Daily Gleaner’s Manipulation Of The Public.

Gleaner caption
Gleaner cap­tion

Readers of Jamaica’s Daily Gleaner the mouth­piece for the People’s National Party, and JFLAG the homo­sex­u­al lob­by group in that coun­try woke up to this sub­tle manip­u­la­tion in that once pres­ti­gious medi­um, under the title.

PNP COMEBACK

Portia Simpson MillerAndrew Holness

The art of sub­tle manip­u­la­tion, but manip­u­la­tion nonethe­less, por­traits of Simpson Miller and Andrew Holness not after an election,but before the elec­tion. Yet this medi­um claim to be fair.

Take a look at the por­trait of Holness, con­tem­pla­tive , sad, deject­ed, con­fused, tired,bewildered, any of the afore­men­tioned adjec­tives would have been appro­pri­ate in describ­ing this pro­file. Conversely look at Miller, hap­py, con­fi­dent, vibrant, com­posed, all of the lat­ter adjec­tives would also be appro­pri­ate in describ­ing her. This medi­um takes you all for fools, they believ­ing you are inca­pable of under­stand­ing the sub­tle art of visu­al manip­u­la­tion, or the impact a pic­ture has on the brain which is wired to rec­og­nize these vari­ables and store them. An unde­cid­ed vot­er going into the vot­ing booth will remem­ber both por­traits and make their deci­sion on which per­son they feel will win based on their demeanor. This is the kind of dis­dain that the élite has for ordi­nary Jamaicans, one nev­er knows when this lev­el of dis­re­spect will ever stop.

As a boy grow­ing up in Jamaica I could­n’t wait to get my hands on the Gleaner, this was the only news­pa­per in Jamaica at the time of course, there was the evening tabloid, the Star. The paper was brought into my District by the Postman, who either rode a bicy­cle or walked, with a sack of mail which he deliv­ered to our Postal Agency , “Posie” as we lov­ing­ly called him, deliv­ered the Gleaner to one of our com­mu­ni­ty’s most respect­ed elders who oper­at­ed a shop close to the Postal Agency. Mister Small would read the paper from cov­er to cov­er, allow his cus­tomers to also read it, but he would take great care to save the paper for me so that on my way home from Primary school I could read it. He under­stood how much I loved to read, he also under­stood my keen inter­est in pol­i­tics and every­thing current .

RIP Mister Small !

Under the lead­er­ship of Oliver Clarke the Gleaner weath­ered many storms and endured, to be revered as the pre emi­nent news-paper not just in Jamaica but in the entire Caribbean. One thing the Editorial Board rec­og­nized from ear­ly , was that the path­way to a bet­ter Jamaica was not through pan­der­ing to the base desires of the moment , but was hinged on lay­ing the foun­da­tion for edu­ca­tion and strong nation build­ing, the frame-work for a bet­ter future. As a result the Gleaner was crit­i­cized for its con­ser­v­a­tive posi­tion. As such for years many accused it of being sup­port­ive of the Jamaica Labor Party, the truth is, what the Gleaner sup­port­ed was a sus­tain­able path to nation build­ing, not a path of depen­den­cy . This how­ev­er did not deter Michael Manley from lead­ing a rabid mob of his sup­port­ers in the 70’s to the Gleaner’s offices on North Street threat­en­ing with clenched fists “next time, next time” No oth­er Political leader has ever been so brazen as to overt­ly threat­en the press and the func­tion it has in pro­tect­ing our free­doms, and ensur­ing our democ­ra­cy is pro­tect­ed from tyrants.

Those who choose a path of revi­sion­ist his­to­ry has skill­ful­ly omit­ted to men­tion these and many oth­er trans­gres­sions of Michael Manley, cast­ing him as an icon­ic mata­dor of demo­c­ra­t­ic prin­ci­ples and ideals,as a teenag­er grow­ing up under his rule I was a wit­ness to his­to­ry, I was there, I don’t need to be told what hap­pened I saw for myself, I saw the good of his intentions,But I also saw for myself his naiveté ‚and mul­ti­ple mis­takes. Being a rous­ing speak­er does not qual­i­fy one to be a good leader, ideas imple­ment­ed improp­er­ly does no one any good they are just ideas. Michael Manley under­stood his frail­ties as a leader, he under­stood his mis­takes, some­thing his cult fol­low­ing does not. Hence Manley’s mea cul­pa when he came back to con­test the elec­tions that saw the back of Edward Seaga.

The Gleaner through all the grow­ing pains of our coun­try main­tained it’s integri­ty as the true source of infor­ma­tion for the Jamaican peo­ple . as a peo­ple who did not have many choic­es when we thought about news­pa­per we thought about the Gleaner , when we thought about tooth­paste it was Colgate, when we thought about Beer we thought about Red Stripe, those were ours, proud­ly Jamaican prod­ucts, irre­spec­tive of what came after those were the names that were indeli­bly seared into our souls.

Oliver Clarke has unfor­tu­nate­ly passed the torch to some­one else, of course all good things must come to an end, and as such we have seen a dra­mat­ic decline in the qual­i­ty of the prod­uct. Despite tech­no­log­i­cal addi­tions to the Gleaner’s prod­uct, like it’s web­site which pur­ports to allow com­ments, a good thing, if not manip­u­lat­ed to push agen­das. This has opened the prod­uct to the world bring­ing Jamaicans in the dias­po­ra into the con­ver­sa­tion, allow­ing every­one the oppor­tu­ni­ty to see what’s hap­pen­ing on the ground. Those advances if used prop­er­ly has tremen­dous poten­tial for inform­ing the dias­po­ra, sell­ing Jamaica to the world, and reap­ing untold finan­cial wind­fall for the Gleaner.This would how­ev­er require informed vision­ary lead­er­ship devoid of myopia or chained to local polit­i­cal preferences.

Instead what has steadi­ly been hap­pen­ing at the Gleaner is a small-mind­ed manip­u­la­tion of it’s read­er­ship, through slant­ed report­ing , and in some cas­es out­right cheer lead­ing, and sub­tle manip­u­la­tion using imagery all toward a nar­row parochial sup­port for the People’s National Party. Editors like every­one else are enti­tled to their opin­ions, what they are not allowed to do is to dis­tort facts to suit their polit­i­cal agen­das. Jamaicans large­ly do not agree with homo­sex­u­al­i­ty that is their right, Neither Britain nor any­one else have the right to tell Jamaicans what to think . nei­ther does any­one or any coun­try have the right to threat­en to use eco­nom­ic black­mail to ter­rorise us . We are a free peo­ple all 2.8 mil­lion who live on the Island and the mil­lions more who live across the globe, gay or straight, black or white, chris­t­ian or Muslim, athe­ist or agnos­tic, male or female.

Let me be clear no one who is gay should be killed, dis­crim­i­nat­ed against because they are gay , denied any ben­e­fit that is avail­able to oth­ers of oth­er sex­u­al ori­en­ta­tion, nei­ther should any gay per­son be denied the right to be gain­ful­ly employed in any dis­ci­pline to which he or she has appro­pri­ate qual­i­fi­ca­tion because of their sex­u­al orientation.

However Gays are in the minor­i­ty and we live in soci­eties that embrace major­i­ty rule, until we go to a for­mu­la of minor­i­ty rule I will not be told by any homo­sex­u­al that I must embrace that lifestyle as nor­mal , or moral, no homo­sex­u­al will con­vince me that I must sur­ren­der my chris­t­ian val­ues on the altar of car­nal­i­ty by sup­port­ing their cause. My God cre­at­ed a man and woman to fill the earth , I will for­ev­er believe his word, and will nev­er bend to elit­ist dog­ma which pro­fess­es that who do not embrace homo­sex­u­al­i­ty, or share their views are beneath them. I will respect their right to be what they are , but they must respect my right to believe that their car­nal immoral lifestyle is an abom­i­na­tion to my God,and as such I will call it for what it is,.….… an abom­i­na­tion !

The Gleaner’s cam­paign to pro­mul­gate homo­sex­u­al­i­ty on the Jamaican nation is an affront to our dig­ni­ty and our val­ues , the over­whelm­ing major­i­ty of us are opposed to this repug­nant counter-cul­ture, and even though we believe in fair­ness we are opposed to any­one push­ing what they believe on us.

The Gleaner’s Editor if he is gay should have the courage to come out of the clos­et and declare his sex­u­al pref­er­ence to the nation, instead of hid­ing behind his Editorials pre­tend­ing to cham­pi­on the rights of homo­sex­u­als when he may very well be defend­ing his own sex­u­al­i­ty. The finan­cial argu­ments he has used has fall­en flat as they have not tak­en into account the poten­tial dis­as­trous con­se­quence to the health sec­tor from dis­eases derived from homo­sex­u­al indul­gence. As such his cru­sade should be seen as the cru­sade of a pos­si­ble gay per­son who is afraid of his own homo­sex­u­al­i­ty, too much of a cow­ard to declare who he is or stand by what he is .

Whatever the out­come of the elec­tions on Thursday December 29th, a day that just hap­pen to be the date of my birth, Jamaicans will have to live with the choice they make. Whether the win­ner is Miller or Holness that lead­er’s deci­sions will decide Jamaica’s course, pos­si­bly for gen­er­a­tions to come, we get the gov­ern­ment we deserve. Jamaicans will have to decide if the way for­ward will con­tin­ue to be one of hand­outs from friends and rel­a­tives liv­ing abroad or they will once and for all take their future and that of their chil­dren into their own hands,understanding that hand­outs and cheap polit­i­cal pork bar­rel pro­grams will not get them to eco­nom­ic free­dom. Economic free­dom will only be achieved through hard work, Education and sacrifice.

Queen Portia !

Portia
Portia

One can­not fix what one does not under­stand to be a prob­lem. Jamaica’s People’s National Party as a par­ty nev­er ful­ly under­stood the con­cept of free mar­ket . They built their par­ty on pop­ulism and the charis­ma of their leaders.

The prob­lem with the People’s National Party is not that they do not mean well, it’s not that they do not care, the prob­lem is the method­olo­gies they employ in their stat­ed quest to improve the lives of Jamaicans actu­al­ly has kept the poor­est peo­ple enslaved in their own pover­ty. I was not around at the time of Norman Manley , but my curios­i­ty about his­to­ry has revealed the true nature of Manley’s con­tri­bu­tion to Jamaica and the pop­ulism he used to deliv­er said ben­e­fits. Norman Manley’s pop­u­lar­i­ty and pop­ulism and that of his son Michael gave birth to an almost cult-like genre of the Jamaican pop­u­la­tion that per­sists to this day despite the PNP’s short-com­ings, and cor­rup­tion over the last three decades. One could rea­son­ably argue that the cult-like loy­al­ty the most­ly poor­er under­class have for the PNP , some­thing the Jamaica Labor Party can only dream of , is anchored large­ly in their inabil­i­ty to under­stand that real change in their lives will come only through hard-work, sac­ri­fice, and nation­al pride. National pride by the way does not mean wear­ing com­mu­nist red, salut­ing with clenched fist, or from those who run around call­ing each oth­er com­rade but has nev­er read a line of Lenin or Marx’s phi­los­o­phy. Today​.Today despite the fall of the Berlin Wall result­ing in the reuni­fi­ca­tion of an impov­er­ished com­mu­nist East Germany with a thriv­ing West Germany over two decades lat­er, the breakup of the for­mer Soviet empire, and the death of com­mu­nism as an organ of empow­er­ment, the PNP is still stuck advo­cat­ing the same regres­sive com­mu­nal poli­cies that caused those occur­rences in these larg­er geo­graph­ic loca­tions in the first place, poli­cies they have since dis­card­ed and are now rac­ing to catch up with the rest of the indus­tri­al­ized world which opt­ed for free mar­ket pol­i­cy, trust­ing in the inge­nu­ity of their peo­ple to dri­ve growth and devel­op­ment through their God-giv­en talents.

Miller

The People’s National Party President Portia Simpson Miller recent­ly chid­ed Prime Minister Andrew Holness for stat­ing that Government real­ly can­not be the prime cre­ator of jobs.This crit­i­cism ought to have been a warn­ing to an informed pop­u­lace that this per­son may mean well but lacks a basic under­stand­ing of what real­ly is required to change the dynam­ics in the coun­try , which will in turn affect their lives in a pos­i­tive way. Alas Jamaica does not have an informed pop­u­la­tion, what we have is a deeply dived peo­ple who bleed red/​orange or green when they are cut. Government’s job is to pro­vide a safe envi­ron­ment, that includes ade­quate infra­struc­ture which in turn gives peo­ple a chance to get the edu­ca­tion they need in the field of their choice to bet­ter their lives. How can gov­ern­ment which does earn rev­enue large­ly through tax­a­tion be the engine that dri­ves sus­tain­able job cre­ation or growth? Unfortunately the PNP is still enshrined in the socialist/​communist dog­ma that is embraced by only North Korea , even Cuba is look­ing to move to a mar­ket econ­o­my. Portia talks about China , brag­ging that the PNP embraced China when it was not pop­u­lar to do so , well the truth of the mat­ter is that the PNP did not embrace China for it’s now diver­si­fied cap­i­tal­ist eco­nom­ic push , they embraced China on ide­o­log­i­cal grounds . Holness missed an oppor­tu­ni­ty to dri­ve this fact home, chalk that up to his youth. In the 21st cen­tu­ry the PNP is still refer­ring to them­selves as com­rades, that train has long left the sta­tion the only ones who has­n’t real­ized this is them.

As I have allud­ed to in these blogs time and again when asked what her pri­or­i­ty would be if elect­ed Prime Minister Miller stat­ed that she would endeav­or to col­lect man­goes that we can­not eat,process them,eat what we can and share the remain­der with the rest of the world . a sup­port­er of Miller famous­ly stat­ed in a blog that Miller is respect­ed and loved all around the world . I thought about that claim as I remind­ed myself that in the same way coun­tries do not share friend­ships they share com­mon inter­ests, women laud each oth­er com­pli­ment each other,celebrate each oth­er, praise each oth­er, claim to sup­port each oth­er for no oth­er rea­son but that they are women. On the world stage polit­i­cal lead­ers tol­er­ate each oth­er. In an appar­ent open mike foul up recent­ly at a gath­er­ing of world lead­ers, French President Nicholas Sarkozy report­ed­ly told President Obama he could­n’t stand Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu because he was a liar, to which Obama retort­ed “You can’t stand him , how do you think I feel hav­ing to deal with him every day”? I am sure both gen­tle­man warm­ly greet­ed and chat­ted with Mister Netanyahu ear­li­er that day.

No Contest Debate !

Andrew Holness out­shone Portia Simpson Miller in the debates last night , it was clear from the start that Portia was out of her ele­ments .Portia stum­bled out of the gates fum­bling with papers that seem to hold the answers to the ques­tions which they had access to before the cha­rade of what passed for a debate aired. Never mind that the so-called mod­er­a­tor , rude and talk­a­tive took up most of the time which should have been spent by the can­di­dates explain­ing to the Jamaican peo­ple how they intend­ed to improve their lives.

Most impor­tant­ly I thought her body lan­guage toward the Prime Minister was un-becom­ing and pet­ty, but this is to be expect­ed of Portia Simpson Miller, whom it seem is too old to get it​.So it was for her old school pol­i­tics as usu­al minus the trac­ing but an over abun­dance of the overt animus. 

JLP Leader Prime Minister Andrew Holness and PNP president Portia Simpson Miller

Courtesy of JamaicaGleaner​.com

Miller revert­ed to say­ing over and again “when we are returned to pow­er” which seem at least to me to be the only thing she cared about. What struck me most was when the ques­tion was posed to her about whether her plan to redi­rect funds from JDIP a pro­gramme that cre­ates jobs to the PNP’s JEEP , would not just be shuf­fling jobs around she denied it. The JEEP pro­gramme that the PNP wants to intro­duce if they are returned to elect­ed office is noth­ing more than a recre­ation of crash pro­gramme. Simpson Miller all but said this in the debates with Holness. She kept allud­ing to want­i­ng a gov­ern­ment with a heart, and her words were that she would like to see drains and gul­lies cleaned, .I’m no expert on pol­i­tics but was­nt this what hap­pened in the sev­en­ties? Didn’t we see the same crash pro­gramme men­tal­i­ty lit­er­al­ly bank­rupt the coun­try? Why should Jamaicans allow them­selves to be coaxed into a regres­sive pol­i­cy of siphon­ing mon­ey from legit­i­mate infra­struc­tur­al devel­ope­ment , which employs Jamaicans by the way, to a tried and failed pol­i­cy of “hav­ing a heart”, lean­ing on a broom and receiv­ing a check . When are Jamaicans going to real­ize that every gen­er­a­tion will have to swal­low hard med­i­cine if the future is to be bet­ter for their chil­dren? When are Jamaican vot­ers going to walk away from the pol­i­tics of expe­di­en­cy, the pol­i­tics of now, the “eat a food ’ men­tal­i­ty? Any argu­ment about waste and cor­rup­tion in JDIP is a legit­i­mate one that ought to be inves­ti­gat­ed thor­ough­ly, after all we have seen a gov­ern­ment min­is­ter step down as a result of the unearthing of these alle­ga­tions of excess­es by the Auditor General , clear­ly where there is smoke there is fire. This how­ev­er does not mean that a pro­gramme of infra­struc­tur­al devel­ope­ment should in any way be inter­fered with to sat­is­fy a regres­sive pol­i­cy of pork bar­rel spend­ing to appease polit­i­cal hacks and depen­dents. It is the ulti­mate vote-buy­ing pol­i­cy, which runs counter to what the PNP and it’s lead­ers say they are opposed to.

