On July 14^th of this year this web­site was born, con­trary to con­ven­tion­al wis­dom I launched with­out an appre­cia­ble vol­ume of con­tent as would have been the pru­dent thing to do, the rea­son I could­n’t wait for con­tent was an issue that enraged a lot of peo­ple, the killing of Young Khajeel Mais. I wrote my first blog then and titled it

JAMAICAN POLICE STILL HAS NOT RELEASED NAME OF SUSPECT.

Readers may go back and read that vir­gin blog , but I would like to tell you about this young man whom I nev­er met ‚but whose death unearthed some­thing inside of me.

17 years old school-boy Khajeel Mais was killed in an appar­ent case of road rage gone ter­ri­bly wrong .
Young Mais, an inno­cent vic­tim rid­ing in the back of a Cab to a fête at a high School, became the vic­tim of a ter­ri­ble case of road rage, when the cab in which he was a pas­sen­ger alleged­ly ran into the back of a BMW-x6 sport util­i­ty vehicle.
Its is alleged that the dri­ver of the sport util­i­ty vehi­cle emerged from the vehi­cle fir­ing at the cab, the cab dri­ver it is report­ed turned his cab around and head­ed in the oppo­site direc­tion ‚with the x6 dri­ver still fir­ing. The cab dri­ver lat­er dis­cov­ered that young Khajeel was killed shot through the head.

Without rehash­ing the sto­ry, the killer was lat­er iden­ti­fied as Patrick Powell a busi­ness-man with a lot of influence,Mister Powell had tak­en off to the United States after the shoot­ing, Police, des­per­ate for his return to the Island arrest­ed his son on an out­stand­ing war­rant for what we were told was a felony wound­ing , the vic­tim is report­ed­ly now a crip­ple after the assault by the junior Powell. The rea­son he was not arrest­ed before is open to your spec­u­la­tion and as such I will not bela­bor that point here. Patrick Powell returned to Jamaica after a series of con­sul­ta­tions with Jamaican pow­er­house lawyer, Patrick Atkinson who rep­re­sents him.

Fast for­ward to November 10^th 2011:

Patrick Powell was offered bail by Supreme Court Justice Carole Beswick. Beswick is a part of the Jamaican Judges hall of shame two days ago we fea­tured anoth­er of the crim­i­nal cod­dling judges that are called his/​her lord­ship. Powell remains in cus­tody as the pros­e­cu­tor has the right to object to bail under the bail act. Beswick has grant­ed Powell bail in the sum of 10 mil­lion dol­lars ‚he is to sur­ren­der his trav­el doc­u­ments and report to the police three times week­ly. As a for­mer police officerI was enthralled by this non­sense, report to the police? All one needs is to get out of jail , if a sus­pect wants to run the police can wait for that first vis­it all they want , a sus­pect could be any­where with a new identity.

This is not a stretch of the imag­i­na­tion, he ran before. Beswick tried to insu­late her­self from the howls of con­dem­na­tion that she knew was sure to emanate from her actions, brought to bear by vig­i­lant cit­i­zens like yours tru­ly and oth­ers, here’s what she had to say. Quote ” I am for­ti­fied by the law and cas­es from the judi­cial com­mit­tee of the United Kingdom Privy Council that bail was not to be with­held as a form of pun­ish­ment”

Ok I am not a lawyer , but where is the pun­ish­ment? The kid is dead Khajeel Mais will not get a chance to enjoy the life God gave him,what part of this does these morons that pass for judges do not get. One of the pri­ma­ry rea­son for the denial of bail is that the sub­ject is a flight risk (will run) unlike­ly to turn up for trial.Patrick Powell is demon­stra­bly a flight risk , he already ran and had to be lured back to the coun­try. The oth­er is that the sub­ject may interfere,with or be a threat to poten­tial wit­ness­es slat­ed to tes­ti­fy at tri­al. From all appear­ance Beswick has no evi­dence that he won’t , so why not err on the side of cau­tion? What is it that dri­ves Jamaican Judges to love crim­i­nals so much? We are post­ing a cur­rent list­ing of all of the Judges in Jamaica who are mak­ing these egre­gious decisions,decisions which are result­ing in the destruc­tion of our country,not all of them are crim­i­nal cod­dlers ‚you decide , every­thing is a mat­ter of pub­lic record, this list was pulled from the Supreme court web­site. Every Jamaican must avail them­selves to these facts, these are the peo­ple who are releas­ing crim­i­nals back onto the streets ‚as I have said some of the Judges are seri­ous Jurists,but not enough of them ‚when the Magistrates are thrown into the mix we get a pic­ture of why crime is at those lev­els. Judges sim­ply refuse to lock crim­i­nals away. We will con­tin­ue to shine a light on the atro­cious behav­ior of these malig­nant tumors eat­ing away at the Jamaican nation.

