The Implosion Of Herman Caine:

My com­ments are not sci­en­tif­ic ‚and should be viewed with­in the sim­ple prism of an ordi­nary per­son with a pletho­ra of opin­ions and noth­ing more. My com­ments are sup­port­ed by data where prac­ti­ca­ble , but should not be con­fused with any­thing sci­en­tif­ic or sophis­ti­cat­ed. I am not a trained Journalist and as such my state­ments must be assim­i­lat­ed in the organ­ic con­text in which they were intended.

On October 12th 2011 I post­ed a blog about black con­ser­vatism in America as I saw it from my lay perspective.

The post was titled Black Republicanism in America, I made the bold state­ment then that Herman Caine Former God father piaz­za CEO would not be the Republican Nominee for pres­i­dent. My state­ments were bold ‚because oth­er than the nar­ra­tive I laid out in that post I had no inside infor­ma­tion that would oth­er­wise cause me to come to that conclusion.

Herman Caine Rick Perry Mitt Romney

For those who are not reg­u­lar read­ers of my blogs this would be a good time to go back to that blog and acquaint your­selves with the com­ments in that post. I was real­ly angry at Caine for run­ning around the coun­try dis­re­spect­ing hard-work­ing Americans who are find­ing it hard to find work or make ends meet. Caine stat­ed with­out equiv­o­ca­tion that it was no one’s fault but their own,referring to out of work Americans. This rep­re­sent­ed ‚at least to me the most arro­gant ‚ego­ma­ni­a­cal dis­re­spect that could be heaped on the mid­dle class in this coun­try. This rep­re­sent­ed what has become com­mon-place behav­ior for those on the extreme right in their rapa­cious dis­dain for the mid­dle class.

Herman Caine strut­ted around mak­ing grand state­ments about things he did not take time to acquaint him­self with. He stout­ly declared he would not be the fla­vor of the month when his poll num­bers start­ed head­ing north,and those of Michelle Bachman were rapid­ly head­ing toward the south pole. It would have served mis­ter Caine well had he availed him­self to the fact that China test­ed their first nuclear device from as far back as the 1960’s . It would have been use­ful if Caine knew that China’s econ­o­my is intrin­si­cal­ly tied to ours and it is in their inter­est to have us as a trad­ing part­ner, rather than an ene­my. Caine would have been well served had he known that the Chinese have made no move despite their humon­gous army and mil­i­tary might ‚to extend their geo­graph­i­cal bor­ders mil­i­tar­i­ly. Mister Caine would have been well served had he under­stood that send­ing war­ships to the Persian gulf to agi­tate a war with Iran is a bad idea for world peace , and serves no use­ful pur­pose but to fur­ther the finan­cial inter­est of the super rich and the mil­i­tary indus­tri­al com­plex. MisterCaine would have been well served had he not demon­strat­ed con­tempt for his race and the tra­vails we have endured, sim­ply because he has accom­plished some finan­cial stability.

It is no sur­prise then that as I pre­dict­ed that Caine was des­tined for fail­ure, that the inevitable implo­sion of Herman Caine has began.I have heard a lot of adjec­tives used to describe Caine usu­al­ly flow­ery ones from the patron­iz­ing whack jobs on the right . They most­ly refer to him as a smart like­able guy,ok ‚I am not about to say whether he is like­able or not, I have nev­er met the guy, I have read that he attend­ed col­lege and did pret­ty well for him­self as a busi­ness man, but smart?

How smart could Caine be if as head of God fathers piaz­za he was accused of sex­u­al­ly harass­ing female sub­or­di­nates ‚the case was settled,he’s run­ning for pres­i­dent of the United States and (1) did not expect the sto­ry to come out , and (2) did not have a pre­pared response? Did some­one say he was a smart guy? I beg to differ!

Newt Gingrich Charles Krauthammer

Come on Herman which is it ?you went from not know­ing about any sex­u­al harass­ment,to hav­ing a vague rec­ol­lec­tion of an incident,to there was one instant where you were stand­ing next to a woman and you said to her “you are about the same height as my wife” to you know of no pay out, to know­ing that a pay­out was made , but you hoped it was­n’t much , to it was just the equiv­a­lent of a few months salary, which is it? Sexual harass­ment claims are a com­mon occur­rence in the work-place some are true , some are fab­ri­cat­ed for mon­e­tary rea​sons​.It is under­stand­able that under all cir­cum­stances if an alle­ga­tion was made that in the inter­est of the com­pa­ny the mat­ter would have been set­tled, whether Caine was guilty or not, there is no win­ning when one gets accused of these kinds of charges. I have no knowl­edge of mis­ter Caine’s guilt or innocence,but I under­stand his desire to keep the inci­dent out of the pub­lic’s domain,in the inter­est of his fam­i­ly and his campaign.

But here is a nov­el idea , how about when asked about the issue, Caine had looked into the cam­era and said to the reporter, “Yes as head of the restau­rant asso­ci­a­tion of America there were alle­ga­tions of sex­u­al harass­ment made against me by low­er lev­el staff mem­bers of the com­pa­ny ‚these kinds of things hap­pen ever day and com­pa­nies have devised ways to deal with them, one such way to deal with them is to offer the accusers some mon­ey to make the mat­ter go away,one may argue it is extor­tion , but when you have a rep­u­ta­tion to uphold you do not want to get bogged down in a messy court case to clear your name, it’s the nature of the beast”.

Mister Caine the smart busi­ness-man/politi­cian did not do this, he pro­ceed­ed to deny and obfus­cate. Charles Krauthhammer not­ed con­ser­v­a­tive icon stat­ed that Caine seemed to be wing­ing it, in ref­er­ence to non­sen­si­cal answers Caine has been giv­ing on the stump to sim­ple ques­tions. And of course faced with the bub­bling caul­dron of a scan­dal that this mat­ter has now inevitably mor­phed into, Krauthammer could not resist ask­ing the bonan­za ques­tion of Caine on (Fox mis­in­for­ma­tion) quote ” Do you believe that race has any­thing to do with this see­ing you are a black con­ser­v­a­tive)? Caine’s response floored me, Quote “Yes I think so but I have no evi­dence to sup­port my belief”. Really ?.…..Ok, so how does race plays into this as far as Caine is con­cerned ? First one would have to assume that the infor­ma­tion was leaked by some­one white, who has an inter­est in see­ing Caine destroyed, sure­ly Democrats would sure­ly like to see Herman Caine matched up against Barack Obama, so that rules out the democrats.This brings us back to the present class of repub­li­can clowns , Caine’s friends. Caine has now blamed a staffer in Rick Perry’s cam­paign who worked on a pre­vi­ous cam­paign of his , Caine stat­ed emphat­i­cal­ly that it had to be that staffer who leaked the infor­ma­tion as he had con­fid­ed that infor­ma­tion to him when he was in his employ. Needless to say that for­mer staffer appeared on nation­al tele­vi­sion and debunked the notion that Caine ever told him any such thing ‚which made it impos­si­ble for him to be the source of the leak, Perry also denied that he had any knowl­edge of the alle­ga­tions of sex­u­al harass­ment in Herman Caine’s past.

These devel­op­ments have revealed Caine to be either pet­ty , a liar or both. If as he claims, Caine told that for­mer staffer of the alle­ga­tions against him when he was in his employ, how could he tell reporters he had no knowl­edge of any alle­ga­tions of sex­u­al har­ras­ment against him? This has led me to say some­thing I take no plea­sure in say­ing, Herman Caine has proven him­self to be a liar. Herman Caine has fall­en on his own sword faster that even I had imag­ined, this is kar­ma per­son­i­fied. I believed he would fiz­zle, and trust me fiz­zle he will, I just nev­er thought it would be as a result of any­thing in his past, I tru­ly believed he would be for­got­ten soon, as a result of the fact that the present ver­sion of what obtains for the repub­li­can par­ty, behold­en hook line and sinker to the ultra right, and mired in a ide­o­log­i­cal puri­ty search, are unhap­py with the stan­dard-bear­er Mitt Romney, and are as a result search­ing for an alter­na­tive. Hence their brief romance with Bachman , Perry and now Caine. I’m not opposed to Herman Caine sole­ly because of his pol­i­tics . I am opposed by his pol­i­tics, but I am more revolt­ed by his crass elit­ist dis­re­gard and dis­re­spect for the mid­dle class. He has demon­strat­ed a brand of craven dis­dain, attrib­ut­able only to the present day repub­li­can par­ty, and their fel­low sup­port­ers on the fringe right, who believe, “I made it, damn every­body else”.

One would have thought some­one like Herman Caine, a prod­uct of mid­dle America of African American Ancestry, who wit­nessed his par­ents toil to send him and his broth­er to good schools so that they can expe­ri­ence the American dream, would have a greater appre­ci­a­tion for the work­ing class . Caine has art­ful­ly removed the lynch­ings , Jim crow, Bull O’Connor dogs and cops, seg­re­gat­ed water foun­tains restau­rants and oth­er ameni­ties, sep­a­rate but equal,and all of the trav­es­ty and shame vis­it­ed on black Americans, effec­tive­ly eras­ing those atroc­i­ties from African-American his­to­ry as if they nev­er hap­pened or con­tin­ue to hap­pen. Yet he has the temer­i­ty and gall to attribute his present trou­bles to racism. This is the same Caine who said he saw no racism at tea par­ty ral­lies, some of which were lit­tle more that glo­ri­fied Klan ral­lies.

Herman Caine can­not be allowed to have it both ways, he has dis­re­spect­ed the black com­mu­ni­ty, but wants to claim racism where none exists. Herman Caine the nov­el­ty, has no more use for the black com­mu­ni­ty than Clarence Thomas does. A pres­i­dent Caine would be a dis­as­ter for the black com­mu­ni­ty, As such our com­mu­ni­ty should not allow him to hide behind us, using us as cov­er to accom­plish the goals of the far right, goals that do not line up with our aspi­ra­tions. As a mat­ter of fact his goals and aspi­ra­tions do not line up with the 99% of work­ing peo­ple in this country.

Holness’ Invitation To Walk The Garrisons.

Oné of the many down sides to com­ment­ing on Jamaica’s politi­cians is, one way or anoth­er you will most assured­ly, be accused of being a sup­port­er of the oth­er party.That is a risk we are pre­pared to take if it gen­er­ates the kind of dis­cus­sions we would like to see that will spark an intel­lec­tu­al rev­o­lu­tion amongst our peo­ple, one that will force change toward trans­paren­cy and account­abil­i­ty among pub­lic offi­cials, and Agencies​.How then do we get to spark that intel­lec­tu­al dis­course when the bat­tle lines are so stark between those who are edu­cat­ed, wants every­one to know it and are quite hap­py not to have oth­ers get a shot at the edu­ca­tion they got, leav­ing them no one to look down on. And on the oth­er side of the divide those who are painful­ly illit­er­ate that they glo­ri­fy some who are bare­ly able to read and write.

Recently sworn Prime Minister Andrew Holness, promised he would write to the leader of the Opposition Portia Simpson Miller invit­ing her to walk with him through Garrison com­mu­ni­ties, a sym­bol­ic move Holness feel, one that will set the tone toward his stat­ed goal of dis­man­tling gar­ri­son com­mu­ni­ties. The Jamaica dai­ly Gleaner of October 31st 2011 is report­ing that true to his word Holness sent a let­ter to Simpson Miller last Friday October 27th, but is yet to receive a response. I’m not that cyn­i­cal to believe that there is a sin­is­ter motive to what the Gleaner sto­ry seem to feel is a reluc­tance on Miller’s part to respond.

Holness

I am will­ing to give Miller the ben­e­fit of the doubt, I am will­ing to wait for some­one with­in the PNP to coin a response, give it to her and allow her to fig­ure out how she can ben­e­fit from that response polit­i­cal­ly. On that basis I can clear­ly see why she has­n’t yet responded.

I mean for cry­ing out loud, what is there to think about? Zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sions only serve to keep peo­ple impov­er­ished and down trod­den, how could any­one who claim to care for the most dis­pos­s­esed amongst us not want to tear these bar­ri­ers down? Barriers mean crime , pover­ty , lack of invest­ment, lack of jobs, lack of edu­ca­tion­al oppor­tu­ni­ties, lack of prop­er health care , and I could go on ad-naeusum.Why would Portia find this objec­tion­able , despite the pol­i­tics involved, is ask­ing her to be gra­cious and mag­nan­i­mous too much to ask ? Miller is report­ed to have stat­ed that there are no walls in her con­stituen­cy, this response was her attempt to sug­gest her con­stituen­cy is not a gar­ri­son, because there are no lit­er­al walls keep­ing any­one in or pre­vent­ing any­one from entering.

This com­ment is both cyn­i­cal and insult­ing, on the one hand, one has to sur­mise that the esteemed leader of the oppo­si­tion is sug­gest­ing that the absence of a wall is proof pos­i­tive that she does not pre­side over a gar­ri­son. On the oth­er hand it could be rea­son­ably con­strued that she actu­al­ly believes that an actu­al wall is a nec­es­sary com­po­nent that makes up a gar­ri­son. So which are we to believe? One thing is cer­tain The leader of the Opposition has spent her entire car­rear hon­ing an image that monop­o­lizes the art of car­ing for the poor, she is mem­ber of par­lia­ment for the con­stituen­cy of South West Saint Andrew one of the most des­per­ate­ly impov­er­ished areas in the coun­try, added to the pover­ty, it is crime infest­ed. Through intim­i­da­tion, mur­der, rape, arson and oth­er means, Miller and oth­er gar­ri­son Members of par­lia­ment are returned to office time and time again. No one real­ly knows what the true polit­i­cal feel­ings of the peo­ple who live in those com­mu­ni­ties are, no one dare to go against the grain , too many have died. This type of des­per­ate 21st cen­tu­ry slav­ery is synana­mous to what Bob Marley so elo­quent­ly sang about , where they removed the chains from the ankles and placed them on the brain . This is not con­fined to the con­stituen­cy of Miller, or Holness, it is not just Arnett Gardens built and armed By the likes of Anthony Spaulding, or Tivoli Gardens the once leg­endary moth­er of all gar­risons, nur­tured fer­til­ized, pruned and cared for by Edward Seaga. The truth is most of the cor­po­rate area is carved up into ridicu­lous no go zones, once pris­tine areas of Willow Way and Standpipe in the heart of uptown are now over-run with crime and made impos­si­ble for decent peo­ple to live.

So the ques­tion aris­es, why would Miller want to see a dis­man­tling of gar­risons? Garrisons have kept her rel­e­vant , kept her paid , bestowed the title of Prime Minister on her, and Most Honorable on her and her hus­band. Does the priv­i­leged give up their priv­i­lege? No it has to be tak­en from them. It is up to the Jamaican peo­ple to tear down the gar­risons. Portia Lucretia Simpson Miller , and Andrew Michael Holness, despite the ges­tures of good-will can­not and will not dis­man­tle gar­risons, Garrisons are not geo­graph­i­cal, or phy­chi­cal they are men­tal, peo­ple will nec­es­sar­i­ly have to get to a point where they real­ize that the Holnesses and the Millers of this world are not in their cor­ner, they have to take their future and that of their chil­dren into their own hands , they have to decide that they will not be pit­ted against each oth­er so that one per­son , one fam­i­ly, can be ele­vat­ed above all else.

It was a won­der­ful thing to see the beau­ti­ful fam­i­ly of Andrew Holness , pic­ture-per­fect, hus­band , wife and two adorable lit­tle boys, those two boys will get a prop­er edu­ca­tion, they will get the best health care, they will get to live in the absolute best Government Housing and have all of the perks and trap­pings that are accord­ed the Prime Minister and his fam­i­ly. But for that one fam­i­ly that made it, how many lit­tle Jamaican boys do not have shoes, clothes, a prop­er bed to sleep in, or has no idea where their next meal is com­ing from?

The intel­lect that would cause the peo­ple to see that they deserve the same things Miller and Holness enjoys, is lack­ing and that defi­cien­cy will keep them enslaved in the gar­risons , held behind imag­i­nary walls that keeps them enslaved in south-west St Andrew to Portia Simpson Miller, and in West Central St. Andrew to Andrew Michael Holness. Holness may deny that his con­stituen­cy is a gar­ri­son all he wants , those of us who lived there, dodged bul­lets there and woke up to see the corpses know a gar­ri­son when we see one , Tower Hill/​Water House is a garrison.

What both­ers me is the total blind­ness and absolute idio­cy of Jamaican vot­ers who con­tin­ue to allow these mis­fits to use and abuse them , while they kill each oth­er to ele­vate them to god like sta­tus. People all over the world, in places where dic­ta­tor­ships ruled for decades , are ris­ing to the occa­sion, real­iz­ing that those who gov­erned are allowed to gov­ern by them the peo­ple, and as such they are tak­ing their future into their own hands , over­turn­ing even the most entrenched sys­tems in places like Egypt and Libya. We get the Government we deserve, the blind­ness of the elec­torate is their undo­ing, where there is no vision the peo­ple perish.

Let’s Start Here Prime Minister Holness !

Contrac­tor General Greg Christie recent­ly lament­ed the lack of will on the part of Jamaican Authorities to once and for all effec­tive­ly clean up the mess of the award­ing of pub­lic contracts.

In deliv­er­ing the Seventh Annual Lecture in the Caribbean International Network (CIN) Lecture Series in New York last night, Christie chron­i­cled sev­er­al rea­sons which sub­stan­ti­ate his view that there is a lack of polit­i­cal will to seri­ous­ly fight cor­rup­tion in pub­lic con­tract­ing in JamaicaRead more: http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​l​a​t​e​s​t​n​e​w​s​/​C​h​r​i​s​tie – No-political-will-to-fight-corruption-in-Jamaica#ixzz1c8Jmhp7r
Greg Christie has been in my mind a tire­less fight­er for fideli­ty , trans­paren­cy and cred­i­bil­i­ty for the Jamaican peo­ple through the office he holds. What makes Christie cred­i­ble in my eyes is the fact that he has vowed to demitt office in November of next year. Cristie lament­ed the lack of action on the part of Government to enact a raft of sug­ges­tions he has fur­nished them,that would have giv­en teeth to the Office of Contractor General.
Christie went on :

Make no mis­take about it. The prob­lems and the chal­lenges that I have sought to overview with you… which have con­front­ed the OCG and me, will per­sist as long as the OCG’s many reme­di­al rec­om­men­da­tions con­tin­ue to be ignored,” he said.“They will remain with us until and unless the OCG is grant­ed inde­pen­dent crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­to­ry pow­ers, inde­pen­dent pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al pow­ers, police pow­ers of arrest, and the pow­er to halt or to reg­u­larise a gov­ern­ment con­tract­ing process that is exhibit­ing the signs of cor­rup­tion, impro­pri­ety or irregularity.”

