mikebeckles.

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Join Us
  • Blog/​News
    • Blog
    • Politics
    • Race And Relations
    • Law Enforcement
    • Rights Safety Security
    • Inspiration
    • Other News
  • Gallery
  • Feeds
  • Contact Mike

Author Archives: Mike

12/14/2017 by Mike

Almost Zero Chance Police Will Turn Up Anything In Weapon’s Cache Investigations…

We were made aware that Karima Hudson, the woman at the fore­front of the alleged ship­ment of weapons and ammu­ni­tion dis­cov­ered In Miami des­tined for Jamaica turned her­self in to police rough­ly a week ago.

She was report­ed­ly tak­en into cus­tody on Monday by detec­tives from the Counter-Terrorism and Organised Crime Investigation Branch (C‑TOC).
She was detained on sus­pi­cion of con­spir­a­cy to import firearms onto the island.
Her Attorney Oswett Smith told the Media that he sus­pects they are unable to make out a case against his client and that it was prob­a­bly for that rea­son that so far she has not been charged with a crime.

It’s kin­da fun­ny how there are always high pro­file Lawyers, imme­di­ate­ly a reg­u­lar guy on the street is like­ly to be charged with a seri­ous crime!
Wonder where the mon­ey comes from to pay these guys?
Anyway.…

I was reli­ably informed that the Police have just final­ly got­ten around to search­ing her home. What if any­thing they found is still a mys­tery thus far.
In fair­ness to the police, [incred­i­bly hard to sup­port the police with their inep­ti­tude these days] I am unaware of what imped­i­ments may have ham­pered their abil­i­ty to secure a war­rant to search her home before?
I do know that it takes time to inter­view wit­ness­es and that based on what they say, police may deter­mine that it makes good sense to search a sus­pec­t’s home.

When a per­son of inter­est decides to turn him/​herself in, its also log­i­cal to assume that he or she may destroy mate­ri­als they believe may have evi­den­tiary val­ue or may impli­cate them.
Notwithstanding, to detec­tives, this is nev­er a deter­rent, trained offi­cers know what to look for, they gen­er­al­ly find mate­ri­als of evi­den­tiary val­ue use­ful for fill­ing out the puzzle.
With that said, it bog­gles the mind that the JCF with all of the empha­sis placed on bring­ing in edu­cat­ed peo­ple into the depart­ment still can­not con­duct and com­plete inves­ti­ga­tions in a way which would make law-abid­ing Jamaicans proud.

Let me be clear, I do not believe this woman is guilty as a prin­ci­pal in this case.
I have no evi­dence out­side that which has been report­ed on in this case. Nevertheless, I believe whole­heart­ed­ly that to the extent that Karima Hudson, is some­how crim­i­nal­ly con­nect­ed to this case her involve­ment is peripheral.

The idea that a woman who worked in a coun­cil office has the kind of mon­ey, con­nec­tions, and grav­i­tas to attempt a crim­i­nal act of this mag­ni­tude is an assault on our intelligence.
What is obvi­ous is that in the same way that some­how the real importers of the arms ship­ment was some­how tipped off and sub­se­quent­ly did not attempt to col­lect the ship­ment, I believe the Investigators in the JCF look­ing at this mat­ter are look­ing no fur­ther than this poor woman.
I believe if this Investigation is approached with pro­fes­sion­al­ism and for­ti­tude the rev­e­la­tions on its con­clu­sion would be earth-shattering.

Now, grant­ed that it would be ludi­crous to believe that the abort­ed ship­ment was the only such ship­ment attempt­ed, the log­i­cal con­clu­sion is that sev­er­al such ship­ments have already slipped through undetected.
With 316 homi­cides in the Parish of St, James alone thus far this year and hun­dreds and hun­dreds of high pow­ered weapons, grenades and oth­er war para­pher­na­lia recov­ered by the police this case can be a bombshell.

This case if inves­ti­gat­ed prop­er­ly could blow the lid off much of what has been hap­pen­ing par­tic­u­lar­ly in the west­ern parish­es of the Island.
Alas, if prece­dent is any indi­ca­tor we will end up with no charges filed against Karima Hudson, no pres­sure applied with a promise of a car­rot with a view to flip­ping her in the event she has some minor role in all of this.

Let us be clear-eyed about this, there is a big fish some­where in Jamaica to whose stew­ard­ship this con­sign­ment was intend­ed. He or she need not wor­ry about ever being inves­ti­gat­ed and bust­ed for his/​her part in flood­ing the Island with guns result­ing this year in well over 1500 dead Jamaicans.
I have no con­fi­dence that despite the hifuleten acronyms C‑TOC or what­ev­er that this inves­ti­ga­tion will yield a damn thing.
No belief that Counter-Terrorism and Organised Crime (C‑TOC) is any­thing but anoth­er fan­cy titled bunch of jok­ers and posers.

Maybe just maybe they will cause me to shut up but I have lit­tle fear of that.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/13/2017 by Mike - 1 Comment

Public Sector Wage Demands Fair But.…

Without tak­ing sides in the pub­lic sec­tor wage debate occur­ring in Jamaica, and under­stand­ing full well how any increase giv­en to work­ers is gob­bled up by infla­tion, I would like to ask this question.
Given the same IMF loan stip­u­la­tions to Jamaica as years ago when the pre­vi­ous Government issued an across the board pub­lic sec­tor wage freeze, why is it that 6% is so insulting?
Look, the wage demands of pub­lic sec­tor work­ers are just and fair nev­er­the­less present demands must be bal­anced against the con­straints of the Government’s abil­i­ty to pay.
They should also be approached with the same degree of def­er­ence giv­en to the pre­vi­ous Government, con­sid­er­ing that it uni­lat­er­al­ly imposed an across the board wage freeze.
Public sec­tor work­ers should approach their wage nego­ti­a­tions with the very same degree of pro­fes­sion­al­ism and real­ism regard­less of who occu­pies Jamaica House.
The cause is just the fight is long but there comes a time when real­i­ty must guide our decisions.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/13/2017 by Mike

Taming The Enemy Within.….…


We are get­ting mighty close to what is called crit­i­cal mass with the gen­er­al arc of crime in Jamaica.
The stark real­i­ty is that the present sit­u­a­tion seems to be out­side the con­trol of local authorities.
We have now passed the stage where appor­tion­ing blame is use­ful in this ongo­ing saga which is the shock­ing dete­ri­o­rat­ing secu­ri­ty sit­u­a­tion on the Island.
Sure we know that both polit­i­cal par­ties share blame for the exist­ing sit­u­a­tion, some with greater cul­pa­bil­i­ty than oth­ers but there is lit­tle doubt that argu­ing about who is more guilty will do noth­ing to rem­e­dy the situation.

The increase in the num­ber of homi­cides this year over last year and that of last year over the pre­ced­ing year have seen admin­is­tra­tions of both polit­i­cal par­ties pre­sid­ing over what appears to be a homi­cide and anoth­er seri­ous crime wave over which nei­ther have control.
If we are able to sus­pend the omnipresent pre­dis­po­si­tion to see every­thing pure­ly from polit­i­cal per­spec­tives we may have a shot at actu­al­ly hav­ing a mean­ing­ful con­ver­sa­tion about how to resolve this issue before it’s too late.
In order for us to begin to arrest this very seri­ous prob­lem, we need to agree that no one per­son has all of the answers and that the course we are on is not working.

Veteran Journalist Dan Rather speak­ing to an alleged scammer…

CAUSATION

We need to take a dif­fer­ent look at what are the issues fuel­ing this crime monster.
The uni­ver­sal­ly accept­ed idea that pover­ty is the cause of crime in the coun­try is intel­lec­tu­al indo­lence and maybe an attempt to deflect atten­tion away from the real reasons.
We can agree that pover­ty is not going to be elim­i­nat­ed from Jamaica any­time soon. If the focus can be divert­ed to the issue of pover­ty as the rea­son that peo­ple are decap­i­tat­ing oth­ers while oth­ers are bring­ing large caches of weapons into the coun­try, then we will con­tin­ue as a dog chas­ing its tail into per­pe­tu­ity, while those who ben­e­fit from crime con­tin­ue to fat­ten themselves.

There is no deny­ing the real­i­ty that ” a hun­gry man is an angry man”, with that in mind, the actions of the man who goes out and steals in order to eat can be viewed with­in the con­text of poverty.
Looking at the total­i­ty of the nation’s crime prob­lem, how­ev­er, pure­ly from the point of view of pover­ty must sub­se­quent­ly be seen as sim­plis­tic and to some degree disingenuous.
The ques­tion then, is, to what end is the nation being mis­led into an accep­tance of the mur­der mad­ness under the guise of poverty?
As I have writ­ten before there are coun­tries across the globe and indeed in our own hemi­sphere with low­er stan­dards of liv­ing and sig­nif­i­cant­ly less crime to boot.

If we intend to be hon­est with our­selves we must agree that the mas­sive caches of weapons com­ing into the coun­try are not being import­ed by peo­ple in pover­ty, nei­ther are the drugs com­ing in and pass­ing through have impov­er­ished peo­ple behind them.

Ganja fields

FACTS

Earlier this year caribbean​na​tion​al​week​ly​.com pub­lished a report released by the United States State’s Department of State, which stat­ed that sev­er­al coun­tries in the Caribbean are major illic­it drug pro­duc­ing and drug-tran­sit coun­tries with some also being major mon­ey laun­der­ing countries.
The US Department of State’s “International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR),” notes that the Bahamas, Belize, Haiti, and Jamaica, are among 22 coun­tries world­wide con­sid­ered major drug pro­duc­ing or major drug tran­sit countries.

The fore­gone gives a slight­ly clear­er view as to what are real­ly some of the fac­tors fuelling the mas­sive crime wave in our country.
The local police have stri­dent­ly main­tained that the illic­it lot­to-scam­ming is a major con­trib­u­tor to the homi­cide rate as well.
Thus far this year there are over 300 deaths in St. James the epic cen­ter of the lot­to scam epi­dem­ic which leaves over a thou­sand oth­er homi­cides which the police would be hard pressed to pin on that trade.
Even if there were anoth­er two hun­dred which could cred­i­bly be attrib­uted to the lot­to scam mak­ing it a total of say 500, there would still be in excess of 800 oth­er homi­cides which were com­mit­ted for oth­er reasons.


Argentian-police-oper­at­ing-against-nar­co-ter­ror­ists.

SOLUTION

Police can­not enforce laws which do not exist.
Corrupt police offi­cers are vast­ly less effec­tive than hon­est cops.
The penal­ty for seri­ous crimes under the penal code does not have suf­fi­cient deter­rent components.
As long as the rights of mur­der­ous crim­i­nals are viewed with the same impor­tance as their vic­tims there will be no dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion between the two cat­e­gories of Jamaicans.
If we are unable to dif­fer­en­ti­ate between how we treat mur­der­ers over how we view their vic­tims we have already lost the war.

I know of no coun­try in which the rights of crim­i­nals are viewed with such del­i­ca­cy. No oth­er place where crim­i­nal­i­ty is so accept­ed by the broad­er soci­ety and excused.
No oth­er place !
We have the answers to the prob­lems the coun­try faces, the Colombians cer­tain­ly faced their prob­lems head-on when they chose to say no to nar­co-ter­ror­ism from the Medellin and Cali cartels.

We can con­tin­ue the pre­ten­tious­ness as a coun­try while hid­ing behind lay­ers of grill for­ti­fi­ca­tions, pret­ty soon how­ev­er, no one will be safe not even those who believe they are in charge with their police escorts.
Massive cor­rup­tion and the lethal­i­ty of the weapons in the hands of the crim­i­nal under­world ren­ders their police escorts null and void against whats to come.
A few patri­ots will have to balls up and make some sac­ri­fices for the life of our beloved Island. The non­sense which comes out of Mona will not save our coun­try it will take balls and courage like that exhib­it­ed by Paul Bogle and Nanny.
This time the ene­my is within.……

REFERENCE

The Colombian Government and decent law-abid­ing peo­ple under­stood that putting the cart before the horse was a pre­scrip­tion for failure.
Within that con­text, aver­age peo­ple decid­ed to take their chil­dren’s and their own future into their own hands.
Summing up the sto­ry of Colombia a coun­try once on the verge of becom­ing a failed nar­co-state was an Article writ­ten for the Daily Telegraph by Journalist Szu Ping Chan in 2015.

Colombian secu­ri­ty forces deal deci­sive­ly with drug and crim­i­nal kingpins

Diplomacy, hard work and com­pro­mise have helped to trans­form the coun­try over the last decade. The iron fist of for­mer pres­i­dent Álvaro Uribe that helped to destroy many rebel strong­holds in 2002 has been put back inside the vel­vet glove held by the cur­rent pres­i­dent, Juan Manuel Santos.The for­mer defense min­is­ter is edg­ing clos­er to sign­ing a his­toric peace deal with the FARC rebels, although the tough­est part of the nego­ti­a­tion — amnesty, and repa­ra­tions — has yet to be agreed.
Meanwhile, Colombia’s mid­dle class is on the rise, climb­ing from 16pc of the pop­u­la­tion in 2002 to 27pc in 2011. In the streets of Bogotá, Cartier, Louis Vuitton and Armani line up next to high street names Zara and Mango.

The pover­ty rate – defined by the World Bank as any­one liv­ing on less than $1.25 (81p) a day – has fall­en from almost 50pc to 34pc over the same peri­od. While pol­i­cy­mak­ers have more to do, Colombians are lift­ing them­selves out of pover­ty. Entrepreneurial spir­it means many choose to sell goods in lit­tle stalls or on the streets. Old jeans and used shoes are sold along­side trin­kets and food. In the cen­ter of Bogotá, one sell­er has around 100 dolls piled up on a tar­pau­lin. An improv­ing econ­o­my means the adver­tis­ing slo­gans are very dif­fer­ent now. “Colombia, mag­i­cal real­ism”, is a homage to the coun­try’s most famous author, Gabriel García Márquez, who died last year.

Note that the Government of President Alvaro Uribe under­stood fun­da­men­tal­ly that he had to deal with the coun­try’s crime prob­lem with an Iron fist.
After top­pling the car­tels the new President Juan Manuel Santos slid the iron fist back into a vel­vet glove.
As I have said for years we need an atti­tu­di­nal change in how we approach this issue. The rights of mur­der­ers is incon­se­quen­tial when we con­sid­er them against what they did to their vic­tims and their families.
There need to be a 180 degree par­a­digm shift in how we go after those who kill and those behind them.
Sending a clear uniquovi­cal mes­sage that their meth­ods will not be tol­er­at­ed is the only mes­sage they understand.
It is the only solu­tion which will begin the process of revers­ing this madness.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/12/2017 by Mike

Why I Responded Live On The Air To A Viewer Who Called Me A Racial Slur

Image result for journalist sharon reed

I real­ly don’t think I had a choice.

When that vile email came across my com­put­er at 9:26 p.m., I saw an oppor­tu­ni­ty. Yes, oppor­tu­ni­ty.

We were on the air live, dis­cussing the role of race in the Atlanta may­oral elec­tion. Two women ― one white and one black ― were the last can­di­dates stand­ing in an extreme­ly con­tentious elec­tion to suc­ceed Mayor Kasim Reed. The cam­paign sea­son had offered up sub­tle and not-so-sub­tle under­tones of race throughout.

Race, and racial bias, was the story.

The for­mat for our 9 p.m. show is loose and inter­ac­tive. We put skin in the game (no pun intend­ed) as anchors, shar­ing our opin­ions and view­points, and we invite view­ers to give us their take. We promise to put their com­ments on the air whether they agree with our pre­sen­ta­tion of the issue or not.

I looked at my email and saw the word “Niger” ― (this par­tic­u­lar view­er couldn’t spell the slur) ― and got a knot in my stom­ach. Adrenaline kicked in.

SHARON REED

But it was a gift in real time. Black jour­nal­ists, includ­ing yours tru­ly, actu­al­ly do get attacked by racist trolls. I could use this email to show any­one watch­ing what we deal with ― some­times every sin­gle day. Opportunity.

To hide it or cen­sor it ― in my view, on that night ― seemed inher­ent­ly wrong and the height of fake news.

People at home deserve to know the truth, not some ver­sion of events san­i­tized for them from our perch on the anchor desk. Especially when it goes to the heart of the mat­ter. If we can’t keep it real dur­ing a dis­cus­sion about race on the air in Atlanta, then when and where can we?

In the min­utes after I read it, at 9:34 p.m., I for­ward­ed the email to our exec­u­tive pro­duc­er. I asked if we could get this on the air and told him only that I’d like to com­ment. He wrote back imme­di­ate­ly and said yes.

There wasn’t time to get my thoughts togeth­er. Truthfully, I could’ve used a few more min­utes. I want­ed some breath­ing room to get it just right and con­sid­ered beg­ging off until after the next com­mer­cial break. Ultimately, I decid­ed to be authen­tic in the ad-lib ― and to trust the audience.

What came out of my mouth at 9:47 p.m. ― 21 min­utes after receiv­ing this offen­sive email ― wasn’t art­ful or pol­ished, but it was real.

I can only speak to my expe­ri­ence, but make no mis­take: It is a shared expe­ri­ence. Other black jour­nal­ists are called “nig­ger,” too. In fact, if you know any black per­son who hasn’t had this hap­pen, now there’s a story!

Many peo­ple have been reach­ing out to reaf­firm just that, and to say thanks for putting it front and center.

SHARON REED

The fre­quen­cy ebbs and flows. Sometimes it’s relat­ed to con­tent, or per­ceived opin­ions based on our skin col­or. Check these out. These are just a FEW of what appeared in my inbox over the course of only a few days.

SHARON REED

Why do racists feel they can do this, that they can get away with this?

Because they can and gen­er­al­ly do. I real­ly don’t think there’s any­thing deep­er. Racists often like to spit that word, because there is hard­ly ever any per­son­al con­se­quence for doing so. Especially now. In a time when we are call­ing peo­ple “white nation­al­ists” instead of what their speech and actions actu­al­ly dic­tate. Cool sto­ry, bro, but not one root­ed in any fact.

Every sin­gle day, jour­nal­ists of col­or get emails like the one I got. Most of us con­tin­ue to do our jobs with excel­lence. You nev­er even know. That seems like one of the rea­sons some peo­ple were stunned by how casu­al­ly yet point­ed­ly racist the email I got was.

Another fac­tor: Most peo­ple are decent and just don’t har­bor or ped­dle such trash. But igno­rance of the low­est com­mon denom­i­na­tor among us seems root­ed in some­thing else, too. We don’t have enough hon­est con­ver­sa­tions about racism in mixed company.

It feels like some white peo­ple have a fear of being ver­bal­ly pounced on for say­ing some­thing awk­ward. And blacks? I cer­tain­ly know the feel­ing. Some of us fear we might not be able to hold back … and could keep it too real.

Having had a minute to reflect on how things unfold­ed, I real­ize that the deci­sion to put that email on the air was root­ed in hurt, defi­ance and even “I told you so” to all of the peo­ple out there who doubt this hap­pens. All of that, and on behalf of so many who sit in silence and sim­ply take it. Our #MeToo.

I have an under­grad­u­ate degree from Georgetown University and master’s from Northwestern University. I’ve worked hard on my craft for years and I believe I am a skilled, bal­anced jour­nal­ist who is nat­u­ral­ly curi­ous. It’s still not enough for anoth­er yahoo foam­ing at the mouth with racism. But then came the response to what I said on TV that night. Immediate. Swift. Overwhelming.

Phone calls … emails … mes­sages from new “friends” on social media.

People across the coun­try are speak­ing up and express­ing a phe­nom­e­nal amount of sup­port. I’m grate­ful for so many of those views, but not because most peo­ple are sup­port­ive. It’s because, col­lec­tive­ly, they offer a pow­er­ful les­son that I actu­al­ly did not consider.

Nearly a week after my “clap­back” went viral, after read­ing so many com­ments and lis­ten­ing to the voice­mails, I real­ize there’s an equal­ly impor­tant take­away: Even though white peo­ple can­not ever know the black expe­ri­ence first­hand, most peo­ple get it when you sim­ply serve up the details to them raw.

Common ground.

It reaf­firms my belief in trans­paren­cy in TV jour­nal­ism. But, be cer­tain ― even as I write this piece ― some in this indus­try claim dis­be­lief, and even sug­gest I man­u­fac­tured the email myself. Their dis­plays show extreme cal­lous­ness regard­ing the deep pain, divide and con­se­quences of racism.

That’s a dark piv­ot. In truth, I have received enough racist emails for a small book.

In oth­er news the sky is blue, the earth is round and com­mon sense is some­thing you pick up when you go out­side and talk to peo­ple who don’t look like you or believe every­thing as you do. It also seems per­son­al inse­cu­ri­ties are val­i­dat­ed when you choose to believe that an expe­ri­enced col­league can­not pos­si­bly be poised or prin­ci­pled enough to actu­al­ly con­front a racist on the spot.

My final thought? It’s actu­al­ly an acknowl­edg­ment. This has not been easy for our sta­tion man­age­ment to nav­i­gate, but to their cred­it, my boss­es han­dled it with grace and nev­er-end­ing support.

And to the next jour­nal­ist who is sub­ject­ed to any kind of per­son­al hate, my advice is to be strong, be hon­est, and don’t over­think the moment. Trust your instincts. They’re prob­a­bly spot on. https://​www​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​e​n​t​r​y​/​s​h​a​r​o​n​-​r​e​e​d​-​a​t​l​a​n​t​a​-​v​i​r​a​l​-​c​l​a​p​b​a​c​k​-​r​a​c​i​a​l​-​s​l​u​r​_​u​s​_​5​a​2​f​f​a​1​3​e​4​b​0​7​8​9​5​0​2​8​3​e​8​0​a​?​n​c​i​d​=​i​n​b​l​n​k​u​s​h​p​m​g​0​0​0​0​0​009

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/12/2017 by Mike

Police 8 Point Plan, Mirror Image Of 10 Plan I Submitted A Day Ago…

YESTERDAY I SUBMITTED A 10 POINT PLAN AND TO HELP FIGHT CRIME IN ST JAMES AND ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
HERE IS MY PLAN.

#1

Desperate times require strong mea­sures. In order to impress the cit­i­zens of St, James the Police Commissioner must buck some trends and go big.
Going big means trans­fer­ring every sin­gle cop sta­tioned in the Parish to oth­er Parishes.

#2
Do not send DCP Blake to the Parish he has no prac­ti­cal polic­ing expe­ri­ence and may very well have been pro­mot­ed above his capa­bil­i­ties. Since those wrongs are not going to be right­ed today there is no rea­son to fur­ther exac­er­bate the sit­u­a­tion by para­chut­ing a tech­no­crat who has no idea what he is doing.
Sending Blake to St. James guar­an­tees one out­come, dis­grun­tled demor­al­ized cops who drop their hands further.

#3
This Police Department of 2017 must begin once again to val­ue the dif­fer­ence a robust Criminal Investigations Branch brings to any police department.
This has noth­ing to do with the cre­ation of mul­ti­ple sup­posed Investigative arms which are based in Kingston and can­not inves­ti­gate itself out of a brown paper bag.

#4
Fresh police offi­cers in the Parish and a push toward com­mu­ni­ty-based polic­ing is crit­i­cal while get­ting capa­ble under­cov­er cops embed­ded into the com­mu­ni­ties is crit­i­cal to any suc­cess the Police Department is going have going forward.
The Police must get back to gath­er­ing intel­li­gence if it is to have any hope of revers­ing this crime wave.

#5
Commissioner Quallo, it is crit­i­cal that the offi­cers oper­at­ing in the com­mu­ni­ties have a senior sub-offi­cer at all times.
Having sea­soned sub-offi­cers on the ground reduces the like­li­hood of cit­i­zens abus­ing younger offi­cers and it reduces the like­li­hood of offi­cers abus­ing citizens.
It also reduces the poten­tial for corruption.

#6
There are seri­ous well-con­nect­ed play­ers oper­at­ing in the Police Area 1.
Out of those con­nec­tions emanate the lot­to-scam, guns for drugs, the cocaine trade and oth­er transna­tion­al crimes which are hav­ing dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences on the secu­ri­ty of Jamaicans.
It is imper­a­tive that the links between those well-con­nect­ed fig­ures and police offi­cers are disconnected.

#7
Commissioner Quallo, you must demand that the Prime Minister and his lack­eys as well as the PNP and its lack­eys step aside and allow the Police to do its work unobstructed.
Failing which Commissioner, you must Investigate the Politicians who as much as lift a fin­ger to obstruct, hin­der, or oth­er­wise ingra­ti­ate them­selves into the oper­a­tional pro­ce­dures of the police depart­ment regard­less of where they oper­ate from, be it Jamaica House or Flankers.

#8
If the Prime Minister and his lack­eys or the PNP and it’s lack­eys refuse to stand aside while the police depart­ment does what it is man­dat­ed to do by virtue of the Jamaica Constabulary Force Act, ten­der your res­ig­na­tion and reveal through the media what they did to ham­per your work.
Do not allow any­one to use you as a scape­goat while they are absolved of respon­si­bil­i­ty for whats happening.

#9
Initiate a push aimed at break­ing up the Gangs oper­at­ing in those spaces, it is impor­tant that you cre­ate an anti-gang task force sole­ly for the west­ern Parishes. This task-force must be relent­less, not just oper­at­ing dur­ing the day­light hours, but must be so relent­less and lethal that no one wants to be asso­ci­at­ed with a gang.
Yes, I said lethal, I specif­i­cal­ly used that term to annoy the bleed­ing heart frauds who pon­tif­i­cate about human rights as if the rights of killers super­sede those of their victims.

#10
Commissioner Quallo, one of the best qual­i­ties of a good leader is that leader’s abil­i­ty to inspire, to moti­vate. The abil­i­ty to make some­thing out of noth­ing, to get sub­or­di­nates to go the extra mile.
Not because of the good­ness of the Organization or even the nobil­i­ty of the cause but because they want to work for that leader.
Your Agency is doing a tremen­dous dis­ser­vice to the young men and women who join, remem­ber that the agency is hav­ing a dif­fi­cult time attract­ing suit­able can­di­dates to fill exist­ing spots.
Additionally, over 500 offi­cers are leav­ing each year, try­ing to imprison them in order to keep them in is a waste of time, it is unconstitutional.
The atti­tude of your senior staff to the men and women under their com­mand is a huge part of the rea­son police offi­cers are flee­ing the department.
Being a leader does not make one a Lord, get that mes­sage to your com­man­ders and maybe, just maybe some of your prob­lems will be averted.

A DAY LATER THE POLICE SUBMITTED A PLAN.
HERE IS THE POLICE 8 POINT PLAN.

Improving intel­li­gence capacity

Enhancing inves­tiga­tive capabilities

Greater use of tech­nol­o­gy to assist with investigations

Reviewing and redefin­ing the divi­sion­al com­mand and staff structure

Increasing col­lab­o­ra­tion with local, region­al and inter­na­tion­al law enforce­ment author­i­ties, espe­cial­ly transna­tion­al and finan­cial crimes

Strengthening part­ner­ships with var­i­ous pub­lic and pri­vate sec­tor stakeholders

Boosting the morale of staff through increased train­ing and devel­op­ment for per­sons with­in St James division.

Enhancing com­mu­ni­ty col­lab­o­ra­tion with com­mu­ni­ty stake­hold­ers and groups

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/12/2017 by Mike

Where There Is Smoke There Is Fire In This Troupe Saga…

There are con­flict­ing reports sur­round­ing a cache of weapons which was inter­cept­ed by US Customs and Border Protection (CBT) and Outbound Enforcement Team (OET) at the US air­port on November 13. The ship­ment was report­ed­ly des­tined for Montego Bay Jamaica.


Reports indi­cate the cache of a hun­dred and nineteen(119) weapons of vary­ing cal­ibers and 200 rounds of assort­ed ammu­ni­tion, as well as firearm parts, were dis­cov­ered by cops who lat­er coör­di­nat­ed with their Jamaican counterparts.
It is report­ed that a sting was set up on the Jamaican end but the con­signee, a woman who was employed to PNP Councillor Michael Troupe as his secretary.
The mil­lion dol­lar ques­tion is,” who told the con­signee not to turn up to receive the shipment”?
If there was a col­lab­o­ra­tion between Florida law enforce­ment and Jamaican author­i­ties, as have been report­ed, it is impor­tant to know who was in pos­ses­sion of said infor­ma­tion in Jamaica where the leak was cer­tain to have emanat­ed from?

Michael Troupe

Reports indi­cate that no one turned up to receive the ship­ment, which is incred­i­bly odd on the face of it. Why would­n’t the person/​s to whom this mas­sive ship­ment of guns and ammu­ni­tion not turn up to receive the ship­ment, unless of course, some­one tipped them off that the ship­ment was already inter­cept­ed by law enforcement?
The ques­tion which must be asked at this point is, who in the cor­rupt Jamaican sew­er had access to the infor­ma­tion that a sting was set up to nab the recipient?

As soon as the sto­ry broke the PNP issued a state­ment indi­cat­ing that the woman to whom the ship­ment was con­signed was at one time in the employ of Troupe but three months ago she walked off the job with­out even giv­ing a rea­son for leaving.
More dig­ging reveals that that state­ment may have been a lie.
The PNP has been scram­bling to dis­tance itself from this hot pota­to even as it pre­tends to be aggres­sive­ly inter­est­ed in a rapid res­o­lu­tion of this tox­ic matter.

Troupe has since hired a lawyer who has inti­mat­ed that the state­ment put out by the PNP may have been premature.
Troupe attor­ney Henry McCurdy insists “We do not know if the name that appears in the social media post is the same per­son who worked for Mr. Troupe and left her job with­out even say­ing to Councillor Troupe that she was leav­ing the job.
She just walked off the job and nev­er returned.”
How convenient?

Troupe in cuffs for alleged lot­to scamming

In the mean­time, Michael Troupe has tak­en to social media to try to ingra­ti­ate him­self with the pub­lic and to offer his own take on events even as he threat­ens to see who­ev­er ques­tions his integri­ty in court.
Trying to intim­i­date crit­ics using threats of legal action is a com­mon tact employed by well-placed crim­i­nals when they are unable to gun down their victims.
Said Michael Troupe “I have made mean­ing­ful con­tri­bu­tions to my coun­try, my parish and, of course, my divi­sion. Therefore, for all those who are slan­der­ing my name, I am pre­pared to see you in court. I stand tall in the face of adver­si­ty.”

In 2012 Michael Troupe was one of two parish coun­cilors in the People’s National Party arrest­ed for lotto-scamming.
Michael Troupe, the then deputy may­or of Montego Bay; and Sylvan Reid, who rep­re­sent­ed the Salt Spring Division — were among five per­sons tak­en into cus­tody by the police in con­nec­tion with the lot­tery scam.
At the time the Police said they seized a large sum of cash and motor vehi­cles in the pre-dawn raids at the homes of both politicians.

The lat­est on this is that the woman in ques­tion received pay­ment from Councillor Troupes as late as three weeks ago.
Troupe shot back that even though she was paid by his office three weeks ago she had long left his employ.
Troupe went on to say that in fact, it was because of the untime­ly nature of pay­ments to work­ers why the woman in ques­tion left his employ.
This lat­est state­ment con­tra­dicts ear­li­er state­ments made by Troupe that he had no idea why the woman walked off the job.

Whether Troupe bears any cul­pa­bil­i­ty in this mat­ter is yet to be deter­mined by the Police. Personally, I will not hold my breath with this Police Department that it is capa­ble of con­duct­ing an inves­ti­ga­tion with­out fear or favor.
Between the cor­rup­tion, lack of know-how and the fear inher­ent in these cops I hard­ly expect a pos­i­tive out­come for the nation despite the fact that the woman in ques­tion is now report­ed­ly in their cus­tody and is being questioned.

Wherever there is smoke there is fire, wher­ev­er there is a lot of smoke there is like­ly a big fire.
This inci­dent is an eye open­er for the Jamaican peo­ple. Many of us have been say­ing for a long time that there is a lot of con­nec­tions behind the mas­sive amounts of weapons which have been flood­ing the Island.

Oh for a Police Department which is unafraid and uncon­cerned about where inves­ti­ga­tions will lead and sim­ply fol­low the evi­dence where it leads?

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/11/2017 by Mike

This Judge Isn’t Buying The Trump Admin’s Excuses For Holding A U.S. Citizen ‘Incommunicado’

WASHINGTON ― A fed­er­al judge on Monday aggres­sive­ly ques­tioned a Justice Department attor­ney about the Trump administration’s con­tention that it can con­tin­ue hold­ing an unnamed U.S. cit­i­zen ― who has asked for an attor­ney ― out of the reach of lawyers who wish to rep­re­sent him.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan said she was “not sure” it was “con­scionable” that she could allow the U.S. gov­ern­ment to con­tin­ue hold­ing the American, who was tak­en into cus­tody in Iraq three months ago, with­out giv­ing him the abil­i­ty to chal­lenge his pro­longed deten­tion as unlaw­ful, through what’s known as a habeas cor­pus petition.

“What the gov­ern­ment is sug­gest­ing is an end run around the right to habeas,” Chutkan said. “He wants coun­sel, which is an asser­tion and request that I don’t think I can ignore.”

The American Civil Liberties Union had filed a habeas cor­pus peti­tion on behalf of the unnamed American, an alleged fight­er for the Islamic State mil­i­tant group. Chutkan, an Obama appointee, indi­cat­ed on Monday that she’d made her rul­ing in the case “as quick­ly” as possible.

Justice Department attor­ney Kathryn Wyer, rep­re­sent­ing the Trump admin­is­tra­tion, argued that the gov­ern­ment was try­ing to resolve the sit­u­a­tion quick­ly. Wyer said the American “didn’t give any indi­ca­tion of urgency” to the FBI when they met with him and when he request­ed a lawyer.

Wyer sug­gest­ed the unlike­ly pos­si­bil­i­ty that the American might know the details of a legal bat­tle involv­ing the habeas rights of pri­or Guantanamo detainees, or that he knows the dif­fer­ence between habeas cor­pus and his Miranda rights ― a dis­tinc­tion most peo­ple are unfa­mil­iar with. She sug­gest­ed it was pos­si­ble that the American only want­ed a lawyer for ques­tion­ing, not to assert his habeas cor­pus rights.

Chutkan didn’t seem to buy that.

“He says he wants coun­sel ― isn’t that enough?” she asked. How on earth, the judge said, would this per­son be able to exer­cise their habeas cor­pus rights if they’re effec­tive­ly being held incommunicado?

“Under those cir­cum­stances, the right to habeas is mean­ing­less,” Chutkan said.

Wyer argued that stand­ing was still an issue, and that the ACLU was a “third-par­ty stranger” to the case. But Chutkan said the ACLU isn’t just some per­son off the street ― it’s a group with “exten­sive expe­ri­ence” with these types of cases.

Jonathan Hafetz, the ACLU lawyer, said he was “flab­ber­gast­ed” by the government’s argu­ments, and said the gov­ern­ment was ask­ing for a “blank check” to hold U.S. cit­i­zens over­seas for indef­i­nite peri­ods of time, even when they’d request­ed a lawyer.

Chutkan shook her head in agree­ment sev­er­al times dur­ing Hafetz’s pre­sen­ta­tion, and had no ques­tions for him. She didn’t explic­it­ly say how she’d rule, but left lit­tle doubt that she’d come down against the gov­ern­ment. https://​www​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​e​n​t​r​y​/​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​n​-​i​s​i​s​-​a​c​l​u​-​c​a​s​e​_​u​s​_​5​a​2​e​b​5​d​8​e​4​b​0​c​7​8​0​1​1​3​7​4​1​e​f​?​n​c​i​d​=​i​n​b​l​n​k​u​s​h​p​m​g​0​0​0​0​0​009

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/11/2017 by Mike

Commissioner Quallo, If You Want To Fix St.James Clean House Now.…

The Police high com­mand is sup­pos­ed­ly con­ven­ing a top-lev­el meet­ing to devise strate­gies to tack­le the astro­nom­i­cal crime rate in the Parish of Saint James which has so far this year result­ed in over 310 peo­ple mur­dered and many more shot and injured not to men­tion prop­er­ty destroyed.

DCP Clifford Blake

Just recent­ly the Police announced that Deputy com­mis­sion­er Clifford Blake would be sent to the Parish to tack­le the mon­ster there which is caus­ing mas­sive loss of life and extreme embar­rass­ment for the police.
I am unsure of what DCP Clifford Blake will bring to the table which will change the tra­jec­to­ry of crime in St. James or any­where for that matter.
Speaking to cops on the ground about this they snick­er when Blake is mentioned.
They have long com­plained that DCP Blake’s claim to fame is to antag­o­nize offi­cers about whether their whis­tles are clean and shiny as well as mak­ing demands that they wear the offi­cial uni­form, replete with cum­mer­bund instead of the more prac­ti­cal den­im dress for duties in places like Riverton city and oth­er grit­ty places in the Saint Andrew South Police Area.

Barnett street St.James

Set the absur­di­ty of a Clifford Blake impact aside.
For decades it was an open secret that cops in the west­ern parish­es which make up the police Area 1 were large­ly corrupt.
Without tar­ring and feath­er­ing all of the offi­cers who have passed through the Police Area 1 over the years, it is fair to say that there is much truth to those whispers.
Having served in the Mobile Reserve which dis­trib­uted cops across the Island to cool hot spots, it was not lost on us when­ev­er we went to the parish of Saint James that there were two police depart­ments, Police Area One and the rest of the Constabulary.

This con­sign­ment nev­er land­ed in St. James, the ques­tion on every­one’s lips is, how many did get through?

Those who make the argu­ment that a cor­rupt police depart­ment can­not have suc­cess in con­tain­ing crime are absolute­ly correct.
The stran­gle­hold with which crime has tak­en over the west­ern parish­es and the stub­born­ness with which it has with­stood reme­dies sug­gests that the police is an inte­gral part of the crime cul­ture there.
While all of this is hap­pen­ing crime is mush­room­ing across the Island with alarm­ing feroc­i­ty. This is not hap­pen­ing in a vac­u­um, for years I have been warn­ing that if the coun­try does not push back hard and deci­sive­ly crim­i­nals will con­tin­ue to push the enve­lope with alarm­ing brazen­ness and it may even­tu­al­ly over­whelm the Island’s already sus­pect secu­ri­ty infrastructure.

A police oper­a­tion in Salt Spring (file photo)

Though not the first time we have had brazen shoot­ers enter a church, just yes­ter­day 9 mourn­ers were shot in a church on Winward Road as they attend­ed a funer­al ser­vice. According to pub­lished reports, there were fatal­i­ties among the injured.
For the record that was an act of ter­ror­ism whether the Island’s polit­i­cal lead­er­ship wants to admit it is nei­ther here nor there.

So what does the police hier­ar­chy do about the crime sit­u­a­tion across the coun­try and specif­i­cal­ly in St James?
Listen closely!
The Police Area 1 did not get to be the crime haven it is overnight, it won’t be reme­died overnight. In order to begin to reverse the trend, the lead­er­ship of the force will have to begin the ardu­ous task of regain­ing trust from the citizenry.

Gang Violence is a major fac­tor, break up the gangs.

That is going to be a mon­u­men­tal task and so in order to change the per­cep­tions of a cor­rupt police the depart­ment will have to be heavy on the optics.
Even so, it will require a con­sid­er­able amount of time before the cit­i­zens being to talk to offi­cers again about what is hap­pen­ing in their com­mu­ni­ties, who are com­mit­ting those acts and where to find them.
If cit­i­zens are unable to dis­tin­guish cop from crim­i­nal how can they be expect­ed to risk their lives to fur­nish intel­li­gence when that noble act of cit­i­zen­ship may end up cost­ing them their lives.

Talk to any cop of the past who had any suc­cess deal­ing with crim­i­nals with­in their areas of oper­a­tion and they will tell you that they were able to get good intel­li­gence from the peo­ple they served. It is a part­ner­ship between the pro­tect­ed and the pro­tec­tors which require mutu­al respect and collaboration.

COMMISSIONER QUALLO, USE THIS SHEET TO HELP YOURSELF AND JAMAICA DEAL WITH THE CRIME SCOURGE

#1

Desperate times require strong mea­sures. In order to impress the cit­i­zens of St, James the Police Commissioner must buck some trends and go big.
Going big means trans­fer­ring every sin­gle cop sta­tioned in the Parish to oth­er Parishes.

#2
Do not send DCP Blake to the Parish he has no prac­ti­cal polic­ing expe­ri­ence and may very well have been pro­mot­ed above his capa­bil­i­ties. Since those wrongs are not going to be right­ed today there is no rea­son to fur­ther exac­er­bate the sit­u­a­tion by para­chut­ing a tech­no­crat who has no idea what he is doing.
Sending Blake to St. James guar­an­tees one out­come, dis­grun­tled demor­al­ized cops who drop their hands further.

#3
This Police Department of 2017 must begin once again to val­ue the dif­fer­ence a robust Criminal Investigations Branch brings to any police department.
This has noth­ing to do with the cre­ation of mul­ti­ple sup­posed Investigative arms which are based in Kingston and can­not inves­ti­gate itself out of a brown paper bag.

#4
Fresh police offi­cers in the Parish and a push toward com­mu­ni­ty-based polic­ing is crit­i­cal while get­ting capa­ble under­cov­er cops embed­ded into the com­mu­ni­ties is crit­i­cal to any suc­cess the Police Department is going have going forward.
The Police must get back to gath­er­ing intel­li­gence if it is to have any hope of revers­ing this crime wave.

#5
Commissioner Quallo, it is crit­i­cal that the offi­cers oper­at­ing in the com­mu­ni­ties have a senior sub-offi­cer at all times.
Having sea­soned sub-offi­cers on the ground reduces the like­li­hood of cit­i­zens abus­ing younger offi­cers and it reduces the like­li­hood of offi­cers abus­ing citizens.
It also reduces the poten­tial for corruption.

#6
There are seri­ous well-con­nect­ed play­ers oper­at­ing in the Police Area 1.
Out of those con­nec­tions emanate the lot­to-scam, guns for drugs, the cocaine trade and oth­er transna­tion­al crimes which are hav­ing dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences on the secu­ri­ty of Jamaicans.
It is imper­a­tive that the links between those well-con­nect­ed fig­ures and police offi­cers are disconnected.

#7
Commissioner Quallo, you must demand that the Prime Minister and his lack­eys as well as the PNP and its lack­eys step aside and allow the Police to do its work unobstructed.
Failing which Commissioner, you must Investigate the Politicians who as much as lift a fin­ger to obstruct, hin­der, or oth­er­wise ingra­ti­ate them­selves into the oper­a­tional pro­ce­dures of the police depart­ment regard­less of where they oper­ate from, be it Jamaica House or Flankers.

#8
If the Prime Minister and his lack­eys or the PNP and it’s lack­eys refuse to stand aside while the police depart­ment does what it is man­dat­ed to do by virtue of the Jamaica Constabulary Force Act, ten­der your res­ig­na­tion and reveal through the media what they did to ham­per your work.
Do not allow any­one to use you as a scape­goat while they are absolved of respon­si­bil­i­ty for whats happening.

#9
Initiate a push aimed at break­ing up the Gangs oper­at­ing in those spaces, it is impor­tant that you cre­ate an anti-gang task force sole­ly for the west­ern Parishes. This task-force must be relent­less, not just oper­at­ing dur­ing the day­light hours, but must be so relent­less and lethal that no one wants to be asso­ci­at­ed with a gang.
Yes, I said lethal, I specif­i­cal­ly used that term to annoy the bleed­ing heart frauds who pon­tif­i­cate about human rights as if the rights of killers super­sede those of their victims.

#10
Commissioner Quallo, one of the best qual­i­ties of a good leader is that lead­er’s abil­i­ty to inspire, to moti­vate. The abil­i­ty to make some­thing out of noth­ing, to get sub­or­di­nates to go the extra mile.
Not because of the good­ness of the Organization or even the nobil­i­ty of the cause but because they want to work for that leader.
Your Agency is doing a tremen­dous dis­ser­vice to the young men and women who join, remem­ber that the agency is hav­ing a dif­fi­cult time attract­ing suit­able can­di­dates to fill exist­ing spots.
Additionally, over 500 offi­cers are leav­ing each year, try­ing to imprison them in order to keep them in is a waste of time, it is unconstitutional.
The atti­tude of your senior staff to the men and women under their com­mand is a huge part of the rea­son police offi­cers are flee­ing the department.
Being a leader does not make one a Lord, get that mes­sage to your com­man­ders and maybe, just maybe some of your prob­lems will be averted.

Like and share.….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/09/2017 by Mike

Black Pastors Selling Their Congregants…

(#1 in a series.)

I take the lib­er­ty to write on issues I deem top­i­cal at any giv­en time, issues which in my hum­ble opin­ion affect peo­ple’s lives on a dai­ly basis.
I do so with the sole inten­tion of effect­ing change and if at all pos­si­ble mak­ing this world a bet­ter place.
Having had the audac­i­ty of tak­ing it upon myself to have an opin­ion on issues of the day has def­i­nite­ly had its highs and lows.
Nevertheless, like ham­mer­ing away at sold rock each blow brings the per­son wield­ing the ham­mer one step clos­er to his desired goal.
I write because I see direc­tions those in pow­er take and I know they will only lead to fail­ure and destruc­tion, gen­er­al­ly at the tremen­dous loss of blood and treasure.

Someone asked me some time ago why I write?
I told him why as I stat­ed above, yet I felt the ques­tion was curi­ous, does one ask a Rapper why he raps, an actor why he acts, a singer why he sings?
One does not have to be a great rap­per, actor, singer, or painter to pur­sue his cho­sen pas­sion. Does one have to give an account­ing why he choos­es writ­ing as a com­mu­ni­ca­tion vehi­cle over say dance-hall reggae?
Writing is no dif­fer­ent. Many Artistes nev­er lived to see the acclaim their work gar­nered and that’s okay, as long as some­one’s life is enhanced by that work.

The Rev. Darrell Scott, a pas­tor at Cleveland Heights’ New Spirit Revival Church Ohio and Donald Trump.

On the instances in which I dare to offer an opin­ion on issues whether its reli­gion, race, pol­i­tics or the rule of law or what­ev­er, I find that read­ers are the least inter­est­ed in the issue of religion.
Yet despite this, the issue of reli­gion touch­es our lives in ways we some­times do not con­sid­er, and have larg­er and far­ther reach­ing con­se­quences on our lives than any oth­er subject.
For exam­ple, Donald Trump’s recent deci­sion to uni­lat­er­al­ly declare Jerusalem the cap­i­tal of the Israeli state to sat­is­fy cer­tain local pres­sures and to appease Benjamin Netanyahu will have far-reach­ing con­se­quences, not just for the peo­ple liv­ing in that region but col­lat­er­al­ly for the entire world.
Yet there is pre­cious lit­tle if any dia­logue on this far-reach­ing and con­se­quen­tial deci­sion which Presidents of both polit­i­cal par­ties have avoid­ed step­ping into.

BIBLICAL PROPHECY SEEM TO BE COMING TO PASS EVEN AS WE MISS EVENTS WHICH BEAR OUT THOSE PROPHECIES

One does not have to be a Bible-thump­ing ide­o­logue to agree that much of what is writ­ten in the Scriptures seem to be hap­pen­ing in front of our eyes today. The Apostle Paul speak­ing to the Thessalonians (2) Thessalonians 2:1 – 3 Now, brethren, con­cern­ing the com­ing of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gath­er­ing togeth­er to Him, we ask you, 2 not to be soon shak­en in mind or trou­bled, either by spir­it or by word or by let­ter, as if from us, as though the day of Christ[a] had come. 3 Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin[b] is revealed, the son of perdition.

Empty pews, church­es closing.

Recent events have cer­tain­ly seemed to be plac­ing the Christian Church in dis­re­pute. Here in the United States, many are look­ing at the Evangelical move­ment with increased sus­pi­cion and trepidation.
How they ask, can a move­ment which pur­ports to rep­re­sent the divine God be a move­ment which dis­crim­i­nates against oth­ers on the basis of race, sex­u­al ori­en­ta­tion, reli­gious beliefs etc?
They argue cor­rect­ly, that Jesus taught the con­cept of lov­ing all peo­ple even when we dis­agree with them. In fact James 4:12 teach­es There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the One who is able to save and to destroy; but who are you who judge your neighbor?
Joel 3:12 Let the nations be aroused And come up to the val­ley of Jehoshaphat, For there I will sit to judge All the sur­round­ing nations.

According to the (Pewresearch​.org), Perhaps the most strik­ing trend in American reli­gion in recent years has been the grow­ing per­cent­age of adults who do not iden­ti­fy with a reli­gious group. And the vast major­i­ty of these reli­gious “nones” (78%) say they were raised as a mem­ber of a par­tic­u­lar reli­gion before shed­ding their reli­gious iden­ti­ty in adulthood.
Several of the respon­dents in the Pew research poll think reli­gion is too much like a busi­ness and oth­ers men­tion cler­gy sex­u­al abuse scan­dals as rea­sons for their stance.
This is not unique to the United States, not only are Christians among young peo­ple not adher­ing to the faiths of their fathers, reli­gious per­se­cu­tion forms a size­able part of the rea­son peo­ple are shun­ning the faith.
According to the (guardian​.com) The per­se­cu­tion of Christians is at a lev­el we’ve not seen for many, many years and the main impact is the migra­tion of Christian peo­ple. There are huge swaths of the world which are now expe­ri­enc­ing a very sharp decline in the num­ber of Christians.”
Forced falling away is falling away nonethe­less, or is it?

Perhaps most con­se­quen­tial to the con­ver­sa­tion is the fact that these are young peo­ple who were raised as mem­bers of dif­fer­ent reli­gious faiths, not just Christianity are now turn­ing their backs on the faiths they pre­vi­ous­ly held.
Is this the falling away of which the Bible speaks, are we there yet?
Like every­one else Christians are enti­tled to their polit­i­cal beliefs, church­es of var­i­ous faiths are ripe and pli­ant insti­tu­tions to be manip­u­lat­ed for polit­i­cal pur­pos­es, evan­gel­i­cal con­gre­ga­tions are no exceptions.
Let us be rea­son­able it takes some degree of faith to believe whole­heart­ed­ly in some­one you have nev­er seen and a thing you can­not prove.
sway­ing con­gre­ga­tions, how­ev­er, depends on whether you are able to con­vince the Pastors of those con­gre­ga­tions about the valid­i­ty of your cause, or make some offer which makes it worth­while for him.

Presidential can­di­date Donald Trump © speaks to the media after meet­ing with a group of black pas­tors at his office in the Manhattan bor­ough of New York November 30, 2015.

The tragedy inher­ent in those deals is that there is pre­cious lit­tle in it for the con­gre­gants. The Pastors gen­er­al­ly do well when­ev­er they attach them­selves to cam­paigns even if mon­ey nev­er changes hands.
The press and expo­sure they receive ele­vate them with­in their com­mu­ni­ties and that gen­er­al­ly trans­lates into more mon­ey for them usu­al­ly as they become more sought after to speak to dif­fer­ent congregations.
It’s a kind of I wash your back you wash mine which has pre­cious lit­tle to do with the inter­est of their con­gre­ga­tions much less the fur­ther­ance of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Sadly for many, they are manip­u­lat­ed on the basis of race, come Sunday morn­ing the church­es across America are some of the most seg­re­gat­ed places where peo­ple gather.
How could peo­ple who claim to wor­ship the same God be unwill­ing to coex­ist as broth­ers and sis­ters, chil­dren of that same God you ask?
Despite this major dis­crep­an­cy, some church lead­ers are will­ing to sell their flock for a mere pho­to-op, despite know­ing that the cause to which they are sell­ing them is anti­thet­i­cal to their very existence.

This Article is one in a series of sev­er­al which will be writ­ten on this subject.
Read like and share.…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/08/2017 by Mike

Tivoli Payout Robbing Those Who Play By The Rules To Pay Those Who Don’t

Two hun­dred mil­lion dol­lars $200 million)has been approved by Cabinet as com­pen­sa­tion to aggriev­ed per­sons who were affect­ed by the oper­a­tions of the secu­ri­ty forces in West Kingston in May 2010. This was dis­closed by Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck in a state­ment to the House of Representatives.

This writer has no quar­rel with gov­ern­ment com­pen­sat­ing prop­er­ty own­ers whose prop­er­ty has been dam­aged by oper­a­tions of the state.
As a home­own­er, I would cer­tain­ly be unhap­py if my home was dam­aged or destroyed by the gov­ern­ment and I was not appro­pri­ate­ly compensated.
With that said, I find it appalling that the Government would apol­o­gize to the com­mu­ni­ty of Tivoli Gardens after what that com­mu­ni­ty did to the Jamaican state.

A sol­dier stands guard on a street in the com­mu­ni­ty of Tivoli Gardens after the incursion…

While we are on the ques­tion of com­pen­sa­tion to a com­mu­ni­ty which has lived free on the pub­lic’s dole, a com­mu­ni­ty which large­ly oper­at­ed with­out pay­ing for the com­modi­ties it used, a‑la elec­tric­i­ty, water, etc.
I would also like to ask the admin­is­tra­tion and indeed the Opposition this, who will com­pen­sate Jamaicans like myself who have worked hard, played by the rules, paid our tax­es and broke no laws. Who will com­pen­sate us the tax­pay­ers whose resources built the police sta­tions they burned, who will com­pen­sate the fam­i­lies of the mem­bers of the secu­ri­ty forces who were killed by peo­ple from that community?

An attack on State — Police sta­tions set ablaze, mer­ce­nar­ies parade high pow­ered weaponry.

How does a gov­ern­ment with the full acqui­es­cence of the Opposition com­pen­sate a com­mu­ni­ty which has thumbed its nose at the broad­er soci­ety and oper­at­ed out­side the bounds of the law with impunity?
This is an egre­gious stain on our his­to­ry, the rule of law, and a scan­dalous depar­ture from the norms of a mod­ern soci­ety. This action is a dis­grace­ful depar­ture from whats right and a rep­re­sen­ta­tive sam­ple of how to destroy the moral fiber of said soci­ety. I am ashamed of my country.

This tran­scends polit­i­cal affil­i­a­tions or alle­giances, the peo­ple of Tivoli Gardens oper­at­ed as most in Arnett Gardens and the oth­er Garrisons across the Corporate area did pri­or to 2010. They looked to crim­i­nals for lead­er­ship and the dis­pen­sa­tion of a kind of jus­tice which can only be char­ac­ter­ized as jun­gle justice.
They thumbed their noses at law enforce­ment and the nation’s laws while giv­ing def­er­ence and rev­er­ence to com­mon mur­der­ous thugs.

Hannah Town police sta­tion burned.

The tax­pay­ers of Jamaica includ­ing this writer have borne the cost of elec­tric­i­ty, water, hous­ing etc for those who live in zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sion for decades.
Sure we paid, did you think that the JPS does not get paid for the kilo­wattage of elec­tric­i­ty it gen­er­at­ed? The water com­mis­sion charges those of us who paid for those who did not. Who paid for the hous­es peo­ple in these com­mu­ni­ties live in with­out pay­ing any mort­gages, while many of us work­ing stiffs could not afford to own one of those lit­tle box­es ourselves?

Denham Town Police sta­tion, razed with gunfire

Apologizing to the com­mu­ni­ty for dis­re­spect­ing the rule of law, for giv­ing its alle­giance to a thug is a prece­dent which will haunt this coun­try for gen­er­a­tions to come.
The apol­o­gy and full­some com­pen­sa­tion offered by the gov­ern­ment with the full acqui­es­cence of the oppo­si­tion par­ty is demon­stra­bly the great­est exam­ple that hard-work­ing peo­ple who play by the rules are at a disadvantage.
The polit­i­cal par­ties loy­al­ty is to their base in the most grit­ty law­less com­mu­ni­ties, hence this despi­ca­ble action.

The Darling Street Police Station burned

I do under­stand that in the tox­ic polar­ized swamp which is Jamaica’s pol­i­tics this log­ic will find no fer­tile soil.
With that under­stand­ing, the lack of out­rage becomes far more illuminating.
This is sim­ply an act of reward­ing bad behav­ior with an apol­o­gy and then some.
Set aside all of the grand­stand­ing and the hyper­bol­ic non­sense you read on the pages of the news­pa­pers in Jamaica, they have their own agen­da, which is to fur­ther the break­down of the rule of law.
Instead, see this action for what it tru­ly is, a slap in the face of ordi­nary Jamaicans who obey our laws, pay their tax­es and play by the rules.
Political sup­port for crim­i­nal­i­ty is deeply embed­ded into the body politic, this is just anoth­er exam­ple of the ordi­nary cit­i­zen being held up and fleeced on behalf of those who made the deci­sion to say fuck you to the rule of law.
Only this time they did not do so at the point of a gun.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/08/2017 by Mike

Trump’s Jerusalem Gambit Will Speed The Colonization Of Palestinian Land

Jerusalem Israeli soldiers

But Palestinians will continue to seek ways to secure their rights to freedom and equality.

By Nadia Hijab and Zena Agha

The United States has long been a con­tra­dic­to­ry play­er in Palestinian and Israeli affairs, attempt­ing to bro­ker “peace deals” on the one hand while pro­vid­ing Israel with bil­lions of dol­lars in mil­i­tary aid and polit­i­cal back­ing on the oth­er. Now Donald Trump has honed this dou­ble-edged US role to a dev­as­tat­ing point with his calami­tous deci­sion to rec­og­nize Jerusalem as Israel’s cap­i­tal — even as he calls for a two-state solu­tion “if agreed” by both sides.

As always, Trump has his own inter­ests at heart. In one fell swoop, he has man­aged to pla­cate his major donor Sheldon Adelson, who con­tributed near­ly $40 mil­lion to Trump’s elec­tion and inau­gu­ra­tion, and please both Israel and pro-Israel Christian evan­ge­lists, while kick­ing the can down the road for the next pres­i­dent to deal with. (White House aides say it will take at least three years for a new embassy to be built.) Most impor­tant of all for Trump, giv­en his desire to make his mark, he can boast that he has deliv­ered some­thing oth­er pres­i­dents have side­stepped for 20 years.

In shred­ding decades of estab­lished pol­i­cy, Trump doesn’t seem to care a bit that his move jeop­ar­dizes his country’s inter­ests in the region — or that it pos­es a direct threat to the Palestinians. Nor do the basic pre­cepts of inter­na­tion­al law seem to have crossed his mind. Not only is East Jerusalem con­sid­ered occu­pied ter­ri­to­ry, but the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty does not rec­og­nize West Jerusalem as Israel’s cap­i­tal. Under the 1947 United Nations par­ti­tion plan, which pro­vid­ed an inter­na­tion­al impri­matur for Israel’s cre­ation, Jerusalem is a cor­pus sep­a­ra­tum with an inter­na­tion­al sta­tus. The con­sen­sus was that this sta­tus should not be changed with­out agree­ment between the sides. As a result, no coun­try in the world main­tains an embassy in the city.

So where does this leave the Palestinians? Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has anchored his hopes to US medi­a­tion since he assumed pow­er over a decade ago. But he imme­di­ate­ly reject­ed Trump’s speech — Trump’s lip ser­vice to “peace” and promise to hold off on final-sta­tus issues were appar­ent­ly cold com­fort — and declared that the United States could no longer serve as medi­a­tor. But the real­i­ty is that Abbas has nur­tured few diplo­mat­ic alter­na­tives to the United States. When the glob­al out­rage qui­ets down, he may find him­self increas­ing­ly iso­lat­ed and weak­ened, side­lined by the machi­na­tions of the so-called Arab Quartet (Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Egypt) in tan­dem with Washington.

On the ground, Trump’s posi­tion will heav­i­ly rein­force Israel’s col­o­niza­tion dri­ve. It will ampli­fy calls from the right wing, includ­ing senior gov­ern­ment offi­cials in Israel such as Naftali Bennett, to annex Area C — an area account­ing for some 60 per­cent of the West Bank where Israel retains full con­trol over secu­ri­ty and civ­il affairs — if not the entire­ty of the occu­pied territory.

First on the list is the E1 cor­ri­dor, a strate­gi­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant strip of land mea­sur­ing approx­i­mate­ly 12 square kilo­me­ters that is locat­ed between Jerusalem and the ille­gal Israeli set­tle­ment of Ma’ale Adumim. An ongo­ing push to annex the area has left 1,400 Palestinians fac­ing evic­tion, includ­ing all 32 fam­i­lies from the vil­lage of Khan Al-Ahmar, which is under an order for imme­di­ate demo­li­tion.

E1 is “strate­gic” because it would secure Ma’ale Adumim’s con­ti­gu­i­ty with Israel by cre­at­ing an urban Jewish block between Ma’ale Adumim and Jerusalem. This would bol­ster Israel’s grip on East Jerusalem by sur­round­ing and dwarf­ing its Palestinian dis­tricts with Jewish neigh­bor­hoods. Significantly, it would all but cut the West Bank in half, mak­ing a con­tigu­ous Palestinian state impossible.

At the cen­ter of it all are the Palestinian Jerusalemites. Ever since Israel ille­gal­ly annexed East Jerusalem in 1967 and expand­ed its bound­aries, its Muslim and Christian inhab­i­tants have been grad­u­al­ly but forcibly trans­ferred. In a bid to “Judaize” the land, Israel has enforced a series of dis­crim­i­na­to­ry laws and poli­cies designed to reduce the Palestinian pop­u­la­tion in East Jerusalem, whether through the destruc­tion of Palestinian homes or the revo­ca­tion of the res­i­den­cy of Jerusalem’s Palestinians. From 1967 to the end of 2016, Israel has revoked the res­i­den­cy of at least 14,595 Palestinian Jerusalemites.

Jerusalem has always been the eco­nom­ic and cul­tur­al cen­ter of life for many Palestinians, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the West Bank. However, Israel’s dri­ve to sep­a­rate Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank, through the con­struc­tion of its unlaw­ful wall and a ring of Jewish set­tle­ments, means most Palestinians can no longer enter Jerusalem to do busi­ness, study, vis­it, or receive med­ical care.

If Trump’s dec­la­ra­tion has clar­i­fied one thing, it is that the United States is an antag­o­nist and the road to a just peace lies else­where. That clar­i­ty may push European coun­tries, how­ev­er reluc­tant­ly, into a posi­tion of lead­er­ship in tack­ling the con­flict, which will neces­si­tate hold­ing Israel account­able for its vio­la­tions of inter­na­tion­al law. And it will only rein­force the deter­mi­na­tion of the Palestinian peo­ple to forge alter­na­tive paths to secure their rights to free­dom, jus­tice, and equal­i­ty.  https://​www​.then​ation​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​t​r​u​m​p​s​-​j​e​r​u​s​a​l​e​m​-​g​a​m​b​i​t​-​w​i​l​l​-​s​p​e​e​d​-​t​h​e​-​c​o​l​o​n​i​z​a​t​i​o​n​-​o​f​-​p​a​l​e​s​t​i​n​i​a​n​-​l​a​n​ds/

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/07/2017 by Mike

Govt & Opposition Apologize To Garrison : Weapons And Ammo Pour In And Murders Escalate..

If you want to know what a fail­ing state look like, take a look at Jamaica.
Yes, this is state­ment is insid­i­ous, brazen and will attract a huge back­lash, not that I ever wor­ry about those, because it is a cor­rect assess­ment of our coun­try at present.

Definition of a failed state: A state whose polit­i­cal or eco­nom­ic sys­tem has become so weak that the gov­ern­ment is no longer in control.
According to the Global Policy Forum, Failed states can no longer per­form basic func­tions such as edu­ca­tion, secu­ri­ty, or gov­er­nance, usu­al­ly due to frac­tious vio­lence or extreme pover­ty. Within this pow­er vac­u­um, peo­ple fall vic­tim to com­pet­ing fac­tions and crime.

From this def­i­n­i­tion, you may extrap­o­late that a fail­ing state would have a veneer of con­trol by the gov­ern­ment but peel­ing that veneer away will reveal the true state of that rot­ting failure.

The Jamaican Prime Minister yes­ter­day stood in the nation’s par­lia­ment and did the Jamaican nation a tremen­dous dis-ser­vice by apol­o­giz­ing to the com­mu­ni­ty of Tivoli Gardens for the 2010 secu­ri­ty incursion.
There is pre­cious lit­tle bi-par­ti­san­ship in Jamaican Politics but as was to be expect­ed Peter Phillips and his oppo­si­tion PNP was in agree­ment with the apology.

An under­stand­ing of Jamaican Politics will inform, that the only issues which evoke bi-par­ti­san­ship in Jamaica seem to be the things which fur­ther erodes the rule of law and social order.
Phillips, want­i­ng to gain one-upman­ship told the house a truth com­mis­sion was nec­es­sary to address not only the issues of May 2010 but events dat­ing back to the 1960s and 1970s.
The idea to apol­o­gize to this com­mu­ni­ty which has thumbed its col­lec­tive nose at the Jamaican state for decades and more so under the Jungle lead­er­ship and con­trol of International crim­i­nal Christopher (Duddus) Coke came from the David Simmons-led com­mis­sion of inquiry.

That Commission com­mis­sioned by Phillips own Party whilst in Government was designed to score polit­i­cal point rather than out of any con­cern for the peo­ple who died or suf­fered in Tivoli Gardens.
To sug­gest that the intent of that com­mis­sion was to fer­ret out the truth in fur­ther­ance of the peo­ple of that com­mu­ni­ty is tan­ta­mount to Donald Trump say­ing he fired Jim Comey because he was mean to Hillary Clinton.

Tivoli pan­el.
Hazel Harris, David Simmons, and Anthony Harriott

The par­ti­san Kangaroo Tivoli Gardens com­mis­sion which was set up by Portia Simpson Miller the then intel­lec­tu­al­ly infan­tile Prime Minister was a dis­grace of a com­mis­sion. That com­mis­sion had a demon­stra­ble bias against the secu­ri­ty forces and its head Barbadian David Simmons had a clear dis­dain for things Jamaican.

In order to under­stand why a truth and rec­on­cil­i­a­tion com­mis­sion would be in the best inter­est of a nation, it would be instruc­tive to look at the mod­el adopt­ed by Nelson Mandela after he assumed the Presidency in South Africa in 1995.

[Truth and Reconciliation Commission, South Africa (TRC), a court-like body estab­lished by the new South African gov­ern­ment in 1995 to help heal the coun­try and bring about a rec­on­cil­i­a­tion of its peo­ple by uncov­er­ing the truth about human rights vio­la­tions that had occurred dur­ing the peri­od of apartheid. Its empha­sis was on gath­er­ing evi­dence and uncov­er­ing infor­ma­tion — from both vic­tims and per­pe­tra­tors — and not on pros­e­cut­ing indi­vid­u­als for past crimes, which is how the com­mis­sion main­ly dif­fered from the Nürnberg tri­als that pros­e­cut­ed Nazis after World War II. The com­mis­sion released the first five vol­umes of its final report on Oct. 29, 1998, and the remain­ing two vol­umes of the report on March 21, 2003.] https://​www​.bri​tan​ni​ca​.com/​t​o​p​i​c​/​T​r​u​t​h​-​a​n​d​-​R​e​c​o​n​c​i​l​i​a​t​i​o​n​-​C​o​m​m​i​s​s​i​o​n​-​S​o​u​t​h​-​A​f​r​ica.

This is what Jamaica has come to, the gov­ern­ment and oppo­si­tion par­ty apol­o­giz­ing to a com­mu­ni­ty which thumbed its col­lec­tive nose at the rule of law

The events which neces­si­tat­ed the Security forces entry into the com­mu­ni­ty of Tivoli Gardens in 2010 bears zero resem­blance to the events which occurred in South Africa.
Without re-lit­i­gat­ing events which occurred there it is impor­tant to under­stand the seri­ous­ness of a sit­u­a­tion in which the nations secu­ri­ty forces can­not enter a part of a coun­try which can fit almost twice into the state of Connecticut one of the small­est states in the United States.
Daily the Police recov­er stach­es of guns across the Island and at the ports of entry.
Additionally, for­eign law enforce­ment agen­cies inter­cept large ship­ments which could only tru­ly be explained as going to fur­nish an army.
So while Rome burns the nation’s lead­ers fid­dle and those who should be low­er­ing the lifeboats are busy orga­niz­ing the deck chairs on the sink­ing Titanic.

I am all for a truth com­mis­sion in which Peter Phillips and every oth­er politi­cian from both polit­i­cal par­ties are will­ing to truth­ful­ly and com­pre­hen­sive­ly tes­ti­fy to every crime they ever com­mit­ted and every action they ever took which has brought us to this place.
If they are unwill­ing to do that then I stren­u­ous­ly implore them not to waste any more mon­ey on these flights of fancies.

In light of what occurred in 2010, the Government and Opposition ought to be engaged in bi-par­ti­san sup­port of our secu­ri­ty forces, ensur­ing that they get all of the sup­port they deserve to do the job that is asked of them.
Instead, both Government and oppo­si­tion are active­ly and pre­ten­tious­ly engaged in destruc­tur­ing the pow­ers and for­ti­tude of the secu­ri­ty forces abil­i­ty to do their jobs.

Peter Phillips

So here are the facts.
While the Government con­tin­ues to pre­tend that the seri­ous and exis­ten­tial threats fac­ing the Island can be reme­died by stu­pid ZOSO’s, the coun­try is being flood­ed with weapons, ammu­ni­tion, and spare parts for those weapons.
The arse­nal in the hands of the crim­i­nal under­world far exceeds that which the police has. Earlier this year police offi­cers in St Ann try­ing to inter­cept a want­ed ter­ror­ist faced live grenades which injured one offi­cer, in addi­tion to the auto­mat­ic weapons fire.

Instead of expe­di­tious­ly and decid­ed­ly tak­ing steps to ensure that our coun­try will not be tak­en over by ter­ror­ists neces­si­tat­ing a for­eign takeover to restore order the entire polit­i­cal lead­er­ship is engaged in pla­cat­ing a com­mu­ni­ty which has for decades oper­at­ed out­side the nation’s laws.
Then they won­der why young men pick up guns?
It is the guar­an­teed way for them to gain respect from the peo­ple who nev­er respect­ed any­one before.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/06/2017 by Mike

Massive Gun And Ammo Shipment Destined For Jamaica Intercepted In Miami

US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Miami International Airport (MIA) Outbound Enforcement Team (OET) con­duct­ing a rou­tine inspec­tion iden­ti­fied a ship­ment con­tain­ing two blue ship­ping bar­rels said to con­tain per­son­al effects. A phys­i­cal inspec­tion revealed var­i­ous food items, cat lit­ter, a card­board box labeled as a four-draw­er dress­er, and one card­board box labeled as a tele­vi­sion stand. Further revealed that the per­son­al effects actu­al­ly con­tained 2 rifles, 115 pis­tols, 2 rifles, 139 mag­a­zines, 103 rounds of 9 mm ammu­ni­tion, 50 rounds of .357 ammu­ni­tion, 50 rounds of .45 ammu­ni­tion, 24 rounds of .40 ammu­ni­tion, 40 rounds of .223 ammu­ni­tion, 9 hand­gun back straps, 5 mag­a­zine parts, 3 pis­tol grips, 3 butt­stocks, and weapons parts. All items were placed on a Customs Hold and trans­port­ed to the CBP-OET office for fur­ther pro­cess­ing. The ship­ping doc­u­ments list­ed the con­sign­or as Karima HUDSON of 3610 Coral Springs, Pompano Beach, Florida 33065. The con­signee was Monique HASTINGS, tele­phone num­ber 0018764305161. The ship­ment was due to be export­ed from Miami to Montego Bay, Jamaica via Caribbean Airlines flight BW8040 on 20/​11/​2017. BW8040 was sched­uled to arrive in Montego Bay from Miami at 1045 via Kingston where it was sched­uled to land in 0830.
This sto­ry is still developing.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/06/2017 by Mike

Officials: Trump To Recognize Jerusalem As Israel’s Capital, Direct State Department To Move U.S. Embassy

Donald Trump will rec­og­nize Jerusalem as the cap­i­tal of Israel on Wednesday and direct the State Department to begin the process to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, senior admin­is­tra­tion offi­cials said.

The deci­sion, which is already being cheered by the President’s sup­port­ers and the Israeli gov­ern­ment, is expect­ed to roil the region, with U.S. Arab allies warn­ing Trump on Tuesday that it will under­mine region­al sta­bil­i­ty and stymie the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians. Trump will sign a waiv­er delay­ing the embassy move for anoth­er six months to com­ply with the law, as senior admin­is­tra­tion offi­cials said it will take years for the move to be completed.

The Trump admin­is­tra­tion on Tuesday cast the move, which Trump will announce Wednesday at 1 p.m. ET, as a “recog­ni­tion of real­i­ty” that Jerusalem has long been the seat of the Israeli gov­ern­ment. Officials stressed that the deci­sion would have no impact on the bound­aries of future Israeli and Palestinian states as nego­ti­at­ed under a final sta­tus agreement.

Senior admin­is­tra­tion offi­cials brief­ing reporters Tuesday evening reject­ed sug­ges­tions that the deci­sion would hurt the peace process, but offered no argu­ments to sug­gest the move would advance the peace process or U.S. inter­ests in the region.

Instead, the offi­cials said keep­ing the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv — despite leg­is­la­tion call­ing for a move to Jerusalem — had not advanced peace in more than two decades.

“It seems clear now that the phys­i­cal loca­tion of the American embassy is not mate­r­i­al to a peace deal. It’s not an imped­i­ment to peace and it’s not a facil­i­ta­tor to peace,” one senior admin­is­tra­tion offi­cial said. “After hav­ing tried this for 22 years, an acknowl­edg­ment of real­i­ty seems like an impor­tant thing.”

Another senior admin­is­tra­tion offi­cial said Trump “came to the judg­ment that this was both the right time and the right step to take specif­i­cal­ly with respect to his hopes that a peace can be achieved,” but offered no fur­ther specifics.

The offi­cials said Trump would reaf­firm that he is pre­pared to sup­port a two-state solu­tion to the Israeli-Palestinian con­flict if both sides can agree to such a deal.

Despite the announce­ment, a senior admin­is­tra­tion offi­cial said Tuesday Trump’s recog­ni­tion of Jerusalem as Israel’s cap­i­tal would not change the US pol­i­cy oppos­ing Israeli con­struc­tion of set­tle­ments in East Jerusalem.

Ahead of his announce­ment, Trump spoke Tuesday to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Egypt’s Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, Saudi Arabia’s King Salman and Jordan’s King Abdullah, prompt­ing state­ments from each leader’s coun­try oppos­ing the plan, warn­ing that it will under­mine region­al sta­bil­i­ty and scut­tle any hopes of peace for the fore­see­able future.

Palestinian lead­ers have already called for three “days of rage” in protest and the State Department issued a trav­el warn­ing about the West Bank and Jerusalem’s Old City.

Trump also spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has long lob­bied for the embassy to move to Jerusalem.

The President is expect­ed to make a pub­lic announce­ment Wednesday declar­ing his deci­sion to rec­og­nize Jerusalem as the cap­i­tal of Israel and his intent to move the US embassy from Tel Aviv, diplo­mat­ic offi­cials and a per­son famil­iar with the plans tell CNN. Trump is also expect­ed to sign a waiv­er delay­ing the embassy move for six months, cit­ing the logis­ti­cal chal­lenges of mov­ing U.S. personnel.

The move is roil­ing U.S. allies because it bucks inter­na­tion­al norms and has the poten­tial to desta­bi­lize the region. Recognizing Jerusalem as the Israeli cap­i­tal could upend efforts led by Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, to revive Mideast peace talks; could spark region­al protests that might put U.S. mil­i­tary and diplo­mat­ic per­son­nel at risk; and could hand a pro­pa­gan­da weapon to mil­i­tant groups and Iran, ana­lysts say.

Reaction was swift, with Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Qatar crit­i­ciz­ing the antic­i­pat­ed deci­sion and urg­ing the admin­is­tra­tion to reconsider.

The European Union for­eign pol­i­cy chief, Federica Mogherini, used a press appear­ance with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to make EU dis­plea­sure clear. Any action that could under­mine an even­tu­al peace agree­ment between Israelis and Palestinians “must absolute­ly be avoid­ed,” Mogherini said.

On Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron stressed in a phone call with Trump the long-held inter­na­tion­al posi­tion that the sta­tus of Jerusalem should be resolved through peace nego­ti­a­tions between Israelis and Palestinians, “and par­tic­u­lar­ly those relat­ing to the estab­lish­ment of two states, Israel and Palestine, liv­ing side by side in peace and secu­ri­ty with Jerusalem as their cap­i­tal,” France’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

The admin­is­tra­tion itself braced for blow­back. State Department secu­ri­ty ser­vices were told to pre­pare for unrest at mis­sions over­seas and the Pentagon repo­si­tioned troops who usu­al­ly pro­tect embassies to be clos­er to coun­tries where protests may break out.

White House press sec­re­tary Sarah Sanders said the deci­sion was the result of a “very thought­ful inter-agency process,” but peo­ple famil­iar with the White House delib­er­a­tions por­tray it as being dri­ven by Trump’s domes­tic polit­i­cal concerns.

The President is increas­ing­ly wor­ried about los­ing his polit­i­cal base and insists that he must be seen as ful­fill­ing cam­paign promis­es on Israel, part of an effort he’s tak­en in the past few weeks to gal­va­nize con­ser­v­a­tive sup­port, accord­ing to a per­son famil­iar with the White House deliberations.

The same source also stat­ed that the President sees the Jerusalem issue as key to pla­cat­ing con­cerns among his core sup­port­ers that he’s going soft on his cam­paign positions.

Previous US pres­i­dents promised to move the embassy and then set that pledge aside due to region­al con­cerns and Jerusalem’s con­test­ed sta­tus between Israelis and Palestinians, both of whom claim the holy city as their capital.

Under the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995, the US embassy must be moved to Jerusalem or the State Department faces the penal­ty of los­ing half its appro­pri­at­ed funds for the acqui­si­tion and main­te­nance of build­ings abroad. Every six months, how­ev­er, pres­i­dents can sign a waiv­er to avoid these penal­ties on nation­al secu­ri­ty grounds.

The resis­tance from allies report­ed­ly led to some debate with­in the White House over how to bal­ance the move with the recog­ni­tion of Palestinian claims to Jerusalem, accord­ing to sources with knowl­edge of the situation.

In the mean­time, the President’s per­son­al polit­i­cal con­cerns aren’t like­ly to sway for­eign allies that could be direct­ly affect­ed by any fall­out from the decision.

“I haven’t heard any­one artic­u­late a sin­gle nation­al secu­ri­ty inter­est as to why now,” said Hussein Ibish, a senior res­i­dent schol­ar at the Arab Gulf States Institute. “It hasn’t been done. Everybody knows why it hasn’t been done. It’s a bad idea and it remains a bad idea.”

And while Jerusalem func­tions as the de fac­to Israeli cap­i­tal, David Makovsky, direc­tor of the Project on the Middle East Peace Process at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said an announce­ment will kill any chances of a peace deal.

“There is a his­toric jus­tice in it, in that every pres­i­dent, Democratic or Republican, speaks in the Knesset,” said Makovsky, refer­ring to the Israeli par­lia­ment. “U.S. busi­ness­men rou­tine­ly do busi­ness with Israelis in their cap­i­tal. That’s been the real­i­ty since 1949, but if you say you rec­og­nize an undi­vid­ed cap­i­tal, you’ve pre-empt­ed peace negotiations.”

Shibley Telhami, a pro­fes­sor at the University of Maryland, said an announce­ment would serve as pro­pa­gan­da fod­der for extrem­ists. “It plays into the hands of every con­ceiv­able Islamic mil­i­tant group. It plays into the hands of Iran,” Telhami said, mak­ing it hard­er for Gulf coun­tries that might share secu­ri­ty goals with Israel to open­ly coöper­ate. “It makes the sit­u­a­tion of each one of those gov­ern­ments tougher, let alone what it does to American troops sta­tioned in the region.” http://​ktla​.com/​2​0​1​7​/​1​2​/​0​5​/​t​r​u​m​p​-​t​o​-​r​e​c​o​g​n​i​z​e​-​j​e​r​u​s​a​l​e​m​-​a​s​-​i​s​r​a​e​l​s​-​c​a​p​i​t​a​l​-​d​i​r​e​c​t​-​s​t​a​t​e​-​d​e​p​a​r​t​m​e​n​t​-​t​o​-​m​o​v​e​-​u​-​s​-​e​m​b​a​s​sy/

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/05/2017 by Mike

Lower Murder Stats Of The Past A Result Of Hardcore Policing: Not Despite, Or Worse, A Result Of It…

Chicago is the cap­i­tal city of the state of Illinois, the pop­u­la­tion of the city of Chicago is approx­i­mate­ly 2.7 mil­lion residents.
The city is con­sid­ered one of the most vio­lent places in the United States, accord­ing to Newsweek Chicago is known for hav­ing the high­est num­ber of homi­cides in the United States, and it’s liv­ing up to that rep­u­ta­tion by already top­ping 400 killings for 2017, after four peo­ple were killed among 36 shot over last weekend.

Despite these fright­en­ing homi­cide num­bers, the killings are con­cen­trat­ed only in cer­tain areas of the city which are heav­i­ly pop­u­lat­ed. You are free to guess who lives in those vio­lent, heav­i­ly pop­u­lat­ed areas.

A south side Chicago neighborhood.

Jamaica is an Island nation whose pop­u­la­tion is rough­ly the same as the city of Chicago’s 2.7 mil­lion residents.
Of the four­teen small parish­es which makes up the tiny Island nation of Jamaica, the Parish of St James is among the small­er parish­es with a land size of approx­i­mate­ly 594.9 square kilo­me­ters or (230 square miles).
So far this year St James which is vying for the new wild west title while boast­ing it is the epic cen­ter of Caribbean tourism has reg­is­tered over 310 homicides.

Leaders, please lis­ten to me, you are doing some­thing wrong!
Blacks killing Blacks in the city of Chicago is not out­side the realm of an accept­able solu­tion for oth­er inter­ests in a racial­ly polar­ized coun­try like the United States.
Jamaicans killing Jamaicans at that alarm­ing rate with­in those tiny spaces can­not be viewed with the same lens. The rever­ber­at­ing trau­mat­ic con­se­quences of this will be felt for gen­er­a­tions to come, grant­ed that there is any­one left.

You sim­ply can­not build a shiny new city in a great big for­est with­out first doing some seri­ous clear­ing and estab­lish­ing an infrastructure.
The notion that we can build a soci­ety of promise and pros­per­i­ty in an envi­ron­ment of law­less­ness and blood­shed is a pipe dream.
This lat­ter state­ment is not meant to be a cri­tique of the present Administration or any pre­vi­ous or future admin­is­tra­tion, it is sim­ply a state­ment of fact.

Part of a com­mu­ni­ty adjoin­ing the city of Montego Bay.

So where are we going wrong?
We need a com­plete 180 degree turn from the way we see our respon­si­bil­i­ty to the crime monster.
As far as is evi­denced there is a mis­guid­ed per­cep­tion among the edu­cat­ed on the Island that crime is a social phe­nom­e­non which must be han­dled with nuance and care.

If that is what they teach them at the University of the West Indies our coun­try is in for a rude awak­en­ing. Most of the coun­try’s aca­d­e­m­ic elites came out of that caul­dron of left­ist ide­o­log­i­cal stew.
The prob­lem with their world­view is that it has failed and failed dis­mal­ly, so much so that even the most pow­er­ful nations which embraced those philo­soph­i­cal under­pin­nings have come to the real­iza­tion that they guar­an­tee only fail­ure and pover­ty for their populations.
Subsequently, even as Russia and China still cling to their total­i­tar­i­an past they have moved to mod­ern­ize their economies, mov­ing them in line with the more mar­ket-dri­ven west­ern models.

Percival James Patterson for­mer PM presided over
years of cor­rup­tion and failed leadership

On those mod­els are built the prin­ci­ple of the rule of law, a con­cept which is not per­fect but one which has demon­stra­bly result­ed in a bet­ter stan­dard of liv­ing for west­ern democracies.
The notion that our secu­ri­ty forces should be cau­tious and care­ful in the fight against dan­ger­ous 21st-cen­tu­ry killers has no basis in reality.
Neither does it guar­an­tee that the fight in which our secu­ri­ty forces are engaged is winnable using those mind-numb­ing­ly stu­pid rules of engagement.

Our Country has a deci­sion to make. Much of what the old nean­derthals like Delroy Chuck, Peter Phillips, et al embrace are the failed teach­ings which came out of the 70’s when Michael Manley was lead­ing throngs of peo­ple to free crim­i­nals from police sta­tions. This igno­rant mind­set has seeped into Andrew Holness and the younger gen­er­a­tion of lead­ers who do not ful­ly under­stand the con­cept of the rule of law.

The stark real­i­ty is that crim­i­nals must know that our secu­ri­ty forces are com­ing for them and if they resist they will be killed, end of story.
The con­stant attack on the tech­niques of the past now cham­pi­oned by Holness and many in the JLP and the PNP fail to speak to the most impor­tant facts.
Their argu­ment that the secu­ri­ty forces had their way and look where it got us, is again a lie which is not sup­port­ed by the facts.

When have the Jamaican secu­ri­ty Forces ever had their way in Jamaica? Was there ever a time in which the polit­i­cal admin­is­tra­tion of both polit­i­cal par­ties did not have their grub­by lit­tle fin­gers in the police department?
When was the secu­ri­ty forces not starved of train­ing resources and pay?

So let’s deal with what they are real­ly deal­ing with when they broach this sub­ject of police hav­ing their way.
It was failed lead­er­ship and the nur­tur­ing of crim­i­nals which neces­si­tat­ed the Suppression of Crimes Act which gave police addi­tion­al pow­ers to com­bat the dan­ger­ous crim­i­nals Jamaica produce.
Other Law Enforcement Agencies like the London Metropolitan Police and the New York City Police Department have attest­ed to the feroc­i­ty and heart­less­ness of Jamaica’s killers.

Portia Simpson Miller.
Failed lead­er­ship on crime ..

It was the pol­i­tics of polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence which cre­at­ed the lack of respect for law enforce­ment in the first place.
It was both polit­i­cal par­ties which cre­at­ed polit­i­cal gar­risons and made them ver­i­ta­ble no-go zones for the secu­ri­ty forces.
It was the cre­ation and main­te­nance of these zones of exclusions(garrisons) which metas­ta­sized into incu­ba­tors of crim­i­nal activ­i­ty result­ing in the Shower Posse, Spanglers, Ratbat, Wareika Hills gangs and the now thou­sands of gangs which have tak­en over the Island.

Jamaica did not become the mur­der cap­i­tal because of tough polic­ing Peter Phillips and Andrew Holness, Jamaica became a crim­i­nal par­adise because that type of polic­ing was not allowed to con­tin­ue and expand.

mur­der-rate-jamaica

Year # of Murders
1970 152
1971 145
1972 170
1973 227
1974 195
1975 266
1976 367
1977 409
1978 381
1979 351
1980 899
1981 490
1982 405
1983 424
1984 484
1986 449
1987 442
1988 414
1989 439
1990 543
1991 561
1992 629
1994 690
1995 780
1998 953
1999 849
2000 887
2002 1045
2003 975
2004 1471
2005 1674
2006 1340
2007 1574
2008 1601
2009 1680
2010 1428
2011 1125
2012 1097
2013 1200
2014 1005
2015 1192
2016 1350

Based on the num­bers above it is clear that between 1970 and 1972, under the lead­er­ship of the Island’s best law and order Prime Minister, Hugh Lawson Shearer, the homi­cide num­bers fluc­tu­at­ed from a high of 145 to 170. An aver­age of just over 155 dead Jamaicans each year to violence.

Michael Manley

By 1972 the nation elect­ed a left­ist Prime Minister on a plat­form of bet­ter must come. By 1973 under Michael Manley’s lead­er­ship mur­ders had jumped to 227.
After two terms of Michael Manley’s lead­er­ship in 1980 mur­ders were up to 899. In that 8 year peri­od not only were 3095 Jamaicans mur­dered accord­ing to police reports, the aver­age year­ly homi­cide rate had jumped from 155 under Hugh Lawson Shearer to 386.875 under Manley’s stewardship.
The sam­pling I used to arrive at this con­clu­sion includ­ed only the years 1970, 1971 and 1972 under Shearer stew­ard­ship while the sam­pling rep­re­sent­ed (8) years of Michael Manley’s stewardship.

Given that the data does not include years before 1970, and we do know that mur­ders were marked­ly less in those years it is fair to argue that if the sta­tis­tics were aver­aged over a peri­od of eight years under the Jamaica Labor Party the year­ly aver­age would have been expo­nen­tial­ly low­er than the 155 aver­age using just the three years under Hugh Lawson Shearer.

Edward Seaga.

By 1980 Edward Seaga was elect­ed to office and homi­cides again dropped from the anom­aly year of 1980 when 899 were slaugh­tered to 490 in 1981.
Based on exist­ing data mur­der nev­er reached the 490 num­ber ever again under the lead­er­ship of Prime Minister Edward Seaga.

By 1988 a reformed and pen­i­tent Michael Manley was returned to office and for the very first time homi­cide had sur­passed the 500 mark, for the first time ever in 1993 when 543 peo­ple were mur­dered( not on list).

Citing ill health Michael Manley stepped down and Percival Patterson was appoint­ed Prime Minister.
Under Patterson’s pol­i­cy of “any­thing, a any­thing” crime gal­loped away from 629 homi­cides annu­al­ly when he assumed office in 92 to 1574 in 2007 when Orette Bruce Golding assumed office as the nation’s Eight Prime Minister.

It is impor­tant to note that by 2005 Murder had reached its high­est peak of 1674 under the do as you please atti­tude of Percival Patterson.

The trend lines are clear, Jamaica’s crime rate and more specif­i­cal­ly it’s homi­cide rate increased under polit­i­cal lead­er­ship in which crim­i­nals were giv­en the upper hand by politi­cians whether through com­mis­sion or omission.
The homi­cide rates under both Hugh Shearer and even lat­er under Seaga after which the nation had endured 8 years of Michael Manley poli­cies indi­cate that stronger law enforce­ment result­ed in few­er dead people.

These num­bers are avail­able for all to look at and extrap­o­late from them the truth. That is the rea­son I am and will be a crit­ic of Andrew Holness who as a JLP Prime Minister has depart­ed from the tried and proven ortho­doxy of his con­ser­v­a­tive labor par­ty predecessors.

There is one way and one way only to go after hard­ened crim­i­nals who have made it clear that they intend to destroy our societies.
That way is with an iron fist and resolve of steel.
That law enforce­ment offi­cer who risks their lives to go after dan­ger­ous killers must be hyper­sen­si­tive to the human rights of those killers is retard­ed thinking.
Criminal play by their own rules, which means there are no rules. Tying the hands of police in that regard is strict­ly tan­ta­mount to aid­ing and abet­ting criminals.

Unless we stop with the pre­tense and the hifa­lutin bull­shit com­ing out of the legal and crim­i­nal rights com­mu­ni­ties we can kiss our coun­try goodbye.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/04/2017 by Mike

Judiciary Giving Lotto-scammers Double Bonanza: Legislature Must Act Now..

One of the most long­stand­ing issues hob­bling Jamaican Authorities abil­i­ty to deci­sive­ly deal with crime is the atti­tude of the Judiciary toward this vex­ing issue.

Jamaica’s Judiciary though not whol­ly cor­rupt, is cer­tain­ly not incor­rupt­ible as cer­tain quar­ters of the Island’s pop­u­la­tion would have you believe.
We know differently.
For the most part, the Islands judges have long mis­char­ac­ter­ized the con­cept of “Independent Judiciary” to mean free to do as they please with bail and sentencing.

The idea of an inde­pen­dent judi­cia­ry and Press are two of the few safe­guards cit­i­zens have against tyran­ni­cal Governments which would oth­er­wise tram­ple on their rights and liberties.
As such, the press and the judi­cia­ry have sacred respon­si­bil­i­ties to be as judi­cious as pos­si­ble in the way they car­ry out their functions.

Jamaican Judges A Large Part Of The Murder Problem/​Ask Dexter Pottinger

Both have failed in car­ry­ing out those sacred functions.
For its part, the once respect­ed media on the Island has den­i­grat­ed into cheer­lead­ers for polit­i­cal par­ties and spe­cial inter­est groups despite the growth in mediums.

The police have long main­tained that judges are far too lenient on crim­i­nals who are brought before the courts. In fact, the archa­ic nature of the Island’s laws makes a mock­ery of the crim­i­nal jus­tice system.
Juxtapose that with the mock­ery the judges make of the sys­tem and there is lit­tle won­der at the rea­son crime is so out of control.

The Island’s crime epi­dem­ic can­not be whol­ly laid at the feet of judges, or that of the press, but both groups play a part, as have oth­ers in the mas­sive esca­la­tion of crime on the Island.
The judi­cia­ry has turned the sys­tem into a mock­ery of a revolv­ing door. It releas­es dan­ger­ous killers back onto the streets regard­less of how many peo­ple they kill, the grue­some nature of their crimes or how many times they have been arrest­ed on homi­cide charges and are still await­ing trial.

This brain-dead prac­tice has over the years result­ed in a num­ber of prob­lems, not the least of which is per­ceived police extra­ju­di­cial killings, police cor­rup­tion, a break­down in the rule of law, lack of respect for the nation’s laws and law enforce­ment offi­cers, and a gen­er­al reliance on com­mu­ni­ty so-called Dons as more effec­tive enti­ties to mete out justice.
Amidst all of this, the Judiciary con­tin­ue to adopt a pompous atti­tude as it main­tains that bail was nev­er intend­ed to be pun­ish­ment. In the mean­time, the court con­tin­ues the insane prac­tice of releas­ing the Island’s most dan­ger­ous killers back onto the streets as soon as the police arrest them.
According to police sta­tis­tics over one hun­dred and forty of the mur­ders com­mit­ted on the Island this year were com­mit­ted by peo­ple on bail.

Bear in mind that that fig­ure rep­re­sents ‘s only those homi­cides which the police have effec­tive­ly solved and were able to cross-ref­er­ence them by deter­rmin­ing that at the time they killed some­one they should have been locked up in jail.
The num­ber of homi­cides com­mit­ted by peo­ple grant­ed bail is much high­er and is a large part of the rea­son the Island’s homi­cide rate is so high.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​j​a​m​a​i​c​a​n​-​j​u​d​g​e​s​-​g​r​a​n​t​s​-​b​a​i​l​-​t​o​-​m​u​r​d​e​r​e​r​s​-​t​h​e​y​-​t​h​e​n​-​k​i​l​l​-​c​op/

It should come as no sur­prise then that since the well-learned judi­cia­ry plays God Almighty by repeat­ed­ly grant­i­ng bail to mass mur­der­ers they would have no prob­lem releas­ing Lotto-Scammers with a tiny slap on the wrist and a smile.
Never mind that the Island’s law enforce­ment agen­cies have repeat­ed­ly said the Lotto-scam­mers are using their illic­it gains to fund the ille­gal gun trade and by exten­sion is respon­si­ble large­ly for the tremen­dous increase in homicides.

From my expe­ri­ence, the seri­ous­ness of the charges brought against Jamaica’s crim­i­nals has nev­er seemed to be impor­tant to many of the judges I have seen on the bench.
One gets the impres­sion that their sin­gu­lar focus has always been to find ways to release them back into the com­mu­ni­ties as soon as possible.
There is now strong evi­dence that there is a col­lab­o­ra­tive process in place between some on the bench and cer­tain defense attor­neys which includes mon­ey chang­ing hands for pris­on­ers to get bail and for lenient sentences.

Reporting on the dis­po­si­tion of cas­es in the Hanover cir­cuit court should prove to even the most loy­al sup­port­ers of the Judiciary that some­thing is rad­i­cal­ly wrong here.
The pal­try fine of $367,000 imposed on fif­teen defen­dants who plead guilty to lot­tery scam­ming is a damn­ing indict­ment of the judiciary.

Judges Have A Responsibility As Officers Of The Court To Follow And Apply The Law, Obviously Not In Jamaica..

The reports indi­cate that sev­en were fined $30,000; five were fined $20,000 while two were fined $25,000. The oth­er man was fined $7,000 and ordered to pay resti­tu­tion of US$580.
Senior law enforce­ment offi­cial notes that the Law Reform Fraudulent Transaction Special Provisions Act, com­mon­ly called the Lottery Scam Act, pro­vides stiffer fines and up to 15 years in prison.
The offi­cial described the fines as scan­dalous and says they do not take into account the links between the lot­tery scam and the increase in vio­lent crimes in west­ern Jamaica.
The offi­cial also point­ed out that in each case the fines were less than US$200, sig­nif­i­cant­ly less than the fines imposed on Jamaicans con­vict­ed in the United States on charges relat­ed to the lot­tery scam.

Indeed they are.
An inde­pen­dent judi­cia­ry was nev­er intend­ed to be a judi­cia­ry which aids the pro­lif­er­a­tion of crimes, it was intend­ed as artic­u­lat­ed ear­li­er in this article.
Since the courts have refused to do its job, the Legislature must now act to pro­tect the country.
A judi­cia­ry is not free to do as it pleas­es, it is unelect­ed and must car­ry out its man­date inde­pen­dent­ly from Government, nev­er­the­less when the needs of the peo­ple change and the actions of the courts are not in con­for­mi­ty with the wish­es of the peo­ple the peo­ple’s rep­re­sen­ta­tives must act.

That action must come in the form of manda­to­ry min­i­mum sen­tences for cer­tain cat­e­gories of crime.
It must remove from judges, the dis­cre­tion and abil­i­ty to grant bail to mur­der accused, unless with strin­gent con­di­tions pre­scribed in law.
Those con­di­tions should include elec­tron­ic mon­i­tor­ing, house arrests, con­fine­ment to cer­tain geo­graph­ic loca­tions among others.
These con­di­tions should only be in law if the coun­try is able to sup­ply the secu­ri­ty forces with the equip­ment nec­es­sary to enforce said conditions.

In this fight to take back our coun­try from the des­per­a­does, it must be all hands on deck. The coun­try can­not afford a few unelect­ed bureau­crats to con­tin­ue to derail our sys­tem of justice.
Judges must be giv­en strict guide­lines to fol­low in cer­tain cat­e­gories of crime. It would also be a good idea to allow Prosecutors to appeal a sen­tence if he feels that the sen­tence was incom­men­su­rate with the crimes an offend­er was charged with.
Finally, Judges must be appoint­ed from the pros­e­cu­tor’s side, the coun­try can ill afford to have the judi­cia­ry pop­u­lat­ed with for­mer defense lawyers.

Principles:
2.4 Judges should exhib­it and pro­mote high stan­dards of judi­cial conduct
so as to rein­force pub­lic con­fi­dence which is the cor­ner­stone of judicial
independence.
3.1 Judges should ensure that their con­duct is above reproach in the view
of rea­son­able, fair-mind­ed and informed per­sons, and that their behavior
is such as to reaf­firm the con­fi­dence of the pub­lic in the integri­ty of the
judi­cia­ry. (Jamaica judi­cial con­duct guide­lines).

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/02/2017 by Mike

More Weapons Off The Streets..

The Jamaican Police con­tin­ue to remove dan­ger­ous weapons from the streets.
Almost dai­ly across the Island, the police remove caches of weapons which would nor­mal­ly end up tak­ing the lives of many innocents.

Even as we sup­port the police in this fight we implore them to try to find ways to stop the weapons at the points of entry.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…
12/02/2017 by Mike

Blame Obama! White House Offers The Lamest Response To Flynn Charges

The White House didn’t mention Obama fired Flynn, or that he warned Trump about potential risks of hiring Flynn.

After President Donald Trump’s for­mer National Security Adviser Michael Flynn plead­ed guilty to lying to fed­er­al agents about his con­tacts with the Russian ambas­sador dur­ing the tran­si­tion peri­od, the White House seemed to dis­tance itself from Flynn by throw­ing for­mer President Barack Obama under the bus.

“Today, Michael Flynn, a for­mer National Security Advisor at the White House for 25 days dur­ing the Trump Administration, and a for­mer Obama admin­is­tra­tion offi­cial, entered a guilty plea to a sin­gle count of mak­ing a false state­ment to the FBI,” White House lawyer Ty Cobb said in a state­ment on Friday, per press pool reports.

The state­ment con­tin­ued, “The false state­ments involved mir­ror the false state­ments to White House offi­cials which result­ed in his res­ig­na­tion in February of this year. Nothing about the guilty plea or the charge impli­cates any­one oth­er than Mr. Flynn. The con­clu­sion of this phase of the Special Counsel’s work demon­strates again that the Special Counsel is mov­ing with all delib­er­ate speed and clears the way for a prompt and rea­son­able con­clu­sion.“https://​www​.salon​.com/​2​0​1​7​/​1​2​/​0​1​/​b​l​a​m​e​-​o​b​a​m​a​-​w​h​i​t​e​-​h​o​u​s​e​-​o​f​f​e​r​s​-​l​a​m​e​s​t​-​r​e​s​p​o​n​s​e​-​t​o​-​f​l​y​nn/

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading…

Post navigation

Older posts
Newer posts →

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Earlier Posts

Inspiration

Historic Jamaica
Historic Jamaica
US States By Population 2022
US
How To Cut Your Food Budget Spending, Eat Healthier And Find Peace …
How To Cut
Wait, Weren’t They Supposed To Be The Law And Order Party?
Wait, Weren’t
Rest In Peace, On And Off The Court Bill Russel A Legend…
Rest In Peace,

Feeds

The Toxic Romance With Criminality: A Historical Reflection !!!
The Toxic Romance
Oprah Reacts To Trump’s Tweet Calling Her ‘Very Insecure’
Oprah Reacts
Jamaicans Fear Retribution In Turks And Caicos
Jamaicans Fear
We Are Dealing With A Generation Of Vipers
We Are Dealing
Case Overload Choking Coroner’s Court
Case Overload
Anita Alvarez Wants To Be Taken Off Laquan McDonald Murder Case
Anita Alvarez
Cop Held For Policewoman’s Murder
Cop Held For
NYPD Detectives Charged With Assaulting Postal Worker Who Accidently Gave Directions To Cop Killer
NYPD

In Memoriam

1794514_10201838192856149_7195034555188897183_n (1)
284063_2256379339656_7056663_n
10007527_10201995648396803_985603500_n
safe_image (1)
10171103_10152376425948578_9084674861969605735_n
1480559_10202062072381577_7150872291198386158_n
10157395_1572990949592991_422432309709859427_n
10151303_10201838190176082_6251591884616289094_n
10152647_1462370020662079_909824011138132726_n
10152619_10201827588671051_838956964369929674_n
1970386_821510291198031_880089478_n
1912337_845188005498336_8537202805013689995_n
Powered by WordPress · Built with Untitled
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
mikebeckles.
Privacy Policy / Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Untitled.
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d