I had a con­ver­sa­tion this morn­ing with a retired Jamaican teacher; I have the great­est regard for this lady; she is charm­ing and likable.
For me, there is just some­thing about some­one who has the patience and ded­i­ca­tion to spend their life edu­cat­ing others.
She was a lit­tle angry but deter­mined that she want­ed to return to Jamaica and find a way to do some­thing about how chil­dren, seniors, and the des­ti­tute are treat­ed; she expressed exas­per­a­tion and trep­i­da­tion regard­ing whether or not she could actu­al­ly make a dif­fer­ence. I told her truth­ful­ly that I had no way of know­ing whether she would be impact­ful or not, but she def­i­nite­ly will have no impact if she decid­ed to do noth­ing. I told her Rosa Parks def­i­nite­ly made a huge impact by just sit­ting down.

I strug­gled with that as a young police offi­cer in Jamaica, was I mak­ing a dif­fer­ence? I ulti­mate­ly con­clud­ed that yes, I was mak­ing a dif­fer­ence; how­ev­er, the dif­fer­ence I want­ed to make was not going to be accom­plished if I stayed with the Department. I con­clud­ed that had I stayed, I would have been behold­en and answer­able to the archa­ic inane sys­tem I was repulsed and opposed to. Ever since I depart­ed, I have strug­gled with how I can make a dif­fer­ence in a sys­tem where even those charged with being the guardians of the peo­ple’s rights and inter­ests are the very ones lim­it­ing and vio­lat­ing those rights? Every Jamaican, at home or abroad, knows that their polit­i­cal lead­ers are some­times the very peo­ple who sup­ply guns and ammu­ni­tion to their neigh­bors to intim­i­date and kill them, which allows them to stay in office, where they per­pet­u­ate the vicious cycle that keeps them, fam­i­ly mem­bers, and friends well off. The same crim­i­nal politi­cians are respon­si­ble for draft­ing and pass­ing leg­is­la­tion that would make it worse for those whose busi­ness it is to com­mit crimes.
Do you believe crim­i­nals are going to put them­selves in Jail?

Sources on the ground have con­firmed that the only rea­son Politicians are not giv­ing guns to com­mu­ni­ty activists like they are used to is that the activists have their own guns and do not need any­thing but polit­i­cal cov­er from politi­cians any­more. So they have not expe­ri­enced an awak­en­ing as some believe.
The gang­sters have their own guns, plain and sim­ple. Even so, some are still ensnared and entan­gled with street crim­i­nals who are killing their fel­low Jamaicans.
What makes this for­mer teacher’s frus­tra­tion so rel­e­vant for me is that I share the same frus­tra­tion about the crime sit­u­a­tion in our coun­try and the lack of will to take the nec­es­sary steps to once and for all estab­lish the rule of law cor­ner­stone of our fledg­ling democ­ra­cy. As is cus­tom­ary, we seek to point out the facts to come to our own con­clu­sions. As is cus­tom­ary, we are com­pelled to point to the glar­ing dis­par­i­ties in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem regard­ing how crim­i­nals are treat­ed. This runs the length of the process from how they are per­ceived when they com­mit heinous crimes to the way police are scru­ti­nized when they are cap­tured or killed, to the sen­tence giv­en them on the rare occa­sion they are ever con­vict­ed. As such, we have writ­ten a series of blogs called Jamaica’s mad lib­er­al judges. We do not write because we are opposed to the Judges, but because we are opposed to the kid gloves with which they treat crim­i­nals, there are numer­ous cas­es, too many to men­tion, where the inter­est of crim­i­nals and those who sup­port them take prece­dence over crime vic­tims. We feel this is an affront and is tan­ta­mount to pun­ish­ing the vic­tim. Criminals in Jamaica start with a huge advan­tage, from the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion to the last court of appeals in the coun­try, there are a stom­ach and an appetite of lenien­cy toward even those who have com­mit­ted the most egre­gious crimes and do so over and over again.