Andrew Holness

Greg Christie
Greg Christie

Andrew Holness Jamaica’s young Prime Minister has a momen­tous but not insur­mount­able task ahead of him, he could start by look­ing at the sug­ges­tions of Contractor General Greg Christie, and imme­di­ate­ly move to enact these sug­ges­tions where prac­ti­ca­ble into law, I mean whats the prob­lem with hon­esty and integri­ty? Holness has begun by ask­ing the leader of the oppo­si­tion to walk with him through gar­ri­son com­mu­ni­ties ‚a sym­bol­ic move Holness feels will go a long way in begin­ning the dis­man­tling of zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sions. As noble as that call is I would pre­fer to see sub­stan­tive actions enact­ed into law that will strength­en the hand of this and future Contractors General in going after entrenched cor­rup­tion in the han­dling of pub­lic funds. This move will not be easy,there are many peo­ple in high places in Jamaica who ben­e­fits from tax­pay­ers funds through the award­ing of contracts,many are high-pro­file donors to both polit­i­cal par­ties, but many more are crim­i­nals that sup­port the par­ties. Contractor General Christie and his staff has received numer­ous death threats for dar­ing to stand up and fight for our country.
Greg Christie does not ask for pow­ers to stoke his ego,as some in some new Agencies seem to think their posi­tion was cre­at­ed for,this Jamaican has demon­strat­ed the will­ing­ness and char­ac­ter nec­es­sary to turn around the endem­ic cul­ture of graft , nepo­tism and cor­rup­tion that obtains in the country.

Andrew Holness begins serv­ing as Prime Minister, with a year left before Parliamentary Elections are con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly due. He can make big bold steps , or try to fool the crowd with cheap pos­tur­ing while main­tain­ing the sta­tus quo, in which case he would be fol­low­ing his men­tor Bruce Golding out the door. There is noth­ing hard in push­ing leg­is­la­tion that pro­tects the Jamaican peo­ple, whats hard is my inabil­i­ty to under­stand why this has not been done.

Black Republicanism:

There is a legit­i­mate debate that has raged qui­et­ly for some­time ‚but now seem to be all out in the open, it has to do with whether or not it is an oxy­moron to be a black Republican. Before we attempt to answer that ques­tion we have to look at the per­cent­age of black peo­ple who vote for the Democratic par­ty, why they do so, and exam­ine whether that means we think mono­lith­i­cal­ly or not. Pundits argue that maybe as many as 99% of black Americans vote for the Democratic Party. The ques­tion then arise as to why such a large per­cent­age of any one group of peo­ple would grav­i­tate to one polit­i­cal par­ty, par­tic­u­lar­ly when they have pre­cious lit­tle to show for it? In exam­in­ing the fore­gone one has to ask whether blacks are forced to sup­port the Democratic par­ty because they have nowhere else to go, or is there a defin­i­tive strate­gic advan­tage for them in sup­port­ing the Democrats.

The Democratic Party was once the par­ty viewed as the par­ty opposed to inte­gra­tion, how­ev­er through Civil Rights leg­is­la­tion start­ed under President Kennedy and the instru­men­tal­i­ty of his broth­er Bobby Kennedy, which became law under President Lyndon Johnson has seen blacks move in droves to throw their sup­port to it. Conversely Whites, and in par­tic­u­lar white men ran in droves to the Republicans,obviously look­ing for a place from which to stage their last stand against equal rights , jus­tice, and a fair play­ing field for all. Fifty years lat­er the repub­li­can par­ty still has white male as it’s core base of sup­port­ers. The Democratic par­ty has mor­phed into a par­ty of coali­tions, blacks, gays, les­bians, some lati­no groups, lib­er­als, jews, and a splin­ter of spe­cial inter­est groups. Republicans have demon­strat­ed that they are quite hap­py to be the par­ty of the white male . Former President Bush to his cred­it tried to make the repub­li­can par­ty a place where blacks would be wel­come, how­ev­er fanat­ics on the right have lit­er­al­ly made blacks per­sona non gra­ta (not wel­come) in that par­ty, at the last repub­li­can nation­al con­ven­tion the num­ber of black del­e­gates could be count­ed on one hand with maybe a fin­ger to spare. The sole black mem­ber of con­gress in that par­ty that pre­dates the lunatic tea par­ty was ex foot­ball play­er J C Watts from Oklahoma, and he has since bowed out.

Allen West  Allan Keys Thomas Sowell

Michael SteeleClarence Thomaslar­ry ElderInnisRuben Diaz

JC WattsArmstrong WilliamsTD JakesCondi RiceSheryl UnderwoodLynn Swann

Arrayed above is a pret­ty impres­sive rep­re­sen­ta­tive sam­ple of what the face of black repub­li­can­ism looks like in America,I will­ful­ly left out Colin Powell whom I think is the most impres­sive of the lot by far, my deci­sion may have been col­ored by the fact that he is of Jamaican parent­age, or it may be because he came to his sens­es and endorsed can­di­date Obama for President, or both. Ok the truth is I like Colin Powell , he accom­plished much, served under repub­li­cans, but was­n’t behold­en to them to the point he lost his soul. He showed char­ac­ter in endors­ing Barack Obama for pres­i­dent, that I thought showed balls, and a sense of being one’s own per­son. Some argue that Powell was burned by repub­li­cans when they had him address the United Nations detail­ing at length alleged stock­piles of weapons of mass destruc­tion that turned out to be pho­ny as most well think­ing peo­ple knew all along. I saw it dif­fer­ent­ly Powell was the only repub­li­can in the Bush Administration that had any cred­i­bil­i­ty, he was the only mem­ber of that cab­i­net that the world would actu­al­ly lis­ten to giv­en how the world saw the Bush Administration. Who then was bet­ter than the for­mer Chairman of the Joint Chiefs to tell the world of the seri­ous­ness of the threats Saddam Hussein posed alleged­ly to the world? Dick Chaney saw a dou­ble coup in that move, dis­cred­it Powell,and bring him down to size after he had used him to sell the ille­git­i­mate war, Powell knew he got played. 

One of the cen­tral themes that comes from most of those who call them­selves black con­ser­v­a­tives is that some­how there is no racism, or that racism has­n’t pre­vent­ed them from mak­ing it so blacks suf­fer­ing and look­ing for a way for­ward have them­selves to blame. It seem that in order for a black man to make it they have to denounce who they are and some­how pre­tend they are some­one else, there are some who are on University cam­pus­es, as they have been from as far back as when Malcolm and Dr. King were fight­ing for equal­i­ty and Justice for blacks in this country,they can be found as talk­ing heads on cable tele­vi­sion, some claim­ing to be repub­li­can strate­gists, and pro­fes­sors. Everyone has a right to sup­port the par­ty of their choice, blacks who have made it has a right to wear their con­ser­vatism on their sleeve, what they do not have a right to do is to go around the coun­try as Caine is doing dis­parag­ing the pres­i­dent, and mak­ing claims that some­how the pres­i­dent is not black enough. Herman Caine like all oth­er blacks who have made it has ben­e­fit­ed from the sac­ri­fices of those who went before , those who toiled and were bit­ten by Bull O’Connor’s dogs, bat­tered by his water-hoses beat­en sense­less by his goons, and lynched. Caine and oth­ers like him stands on the graves of those who suf­fered and died to make it pos­si­ble for them to stand at all, or even raise their heads to look in the face of the white man, or walk on the same side of the street he is on, or dare look at his woman, while at the same time they dis­re­spect their sac­ri­fice , pre­tend­ing that they would be where they are today with­out those sac­ri­fices. Interestingly enough those who sac­ri­ficed the least are now ben­e­fit­ing the most, Those who occu­pied posi­tions in acad­e­mia, and oth­er posi­tions in sec­ond class American soci­ety were quite con­tent to have things remain the way they were, in fact they were trot­ted out dur­ing the strug­gle to extol the virtues of how great America was , and the won­der­ful lives blacks were liv­ing, Those who dared to chal­lenge the sta­tus quo were deemed to be trou­ble mak­ers and com­mu­nists by the white pow­er struc­ture , usu­al­ly through their black lap dogs.

Where was Herman Caine in the annals of the civ­il rights strug­gle, who ever heard of this lack­ey, he has sat out the strug­gle, yes Caine has every right to brag about his ascen­den­cy , of course it was the stead­fast­ness of his par­ents why both he and his broth­er could attend col­lege and make some­thing of them­selves, what he does not have a right to do is to sug­gest that some­how he has the for­mu­la for black­ness. There have always seem to be a resid­ual hatred on the part of many black Americans when it comes to the achieve­ments of oth­er blacks who do not share their experience,painful as this trait is, it offers those who wish­es us ill a per­fect oppor­tu­ni­ty to attack us by using cer­tain mem­bers of the black com­mu­ni­ty as proxy. Michael Steele became chair­man of the repub­li­can nation­al com­mit­tee because Obama was elect­ed pres­i­dent, once he won back the house they boot­ed him, Caine is trot­ting around attack­ing the pres­i­dent does any­one real­ly think this man will be elect­ed pres­i­dent on the repub­li­can tick­et? No ! but they get to say all the nasty things they want by hav­ing some­one in black skin say it. Look how well it has turned out for the black com­mu­ni­ty hav­ing Clarence Thomas on the supreme court. 

It is the same self hate that pre­vents the bulk of us from own­ing and suc­ceed­ing in our own busi­ness­es, instead we spend more mon­ey on con­sumer goods than any oth­er eth­nic group in this coun­try. Everyone now mar­kets to us , we buy any­thing, they curse us , they tell us they nev­er cre­at­ed their mer­chan­dize for us , yet we con­tin­ue to buy and con­sume their prod­ucts at a rate that makes them astro­nom­i­cal­ly wealthy , while we have noth­ing to show for all that mon­ey that pass through our hands annu­al­ly. Why? Because we refuse to show love to our own kind. It seem it would kill us to sup­port black busi­ness­es that are not hair salons and bar­ber­shops, the only rea­son we sup­port those two areas of black entre­pun­ear­ship is pri­mar­i­ly because we can­not get that kind of ser­vice elsewhere. 

The prob­lem with being a black repub­li­can is that the repub­li­can par­ty has not done any­thing to sug­gest that it wel­comes blacks into its ranks, con­verse­ly they are absolute­ly hos­tile to blacks and make no apolo­gies for it, con­sid­er a par­ty that is home to the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, the tea par­ty, Glen Beck, and the Fox mis-infor­ma­tion crowd, con­sid­er the par­ty that is home to ex-clan grand wiz­ard David Duke. It makes per­fect sense that blacks who have tak­en advan­tage of oppor­tu­ni­ties avail­able to them,and have got­ten edu­cat­ed to hold them­selves and oth­ers to high­er stan­dards than some of what obtains but not sole­ly con­fined to the black com­mu­ni­ty. As we have said in these posts President Obama can­not change the job­less num­bers in black-America if young black men con­tin­ue to hang out on street cor­ners with their pants sag­ging way below their back-sides, smok­ing weed, when they ought to be in school. The same is true of young black women who at an astro­nom­i­cal rate, con­tin­ue to have chil­dren out-of-wed­lock with­out any fathers for their off­springs, imme­di­ate­ly plac­ing their chil­dren at a disadvantage. 

There is a pre­vail­ing sense with­in our com­mu­ni­ty at least to my mind, that once we accom­plish some­thing we move dan­ger­ous­ly far away from who we are in order to be noticed , and we stay there until we fall out of favor with those we try to impress, then we come crawl­ing back to the black com­mu­ni­ty look­ing for redemp­tion. Wearing a suit ad occu­py­ing an ele­vat­ed posi­tion in acad­e­mia, and for­get­ting where one come from while pre­tend­ing that all is well with the world , and that all black peo­ple who have not made it as you have are lazy and deserv­ing of their lot in life is haughty, sim­plis­tic ‚and dis­gust­ing­ly phar­isee . It is no dif­fer­ent from some of those who are enter­tain­ers, sports stars rap­pers, and actors who make tons of mon­ey go out and pur­chase the shini­est most expen­sive cars , clothes , and homes and in no time ends up broke and right back where they start­ed, the urge to be seen is the same. In the sev­en­ties eight­ies and nineties an edu­cat­ed black woman could be spot­ted a mile away , her hair was unprocessed , usu­al­ly in a twist of sorts, or had a frizz look, her skirt was long and her atti­tude haughty, it said I went to col­lege. Today the hair­styles have changed some­what , but the anger remains, the men for their part walk around with white wives and align them­selves to the repub­li­can par­ty, even though they are not want­ed real­ly, but are used aus­pi­cious­ly and con­ve­nient­ly when needed. 

The list of black con­ser­v­a­tives is impres­sive and runs the gamut of pro­fes­sions, from Judges to busi­ness peo­ple , from ath­letes to aca­d­e­mics, from the cler­gy to the media there is no short­age of blacks who iden­ti­fy as con­ser­v­a­tives, the truth is blacks have always embraced con­ser­v­a­tive prin­ci­ples, God ‚Country, fam­i­ly, no oth­er eth­nic groups is more reli­gious, or prac­tis­es their reli­gion with more fer­vor, so it is not unusu­al that well to do blacks that are promi­nent­ly exposed would espouse their con­ser­v­a­tive prin­ci­ples, what I do not under­stand is why are they repub­li­cans? Some blacks argue that repub­li­cans end­ed slav­ery, well tech­ni­cal­ly yes,but when the wrap­per is peeled back it seem there was more to abol­ish­ing slav­ery than just moral con­vic­tions. After all the north need­ed soldiers,and Lincoln need­ed to have a greater moral cause for the war oth­er than just keep­ing the union togeth­er, it was imper­a­tive that Europe did not enter the war to pro­tect the ter­ri­to­ry of Louisiana.

As does all Americans have a right to sup­port the par­ty of their choice , so does mem­bers of the black com­mu­ni­ty, it is pre­sump­tu­ous of Herman Caine to tell black America they are brain-washed in vot­ing for democ­rats in the num­bers they do, I could use a lot of adjec­tives to describe Caine , but I will refrain from doing so as he has a right to make an ass of him­self, what he does not have a right to do is to speak for me or any mem­ber of my fam­i­ly, my friends or even my race. Caine is a nov­el­ty , he will dis­cov­er this real soon, the num­bers attrib­uted to him in these ear­ly stages are sim­ply a protest against the slate of repub­li­can can­di­dates whom are at best wishy-washy. Even though the tea par­ty has elect­ed two black mem­bers to the house of rep­re­sen­ta­tives ‚one from in Florida and South Carolina each ‚this does not mean that Herman Caine will be the repub­li­can nom­i­nee for pres­i­dent of these United States, if Caine believes this he is even more stu­pid than I thought.

Arab Spring, American Fall:

The ques­tion was asked recent­ly, if what we saw hap­pen in North Africa and the Middle East last spring could hap­pen here in America? I per­son­al­ly had my doubts about any real protest action tak­ing root in this coun­try oth­er than the one on the right fund­ed and egged on by the rich­est and most pow­er­ful who own the Congress.

Well it’s ear­ly yet, but it seem like reg­u­lar Americans, real Americans, are fed up with wealthy Corporations own­ing their gov­ern­ment, they seem to have had it with lis­ten­ing to emp­ty promis­es from bought and paid for politi­cians . It seem that the Arab spring has found its way to America’s shores in the form of the( American Fall). Americans are hurt­ing, many of the peo­ple out of work are not used to a hard exis­tence, they have nev­er lived in pover­ty, even some of their worst sto­ries of sur­vival would be peach­es and cream for many peo­ple liv­ing in oth­er parts of the world.

I remem­ber a col­league of mine telling of how hard his fam­i­ly had it grow­ing up, detail­ing and extolling the hor­rors of not hav­ing any­thing but cool-aid in the fridge to drink, I looked at him and sim­ply asked ” you had a fridge?” By the time the laugh­ter sub­sided he had come to the real­iza­tion of how good he had it grow­ing up.

Despite all of the afore­men­tioned , hard­ship is hard­ship, when one can­not pay the mort­gage , or rent, can­not pay on stu­dent loans,cannot buy food ? that’s hard­ship, and we can in no way triv­i­al­ize those suf­fer­ings. Average Americans have watched as their Government bailed out huge cor­po­ra­tions deemed too large to fail by the last President and this one now serv­ing, they have seen Wall Street rake in humon­gous prof­its , and dole out large bonus­es to their exec­u­tives, while lay­ing off workers,American busi­ness­es are sit­ting on an esti­mat­ed 2 tril­lion dol­lars in cash that could be spent on hir­ing work­ers, they claim there is no demand for any­thing and so they can­not hire any new workers.

On the oth­er hand Republicans have stead­fast­ly refused to roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealth­i­est Americans. Where is the shared sac­ri­fice? those on the right argue it is un-American to extend a hand to those who are in need and suf­fer­ing, in their view the free mar­ket sys­tem gives every­one a fair shake , those who can­not make it are lazy and in some form are un-American.

