Barack Obama Appears To Zing Donald Trump With Twitter Followers Boast “I Actually Have More Than Other People Who Use It More Often.”

Lee Moran

Former President Barack Obama appeared to throw sub­tle shade at President Donald Trump for hav­ing few­er Twitter fol­low­ers than him­self dur­ing a forum in India on Friday.

In a con­ver­sa­tion with jour­nal­ist Karan Thapar at the Hindustan Times Leadership Summit in New Delhi, Obama boast­ed on stage about hav­ing “100 mil­lion Twitter followers”.

YouTube player

I actu­al­ly have more than oth­er peo­ple who use it more often,” he added, prompt­ing laugh­ter from the audi­ence who inter­pret­ed it as a ding against Trump. (For the record, Obama actu­al­ly has 97.4 mil­lion fol­low­ers. Trump has 43.8 million).

I think it’s impor­tant to be mind­ful about both the pow­er of these tools and also its lim­its and to under­stand it can be used for both good or for ill,” Obama added, dur­ing a more gen­er­al dis­cus­sion on technology.

Flynn Charged

Former nation­al secu­ri­ty advis­er Michael Flynn plead­ed guilty Friday to lying to the FBI, becom­ing the first Trump White House offi­cial to face crim­i­nal charges and admit guilt so far in the wide-rang­ing elec­tion inves­ti­ga­tion led by spe­cial coun­sel Robert Mueller.

Flynn also agreed to coöper­ate with Mueller’s probe, which focus­es on Russian med­dling in the 2016 elec­tion and pos­si­ble coör­di­na­tion between Russia and Donald Trump’s cam­paign aimed at send­ing the Republican busi­ness­man to the White House. More here: http://​www​.chicagotri​bune​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​n​a​t​i​o​n​w​o​r​l​d​/​ct-michael-flynn-charged-20171201-story.html

Killings A New Normal

A very dear friend tried to con­vince me he was no alco­holic awhile back, ” Mike after mi nah dring rub­bin alco­hol, ungle if mid did a drink rub­bin aco­hol mi wudda sey mi need help.”
Two stints in prison lat­er, as a result of his drink­ing and dri­ving, he is still con­vinced that he does­n’t have a drink­ing problem.

There is a cer­tain sense of con­tent­ment, or res­ig­na­tion peo­ple feel in their cir­cum­stances, I guess it makes them accept far less than they were cre­at­ed to accept.
Whether it’s as my friend say he is no alco­holic, or Jamaican peo­ple say­ing “crime de every weh”, in response to the fright­en­ing mur­der rate it seems deni­a­bil­i­ty has now become a cop­ing mechanism.

In the United States, the all-out assault on once held soci­etal norms for the high­est exec­u­tive office is passed off as just Trump being Trump.
We have become so accus­tomed to the vul­gar­i­ty and gar­ish behav­ior that we tell our­selves that is the way it has to be, this is the new normal.
Back home the killings elic­it a glance if at all, the crime scene tape has become a spec­ta­cle, a spec­ta­cle which lasts until the corpse is removed and the blood is washed away and it’s back to busi­ness as usual.

I am always a lit­tle miffed at the idea that we can­not make a change as if we are total­ly pow­er­less. I have nev­er shared the per­cep­tion that it’s up to some­one else to do for us what we ought to be doing for ourselves.
Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a bus and ignit­ed a movement.
There is some­thing each and every per­son can do to make a bet­ter world. If the price of a cer­tain brand of bread is too high sim­ply stop eat­ing that brand, no mat­ter how much you like the taste of that brand.

Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat and is prompt­ly arrest­ed.
A move­ment was born.…

I don’t like the way the few NFL play­ers are being treat­ed for tak­ing a knee dur­ing the singing of the nation­al anthem. No one will notice but I have stopped watch­ing since Colin Kaepernick has been black­list­ed and will nev­er watch anoth­er game unless he is hired by a team.
So you say what dif­fer­ence does t make if you stop watch­ing many more peo­ple are?
Many peo­ple are watch­ing but I ain’t, that’s the dif­fer­ence. If enough of us stand up and say no what do you think the out­come will be?

The urge I have and the adren­a­line rush of watch­ing a good game are strong but they do not out­weigh my resolve to stand on prin­ci­ple and not sell out for a cou­ple hours of fun.
Former President Barack Obama was always quick to remind us, we are the change we seek. It is not up to some­one else to fix things for us.
Each Generation has a duty to the cause of jus­tice and broth­er­hood, peace and pros­per­i­ty so that when we have fin­ished our leg, the baton will be passed leav­ing the next run­ner with a good shot at this race called life.

We call ill afford to hand the baton to the next run­ner leav­ing him no chance of winning.
Winning is life, it is our exis­tence, it is the dif­fer­ence between sur­vival and extinc­tion. Don’t ever for one minute believe that we can­not be evis­cer­at­ed as if we nev­er existed.

What we should not be doing is doing our ene­my’s work for them. If the wan­ton sav­agery and the bar­bar­ic killings are not stopped by some­one or some­thing who will be left?
How about each and every one of us decides that we will not sup­port crim­i­nal behav­ior and mean it?
How about we make the deci­sion that at least in my house­hold there will be no blood money?
We may not think it’s can­ni­bal­ism when the mon­ey the mend bring home was tak­en from the per­son whose life he had just snuffed out but it is.
Today it’s that per­son, rest assured tomor­row it will be you.

A Society Which Hates Its Defenders Must Be Prepared To Deal With The Consequences Coming From Its Offenders

Not much has changed in Jamaican Media from what exist­ed two or three decades ago except that we have more enti­ties than the pre­vi­ous RJR and JBC radio and JBC Television which signed off at mid­night, after which there were only crickets.
Sure, Radio and Television have got­ten expo­nen­tial­ly more vul­gar and as a con­se­quence, the soci­ety has den­i­grat­ed much fur­ther than in many oth­er nations.
The results of this are borne out in the vio­lence and homi­cide sta­tis­tics which are chok­ing the lifeblood out of the tiny Island we once thought of as paradise.

In the time since then, we have had tens of thou­sands of mur­dered Jamaicans, Vybz Kartel lec­tured at the (Intellectual ghet­to (UWI) and Ninjaman gave a pep talk to law enforce­ment officers.
The irony in all this is that both are now con­vict­ed murderers!
From the lofty out of touch Editorial offices at that behe­moth on North Street to the cushy lit­tle stu­dios of both radio and tele­vi­sion the inces­sant dai­ly bar­rage of anti-police invec­tives was bound to have neg­a­tive con­se­quences for our country.

You see, the perch­es haven’t changed, nei­ther have the influ­ences which come from the media hous­es changed.
What has changed are the ways the rest of the world views the issues of today and how to deal with those issues and no one both­ered to inform the Editorial boards of the Gleaner, Observer or the self-appoint­ed mouth­pieces of the Jamaican peo­ple in the tra­di­tion­al mediums.
The prob­lems with their views are that they are large­ly shaped from parochial per­spec­tives, devoid of exposure.

Hughes

So they still write their Editorial pieces from those lofty perch­es and the vil­lage lawyers debate them on talk radio and tele­vi­sion. The back­ward­ness of those edi­to­ri­als final­ly seep down into the body politic, and to the man on the streets where it becomes gospel.
The prob­lem with all this is that the ini­tial per­spec­tive was not based on crit­i­cal think­ing or deep intro­spec­tion or even data-driven.
They are old tired posi­tions of pun­dits and prog­nos­ti­ca­tors steeped in old prej­u­dices and per­cep­tions which have no rel­e­vance to today’s society.

So sure, the edi­to­r­i­al board of the Gleaner would be offend­ed by the idea that their baby INDECOM is prob­lem­at­ic, they do not care about the mas­sive loss of life occur­ring in the coun­try, why would they, it makes for sen­sa­tion­al headlines?
They do not care about the men and women who brave the bul­lets when they sleep either, berat­ing them sells news­pa­pers too.

