For the first time in its 200-year history, the Senate Judiciary Committee has two black committee members after Democrats appointed Sen. Kamala Harris (D‑Calif.) and Sen. Cory Booker (D‑N.J.) to the influential panel.
The dual appointment, announced on Tuesday, came as somewhat of a surprise. Democrats needed to fill two spots on the committee, following the resignation of Sen. Al Franken (D‑Minn.) and the victory of Doug Jones in Alabama’s special Senate election last month.
The Congressional Black Caucus had been pushing Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D‑N.Y.) to appoint one of its members, and Harris, former attorney general of California, had been expected to take one of the seats, according to The Associated Press. In the end, however, Schumer chose both African-American Democratic senators for the panel.
“The Congressional Black Caucus could not be more proud of both of our Senate members and know the experience and expertise they bring to the Committee will be beneficial for all Americans, specially those disproportionately targeted by the criminal justice system,” Rep. Cedric Richmond (D‑La.), the caucus chairman, said in a Tuesday statement.
Only one other African-American lawmaker has served on Judiciary Committee since its founding in 1816. Then-Sen. Carol Moseley Braun (D‑Ill.) was a member of the committee in the 1990s.
What’s better than one African American on the Senate Judiciary Committee? Two. *In Our @S_C_ Voice* Yes, we’re still celebrating. @CoryBooker and @SenKamalaHarris are only the 2nd and 3rd African Americans to serve on the @JudiciaryDems Committee in 200+ years.
Booker, the first black man to serve on the Judiciary Committee, vowed in a tweet to use his new role to “check awful actions” by President Donald Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and to “keep working to advance the cause of reforming our broken justice system. ”
Excited to join the Judiciary Committee. It’ll be my mission to check awful actions by Trump & Sessions; keep working to advance the cause of reforming our broken justice system; and to bend the arc of history closer toward equal justice for all. https://twitter.com/KristenClarkeJD/status/950802819346587648 …
Harris said in a tweet that she was “thrilled” about the committee appointment.
“I will fight for justice on behalf of Californians and all Americans,” she wrote.
Thrilled to share that I’ve been appointed to the Senate Judiciary Committee. You have my commitment that I will fight for justice on behalf of Californians and all Americans.
I’m all for accountability but there is simply too much posturing and politics involved in policing in Jamaica. Montague had every right to request a report from the Commissioner of police the method he chose was out of line and should not be tolerated by the police hierarchy. It’s time that the police stand up to these grandstanding part-timers.
Over 1600 Jamaicans were slaughtered by terrorist thugs last year, thus far this year they are on a merry clip to kill as many this year if not more.
Tactical Jamaican police teamThes guys can solve this problem, turn them lose to stop the killings.Our officers fear no one„ stop shackling them.Our officers need support to go after the killers.Police have pulled back because the government has demonstrated that it does not support them.Prime Minister Holness, step aside, call off your hounds, allow the police to do their jobs.Police security team
We say to Prime Minister Andrew Holness stop playing this political game you are playing. We say to Peter Phillips and his band of cultists, stop playing politics and put country first.
OVER 1600 JAMAICANSMURDEREDLASTYEAR, THEYWERENOTKILLEDBYTHEPOLICESOGUESSWHATTHESEFRAUDSAREDEATHLYSILENT.
Susan Goffe JFJTerrence Williams INDECOMHorace Levy PMIArlene Harrison Henry OPDDelroy Chuck Justice MinisterWitter Formerly of OPDHughes Nationwide
These are just a fraction of the many faces which have deceived the Jamaican people into thinking that the epidemic of crime blanketing the country is solely a function of police incompetence.[though the police are arguably incompetent].
The most sacred right any human being has is the right to life.Without life, any other right he or she may be entitled to is rendered moot. The police may not have the right to stop and search someone under the law. And so we can argue and demonize them without thinking that the likelihood of being stopped and searched goes a long way in preventing someone from walking around with a gun. If that person does not walk around with a gun he cannot shoot someone with whom he gets into a petty argument.
When we stop the police from taking pro-active measures as simple as a stop and frisk we are by default authorizing and emboldening criminals to walk with their weapons and that is how we end up with massively increased murder numbers.
It is stunning that those who purport to care about human rights and human dignity does not care about the fundamental right the innocent have to live. It is absolute silence, crickets, coming from the frauds pictured above. It is as if the people who died were not Jamaicans who had a right to live their lives like everyone else. I call on these fraudulent charlatans and others like them to explain to the Jamaican people the reason for their silence?
They are extremely vociferous when law enforcement officers are forced to take out hardened criminals who deny innocent Jamaicans their most fundamental right, the right to life. What is the basis for your silence? Does the innocent who are killed not qualify to have advocacy on their behalf? I say they do and that is the reason we characterize you pictured above, as frauds and charlatans who only care about the rights of bloodthirsty killers.
We will change that designation, we will change our characterizations of you as criminal rights advocates when you change your tune and speak to the loss of lives of the innocent and not only advocate for those who take innocent lives.
Despite all of the failings of the Police high command as a unit for effective policing in Jamaica, the present wave of murder and mayhem cannot be laid at the feet of the police alone. Neither will the throwing of Commissioner of Police George Quallo under the bus suffice to distract from the frightening number of 1600 plus dead Jamaicans last year.
Andrew Holness came to the Job of Prime Minister determined to micro-manage crime, in a way that I can only characterize as, “in an “up by elitist Mona kind way”. You all remember when Bruce Golding said that his Government would not be dictated to by Mona, in reference to the US embassy? Well, I’m not talking about that part of Mona, I’m actually talking about the “Intellectual ghetto” as per Mutty Perkins.
Andrew Holness had ample time to look at what the country needed before he was elected and took on the job of Prime Minister. Holness is young, educated and is supposedly smart. Having listened to Holness’s utterances since he assumed executive leadership of the country, has caused me much dismay. He has me questioning whether he fully understands how a modern society works.
There are a couple of things which seem to elude Andrew Holness despite what I conclude is a genuine desire on his part to want a prosperous Jamaica. The problem with his Utopian dream is that there can be no prosperity in an atmosphere of murder and other violent crimes. Attracting investment and retaining it by any quantifiable measure in Jamaica’s present circumstance is tantamount to attempting to fill a basket with water.
#1 At best, a country can have but marginal success compared to what it could normally accomplish, if the specter of murder and terrorism is not removed, even given the best of conditions in the wider world.
#2 Bad mouthing the police by aligning with Terrence Williams of INDECOM and the Media elites like Cliff Hughes and others who make a living from telling lies and opining about police failings, is not exactly the prescription for having a security force which wants to work for you. Each and every politician must understand, the difference between campaigning and the complexities of governing. Andrew Holness still hasn’t yet learned that lesson.
In speech after speech, Andrew Holness told his audiences that the police would not be allowed to kick in doors and kill people under his administration. The problem with that shameless bit of pandering, is that kicking doors in is the work that police do when criminals do not want to surrender to being arrested. It is dirty, it is harsh, it is not pretty to see but that is what happens when criminals decide to try to kill innocent civilians and police officers. [I am not in any way justifying situations in which officers betray their oaths and take innocent lives or take lives when they did not have to]
Based on his unequivocal support for the crime enhancement INDECOM Act and his bad-mouthing of policing methods which did not comport with the dictates of the elitist cabal of uptown, Holness all but guaranteed a police work slow down. As I asked in an article a while back. why would Jamaican police risk their freedom and their lives for a country which does not value their sacrifice?
The logical conclusion is that in the same way the average Jamaicans do not understand how living in a country of law enhances their lives, Prime Minister Andrew Holness, Peter Phillips and all who follow them do not understand that concept either.
Sadly, their ignorance and incompetence are causing the death of hundreds if not thousands of people each year. Our country is at war, it requires soldiers to fight that war. The Prime Minister’s stance will only cause more deaths not end them.
Mike Beckles is a former Jamaican police Detective corporal, businessman, researcher, and blogger. He is a black achiever honoree, and publisher of the blog chatt-a-box.com. He’s also a contributor to several websites. You may subscribe to his blogs free of charge, or subscribe to his Youtube channel @chatt-a-box, for the latest podcast all free to you of course.
What is the number? What is the number of dead people which will get the Jamaican Government and the full political opposition to realize that the status quo is untenable? I pose this question to Prime Minister Andrew Holness and his colleagues as well as to Dr.Peter Phillips and his colleagues on the opposition benches. What is critical mass for you?
PM Andrew Holness
Our country’s population hovers somewhere around 2.7 million. Last year alone there was a reported 1600 plus killings. Many Jamaicans including some police officers believe that the numbers are much higher.
With a population of 2.7 million and over 1600 dead, the chances of getting killed on an average day in Jamaica is one in under 17,000. Those are shocking numbers which are probably much worse when we remove the political class and the wealthy elites who have security details, live in gated communities with heavy security and have the option of arming themselves.
Peter Phillips opposition leader
When they are removed from the equation it leaves a much smaller pool of Jamaicans who are actually exposed to the will of the mindless murderers who kill at will.
The crisis of violent crime facing the country is not a phenomenon unto itself, it is representative of a much larger rot of disrespect and disregard which took over the country in the early 90’s and has developed now into a society which can only be characterized as lawless.
I ask our country’s leaders this question with a heavy heart. It is difficult for me to envisage the bodies of one thousand six hundred once living breathing vivacious humans laid out side by side, dead. I cannot mentally reconcile all that innocent dead in a situation in which there is no nation on nation conflict.
The way our leadership is looking at this issue is demonstrably not working. Personally speaking, I am tired of talking about this, I am tired of writing about it. I’m sure this is true of most Jamaicans as well, who knows what needs to be done but are not in positions to change it.
The not so distant passage of the (ZOSO) Zones Of Special Operations Act in the Island’s legislature gave many people hope that finally, the Government was doing something about crime. The Act, the brainchild of Prime Minister Andrew Holness, is tantamount to a drug fiend’s first high which dissipates rather quickly and can never be duplicated.
Many Jamaicans, including past and present police officers, were, and have been highly supportive of the Act, hopelessly clinging to anything which is being sold as a solution to the crime Monster. This publication which is dedicated to justice and the rule of law and this writer chose to look at the long ball. As a result, I said ZOSO was a distraction which would have no real measurable effect on crime and in time would be proven to be a mere distraction by the nation’s leadership.
The Zones Of Special Operations Act. is simply a situation in which large amounts of police officers and members of the Military are placed in a certain geographic area. )usually, one determined to be a high crime area). Naturally, the authorities which decide which area is to be designated a ZOSO say no one knows where the next ZOSO will be, except the Prime Minister and his tight group of national security advisers.
Unfortunately, that gives me no comfort. As a cop who spent a whole week in the hills of Westmoreland waiting for airplanes to land at an illegal strip in Montpelier, only to be approached in the bushes by one of the men we were supposed to be arresting as soon as the plane landed, and told we were wasting our time because his boss received word that we would be coming before we reached there. That information given to politicians was leaked to criminals effectively placing our lives at risk and making a mockery of crime fighting.
ZOSO is the state of affair which ought to exist across the Island. It is the sense of freedom and security citizens should feel living and participating in their communities. However, in order to build that out, it would require an extraordinary amount of human resources which Jamaica simply does not have.
As it stands it is unsustainable because it uses up large amounts of resources in small geographic areas leaving other areas without. Finally, criminals would be stupid to stay[they aren’t] in an area knowing it is highly likely their high crime area may be descended on by swarms of police and soldiers. I argued that criminals would simply move to other areas and continue with their activities. They have! That is the reason you do not hear much talk about ZOSO anymore, mere months after it’s passage.
After his loss to Portia Simpson Miller, I wrote an article challenging him to go out into the fields and talking to the people no matter where they lived. I challenged him to roll up his sleeves and sit with the people in every nook and cranny, eat with them and hear their concerns. Whether he read the article or not is neither here nor there, Andrew Holness did exactly that.
However, after winning the last national elections I was stunned to hear the elitist rhetoric coming from Holness. I have zero expectation of anything positive from the leadership of the PNP, that is the reason I cast my lot with Holness. I got a rude awakening when I heard the newly minted Prime Minister berating the JCF, telling his friends that there would be no return to the days when police would kick in doors and summarily kill people.
I was stunned at the sense of vitriol and the barefaced nature of the PrimeMinister’s defamation which was bereft of substance and was at its core a self-serving and gratuitous statement born out of malice and ignorance. It was a statement designed to placate and quite the criminal rights lobby which has set up shop on the Island. Ironically, the Prime Minister’s wife a newly minted member of the legislature did not seem to share those sentiments. At least her public utterances seem to differ from those of her husband.
THECONSEQUENCES
Andrew Holness did not need to create that chasm between himself and the police department, they voted en-masse for him allowing the labor party to sweep the elections gaining a one-seat majority in the legislature. The Labor Party was able to keep its 21 incumbents intact and gained 11 former seats briefly held by the PNP in 2011.
The calculation to throw the security forces under the bus was an old one used by both political parties toward furthering their political agendas. Sadly, far too many members of the Island’s police force are intrinsically tied to the two political parties, and for no good reason.
The PNP has never had any desire to deal with the nation’s crime crisis. In fact, the previous unprecedented hold that the party had on power and the ensuing deterioration of our national culture is a direct result of the party’s hands-off approach to crime in some instances and it’s direct involvement in others.
Commissioner of Police George Quallo (file photo)
The Government’s decision to avoid taking real and practical steps against criminals coupled with its disrespectful posture toward the police has not only destroyed the morale of the police, it has emboldened criminals and placed the lives of citizens in peril. The present brouhaha between Minister Montague and Commissioner Quallo in which the Commissioner, we are told has been told he has to go, is another attempt by the Government to deflect from the consequences of its own failures on its most important responsibility to secure the nation.
The longer the administration takes to stop playing politics with national security the harder it is for the security forces to reverse the outcome of this policy. The more this government and the opposition play politics is the more Jamaicans will die. It is a sad and shocking crisis, and lack of political leadership, the consequences of which are tens of thousands of dead Jamaicans over the years as the political class panders to foreign groups much to the demise of our people.
We have just received word that Police Commissioner George Quallo has been fired.
Commissioner of Police George Quallo (file photo)
The (POA) Police Officers Association recently blasted national security minister Robert Montague for meddling in the running of the force and vowed to accompany Commissioner Quallo to a meeting scheduled today between the Commissioner and the Minister.
Word is that it was at that meeting that the Commissioner was fired. Sources confirmed the Commissioner was told he has to go but for the moment is still on the job. The Government faced with mounting murder statistics seemingly is looking for a scapegoat and the commissioner of police is an ideal target. More to come.…..
Welcome to justice Jamaica style. In all of the talk about crime in Jamaica and the regular anti-police gibberish coming from the faces of the self-styled elites in the country like Cliff Huges of Nationwide radio, we intend to show you why crime is so stubborn in Jamaica.
Anti-police troll Cliff Hughes of Nationwide radio.
#1
Paul Raphael, 49 years old fined $1 million or 12 months in prison for trafficking cocaine and $500,000 or 12 months in prison for dealing in cocaine. Most importantly he was admonished and discharged for the offense of possession of cocaine by Parish Court Judge Sancia Burrell.
Parish Court Judge Sancia Burrell.
It is incredibly difficult for crime to trend downward when the very agencies of justice work assiduously and dutifully to make the country much more attractive to those who are predisposed to commit crimes. And furthermore to help to recruit others who may otherwise have been deterred had the country made it clear it will not tolerate criminal behavior.
Miller’s face sarcastically emblazoned on a Jamaican note.
Ironically this is the very same judge who paid lip service by mocking the ridiculous law which constrained her from issuing a fine above J$100 on gangster Tesha Miller after he pleaded guilty to making a false declaration to Jamaican immigration officials.
Given a chance to show that she wasn’t just chatting because she had a mouth she wilted like a four leaf clover. At the time even some of the lame politicians were stunned that these laws are still in effect. Unfortunately what the nation gets is a bunch of losers who bang on desks and shout insults at each other on the public’s dime.
#2
Thirty-seven ( 37)-year-old Michael Abrahams of Caribbean Estate, St. Catherine was sentenced for: Possession of Cocaine — $500,000 or 6 months in prison and Dealing in Cocaine — 9 months hard labor, suspended for two years when he appeared before the St. Catherine Parish Court. Abrahams was arrested at his home on Friday, July 7, after detectives from the Narcotics Division conducted a raid at his premises and found Cocaine weighing approximately 70 kilograms and valued at $92.8 million.
How long are the Jamaican people going to be idiotic sheep lulled and indoctrinated into believing that these judges are not being paid to deliver these kinds of justice?
What we do not hear from the frauds like Hughes is a demand for accounting from his friends who are making decisions or better yet are not making the right decisions. This is why we must eschew these charlatans when they try to turn us against the police in the line of fire who are really doing all they can with precious little to no support from the system as you have seen in these ridiculous sentences.
This story has been updated after the initial publication.
In a recent forum, I spoke to the lie that poverty is the driver of crime in Jamaica. I sought to debunk that myth by arguing that there is absolutely no evidence to support the idea that poverty is the driver of crime as it is in Jamaica. ZERO !!!
If that were true the poorest nations would be the most violent and murderous nations. Admittedly petty thieves and other hustling has some connection to poverty, not the heinous killings we are seeing in Jamaica. The killings in Jamaica stems from a couple of things. (1) Societal and Governmental acquiescence. (2) Greed. (3) Political protection of criminals. et al.
Cuba which is 90 miles from our shores and a population of 12 million people well over four times that of Jamaica has far less crime even though the standard of living of Jamaicans is far higher.
Vietnam. Indonesia. Ghana, most African nations not controlled by terrorists, you name it, all of the really poor nations have lower per capita crime than Jamaica does. Conversely, if we look at nations like Mexico, (previously in Colombia), Guatemala, Sub-Saharan Africa where Terrorism has taken over as it has in Jamaica, it is as a result of Government corruption and hindrance of the forces of law and order to do their jobs.
GREED The greed I alluded to transcend the average thugs who are murdering people for their property, those who kill for the ill-gotten spoils of the lotto scam trade it extends to the Government’s myopic schenes to draw in large sums of cash from the public without giving thought to the consequences going forward.
.….….……
Last year the government granted a Traffic Ticket Amnesty, in which outstanding tickets issued between September 1, 2010, and July 31, 2017, could be paid without penalties.The three-month amnesty took effect on August 2, 2017. The initiative by the government was aimed at increasing revenue by collecting the outstanding amounts owed by delinquent motorists.
Minister of National Security Robert Montague told the House of Representatives in July 2017 that data showed outstanding traffic tickets totaled $2.2 billion. Additionally, there is approximately $566 million in outstanding payments owed to the courts by motorists who contested the offense and were fined after being found guilty up to December 31, 2016.
Tax Administration Jamaica confirmed that approximately $300 million was collected since the start of the amnesty, the second in the last five years. About $340 million was collected in the first amnesty in 2012⁄13.(observer.com)
.….….…
SOCIETALANDGOVERNMENTALACQUIESCENCE
As the crime rate burgeons out of control, it is evident that the Administration is determined to take actions which will have long-term negative consequences for the rule of law. This will continue to place the lives of the members of the security forces and the average citizens at further risks.
As the Government has done using the Ministry of Justice and Delroy Chuck to offer mindless mass murderers massive concessions for pleading guilty, so too is Robert Montague being used to take shortcuts in the interest of cash, while the long-term consequences gather like an ominous storm cloud on the distant horizon.
The images of motorists fighting with police officers who seek to bring sanity to the mass chaos of the indisciplined roadways are real. It is a jungle of madness in which officers place their lives on the line simply by asking a bus driver or illegal taxi-operator to move from one location to another. Offering amnesty to these offenders flies in the face of the hard work of these officers.
POLITICALPROTECTIONOFCRIMINALS
It is a rapacious and short-sighted approach which is stupid, regressive and downright retarded. Traffic ticket amnesty does nothing but empowers traffic offenders to ignore paying for their tickets and simply await the next amnesty, upon which they are given a massive discount for thumbing their noses at the laws.
It rewards offenders not just for the traffic offense they initially committed but for ignoring paying for the ticket afterward. The simple solution is to suspend their driver’s licenses, make it impossible for them to register their vehicles and subject them to arrest whenever they are caught.
Why wonder why there is corruption in the police department when the administration thwart the efforts of the police at every turn?
Senior Resident Magistrate Judith Pusey who has for all intents and purposes subverted the process to set Kern Spencer free of all charges in the Cuban light bulb scandal has been elevated to the Supreme Court.
Judith Pusey
Pusey is One of six women elevated to the supreme court at a time when the country is inundated with crime and terrorism the country needs Judges who are going to uphold their oaths to the constitution, not judges who do all in their powers to subvert the process of justice.
In a new year’s speech which gives us a window into his soul and a view of his thinking, Prime Minister Andrew Holness had much to say about the dangerous spate of killings in Jamaica. Holness made the following comments while addressing the congregation at the 13th annual ‘Heal the Family Heals the Nation’ gathering at the National Arena staged by the Power of Faith Ministries.
Said the Prime Minister.
Andrew Holness
[“Leaders you have to bring it to your pulpit. We can’t allow much of what is happening to be covered up, particularly the abuse that is happening within families. We must preach out against the fathers who are molesting their daughters. And it is happening in our midst. Some mothers remain quiet – don’t say anything about it: that daughter grows up with a lot of anger in her. She has children and she takes it out on her children and all that those children will know, is violence. If you see something like that, it is not right. It cannot be accepted practice in our culture. We must expose it and preach against it.”]
[ “The church has an amazing capacity for counseling and outreach, use it. That is one practical way in which we can start to address the issue of violence”. “We talk about crime but we don’t talk enough about violence. It is the violence that drives the crime: it is the violence that makes the crime brutal and savage, we have to address this issue of violence which is becoming part of our culture, a part of our social transaction”…]
There is nothing wrong with the text or tenor of the Prime Minister’s statements really. Except that what is missing, is a fundamental understanding by the Prime Minister of what the nation is dealing with and more so what will be required to fix it.
Firstly and before we get into the practical mechanics of whats happening in Jamaica and what fixes will be effective, let us get something really straight. God Almighty will not fix our problems for us, he has already strengthened us to do for ourselves. Through his pre-set principles,we decide outcomes based on our own actions.
Philippians 4:13. I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. That include putting men on the moon, placing satellites into orbit, massive advances in science and technology as well as in Engineering.
We are not going to win wars by kneeling and praying, we win wars by training and supporting our armies, knowing our enemies, and ensuring that we do not underestimate them. God is not a magician sitting atop the clouds waving a wand one way or the other based on how we respond to him.
SOWHATISTHEPRIMEMINISTERGETTINGWRONG?
A man who goes to the hospital with a tumor in his left lung had his right lung removed is in serious trouble. Not because the problem was misdiagnosed but because the medical staff who had the responsibility to apply due care by making sure that the correct procedures and protocols are followed fell down on the job.
Mister Prime Minister, well over 1600 Jamaicans was murdered in 2017. Compare that to Chicago Illinois, one of America’s most violent cities, which had 675 homicides and roughly the same population as Jamaica. There are Jamaicans who are giving you the impression that this is merely crime. I assure you it isn’t, I can also tell you, yes there is crime everywhere but your murder numbers are not mere crime numbers. The country is at war.
Brixton high street…
The homicide numbers in Jamaica far exceeds that of Great Britain, Jamaica’s patron, which recorded 723 murders in 2017 and 524 in 2016. [www.statista.com] Britain has a population of 65.64 million as compared to Jamaica’s 2.7 million.
We can poll nations around the world with larger and smaller populations than Jamaica’s and we would be hard-pressed to find a nation with the per capita murder statistics of Jamaica. A good place to start is with Cuba 90 miles off our shores, which has a population of approximately 12 million people roughly four times that of Jamaica which has 2.7 million people. They have a standard of living which is significantly lower than that of Jamaican [thanks to over 50 years of American blockade] yet their homicide numbers are far less onerous, where available..
A street in old Havana
According to https://www.osac.gov.
While there are no reliable crime statistics from the government, the U.S. Embassy continues to receive several reports per month of non-violent crimes against tourists. These numbers are increasing slightly and are consistent with reporting from other diplomatic missions. Most crime can be associated with pickpocketing, purse snatching, fraud schemes, and thefts from unoccupied cars, hotel rooms, and dwellings. American travelers are generally perceived to be wealthy. Most offenses take place in areas frequented by foreigners.
Although most tourist hotels are relatively safe in Havana, pickpockets, prostitutes, and other criminals may congregate there. Cuba has an active commercial sex trade.
Marching for peace as this one in August town is an acknowledgment that we are at war and a sign of surrender to the criminals who hold the state to ransom.
We could go on and on but you get the picture. Our closest neighbor geographically, hardly has a homicide problem. The crimes reported by this America Agency [hardly a friend of Cuba] makes mention of non-violent crimes, the kind which may appropriately be assigned to poverty.
Mister Prime Minister here is the problem in our country and I daresay you are a significant part of that problem, if not culpably, culturally. You have taken the position that crime can be approached using platitudes, begging, beseeching, praying, and a soft hand. You and those who advise you are wrong. The fact that you and I daresay the criminally complicit political opposition have mortgaged out the nation’s security to Criminal supporting groups, is entirely why you are unable to properly deal with the problem. You cannot fix what you have decidedly and willfully refused to properly diagnose.
Meeting with warring factions and shaking hands with some who have a history of Criminal activities flies in the face of law enforcement and a disgraceful display of collusion against the rule of law …
What is going on in Jamaica will not be remedied with community policing. We have long passed that stage, that is not to say that community based policing cannot operate side by side with a more militaristic approach to the problem. You simply have to stop listening to the pretentious know-it-alls who dominate the public airwaves and the national dialogue. As I have said repeatedly in previous articles, human rights and hard no-nonsense policing are not opposed to each other. The opposition party and your acolytes of the clergy and those in the media and criminal rights fraternity are quick to make the link that if police go after dangerous criminals they, by virtue of that fact alone are predisposed to abusing the rights of citizens. Simply put it is bull-shit.
Meeting with gangsters to ask them to stop killing each other and disrupting the nation is capitulation.
Young men who have engaged in the power rush they seem to get from taking innocent lives are not about to give up those weapons and return to irrelevance. They are not going to go back to being nobody when the Prime Minister and other leaders are in church begging God for help from them. They will not give up their weapons when politicians are meeting with them, essentially raising their profile and importance.
These people are not about to give up their weapons.
The shining path in Peru, the ELN , and FARC in Colombia did not give up their weapons, neither have the cartels in Mexico done so. Those weapons will have to be taken from their lifeless fingers. Jamaicans can pretend all they want that what is happening in our country is different. We have seen what it really meant in 2010. Shamefully, rather than laud the security forces the nation through its political leaders on both sides of the aisle created a kangaroo court to condemn the security forces for saving Jamaica. Paying Tivoli residents and apologizing to that community cemented the fact that there is precious little difference between the two political parties.
Support the work these men are doing in a fulsome and straightforward way and watch crime trend down.
The two parties are basically the white collar segment of the criminal gangs which rule the streets. More consequential, paying Tivoli and apologizing and demonizing the security forces cemented the notion that Jamaica is a criminal state.
Regardless of what you think about slain police officer Constable Courtney Linton, who was shot dead by gunmen in Orangefield on October 31, last year, what do you say about the killing of his girlfriend 40-year-old Zoe King who was nine months pregnant?
Terrence Williams INDECOM.
Ms. King was killed at her home in Orange field St Catherine, a once peaceful rural community of law-abiding families. She was scheduled to have her baby next week according to published reports.
The police say she was at home when 4 armed men invaded her home, the pregnant Ms.King was chased by the men and summarily slaughtered.
Let me be clear about this, I believe that the people who sit in their offices in Kingston and pontificate about human rights better be careful. Whether they are from INDECOM, FAST, JFJ, IACHR. Peace Management Unit, Public Defender’s office or wherever, the blood of the people is crying out. If you are not for the people you are against the people.
Hughes: Media.
There is no more fundamental a right indued to any person than the God-given right to life. The over 1600 dead Jamaicans last year elicited deathly silence from every single group named and the ones not named.
Horace Levy :PMI.
For the most part literally, all of the murdered victims had their lives snuffed out illegally, yet there has been no outcry from the criminal rights fraternity named above. We are not unmindful of the fact that the only time we have heard from these charlatan criminal supporting groups have been on the occasions that members of the security forces exterminate elements of the criminal underworld.
As a consequence let us be clear, INDECOM, FAST, JFJ, IACHR. The Peace Management Unit, The Public Defender’s office, and others are criminal supporting groups operating in Jamaica. Let us dispense with the lies and pretense and peel off the veneer of bullshit. Each and every one of these entities by themselves and collectively is working toward the furtherance of the defense of those who kill innocent and defenseless Jamaicans.
Arlene Harrison Henry :OPD.
Who murders a pregnant woman? What will it take for the powers that be in this country to recognize that it has a serious war on its hands? How long will it take these people who clearly are in a drunken stupor to come to the realization that this is not just crime?
When will the blood of the innocent rise up and engender rage in the people to the extent they say “no more”? How long will it take for the people to realize that God will not be fighting this battle for them, they will have to fight it for themselves?
When will they realize that the wolves in sheep clothing who pretend to care about them are indeed the enemy within, protecting and enhancing their demise?
I call on the Holness Administration to stop playing politics, suspend habeas corpus and send the military in to root out these killers. To hell with the Opposition and the talking head in the media and other criminals supporting entities.
Susan Goffe :JFJ.
Failing which there will inevitably and inexorably be a righteous uprising and the results will not be pretty. Act now and put an end to the carnage Prime Minister.
The blood of well over 1600 Jamaicans is very well on the hands of these fraudulent imposters as it is on the hands of those who pulled the trigger or uses a knife.
The country must decide, as the new year begins with record numbers which already suggest it will be a banner murder year, whether it wants to continue listening to these frauds.
If Jamaicans are okay with four armed men gunning down a pregnant woman killing her and her unborn baby, then I will write not another line about this war being waged in Jamaica. It will be enough to say this country we all love is no more, it is now a killing field unworthy of our care.
It will mean, gone is the little rock I took a bullet for and in its place is a Godless, lascivious and hedonistic wasteland in which life has no value.
A place in which pleasure circumvent everything else and everyday life continues as the spilled blood of the innocent washes over the barren wasteland our four father slaved and died for.
Sixteen hundred and sixteen (1,616) murders were recorded in Jamaica during the year 2017.
Of those murders, 335 took place in the parish of St James. However, the tally for total murders could rise as fifty other cases have reportedly been listed as death investigations.
This means 2017 is among the bloodiest years on record.
In the year 2009, 1,683 persons were killed in Jamaica – the highest on record.
National Security Minister Robert Montague has rejected the report submitted to him by Police Commissioner George Quallo. Montaque had demanded a full report from the police on the circumstances surrounding the traffic pileup on new years day, on the sole road which leads into the Norman Manley International airport.
Montague
According to published reports, the traffic pileup came as a result of revelers blocking the roadways preventing the free flow of traffic. Many travelers wishing to leave the country were reported to have missed their flights. Montague correctly demanded a full report from Quallo as to the circumstances which led to what clearly was a dangerous and costly foul-up. For his part Commissioner, Quallo has said that the incident was an embarrassment to his Agency.
Commissioner Quallo in foreground
In a release, yesterday Minister Montague said the report did not meet the standards which the Jamaican public has come to expect from the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF).
He said the report is inadequate, as it has not addressed the questions he raised. According to the release, the report did not outline the conditions of approval and did not clearly speak to a policing plan that was put in place for the event. Montague said as the minister, he cannot accept the report as it is not reflective of the hard work of the men and women who protect Jamaica daily.
He said it is on their behalf that he had no choice but to reject it. Additionally, the minister said based on reports from the public, the police personnel on the ground displayed the utmost professionalism and courtesy, in the face of the hostile behavior from some people who attended the party. Montague reminded the Commissioner that he has total command and superintendence of the force and as such someone must be held accountable.
National Security Minister Robert Montague is well within his rights to reject the report from the Police Commissioner based on the bullet points he outlined for the rejection. The JCF has been under attack for decades, something which the present commissioner bears no responsibility for, the Island is simply a criminal supporting enclave.
Scenes from the pile-up on new years day.
Nevertheless, the JCF cannot be absolved of responsibility for some of the problems it faces. The challenges are many and the options are few, notwithstanding the police department had it within itself to do a much better job for the country. Lack of resources, political interference, subversive attacks from criminal rights groups and a lack of proper remunerations are just a few of the challenges which have plagued the agency.
Over the decades, however, as the complaints rose to crescendo levels, the police high command has been content to sit on the sidelines and allow the rank-and-file members,[the officers with the least power] to bear the full brunt of the criticisms and persecution from the criminal supporting public. Clearly, the latest report of the commissioner up the ladder has been nothing more than an abbreviated document which was hastily thrown together to deflect blame from the incompetence of the high command.
No Inspector, Sergeant or corporal much less a constable has the authority to green-light sporting events like the one which created the log-jam on the Palisadoes road. Minister Montague is exactly correct in the stance he has taken in not allowing Commissioner Quallo to deflect blame from the senior aides under his command.
For years this writer has complained about the level of incompetence within the high command. Simple fixes to problems elude the senior cadre of the department and the consequences are channeled to the men and women who have zero control over decision making. Members of the Police High command have no sense of shame in hogging the cameras when the hard-working men and women of the department reap success. They should not be allowed to hide away and channel blame onto the powerless officers who do their best under trying circumstances.
The retiring senator has always been a shameless tool of billionaire campaign donors, and a partisan errand boy for the likes of Donald Trump.
By John Nichols
Orrin Hatch referred last year to his long Senate tenure as “my whole stinking career.”
That was a fair assessment of the Utah Republican’s 41 years in Washington.
Seventy-five percent of Utah voters told pollsters last fall that they did not want the senator to seek reelection in 2018.
Hatch took the hint this week, announcing that he plans to retireafter four decades of placing special interests and the personal power that is obtained by serving them above the public interest and the people whose lives are made dramatically worse when government abandons them.
Few, aside from President Trump, Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and the lobbyists for the special interests Hatch served, will miss one of the most egregious hypocrites ever to serve in a chamber where mendacity has always been well represented.
Hatch was elected to the Senate in 1976, after running a campaign that anticipated the crudely divisive strategies and relentless negativity that has come to characterize contemporary campaigning. Hatch was a pioneering practitioner of the new politics of shameless pretense that would come to define Washington. A Republican who had moved to Utah from Pennsylvania, he claimed that the incumbent Democratic senator, who had been born and raised in Utah, was out of touch with the values and the concerns of the state.
That was a fantasy developed by the political con artists who had the malleable newcomer run on the issue of term limits. Hatch made a joke of incumbent Frank Moss’s three terms of honorable service in the Senate: “What do you call a Senator who’s served in office for 18 years? You call him home.” And Hatch promised not to serve for too long in Washington.
Moss was not a typical politician. He was one of the most effective public servants of the twentieth century. While studying at George Washington University’s Law School in Washington, he worked during Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s first term with the National Recovery Administration, the Resettlement Administration, and the Farm Credit Administration. After graduating, he joined the legal staff of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, serving during the period from 1937 to 1939 when it was chaired by future US Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas. Upon his return to Utah, Moss was elected to a Salt Lake City’s Municipal Court judgeship; but when the call of duty came with the bombing of Pearl Harbor, he signed up for US Army Air Corps, serving in Europe through much of World War II. Back home, he was again elected as a judge and then became a county prosecutor before his election to the US Senate in the Democratic wave election of 1958.
As a senator from Utah, Moss backed civil rights and women’s rights, promoted nuclear disarmament and opposed the war in Vietnam. But what earned him praise as “the conscience of the Senate” was his advocacy for those who could not afford to hire lobbyists.
The veteran of the Roosevelt administration brought a bold New Deal vision to the Senate where he outlined an agenda that sought to expand access to health care (as an original sponsor of Medicaid legislation), to protect the environment (as a leading advocate for the creation of new national parks) and, above all, to put federal policy on the side of consumers. Moss used his position as chair of the Senate Commerce Committee’s subcommittee on consumer protection to sponsor legislation that took on the tobacco industry (sponsoring the 1966 Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act that required cigarette companies to include warnings about health threats on cigarette packages and erected barriers to tobacco advertising on radio and television), cracked down on the manufacturers of dangerous toys and poisonous products (sponsoring the Toy Safety Act and the Poison Prevention Packaging Act) and forced manufacturers to stop ripping off consumers (working with Washington Democrat Warren Magnuson to enact the groundbreaking Consumer Product Warranty and Guarantee Act). He led investigations of elder abuse, went after irresponsible doctors and worked with Idaho Senator Frank Church to provide federal support for hospice programs.
In other words, far from being out of touch, Moss was determined to serve people in Utah and across the country who had been victimized by corporations. Unfortunately, as the corporations and their allies learned how to influence not just the legislative process but the electoral process, a space was made for the likes of Orrin Hatch — a candidate The Salt Like Tribune referred to as “an aggressive, TV-ready opponent.”
Hatch’s attack campaign prevailed in 1976 and Moss was no longer able to lead the charge on behalf of citizens and consumers, of working people and the most vulnerable Americans.
Over the next four decades, Hatch would serve as dramatically different senator from his predecessor. Self-absorbed and boastful, Hatch calculated that his political future would be best served by aligning with those who could write big campaign checks. Hatch took care of his political benefactors and seemed always to be plotting his next move (angling for a place on the Supreme Court or on a Republican presidential ticket, elbowing his way into key committee assignments). When Democrats controlled the Senate, Hatch was ready to cut deals, even with liberals like Massachusetts Senator Edward Kennedy. When Republicans took charge, however, he became a predictably shameless partisan — as when the same senator who repeatedly savaged professor Anita Hill on behalf of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas played a critical role in blocking the Supreme Court nomination of Merrick Garland (whom he acknowledged was an outstanding jurist) in order to prevent President Barack Obama’s nominee from getting a place on the high court.
Élite media outlets gave Hatch plenty of coverage, and cover, because the relentless self-promoter was always ready to deliver a talking point or appear on a political talk show. But they could not obscure the fact that of his steady hypocrisy — which included the abandonment of his term-limits pledge.
Across four decades, Hatch’s steadiest default positions were as a robotic ally of the corporate interests and billionaire donors from whom he collected tens of millions and as an errand boy for Republican presidents up to and including Donald Trump.Responsible Republicans kept their distance from Trump, but Hatch declared: “We’re going to keep fighting, and we’re going to make this the greatest presidency that we’ve seen, not only in generations but maybe ever.”
Last fall, the senator from Utah played a critical role in moving the GOP tax bill through the Senate Finance Committee he chaired.
As crude as ever, Hatch blew up over the suggestion that he was acting as what he has always been: the manservant of corporate capital.
Before a key vote on the tax bill, Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown said: “I just think it would be nice, just tonight, before we go home, to just acknowledge, ‘Well, this tax cut really is not for the middle class — it’s for the rich.’”
The chairman exploded, calling the criticism “bull crap” and griping that: “I really resent anybody who says I’m just doing this for the rich. Give me a break.
In fact, Hatch was just doing it for the rich — as he did throughout a Senate career that will never be mistaken for “public service.”
Frank Moss was a public servant who was willing to risk his career in order to represent the people versus the powerful. He started off on the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission and remained a watchdog to the end.
It is a brand new year we should be focused on new ideas and new initiatives to keep our country safe. Unfortunately, our leaders have not moved to take control of the crises facing our country so we are forced to be obsessing about issues which should have been addressed years ago.
Brazen images many Jamaicans do not see.
Fortunately, the threats Jamaica faces are not from hostile state actors but from criminals within and without who would turn the Island into a Serengeti of bloodshed and lawlessness. Our problems are not insurmountable, nevertheless, if the nation’s leaders continue to posture for cheap political leverage it won’t be long before they become so.
Yesterday I spoke to how Jamaica got to the state of lawlessness it’s presently mired in. I also pointed to a few Nations which have had serious problems with lawlessness and outlined specifically how the nation of Colombia has weathered the storm under the strong decided leadership of president Álvaro Uribe Vélez.
A recent picture of a young woman with a lethal weapon
My friend tells me that if Jamaica wants to fix its crime problem it has to adopt New York City’s model. Unfortunately for Jamaica the model used by New York City which began under the leadership of David Dinkins the city’s first African-American Mayor begun with community policing.
This is what officers face when they go out to make arrests, they do not need support.
The problem continued under a more aggressive Rudolph Guliani but was infused with a far more decided and no-nonsense approach as it related to enforcement practices and procedures. The so-called broken windows approach which included prosecuting offenders for all infractions as well as a stop and frisk component which many criticized. I supported the stop and frisk component, I fundamentally believed that a person who would take an illegal weapon into the streets who believes he will be stopped and arrested for that weapon he would think twice about doing it.
Part of a community adjoining the city of Montego Bay.
As was the case in most situations in America, it was the disparate application of the stop and frisk component which justified the courts stepping in and ending it. Jamaica is long past the place where simply adopting community policing will change the paradigm. Community policing is invaluable after the brush has been cleared. There is no scenario in which community officers can be injected into communities warring with AK47 and other automatic weapons. Which brings me to the issue of wars.
WARRINGACTORSARENOTMERECRIMINALSTHEYARE A THREATTONATIONALSECURITY.
As long as the nation naively continue to pretend that the heavily armed warring factions which operate in parts of the Wareika foothills, Tivoli and Arnett Gardens, Riverton and all places in between, all the way to the western parishes, there will be no end to the bloodletting. This is not merely criminal conduct, it wasn’t just criminal conduct when the murderous overlord Christopher Coke decided that he would not submit to an arrest warrant. In the same way that Pablo Escobar the leader of the Medellin cartel in Colombia and other leaders of the Cali and other cartels acted when the Government sought to arrest them. They fought the state.
There is a war going on between the heavily armed gangs in Jamaica, the problem is that neither the Government nor the Opposition realizes it.
Today Mexico and Guatemala continue to struggle to deal with narco-terrorists within their countries primarily because of the corrupt nature of many within the body politic. Nevertheless, Mexico took the necessary steps to arrest El Chapo Guzman and ship him off to the United States where he is presently facing real justice for his crimes. As it was in Colombia and it is in Mexico today so is it in Jamaica. This is exactly what is happening in Mexico today, it was the norm in Colombia before Uribe’s Presidency in 2002.
Consequences of Mexico’s drug wars
Jamaicans on the streets have acknowledged that the existential threat the nation faces from these violent actors is indeed a state of war. People are terrified and traumatized in their homes at the incessant sound of gunfire, unsure whether this time it will be their doors kicked in and lights out for their entire family. Children are unable to go to school and entire communities are placed under siege as marauding gangs of urban terrorist parade their heavy automatic weapons totally unconcerned about consequences.
A scene from Jamaica’s undeclared civil war.
The average Jamaican have long understood that the country was in a state of undeclared civil-war, it is the two political parties which have consistently refused to acknowledge it for what it is. This year alone there are estimates which put the Island’s homicide numbers above 1600 for the first time since 2005.
Horace Levy
It is not only the political parties which are culpable in this fiasco, there are other actors which are equally as culpable in the continuance of this charade. The fact that there is a so-called “Peace Management Unit”, is in and of itself an acknowledgment that the country is in a state of war. Ironically the Peace Management Unit and its leaders, beginning with Horace, Levy does not want peace. Peace would mean irrelevance for Levy and his cabal of deplorables.
Instead of helping the Police to identify the terrorists in the communities Levy and others foment and nurture dissent and opposition against the police all the while pretending to want peace in the communities. What we end up with are a bunch of people who attach themselves to the body politic like the thousands of parasitic plantlife which attach themselves to the tall trees in the Amazon Jungle.
They fan the flames of anarchy, all the time pretending to care about Human Rights. They play a dangerous game of Russian roulette with the nation’s security with devastating consequences for the average Jamaican. Some of these agencies are funded by foreign dark money.
Gangs of Jamaica
The Jamaican Government has a responsibility as it’s primary function to drown out the noise and deploy the military to go into the enclaves in which these terrorists are murdering and mutilating and eradicate them once and for all as President Uribe did in Colombia. There should be no fear of criticisms, critics benefit from the murder mayhem which exists, without it they have no relevance.
That is the reason Uribe did not bow to them, it is why Duterte in the Philippines are not bowing to critics. Various administrations of both political parties have given far too much deference to so-called human rights lobby operating in our country. The consequences are there for all to see. The idea that a Government in a country like Jamaica would be deferential and beholden to armed thugs is shocking and embarrassing to say the least.
Arlene Harrison-Henry
There should be one statement coming from the Government to the heavily armed gangs operating on the Island. Turn in the weapons, all of them in 7 days, failing which we will pluck them from your cold dead fingers. The time has come for the Jamaican Government and those on the opposition benches to recognize that if they do not act to remove the weapons from the hands of the murderous killers there will be hell to pay. Events of 2010 will have been a cakewalk relatively speaking.
Yes, if that means suspending habeas corpus then so be it. These are desperate times which requires decisive measures. Those who sit on the sidelines and make grand statements are going to do what they do best “chat”, the nation’s national security cannot be executed with deference to them. In many countries, they can criticize and make their statements only from afar. It’s time that Jamaica follow suit.
Much of the challenges faced by Latin and South America, parts of Africa and the Caribbean, stems from deeper issues other than the obvious default reason of poverty. If we are able to dispense with the preconceived notion that poverty is the defining crime-driving characteristic we may be able to have a meeting of the minds on the role political corruption plays in the metastasizing effect of crime.
Before we talk about corruption it may be a good idea to look also at the idea that for the most part high crime producing countries have largely been nations which have had a hard time governing themselves after been freed from the chains of colonialism.
Among some of the nations which have struggled with deep social issues are Colombia, Guatemala, and Mexico. In many cases the problem of crime has worsened as a direct result of Government’s inaction or in others their direct action. In Colombia and Mexico, two of the Nations which have waged decades-long wars against narco-traffickers, a large part of the reason the problem has been so intractable has been the corruption of public officials at all levels.
Colombia is a nation which I generally point to as a model of decided leadership against crime and corruption.
Then President Álvaro Uribe
Much of Colombia’s change may be attributed to the hard-line politician named Alvaro Uribe after he took over the Colombian presidency. He would go on to rule the country for eight years, until 2010, scoring major victories against violent groups on the left and right. President Uribe was barred constitutionally from running for a third term.
Today in the words of Colombia’s official tourist slogan: “The only risk is wanting to stay.” As for Colombians themselves, a worldwide poll conducted late last year by WIN/Gallup International Association found they are not just in passably good spirits. They are the most contented people on the planet, with a “happiness score” of 75 — almost double the global average. (Canadians were No. 18 with a score of 48.)
The murder rate remains troubling according to ( the star.com) by most accounts — 33.2 deliberate homicides per 100,000 population in 2011 — but that figure represented a sharp decline since Uribe took power in 2002 when the rate was more than twice as high, at 70.2. President Uribe was barred constitutionally from running for a third term in office in 2010, and his anointed successor, Juan Manuel Santos, was elected in his place.
A typical scene before Uribe.
As late as 2002 The large cities — Bogota, Medellin, Cali — were still mostly shuttered at night, and inter-city roads were frequently impassable owing to the threat of robbery or kidnap. Meanwhile, the drug gangs were flourishing, and vast swathes of the countryside were controlled by armed rebels.
The bad statistical indices — those for extortion, kidnapping, and murder — are way down, while the good indicators are sharply up, including employment, tourist arrivals, foreign direct investment and economic growth. Savvy outsiders now consider Colombia a safe place to invest their money and a great country to visit, a land where personal security no longer needs to be a major concern, at least not for those who stay clear of drugs and politics.
Despite all of these positives, not everyone is happy with the sharp turnaround in Colombia made possible by President Uribe’s strong band decisive leadership.
Gimena Sanchez, a Colombia expert at the Washington Office on Latin America, a U.S.-based think tank, says many unresolved problems lurk behind Colombia’s new and improved façade, including some 3,000 extra-judicial killings committed by the armed forces during Uribe’s two terms.
“Now we’re seeing an increase in killings of human-rights defenders,” she says. “The conflict has shifted, but the perception that everything is great and there are no problems isn’t true. It’s not the full picture.”
Sounds familiar? Despite the meteoric rise in the confidence of the Colombian people in the dramatic turn around of their country, the buzzwords are the very same. Never mind that there is generally no evidence to back up claims of extrajudicial killings claims from the those who purport to be advocates for human rights they make those scurrilous claims anyway.
The streets of Bogota Colombia today.
In the 18-year period leading up to 2002 when President Uribe took office, the process knows as La Violencia, claimed upwards of 200,000 lives in Colombia. Colombia’s murder rate around the turn of the century was the highest in Latin America. In 2002, at least 28,387 people were killed in the country, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Its homicide rate of 68.9 per 100,000 people in 2002 was more than 10 times higher than Costa Rica (6.3) and nearly twice that of Guatemala (37.0) and Venezuela (38.0).
Despite the changes and the consistent annual downward trend of homicides in Colombia, there are those who are fixated on what authorities did to bring sanity to their country. Those criticisms are usually made from the comfort and safety of countries with none of the existential threats the nations they target face. Jamaica has a decision to make, unfortunately, it does not seem like there is a Jamaican Uribe anywhere in the two political parties There is nevertheless no shortage of Jamaican style Gimena Sanchez.
More people died from police violence in 2017 than the total number of U.S. soldiers killed in action around the globe (21). More people died at the hands of police in 2017 than the number of black people who were lynched in the worst year of Jim Crow (161 in 1892). Cops killed more Americans in 2017 than terrorists did (four). They killed more citizens than airplanes (13 deaths worldwide), mass shooters (428 deaths) and Chicago’s “top gang thugs” (675 Chicago homicides).
Yet only 12 officers were charged with a crime related to a shooting death.
An extensive new study from Mapping Police Violence details the data for police violence. The collective tracks police shooting numbers and statistics, maps the incidents and compiles the data in real time. The site uses information from a number of sources, including Killed by Police, Fatal Encounters and the U.S. Police Shootings Database, to break down shootings by race, location, weapons used, and whether or not the victim was armed. It is a valuable tool used by academics, researchers and certain writers at The Root.
Aside from the fact that only 1 percent of the officers who killed someone were charged with a crime in 2017, some of the report’s most interesting facts include the following:
Of the 534 killer cops Mapping Police Violence was able to identify, 43 had shot or killed someone before. Twelve had previously shot or killed multiple people.
Most of the people killed (718) were suspects in nonviolent offenses, were stopped for traffic violations or had committed no crime at all.
13 percent of people killed by cops were unarmed.
Most of the unarmed victims were people of color. Of the 147 unarmed people killed by police, 48 were black and 34 were Hispanic.
Black people accounted for 27 percent of the people killed by law enforcement officers. Of the unarmed victims of police violence, blacks made up 37 percent, almost three times their percentage of the U.S. population (13 percent).
Of the people who were unarmed and not attacking, but were still killed by cops, 35 percent were black.
95 people were killed when police shot at a moving vehicle, a practice that many say should be banned.
170 of the people killed were armed with a knife. in 117 of those incidents, police shot the person before trying any other method to disarm the person.
20 percent of the people who had a gun when they were killed were not threatening anyone.
Law enforcement training spends seven times more hours training officers on the use of firearms than on how to de-escalate situations.
Again, only 12 officers were charged with a crime after killing 1,129 citizens they were sworn to protect and serve. Here’s to another banner year of police getting away with murder. Can’t you feel America getting great again? Read more @ https://www.theroot.com/heres-how-many-people-police-killed-in-2017 – 1821706614
Recent media reporting that the police high command is demanding the names of members who reported sick to press home their demands for better pay is shocking and should be seen as another attack on the constitutional rights and freedoms of members of the rank-and-file.
Rest assured that this action if true as reported, is not merely a function of the incompetent high command, it is coming directly from Jamaica house. What reason would the high command of the force have for mining the identity of members who were sick unless their intentions are expressly retaliatory?
The Police high command have been a tool of politicians for decades. This is true across administrations of both political parties. This ineptitude and blatant yard-boy proclivity on the part of the men in the highest echelons of the force have created a sieve-like effect which sees almost 600 young men and women leaving the force each year.
The latest bit of underhanded chicanery by the high command is just the latest in a series of actions taken against average hard working officers in which the high command has dirty hands. The recently legislated ZOSO act had as a critical part of its infrastructure a component which makes it a crime for officers to leave the police department without first submitting a resignation letter six months in advance.
It was under the Bruce Golding Administration that the nation was given INDECOM, a blatantly divisive and onerous law to law enforcement, which easily could have been drafted better to deal appropriately with errant cops without the rancor and chilling effects it has had on law enforcement.
It is important to remember that the sitting Prime Minister Andrew Holness, has himself now been forced to come around to the onerous nature of the INDECOM law. A full 7 years after we have been hammering home almost daily, the dangerous nature of the law.
From social media accounts, there is a general feeling that members of the JCF are tacking toward the PNP and have been for some time now. I respectfully ask the JLP Government and those who support the administration slavishly, “are you not aware that people are able to think for themselves”?
The police have been an important voting bloc in the nation for decades. In fact, the saying was ” As goes the police so does the nation.” There was never anything wrong with the police voting their conscience as long as they act impartially in the daily functions of their duties.
The vote swings of the police en-masse have always been reflective of the general mood of the nation at every given time in the nation’s young history. It’s downright arrogant of anyone to believe that the actions of the Golding administration as it relates to the INDECOM act would not have lingering bad blood.
You cannot keep poking the lion and not expect a response. The Police high command in place today is a product of a high command which was before it. What that means is that the conniving, punitive, incompetence and the currying of favor with politicians are learned behavior. That is part of the real reason young men and women who join are leaving in droves.
They can try to criminalize attrition all they want, people are going to drop everything and walk away as I did many years ago. The very same tired and despicable punitive components the police high command employed two and three decades ago are still the very same pathetic tools it has in its depleted toolbox today. Demanding that officers who have just returned from duty hand over their service weapons in a country which just recorded over 1600 homicides in the year just concluded, is a telling testimony that the police high command has criminal intent.
If the reporting is true that they are in fact demanding that officers hand over their service weapons leaving themselves defenseless it goes to the heart of their desire to see young officers killed because they took a stand for better pay.
The police high command has always prostituted itself to politicians, the nation is gripped by a seeming endless murder rate which the high command has no solutions to. Clearly, in the face of its inability to do anything substantive about crime the high command is now dedicated to bootlicking only, something it has done quite well for decades. The quality of a police department is a direct result of its leadership, it is not the bad officers who are leaving monthly.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.