So let’s look at this con­cept, are those peo­ple out of work lazy , and un-American? Many now out of work , worked two jobs, or extra long hours when they could, just to get by in an econ­o­my that was more and more employ­er friend­ly, as jobs got shipped over­seas . There were few­er jobs here,and as we all know it’s demand that dri­ves sup­ply and not the oth­er way around,older work­ers were notic­ing a trend where they were being laid off from jobs they had for decades, some were offered buy­outs, in some large com­pa­nies like IBM, and oth­ers, were asked to do more for the same pay, this is noth­ing new, as the pool of avail­able work­ers swelled, employ­ers could ask more from employ­ees, as well as get rid of long serv­ing well paid employ­ees, mak­ing way for younger work­ers whom they paid some­times at less that half the wage they paid old­er workers.

(via Peter Harris )

Peter Harris photo

As I said ear­li­er I did not see a pop­u­lar peo­ple protest in America that would be of any sig­nif­i­cance, not with the fact that America is now lit­er­al­ly a Police State, reg­u­lar Americans are not allowed to demon­strate against their Government with­out thou­sands of jack-boot­ed cops bat­ter­ing and beat­ing them into a pulp, true to form the NYPD did not waste any time beat­ing , taz­ing, and just plain bat­ter­ing cit­i­zens who had done noth­ing but express their right to free speech.

The web­site Buzz Feed doc­u­ment­ed mul­ti­ple instances of out of con­trol NYPD thugs abus­ing cit­i­zens who were exer­cis­ing their free speech right. http://​www​.buz​zfeed​.com/​m​j​s​5​3​8​/​v​i​o​l​e​n​t​-​p​i​c​t​u​r​e​s​-​f​r​o​m​-​o​c​c​u​p​y​-​w​a​l​l​-​s​t​r​e​e​t​-​p​r​o​t​e​sts.

What’s inter­est­ing is that there has been zero instance of police inter­fer­ence with racist fanat­i­cal zealots on the right, who make up the so-called tea par­ty move­ment. After all those peo­ple were demon­strat­ing for the right of the rich­est Americans to have more wealth , not be taxed, and to throw the black man out of the White House. This is a wake­up call for aver­age Americans, this is a defin­ing moment in his­to­ry you the aver­age per­son has no right to demon­strate, the fact that your gov­ern­ment has been tak­en over by rich tycoons who pay off those in the con­gress to do their bid­ding, it is no longer about you or your chil­dren, the die has been cast, have you ever won­dered why they lay of teach­ers, social workers,and any work­er that ben­e­fits you , but con­tin­ue to hire cops?

Follow the link pro­vid­ed above and you will get a glimpse into what’s in store for you, you will be not be allowed to demon­strate , and even if a per­mit is grant­ed , it will be in a des­ig­nat­ed space that it will have no effect, you will be herd­ed into an area enclosed where there will be more cops than demon­stra­tors, wel­come to America , wel­come to the NEW WORLD ORDER. Welcome to the world of the big banks and big cor­po­ra­tions run­ning the show, they have enough of the semi lit­er­ate uni­formed thugs to keep you in your place.

Democrats would like to own this move­ment , but they should be real care­ful , look at the impact the tea par­ty has had on the repub­li­can par­ty, House leader Bohner has no con­trol over his own cau­cus, and can­not nego­ti­ate with the President to get any­thing done. All in all the occu­py wall street is a legit­i­mate move­ment by reg­u­lar peo­ple who are right and have jus­ti­fi­ca­tion on their side, as opposed to the mis­fits on the right who pro­mul­gate racism and hate. I hope this move­ment catch­es fire and sweep across America with fer­vor nev­er imagined,people are fed up and right­ly so, giv­en enough peo­ple fight­ing in this moral war their uni­formed thugs will not be able to stop the will of the people.

Unfortunately I believe we all know that this will sim­ply fiz­zle, these move­ments for the peo­ple always do.

Andrew Holness New Prime Minister ?

On the front page of this site I com­ment­ed that Jamaica is at a crossroads,at no time is this state­ment more pro­found than at this moment in time in our coun­try’s history.

The reason/​s behind Prime Minister Bruce Golding’s deci­sion to step down is a mon­u­men­tal one , he is not the first Prime Minister to do so, but he may be the first to do so under total­ly unclear moti­va­tions. In the short peri­od since 1962 there have been cas­es where prime min­is­ters have demit­ted office for one rea­son or anoth­er, Donald Sangster died in office, Michael Manley stepped aside due to ill-health and made way for Patterson, who in turn stepped aside mak­ing way for Simpson Miller before his term expired.

None of these chief exec­u­tives have demit­ted office under the cloud Golding has been under, ever since the débâ­cle involv­ing his alleged bungling of the Christopher Coke extra­di­tion . There has been a sus­tained cho­rus-call for his res­ig­na­tion, we on these blogs has also called for his res­ig­na­tion, not for polit­i­cal rea­sons, but because we val­ue coun­try over all else.

There has also been a sus­tained call from oth­er quar­ters for pure­ly polit­i­cal rea­sons, rea­sons that have noth­ing to do with our coun­try’s well-being, but are genised in a desire to see Jamaica return to the days of crash pro­gramme social­ist hand outs. We are less inclined than oth­ers to sug­gest ulte­ri­or motives for the Prime Minister’s res­ig­na­tion , what we do know is that he just lost his moth­er, a loss which must weigh heav­i­ly on him, we wish mis­ter Golding well and hope that heir appar­ent Andrew Holness will check any ego he has at the door .

We are well aware of the nar­cis­sis­tic ego­ma­nia that is a sta­ple of Jamaica’s politi­cians, Holness would be well advised not to take this to Jamaica House. As we have called on Golding to tran­scend pol­i­tics and be a dif­fer­ent kind of polit­i­cal leader, we also call on young Holness to shed the bag­gage of trib­al pol­i­tics and put coun­try first, oth­er­wise his demise will be assured as is the case with Golding.

We will await fur­ther devel­op­ments before com­ment­ing further.

mike beck­les.

heve your say.

Koch Brothers War:

Republicans have been demand­ing that the Obama Administration cut spend­ing, they have accused the pres­i­dent of spend­ing America into bank­rup­cy. But lets take a clos­er look at what’s real­ly going on here, Politicians we know are plain liars and can­not be trust­ed, then there are the pun­dits that talk to hear them­selves talk, cable tele­vi­sion runs the gloom and doom prog­nos­ti­ca­tion round the clock, that is if one watch­es CNN, or MSNBC, I nev­er turn my TV to FOX misinformation.

Tea par­ty mem­bers of Congress have one goal, that is to gum up the works ‚run out the clock on Obama’s pres­i­den­cy. The far right group came into exis­tence just around the time Obama was elect­ed, the faces of the group seem to be car­ing sweet sub­ur­ban white women who just want to ensure a secure future for their chil­dren, who would have a prob­lem with that ? Well not so fast, when the beau­ti­ful wrap­per is peeled back their emerges a sin­is­ter more seri­ous struc­tur­al foun­da­tion in the form of bil­lion­aires, the Koch broth­ers , David and Charles ‚whose net worth is esti­mat­ed at thir­ty-five bil­lion dol­lars. Their hold­ings Koch Industries rake in a whop­ping annu­al one hun­dred bil­lion dol­lars, their hold­ings are astro­nom­i­cal. From oil refiner­ies in sev­er­al states to Brawny paper tow­els, Dixie cups, Georgia pacif­ic lum­ber ‚Stain mas­ter car­pet and Lycra to name of few.

The New Yorker Magazine of August 30th 2010 titled Covert Operations detailed the Koch broth­ers secret war against the Obama Administration . Their com­pa­ny Koch Industries have been named by the University of Massachusetts at Amherst’s Political Economy Research Institute as one of the top ten air pol­luters in the coun­try, they have also been cit­ed by Greenpeace as a quote “a king­pin of cli­mate sci­ence denial” to any objec­tive per­son this New Yorker Article by Jane Mayer is a must read.

The Koch broth­ers indus­tri­al and man­u­fac­tur­ing inter­ests puts it at odds with reg­u­la­tions com­ing out of the EPA advanced more so by this Administration, which has tak­en decid­ed action to pro­tect the envi­ron­ment like halt­ing drilling off the Gulf coast after the dev­as­ta­tion of the (BP) beyond petro­le­um oil spill. Tea par­ty activists drawn into some­thing beyond their own com­pre­hen­sion, argues they are fight­ing for fis­cal restraint, what they don’t know is that what they are fight­ing for is more pol­lut­ed air, and drink­ing water .

There is how­ev­er a dif­fer­ent slant to this debate,many argue that tea par­ty activists and oth­er repub­li­cans were quite fine when pres­i­dent Bush was get­ting the coun­try into two unfund­ed war. Many argue the Iraq war was unnec­es­sary, and was a war of choice. The crit­i­cism of this pres­i­dent are usu­al­ly sil­ly and hyp­o­crit­i­cal and to some racial as it relates to Obama. Whether the Koch broth­ers are doing this on the basis of race or as a result of their lib­er­tar­i­an politics,or both is imma­te­r­i­al, what’s at stake here is that if repub­li­can tea par­ty house mem­bers have their way in this uncer­tain econ­o­my, and there are dras­tic cuts to Government spend­ing there will be a mas­sive con­trac­tion of the economy.

This assess­ment does not need pun­dit­ry from Harvard or Princeton, The Government is the only enti­ty that has the resources , earned or bor­rowed to spend to keep peo­ple employed, econ­o­mists sug­gest there are over two tril­lion dol­lars sit­ting out there in the pri­vate sec­tor that could be spent to employ Americans, the pri­vate sec­tor how­ev­er is not hir­ing so it is up to gov­ern­ment to keep stim­u­lat­ing the economy.

It is nei­ther com­mu­nism nor Socialism to stim­u­late the econ­o­my with large infu­sion of cap­i­tal to keep peo­ple employed , America’s infra­struc­ture is in need of repairs what bet­ter thing to do than to put Americans to work repair­ing America’s infra­struc­ture which in turn keeps the econ­o­my afloat? Government does not have the lux­u­ry of the pri­vate sec­tor, in adopt­ing a wait and see approach as it relates to whether it infus­es cap­i­tal in the econ­o­my , it has become increas­ing­ly clear that the demands of the tea par­ty that the Obama Administration cut spend­ing is designed more for the con­trac­tion of the econ­o­my , which will in fact have an even more dev­as­tat­ing effect on the econ­o­my as it relates to job loss, which is sure to take down the president.

This strat­e­gy by the very rich , who fund reac­tionary groups like the tea par­ty, while they hide behind the scenes and pulls the strings, is cyn­i­cal, unpa­tri­ot­ic, and down­right self­ish. President Obama and his fam­i­ly may nev­er ever be poor again , but the actions of this very rich few is caus­ing immense harm to the mass­es of the mid­dle class of this coun­try. they do not care, they know Obama will have his mon­ey their dis­gust and dis­dain is for the mid­dle class.

mike beckles:have your say

Hypocrite :Delroy Chuck!

I have repeat­ed­ly point­ed out that Jamaica’s police force has for decades been giv­en bas­ket to car­ry water, they have been giv­en an impos­si­ble task and a man­date that is lit­er­al­ly impos­si­ble to fulfill.

Jamaica is a small coun­try with lim­it­ed resources but many and var­ied chal­lenges, as such I ful­ly under­stand that there are going to be sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ences with the qual­i­ty of every thing from infra­struc­ture to the deliv­ery of ser­vices when com­pared to devel­oped, and even oth­er devel­op­ing coun­tries. With that said, I do not know of any objec­tive Jamaican, or any observ­er in the know, who would argue that there have not been a sys­tem­at­ic mis­han­dling and ram­pant cor­rup­tion in the way resources are han­dled. As a result, the coun­try has slipped pre­cip­i­tous­ly back­ward , while oth­er coun­tries with few­er resources and even more peo­ple have made sig­nif­i­cant progress toward improv­ing the lives of their pop­u­la­tion. Government Agencies charged with the deliv­ery of ser­vices are a good place to start look­ing at how gov­ern­ment have failed the peo­ple, from health to fire , from agri­cul­ture to labor, from edu­ca­tion to youth and sports, how­ev­er no agency have been exposed to pub­lic scruti­ny and pub­lic ridicule as the Jamaica con­stab­u­lary force has been. This Agency has been set up to fail by Governments of both polit­i­cal par­ties. Both Parties have sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly pulled the wool over the eyes of an ever increas­ing­ly gullible pub­lic, a pub­lic that more and more seem inca­pable of think­ing for itself . Politicians have used the police force as their per­son­al valet ser­vice , while at the same time using it as a buffer to ward off crit­i­cism of their cor­rup­tion and abject inep­ti­tude as lead­ers. The pub­lic has been taught to hate police offi­cers , which means hat­ing the rule of law, politi­cians get rich, police offi­cers get killed. There are cor­rupt politi­cians all over the world. but Jamaica takes the cake when it comes to politi­cians that are filthy , dirty, and cor­rupt, most if not all are crim­i­nals parad­ing in suits as decent law-abid­ing cit­i­zens. Of course they get away with doing it because we start­ed with a police force that was designed as Night Watchmen, a force that was sup­posed to be a short pants wear­ing group from the peas­antry that looks out for the inter­est of the rich and con­nect­ed. To date there has not been a com­mis­sion­er /​Chief Constable with balls that will stand up to a politi­cian and say” hell no I will enforce the laws , and if you do not like it I’ll see you in court” Oh wait actu­al­ly that may not be a good idea on sec­ond thought ! the court sys­tem is a lib­er­al cesspool of anti police operatives.

Just after he was ele­vat­ed to the high­est exec­u­tive office in the coun­try, The Jamaica Gleaner was gra­cious in allow­ing me to post an open let­ter to now dis­graced Prime Minister Bruce Golding. In that let­ter I beseeched the new Prime Minister to avoid the temp­ta­tions that goes with pow­er , I implored him to be dif­fer­ent , I begged him to be a new kind of leader , a new kind of Prime Minister that will not be just anoth­er Prime Minister, but the tem­plate by which future prime min­is­ters would be judged . Golding did not heed my call and as result he is resign­ing in dis­grace over his involve­ment in The Christopher Coke débâ­cle, too lit­tle too late Orette Bruce Golding did not live up to the promise of his abil­i­ties, he failed to real­ize the par­a­digm shift in the way peo­ple com­mu­ni­cate , he mis­cal­cu­lat­ed on the amount of pow­er invest­ed in him, he gam­bled and he lost . A few days ago Delroy Chuch Golding’s new Minister of Justice launched a broad­side against the police. Addressing Lay Magistrates and Justices of the peace Chuck at their quar­ter­ly meet­ing in Saint Andrew did not mince words in paint­ing the police as the prob­lem in Jamaica’s crim­i­nal Justice system.

Addressing the Lay Magistrates Association of Jamaica St Andrew Chapter’s quar­ter­ly meet­ing at the Medallion Hall Hotel in Kingston yes­ter­day, the min­is­ter said Jamaica’s jus­tice sys­tem was not serv­ing the peo­ple of the coun­try prop­er­ly, and the soon­er cit­i­zens accept­ed that this was the case and moved to address it, the bet­ter it would be for everyone.“Far too many of our young men are being picked up and locked away for no good rea­son, some­times because of per­son­al vendet­ta, per­son­al spite or feel­ings,” stat­ed Chuck. these young men knew their rights, the Ministry of Justice would be more bank­rupt than it is now, because so many of these cas­es could be pros­e­cut­ed suc­cess­ful­ly.” Conceding that the police some­times need­ed this par­tic­u­lar process because of the heart­less­ness of some peo­ple in soci­ety, vio­lent crim­i­nals and the dif­fi­cul­ty in iden­ti­fy­ing per­sons (because they go by main­ly alias­es), he said that was one of the rea­sons the deten­tion time was increased from 24 to 72 hours. While stat­ing that the police need­ed more time to deter­mine if the per­son they had in cus­tody was actu­al­ly the per­son they want­ed, he, how­ev­er, added that there was no right for them to arrest and detain any­one unless they had rea­son­able grounds. “Whether it is 24 or 72 hours, there must be rea­son­able grounds for arrest­ing and detain­ing the indi­vid­ual. It can­not be an arbi­trary arrest that ‘I have the right to arrest you for 72 hours’. That does­n’t exist,” he stat­ed. The min­is­ter added, “When the police arrest and detain some­one, that per­son has a right to hear from the police why he is being arrest­ed and detained. And he can say to the police ‘If you fail to tell me why I am being arrest­ed and detained I am going to pros­e­cute you’. And if the police fail to tell him, then he has a pros­e­cutable case in court.” Reading from the Jamaica Constabulary Force Act, sec­tion 50 (b) (f), the min­is­ter reit­er­at­ed that he was speak­ing from a point of law. Failing the jus­tice sys­tem Stating that far too many JPs just ‘sign off’ and were not doing their due dili­gence by insist­ing that the police con­vince them of the rea­son for the arrest, he told them that in doing so, “you have failed not only that man, but you have failed the jus­tice sys­tem, because you have allowed injus­tice to be met­ed out to the ordi­nary cit­i­zens of this coun­try.” Chuck also charged the lay mag­is­trates and JPs that, at any point, if the police brought some­one before them with­out a con­vinc­ing rea­son for that per­son­’s arrest and deten­tion, then they should refuse to sign the doc­u­ment and advise the police to release the per­son, “and if he refus­es to release the man, you let the com­mis­sion­er or me know”. He told the JPs that he had obtained per­mis­sion from the com­mis­sion­er of police, Owen Ellington, to not only vis­it jail cells, but check log books for rea­sons why Jamaican cit­i­zens were incar­cer­at­ed, and if no good rea­son was in the log book or if they were detained beyond the 72 hours, then they should insist that the indi­vid­ual be released. “If we can weed out some of this abuse of pow­er, you would be sur­prised at how much bet­ter the young men in our com­mu­ni­ty would respect the jus­tice sys­tem,” stat­ed the jus­tice min­is­ter.anastasia.​cunningham@​gleanerjm.​com

If we can weed out some of you filthy politi­cians do you real­ize just how much bet­ter our coun­try will be? Who is the guy try­ing to impress with his dirty hands , I won’t even speak on Ellington , many think this guy is actu­al­ly a good chief con­sta­ble, in my esti­ma­tion he is a spine­less yes-man.