Gays in cabinet

On the ques­tion of Gays poten­tial­ly serv­ing in a Simpson Miller cab­i­net , Miller retort­ed that she is not into get­ting into peo­ple’s pri­vate busi­ness­es, and as such she would not tol­er­ate any dis­crim­i­na­tion against gays in a Simpson-Miller gov­ern­ment . This is the answer Washington wants to hear it is the answer London wants to hear, it is the answer JFLAG wants to hear in fact the lat­ter was already on record­ing com­mend­ing Miller for her posi­tion as soon as the Gleaner was pub­lished Wednesday December 21st. But let’s step back and see what the Jamaican peo­ple over­whelm­ing­ly wants. Most Jamaicans are vehe­ment­ly opposed to homo­sex­u­al­i­ty, whether one agrees with that posi­tion or not a major­i­ty of 2.8 mil­l­lion peo­ple have a right to self-deter­mi­na­tion, no one is going into hous­es seek­ing out gays to be burned at the stake, Jamaicans how­ev­er have a right to say we are opposed to this lifestyle , we do not want it and we will not be told what to like by impe­ri­al­ist pow­ers that does not share our val­ues. Millers response was a clear and unequiv­o­cal pan­der­ing aimed at vote har­vest­ing, in her zeal to pan­der to that repug­nant un-Jamaican counter-cul­ture and break our estab­lished laws she has solid­ly cast­ed the PNP as the par­ty of gays and les­bians, the par­ty that opened up Jamaica to devian­cy and ungod­li­ness, the major­i­ty of Jamaicans be dammed.

The major­i­ty of PNP sup­port­ers are dia­met­ri­cal­ly opposed to homo­sex­u­al­i­ty, so who does Miller and her par­ty rep­re­sent in this pan­der­ing? Who does the PNP rep­re­sent in this un-Jamaican posi­tion? Where is the church in this , are they going to remain silent on this very burn­ing issue ? Is the church going to do its job, pol­i­tics aside and tell it’s con­gre­ga­tions about the evils of homo­sex­u­al­i­ty and the dan­ger inher­ent in open­ing the door to sodomy? We shall see.

Political ads.

The JLP was rebuffed in an effort to air an adver­tise­ment show­ing Portia Simpson Miller rant­i­ng about not being afraid of any­one, any­time any­where by the mini gods at the Gary Allen led RJR group, under the guise that the ad con­flict­ed with its pol­i­cy of air­ing adver­tise­ments that meets a cer­tain stan­dard. What Jamaicans and indeed the world is unaware of is who the hell gives these min­ions the right to decide for 2.8 mil­lion peo­ple liv­ing in the coun­try what gets aired or does­n’t? The Airwaves are owned by the peo­ple not by Allen. Every child’s action becomes part of their per­ma­nent record , it deter­mines what insti­tu­tion of high­er learn­ing that child will be allowed to enter , it dic­tates what jobs that child will be allowed to have when he/​she grows up , yes and that’s for chil­dren. Why is it that the politi­cos who run the media hous­es in our lit­tle coun­try believe they should dic­tate who the vot­ers choose? Miller made those com­ments out of her own mouth, in pub­lic , they were not doc­tored or changed , she made them as an adult. Can some­one please explain to me why she should be shield­ed from the con­se­quences of her actions, and why are so many will­ing to allow her below medi­oc­rity per­sona to be pushed aside so that she can have what she feels is her birth right, or as her freudi­an slip indi­cat­ed , so that she can be crowned Queen of Jamaica.

I don’t know about you but that showed me exact­ly how her mind works, it’s always been about Portia.

THIS IS REALLY WHAT’S AT STAKE

It’s the sil­ly sea­son in Jamaica. Once again Jamaicans allow them­selves to be whipped into a fren­zy in sup­port of one of the two polit­i­cal gangs that take turns ruin­ing .… I mean run­ning Jamaica. This hap­pens every four or five years despite protes­ta­tions from many that they do not see nei­ther the win­ners or losers in their com­mu­ni­ties after the elec­tions untill the next cycle comes around. So the sto­ries have start­ed com­ing in about the ston­ing of busses filled with peo­ple on their way home from a meet­ing held in Mandeville Manchester called to announce the date of the elec­tions. There are also reports of one man being shot and killed after that same meet­ing, I mean, seri­ous­ly people?

Portia and comrades having a good time
Portia and com­rades hav­ing a good time

The Jamaican Dollar fluc­tu­ates some­where between 83 – 85 to one US$ this means the dol­lar is real­ly worth­less, even in Jamaica traders and ped­dlers ask for US dol­lar in pay­ment for goods and ser­vices, infla­tion has dri­ven the price of food and oth­er con­sumer goods through the roof, crime cor­rup­tion and ter­ror are rampant.These are just some of the issues plagu­ing our once beau­ti­ful par­adise. Many argue they don’t care what’s going on Jamaica is nice, and I con­cur of course our coun­try the beau­ti­ful land of wood and water is just as beau­ti­ful, if of course one choos­es to ignore the fact that too many of our trees has been cut down so we have small­er rivers and streams as a result of less rain­fall when com­pared to three decades ago , but I digress.

It is not the coun­try it’s always the people.

The Observer Editorial of today Tuesday December 20th prais­es RJR for not air­ing the JLP’s adver­tise­ment show­ing Portia Simpson Miller rant­i­ng and rav­ing about not being afraid of quote “no bwoy, nu gal, nowhere” .

RJR right to sus­pend Portia trac­ing ad.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com.

In his Editorial the writer went to pains to try to absolve Portia of respon­si­bil­i­ty for the words com­ing from her very lips.

These com­ments were not untrue quotes assigned to her mali­cious­ly, they were not doc­tored and damn sure are not incor­rect , yet this opin­ion shaper went to lengths to con­vince vot­ers that quote ” The peo­ple will judge Mrs Simpson Miller as to her char­ac­ter, as they did in 2007. The JLP needs to have a lit­tle more faith in the good sense of the Jamaican vot­er. What a load of crock the actions of chil­dren from as far back as grade school now forms part of that child’s per­ma­nent record, it deter­mines what high school or col­lege that child is accept­ed into , it deter­mines what that child will be when he/​she grows up , yet some­how the words and actions of Portia Simpson should be ignored and cov­ered up. Portia Simpson Miller has allowed the ghet­to to shape her as much as any­thing else, as a young detec­tive I observed her in front of the Whitehall Avenue school roll and bawl in the mid­dle of the streets because her red ban­dan­na wear­ing thugs were not allowed to steal bal­lot box­es from the school, nev­er mind that her con­stituen­cy is bor­der­ing Spanish Town Road, and White Hall Avenue is in Saint Andrew North. Whatever we do in life fol­lows us for the rest of our lives Simpson Miller is no excep­tion. Gary Allen and oth­ers are noth­ing more than lit­tle Gods in their lit­tle ponds in Jamaica , small fish in their lit­tle holes mak­ing deci­sions of what peo­ple are allowed to hear and what they aren’t allowed to hear , for­tu­nate­ly there are choic­es now , peo­ple do not have to lis­ten to RJR now do they?

WHY NOTFIXED ELECTION DATE?

Jamaicans will go to the polls on December 29th 2011.

December 29th is a sig­nif­i­cant mile­stone for me as that is the date of my birth. I have a prob­lem with Prime Minister Holness call­ing elec­tions on my birth­day, I’m not hap­py about that kind of mad­ness on my spe­cial day. Ok that was a joke, but seri­ous­ly though over the years I have added my voice in the call for fixed elec­tion dates. It seem juve­nile and almost child­ish for some­thing as seri­ous and Jermain to our coun­try’s sta­bil­i­ty as elec­tions to be left to the whim and fan­cy of one per­son. I am yet to hear a rea­son­able argu­ment that sup­ports the sta­tus quo.Conversely it has been a tool for Prime Ministers to use when it suits them , and at a time when the polls are in their favor.

In the greater scheme of things it real­ly is not as seri­ous as some who argue against it would have you believe, at least in my mind , and I would be open to hear­ing and assim­i­lat­ing more argu­ments in sup­port of our posi­tion. It is impor­tant but for me it does not par­al­lel the need for con­sti­tu­tion­al reform and a com­plete de-annex­a­tion from Britain. I do believe a date cer­tain would be more ben­e­fi­cial to the finan­cial mar­kets and the busi­ness sec­tor, nei­ther of which par­tic­u­lar­ly likes dis­qui­et or uncer­tain­ty. It seem to me it would also cause those han­dling the peo­ple’s busi­ness to bring greater stew­ard­ship and pro­fes­sion­al­ism to their jobs, unless of course they choose to com­mit polit­i­cal suicide.

One thing is cer­tain as a specie we con­tin­ue to give up free­doms that made our lives fun and inter­est­ing, the lat­i­tude a prime Minister has in call­ing elec­tions with­in a cer­tain time but not a spe­cif­ic date will prob­a­bly be tak­en away because of the games­man­ship that has become syn­ony­mous with that lat­i­tude. Simple lux­u­ries like hav­ing a cell phone in one’s car has been abused by those who talk and text while they dri­ve , has attract­ed sig­nif­i­cant penal­ties to those conveniences.

So as we pay a price for talking/​texting while dri­ving, our Prime Ministers may very soon lose the lat­i­tude of being the decider of when elec­tions are called.

THE ROAD TO HELL

WINDSHIELD WIPER FREED

Alvin Campbell, o/​c Rocky, who came to nation­al atten­tion as a wind­screen wiper on the TVJ pro­gramme ‘Impact’ with Ms Emily Crooks, was freed on Tuesday of all charges in the Half-Way Tree Resident Magistrate’s Court before Her Honour Ms Maxine Ellis. On the court being told that there were no state­ments on the file, his attor­ney, Howard Hamilton, QC, told the court that he was not sur­prised at that dis­clo­sure because it had long been his clien­t’s con­tention that there could nev­er have been any alle­ga­tion that he had obstruct­ed any motorist as, on the occa­sion of his arrest, the police had sim­ply come along and “scraped up” all per­sons like him, who had been wip­ing wind­screens for a living.

alter­na­tive measures

The mag­is­trate, while admit­ting that she her­self was famil­iar with the prac­tice, expressed the view that some alter­na­tive mea­sures ought to be con­tem­plat­ed to enable these young men to be gain­ful­ly employed, but as there was no one present alleg­ing that Mr Campbell had obstruct­ed them, the case was dis­missed for want of pros­e­cu­tion. Mr Hamilton advised the court that he had been in dia­logue with the min­is­ter of nation­al secu­ri­ty, who has expressed the inten­tion to exam­ine pro­pos­als to address the situation.

I am, etc.,

HOWARD HAMILTON, QC

26 Duke Street

Kingston

LETTER OF THE DAY

HAMILTON THE WINDSHIELD CLEANER AND THE MINISTER

The Gleaner of November 4 pub­lished a let­ter titled ‘Windshield wiper freed’. The author of the let­ter, Howard Hamilton, QC, is a well-known Jamaican lawyer and now it seems de fac­to pro­tag­o­nist for wind­shield clean­ers. In the let­ter he boasts about his client being freed. While I have no knowl­edge of the guilt or inno­cence of this accused man, I have a seri­ous prob­lem with Hamilton’s asser­tions in para­graph two. As a for­mer detec­tive of the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) I am incensed. Paragraph two reads: “On the court being told that there were no state­ments on the file, his attor­ney, Howard Hamilton, QC, told the court that he was not sur­prised at that dis­clo­sure because it had long been his clien­t’s con­tention that there could nev­er have been any alle­ga­tion that he had obstruct­ed any motorist as, on the occa­sion of his arrest, the police had sim­ply come along and ‘scraped up’ all per­sons like him, who had been wip­ing wind­screens for a liv­ing.” The law gives the police in Jamaica the author­i­ty to pros­e­cute an offend­er who, with­in his view, obstructs traf­fic. No sup­port­ing state­ment is required to arrest, pros­e­cute, or con­vict. That’s the law. If Howard Hamilton does not like the law, he can use his vast influ­ence to lob­by for change but he should not attempt to mis­lead the pub­lic into believ­ing that this alleged offend­er was exon­er­at­ed because no motorist was hin­dered, and sub­se­quent­ly no com­plainant state­ment was avail­able. In cas­es of this nature pros­e­cut­ed under the (Road Traffic Act) it is one’s word against the polices’. The last para­graph of Hamilton’s let­ter reads thus: “Mr Hamilton advised the court that he had been in dia­logue with the min­is­ter of nation­al secu­ri­ty, who has expressed the inten­tion to exam­ine pro­pos­als to address the sit­u­a­tion.” What is Hamilton doing talk­ing to the min­is­ter of nation­al secu­ri­ty, a politi­cian, and the over­all boss of the police force about a mat­ter in which he was involved, still before the courts and to which a res­o­lu­tion had not yet being reached? Hamilton a renowned lawyer with immense influ­ence has no busi­ness hav­ing any con­ver­sa­tion with the min­is­ter of nation­al secu­ri­ty about any mat­ter in which he is involved and still before the courts. I would also like to ask the com­mis­sion­er of police to seri­ous­ly look at these police­men who arrest peo­ple and do not com­plete the process of case prepa­ra­tion that is nec­es­sary to gain a con­vic­tion. I am all too famil­iar with lazy cops who bring the JCF into ridicule and dis­re­pute. Superintendent Radcliffe Lewis, with much fan­fare, took on this issue, a move I sup­port­ed in this medi­um as nec­es­sary. He must be the boss who del­e­gates and select one mid-lev­el super­vi­sor, prefer­ably an inspec­tor or sergeant, to vet the court files for cor­rec­tion and com­ple­tion. This is what those ranks are sup­posed to do.

I am, etc.,

Mike Beckles

MIKE BECKLES MYOPIA

Mike Beckles’ let­ter in your November 5 edi­tion typ­i­fies the skewed views per­sons will have of sit­u­a­tions in Jamaica from their lofty tow­ers in Poughkeepsie, New York, which, as every used car sales­man in America knows, is itself a recog­nised retire­ment loca­tion for “lit­tle old ladies, whose motor cars have clocked very lit­tle mileage” For his infor­ma­tion, there is no statute on the books in Jamaica which makes it an offence to wipe wind­screen of motor cars on a pub­lic thor­ough­fare. It is a dif­fer­ent mat­ter if, in the act of wip­ing a wind­screen, a motorist is obstruct­ed there­by, and, as Mr Beckles has cor­rect­ly stat­ed, “the law gives the police in Jamaica the author­i­ty to pros­e­cute an offend­er who, with­in his view, obstructs traf­fic”. It is in his next para­graph, how­ev­er, that Mr Beckles, not sur­pris­ing­ly, veers off track. “No sup­port­ing state­ment is required to arrest, pros­e­cute or con­vict,” he says.

Fourth court appearance

For Mr Beckles’ ben­e­fit, the occa­sion of Alvin Campbell’s acquit­tal was his fourth appear­ance in court and, as the clerk of court report­ed to the res­i­dent mag­is­trate, that there were no state­ments on the file from day one, none from any motorist and none from the arrest­ing offi­cer him­self — so there was no alle­ga­tion that the arrest­ing offi­cer had wit­nessed any obstruc­tion. On the oth­er hand, it was Mr Campbell’s con­tention that he was arrest­ed because he was a “known” wind­screen clean­er, and not for clean­ing any wind­screen that day. As for my hav­ing dia­logue with the min­is­ter of nation­al secu­ri­ty, that had noth­ing to do with Mr Campbell specif­i­cal­ly but, rather, was to devise a more humane approach to redi­rect these young men who, in a des­per­ate attempt to eke out a liv­ing on the harsh streets of Kingston, may be tempt­ed, or dri­ven, to a life of crime.

I am, etc.,

HOWARD HAMILTON, QC

26 Duke Street

MY RESPONSE

Myopic?Let me tell you who is myopic , it is peo­ple like you who have dic­tat­ed for too long the course our Country takes because you could not see the long-term effects of your short-sight­ed band-aid approach, wind­shield wip­ing is not a crime you are the Lawyer , what is an offence is obstruct­ing traf­fic, the Police are not out there enforc­ing wind­shield wip­ing what they are out there enforc­ing is Traffic obstruc­tion and crimes of oppur­tu­ni­ty being com­mit­ted as a result of peo­ple con­gre­gat­ing in these locations.For Decades Lawyers like you have been ele­vat­ed to Gods in Jamaica tak­ing advan­tage of poor peo­ple when you care noth­ing about any­thing but your fidu­cia­ry Interest. I do not need your lec­ture about the fact that there is no statute on the books that crim­i­nal­ize wind­shield wip­ing , I am patent­ly aware of that, and I nev­er stat­ed that there was, what I said was that obstruct­ing traf­fic is an offence , you can use your smoke and mir­rors but they do not work on me and peo­ple with brains in their heads , go back and read my state­ments. On the issue of your dis­cus­sions with the Minister of National Security I am not sur­prised that you do not see any­thing inher­ent­ly wrong with speak­ing to the Minister about wind­shield wipers , effec­tive­ly lob­by­ing him to call off the Police from doing their legit­i­mate and sworn duties. Now to you and your friends who think that all who reside over­seas are rich peo­ple , first let me tell you I worked like a dog to put myself through high school in Jamaica , served in the JCF for ten years took count­less guns and Criminals off the streets, got shot in the line of duty, and have been shot at in every gar­ri­son by Criminals that you and your ilk work assid­u­ous­ly to release back onto the streets. I am about half your age so I will not get into the cass cass trac­ing match with you about geog­ra­phy , I would have thought that would have been beneath you , I am dis­ap­point­ed , I was wrong , deal on the mer­its you erred egregiously.….….….peace.