This has bred a don’t care atti­tude in some police offi­cers. It cre­ates a more sat­is­fied pub­lic with the jun­gle jus­tice dis­pensed by local thugs, which is usu­al­ly swift and deci­sive, or mob jus­tice, which includes mul­ti­ple com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers tak­ing the laws into their own hands. Generally, with the sen­tence of death being the ver­dict for all infrac­tions, offens­es that can range from a traf­fic acci­dent where a car hits a well-liked mem­ber of the com­mu­ni­ty to rob­bery or mur­der, it does­n’t mat­ter the offend­er is giv­en a death sen­tence. The sen­tence is car­ried out with ruth­less and bru­tal alacrity. If we choose to ignore the fact that the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem does not work for any­one, that it erodes the trust cit­i­zens had in the rule of law and the pow­er of the state to pro­tect them, to the point they believe report­ing crimes to the agents of the state is a waste of time. They are bet­ter served to go to the local (don) than we risk slip­ping deep­er and deep­er into the abyss of anar­chy daily.

Some argue that each case rests on its own mer­it; we agree. Some argue that a tri­al Judge knows the case and the evi­dence in each case, and as such, he or she is in the best posi­tion to make a judg­ment call one way or the oth­er. We agree. Some argue that judges should have free rein, with­out prop­er safe­guards in place, and that they should be allowed to adju­di­cate with­out over­sight from any oth­er Government branch. We disagree.

Even though mem­bers of the judi­cia­ry may not be as cor­rupt as oth­er lead­ers in oth­er parts of Government, giv­ing them carte-blanche in the dis­pen­sa­tion of judges with­out no input from the peo­ple through their rep­re­sen­ta­tives in par­lia­ment, do exact­ly what we say we do not want, we end up with cor­rup­tion, only from dif­fer­ent peo­ple. Those who argue for an unre­strained Judiciary say they argue because they are afraid of polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence, a fair­ly rea­son­able argu­ment to make. Still, if we allow judges to oper­ate with­out over­sight and restraint, we end up cre­at­ing the very sys­tem we say we do not want; we end up cre­at­ing lit­tle gods who are answer­able to no one. Their lord­ships.

Jamaican Judges are answer­able to no one, and as such, we have seen the sys­tem den­i­grate to where we are today as a nation, dan­gling pre­cip­i­tous­ly close to the abyss of being a failed state. Crime and ter­ror are ram­pant; there is no under­stand­ing or will to erad­i­cate it from our coun­try; those who lead loves it the way it is; after all, a pop­u­la­tion that does not know it deserves bet­ter, prob­a­bly does not deserve better.

As is cus­tom­ary, when­ev­er we come across a case where we feel a judge has crossed the line and has betrayed the trust placed in him/​her, we high­light the case, we com­ment. Still, ulti­mate, you are the ulti­mate judges, and it is you who should decide if we are rea­son­able in our assess­ment of Jamaica’s judges.

Daily Gleaner sto­ry high­light­ing this man.

Judge David Fraser

This Judge sen­tenced a man who bru­tal­ly raped a 12-year-old girl, stran­gled and buried her when he thought she was dead, to 12 years in prison. 

Twelve years, as bru­tal and heinous as the crime of rape is, let’s put that aside for a sec­ond, this man tried to kill this child, then buried her, which demon­strates that in his heart he felt that the deed of “mur­der” was com­mit­ted, he then went to the next step that applies when some­one kills anoth­er, dis­po­si­tion of the body, he did that.

Based on his actions, this man raped this lit­tle girl, killed her (in his mind), then buried her; she brave­ly clawed her way out of the hell he placed her in only to be raped once more and abused by Judge David Fraser, and the crim­i­nal jus­tice system.

Jamaica’s Chief Prosecutor, Paula Llewelyn, and mem­bers of the Police Force, and most impor­tant­ly, the lit­tle girl’s moth­er, felt they were once again left hang­ing by the all-mighty Judge Fraser.

Here’s what Llewelyn had to say.

Sentencing is the sole pre­rog­a­tive for His Lordship, the judge,” Llewellyn said last week Friday. She said when she got the report from the crown coun­sel in the case, she was some­what sur­prised and sad­dened because “in this mat­ter, the facts to which the accused man plead­ed guilty are extreme­ly grave.” She was, how­ev­er, quick to point out that the nor­mal pro­to­cols that obtain between Bench and Bar would pre­vent her from mak­ing any fur­ther com­ment on “this unfor­tu­nate scenario.”

Natural pro­to­cols that obtain between Bench and Bar, she said.

All Prosecutors and Judges in Jamaica are lawyers; if any­one want­ed a clear and unequiv­o­cal feel for where the ordi­nary man stands in all of this, the above statement/​slip of Paula Llewelyn’s tongue is proof pos­i­tive that they do not matter.

My whole feel­ing about this, as I have always felt, this con­nivance between Bench and Bar amounts to noth­ing more than “bull shit” for the aver­age citizen.

Here lie ladies and gen­tle­men, the rea­son why Judges must be giv­en strict guide­lines when they are deal­ing with seri­ous crimes like the ones in this case.

This poor young girl has been bru­tal­ly raped and buried once again by arro­gant Judges that get referred to as quote “his lord­ship.”

Judge for yourself

A third per­son is now being sought in the dou­ble mur­der of Neville and Norma Lyn-Hall of Discovery Bay Saint Anne. Steve Sylvester Stewart,20 year-old oth­er­wise called ‘High Top’ of Fortland Road, Discovery Bay, St Ann, is want­ed for ques­tion­ing in con­nec­tion with the mur­ders of senior lec­tur­er Norma Lyn-Hall of the Brown’s Town Community College and her hus­band, busi­ness­man Neville Hall, were dis­cov­ered, two per­sons were detained. We are still not aware what kind of infor­ma­tion St Ann Detectives have regard­ing this sus­pect. We would how­ev­er ven­ture to say that they have gleaned valu­able intel­li­gence from the oth­er sus­pects in their cus­tody. Here is some­thing I would like read­ers to note, this sus­pect Steve Sylvester Hall was out on bail, after he was arrest­ed and charged with shop-break­ing and lar­ce­ny. There are those who berate us when we talk about the lib­er­al­ism that obtains in the joke of a jus­tice sys­tem in Jamaica. We are not argu­ing that a judge could pos­si­ble know that this sus­pect would have gone out and joined with oth­ers in killing this unfor­tu­nate cou­ple. We are not argu­ing that a judge should keep all per­sons who break into shops locked away. What we are say­ing is that the per­va­sive lib­er­al agen­da of Jamaica judges lit­er­al­ly give crim­i­nals carte ‑blanche to con­tin­ue, and even grad­u­ate to more seri­ous crimes, because of the lack of puni­tive com­po­nent in the penal­ty for crimes.Criminals know they will be back on the streets in no time. It was com­mon fare for sus­pects arrest­ed to tell me they would be back on the streets in no time, true to form their high-priced lawyers would have them out in a mat­ter of hours.We will be watch­ing this case, and we will as always con­tin­ue to shine the spot­light on this case , prob­lem is the police may not be able to keep them locked up as at their first entrance into a court room they will be released back onto the streets.

A Full Court, com­pris­ing Justice Horace Marsh, Justice Patrick Brooks and Justice Leighton Pusey held on Friday that the amend­ments to the Bail Act were uncon­sti­tu­tion­al and made sev­er­al dec­la­ra­tions. Amendments were made to the Bail Act as the Government strug­gled to deal with the high crime rate and was expect­ed to be in place for one year. The 60-day peri­od in cus­tody was sub­ject to the right of the per­son being held to be brought before the court after sev­en days, and there­after at 14-day inter­vals, at which time the court reviews the ques­tion of whether the per­son should con­tin­ue to be held in cus­tody or bail be con­sid­ered. The pros­e­cu­tion also had the right to appeal against the grant­i­ng of bail.

FORMER JUSTICE Minister Senator A.J. Nicholson, QC, has wel­comed the court’s rul­ing that last year’s amend­ments to the Bail Act were uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. The Supreme Court struck down the amend­ments last Friday. He explained that, as leader of Opposition busi­ness, when the pro­posed leg­is­la­tion came to be debat­ed in the Senate he advised that the People’s National Party (PNP) would not lend sup­port to the amend­ments because the Government min­is­ters who pilot­ed the Bill failed to con­vince them that the amend-ments were not in breach of cer­tain sec­tions of the Chapter on Fundamental Rights in the Constitution.(cour­tesy the jamaica glean­er) It was report­ed then that short­ly before six anti-crime bills were passed on July 9 last year, for­mer res­i­dent mag­is­trate Senator Marlene Malahoo Forte had acknowl­edged that the Interim Bail Act to pro­vide for a 60-day deten­tion of per­sons who com­mit seri­ous gun and drug-relat­ed offences was draconian.

One thing is appar­ent , and that is that both sides of the polit­i­cal divide, play polit­i­cal games with crime when they are in oppo­si­tion, recent state­ments from Delroy Chuch (now Justice Minister) and Peter Bunting from the PNP made them unqual­i­fied to hold any office that has to do with crime and nation­al security.These hacks should nev­er be privy to any­thing that has to do with security.

Unfortunately these are the civil­lian boss­es of the Police force and Military, it’s a damn dis­grace that these morons who dis­parge police and the rule of law from their perch­es on the oppo­si­tion bench­es , when elect­ed pre­tend that they are bas­tions of sup­port for the rule of law. These guys should not even be allowed in to clean the floors of the peo­ple’s house of Parliament.

The Ruling of the Supreme Court in this mat­ter shows a cou­ple of things, .(1) That the Architects of this piece of leg­is­la­tion did not take enough legal coun­sel to ensure that it would pass the Constitutional smell test.(2) That Jamaica’s Judges sim­ply does not get it. Now let me has­ten to say I am not a Lawyer, and I must also add that if the piece of Legislation is Unconstitutional then the learned Judges has a duty to strike it down. Clearly from their actions they believe that it was Unconstitutional as con­sti­tut­ed. This brings us to the meat of the matter:Who were the part­ners with the Government in draft­ing this piece of Legislation? it clear­ly could not be the Opposition Party in Jamaica, clear­ly every­one knows that they will take no action against crim­i­nal­i­ty or Terror , .This left the Government with no grown ups , with whom to debate, a com­po­nent impor­tant in get­ting the best results possible.

The Jamaican pub­lic, clear­ly an opin­ion­at­ed but nonethe­less large­ly uninformed,uneducated pub­lic must under­stand that this forms part of the rea­son the leg­is­la­tion was ruled Unconstitutional. On the oth­er hand it is Interesting to take note as we crow about the fact that our Democracy works, that we must ask our­selves ” work for whom” Does this Ruling work for the almost two Thousand peo­ple whom are slaugh­tered each year?. Does it work for the Hundreds of chil­dren mur­dered.? Does it work for the hun­dreds of women Raped each year? Does it work for the peo­ple liv­ing in the Garrisons whose daugh­ters are being abused by Local thugs ‚who are unable to speak out because of fear of their lives and their prop­er­ty.? Does it work for the peo­ple who are chased out of their homes, their homes razed with fire , or tak­en over by thugs.? Does it work for the Police Officers and sol­diers who toil to remove the ter­ror­ists from the streets only to see them released back onto the streets as soon as they are tak­en in.? Does it work for the silent Jamaicans who are too scared or too pow­er­less to open­ly declare that yes they do sup­port the mea­sures of the Government ‚at least in rec­og­niz­ing that there needs to be tough new, appro­pri­ate Legislation enact­ed that have com­men­su­rate penal­ty for the crimes being com­mit­ted. When we remove all of the afore­men­tioned from the equa­tion , just who should be proud of the Supreme Court’s Ruling? Is it the Elitists that reside in the Mansions above Cross Roads,or the Criminals that lit­er­al­ly run the streets ?.

Either way this is real­ly no great vic­to­ry for dea­cent Jamaican people.!!!!

THE MAD LIBERAL AGENDA OF JAMAICA’S COURTS.

THE SUPREME Court yes­ter­day struck down con­tro­ver­sial amend­ments to the Bail Act. The amend­ments allowed for per­sons charged with seri­ous offences to be dis­qual­i­fied for bail for a max­i­mum of 60 days.Supreme Court judges Horace March, Patrick Brooks, and Leighton Pusey heard the motion and grant­ed dec­la­ra­tions that the amend­ments were uncon­sti­tu­tion­al and void.

The fore­gone was the lead para­graph in a the Jamaica Gleaner sto­ry regard­ing Jamaica’s Supreme Court Ruling strik­ing down the Government’s amend­ment to the Bail Act.

Attorneys-at-law Norman Godfrey and Marcus Greenwood, who rep­re­sent­ed two per­sons who were being detained under the Bail Act, took the issue to the Supreme Court in May. They argued that the amend­ments were uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, inhu­mane, and inter­fered with the judge’s dis­cre­tion to grant bail for cer­tain offences, includ­ing mur­der. They also argued that the amend­ments removed a cit­i­zen’s fun­da­men­tal right to bail.(glean­er quote)

The Government, in an attempt to curb the high crime rate, had amend­ed the Bail Act in July last year for one year. The act was extend­ed recently.(gleaner quote)

(1) 04/​21/​2010Jamaica Star: Judge grant­ed bail to 6 men who alleged­ly beat a mar­ried cou­ple who were engaged in inti­ma­cy in the pri­va­cy of their own home.The scums alleged­ly accused the cou­ple of freaky sex,then report­ed­ly beat both hus­band and wife with bats, after which they com­menced to gang rape the woman, report­ed­ly doing the same thing the man was doing to his wife in a con­sen­su­al manner,They report­ed­ly then put a gun to her head and forced her to per­form oral sex on all of them.She report­ed­ly passed out.all six were grant­ed bail in the sum of J$300,000.
Presiding Judge MARCIA DUNBAR-GREEN
(2) 04/​21/​2010 Star : Judge pur­port­ed­ly tells Police Officer to col­lect state­ment from inmate Oniel Fraser,The inmate, Oneil Fraser, charged with wound­ing with intent, told the court that he was being abused by the police offi­cers at the Kingston Central jail and that an Inspector stabbed at him with a knife,Superintendent Cornel Messam of the Kingston Central Police Station told THE STAR that he was aware of the accu­sa­tions made by the inmate. However, he men­tioned that the senior offi­cer was wrong­ful­ly accused.

“I am aware of the mat­ter, how­ev­er, the inmate is not being truth­ful about the mat­ter,” said Messam.According to the senior offi­cer, Fraser has been involved in a num­ber of inci­dents at the facil­i­ty since his trans­fer from the Half-Way Tree lock-up. Messam added that such a claim is impos­si­ble, since weapons are strict­ly pro­hib­it­ed from enter­ing the lock-ups,
“I know that inmate, he is a trou­ble­mak­er that was trans­ferred from the Half-Way Tree lock-up … Such alle­ga­tions are impos­si­ble because knives and guns are not car­ried into jail,” said the senior officer.

Fraser was sen­tenced to three months in prison last week for using a pad­lock to cause injury to an inmate.

The police said that the mat­ter is being investigated.
Resident Magistrate Georgiana Fraser was very con­cerned about this accu­sa­tion and imme­di­ate­ly asked that a police offi­cer take a state­ment from the inmate and ensure that it is report­ed to the Complaints Division.

(3) Friday July 16^th 2010 Activist Judge Judith Pusey grant­ed bail to a 51 yr old moth­er, and her 15-year-old daugh­ter, in the sum of J$150,00, and J$50,000 respectively,the equiv­a­lent of US1’685.00, and US$561.00 , both women were charged with blud­geon­ing to death the 55 yr old father and boyfriend of both accused,nothing more to be said here this is unimag­in­able this is what life is worth in Jamaica the price of a park­ing ticket.

(4) cor­po­rate area Court:A judge releas­es two men with sus­pend­ed sen­tences of one year , after they con­fessed to putting a bul­let through the back of a taxi dri­ver whom they robbed so they could have mon­ey for new sneak­ers and jack­ets to wear to the dance the night of the killing, the deceased left a wife and three chil­dren with­out any form of finan­cial support.
The Judges com­ment on releas­ing them ? I don’t want you men to become more hard­ened crim­i­nals by send­ing you to prison.
My ques­tion is, how much more hard­ened can one become beyond being an armed rob­ber and a murderer? .
If I was to haz­ard a guess I would say this is not the first crim­i­nal act they had com­mit­ted, nor the first life they had taken.

This par­tic­u­lar case has left me stunned beyond words.

The cas­es of Judaical abuse and absolute­ly insan­i­ty are too many to men­tion , but now here in this forum we will be hold­ing their feet to the fire, we will be call­ing them out. and we will not be deterred,

Have your say.

Mike beck­les: