
In fact Ninjaman recent­ly did time in prison ‚and Bountykilla have been arrest­ed I believe more than once for domes­tic abuse of one live in lover or another.
What I find instruc­tive is that these two men, both of whom have con­tributed immense­ly to the pop­u­lar cul­ture, now have the vision and insight to see that the cul­ture is bad­ly flawed.

Dance-hall lyrics are not the rea­son there are so many homi­cides on the Island but they do con­tribute to the so called bad-man culture.
That these two are able to rec­og­nize that law-enforce­ment deserves the sup­port of every sin­gle Jamaican ele­vates them expo­nen­tial­ly in my view over many who pur­port to be educated.

The back­lash against the two by trolls on social media, depicts in real ways the mind­set of Jamaicans when it comes to crime in our country.
Lets be clear, there is noth­ing that these two men could have said, out­side their sup­port for law enforce­ment of course,which would not have elicit­ed tens of thou­sands of blan­ket likes and raves.
But the minute they decide to become good respon­si­ble cit­i­zens , using their plat­forms to save lives, the vil­lage lawyer cock­roach­es are out with smart ass dissent.

Vybz Kartel

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​t​h​e​-​t​r​u​t​h​-​i​s​-​n​o​t​-​a​l​w​a​y​s​-​p​o​p​u​l​a​r​-​i​t​s​-​j​u​s​t​-​t​h​e​-​r​i​g​h​t​-​t​h​i​n​g​-​t​o​-​do/

Carolyn Cooper

What both­ers me is that these trolls had no prob­lem when Carolyn Cooper had Adijia Palmer (Vybs Kartel )at the University of the West Indies lec­tur­ing stu­dents on the mer­its of dance-hall in our pop­u­lar culture.
Might I remind them that Kartel is now doing a life sen­tence for cap­i­tal murder.
By the strangest real­i­ty Kartel is allowed to con­tin­ue to per­pet­u­ate on the pop cul­ture, the same putrid mur­der music for which he is heav­i­ly responsible.

Lets under­stand some­thing here.
There was a strong argu­ment to be made that the poor boys in the ghet­to are unable to afford the high pow­ered weapons, and un-end­ing sup­ply of ammu­ni­tion they have in their possessions.

That was in the past, Here’s how they make mon­ey today
Murder for hire.
Extortion.
South American cocaine and guns com­ing into Jamaica, a trans­ship­ment hub .
The Haitian con­nec­tion which exchanges Ganja and stolen meat for guns.
The huge amounts of cash com­ing into the Island as a result of the scam­ming trade.
Jamaicans liv­ing in the dias­po­ra send­ing back mon­ey to pur­chase guns and ammunition.
Jamaicans send­ing back guns in bar­rels and every oth­er recep­ta­cle rivals only the inge­nious meth­ods they employ in try­ing to get mar­i­jua­na into the United States and oth­er countries.
These boys have cash.

Those of us who have ever had any­thing to do with law enforce­ment are clear-eyed about the var­i­ous ways guns enter into our country.
So when we ask that there be a mind­set among all of our rea­son­able cit­i­zens regard­ing the crime mon­ster , we must com­mend these dance hall artiste when they step for­ward to lend their voic­es toward the cause of sav­ing lives and our coun­try in the long run.

At the same time we should nev­er lose our focus as it relates to those who active­ly encour­age, fund, and oth­er­wise sup­port crim­i­nal­i­ty in Jamaica even as they live as decent law abid­ing cit­i­zens in oth­er countries.
Their bel­li­cose rhetoric and ham­ster-wheel argu­ments are the same as those who do live in Jamaica who essen­tial­ly encour­age, fund, and oth­er­wise sup­port crim­i­nal­i­ty, but are shield­ed from it’s con­se­quences by virtue of their posi­tions in society.
The oth­er mon­grels only yelp because those in pow­er tell them when to yelp.
Ignore those !!!

Two Cops Shot, Injured In St James

Jamaican Media is report­ing that two offi­cers were shot ear­ly this morning.

ST JAMES, Jamaica — Two police offi­cers were shot and injured this morn­ing in St James.

The police con­firmed the inci­dent, which took place about 12:45 am, but declined to give any details, say­ing they have not received any “com­pre­hen­sive report” on the matter.

The two offi­cers are said to be in sta­ble con­di­tion. http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​l​a​t​e​s​t​n​e​w​s​/​T​w​o​-​c​o​p​s​-​s​hot – injured-in-St-James

HANOVER, Jamaica — A man and two chil­dren were last night shot dead in Williamsfield, Hanover while three oth­er peo­ple were injured in the attack. Dead are 34-year-old Hopeton Lee, five-year-old Kimani Johnson and one-year-old Daquan Davidson, all of Williamsfield address­es in Hanover. Police reports are that about 10:45 pm, Lee was at home with his rel­a­tives when armed men entered the premis­es and opened fire hit­ting him. The assailants fled the scene and about 10:50 pm, opened fire on anoth­er house in the com­mu­ni­ty, where Kimani, Daquan and three oth­ers were shot.

The police were sum­moned and on their arrival, all six were tak­en to hos­pi­tal where Lee, Kimani and Daquan were pro­nounced dead, while the oth­er three were admit­ted in seri­ous con­di­tion. The police said no motive has been estab­lished for the incident.

Now Even Dance-hall Is Saying (indecom) Is Bad: Hmm..

mb
Well you can’t make this up!!!
Psalm 8:2

Out of the mouth of babes and suck­lings hast thou ordained strength because of thine ene­mies, that thou might­est still the ene­my and the avenger.

I was always of the view that if you keep chip­ping away at a moun­tain long enough, giv­en enough time you can chis­el out a tunnel .
A tun­nel leads to light.
For years I have made it a per­son­al cam­paign to speak out using every medi­um I can to bring atten­tion to the seri­ous and exis­ten­tial prob­lem of crime in our country.

I have received much blow-back over the years for stand­ing with the police.
Many dis­missed my unshak­en sup­port for the police as sim­ple loy­al­ty borne out of the fact that I served.
To those I have said repeat­ed­ly ‚” No“It’s not about the fact that I served, it’s because I under­stand that there is no oth­er sit­u­a­tion in which we can have a liv­able coun­try with­out the rue of law.
Which means no mat­ter how flawed our law enforce­ment agen­cies are we stick with them and fix the problems.

Bounty

Desmond Ballentine (Ninjaman) and Rodney Price (Bounty Killer) are two foun­da­tion dance-hall artiste who came up through the grit­ty streets of Kingston .I do not know Bounty Killa but Ninjaman a prod­uct of the beau­ti­ful parish of saint Mary came to Kingston and resided in the Marl Road com­mu­ni­ty where I lived.
As a Young police offi­cer I met Ninja, I had a small bar on Plantain avenue behind the Old New Yorker fac­to­ry off Waltham Park and Bay Farm Roads.

Every Friday and Saturday I had a lit­tle sound sys­tem play­ing at my lit­tle spot . The sound sys­tem was owned by a Rastafarian gen­tle­man from the area. That is where Ninja cut his teeth as a disc jock­ey long before he became the don-gor­gon.
There is an old Jamaican proverb which says, if fish comes from the bot­tom of the ocean and tell you there are sharks down there you bet­ter believe the fish.,

On the issue of crime and how we deal with it effec­tive­ly Ballentine and Pryce are babies , though they are from the streets, and knows what goes on, these gen­er­al­ly aren’t the peo­ple as per con­ven­tion­al wis­dom, we would look to for advice, hence my “lit­tle child shall lead them scrip­ture verse..
Notwithstanding when peo­ple like the afore­men­tioned two tell us whats going on it behoove us to listen.

At a ses­sion organ­ised to moti­vate mem­bers of the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) yes­ter­day received crime-fight­ing instruc­tions from two of the most unlike­ly indi­vid­u­als that one would expect to see address­ing cops — dance­hall dee­jays Bounty Killer and Ninjaman.(source JamaicaObserver)

Ballentine, in his address, chid­ed the Independent Commission of Investigations (INDECOM) for putting what he described as unwar­rant­ed pres­sure on police seek­ing to uphold the law.

Ninja

I’m com­ing from a bad man point of view. No bad man nuh inna Jamaica again; unuh have a set of crim­i­nals and mur­der­ers deal­ing with.

Some peo­ple just tek up gun and turn it on any­one they feel, and if the police catch one of dem and deal wid dem, INDECOM charge dem for it,” the artiste, who served three-and-a-half years behind bars, said before turn­ing on the Government.

He called for more resources for JCF mem­bers, whom he described as the country’s “slaves”, argu­ing that they are not ade­quate­ly paid for the work they do.
http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​B​o​u​nty – Ninja-lecture-cops_86875

Let’s start mak­ing the vil­lage raise the child again. Last year was a grue­some year with killings. The police, the sol­diers, the secu­ri­ty forces, they are play­ing their part; we as soci­ety have to play our part as well,” Pryce said.

I rest my case !
Dance-hall artiste are not fools, they know whats going on, they have their ears to the ground. The pow­ers that be in Kingston know that inde­com is bad for the coun­try, many peo­ple have come out and said so.
As some­one who has been ham­mer­ing this home since I first saw the minu­tia of the law, I under­stood it was going to increase crime.

At the risk of sound­ing like a bro­ken record I say again . The( inde­com )act serves the inter­est of a small cabal of pow­er­ful peo­ple on the Island.
It was a gift giv­en to them by Bruce Golding.
The act has many sup­port­ers, those sup­port­ers may be found in two groups. (1) Those who ben­e­fit from it and I have named them in mul­ti­ple pre­vi­ous articles.(2) And a bunch of know noth­ing vil­lage lawyers who can­not see beyond what they are told.
The abil­i­ty to crit­i­cal think was not giv­en to everyone .
Some swal­low every­thing they are told with­out the abil­i­ty to think things through for themselves.

Those sheeple[sic] have to be led , deci­sions have to be made for and despite them , not with them.
The harm the inde­com act con­tin­ue to do is being mea­sured in the blood of too many Jamaicans, some of them inno­cent and undeserving.
It’s time that this law and this creep who head the agency be shown the door.

Incessant Second Guessing And Lack Of Support Has Severely Traumatized Our Police Department..

mb

In response to the killing of six gangland figures recently by the security forces I commended the police and soldiers who valiantly took it to gangsters.
At the same time I questioned comments coming out of the police high command lamenting the loss of the gangsters lives.
Weapons recov­ered by the police at the scene.

