Former President Barack Obama appeared to throw subtle shade at President Donald Trump for having fewer Twitter followers than himself during a forum in India on Friday.
In a conversation with journalist Karan Thapar at the Hindustan Times Leadership Summit in New Delhi, Obama boasted on stage about having “100 million Twitter followers”.
“I actually have more than other people who use it more often,” he added, prompting laughter from the audience who interpreted it as a ding against Trump. (For the record, Obama actually has 97.4 million followers. Trump has 43.8 million).
“I think it’s important to be mindful about both the power of these tools and also its limits and to understand it can be used for both good or for ill,” Obama added, during a more general discussion on technology.
Former national security adviser Michael Flynn pleaded guilty Friday to lying to the FBI, becoming the first Trump White House official to face criminal charges and admit guilt so far in the wide-ranging election investigation led by special counsel Robert Mueller.
Flynn also agreed to coöperate with Mueller’s probe, which focuses on Russian meddling in the 2016 election and possible coördination between Russia and Donald Trump’s campaign aimed at sending the Republican businessman to the White House. More here: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-michael-flynn-charged-20171201-story.html
A very dear friend tried to convince me he was no alcoholic awhile back, ” Mike after mi nah dring rubbin alcohol, ungle if mid did a drink rubbin acohol mi wudda sey mi need help.” Two stints in prison later, as a result of his drinking and driving, he is still convinced that he doesn’t have a drinking problem.
There is a certain sense of contentment, or resignation people feel in their circumstances, I guess it makes them accept far less than they were created to accept. Whether it’s as my friend say he is no alcoholic, or Jamaican people saying “crime de every weh”, in response to the frightening murder rate it seems deniability has now become a coping mechanism.
In the United States, the all-out assault on once held societal norms for the highest executive office is passed off as just Trump being Trump. We have become so accustomed to the vulgarity and garish behavior that we tell ourselves that is the way it has to be, this is the new normal. Back home the killings elicit a glance if at all, the crime scene tape has become a spectacle, a spectacle which lasts until the corpse is removed and the blood is washed away and it’s back to business as usual.
I am always a little miffed at the idea that we cannot make a change as if we are totally powerless. I have never shared the perception that it’s up to someone else to do for us what we ought to be doing for ourselves. Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a bus and ignited a movement. There is something each and every person can do to make a better world. If the price of a certain brand of bread is too high simply stop eating that brand, no matter how much you like the taste of that brand.
Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat and is promptly arrested. A movement was born.…
I don’t like the way the few NFL players are being treated for taking a knee during the singing of the national anthem. No one will notice but I have stopped watching since Colin Kaepernick has been blacklisted and will never watch another game unless he is hired by a team. So you say what difference does t make if you stop watching many more people are? Many people are watching but I ain’t, that’s the difference. If enough of us stand up and say no what do you think the outcome will be?
The urge I have and the adrenaline rush of watching a good game are strong but they do not outweigh my resolve to stand on principle and not sell out for a couple hours of fun. Former President Barack Obama was always quick to remind us, we are the change we seek. It is not up to someone else to fix things for us. Each Generation has a duty to the cause of justice and brotherhood, peace and prosperity so that when we have finished our leg, the baton will be passed leaving the next runner with a good shot at this race called life.
We call ill afford to hand the baton to the next runner leaving him no chance of winning. Winning is life, it is our existence, it is the difference between survival and extinction. Don’t ever for one minute believe that we cannot be eviscerated as if we never existed.
What we should not be doing is doing our enemy’s work for them. If the wanton savagery and the barbaric killings are not stopped by someone or something who will be left? How about each and every one of us decides that we will not support criminal behavior and mean it? How about we make the decision that at least in my household there will be no blood money? We may not think it’s cannibalism when the money the mend bring home was taken from the person whose life he had just snuffed out but it is. Today it’s that person, rest assured tomorrow it will be you.
Not much has changed in Jamaican Media from what existed two or three decades ago except that we have more entities than the previous RJR and JBC radio and JBC Television which signed off at midnight, after which there were only crickets. Sure, Radio and Television have gotten exponentially more vulgar and as a consequence, the society has denigrated much further than in many other nations. The results of this are borne out in the violence and homicide statistics which are choking the lifeblood out of the tiny Island we once thought of as paradise.
In the time since then, we have had tens of thousands of murdered Jamaicans, Vybz Kartel lectured at the (Intellectual ghetto (UWI) and Ninjaman gave a pep talk to law enforcement officers. The irony in all this is that both are now convicted murderers! From the lofty out of touch Editorial offices at that behemoth on North Street to the cushy little studios of both radio and television the incessant daily barrage of anti-police invectives was bound to have negative consequences for our country.
You see, the perches haven’t changed, neither have the influences which come from the media houses changed. What has changed are the ways the rest of the world views the issues of today and how to deal with those issues and no one bothered to inform the Editorial boards of the Gleaner, Observer or the self-appointed mouthpieces of the Jamaican people in the traditional mediums. The problems with their views are that they are largely shaped from parochial perspectives, devoid of exposure.
Hughes
So they still write their Editorial pieces from those lofty perches and the village lawyers debate them on talk radio and television. The backwardness of those editorials finally seep down into the body politic, and to the man on the streets where it becomes gospel. The problem with all this is that the initial perspective was not based on critical thinking or deep introspection or even data-driven. They are old tired positions of pundits and prognosticators steeped in old prejudices and perceptions which have no relevance to today’s society.
So sure, the editorial board of the Gleaner would be offended by the idea that their baby INDECOM is problematic, they do not care about the massive loss of life occurring in the country, why would they, it makes for sensational headlines? They do not care about the men and women who brave the bullets when they sleep either, berating them sells newspapers too.