SUMMARY

I post these back and forth between the esteemed Queens coun­cil attor­ney Howard Hamilton and myself , which appeared November 2010 in the Jamaica Gleaner In an effrot to draw atten­tion to the high lev­els of sup­port and acqui­es­cence that is avail­able for those who clear­ly break our laws. Even though the per­pe­tra­tors may think they have legit­i­mate rea­sons , break­ing the laws can­not be con­doned or supported.

This fol­lows the last blog about the ack­ee thief, my inten­tion is to show that there is a built-in tac­it sup­port for crim­i­nal­i­ty in Jamaica even from those whom are offi­cers of the court. In some cas­es their inten­tions are good but the path they choose to imple­ment those good inten­tions are treach­er­ous and bad for our country.

The law can­not be cir­cum­vent­ed , the goal posts can­not be moved, we can­not change the rules in the mid­dle of the game, the firm­ness of the law is the most crit­i­cal com­po­nent that keeps those who desire a life of crime from over run­ning the rest of us. The deter­rent effect is what keeps some out of a life of crime. What the detrac­tors do not under­stand is that once the teeth is removed it is both use­less and pointless.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

IT WAS NEVER ABOUT ACKEES !

Recently we com­ment­ed on the case of a mag­is­trate in Jamaica sen­tenc­ing an offend­er to three-months in jail for steal­ing ack­ee from the grounds of Kings House. King’s House is the offi­cial res­i­dence of the Governor General. Anyone who read my blogs knows I crit­i­cize judges every­day for turn­ing crim­i­nals loose onto the streets and impos­ing ridicu­lous­ly low sen­tences for very seri­ous offences and crimes. This par­tic­u­lar Magistrate has nev­er been a favourite of mine ‚but on this issue I sup­port her decision.

There has been howls of con­dem­na­tion from the tra­di­tion­al crim­i­nal sup­port­ing sources in the our coun­try, you know them ‚the vil­lage lawyers, the know it all, those who feel they should have unfet­tered access to the prop­er­ty of oth­ers , and of course the chief crim­i­nal sup­port­ing group in the coun­try Jamaicans for justice.

Many argue that the Governor General should inter­vene in the deci­sion of the court and grant the man par­don, this of course the GG is unable to do with­out con­sul­ta­tion with the Privy Council In England. and he appro­pri­ate­ly said as much in response to the sil­ly calls for his inter­ven­tion.

The gov­er­nor-gen­er­al has observed that while the Constitution grants him the pow­er to exer­cise par­don or sub­sti­tute a less severe form of pun­ish­ment, it also pro­tects the integri­ty and inde­pen­dence of the judi­cia­ry by stip­u­lat­ing that the gov­er­nor-gen­er­al must act in con­sul­ta­tion with the Privy Council. This, there­fore, means that the gov­er­nor-gen­er­al acts on the advice of the Privy Council, and any oth­er course of action will be ultra vires the Constitution(jamaica glean​er​.com)

Now our friends at the Gleaner we love them but we also chide them some­times for putting insuf­fi­cient infor­ma­tion out to the pub­lic or putting stuff out that many of its read­ers do not under­stand unless they are read­ing with the aid of an ency­clo­pe­dia. So we will briefly tell you what (ultra vires)means. Ultra vires a Latin term mean­ing “beyond pow­ers. So the far left in Jamaica which usu­al­ly is com­posed of most­ly those who have attend­ed the University of the West Indies and has been bathed in the doc­trine of socialism/​communism real­ly wants the Governor General to break the law, in essence over-reach into ter­ri­to­ry he has no legal author­i­ty to inter­fere in.

Jamaica’s Governor General Sir Kenneth Hall

To many this is about ack­ees, to me it is not. One per­son com­ment­ing in a forum on the Gleaner’s web­site opined that since he was arrest­ed at the spot no theft was com­mit­ted, the fal­la­cy inher­ent in that posi­tion is astound­ing, but is a good rep­re­sen­ta­tive sam­ply­ing of how some Jamaicans think. I guess a mur­der­er arrest­ed at the scene of the crime is no mur­der­er. Nonetheless the bar­rage of crit­i­cisms being heaped onto the judge and the GG goes on unabated .

So lets take a look at what’s at stake here , while the dif­fer­ent sides argue, more infor­ma­tion comes to light and as such many are hard­en­ing their posi­tions , none more so than the crim­i­nal rights group Jamaicans for jus­tice. They con­tend that the thief was once a charge of the state and he nev­er had the ben­e­fit of a prop­er home,he was hun­gry and, so he stole the ack­ees to sell in order to pur­chase food. Even if all of the afore­men­tioned was true they do not give any­one the right to steal. If caught and con­vict­ed an offend­er may use those argu­ments toward get­ting a mit­i­gat­ed sen­tence , which of course would be total­ly up to the tri­er of facts. They are not argu­ments that legit­imizes larceny.

This prob­lem by the way is symp­to­matic of the per­va­sive crim­i­nal­i­ty and innate cor­rup­tion that forms the very DNA of our coun­try, no longer a rash on the out­side, this accep­tance and sup­port of all acts crim­i­nal is now a malig­nan­cy. What we can extrap­o­late from all of this is the dif­fi­cul­ty that will form the way for­ward in bring­ing Jamaica back to a place of respectabil­i­ty and hon­or. A recent report again has Jamaica as one of the world’s most cor­rupt nations.

I per­son­al­ly have no prob­lem the man who stole the ack­ees, after all he was arrest­ed and a mag­is­trate has ruled on what the penal­ty should be. What I have a prob­lem with are the bleed­ing hearts who have noth­ing to do but sup­port crim­i­nal­i­ty and are apol­o­gists for those who decide to make crime a way of like.

There are no short­age of caus­es that could attract well-mean­ing peo­ple. There is pover­ty , hunger, child abuse, can­cer, intol­er­ance , vic­tims of crime and the list goes on (ad infini­tum) The frauds at Jamaicans for jus­tice have tak­en it upon them­selves to sup­port, and speak for those who rob,rape, and mur­der. Not only have they done so but they have launched a sys­tem­at­ic cam­paign of lies and mis­in­for­ma­tion against Jamaica’s police and mil­i­tary offi­cers who patrol the dense­ly pop­u­lat­ed gar­risons where AK47 tot­ing thugs parade open­ly with their weapons and have zero com­punc­tion about killing law enforce­ment offi­cers or any­one else for that matter. 

Susan Goff Carolyn Gomes

These are the faces of crim­i­nal sup­port in Jamaica, make no mis­take about it,there are many more who are using their posi­tions of pow­er to fur­ther the anar­chy that pre­vails , but these two are the worst offend­ers. Those two are fund­ed and sup­port­ed by out­side agi­ta­tors in Europe and Washington DC , of course in order to secure these funds they must gath­er infor­ma­tion on sup­posed instances of abuse that has gone un-addressed by Government. As you would expect Gomes and Goff has repeat­ed­ly sup­plied patent­ly false and doc­tored data that has repeat­ed­ly been exposed to be just lies, or at best unsubstantiated.

They throw around terms like extra judi­cial killing as if they know what that is. Their nar­ra­tive is void of any under­stand­ing of the cir­cum­stances under which an offi­cer may shoot a sus­pect, or the time offi­cers have to make those life and death deci­sions. Decisions that are made in a frac­tion of a sec­ond, have life alter­ing con­se­quences but which they have a life­time to sec­ond guess and criticize.

Carolyn Gomes desire and attempts at telling police offi­cers how to do their jobs is the same as police telling her how to treat a sick baby. Carolyn Gomes is a pedi­a­tri­cian , her job is treat­ing sick babies, she has no train­ing in police work and as such she should con­fine her­self to that which she has train­ing in . The issue of human rights is a fun­da­men­tal­ly impor­tant issue, which can­not be over­stat­ed, it goes far deep­er than police offi­cers who may on instances over­step their author­i­ty. Let me be clear I have no desire in shield­ing or apol­o­gis­ing for offi­cers who over­step their author­i­ty and com­mit bla­tant and unpro­voked abuse of any mem­ber of the pub­lic. An attack on any mem­ber of the pub­lic is an attack on all of us, and it ought not be con­doned or tolerated.

Conversely I am patent­ly aware of the dif­fi­cul­ty police offi­cers have in exe­cut­ing their duties in Jamaica’s inner cities, I was one of those offi­cers, it was hard when I served, it is hard­er now. There is a sig­nif­i­cant increase in the num­ber of weapons and ammu­ni­tion avail­able to crim­i­nals, there is also a sig­nif­i­cant improve­ment in the cal­i­bre weapons and the amount of ammu­ni­tion avail­able to them. there is also no short­age of vil­lage lawyers and mon­day morn­ing quar­ter­backs with noth­ing bet­ter to do than hear their own voic­es on radio. I know the dif­fi­cul­ty these men and women face in these split sec­ond sit­u­a­tions, I was one of them, I took a bul­let from a .45 cal­i­bre weapon. As such I will always err on the side of those who offered to serve,over those whose desire it is to kill and destroy. The lines are clear there is no mid­dle, no fence to sit on , either you sup­port the rule of law or you sup­port terrorists.

The Jamaican Government for its part scared shit­less about the con­se­quences of the lies Gomes feeds to International Human Rights Agencies, have reward­ed her with a National Honor. A nation­al hon­or on the blood of all of the brave police offi­cers and mem­bers of our mil­i­tary who have giv­en their lives in the exis­ten­tial fight Jamaica has been engaged in with deter­mined and heav­i­ly armed urban terrorists.

This spine­less and cow­ard­ly act on the part of the Government is even more offen­sive when con­sid­ered against the many police offi­cers who have their lives extin­guished every year, not to men­tion those shot and injured in defense of the very cow­ards who con­demn them. I am one of those offi­cers who had been shot in the line of duty and live to talk about it. That is the rea­son I am unapolo­getic and undet­tered by crit­ics who think they know some­thing . When the pages of his­to­ry are writ­ten these char­la­tans and Jezebels will be remem­bered as hero­ines when the truth is they were noth­ing more than Benedict Arnolds in our coun­try’s search for peace and justice.

In the 80’s New York City was a lit­er­al cesspool of crime, the streets were a haz­ard, from squeegee men to graf­fi­ti van­dals, from mur­der­ing drug deal­ers to orga­nized crime, liv­ing or doing busi­ness in the city was an occu­pa­tion­al haz­ard. Ed Koch the three term Mayor had long ran out of ideas and zeal. busi­ness­es had been migrat­ing from the worlds great­est city in droves. Times Square the epic-cen­ter of NY city was noth­ing more than porn alley where las­civ­i­ous­ness reigned, peep show, prostitution,and drug deal­ing sypnop­sized what Times Square was all about.

David Dinkins

Giuliani

David Dinkins the City’s first African Mayor was elect­ed with a frag­ile coali­tion, and giv­en the task of return­ing the city to its for­mer glo­ry. Dinkins got to work, he trained and put thou­sands of cops onto the streets in a pro­gramme called safe streets safe city. He solicit­ed and secured fed­er­al funds to pay for the addi­tion­al cops and insti­tut­ed a raft of oth­er social pro­grammes that removed youths from the streets. Dinkins was boot­ed from Office at the end of his first term, and replaced by Rudolph Giuliani a tyran­ni­cal Italian American with a Napoleon com­plex. Giuliani had effec­tive­ly used race to dri­ve a wedge between the dif­fer­ent com­mu­ni­ties that elect­ed Dinkins. He agi­tat­ed and sowed rifts between NY Jewish and black com­mu­ni­ties, and the city’s Asian and Black communities.Dinkins was unable to please all of these groups and his efforts were not helped by Koch ‚his Democratic pre­de­ces­sor who sided with Giuliani .

In the end Giuliani was reward­ed with the fruits of Dinkins labor . NY City was restored to its for­mer glo­ry and remains so . It was returned to what is still one of the safest large cities in the world because the strat­e­gy of tack­ling small offences and attach­ing seri­ous penal­ties to these offences ensured that those who com­mit those offens­es did not grad­u­ate to more seri­ous crimes, it works.

The hue and cry in our coun­try today is about all of the crim­i­nals locked away in jails, at the same time they argue that the police is inef­fec­tive. Which is it ? Both state­ments can­not be true ! That aside, is the ques­tion about the large num­ber of peo­ple incar­cer­at­ed, or should it be about what is it that caus­es so many out of a pop­u­la­tion of 2.8 mil­lion to choose a life of crime ?

The fact is, the issue is not about Ackees at all. The real issue here is that this is some­one who stole , got caught and got his just desert, a cou­ple of months in jail. Many argue he was hun­gry, as if being hun­gry gives one the right to steal, some even argue hunger is a rea­son to steal. The truth is in this case jail is not a bad option as it would assure him a place to stay and free food for at least three months on the tax­pay­er’s dime. In many parts of the world this thief would have paid with the loss of a hand,some of these bleed­ing heart crim­i­nal sup­port­ers needs to be sent to Saudi Arabia and oth­er places for an ori­en­ta­tion, they want to talk about abuse let them go there and talk that rubbish.

I believe in Jamaica, I know Jamaica will become a coun­try of laws, this will mate­ri­al­ize as glob­al­iza­tion spreads and take hold, I am not a fan or a sup­port­er of glob­al­iza­tion, I am just aware of the impli­ca­tions of a more cen­tral­ized order in the world, we have already seen how that played out in the Christopher Dudus Coke extra­di­tion case, if change can­not hap­pen from with­in it cer­tain­ly will come from without.

THE MADNESS CONTINUES.


The sil­ly sea­son is here once more ‚accord­ing to the Jamaican papers Prime Minister Andrew Holness will report­ed­ly announce the date of the Elections on Sunday December 4th. According to the coun­try’s con­sti­tu­tion elec­tion must be called by the Government , and must be held with­in three months of the dis­so­lu­tion of Parliament which itself has a life-span of five years. We fer­vent­ly hope that Jamaicans who are prone to vio­lence when the adren­a­line rush begins, will be able to con­trol them­selves from killing and maim­ing each oth­er, it would be too much for me to even both­er to expect matu­ri­ty from the bump heads that are up for elec­tion/re-elec­tion, from those at the top down to the young aspi­rants the rhetoric is the same inflamed bel­li­cose non­sense that we have all grown accus­tomed to, squash it please .

There is a lot in the news these days, the Leader of the polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion refus­es to walk with the new Prime Minister in a show of sol­i­dar­i­ty toward the dis­man­tling of gar­risons, she claimed that a sym­bol walk will not enhance the process of dis­man­tling gar­risons, this may be true that a mere walk will not break down decades of men­tal brain­wash­ing, but Portia, can it real­ly hurt ?

DEBATES

Then there is the issue of debates , the Prime Minister said he want­ed to debate the oppo­si­tion leader, there has been much back and forth about this with Portia seem­ing to favor a team debate , at one point it seem there prob­a­bly would be no debates since they are not bound by law so to do, but from all indi­ca­tions Portia seem to have come out of hid­ing and has agreed to a series of three debates with Holness, this after the crit­i­cisms seemed to be get­ting loud­er that Portia real­ly was afraid to debate the younger well-edu­cat­ed Holness. We find this odd and less than kosher since Portia has been in rep­re­sen­ta­tion­al pol­i­tics before Holness was born, but we may be wrong.

ACKEE THIEF GETS PRISON TIME

Also in the news is a mat­ter that all Jamaicans should be hap­py about , but pre­dictably many are cry­ing foul. A man who breached the secu­ri­ty of the grounds of King’s House the res­i­dence of the Governor General and stole ack­ees from a tree was sen­tenced to three months in jail by a judge. There are howls of con­dem­na­tion from sev­er­al quar­ters of the coun­try , not least of which is the crim­i­nal sup­port­ing group Jamaicans for Justice and their char­la­tan leader Carolyn Gomes. They argue that the GG should inter­vene and grant clemen­cy to the con­vict­ed thief. The GG for his part has come out artic­u­lat­ing just under what con­di­tions he could inter­vene, which I will not go into here because I do not think any­one should inter­vene in the court’s deci­sion. For those who argue for lenien­cy by the GG, espe­cial­ly the crim­i­nal sup­port­ing JFJ liars, here’s a lit­tle bit of infor­ma­tion for you, you argue that you want an inde­pen­dent Judiciary yet when the Judiciary act inde­pen­dent­ly you want well placed peo­ple to inter­vene to free crim­i­nals( oonuh teefin fren) you cant’ have it both ways. What you real­ly want is a sys­tem that works the way you want it to work, when you want it to work, for whom you want it to work. Well that won’t work , we moved away from the British Monarchy a long time ago, we do not want any inter­fer­ence in the affairs of the courts by any­one, no more gov­ern­ing by decree, we now have a gov­ern­ment by consent.