What a hyp­ocrite ! Was it the police who refused to sign the extra­di­tion order allow­ing Dudus to get his just due? or was it Bruce Golding who inject­ed him­self into what clear­ly was a judi­cial mat­ter sand­bag­ging, and obstruct­ing all the way until pub­lic pres­sure forced him to capit­u­late. Did Delroy Chuck take Golding to task for destroy­ing the Justice sys­tem? No Chuck did no such thing , con­verse­ly what he did was to join his cronies in reject­ing Goldings sup­posed let­ter of res­ig­na­tion in their smoke filled back room .The Justice sys­tem of which you speak was destroyed long ago and cops had very lit­tle to do with it , it was Lawyers like you and lib­er­al judges who keep putting your crim­i­nal polit­i­cal cohorts back onto the streets, but most of all med­dling dirty politi­cians like you who attend the funer­al of com­mon crim­i­nal dons that destroyed it.

Tell me Delroy Chuck was it the Police who forced you to have a trib­ute read on your behalf at the funer­al of Andrew Phang Stephens of your North East Saint Andrew con­stituen­cy ?Shot by Police no less , Is that the rea­son you have it out for our cops? You should not have clear­ance to enter a pub­lic library, much less to talk about you are a min­is­ter of Justice,who do you think you are fooling?

Lets get things straight here, you politi­cians will not run Jamaica as your pri­vate play­ground any longer , we will stand up and we will call you out. I am con­ver­sant of the uphill strug­gle in edu­cat­ing a pop­u­la­tion that have been schooled into beleiv­ing in the green and orange, we will how­ev­er con­tin­ue to chip away at your lies , and we will expose you , you can count on it.

Your Boss Bruce Golding once claimed if any­one messed with Laborites it would be ban­garang, I chid­ed Golding in a let­ter in the Gleaner, of course you took me to task about my patri­o­tism and point­ed to Portia’s reck­less rhetoric, as if Portia is rel­e­vant , or that her per­ceived reck­less­ness made Golding’s reck­less­ness legit­i­mate. You Delroy Chuck accused me of being unpa­tri­ot­ic because I left Jamaica, then I chal­lenged you, I asked you to tell me what was your con­tri­bu­tion to nation build­ing com­pared to mine? Like the cow­ard you are, you slith­ered away not to heard from again.

Now elec­tion is com­ing, you are out talk­ing about police abuse it’s time you morons be called to account . You present your­selves as pure , with clean hands to the illit­er­ate mass­es of the peo­ple who are impressed with you , not all peo­ple are fooled by your dis­guis­es, . You, like Golding , and Portia and all the rest are sim­ply oppor­tunis­tic bas­tards who con­tin­ue to pit poor Jamaican peo­ple against their broth­ers because too many are too stu­pid to see you for what you real­ly are . Only in Jamaica would any Justice Minister say those things about the police and not be kicked the hell out of office . You are a damn dis­grace, and should fol­low your boss out the door.

mike beck­les:

have your say:

Palestine’s Dilema Part 2 !

The United Nations offi­cial­ly came into exis­tence on October 24th 1945. The char­ter was rat­i­fied by China, France, The Soviet Union the United States, the United Kingdom, and by a major­i­ty of oth­er sig­na­to­ries. The name United Nations was coined by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, in 1942 dur­ing the sec­ond world war 26 nations pledged to con­tin­ue fight­ing against Hitler’s Germany, Italy and Japan the three major Axis pow­ers. Over the years the role of the United Nations has evolved to include fight­ing human rights abus­es, and sup­pos­ed­ly work­ing toward per­ma­nent world peace. It would be fair to expect that the United nation by the words in its own char­ter, ensure that each and every coun­try is treat­ed with respect and that all peo­ple are guar­an­teed equal respect , and afford­ed their fun­da­men­tal rights giv­en to them by God Almighty, what­ev­er they may call their God. Today Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas entered the cham­bers of the United Nations to a stand­ing ova­tion and sus­tained and thun­der­ous applause from mem­bers of the General Assembly. Abbas came to the United Nations with the hopes and aspi­ra­tion of the Palestinian peo­ple weigh­ing heav­i­ly on him.

Cable tele­vi­sion showed thou­sands of Palestinian peo­ple in the West Bank stand­ing in rapt con­cen­tra­tion in Arafat Square, as their pres­i­dent, Mahmoud Abbas affec­tion­ate­ly called Abbu Mazen, deliv­ered a his­toric speech, punc­tu­at­ed with applause from the entire world body of lead­ers in the assem­bly. Abbas spoke elo­quent­ly and pas­sion­ate­ly of the trails and tribu­la­tion of his peo­ple under Israeli Occupation and bru­tal Oppression. He spoke to the plight of Palestinian farm­ers cut off from their farms,without access to water, sick peo­ple tak­en to hos­pi­tal sub­ject to check­points, its peo­ple sub­ject to humil­i­a­tion and degra­da­tion from the Hands of Israel and it’s agents, Abbas spoke pas­sion­ate­ly and elo­quent­ly about the fact that Palestinians are the only occu­pied peo­ple left on plan­et earth, occu­pied by a pow­er that have thumbed it’s nose at inter­na­tion­al laws and the atten­dant con­dem­na­tions that come with those transgressions. 

The United States, through the pro­gres­sion of many pres­i­den­cies, some­how con­vinced the world that it is an hon­est bro­ker for peace between the Israelis and the Palestinian peo­ple, this how­ev­er does not pass the smell test, when the United States start every state­ment on the issue, by affirm­ing its com­mit­ment to the state of Israel. How can any medi­a­tor say “I will medi­ate peace between these two war­ring fac­tions, but I am on the side of this one”? At the heart of the prob­lem is the demand by Israel that Palestinians rec­og­nize their right to exist as a jew­ish state. To the casu­al observ­er that may seem like a pret­ty easy thing to do as a cat­a­lyst to peace. The truth is, the prob­lem is far more com­pli­cat­ed than that. In 1947 the Jewish state of Israel was cre­at­ed, and insti­tut­ed by the United States and England at the mouth of the Suez Canal, a vital ship­ping cor­ri­dor to and from the Arabian peninsular,the Jewish State from its incep­tion has been a sub­ject of intense fight­ing and debate , not as some would have you believe that it’s about Israel’s right to exist, but more so ‚a ques­tion of Israel’s right to exist at that par­tic­u­lar loca­tion. The Americans have armed and sup­port­ed Israel despite repeat­ed con­dem­na­tion from most coun­tries in the world a move that for all intents and pur­pos­es iso­lates Israel fur­ther in the eyes of most of the International com­mu­ni­ty, which sees Israel as a pari­ah state, one not sub­ject to International laws, but pro­tect­ed by a super­pow­er which is hyp­o­crit­i­cal, as it speaks from both sides of its mouth , sup­port­ing an apartheid style rogue state, whilst at the same time argu­ing for democ­ra­cy in oth­er coun­tries with which it disagrees.

At the same time Abbas was artic­u­lat­ing the case for state­hood for his peo­ple, the United States was wait­ing in the wings with the threat of veto if the request gar­ners enough sup­port . The Palestinians need nine votes out of a total of fif­teen coun­tries that make up the secu­ri­ty coun­cil. There is how­ev­er a sub-plot to America’s threat to veto any state­hood for the Palestinians. America has stat­ed its com­mit­ment to see a two state solu­tion to the prob­lem over the course of sev­er­al pres­i­den­cy, this is true also of the present occu­pant of the White House, Barack Obama. So how then can America argue that it will veto some­thing it says it sup­ports ? President Obama ‚Prime Minister Netanyahu, US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice and sup­port­ers of Israel say quote ” There is no short­cut to peace” they argue there can be no peace from a piece of paper adopt­ed at the United Nations; They argue the Palestinians must nego­ti­ate with Israel with a view to a set­tle­ment of their dis­pute. Wait just one minute ! Did America nego­ti­ate it’s inde­pen­dence with England ?

Did the peo­ple of South Africa nego­ti­ate with the Apartheid régime for their free­dom? How then, can America expect any objec­tive per­son not sold out to the Israeli lob­by, to accept that the Palestinian peo­ple under occu­pa­tion and sub­ju­ga­tion, nego­ti­ate with their oppres­sors for state­hood , when they can’t get from point A to point B with­out going through sev­er­al check­points? Many peo­ple have argued and lament­ed at the oppres­sion of the Palestinian peo­ple, not least of whom is for­mer President and nobel peace prize win­ner Jimmy Carter. What Israel and its sup­port­ers have done is to attack the mes­sen­gers as anti-Semitic and anti-Israel. It is one thing to demo­nize free­dom lov­ing peo­ple who speak out , it is one thing to block­ade Gaza and turn back con­voys of food and med­i­cine intend­ed for suf­fer­ing peo­ple in that over­pop­u­lat­ed ghet­to. It is how­ev­er anoth­er thing when Jimmy Carter a for­mer President who has worked assid­u­ous­ly and tire­less­ly to fur­ther the peace process between the two fac­tions speak out. It is anoth­er thing when for­mer pres­i­dent Bill Clinton stat­ed in an inter­view with CNN a few days ago quote ” Israel should state pub­licly that it does not sup­port a two state solu­tion, let the Palestinians get on with their lives , and live with the con­se­quences” end quote. 

What gives the state­ments of these two ex-pres­i­dents such weight, is the fact that they were at the fore­front of many ardu­ous dis­cus­sions, back and forth in an effort to arrive at a just res­o­lu­tion. Netanyahu summed up Israel’s posi­tion rather suc­cinct­ly, when he stat­ed that Israel is a very small coun­try that needs addi­tion­al ter­ri­to­ry to be able to defend itself , nev­er mind that the very land-grab they claim as legit­i­mate and nec­es­sary for their secu­ri­ty , is at the heart of the case the Palestinians are mak­ing why they can­not nego­ti­ate with Israel as long as the build­ing of set­tle­ments con­tin­ue. What this mean is that there is a stale­mate. Israel knows full well that the Palestinians will not agree to any dis­cus­sions with them as long as they con­tin­ue to annex more Palestinian lands.

It is clear to hon­est objec­tive observers that Israel’s strat­e­gy is to annex as much real estate as pos­si­ble which it will claim lat­er, it can­not give up as its cit­i­zens are liv­ing on the land or they have to con­trol the land in order to main­tain their defens­es. The Palestinians are cer­tain­ly not blame­less in the debate, they must renounce the strat­e­gy of sui­cide bomb­ings, and attack­ing inno­cent Israeli cit­i­zens on bus­es and in their homes, there are Jewish peo­ple with­in Israel whom are con­sci­en­tious and car­ing, and who in fact dis­agree vehe­ment­ly with the pos­ture of their Government. The res­o­lu­tion that Palestine seek will not come from sui­cide bomb­ings and fir­ing rock­ets into Israel, it will only embold­en Israel to use dis­pro­por­tion­ate force on Palestinian civil­ians as they have done over the years as the world turns a blind eye.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also addressed the General Assembly, as usu­al he was com­bat­ive, bel­liger­ent and force­ful, his argu­ments were the same as they were before, he start­ed out by insult­ing the mem­bers of the gen­er­al assem­bly, call­ing the assem­bly a place where dark­ness dwells, this com­ment comes as a result of the stance oth­er coun­tries take as it relates to fair­ness and equal­i­ty, of course Israel the per­pet­u­al vic­tim feels no oth­er per­spec­tive is legit­i­mate, and any­one who crit­i­cizes it’s actions are ene­mies of Israel, or worse anti-Semitic, this fear of being labeled as an anti-Semite has stilled the tongue of many who do not want to risk the wrath of the United States and it’s proxy Israel. Those of us who val­ue peace and dig­ni­ty for all human­i­ty must unite and call for a State of Palestine for the Palestinian peo­ple, we must demand that Palestinians stop using sui­cide bomb­ings as a strat­e­gy, we must demand that Palestinians do not rain rock­ets on Israeli cities killing and ter­ri­fy­ing inno­cent cit­i­zens who just want to live in peace. We must demand that Israel return occu­pied lands to their right­ful own­ers and cease the ille­git­i­mate con­struc­tion of set­tle­ments in the West Bank, and return to pre 1967 bor​ders​.it is incon­ceiv­able that in 2011 any nation could argue they are hold­ing onto lands they cap­tured in a war, that kind of think­ing must be out­lawed and con­demned. There is no legit­i­mate argu­ment to be made for the con­tin­ued build­ing of set­tle­ments on con­test­ed land, Israel itself has not even made the claim that the land its set­tlers are occu­py­ing belongs to the state of Israel, there­fore it must rea­son­ably be con­strued that the actions of Israeli set­tlers in build­ing homes on land they know do not belong to them, is sim­ply a land grab,provocative ‚and will do noth­ing to fur­ther the pos­si­bil­i­ty of peace between the two factions.Netanyahu argued that the set­tle­ments are not the cause of the prob­lem but is a result of the prob­lem. Seriously ? What that means is that set­tlers have some kind of legit­i­ma­cy in expand­ing Israel’s bor­ders for the Protection of Israeli cit­i­zens. That is a fun­da­men­tal­ly flawed posi­tion to take as that would mean Israel would have to con­tin­ue to annex more and more land as where ever its cit­i­zens live they will need a buffer from Palestinian retal­i­a­tion. No one should begrudge the peo­ple of Israel a home­land, no one should object to Israel’s right to exist, in fact any­one who so opine is an ene­my of human­i­ty, Jewish peo­ple have suf­fered great­ly at the hands of peo­ple who felt they were less than human . As a result of this a report­ed six mil­lion Jews were slaugh­tered at the hands at racist Nazis. This should sen­si­tive Jews to suf­fer­ing , oppres­sion, and injus­tice the way slav­ery, Jim crow, and con­tin­ued racism sen­si­tized me to inequal­i­ty, vio­la­tions of human rights, and oppres­sion. How can Jews con­tin­ue to expect and in some cas­es demand that oth­ers remem­ber the holo­caust when they are oppress­ing oth­ers ? Many who are in sup­port of Israel on reli­gious grounds are unaware of what is real­ly hap­pen­ing on the ground as it relates to the plight of the Palestinian peo­ple. Israel claims it does not trust the United Nations to be fair. It seeks to dele­git­imize the world body, so that it can con­tin­ue to ignore res­o­lu­tion after res­o­lu­tion, with­out con­se­quence. No oth­er coun­try of six, or six­ty mil­lion peo­ple on this plan­et would be allowed to thumb its nose at the world body as Israel has. War has been waged on Iraq, war has been waged against Bosnian Serbs, War has been waged on Libya, Afghanistan, oth­er nations like Iran has been threat­ened with war based on assump­tions of nuclear pro­grams, gen­er­al­ly at Israel’s demand and with Israeli intelligence.All on UN res­o­lu­tions, The same body Israel claim not to trust as a place where dark­ness dwells. Why is Israel dif­fer­ent? Why is Israel pro­tect­ed by west­ern pow­ers under the guise it is an ally? Does the term ally give a nation carte blanche to ignore and cir­cum­vent International Law ? How can Israel claim not to trust the UN, when the very pow­ers that sup­ports her are the chief spon­sors and finan­cial sup­port­ers of the body? How come Israel calls on the Un to stop Iran’s sup­posed nuclear pro­gram, but claims the body is a place where dark­ness dwells ? It is time for the non­sense to stop , if there are to be rules that gov­ern the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty, then the laws must be applied fair­ly and just­ly across the board, irre­spec­tive of the sta­tus of the trans­gres­sor or its friends, then and only then can we as a specie begin to lay claim to a just and peace­ful world, as there can be no peace with­out justice. 

This sit­u­a­tion as it obtains, is unten­able, tra­di­tion­al Israeli allies like Turkey’s Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan a very influ­en­tial fig­ure in the mid­dle east has been sharply crit­i­cal of Israeli killing of an American cit­i­zen of Turkish decent, he spoke to the silence of America on the issue, won­der­ing if America’s silence has any­thing to do with the slain American Turkish ances­try. The peo­ple were killed by Israel’s mil­i­tary try­ing to bring food and med­i­cine to des­per­ate cit­i­zens in Gaza.

Prime Minister Netanyahu came to the UN talk­ing about Iran’s sup­posed nuclear pro­gram, he talked about the prospect of Ahmadinejad hav­ing nuclear weapons, he talked about things of the past and things not con­nect­ed to the issue of the day. In the end the day belonged to Mahmoud Abbas and the hopes and dreams of the peo­ple of Palestine and their desire to be free respect­ed peo­ple like any oth­er human beings cre­at­ed by God.

mike beck­les:

have your say;

Palestine’s Dilema Part 1!

Yesterday President Obama went to the United Nations and offered up a stout defense of the state of Israel. At the heart of this year’s General assem­bly meet­ing is the desire by Palestinians to have a sep­a­rate state of their own, side by side with the Jewish state of Israel. The pres­i­dent went to great lengths to artic­u­late the com­mit­ment of the United States in defense of the state of Israel. Absent from the speech was any par­al­lel com­mit­ment to see the thorny issue of Israel’s con­tin­ued build­ing of set­tle­ments stopped, an issue many objec­tive observers see as a land grab. The Israelis for their part seem to argue that the con­tin­ued build­ing of set­tle­ment is in the inter­est of their own secu­ri­ty, this con­vo­lut­ed argu­ment is part of their response to this issue when they are not argu­ing they have no con­trol over the set­tlers. In fair­ness to Israel some set­tle­ments have been bull­dozed as a sign of good-will by a pre­vi­ous admin­is­tra­tion. This Administration of Benjamin Netanyahu is a less than ready to nego­ti­ate with the Palestinian Authority head­ed by Mahmoud Abbas aka Abu Mazen.