At the very best, the brightest of them cannot extrapolate from the data the negative impact this law is having on the lives of ordinary Jamaicans. They are hell-bent on their focus, which is to demonize the police. Any emerging data which conflicts with the rotten fish they are selling is swiftly discarded in a convoluted word salad of hyperbole.
A society which hates its defenders must be prepared to deal with the consequences coming from its offenders.The media has a responsibility, to be honest with its assessment of topical issues. It must endeavor to ensure that it does due diligence even in the opinions it proffers, they too matter.
Eventually, the stench of the rot rises up to the highest turret of your towers and no one is immune from the fallout. Be careful with your stewardship.
Peter Phillips the recently installed leader of the Opposition in Jamaica really has nothing going for him so he decided he will simply oppose any and everything that the Government does or says. Now, to be fair to the People’s National Party no one could reasonably accuse them of being anything close to a law and order party. In fact, under their longest serving and the Island’s most destructive Prime Minister Percival James Patterson, the mantra was “anyting a anyting”, a classic wink and nod to criminals to run-wid-it, do what they wanted.
Peter Phillips opposition leader
So it came as no surprise that the old tun back rasta Peter Phillips would be opposed to the idea of reining in INDECOM. Now, granted that Prime Minister Andrew Holness does not have clean hands, or more like clean conscience in this, he at least has a disgruntled Police Force on his hands, angry about the lack of progress with wage negotiations. With over 500 cops walking away each year and the JCF unable to reach recruitment targets Holness has no choice but to kiss some asses. So he arrived at his come to Jesus moment at the National Arena a few days ago telling supporters that the police are afraid to do their jobs because of an overzealous INDECOM. No shit !!!
It follows that Peter Phillips with no plan of his own or any intention of having a plan for crime, except to watch it escalate would oppose what Holness said. It made good politics for the brain-dead cool-aid drinkers who blindly follow Phillips cult party but is his position sound policy? Peter Phillips went on to argue that since he was a boy he heard about name brand cops and that their claim to fame was because they were violent.
No Peter, you troll, the name brand cops of whom you speak were in fact not violent at all contrary to popular perceptions. Ask around about Keith Trinity Gardiner, Dick Hibbert, the dearly departed Tony Hewitt, (Cornwall Bigga Ford one of yours) and a long list of others and people will tell you they were effective because they were fearless, selfless and tireless, something you would not know about as a politician you are the opposite, simply cowardly, lazy and selfish. Ask them how many times they have been shot and shot at, rest in peace Anthony Hewitt? Your feeble attempt at rewriting history shows you for the rapacious graceless punk that you are, just another greasy despicable power hungry troll.
Which brings me to why the PNP would have you as their leader when you already betrayed the party and indeed our country to foreign powers. Come on Peter Phillips do you think we have forgotten? Remember those MOU’s you signed? The highly classified MOUs, which involve Jamaica, the United States (US), and the United Kingdom (UK), were signed by Phillips in 2004. Though Phillips argued that he had authority to sign the MOU’s Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions Jeremy Taylor at the time under cross-examination, testified that the MOUs involved the military and should have had the signature of the then minister of defense, P.J. Patterson, and not Phillips.
Have PNP supporters forgotten this little incident? You see Mister Phillips you cannot be trusted and everyone knows this, so let’s be clear, you have zero credibility on National Security or on crime for that matter. You sold the country down the river before, so no one is surprised that you would take a raw political stance on a matter this important again.
Trump’s move to displace the legitimate head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau assaults consumers — and violates the rule of law.
By John Nichols
There is a tendency to presume that a “constitutional crisis” must involve generals exercising unwarranted authority in a clash with civilian leaders — or a president firing an FBI director because he feels threatened by inquiries into wrongdoing by that president’s aides and allies.
But some form of constitutional crisis can occur whenever competing views of how the federal government should operate clash with one another. The crisis becomes severe when one side of the disagreement chooses to assert its position by disobeying laws that are on the books in order to achieve political ends.
That’s what is happening now with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The CFPB is an independent agency with clearly defined mandates and rules, spelled out by the Dodd – Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, which created the agency.
When CFPB director Richard Cordray stepped down this month, there was no mystery as to who should succeed him. The Dodd-Frank law says that the deputy director “shall serve as acting directorin the absence or unavailability of the director.” Before his exit, Cordray named his able chief of staff, Leandra English, as deputy director. That set English up to serve as acting director until President Trump nominates a new director and that nominee is confirmed by the Senate.
But President Trump, whose disrespect for independent agencies has been well established, and who had been particularly critical of the CFPB, had other ideas. He named Office of Management and Budget director Mick Mulvaney as the acting director.
Trump had no legitimate authority to make that appointment. As Senator Elizabeth Warren, the Massachusetts Democrat who was the leading advocate for establishing the CFPB, explains.
[The] law that Congress put in place specifically says the deputy director takes over when the director is absent or unavailable. So if we’re going to have a deputy director who’s going to take over on an interim basis, it ought to be done according to the law. There’s no vacancy here for Donald Trump to fill.
Marty Lederman, a law professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, writes that
Dodd-Frank does not say that she “may” serve. It doesn’t even say, as other statutes do, that she “shall serve” unless and until the President appoints someone else to do so.… In such cases of an unequivocal, mandatory statutory designation of the acting officer, the argument goes, the President may not exercise his appointment authority under the VRA, because Congress itself has already settled the question of who serves.
Terrence Williams has now demonstrated that he is bigger than those who employ him. In fact, Williams clap-back at Andrew Holness’ comment that INDECOM sometimes goes too far bears out what I have maintained since the agency was authorized.
It now seems that because of INDECOM’s foreign backing, Terrence Williams has adopted a Laissez-faire attitude toward anything anyone says about INDECOM. His “I don’t give a shit what you think “attitude is now directed at the duly elected Prime Minister. Now, this is a little bit funny to someone like me.