Jamaica is a coun­try swim­ming in a cesspool of crime, not quite sure how to claw its way out of that morass, yet on the rare occa­sion that a crim­i­nal is pun­ished the crim­i­nal sym­pa­thiz­ers are out in full force con­demn­ing the courts for doing exact­ly what it should and with­in the frame­work that it has. One per­son com­ment­ed in anoth­er forum that there was no theft because the ack­ee was recov­ered at the scene , I asked him whether some­one who cuts his throat killing him, and is appre­hend­ed at the scene is guilty of mur­der? We Jamaicans are a spe­cial bunch, we refuse to allow facts or truth to get in the way of our opin­ions. As such many deci­sions are made in a knee-jerk man­ner with­out due dili­gence in think­ing them through. As if the calls for the ack­ee thief was not galling enough, the court has capit­u­lat­ed and grant­ed him bail, banana repub­lic any­one? You see I have no spe­cial beef with the ack­ee thief , what I have a prob­lem with are those who agi­tate for crim­i­nals, and the ensu­ing break­down in the jus­tice sys­tem that is beyond the scope of com­pre­hen­sion of those who agitate.

From left: Resident Magistrates Viviene Hall-Harris, Sandria Wong-Small, and senior resident magistrate for St James, Winsome Henry, in conversation with Justice Lennox Campbell. - File

Lennox Campbell in the clown suit

Just recent­ly a Supreme Court Judge Lennox Campbell released a group of Cop killing mag­gots back onto the streets to kill more police offi­cers, sim­ply because he was inca­pable of empan­el­ing a jury, there is no prece­dent for Campbell’s actions and if allowed to stand it sets a dan­ger­ous mes­sage to the already too pow­er­ful crim­i­nal lawyers, frus­trate the process and the case gets thrown out of court.

For those who cry blue mur­der when the mur­der­ing scum bags are sent to meet their mak­ers , what do you think will hap­pen when cops see these punks again, do you think they will end up in a court of law, let me tell you, they will meet anoth­er kind of Judge, and that judge will have no sym­pa­thy, care­ful what you ask for.

Appeals court upholds bail for Patrick Powell.

As we have pre­dict­ed on this site the alleged killer of young Khajeel Mais, Patrick Powell would be released on bail . Powell who was grant­ed bail in the home cir­cuit court by judge Carol Beswick, but who remained in cus­tody because of a motion filed in the Appelate court by the pros­e­cu­tion, which object­ed to bail based on the fact that Powell had indeed fled the coun­try after killing 17 years old Mais as he rode in a cab to a fête being held at a promi­nent St Andrew High School.

Jamaican law clear­ly states that a sus­pect may be remand­ed in cus­tody if he/​she is a flight risk, mean­ing that per­son may not turn up for tri­al, or if the per­son may be a threat to poten­tial wit­ness­es. Powell demon­stra­bly is a clear and unequiv­o­cal flight risk , from what we hear he is an American cit­i­zen and he ran after the shoot­ing , he was lured back to the Island after one of his off­springs was arrest­ed on a seri­ous felony charge which was pend­ing. The Appeals Court now rules that Beswick did not act improperly.

THE BAIL ACT BE DAMMNED

Once again Jamaica’s mini gods have struck a blow for the con­nect­ed and well-heeled, but against the com­mon man when aggriev­ed, as we have sought to do we bring this to your atten­tion for your eval­u­a­tion and assim­i­lat­ing , you decide if these acts are in the best inter­est of Jamaica. Powell pic­tured here in hand­cuffs, not only ran from the coun­try after shoot­ing the young man but he brazen­ly refused to coöper­ate with the inves­ti­ga­tions, and refused to hand over the weapon which at the time of his arrest was report­ed­ly a licensed firearm. In any oth­er Country that would have land­ed him in prison straight away with­out any con­sid­er­a­tion of argu­ments from defense coun­sel, not so in Jamaica they let him out on the streets.We are well aware that law enforce­ment offi­cers are giv­en no respect in Jamaica so not coop­er­at­ing with the inves­ti­ga­tions is noth­ing, peo­ple who phys­i­cal­ly assault or wound offi­cers in the exe­cu­tion of their duties face no penal­ties, they are gen­er­al­ly sent home with­out even a conviction.

Since Jamaican Authorities refuse to uphold our laws it becomes expe­di­ent there­fore that we lob­by the Us State Department which sure­ly believe in the rule of law, and ask that they take a more detailed and seri­ous look at peo­ple com­ing out of Jamaica in the United States.Wit a view to ensur­ing that a more rig­or­ous and com­pre­hen­sive back­ground check be done to ensure that crim­i­nals who attack Jamaican offi­cers and com­mit oth­er crimes does not enter the United States to do the same , after all there is more than enough cas­es of these assaults hap­pen­ing to war­rant a seri­ous look by US author­i­ties. If change can­not hap­pen from with­in then we must ensure change hap­pen from without.

MIKE HENRY RESIGNS

Henryglean­er photo.

Transport and works Minister Mike Henry has resigned in the recent rev­e­la­tions of gross cost over­runs and work report­ed­ly com­plet­ed to the tune of 23 mil­lion dol­lars yet those works are yet to be iden­ti­fied. damion.​mitchell@​gleanerjm.​com

This lat­est devel­ope­ment does not bode well for the rul­ing Jamaica Labor Party, Henry fol­lows close­ly behind Former Prime Minister Bruce Golding who stepped down over lin­ger­ing rum­blings and dis­con­tent from some quar­ters about his han­dling of the Christopher Coke extra­di­tion case. With Elections con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly due soon and Prime Minister Andrew Holness desire to gain his own man­date, these devel­op­ments could not come at a worse time. Holness had just pulled to a vir­tu­al tie with the PNP in the polls , pri­mar­i­ly due to what vot­ers saw as his youth and per­ceived lack of ties to old school style politics.

Any momen­tum gained could eas­i­ly evap­o­rate for Holness if he fails to act quick­ly and deci­sive­ly to ensure that this mat­ter is aired out , with no inkling of coverup, but let­ting the chips fall where they may,. This is not the first time Mike Henry has been in the news as it relates to reck­less or extrav­a­gant spend­ing of tax­pay­ers money.

Vybz Kartel gets bail

Jamaica dance hall DJ Adija Palmer aka (vybz Kartel) who is in cus­tody charged with a whop­ping five mur­ders has been grant­ed bail by Supreme Court judge, Justice Bertram Morrison in rela­tion to the case involv­ing the mur­der of St. Catherine busi­ness­man, Barrington Burton. Bail was grant­ed in the sum of $3 million.

inter­est­ing­ly bail was grant­ed at an in cham­ber meet­ing between the judge and defense lawyers Tom Tavares Finson and Christian Tavares Finson. Palmer will be unable to take up the bail offer right away because of the oth­er cap­i­tal mur­der cas­es against him that are yet unre­solved. Of course reports indi­cate his lawyers are prepar­ing to take their win­ning argu­ments to the oth­er judge/​s in those mat­ters with a view to hav­ing him released on bail. You can then rea­son­ably con­clude that he will be out on the streets to direct­ly or through prox­ies threat­en and ter­ror­ize wit­ness­es involved in these pend­ing cases.

Great job Justice Bertram Morrison[sic] you have now entered the Jamaican judges hall of shame.

JamaJaJamaica’s elec­tions are called by the gov­ern­ment of the day and must be held with­in three months of the dis­so­lu­tion of Parliament which, itself, has a life-span of five years. Administratively, the coun­try is cur­rent­ly divid­ed into 60 con­stituen­cies, each hav­ing one rep­re­sen­ta­tive in Parliament. Constituencies increased from 32 in 1944 to 45 for the 1959 elec­tions, then to 53 in 1967 and in 1976 to its present num­ber.maica’s elec­tions are called by the gov­ern­ment of the day and must be held with­in three months of the dis­so­lu­tion of Parliament which, itself, has a life-span of five years. Administratively, the coun­try is cur­rent­ly divid­ed into 60 con­stituen­cies, each hav­ing one rep­re­sen­ta­tive in Parliament. Constituencies increased from 32 in 1944 to 45 for the 1959 elec­tions, then to 53 in 1967 and in 1976 to its present num­ber.ica’s elec­tions are called by the gov­ern­ment of the day and must be held with­in three months of the dis­so­lu­tion of Parliament which, itself, has a life-span of five years. Administratively, the coun­try is cur­rent­ly divid­ed into 60 con­stituen­cies, each hav­ing one rep­re­sen­ta­tive in Parliament. Constituencies increased from 32 in 1944 to 45 for the 1959 elec­tions, then to 53 in 1967 and in 1976 to its present numJamaica’s elec­tions are called by the gov­ern­ment of the day and must be held with­in three months of the dis­so­lu­tion of Parliament which, itself, has a life-span of five years. Administratively, the coun­try is cur­rent­ly divid­ed into 60 con­stituen­cies, each hav­ing one rep­re­sen­ta­tive in Parliament. Constituencies increased from 32 in 1944 to 45 for the 1959 elec­tions, then to 53 in 1967 and in 1976 to its present num

Jamaican Judge Releases Cop Killers, Without Explanation.

If you thought you had heard it all as it relates to the mad­ness that exists on the Island of Jamaica fol­low these blogs. Many who live abroad but would like to relo­cate to Jamaica will truth­ful­ly tell you they are restrained from return­ing to the land of their birth because of a pletho­ra of rea­sons, not least of which is the inor­di­nate­ly high crime rate that has plagued the Island nation for decades. I for my part have been sound­ing the drum-beat for a long time about the run-away crime and the rea­son it con­tin­ues to be so. There is no one issue that fuels the high crime rate in Jamaica, and as such the solu­tion will have to be a mul­ti-faceted approach to fix­ing it .

No issue stands out in the con­tin­ued decline of our Country’s moral fibre than the break­down in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem, as I have point­ed out in these blogs some of the peo­ple tasked with adju­di­cat­ing are lit­tle more than crim­i­nal sup­port­ers them­selves. Jamaica’s Judges have always been a lib­er­al bunch ‚many hav­ing done their law degrees in England ‚not a Country known for deal­ing deci­sive­ly with hard­ened crim­i­nals, most oth­ers are schooled at the University of the West Indies , a place that is fast becom­ing a laugh­ing-stock , a place where Vybz Kartel deliv­ered a lec­ture, a place that has been for decades, a lib­er­al socialist/​communist breed­ing ground. The University of the West Indies have been a place from which the Communist news­pa­per the strug­gle was born, and lec­tur­ers like Trevor Munroe were heroes.

It is no won­der then, that those who grad­u­ate from that insti­tu­tion would be less than ide­al for the pur­pose of admin­is­ter­ing deci­sive jus­tice even putting aside the archa­ic penal­ties on the books. As I have point­ed out time and again the great­est deter­rent to crime is soci­ety’s deci­sive actions in catch­ing crim­i­nals and putting them away for lengthy peri­ods of time. Will those actions erad­i­cate crime? No! but since the bleed­ing hearts in soci­ety have won the day and law-abid­ing cit­i­zens have cow­ered in fear from hav­ing mur­der­ers pay the ulti­mate price, then that is the next best thing.

Jamaican Judges have as a sin­gle unit, tak­en a wreck­ing ball to our coun­try’s National Security, Jamaica is now a tri­al lawyers par­adise. Trial lawyers are a pow­er­ful lob­by group in Jamaica and they do not need to do much in terms of influ­ence ped­dling on a pop­u­la­tion that is large­ly illit­er­ate, and to a large degree cor­rupt. In Jamaica any­one who is some­one knows every­one who is some­one. Ok I know that was a lit­tle like, huh ? but you get the pic­ture. My point is influ­ence ped­dling is real­ly easy when one con­sid­ers that most crim­i­nal lawyers and the Judges attend­ed the same law schools and are part of the same clubs and organizations.The aver­age Jamaican is real­ly shut out of the process.

When Criminals are let off eas­i­ly cit­i­zens have no faith in the sys­tem, if they have no faith in the sys­tem they turn to local enforcers for a dif­fer­ent brand of jus­tice, they do not report crimes to the police, if they do not report crimes to the police the police becomes irrelevant,criminals become embold­ened, which breeds more crime. The most ardent advo­cates for an inde­pen­dent Judiciary with­out over­sight are trail lawyers, why is that? what is their inter­est? I’ll tell you , if your friend the Judge is unre­strained in what he or she can do as it relates to your client would­n’t you want an unre­strained Judiciary? Jamaica’s Judges are some of the most activist in the world , it is not uncom­mon for them to blast a Ministry or the entire Government from the bench, even though they are hired and paid by the same Government. They use the bench to berate the police and any­one who has incurred their wrath, in essence the deco­rum and air of being above it all does not apply to them. They berate poor­ly trained over worked pros­e­cu­tors, while cheer lead­ing defense attorneys.

None of this is lost on the crim­i­nal ele­ments who are usu­al­ly sit­ting right there in the court-rooms watch­ing and laugh­ing at police and hap­less ill pre­pared pros­e­cu­tors. As we have done when we see these despi­ca­ble acts we bring them to your atten­tion so you may decide , you be the judge, no pun intend­ed, you thought you have heard it all well not quite .

HERE’S A REPORT FROM THE JAMAICA DAILY NEWS.

JUSTICE Lennox Campbell on Wednesday drew fire from the direc­tor of pub­lic pros­e­cu­tions (DPP) after he abrupt­ly ter­mi­nat­ed jury selec­tion and sent home the four men charged with the mur­der of a retired police offi­cer 12 years ago. Between Monday and Wednesday, 11 jurors were empan­elled out of the required 12 to com­plete the pan­el when Justice Campbell, who had been seething over the issue of jury short­age since Monday, expressed his frus­tra­tion and told the men that they were free to go. “Go home,” Campbell told the men in the Home Circuit Court. “I’m not giv­ing you a date to return. Good-bye.” Campbell also removed the report­ing con­di­tion of the men — Byron Johnson, Solomon Johnson, Devon Hackett and Carlos Williams — who were on bail. Surprised by Campbell’s direc­tive, Diahann Gordon Harrison, the deputy direc­tor of pub­lic pros­e­cu­tions assigned to the case, sought clar­i­ty but the judge insist­ed that he would not be set­ting a return date for the men. Both the pros­e­cu­tion and defence lawyers protest­ed, sug­gest­ing that the jus­tice order the police to select per­sons from off the streets (known in legal cir­cles as tails­men) to fill the one remain­ing slot on the pan­el, but Justice Campbell was firm in his deci­sion, say­ing that the case had been before the court for the past 11 years and that each accused per­son had the con­sti­tu­tion­al right to be tried with­in a rea­son­able time of being charged. Campbell also upbraid­ed the pros­e­cu­tion over the short­age of jurors despite the fact that it is the court staff and the police offi­cers in charge of deten­tion and courts who are respon­si­ble for procur­ing jurors, through the process of sum­mons­es. Defence attor­ney Valerie Neita-Robertson inter­vened on the part of the pros­e­cu­tion but she, too, suf­fered Justice Campbell’s ire. Contacted by the Observer short­ly after court, DPP Paula Llewellyn said that Justice Campbell did not act in accor­dance with the law in send­ing home the men. “The course adopt­ed by the learned tri­al judge for the dis­pos­al of a Circuit Court mat­ter was the wrong approach,” said Llewellyn, who not­ed that her office had been mak­ing con­cert­ed efforts to rid the court list of old cas­es. “In all my 26 years as a pros­e­cu­tor I have nev­er seen any­thing like that. I am extreme­ly dis­ap­point­ed by the judge’s action; that is noth­ing but a nul­li­ty,” Llewellyn said. Llewellyn said that a case before a jury can only be dis­charged in one of four ways — by the pros­e­cu­tion enter­ing a nolle pros­e­qui; a pan­el of jurors being direct­ed by a judge to return a for­mal ver­dict of not guilty if the pros­e­cu­tion offers no fur­ther evi­dence; the uphold­ing of a no case sub­mis­sion at the end of the pros­e­cu­tion’s case; or a pan­el of jurors return­ing a ver­dict of not guilty after delib­er­a­tion on evi­dence pre­sent­ed dur­ing a tri­al. The men were joint­ly charged with the December 1999 shoot­ing death of retired police Corporal James Calder McDonald in Seaforth, St Thomas. McDonald’s throat was also slashed and his firearm stolen.The case has been on the Home Circuit Court list since September 17, 2001. Court records indi­cate that there were 38 tri­al dates and adjourn­ments were grant­ed over the years for var­i­ous rea­sons, includ­ing a short­age of jurors. The men can be re-arrest­ed and brought back before the court or sum­mons issued for them to appear.jamaica observ​er​.com

The Director of Public Prosecutions Paula Llewellyn says she’s disappointed at the manner in which the judge threw out the case- file photoFrom left: Resident Magistrates Viviene Hall-Harris, Sandria Wong-Small, and senior resident magistrate for St James, Winsome Henry, in conversation with Justice Lennox Campbell. - File

Gleaner pho­to of Campbell with Resident Magistrates

Yes the case has been before the courts for too long, yes the accused men are enti­tled to due process,yes the accused men are enti­tled to a jury tri­al of their peers in a time­ly man­ner, yes eleven years is way too long for a case to be lan­guish­ing in the courts. But whose fault is it?