Now all life was cre­at­ed by God Almighty , sub­se­quent­ly all life is to be respected.
However ‚when someone(1) takes the life of anoth­er human being, or (2) embark upon a dai­ly life of crime .
That per­son of their own voli­tion, make the deci­sion to place their life in danger.

Lets make it real sim­ple.……
A per­son who decides to jump over Niagara Falls does so on their own volition.
We do not blame the Falls for the death of that indi­vid­ual right? The falls is the falls , you jump you die !!
At the same time there is no need to lament the deceased, he or she made their own choice, and in that case “died with their choice”.
Me, I lament the loss of life of peo­ple who did not make a deci­sion to give up their lives.
That is at the heart of why I became a police offi­cer as a young man in 82.
It is why I con­tin­ue to speak out on behalf of vic­tims of crime, regard­less of who they are.

What are you bab­bling about Mike?… 

Well lets get back to the police and their apol­o­giz­ing for the loss of life>
Is it just me or does it seem like the men and women of the force have a new pep in their steps at the instal­la­tion of a real leader, DCP Novelette Grant, albeit temporarily?
Okay it’s prob­a­bly just me and my excite­ment at Novelette get­ting a shot, no mat­ter how short, to show that she can do the job as well as oth­ers before her if not better.

Nevertheless the Police high com­mand have found it nec­es­sary to keep up the apol­o­gy tour after the appro­pri­ate demise of the six thugs in St James.
In a release the high com­mand asked peo­ple want­ed by police to avoid vio­lent con­fronta­tion with the police.
Acting police com­mis­sion­er Novelette Grant said that “had the deceased peace­ful­ly sur­ren­dered, they would have been arrest­ed and charged with ille­gal pos­ses­sion of firearm and ammunition”.
Regrettably, they chose to vio­lent­ly con­front the secu­ri­ty forces,” Grant said.

DCP Novelette Grant

According to Grant, there is an increas­ing pat­tern of vio­lent attacks on the police and mil­i­tary by crim­i­nal sus­pects who, on many occa­sions, have elud­ed cap­ture. Unfortunately, on this occa­sion, those who were embold­ened by these pre­vi­ous instances con­front­ed the secu­ri­ty forces and met their demise. http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​S​u​r​r​e​n​d​e​r​-​p​e​a​c​e​f​u​lly – police-urge-sus­pects-after-gang­sters-killed-in-gun-bat­tle.

The Police are absolute­ly trau­ma­tized by the con­stant and inces­sant haranguing .
The inces­sant bar­rage of crit­i­cisms is sure­ly hav­ing an effect on even the high­est lev­els of the force. Even though offi­cers at the high­est lev­els are not exposed to the dai­ly dan­gers of polic­ing in Jamaica the way street cops are.

The fact that the police high com­mand see it nec­es­sary to con­tin­ue on what I call an “apol­o­gy tour” , for doing exact­ly what the JCF Act empow­ers them to do , is tes­ta­ment to the lev­el of trau­ma the depart­ment has been exposed to, for car­ry­ing out it’s sworn mandate.

Here’s where I dif­fer from Novelette Grant.…

Said Grant.“had the deceased peace­ful­ly sur­ren­dered, they would have been arrest­ed and charged with ille­gal pos­ses­sion of firearm and ammunition”.
“Regrettably, they chose to vio­lent­ly con­front the secu­ri­ty forces.”
My dear act­ing com­mis­sion­er, every per­son on this plan­et knows what the func­tions of the police are.
There are no ambi­gu­i­ties inher­ent or oth­er­wise, which would reg­u­lar­ize or legal­ize, not com­ply­ing with autho­rized agents of the law, much less threat­en­ing their lives.

Officer head­ing out on patrol…

On that basis alone, there need be no apology!!
If we are to have a coun­try . If we are to have a democ­ra­cy. If we are to have the rule of law. The foun­da­tions of that soci­ety, our soci­ety must respect the rule of law and those who enforce said laws.
You jump over Niagara Falls you die.
You attack the police in the law­ful exe­cu­tion of their duties, much less with weapons of death you die.

The police should nev­er find itself apol­o­giz­ing for doing exact­ly what they are tasked with, and empow­ered to do.
We begin to take back our coun­try street by street, block by block, neigh­bor­hood by neighborhood.
Being a tough and pro­fes­sion­al police depart­ment has noth­ing to do with being dis­re­spect­ful and abusive.
It’s a straw-man lie being fed the pub­lic by the elites who are liv­ing off the pro­ceeds of crime. They are in the media, and these Trolls are intent on using those perch­es to shape the nar­ra­tive to suit their end.

Levy

We know who they are.
The tri­al liars, I mean lawyers. The Media elites. The polit­i­cal elites, some of whom can­not get on an air­plane to trav­el abroad because the Americans have yanked their visas,.
I recall being a very tough cop.
I also remem­ber young and old com­ing out to thank me for my work in the Grant’s Pen Gully, Shortwood gul­ly ‚White Hall, and Red Hills slums.
Yup the kiss­es from those old ladies will for­ev­er be in my heart as long as I live, as they thanked me for ensuri ng that they could go about their busi­ness peaceably.
That kind of polic­ing , tough though I was, does not seem to me to have been abu­sive polic­ing, not to those law-abid­ing residents.
Those who want­ed me moved away to anoth­er sta­tion or dead were the peo­ple who were a dan­ger to those communities.

If the Elites want to have a supe­ri­or police force over and above that which exist , let them give guns to (inde­com) and let them deal with the killers since they can do a bet­ter job of appre­hend­ing them with­out shoot­ing them.

Nowadays there is no short­age of bleed­ing heart char­la­tans who come as sav­iors of the people..
The only lives they care about are the lives of those whom have tak­en mul­ti­ple inno­cent lives.
So to hell with Terrence Williams and indecom.
Tell that lit­tle leech Horace Levy at Jamaicans for Justice to go get a damn job and stop pros­ti­tut­ing as a defend­er as of the poor, we know he is mere­ly eat­ing a food.

So called Public Defender. Arlene Harrison Henry..
This state fund­ed office is a total dupli­ca­tion of efforts and a tax­pay­er fund­ed assault on law enforcement…

Tell the entire bunch of Parasites who sit around and crit­i­cize the police but does noth­ing to help to secure the country.
Words are words , actions are what’s important.
Those at the pub­lic defend­er’s office as well , what a waste of tax-pay­ers dollars.
We have a Director of Public Prosecution, that’s the pub­lic defend­er. Any oth­er office which oper­ates as a defend­er of the pub­lic is a dupli­ca­tion which should be dis­band­ed and the funds redi­rect­ed to the real defend­er of the pub­lic the office of the DPP.

If our coun­try is to be bet­ter there need be a full repeal of the inde­com act and the law reauthorized.
As it is it is a crime enhance­ment law which is cost­ing Jamaicans their lives, it must go and so should Terrence Williams.
Lets begin the process of tak­ing back the streets of our cities , towns and villages .
Lets do it the right way.….

Used Like A Prop..

How often have I spoken to the issue of visible black people allowing themselves to be used by enemies of their communities as props to solidify their racist narrative?
Steve Harvey gets blow-back for meet­ing with trump at trump tow­ers in New York city..
Harvey is just the lat­est coon..
Cry me a riv­er Steve..

Steve Harvey come­di­an, tele­vi­sion-star, host of fam­i­ly feud, entre­pre­neur and radio per­son­al­i­ty became the most recent vic­tim of this strategy,.
He is stunned, and says he is bad­ly hurt at the blow-back he is receiv­ing. But Steve is not a total fool .….…or is he?
don­ald trump[sic] ignored requests to attend an event hon­or­ing black jour­nal­ists . He ignored invites from the NAACP. He refused to have dia­logue with the Congressional Black Caucus. He has not met with the Urban League. He has not met with a sin­gle African-American Mayor.
He has not even met with a rec­og­nized body of African-American Clergy.

Steve Harvey said he met with trump because he real­ly wants to help the inner cities !
Question : Steve you are not an elect­ed may­or , Governor , not even dog-catch­er, please explain in what way you envis­aged a meet­ing between your­self and trump would help inner cities?

You see Steve you got played.
You are on tele­vi­sion dai­ly dish­ing out rela­tion­ship advice .
You are reach­ing mil­lions of view­ers dai­ly , that is what don­ald trump found useful.
He real­ly has no need for you Steve, but he knows you are well know. Having a pho­to-op with you imme­di­ate­ly reach­es mil­lions of viewers .
That allows him to some­how shake the fact that he is a dan­ger­ous racial demagogue.

You Steve, walked right into that trap because you got car­ried away with your own sense of importance.
Oh to be a fly on the wall Steve when they devised that strat­e­gy to meet with you.
You great­ly dimin­ished your­self Steve and for that I am real­ly sorry.

UPDATE TO THIS STORY.
January 16th Martin Luther Kings birth­day, the ever schem­ing don­ald trump had some­one over to the gild­ed tow­er in midtown .
It’s not too dif­fi­cult to imag­ine who trump and his peo­ple thought up, to have a pho­to-op with on the birth­day of Dr King.
This of course after he ear­li­er tweet­ed the following.…

Celebrate Martin Luther King Day and all of the many won­der­ful things that he stood for. Honor him for being the great man that he was!

(trump shakes hands with Martin Luther King III after their meet­ing at trump tower.)

Oh Malcolm,Malcolm, Malcolm.…

In all fair­ness to Steve, he deserve a chance to explain himself.
Now Steve explained him­self , do you agree with him, and even if you do , does that release Steve from the accu­sa­tion he was used as a prop?

YouTube player

The Silent Majority Wants An End To Crime: The Elites In Kingston Are Fueling The Crime Wave.…

The fol­low­ing is a snip­pet of the way real Jamaicans are feel­ing about their com­mu­ni­ties and their coun­try in general.
It is impor­tant that as you watch and lis­ten you appre­ci­ate the pal­pa­ble fear these ordi­nary Jamaicans feel, and the gen­uine con­cern they have about not even appear­ing on cam­era out of fear of reprisal from cronies of the six urban ter­ror­ists who were extin­guished by the secu­ri­ty forces two nights ago.

(cour­tesy of cvm television.)

The Jamaican peo­ple are a decent law abid­ing people.
This writer has spo­ken to this for years, about the good­ness and kind­ness of these people.
I under­stood fun­da­men­tal­ly that the elites who define and dom­i­nate our cul­ture are total­ly uncon­cerned about the peo­ple like the folks in this video.
Ordinary peo­ple are the one’s who allow their sons and daugh­ters to place their lives on the line as police offi­cers and soldiers.

Outside the elit­ist bub­ble , these peo­ple are ordi­nary peo­ple whom have con­tributed much toward the devel­op­ment of our country.
More than any­thing else they have sent their sons and daugh­ters to put them­selves in harms way for all Jamaicans , none more so than their great­est ene­mies who walk the halls of acad­e­mia, sit in the media hous­es and the oth­er places where elit­ism grow and thrive.
These, the above Cross Roads crowd, receive much from our coun­try with­out risk­ing anything.

They are giv­en pow­er­ful posi­tions in Government and the diplo­mat­ic ser­vices, they receive nation­al hon­ors they do not deserve, and haven’t earned.
The elit­ist media and their friends above Cross Roads have sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly used the sto­ry line of these, the least pro­duc­tive, most crim­i­nal­ly com­plic­it ele­ments in our coun­try to shape nation­al secu­ri­ty policy.
The peo­ple who give the most, their sons and daugh­ters to die receives noth­ing in return.

The despi­ca­ble per­pet­u­a­tion of the vic­tim-hood men­tal­i­ty has been duti­ful­ly and glee­ful­ly enhanced by the lame stream cheer-lead­ing media which unwit­ting­ly allowed inner city alle­ga­tions of abuse to deter­mine how crime is approached.
This has not only shaped local pol­i­cy but has impact­ed inter­na­tion­al per­cep­tions about local law-enforce­ment practices.
A google search bears that out.

The time has come for real Jamaicans. Real peo­ple like the peo­ple in this video to make it known that they will not tol­er­ate this kind of crim­i­nal­i­ty in their communities.
I will say this again , the vast major­i­ty of the rur­al folks are decent good people.
I call on all Jamaicans in every nook and cran­ny of our beau­ti­ful coun­try to stand against the elites in Kingston.
Tell them where they can go with (inde­com) and Terrence Williams.

For years we warned about this, our warn­ings fell on deaf years.

For years we warned against the lying char­la­tan Carolyn Gomes’ .
Many accused me of tak­ing the side of police because I am a for­mer police officer.
It was only after they had already bestowed a nation­al hon­or on Gomes that she showed who she tru­ly was.
And what her cam­paign about human rights was tru­ly about.

We have been warn­ing about Terrence Williams for awhile now .
The idea of an over­sight Agency to look at alle­ga­tions of secu­ri­ty forces excess and abuse is a must.
In this day and age there must be safe­guards , checks and bal­ances against state power.
However that check against the pow­er of Government must be bal­anced with the Government’s pri­ma­ry role and pre­rog­a­tive to pro­vide a secure envi­ron­ment for the nation.

Terrence Williams

It can be done.
It must be done, the two are not mutu­al­ly exclu­sive. and are inex­tri­ca­bly linked.
With that said, our coun­try must move from being a coun­try of men, to becom­ing a coun­try of laws.
This tran­si­tion effec­tive­ly removes the abil­i­ty for lit­tle men with grandiose ideas and over inflat­ed sense of their own impor­tance to cause harm to many.

The silent major­i­ty of Jamaicans want a peace­ful place to live and raise their families .
I call on the Administration to ignore the noise of the Kingston crowd , both those in the ghet­to and those above Cross Roads who enhances, sup­port and defend crim­i­nal­i­ty in our country

The silent major­i­ty of Jamaicans do not sup­port criminals .
The elit­ists do.

We Will Never Forget !!!!

Amidst the noise and hoopla which will emanate this week in and around the Nation’s cap­i­tal this week­end , let us peo­ple of col­or, con­sci­en­tious peo­ple of African ances­try ‚take a few moments to rec­og­nize the incred­i­ble sac­ri­fice Martin Luther King made, and the high price he paid along with thou­sands of oth­er unsung heroes.

YouTube player

Many peo­ple of col­or ignore momen­tous events like the instal­la­tion of a new American President as insignif­i­cant to their lives.
This how­ev­er is a mistake .
Thinking of these events in parochial terms lulls us into a false sense of ambivalence.

YouTube player

An American President’s poli­cies have tremen­dous­ly far reach­ing impact and con­se­quences on every­thing across our planet ,
These poli­cies not only deter­mine war and peace, pros­per­i­ty and pover­ty, but even more press­ing exis­ten­tial issues as crit­i­cal as the air we breathe and the water we drink.

We make a trag­ic mis­take if we ignore the events hap­pen­ing in our world today.

Tough No Nonsense Policing And Good Investigation :do It Right.…

mb

Soldiers in a the­ater of war places a lot of trust in the men who lead them into war.
They believe they will be giv­en the kind of lead­er­ship they deserve which allows them the best shot at com­plet­ing their mission.
Well so I’m told by my friends and fam­i­ly mem­bers who actu­al­ly served in the great­est, most lethal mil­i­tary in the his­to­ry of mankind, the United States military.
Right Chris Porter , Copelad Bedward , Haniff Brown and the many oth­er ex-police offi­cers who served with dis­tinc­tion in the US mil­i­tary after leav­ing the Jamaica Constabulary Force?

Policing in dan­ger­ous urban envi­ron­ments require strong lead­er­ship as well, just of a slight­ly dif­fer­ent nature.
Cops who take on the dan­ger­ous job of polic­ing dan­ger­ous Favela In Brazil do their jobs with the knowl­edge that their lead­er­ship stand solid­ly behind their efforts to bring san­i­ty to these oth­er­wise chaot­ic urban slums.
Jamaica , one of the world’s most vio­lent coun­try, with dan­ger­ous urban slums known as Garrisons. is no different.

Acp Élan Powell and retir­ing CP Carl Williams

Police offi­cers go out to do good !
That is the premise from which any dis­cus­sion on polic­ing must commence.
For the cyn­ics who line up to chat and crit­i­cize, I ask , when was the last time you placed your mis­er­able life on the line in defense of others?
So then, if the police go out to do good, and the back up their com­mit­ment by plac­ing their lives on the line for us.
Why would we not sup­port them again?

Nobody wants bad cops , we want our cops account­able like every­one else .
What we should nev­er tol­er­ate is the demo­niz­ing of our pro­tec­tors by peo­ple who are too cow­ard­ly to step up to the plate and do. yet they have every­thing to say.


Welcome to the Commissioner’s chair DCP Novelette Grant a leader.
A cops cop, a woman who signed up to do a job dom­i­nat­ed by men and did it well.
My praise for the Police high com­mand is well.…… There is nev­er any praise for the high com­mand from me .
However, I have great respect and trust in my for­mer col­league Novelette Grant .
Smart as a whip, speaks her mind and is not afraid to stand up for her colleagues.
Something Dr Carl Williams for­got to do.

I knew Novelette Grant from our days at Port Royal her batch of stu­dent con­sta­bles were the very first to grad­u­ate from the Police academy.
Six months lat­er my batch, the first batch to begin train­ing at the acad­e­my , followed .

DCP Grant speaks to the stress cops are forced to deal with.
A cops cop , Grant speaks to these chal­lenges like none of her col­leagues in the senior ech­e­lons of the force.
One of her Former female colleague and friend who entered the academy and graduated with her. had this to say about Novelette Grant.

I was a squad­mate of Novelette Grant we start­ed our ini­tial train­ing in Port Royal and was the first grad­u­at­ed batch out of Twickenham Park called the Jamaica Police Academy. Novelette was our Valedictorian and was the select­ed grad­u­ate, Best at Laws. She was trans­ferred to the rur­al areas where she worked along­side what you would call the grass-root police.
She has always per­sist­ed in qual­i­fy­ing her­self edu­ca­tion­al­ly. She was nev­er one to suck up to the pow­ers that be, but where she saw weak­ness or unfair­ness. Would with intel­li­gence. Speak her mind.

I remem­ber even in train­ing school , her stand­ing up to the feared ““shock­ing” Sgt. Brooks and our drill instruc­tor Ruddy Bailey””. We would always wor­ry once Novelette was. Called to the office Summoned by screw Morgan”” with Ms Frazier behind. Novelette always came back smil­ing. Shrugged and said” the frog is only dead when he is on his back, but as long as i can hop i will croak” Novelette has grown in the ranks.

She went onto the accel­er­at­ed ranks, served as ACP under two Commissioners and as DCP. Under two Commissioner. I dare­say she should be giv­en a fair chance to uti­lize her skills many and var­ied in get­ting the Job done. The fight for our Forces pro­fes­sion­al and impor­tant duty to fight crime and to bring back respect for law and order, giv­en the oppor­tu­ni­ty, tools, the vehi­cles and finan­cial resources need­ed for their morale.

That is a ring­ing endorse­ment of a col­league if ever there was one. Well said Donna Dell.
As I have stat­ed in this medi­um from time to time the JCF lead­er­ship is weak, feck­less, inef­fec­tu­al, cow­ard­ly, and incompetent.
Those are actu­al­ly the good adjec­tives, the oth­ers .….….don’t ask.
Novelette Grant stands head and shoul­ders above all of the peo­ple in the high com­mand, in her clar­i­ty of focus and her staunch defense of offi­cers on the street.
Jamaica does itself a tremen­dous ser­vice by appoint­ing this qual­i­fied woman to the posi­tion of chief constable.

Weapons recov­ered by the police at the scene.

On a side note :
I hope that the Investigative arm of the police force (whats left of it)understand the wealth of infor­ma­tion which are on these cell phones.
They must secure war­rants and go get these phone records .
The death of these gang mem­bers should nev­er be the end of inves­ti­gat­ing them it should be the beginning .
These guys are killers who use their tele­phones to com­mu­ni­cate with oth­ers. their nefar­i­ous and evil deeds.
Those instru­ments are trea­sure troves of action­able infor­ma­tion which local law rein­force­ment must secure and utilize.
Breaking the backs of these gangs require tough smart policing.
Do it right !!!

Good Job Cops: What’s This About Apologizing For Their Loss ?

mb
Jamaicans woke up to wonderful news Sunday morning January 15th. It was like back in the days when the police were allowed to go after criminals.
The fatal shooting of six men in an alleged gun battle with members of the security forces in Goodwill, St James was good news indeed.
There will be two types of responses from these killings , wild celebration by people who believe in the rule of law ‚and a load of bullshit from those who benefit from crime and thus support criminality.
The fraud­u­lent Elitists on the Island who sit in their ivory tow­ers and pon­tif­i­cate about treat­ing these ver­min with kids gloves should be made to stare at their dead bod­ies for hours with­out stop­ping.
These alleged mem­bers of the ski-mask gang will not be tak­ing the lives of any oth­er inno­cent person.

That’s it.
The com­ments going for­ward will be clear cut in deter­min­ing the side com­men­ta­tors are on , no mat­ter how they try to couch their argu­ments in gobbledygook.

The secu­ri­ty Forces final­ly decid­ed to say fuck you” to Terrence Williams and his bunch of scum-bag friends who pro­tect the crim­i­nals on the Island.
They demon­strat­ed that what all for­mer Jamaican Police offi­cers already knew, cops are absolute­ly not afraid of any dirty filthy crim­i­nals.
They are afraid of a Government which is too chick­en-shit to pro­tect them as they go about what they are sworn to do.
This not a crit­i­cism of the Andrew Holness led Government.
Government in this con­text is par­ty neutral.

As usu­al (inde­com) is sup­pos­ed­ly inves­ti­gat­ing the exter­mi­na­tion of the six. My only regret is that every­one in that out­fit was­n’t caught in the cross­fire.
These sce­nar­ios are not the same as shootouts in oth­er coun­tries where a per­son pulls a weapon on an offi­cer and is shot.
These sce­nar­ios have exist­ed for decades in Jamaica and has exac­er­bat­ed now with the huge pro­lif­er­a­tion of semi auto­mat­ic weapons all over the Island.
In oth­er coun­tries the sce­nar­ios which play out in Jamaica dai­ly elic­it mas­sive swat respons­es, and the shoot­ing death of the perpetrators.
The take-away is that Jamaican cops are asked to face heav­i­ly armed killers but are not allowed to appro­pri­ate­ly defend them­selves if the elit­ists con­tin­ue to have their way.

Weapons recov­ered by the police at the scene.

Jamaican Police offi­cers are not con­fronting sane ratio­nal peo­ple who are will­ing to drop their weapons when con­front­ed, they want to kill police officers.
These are ruth­less , mind­less, ani­mals who take tremen­dous plea­sure in killing every­one, includ­ing police.
Strike that .
Particularly police.

What I don’t want to hear from the Police is the non­sense bull­shit that they are sor­ry for the loss of life.
Get over your damn selves already.
The spe­cial inter­ests who sup­port these mass mur­der­ers do not utter a word when police offi­cers are gunned down mercilessly.
Neither of the two state spon­sored anti ‑police enti­ties, (inde­com) and the pub­lic defend­er’s office, nor Jamaicans for Justice and the oth­er despi­ca­ble leech­es who give aid and com­fort to those low life garbage, ever offer a word of com­fort to the fam­i­lies of slain officers.
These crim­i­nals made a deci­sion not to val­ue the lives of oth­ers . They decid­ed not to val­ue their own lives when they opened fire on the police and soldiers .
The secu­ri­ty forces should not be in the busi­ness of apol­o­giz­ing for their loss.
Thats the remit of (inde­com) (jfj) and others.

If The Past Administration Thought The Prison Deal Was Good Why Did They Not Accept It And Be Done With It?

mb

As news broke that Jamaican author­i­ties had reject­ed the $5.5 bil­lion dol­lar deal from Great Britain , social Media lit up with opinions.
The deal would have seen the Former colo­nial pow­er help­ing to fund the con­struc­tion of a new prison on the Island but would also result in hun­dreds of pris­on­ers being dumped on the Island as well.
According to esti­mates the $5,5 bil­lion that the British pro­posed to con­tribute would have rep­re­sent­ed only 40% of the actu­al cost.
Which would leave the Island hold­ing the bag on find­ing fund­ing for the oth­er 60% which would amount to just under 8 billion.
As well as tak­ing on hun­dreds of pris­on­ers some­how con­nect­ed to the Island already in British pris­ons and accept­ing Jamaicans in Britain who run afoul of their laws into perpetuity.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​d​a​v​i​d​-​c​a​m​e​r​o​n​-​r​u​l​e​s​-​o​u​t​-​s​l​a​v​e​r​y​-​r​e​p​a​r​a​t​i​o​n​-​d​u​r​i​n​g​-​j​a​m​a​i​c​a​-​v​i​s​it/

As astro­nom­i­cal as those mon­e­tary fig­ures are for Jamaica , it is the intend­ed British dump of over 300 pris­on­ers on the Island which ought to shock Jamaicans everywhere.
None of those peo­ple were con­vict­ed of com­mit­ting any crimes on the Island.
It’s impor­tant to rec­og­nize that accept­ing the deal would have opened up a con­duit for Britain to dump any per­son vague­ly con­nect­ed to Jamaica who com­mits on offence in Britain onto the Island.

Prison Deal A £25m Gift Wrapped Trojan Horse.

The ini­tial deal was first offered to the pre­vi­ous PNP Administration led by for­mer Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller .
As far as the PNP is con­cerned they had made no deci­sion on whether or not to accept the deal which was offered to the Island on the occa­sion of the vis­it of then Prime Minister David Cameron.
Nevertheless sources close to the par­ty revealed that the Portia Simpson Administration was lean­ing heav­i­ly toward accept­ing the deal , large­ly because the British Government would have pro­vid­ed monies to care for pris­on­ers the pris­on­er to be sent back for a peri­od of about two years.
What was alleged­ly pro­posed to care for each pris­on­er by British author­i­ties dif­fered vast­ly from what Jamaica is able to allot to the care of a sim­i­lar pris­on­er on the Island.
That sweet­en­er was enough of an entice­ment to have the tongues of for­mer admin­is­tra­tion offi­cials wagging.

Now that the JLP Government has appro­pri­ate­ly reject­ed this Trojan horse, mem­bers of the polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion and the usu­al bleed­ing hearts in the crim­i­nal rights fra­ter­ni­ty are quick to point out that the nation’s pris­on’s are below inter­na­tion­al standards.
Their self right­eous cru­sade is devoid of any con­sid­er­a­tion of the exist­ing crime sta­tis­tics, and the toll mur­ders and oth­er seri­ous crimes are hav­ing on the psy­che of the country.
The coun­try’s lead­er­ship should not waste a sin­gle night’s sleep wor­ry­ing over the com­fort lev­el of crim­i­nals . They made con­scious deci­sions to com­mit heinous crimes.
They made their beds they ought to sleep in them.

At the time of Cameron’s arrival on the Island the then leader of the Opposition and now Prime Minister Andrew Holness opined that the mon­ey being sug­gest­ed for the prison would be bet­ter put to use in education.
I do not have specifics on why the offer was reject­ed by the gov­ern­ment, suf­fic­ing to say that the very idea that our coun­try would be accept­ing pris­on­ers who had not been con­vict­ed of any crime in Jamaica is a non-starter.

At the same time the the Opposition lead­er’s state­ment that those funds could be bet­ter served if allo­cat­ed to edu­ca­tion missed the mark then.
If part of, or whol­ly the rea­son the deal was reject­ed final­ly, they also miss the mark now.
Conflating nation­al secu­ri­ty and edu­ca­tion is reck­less and a clear dere­lic­tion of respon­si­bil­i­ty to a crit­i­cal and fun­da­men­tal func­tion of Government, which is to pro­tect the nation.
We need an edu­cat­ed workforce.
We also need pris­ons to put peo­ple who are threats to soci­etal order.
It’s not a zero sum game we need both.
We do know that edu­cat­ed , employed peo­ple may be less like­ly to com­mit crimes.
What we also know is that many of the crimes being com­mit­ted on the Island have at their gen­e­sis some very edu­cat­ed and well-placed people.
We need pris­ons for them,..

Conflating edu­ca­tion with nation­al secu­ri­ty require­ments is reck­less at it’s core. It plays into the mis­in­formed idea that if only peo­ple are edu­cat­ed and have jobs they do not com­mit crimes.
That has been the nar­ra­tive guid­ing nation­als secu­ri­ty pol­i­cy for too long, a mind­set which is tied to the Privy Council’s deci­sion to pre­vent hang­ing of murderers.
The mod­els they gen­er­al­ly point to are (1) in Asian nations which some­times have strin­gent laws which are heavy on their puni­tive com­po­nent which they nev­er both­er to mention.
Or (2) the Scandinavian mod­els which are large­ly eth­nic mono­lith­ic wealthy soci­eties in which Governments take care of much of their cit­i­zens most basic needs.
Of course there are going to be less crimes in those societies.
Jamaica is nowhere near where Scandinavia is so we must build prisons.
This deal seemed to have been just a bad one for Jamaica.

Levy

On this par­tic­u­lar issue the Government should ignore the bark­ing of the Political oppo­si­tion. If the past PNP Administration thought it was such a great deal they would have been hap­py to sign Jamaica away for it.
How the Government responds to the lit­tle mon­grels in the eat-a-food crim­i­nal rights fra­ter­ni­ty is it’s problem.
You ele­vat­ed them and gave them clout , deal with their haranguing…

Andrew Holness Administration Rejects UK Prison Deal

The Andrew Holness admin­is­tra­tion has reject­ed the $5.5 bil­lion offer of the United Kingdom (UK) to help build a mod­ern prison in Jamaica.

Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade Minister Kamina Johnson Smith made the announce­ment in the Senate this morn­ing end­ing almost six months of wait for the answers.

She said the terms of the offer “were not ben­e­fi­cial to Jamaica as a whole”. She did not state exact­ly the unfa­vor­able terms. She also declined to answer ques­tions from Opposition Senator Lambert Brown, who tabled the ques­tions, on whether nego­ti­a­tions are under­way to get favor­able terms.“The mat­ter is closed at this time”. Leader of Opposition Business Mark Golding also could not get an answer on when the offer was rejected.

Johnson Smith said the ques­tions, among oth­ers, were not appro­pri­ate and cit­ed nation­al secu­ri­ty con­cerns. However, she said the ques­tions could be sent to the secu­ri­ty min­istry. “Transparency, where is it?” Brown fired at the Government side. Johnson Smith lat­er accused the Opposition of “grand­stand­ing”. The issue is sen­si­tive for the prime min­is­ter because, while lead­ing the oppo­si­tion last year, he told then British Prime, Minister David Cameron, who announced the deal, that the mon­ey would be bet­ter spent on education.

A known con­di­tion of the deal includ­ed Jamaica accept­ing about 300 British pris­on­ers of Jamaican her­itage to com­plete their sen­tence here. The UK’s $5.5 bil­lion for the 1,500-bed facil­i­ty would only be 40 per cent of the cost. Jamaica would have to find the rest. Public Defender Arlene Harrison Henry has said cur­rent prison con­di­tions are below min­i­mum con­sti­tu­tion­al requirements.
Read more her: http://​jamaica​-glean​er​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​1​7​0​1​1​3​/​a​n​d​r​e​w​-​h​o​l​n​e​s​s​-​a​d​m​i​n​i​s​t​r​a​t​i​o​n​-​r​e​j​e​c​t​s​-​u​k​-​p​r​i​s​o​n​-​d​eal

Holness In Israel But.…

mb
One of the many criticisms which dogged former Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller during her two stints as PM was her many overseas trips.

Though a non-sup­port­er of Mrs Miller and her par­ty, at the time I stat­ed my belief that her trav­els and meet­ings with for­eign heads of states were a cru­cial part of her job description.
Nevertheless ‚I believed then, as I do now ‚that those over­seas trips must be geared at extract­ing max­i­mum ben­e­fits for the Jamaican peo­ple, as it must to be the pre­sump­tion that for­eign lead­ers are hav­ing those meet­ings to get max­i­mum advan­tage for their nations.
As such I was con­strained in my crit­i­cisms of the for­mer Prime Minister on her for­eign trips. I believed she had the right to pur­sue eco­nom­ic and oth­er oppor­tu­ni­ties for Jamaica.
I also believe that it is the right of the new Prime Minister of Jamaica to do the very same thing as part of his duties as chief exec­u­tive offi­cer of the country.

We should nev­er lose sight of the fact that coun­tries do not have friend­ships , they have interests.
As we applaud moves aimed at secur­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties for our peo­ple we can ill-afford to be star­ry-eyed polit­i­cal­ly, about the fact that for­eign Leaders invite oth­er lead­ers because they believe that form­ing, or strength­en­ing bonds, or even the mere optics of such meet­ings, advances their agendas.

Benjamin Netanyahu a mas­ter of manip­u­la­tion, and the art of the optics ‚was not shy about thank­ing Andrew Holness for not join­ing a UNESCO vote against Israel. (already acknowl­edg­ing that Israel wants to show it has friends which sup­port it’s policies) .
So in this par­tic­u­lar case the inter­est of Israel was already served.
It would be fool­hardy to believe that his Invitation to the Jamaican PM was intend­ed to be any­thing more than an, “in your face” pho­to-op to UNESCO.
In the end Jamaica may stand to lose more than it gains from this visit.

The vote of which Netanyahu spoke, was the UNESCO’s World Heritage com­mit­tee vote, it was con­vened in Istanbul Turkey.
According to Israel the res­o­lu­tion was designed to, (in their words) “erase any Jewish con­nec­tion to Jerusalem”.
The fol­low­ing coun­tries are on the exec­u­tive: Angola, Azerbaijan, Burkina Faso, Croatia, Cuba, Finland, Indonesia, Jamaica, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Tunisia, Turkey, United Republic of Tanzania, Vietnam and Zimbabwe.
For years Israel has lob­bied to break the almost mono­lith­ic vote of the African con­ti­nent in it’s sup­port for the Palestinian peo­ple in their strug­gle against Israeli occu­pa­tion and oppression.

This is of course with the excep­tion of Tanzania, which has always vot­ed with oth­er non-African nations in sup­port of the state of Israel. These include Croatia, Finland, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, or at least abstain, accord­ing to the (Jerusalem Post).
Jamaica’s vote with Israel came as a result of mas­sive lob­by­ing from Israel.
The Question now must be ‚what will Jamaica derive from this vote which will cer­tain­ly raise eye­brows from quar­ters opposed to Israel on principle?

Israel Expels 8,000 African Immigrants Because They “Threaten Jewish Identity”

I have no prob­lem with the PM look­ing at out­side mod­els which may be emulated.
As Andrew Holness said , Jamaica has long looked at Israel’s advances in agri­cul­ture, tech­nol­o­gy etc as a mod­el which can be applied to Jamaica.
Nevertheless it is impor­tant to note that the Obama admin­is­tra­tion, for the first time in Israel’s his­to­ry, pulled America’s veto pro­tec­tion which shield­ed the state of Israel from UN con­dem­na­tion for it’s con­tin­ued ille­gal land-grab , and set­tle­ment building.
Every time that Israel takes a bit more of Palestine through it’s ille­gal build­ing of set­tle­ments, it auto­mat­i­cal­ly extends out­ward it’s perime­ter of defense, which it states is nec­es­sary for the defense of Israel.

This map illus­trates the process Israel has used , large­ly through set­tle­ment build­ing , of push­ing the bor­ders of Israel out to the point there is no longer a place called Palestine.

That is the rea­son the last two American Presidents, George W Bush and Barack Obama, both insist­ed that in order for the peace process to be enhanced Israel must stop the ille­gal build­ing of set­tle­ments on Palestinan lands.
It must also be not­ed that Israel’s poli­cies toward the Palestinian peo­ple and it’s treat­ment toward African Jews (real Hebrew peo­ple) has drawn strong con­dem­na­tion from across the globe, to include for­mer President Jimmy Carter, who con­tends the Israeli state is the clos­est thing to an Apartheid state.
As we speak many Hebrew peo­ple dar­ing to return to Israel are spat upon and abused, many are locked up in a mon­ster prison in the Negev desert.
It’s impor­tant that as we seek to bol­ster and cre­ate new rela­tion­ships we do not align our­selves with inter­ests which are anti­thet­i­cal to our core values.

Democracy is not what any one coun­try say it is, democ­ra­cy is an ever evolv­ing concept.
Even in the United States the World’s sec­ond largest democ­ra­cy we see now, that the cher­ished prin­ci­ple called democ­ra­cy is in dan­ger. When those not even yet in office are show­ing that democ­ra­cy is what they say it is.

Read, com­ment, and share.

Get Your Moral Courage In Gear’

Novelette Grant strong­ly believes that the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) is ready to be led by a woman.

Though she is yet to sub­mit her appli­ca­tion for the post of police com­mis­sion­er, adver­tised rough­ly two weeks ago, Grant, who is now act­ing com­mis­sion­er, yes­ter­day declared her inten­tion to apply. The post offi­cial­ly became vacant last Friday, the last day of Dr Carl Williams’ tenure, after he exit­ed the job on ear­ly retire­ment. Yesterday, at a JCF press con­fer­ence held at the Commissioner’s Office, Grant explained why she should take lead­er­ship of the 150-year-old organisation.“What I bring is 35 years of knowl­edge of this organ­i­sa­tion. I think I have an excel­lent under­stand­ing of its work­ings and I think I have an excel­lent under­stand­ing of its fail­ings, too,” Grant said.
See sto­ry here :http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​G​r​a​n​t​-​r​e​a​d​y​-​f​o​r​-​t​h​e​-​t​o​p​-​j​o​b​_​8​6​290

President Obama’s Farewell Speech:full Text.…

Because of you, by almost every measure, America is a better, stronger place than it was when we started.”

Chicago! It’s good to be home! Thank you, every­body. Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you. All right, every­body sit down. We’re on live TV here. I’ve got to move. You can tell that I’m a lame duck because nobody is fol­low­ing instruc­tions. Everybody have a seat.

My fel­low Americans, Michelle and I have been so touched by all the well wish­es that we’ve received over the past few weeks. But tonight, it’s my turn to say thanks. Whether we have seen eye-to-eye or rarely agreed at all, my con­ver­sa­tions with you, the American peo­ple, in liv­ing rooms and in schools, at farms, on fac­to­ry floors, at din­ers and on dis­tant mil­i­tary out­posts -– those con­ver­sa­tions are what have kept me hon­est, and kept me inspired, and kept me going. And every day, I have learned from you. You made me a bet­ter President, and you made me a bet­ter man.

So I first came to Chicago when I was in my ear­ly 20s. And I was still try­ing to fig­ure out who I was, still search­ing for a pur­pose in my life. And it was a neigh­bor­hood not far from here where I began work­ing with church groups in the shad­ows of closed steel mills. It was on these streets where I wit­nessed the pow­er of faith, and the qui­et dig­ni­ty of work­ing peo­ple in the face of strug­gle and loss.

AUDIENCE: Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!

OBAMA: I can’t do that.

AUDIENCE: Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!

OBAMA: This is where I learned that change only hap­pens when ordi­nary peo­ple get involved and they get engaged, and they come togeth­er to demand it.

After eight years as your President, I still believe that. And it’s not just my belief. It’s the beat­ing heart of our American idea –- our bold exper­i­ment in self-gov­ern­ment. It’s the con­vic­tion that we are all cre­at­ed equal, endowed by our Creator with cer­tain unalien­able rights, among them life, lib­er­ty, and the pur­suit of hap­pi­ness. It’s the insis­tence that these rights, while self-evi­dent, have nev­er been self-exe­cut­ing; that We, the People, through the instru­ment of our democ­ra­cy, can form a more per­fect union.

What a rad­i­cal idea. A great gift that our Founders gave to us: The free­dom to chase our indi­vid­ual dreams through our sweat and toil and imag­i­na­tion, and the imper­a­tive to strive togeth­er, as well, to achieve a com­mon good, a greater good.

For 240 years, our nation’s call to cit­i­zen­ship has giv­en work and pur­pose to each new gen­er­a­tion. It’s what led patri­ots to choose repub­lic over tyran­ny, pio­neers to trek west, slaves to brave that makeshift rail­road to free­dom. It’s what pulled immi­grants and refugees across oceans and the Rio Grande. It’s what pushed women to reach for the bal­lot. It’s what pow­ered work­ers to orga­nize. It’s why GIs gave their lives at Omaha Beach and Iwo Jima, Iraq and Afghanistan. And why men and women from Selma to Stonewall were pre­pared to give theirs, as well.

So that’s what we mean when we say America is excep­tion­al ― not that our nation has been flaw­less from the start, but that we have shown the capac­i­ty to change and make life bet­ter for those who fol­low. Yes, our progress has been uneven. The work of democ­ra­cy has always been hard. It’s always been con­tentious. Sometimes it’s been bloody. For every two steps for­ward, it often feels we take one step back. But the long sweep of America has been defined by for­ward motion, a con­stant widen­ing of our found­ing creed to embrace all and not just some.

If I had told you eight years ago that America would reverse a great reces­sion, reboot our auto indus­try, and unleash the longest stretch of job cre­ation in our his­to­ry if I had told you that we would open up a new chap­ter with the Cuban peo­ple, shut down Iran’s nuclear weapons pro­gram with­out fir­ing a shot, take out the mas­ter­mind of 911 if I had told you that we would win mar­riage equal­i­ty, and secure the right to health insur­ance for anoth­er 20 mil­lion of our fel­low cit­i­zens, if I had told you all that, you might have said our sights were set a lit­tle too high. But that’s what we did. That’s what you did.

You were the change. You answered people’s hopes, and because of you, by almost every mea­sure, America is a bet­ter, stronger place than it was when we started.

In 10 days, the world will wit­ness a hall­mark of our democracy.

AUDIENCE: Nooo ―

OBAMA: No, no, no, no, no ― the peace­ful trans­fer of pow­er from one freely elect­ed President to the next. I com­mit­ted to President-elect Trump that my admin­is­tra­tion would ensure the smoothest pos­si­ble tran­si­tion, just as President Bush did for me. Because it’s up to all of us to make sure our gov­ern­ment can help us meet the many chal­lenges we still face.

We have what we need to do so. We have every­thing we need to meet those chal­lenges. After all, we remain the wealth­i­est, most pow­er­ful, and most respect­ed nation on Earth. Our youth, our dri­ve, our diver­si­ty and open­ness, our bound­less capac­i­ty for risk and rein­ven­tion means that the future should be ours. But that poten­tial will only be real­ized if our democ­ra­cy works. Only if our pol­i­tics bet­ter reflects the decen­cy of our peo­ple. Only if all of us, regard­less of par­ty affil­i­a­tion or par­tic­u­lar inter­ests, help restore the sense of com­mon pur­pose that we so bad­ly need right now.

That’s what I want to focus on tonight: The state of our democ­ra­cy. Understand, democ­ra­cy does not require uni­for­mi­ty. Our founders argued. They quar­reled. Eventually they com­pro­mised. They expect­ed us to do the same. But they knew that democ­ra­cy does require a basic sense of sol­i­dar­i­ty -– the idea that for all our out­ward dif­fer­ences, we’re all in this togeth­er; that we rise or fall as one.

There have been moments through­out our his­to­ry that threat­ens that sol­i­dar­i­ty. And the begin­ning of this cen­tu­ry has been one of those times. A shrink­ing world, grow­ing inequal­i­ty; demo­graph­ic change and the specter of ter­ror­ism -– these forces haven’t just test­ed our secu­ri­ty and our pros­per­i­ty, but are test­ing our democ­ra­cy, as well. And how we meet these chal­lenges to our democ­ra­cy will deter­mine our abil­i­ty to edu­cate our kids, and cre­ate good jobs, and pro­tect our home­land. In oth­er words, it will deter­mine our future.

To begin with, our democ­ra­cy won’t work with­out a sense that every­one has eco­nom­ic oppor­tu­ni­ty. And the good news is that today the econ­o­my is grow­ing again. Wages, incomes, home val­ues, and retire­ment accounts are all ris­ing again. Poverty is falling again. The wealthy are pay­ing a fair­er share of tax­es even as the stock mar­ket shat­ters records. The unem­ploy­ment rate is near a 10-year low. The unin­sured rate has nev­er, ever been low­er. Health care costs are ris­ing at the slow­est rate in 50 years. And I’ve said and I mean it ― if any­one can put togeth­er a plan that is demon­stra­bly bet­ter than the improve­ments we’ve made to our health care sys­tem and that cov­ers as many peo­ple at less cost, I will pub­licly sup­port it.

Because that, after all, is why we serve. Not to score points or take cred­it, but to make people’s lives better.

But for all the real progress that we’ve made, we know it’s not enough. Our econ­o­my doesn’t work as well or grow as fast when a few pros­per at the expense of a grow­ing mid­dle class and lad­ders for folks who want to get into the mid­dle class. That’s the eco­nom­ic argu­ment. But stark inequal­i­ty is also cor­ro­sive to our demo­c­ra­t­ic ide­al. While the top one per­cent has amassed a big­ger share of wealth and income, too many fam­i­lies, in inner cities and in rur­al coun­ties, have been left behind ― the laid-off fac­to­ry work­er; the wait­ress or health care work­er who’s just bare­ly get­ting by and strug­gling to pay the bills ― con­vinced that the game is fixed against them, that their gov­ern­ment only serves the inter­ests of the pow­er­ful ― that’s a recipe for more cyn­i­cism and polar­iza­tion in our politics.

But there are no quick fix­es to this long-term trend. I agree, our trade should be fair and not just free. But the next wave of eco­nom­ic dis­lo­ca­tions won’t come from over­seas. It will come from the relent­less pace of automa­tion that makes a lot of good, mid­dle-class jobs obsolete.

And so we’re going to have to forge a new social com­pact to guar­an­tee all our kids the edu­ca­tion they need to give work­ers the pow­er to union­ize for bet­ter wages; to update the social safe­ty net to reflect the way we live now, and make more reforms to the tax code so cor­po­ra­tions and indi­vid­u­als who reap the most from this new econ­o­my don’t avoid their oblig­a­tions to the coun­try that’s made their very suc­cess possible.

We can argue about how to best achieve these goals. But we can’t be com­pla­cent about the goals them­selves. For if we don’t cre­ate oppor­tu­ni­ty for all peo­ple, the dis­af­fec­tion and divi­sion that has stalled our progress will only sharp­en in years to come.

There’s a sec­ond threat to our democ­ra­cy ― and this one is as old as our nation itself. After my elec­tion, there was talk of a post-racial America. And such a vision, how­ev­er well-intend­ed, was nev­er real­is­tic. Race remains a potent and often divi­sive force in our soci­ety. Now, I’ve lived long enough to know that race rela­tions are bet­ter than they were 10, or 20, or 30 years ago, no mat­ter what some folks say. You can see it not just in sta­tis­tics, you see it in the atti­tudes of young Americans across the polit­i­cal spectrum.

But we’re not where we need to be. And all of us have more work to do. If every eco­nom­ic issue is framed as a strug­gle between a hard­work­ing white mid­dle class and an unde­serv­ing minor­i­ty, then work­ers of all shades are going to be left fight­ing for scraps while the wealthy with­draw fur­ther into their pri­vate enclaves. If we’re unwill­ing to invest in the chil­dren of immi­grants, just because they don’t look like us, we will dimin­ish the prospects of our own chil­dren ― because those brown kids will rep­re­sent a larg­er and larg­er share of America’s work­force. And we have shown that our econ­o­my doesn’t have to be a zero-sum game. Last year, incomes rose for all races, all age groups, for men and for women.

So if we’re going to be seri­ous about race going for­ward, we need to uphold laws against dis­crim­i­na­tion ― in hir­ing, and in hous­ing, and in edu­ca­tion, and in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem. That is what our Constitution and our high­est ideals require.

But laws alone won’t be enough. Hearts must change. It won’t change overnight. Social atti­tudes often­times take gen­er­a­tions to change. But if our democ­ra­cy is to work in this increas­ing­ly diverse nation, then each one of us need to try to heed the advice of a great char­ac­ter in American fic­tion ― Atticus Finch who said “You nev­er real­ly under­stand a per­son until you con­sid­er things from his point of view…until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.”

For blacks and oth­er minor­i­ty groups, it means tying our own very real strug­gles for jus­tice to the chal­lenges that a lot of peo­ple in this coun­try face ― not only the refugee, or the immi­grant, or the rur­al poor, or the trans­gen­der American, but also the mid­dle-aged white guy who, from the out­side, may seem like he’s got advan­tages, but has seen his world upend­ed by eco­nom­ic and cul­tur­al and tech­no­log­i­cal change. We have to pay atten­tion, and listen.

For white Americans, it means acknowl­edg­ing that the effects of slav­ery and Jim Crow didn’t sud­den­ly van­ish in the ‘60s that when minor­i­ty groups voice dis­con­tent, they’re not just engag­ing in reverse racism or prac­tic­ing polit­i­cal cor­rect­ness. When they wage peace­ful protest, they’re not demand­ing spe­cial treat­ment but the equal treat­ment that our Founders promised.

For native-born Americans, it means remind­ing our­selves that the stereo­types about immi­grants today were said, almost word for word, about the Irish, and Italians, and Poles ― who it was said we’re going to destroy the fun­da­men­tal char­ac­ter of America. And as it turned out, America wasn’t weak­ened by the pres­ence of these new­com­ers; these new­com­ers embraced this nation’s creed, and this nation was strengthened.

So regard­less of the sta­tion that we occu­py, we all have to try hard­er. We all have to start with the premise that each of our fel­low cit­i­zens loves this coun­try just as much as we do; that they val­ue hard work and fam­i­ly just like we do; that their chil­dren are just as curi­ous and hope­ful and wor­thy of love as our own.

And that’s not easy to do. For too many of us, it’s become safer to retreat into our own bub­bles, whether in our neigh­bor­hoods or on col­lege cam­pus­es, or places of wor­ship, or espe­cial­ly our social media feeds, sur­round­ed by peo­ple who look like us and share the same polit­i­cal out­look and nev­er chal­lenge our assump­tions. The rise of naked par­ti­san­ship, and increas­ing eco­nom­ic and region­al strat­i­fi­ca­tion, the splin­ter­ing of our media into a chan­nel for every taste ― all this makes this great sort­ing seem nat­ur­al, even inevitable. And increas­ing­ly, we become so secure in our bub­bles that we start accept­ing only infor­ma­tion, whether it’s true or not, that fits our opin­ions, instead of bas­ing our opin­ions on the evi­dence that is out there.

And this trend rep­re­sents a third threat to our democ­ra­cy. But pol­i­tics is a bat­tle of ideas. That’s how our democ­ra­cy was designed. In the course of a healthy debate, we pri­or­i­tize dif­fer­ent goals, and the dif­fer­ent means of reach­ing them. But with­out some com­mon base­line of facts, with­out a will­ing­ness to admit new infor­ma­tion, and con­cede that your oppo­nent might be mak­ing a fair point, and that sci­ence and rea­son mat­ter then we’re going to keep talk­ing past each oth­er, and we’ll make com­mon ground and com­pro­mise impossible.

And isn’t that part of what so often makes pol­i­tics dispir­it­ing? How can elect­ed offi­cials rage about deficits when we pro­pose to spend mon­ey on preschool for kids, but not when we’re cut­ting tax­es for cor­po­ra­tions? How do we excuse eth­i­cal laps­es in our own par­ty, but pounce when the oth­er par­ty does the same thing? It’s not just dis­hon­est, this selec­tive sort­ing of the facts; it’s self-defeat­ing. Because, as my moth­er used to tell me, real­i­ty has a way of catch­ing up with you.

Take the chal­lenge of cli­mate change. In just eight years, we’ve halved our depen­dence on for­eign oil; we’ve dou­bled our renew­able ener­gy; we’ve led the world to an agree­ment that has the promise to save this plan­et. But with­out bold­er action, our chil­dren won’t have time to debate the exis­tence of cli­mate change. They’ll be busy deal­ing with its effects: more envi­ron­men­tal dis­as­ters, more eco­nom­ic dis­rup­tions, waves of cli­mate refugees seek­ing sanctuary.

Now, we can and should argue about the best approach to solve the prob­lem. But to sim­ply deny the prob­lem not only betrays future gen­er­a­tions, it betrays the essen­tial spir­it of this coun­try ― the essen­tial spir­it of inno­va­tion and prac­ti­cal prob­lem-solv­ing that guid­ed our Founders.

It is that spir­it, born of the Enlightenment, that made us an eco­nom­ic pow­er­house ― the spir­it that took flight at Kitty Hawk and Cape Canaveral; the spir­it that cures dis­ease and put a com­put­er in every pocket.

It’s that spir­it ― a faith in rea­son, and enter­prise, and the pri­ma­cy of right over might ― that allowed us to resist the lure of fas­cism and tyran­ny dur­ing the Great Depression; that allowed us to build a post-World War II order with oth­er democ­ra­cies, an order based not just on mil­i­tary pow­er or nation­al affil­i­a­tions but built on prin­ci­ples ― the rule of law, human rights, free­dom of reli­gion, and speech, and assem­bly, and an inde­pen­dent press.

That order is now being chal­lenged ― first by vio­lent fanat­ics who claim to speak for Islam; more recent­ly by auto­crats in for­eign cap­i­tals who see free mar­kets and open democ­ra­cies and and civ­il soci­ety itself as a threat to their pow­er. The per­il each pos­es to our democ­ra­cy is more far-reach­ing than a car bomb or a mis­sile. It rep­re­sents the fear of change; the fear of peo­ple who look or speak or pray dif­fer­ent­ly; a con­tempt for the rule of law that holds lead­ers account­able; an intol­er­ance of dis­sent and free thought; a belief that the sword or the gun or the bomb or the pro­pa­gan­da machine is the ulti­mate arbiter of what’s true and what’s right.

Because of the extra­or­di­nary courage of our men and women in uni­form, because of our intel­li­gence offi­cers, and law enforce­ment, and diplo­mats who sup­port our troops, no for­eign ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tion has suc­cess­ful­ly planned and exe­cut­ed an attack on our home­land these past eight years. And although Boston and Orlando and San Bernardino and Fort Hood remind us of how dan­ger­ous rad­i­cal­iza­tion can be, our law enforce­ment agen­cies are more effec­tive and vig­i­lant than ever. We have tak­en out tens of thou­sands of ter­ror­ists ― includ­ing bin Laden. The glob­al coali­tion we’re lead­ing against ISIL has tak­en out their lead­ers, and tak­en away about half their ter­ri­to­ry. ISIL will be destroyed, and no one who threat­ens America will ever be safe.

And to all who serve or have served, it has been the hon­or of my life­time to be your Commander-in-Chief. And we all owe you a deep debt of gratitude.

But pro­tect­ing our way of life, that’s not just the job of our mil­i­tary. Democracy can buck­le when we give in to fear. So, just as we, as cit­i­zens, must remain vig­i­lant against exter­nal aggres­sion, we must guard against a weak­en­ing of the val­ues that make us who we are.

And that’s why, for the past eight years, I’ve worked to put the fight against ter­ror­ism on a firmer legal foot­ing. That’s why we’ve end­ed tor­ture, worked to close Gitmo, reformed our laws gov­ern­ing sur­veil­lance to pro­tect pri­va­cy and civ­il lib­er­ties. That’s why I reject dis­crim­i­na­tion against Muslim Americans, who are just as patri­ot­ic as we are.

That’s why we can­not with­draw from big glob­al fights ― to expand democ­ra­cy, and human rights, and women’s rights, and LGBT rights. No mat­ter how imper­fect our efforts, no mat­ter how expe­di­ent ignor­ing such val­ues may seem, that’s part of defend­ing America. For the fight against extrem­ism and intol­er­ance and sec­tar­i­an­ism and chau­vin­ism are of a piece with the fight against author­i­tar­i­an­ism and nation­al­ist aggres­sion. If the scope of free­dom and respect for the rule of law shrinks around the world, the like­li­hood of war with­in and between nations increas­es, and our own free­doms will even­tu­al­ly be threatened.

So let’s be vig­i­lant, but not afraid. ISIL will try to kill inno­cent peo­ple. But they can­not defeat America unless we betray our Constitution and our prin­ci­ples in the fight. Rivals like Russia or China can­not match our influ­ence around the world ― unless we give up what we stand for and turn our­selves into just anoth­er big coun­try that bul­lies small­er neighbors.

Which brings me to my final point: Our democ­ra­cy is threat­ened when­ev­er we take it for grant­ed. All of us, regard­less of par­ty, should be throw­ing our­selves into the task of rebuild­ing our demo­c­ra­t­ic insti­tu­tions. When vot­ing rates in America are some of the low­est among advanced democ­ra­cies, we should be mak­ing it eas­i­er, not hard­er, to vote. When trust in our insti­tu­tions is low, we should reduce the cor­ro­sive influ­ence of mon­ey in our pol­i­tics, and insist on the prin­ci­ples of trans­paren­cy and ethics in pub­lic ser­vice. When Congress is dys­func­tion­al, we should draw our con­gres­sion­al dis­tricts to encour­age politi­cians to cater to com­mon sense and not rigid extremes.

But remem­ber, none of this hap­pens on its own. All of this depends on our par­tic­i­pa­tion; on each of us accept­ing the respon­si­bil­i­ty of cit­i­zen­ship, regard­less of which way the pen­du­lum of pow­er hap­pens to be swinging.

Our Constitution is a remark­able, beau­ti­ful gift. But it’s real­ly just a piece of parch­ment. It has no pow­er on its own. We, the peo­ple, give it pow­er. We, the peo­ple, give it mean­ing. With our par­tic­i­pa­tion, and with the choic­es that we make, and the alliances that we forge. Whether or not we stand up for our free­doms. Whether or not we respect and enforce the rule of law. That’s up to us. America is no frag­ile thing. But the gains of our long jour­ney to free­dom are not assured.

In his own farewell address, George Washington wrote that self-gov­ern­ment is the under­pin­ning of our safe­ty, pros­per­i­ty, and lib­er­ty, but “from dif­fer­ent caus­es and from dif­fer­ent quar­ters much pains will be taken…to weak­en in your minds the con­vic­tion of this truth.” And so we have to pre­serve this truth with “jeal­ous anx­i­ety;” that we should reject “the first dawn­ing of every attempt to alien­ate any por­tion of our coun­try from the rest or to enfee­ble the sacred ties” that make us one.

America, we weak­en those ties when we allow our polit­i­cal dia­logue to become so cor­ro­sive that peo­ple of good char­ac­ter aren’t even will­ing to enter into pub­lic ser­vice; so coarse with ran­cor that Americans with whom we dis­agree are seen not just as mis­guid­ed but as malev­o­lent. We weak­en those ties when we define some of us as more American than oth­ers; when we write off the whole sys­tem as inevitably cor­rupt, and when we sit back and blame the lead­ers we elect with­out exam­in­ing our own role in elect­ing them.

It falls to each of us to be those those anx­ious, jeal­ous guardians of our democ­ra­cy; to embrace the joy­ous task we’ve been giv­en to con­tin­u­al­ly try to improve this great nation of ours. Because for all our out­ward dif­fer­ences, we, in fact, all share the same proud title, the most impor­tant office in a democ­ra­cy: Citizen. Citizen.

So, you see, that’s what our democ­ra­cy demands. It needs you. Not just when there’s an elec­tion, not just when your own nar­row inter­est is at stake, but over the full span of a life­time. If you’re tired of argu­ing with strangers on the Internet, try talk­ing with one of them in real life. If some­thing needs fix­ing, then lace up your shoes and do some orga­niz­ing. If you’re dis­ap­point­ed by your elect­ed offi­cials, grab a clip­board, get some sig­na­tures, and run for office your­self. Show up. Dive in. Stay at it.

Sometimes you’ll win. Sometimes you’ll lose. Presuming a reser­voir of good­ness in oth­er peo­ple, that can be a risk, and there will be times when the process will dis­ap­point you. But for those of us for­tu­nate enough to have been a part of this work, and to see it up close, let me tell you, it can ener­gize and inspire. And more often than not, your faith in America ― and in Americans ― will be confirmed.

Mine sure has been. Over the course of these eight years, I’ve seen the hope­ful faces of young grad­u­ates and our newest mil­i­tary offi­cers. I have mourned with griev­ing fam­i­lies search­ing for answers, and found grace in a Charleston church. I’ve seen our sci­en­tists help a par­a­lyzed man regain his sense of touch. I’ve seen wound­ed war­riors who at points were giv­en up for dead walk again. I’ve seen our doc­tors and vol­un­teers rebuild after earth­quakes and stop pan­demics in their tracks. I’ve seen the youngest of chil­dren remind us through their actions and through their gen­eros­i­ty of our oblig­a­tions to care for refugees, or work for peace, and, above all, to look out for each other.

So that faith that I placed all those years ago, not far from here, in the pow­er of ordi­nary Americans to bring about change ― that faith has been reward­ed in ways I could not have pos­si­bly imag­ined. And I hope your faith has, too. Some of you here tonight or watch­ing at home, you were there with us in 2004, in 2008, 2012 maybe you still can’t believe we pulled this whole thing off. Let me tell you, you’re not the only ones.

Michelle Michelle LaVaughn Robinson, girl of the South Side for the past 25 years, you have not only been my wife and moth­er of my chil­dren, you have been my best friend. You took on a role you didn’t ask for and you made it your own, with grace and with grit and with style and good humor. You made the White House a place that belongs to every­body. And the new gen­er­a­tion sets its sights high­er because it has you as a role mod­el. So you have made me proud. And you have made the coun­try proud.

Malia and Sasha, under the strangest of cir­cum­stances, you have become two amaz­ing young women. You are smart and you are beau­ti­ful, but more impor­tant­ly, you are kind and you are thought­ful and you are full of pas­sion. You wore the bur­den of years in the spot­light so eas­i­ly. Of all that I’ve done in my life, I am most proud to be your dad.

To Joe Biden the scrap­py kid from Scranton who became Delaware’s favorite son ― you were the first deci­sion I made as a nom­i­nee, and it was the best. Not just because you have been a great Vice President, but because in the bar­gain, I gained a broth­er. And we love you and Jill like fam­i­ly, and your friend­ship has been one of the great joys of our lives.

To my remark­able staff: For eight years ― and for some of you, a whole lot more ― I have drawn from your ener­gy, and every day I tried to reflect back what you dis­played ― heart, and char­ac­ter, and ide­al­ism. I’ve watched you grow up, get mar­ried, have kids, start incred­i­ble new jour­neys of your own. Even when times got tough and frus­trat­ing, you nev­er let Washington get the bet­ter of you. You guard­ed against cyn­i­cism. And the only thing that makes me proud­er than all the good that we’ve done is the thought of all the amaz­ing things that you’re going to achieve from here.

And to all of you out there ― every orga­niz­er who moved to an unfa­mil­iar town, every kind fam­i­ly who wel­comed them in, every vol­un­teer who knocked on doors, every young per­son who cast a bal­lot for the first time, every American who lived and breathed the hard work of change ― you are the best sup­port­ers and orga­niz­ers any­body could ever hope for, and I will be for­ev­er grate­ful. Because you did change the world. You did.

And that’s why I leave this stage tonight even more opti­mistic about this coun­try than when we start­ed. Because I know our work has not only helped so many Americans, it has inspired so many Americans ― espe­cial­ly so many young peo­ple out there ― to believe that you can make a dif­fer­ence to hitch your wag­on to some­thing big­ger than yourselves.

Let me tell you, this gen­er­a­tion com­ing up ― unselfish, altru­is­tic, cre­ative, patri­ot­ic ― I’ve seen you in every cor­ner of the coun­try. You believe in a fair, and just, and inclu­sive America. You know that con­stant change has been America’s hall­mark; that it’s not some­thing to fear but some­thing to embrace. You are will­ing to car­ry this hard work of democ­ra­cy for­ward. You’ll soon out­num­ber all of us, and I believe as a result the future is in good hands.

My fel­low Americans, it has been the hon­or of my life to serve you. I won’t stop. In fact, I will be right there with you, as a cit­i­zen, for all my remain­ing days. But for now, whether you are young or whether you’re young at heart, I do have one final ask of you as your President ― the same thing I asked when you took a chance on me eight years ago. I’m ask­ing you to believe. Not in my abil­i­ty to bring about change ― but in yours.

I am ask­ing you to hold fast to that faith writ­ten into our found­ing doc­u­ments; that idea whis­pered by slaves and abo­li­tion­ists; that spir­it sung by immi­grants and home­stead­ers and those who marched for jus­tice; that creed reaf­firmed by those who plant­ed flags from for­eign bat­tle­fields to the sur­face of the moon; a creed at the core of every American whose sto­ry is not yet writ­ten: Yes, we can.

Yes, we did. Yes, we can.

Thank you. God bless you. May God con­tin­ue to bless the United States of America.

On Crime :my Disdain For Those Whose Default Position Is ” It’s Unlawful” In Reference To Fixes, Is Palpable…

Laws are made to deal with situations at the time. Jamaica’s laws are largely Colonial era laws which have precious little relevance to today’s problems.
mb
More and more the comments someone made to me sometime ago seem relevant to Jamaica’s crime problem. Quote, “Jamaica needs a dictatorship to truly stamp out crime on the Island”.

Now grant­ed I do not nec­es­sar­i­ly agree with that sen­ti­ment , I do wish how­ev­er there was some way to shut the mouths of some of the chat-a-lots who talk a lot about what they either do not know, or their opin­ions should sim­ply be dis­re­gard­ed and discarded.

Yesterday we car­ried Ian Boyne’s Article which appeared in the Sunday Gleaner. In his Article Boyne pro­posed some strin­gent mea­sures which he feels should be adopt­ed as a solu­tion to crime.
I thought it was wor­thy of dis­cus­sion, but I also under­stand that Boyne is a Journalist, not a legal or secu­ri­ty offi­cial. So there is no sur­prise ele­ments of his com­ments would be legal­ly problematic.
At the same time I har­bor a cer­tain degree of dis­dain for those who sup­port the sta­tus quo on the basis that sug­gest­ed fix­es, regard­less of what is sug­gest­ed is either unwork­able or unlawful.
Laws are made to deal with sit­u­a­tions at the time they are made . Jamaica’s laws are large­ly Colonial era laws which have pre­cious lit­tle rel­e­vance to, or impact on, today’s problems.
The broad­er take­away for me from Boyne’s arti­cle is that things are reach­ing crit­i­cal mass. Andrew Holness , the Prime Minister allud­ed to that in a recent speech. He said he sensed that the peo­ple were tired of the killings and want­ed action on crime.

In response to us fea­tur­ing Boyne’s Article a friend who spent years in the police depart­ment opined that Boyne was always crit­i­cal of the police even when it was unwar­rant­ed. He argued that Boyne’s out­burst is rem­i­nis­cent of the mood before the Military and police were forced to annex Tivoli Gardens to the country.
He was adamant that Jamaicans only have some­thing pos­i­tive to say about police offi­cers when their ass­es are in a vice.
Their ass­es are in a vice now…
To his com­ments I said .….….….….….….….….….….Well I said noth­ing because he was exact­ly correct !

Nothing will come out of here which will seri­ous­ly and effec­tive­ly address the crime epi­dem­ic.
Too many sit­ting here or either tied to crime or are too scared to lift a fin­ger .
Afraid of the self appoint­ed shad­ow Government in the legal fra­ter­ni­ty, the media, the halls of acad­e­mia and oth­er perch­es from where they deter­mine nation­al secu­ri­ty pol­i­cy, abro­gat­ing the will of the major­i­ty for that of a few.

Here’s my advice to the pon­tif­i­cat­ing fools who stand in the way of change. Arguing that sug­gest­ed fix­es are “unlaw­ful” is self-serv­ing and should be seen for what it is.
As I said in a pre­vi­ous arti­cle , “you damn fools do real­ize that sim­ply chang­ing the laws strikes down your argu­ments right”?
We dri­ve cars until they are no longer road wor­thy. We wear clothes until they are worn, torn, or we sim­ply tire of them.
So I sim­ply want to point out to you genius elites [sic] , when the laws are no longer serv­ing the pur­pose for which they were intend­ed we change them, whether you like it or not.

After the Morant Bay rebel­lion the Colonial rulers did not sit on their back­sides and hoped there would be no recurrence.
Take this fact or leave it.
They cre­at­ed the Jamaica Constabulary Force ‚which at it’s gen­e­sis was a night­watch­man type force.
Drastic and out­ra­geous you say?
Call it what­ev­er you want, as long as the Colonial mas­ters had con­trol of the Island there were no more unman­age­able uprisings.

If every man, woman, and child in Jamaica had a job mur­ders would still be out of control.
To you who say you “you can’t prove that”.
My response is “prove that it would­n’t be”!
Lack of a jobs has noth­ing to do with murders.
In fact many Jamaicans have this insane propen­si­ty to com­mit crimes. They will tell you they will not take any job that will not allow them to steal. You have all heard it,( “mi lef di jab kaa nu hus­tling nu de de”).

It is an affront to the integri­ty of decent unem­ployed peo­ple to sug­gest that those who com­mit heinous mur­ders do so because they are unemployed.
So like I said yes­ter­day to the vul­tures who fly down on every sug­ges­tion which has seri­ous puni­tive com­po­nents to the crime problem.
Despite your holi­er than thou opin­ions, it is we the peo­ple who have tried it your way . It is we the peo­ple who lis­tened to your self-right­eous bull­shit that ref­or­ma­tion must be the solu­tion with­out a puni­tive response.
It is we the peo­ple who bleed while you sit in your edi­fices of grandeur and pon­tif­i­cate about some­thing you know noth­ing about.
It is we the peo­ple who lis­tened to your grandiose sug­ges­tions that killing mass mur­der­ers does not stop killings.
When was the last time an exe­cut­ed mur­der­er returned to kill again?
Oh wait, spare me the (duppies,)stories .

Since you peo­ple refuse to yield to com­mon sense solu­tions to the Island’s crime problem.
I call on well think­ing Jamaicans who want to live in peace to take action. People who want to send their chil­dren to school with­out fear they will nev­er return take action. People who want to step out with­out the immi­nent threat of mur­der hang­ing over their heads take action.
Since the Government is scared of the elites in high places, it may be time that the elites are not allowed a voice.
It is your chil­dren who are being raped and mur­dered , not theirs, your moth­ers and sis­ters , your sons and fathers , not theirs.
Look at what the Colombian peo­ple did.
It’s your coun­try not theirs alone.….…

Read , com­ment , share.