Andrew Holness is part of the cabal of deplorables[sic] which cooked up this act, with Bruce Golding, Delroy Chuck, and others. Yes, he was part of that Administration and of course with the blessings of the simple-minded Portia Simpson Miller and her band of criminal supporting thugs.
Remember that Terrence Williams’ brother is part of the JLP Administration. Now here is the kicker, Holness knew at the time that the way the law was drafted and worded would have serious consequences for Police officers yet he did nothing. He has since then steadfastly refused to acknowledge that the law is harmful even as his wife a neophyte politician expressed empathy with the police. It is only now that he has a surly police department on his hand, angry about the way wage negotiations are regressing that Holness suddenly has his epiphany. While we are on the subject let me once again say to the lawyers and village lawyers who are incapable of understanding what we mean when we say the law is grossly injurious to police officers, no matter how clean they are.
Bruce Golding gave the nation INDECOM and all its side effects, as well as the Tivoli affair and God know what else?
(1) The law demands that Police Officers attend INDECOM’s offices at the earliest opportunity (at the peril of prison) and give statements in cases where they were forced to use lethal force. Anyone who has ever been involved in a shooting understands how devastatingly traumatic that is. In most departments in other countries officers are given time to decompress from that ordeal. According to the Emperor of INDECOM [sic], it appears that officers relish being engaged in fatal shootings, so the levels of fatal shootings are attributable to that love of killing and not the extreme violent nature of the Island’s killers..
(2) Officers are forced to defend themselves in court in cases where they did their jobs and a zealous confrontational INDECOM and Terrence Willimas charges them with a crime, usually resulting in immense hardships and financial ruination.
(3) To those talking about good cops having nothing to fear, put that in your pipes and smoke it. Let’s see how you would like to be ruined financially for doing exactly what you swore to do at the peril of prison.
(4) This writer is encouraged that the Government is now providing some semblance of financial relief to officers to help with their legal bills in cases where they are persecuted for doing their duty. The thing to do is to repeal the law and replace it with a law which protects both police and public alike. I will personally continue to do my little part to keep the light shining on this monstrous crime enhancement law which is taking the lives of countless Jamaicans and changing the way people respond to the rule of law forever.
Terrence Williams is not an independent investigator he is a blatant anti-police antagonist with his own agenda.
I call on this Government to stop this right now by repealing the INDECOM law and replace the law with one which works for both the Police and the public. Hire a Commissioner who is untainted by the self-aggrandizement and self-promotion, one who understands that as an independent investigative unit his/her agency cannot take sides one way or the other.
Terrence Williams argues that INDECOM also has oversight of the Military and Corrections departments yet he has heard no complaints of low morale from those two entities. (1) When the Military takes to the streets it does so under the purview of the Police, not as a law enforcement entity on its own. (2) The corrections department deals with incarcerated people who are subject to the rules of the Institution in which they are held and are dealt with according to the rules therein. (3) The Police are forced to deal with everyone who breaks the law and those who support them and their refusal to submit to being held accountable for their transgressions against the law.
Either this guy is not too bright or he is deliberately trying to deceive the public, something he has done effectively with the help of a complicit cabal of anti-police antagonists in the media for seven years. Police work is nothing like what the military or corrections departments do, Police officers are asked to deal with much more, including making life and death decisions within a fraction of a second. Since lying Terrence Williams knows so much about this police culture he so glibly talks about through his lying deceptive lips, I say to him do a ride along with the two or so cops at night in Payne land, West Kingston, East Kingston or the ghettos surrounding Montego Bay.
I know this gets to you Terrence, so I challenge you to put on your big boy pants for a week and show the nation that you are not just talking. Demonstrate to the country that when you make your big chat you are willing to back them up by placing your life on the line to back them up. Do the ride-along with the real men who protect our country. You are a disrespectful little narcissist who speaks about the men and women of the police department in disrespectful terms, even the career officers who have given decades of service to our country way above anything you will ever accomplish. Show some damn respect. Failing which, sit your ass down and shut your fucking mouth.….….
For years after leaving law enforcement I have asked the question of my country’ s leaders, “what kind of country do we want to have”? Are we trying to achieve a narco-state, a country divided into enclaves like sub-Saharan Africa or Lebanon and other failed states? Or do we want to make Jamaica the glorious state it can be considering what our country has to offer? Are we content to continue feeding the stereotypical perceptions that Blacks are incapable of self-governance? Since Independence, we have certainly demonstrated that we are incapable, or at best unwilling to make good governing decisions.
Why have political leaders of both political parties made such horrible decisions, decisions which are antithetical to the oaths they took to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic? Each and every Government have as their primary responsibility, the charge to protect their citizens using all of the tools at their disposal. Administrations of both political parties have been quick to adopt and support a foreign imposed moratorium on capital punishment but have been negligent in upholding the foundational pillars of the Bail Act.
The courts are supposedly independent arbiters outside the control of the [people’s representatives, such is what many legal scholars and many wannabes will have you believe. The truth of the matter is the courts are there to interpret the laws passed by the Parliament, the people’s representatives. Therefore if a law is not working it is up to the Nation’s Parliament to take action to ensure that the laws are up to date. So when the Prime Minister tells a crowd of cheering supporters that the INDECOM act has been problematic,(something I have argued for years), then rather than propose a repeal and replace, (a logical remedy), the PM promises to make more money available to police for their defense. In essence that is politicians blowing smoke up people’s collective asses rather than doing what they were elected to do, lead.
When the Minister of National Security finally admits that there is a problem because people are being granted bail and they are returning to kill over and over again, it’s starting to sound a little tone deaf when they could have fixed that problem a long time ago. Revealing that 143 Jamaicans have been murdered by men who are on bail for other charges just this year alone Robert Montague said he will be proposing legislation that will ensure that people who commit gun crimes or are held with guns do nor receive bail).
That has been my suggestion for years, why would an alleged murderer be allowed out on bail, yet in the Jamaican courts alleged murderers are granted bail up to six times after been charged with capital murder and killed again and again and again. That kind of brain-dead madness only happens in Jamaica, nowhere else, so much so that Jamaica has become a laughing stock around the CARICOM region and sits atop the murder states on the planet.
Despite the fact that the present Bail act is grossly outdated and insufficient to deal with the exigencies of the time, there are strong stipulations within the act which gives Judges the backing they need should they choose to be good stewards in the dispensation of their mandates. Insofar as that is concerned Jamaica’s judges have come up woefully short in honoring their oaths, they have effectively turned the criminal justice system into a revolving door, making a mockery of the system of justice.
Sure, Bail is not supposed to be used as punishment for an offender but the Bail act despite all its frailties, gives judges cover to keep alleged criminals in jail where they belong. There are three specific points in the act which makes it clear that even way back when the act was first conceived serious crimes were taken rather seriously. Bail may be refused if… (1) the offender is unlikely to show up for trial. (2) the offender may interfere/kill with witnesses. (3) The seriousness of the crimes the offender is accused of committing.
There are no logical arguments to be made for what Jamaican judges have done, no justification for the harm they have caused by turning loose serious offenders to kill after they have been arrested on homicide charges. It is a serious breach of the public’s trust, the harm perpetrated on the nation by these bureaucrats, unelected by anyone but who wield immense power and influence. The nation must now begin the serious process of taking the necessary steps to bring sanity back to our streets and our communities. Much of which must be done legislatively. Jamaican cannot continue to act outside international norms without consequence. We must say to these thugs once and for all “no more” and mean it.
Among the raft of suggestions I have proposed for tackling the crime epidemic in Jamaica are mandatory minimum sentences for certain category of crimes as well as a full repeal of the INDECOM and Bail acts and a re-passage of both laws with added components that reflects the seriousness of the times in which we live.
Finally, parts of the Administration in Kingston are also calling for the very same things we have been advocating across administrations for the last decade or more. A couple of years ago, I put together this plan which I updated at the time the Parliament was debating the ZOSO Act; since then, there has not been much movement toward any of the bullet points. Well, now we have begun to see some cracking, at least some of the rhetoric coming from the Prime Minister and the Minister of National Security tends to indicate that they are beginning to get it.
Either that, or there are moves afoot to placate the police as they demand a livable wage. Which would suggest that the administration fully appreciates and understand what needs to be done to stop this galloping crime wave and make the job of the police more impactful. On Sunday, Holness acknowledged that INDECOM was hurting law enforcement efforts, a point I have made systematically for the last seven years.
Montague
At the same conference, the Minister of National Security told supporters, “We are moving to tighten our gun laws because in 84 percent of all crimes in Jamaica, the gun is present, and we don’t make guns in Jamaica. So we are going to tighten the gun laws. And when I take a law to Parliament, I want you, the Labourites, to stand with us, and we will find out if the other people dem a guh stand wid us, too, because everything we do that is good, dem oppose us.”
“When I bring that bill to Parliament, we going to say, if you charge with a gun crime, no bail. No bail. Because so far this year, 143 Jamaicans have been murdered by men who are on bail for other charges. With the new law, no bail. We going to put it into law that if you are caught with a gun, there will be a mandatory minimum sentence that you know when you get convicted, no fine. You going to tan a prison fi 15 – 20 years,” he told supporters.
I encourage the administration to remove those who purport to care about human rights from the table. They offer zero solutions to the Island’s crime epidemic, and neither do they offer any help to the victims of crime or those who survive their murdered loved ones. We must begin to see these people as the self-serving vultures they are and dismiss them categorically from the discussion. Human Rights and national security are not a mutually exclusive phenomenon; we can and must do both simultaneously; it is not a zero-sum game.
I continue to implore the Government to move on this plan, the change in rhetoric on INDECOM, the National Identification law, and the Bail Act are encouraging steps, but only a full and comprehensive embrace of the strategies outlined here will bring the desired results.
(1) Shore up the ports of entry, effectively stopping the guns coming in illicitly and holding those gains.
(2) Tactically cordon the areas you want to search, then go in with trained Dogs to find the weapons and arrest the murderers.
(3) Stagger where the security forces go at any given time; it should not be based solely on the area with the highest number of killings. By doing so, you minimize the likelihood that your next move can be anticipated.
(4) Remove from the Prime Minister the power to decide where the security forces go in the ZOSO. It matters not that the PM supposedly acts on the advice of the Security Council. This Act hyper politicizes policing and gives the next party to hold power the ability to engage in tit-for-tat using the security forces to carry out their nefarious bidding. As long as security operations are green-lighted by politicians, those operations stand to be politicized.
(5) Stop granting bail to accused murderers.
(6) Stop demagoguing the security forces. Use the airwaves to educate the people about the benefits of adhering to the rule of law.
(7) Stop giving the nation the impression that effective hard-nosed policing, which arrests criminals and places them in jail, is antithetical to citizens’ human rights. The greatest right a person has is the right to life. You have no right if you are dead; as such, the country must place it focuses on removing from its midst the mindless killers and throw its support behind law enforcement.
(8) Stop corrupting public officials. Report police and other public officials who ask for bribes. Do not offer to bribe public officials.
(9) Enact truth in sentencing for certain categories of violent crimes. Mandatory 25 years to life for murder. This is absolutely necessary since the nation’s leaders have decided to go against the wishes of the people and have declared a moratorium on hanging. Twenty years minimum for any crimes committed using a firearm.
(10) Look at the US Rico statute, and draft a law that models that statute effectively prosecuting gangsters as the Rico Statute does.
(11) Institute a mandatory National Identification program, law enforcement needs to be able to identify each and every Jamaican.
(12) Remove all political interference from law enforcement. What this administration is doing is even more political interference, not less. Move the plethora of human rights advocates from the table where national security is being discussed.
Speaking at the Jamaica Labour Party conference at the National Arena in Kingston on Sunday Andrew Holness the Island’s Prime Minister finally came to his damn senses, sort of, at least. Addressing the party faithful, Holness had a come to Jesus moment of sorts, an epiphany even, one which even his wife and member of Parliament Juliet Holness, had a long time ago.
Holness finally argued that INDECOM sometimes go too far in its functions and in the process, is causing members of the security forces to be fearful in the execution of their duties. He says the security forces need to feel that they are protected as they fight the high crime rate. He says a balance is needed.
My good friend would say “no shit Einstein, what took you the f**k so long to figure that out”? Here’s the thing, for as long as this destructive law has been in effect I have fought it’s existence tooth and nail. I have had many people call me all kinds of names, others have even threatened me for daring to criticize a law they wanted which finally handcuffs law enforcement the way they wanted it to.
PM Andrew Holness
I, on the other hand, have stridently argued that yes we need police oversight, but we also need strong law enforcement if ever our country is to have a shot at prospering. Though not a zero-sum game we have to enforce our laws and iron out the issues which emerge as we go along. Under no condition can we have a situation in which police officers are afraid to do their jobs because of onerous over-zealous oversight. In the case of INDECOM and those at its helm, the agency is not merely an oversight entity, it has deliberately cultivated an atmosphere of animosity and bad blood which has nothing to do with its mandate.
Ultimately the law was poorly written, way too much power was given to the agency and to add insult to injury they placed a narcissistic little Napolean at its helm. The Prime Minister must have seen the comments coming from the lips of the Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago Dr. Keith Rowley who made it clear days ago that lawlessness would not be tolerated in his country.
Prime Minister Dr. Keith Rowley
Despite Holness’ words, one cannot copy common sense, you either have it or you don’t. He went right ahead and placed his feet in his mouth as was to be expected. Said Holness “the government has set aside funds in the Supplementary Budget to assist members of the security forces with paying the legal costs of lawsuits arising from their actions in the line of duty”.
The law is not a shackle, repeal the law if it’s bad, debate the act again, this time with the added benefit of seeing what did not work and pass a good law which protects both citizens and police officers alike. Unless of course, the law was written to offer work to the phalanx of lawyers who are leaving school and finding it difficult to find work? The law cannot ever become bigger and more powerful than those who made it or those it was intended to protect, repeal it now. The answer to the problem cannot be to allow Terrence Williams’ zealotry and narcissism to destroy people’s lives at the expense of taxpayers.
The reality is that once the Government came to its senses that the law is becoming a net negative and thereby causing the escalation of crime, the law ought to be done away with.
In 2010 when the framework of the law was made public, I was shocked that something that destructive could be passed out of the Parliament. Since then I have consistently made the argument that it would be a crime producing law. I have taken much flack from academics and idiots alike, I’m sometimes unsure where the lines are between those two groups. Ultimately, I understand that many who criticized me for the position I take do not understand the law do not understand what law enforcement officers face and some did not want to understand.
I know that the palpable hatred many in the society have for the rule of law and law enforcement officials would keep the monstrous crime enhancing law intact, regardless of the loss of lives it causes. I said repeatedly in the many articles I wrote on the subject, that the shit would hit the fan and they would come to their senses. There are spatters on the ceiling now but from the comments of the Island’s chief executive, he still hasn’t come to his senses fully yet. “Many more will have to suffer, many more will have to die, don’t ask me why”. (Hon Robert Nesta Marley)
Is there a reason that the Government of Jamaica cannot step forward and say unequivocally to criminals,” there will be no sanctuary or respite we will hunt you down and we will find you,” outside the mealy-mouthed platitudes we hear of course?
Is there a reason the Opposition Party cannot do the same? Is it purely because the Government does not want to push too hard considering that the country is such a criminal loving sanctuary? Is it that the Opposition party knows there is always traction to be gained by parroting the worn out line about their concern for human rights? Is this all there is to it or is there something else at play here in Jamaica as it relates to the crime wave which makes it impossible for the political leaders to come out with one voice against the incessant bloodshed?
Prime Minister Dr.Keith Rowley
A friend recently called my attention to the statement of the Prime Minister of Trinidad who told his nation that his administration would not allow for lawlessness in Trinidad and Tobago, instructed the police and the security forces to take “any and all resources’ to ensure law and order. Responding to a specific incident of lawlessness in his country and in a thinly veiled swipe at Jamaica, Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley warned he would not allow Trinidad and Tobago to go down the road that exists in some Caribbean countries where certain people believe that they must be in control of areas and even try to prevent members of the law enforcement agencies from entering those areas.
The incident in question saw residents blocking the roads and the highway leading in and out of the capital Port of Spain following the arrest of two “community leaders” who were released hours later. But the action by the residents led to bumper to bumper traffic for hours as motorists fled the capital in droves to escape being trapped during the afternoon rush hour. Some car owners reported that their vehicles were hit by stray bullets and police said they received reports that motorists were robbed as they remained stuck in traffic. Some reported that their windows were damaged while some delivery trucks were reportedly looted.
Dr. Rowley told reporters that his administration’s support for law enforcement is “unwavering” and that all national security agencies “have the full support of the state to enforce the law in Trinidad and Tobago regardless of who you are, where you are and what your status is in this country”. “I am hereby letting the citizenry know that this is the time when all good men, all good women, should stand on the line of law enforcement and let all those who have criminal intent in this country know that they stand alone where these matters are concerned.