Is it the fault of James Calder or his family?does the right of the accused men super­sede the right cor­po­ral Calder had to life? And if so is there any won­der why the sys­tem is now reduced to a cesspool of cor­rup­tion and graft? How does Lennox Campbell the “ground God” explain his actions as per the argu­ments made by DPP Llewelyn as to the ways in which a case may be dis­charged by a Judge, or does his lord­ship even need to account ? The Charlatans at the Criminal Rights lob­by group Jamaicans for jus­tice,those at fam­i­lies against state ter­ror­ism and all the oth­er ter­ror sup­port­ing groups are duplic­i­tous­ly silent. Had a judge released a police offi­cer from his/​her oblig­a­tions to answer to a charge of homi­cide against a typ­i­cal low down dirty scum bag crim­i­nals irre­spec­tive of the amount of time that had elapsed , all of the afore­men­tioned ter­ror sup­port­ers would be up in arms con­demn­ing that judge, yet they are all silent when Campbell releas­es these mag­gots who slashed the throats of this offi­cer and stole his weapon.

There is no statute of lim­i­ta­tions for mur­der there­fore it is real­ly not up to lord Campbell to decide to send these scum home, fail­ure to empan­el a jury is not the fault of the mur­dered police offi­cer or his fam­i­ly, it is the fault of the judge , in this case Lennox Campbell, it is the fault of the cor­rupt sys­tem that obtains there that makes it almost impos­si­ble after eleven years to empan­el a jury . What does it say about a coun­try when it becomes nec­es­sary to release mur­der­ers who kill police offi­cer because a judge can­not empan­el a jury?

Mini Gods like Campbell and oth­ers named on this site have tak­en it upon them­selves to admin­is­ter their indi­vid­ual brand of jus­tice in a coun­try where they are called “your lord­ship” They have sim­ply believed their own press. Those who call for a judi­cia­ry with­out over­sight bet­ter be aware of what they are clam­our­ing for, the tri­al lawyers know what they are ask­ing for,but the aver­age guy on the streets that wants judges to be total­ly free from over­sight or account­abil­i­ty have no idea what they are advo­cat­ing. Kern Spencer’s crim­i­nal tri­al is no fur­ther to a res­o­lu­tion than when it com­menced because a Resident mag­is­trate refus­es to recuse her­self from the case even when it is clear that her utter­ances has prej­u­diced the case against the peo­ple, what is the recourse of the peo­ple ? you tell me, there is no recourse the case is still in lim­bo and the same Magistrate is in charge, (anoth­er mini god)

Jamaica is not a coun­try like Barbadoes that has a large­ly edu­cat­ed pop­u­la­tion, the major­i­ty of the peo­ple who are poor and une­d­u­cat­ed look up to those who are able to read much less those who are edu­cat­ed and/​or wield pow­er, at every turn those who wield pow­er and are revered by the peo­ple use the pow­er they have to dis­re­spect the peo­ple. Jamaican judges have sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly dis­re­spect­ed the peo­ple by using their posi­tions of pow­er to leg­is­late from the bench when their func­tion is to aju­di­cate, to inter­pret the laws and admin­is­ter jus­tice impartially.

Supreme Court Judges are demand­ing more secu­ri­ty as the coun­try gets more and more law­less, by the way it is the police who are sup­ply­ing the secu­ri­ty to judges like Lennox Campbell, oh I would rel­ish that assign­ment to pro­vide secu­ri­ty to Lennox Campbell , his lord­ship.

OF GARRISONS CONCESSIONS AND DEBATES

I want to bring a cou­ple of thoughts to the atten­tion of Jamaicans and oth­ers who have an inter­est in whats going on in our country.

THE QUESTION OF THE GARRISON MARCH

Gleaner pho­to

The first is the offer Prime Minister Holness has made to the leader of the Opposition Portia Simpson Miller to walk in some com­mu­ni­ties char­ac­ter­ized as gar­ri­son com­mu­ni­ties or zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sions. There has been many and var­ied opin­ions on whether this pro­posed sym­bol­ic ges­ture will accom­plish any­thing. Some have argued that time has passed and what is need­ed now is con­crete action. Those are legit­i­mate arguments,but are not argu­ments that negates the pos­i­tive out­come for the coun­try that would emanate from peo­ple liv­ing in the inner cities and all over Jamaica to see the top two polit­i­cal lead­ers walk­ing and talk­ing as friends. Some have argued that Bob Marley brought Manley and Seaga togeth­er yet polar­iza­tion per­sists, what they fail to under­stand or acknowl­edge is that events would have poten­tial­ly been vast­ly dif­fer­ent and many more lives lost had that event not occurred. We are not going to try to nuance that to death what we will say is that if it does­n’t hurt whats the prob­lem in doing it for the coun­try? To date Mrs. Simpson Miller has not seen fit to engage this new Prime Minister in the hand of fel­low­ship that he extend­ed to her, choos­ing to attach a bunch of pre­req­ui­sites before her par­tic­i­pa­tion in any march.

PORTIA’S NON CONCESSION TO BRUCE

Bruce Golding

Former Prime Minister Bruce Golding lashed out at Portia Simpson Miller at the JLP con­fer­ence at the National Arena on Sunday November 20th. In an address Golding lashed Miller for what he char­ac­ter­ized as a breach of pro­to­cols estab­lished by all for­mer Prime Ministers gone before in call­ing the win­ner and con­ced­ing defeat when they lost .Golding went on to say that the media had grown impa­tient with him not arriv­ing at the Belmont Road Head quar­ters of the JLP on the night he won the elec­tion. he stat­ed he held back from going to Belmont Road as the nor­mal con­ces­sion phone call did not come from Mrs. Simpson Miller.

Mrs. Miller for her part shot back that she had always treat­ed Mister Golding with respect through­out his time as Prime Minister , and empha­sized that she even attend­ed his inau­gu­ra­tion. She stat­ed that because of the close­ness of the race and oth­er issues which she intend­ed to address in the courts she decid­ed not to concede.

Click to show "Portia Simpson Miller" result 3

Portia Simpson Miller

Supporters of Mrs Miller con­tend this is sour grapes on the part of Golding, and that this is in the past. Is it

On the night after she lost the elec­tions Portia Simpson Miller in a rather bel­li­cose and bel­liger­ent speech stat­ed that she would con­cede noth­ing to the labour par­ty and that she would be their worst night­mare. Presumably Mrs Miller was refer­ring to the dual cit­i­zen­ship issue with three of the JLP’ can­di­dates which was an issue as far as the con­sti­tu­tion of the coun­try is con­cerned. Jamaica’s con­sti­tu­tion clear­ly states that any­one hav­ing alle­giance to a for­eign pow­er can­not sit in Parliament. The PNP which Miller heads also had can­di­dates that had dual cit­i­zen­ship. Mrs Millers argu­ments are legit­i­mate but did not pre­clude her from con­ced­ing to the Prime Minister elect whilst let­ting him know that she intend­ed to see the mat­ter through in court.

In fact con­ced­ing vic­to­ry in no way takes away her right to chal­lenge the results of the elec­tion in a court of law,neither does it pre­vent her from receiv­ing her just redress should a court find in her favor. The fact is it was a bad deci­sion ‚one which I am sure Portia regretted.

POLITICAL DEBATES

There is still sub­stan­tial squab­bling going on about the for­mat of debates by the can­di­dates, or even whether there should be any debates at all. The new­ly installed Prime Minister has indi­cat­ed his will­ing­ness to debate the leader of the oppo­si­tion before a nation­al tele­vised audi­ence. Now grant­ed there is no law that dic­tates that can­di­dates seek­ing the high­est elect­ed office in the coun­try should debate. It should not be a prob­lem for any­one want­i­ng to lead the coun­try to let peo­ple know how they will han­dle the job. Detractors of the debate that every­one seek­ing a job has to inter­view for that job , some­times doing two or there inter­views in the process before being seri­ous­ly con­sid­ered for that posi­tion. What makes politi­cians any dif­fer­ent? no won­der when they are elect­ed they believe the laws do not apply to them.

From all indi­ca­tions Mrs Miller would like a debate where she is a part of a team of can­di­dates where she can be shield­ed by her col­leagues, the leader of the coun­try must be smart and assertive he/​she will have no cov­er in seri­ous inter­na­tion­al nego­ti­a­tions, Portia must debate the issues one and one with Andrew Holness and let the chips fall where they may, she does not get to say what she will or will not do.

have your say

Super Committee !

The Super com­mit­tee made up of Republicans and Democrats tasked with com­ing up with a com­pro­mise solu­tion on the Nations debt cri­sis has come back stat­ing that they have failed to find com­mon ground. Was this a fail­ure on their part or should Americans feel a sense of relief that these twelve con­gres­sion­al Representatives could not find a way for­ward? And by the way auto­mat­ic spend­ing cuts will take effect across the board in all Government Departments. These Representatives have been at it for the past sev­en months and the American peo­ple has noth­ing to show for it . But is that a bad thing? for those on the right they will most like­ly see this as a vic­to­ry , it keeps in tact their pledge to their con­ser­v­a­tive God Grover Norqusit nev­er to raise tax­es, such is the pow­er of one man over the oth­er mil­lions of Americans who vot­ed them into office. Those on the left could also claim that this is a good thing for enti­tle­ment pro­grams such as Medicare and Social secu­ri­ty. One thing is clear once again as if we need­ed clar­i­fi­ca­tion, it is that those in Congress can­not be trust­ed to act in the inter­est of the peo­ple who elect­ed them. The American peo­ple would be bet­ter served if they hired a firm of CEO’s to look after their busi­ness pay them a salary and fire them if they are not sat­is­fied, clear­ly the monies spent on salaries and ben­e­fits for these 535 peo­ple are wast­ed, and would be bet­ter spent pay­ing teach­ers , putting com­put­ers into class rooms and pro­vid­ing health care for those who can­not afford it.

The super com­mit­tee is a micro­cosm of what’s wrong with the American con­gress ‚mem­bers on the right in par­tic­u­lar are ide­o­log­i­cal­ly steeped in their com­mit­ments to spe­cial inter­est and lob­by­ists that they do not care about the inter­est of ordi­nary Americans. This cou­pled with their hatred for Barack Obama will pre­vent Democrats from get­ting any­thing done, even though they are will­ing to make con­ces­sions. Congressional approval is in the toi­let but Republican mem­bers are will­ing to take the asso­ci­at­ed risks to get their stat­ed goal of mak­ing Obama a one term pres­i­dent. We will have to wait to see what the ver­dict of the vot­ers will be, we may very well see Republicans reward­ed for sab­o­tag­ing the econ­o­my in an effort to make the pres­i­dent look weak and inef­fec­tu­al. After all they won the house in 2010 sim­ply by being obstructionist.

Go fig­ure..

Have your say.

Why Portia Cannot Relenquish Garrison.

Conventional wis­dom amongst Jamaicans is that ever per­son from Jamaica sees pol­i­tics through green or orange lens­es . Even the most casu­al com­ment or obser­va­tion in a pub­lic forum draws the most stark and angry attack.

For decades after our so-called inde­pen­dence our peo­ple have slaugh­tered each oth­er to keep politi­cians in office, this is true of sup­port­ers of both polit­i­cal par­ties, hav­ing spent a decade on the front lines dodg­ing bul­lets from the weapons both sides sup­plied to young une­d­u­cat­ed and vul­ner­a­ble youths, I am not par­tic­u­lar­ly endeared to either polit­i­cal gang. At the same time I am rather intol­er­ant of fly by night vil­lage lawyers who have opin­ions based on noth­ing more than par­ty alle­giance. Having spent so much of my life liv­ing and work­ing in Jamaica I am acute­ly aware of the chal­lenges inher­ent in try­ing to change or alter the opin­ions of many Jamaicans, the truth is too many are lost to igno­rance, arro­gance, or both. As a nation, the next best thing is to try to impact the chil­dren in a pos­i­tive way in an effort to change the mind­set going for­ward if the coun­try is to be com­pet­i­tive, or even main­tain some resm­blance to a demo­c­ra­t­ic nation going for­ward. I read sev­er­al blogs and pub­li­ca­tions dai­ly, some of them includes the Jamaican dai­ly and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions from the United States and oth­er parts of the world, on the occa­sions where Jamaicans are allowed to com­ment, I am always dis­ap­point­ed by their inabil­i­ty to sep­a­rate them­selves from the blink­ered hand­i­cap of the nar­row parochial con­straints of PNP,JLP pol­i­tics. Clearly the Orange and Green has evolved from a fun­gus that was vis­i­ble from the out­side to a dis­ease that is now in their blood stream. Those of us who dare point out the prob­lems asso­ci­at­ed with their polit­i­cal idols are attacked as sup­port­er of the oth­er side, even if one has a record of point­ing to the prob­lems of both sides. It is inescapable then to avoid being labeled a par­ti­san, so I am pre­pared when­ev­er I write to be labeled a par­ti­san as long as the argu­ments I put for­ward are sup­port­ed by data and facts.

Miller 

As I have said pre­vi­ous­ly, know­ing this makes me res­olute about not wor­ry­ing about the cyn­ics, and the crit­ics, I remain com­mit­ted to work­ing with and dis­cussing ideas with intel­li­gent open-mind­ed Jamaicans in the dias­po­ra and at home.

Holness

On Sunday October 23rd 39-year-old Andrew Michael Holness was installed in a cer­e­mo­ny at Kings House as Jamaica’s 9th and youngest ever Prime Minister. Holness gave a lengthy speech lit­tered with obser­va­tions and vision for the coun­try. One of the things he said he would do is ask the leader of the Opposition to walk with him in a sym­bol­ic show of uni­ty toward dis­man­tling (Garrisons), zones of polit­i­cal exclusions,with a view to end­ing gar­ri­son pol­i­tics once and for all in Jamaica. Garrison Politics has been a shame­ful blight on the country.

WHAT ARE GARRISONS ?

gar·ri·son

noun

1.
a body of troops sta­tioned in a for­ti­fied place.
2.
the place where such troops are stationed.
3.
any mil­i­tary post, espe­cial­ly a per­ma­nent one.
verb (used with object)
4.
to pro­vide (a fort, town, etc.) with a garrison.
5.
to occu­py (a fort, post, sta­tion, etc.) with troops.
6.
to put (troops) on duty in a fort, post, sta­tion, etc .(source dic​tio​nary​.com)
A gar­ri­son in the Jamaican sense ful­fill all of the char­ac­ter­is­tic com­po­nents stip­u­lat­ed in these definitions,in Kingston and Saint Andrew, as also Saint Catherine, these zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sion lit­ter the land­scape, and as it would for an oppos­ing army breech­ing a gar­ri­son as stip­u­lat­ed above, the con­se­quence of such actions will­ful or unwit­ting will almost result in death. The dif­fer­ence between Jamaican Garrisons and the for­ti­fi­ca­tions men­tioned in the def­i­n­i­tion is that the gar­risons in Jamaica do not need walls, how­ev­er the lines of demarka­tion are fierce­ly guard­ed by well armed punks with high-pow­ered weapons, and a seem­ing­ly unend­ing sup­ply of ammu­ni­tion sup­plied by their bene­fac­tors. The leader of the polit­i­cal Opposition famous­ly said her con­stituen­cy has no walls, in her mind the absence of a wall means it isn’t a gar­ri­son! We’ll get back to that.
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OFGARRISON IN THE JAMAICAN SENSE?
The year 1980 saw one of the great­est peri­od of polit­i­cal upheaval in Jamaica’s his­to­ry, over 800 peo­ple were report­ed­ly killed as a result of polit­i­cal vio­lence, these num­bers attrib­uted to any oth­er coun­try would be char­ac­ter­ized as civ­il war in pro­por­tion, not so in Jamaica, killing is a way of life, it is accept­ed , pro­mot­ed in music, glo­ri­fied in the media and on polit­i­cal cam­paign stumps. Killing and maim­ing is a cel­e­brat­ed way of show­ing one’s girth and clout in the streets, this vio­lence begets more vio­lence in order to sus­tain itself, the result up to the end of 2009 by police sta­tis­tics is over 1600 mur­dered in a coun­try of under 2.8 mil­lion peo­ple. So what is a Garrison in the Jamaican sense ? Well after Jamaica was uncer­e­mo­ni­ous­ly cut from the apron strings of England her colo­nial mas­ter, our peo­ple were asked to gov­ern them­selves after hun­dreds of years of colo­nial dom­i­na­tion, the coun­try received no repa­ra­tions for the assault and abuse , Jamaica like oth­er for­mer colonies was sim­ply cast aside to fend for itself. Scarce resources like hous­ing, and jobs became a bar­gain­ing chip for politi­cians to dole out to those who showed alle­giance to their polit­i­cal par­ty depend­ing on which par­ty is in pow­er, in oth­er word a pseu­do colo­nial depen­den­cy , just on a dif­fer­ent scale.
This manip­u­la­tion of scarce resources for polit­i­cal gain cre­at­ed enmi­ty between the fac­tions aligned to the two polit­i­cal par­ties ‚the (PNP)People’s National Party the brain child of National Hero Norman Washington Manley whose son Michael Manley as Prime Minister was to lead Jamaica through its rough­est polit­i­cal peri­od, and the (JLP) the brain child of his cousin Alexander Bustamante, also one of Jamaica’s nation­al heroes.
Norman Manley a Queens Counsel british trained lawyer and Bustamante a street savvy Trade Unionists are seen as the found­ing fathers of the coun­try after Independence, many old­er Jamaicans devel­oped a love and undy­ing alle­giance to both men depend­ing on their beliefs many would die for them, as that gen­er­a­tion passed a more mil­i­tant gen­er­a­tion of politi­cians emerged in the per­sons of Michael Manley and Edward Seaga, the polit­i­cal rhetoric was ramped up and became more bel­li­cose, this hard­ened the posi­tions of both camps, and their fol­low­ers became more vio­lent, the lines of demar­ca­tion became more stark, and as before many would die for them and many has killed for them. It became com­mon­place for pub­lic funds to be used by those in office to take care of those who did the grunge work to put them in pow­er, this cre­at­ed a vicious sys­tem where peo­ple saw their very sur­vival, their very abil­i­ty to be able to afford food as tied to their par­ty get­ting in pow­er and stay­ing there. Needless to say those on the oppos­ing side are quite pre­pared to do what it takes to expel those in pow­er and install their bene­fac­tors. Politicians of both par­ties were more than hap­py to deliv­er the means for the peo­ple to kill oth­ers who were opposed to their brand of pol­i­tics, as a result the streets were flood­ed with guns and entire areas became no go for any­one even sus­pect­ed of being a sup­port­er of the oth­er side. An inno­cent exer­cise as the wear­ing of the wrong col­or can get one rid­dled with bullets.
Criminal thugs who deliv­er votes to the polit­i­cal rep­re­sen­ta­tives by means of intim­i­da­tion, arson, rape, and mur­der became a part of the cul­ture ‚they are accept­ed cel­e­brat­ed and revered, ref­ered to as com­mu­ni­ty lead­ers, and even Dons, when in truth these men were lit­tle more than mur­der­ing punks who preyed on the inno­cent and the defense­less. they received Government con­tracts even though they knew noth­ing about con­struc­tion or in most cas­es had no train­ing in the dis­ci­pline for which they received the con­tracts, this has become a cesspool of cor­rup­tion and an immense drain on the scarce resources of the coun­try. Jamaica is in debt to the tune of Billions of American dol­lars, yet the aver­age per­son on the streets has no way of mea­sur­ing how those monies they, their chil­dren and their chil­dren’s chil­dren will have to pay back has pos­i­tive­ly impact­ed their lives. As we speak the Contractor General Greg Christie is fight­ing a los­ing bat­tle in get­ting both par­ties to enact leg­is­la­tion giv­ing teeth to the office of Contractors General , which would enable him to effec­tive­ly inves­ti­gate, issue sub­poe­na and arrest trans­gres­sors in the award­ing of pub­lic con­tracts. They stead­fast­ly refuse to give him and future CG’s that pow­er, the fact is they are the ones who are ben­e­fit­ting from these nefar­i­ous and dis­gust­ing acts of thiev­ery that is bank­rupt­ing the coun­try and are not about to grant any­one the pow­er to arrest them or quote“stop dem food”.
As time pro­gressed the thugs who run the com­mu­ni­ties on a day to basis real­ized they real­ly did not need the politi­cians for any­thing more than polit­i­cal cov­er from law enforce­ment, this result­ed in a dan­ger­ous flip in the bal­ance of pow­er between the don and the politi­cian, the tail was effec­tive­ly wag­ging the dog. The Jamaican film Shottas par­o­dies the sit­u­a­tion per­fect­ly, the pro­lif­er­a­tion of ille­gal drugs , mar­i­jua­na and cocaine changed the dynam­ics in the 1980’s and 90’s many com­mu­ni­ty enforcers became rot­ten rich men who need­ed no hand­outs from politi­cians and as such did not have to lis­ten to them. they con­trolled the politi­cians, hand­ed out treats to com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers, whilst at the same time exert­ing tight con­trol over the peo­ple liv­ing with­in these communities,the con­trol includ­ed rape of their chil­dren boys and girls, many peo­ple sent their chil­dren from their com­mu­ni­ties and report­ed them miss­ing to the police in order to save them from vicious sex­u­al abuse at the hands of com­mu­ni­ty enforcers. The pow­er cre­at­ed an aura and a mys­tique of invin­ci­bil­i­ty than caused one Don to over-reach, which may have cul­mi­nat­ed in the untime­ly depar­ture of a Prime Minister from Office. He found out too late that his abil­i­ty to pro­tect an enforcer did not extend beyond Jamaica’s shores.
Golding
Being a Garrison mem­ber of Parliament has sev­er­al perks, some of which means nev­er hav­ing to wor­ry about relin­quish­ing pow­er, con­stant­ly feed­ing at the pub­lic trough. receiv­ing un-earned nation­al hon­ors, con­stant­ly being show­ered with adu­la­tion and praise, and all that politi­cian has to do is pre­tend to care and offer plat­i­tudes to mem­bers of the con­stituen­cy. There is no one that this char­ac­ter­i­za­tion fits more than the leader of the oppo­si­tion Portia Simpson Miller, she insists there are no walls in the con­stituen­cy of south-west St Andrew she has rep­re­sent­ed for over 35 years, from majes­tic Gardens to Whitfield Town, to the bot­tom of Maxfield avenue, west along Spanish Town Road the rot and decay is pal­pa­ble, I am told the con­stituen­cy was a pris­tine place pre-Portia, how­ev­er the brand of pol­i­tics she brought to that area has turned the area into a ghost town that remains so to this day, it has how­ev­er kept her in office, notice I omit­ted the word “elect­ed” .She and her hus­band has also been bestowed with the high hon­or of “Most Honorable”. Only in Jamaica.
This brings us to the Prime Minister’s sym­bol­ic ges­ture to Miller, a let­ter ask­ing her to walk the gar­risons with him, a first step that would show that there is no need to kill each oth­er in the name of politics.
Miller hes­i­tat­ed, I pre­sumed untill some­one must have coined a response for her, in response here’s what she told the Prime Minister, Quote“a mere walk through the com­mu­ni­ties would not achieve the desired out­comes ‚while I am not opposed to par­tic­i­pat­ing in the tour with the prime min­is­ter, such an ini­tia­tive should be sup­port­ed by a pro­gramme of social trans­for­ma­tion.”
Hah pre­con­di­tions ! Simpson Miller has been in rep­re­sen­ta­tion­al pol­i­tics from I was a child, she has risen to the top of the food chain to being Prime Minister the high­est elect­ed office in the land. Even though she attained the Office the same way Holness did , by default she was in office for two years. She has been a part of sev­er­al PNP admin­is­tra­tions , the last last­ed for 1812 years. Throughout all of this she nev­er saw fit even when she had the ulti­mate pow­er as Prime Minister of the coun­try to effect change, Miller was unable to show the nec­es­sary lead­er­ship that would affect social trans­for­ma­tion.
Andrew Holness has been in office for all of 3 weeks, yet Portia Simpson Miller wants him to ensure social trans­for­ma­tion before she can agree to a sim­ple and sym­bol­ic walk of unity.
Portia Simpson Miller has rep­re­sent­ed the south St Andrew con­stituen­cy since Andrew Holness was 4 years old, today the peo­ple in that con­stituen­cy who may have sur­vived the killings and pover­ty that is the norm there are worse off than they were 35 years ago before the arrival of hur­ri­cane Portia. Miller has had the lead­er­ship reins of the coun­try and we have seen noth­ing to point to that would cause us to believe she under­stand the chal­lenges of the twen­ty-first cen­tu­ry or has the req­ui­site skills to nav­i­gate the com­pli­cat­ed waters of inter­na­tion­al diplo­ma­cy nec­es­sary to secure fund­ing, and devel­ope­ment for our people.
Social trans­for­ma­tion is impor­tant, it was impor­tant when Miller entered the polit­i­cal game, it is impor­tant today, but it cer­tain­ly will not be achieved overnight, nei­ther will launch­ing a so-called ini­tia­tive change the cir­cum­stance of peo­ple need­ing inter­ven­tion in their com­mu­ni­ties. A leader must be able to attend to sev­er­al things at the same time, a sym­bol­ic walk through the gar­risons and a social inter­ven­tion pro­gramme are not mutu­al­ly exclu­sive, they can be accom­plished simul­ta­ne­ous­ly, (ride and whis­tle). This leads us to the con­clu­sion that Portia Simpson Miller talks the talk but when the time comes for her to walk the talk she is nowhere to be found. It is imper­a­tive that the Jamaican peo­ple and more so those who are encap­su­lat­ed with­in those zones of exclu­sions under­stand that their future is, as it has always been, in their hands and their hands alone. Neither Sister P nor Prince Andrew has the solu­tion to their prob­lems, peo­ple liv­ing there for over 50 years have seen Andrew Holness come into this world and attain the office of Prime Minister at the ten­der age of 39 and their cir­cum­stance remains the same , it is time for them to shrug off the bondage of alle­giance they have to both par­ties and decid­ed­ly carve a path for them­selves and their children.
As I have stat­ed before, Garrisons are the same as slav­ery, those caught with­in the psy­cho­log­i­cal walls of those com­mu­ni­ties are deprived of the every­day ameni­ties oth­ers take for grant­ed. clean drink­ing water, afford­able hous­ing, education,health-care, clean air, prop­er police and fire ser­vices, these are some of the most basic things that most peo­ple take for grant­ed but are absent from most gar­ri­son com­mu­ni­ties, in Jamaica gar­ri­son com­mu­ni­ties and the police have a need­less acri­mo­nious rela­tion­ship that is built on dis­trust of each oth­er, a dis­trust foment­ed and fed by the very politi­cians who rep­re­sent the garrisons.
Poverty is not hered­i­tary, it is not genet­ic, peo­ple from the rur­al parts of the coun­try has proven that, left alone to be all they can be Jamaicans from all parts of the coun­try have escaped pover­ty , and have risen to the halls of pow­er and the zenith of suc­cess in Education and Business, cows do not feed and wait for the grass to grow under their feet so they can eat again, they keep mov­ing, no one should allow geo­graph­i­cal bound­aries set by oth­ers who do not live with­in those said bound­aries to dic­tate how they live their lives. Untill peo­ple edu­cate them­selves and make politi­cians like Simpson Miller per­sona non gra­ta (not wel­come) in their com­mu­ni­ties they will con­tin­ue to be behold­en to the dic­tates of those invis­i­ble walls. And yes Portia your con­stituen­cy has walls you are just unable to see them.
Andrew Holness if he is seri­ous must under­stand that the change he seek will not come from the likes of Simpson Miller ‚the old guard,they were schooled in the old ways , they are a part of the prob­lem ‚not the solu­tion , if progress is to be made the train must be rolled around them,begin with a mas­sive pro­gram of mobi­liza­tion to a nation­al awak­en­ing, love of God pride in coun­try and duty to our fel­low-man , if you can inspire the nation you will have a chance to make difference,do not wait on Portia, or you wait in vain , Portia is the Garrison, the gar­ri­son is Portia.
have your say.

Jamaica’s Criminal Loving Judges:

On July 14th of this year this web­site was born, con­trary to con­ven­tion­al wis­dom I launched with­out an appre­cia­ble vol­ume of con­tent as would have been the pru­dent thing to do, the rea­son I could­n’t wait for con­tent was an issue that enraged a lot of peo­ple, the killing of Young Khajeel Mais. I wrote my first blog then and titled it

JAMAICAN POLICE STILL HAS NOT RELEASED NAME OF SUSPECT.

 Khajeel Mais
Khajeel Mais

Readers may go back and read that vir­gin blog , but I would like to tell you about this young man whom I nev­er met ‚but whose death unearthed some­thing inside of me.

17 years old school-boy Khajeel Mais was killed in an appar­ent case of road rage gone ter­ri­bly wrong .
Young Mais, an inno­cent vic­tim rid­ing in the back of a Cab to a fête at a high School, became the vic­tim of a ter­ri­ble case of road rage, when the cab in which he was a pas­sen­ger alleged­ly ran into the back of a BMW-x6 sport util­i­ty vehicle.
Its is alleged that the dri­ver of the sport util­i­ty vehi­cle emerged from the vehi­cle fir­ing at the cab, the cab dri­ver it is report­ed turned his cab around and head­ed in the oppo­site direc­tion ‚with the x6 dri­ver still fir­ing. The cab dri­ver lat­er dis­cov­ered that young Khajeel was killed shot through the head.

Without rehash­ing the sto­ry, the killer was lat­er iden­ti­fied as Patrick Powell a busi­ness-man with a lot of influence,Mister Powell had tak­en off to the United States after the shoot­ing, Police, des­per­ate for his return to the Island arrest­ed his son on an out­stand­ing war­rant for what we were told was a felony wound­ing , the vic­tim is report­ed­ly now a crip­ple after the assault by the junior Powell. The rea­son he was not arrest­ed before is open to your spec­u­la­tion and as such I will not bela­bor that point here. Patrick Powell returned to Jamaica after a series of con­sul­ta­tions with Jamaican pow­er­house lawyer, Patrick Atkinson who rep­re­sents him.

Fast for­ward to November 10th 2011:

Patrick Powell was offered bail by Supreme Court Justice Carole Beswick. Beswick is a part of the Jamaican Judges hall of shame two days ago we fea­tured anoth­er of the crim­i­nal cod­dling judges that are called his/​her lord­ship. Powell remains in cus­tody as the pros­e­cu­tor has the right to object to bail under the bail act. Beswick has grant­ed Powell bail in the sum of 10 mil­lion dol­lars ‚he is to sur­ren­der his trav­el doc­u­ments and report to the police three times week­ly. As a for­mer police officerI was enthralled by this non­sense, report to the police? All one needs is to get out of jail , if a sus­pect wants to run the police can wait for that first vis­it all they want , a sus­pect could be any­where with a new identity.

Patrick Powell
Patrick Powell

This is not a stretch of the imag­i­na­tion, he ran before. Beswick tried to insu­late her­self from the howls of con­dem­na­tion that she knew was sure to emanate from her actions, brought to bear by vig­i­lant cit­i­zens like yours tru­ly and oth­ers, here’s what she had to say. Quote ” I am for­ti­fied by the law and cas­es from the judi­cial com­mit­tee of the United Kingdom Privy Council that bail was not to be with­held as a form of pun­ish­ment

Ok I am not a lawyer , but where is the pun­ish­ment? The kid is dead Khajeel Mais will not get a chance to enjoy the life God gave him,what part of this does these morons that pass for judges do not get. One of the pri­ma­ry rea­son for the denial of bail is that the sub­ject is a flight risk (will run) unlike­ly to turn up for trial.Patrick Powell is demon­stra­bly a flight risk , he already ran and had to be lured back to the coun­try. The oth­er is that the sub­ject may interfere,with or be a threat to poten­tial wit­ness­es slat­ed to tes­ti­fy at tri­al. From all appear­ance Beswick has no evi­dence that he won’t , so why not err on the side of cau­tion? What is it that dri­ves Jamaican Judges to love crim­i­nals so much? We are post­ing a cur­rent list­ing of all of the Judges in Jamaica who are mak­ing these egre­gious decisions,decisions which are result­ing in the destruc­tion of our country,not all of them are crim­i­nal cod­dlers ‚you decide , every­thing is a mat­ter of pub­lic record, this list was pulled from the Supreme court web­site. Every Jamaican must avail them­selves to these facts, these are the peo­ple who are releas­ing crim­i­nals back onto the streets ‚as I have said some of the Judges are seri­ous Jurists,but not enough of them ‚when the Magistrates are thrown into the mix we get a pic­ture of why crime is at those lev­els. Judges sim­ply refuse to lock crim­i­nals away. We will con­tin­ue to shine a light on the atro­cious behav­ior of these malig­nant tumors eat­ing away at the Jamaican nation.

Current Judges

The Hon. Miss Justice Gloria Smith (Senior Puisne Judge)

The Hon. Miss Justice Kay Beckford

The Hon. Mr. Justice Horace Marsh

The Hon. Mr. Justice Donald McIntosh

The Hon. Mr. Justice B. Andrew Rattray

The Hon. Mrs. Justice Carol Lawrence-Beswick

The Hon. Mr. Justice Lennox Campbell

The Hon. Mr. Justice Patrick Brooks

The Hon. Mrs. Justice Marjorie Cole-Smith

The Hon. Miss Justice Paulette Williams

The Hon. Mr. Justice Courtney Daye

The Hon. Miss Justice Ingrid Mangatal

The Hon. Mr. Justice Raymund King

The Hon. Mr. Justice Bryan Sykes

The Hon. Miss Justice Jennifer Straw

The Hon. Mrs. Justice Almarie Sinclair-Haynes

The Hon. Mr. Justice Leighton Pusey

The Hon. Miss Justice Christine McDonald

The Hon. Mr. Justice Martin Gayle

The Hon. Mrs. Justice Marva McDonald-Bishop

The Hon. Mr. Justice Bertram Morrison

The Hon. Mr. Justice Glen Brown

The Hon. Mrs. Justice Sarah Thompson-James

The Hon. Mr. Justice David Fraser

The Hon. Mr. Justice Frank Williams

The Hon. Miss Justice Carol Edwards

The Hon. Mr. Justice Kirk Anderson

Acting Judges

The Hon. Mr. Justice Evan Brown

The Hon. Miss Justice Nicole Simmons

The Hon. Miss Justice Sharon George

Masters

Mrs Audre Lindo

Mrs Sonia Bertram-Linton

I

JUDGE : For Yourself.

BuildingK20120214NGI had a con­ver­sa­tion this morn­ing with a retired Jamaican teacher; I have the great­est regard for this lady; she is charm­ing and likable.
For me, there is just some­thing about some­one who has the patience and ded­i­ca­tion to spend their life edu­cat­ing others.
She was a lit­tle angry but deter­mined that she want­ed to return to Jamaica and find a way to do some­thing about how chil­dren, seniors, and the des­ti­tute are treat­ed; she expressed exas­per­a­tion and trep­i­da­tion regard­ing whether or not she could actu­al­ly make a dif­fer­ence. I told her truth­ful­ly that I had no way of know­ing whether she would be impact­ful or not, but she def­i­nite­ly will have no impact if she decid­ed to do noth­ing. I told her Rosa Parks def­i­nite­ly made a huge impact by just sit­ting down.

I strug­gled with that as a young police offi­cer in Jamaica, was I mak­ing a dif­fer­ence? I ulti­mate­ly con­clud­ed that yes, I was mak­ing a dif­fer­ence; how­ev­er, the dif­fer­ence I want­ed to make was not going to be accom­plished if I stayed with the Department. I con­clud­ed that had I stayed, I would have been behold­en and answer­able to the archa­ic inane sys­tem I was repulsed and opposed to. Ever since I depart­ed, I have strug­gled with how I can make a dif­fer­ence in a sys­tem where even those charged with being the guardians of the peo­ple’s rights and inter­ests are the very ones lim­it­ing and vio­lat­ing those rights? Every Jamaican, at home or abroad, knows that their polit­i­cal lead­ers are some­times the very peo­ple who sup­ply guns and ammu­ni­tion to their neigh­bors to intim­i­date and kill them, which allows them to stay in office, where they per­pet­u­ate the vicious cycle that keeps them, fam­i­ly mem­bers, and friends well off. The same crim­i­nal politi­cians are respon­si­ble for draft­ing and pass­ing leg­is­la­tion that would make it worse for those whose busi­ness it is to com­mit crimes.
Do you believe crim­i­nals are going to put them­selves in Jail?

Sources on the ground have con­firmed that the only rea­son Politicians are not giv­ing guns to com­mu­ni­ty activists like they are used to is that the activists have their own guns and do not need any­thing but polit­i­cal cov­er from politi­cians any­more. So they have not expe­ri­enced an awak­en­ing as some believe.
The gang­sters have their own guns, plain and sim­ple. Even so, some are still ensnared and entan­gled with street crim­i­nals who are killing their fel­low Jamaicans.
What makes this for­mer teacher’s frus­tra­tion so rel­e­vant for me is that I share the same frus­tra­tion about the crime sit­u­a­tion in our coun­try and the lack of will to take the nec­es­sary steps to once and for all estab­lish the rule of law cor­ner­stone of our fledg­ling democ­ra­cy. As is cus­tom­ary, we seek to point out the facts to come to our own con­clu­sions. As is cus­tom­ary, we are com­pelled to point to the glar­ing dis­par­i­ties in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem regard­ing how crim­i­nals are treat­ed. This runs the length of the process from how they are per­ceived when they com­mit heinous crimes to the way police are scru­ti­nized when they are cap­tured or killed, to the sen­tence giv­en them on the rare occa­sion they are ever con­vict­ed. As such, we have writ­ten a series of blogs called Jamaica’s mad lib­er­al judges. We do not write because we are opposed to the Judges, but because we are opposed to the kid gloves with which they treat crim­i­nals, there are numer­ous cas­es, too many to men­tion, where the inter­est of crim­i­nals and those who sup­port them take prece­dence over crime vic­tims. We feel this is an affront and is tan­ta­mount to pun­ish­ing the vic­tim. Criminals in Jamaica start with a huge advan­tage, from the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion to the last court of appeals in the coun­try, there are a stom­ach and an appetite of lenien­cy toward even those who have com­mit­ted the most egre­gious crimes and do so over and over again.

This has bred a don’t care atti­tude in some police offi­cers. It cre­ates a more sat­is­fied pub­lic with the jun­gle jus­tice dis­pensed by local thugs, which is usu­al­ly swift and deci­sive, or mob jus­tice, which includes mul­ti­ple com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers tak­ing the laws into their own hands. Generally, with the sen­tence of death being the ver­dict for all infrac­tions, offens­es that can range from a traf­fic acci­dent where a car hits a well-liked mem­ber of the com­mu­ni­ty to rob­bery or mur­der, it does­n’t mat­ter the offend­er is giv­en a death sen­tence. The sen­tence is car­ried out with ruth­less and bru­tal alacrity. If we choose to ignore the fact that the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem does not work for any­one, that it erodes the trust cit­i­zens had in the rule of law and the pow­er of the state to pro­tect them, to the point they believe report­ing crimes to the agents of the state is a waste of time. They are bet­ter served to go to the local (don) than we risk slip­ping deep­er and deep­er into the abyss of anar­chy daily.

Some argue that each case rests on its own mer­it; we agree. Some argue that a tri­al Judge knows the case and the evi­dence in each case, and as such, he or she is in the best posi­tion to make a judg­ment call one way or the oth­er. We agree. Some argue that judges should have free rein, with­out prop­er safe­guards in place, and that they should be allowed to adju­di­cate with­out over­sight from any oth­er Government branch. We disagree.

Even though mem­bers of the judi­cia­ry may not be as cor­rupt as oth­er lead­ers in oth­er parts of Government, giv­ing them carte-blanche in the dis­pen­sa­tion of judges with­out no input from the peo­ple through their rep­re­sen­ta­tives in par­lia­ment, do exact­ly what we say we do not want, we end up with cor­rup­tion, only from dif­fer­ent peo­ple. Those who argue for an unre­strained Judiciary say they argue because they are afraid of polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence, a fair­ly rea­son­able argu­ment to make. Still, if we allow judges to oper­ate with­out over­sight and restraint, we end up cre­at­ing the very sys­tem we say we do not want; we end up cre­at­ing lit­tle gods who are answer­able to no one. Their lord­ships.

Jamaican Judges are answer­able to no one, and as such, we have seen the sys­tem den­i­grate to where we are today as a nation, dan­gling pre­cip­i­tous­ly close to the abyss of being a failed state. Crime and ter­ror are ram­pant; there is no under­stand­ing or will to erad­i­cate it from our coun­try; those who lead loves it the way it is; after all, a pop­u­la­tion that does not know it deserves bet­ter, prob­a­bly does not deserve better.

As is cus­tom­ary, when­ev­er we come across a case where we feel a judge has crossed the line and has betrayed the trust placed in him/​her, we high­light the case, we com­ment. Still, ulti­mate, you are the ulti­mate judges, and it is you who should decide if we are rea­son­able in our assess­ment of Jamaica’s judges.

Daily Gleaner sto­ry high­light­ing this man.

Judge David Fraser

This Judge sen­tenced a man who bru­tal­ly raped a 12-year-old girl, stran­gled and buried her when he thought she was dead, to 12 years in prison. 

Twelve years, as bru­tal and heinous as the crime of rape is, let’s put that aside for a sec­ond, this man tried to kill this child, then buried her, which demon­strates that in his heart he felt that the deed of “mur­der” was com­mit­ted, he then went to the next step that applies when some­one kills anoth­er, dis­po­si­tion of the body, he did that.

Based on his actions, this man raped this lit­tle girl, killed her (in his mind), then buried her; she brave­ly clawed her way out of the hell he placed her in only to be raped once more and abused by Judge David Fraser, and the crim­i­nal jus­tice system.

Jamaica’s Chief Prosecutor, Paula Llewelyn, and mem­bers of the Police Force, and most impor­tant­ly, the lit­tle girl’s moth­er, felt they were once again left hang­ing by the all-mighty Judge Fraser.

Here’s what Llewelyn had to say.

Sentencing is the sole pre­rog­a­tive for His Lordship, the judge,” Llewellyn said last week Friday. She said when she got the report from the crown coun­sel in the case, she was some­what sur­prised and sad­dened because “in this mat­ter, the facts to which the accused man plead­ed guilty are extreme­ly grave.” She was, how­ev­er, quick to point out that the nor­mal pro­to­cols that obtain between Bench and Bar would pre­vent her from mak­ing any fur­ther com­ment on “this unfor­tu­nate scenario.”

Natural pro­to­cols that obtain between Bench and Bar, she said.

All Prosecutors and Judges in Jamaica are lawyers; if any­one want­ed a clear and unequiv­o­cal feel for where the ordi­nary man stands in all of this, the above statement/​slip of Paula Llewelyn’s tongue is proof pos­i­tive that they do not matter.

My whole feel­ing about this, as I have always felt, this con­nivance between Bench and Bar amounts to noth­ing more than “bull shit” for the aver­age citizen.

Here lie ladies and gen­tle­men, the rea­son why Judges must be giv­en strict guide­lines when they are deal­ing with seri­ous crimes like the ones in this case.

This poor young girl has been bru­tal­ly raped and buried once again by arro­gant Judges that get referred to as quote “his lord­ship.”

Judge for yourself

The Implosion Of Herman Caine:

My com­ments are not sci­en­tif­ic ‚and should be viewed with­in the sim­ple prism of an ordi­nary per­son with a pletho­ra of opin­ions and noth­ing more. My com­ments are sup­port­ed by data where prac­ti­ca­ble , but should not be con­fused with any­thing sci­en­tif­ic or sophis­ti­cat­ed. I am not a trained Journalist and as such my state­ments must be assim­i­lat­ed in the organ­ic con­text in which they were intended.

On October 12th 2011 I post­ed a blog about black con­ser­vatism in America as I saw it from my lay perspective.

The post was titled Black Republicanism in America, I made the bold state­ment then that Herman Caine Former God father piaz­za CEO would not be the Republican Nominee for pres­i­dent. My state­ments were bold ‚because oth­er than the nar­ra­tive I laid out in that post I had no inside infor­ma­tion that would oth­er­wise cause me to come to that conclusion.

Herman Caine Rick Perry Mitt Romney

For those who are not reg­u­lar read­ers of my blogs this would be a good time to go back to that blog and acquaint your­selves with the com­ments in that post. I was real­ly angry at Caine for run­ning around the coun­try dis­re­spect­ing hard-work­ing Americans who are find­ing it hard to find work or make ends meet. Caine stat­ed with­out equiv­o­ca­tion that it was no one’s fault but their own,referring to out of work Americans. This rep­re­sent­ed ‚at least to me the most arro­gant ‚ego­ma­ni­a­cal dis­re­spect that could be heaped on the mid­dle class in this coun­try. This rep­re­sent­ed what has become com­mon-place behav­ior for those on the extreme right in their rapa­cious dis­dain for the mid­dle class.

Herman Caine strut­ted around mak­ing grand state­ments about things he did not take time to acquaint him­self with. He stout­ly declared he would not be the fla­vor of the month when his poll num­bers start­ed head­ing north,and those of Michelle Bachman were rapid­ly head­ing toward the south pole. It would have served mis­ter Caine well had he availed him­self to the fact that China test­ed their first nuclear device from as far back as the 1960’s . It would have been use­ful if Caine knew that China’s econ­o­my is intrin­si­cal­ly tied to ours and it is in their inter­est to have us as a trad­ing part­ner, rather than an ene­my. Caine would have been well served had he known that the Chinese have made no move despite their humon­gous army and mil­i­tary might ‚to extend their geo­graph­i­cal bor­ders mil­i­tar­i­ly. Mister Caine would have been well served had he under­stood that send­ing war­ships to the Persian gulf to agi­tate a war with Iran is a bad idea for world peace , and serves no use­ful pur­pose but to fur­ther the finan­cial inter­est of the super rich and the mil­i­tary indus­tri­al com­plex. MisterCaine would have been well served had he not demon­strat­ed con­tempt for his race and the tra­vails we have endured, sim­ply because he has accom­plished some finan­cial stability.

It is no sur­prise then that as I pre­dict­ed that Caine was des­tined for fail­ure, that the inevitable implo­sion of Herman Caine has began.I have heard a lot of adjec­tives used to describe Caine usu­al­ly flow­ery ones from the patron­iz­ing whack jobs on the right . They most­ly refer to him as a smart like­able guy,ok ‚I am not about to say whether he is like­able or not, I have nev­er met the guy, I have read that he attend­ed col­lege and did pret­ty well for him­self as a busi­ness man, but smart?

How smart could Caine be if as head of God fathers piaz­za he was accused of sex­u­al­ly harass­ing female sub­or­di­nates ‚the case was settled,he’s run­ning for pres­i­dent of the United States and (1) did not expect the sto­ry to come out , and (2) did not have a pre­pared response? Did some­one say he was a smart guy? I beg to differ!

Newt Gingrich Charles Krauthammer

Come on Herman which is it ?you went from not know­ing about any sex­u­al harass­ment,to hav­ing a vague rec­ol­lec­tion of an incident,to there was one instant where you were stand­ing next to a woman and you said to her “you are about the same height as my wife” to you know of no pay out, to know­ing that a pay­out was made , but you hoped it was­n’t much , to it was just the equiv­a­lent of a few months salary, which is it? Sexual harass­ment claims are a com­mon occur­rence in the work-place some are true , some are fab­ri­cat­ed for mon­e­tary rea​sons​.It is under­stand­able that under all cir­cum­stances if an alle­ga­tion was made that in the inter­est of the com­pa­ny the mat­ter would have been set­tled, whether Caine was guilty or not, there is no win­ning when one gets accused of these kinds of charges. I have no knowl­edge of mis­ter Caine’s guilt or innocence,but I under­stand his desire to keep the inci­dent out of the pub­lic’s domain,in the inter­est of his fam­i­ly and his campaign.

But here is a nov­el idea , how about when asked about the issue, Caine had looked into the cam­era and said to the reporter, “Yes as head of the restau­rant asso­ci­a­tion of America there were alle­ga­tions of sex­u­al harass­ment made against me by low­er lev­el staff mem­bers of the com­pa­ny ‚these kinds of things hap­pen ever day and com­pa­nies have devised ways to deal with them, one such way to deal with them is to offer the accusers some mon­ey to make the mat­ter go away,one may argue it is extor­tion , but when you have a rep­u­ta­tion to uphold you do not want to get bogged down in a messy court case to clear your name, it’s the nature of the beast”.

Mister Caine the smart busi­ness-man/politi­cian did not do this, he pro­ceed­ed to deny and obfus­cate. Charles Krauthhammer not­ed con­ser­v­a­tive icon stat­ed that Caine seemed to be wing­ing it, in ref­er­ence to non­sen­si­cal answers Caine has been giv­ing on the stump to sim­ple ques­tions. And of course faced with the bub­bling caul­dron of a scan­dal that this mat­ter has now inevitably mor­phed into, Krauthammer could not resist ask­ing the bonan­za ques­tion of Caine on (Fox mis­in­for­ma­tion) quote ” Do you believe that race has any­thing to do with this see­ing you are a black con­ser­v­a­tive)? Caine’s response floored me, Quote “Yes I think so but I have no evi­dence to sup­port my belief”. Really ?.…..Ok, so how does race plays into this as far as Caine is con­cerned ? First one would have to assume that the infor­ma­tion was leaked by some­one white, who has an inter­est in see­ing Caine destroyed, sure­ly Democrats would sure­ly like to see Herman Caine matched up against Barack Obama, so that rules out the democrats.This brings us back to the present class of repub­li­can clowns , Caine’s friends. Caine has now blamed a staffer in Rick Perry’s cam­paign who worked on a pre­vi­ous cam­paign of his , Caine stat­ed emphat­i­cal­ly that it had to be that staffer who leaked the infor­ma­tion as he had con­fid­ed that infor­ma­tion to him when he was in his employ. Needless to say that for­mer staffer appeared on nation­al tele­vi­sion and debunked the notion that Caine ever told him any such thing ‚which made it impos­si­ble for him to be the source of the leak, Perry also denied that he had any knowl­edge of the alle­ga­tions of sex­u­al harass­ment in Herman Caine’s past.

These devel­op­ments have revealed Caine to be either pet­ty , a liar or both. If as he claims, Caine told that for­mer staffer of the alle­ga­tions against him when he was in his employ, how could he tell reporters he had no knowl­edge of any alle­ga­tions of sex­u­al har­ras­ment against him? This has led me to say some­thing I take no plea­sure in say­ing, Herman Caine has proven him­self to be a liar. Herman Caine has fall­en on his own sword faster that even I had imag­ined, this is kar­ma per­son­i­fied. I believed he would fiz­zle, and trust me fiz­zle he will, I just nev­er thought it would be as a result of any­thing in his past, I tru­ly believed he would be for­got­ten soon, as a result of the fact that the present ver­sion of what obtains for the repub­li­can par­ty, behold­en hook line and sinker to the ultra right, and mired in a ide­o­log­i­cal puri­ty search, are unhap­py with the stan­dard-bear­er Mitt Romney, and are as a result search­ing for an alter­na­tive. Hence their brief romance with Bachman , Perry and now Caine. I’m not opposed to Herman Caine sole­ly because of his pol­i­tics . I am opposed by his pol­i­tics, but I am more revolt­ed by his crass elit­ist dis­re­gard and dis­re­spect for the mid­dle class. He has demon­strat­ed a brand of craven dis­dain, attrib­ut­able only to the present day repub­li­can par­ty, and their fel­low sup­port­ers on the fringe right, who believe, “I made it, damn every­body else”.

One would have thought some­one like Herman Caine, a prod­uct of mid­dle America of African American Ancestry, who wit­nessed his par­ents toil to send him and his broth­er to good schools so that they can expe­ri­ence the American dream, would have a greater appre­ci­a­tion for the work­ing class . Caine has art­ful­ly removed the lynch­ings , Jim crow, Bull O’Connor dogs and cops, seg­re­gat­ed water foun­tains restau­rants and oth­er ameni­ties, sep­a­rate but equal,and all of the trav­es­ty and shame vis­it­ed on black Americans, effec­tive­ly eras­ing those atroc­i­ties from African-American his­to­ry as if they nev­er hap­pened or con­tin­ue to hap­pen. Yet he has the temer­i­ty and gall to attribute his present trou­bles to racism. This is the same Caine who said he saw no racism at tea par­ty ral­lies, some of which were lit­tle more that glo­ri­fied Klan ral­lies.

Herman Caine can­not be allowed to have it both ways, he has dis­re­spect­ed the black com­mu­ni­ty, but wants to claim racism where none exists. Herman Caine the nov­el­ty, has no more use for the black com­mu­ni­ty than Clarence Thomas does. A pres­i­dent Caine would be a dis­as­ter for the black com­mu­ni­ty, As such our com­mu­ni­ty should not allow him to hide behind us, using us as cov­er to accom­plish the goals of the far right, goals that do not line up with our aspi­ra­tions. As a mat­ter of fact his goals and aspi­ra­tions do not line up with the 99% of work­ing peo­ple in this country.

Small Business Is The Back-bone.

My good friend Larkie recent­ly asked me “how come you nev­er blogged about busi­ness”? I thought about it a for a lit­tle while, then I admit­ted to him that I real­ly did not have any author­i­ty to talk about some­thing that I knew noth­ing about.

He was incred­u­lous , ” how come you write about crime and pol­i­tics”? I explained that I felt I had a con­tri­bu­tion to make hav­ing spent a decade in law enforce­ment, and hav­ing been impact­ed direct­ly by pol­i­tics all my life, I felt, as does oth­er cit­i­zens, I too had a point of view. I explained that I had no sig­nif­i­cant suc­cess­es to point to that would cause any­one to take any­thing I said about busi­ness seri­ous­ly. He looked at me quizzi­cal­ly as he stood there in my lit­tle mom and pop busi­ness, then he looked around and said if this isn’t suc­cess what is, do you have to make millions?

The truth is I have no idea whether it takes mil­lions or bil­lions in the bank for one to see him/​herself as a suc­cess, what I do know is that noth­ing defeats suc­cess more than the feel­ing that you are suc­cess­ful. Does it require mil­lions in the bank, or does it require one to sur­vive for over a decade in a small American city com­pet­ing with the big boys next door?

I know it is impor­tant to oper­ate on the premise that the cus­tomer is always right, I under­stand it is impor­tant to care about peo­ple and what they want, I under­stand it is impor­tant to make cus­tomers feel that they just received a deal when they make a pur­chase or received ser­vice from you. This can be accom­plished with a bal­anced mix of integri­ty, and an under­stand­ing of how to make num­bers work for you. Successful busi­ness lead­ers know how impor­tant it is to stay on the cut­ting edge of their indus­try , always mak­ing sure to have a leg up on the com­pe­ti­tion, always look­ing for the next big thing. The foun­da­tion­al prin­ci­ples of busi­ness whether large or small are the same, one must under­stand the ter­rain and shape prod­uct and ser­vices to suit the customer.

Federal Reserve Building

The lat­est job num­bers here in the US point­ed to the fact that the lion’s share of the jobs being cre­at­ed are being cre­at­ed by small busi­ness­es, those are busi­ness­es that employ between one and fifty employ­ees, the large cor­po­ra­tions and com­pa­nies do not trust this coun­try and the peo­ple who made them filthy rich to rein­vest in them, they are sit­ting on a report­ed 2 tril­lion dol­lars in liq­uid cash , wait­ing and watch­ing for leg­is­la­tion by repub­li­cans that will give them even more tax breaks than Bush gave them, and remove safe­guards that pro­tects the environment.

Small Businesses have always been the back­bone of America, a coun­try that man­aged to fig­ure out how to col­lect tax­es , untill she got greedy and cre­at­ed a tax code even the writ­ers do not under­stand. It fol­lows there­fore that if it is the small stores and man­u­fac­tur­ing plants that lines every street of every ham­let, street ‚town, city, and state that are sus­tain­ing our econ­o­my, then that is where the invest­ment dol­lars should go, and not to the large fat cat cor­po­ra­tions and banks that hold us in contempt.

And while we are on the sub­ject of fat cat Banks, Bank of America recent­ly decid­ed to scrap plans to impose a $5 month­ly fee to its cus­tomers who use their deb­it cards for every-day busi­ness trans­ac­tions, this would have net­ted Bank of America Billions of dol­lars annu­al­ly. The deci­sion was forced by a grass-roots cam­paign and tens of thou­sands of Bank of America’s cus­tomers who vowed to take their mon­ey else­where. Bank of America’s exec­u­tives had arro­gant­ly stat­ed that their cus­tomers who expressed their deter­mi­na­tion to pull their accounts , quote “had choic­es”. And choic­es they did indeed have , some­one must have told the fat cats that was not a very wise posi­tion to take as they capit­u­lat­ed to account hold­ers who said no!

That is the America I love, the America where peo­ple real­ize they are the ones who have the pow­er, the pow­er of their pock­et-books, the pow­er to orga­nize and make their voic­es heard and their impact felt. There is how­ev­er anoth­er side to this dra­ma , many fear Bank of America will sim­ply with­draw this time, but find a way to impose the fee anoth­er way when it’s cus­tomers are not look­ing. This means that account hold­ers will have to stay vig­i­lant and make sure they do not sneak addi­tion­al fees in through the back door.

Still on the sub­ject of big banks, a few days ago I saw $15 charge on my busi­ness check­ing state­ment, so I called my friend­ly TD Bank North and asked to speak to my friend who works there. Well the Manager answered the phone he indi­cat­ed that my friend Pam was on anoth­er call , he gra­cious­ly vol­un­teered to take care of me so I told Tony the rea­son for my call. I asked him to explain what the very sim­ple but dis­con­cert­ing [charge] on my state­ment meant . Tony com­menced by sooth­ing me ‚” Mike you always kept a respectable bal­ance, but for one day last month you fell below $500 and that is where the charge comes in”. I was floored, I had used that bank and seen it gone through three dif­fer­ent name changes, and the only time my bal­ance went below $500 in ten years they socked me with a $15 fee. I real­ized then that we the cus­tomers meant noth­ing but a num­ber on a bal­ance sheet . I thanked Tony and hung up.

Bank of America’s cus­tomers can take heart, it could have been worse, they could have had TD Bank North as their bank.

No fault of Pam and Tony and all the oth­er fine peo­ple who works at my local branch,but that is absolute­ly not the best way to do business,that much I know .

have your say.

Holness’ Invitation To Walk The Garrisons.

Oné of the many down sides to com­ment­ing on Jamaica’s politi­cians is, one way or anoth­er you will most assured­ly, be accused of being a sup­port­er of the oth­er party.That is a risk we are pre­pared to take if it gen­er­ates the kind of dis­cus­sions we would like to see that will spark an intel­lec­tu­al rev­o­lu­tion amongst our peo­ple, one that will force change toward trans­paren­cy and account­abil­i­ty among pub­lic offi­cials, and Agencies​.How then do we get to spark that intel­lec­tu­al dis­course when the bat­tle lines are so stark between those who are edu­cat­ed, wants every­one to know it and are quite hap­py not to have oth­ers get a shot at the edu­ca­tion they got, leav­ing them no one to look down on. And on the oth­er side of the divide those who are painful­ly illit­er­ate that they glo­ri­fy some who are bare­ly able to read and write.

Recently sworn Prime Minister Andrew Holness, promised he would write to the leader of the Opposition Portia Simpson Miller invit­ing her to walk with him through Garrison com­mu­ni­ties, a sym­bol­ic move Holness feel, one that will set the tone toward his stat­ed goal of dis­man­tling gar­ri­son com­mu­ni­ties. The Jamaica dai­ly Gleaner of October 31st 2011 is report­ing that true to his word Holness sent a let­ter to Simpson Miller last Friday October 27th, but is yet to receive a response. I’m not that cyn­i­cal to believe that there is a sin­is­ter motive to what the Gleaner sto­ry seem to feel is a reluc­tance on Miller’s part to respond.

Holness

I am will­ing to give Miller the ben­e­fit of the doubt, I am will­ing to wait for some­one with­in the PNP to coin a response, give it to her and allow her to fig­ure out how she can ben­e­fit from that response polit­i­cal­ly. On that basis I can clear­ly see why she has­n’t yet responded.

I mean for cry­ing out loud, what is there to think about? Zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sions only serve to keep peo­ple impov­er­ished and down trod­den, how could any­one who claim to care for the most dis­pos­s­esed amongst us not want to tear these bar­ri­ers down? Barriers mean crime , pover­ty , lack of invest­ment, lack of jobs, lack of edu­ca­tion­al oppor­tu­ni­ties, lack of prop­er health care , and I could go on ad-naeusum.Why would Portia find this objec­tion­able , despite the pol­i­tics involved, is ask­ing her to be gra­cious and mag­nan­i­mous too much to ask ? Miller is report­ed to have stat­ed that there are no walls in her con­stituen­cy, this response was her attempt to sug­gest her con­stituen­cy is not a gar­ri­son, because there are no lit­er­al walls keep­ing any­one in or pre­vent­ing any­one from entering.

This com­ment is both cyn­i­cal and insult­ing, on the one hand, one has to sur­mise that the esteemed leader of the oppo­si­tion is sug­gest­ing that the absence of a wall is proof pos­i­tive that she does not pre­side over a gar­ri­son. On the oth­er hand it could be rea­son­ably con­strued that she actu­al­ly believes that an actu­al wall is a nec­es­sary com­po­nent that makes up a gar­ri­son. So which are we to believe? One thing is cer­tain The leader of the Opposition has spent her entire car­rear hon­ing an image that monop­o­lizes the art of car­ing for the poor, she is mem­ber of par­lia­ment for the con­stituen­cy of South West Saint Andrew one of the most des­per­ate­ly impov­er­ished areas in the coun­try, added to the pover­ty, it is crime infest­ed. Through intim­i­da­tion, mur­der, rape, arson and oth­er means, Miller and oth­er gar­ri­son Members of par­lia­ment are returned to office time and time again. No one real­ly knows what the true polit­i­cal feel­ings of the peo­ple who live in those com­mu­ni­ties are, no one dare to go against the grain , too many have died. This type of des­per­ate 21st cen­tu­ry slav­ery is synana­mous to what Bob Marley so elo­quent­ly sang about , where they removed the chains from the ankles and placed them on the brain . This is not con­fined to the con­stituen­cy of Miller, or Holness, it is not just Arnett Gardens built and armed By the likes of Anthony Spaulding, or Tivoli Gardens the once leg­endary moth­er of all gar­risons, nur­tured fer­til­ized, pruned and cared for by Edward Seaga. The truth is most of the cor­po­rate area is carved up into ridicu­lous no go zones, once pris­tine areas of Willow Way and Standpipe in the heart of uptown are now over-run with crime and made impos­si­ble for decent peo­ple to live.

So the ques­tion aris­es, why would Miller want to see a dis­man­tling of gar­risons? Garrisons have kept her rel­e­vant , kept her paid , bestowed the title of Prime Minister on her, and Most Honorable on her and her hus­band. Does the priv­i­leged give up their priv­i­lege? No it has to be tak­en from them. It is up to the Jamaican peo­ple to tear down the gar­risons. Portia Lucretia Simpson Miller , and Andrew Michael Holness, despite the ges­tures of good-will can­not and will not dis­man­tle gar­risons, Garrisons are not geo­graph­i­cal, or phy­chi­cal they are men­tal, peo­ple will nec­es­sar­i­ly have to get to a point where they real­ize that the Holnesses and the Millers of this world are not in their cor­ner, they have to take their future and that of their chil­dren into their own hands , they have to decide that they will not be pit­ted against each oth­er so that one per­son , one fam­i­ly, can be ele­vat­ed above all else.

It was a won­der­ful thing to see the beau­ti­ful fam­i­ly of Andrew Holness , pic­ture-per­fect, hus­band , wife and two adorable lit­tle boys, those two boys will get a prop­er edu­ca­tion, they will get the best health care, they will get to live in the absolute best Government Housing and have all of the perks and trap­pings that are accord­ed the Prime Minister and his fam­i­ly. But for that one fam­i­ly that made it, how many lit­tle Jamaican boys do not have shoes, clothes, a prop­er bed to sleep in, or has no idea where their next meal is com­ing from?

The intel­lect that would cause the peo­ple to see that they deserve the same things Miller and Holness enjoys, is lack­ing and that defi­cien­cy will keep them enslaved in the gar­risons , held behind imag­i­nary walls that keeps them enslaved in south-west St Andrew to Portia Simpson Miller, and in West Central St. Andrew to Andrew Michael Holness. Holness may deny that his con­stituen­cy is a gar­ri­son all he wants , those of us who lived there, dodged bul­lets there and woke up to see the corpses know a gar­ri­son when we see one , Tower Hill/​Water House is a garrison.

What both­ers me is the total blind­ness and absolute idio­cy of Jamaican vot­ers who con­tin­ue to allow these mis­fits to use and abuse them , while they kill each oth­er to ele­vate them to god like sta­tus. People all over the world, in places where dic­ta­tor­ships ruled for decades , are ris­ing to the occa­sion, real­iz­ing that those who gov­erned are allowed to gov­ern by them the peo­ple, and as such they are tak­ing their future into their own hands , over­turn­ing even the most entrenched sys­tems in places like Egypt and Libya. We get the Government we deserve, the blind­ness of the elec­torate is their undo­ing, where there is no vision the peo­ple perish.

Let’s Start Here Prime Minister Holness !

Contrac­tor General Greg Christie recent­ly lament­ed the lack of will on the part of Jamaican Authorities to once and for all effec­tive­ly clean up the mess of the award­ing of pub­lic contracts.

In deliv­er­ing the Seventh Annual Lecture in the Caribbean International Network (CIN) Lecture Series in New York last night, Christie chron­i­cled sev­er­al rea­sons which sub­stan­ti­ate his view that there is a lack of polit­i­cal will to seri­ous­ly fight cor­rup­tion in pub­lic con­tract­ing in JamaicaRead more: http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​l​a​t​e​s​t​n​e​w​s​/​C​h​r​i​s​tie – No-political-will-to-fight-corruption-in-Jamaica#ixzz1c8Jmhp7r
Greg Christie has been in my mind a tire­less fight­er for fideli­ty , trans­paren­cy and cred­i­bil­i­ty for the Jamaican peo­ple through the office he holds. What makes Christie cred­i­ble in my eyes is the fact that he has vowed to demitt office in November of next year. Cristie lament­ed the lack of action on the part of Government to enact a raft of sug­ges­tions he has fur­nished them,that would have giv­en teeth to the Office of Contractor General.
Christie went on :

Make no mis­take about it. The prob­lems and the chal­lenges that I have sought to overview with you… which have con­front­ed the OCG and me, will per­sist as long as the OCG’s many reme­di­al rec­om­men­da­tions con­tin­ue to be ignored,” he said.“They will remain with us until and unless the OCG is grant­ed inde­pen­dent crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­to­ry pow­ers, inde­pen­dent pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al pow­ers, police pow­ers of arrest, and the pow­er to halt or to reg­u­larise a gov­ern­ment con­tract­ing process that is exhibit­ing the signs of cor­rup­tion, impro­pri­ety or irregularity.”

Andrew Holness

Greg Christie
Greg Christie

Andrew Holness Jamaica’s young Prime Minister has a momen­tous but not insur­mount­able task ahead of him, he could start by look­ing at the sug­ges­tions of Contractor General Greg Christie, and imme­di­ate­ly move to enact these sug­ges­tions where prac­ti­ca­ble into law, I mean whats the prob­lem with hon­esty and integri­ty? Holness has begun by ask­ing the leader of the oppo­si­tion to walk with him through gar­ri­son com­mu­ni­ties ‚a sym­bol­ic move Holness feels will go a long way in begin­ning the dis­man­tling of zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sions. As noble as that call is I would pre­fer to see sub­stan­tive actions enact­ed into law that will strength­en the hand of this and future Contractors General in going after entrenched cor­rup­tion in the han­dling of pub­lic funds. This move will not be easy,there are many peo­ple in high places in Jamaica who ben­e­fits from tax­pay­ers funds through the award­ing of contracts,many are high-pro­file donors to both polit­i­cal par­ties, but many more are crim­i­nals that sup­port the par­ties. Contractor General Christie and his staff has received numer­ous death threats for dar­ing to stand up and fight for our country.
Greg Christie does not ask for pow­ers to stoke his ego,as some in some new Agencies seem to think their posi­tion was cre­at­ed for,this Jamaican has demon­strat­ed the will­ing­ness and char­ac­ter nec­es­sary to turn around the endem­ic cul­ture of graft , nepo­tism and cor­rup­tion that obtains in the country.

Andrew Holness begins serv­ing as Prime Minister, with a year left before Parliamentary Elections are con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly due. He can make big bold steps , or try to fool the crowd with cheap pos­tur­ing while main­tain­ing the sta­tus quo, in which case he would be fol­low­ing his men­tor Bruce Golding out the door. There is noth­ing hard in push­ing leg­is­la­tion that pro­tects the Jamaican peo­ple, whats hard is my inabil­i­ty to under­stand why this has not been done.