Appeals Court Rules Live-streaming Police During Traffic Stops Protected By First Amendment

YouTube player

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that a North Carolina town’s pol­i­cy that alleged­ly banned video live-stream­ing police dur­ing traf­fic stops was in vio­la­tion of the First Amendment. The rul­ing stat­ed that Dijon Sharpe was live-stream­ing his traf­fic stop on Facebook Live when police offi­cer Myers Helms attempt­ed to take his phone away because he said live-stream­ing threat­ened his safe­ty. Sharpe then sued the Winterville police offi­cers in their offi­cial capac­i­ty for hav­ing a pol­i­cy that vio­lates the First Amendment and also sued Helms indi­vid­u­al­ly. The dis­trict court did not find that the pol­i­cy vio­lat­ed the First Amendment and dis­missed the indi­vid­ual com­plaint against Helms under qual­i­fied immu­ni­ty, accord­ing to the rul­ing. The appeals court vacat­ed the dis­trict court’s order, rul­ing that if such pol­i­cy exists that bans video live-stream­ing, it does vio­late the First Amendment. The rul­ing said that live-stream­ing police encoun­ters pro­vides infor­ma­tion the same way record­ing police offi­cers does.

Recording police encoun­ters cre­ates infor­ma­tion that con­tributes to dis­cus­sion about gov­ern­men­tal affairs,” the rul­ing said. “So too does livestream­ing dis­sem­i­nate that infor­ma­tion, often cre­at­ing its own record. We thus hold that livestream­ing a police traf­fic stop is speech pro­tect­ed by the First Amendment.” The court ruled that Sharpe’s claim can pro­ceed, but that he must now prove that the alleged pol­i­cy ban­ning live-stream­ing exists in Winterville. If he can prove it, the town will then have a chance to prove it does not vio­late the First Amendment, the rul­ing reads. The appeals court did hold up the dis­trict court’s rul­ing that dis­missed the indi­vid­ual com­plaint against Helms, and said that Helms is pro­tect­ed under qual­i­fied immu­ni­ty, which is a rule that pro­tects police offi­cers from being held indi­vid­u­al­ly liable unless the offi­cer clear­ly vio­lates a con­sti­tu­tion­al right. Sharpe argued that it was “clear­ly estab­lished” that Helms vio­lat­ed his First Amendment rights, but the court dis­agreed and said the offi­cer was “enti­tled” to qual­i­fied immu­ni­ty. “On the oth­er hand, although Officer Helms was alleged­ly act­ing under the pol­i­cy that plau­si­bly vio­lates the First Amendment, Sharpe’s claim against him in his per­son­al capac­i­ty fails,” the rul­ing reads. “It was not clear­ly estab­lished that Officer Helms’s actions vio­lat­ed Sharpe’s First Amendment rights and so he is pro­tect­ed by qual­i­fied immunity.”

Let Us Stop For A Minute And Acknowledge Black History

YouTube player

February is des­ig­nat­ed Black History month in the United States. As we com­mem­o­rate Africa’s rich his­to­ry through­out the Americas, let us not for­get that many of the things we use today and take for grant­ed were cre­at­ed by black inventors.
As we doc­u­ment some of those inven­tions, let us remind our­selves that many more were cre­at­ed by our ances­tors but were mis­ap­pro­pri­at­ed and plain old stolen and cred­it­ed to others.

We can­not claim the future unless we recon­nect with the past, with who we are, not what some would tell us we are.
There are those occu­py­ing high polit­i­cal office who would soon­er erase African-American con­tri­bu­tions from our minds, from American his­to­ry books. They have banned and burned books, removed African stud­ies cours­es, and maligned the teach­ing of African-American stud­ies in col­leges and high schools.
One such degen­er­ate even said African-American his­to­ry has no edu­ca­tion­al value.


Unfortunately for that dunce, the United States has no his­to­ry of its own except, of course, Native-American his­to­ry. All oth­er aspects of American his­to­ry have been bor­rowed from oth­er parts of the world, with a tremen­dous amount of it bor­rowed and stolen from Africa.
Currently, far too many black folks in the United States writ large are still lack­ing in self-aware­ness, choos­ing instead to be invest­ed in enter­tain­ment and lasciviousness.
Your ene­my will define you if you do not know who you are.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

NYPD Blatant Abuses During 2020 Protests

YouTube player

When police vio­late the rights of cit­i­zens in the United States, the cit­i­zen is forced to report the abuse at the sta­tion house to which the offend­ing offi­cers are attached, or not at all. In most cas­es, as report­ed by indi­vid­u­als and groups who have test­ed this process, the per­son report­ing abuse by police is treat­ed with dis­dain, threats, and intim­ida­to­ry tac­tics. In oth­er cas­es, peo­ple are lied to and even arrest­ed on trumped-up charges as they try to make a complaint.
In cas­es where there is a civil­ian com­plaint review board, it is almost point­less report­ing to them; as you will see with the review board in New York City, it is tooth­less and total­ly useless.
Officers get to decide whether or not they want to attend inter­views relat­ing to their mis­con­duct, regard­less of the seri­ous­ness of the alle­ga­tions against them. And even in cas­es where the alle­ga­tions are thor­ough­ly inves­ti­gat­ed and are sub­stan­ti­at­ed, the Review Board can only pass on the find­ings to the depart­ment for action.
The Review Board has no way of know­ing whether the depart­ment act­ed on the findings.
This is what pass­es for police account­abil­i­ty in the United States. Police depart­ments and their rogue ele­ments are unac­count­able and above the law.(mb)

»»»»»»»>

A new­ly released report from the city agency that inves­ti­gates com­plaints of police mis­con­duct crit­i­cizes the NYPD for fail­ing to prop­er­ly track where offi­cers were deployed dur­ing the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests. It also says the depart­ment did not request enough sup­port from emer­gency med­ical pro­fes­sion­als, and did not equip offi­cers with riot gear that made it easy for them to be identified.

The police watch­dog agency, the Civilian Complaint Review Board, pub­lished the near­ly 600-page doc­u­ment Monday. It details its review of hun­dreds of com­plaints against offi­cers who respond­ed to the protests in 2020 after Minneapolis police killed George Floyd.

The agency received a bar­rage of offi­cer com­plaints fol­low­ing city-wide demon­stra­tions between May and November of that year. Investigators weren’t able to con­duct a full review of many of those com­plaints. Of the cas­es the agency did review ful­ly, it found that at least 146 mem­bers of ser­vice who respond­ed to the protests vio­lat­ed depart­ment rules. Officers broke NYPD pol­i­cy in about 40% of the cas­es it was able to ful­ly inves­ti­gate, the report says.

In more than a quar­ter of full inves­ti­ga­tions, the agency couldn’t iden­ti­fy the offi­cer at the cen­ter of the com­plaint, mak­ing it impos­si­ble to rec­om­mend dis­ci­pline. Overall, the police depart­ment, which has the final say on dis­ci­pline, has only imposed dis­ci­pline against 42 offi­cers so far. Dozens of cas­es are still pending.

Among the inci­dents detailed: On Flatbush Avenue in Brooklyn, two police cruis­ers drove through a crowd of pro­test­ers. In Lower Manhattan, offi­cers alleged­ly hit peo­ple with batons so hard that they caused bone frac­tures. Police spewed pep­per spray indis­crim­i­nate­ly into a crowd out­side the Barclays Center. They sur­round­ed demon­stra­tors in Mott Haven, arrest­ed them and alleged­ly zip tied some pro­test­ers’ hands so tight­ly that they went numb. One sergeant pushed a pho­to­jour­nal­ist to the ground, caus­ing scrapes to his arms, legs and cheeks and $800 in dam­age to his camera.

In a state­ment, a spokesper­son for the NYPD not­ed that the num­ber of offi­cers who faced a sub­stan­ti­at­ed com­plaint rep­re­sents less than 1% of the of 22,000 mem­bers of ser­vice who respond­ed to the protests. “This con­firms that the NYPD response to the protests dur­ing the sum­mer of 2020 was large­ly pro­fes­sion­al, com­mend­able, and respon­sive to the unique cir­cum­stances that were present at the time,” the state­ment said. In a let­ter to CCRB lead­er­ship, NYPD Acting Deputy Commissioner of Legal Matters Carrie Talanksy accused the CCRB of bas­ing its find­ings on “lim­it­ed infor­ma­tion” and failed to acknowl­edge that offi­cers were work­ing in “hos­tile and adver­sar­i­al con­di­tions.” She not­ed that more than 400 offi­cers were injured and about 250 were hos­pi­tal­ized. She said the over­sight agency “arti­fi­cial­ly inflates the data pre­sent­ed to the NYPD’s detri­ment,” and said the depart­ment has already tak­en action in some of the cas­es out­lined in the report and has imple­ment­ed rec­om­men­da­tions from the Department of Investigation.

The watch­dog agency had planned to share its find­ings in mid-2022, but the pub­li­ca­tion date was repeat­ed­ly delayed as the agency strug­gled to keep up with an unprece­dent­ed num­ber of com­plaints against offi­cers who were often unnamed.

A cas­cade of exter­nal road­blocks and inter­nal fail­ures stalled inves­ti­ga­tions into those com­plaints. Officers declined to par­tic­i­pate in vir­tu­al inter­views at the height of the pan­dem­ic, requests for body cam­era footage turned up irrel­e­vant videos and illeg­i­ble per­son­nel ros­ters made it near­ly impos­si­ble to iden­ti­fy the swath of offi­cers who were deployed out­side of their nor­mal precincts dur­ing the days of protests across the city. Many offi­cers cov­ered their shield num­bers to hide their iden­ti­ties from pro­test­ers who might lat­er file a complaint.

A Gothamist inves­ti­ga­tion found that many CCRB employ­ees had been sound­ing the alarms for months, urg­ing the agency to speak up ear­li­er about the chal­lenges it was fac­ing. Staff told Gothamist that the agency also failed to team up inves­ti­ga­tors in a way that would have made it eas­i­er for them to share evi­dence and collaborate.

A staffing short­age in the CCRB unit that han­dles the most seri­ous cas­es has also cre­at­ed a back­log for admin­is­tra­tive tri­als against offi­cers who have been charged with pol­i­cy vio­la­tions. More than 60 of those cas­es are unresolved.

Other groups have already doc­u­ment­ed wide­spread issues with the NYPD’s response to the 2020 demon­stra­tions. A Department of Investigation report found police used “exces­sive tac­tics” and a Human Rights Watch report called the police response to a protest in Mott Haven “inten­tion­al, planned, and unjustified.”

The CCRB report zeroes in on indi­vid­ual alle­ga­tions against offi­cers, the out­comes of the agency’s inves­ti­ga­tions and the pun­ish­ments that offi­cers did — or didn’t — face.

Protests against police bru­tal­i­ty bred more instances of police mis­con­duct,” CCRB Chair Arva Rice wrote in the report. “If this mis­con­duct goes unad­dressed, it will nev­er be reformed.”

The report high­lights some of the agency’s most com­mon find­ings against offi­cers, includ­ing that many offi­cers vio­lat­ed NYPD guide­lines when they struck civil­ians with batons, improp­er­ly used pep­per spray against peace­ful pro­test­ers and used exces­sive phys­i­cal force to push and shove peo­ple. Multiple offi­cers also failed to pro­vide med­ical care to peo­ple with injuries, didn’t turn on their body cam­eras dur­ing some inter­ac­tions that should have been record­ed, or placed bands on their shields to hide their num­bers and refused to tell peo­ple their names.

Here are some oth­er key takeaways:

Case out­comes:

  • The CCRB received more than 750 com­plaints, 321 of which fell with­in the CCRB’s juris­dic­tion. (The CCRB is only allowed to inves­ti­gate a few types of mis­con­duct: force, abuse of author­i­ty, dis­cour­tesy and offen­sive lan­guage. The agency also launched a new unit to inves­ti­gate claims of racial pro­fil­ing and bias-based polic­ing last year.)
  • The agency was able to ful­ly inves­ti­gate 226 of those complaints.
  • The CCRB deter­mined that offi­cers had vio­lat­ed pol­i­cy in 88com­plaints.
  • Investigators were unable to deter­mine the sus­pect­ed officer’s iden­ti­ty in 59 complaints.
  • The agency was unable to deter­mine if mis­con­duct had occurred in 50 complaints.
  • Officers were found to have fol­lowed NYPD guide­lines in just 18 of the 321 complaints.
  • The agency found that the alleged mis­con­duct did not occur in 11 cases
  • The CCRB sub­stan­ti­at­ed 269 alle­ga­tions of mis­con­duct against 146mem­bers of ser­vice (Sometimes com­plaints include mul­ti­ple dif­fer­ent alle­ga­tions of wrong­do­ing. The agency also notes that it count­ed offi­cers more than once in this tal­ly if they had mul­ti­ple com­plaints with sub­stan­ti­at­ed misconduct.)
  • The sub­stan­ti­at­ed alle­ga­tions include: 140 claims of exces­sive force, 72 claims of abuse of author­i­ty, 24 claims of untruth­ful state­ments, 24 claims of dis­cour­tesy and 9 claims of offen­sive language.
  • The NYPD has final­ized 78 cas­es and has imposed dis­ci­pline in 42of them.

Main obsta­cles dur­ing investigations:

  • Officers took “per­va­sive and pur­pose­ful actions” to hide their iden­ti­ties, includ­ing putting bands over their shields and refus­ing to pro­vide their names and shield num­bers to civilians.
  • The NYPD pro­vid­ed delayed and incon­sis­tent respons­es to requests for body cam­era and oth­er video footage.
  • Officers refused to be inter­viewed vir­tu­al­ly for sev­er­al months when COVID restric­tions pre­vent­ed the CCRB from hold­ing in-per­son interviews.
  • Remote work and oth­er COVID restric­tions caused work delays.

The CCRB out­lined more than a dozen rec­om­men­da­tions for the police depart­ment, to improve its response to protests and make it eas­i­er for the agency to inves­ti­gate com­plaints in the future. The NYPD is not required to fol­low them.

Those rec­om­men­da­tions include:

  • All offi­cers should go through updat­ed train­ing on crowd con­trol tactics.
  • Officers’ names and shield num­bers should be clear­ly vis­i­ble dur­ing protests.
  • Police should not take action against peo­ple who are com­ply­ing with orders.
  • The depart­ment should do a bet­ter job of track­ing vehi­cle assign­ments, super­vi­sor assign­ments and which offi­cers respond to their fel­low offi­cers’ calls for help dur­ing protests.
  • Body cam­eras should be turned on when­ev­er offi­cers are inter­act­ing with civil­ians, includ­ing when offi­cers are in dis­tress and call for help.
  • The CCRB should have direct access to body cam­era footage.
  • The NYPD should set up med­ical treat­ment areas staffed with EMTs who can quick­ly treat injured peo­ple who are arrest­ed, before they are tak­en to be processed.
  • Officers should pro­vide a vouch­er when­ev­er they seize prop­er­ty so that it can be returned to the owner.

The CCRB’s long-antic­i­pat­ed report brings some sense of res­o­lu­tion for the scores of New Yorkers who were pep­per sprayed, pushed, beat­en with batons and cursed at dur­ing the 2020 protests. But, near­ly three years lat­er, about 60 of the most severe alle­ga­tions are still pend­ing. Multiple civ­il law­suits filed against the police depart­ment are also ongo­ing, includ­ing one filed by Attorney General Letitia James.

The City Council is con­sid­er­ing a bill that would ban the NYPD’s infa­mous Strategic Response Group from respond­ing to non­vi­o­lent protests. The Department of Investigation found that the unit pro­voked pro­test­ers, instead of de-esca­lat­ing tense encoun­ters. The Council’s pub­lic safe­ty com­mit­tee was sup­posed to hold an over­sight hear­ing to ques­tion the unit about its bud­get and tac­tics in December, but that hear­ing has been post­poned twice and is now resched­uled for March.(Reported by the Gothamist)

A Dip In Neighbor’s Pool Leads To Nightmare At Hands Of Oroville Police, Lawsuit Alleges

YouTube player

Just when you think, ok, there is no way that police can do worse than what we have already seen.

Last year on Sept. 1, as Butte County was in the midst of 100-plus-degree heat wave, Dana Marie James found her­self arrest­ed for tres­pass­ing after tak­ing a dip in a Chico homeowner’s pool.

James was arrest­ed by a deputy from the Butte County Sheriff’s Office who “observed that Ms. James was inco­her­ent, had an altered men­tal sta­tus and was pos­si­bly under the influ­ence of a con­trolled sub­stance,” accord­ing to a law­suit against anoth­er agency, the Oroville Police Department, filed in fed­er­al court Monday.

She was tak­en to jail in Oroville, with her shoes left behind, booked and then cit­ed and released just before 3 p.m.

Ms. James dis­played obvi­ous signs and symp­toms of men­tal and phys­i­cal impair­ment at the time of her release from the jail and this is record­ed on jail video,” the suit filed by Rocklin attor­ney Robert Chalfant says. “Ms. James was not giv­en a bus pass so that she could return to her home in Chico, California, or pro­vid­ed shoes.

Ms. James was sim­ply thrown out onto the streets of the city of Oroville.”

Then, accord­ing to the civ­il rights law­suit, the 52-year-old woman’s real trou­bles began, cul­mi­nat­ing with her being aban­doned in the mid­dle of the night in a remote area where she end­ed up being struck by a hit-and-run dri­ver. Chalfant says James suf­fered life-alter­ing injuries from the collision.

Acting Oroville Police Chief Bill LaGrone, reached on his cell­phone Monday, declined to com­ment on the law­suit, cit­ing pend­ing litigation.

But the suit accus­es the police of a “state cre­at­ed dan­ger,” delib­er­ate indif­fer­ence, neg­li­gence and oth­er claims stem­ming from what James’ lawyer describes as Oroville’s fail­ure to prop­er­ly train its officers.

Woman wasn’t medically cleared to return to jail

Six hours after James was first released, around 9 p.m., she was arrest­ed again, this time at a Home Depot by Oroville police Officer Robert Sasek, the suit says.

During her arrest at the Home Depot, Ms. James was inco­her­ent and unable to care for her­self,” the suit says. “Ms. James was act­ing irra­tional­ly, had sig­nif­i­cant men­tal impair­ment includ­ing illog­i­cal and dis­or­ga­nized thoughts, and Officer Sasek believed that she was under the influ­ence of a con­trolled substance.”

Sasek took her to jail, but the intake nurse there would not allow her to be booked until she received med­ical clear­ance, the suit said.

That’s when Sasek drove James to Oroville Hospital, where he had her wait in his patrol car while he went inside, the suit says. He returned and then released her in the park­ing before leav­ing. He was called back to the hos­pi­tal when a hos­pi­tal secu­ri­ty guard called Sasek on his per­son­al cell­phone, the suit says.

The secu­ri­ty guard informed Officer Sasek that Ms. James had been walk­ing around the exte­ri­or of the hos­pi­tal try­ing to open locked doors,” the suit says. “The secu­ri­ty guard fur­ther informed Officer Sasek that Ms. James was ‘out of con­trol’ and had ‘bar­ri­cad­ed’ her­self in a hos­pi­tal bathroom.”

By the time Sasek arrived, the secu­ri­ty guard had James back out in the park­ing lot, and Sasek was joined by Oroville police Sgt. Ali Khan, the suit says. Sasek then drove to a gas sta­tion with James, where he met Khan and an unnamed offi­cer, and “the three offi­cers dis­cussed a plan of action,” the suit says.

All three offi­cers knew and dis­cussed that Ms. James had been reject­ed by the jail at book­ing because she had an urgent med­ical con­di­tion requir­ing eval­u­a­tion and treat­ment and need­ed to be ‘med­ical­ly cleared’ pri­or to being accept­ed into cus­tody at the jail,” the suit says.

Abandon’ at the dump, cop sped off

The unnamed offi­cer then sug­gest­ed they “take her out to a remote area on Neal Road at the Waste Facility and aban­don Ms. James at the dump,” accord­ing to the suit.

Sergeant Ali Khan agreed with the plan and did not object or instruct his sub­or­di­nates to cease their unlaw­ful and improp­er con­duct even though he knew that plaintiff’s rights were being vio­lat­ed and had the oppor­tu­ni­ty to inter­vene,” the suit says, adding that Khan “had an affir­ma­tive duty to stop the unlaw­ful con­duct of his sub­or­di­nates but failed to do so.”

Sasek then drove 15½ miles north of town to the Neal Road Recycling and Waste Facility, the suit says.

While being trans­port­ed towards Chico, Ms. James asked, ‘Where are we going?’ and Officer Sasek respond­ed, ‘Don’t wor­ry about it’ and told her to ‘just shut up,’” the suit says.

At mid­night, Sasek dropped James off in com­plete dark­ness, the suit says, and when she asked where they were he respond­ed, “You will fig­ure it out, it’s not my problem.”

Ms. James plead­ed with Officer Sasek to ‘take me home,’ pri­or to Officer Sasek get­ting back into his patrol vehi­cle and floor­ing the gas ped­al, which threw dirt and grav­el direct­ly at Ms. James,” the suit says. “Ms. James was now all alone on Neal Road. It was dark out and there were no streetlights.

Ms. James had no phone, no water, no shoes, no flash­light and no idea where she was. Officer Sasek just drove away dis­card­ing her on Neal Road out­side of the dump at approx­i­mate­ly midnight.”

The offi­cers “treat­ed Ms. James as though she was garbage,” the suit says. “Their heart­less deci­sion to aban­don her at the dump would war­rant crim­i­nal charges if they had aban­doned a dog or cat.”

Hospitalized for 35 days after ordeal

After being left, James tried walk­ing along the shoul­der of the road back toward Oroville, the suit says, where “she was struck on her right side by a pass­ing vehi­cle and was sent fly­ing down an embank­ment into sev­er­al large boul­ders where she remained in and out of con­scious­ness and severe­ly injured for approx­i­mate­ly 10 hours.”

The vehi­cle that hit her didn’t stop, the suit says.

At approx­i­mate­ly 9:00 a.m. on September 2 (the next day), Ms. James sum­moned the strength to crawl up the embank­ment where she had remained in and out of con­scious­ness all night and was seen by work­ers employed at the Franklin Construction yard,” the suit says. “They imme­di­ate­ly rec­og­nized the seri­ous­ness of her injuries, pro­vid­ed water and assis­tance and called 911.”

Butte County Sheriff’s Department offi­cers arrived and insult­ed Ms. James by ask­ing if her boyfriend had beat­en her up,” the suit says. “The Butte County Sheriff’s Department failed to con­duct any inquiry into how Ms. James had arrived at that loca­tion or who was respon­si­ble for hit­ting her with their vehicle.”

This time, James was tak­en to anoth­er hos­pi­tal, Enloe Medical Center in Chico, where she spent sev­en days in inten­sive care and 35 total days in the hos­pi­tal, the suit says.

She endured mul­ti­ple surg­eries, devel­oped sep­sis and suf­fered an infec­tion on her right foot so deep she may lose those toes, the suit says.

Based on the severe inter­nal injuries that Ms. James sus­tained, med­ical providers were forced to remove 30 to 40 per­cent of her colon, and approx­i­mate­ly two feet of her small intes­tine,” the suit says. “Ms. James has also been informed that due to the inter­nal injuries and removal of a por­tion of her small intes­tine and a por­tion of her colon, she will like­ly be required to wear a colosto­my bag for life.”

The suit also says that after Sasek left James at the dump, he “returned to his office the fol­low­ing day and com­plet­ed his arrest report for his arrest of Ms. James at the Oroville Home Depot and sub­mit­ted it to the Butte County District Attorney for prosecution.”(This sto­ry orig­i­nat­ed @Yahoonews)

NJ charges Patterson cop who shot wounded fleeing man in the back…

New Jersey’s top law enforce­ment offi­cial brought crim­i­nal charges Monday against a police offi­cer he said shot a flee­ing per­son in the back, wound­ing him severely.

Attorney General Matthew Platkin said the state filed charges of sec­ond-degree aggra­vat­ed assault and offi­cial mis­con­duct against Paterson Police Officer Jerry Moravek.

The charges stem from a June 2022 inci­dent in which Moravek saw the vic­tim, who is not iden­ti­fied in the charg­ing doc­u­ments, run past him soon after hear­ing gun­shots. Moravek shout­ed for the per­son to drop the gun before fir­ing, strik­ing him in the back.

Platkin said the per­son did not have a gun in his pos­ses­sion or with­in reach. A firearm was found near the site of the shoot­ing, accord­ing to the charg­ing doc­u­ment, but Platkin said there was no DNA or fin­ger­print evi­dence link­ing it to the man.

We have promised to nev­er be com­pla­cent and we have made a com­mit­ment to stand up against unnec­es­sary and exces­sive uses of force by those with a duty to pro­tect the pub­lic,” Platkin said.

Moravek’s attor­ney, Patrick Caserta, said in a state­ment that his client had been false­ly accused. He said the offi­cer had a duty to pur­sue the per­son he thought had fired shots.

During a short foot chase, there came a time when Officer Moravek believed his life and the life of oth­er peo­ple in the street was at risk. He believed at that split-sec­ond that the per­son he was chas­ing was turn­ing to fire that hand­gun at him and he real­ized that if he missed, the bul­lets could strike any­one near­by,” the state­ment read.

Moravek made repeat­ed calls for an ambu­lance after­ward, Caserta added.

Video released from the inci­dent shows Moravek ask­ing the per­son he shot why he ran from him.

I was scared. I don’t have no gun, though” he said.

Platkin said the offi­cer did­n’t give the per­son he shot a warn­ing that he was going to fire or order him to stop run­ning or get down on the ground.

The shoot­ing left bul­let frag­ments in the per­son­’s spine, Platkin said. He has not been able to walk since, accord­ing to the charg­ing document.

Paterson Mayor Andre Sayegh said in a state­ment that a pre­lim­i­nary review found that Moravek fol­lowed guide­lines while respond­ing to a ser­vice call and after hear­ing gun­shots fired. The may­or, a Democrat, cit­ed the pend­ing legal process and said he would­n’t com­ment further.

The charges come as New Jersey has sought to increase scruti­ny of police offi­cers involved in shoot­ings. In late 2020, Platkin’s pre­de­ces­sor issued new use-of-force rulesbar­ring phys­i­cal force against civil­ians except as a last resort, among oth­er requirements.

In 2019, New Jersey Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy signed a mea­sure requir­ing the state attor­ney gen­er­al to con­duct inves­ti­ga­tions when police fatal­ly shoot someone.

Platkin, a Murphy appointee, said Monday’s charges don’t stem from that law and pre­sent­ing the case to a grand jury isn’t required, but his office “will not hes­i­tate” to do so in cas­es like this one.

Paterson is a city of near­ly 160,000 peo­ple about 20 miles (30 kilo­me­ters) west of Manhattan.

Massive Expansion Of The Police State Enhanced By Black Democrats And Others…

YouTube player

At a time when rela­tions are strained to break­ing between peo­ple of col­or and police, polit­i­cal lead­ers, includ­ing black elect­ed offi­cials, are march­ing for­ward as if all is kosher with mas­sive police state expan­sions. They are obliv­i­ous to the calls from the cit­i­zens to stop throw­ing more and more of their hard-earned tax dol­lars on peo­ple who are wil­ful­ly mur­der­ing their loved ones…
Massive infu­sions of cash into the cof­fers of polit­i­cal cam­paigns and good old fash­ion scared shit­less to oppose the blue gang have caused even black Mayors to back spend­ing more mon­ey on the police instead of opt­ing for trained coun­selors and oth­er pro­fes­sion­als, not car­ry­ing a gun or Rambo-type folks who con­sid­er them­selves ham­mers and every­one else nails.
The Atlanta City Council in September 2021 approved a plan to build a facil­i­ty dubbed police city in a 10 – 4 vote. Then-Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms sup­port­ed the plan, call­ing the coun­cil vote “coura­geous” and reject­ing the idea that we must “defund the police” as Black Lives Matter pro­test­ers have advocated.
“What I’ve said repeat­ed­ly over the last year is that hold­ing the men and women who serve us in a pub­lic safe­ty capac­i­ty account­able is not mutu­al­ly exclu­sive from sup­port­ing them,” Bottoms said, sug­gest­ing the only way to abol­ish police is to abol­ish crime.

Keisha Lance Bottoms

Lance Bottoms, who now works in the Biden Administration, takes the same tack from Joe Biden and oth­er Democrats regard­ing defund­ing police, large­ly out of fear of Republican smear and the inabil­i­ty to critical-think.
The idea that in 2023 we lack the imag­i­na­tion to envis­age not send­ing poor­ly trained white racists with guns and the pow­er to kill to deal with issues affect­ing black cit­i­zens is alarming.
That we still con­sid­er the old slave patrol idea of polic­ing and con­tin­ue to build mas­sive edi­fices to train and enhance that igno­ble ide­al­o­gy is astounding.
There are bet­ter ways to deal with bro­ken tail­lights and fail­ure to use turn sig­nals than armed robots with guns abus­ing and killing peo­ple just liv­ing their lives. Unless harass­ing, beat­ing, and killing them is the point.
Bottoms claimed the train­ing facil­i­ty would “help boost morale, reten­tion and recruit­ment” of police offi­cers and pro­vide “21st-cen­tu­ry train­ing, root­ed in respect and regard for the com­mu­ni­ties they serve.” The cen­ter would be among the largest in the coun­try, more mas­sive than LAPD or NYPD facilities.
In oth­er words, if tax­pay­ers do not give police what they want and allow them to con­tin­ue to oper­ate as they have been, they will throw a hiss fit and refuse to do their jobs, and would-be appli­cants will look else­where for employment.
If this is true, this is a mar­velous idea and a spec­tac­u­lar way of get­ting the kinds of police offi­cers the coun­try needs.
Maybe .…just maybe, what the coun­try needs is to let the depart­ments bleed out those pow­er-crazed androids. In the end, few­er good cops are expo­nen­tial­ly bet­ter than a ton of shit­ty cops.

DeKalb County CEO Michael Thurmond Democrat


The naïveté‘ of that state­ment would be laugh­able if it weren’t so utter­ly stu­pid. Does the American police need their morale boosted?
Keisha Lance Bottoms’ state­ments remind­ed me of the trees who thought the Axe was their friend because the han­dle is made of wood. Or the Frog who fer­ried a scor­pi­on on it’s back across the riv­er with the assur­ac­nce the scor­pi­on would­n’t sting him.
Ultimately, an Axe may have a wood­en han­dle, but only to chop down trees. A scor­pi­on will assure a frog it won’t sting, but even­tu­al­ly it will, because that’s what scor­pi­ons do, … they sting.
It is intel­lec­tu­al­ly indo­lence to con­tin­ue to heap more and more mon­ey on polic­ing through the raz­ing of much-need­ed forests as is being done to cre­ate a cop city in Atlanta instead of reimag­in­ing how we can secure our com­mu­ni­ties with­out the trau­ma that police con­tin­ue to create.

Atlanta’s Andrea Dickens, Democrat and black.


Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens and DeKalb County CEO Michael Thurmond cleared the way for the 85-acre, $90 mil­lion com­plex on city-owned for­est land near a pre­dom­i­nate­ly Black com­mu­ni­ty. Huge sur­prise there.
According to the Atlanta Police Foundation — the orga­ni­za­tion leas­ing the land and fund­ing two-thirds of the facil­i­ty with Atlanta tax­pay­ers pick­ing up the rest of the tab — the train­ing cen­ter promis­es to “reimag­ine law enforce­ment train­ing and Police/​Fire Rescue com­mu­ni­ty engagement.”
Of course, yes, reimag­ing polic­ing as the Frog imag­ined the scor­pi­on would­n’t stink, killing him mid­stream. We get it.
Well, the peo­ple in Dekald coun­ty and its envi­rons can­not blame ‘whitey’ for this one, at least on the face of it. This is the work of black co*&s; I mean, black leaders.
Some also thought more black cops and black police chiefs would solve police vio­lence so there is that as well. Naievely and unimigi­na­tive­ly fail­ing to under­stand that it’s not just about col­or but a cul­ture of impuni­ty fos­tered by immunity.
The naivety and intel­lec­tu­al lazi­ness per­me­at­ing the con­ver­sa­tion on this sub­ject are astound­ing. The idea that polic­ing, a con­struct, can­not be reimag­ined because it is absolute and there is no replace­ment is beyond laugh­able. But then again, some peo­ple believe they must destroy what’s left of our frag­ile eco­log­i­cal sys­tem for coal min­ing to heat homes and busi­ness­es, even as oth­er nations are mak­ing leaps and bounds in green energy.
And to be fair, there is a mas­sive police facil­i­ty going up right here in my coun­ty of Dutchess New York, to the tune of.….… wait for it.…. 
As of June 30, 2021, $159.4 mil­lion has been spent or encum­bered on all phas­es of the project, with a remain­ing $32.8 mil­lion approved and avail­able to spend of the full $192.2 mil­lion appropriated.
[The Justice and Transition Center’s (Jail) design has been down­sized from its orig­i­nal 569-bed design to 328 beds in 2020. Funds approved and avail­able in 2016 for this phase of the con­struc­tion project are $154.8 mil­lion. The esti­mat­ed cost to com­plete the revised jail plan is $131.4 mil­lion, with a pro­ject­ed cost sav­ings of approx­i­mate­ly $22.8 mil­lion. The cur­rent time­line for con­struc­tion com­ple­tion of the jail is May 2024.] As report­ed by MidHudsonNews​.com)
The mas­sive, ever-increas­ing­ly dan­ger­ous police state is here to stay. 

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

How The Beautiful Face Of Ilhan Omar Triggers Racist Cretins…

YouTube player

Many peo­ple who know Kevin McCarthy have long argued that the new­ly mint­ed speak­er of the US house of rep­re­sen­ta­tives is a cheap emp­ty suit. Harsh? I have no way of know­ing; I do not know the guy. But it darn sure seems like McCarthy will do any­thing to get what­ev­er it is that he wants. Some see his embrace of Marjorie Green and Paul Gosar, two racist clowns in his con­fer­ence, as a sign McCarthy will sell his soul as long as he can attain his polit­i­cal ambitions.
It is hard to argue with after what we wit­nessed in the US House in an almost unprece­dent­ed fash­ion, as it took fif­teen bal­lots for the Californian to be elect­ed speak­er and only after much horse trad­ing and the use of loopholes.
Audio Article below.

U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D‑Minn.) attends a press con­fer­ence on com­mit­tee assign­ments for the 118th U.S. Congress, at the U.S. Capitol Building on January 25, 2023, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/​Getty Images)

Raw polit­i­cal ambi­tions may be com­pa­ra­ble to a drug-addict­ed pros­ti­tute who will do any­thing for the fix they need. And so it should come as no sur­prise that Kevin McCarthy would sched­ule a vote as he did to deny Minnesota rep­re­sen­ta­tive Ilhan Omar a seat on the Foreign Affairs Committee, using the fraud­u­lent argu­ment that she has made anti-Semitic com­ments against Jews.
It was a base­less tit-for-tat against the Democrats because the vile cretins Marjorie Green and Paul Gosar were removed from their com­mit­tee assign­ments by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi for mak­ing Violent threats against their Democratic colleagues.
But it was worse; though con­gress­woman Omar apol­o­gized for com­ments deemed anti-Semitic (which she should not have done), it was not enough for the weak and feck­less Kevin McCarthy; he need­ed a scape­goat, and Ms. Omar a for­mer refugee, a black woman, and an immi­grant made a rich tar­get for McCarthy to use as appease­ment fod­der to his racist right-wing cabal in the insur­rec­tion­ist con­fer­ence. Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries moved imme­di­ate­ly to seat her on the House Budget Committee.

Two crushed-suit­ed cheap suits parad­ing as leaders.


McCarthy also tar­get­ed two of his California Democratic col­leagues, Representatives Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell, whom he gra­tu­itous­ly removed from their Intelligence com­mit­tee assignments.
Kevin McCarthy’s move to oust the three Democrats is the lat­est exam­ple of a man will­ing to appease the racist gut­ter-rats in his conference.
We all remem­bered Kevin Mccarthy stand­ing in the well of the US House of Representatives, denounc­ing Donald Trump for weaponiz­ing the racist white horde and unleash­ing them on Congress with the express to kill speak­er Nancy Pelosi and Mike Pence, his own vice pres­i­dent, failed to uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly stop the cer­ti­fi­ca­tion of Joe Biden’s vic­to­ry in 2021.
Days lat­er, the same McCarthy was at Mara Lago lick­ing Donald Trump’s shoes with his tongue and singing a dif­fer­ent tune.
The sad real­i­ty is that America will have to trudge along with the equiv­a­lent of a crack-addict­ed pros­ti­tute who will do any­thing to remain speak­er of the house.
Made pos­si­ble because of ger­ry­man­der­ing in Places like California and New York that allowed Republicans to do as they pleased in redraw­ing Congressional districts.
Oh, by the way… It is not anti-Semitic to crit­i­cize peo­ple who claim to be Jews. No one is above crit­i­cism; I do not care who you are, and no one is untouchable.
No one should allow them­selves to be cowed into silence by any group, that includes those who would ratio­nal­ly and rea­son­ably crit­i­cize black people.
No one is above crit­i­cism. It is not racist or anti- Semetic to pos­i­tive­ly crit­i­cize any group or individual.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Memphis Police Department Fires 6th Cop Involved In The Death Of Tyre Nichols

YouTube player

Preston Hemphill

The Memphis Police Department fired a sixth offi­cer Friday for his role in the events lead­ing to the death of Tyre Nichols, a 29-year-old Black man who was beat­en by police offi­cers and died three days lat­er. The offi­cer, Preston Hemphill, was placed on leave at the start of the depart­men­t’s inves­ti­ga­tion. MPD announced his ter­mi­na­tion Friday, near­ly a month after Nichols was beat­en. The depart­ment said Hemphill vio­lat­ed poli­cies includ­ing per­son­al con­duct, truth­ful­ness, com­pli­ance with Taser reg­u­la­tions, com­pli­ance with uni­form reg­u­la­tions, and a pol­i­cy gov­ern­ing inven­to­ry and recov­ered property.
Read more here: https://​www​.com​mer​cialap​peal​.com/​s​t​o​r​y​/​n​e​w​s​/​l​o​c​a​l​/​2​0​2​3​/​0​2​/​0​3​/​m​e​m​p​h​i​s​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​d​e​p​a​r​t​m​e​n​t​-​f​i​r​e​s​-​s​i​x​t​h​-​o​f​f​i​c​e​r​-​i​n​-​d​e​a​t​h​-​o​f​-​t​y​r​e​-​n​i​c​h​o​l​s​/​6​9​8​7​2​4​5​0​0​07/

LAPD Held Down Keenan Anderson, Repeatedly Tased Him — Then Suggested His Death Was His Own Fault

YouTube player

That the LAPD is con­fi­dent­ly deploy­ing this pub­lic rela­tions tac­tic near­ly three years after George Floyd’s death is a grim reflec­tion of how lit­tle has changed.

People mourn Keenan Anderson in Santa Monica, Calif., on Jan. 14, 2022. Photo: Jacob Lee Green/​Sipa via AP

THE LOS ANGELES Police Department is push­ing the nar­ra­tive that Keenan Anderson — a 31-year-old Black teacher, who LAPD cops held down and repeat­ed­ly tased as he begged for his life — is respon­si­ble for his own death.

Preliminary tox­i­col­o­gy tests, per­formed on Anderson’s body by the police depart­ment itself, found traces of cannabi­noids and cocaine metabo­lite in his sys­tem – results that in no way mit­i­gate the extreme vio­lence inflict­ed on Anderson by the police ahead of his January 3 death.

The drug tests were not released as part of an offi­cial autop­sy; the Los Angeles County coroner’s office is still inves­ti­gat­ing Anderson’s death and has not yet ruled on its exact med­ical cause. Instead, the LAPD con­duct­ed its own drug tests and announced the results in an unam­bigu­ous effort to den­i­grate and blame its vic­tim, the third man of col­or killed by the depart­ment in the few short weeks of 2023 alone

There’s noth­ing sur­pris­ing about this sort of police prac­tice. The idea that drug pos­ses­sion or use by Black peo­ple cre­ates grounds enough to war­rant police vio­lence, even dead­ly vio­lence, has under­gird­ed half a cen­tu­ry of U.S. polic­ing. Cops from the depart­ment that mur­dered George Floyd attempt­ed to blame his death on the fen­tanyl found present in his sys­tem, too, but thank­ful­ly with­out success.

If Anderson’s offi­cial autop­sy under­mines police claims that drugs played a role in his death, it would be a relief, but not a vic­to­ry. Instead, the very will­ing­ness of the LAPD to release its tox­i­col­o­gy report speaks to a much broad­er prob­lem: the cer­tain con­fi­dence in the public’s will­ing­ness to demo­nize and blame Black vic­tims. If such racist nar­ra­tives around drugs weren’t read­i­ly avail­able, the police depart­ment wouldn’t have both­ered releas­ing the tox­i­col­o­gy results at all.

That the LAPD is con­fi­dent­ly deploy­ing this pub­lic rela­tions tac­tic near­ly three years after Floyd’s death is a grim reflec­tion of how lit­tle has changed.

This should come as no sur­prise, either: The upris­ings that fol­lowed Floyd’s mur­der were met with harsh state repres­sion in the streets, aid­ed by dis­avowals and dis­missals across the media and polit­i­cal main­stream. The Democratic law­mak­ers who knelt ludi­crous­ly in kente cloth to sig­nal their anti-racist cre­den­tials are the same lead­ers who have reject­ed every seri­ous attempt to reck­on with the racist vio­lence that defines U.S. policing.

The real­i­ty of U.S. polic­ing per­sists as a con­tin­u­ous, unre­pen­tant, and reform-resis­tant threat to Black lives.

Calls to defund the police were deemed elec­toral­ly radioac­tive, demands to abol­ish the police derid­ed as delu­sion­al, police bud­gets fur­ther swelled, and impuni­ty has con­tin­ued to reign.

Police killed 1,176 peo­ple in 2022 — more killings than in any of the last 10 years. And while racial jus­tice orga­niz­ers and abo­li­tion­ists con­tin­ue to fight, the mass rebel­lions of 2020 were aggres­sive­ly drained of polit­i­cal poten­cy by an array of coun­terin­sur­gent forces, from mass arrests, media demo­niza­tion, and, cru­cial­ly, the com­plete and cow­ard­ly aban­don­ment by lib­er­al politi­cians on the city, state, and fed­er­al levels.

I don’t doubt poll­sters’ find­ings, that vot­ers in 2020 were turned off by the term “defund,” but I’m not inter­est­ed in relit­i­gat­ing debates around elec­toral slo­gans. What mat­ters is that the real­i­ty of U.S. polic­ing per­sists as a con­tin­u­ous, unre­pen­tant, and reform-resis­tant threat to Black lives.(From the intercept)

Man Missing Both Legs Dies After Cops Shot Him At Least Eight Times

YouTube player

If you thought that these killers will stop because of the outcry against their actions, you need to guess again. Obviously, no one is safe from their murderous onslaught. This legless man was murdered after the five killers beat and killed Tyre Nichols in Memphis Tennessee.

The fam­i­ly of Anthony Lowe Jr is call­ing for jus­tice after the 36-year-old dou­ble amputee was shot and killed by police offi­cers in Huntington Park, California, last Thursday after­noon. In a con­fronta­tion cap­tured on video by a bystander and post­ed to social media, Mr. Lowe, who uses a wheel­chair, is seen hold­ing a knife and scram­bling away from mul­ti­ple police offi­cers who appear to be point­ing weapons at him. Shortly there­after, police shot Mr. Lowe mul­ti­ple times and killed him. “You guys knew your lives weren’t in dan­ger,” Mr. Lowe’s cousin Ellakenyada Gorum told KCAL in Los Angeles. “He’s run­ning on his limbs. How cold-heart­ed could they be?”

The Huntington Park Police Department told the tele­vi­sion sta­tion that its offi­cers respond­ed to a call around 3:45 on Thursday after­noon from a man who report­ed that he had been stabbed by a man in a wheel­chair. After police arrived at the scene, they found and con­front­ed Mr Lowe. Police said the offi­cers first attempt­ed to taser Mr Lowe, but were unable to stop him from threat­en­ing them with the knife. Next, they shot him. The video below may be upset­ting, but does not include footage of the shoot­ing itself. To Mr Lowe’s fam­i­ly, the notion that police had to fatal­ly shoot Mr Lowe to pro­tect them­selves strains creduli­ty. “Be real­is­tic about this, what could he have pos­si­bly done in a wheel­chair?” Mr Lowe’s aunt, who did not pro­vide her name, told the tele­vi­sion sta­tion. “We want jus­tice.” The shoot­ing of Mr Lowe, a Black man, comes as police vio­lence per­pe­trat­ed against Black Americans is once again at the fore­front of the nation­al con­scious­ness due to the killing of Trye Nichols by police in Memphis and the killing of Keenan Anderson by police in Los Angeles. Body cam­era footage of Mr Nichols’ death released last week sparked fresh out­rage over the killing in Memphis and around the coun­try, with Americans respond­ing by par­tic­i­pat­ing in protests in mul­ti­ple cities. Now, Mr Lowe’s fam­i­ly and com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers are also call­ing for jus­tice to be done in his case.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​c​o​p​-​f​i​r​e​d​-​9​-​t​i​m​e​s​-​i​n​t​o​-​t​h​e​-​b​a​c​k​-​o​f​-​a​-​w​h​e​e​l​c​h​a​i​r​-​b​o​u​n​d​-​m​a​n​-​k​i​l​l​i​n​g​-​h​im/

White Minority Rule And Police Violence Explained…

YouTube player

The injus­tice plagu­ing America is a byprod­uct of hatred taught in mil­lions of homes nation­wide. From those homes come young peo­ple who are going to col­leges of all kinds from those col­leges and uni­ver­si­ties, includ­ing mil­i­tary col­leges. They are grad­u­at­ing and enter­ing pol­i­tics with the hatred taught them in their homes.
And so we get mil­i­tary offi­cers and politi­cians, lawyers and judges, and peo­ple who pop­u­late the pub­lic and pri­vate sec­tors. They rise to posi­tions of tremen­dous pow­er, includ­ing the pres­ti­gious posi­tions of pres­i­dent, Supreme Court jus­tices, and US senators.
Then there are those at the bot­tom, cops, those who essen­tial­ly did not do so well in school but want in on the pow­er of white­ness, so they clam­or to be a part of law enforce­ment. Through law enforce­ment, they get to wield immense pow­er, includ­ing the pow­er to take life. And so they opt for the crash course taught in the police acad­e­mies, light in laws and human rights, heavy on sub­ju­gat­ing, shoot­ing to kill, and indoc­tri­na­tion on mak­ing peo­ple bow to their demands.
After a few weeks of that crash course, they are ful­ly empow­ered to do as they please to whomev­er they please.
That is the mil­i­tary arm of white suprema­cy (the police) sup­port­ed by those who nev­er both­ered attend­ing col­lege or could not cut it academically.
Audio ver­sion of Article.

Depiction of slave patrol. White patrollers exam­ine slave pass­es of the enslaved blacks. /​Scan via Wikimedia Commons

LET US BACKTRACKLITTLE
During the ear­ly enslave­ment of African peo­ple in the United States, the planters were con­cerned about the num­ber of enslaved peo­ple being brought in. Not that they did not like the free labor and the abil­i­ty to own oth­er peo­ple, but their con­cerns were cen­tered around main­tain­ing control.
As it is today, where real wealth is cen­tered in the hands of a tiny few at the top, the planters also had con­cerns with the white pop­u­la­tion that did not have access to the life of lux­u­ry and opu­lence they enjoyed.
So the prob­lem was two-fold, the increas­ing num­ber of black enslaved peo­ple and the impov­er­ished white pop­u­la­tion that looked at their wealth suspiciously.
A way had to be found to ensure a com­mon cause was not estab­lished between the two groups. American racism was born.
The strat­e­gy employed includ­ed hir­ing white over­seers on the plan­ta­tions and giv­ing them carte blanch to do as they pleased with the enslaved blacks with­out con­se­quence. They were allowed to beat, tor­ture, rape, and abuse the slaves.
Additionally, poor white trash was hired as slave patrols, indi­vid­u­al­ly and as col­lec­tives, to hunt down and cap­ture run­aways and return them to their masters.
Although the white under­class resent­ed the wealth and opu­lence of the super-rich plan­ta­tion own­ers, they were hap­py to be giv­en the pow­er to super­vise and hunt down run­aways and to inflict pun­ish­ment on them.
They were hap­py to have some­one to feel supe­ri­or to. Their hatred for the cap­tive black peo­ple far exceed­ed their envy of the wealth and opu­lence of their white counterparts.

THE DANGEROUS CLASS

Dr. Philip L. Reichel, Professor Emeritus of Sociology University of Northern Colorado in 2022, wrote, ‘the con­tin­u­al and obvi­ous force devel­oped by the South to con­trol its ver­sion of the “dan­ger­ous class­es” was the slave patrol. The demo­niza­tion of enslaved black peo­ple as dan­ger­ous has roots dat­ing back to the gen­e­sis of American slavery.
The disin­gen­u­ous thing about those who owned slaves was a dis­con­nect in their reac­tion when their cap­tives fled bondage.
Reichel wrote. The por­tray­al of slaves as docile, hap­py, and gen­er­al­ly con­tent with their bondage has been successfully
chal­lenged in recent decades. We can today express amaze­ment that slave­own­ers could have been unaware of their slaves’ unhap­pi­ness, yet some whites were con­tin­u­al­ly sur­prised that slaves resist­ed their sta­tus. Such an atti­tude was not found only among Southern slave­own­ers. In a 1731 adver­tise­ment for a fugi­tive slave, a New England mas­ter was dis­mayed that this slave had run away “with­out the least provo­ca­tion” (quot­ed in Foner, 1975: 264). Whether pro­voked in the eyes of slave­hold­ers or not, slaves did resist their bondage. That resis­tance gen­er­al­ly took three forms: run­ning away, crim­i­nal acts, and con­spir­a­cies or revolts. Any of those actions con­sti­tut­ed a dan­ger to whites.
The black enslaved pop­u­la­tion was not all docile; enslaved peo­ple found inge­nious ways to fight back. Slave revolts and oth­er means of resis­tance ensued though most of America’s his­to­ry as a slave-hold­ing nation has been scrubbed of these events. Poisoning became a trea­sured tool of the enslaved.
According to Dr. Reichel, con­sis­tent with the ear­li­est enforce­ment tech­niques iden­ti­fied in English and American his­to­ry, the first means of con­trol­ling enslaved peo­ples was infor­mal in nature. In 1686 a South Carolina statute said any­one could appre­hend, chas­tise and send home any enslaved per­son found off their plan­ta­tion with­out autho­riza­tion. In 1690 such action was made everyone’s duty or be fined forty shillings (Henry, 1968: 31). Enforcement of slav­ery by the aver­age cit­i­zen was not to be tak­en light­ly. A 1705 act in Virginia made it legal “for any per­son or per­sons what­so­ev­er, to kill or destroy such slaves (i.e., runaways)…without accu­sa­tion or impeach­ment of any crime for the same.” 

UNDERSTANDING THE FOUNDATION OF THE INHERENT VIOLENCE IN MODERN POLICING

The move­ment of enslaved peo­ple was strict­ly reg­u­lat­ed and enforced. Enslaved peo­ple found off the plan­ta­tions on which they were cap­tives with­out per­mis­sion papers faced a grue­some death at the hands of any­one who desired to end their lives.
After slav­ery, jim crow laws were cre­at­ed to keep the new­ly released black pop­u­la­tion in check. Sundown Towns became a thing all across the coun­try. Sundown Towns still exist in the United States today, where black peo­ple know that if they are caught after sun­down, death poten­tial­ly awaits. Yes, in 2023.
What makes it so shock­ing today, as it has been since slav­ery and direct­ly after eman­ci­pa­tion, is that assault on African-Americans in the United States is gen­er­al­ly led by the police or what­ev­er exists as law enforcement.
Police are still autho­rized to use uncon­sti­tu­tion­al means to stop black peo­ple and demand their iden­ti­fi­ca­tion for no legit­i­mate rea­son, and it’s all legal, accord­ing to the supreme court.

WHY IS IT IMPOSSIBLE TO ROOT OUT THIS VICIOUSLY WICKED SYSTEM
At present, the Republican par­ty is the par­ty most­ly in defense of white suprema­cy and is opposed to expand­ing vot­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties to all Americans who qual­i­fy. It is the par­ty that stands in the way of police reform. The Republican Governor in Florida has tak­en extreme steps to lim­it the teach­ing of African-American his­to­ry in high schools and col­leges, label­ing it ‘woke.’
The Republican major­i­ty on the supreme court in 2013 dis­man­tled the 1965 vot­ing rights act under the guise that there is no fur­ther need for the law because the con­di­tions that exist­ed that neces­si­tat­ed its pas­sage are no longer here. It goes with­out say­ing that the rea­son­ing was an out­right lie by the John Roberts court. But dis­man­tling the land­mark vot­ing rights law was a long­stand­ing goal of Roberts, a for­mer Reagan admin­is­tra­tion aide.
Immediately after the deci­sion of the court in Shelby County, Alabama V Holder, Republican-run States set about pass­ing laws mak­ing it extreme­ly more dif­fi­cult to vote. They removed drop box­es, reduced ear­ly vot­ing days, closed the major­i­ty of the polling sta­tions in pre­dom­i­nant­ly black neigh­bor­hoods, and Georgia even made it a crime to offer a per­son stand­ing on a vot­ing line a bot­tle of water.
But that was not all; black vot­ers were forced to stand in lines snaking around city blocks to vote. The process result­ed in those vot­ers hav­ing to spend up to ten hours in order to vote.
To that vot­er, it means los­ing a day’s pay to cast their bal­lot. Losing a day’s pay is a humungous poll tax that African-Americans have been forced to pay since they were allowed to vote, some­thing white vot­ers in sub­ur­ban and rur­al areas nev­er have to wor­ry about.

THE EXISTING BUILDING BLOCKS AGAINST ENDING WHITE SUPREMACY AND POLICE VIOLENCE

Several struc­tur­al built-ins have worked effi­cient­ly to ensure the con­tin­u­a­tion of white suprema­cy, despite the coun­try’s racial make­up changes.
(1) The sen­ate fil­i­buster: 
In the Senate, a fil­i­buster is an attempt to delay or block a vote on a piece of leg­is­la­tion or a con­fir­ma­tion. To under­stand the fil­i­buster, it’s nec­es­sary first to con­sid­er how the Senate pass­es a bill. When a sen­a­tor or a group of sen­a­tors intro­duces a new bill, it goes to the appro­pri­ate com­mit­tee for dis­cus­sion, hear­ings, and amend­ments. If a major­i­ty of that com­mit­tee votes in favor, the bill moves to the Senate floor for debate. Once a bill gets to a vote on the Senate floor, it requires a sim­ple major­i­ty of 51 votes to pass after debate has end­ed. But there’s a catch: before it can get to a vote, it actu­al­ly takes 60 votes to cut off debate, which is why a 60-vote super­ma­jor­i­ty is now con­sid­ered the de fac­to min­i­mum for pass­ing leg­is­la­tion in the Senate. (Brennancenter​.org)
(1) Two US sen­a­tors per state. Each state gets two US sen­a­tors regard­less of size or pop­u­la­tion. So Wyoming, with just over half a mil­lion res­i­dents statewide (578,803), has the same clout in the sen­ate as California, with forty mil­lion (40, 000,000 )res­i­dents, or New York, with twen­ty mil­lion (20,000,000) residents.
The math is sim­ple, Wyoming, with a pop­u­la­tion of just over half a mil­lion res­i­dents, 92.4% of them white Caucasians, gets to can­cel out the voic­es of California’s peo­ple of col­or, who make up a whop­ping 65.3% of that state’s population.
(3) White minor­i­ty rule: Intelligencer reports Republican sen­a­tors haven’t rep­re­sent­ed a major­i­ty of the U.S. pop­u­la­tion since 1996 and haven’t togeth­er won a major­i­ty of Senate votes since 1998. Yet the GOP con­trolled the Senate from 1995 through 2007 (with a brief inter­reg­num in 2001-02 after a par­ty switch by Jim Jeffords) and again from 2015 until 2021Five Supreme Court jus­tices (and many low­er court judges) were con­firmed by sen­ates where the GOP major­i­ty was elect­ed with less pop­u­lar sup­port than Democrats. Those right-wing hard­lin­ers are now poised to use their con­trol over the court to attack vot­ing rights and pre­serve Republican ger­ry­man­ders while strik­ing down pro­gres­sive poli­cies. This same minor­i­ty rule has also paved the way for mas­sive tax cuts for the rich under George W. Bush and Donald Trump, facil­i­tat­ing eco­nom­ic inequality.
Even though the US sen­ate is almost even­ly split between Republicans, who rep­re­sent white suprema­cy, and the Democratic par­ty, which rep­re­sents every­one else, Democratic sen­a­tors rep­re­sent tens of mil­lions more peo­ple than their Republican counterparts.
Vox​.com report­ed The impli­ca­tions of this malap­por­tion­ment are breath­tak­ing. Among oth­er things, Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett were all nom­i­nat­ed by a pres­i­dent who lost the pop­u­lar vote and con­firmed by a bloc of sen­a­tors rep­re­sent­ing less than half the coun­try. If the United States chose its lead­ers in free and fair elec­tions, none of these indi­vid­u­als would serve on the Supreme Court — and Democratic appointees would like­ly have a major­i­ty on the Court.
It goes fur­ther than Vox imag­ined; John Roberts the chief jus­tice, and Samuel Alito were elect­ed by pres­i­dent George W Bush who also lost the pop­u­lar vote.
Five of the six Republicans on the court tak­ing away rights that Americans enjoyed for decades have been appoint­ed by two pres­i­dents put in place against the wish­es of the major­i­ty of the American peo­ple through the mon­stros­i­ty called the Electoral col­lege. No oth­er so-called demo­c­ra­t­ic nation has a sys­tem that ignores the major­i­ty of its vot­ers and replaces their will with a con­vo­lut­ed sys­tem in which the los­er becomes the winner.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

SSL Board Seems More Annoyed At The Scrutiny That At The Serious Breach Affecting The Company…

YouTube player

I was a lit­tle sur­prised to see a rather long expose in the Jamaica Observer regard­ing the SSL Scandal that came to light recent­ly, which includ­ed a tremen­dous loss of mon­ey to for­mer track star Usain Bolt and others.
My sur­prise is two-fold, despite the tremen­dous inter­est of the pub­lic to know what is hap­pen­ing in this seri­ous mat­ter, the some­what lengthy raft of infor­ma­tion released by the board and man­age­ment of Stocks and Securities Limited (SSL), includ­ing spe­cif­ic date, time, and oth­er cru­cial infor­ma­tion is infor­ma­tion that should be kept secret as part of a com­pre­hen­sive crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion into SSL.

Jamaica is steeped in many aspects of moder­ni­ty, yet the small nation does not have the leg­isla­tive or phys­i­cal infra­struc­ture to deal with the com­plex­i­ties of a func­tion­ing mod­ern soci­ety. It is com­pa­ra­ble to build­ing high­rise com­plex­es yet hav­ing no infra­struc­ture to fight fires that may break out in such complexes.
The leg­isla­tive frame­work need­ed to cor­ral and con­tain insti­tu­tions like SSL and oth­ers that con­trol peo­ple’s assets is sim­ply lack­ing. At the same time, the bureau­cra­cy around open­ing a sim­ple sav­ings account by the lit­tle guy is astounding.
To begin with, imme­di­ate­ly after a breach of the size that fleeced Usain Bolt and oth­ers were dis­cov­ered, the gov­ern­ment should have stepped in and frozen all of the com­pa­ny’s assets and lim­it­ed day-to-day oper­a­tion to only under the stead­fast gaze of gov­ern­ment auditors.
But this can­not occur in Jamaica because, as I have said repeat­ed­ly, Jamaica is not a nation of laws but a place where any­thing goes. It is a place where the so-called big man is king. People with mon­ey and con­nec­tions do as they please.
The fact that SSL has con­tin­ued oper­at­ing despite this scan­dal may prove that what­ev­er sham inves­ti­ga­tion may occur is already com­pro­mised and doomed to unearth noth­ing but half-truths touch­ing on low-hang­ing fruits.
For an inves­ti­ga­tion to mean any­thing, the com­put­ers ot SSL should have been seized by a com­pe­tent law enforce­ment agency imme­di­ate­ly the scan­dal came to light. At the same time, com­pa­ny lead­ers should have been iso­lat­ed from each oth­er and inter­ro­gat­ed individually.
Instead, SSL seems to be oper­at­ing as if noth­ing hap­pened while the nation’s polit­i­cal lead­ers are reduced to mak­ing state­ments, none of which will bring to light exact­ly who are the peo­ple responsible.
Even more shock­ing is the cal­lous lan­guage being used by the board as it seeks to speak to the seri­ous issue at hand but is obvi­ous­ly fum­ing that any­one dared to spec­u­late as to what occurred at SSL.
Here is the full response as report­ed by the Jamaica Observer.

The Board and Management of Stocks and Securities Limited intend­ed to facil­i­tate law enforce­ment and oth­er pro­fes­sion­al inves­ti­ga­tors as they probe the recent events at Stocks and Securities Limited, with­out mak­ing pub­lic com­ment. However, it has become nec­es­sary to set the record straight in respect of some dam­ag­ing and wide­ly repeat­ed inac­cu­ra­cies which sug­gest, inter alia, that the SSL direc­tors and man­age­ment sought to dis­pose of assets in order to frus­trate efforts by author­i­ties to take con­trol of same. This is sim­ply untrue. Here are the facts regard­ing that false alle­ga­tion as well as some oth­er canards.

Notification to the FSC

On Tuesday, January 10, 2023, Stocks and Securities Limited noti­fied the Financial Services Commission of the dis­cov­ery of appar­ent fraud and of the imme­di­ate steps being tak­en. The let­ter specif­i­cal­ly stat­ed: “This serves to advise the Financial Services Commission that Stocks and Securities Limited (SSL) is cur­rent­ly inves­ti­gat­ing alle­ga­tions of alleged fraud com­mit­ted by an employ­ee serv­ing in the role of Client Relationship Manager. The expo­sure is unknown, and SSL is cur­rent­ly under­tak­ing inves­ti­ga­tions with the sup­port of our attor­neys, Guardsman Élite, and exter­nal audi­tors. The employ­ee was inter­viewed by our attor­neys on January 6 and 7, 2023 in the pres­ence of her attor­ney and has admit­ted to wrong­do­ing. Other inter­views are sched­uled for the week of January 9, 2023, with known associates.

Nature of the sus­pect­ed fraud­u­lent activ­i­ty by employee

At this time, it appears that the employ­ee amend­ed and gen­er­at­ed fraud­u­lent client doc­u­ments includ­ing encash­ment requests and state­ments to cir­cum­vent the inter­nal protocols.

Steps tak­en and next steps

The mat­ter has been report­ed to the Board of Directors and com­mu­ni­ca­tion to clients has com­menced. The Company esti­mates that with­in sev­en (7) to four­teen (14) days there will be a rea­son­able esti­mate of the expo­sure, how­ev­er, this is unknown at this time. SSL has con­firmed that its insur­ance pol­i­cy includes cov­er­age for employ­ee dis­hon­esty and forgery with cov­er­age up to US$1 mil­lion. Efforts are also being made to have the employ­ee com­mit to resti­tu­tion. The very next day, January 11, 2023, a rep­re­sen­ta­tive of Dr the Hon Usain St Leo Bolt vis­it­ed the offices of Stocks and Securities Limited and indi­cat­ed that the said employ­ee had turned up at their offices to con­fess that she had fal­si­fied state­ments pro­vid­ed to them, had stolen mon­ey from them and oth­er SSL clients, and was request­ing help from Dr. the Hon Usain St Leo Bolt’s man­age­ment team to repay the clients whose funds she had stolen. It is believed that the rea­sons that she did not ini­tial­ly con­fess to defraud­ing this par­tic­u­lar client are (1) she was aware of the tremen­dous spot­light which the Bolt name would bring to bear on her activ­i­ties, and (2) amaz­ing­ly, she, for what­ev­er rea­son, and despite hav­ing admit­ted to the Bolt man­age­ment team that Dr, the Hon Usain Bolt was among her vic­tims, appar­ent­ly still believed that she could bor­row the mon­ey from the Bolt man­age­ment group to repay the oth­er SSL clients. The very first point at which the com­pa­ny became aware that the fraud affect­ed this client was when the mem­ber of the Bolt man­age­ment team vis­it­ed SSL’s office, the for­mer employ­ee hav­ing omit­ted any men­tion of this client in her ini­tial con­fes­sion. Work had start­ed to review all trans­ac­tions relat­ed to those clients whom she had ini­tial­ly list­ed and to car­ry out the noti­fi­ca­tions to the FSC, JSE, affect­ed clients, insur­ance, etc when the rep­re­sen­ta­tive of Dr the Hon Usain St Leo Bolt vis­it­ed the offices of Stocks and Securities Limited. The shock expe­ri­enced by all was and remains pal­pa­ble. While the com­pa­ny believed that the impact on the first iden­ti­fied 39 clients could be addressed with the coöper­a­tion of reg­u­la­tors, it was imme­di­ate­ly appar­ent that the nation­al and indeed, glob­al stature of the last client impact­ed would like­ly make a mea­sured and sys­tem­at­ic approach to inves­ti­ga­tion very chal­leng­ing indeed.

Why has SSL not com­ment­ed pub­licly before today?

On Tuesday, January 10, 2023, SSL noti­fied the FSC and on January 11, 2023, SSL issued a press release noti­fy­ing the pub­lic that alleged fraud had been iden­ti­fied. At the time of the FSC notice, SSL was unaware of any alleged fraud relat­ed to Dr the Hon Usain St Leo Bolt’s hold­ing com­pa­ny. SSL appoint­ed a trustee on January 16, 2023, and the Financial Services Committee appoint­ed a Special Investigator and Temporary Manager on January 17, 2023. Practically, the FSC through their Temporary Manager has had con­trol over the enti­ty so SSL has not been in a posi­tion to respond pub­licly or clar­i­fy allegations.

Did the Directors and Shareholders of SSL attempt to wind up the enti­ty in con­tra­ven­tion of FSC

instruc­tions? Emphatically No. The appoint­ment of the Trustee was noti­fied to the FSC on January 12, 2023, and dis­cus­sions were ongo­ing. SSL appoint­ed Mr. Caydion Campbell of Phoenix Restructuring, Advisory and Insolvency Services Enterprise (PRAISE) as Trustee under the Companies Act of Jamaica effec­tive Monday, January 16, 2023. SSL’s direc­tors and share­hold­ers met that day to con­firm the appoint­ment, in keep­ing with the work plan sub­mit­ted to the FSC by man­age­ment. It was the inten­tion of the direc­tors that their pow­ers and author­i­ty be vest­ed in the Trustee and that the affairs of SSL would be under his con­trol. The fur­ther inten­tion was that the Trustee and his team would con­duct an Independent Business Review (“IBR”) and oth­er inves­ti­ga­tions into SSL’s oper­a­tions to deter­mine, among oth­er things, its finan­cial state of affairs as of the date 16 January 2023. The pur­pose of the appoint­ment was not, we repeat, not to wind up the com­pa­ny. Among Mr. Campbell’s key objec­tives were intend­ed to be to ensure that all nec­es­sary con­ser­va­to­ry mea­sures were in place over the assets of SSL, as well as to ensure com­pli­ance with the enhanced gov­er­nance pro­to­cols as direct­ed by the FSC. It was intend­ed that he would also use the results of the IBR to explore the restruc­tur­ing and reor­ga­ni­za­tion options that were avail­able to pre­serve and enhance the val­ue of the busi­ness, oper­a­tions, and under­tak­ings of SSL for the ben­e­fit of all its stake­hold­ers. Once agreed with the FSC, a res­o­lu­tion plan would have been devel­oped and imple­ment­ed. Mr. Campbell is a Trustee licensed under the Insolvency Act by the Supervisor of Insolvency. He has 30 years’ expe­ri­ence in Corporate Recoveries, Turnaround Management, Proposals, Receiverships and Bankruptcies. He also has exten­sive expe­ri­ence in pro­vid­ing pro­fes­sion­al ser­vices in the areas of finan­cial analy­sis, due dili­gence, inde­pen­dent busi­ness review, busi­ness reor­ga­ni­za­tion and dis­pute analy­sis investigation.

The answer is again, No. Disciplinary pro­ceed­ings which ulti­mate­ly end­ed with her ter­mi­na­tion were com­menced in September 2022. The hear­ings were delayed for a num­ber of rea­sons, pri­mar­i­ly relat­ed to her med­ical issues. Specifically, it was dis­cov­ered that she had pro­duced a false state­ment to a client of SSL. After inves­ti­ga­tions and meet­ings with the client and his attor­ney, it was con­firmed that there was no fraud­u­lent activ­i­ty by the employ­ee (ie. no evi­dence of cash being stolen) in rela­tion to that client, although the employ­ee’s actions may well have been prepara­to­ry to com­mit­ting fraud in respect of the client. The dis­ci­pli­nary pan­el ulti­mate­ly rec­om­mend­ed that the employ­ee be dis­missed for her neg­li­gence and gross incompetence.

Why did SSL not dis­cov­er the alleged fraud com­mit­ted against WellJen Limited (Dr the Hon Usain St Leo Bolt’s hold­ing company)?

On December 20, 2022, a client pre­sent­ed a state­ment that he said was gen­er­at­ed by the for­mer employ­ee and when com­pared with the port­fo­lio state­ment was found to be inac­cu­rate. SSL imme­di­ate­ly engaged a team to com­mence inves­ti­ga­tions into the employee’s activ­i­ties. During the hol­i­day peri­od, dis­cus­sions with her attor­ney com­menced simul­ta­ne­ous­ly and by the first week of January 2023, it was agreed that she would pro­vide a con­fes­sion. By January 6 and 7, 2023 SSL had obtained a state­ment from the for­mer employ­ee, pro­vid­ed in the pres­ence of her attor­ney, and sworn before a Justice of the Peace. Her con­fes­sion revealed that 39 clients had been defraud­ed (not includ­ing WellJen Limited), and inves­ti­ga­tions com­menced to deter­mine the pre­cise sum that had been stolen. The mat­ter was report­ed to the Board of Directors on the first busi­ness day after the con­fes­sion – January 9, 2023. On January 10, 2023, the FSC was noti­fied. And on January 11, 2023 SSL was noti­fied of the con­fes­sion she made direct­ly to the team of Dr the Hon Usain St Leo Bolt at his office. No cur­rent board mem­bers or man­agers were aware that Dr the Hon Usain St Leo Bolt had an account giv­en: 1. The account was not held in his name; and 2. The account did not from 2018, have bal­ances which would have flagged it as a high-val­ue account.

What is the nature of the invest­ments that were sub­ject to fraud?

As a licensed secu­ri­ties deal­er, SSL facil­i­tates clients’ invest­ments in secu­ri­ties – includ­ing local and inter­na­tion­al stocks and bonds. SSL has had an envi­able rep­u­ta­tion over the years for the man­age­ment of client port­fo­lios, par­tic­u­lar­ly in inter­na­tion­al instru­ments, and there­fore it has been one of the insti­tu­tions of choice for high-net-worth indi­vid­u­als, fam­i­lies, and com­pa­nies. The for­mer employ­ee was well respect­ed in the indus­try and was trust­ed com­plete­ly by her clients. She abused this trust in var­i­ous ways for her own per­son­al enrich­ment. She con­fessed to mod­i­fy­ing and fab­ri­cat­ing requests to sell secu­ri­ties, and to using var­i­ous tech­niques to steal the pro­ceeds of the liq­ui­da­tion of the securities.

Why was the alleged fraud not detect­ed before?

Investigations and a review of all process­es will be required to deter­mine the com­plete answer to this ques­tion. SSL has an online sys­tem that all clients can use to track their port­fo­lio per­for­mance. In fact, this sys­tem is con­sid­ered one of the best in the world and accu­rate­ly shows clients’ port­fo­lio hold­ings. Unfortunately, it is com­mon to the affect­ed clients that they did not use the online sys­tem, but rather, relied on state­ments gen­er­at­ed by the for­mer employ­ee, which undoubt­ed­ly was the like­ly rea­son they were tar­get­ed. In her con­fes­sion, the employ­ee indi­cat­ed that she con­duct­ed trans­ac­tions for clients out­side of SSL’s sys­tems, she con­tin­ued to make pay­ments to those clients from the pool of funds which she her­self had per­son­al­ly accu­mu­lat­ed. This meant that the clients would not have been aware of the con­di­tion of the actu­al account at SSL because they were being paid accord­ing to their requests. Being trust­ed by clients, she was giv­en a great deal of lat­i­tude by them. It is now known that some clients even pro­vid­ed pre-signed undat­ed encash­ment letters.

Did SSL use the funds defraud­ed from clients in their operations?

No. SSL Board and Management does not know how or where the funds stolen from clients of SSL were used. Client funds and Proprietary Funds (Funds for SSL’s oper­a­tions) are entire­ly sep­a­rate, with sep­a­rate depart­ments and con­trols to ensure they are not mixed. There are clients that have also invest­ed in, or par­tic­i­pat­ed in debt offer­ings by SSL or its relat­ed enti­ties (ie. They pro­vid­ed loans). These are nor­mal activ­i­ties. The FSC con­duct­ed an audit between February and June 2019 and no such irreg­u­lar­i­ties were detected.

Did SSL have pre­vi­ous breach­es and did SSL do any­thing about them?

Not all breach­es relate to fraud or fraud­u­lent activ­i­ty. There was no indi­ca­tion of any fraud or use of client funds by SSL in any audits, whether by inde­pen­dent audi­tors or by the FSC. It is not uncom­mon for finan­cial enti­ties to have breach­es of some nature or anoth­er. This usu­al­ly results in Directives from the reg­u­la­tor, pri­mar­i­ly relat­ing to time­frames for address­ing these issues. SSL rec­og­nized the con­se­quences of non-com­pli­ance with direc­tives and took the req­ui­site steps to address them.

Is SSL a failed entity?

There has been no ‘run’ to date on invest­ments made through SSL. The vast major­i­ty of clients have not been affect­ed by fraud. Nevertheless, trust in the enti­ty has been deeply dam­aged. The rumour mill con­tin­ues to gen­er­ate unfound­ed claims, while the con­fessed per­pe­tra­tor remains at home.

How would SSL have resolved this matter?

SSL self-report­ed to the FSC and the pub­lic when the fraud was dis­cov­ered. Between the first meet­ing with the FSC on January 12, 2023, and the appoint­ment of the Temporary Manager by the FSC on January 16, 2023 there was one busi­ness day. The plan, as out­lined, was to appoint a Trustee to man­age the enti­ty, inde­pen­dent­ly sup­port the FSC’s inves­ti­ga­tion, and work with all stake­hold­ers to see how the enti­ty could be restruc­tured. SSL con­tact­ed its insur­ers on January 11, 2023, and Shareholders and Investors were also will­ing to exam­ine arrange­ments to pro­vide resti­tu­tion to affect­ed clients. Other finan­cial enti­ties that have been hit by finan­cial prob­lems of one type or oth­er have had the oppor­tu­ni­ty to exe­cute their work plans, how­ev­er, the incor­rect impres­sion appears to be that SSL has tak­en no steps and had no plan.

Conclusion

The events that have unfold­ed have had tremen­dous adverse con­se­quences for the affect­ed clients, and for the hard-work­ing staff at SSL. The for­mer employ­ee’s dis­hon­esty has led to the most wide­ly pub­li­cized news event from Jamaica in recent years. The Board and Management had 5 busi­ness days between the con­fes­sion and the FSC tak­ing over the enti­ty. During that time steps were tak­en to engage audi­tors, report the mat­ter to the author­i­ties, and hold meet­ings with stake­hold­ers and the FSC. The fire has been fueled by sen­sa­tion­al spec­u­la­tion, which tends to affect adverse­ly the essen­tial trac­ing of ill-got­ten assets and indeed, the over­all inves­ti­ga­tion, activ­i­ties that the Board and Management were and are pre­pared to sup­port. The Management of SSL con­tin­ues to go to work every sin­gle day to sup­port the FSC, FID, and Fraud Squad in their work. These staff mem­bers are mind­ful of the attacks and asser­tions which have been made on them from var­i­ous quar­ters, while the for­mer employ­ee who con­fessed remains at home. This is extreme­ly demor­al­iz­ing for those who con­tin­ue to work hard to try to ensure jus­tice is done. Jamaica has a high­ly rep­utable finan­cial mar­ket, with a sound reg­u­la­to­ry frame­work oper­at­ing at inter­na­tion­al stan­dards. This remains so despite the recent spate of cas­es of fraud at var­i­ous finan­cial insti­tu­tions. A few bad apples, who do what fraud­sters do – find ways to beat the sys­tem – should not cast doubt and sus­pi­cion on the many thou­sands who toil dai­ly to pre­serve the integri­ty of the sec­tor. Justice should be the objec­tive for all affect­ed clients, famous or unknown. That is our aim and we will con­tin­ue to sup­port that objec­tive in every way possible.”

End.….….….….….….….….….….….….….

The infor­ma­tion laid out by the SSL board though crit­i­cal to the pub­lic’s need to know must be weighed against the more impor­tant task of bring­ing to jus­tice the perpetrator/​s of this crime. Some, if not all, of the infor­ma­tion laid out by the board is almost assured­ly infor­ma­tion that will form part of any future crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion and should not have been released by the board.
The tone of the let­ter appears to reflect annoy­ance, even anger, at what it seems to see as a mere nui­sance rather than the seri­ous issue it is. The assur­ance giv­en by the board that clients are pro­tect­ed up to the tune of US 1 mil­lion is cold com­fort to those who are report­ed to have lost upward of US $12 million.
The annoyance/​anger that the mem­bers of the SSL board appear to feel at this intru­sive spot­light on their com­fy space is of zero impor­tance as it argues the fol­low­ing contradictorily.»»»>
SSL has an online sys­tem that all clients can use to track their port­fo­lio per­for­mance. In fact, this sys­tem is con­sid­ered one of the best in the world and accu­rate­ly shows clients’ port­fo­lio hold­ings. Unfortunately, it is com­mon to the affect­ed clients that they did not use the online sys­tem, but rather, relied on state­ments gen­er­at­ed by the for­mer employ­ee, which undoubt­ed­ly was the like­ly rea­son they were tar­get­ed. In her con­fes­sion, the employ­ee indi­cat­ed that she con­duct­ed trans­ac­tions for clients out­side of SSL’s sys­tems, she con­tin­ued to make pay­ments to those clients from the pool of funds which she her­self had per­son­al­ly accumulated.
How good can SSL sys­tem be if an employ­ee can con­duct busi­ness out­side of the com­pa­ny’s sys­tems, as stat­ed in the lengthy canard that the board ren­dered obvi­ous­ly to shift blame from itself?

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Cops Searching For Wrong Person Wreck Family’s Home During Raid

YouTube player

I mean, they can­not help them­selves. It seems every aspect of their job is an oppor­tu­ni­ty to live out Rambo fan­tasies. Consequently, America’s streets and what used to be the sacred sanc­tums for Americans, their homes, are now open tar­gets for police to play bat­tle­field soldiers.
It will only get worse as politi­cians from both polit­i­cal par­ties who are lap­dogs to the wealthy stand in the way of restruc­tur­ing how police are allowed to operate.
As long as America ben­e­fits from lock­ing up mil­lions of its cit­i­zens through unjust drug laws and minor traf­fic infrac­tions, the sol­diers look­ing for war will con­tin­ue to wreak hav­oc across the country.
It has become clear­er by the day that, based on how they train these mon­sters, they are all ham­mers and the rest of us are nails.(mb)
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​w​h​y​-​t​h​e​y​-​r​u​n​-​f​r​o​m​-​p​o​l​i​ce/

YouTube player

Every day the atroc­i­ties get worse

A Texas police chief is on leave after a SWAT team wrecked a Galveston family’s home dur­ing a raid in search of a mur­der sus­pect who wasn’t there and turned out to be the wrong guy, offi­cials say. 
Erika Rios and her teenage chil­dren were awak­ened in their beds around 2 a.m. on Jan. 22 by a voice on a mega­phone boom­ing out­side, say­ing they were Galveston Police, she told The Daily News. Glass shat­tered as police fired less-than-lethal rounds through win­dows, kicked in doors and dam­aged wiring, Rios told the out­let. “We were all so con­fused,” she said, accord­ing to The Daily News. “When they dragged me out, I was left with a bruise and scrape on my right thigh.”
Police were look­ing for a 17-year-old named Cameron Vargas in con­nec­tion to the killing of Malik Dunn, a 25-year-old found shot to death two days ear­li­er on Jan. 20, KPRC report­ed. Vargas is a friend of Rios’ son and had been at the home but left hours ear­li­er, Rios told the station.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​c​o​u​r​t​-​s​a​n​c​t​i​o​n​e​d​-​p​r​e​-​t​e​x​t​u​a​l​-​t​r​a​f​f​i​c​-​s​t​o​p​s​-​a​-​t​o​o​l​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​u​s​e​-​t​o​-​e​s​c​a​l​a​t​e​-​v​i​o​l​e​n​ce/

Galveston police chief Doug Balli was placed on 10-day admin­is­tra­tive leave.

I was scared, scream­ing,” Rios’ daugh­ter Chelsea Peralez said, accord­ing to KPRC. ”I end­ed up going to my broth­er, ask­ing what they were doing, and they con­tin­u­ous­ly kept shoot­ing the wood­en pel­lets.” Vargas was tak­en into cus­tody on Jan. 23, but charges were dropped on Jan. 25, court doc­u­ments show. Investigators cleared Vargas as a sus­pect, out­lets reported.
City offi­cials put Police Chief Doug Balli on 10-day admin­is­tra­tive leave in the after­math of the raid.
The city man­ag­er “is con­duct­ing an inter­nal inves­ti­ga­tion into the chief’s con­duct. Specifically, city admin­is­tra­tion is inves­ti­gat­ing a fail­ure of com­mu­ni­ca­tion sur­round­ing a search per­formed in the ear­ly morn­ing hours of January 22,” the City of Galveston said in an emailed news release to McClatchy News. Officials did not elab­o­rate on the exact nature of the “fail­ure of com­mu­ni­ca­tion.” Assistant Police Chief Andre Mitchell has stepped in to fill the role in Balli’s absence, offi­cials said.
McClatchy News reached out to Galveston police regard­ing the raid and sub­se­quent inves­ti­ga­tion into Balli, but did not receive an imme­di­ate response. “I’ve been left with trau­ma­tized kids, no heat in my home and bust­ed win­dows, all because they were look­ing for some­body who didn’t even live there, who was also inno­cent,” Rios told The Daily News. “I’m try­ing to repair what I can and heal my kids, but it’s hard as a sin­gle moth­er. It has been a whirl­wind and it was all so unnec­es­sary.” The Buzbee Law Firm, which is rep­re­sent­ing the Rios fam­i­ly, has sched­uled a press con­fer­ence for 11 a.m. Wednesday, Feb. 

Swarm Of Cops Beat Tyre Nichols To Death, Others Failed To Stop It Only Five Charged/​one More Suspended

YouTube player

The Memphis Police Department has today sus­pend­ed anoth­er offi­cer in the beat­ing death of Tyre Nichols. His name is Preston Hemphill.

In addi­tion to the oth­er vio­lent ani­mals who mur­dered mis­ter Nichols Preston Hemphill was removed qui­et­ly. Hemphill deployed his Taser dur­ing the con­fronta­tion. In his own body cam­era video, Hemphill is seen chas­ing Nichols down the road but then turns back to the scene of the ini­tial traf­fic stop.

Many peo­ple are naive­ly shocked at the speed with which the five black cops were ter­mi­nat­ed and charged with sec­ond-degree mur­der. As I main­tained, there is no rea­son to be sur­prised. It would be sur­pris­ing if they weren’t thrown out and allowed to fend for them­selves based on their skin color.
Juxtapose that with the way Preston Hemphill’s involve­ment is being han­dled and. Hemphill was heard on his body cam­era video say­ing twice, “I hope they stomp his a – .” Hemphill, who is white, has not been fired or charged. Hemphill “was relieved when the oth­er offi­cers were relieved,” a Memphis police spokesper­son said on Monday.

Attorneys for Nichols’ fam­i­ly, Ben Crump and Antonio Romanucci, said they were extreme­ly dis­ap­point­ed that Hemphill was relieved of duty but not fired or charged. The lawyers are also ques­tion­ing why the Memphis police did not imme­di­ate­ly announce Hemphill’s name or that he was relieved of duty.

Why is his iden­ti­ty and the role he played in Tyre’s death just now com­ing to light?” they said in a state­ment. “We have asked from the begin­ning that the Memphis Police Department be trans­par­ent with the fam­i­ly and the com­mu­ni­ty — this news seems to indi­cate that they haven’t risen to the occa­sion. It cer­tain­ly begs the ques­tion why the white offi­cer involved in this bru­tal attack was shield­ed and pro­tect­ed from the pub­lic eye, and to date, from suf­fi­cient dis­ci­pline and account­abil­i­ty. The Memphis Police Department owes us all answers.”(ABC NEWS REPORTED)

While DeSantis Is Busy Trying To Obliterate Black History They Are Teaching Kids In Ohio How To Be Good Little Nazis

While Florida’s El Duce is busy trying to stifle black studies in that state that would inform all races about what really happened to blacks in America there is real trouble in Ohio where they are actively indoctrinating small children into becoming Nazis.

The Department of Education in Ohio is inves­ti­gat­ing the open­ly anti­se­mit­ic and racist Nazi home­school­ing group with thou­sands of mem­bers being oper­at­ed by a cou­ple from Upper Sandusky, Ohio, an offi­cial at the depart­ment told VICE News. On Sunday, VICE News and the Huffington Post report­ed that Logan and Katja Lawrence were the oper­a­tors of the neo-Nazi Dissident Homeschool group which now boasts over 2,500 mem­bers on its Telegram chan­nel, based on the research from anti-fas­cist researchers at the Anonymous Comrades Collective. The group open­ly advo­cates white suprema­cist ide­olo­gies with the aim to make sure the chil­dren they teach 
“become won­der­ful Nazis.”

The Lawrences share their class­room sched­ules, home­work assign­ments, and les­son plans with oth­er par­ents in the group, the vast major­i­ty of which are infused with Nazi ide­ol­o­gy or open praise for Adolf Hitler.

Katja Lawrence, 37, also shares exam­ples of how her fam­i­ly embraces Nazi ide­ol­o­gy, includ­ing bak­ing a Führer cake for Hitler’s birth­day and shar­ing a record­ing of her chil­dren shout­ing “sieg heil.”

I am out­raged and sad­dened,” Stephanie Siddens, the inter­im super­in­ten­dent of pub­lic instruc­tion at the Department of Education told VICE News. “There is absolute­ly no place for hate-filled, divi­sive and hurt­ful instruc­tion in Ohio’s schools, includ­ing our state’s home-school­ing com­mu­ni­ty. I emphat­i­cal­ly and cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly denounce the racist, anti­se­mit­ic and fas­cist ide­ol­o­gy and mate­ri­als being circulated.”

Under Ohio state laws, the Lawrences sim­ply have to inform the local super­in­ten­dent that they want to home­school their chil­dren and agree to abide by cer­tain broad con­di­tions in order to legal­ly keep their chil­dren out of pub­lic schools.

The Ohio Department of Education is now active­ly review­ing com­pli­ance with statu­to­ry and reg­u­la­to­ry require­ments as a result of the media reports, a spokesper­son for the depart­ment told VICE News.

If require­ments are met, the dis­trict super­in­ten­dent releas­es the stu­dent from required com­pul­so­ry school atten­dance,” The Ohio Department of Education states on its web­site. “This excus­es the stu­dent and fam­i­ly from school atten­dance require­ments in state law.”
Read the full sto­ry here https://​www​.vice​.com/​e​n​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​x​g​y​b​4​k​/​o​h​i​o​-​n​a​z​i​-​d​i​s​s​i​d​e​n​t​-​h​o​m​e​s​c​h​ool

Why They Run From Police…

YouTube player

Audio ver­sion of article.

One age-old ques­tion asked when peo­ple try to run from the police, and things go wrong is, ‘why do they run’? The ques­tion ‘pre­tends’ not to under­stand the most basic instinct of all liv­ing species to be free.
If we set aside that pre­tense, in many cas­es, when some­one runs from the police, even if they are guilty of a crime, they stand a chance of get­ting away with it.….…at least in their mind at the time.
Years ago, I wrote an arti­cle about some of the per­ils law enforce­ment face in Jamaica, where I was engaged in law enforce­ment for a decade, not the least of which was the moun­tain­ous ter­rain. Even in cas­es of mur­der, if there are no eye­wit­ness­es to the crime, once the offend­er jumps into a gul­ly, he stands an almost 100% chance of get­ting away with that murder.
Why do they run? To under­stand why peo­ple run from law enforce­ment in the United States, we must first under­stand what law enforce­ment has been from its incep­tion to black Americans.
Let’s begin!!!
On the web­site of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) is the fol­low­ing paragraph.
The ori­gins of mod­ern-day polic­ing can be traced back to the “Slave Patrol.” The ear­li­est for­mal slave patrol was cre­at­ed in the Carolinas in the ear­ly 1700s with one mis­sion: to estab­lish a sys­tem of ter­ror and squash slave upris­ings with the capac­i­ty to pur­sue, appre­hend, and return run­away slaves to their own­ers. Tactics includ­ed using exces­sive force to con­trol and pro­duce desired slave behav­ior.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​i​t​-​i​s​-​a​b​o​u​t​-​t​h​e​-​w​a​r​r​i​o​r​-​c​o​p​-​i​t​-​c​a​n​n​o​t​-​b​e​-​f​i​x​ed/

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​c​o​p​-​d​r​i​v​i​n​g​-​u​n​r​e​g​i​s​t​e​r​e​d​-​t​r​u​c​k​-​d​r​i​n​k​i​n​g​-​b​e​e​r​-​w​h​o​-​s​h​o​t​-​t​e​e​n​-​t​a​k​e​s​-​t​h​e​-​s​t​a​nd/

PATROLLER’S OATH

I [patroller’s name], do swear, that I will as searcher for guns, swords, and oth­er weapons among the slaves in my dis­trict, faith­ful­ly, and as pri­vate­ly as I can, dis­charge the trust reposed in me as the law directs, to the best of my pow­er. So help me, God.”
North Carolina Slave Patrol Oath.
https://mikebeckles.com/5‑fired-memphis-officers-charged-with-murder-in-death-of-tyre-nichols/

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​b​l​a​c​k​-​m​e​m​p​h​i​s​-​m​a​n​-​d​e​a​d​-​a​f​t​e​r​-​a​l​l​e​g​e​d​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​b​e​a​t​i​ng/


The NAACP argues: By the 1900s, local munic­i­pal­i­ties began estab­lish­ing police depart­ments to enforce local laws in the East and Midwest, includ­ing Jim Crow laws. Local munic­i­pal­i­ties leaned on police to enforce and exert exces­sive bru­tal­i­ty on African Americans who vio­lat­ed any Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow Laws con­tin­ued through the end of the 1960s. End quote.

I’m afraid I have to dis­agree with the NAACP that Jim Crow Laws end­ed toward the end of the 1960s. Jim Crow laws and the method of enforce­ment remain to this day.
So for one to get an appre­ci­a­tion for why black peo­ple run from the police, one has to under­stand at least what polic­ing has been to black Americans as opposed to their white counterparts.
Black peo­ple run­ning from the police is an act of free­dom, just as the enslaved black peo­ple ran from the oppres­sive mon­stros­i­ty of slav­ery and the geno­ci­dal sys­tem that kept them enslaved.
To argue, ‘all they have to do is to com­ply with the police,’ is the most unique­ly white priv­i­leged thing to say. It cre­ates the false impres­sion that the sys­tem looks at blacks the same way as it does whites.
To assert that com­pli­ance with the police guar­an­tees equal and fair treat­ment is by itself steeped in either igno­rance or delusion.
To a young black male being stopped by the police, com­ply­ing could eas­i­ly mean being arrest­ed on trumped-up felony charges result­ing in years in prison for crimes they nev­er com­mit­ted. For them, flee­ing is the best recourse. As it was for their ances­tors flee­ing the slave patrols, it is equal­ly the same today; being caught has sim­i­lar con­se­quences, yes, even death.
For those of you who would come out the side of your faces to ques­tion the verac­i­ty of the lat­ter state­ment, tell it to Tyre Nichols.
The 13th Amendment, which abol­ished slav­ery in the United States, pur­pose­ly retained a clause rein­forc­ing the con­tin­u­a­tion of slavery.
Section 1: Neither slav­ery nor invol­un­tary servi­tude, except as a pun­ish­ment for crime where­of the par­ty shall have been duly con­vict­ed, shall exist with­in the United States or any place sub­ject to their juris­dic­tion. See, e.g., Clyatt v. United States, 197 U.S. 207, 215 (1905).
One does­n’t need a law degree from Harvard to rec­og­nize that slav­ery has not end­ed con­cep­tu­al­ly, based on sec­tion (1). To any young black male, whether he com­mit­ted a crime or not, being stopped by the police is a clear and present dan­ger of going into slavery.
It is not called slav­ery today; it is the prison indus­tri­al com­plex. Those who coined the lan­guage in sec­tion (1) of the 13th Amendment were ful­ly aware of what they were doing in the lan­guage. ‘Except as a pun­ish­ment for crime,’ under­stand­ing that the mass incar­cer­a­tion of blacks would be the next iter­a­tion and con­tin­u­a­tion of the enslave­ment of black Americans.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​c​o​u​r​t​-​s​a​n​c​t​i​o​n​e​d​-​p​r​e​-​t​e​x​t​u​a​l​-​t​r​a​f​f​i​c​-​s​t​o​p​s​-​a​-​t​o​o​l​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​u​s​e​-​t​o​-​e​s​c​a​l​a​t​e​-​v​i​o​l​e​n​ce/

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​c​a​n​n​o​t​-​r​i​d​-​t​h​e​m​s​e​l​v​e​s​-​o​f​-​t​h​e​-​r​a​c​i​s​m​-​e​m​b​e​d​d​e​d​-​i​n​-​t​h​e​i​r​-​p​s​y​c​h​es/

Many well-inten­tioned com­men­ta­tors on police vio­lence, includ­ing yours, tru­ly have, from time to time, argued that American polic­ing is bro­ken. Yes, in terms of how police offi­cers are sup­posed to oper­ate, it can rea­son­ably be argued it is broken.
In terms of the intent behind the way polic­ing was designed to work in the United States, it is work­ing exact­ly as modeled.
What makes it so offen­sive to the sen­si­bil­i­ties of con­sci­en­tious peo­ple is the grue­some bar­barism of it when it is held up to the light of scrutiny.
No one should be delu­sion­al about how police vio­lence is viewed among a large sub­set of the white com­mu­ni­ty, however.
Operating from the anonymi­ty of their key­boards, in group chats, and on mes­sage boards, a truer pic­ture of who they are emerges. From this ran­cid pool comes cops, pros­e­cu­tors, judges, politi­cians, and their sup­port­ers that stand in the way of reform.
When the laws are writ­ten to impact a par­tic­u­lar group direct­ly and enforced with the same mind­set, the results are what we have with the incar­cer­a­tion rate of blacks in the United States.
Scratching the sur­face of the defin­i­tive intent to lock up black Americans puts to rest the lie that blacks are more like­ly to com­mit crimes than whites who are not policed the same way.
Why do they run? For the major­i­ty of the key­board war­riors who pon­tif­i­cate about, ‘why do they run’? They dod not want and answer, their ques­tion is the point.
The next time you ask that ques­tion, remem­ber what you just read.
https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​w​h​i​t​e​-​w​o​m​e​n​-​c​o​n​t​i​n​u​e​-​t​o​-​g​l​o​r​i​f​y​-​i​n​-​t​h​e​-​d​e​s​t​r​u​c​t​i​o​n​-​o​f​-​b​l​a​c​k​-​b​o​d​i​es/

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Police Cannot Rid Themselves Of The Racism Embedded In Their Psyches…

A woman was arrest­ed in Westminster, Colorado, on Jan. 24 fol­low­ing an argu­ment with a man out­side of a Party City store. Charleene Gibson was arrest­ed fol­low­ing an alter­ca­tion with the man near 92nd Avenue and Sheridan Boulevard. 
Gibson was arrest­ed after the inci­dent took place in front of the par­ty sup­plies store in sub­ur­ban Denver with a man who tried to take a pic­ture of her car parked near the entrance. However, Gibson said she was there to stock up on sup­plies for her birth­day and had parked close to the front door after receiv­ing per­mis­sion from the store clerk. The Party City employ­ee said it was OK to park there for a few min­utes while we load bal­loons in the car. I stayed in the car and turned my haz­ards on,” said Gibson. Gibson said she stepped in front of his lens when the man tried to take a pic­ture of her car after com­plain­ing she’d blocked the curb ramp. Gibson said that’s when the man attacked her and hit her sev­er­al times before she struck him back. “Then he grabbed me,” she said. “And punched me in my jaw, and then he yanked me again and then punched me two times right here, and that’s when I start­ed to punch him back.”A video of the arrest went viral, which cap­tured the police arrest­ing Gibson as a friend who wit­nessed the argu­ment, NiaShay Burns, record­ed the arrest on her cell­phone. Burns is heard on the video repeat­ed­ly say­ing, “He hit her first!”

Burns can be heard on the video telling the offi­cers that three women plus anoth­er wit­ness were telling them that the man hit her first as a male offi­cer hand­cuffed Gibson. A female offi­cer moved to arrest Gibson’s sis­ter Amber after she seem­ing­ly began to try to walk away from the scene after see­ing Gibson being put in hand­cuffs. As the offi­cer shoved Amber against a vehi­cle, Burns cried out, “She didn’t do any­thing!” The female offi­cer lat­er grabbed Gibson’s arm forcibly and escort­ed her to one of sev­er­al police vehi­cles as Burns again told the offi­cers, “You guys! He hit her first!” After ask­ing the police offi­cers if the man was going to jail, one of the police offi­cers told Burns that the man would be receiv­ing a cita­tion and was not being arrest­ed. “So, he’s not going to jail, but he hit her first, and he’s a man and she’s a woman,” Burns replied. “Wait, wait, I’m con­fused.” “I under­stand that,” replied one police offi­cer. “We can go over this at f— court, OK?” Burns lat­er cap­tured the man stand­ing in the door­way of the store and said, “This man punched my cousin in the face, and he’s not going to jail but she is.” Gibson was arrest­ed for 3rd-degree felony assault of an at-risk adult because of the man’s age. He is 74 years old. Burns shared the video on TikTok with the cap­tion, “Went to jail for defend­ing her­self while the guy a white man at that who punched her got a sum­mons share this help us fight this.”

YouTube player

According to local reports, the man received a tick­et for mis­de­meanor third-degree assault as well as dis­or­der­ly con­duct. The man told the police that Gibson knocked his phone out of his hand. One wit­ness claimed that the women assault­ed the man after cor­ner­ing him, but anoth­er said that the man punched Gibson in the face and that the oth­er two women came and tried to help her. “When we were tus­sling and mov­ing around, my sis­ter Amber was try­ing to get him off of me,” said Gibson. “He was antag­o­niz­ing us, say­ing stuff like ‘bring it on.’” Local news out­let 9News report­ed that after they began ask­ing ques­tions regard­ing the arrest video, the Westminster Police Department called Gibson to advise her they were no longer charg­ing her with felony assault and had down­grad­ed her charge to mis­de­meanor dis­or­der­ly con­duct. The WPD claimed the wit­ness­es gave con­flict­ing state­ments and they dropped the felony charge after talk­ing with the District Attorney. Additionally, an inves­ti­ga­tion has been launched into how the offi­cers han­dled the arrest. Burns is cer­tain that with­out that video evi­dence, Gibson would still be fac­ing a felony charge. “If I didn’t have my phone and I didn’t take it out in this sit­u­a­tion, she would have got­ten a felony charge.” Burns said. “I don’t want to sug­ar­coat it, but I do — like, that’s what it is. It’s because of the col­or of our skin,” added Gibson. “It’s the fact that we were upset and express­ing our­selves —that I went to jail.” (Atlantablackstar​.com)

It Is About The Warrior Cop, It Cannot Be Fixed…

YouTube player

People con­tin­ue to, tongue in cheek, argue that ‘not all cops are racist igno­ra­mus­es.’ I guess we should take some solace from this new lie; after all, it’s an improve­ment over the tra­di­tion­al spiel, “there are only a few rot­ten apples,” but the evi­dence to the con­trary is so over­whelm­ing we are at the,’ not all are bad’ stage from the cop-apologists.
If we have to say ‘not all are bad,’ it is already evi­dent that we are in a seri­ous cri­sis. At this point, I would argue that one would be lucky to find a decent con­sti­tu­tion-respect­ing cop in an entire department.
The police cul­ture in the United States is so bro­ken that, at this point, it is impos­si­ble to fix with­out com­plete­ly revamp­ing how police are allowed to oper­ate across the board.
It is impor­tant to [note] for the record, as soci­ol­o­gists and oth­er experts grap­ple with find­ing rea­sons for the increase in vio­lent crimes, that dis­trust and dis­con­nect be seen as the main reason.
The dan­ger­ous police cul­ture that exists is so well-embed­ded that even when mil­lions of peo­ple through­out the coun­try of all races take to the streets to demand change, they are not smart enough to change their filthy ways.
Reporting on police vio­lence, Marshallproject​.org wrote; ‘More than two years after mil­lions of Americans took to the streets fol­low­ing the mur­der of George Floyd, famil­iar sto­ries about police vio­lence per­sist. By the num­bers, 2021 was the dead­liest for police shoot­ings since The Washington Post began track­ing them in 2015. The data­base Mapping Police Violence found sim­i­lar results.
The year 2022 was even worse as police killed more than 1200 Americans, most unarmed and with men­tal issues.
American police do not have a train­ing issue; they have a blood­lust issue.
The sad irony is that for black motorists, there is a greater threat to their lives from police than from any oth­er source. In fact, black motorists los­ing their lives to oth­er crim­i­nals from mere­ly dri­ving down a street or high­way is not a thing.
Those of you who would argue this is hyper­bol­ic, do not come for me; look up Sandra Bland, Philando Castile, Tyre Nichols, Daunte Wright, Patrick Lyoya, and on and on the killings go.
The Guardian, which has been map­ping police vio­lence in recent years, report­ed in 2022 that police in the US have killed near­ly 600 peo­ple dur­ing traf­fic stops since 2017, with the deaths con­tin­u­ing apace this year, a review of nation­al police vio­lence data shows.
For decades American law enforce­ment enjoyed an inter­na­tion­al­ly white­washed per­sona, most­ly bur­nished by Hollywood movies and tele­vi­sion shows that glo­ri­fied polic­ing in ways that no rea­son­able per­son would have a prob­lem with. Realistically, none of this was true. The real­i­ty for African-Americans who bore the brunt of police oppres­sion in the United States was far removed from the glitz and glam­or of Hollywood faux depictions.
Black Americans wrong­ly con­vict­ed by cor­rupt police and pros­e­cu­tors, in some cas­es, have spent decades of their lives incar­cer­at­ed. In con­trast, oth­ers, not so lucky, have been exe­cut­ed for crimes they did not com­mit. Thanks to con­sci­en­tious enti­ties like the Innocence Project and oth­ers that have been awak­ened to the atroc­i­ties being com­mit­ted against inno­cent peo­ple of color.
The cul­ture of impuni­ty that has tak­en over American polic­ing can be traced to the so-called rise of the war­rior cop. As I have writ­ten in sev­er­al oth­er arti­cles, the impuni­ty you see police exhib­it is a direct result of the immu­ni­ty cre­at­ed for them by the Supreme Court.
Congress did not leg­is­late qual­i­fied immu­ni­ty; it was cre­at­ed and foist­ed on the American peo­ple by the unelect­ed robed bureau­crats on the high­est court. Qualified immu­ni­ty carved out unrea­son­able and uncon­scionable stan­dards for state actors that the aver­age American does not enjoy. It essen­tial­ly sets gov­ern­ment work­ers out­side the scope of the laws unless the aggriev­ed par­ty can show that a cop, for exam­ple, should have known that their action was out­side of the law based on pre­vi­ous cas­es. No American cit­i­zen act­ing out­side gov­ern­ment ser­vice has such grace under the laws. If you break the law, you go to jail, end of story.
Additionally, police depart­ments have been pur­pose­ful­ly hir­ing sol­diers return­ing from America’s for­eign wars. Many of these hires have seri­ous issues that need­ed to be sort­ed out; stick­ing a badge on their chest and giv­ing them a gun and the pow­er to kill does not help. From the begin­ning, this writer said it was a bad idea.…. unless, of course, the out­comes we are hav­ing are the ones they desired.
Every cop-apol­o­gist, every American, in fact, every per­son on this plan­et should watch this video before open­ing their mouth on the issue of American police killings.
This is David Allan Grossman, born in Frankfurt, West Germany on August 23, 1956. His career includes ser­vice in the U.S. Army. Grossman is an author who also lec­tures police on how to kill effec­tive­ly. Those inter­est­ed can research what this for­mer mil­i­tary offi­cer has been teach­ing America’s cops.
There is no reform­ing this; the whole thing must be dis­card­ed if the killings are to stop.

YouTube player