At the very best, the bright­est of them can­not extrap­o­late from the data the neg­a­tive impact this law is hav­ing on the lives of ordi­nary Jamaicans.
They are hell-bent on their focus, which is to demo­nize the police. Any emerg­ing data which con­flicts with the rot­ten fish they are sell­ing is swift­ly dis­card­ed in a con­vo­lut­ed word sal­ad of hyperbole.

A soci­ety which hates its defend­ers must be pre­pared to deal with the con­se­quences com­ing from its offenders.The media has a respon­si­bil­i­ty, to be hon­est with its assess­ment of top­i­cal issues. It must endeav­or to ensure that it does due dili­gence even in the opin­ions it prof­fers, they too matter.

Eventually, the stench of the rot ris­es up to the high­est tur­ret of your tow­ers and no one is immune from the fallout.
Be care­ful with your stewardship.

No Old Tun-back Rasta Peter Phillips,name Brand Cops Were Not Violent:tireless, Fearless, Selfless, Yes.…

Peter Phillips the recent­ly installed leader of the Opposition in Jamaica real­ly has noth­ing going for him so he decid­ed he will sim­ply oppose any and every­thing that the Government does or says.
Now, to be fair to the People’s National Party no one could rea­son­ably accuse them of being any­thing close to a law and order party.
In fact, under their longest serv­ing and the Island’s most destruc­tive Prime Minister Percival James Patterson, the mantra was “anyt­ing a anyt­ing”, a clas­sic wink and nod to crim­i­nals to run-wid-it, do what they wanted.

Peter Phillips oppo­si­tion leader

So it came as no sur­prise that the old tun back ras­ta Peter Phillips would be opposed to the idea of rein­ing in INDECOM.
Now, grant­ed that Prime Minister Andrew Holness does not have clean hands, or more like clean con­science in this, he at least has a dis­grun­tled Police Force on his hands, angry about the lack of progress with wage negotiations.
With over 500 cops walk­ing away each year and the JCF unable to reach recruit­ment tar­gets Holness has no choice but to kiss some asses.
So he arrived at his come to Jesus moment at the National Arena a few days ago telling sup­port­ers that the police are afraid to do their jobs because of an overzeal­ous INDECOM.
No shit !!!

It fol­lows that Peter Phillips with no plan of his own or any inten­tion of hav­ing a plan for crime, except to watch it esca­late would oppose what Holness said. It made good pol­i­tics for the brain-dead cool-aid drinkers who blind­ly fol­low Phillips cult par­ty but is his posi­tion sound policy?
Peter Phillips went on to argue that since he was a boy he heard about name brand cops and that their claim to fame was because they were violent.

No Peter, you troll, the name brand cops of whom you speak were in fact not vio­lent at all con­trary to pop­u­lar perceptions.
Ask around about Keith Trinity Gardiner, Dick Hibbert, the dear­ly depart­ed Tony Hewitt, (Cornwall Bigga Ford one of yours) and a long list of oth­ers and peo­ple will tell you they were effec­tive because they were fear­less, self­less and tire­less, some­thing you would not know about as a politi­cian you are the oppo­site, sim­ply cow­ard­ly, lazy and selfish.
Ask them how many times they have been shot and shot at, rest in peace Anthony Hewitt?
Your fee­ble attempt at rewrit­ing his­to­ry shows you for the rapa­cious grace­less punk that you are, just anoth­er greasy despi­ca­ble pow­er hun­gry troll.

Which brings me to why the PNP would have you as their leader when you already betrayed the par­ty and indeed our coun­try to for­eign powers.
Come on Peter Phillips do you think we have forgotten?
Remember those MOU’s you signed?
The high­ly clas­si­fied MOUs, which involve Jamaica, the United States (US), and the United Kingdom (UK), were signed by Phillips in 2004.
Though Phillips argued that he had author­i­ty to sign the MOU’s Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions Jeremy Taylor at the time under cross-exam­i­na­tion, tes­ti­fied that the MOUs involved the mil­i­tary and should have had the sig­na­ture of the then min­is­ter of defense, P.J. Patterson, and not Phillips.

Have PNP sup­port­ers for­got­ten this lit­tle incident?
You see Mister Phillips you can­not be trust­ed and every­one knows this, so let’s be clear, you have zero cred­i­bil­i­ty on National Security or on crime for that matter.
You sold the coun­try down the riv­er before, so no one is sur­prised that you would take a raw polit­i­cal stance on a mat­ter this impor­tant again.

This Is A Constitutional Crisis

Trump’s move to displace the legitimate head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau assaults consumers — and violates the rule of law.

Terrence Williams Bigger Than The Government Thanks To International Money: Administration Afraid Of Him…

Terrence Williams has now demon­strat­ed that he is big­ger than those who employ him.
In fact, Williams clap-back at Andrew Holness’ com­ment that INDECOM some­times goes too far bears out what I have main­tained since the agency was authorized.

It now seems that because of INDECOM’s for­eign back­ing, Terrence Williams has adopt­ed a Laissez-faire atti­tude toward any­thing any­one says about INDECOM.
His “I don’t give a shit what you think “atti­tude is now direct­ed at the duly elect­ed Prime Minister.
Now, this is a lit­tle bit fun­ny to some­one like me.

Andrew Holness is part of the cabal of deplorables[sic] which cooked up this act, with Bruce Golding, Delroy Chuck, and oth­ers. Yes, he was part of that Administration and of course with the bless­ings of the sim­ple-mind­ed Portia Simpson Miller and her band of crim­i­nal sup­port­ing thugs.

Remember that Terrence Williams’ broth­er is part of the JLP Administration. Now here is the kick­er, Holness knew at the time that the way the law was draft­ed and word­ed would have seri­ous con­se­quences for Police offi­cers yet he did nothing.
He has since then stead­fast­ly refused to acknowl­edge that the law is harm­ful even as his wife a neo­phyte politi­cian expressed empa­thy with the police.
It is only now that he has a surly police depart­ment on his hand, angry about the way wage nego­ti­a­tions are regress­ing that Holness sud­den­ly has his epiphany.
While we are on the sub­ject let me once again say to the lawyers and vil­lage lawyers who are inca­pable of under­stand­ing what we mean when we say the law is gross­ly inju­ri­ous to police offi­cers, no mat­ter how clean they are.

Bruce Golding gave the nation INDECOM and all its side effects, as well as the Tivoli affair and God know what else?

(1) The law demands that Police Officers attend INDECOM’s offices at the ear­li­est oppor­tu­ni­ty (at the per­il of prison) and give state­ments in cas­es where they were forced to use lethal force.
Anyone who has ever been involved in a shoot­ing under­stands how dev­as­tat­ing­ly trau­mat­ic that is.
In most depart­ments in oth­er coun­tries offi­cers are giv­en time to decom­press from that ordeal.
According to the Emperor of INDECOM [sic], it appears that offi­cers rel­ish being engaged in fatal shoot­ings, so the lev­els of fatal shoot­ings are attrib­ut­able to that love of killing and not the extreme vio­lent nature of the Island’s killers..

(2) Officers are forced to defend them­selves in court in cas­es where they did their jobs and a zeal­ous con­fronta­tion­al INDECOM and Terrence Willimas charges them with a crime, usu­al­ly result­ing in immense hard­ships and finan­cial ruination.

(3) To those talk­ing about good cops hav­ing noth­ing to fear, put that in your pipes and smoke it. Let’s see how you would like to be ruined finan­cial­ly for doing exact­ly what you swore to do at the per­il of prison.

(4) This writer is encour­aged that the Government is now pro­vid­ing some sem­blance of finan­cial relief to offi­cers to help with their legal bills in cas­es where they are per­se­cut­ed for doing their duty.
The thing to do is to repeal the law and replace it with a law which pro­tects both police and pub­lic alike.
I will per­son­al­ly con­tin­ue to do my lit­tle part to keep the light shin­ing on this mon­strous crime enhance­ment law which is tak­ing the lives of count­less Jamaicans and chang­ing the way peo­ple respond to the rule of law forever.

Terrence Williams is not an inde­pen­dent inves­ti­ga­tor he is a bla­tant anti-police antag­o­nist with his own agenda.

I call on this Government to stop this right now by repeal­ing the INDECOM law and replace the law with one which works for both the Police and the public.
Hire a Commissioner who is untaint­ed by the self-aggran­dize­ment and self-pro­mo­tion, one who under­stands that as an inde­pen­dent inves­tiga­tive unit his/​her agency can­not take sides one way or the other.

Terrence Williams argues that INDECOM also has over­sight of the Military and Corrections depart­ments yet he has heard no com­plaints of low morale from those two entities.
(1) When the Military takes to the streets it does so under the purview of the Police, not as a law enforce­ment enti­ty on its own.
(2) The cor­rec­tions depart­ment deals with incar­cer­at­ed peo­ple who are sub­ject to the rules of the Institution in which they are held and are dealt with accord­ing to the rules therein.
(3) The Police are forced to deal with every­one who breaks the law and those who sup­port them and their refusal to sub­mit to being held account­able for their trans­gres­sions against the law.

Either this guy is not too bright or he is delib­er­ate­ly try­ing to deceive the pub­lic, some­thing he has done effec­tive­ly with the help of a com­plic­it cabal of anti-police antag­o­nists in the media for sev­en years. Police work is noth­ing like what the mil­i­tary or cor­rec­tions depart­ments do, Police offi­cers are asked to deal with much more, includ­ing mak­ing life and death deci­sions with­in a frac­tion of a second.
Since lying Terrence Williams knows so much about this police cul­ture he so glibly talks about through his lying decep­tive lips, I say to him do a ride along with the two or so cops at night in Payne land, West Kingston, East Kingston or the ghet­tos sur­round­ing Montego Bay.

I know this gets to you Terrence, so I chal­lenge you to put on your big boy pants for a week and show the nation that you are not just talking.
Demonstrate to the coun­try that when you make your big chat you are will­ing to back them up by plac­ing your life on the line to back them up.
Do the ride-along with the real men who pro­tect our coun­try. You are a dis­re­spect­ful lit­tle nar­cis­sist who speaks about the men and women of the police depart­ment in dis­re­spect­ful terms, even the career offi­cers who have giv­en decades of ser­vice to our coun­try way above any­thing you will ever accomplish.
Show some damn respect.
Failing which, sit your ass down and shut your fuck­ing mouth.….….

Jamaica’s Judges Abuse Their Oaths To Aid Murderers And Other Violent Offenders, Fact.….

For years after leav­ing law enforce­ment I have asked the ques­tion of my coun­try’ s lead­ers, “what kind of coun­try do we want to have”?
Are we try­ing to achieve a nar­co-state, a coun­try divid­ed into enclaves like sub-Saharan Africa or Lebanon and oth­er failed states?
Or do we want to make Jamaica the glo­ri­ous state it can be con­sid­er­ing what our coun­try has to offer?
Are we con­tent to con­tin­ue feed­ing the stereo­typ­i­cal per­cep­tions that Blacks are inca­pable of self-gov­er­nance? Since Independence, we have cer­tain­ly demon­strat­ed that we are inca­pable, or at best unwill­ing to make good gov­ern­ing decisions.

Why have polit­i­cal lead­ers of both polit­i­cal par­ties made such hor­ri­ble deci­sions, deci­sions which are anti­thet­i­cal to the oaths they took to pro­tect the nation from all ene­mies for­eign and domestic?
Each and every Government have as their pri­ma­ry respon­si­bil­i­ty, the charge to pro­tect their cit­i­zens using all of the tools at their disposal.
Administrations of both polit­i­cal par­ties have been quick to adopt and sup­port a for­eign imposed mora­to­ri­um on cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment but have been neg­li­gent in uphold­ing the foun­da­tion­al pil­lars of the Bail Act.

Jamaican Judges A Large Part Of The Murder Problem/​Ask Dexter Pottinger

The courts are sup­pos­ed­ly inde­pen­dent arbiters out­side the con­trol of the [peo­ple’s rep­re­sen­ta­tives, such is what many legal schol­ars and many wannabes will have you believe.
The truth of the mat­ter is the courts are there to inter­pret the laws passed by the Parliament, the peo­ple’s rep­re­sen­ta­tives. Therefore if a law is not work­ing it is up to the Nation’s Parliament to take action to ensure that the laws are up to date.
So when the Prime Minister tells a crowd of cheer­ing sup­port­ers that the INDECOM act has been problematic,(something I have argued for years),
then rather than pro­pose a repeal and replace, (a log­i­cal rem­e­dy), the PM promis­es to make more mon­ey avail­able to police for their defense.
In essence that is politi­cians blow­ing smoke up peo­ple’s col­lec­tive ass­es rather than doing what they were elect­ed to do, lead.

When the Minister of National Security final­ly admits that there is a prob­lem because peo­ple are being grant­ed bail and they are return­ing to kill over and over again, it’s start­ing to sound a lit­tle tone deaf when they could have fixed that prob­lem a long time ago.
Revealing that 143 Jamaicans have been mur­dered by men who are on bail for oth­er charges just this year alone Robert Montague said he will be propos­ing leg­is­la­tion that will ensure that peo­ple who com­mit gun crimes or are held with guns do nor receive bail).

That has been my sug­ges­tion for years, why would an alleged mur­der­er be allowed out on bail, yet in the Jamaican courts alleged mur­der­ers are grant­ed bail up to six times after been charged with cap­i­tal mur­der and killed again and again and again.
That kind of brain-dead mad­ness only hap­pens in Jamaica, nowhere else, so much so that Jamaica has become a laugh­ing stock around the CARICOM region and sits atop the mur­der states on the planet.

Despite the fact that the present Bail act is gross­ly out­dat­ed and insuf­fi­cient to deal with the exi­gen­cies of the time, there are strong stip­u­la­tions with­in the act which gives Judges the back­ing they need should they choose to be good stew­ards in the dis­pen­sa­tion of their mandates.
Insofar as that is con­cerned Jamaica’s judges have come up woe­ful­ly short in hon­or­ing their oaths, they have effec­tive­ly turned the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem into a revolv­ing door, mak­ing a mock­ery of the sys­tem of justice.

Sure, Bail is not sup­posed to be used as pun­ish­ment for an offend­er but the Bail act despite all its frail­ties, gives judges cov­er to keep alleged crim­i­nals in jail where they belong.
There are three spe­cif­ic points in the act which makes it clear that even way back when the act was first con­ceived seri­ous crimes were tak­en rather seriously.
Bail may be refused if…
(1) the offend­er is unlike­ly to show up for trial.
(2) the offend­er may interfere/​kill with witnesses.
(3) The seri­ous­ness of the crimes the offend­er is accused of committing.

There are no log­i­cal argu­ments to be made for what Jamaican judges have done, no jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for the harm they have caused by turn­ing loose seri­ous offend­ers to kill after they have been arrest­ed on homi­cide charges.
It is a seri­ous breach of the pub­lic’s trust, the harm per­pe­trat­ed on the nation by these bureau­crats, unelect­ed by any­one but who wield immense pow­er and influence.
The nation must now begin the seri­ous process of tak­ing the nec­es­sary steps to bring san­i­ty back to our streets and our communities.
Much of which must be done leg­isla­tive­ly. Jamaican can­not con­tin­ue to act out­side inter­na­tion­al norms with­out consequence.
We must say to these thugs once and for all “no more” and mean it.

Adopt My Anti-crime Strategy And Watch The Difference: Bits And Pieces Is Not Enough…

Among the raft of sug­ges­tions I have pro­posed for tack­ling the crime epi­dem­ic in Jamaica are manda­to­ry min­i­mum sen­tences for cer­tain cat­e­go­ry of crimes as well as a full repeal of the INDECOM and Bail acts and a re-pas­sage of both laws with added com­po­nents that reflects the seri­ous­ness of the times in which we live.

Finally, parts of the Administration in Kingston are also call­ing for the very same things we have been advo­cat­ing across admin­is­tra­tions for the last decade or more.
A cou­ple of years ago, I put togeth­er this plan which I updat­ed at the time the Parliament was debat­ing the ZOSO Act; since then, there has not been much move­ment toward any of the bul­let points.
Well, now we have begun to see some crack­ing, at least some of the rhetoric com­ing from the Prime Minister and the Minister of National Security tends to indi­cate that they are begin­ning to get it.

Whack-a-mole-crime Strategy

Either that, or there are moves afoot to pla­cate the police as they demand a liv­able wage. Which would sug­gest that the admin­is­tra­tion ful­ly appre­ci­ates and under­stand what needs to be done to stop this gal­lop­ing crime wave and make the job of the police more impactful.
On Sunday, Holness acknowl­edged that INDECOM was hurt­ing law enforce­ment efforts, a point I have made sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly for the last sev­en years.

Montague

At the same con­fer­ence, the Minister of National Security told sup­port­ers, “We are mov­ing to tight­en our gun laws because in 84 per­cent of all crimes in Jamaica, the gun is present, and we don’t make guns in Jamaica. So we are going to tight­en the gun laws. And when I take a law to Parliament, I want you, the Labourites, to stand with us, and we will find out if the oth­er peo­ple dem a guh stand wid us, too, because every­thing we do that is good, dem oppose us.”

When I bring that bill to Parliament, we going to say, if you charge with a gun crime, no bail. No bail. Because so far this year, 143 Jamaicans have been mur­dered by men who are on bail for oth­er charges. With the new law, no bail. We going to put it into law that if you are caught with a gun, there will be a manda­to­ry min­i­mum sen­tence that you know when you get con­vict­ed, no fine. You going to tan a prison fi 15 – 20 years,” he told supporters.

I encour­age the admin­is­tra­tion to remove those who pur­port to care about human rights from the table. They offer zero solu­tions to the Island’s crime epi­dem­ic, and nei­ther do they offer any help to the vic­tims of crime or those who sur­vive their mur­dered loved ones.
We must begin to see these peo­ple as the self-serv­ing vul­tures they are and dis­miss them cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly from the discussion.
Human Rights and nation­al secu­ri­ty are not a mutu­al­ly exclu­sive phe­nom­e­non; we can and must do both simul­ta­ne­ous­ly; it is not a zero-sum game.

The Thriving Business Of Crime In Jamaica, It’s Inception, And What It Will Take To Break It’s Back.

I con­tin­ue to implore the Government to move on this plan, the change in rhetoric on INDECOM, the National Identification law, and the Bail Act are encour­ag­ing steps, but only a full and com­pre­hen­sive embrace of the strate­gies out­lined here will bring the desired results.

(1) Shore up the ports of entry, effec­tive­ly stop­ping the guns com­ing in illic­it­ly and hold­ing those gains.

(2) Tactically cor­don the areas you want to search, then go in with trained Dogs to find the weapons and arrest the murderers.

(3) Stagger where the secu­ri­ty forces go at any giv­en time; it should not be based sole­ly on the area with the high­est num­ber of killings.
By doing so, you min­i­mize the like­li­hood that your next move can be anticipated.

(4) Remove from the Prime Minister the pow­er to decide where the secu­ri­ty forces go in the ZOSO.
It mat­ters not that the PM sup­pos­ed­ly acts on the advice of the Security Council.
This Act hyper politi­cizes polic­ing and gives the next par­ty to hold pow­er the abil­i­ty to engage in tit-for-tat using the secu­ri­ty forces to car­ry out their nefar­i­ous bidding.
As long as secu­ri­ty oper­a­tions are green-light­ed by politi­cians, those oper­a­tions stand to be politicized.

(5) Stop grant­i­ng bail to accused murderers.

(6) Stop dem­a­gogu­ing the secu­ri­ty forces.
Use the air­waves to edu­cate the peo­ple about the ben­e­fits of adher­ing to the rule of law.

(7) Stop giv­ing the nation the impres­sion that effec­tive hard-nosed polic­ing, which arrests crim­i­nals and places them in jail, is anti­thet­i­cal to cit­i­zens’ human rights.
The great­est right a per­son has is the right to life. You have no right if you are dead; as such, the coun­try must place it focus­es on remov­ing from its midst the mind­less killers and throw its sup­port behind law enforcement.

(8) Stop cor­rupt­ing pub­lic offi­cials. Report police and oth­er pub­lic offi­cials who ask for bribes.
Do not offer to bribe pub­lic officials.

(9) Enact truth in sen­tenc­ing for cer­tain cat­e­gories of vio­lent crimes.
Mandatory 25 years to life for murder.
This is absolute­ly nec­es­sary since the nation’s lead­ers have decid­ed to go against the wish­es of the peo­ple and have declared a mora­to­ri­um on hanging.
Twenty years min­i­mum for any crimes com­mit­ted using a firearm.

(10) Look at the US Rico statute, and draft a law that mod­els that statute effec­tive­ly pros­e­cut­ing gang­sters as the Rico Statute does.

(11) Institute a manda­to­ry National Identification pro­gram, law enforce­ment needs to be able to iden­ti­fy each and every Jamaican.

(12) Remove all polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence from law enforce­ment. What this admin­is­tra­tion is doing is even more polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence, not less. Move the pletho­ra of human rights advo­cates from the table where nation­al secu­ri­ty is being discussed.

(13) Repeal and replace the INDECOM Act.

If The Law Is Bad Repeal It Stupid…

Speaking at the Jamaica Labour Party con­fer­ence at the National Arena in Kingston on Sunday Andrew Holness the Island’s Prime Minister final­ly came to his damn sens­es, sort of, at least.
Addressing the par­ty faith­ful, Holness had a come to Jesus moment of sorts, an epiphany even, one which even his wife and mem­ber of Parliament Juliet Holness, had a long time ago.

Holness final­ly argued that INDECOM some­times go too far in its func­tions and in the process, is caus­ing mem­bers of the secu­ri­ty forces to be fear­ful in the exe­cu­tion of their duties. He says the secu­ri­ty forces need to feel that they are pro­tect­ed as they fight the high crime rate. He says a bal­ance is needed.

My good friend would say “no shit Einstein, what took you the f**k so long to fig­ure that out”?
Here’s the thing, for as long as this destruc­tive law has been in effect I have fought it’s exis­tence tooth and nail.
I have had many peo­ple call me all kinds of names, oth­ers have even threat­ened me for dar­ing to crit­i­cize a law they want­ed which final­ly hand­cuffs law enforce­ment the way they want­ed it to.

PM Andrew Holness

I, on the oth­er hand, have stri­dent­ly argued that yes we need police over­sight, but we also need strong law enforce­ment if ever our coun­try is to have a shot at prospering.
Though not a zero-sum game we have to enforce our laws and iron out the issues which emerge as we go along.
Under no con­di­tion can we have a sit­u­a­tion in which police offi­cers are afraid to do their jobs because of oner­ous over-zeal­ous oversight.
In the case of INDECOM and those at its helm, the agency is not mere­ly an over­sight enti­ty, it has delib­er­ate­ly cul­ti­vat­ed an atmos­phere of ani­mos­i­ty and bad blood which has noth­ing to do with its mandate.

Ultimately the law was poor­ly writ­ten, way too much pow­er was giv­en to the agency and to add insult to injury they placed a nar­cis­sis­tic lit­tle Napolean at its helm.
The Prime Minister must have seen the com­ments com­ing from the lips of the Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago Dr. Keith Rowley who made it clear days ago that law­less­ness would not be tol­er­at­ed in his country.

Prime Minister Dr. Keith Rowley

Despite Holness’ words, one can­not copy com­mon sense, you either have it or you don’t.
He went right ahead and placed his feet in his mouth as was to be expected.
Said Holness “the gov­ern­ment has set aside funds in the Supplementary Budget to assist mem­bers of the secu­ri­ty forces with pay­ing the legal costs of law­suits aris­ing from their actions in the line of duty”.

The law is not a shack­le, repeal the law if it’s bad, debate the act again, this time with the added ben­e­fit of see­ing what did not work and pass a good law which pro­tects both cit­i­zens and police offi­cers alike.
Unless of course, the law was writ­ten to offer work to the pha­lanx of lawyers who are leav­ing school and find­ing it dif­fi­cult to find work? The law can­not ever become big­ger and more pow­er­ful than those who made it or those it was intend­ed to pro­tect, repeal it now.
The answer to the prob­lem can­not be to allow Terrence Williams’ zealotry and nar­cis­sism to destroy peo­ple’s lives at the expense of taxpayers.

The real­i­ty is that once the Government came to its sens­es that the law is becom­ing a net neg­a­tive and there­by caus­ing the esca­la­tion of crime, the law ought to be done away with.

In 2010 when the frame­work of the law was made pub­lic, I was shocked that some­thing that destruc­tive could be passed out of the Parliament.
Since then I have con­sis­tent­ly made the argu­ment that it would be a crime pro­duc­ing law.
I have tak­en much flack from aca­d­e­mics and idiots alike, I’m some­times unsure where the lines are between those two groups.
Ultimately, I under­stand that many who crit­i­cized me for the posi­tion I take do not under­stand the law do not under­stand what law enforce­ment offi­cers face and some did not want to understand.

I know that the pal­pa­ble hatred many in the soci­ety have for the rule of law and law enforce­ment offi­cials would keep the mon­strous crime enhanc­ing law intact, regard­less of the loss of lives it causes.
I said repeat­ed­ly in the many arti­cles I wrote on the sub­ject, that the shit would hit the fan and they would come to their senses.
There are spat­ters on the ceil­ing now but from the com­ments of the Island’s chief exec­u­tive, he still has­n’t come to his sens­es ful­ly yet.
“Many more will have to suf­fer, many more will have to die, don’t ask me why”. (Hon Robert Nesta Marley)

The Kind Of F****** Leadership, Missing In Jamaica.…

Is there a rea­son that the Government of Jamaica can­not step for­ward and say unequiv­o­cal­ly to crim­i­nals,” there will be no sanc­tu­ary or respite we will hunt you down and we will find you,” out­side the mealy-mouthed plat­i­tudes we hear of course?

Is there a rea­son the Opposition Party can­not do the same?
Is it pure­ly because the Government does not want to push too hard con­sid­er­ing that the coun­try is such a crim­i­nal lov­ing sanctuary?
Is it that the Opposition par­ty knows there is always trac­tion to be gained by par­rot­ing the worn out line about their con­cern for human rights?
Is this all there is to it or is there some­thing else at play here in Jamaica as it relates to the crime wave which makes it impos­si­ble for the polit­i­cal lead­ers to come out with one voice against the inces­sant bloodshed?

Prime Minister Dr.Keith Rowley

A friend recent­ly called my atten­tion to the state­ment of the Prime Minister of Trinidad who told his nation that his admin­is­tra­tion would not allow for law­less­ness in Trinidad and Tobago, instruct­ed the police and the secu­ri­ty forces to take “any and all resources’ to ensure law and order.
Responding to a spe­cif­ic inci­dent of law­less­ness in his coun­try and in a thin­ly veiled swipe at Jamaica, Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley warned he would not allow Trinidad and Tobago to go down the road that exists in some Caribbean coun­tries where cer­tain peo­ple believe that they must be in con­trol of areas and even try to pre­vent mem­bers of the law enforce­ment agen­cies from enter­ing those areas.

The inci­dent in ques­tion saw res­i­dents block­ing the roads and the high­way lead­ing in and out of the cap­i­tal Port of Spain fol­low­ing the arrest of two “com­mu­ni­ty lead­ers” who were released hours lat­er. But the action by the res­i­dents led to bumper to bumper traf­fic for hours as motorists fled the cap­i­tal in droves to escape being trapped dur­ing the after­noon rush hour.
Some car own­ers report­ed that their vehi­cles were hit by stray bul­lets and police said they received reports that motorists were robbed as they remained stuck in traf­fic. Some report­ed that their win­dows were dam­aged while some deliv­ery trucks were report­ed­ly looted.

Dr. Rowley told reporters that his admin­is­tra­tion’s sup­port for law enforce­ment is “unwa­ver­ing” and that all nation­al secu­ri­ty agen­cies “have the full sup­port of the state to enforce the law in Trinidad and Tobago regard­less of who you are, where you are and what your sta­tus is in this country”.
“I am here­by let­ting the cit­i­zen­ry know that this is the time when all good men, all good women, should stand on the line of law enforce­ment and let all those who have crim­i­nal intent in this coun­try know that they stand alone where these mat­ters are concerned.

That state­ment from the Trinidadian Prime Minister is f****** lead­er­ship! That’s the kind of lead­er­ship which is miss­ing from our discourse.
It is cer­tain­ly not the first time our CARICOM neigh­bors have swiped at us on the issue of crime and lawlessness.
Unfortunately for the sec­tion of the Jamaican soci­ety which is the most vocal on top­i­cal issues when­ev­er oth­ers crit­i­cize us for our stu­pid­i­ty on crime rather than fix our prob­lem we dou­ble down on stupid.

Errol Alexander

In 2015 Acting Police Commissioner Errol Alexander of Saint Lucia told crim­i­nals who chose to attack Police offi­cers quote: “I am send­ing a mes­sage out there that if the crim­i­nals think that we are in Jamaica, we are not in Jamaica, we are in Saint Lucia, and we will take what­ev­er mea­sures nec­es­sary to pro­tect the safe­ty of our police officers.”

That’s f****** lead­er­ship, not equiv­o­cat­ing, not mealy-mouthed crim­i­nal cod­dling bullshit.
Every day the news­pa­pers and online pub­li­ca­tions are flood­ed with the sto­ries of the wan­ton bloodshed.
Will that kind of talk end criminality?
No, but it sends a strong mes­sage to the force of anar­chy and may­hem that we the peo­ple are com­ing after them.
That there are more of us than there are of them, well in Jamaica’s case that may be hard to reconcile.

I am sick to my stom­ach at the killing in the coun­try, the pre­ten­tious bull­shit nature of many in the soci­ety who talk about human rights as if dead peo­ple can enjoy rights, and a gov­ern­ment which pre­tends that it’s sup­posed good inten­tions will solve this problem.
Let’s be clear-eyed about this killing spree, it is not about to get bet­ter until the Government and oppo­si­tion par­ty gets their heads out of their col­lec­tive ass­es and rec­og­nize that this is not mere­ly crime anymore.
We have a seri­ous prob­lem here which will not be solved by try­ing to bring these blood-thirsty scums to jus­tice, they will have to be ter­mi­nat­ed and ter­mi­nat­ed with dispatch.
It is only then that they will get the mes­sage that the nation is not fuck­ing around any­more and think long and hard about their own mor­tal­i­ty when they decide to ter­mi­nate someone.