The prob­lems that exist between the Palestinians and Israelis are old and dates back to Biblical times, they were not fixed with any American pres­i­dent since the state of Israel was formed on con­test­ed lands in 1947. Those who pur­port to sup­port Israel on bib­li­cal grounds, argu­ing that God had promised the land to Israel, will find it dif­fi­cult to con­tin­ue to make that argu­ment in the face of Israel’s con­tin­ued occu­pa­tion of a sov­er­eign peo­ple, sub­ject­ing them to mul­ti­ple spot checks just to move or do ordi­nary things dur­ing the course of a day, some­thing we all take for grant­ed. The United States can­not be a cred­i­ble bro­ker for peace in light of its con­tin­ued and sus­tained sup­port for all things Israel even in light of her trans­gres­sions and sub­se­quent con­dem­na­tion by the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty. Israel will con­tin­ue to find itself iso­lat­ed as long as she is pro­tect­ed by the United States, and does as she pleas­es out of the reach of nor­mal puni­tive sanc­tions that would have been attached to oth­er states. The sense of enti­tle­ment Israel feels is at the heart of the prob­lems and will not be addressed in our life­time if the process toward peace is the road present­ly being trav­elled. Israel can­not expect to flaunt inter­na­tion­al law and cry anti-Semitism when oth­ers speak out. Despite the noise by those on the cam­paign trail pros­trat­ing them­selves in front of Jewish vot­ers, there are some states­men who have a grasp of some sem­blance of fair­ness. Former pres­i­dent Clinton stat­ed in an inter­view with CNN.” The Israelis should state pub­licly that they do not want a two state solu­tion, let the Palestinian peo­ple get on with their lives, and live with the con­se­quences”. Once again pres­i­dent Obama has reneged on a stat­ed promise; he stat­ed he sup­port­ed a two state solu­tion between Israel and the Palestinian, yet yes­ter­day he explic­it­ly went to the United Nations with the intent to veto any move by Abbas to ask the Security Council for state­hood for the Palestinian peo­ple. Christian fun­da­men­tal­ists in America push for uncon­di­tion­al sup­port for Israel, They do so irre­spec­tive of Israel’s trans­gres­sions against the Palestinian peo­ple, if they are argu­ing from a reli­gious per­spec­tive that God has cho­sen Israel, are we to believe that God favors some peo­ple over oth­ers? Does God not care what his cho­sen peo­ple do unto oth­ers? The Palestinian peo­ple for their part must under­stand that they will, not win a bat­tle of might over Israel, they must approach their cause the way Doctor King and Gandhi approached their prob­lems, their cause as it relates to their oppres­sion and con­tin­ued occu­pa­tion is just . They must use moral per­sua­sion, they will be vin­di­cat­ed only through that path.

mike beck­les”

have your say:

PNP JEEP


 images (46)As some­one who sup­port nei­ther of the two gangs that pass for gen­uine polit­i­cal par­ties in Jamaica. I am nonethe­less left shak­ing my head, won­der­ing just how stu­pid Portia Simpson Miller and her par­ty think Jamaicans are ? We will attempt to answer that ques­tion through out this post , mak­ing all attempts to be fair and objec­tive to Miller, based on her record and that of her par­ty. The People’s National Party (PNP) won the pop­u­lar­i­ty con­test decades ago over their rivals the Jamaica Labor Party (JLP),As a result they arro­gant­ly claim Jamaica is PNP coun­try. arro­gant though that claim is, there is s sig­nif­i­cant amount of truth to it. As a boy my dear grand­dad who did dou­ble duties as my dad, told me numer­ous times that Bustamante said his cousin Norman Manley was like a snake and he did not trust him as far as he could throw him. Both my grand­dad and his broth­er my great Uncle told these sto­ries, my youngest broth­er brings our great-uncle back to life with par­o­dy when he relives those sto­ries. Busta obvi­ous­ly had lit­tle trust for his cousin Norman Manley.

One can rea­son­ably argue that maybe Busta’s dis­trust was para­noia, after all Busta was not the glib artic­u­late British edu­cat­ed Queens coun­cil Barrister his cousin Norman was. Jokes abound, (gen­er­al­ly in the cir­cles of PNP par­ti­sans), about Busta’s lack of intel­lect, Busta hav­ing honed his skills in the rough and tum­ble world of the trade union move­ment in its ear­ly days. Busta is not absolved from the stain of pop­ulism and charis­ma, his cousin was just bet­ter at it . Having been born Alexander Clarke to an Irish planter Robert Clarke and a Jamaican woman Mary Clarke Bustamante report­ed­ly changed his name to Bustamante the name of a Spanish sea-cap­tain whom it is report­ed adopt­ed him. Busta report­ed­ly spent some of his ear­ly years in Spain where he was edu­cat­ed and lat­er joined the Spanish Army. He then went to Cuba and New York after which he returned to Jamaica in ‚1932 he dab­bled in a pri­vate busi­ness he found­ed which spe­cial­ized in lend­ing mon­ey, but poor work­ing con­di­tions , low wages , pover­ty and oth­er social ills cat­a­pult­ed him into writ­ing let­ters, orga­niz­ing protest action, giv­ing speech­es and medi­at­ing on behalf of work­ers. His advo­ca­cy took him all over the Caribbean where he advo­cat­ed on behalf of work­ers, In 1938 the Bustamante Industrial Trade Union was born. I detail these facts to show that on the ques­tion of pop­ulism Bustamante could mix it up with the best of them. The People’s National Party fig­ured out how to win elec­tions, like the JLP they claimed a man­date to defend the rights of the poor, they fig­ured if the poor­er class of peo­ple believe they are on their side they will most like­ly have more peo­ple sup­port­ing them, they have played that card per­fect­ly, they have won more elec­tions since Independence that the JLP has.

Many who sup­port the PNP sim­ply do not under­stand that Government can­not be looked at as a means to bet­ter their lives. Government can be a vehi­cle to effect change , by the laws it enacts, the imped­i­ments to growth it removes , and poli­cies it fol­lows, that are friend­ly to invest­ment. Government how­ev­er can­not be the employ­er of labor in a mean­ing­ful way that is sus­tain­able, Governments take in tax­es from tax­pay­ers , it hires and pays work­ers from those tax­es, it pro­vides ser­vices like police , fire, and pays teach­ers , there can only be real employ­ment and greater pros­per­i­ty when the foun­da­tions are laid that are friend­ly to busi­ness allow­ing them to invest , hire work­ers , and pay takes , that is the way to eco­nom­ic pros­per­i­ty, not from Government hand-outs through pork bar­rel, or crim­i­nal shov­el­ing of cash to sup­port­ers, those are exact­ly how to dri­ve a coun­try into pover­ty ‚and failed state sta­tus. The PNP has suc­cess­ful­ly done that after 1812 years in office . I am left pow­er­less, just shak­ing my head that this par­ty which has lit­er­al­ly brought this coun­try to ruina­tion, with uncon­trolled crime , pover­ty, and cor­rup­tion could even be con­sid­ered as a cred­i­ble alter­na­tive to the JLP after less that one term in Office. The JLP has done sig­nif­i­cant harm to the coun­try in it’ han­dling of the Christopher Coke mat­ter, what was revealed to the world is what Jamaicans had already known, that both polit­i­cal par­ties are real­ly just crim­i­nal gangs, just gangs oper­at­ing with dif­fer­ent lay­ers and respon­si­bil­i­ties. The PNP could have done the patri­ot­ic thing and not con­test the next elec­tion. They could use the time to retool the par­ty, get rid of the old bag­gage , Portia, Omar Davies, Nicholson,Knight, Pickersgil, Buntin, etal. Michael Manley did not con­test the gen­er­al elec­tion of 1983, Edward Seaga called that snap elec­tion at a time when he thought he could win , Reagan had just invad­ed Grenada and Seaga had sent Jamaican sol­diers as part of the occu­py­ing force. Manley was caught flat-foot­ed and chose not to con­test the elec­tions, choos­ing instead to run around the world giv­ing speech­es and telling Jamaicans that the Government was ille­git­i­mate. Of course Manley knew he had no legs to stand on , any prime Minister can call elec­tions when­ev­er he choos­es under Jamaican law. Manley chose not to con­test because he felt he would lose, plain and sim­ple. Arguing then that the snap elec­tions were fraud­u­lent, is tan­ta­mount to a box­er get­ting knocked out after fail­ing to pro­tect him­self, then blames his oppo­nent. Portia Simpson Miller and her par­ty have now come up with anoth­er acronym [JEEP] Jamaica Emergency Employment Program.

Portia Simpson Miller

As if we have not had our fill of PNP acronyms, and slo­gans they have now devel­oped this new JEEP. There are how­ev­er a few parts miss­ing from this JEEP. Where are we going to get the mon­ey to fuel this jeep? any­one can make promis­es, Portia knows that there is noth­ing in this JEEP pro­gram that is paid for , If they are to be insti­tut­ed then there would have to be mas­sive tax increas­es or bor­row­ing. There is absolute­ly no way we can enact a social­ist pro­gram that puts peo­ple to work unfund­ed. The peo­ple’s National Party has learned noth­ing from events shap­ing the world over the last two decades. Globalization is the way for­ward, some refer to this new phe­nom­e­non as the new world order. It has at its core seri­ous impli­ca­tions for small nations like Jamaica, small­er nations will have to fig­ure out on whose side they are on and stick to that group. In order to com­pete in the areas of trade, receive con­ces­sions on fuel prices, and oth­er areas of the econ­o­my, small­er nation must be part of a group to real­ize those con­ces­sions and receive those con­sid­er­a­tions. CARICOM by the way is a far cry from being that group, with some mem­bers of CARICOM look­ing out exclu­sive­ly for their indi­vid­ual inter­est. European nations have come togeth­er as the European Union, a counter bal­ance to what they per­ceive to be hege­mo­ny on the part of the United States after the fall of the Soviet Union. The Africans are talk­ing about an African Union or some sort of United States of Africa, of course they can’t even agree to dis­agree. South American nations like Brazil are emerg­ing as dom­i­nant forces on the world stage through pro­duc­tion and their com­mit­ment to using alter­na­tive ener­gy sources like ethanol , leav­ing more mon­ey in their cof­fers to grow their economies. Asia has come of age , China in the lead is ben­e­fit­ing from glob­al­iza­tion , build­ing their econ­o­my on mas­sive pro­duc­tion of cheap and inex­pen­sive goods , manip­u­lat­ing their cur­ren­cy , as well as intel­lec­tu­al prop­er­ty pira­cy. Other Asian nations like Indonesia, India, Japan, the Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia, South Korea, and even Vietnam are emerg­ing as eco­nom­ic pow­er­hous­es as a result of coöper­a­tion , ben­e­fit­ing from out­sourced man­u­fac­tur­ing by large coun­tries like the United States. These coun­tries have seen their economies take on new life as they attract man­u­fac­tur­ing through cheap labor and less gov­ern­ment bureau­cra­cy. Most impor­tant­ly , at a time when all nations with the excep­tion of stub­born auto­crat­ic few like Cuba, and North Korea, are mov­ing their economies toward free mar­ket and open trad­ing, the PNP is propos­ing a raft of failed Socialist enti­tle­ments. The for­mer bas­tions of Communism/​Socialism China and Russia have now rec­og­nized that the only way to remain rel­e­vant is by open­ing their economies to the pri­vate sec­tor allow­ing for inter­na­tion­al trade and coöper­a­tion, it was what made America great, they made things and sold what they made . Jamaica should now be look­ing to fol­low suit with­out sell­ing off the coun­try to China or any oth­er large Nation with mon­ey. Our posi­tion ought to be, we have labor we are pre­pared to remove bar­ri­ers to invest­ment and trade. We must low­er crime which will see an enor­mous influx of new entrapenurialship,essentially more play­ers will want to come to the table. Instead the People’s National Party is propos­ing to take the coun­try back four decades to the sev­en­ties, with a raft of unfund­ed enti­tle­ment pro­grams that look good to poor peo­ple get­ting a lit­tle mon­ey for doing noth­ing, but it will cer­tain­ly be the death knell of the econ­o­my this time . When you hand out money(paper) that you haven’t earned , you sim­ply print it , it dri­ves up infla­tion, cheap­ens the cur­ren­cy and forces busi­ness­es to fail. One would have thought that by now the pro­po­nents of these pro­grams would rec­og­nize that the way to pros­per­i­ty is not through social­ism, but through edu­ca­tion hard work and inge­nu­ity. It is time for this par­ty of Norman Manley and his son Michael Manley to stop with the (sam­fy) and tell poor work­ing class Jamaicans there are no quick fix­es to their prob­lems, edu­cat­ing them that the only true path is through edu­ca­tion and hard work. That is the decent thing to do, the patri­ot­ic thing to do, fail­ing which we will con­tin­ue to lose gen­er­a­tions after gen­er­a­tions to pover­ty crime and despair. Now is the time Portia, you say you love the poor !If you love the poor now is the time to use your influ­ence to edu­cate them, I know it’s not pop­u­lar to do, I know it’ not in your DNA, but if you want to leave a lega­cy of car­ing, and con­cern for the peo­ple you say you love, use this oppor­tu­ni­ty to tell poor une­d­u­cat­ed Jamaicans that you will not be giv­ing them any more cur­ry goat and rice to secure their votes, tell them you want them to under­stand that they will have to help in nation build­ing, by start­ing now , right here , at this time, in this place. What Simpson Miller should be propos­ing at this junc­ture in the inter­est of our coun­try is a sim­ple plan that offers sus­tain­able jobs, here’s how. Miller would first have to have an under­stand­ing of the debil­i­tat­ing effect crime has on soci­ety, she would have to have a desire and or the will to give law enforce­ment what they need to do their jobs. Will and desire that are nec­es­sary com­po­nents that would enable the coun­try to offer poten­tial investors an envi­ron­ment not steeped in crimes to include extor­tion. Portia has none of those under­stand­ings, in inter­view after inter­view she has demon­stra­bly shown that she does not have a full grasp of the issues , or even under­stand the process nec­es­sary to grow our econ­o­my. The fact that the very vehi­cle she choses to push on the Jamaican peo­ple, the social­ist JEEP was designed by peo­ple oth­er than her or oth­er senior oper­a­tives in the par­ty , sug­gest that this is noth­ing based on core beliefs, but a cam­paign slo­gan designed sole­ly to win office. Here’s an idea, at a time when the world econ­o­my is reor­ga­niz­ing , old norms are out the win­dow, and new real­i­ties have to be embraced Jamaica needs to look to the future to see how we can lim­it the amount of scarce dol­lars we pay out for oil. This is the time for both the Governing par­ty and the Opposition to come togeth­er in the inter­est of the coun­try and see how we can encour­age a mas­sive invest­ment in solar, and wind ener­gy, there is no short­age of either of those two types of ener­gy. Investing in them at this time cre­ates jobs , reduces our car­bon foot­print and ben­e­fits our econ­o­my going for­ward. I would be hap­py to sup­ply a writ­ten plan on how this can be achieved to the Government and the leader of the oppo­si­tion, if they are will­ing to work togeth­er for the ben­e­fit of our coun­try. As Golding found out from the world’s eco­nom­ic down-turn mak­ing promis­es does noth­ing to improve the lives of Jamaicans, we are now liv­ing in an inter­con­nect­ed world where the cough of one coun­try insti­gates the snif­fle of anoth­er . Serious politi­cians must now stop with cheap pos­tur­ing and tell the mass­es of the peo­ple there are no quick fix­es to the coun­try’s fis­cal prob­lems. We are a small coun­try our prob­lems are not insur­mount­able, if we fix our crime prob­lem, fix our bureau­crat­ic prob­lems, we have a chance of once again attract­ing invest­ments into our coun­try. Portia and the PNP does not under­stand this . Bruce Golding the present Prime Minister under­stands this , but was unable to extri­cate him­self from the crim­i­nal ten­ta­cles of Christopher Coke and his Tivoli Empire, he will go down in infamy as the lit­tle train that couldn’t.

Obama’s Approval Dips !

President Obama’s approval rat­ing is now at an all time low of 43% accord­ing to a recent CBS poll, his dis­ap­proval now stands at 50 %.

The polit­i­cal vul­tures smell blood and are already cir­cling ready for the car­cass. Many have already giv­en him up as dead.

The best thing this pres­i­dent has going for him is a repub­li­can par­ty that can­not find a seri­ous can­di­date that has half the intel­lect he has.

The ven­omous hate in the blo­gos­phere, radio, and TV caused me to won­der how in hell this man ever got elect­ed pres­i­dent of these United States?

I am remind­ed when­ev­er I see the ran­cid hate filled rants , that there are still a lot of repub­li­cans who did not vote for the pres­i­dent, these are gen­er­al­ly low infor­ma­tion semi /​and illit­er­ates who are real­ly not exposed , they do not care to know any truths beyond what pass­es for it in their lit­tle cocoon.

The house and sen­ate is now pop­u­lat­ed with tea par­ty mem­bers who have tak­en an oath not to work with the pres­i­dent on any­thing, this is sole­ly based on race , the pres­i­dent knows it but won’t say it , mem­bers of the black cau­cus knows it but won’t say it, democ­rats know it but they are most­ly white and will not call out their own . Blood is thick­er than water.

President Obama must take the bull by the horns , his sup­port­ers did not elect him to roll over to racist lying repub­li­cans, they did not elect him to acqui­esce to repub­li­can demands, they vot­ed for him to enact the agen­da he laid out on the cam­paign trail, they did not elect him to give repub­li­cans what they want, nei­ther was he elect­ed only to allow repub­li­cans to gov­ern from the minority.

They have essen­tial­ly been gov­ern­ing from the minor­i­ty from day one of the pres­i­den­t’s term, jam­ming and obstruct­ing at every turn. This has got to stop mis­ter Obama, you have demon­strat­ed that you are will­ing to make peace and work together.

Republicans do not want you to have any accom­plish­ments, they said so, you acknowl­edged it recent­ly , they have said they will not sup­port any bill that could give you a win.

Imagine that, giv­ing you a win , they do not care about the peo­ple or the coun­try, coun­try be damned, as long as they stop you.

Any fur­ther attempts at work­ing with them can only be inter­pret­ed not as con­cil­ia­to­ry but as weakness

President Obama

Americans want their pres­i­dent to be force­ful, deter­mined and resolute .

Right now this pres­i­dent is kow­tow­ing to the peo­ple who want to wit­ness his demise, for no oth­er rea­son than the col­or of his skin.