That statement from the Trinidadian Prime Minister is f****** leadership! That’s the kind of leadership which is missing from our discourse. It is certainly not the first time our CARICOM neighbors have swiped at us on the issue of crime and lawlessness. Unfortunately for the section of the Jamaican society which is the most vocal on topical issues whenever others criticize us for our stupidity on crime rather than fix our problem we double down on stupid.
Errol Alexander
In 2015 Acting Police Commissioner Errol Alexander of Saint Lucia told criminals who chose to attack Police officers quote: “I am sending a message out there that if the criminals think that we are in Jamaica, we are not in Jamaica, we are in Saint Lucia, and we will take whatever measures necessary to protect the safety of our police officers.”
That’s f****** leadership, not equivocating, not mealy-mouthed criminal coddling bullshit. Every day the newspapers and online publications are flooded with the stories of the wanton bloodshed. Will that kind of talk end criminality? No, but it sends a strong message to the force of anarchy and mayhem that we the people are coming after them. That there are more of us than there are of them, well in Jamaica’s case that may be hard to reconcile.
I am sick to my stomach at the killing in the country, the pretentious bullshit nature of many in the society who talk about human rights as if dead people can enjoy rights, and a government which pretends that it’s supposed good intentions will solve this problem. Let’s be clear-eyed about this killing spree, it is not about to get better until the Government and opposition party gets their heads out of their collective asses and recognize that this is not merely crime anymore. We have a serious problem here which will not be solved by trying to bring these blood-thirsty scums to justice, they will have to be terminated and terminated with dispatch. It is only then that they will get the message that the nation is not fucking around anymore and think long and hard about their own mortality when they decide to terminate someone.
Much of what is happening in Jamaica has happened before, in Colombia. In the process of the shameful bloodletting in that nation, no one was blameless, politicians, parsons, police, judiciary too many had bloody hands, they dirtied themselves as they dived into the cauldron of blood grasping for the dirty dollars, the by-product of anguish and pain.
In the end, it took citizens who decided that they did not want their country to be a narco-state (methods aside) and they took action. That time is here that time is now for decent law-abiding Jamaicans (whatever is left if any) to band together and take action. To hell with the mealy-mothed pretentious parasites who bray about human rigts. The most important right a person has is the right to life.
My question is – has Tiger Woods ever not been in the sunken place?
This is the man who was so non-black identified that he made up his own race (including giving Caucasian and American Indian equal footing to black and Asian with an African-American father from Kansas and a mother from Thailand.) Then he turned out to be just nasty with his prolific dick slanging in his now-defunct marriage to a nanny. And now, the 41-year-old who has a mug shot floating around with a face and hairline that makes him look like a baby boomer is going to play golf with Donald Trump, the president who loves to malign black athletes.
For this – and so much more – Jordan Peele used the most famous line from his critically acclaimed film, Get Out, to say to Woods, “Now you’re in The Sunken Place,” after posting a Golf Channel story saying that Woods would be playing with Trump on Cablanasian Friday.
The oldest daughter of former President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama is back in the news just for being a regular college student, doing the things that college students (or perhaps 19-year-olds in general) do: kissing, smoking and just pushing boundaries as they morph into young adults.
Too bad that because Malia Obama’s father was the first black president and very much hated by racists conservatives across the nation, her actions are being politicized and used to malign her father.
The year was 1980 I had just moved from North East St. Catherine as a fresh-faced young adult who had previously graduated high school. Edward Seaga had just trounced Michael Manley at the polls and the nation looked toward a new future free from tribal politics, a future of hope.
I moved to upper Marl road where I stayed with my siblings and stepdad on Hyde Park Road. I would later enter the Port Royal police training facility but was to later leave to begin training at the Jamaica Police Academy as the very first batch of recruits to begin training and graduate from the newly minted old school of agriculture. I thought it was strange that the police never seemed to have anything built for them, they always seemed to occupy facilities others had vacated, but I digress.
After graduation, I was sent to the old west street facility, better known as the beat and foot patrol division, after a six-month stint I was one of a few officers ever to be transferred to the Mobile Reserve who were not trained specifically for that division, another first.
I didn’t like it there one bit but it eventually grew on me as I made the then highly respected Ranger’s squad. My love of business, my profession today, began around then when I purchased a small bar from a lady who operated the bar right there where she lived on Plantain Avenue behind the old New Yorker Factory on Waltham Park and Bay Farm Roads.
A younger Ninjaman
It was there that I met Desmond Ballantine otherwise called (Ninjaman). Ninjaman was a budding DJ then, every Friday and Saturday night we had the sound system African Star, based on Marl Road playing at my little joint. Ninjaman followed that Soundsystem then. He would walk up to the bar wearing a full-length dress coat in the sizzling Jamaican heat, his trademark I guess?
In the time since those early days when I was a young cop and Ninja man was a budding disc jockey trying to make a name for himself much water has flown under the bridge. Despite the many successes in his rise to the top of the dancehall pyramid, Ninjaman never seemed to be able to extricate himself from the beguiling tentacles of crime.
Ninjam man did not have to choose that path, sure he lived in the community of Marl Road a sometimes gritty community as did I. He arrived from St Mary as I arrived from St Catherine around the same time. The choices we make are our own not a function of where we come from.
That is the reason I have no sympathy for Desmond Ballyntine (ninja man) on his conviction for murder. A life is a very precious commodity. Each person gets a single life, in my estimation, it is an egregious injustice, a terrible transgression to take someone’s life unless it is in defense of your own.
It is now time that the Artical Don, stand like a man and face his punishment. After all, he will be living his life regardless of the penalty they mete out to him. An option he and his son Jahneil took from Ricardo Johnson in 2009 when they unceremoniously snuffed out his life. Desmond Ballentine and his son will never receive the justice they deserve. Under the Jamaican shit-stem of justice, they will not be executed as they should be for taking the life of Ricardo Johnson. They will receive a slap on the wrist upon which they may very well appeal, who knows? Some money may change hands and eventually they case may get tossed on some minor technicality.
Black men are sentenced to far more time in prison than white men for committing similar crimes, according to a new report from the U.S. Sentencing Commission.
A report released last week from the USSC ― an independent agency of the U.S. judicial branch ― looked at federal prison sentences in the United States from Oct. 1, 2011, to Sept. 30, 2016, and found that black male offenders received sentences on average 19.1 percent longer than those of “similarly situated” white male offenders.
The commission also factored in offenders’ criminal histories to look at whether violence in offenders’ pasts could account for the racial disparities ― and found that it did not. Looking at 2016, the only year for which such data was available, the commission found that, after controlling for criminal history, black men still received 20.4 percent longer sentences than did white men.
This report’s findings match those of a previous USSC report from 2007 to 2011, which found a nearly 20 percent gap in sentences between black and white men.
The percentage difference in sentence length between black and white male offenders has increased from 1998 to 2016. Red is 1998 to 2003, green is 2003 to 2004, blue is 2005 to 2007, black is 2007 to 2011 and yellow is 2011 to 2016.
The racial disparities in sentencing appear to have increased over the last two decades, worsening specifically after 2005.
According to older USSC reports, the gap between black and white men in sentencing was about 11 percent for 1998 to 2003 and 5 percent for 2003 to 2005. But it jumped to 15 percent for 2005 to 2007 and to nearly 20 percent thereafter.
USSC noted in a 2010 report that the differences in sentence length between black and white male offenders “have increased steadily” since the Supreme Court ruled in 2005 in United States v. Booker to increase judges’ discretion in sentencing.
But the factors contributing to racial disparities in sentencing are complex, according to Marc Mauer, director of the nonprofit Sentencing Project. Judges aren’t the only factor, or necessarily even the biggest, in sentencing disparities.
“It’s not necessarily racist judges,” Mauer told HuffPost by email Friday. “But much of [the] disparity [is] likely due to decision-making by prosecutors.”
Mauer pointed to research from scholars Sonja Starr and Marit Rehavi, which found that prosecutors “have a huge impact on sentences,” as they have broad discretion in how to charge an offender or whether to offer a plea-bargain.
Overall, sentencing is just one part of the broader problem of racial discrimination in the criminal justice system: Black people are incarcerated in U.S. state prisons at more than five times the rate of white people. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/black-white-sentencing-criminal-justice-report_us_5a0f8295e4b0e97dffed66a0?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
Among the persons being targeted, declared Selvin Haye, deputy commissioner in charge of crime, are the financiers behind the illegal importation and distribution of firearms, as well as those involved in drug trafficking.
“We will be building more and better enterprise cases to tackle this type of crime and criminality. We will be using specialized teams now armed with better investigative skills and analytical capabilities to track these criminals,” Haye said.
Police Commissioner George Quallo (right); Clifford Blake (center) deputy commissioner of police Strategic Operations; and Wray Palmer, deputy commissioner of police Inspectorate of the Constabulary, during a press conference at the Commissioner’s Old Hope headquarters, yesterday Gleaner photo.
Well, I guess we have gotten over the charade that ZOSO was going to be a significant driver of crime in a southerly direction. We are now onto the next smoke screen. Inherent in those comments coming from the police high command is a confession that there have been zero emphasis to link those shipping the weapons and ammunition from overseas to the contrabands they ship. The police high command has been complicit in simply basking in the glory of an occasional find here and there and taking the credit for the work the cops on the streets do. That has been the modus operandi of the bloated top heavy bureaucracy that is known as the police high command. A command structure which has never done much in the way of garnering real command and is anything but structured. https://mikebeckles.com/where-are-the-investigators/
So now they admit that despite the crime wave over the last several decades, hell, since I left the force after my brief stint in 91 that the department wasn’t doing what they ought to have been doing even now? The Deputy Commissioner’s statement was a real expose’ into what is really happening or more like, what is not happening in the force that is contributing to the wave of homicides and other serious crimes sweeping the country.
Commissioner of Police George Quallo (right) chats with Mark Codling (left) acting principal director, National Spatial Data Management Pension and Alexander Williams, chairman, Land Information Council of Jamaica during the opening ceremony for the Geographic Information Systems Day, held at the Assembly Hall of the University of the West Indies, Mona
Though it is 2017 the force seems to be more focused on recording reports onto computers (moving away from those God-awful big old books ) than solving serious crimes. I was never one who had much confidence in the ability of the police high command to get anything done or to sustain a good thing established by the rank and file. As such I never gave any credence to the grand pronouncements which come out of that body. Neither do I bother paying attention to those who are convinced that there is new innovation happening in the force which will amount to anything positive today.
In his first reporting to the Parliament having been mandated by law after the launch of the first Zone of special operations in Mount Salem St James prime Minister Andrew Holness told the nation quote:
The justification for the ZOSO designation was based on the relevant legal criteria, intelligence, as well as strategic and operational considerations of the joint command of the security forces. He said that, following 32 special operations conducted by the joint force in the first 10 days, five illegal firearms were recovered, two wanted men were taken into custody and a number of “lead sheets” used in lotto scamming activities recovered. “The next 10 days will see the continuation of internal security operations to rid the zone of illegal weapons, ammunition, and contraband,” the prime minister told the House.
Holness
The leader of the Opposition Peter Phillips countered that despite the operation haul of “five guns and two arrests in 10 days”, 54 murders have occurred at the same time across the island. He insisted that since the declaration of the ZOSO, the daily national rate has increased. “That is to say that we had been going nationally at about 4.2 murders per day…and in the period since the zone, the national average has been about 5.5 murders per day.”
I never thought that there would be a crime initiative that would have any measurable effect on crime in the present environment that exists in the country today. There has to be a seismic attitudinal shift in the way people see crime affecting their lives and what they are willing to do to change that paradigm. Jamaica has never been a place which was supportive of crime initiatives, it has always been highly opinionated without the facts as well. Those characteristics are a perfect storm which causes the Island of 2.8 million people to be one of the highest producers of crime on the planet.
Peter Phillips
One of the principles I applied as an officer was to allow suspects to talk, they will tell you pretty much what you need to know. Today as a person who operates in the business space I still listen intently to all who I do business with-with a view to determining their authenticity. The statements of the police high command have been extremely revealing.
Which brings me to my final point. The police high command is even more stupid than I previously thought they were. If the Police high command really intended to finally get up off their tired decrepit behinds and do something about tracing the caches of weapons pouring into the Island why would they announce it?
One of the things those concerned about crime harp on is political interference in law enforcement. Politicians are culpable as it relates to the crime wave sweeping the country but as it relates to the police announcing its intentions to criminals politicians bear zero responsibility. That collusion or utter stupidity is the police’s and theirs alone.
Commissioner of Police George Quallo
No one stands in the way of the police if they chose to go after principals in the weapons trade, not even the politicians. If the police are interested in busting the people at the top who are importing guns and ammunition into the country the police can do it. Announcing that they intend to go after principals now when it should have been doing that as a matter, of course, tells a skeptic like me that they are not going after the big fish they are simply telling them to be more discreet.
police remove illegal guns from the streets…
I have always supported the police but I can in no way turn a blind eye to blatant incompetence at the bare minimum and gross complicity at worse on the part of the police. Trust me it is not as hard as the police tell you it is to track down and bring these criminals to justice. If the police really wanted to bring these principal offenders to justice they would seek the warrants they need and go about their investigations without making announcements. After all the politicians are some of the worst criminals, why would the police tell them what they intend to do? That ladies and gentleman is the reason I decided to walk away from this department as soon as the opportunity presented itself.
I haven’t watched a single pre-season or regular season NFL game this year and trust me I love football. Nevertheless, I made the decision not to ever turn another Television set on to another NFL game for one reason. The league blacklisting of Colin Kaepernick.
Kaepernick
Whenever I say I will never watch another NFL game, my white associates, nod in agreement obviously believing that I am mad that a few NFL players led by Kaepernick dared to kneel for what they believe. I never missed a chance to quickly explain to them that I haven’t stopped watching because I believe that kneeling during the National anthem is a sign of disrespect to the flag or worse is some kind of convoluted disregard for the Military. They generally nod “oh I see” and that’s the end of that. A silly little restaurant in La Grange Ville has a sign displayed [No football games here] obviously a way of saying they stand with the Military. I have never been there to spend a penny and will never ever set foot in there. You see it’s only in cases like these that you get to see the true character of people. Unfortunately, African-Americans largely have no concept of the strength they wield through the power of their wallets and pocketbooks.
President George W. Bush awarded Ali the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2005.
The fact of the matter is that there is absolutely no connection between the Military, the National Anthem, and football, outside the sponsorship the NFL receives from the Defense Department. There’s neither a constitutional or moral requirement to stand for the national anthem, it is simply something people do out of love of country. Nevertheless, there are several ways to love country outside getting liquored up at a football game wrapped in the flag and pretending that the military is next to God. We can begin by loving and caring for our fellow man regardless of who they are, what color they have or what their sexual orientation is. We can begin by shedding hatred and the awful ignorance which causes the ignoble character flaw called racism within us.
Rosa Parks
Many who wrap themselves in the flag and pretend to have a monopoly on patriotism would never sign up to serve their country. Others in high offices found myriad excuses to avoid fighting for the very country they now claim to love. So lets cut to the chase Colin Kaepernick is no villain for kneeling neither was Rosa Parks a villain on December 1, 1955, in Montgomery, Alabama when she was arrested for refusing to give up her seat to a white man.
Muhhamed Ali was no villain when he refused Army induction on Apr 28, 1967. and neither were Tommy Smith and John Carlos’ when they made the black power salute at the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City. The undeniable truth of the matter is that more than a half a century after Jim Crow, Segregation, the march on Washington, separate but equal and the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King there is a stubborn percentage of white America which ignorantly believes that blacks should be relegated to the back of the Bus.
They fundamentally believe in social order but cares nothing about justice for the downtrodden. These are they who decry broken windows and civil disobedience but does not bat an eye at the blatancy and the viciousness of state sanctioned oppression of marginalized communities of color. This kind of blatant oppression and racial superiority is now given new life when out of the highest office comes the call to blacklist and punish citizens who dare to stand up or in this case kneel to bring attention to systemic racial oppression.
Writing for (the Nation.com) Dave Zirin said : ThisNFL season has blazed new political trails as players have used their platform to stand up to racism in the face of a ferocious backlash. It has truly been a season of firsts. But there is another “first” on the immediate horizon that speaks to the league’s baldly reactionary history in regards to race.
The NFL — for all their corporate rhetoric about being something that “brings the country together” — of course, has a team named after a Native American racial slur in the nation’s capital. That’s not news. What is news is that on Thanksgiving, for the first time in league history, this team in Washington will be playinghost. That means as we finish our food, slip into sweatpants, and to gather around the television to watch NFL football, a tradition only slightly less ubiquitous than pumpkin pie, the R*dskins slur— a name that exists only because of genocide and displacement—will have center stage.
For many in the Black Community at all levels of the spectrum none of this matters, they will continue watching the games and hooting and hollering because after all , missing the game is not an option. For a couple hours of entertainment, they are quite willing to continue to support the perpetuation of a system which will continue to enslave their children and grandchildren in perpetuity.
After all, in the African-American community, nothing [trumps] entertainment, not even the future of generations to come.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.