Much of what is hap­pen­ing in Jamaica has hap­pened before, in Colombia.
In the process of the shame­ful blood­let­ting in that nation, no one was blame­less, politi­cians, par­sons, police, judi­cia­ry too many had bloody hands, they dirt­ied them­selves as they dived into the caul­dron of blood grasp­ing for the dirty dol­lars, the by-prod­uct of anguish and pain.

In the end, it took cit­i­zens who decid­ed that they did not want their coun­try to be a nar­co-state (meth­ods aside) and they took action.
That time is here that time is now for decent law-abid­ing Jamaicans (what­ev­er is left if any) to band togeth­er and take action.
To hell with the mealy-mothed pre­ten­tious par­a­sites who bray about human rigts.
The most impor­tant right a per­son has is the right to life.

Black Friday …

Maybe we need to take a step back and have a lit­tle introspection.
Whenever we get the urge to run out and indulge in a spend­ing spree which does not ben­e­fit us it behoove us to take up a real his­to­ry book and learn a lit­tle about ourselves.

Jordan Peele Says Tiger Woods Is ‘In The Sunken Place’

By Angela Helm

My ques­tion is – has Tiger Woods ever not been in the sunken place?

This is the man who was so non-black iden­ti­fied that he made up his own race (includ­ing giv­ing Caucasian and American Indian equal foot­ing to black and Asian with an African-American father from Kansas and a moth­er from Thailand.) Then he turned out to be just nasty with his pro­lif­ic dick slang­ing in his now-defunct mar­riage to a nan­ny. And now, the 41-year-old who has a mug shot float­ing around with a face and hair­line that makes him look like a baby boomer is going to play golf with Donald Trump, the pres­i­dent who loves to malign black athletes.

Malia Obama Maligned And Defended For Being A Regular Person

The old­est daugh­ter of for­mer President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama is back in the news just for being a reg­u­lar col­lege stu­dent, doing the things that col­lege stu­dents (or per­haps 19-year-olds in gen­er­al) do: kiss­ing, smok­ing and just push­ing bound­aries as they morph into young adults.

Too bad that because Malia Obama’s father was the first black pres­i­dent and very much hat­ed by racists con­ser­v­a­tives across the nation, her actions are being politi­cized and used to malign her father.
https://​youtu​.be/​R​1​i​0​5​o​G​u​j7Q
Shortly after TMZ post­ed pho­tos of Malia Obama kiss­ing a boy and smok­ing cig­a­rettes at Harvard, where she is cur­rent­ly a stu­dent, some oth­er of her snitch­ing-ass “friends” post­ed a video of her blow­ing smoke rings which the con­ser­v­a­tive press ran with. http://​www​.the​root​.com/​m​a​l​i​a​-​o​b​a​m​a​-​m​a​l​i​g​n​e​d​-​a​n​d​-​d​e​f​e​n​d​e​d​-​f​o​r​-​b​e​i​n​g​-​a​-​r​e​g​u​l​a​r​-​p​-​1​8​2​0​7​3​5​773

The Wrong Path Taken

The year was 1980 I had just moved from North East St. Catherine as a fresh-faced young adult who had pre­vi­ous­ly grad­u­at­ed high school.
Edward Seaga had just trounced Michael Manley at the polls and the nation looked toward a new future free from trib­al pol­i­tics, a future of hope.

I moved to upper Marl road where I stayed with my sib­lings and step­dad on Hyde Park Road.
I would lat­er enter the Port Royal police train­ing facil­i­ty but was to lat­er leave to begin train­ing at the Jamaica Police Academy as the very first batch of recruits to begin train­ing and grad­u­ate from the new­ly mint­ed old school of agriculture.
I thought it was strange that the police nev­er seemed to have any­thing built for them, they always seemed to occu­py facil­i­ties oth­ers had vacat­ed, but I digress.

After grad­u­a­tion, I was sent to the old west street facil­i­ty, bet­ter known as the beat and foot patrol divi­sion, after a six-month stint I was one of a few offi­cers ever to be trans­ferred to the Mobile Reserve who were not trained specif­i­cal­ly for that divi­sion, anoth­er first.

I did­n’t like it there one bit but it even­tu­al­ly grew on me as I made the then high­ly respect­ed Ranger’s squad.
My love of busi­ness, my pro­fes­sion today, began around then when I pur­chased a small bar from a lady who oper­at­ed the bar right there where she lived on Plantain Avenue behind the old New Yorker Factory on Waltham Park and Bay Farm Roads.

A younger Ninjaman

It was there that I met Desmond Ballantine oth­er­wise called (Ninjaman). Ninjaman was a bud­ding DJ then, every Friday and Saturday night we had the sound sys­tem African Star, based on Marl Road play­ing at my lit­tle joint.
Ninjaman fol­lowed that Soundsystem then. He would walk up to the bar wear­ing a full-length dress coat in the siz­zling Jamaican heat, his trade­mark I guess?

In the time since those ear­ly days when I was a young cop and Ninja man was a bud­ding disc jock­ey try­ing to make a name for him­self much water has flown under the bridge.
Despite the many suc­cess­es in his rise to the top of the dance­hall pyra­mid, Ninjaman nev­er seemed to be able to extri­cate him­self from the beguil­ing ten­ta­cles of crime.

Ninjam man did not have to choose that path, sure he lived in the com­mu­ni­ty of Marl Road a some­times grit­ty com­mu­ni­ty as did I. He arrived from St Mary as I arrived from St Catherine around the same time.
The choic­es we make are our own not a func­tion of where we come from.

That is the rea­son I have no sym­pa­thy for Desmond Ballyntine (nin­ja man) on his con­vic­tion for murder.
A life is a very pre­cious commodity.
Each per­son gets a sin­gle life, in my esti­ma­tion, it is an egre­gious injus­tice, a ter­ri­ble trans­gres­sion to take some­one’s life unless it is in defense of your own.

It is now time that the Artical Don, stand like a man and face his pun­ish­ment. After all, he will be liv­ing his life regard­less of the penal­ty they mete out to him.
An option he and his son Jahneil took from Ricardo Johnson in 2009 when they uncer­e­mo­ni­ous­ly snuffed out his life.
Desmond Ballentine and his son will nev­er receive the jus­tice they deserve. Under the Jamaican shit-stem of jus­tice, they will not be exe­cut­ed as they should be for tak­ing the life of Ricardo Johnson.
They will receive a slap on the wrist upon which they may very well appeal, who knows? Some mon­ey may change hands and even­tu­al­ly they case may get tossed on some minor technicality.

Welcome to Jamaica.….……

Black Men’s Sentences 20 Percent Longer Than White Men’s For Similar Crimes

Black men are sen­tenced to far more time in prison than white men for com­mit­ting sim­i­lar crimes, accord­ing to a new report from the U.S. Sentencing Commission.

report released last week from the USSC ― an inde­pen­dent agency of the U.S. judi­cial branch ― looked at fed­er­al prison sen­tences in the United States from Oct. 1, 2011, to Sept. 30, 2016, and found that black male offend­ers received sen­tences on aver­age 19.1 per­cent longer than those of “sim­i­lar­ly sit­u­at­ed” white male offenders.

The com­mis­sion also fac­tored in offend­ers’ crim­i­nal his­to­ries to look at whether vio­lence in offend­ers’ pasts could account for the racial dis­par­i­ties ― and found that it did not. Looking at 2016, the only year for which such data was avail­able, the com­mis­sion found that, after con­trol­ling for crim­i­nal his­to­ry, black men still received 20.4 per­cent longer sen­tences than did white men.

This report’s find­ings match those of a pre­vi­ous USSC report from 2007 to 2011, which found a near­ly 20 per­cent gap in sen­tences between black and white men.

The per­cent­age dif­fer­ence in sen­tence length between black and white male offend­ers has increased from 1998 to 2016. Red is 1998 to 2003, green is 2003 to 2004, blue is 2005 to 2007, black is 2007 to 2011 and yel­low is 2011 to 2016.

The racial dis­par­i­ties in sen­tenc­ing appear to have increased over the last two decades, wors­en­ing specif­i­cal­ly after 2005.

According to old­er USSC reports, the gap between black and white men in sen­tenc­ing was about 11 per­cent for 1998 to 2003 and 5 per­cent for 2003 to 2005. But it jumped to 15 per­cent for 2005 to 2007 and to near­ly 20 per­cent thereafter.

USSC not­ed in a 2010 report that the dif­fer­ences in sen­tence length between black and white male offend­ers “have increased steadi­ly” since the Supreme Court ruled in 2005 in United States v. Booker to increase judges’ dis­cre­tion in sen­tenc­ing.

But the fac­tors con­tribut­ing to racial dis­par­i­ties in sen­tenc­ing are com­plex, accord­ing to Marc Mauer, direc­tor of the non­prof­it Sentencing Project. Judges aren’t the only fac­tor, or nec­es­sar­i­ly even the biggest, in sen­tenc­ing disparities.

It’s not nec­es­sar­i­ly racist judges,” Mauer told HuffPost by email Friday. “But much of [the] dis­par­i­ty [is] like­ly due to deci­sion-mak­ing by prosecutors.”

Mauer point­ed to research from schol­ars Sonja Starr and Marit Rehavi, which found that pros­e­cu­tors “have a huge impact on sen­tences,” as they have broad dis­cre­tion in how to charge an offend­er or whether to offer a plea-bargain.

Overall, sen­tenc­ing is just one part of the broad­er prob­lem of racial dis­crim­i­na­tion in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem: Black peo­ple are incar­cer­at­ed in U.S. state pris­ons at more than five times the rate of white peo­ple. https://​www​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​e​n​t​r​y​/​b​l​a​c​k​-​w​h​i​t​e​-​s​e​n​t​e​n​c​i​n​g​-​c​r​i​m​i​n​a​l​-​j​u​s​t​i​c​e​-​r​e​p​o​r​t​_​u​s​_​5​a​0​f​8​2​9​5​e​4​b​0​e​9​7​d​f​f​e​d​6​6​a​0​?​n​c​i​d​=​i​n​b​l​n​k​u​s​h​p​m​g​0​0​0​0​0​009

Police High Command Either Complicit Or More Stupid Than I Thought..

Among the per­sons being tar­get­ed, declared Selvin Haye, deputy com­mis­sion­er in charge of crime, are the financiers behind the ille­gal impor­ta­tion and dis­tri­b­u­tion of firearms, as well as those involved in drug trafficking.

We will be build­ing more and bet­ter enter­prise cas­es to tack­le this type of crime and crim­i­nal­i­ty. We will be using spe­cial­ized teams now armed with bet­ter inves­tiga­tive skills and ana­lyt­i­cal capa­bil­i­ties to track these crim­i­nals,” Haye said.

Police Commissioner George Quallo (right); Clifford Blake (cen­ter) deputy com­mis­sion­er of police Strategic Operations; and Wray Palmer, deputy com­mis­sion­er of police Inspectorate of the Constabulary, dur­ing a press con­fer­ence at the Commissioner’s Old Hope head­quar­ters, yes­ter­day
Gleaner pho­to.

Well, I guess we have got­ten over the cha­rade that ZOSO was going to be a sig­nif­i­cant dri­ver of crime in a souther­ly direction.
We are now onto the next smoke screen.
Inherent in those com­ments com­ing from the police high com­mand is a con­fes­sion that there have been zero empha­sis to link those ship­ping the weapons and ammu­ni­tion from over­seas to the con­tra­bands they ship.
The police high com­mand has been com­plic­it in sim­ply bask­ing in the glo­ry of an occa­sion­al find here and there and tak­ing the cred­it for the work the cops on the streets do.
That has been the modus operan­di of the bloat­ed top heavy bureau­cra­cy that is known as the police high command.
A com­mand struc­ture which has nev­er done much in the way of gar­ner­ing real com­mand and is any­thing but structured.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​w​h​e​r​e​-​a​r​e​-​t​h​e​-​i​n​v​e​s​t​i​g​a​t​o​rs/

So now they admit that despite the crime wave over the last sev­er­al decades, hell, since I left the force after my brief stint in 91 that the depart­ment was­n’t doing what they ought to have been doing even now?
The Deputy Commissioner’s state­ment was a real expose’ into what is real­ly hap­pen­ing or more like, what is not hap­pen­ing in the force that is con­tribut­ing to the wave of homi­cides and oth­er seri­ous crimes sweep­ing the country.

Commissioner of Police George Quallo (right) chats with Mark Codling (left) act­ing prin­ci­pal direc­tor, National Spatial Data Management Pension and Alexander Williams, chair­man, Land Information Council of Jamaica dur­ing the open­ing cer­e­mo­ny for the Geographic Information Systems Day, held at the Assembly Hall of the University of the West Indies, Mona

Though it is 2017 the force seems to be more focused on record­ing reports onto com­put­ers (mov­ing away from those God-awful big old books ) than solv­ing seri­ous crimes.
I was nev­er one who had much con­fi­dence in the abil­i­ty of the police high com­mand to get any­thing done or to sus­tain a good thing estab­lished by the rank and file. As such I nev­er gave any cre­dence to the grand pro­nounce­ments which come out of that body. Neither do I both­er pay­ing atten­tion to those who are con­vinced that there is new inno­va­tion hap­pen­ing in the force which will amount to any­thing pos­i­tive today.

In his first report­ing to the Parliament hav­ing been man­dat­ed by law after the launch of the first Zone of spe­cial oper­a­tions in Mount Salem St James prime Minister Andrew Holness told the nation quote:

The jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for the ZOSO des­ig­na­tion was based on the rel­e­vant legal cri­te­ria, intel­li­gence, as well as strate­gic and oper­a­tional con­sid­er­a­tions of the joint com­mand of the secu­ri­ty forces. He said that, fol­low­ing 32 spe­cial oper­a­tions con­duct­ed by the joint force in the first 10 days, five ille­gal firearms were recov­ered, two want­ed men were tak­en into cus­tody and a num­ber of “lead sheets” used in lot­to scam­ming activ­i­ties recov­ered. “The next 10 days will see the con­tin­u­a­tion of inter­nal secu­ri­ty oper­a­tions to rid the zone of ille­gal weapons, ammu­ni­tion, and con­tra­band,” the prime min­is­ter told the House.

Holness

The leader of the Opposition Peter Phillips coun­tered that despite the oper­a­tion haul of “five guns and two arrests in 10 days”, 54 mur­ders have occurred at the same time across the island. He insist­ed that since the dec­la­ra­tion of the ZOSO, the dai­ly nation­al rate has increased. “That is to say that we had been going nation­al­ly at about 4.2 mur­ders per day…and in the peri­od since the zone, the nation­al aver­age has been about 5.5 mur­ders per day.

I nev­er thought that there would be a crime ini­tia­tive that would have any mea­sur­able effect on crime in the present envi­ron­ment that exists in the coun­try today.
There has to be a seis­mic atti­tu­di­nal shift in the way peo­ple see crime affect­ing their lives and what they are will­ing to do to change that paradigm.
Jamaica has nev­er been a place which was sup­port­ive of crime ini­tia­tives, it has always been high­ly opin­ion­at­ed with­out the facts as well.
Those char­ac­ter­is­tics are a per­fect storm which caus­es the Island of 2.8 mil­lion peo­ple to be one of the high­est pro­duc­ers of crime on the planet.

Peter Phillips

One of the prin­ci­ples I applied as an offi­cer was to allow sus­pects to talk, they will tell you pret­ty much what you need to know. Today as a per­son who oper­ates in the busi­ness space I still lis­ten intent­ly to all who I do busi­ness with-with a view to deter­min­ing their authenticity.
The state­ments of the police high com­mand have been extreme­ly revealing.

Which brings me to my final point.
The police high com­mand is even more stu­pid than I pre­vi­ous­ly thought they were.
If the Police high com­mand real­ly intend­ed to final­ly get up off their tired decrepit behinds and do some­thing about trac­ing the caches of weapons pour­ing into the Island why would they announce it?

One of the things those con­cerned about crime harp on is polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence in law enforcement.
Politicians are cul­pa­ble as it relates to the crime wave sweep­ing the coun­try but as it relates to the police announc­ing its inten­tions to crim­i­nals politi­cians bear zero responsibility.
That col­lu­sion or utter stu­pid­i­ty is the police’s and theirs alone.

Commissioner of Police George Quallo

No one stands in the way of the police if they chose to go after prin­ci­pals in the weapons trade, not even the politicians.
If the police are inter­est­ed in bust­ing the peo­ple at the top who are import­ing guns and ammu­ni­tion into the coun­try the police can do it.
Announcing that they intend to go after prin­ci­pals now when it should have been doing that as a mat­ter, of course, tells a skep­tic like me that they are not going after the big fish they are sim­ply telling them to be more discreet.

police remove ille­gal guns from the streets…

I have always sup­port­ed the police but I can in no way turn a blind eye to bla­tant incom­pe­tence at the bare min­i­mum and gross com­plic­i­ty at worse on the part of the police.
Trust me it is not as hard as the police tell you it is to track down and bring these crim­i­nals to justice.
If the police real­ly want­ed to bring these prin­ci­pal offend­ers to jus­tice they would seek the war­rants they need and go about their inves­ti­ga­tions with­out mak­ing announcements.
After all the politi­cians are some of the worst crim­i­nals, why would the police tell them what they intend to do?
That ladies and gen­tle­man is the rea­son I decid­ed to walk away from this depart­ment as soon as the oppor­tu­ni­ty pre­sent­ed itself.

This Thanksgiving After Dinner There Will Be No Football For Me…

I haven’t watched a sin­gle pre-sea­son or reg­u­lar sea­son NFL game this year and trust me I love football.
Nevertheless, I made the deci­sion not to ever turn anoth­er Television set on to anoth­er NFL game for one reason.
The league black­list­ing of Colin Kaepernick.

Kaepernick

Whenever I say I will nev­er watch anoth­er NFL game, my white asso­ciates, nod in agree­ment obvi­ous­ly believ­ing that I am mad that a few NFL play­ers led by Kaepernick dared to kneel for what they believe.
I nev­er missed a chance to quick­ly explain to them that I haven’t stopped watch­ing because I believe that kneel­ing dur­ing the National anthem is a sign of dis­re­spect to the flag or worse is some kind of con­vo­lut­ed dis­re­gard for the Military.
They gen­er­al­ly nod “oh I see” and that’s the end of that.
A sil­ly lit­tle restau­rant in La Grange Ville has a sign dis­played [No foot­ball games here] obvi­ous­ly a way of say­ing they stand with the Military.
I have nev­er been there to spend a pen­ny and will nev­er ever set foot in there. You see it’s only in cas­es like these that you get to see the true char­ac­ter of people.
Unfortunately, African-Americans large­ly have no con­cept of the strength they wield through the pow­er of their wal­lets and pocketbooks.

President George W. Bush award­ed Ali the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2005.

The fact of the mat­ter is that there is absolute­ly no con­nec­tion between the Military, the National Anthem, and foot­ball, out­side the spon­sor­ship the NFL receives from the Defense Department.
There’s nei­ther a con­sti­tu­tion­al or moral require­ment to stand for the nation­al anthem, it is sim­ply some­thing peo­ple do out of love of country.
Nevertheless, there are sev­er­al ways to love coun­try out­side get­ting liquored up at a foot­ball game wrapped in the flag and pre­tend­ing that the mil­i­tary is next to God.
We can begin by lov­ing and car­ing for our fel­low man regard­less of who they are, what col­or they have or what their sex­u­al ori­en­ta­tion is.
We can begin by shed­ding hatred and the awful igno­rance which caus­es the igno­ble char­ac­ter flaw called racism with­in us.

Rosa Parks

Many who wrap them­selves in the flag and pre­tend to have a monop­oly on patri­o­tism would nev­er sign up to serve their coun­try. Others in high offices found myr­i­ad excus­es to avoid fight­ing for the very coun­try they now claim to love.
So lets cut to the chase Colin Kaepernick is no vil­lain for kneel­ing nei­ther was Rosa Parks a vil­lain on December 1, 1955, in Montgomery, Alabama when she was arrest­ed for refus­ing to give up her seat to a white man.

Muhhamed Ali was no vil­lain when he refused Army induc­tion on Apr 28, 1967. and nei­ther were Tommy Smith and John Carlos’ when they made the black pow­er salute at the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City.
The unde­ni­able truth of the mat­ter is that more than a half a cen­tu­ry after Jim Crow, Segregation, the march on Washington, sep­a­rate but equal and the assas­si­na­tion of Dr. Martin Luther King there is a stub­born per­cent­age of white America which igno­rant­ly believes that blacks should be rel­e­gat­ed to the back of the Bus.

They fun­da­men­tal­ly believe in social order but cares noth­ing about jus­tice for the downtrodden.
These are they who decry bro­ken win­dows and civ­il dis­obe­di­ence but does not bat an eye at the bla­tan­cy and the vicious­ness of state sanc­tioned oppres­sion of mar­gin­al­ized com­mu­ni­ties of color.
This kind of bla­tant oppres­sion and racial supe­ri­or­i­ty is now giv­en new life when out of the high­est office comes the call to black­list and pun­ish cit­i­zens who dare to stand up or in this case kneel to bring atten­tion to sys­temic racial oppression.

Writing for (the Nation​.com) Dave Zirin said :
This NFL sea­son has blazed new polit­i­cal trails as play­ers have used their plat­form to stand up to racism in the face of a fero­cious back­lash. It has tru­ly been a sea­son of firsts. But there is anoth­er “first” on the imme­di­ate hori­zon that speaks to the league’s bald­ly reac­tionary his­to­ry in regards to race.

The NFL — for all their cor­po­rate rhetoric about being some­thing that “brings the coun­try togeth­er” — of course, has a team named after a Native American racial slur in the nation’s cap­i­tal. That’s not news. What is news is that on Thanksgiving, for the first time in league his­to­ry, this team in Washington will be play­ing host. That means as we fin­ish our food, slip into sweat­pants, and to gath­er around the tele­vi­sion to watch NFL foot­ball, a tra­di­tion only slight­ly less ubiq­ui­tous than pump­kin pie, the R*dskins slur— a name that exists only because of geno­cide and dis­place­ment—will have cen­ter stage.

For many in the Black Community at all lev­els of the spec­trum none of this mat­ters, they will con­tin­ue watch­ing the games and hoot­ing and hol­ler­ing because after all , miss­ing the game is not an option.
For a cou­ple hours of enter­tain­ment, they are quite will­ing to con­tin­ue to sup­port the per­pet­u­a­tion of a sys­tem which will con­tin­ue to enslave their chil­dren and grand­chil­dren in perpetuity.

After all, in the African-American com­mu­ni­ty, noth­ing [trumps] enter­tain­ment, not even the future of gen­er­a­tions to come.