I under­stand his stat­ed goal to reach across the aisle and offer a hand of rec­on­cil­i­a­tion and compromise.

Mister President there are no hands for you to grasp.

They have pulled their hands away,you are no longer a Senator look­ing for oth­ers to co-sign a Bill, you are the President of the United States of America, act like it.

mike beck­les:

have your say>

Jamaica’s Incompetent Legislators:

The Kingston and Saint Andrew cor­po­ra­tion has been com­plain­ing about ille­gal build­ing in the Kingston and Saint Andrew areas which falls under its sphere of respon­si­bil­i­ty. Interestingly the Mayor of the cor­po­ra­tion Desmond McKenzie is a coun­cil­lor from Tivoli Gardens the epic cen­ter of JLP pol­i­tics and heart of Prime Minister Bruce Golding’s west Kingston Constituency.

If the Mayor as head of the coun­cil, and a close ally of the Prime min­is­ter ‚can­not get the ille­gal build­ing to stop , what chance is there for a res­o­lu­tion to this prob­lem? The truth is Jamaicans were gen­er­al­ly nev­er required to seek gov­ern­men­tal approval for build­ing their homes or oth­er struc­tures, how­ev­er as we move into becom­ing a devel­oped coun­try, we real­ized we have to adhere to codes that are uni­ver­sal with a view to sav­ing lives and ensure rel­a­tive safety.

The prob­lem in Jamaica’s case is that Jamaican laws have not kept pace with the times and as such there is no incen­tive to obey the archa­ic exist­ing laws.

In these blogs we have sought to point this out as it relates to the issue of crime and crim­i­nal­i­ty. This prob­lem is how­ev­er not con­fined to crim­i­nal law , but oth­er areas of the laws to include those that cov­ers build­ing con­struc­tion or the pro­tec­tion of tourists com­ing off cruise ships.

McKenzie

Surprisingly The Council’s Mayor told the Jamaica Gleaner that the reg­u­la­tions gov­ern­ing build­ing con­struc­tion are woe­ful­ly inef­fec­tive, result­ing in many play­ers in the con­struc­tion indus­try ignor­ing the KSAC orders to cease and desist.

Finally a state­ment of truth or com­mon sense from a politi­cian. We have been shout­ing this for years. The rea­son we have the lev­el of crime and dis­re­spect for the rule of law is sim­ply because the laws are old and use­less, and the penal­ties assigned inef­fec­tu­al as deterrent.

This offers us a per­fect segue into anoth­er prob­lem in the heart of the coun­try. The issue of tourist harass­ment in resort towns like Ocho Rios. Nothing new by the way, but some­thing left unchecked, because the mon­ey the cash cow brings in still rolls in.

President of the St Ann Chamber of Commerce, Kumar Sujanani, com­plained that the police were not imple­ment­ing the Prescribed Areas Act, even while the com­plaints of tourist harass­ment per­sist­ed. According to Sujananai, the com­plaint was top of the list from cruise pas­sen­gers who dis­em­bark in Ocho Rios. But accord­ing to Superintendent of Police at Area Two head­quar­ters, Gary Griffiths, who was for­mer­ly in charge of St Ann, the police had, in fact, imple­ment­ed the act in an area stretch­ing from Island Village to Pineapple Place, effec­tive­ly cov­er­ing the major­i­ty of the resort town. Superintendent Griffiths said the mea­sure was dis­con­tin­ued due to non-coöper­a­tion and com­plaints by mer­chants, espe­cial­ly those on Main Street, the main shop­ping area in Ocho Rios.

Sujanani Griffiths 

Here we have peo­ple with pow­er and influ­ence blam­ing the police for doing some­thing the police has very lit­tle pow­er to control. 

Rather than use what influ­ence he has individually,or that of the Chamber he heads, to lob­by Government to pass tougher leg­is­la­tion that would effec­tive­ly deal with the issue of tourist harass­ment, he seeks to lam­bast the police the tra­di­tion­al scapegoat .

From the look on the face of Superintendent Griffith’s face I can see he would like to tell this clown where to go with his nonsense.

As a young con­sta­ble sta­tioned at the Mobile Reserve in St Andrew I spent count­less hours with my col­leagues com­bat­ting the issue of tourist harass­ment in towns like Ocho Rios and Montego Bay. Despite count­less hours of patrol time, thou­sands of arrests, and untold phys­i­cal con­fronta­tions with ped­dlers drug-deal­ers and hus­tlers the prob­lem persisted.

Which must lead to a com­pre­hen­sive review of the reason/​s behind the fail­ure of this project.

If peo­ple are arrest­ed , over and over , and over , yet they per­sist in doing what they did that keep get­ting them arrest­ed, then the blind can see that the prob­lem is with the penal­ty. As is the case with all areas of crim­i­nal­i­ty in Jamaica there are inad­e­quate and archa­ic penal­ties assigned to these crimes .

The truth is some offend­ers were arrest­ed dozens of times each month and released some­times with­out even pay­ing a fine.

No one is sug­gest­ing that peo­ple look­ing to make a few bucks from sell­ing trin­kets be impris­oned for life . What we are say­ing is there must be an under­stand­ing that tourists come to our shores with mon­ey to spend, they deserve to be treat­ed with respect,as we would like to be treat­ed , we should also make sure that the tourism dol­lar not be con­fined to rich hote­liers and busi­ness peo­ple, but must be avail­able to the gen­er­al populace.

There must also be a cumu­la­tive penal­ty that says if you get caught com­mit­ting this offense, after a cer­tain amount of times prefer­ably three (3) you are going to jail for a year.

I guar­an­tee this prob­lem would go away,vendors and ped­dlers would sell in des­ig­nat­ed spaces pro­vid­ed for them.

There has got to be order oth­er­wise it’s chaos , what’s hap­pen­ing now and has been so for decades, it is the drip , drip, slow death of Jamaica’s Tourist industry.

The rise in num­ber of oth­er Caribbean Islands as legit­i­mate tourism des­ti­na­tions is proof pos­i­tive that the coun­try’s tourism prod­uct is get­ting tired and stale. Crime vio­lence and harass­ment to vis­i­tors has con­densed the prod­uct itself ‚lit­er­al­ly rel­e­gat­ing it to all-inclu­sive resorts, with vis­i­tors not get­ting a chance to see the coun­try, and prob­a­bly for the better.

Many cruise ship pas­sen­ger con­fide in me that when docked in Jamaica the stay on board, usu­al­ly out of fear.

There must be a gen­er­al con­sid­er­a­tion for the inter­est of every­one when plans are being draft­ed for Cruise ship ports. These must take into con­sid­er­a­tion craft shops , restau­rants, etc. Essentially they must con­tain a direct com­po­nent that ben­e­fits aver­age Jamaicans over and above the gen­er­al ben­e­fits derived from tax dol­lars collected.

Each per­son with a con­tri­bu­tion should feel he or she may ben­e­fit from what­ev­er they have to offer. there must how­ev­er be a dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion between offer­ing a gen­uine prod­uct in a con­trolled and des­ig­nat­ed locale, against push­ing trin­kets into the faces of peo­ple com­ing off a ship demand­ing they buy them, that to most peo­ple is tan­ta­mount to soft extortion.

People will buy what they want because they want to buy it, not because some­one forces it on them, or intim­i­dates them into buy­ing some­thing that at its gen­e­sis , was always going to be an impulse, dis­cre­tionary purchase.

A friend of mine, a female police offi­cer in the States, told me of a hor­ror inci­dent she and her hus­band encoun­tered in Montego Bay when they refused the advances of a sell­er of trin­kets to pur­chase a piece of trin­ket he pushed on them. The inci­dent she relat­ed esca­lat­ed into threats and ver­bal abuse , which cul­mi­nat­ed with a machete being pulled on them , forc­ing oth­er ven­dors to inter­vene on their behalf. Needless to say they will nev­er be back to Jamaica.

We know that bad news gets dis­sem­i­nat­ed four times faster than good news does, so we have to con­clude that soon­er or lat­er this will invari­ably catch up to the Jamaica tourism indus­try, and the coun­try in gen­er­al. Legislators must acknowl­edge that our laws are old , use­less, and inef­fec­tive, this has had a crip­pling effect on the coun­try’s jus­tice sys­tem because of recidi­vism, and a dev­as­tat­ing over­all effect on our coun­try. Law mak­ers must do some­thing about over­haul­ing our laws, instead of spend­ing their time bang­ing on desks and shout­ing child­ish insults at each other.

Asking this of them may how­ev­er be too much to expect from the losers that make up the coun­try’s polit­i­cal leadership.

mike beckles:

have your say:

Politicians Furious Over Demand For Brownings:

There is surprising news coming out of Jamaica’s industrial front, shockingly, employers and entities have asked the island’s national training agency — HEART Trust/​NTA — for brown or light-skinned trainees to fill vacancies at their companies.

Wow” this can­not be , how could we have missed this in a coun­try like Jamaica that claimed to have been unshack­led from the chains of colo­nial­ist oppres­sion , seg­re­ga­tion, depri­va­tion and dispossession.

I fail to see how this could hap­pen in Jamaica where peo­ple feel they would be bet­ter off under the colo­nial mas­ters, peo­ple who refuse to demand a new con­sti­tu­tion, one that releas­es them from being sub­jects to a for­eign pow­er that cares noth­ing about them , but still swear alle­giance to said sov­er­eign nonetheless.

It bog­gles the mind that this could come up , when for decades only half white women could even think of enter­ing beau­ty con­tests, or have a chance to win the miss Jamaica crown at home , even though the coun­try is approx­i­mate­ly 96% black. How can this be when most com­pa­nies , Organizations, and lit­er­al­ly every enti­ty is owned , run, and staffed by light-skinned peo­ple, thank God for Government jobs and small hus­tle or dark-skinned peo­ple would lit­er­al­ly starve.

How could this be when the tourism Industry is staffed by peo­ple with alien accents, even though some have nev­er set foot on an air­plane? How could this be hap­pen­ing when they did­n’t want Marley’s stu­dio on Hope Road? Yes Hope road , anyway.….

Of course this vir­gin dis­cov­ery has gen­er­at­ed a cho­rus of out­cry from the usu­al quar­ters, the online fra­ter­ni­ty and the old polit­i­cal hands, of course there are none old­er and have greater sleight of hand that Pearnel Charles of the JLP and the one and only Sister P , Portia Simpson Miller the President of the PNP , leader of the Opposition and for­mer Prime Minister.

If it was up to me I would just give one of those nation­al hon­ors they dole out to cronies and friends, you know the type Carolyn Gomes and oth­ers have got­ten? Yes those , just give one of those to Portia, and hope­ful­ly we wont have to hear her pon­tif­i­cate, cry, and shout in anger, when­ev­er the issue of rights, pover­ty, and dis­crim­i­na­tion comes up.

I am all for any such motion on Portia’s behalf, if it means I won’t hear from her again. Mark you I am always left won­der­ing at what stage does Portia get to do some­thing about pover­ty, abuse ‚and vio­la­tion of rights? You know since she has been in rep­re­sen­ta­tion­al pol­i­tics for ever, includ­ing the high­est exec­u­tive office in the coun­try, the Prime Minister.

This is how the Gleaner char­ac­ter­ized Pearnel Charles’ response.

Charles

At first, the labour min­is­ter was flab­ber­gast­ed at the mere sug­ges­tion that Jamaican employ­ers could be using skin tone as a cri­te­ri­on for employ­ment. “No, sir. I don’t believe it,” said a baf­fled Charles before his bemuse­ment turned to anger. If I meet one of those employ­ers, I would per­son­al­ly see to that per­son being pros­e­cut­ed,” said the labour min­is­ter, him­self a vet­er­an trade union­ist. He not­ed that such dis­crim­i­na­tion had no place in the 21st cen­tu­ry. “hat can’t hap­pen under this Government … not when I am min­is­ter,” said Charles as the notion sank in. e added: “If you can prove it to me, I’ll throw the whole book at such an employ­er in this coun­try.” Carles, who called the colour prej­u­dice expressed by some employ­ers racist, sought to assure the nation that the Ministry of Labour would move swift­ly and deci­sive­ly if it were to receive com­plaints from per­sons who were denied employ­ment on the basis of their skin tone. “Expect imme­di­ate action from me and the Government using every piece of machin­ery to elim­i­nate it from this soci­ety,” he said.

Now I am no lawyer but I am left won­der­ing exact­ly what would Charles do except to advise any such per­son , so trans­gressed against, to seek legal counsel? 

It seem to me that behind all of the com­mo­tion and howls of feign igno­rance and anger that Jamaica has always been a coun­try deeply steeped in racism and Caste-ism.

Miller

Simpson Miller, in her angry reac­tion to the report, warned Sunday night that such prej­u­dice against dark-skinned peo­ple would not be tol­er­at­ed in Jamaica “ever again”. She said the prac­tice, report­ed by offi­cials at the HEART Trust/​NTA, is a “pre­scrip­tion for what we do not want in a coun­try like this” and urged the Government to launch its own inves­ti­ga­tions. “We do not want divi­sions … . We are all one,” she told the pub­lic ses­sion of her South West St Andrew con­stituen­cy con­fer­ence at the Haile Selassie High School. “When you come to tell me that you’re going to bring back in Jamaica the days of the colo­nial mas­ters when only peo­ple with fair skin and a cer­tain type of hair can get jobs, I am call­ing on the Government to inves­ti­gate those com­pa­nies,” she said. Simpson Miller also urged con­sumers to be vig­i­lant, warn­ing that “any com­pa­ny we go to do busi­ness and we see only brown peo­ple, and we don’t see a mix­ture of brown and black, then we are going to move our busi­ness”.tyrone.​reid@​gleanerjm.​com

Well what can any­one say about Portia? Portia is Portia , rhetoric, anger, brava­do, emo­tions, heat no light or any­thing of sub­stance, her state­ment speaks for itself.

The truth is, in their haste to cur­ry favor with vot­ers, now that elec­tion is loom­ing ‚both of these sea­soned hands are falling over them­selves to show they are in sync with the peo­ple, they both know how to play that game, a game Charles can nev­er win against Portia, Portia has a monop­oly on car­ing , shed­ding tears, and express­ing anger.

Both of these politi­cians are well aware that the sys­tem they now feign igno­rance of, has ele­vat­ed and kept them and oth­ers like them, in pow­er . The issue of col­or, is only one of the dis­crim­i­na­to­ry prac­tices that per­se­vere in the coun­try , there are all kinds of exclu­sion­ary castes based on mon­ey, edu­ca­tion, Politics, etc.

Both politi­cians also know that there is lever­age to be gained from this issue, and as usu­al are play­ing to the most base instincts of the mass­es. So once the masks of brava­do and anger are peeled from the faces of these two actors, we real­ize this issue has been with us for ever, expressed, and implied, for as long as we have been around .

Faux igno­rance and con­coct­ed anger does noth­ing to remove this scourge from amongst us. Many ordi­nary Jamaicans have known this for gen­er­a­tions, hence the songs about brown­ing, and the many and var­ied attempts at bleaching.

mike beck­les:

have your say:

After Dudus Then What?

The issue of Coke’s extra­di­tion, guilty plea, and future sen­tenc­ing has cleared away the brush of cor­rup­tion, reveal­ing the bar­ren under­brush of a post colo­nial archa­ic cor­rupt sys­tem, that is no dif­fer­ent than the cor­rupt crim­i­nal , blood thirsty war­lords who carve out large parts of sub-saha­ran Africa as their own.

As America has removed them in Liberia, Mogadishu and oth­er places in Africa, so too has Coke, Blake , Coke Senior before him, have been removed, by America,a place some Jamaicans love to hate.

It is rea­son­able to con­clude that many Jamaicans do not share the ideals many of us share. Most of us want a sta­ble coun­try where oppor­tu­ni­ties abound , a place which enables us to live in peace , be all we can be, one that pro­vides a future for our chil­dren, one that is bet­ter than the one we have. It became clear to me that a large per­cent­age of our peo­ple, even some who reside abroad, are opposed to those sim­ple foun­da­tion­al principles.

They are more drawn to dis­hon­est under­hand­ed cor­rupt hus­tling , one that is steeped in stress of look­ing over one’s shoul­der for the law and those with whom they com­pete in their crim­i­nal endeavors.

Garrisons asso­ci­at­ed with, nur­tured and fund­ed by both polit­i­cal par­ties, have long been zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sion for peo­ple of both polit­i­cal par­ties. This also extends to law enforce­ment who are ham­pered by polit­i­cal hand­cuffs. These zones of exclu­sion have been encour­aged by a cheer-lead­ing media, crim­i­nal rights groups , the church, and from all areas of Jamaican life.

I am unaware of any oth­er coun­try in the civ­i­lized world where politi­cians dare tell police they can­not enforce the law as Edward Seaga believed , Seaga once asked what was Adams doing in Tivoli Gardens. Suggesting that Tivoli Gardens was his pri­vate domain and it was up to him to deter­mine who enter and exit­ed. That kind of bare-faced unabashed cheek­i­ness has dom­i­nat­ed Jamaica’s polit­i­cal land­scape since independence.

My posi­tion when I served in the JCF was always, “who the hell do these rif raf think they are’? I must say no one ever told me what I could and could not do , I used the let­ter of the law.

Christopher Coke

The two most fear­some Garrisons in Jamaica have been the PNP’s Arnett Gardens, lit­er­al­ly built and main­tained by Anthony Spaulding, and Tivoli gar­dens main­tained by Edward Seaga, for­mer long reign­ing mem­ber of par­lia­ment for west Kingston, and Prime Minister.

For decades those in the media have giv­en a free pass to crim­i­nals liv­ing and oper­at­ing from gar­risons, I am unsure what the motives are on this, but they have nev­er missed an oppor­tu­ni­ty to thrust a micro­phone into the face of paid mourn­ers so that they may lie about wit­ness­ing extra-judi­cial killings by police. They do so despite know­ing that the sto­ries the fraud­u­lent mourn­ers tell are large­ly down­right lies.

This phe­nom­e­non has not escaped crim­i­nals who actu­al­ly saw a pub­lic rela­tions coup to be had in con­tin­u­ing this parade of lies and mourning.

Even when vicious mur­ders are killed or appre­hend­ed they come out in droves demand­ing they be set free. Murderers like Zekes are brought out to the Central Police Station by the inept Police, with a view to hav­ing him speak to sup­port­ers. Imagine a com­mon crim­i­nal ele­vat­ed to the sta­tus of peace mak­er extolling his sub­jects to go home, telling them he was fine. Criminals ele­vat­ed to the sta­tus of rock stars, increas­ing their influ­ence when police have to lean on them to calm unrest.

We have seen it hap­pen in the case of many oth­er com­mon thugs, exert­ing their influ­ence over the Jamaica state at the expense of the rule of law. None of these mod­ern-day three fin­ger Jacks despite their influ­ence, have had the pull, sup­port, or evoked the fear that Christopher Coke evoked . Conversely none have seen the gen­uine out­pour­ing of raw emo­tions and love that have been expressed for this now con­fessed gun-run­ner and drug deal­er. There are those who argue that Coke is guilty of much more than the crimes he con­fessed to, but can only be held account­able by America for trans-Atlantic crimes, in the absence of polit­i­cal and law enforce­ment will to hold him account­able in Jamaica.

Bruce gold­ing

As I have said in pre­vi­ous blogs, Coke and those who pre­ced­ed him are also vic­tims of a sys­tem that has allowed them to devel­op, for the ben­e­fit of a cho­sen few in the polit­i­cal arena.

For as much as some may see Dudus as some­one who has achieved tremen­dous wealth and pow­er , the truth is, he is also a vic­tim of Jamaica’s cor­rupt sys­tem , his present place of abode speaks to that vic­tim­hood. The self-exam­i­na­tion of which I speak ‚can­not be con­fined to the tra­di­tion­al whip­ping boys, politi­cians and police​.It must be com­pre­hen­sive to include those in talk radio, and oth­er areas of the media, those in the church, pri­vate sec­tor, the legal fra­ter­ni­ty, and most cer­tain­ly, those in the fight to secure crit­i­cal human rights. I have very lit­tle respect for those who pur­port to rep­re­sent the dis­pos­sessed and disadvantaged.

I am revolt­ed at the thought of refer­ring to them as human rights advo­cates; my view is they are crim­i­nal rights sup­port­ers. My dis­gust and utter revul­sion for them is cen­tered around the sim­ple fact that they are inca­pable of under­stand­ing that the best way to ensure that cit­i­zens rights are respect­ed is that those very cit­i­zens obey the laws of the land.

There is no con­flict in the accep­tance of the adher­ence to the rule of law, and the safe­guards that must be adhered to as they relate to respect for cit­i­zens rights.

Human rights advo­cates have their wires crossed, they are brain-dead into believ­ing that obey­ing Jamaican laws are option­al, their actions sug­gest those who choose to break our laws should have a right to do so.

Some have even col­lect­ed false data to include the names of police offi­cers and sup­plied those data to the Inter America Commission on human rights. A com­mis­sion based in Washington DC, a place where the rule of law is king, and incontrovertible.

The mind­set in Jamaica has got to change if the coun­try is to move for­ward. There is a gen­er­al notion that the rule of law is an after thought, too many of our peo­ple are will­ing to cut crim­i­nals slack, give them a bly, the ben­e­fit of the doubt.

The break­ing of laws is seen as no big deal, with most gen­er­al­ly sid­ing and giv­ing aid and com­fort to the transgressors.

Dr Fredrick Hickling renowned Psychiatrist at the University of the West Indies has sug­gest­ed that a large swath of the pop­u­la­tion is trau­ma­tized and sub­se­quent­ly men­tal­ly ill. Whether we are trau­ma­tized and in need of Psychiatric help is the pre­rog­a­tive of the Dr, Hicklings of this world , what is cer­tain is that our lit­tle coun­try must take stock of the direc­tion the rest of the world is going and get in line.

Getting in line must also mean demand­ing that polit­i­cal rep­re­sen­ta­tives have char­ac­ter, and do what they are elect­ed to do. The peo­ple must demand con­sti­tu­tion­al reform, and a char­ter of rights that caters to their well-being. As evi­denced by this Christopher Coke débâ­cle there are gap­ing holes in the cred­i­bil­i­ty of play­ers from the Prime Minister down to the guy who drove the garbage trucks trans­port­ing the guns from place to place.

Coke and what he rep­re­sents did not hap­pen overnight, it took decades of cor­rup­tion and polit­i­cal manip­u­la­tion to get there .In fact , though Coke and oth­ers had their base in Tivoli Gardens the epic cen­ter of JLP pol­i­tics , his influ­ence reached far and wide to include oth­er coun­tries where mem­bers of his crim­i­nal empire operated.

He oper­at­ed under the noses of Jamaican author­i­ties who were ter­ri­fied to touch him. Government con­tracts were report­ed­ly award­ed to him and his pres­i­den­tial click by the PNP gov­ern­ment even though he was a polit­i­cal adversary.

The impo­tent police force for its part chose to be like a mon­grel dog, with a lot of bark­ing at poor defense­less youths that have no influ­ence, round­ing and lock­ing them up as if that was a solu­tion to the crime prob­lem. While Coke and oth­er untouch­ables oper­at­ed with impunity.

Rank and file police offi­cers unafraid were more than will­ing to smash Coke and his cronies, as well as some that are oper­at­ing to this day. However when Renetto Adams and mem­bers of the now defunct crime man­age­ment unit entered Tivoli Gardens and took action after being greet­ed with heavy and sus­tained gun­fire, they some­how end­ed up being the ones cas­ti­gat­ed by the media, crim­i­nal rights, the church, and those in the polit­i­cal élite. Of course that gave fuel to the fire of per­va­sive crim­i­nal sup­port in the country.

Only in Jamaica could law enforce­ment offi­cers in the exe­cu­tion of their duties get cas­ti­gat­ed for going after ter­ror­ists. This is the norm and the mind­set of the black social-climb­ing , nev­er-see-come-see bijous’ most­ly edu­cat­ed at the University of the West Indies, once a hotbed of lib­er­al Marxist ideology.

Most who walked those cor­ri­dors are sol­diers look­ing for a war, they wear a chip on their shoul­der, “look at me I have an edu­ca­tion’, they nev­er write their names with­out adding their accom­plish­ments BSC, LLB etc, seek­ing to impress, as if some­one cares.

Those are the anti estab­lish­ment any­thing goes lead­ers in the Judiciary, legal fra­ter­ni­ty, and media to name of few areas.They believe they are immune from the ten­ta­cles of crime liv­ing in their gat­ed com­mu­ni­ties, and doing the rounds on the cock­tail cir­cuit. They come out to give their opin­ions when they think it helps their secu­ri­ty, by speak­ing about police abus­es, they are mod­ern-day Pharisees.

Crime metas­ta­size in an envi­ron­ment of acqui­es­cence and fear. Stop the lit­tle offences and they will not grad­u­ate into large crimes. Whether you agree with the crim­i­nal­iza­tion of gan­ja is imma­te­r­i­al. Allow one guy to sell weed on the cor­ner, and soon it’s two guys before you know it every­one is sell­ing weed on the cor­ner, then comes the con­flict over turf, then comes more dan­ger­ous and addic­tive drugs. Soon the cor­ner is a place where addicts hang out, shots bark, homes and cars bur­glar­ized, ordi­nary peo­ple unable to walk in peace and kids are recruit­ed into being run­ners, mus­cle, and dealers.

This esca­la­tion comes about when we fail to stop the first guy because it was only weed. There are those who inject them­selves into the debate pur­port­ing to under­stand the ghet­to and the peo­ple who live there, they argue that guys who hang out on cor­ners are not involved in crim­i­nal activ­i­ty, and are mere­ly what they call (cor­ner crews). This has got to be the most laugh­able attempt at ratio­nal­iza­tion. What the hell is a crew, are they car­pen­ters, stone masons, or builders of sorts, define crew so we can bet­ter under­stand what these guys do.

Group of peo­ple work­ing togeth­er; a gang: a crew of stage hands. b. A group of peo­ple gath­ered togeth­er tem­porar­i­ly; a crowd.(free online dictionary)

Keeping the same mind­set that got us into this mess is not an option if we want to have a bet­ter 50 years after our so-called inde­pen­dence. I have no faith how­ev­er that we will make bet­ter deci­sions going for­ward, all one have to do is to have a con­ver­sa­tion with a neigh­bor, hear his view and one real­izes instant­ly that there is not much hope going forward.

Mike Beckles:

Have your say:

PNP Ready To Rescue Jamaica’

We are left shak­ing our heads at this lat­est state­ment by the People’s National Party , a day after it’s affil­i­ate PNP youth arm stout­ly declared that the par­ty is on elec­tion count-down. One won­ders if the mem­bers of the PNP ever won­der, or is as a col­lec­tive enti­ty , capa­ble of think­ing about Jamaica for a change? The world’s economy,and I dare­say the way things gets done around the world is expe­ri­enc­ing a sys­temic shift, a set­tling if you will, adjust­ing to new real­i­ties. This reset­ting of the world’s econ­o­my will rep­re­sent a shift from tra­di­tion­al norms this is the new world order. Countries all over the world to include the United States of America has seen dra­mat­ic down-turns in eco­nom­ic activ­i­ty. The United States has lost mil­lions of jobs that sim­ply will not return. A tra­di­tion­al fac­to­ry work­er in the US could afford a three bed­room house in the sub­urbs, with a white pick­et fence , a wife and two and one half kids. This work­er could afford to send his kids to col­lege, the fam­i­ly was able to take a vaca­tion annu­al­ly, some of whom as a child I saw in Jamaica.This fac­to­ry work­er is no more. All fac­to­ries are now retro­fit­ted with state of the art robots that do pret­ty much all the work that work­er did. That rep­re­sents the work­ers that glob­al­iza­tion had not already sucked away to coun­tries like Indonesia, China, and the Philipines, coun­tries that have an abun­dance of cheap labor,and are unre­strained by the shack­les of west­ern work­ing stan­dards . As coun­tries like the United States Canada,and England adjust to these real­i­ties the con­se­quen­tial rip­ple effect must rever­ber­ate to small­er coun­tries like Jamaica that are inex­tri­ca­ble linked to the larg­er pow­ers and to some degree depend on them for their lit­er­al eco­nom­ic sur­vival. As fam­i­lies lose their jobs in large indus­tri­alised nations they have much less dis­cre­tionary income to vaca­tion, or to send mon­ey home to loved ones. Jamaica has as it’s num­ber one and two for­eign exchange earn­ers Tourism, and Remittance in that order . It is plain to see how Jamaica’s econ­o­my would be seri­ous­ly neg­a­tive­ly impact­ed in light of this tremen­dous glob­al eco­nom­ic down­turn. There is how­ev­er a glim­mer of hope when­ev­er we expe­ri­ence these re-adjust­ments. They do offer us a oppur­tu­ni­ty to re-eval­u­ate our skill-sets and improve wher­ev­er possible.Doing so enables us to be equipped to meet the needs of the emerg­ing future.

After being in office for 1812 years , and oppo­si­tion for four, the best the PNP’s pres­i­dent could come up with as a pri­or­i­ty for the coun­try, should she be returned to pow­er as Prime Minister was pro­cess­ing man­goes. This sim­ply must be an affront to Jamaicans, who should by now, start to real­ize that the PNP and it’s affil­i­ates are sim­ply inca­pable of under­stand­ing , much less solv­ing the seri­ous prob­lems that faces the Nation going for­ward. How can they find solu­tions if they are inca­pable of under­stand­ing the problems?

Simpson Miller.

I am both ashamed and infu­ri­at­ed every time I hear the PNP, whether through its pres­i­dent, or the oth­er per­pet­u­al cam­paign­ers ‚recy­cle the same reme­di­al clichés, not tak­ing seri­ous­ly the con­cerns of the peo­ple, or not hav­ing the intel­lec­tu­al capac­i­ty to com­pre­hend the seri­ous­ness of crime, ter­ror, hunger, lack of edu­ca­tion, health care, pover­ty, cor­rup­tion and a pletho­ra of oth­er social ills that have stunt­ed Jamaica’s growth, and threat­ens the very exis­tence of the country.

The PNP has always believed they have a right to gov­er­nance, they arro­gant­ly pro­claim Jamaica to be PNP coun­try. This arro­gance has pre­clud­ed them from com­ing up with work­able Solutions to bet­ter the lives of ordi­nary Jamaicans. Choosing instead time after time to resort to the same tired old clichés that appeal to the base instincts of the un-edu­cat­ed masses.

This time my fel­low Jamaicans is no dif­fer­ent than the oth­er times, same tired old lines, look in her con­stituen­cy and ask your­selves “is this what i want for my country”?

She has rep­re­sent­ed that con­tituen­cy for a very long time.

mike beck­les.

have your say:

HUMAN RIGHTS IN JAMAICA:

Wayne Henriques affec­tion­ate­ly called max

Above is the pic­ture of late Police Sargeant Wayne Henriques affec­tion­ate­ly ref­ered to as Max, by those who knew and loved him. Here my fel­low humans, is the face of a the brave men and women of Jamaica’s secu­ri­ty forces who toil tire­less­ly for mar­gin­al compensation,and oper­ate under deplorable work­ing conditions.

I ask all of you whom are not sup­port­ers of crim­i­nal­i­ty to remem­ber this face.

Wayne Henriques was a mar­ried father , a car­rear cop , on leave cel­e­brat­ing his wed­ding anniversary . 

Wayne was called away from his love­ly wife and won­der­ful kids, called back into the ser­vice of oth­ers, his fam­i­ly nev­er saw him again .

Sargeant Wayne Henriques and his col­leagues were bru­tal­ly attacked on MountainView avenue , when the shoot­ing end­ed Wayne and one of his col­leagues lay dead , while six oth­er offi­cers were shot and seri­ous­ly wound­ed by AK47 tot­ing mili­tia-men. Wayne Henriques had gone to the aid of a fel­low Jamaican, a woman strand­ed at bar­ri­cades erect­ed by maraud­ing urban terrorists.

Jamaica under what obtains for nor­mal­cy sees 1600 homi­cides annu­al­ly. Young boys and girls are sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly and rou­tine­ly raped in gar­ri­son com­mu­ni­ties , deprived of their God-giv­en rights to be kids and enjoy the pure inno­cence of being chil­dren. Parents are forced to false­ly report their daugh­ters miss­ing to police, after send­ing them to oth­er parts of the coun­try to live with rel­a­tives and friends, in order to pro­tect them from the ordeal of hav­ing to acqui­esce to the lust­ful drug induced sex­u­al per­ver­sion of local thugs who des­ig­nate them­selves “dons”.

Residents cow­er in fear in their own homes behind lay­ers and lay­ers of met­al bars, effec­tive­ly mak­ing them­selves pris­on­ers in their own homes. Even lay­ers of met­al bars are insuf­fi­cient in pro­tect­ing the cow­er­ing pop­u­lace if they run afoul of local thugs . Any such infrac­tion real or per­ceived, results in res­i­dents homes fire­bombed and any­one flee­ing the flames machine-gunned.
No one is immune from the fusilade of bul­lets, not even just born babies.
The coun­try, even out­side the scare of the Tivoli Invasion has no real growth or devel­ope­ment of con­se­quence to point to, crime and vio­lence has lit­er­al­ly crip­pled agri­cul­tur­al and man­u­fac­tur­ing sec­tors, most com­pa­nies have sim­ply moved away. Those with American Visas have left, oth­ers are forced to scrounge and beg, liv­ing off the largess of rel­a­tives and friends liv­ing abroad. Remittance is now Jamaica’s num­ber two for­eign exchange earn­er. Tourism the cash cow has seen more and more hote­liers offer­ing all-inclu­sive deals with a view to keep­ing their guests safe.
Farmers have no incen­tive to raise ani­mals which are rou­tine­ly stolen. Many whom are crop farm­ers have decid­ed against their cho­sen pro­fes­sion as their crops are sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly stolen.
Most Jamaicans liv­ing at home, or those who vis­it, will attest to the dire hard­ship of sur­viv­ing in Jamaica. Number one at the top of their stress list , is the issue of per­va­sive crim­i­nal­i­ty, and Government’s seem­ing indif­fer­ence to the direct and cumu­la­tive neg­a­tive effect it has on the nation’s psyche.
As a for­mer law enforce­ment offi­cer I am aware, with­out fear of con­tra­dic­tion, of the dan­ger, stress, and per­il , in being a police offi­cer in our coun­try. The world’s largest Police force the (NYPD) found out in the late 80“s to ear­ly 90’s how lethal Jamaican crim­i­nals were. They came to their sens­es when shock­ing­ly, one of their offi­cers was bru­tal­ly mur­dered sit­ting in his patrol car in Queens NY.
All across the United Sates, from California to New York , and as far as Alaska, State and fed­er­al offi­cials were forced to adopt appro­pri­ate, and decid­ed mea­sures to effec­tive­ly counter, con­tain, and degrade the capa­bil­i­ties of Jamaica’s ter­ror­is­tic drug deal­ing thugs.
Every year sev­er­al police Officers are mur­dered in Jamaica some on the front­lines, some mur­dered in the sanc­tu­ary of their very homes.
The report from Jamaicans for Justice, that suc­ceed­ed the May 2010 annex­a­tion of Tivoli Gardens by the secu­ri­ty forces , made no men­tion of the cir­cum­stances that led to the death of res­i­dents of that enclave.
No men­tion was made to her han­dlers, of the police sta­tions that were bombed and the police offi­cers, and mem­bers of the mil­i­tary who were killed and injured.
There was no men­tion of the restraint allud­ed to by the Observer report above.
Bureaucrats on the Commission, wher­ev­er they are domi­ciled, are patent­ly aware that in no coun­try in the world would that kind of assault be tol­er­at­ed or allowed to foment, much less unleashed on any state.
Expressed ene­mies of the state Randy Weaver was swift­ly deal with on Ruby Ridge by the FBI.
David Coresh and the Branch Davidians were expe­di­tious­ly exter­mi­nat­ed by the ATF.
The Black pan­ther par­ty was effec­tive­ly dec­i­mat­ed with bombs in Philadelphia.
Terrorists in Britain , Moscow, Tel Aviv, Paris,Mumbai , and wher­ev­er they raise their ugly heads are effec­tive­ly dealt with.
What makes Jamaica any different?
What is the pur­pose of enquiries by some that have no clout or lever­age in ques­tion­ing their own state or local offi­cials, much less Federal authorities.
Who and what gives them the right to demand reports , and sit in Judgement of our secu­ri­ty forces when they appro­pri­ate­ly put down acts of bla­tant ter­ror , and anarchy.
Carolyn Gomes took the name of one of Jamaica’s most ded­i­cat­ed police offi­cers to that com­mis­sion , where she made unsub­stan­ti­at­ed alle­ga­tions against him.
The Government’s rep­re­sen­ta­tive Audrey Marks dis­gust­ed­ly made no attempt at stand­ing up for Superintendent Delroy Hewitt a fine police officer .
Hewitt’s name was uncer­e­mo­ni­ous­ly dragged through the mud by Gomes and the oth­er mercenary,who false­ly alleged that he is guilty of sev­er­al cas­es of extra judi­cial killings, if ever there was an offi­cer that was 180 degree opposed to that kind of behav­ior it would be Delroy Hewitt.
Gomes was unhap­py with the fact that Ellington, Jamaica’s police com­mis­sion­er was hav­ing none of the nonsense,and stat­ed quote“that is one of my best officers” .,
Those who do not know Delroy Hewitt may form their opin­ions. Here’s what I have to say to Gomes.“Those hon­ors you received on the backs of dead police and mil­i­tary offi­cers , may they burn you in hell”.
Jamaica is a devel­op­ing coun­try that could have been a gem had­n’t it been for unscrupu­lous politi­cians,. The prob­lems the coun­try faces are many and varied.
Ideally peo­ple arrest­ed by the state should be guar­an­teed a bed on which to sleep, ade­quate ablu­tion area and some degree of exer­cise. Children find­ing them­selves in police lock-ups are not the fault of the police, but of their par­ents first, and the Government second.
Police offi­cers can­not take juve­nile offend­ers to their homes , they have to be housed at police sta­tions, absent facil­i­ties fur­nished by Government.
If police offi­cers refused to arrest offend­ers juve­nile or oth­er­wise, Gomes’ argu­ments would be that police are inef­fec­tive, and useless.
As a Jamaican I refuse to allow Carolyn Gomes to use revi­sion­ist his­to­ry to rewrite what pre­cip­i­tat­ed the actions of the secu­ri­ty forces in Tivoli gar­dens in May of 2010. We do not know what hap­pened in the fog of war in Tivoli gar­dens. We weren’t there, and nei­ther was Carolyn Gomes or the peo­ple who sup­port her. We are unaware of any instances of extra­ju­di­cial killings by any mem­ber of the secu­ri­ty forces, we weren’t there , and nei­ther was Gomes or her affiliates.
Irresponsibly shout­ing about extra­ju­di­cial killings with­out evi­dence of same, or a tech­ni­cal under­stand­ing of what it con­sti­tutes , or because some­one say so does not make it cred­i­ble. Gomes sim­ply do not know what con­sti­tutes extra­ju­di­cial killings, evi­dence of which may be found in her inter­view with TVJ, in that dis­joint­ed ram­ble she showed she was out of her league as it relates to what con­sti­tutes mur­der , manslaugh­ter, or even an unlaw­ful killing, she even mean­dered into death by motor vehicle.
We sug­gest Gomes con­fine her­self to her pedi­atric prac­tice and leave law enforce­ment to those whose job it is to enforce the laws.
Jamaicans liv­ing in gar­risons have sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly and rou­tine­ly demon­strat­ed against police irre­spec­tive of what actions they take. In some instance they are intim­i­dat­ed into doing so, some­times the do so will­ing­ly, and on oth­er occa­sions they are paid to do so. It is com­mon for them to wail and throw them­selves on the ground detail­ing what they claim to be acts of extra­ju­di­cial killings that hap­pened in their view at 3:am inside the vic­tims’ house, even though they do not live in the same house.
Members of Jamaican media are gen­er­al­ly more than will­ing to grant pro­fes­sion­al mourn­ers a soap-box know­ing full well they are lying. “Welcome to Jamaica , no prob­lem man” many hear this refrain ‚but are unaware of the dirty under­bel­ly of Jamaican life , an under­bel­ly that seem to get more sor­did with each pass­ing year.
LET’S EXAMINE THIS TERM EXTARJUDICAIL KILLING THAT GETS BANDIED ABOUT.
A mem­bers of the secu­ri­ty forces may use dead­ly force in defence of his life or that of another.
If some­one shoots at an offi­cer then drops the weapon and puts his hands up police are not jus­ti­fied in killing him.
If a per­son points a weapon at an offi­cer , even though he has­n’t fired the weapon that offi­cer is jus­ti­fied in tak­ing that per­son out. If after the offi­cer neu­tral­izes the threat to him­self or any oth­er per­son , and it is dis­cov­ered that the weapon was a fake, or was emp­ty, the offi­cer is still jus­ti­fied in the actions he took, as he could not have know that the weapon was fake or empty.
If an offi­cer who, observes a per­son with a gun in the com­mis­sion of a crime, orders that per­son to drop the weapon, as long as the gun is point­ed at some­one, that offi­cer is jus­ti­fied under the law in tak­ing that per­son out , if he refus­es to obey said offi­cers commands.
Police offi­cers are jus­ti­fied in shoot­ing some­one armed with oth­er weapons , like knives , machetes, etc, if that per­son dis­obeys com­mands to drop the weapon and advances on the offi­cer in a threat­en­ing manner.
Each and every case of police shoot­ing must be looked at as a sin­gle case in and of itself,and can­not rea­son­ably be viewed with­in a broad­er con­text of oth­er killings,even by the same officer.
A Surgeon who loos­es a patient in the oper­at­ing the­atre is not a mur­der­er, unless there is evi­dence of malfea­sance, or neglect. A police offi­cer who kills a crim­i­nal just­ly , is not a mur­der­er that is the nature of his job. No argu­ment about the amount of peo­ple killed by an offi­cer or a unit, is cred­i­ble as a barom­e­ter in deter­min­ing crim­i­nal cul­pa­bil­i­ty by itself, . What those num­bers point to, is the effec­tive­ness and hard work of that unit or individual.
All cas­es are dif­fer­ent, Gomes’ argu­ments about what she per­ceives as the quote ‘unten­able” amount of police killings based on the num­ber of crim­i­nals shot , is an argu­ment she will find unten­able and impos­si­ble to substantiate.
They go not to any unsub­stan­ti­at­ed alle­ga­tion of abuse as she wants the world to believe ‚but more so to the ram­pant , unchecked crim­i­nal­i­ty that is the norm in Jamaica.
In order for that argu­ment to have cred­i­bil­i­ty, or legit­i­ma­cy, a Trier of facts , versed in the laws as they relate to the use of lethal force , would have to deter­mine that each and every case of shoot­ing by mem­bers of the secu­ri­ty forces was an ille­gal unjus­ti­fied act.
If any such Trier of fact is unable to do so, then those argu­ments based on num­bers , is one of igno­rance, steeped in mal­ice, and does not deserve a response. That is the predica­ment in which Gomes and those who sup­port her find themselves.
Gomes and oth­ers like Earl Witter (pub­lic defend­er) main­tains legit­i­ma­cy by using police , they are not the only ones , to have done so.

Every lit­tle lout in talk radio has done so , Politicians have done so , Gomes and her lot are just the lat­est bunch to have got­ten on the band wag­gon, and it damn sure is work­ing. She has gar­nered sev­er­al awards so far. 

Where are the awards for Wayne Henriques and others?

have your say:

IS THE TEA PARTY RACIST?

mb

I am fas­ci­nat­ed by democ­rats, par­tic­u­lar­ly the black ones , I am total­ly blown away by their inabil­i­ty to stand for something.

This runs the gamut from the low­est to the President him­self . Those who stand for noth­ing falls for any­thing. The pres­i­dent and his par­ty has stood for noth­ing , has allowed them­selves to be pushed around and man­han­dled by the racist tea par­ty, so much so that Americans have very lit­tle hope that the man who cam­paigned on the mantra of hope and change can deliv­er either.

Americans like their President to be deci­sive and firm , wrong or right , con­vic­tion is impor­tant. As a for­mer sup­port­er of President Obama I must say I too am dis­ap­point­ed in the President. Not because I expect­ed him to deliv­er some­thing to ben­e­fit me. But because of his lack of back-bone in stand­ing up to Republicans.

The tea par­ty has lam­bast­ed ‚assailed and car­i­ca­tured this President from day one, dim-wit­ted democ­rats were too pissed scared to open their snivel­ing , quiv­er­ing mouths to push back in defence of our President, this includes the black cau­cus . No one dared crit­i­cize Sarah Palin for her repeat­ed racist attacks on the President and his wife Michelle Obama. Mrs Obama by the way, a Princeton edu­cat­ed Lawyer did not need to attend sev­er­al col­leges before she could earn a bach­e­lor’s degree.

No one dared open their mouths at Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Fox organ of mis-infor­ma­tion, or any of the Republican agents or organs that have been unleashed against President Obama. Not even Obama him­self, too scared to call a spade a spade .

What the hell does Obama and the Democrats think the tea par­ty car­toon car­i­ca­tures of the pres­i­dent in loin cloth by the hut sig­ni­fy? what does all of the oth­er despi­ca­ble depic­tions mean ? does it mean we dis­agree with you? No they mean you are beneath us and we do not want you in the White House , that is what they mean. All of the black politi­cians and oth­ers who should sup­port the pres­i­dent are duplic­i­tous­ly silent behind all of the attacks. 

Cornel West and the President in hap­pi­er times

Cornell West and Tavis Smiley have gone as far as to accuse the pres­i­dent of not doing enough for black peo­ple , seri­ous­ly? what have Cornell West and Tavis Smiley done to push back at the racist reac­tionar­ies in the tea par­ty that has been a thorn in the side of President Obama.

Blacks have long sought to put down their own kind, while mak­ing excus­es, and ratio­nal­iz­ing for those who have enslaved and still keep them in bondage. It is the ” we sick mas­sa syn­drome” . The late great Malcolm X had some choice words for them, whom he char­ac­ter­ized as “negroes”.

Finally a Democrat made the mis­take of open­ing his mouth and speak­ing out , call­ing the tea par­ty what it real­ly is , here’s what Indiana con­gress-man Andre Carson had to say . 

The Tea Party wants to see blacks Americans hang­ing on a tree” .Some of the folks in Congress would love to see us as sec­ond class cit­i­zens,” Carson said at a Caucus event in Miami. “Some of them in Congress right now of this Tea Party move­ment would love to see you and me, I’m sor­ry chair­man, hang­ing on a tree.

Tea Party groups are out­raged and are call­ing for the con­gress­man to resign imme­di­ate­ly. Fellow Congressional Black Caucus mem­ber Allen West says he’s recon­sid­er­ing his mem­ber­ship in the group. Carson told CNN he stands by his com­ments.“I stand on the truth of what I spoke,” he said. “My inten­tions weren’t to hurt any­one or any group”

Ok let me see if I under­stand this cor­rect­ly ! the tea par­ty is demand­ing that a con­gress­man elect­ed by his con­stituents resign for speak­ing out against their racist dem­a­goguery, well I nev­er, these tea par­ty lunatics real­ly have some nerve.

What real­ly gets me is Allen West Black Republican con­gress man stat­ing that he is recon­sid­er­ing his mem­ber­ship in the Black cau­cus. Please do every­one a favor Allen West, leave the Caucus​.You serve no pur­pose in that group and as such. should not have been in it to begin with.

Allen West

Definition of CAUCUS. : a closed meet­ing of a group of per­sons belong­ing to the same polit­i­cal par­ty or fac­tion usu­al­ly to select can­di­dates or to decide on pol­i­cy

Allen West and the oth­er mem­bers of the black cau­cus are from dia­met­ri­cal­ly dif­fer­ent polit­i­cal per­sua­sions, they share noth­ing in com­mon except the col­or of their skin , they dif­fer on every­thing polit­i­cal­ly. Why is Allen West in the black caucus?

Herman Caine

Then there is Herman Caine, Black repub­li­can can­di­date for pres­i­dent. If this was­n’t so insult­ing it would be com­i­cal. Some of you may be ask­ing Herman Caine? who the heck is this guy? Well Caine is a for­mer CEO of a piaz­za fran­chise, he rose from rags to rich­es and nev­er miss­es an oppur­tu­ni­ty to tell that his father was a chauffer.Cain allows tea par­ty big­ots to absolve them­selves of the shame of their racist iden­ti­ty at his expense . 

They trot this guy out with the tra­di­tion­al refrain, see we are not racist, we have black can­di­dates, bull.

The truth is the for­mer repub­li­can par­ty of peo­ple like McCain, and Chuck Hagel could not attract but a few black del­e­gates to its lil­ly white con­ven­tion, does any­one believe this jok­er stand a chance of being elect­ed pres­i­dent on the repub­li­can tick­et? This guy is a nov­el­ty, com­ic relief like Sarah Palin, Donald trump, and Allan Keyes before him.

Caine claims he knows racism when he sees it , as a con­fessed son of the south, (what­ev­er that means) , and he has seen no racism in the tea par­ty .When one con­sid­ers the amount of black blood that has been shed in the American south. I won­der what the plac­ards depict­ing President Barack Obama as every­thing from a witch doc­tor to a mon­key mean? Whatever shred of cred­i­bil­i­ty this Caine may have had, sim­ply vapor­ized and blew away with that damn lie. Herman Caine has become the lat­est black to be an apol­o­gist for white racists, there are oth­ers like FOX news Juan Williams , and Jessie Petersen, and a slew of oth­er self loathing blacks.

They should ask for­mer Republican National com­mit­tee chair­man Michael Steele how that worked out for him. Republicans hid behind Steele, held their noses, and used him to harass Obama, the net gain for repub­li­cans was a land­slide in the house for them. No soon­er they won the House they showed Steele the door with his tail between his legs.

Colin Powell

Former chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of staff and Secretary of State Colin Powel, prob­a­bly the best known black Republican, has seen how blacks gets treat­ed in the repub­li­can par­ty when he got iced out of Bush’s inner cir­cle. Powel is cur­rent­ly fend­ing off a bar­rage of attacks to his char­ac­ter from Dick Chaney. The same is true of for­mer Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

Blacks and the repub­li­can par­ty are as oil on water they sim­ply do not mix.

As it was in the days of Malcolm X, the ones lead­ing the charge to lynch Congress-man Carson are blcks, These uncle Toms nev­er saw fit to denounce their mas­ters in the tea par­ty when they sought to demean and degrade President Obama, but are now up in arms demo­niz­ing a black man who has the guts and the char­ac­ter to speak out against bla­tant and demon­strat­ed racism.

As they did against Dr. King and Malcolm and oth­er lead­ers of the civ­il rights strug­gle, the white pow­er struc­ture trot­ted out uncle tom negroes to make the case that every­thing was right in America, paint­ing those who sought to have their God-giv­en rights respect­ed, as trou­ble mak­ers , com­mu­nists, anti-American and every­thing includ­ing the kitchen sink.

Does any­one in their right mind believe the vit­ri­olic vapid and ven­omous attacks lev­elled at pres­i­dent Obama is because of pol­i­cy? In fact exam­ine Obama’s poli­cies against for­mer pres­i­dent Bush 43rd and see if they dif­fer much.

Bush start­ed and main­tained two wars. Obama esca­lat­ed one and scaled back one.

Bush had the patri­ot Act signed into law . Obama extend­ed the patri­ot Act.

Bush main­tained prison in Guantanamo May. Obama keeps it open.

Bush gave tril­lions in tax cuts to the rich . Obama wants to roll them back, no success.

Bush’s poli­cies dev­as­tat­ed the econ­o­my. Obama strug­gles to bring the econ­o­my back.

Bush had no clue how to get Bin Laden. Obama found and exter­mi­nat­ed him.

Bush cre­at­ed ene­mies for America with his brava­do. Obama restores America to a coun­try of peace, that respect others.

Which of these two men is wor­thy of praise, if any? where are the seis­mic pol­i­cy dif­fer­ences that makes Obama so despised as against pres­i­dent Bush? The fact is there is none, the prob­lem tea par­ty activist and their zoot-suit­ed black court jesters have with the pres­i­dent is the col­or of his skin. White tea par­ty mem­bers hate the pres­i­dent because he is half black. Black tea par­ty activists hate the pres­i­dent because they hate themselves.

If democ­rats want to have a chance in the next elec­tion, they must start grow­ing some back­bone, no one wants wimps to rep­re­sent them at a time when racist dem­a­gogues are out in full force against what we have accom­plished , tear­ing at the seams of the gar­ments those whom have gone before have stitched for us . Threatening to rip them from us expos­ing the naked­ness of our dispossession.

Black peo­ple the world over who respect them­selves are tired of being told who our lead­ers should be, what we can and can­not say , and when we may or may not speak. The con­gres­sion­al black cau­cus have been silent through­out all of the assault on Barack Obama, which is an all out assault on all black peo­ple and what we have fought for and accom­plished . Make no mis­take there are those who will argue things are good and we should try to get along, well they aren’t, untill they respect us, and the lead­ers we chose to lead us, as Maxine Walters said “they can go straight to hell’.

This is not for blacks like Allen West, it is not for Clarence Thomas, it is not for the clowns that embar­rass them­selves at tea par­ty events pro­vid­ing com­ic relief. After all you may remove some from the plan­ta­tion, but may not remove the plan­ta­tion from some.

mike beck­les:

have your say: