Media Complicit As Usual In Selling Fake Story About Clarendon Police Shooting..

The mis­take the cops made in Spalding yes­ter­day was in not shoot­ing the attack­ing mob lead­ers dead!!!

Attack a police offi­cer in any coun­try on this plan­et and if you live to regret it you will real­ly regret it, I mean real­ly regret it.
In America attack­ing a police offi­cer even with­out a weapon could be auto­mat­ic death, and if you sur­vive to talk about it, you will have years in prison to con­sid­er your actions.
I recent­ly watched a video of a woman who attacked Russian cops with her hands and their response was brutish.
Literally shock­ing was the lev­el of force the offi­cers employed to the attack­er who was a woman no less.
Whether we agree with the lev­el of force employed by the offi­cer under attack is nei­ther here nor there. Wrong or right that is his/​her call to make when he/​she feels his/​her life threat­ened.
Every offi­cer of the law, like every­one else, has an expec­ta­tion that they will fin­ish their shift and go home to their fam­i­lies with­out being assault­ed, abused or worse.
He/​she alone gets to make that call and the laws should back that offi­cer ful­ly everywhere.

Why is it then that Jamaicans liv­ing at home feel that they have a license to attack police offi­cers who are doing their jobs?
Before we exam­ine those rea­sons, it is impor­tant to acknowl­edge that when Jamaicans set foot over­seas, they are keen­ly con­ver­sant that what they do at home will not fly in oth­er coun­tries.
Even with­in the CARICOM region in which Jamaicans are sup­posed to be able to trav­el rel­a­tive­ly freely, mem­ber states still some­times nuance the rules of the CARICOM char­ter to allow their law-enforce­ment to be par­tic­u­lar­ly wary and vig­i­lant to the pres­ence of Jamaicans trav­el­ing to their coun­tries. The record of crim­i­nal activ­i­ty is unde­ni­able and there should be no con­ver­sa­tion around what are unde­ni­able facts.
In the past police offi­cials have ridiculed Jamaicans who com­plain about the treat­ment they receive when they vis­it their coun­try and are sin­gled out for spe­cial treat­ment, “this is not Jamaica.“
Clear ref­er­ences that they will not tol­er­ate the kind of law­less­ness which exist in Jamaica in their countries.

There is no secret that Jamaica is and has always been a very vio­lent and law­less coun­try. In response to the law­less­ness and vio­lence, the strat­e­gy has been to tight­en con­trol over the police ser­vice, effec­tive­ly ren­der­ing offi­cers “paper tigers” through a series of leg­is­la­tion under the guise that they are trans­form­ing the police force into pro­fes­sion­al police ser­vices.
Now, there is a con­ver­sa­tion to be had around the rea­sons behind the strat­e­gy to muz­zle and hand­cuff the police.
Not the least of which is the cor­rupt nature of the politi­cians who pop­u­late both polit­i­cal par­ties.
A police depart­ment behold­en to them and inca­pable of con­duct­ing intel­li­gent inves­ti­ga­tions is inca­pable of stop­ping their rapa­cious assault against the peo­ple’s resources.

Rather than change the par­a­digm after the mili­tia upris­ing of 2010 in sup­port of drug lord Christopher Duddus Coke both polit­i­cal par­ties dou­bled down on stu­pid, or should I say dou­bled down on crim­i­nal acqui­es­cence and gave the coun­try INDECOM.
That is the lega­cy of the Duddus sup­port­er Orett Bruce Golding, who was forced from office for stand­ing in the way of the extra­di­tion of a known drug lord and crim­i­nal king­pin, who has been accused of being a mer­ci­less mur­der­er.
After the secu­ri­ty forces lib­er­at­ed Tivoli Gardens from the con­trol of that scum king­pin and annexed it to the rest of the Island, both polit­i­cal par­ties band­ed togeth­er to con­demn the secu­ri­ty forces for act­ing deci­sive­ly toward the king­pin and his mili­tia.
Although the Americans pre­vailed in hav­ing Coke extra­dit­ed, the mes­sage to the crim­i­nal under­world was clear.
We are with you don’t wor­ry”.

The inci­dent in Manchester yes­ter­day in which a bus dri­ver felt embold­ened to psy­chi­cal­ly attack a uni­formed police offi­cer doing his job, and the ensu­ing mêlée and destruc­tion of prop­er­ty by the band of dumb ani­mals must be laid square­ly at the feet of the polit­i­cal class.
My prob­lem with the actions of the offi­cers is that because of fear that the Government has insti­tut­ed in them through INDECOM as a harass­ment agency, the offi­cers missed an oppor­tu­ni­ty to send a clear mes­sage.
Jamaica has far too many opin­ion­at­ed idiots to func­tion as a mod­ern soci­ety.
My only prob­lem with the cops involved is that they retreat­ed, that’s not police train­ing. 
Police train­ing dic­tates that in sit­u­a­tions like the one they faced they stand their ground back to back, train their weapons to the head of the lead attack­ers and as soon as they step for­ward to cause harm to them, method­i­cal and sys­tem­at­i­cal shoot to kill.
Let’s see how many would keep step­ping for­ward.
That’s what I fault the offi­cers with, but they do not make them like they used to.

Image may contain: one or more people, people standing and text
Here are some of the riot­ers who destroyed gov­ern­ment property

At the end of the day what we need to do is to ignore the con­tin­u­ous talk­ing from the shit­heads and come to the real­iza­tion that there is no pros­per­i­ty to be deliv­ered by the JLP, and damn sure no alter­na­tive growth path by the crim­i­nal sup­port­ing PNP in this mad­ness and chaos.
That is why we need to shut INDECOM down now, send Hamish Campbell home and take back our coun­try from this mad­ness.
If any of these offi­cers are charged with any­thing there should be hell to pay by INDECOM.
The fact that Jamaica con­tin­ues to strug­gle with cor­rup­tion accord­ing to Transparency International is proof pos­i­tive that the facts are on our side and not on the side of the Island’s lead­er­ship.
The fraud­u­lent wit­ness­es whom I have been writ­ing about for years, who are nur­tured and pro­mot­ed by the crim­i­nal sup­port­ing press must not be allowed to place anoth­er police offi­cer on sus­pen­sion.
If INDECOM con­tin­ues to be a clear enhancer of this kind of assault on our police, steps must be tak­en to ensure that INDECOM does not destroy the life of anoth­er hard-work­ing police offi­cer.
The same method­olo­gies which are applied to INDECOM should be applied to those who sup­port that crim­i­nal enhance­ment agency.
No coun­try which sup­ports crim­i­nals at the expense of its law enforce­ment agents can be suc­cess­ful, cor­rupt coun­try, no invest­ment.
Jamaica’s crim­i­nal politi­cians sure­ly can­not con­tin­ue to fool the major­i­ty of the peo­ple forever.


Most impor­tant­ly, through the pro­lif­er­a­tion of smart­phones and CCTV cam­eras, the lie which the anti-police media gave legit­i­ma­cy to are being exposed.
The real ques­tion after many years in which lying crim­i­nals turn up to give false evi­dence against the police must be, how many police offi­cers lives have been ruined as a result?
This writer has been mak­ing the case that this prac­tice which is aid­ed and abet­ted by the media has result­ed in a lot of the cas­es against offi­cers end­ed up fail­ing to meet the most basic pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al stan­dards because they were fraud­u­lent from the start.

SUBSCRIBE FOR CUTTING EDGE ANALYSIS, LIKE AND SHARE ARTICLES

View Post

Black Voters Must Assert Themselves By Taking Over The Party…

Not too long ago I wrote about the fact that the Democratic par­ty and the mod­er­ates who run it, still cling to the mis­guid­ed idea that they can con­tin­ue to be Republican-lite and still hold togeth­er the var­ied mosa­ic coali­tion which now defines the par­ty.
For a long time, the Democratic par­ty strad­dled the fence on social issues, by avoid­ing the lib­er­al label, man­ag­ing to win nation­al office, but los­ing bad­ly to Republicans at the state and local lev­els.
Not stand­ing up for social jus­tice as the par­ty should, even as the Republican par­ty has made clear that it stands opposed to any kind of social jus­tice and con­sol­i­dates itself into a white peo­ple’s polit­i­cal par­ty.
The rise of Donald Trump to take over what was left of the par­ty trans­formed by Newt Gingrich, and the silent acqui­es­cence of the whipped into shape remain­der of the elect­ed Republicans, made it clear that the Republican par­ty is now a white pow­er party. 

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​d​e​m​o​c​r​a​t​i​c​-​p​a​r​t​y​-​s​e​e​m​i​n​g​l​y​-​o​b​l​i​v​i​o​u​s​-​t​o​-​i​t​s​-​s​u​p​p​o​r​t​e​r​s​-​n​e​e​ds/

The truth is that many Democratic strate­gists and talk­ing heads have missed the signs just as bad­ly as the politi­cians have.
The old coali­tion of so-called blue-col­lar work­ers, code for (une­d­u­cat­ed whites), which formed the core of the old Democratic par­ty, has been shat­tered by the pow­er of tar­get­ed strate­gies bankrolled by bil­lion­aires like Charles and David Koch.
In States like Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan assaults against Unions by bought and paid for Republican politi­cians like Scott Walker, who was recent­ly defeat­ed in Wisconsin, and Rick Snyder in Michigan, all but ren­dered the unions pow­er­less as states under Republican lead­er­ship adopt right to work laws which evis­cer­at­ed the unions.

As the polit­i­cal land­scape con­tin­ues to shift, many of those so-called blue-col­lar work­ers have moved on to the Republican par­ty which has sold them a bill of goods based on the col­or of their skin.
For the most part iden­ti­ty pol­i­tics have tak­en over for those vot­ers, even though their inter­est is more aligned with the poli­cies of the Democratic par­ty.
White iden­ti­ty pol­i­tics present a stronger pull than the pock­et­book needs these vot­ers had which were bet­ter addressed by Democratic policies.

https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​h​o​w​-​d​e​m​o​c​r​a​t​s​-​g​o​t​-​c​o​m​p​l​e​t​e​l​y​-​s​t​e​a​m​r​o​l​l​e​d​-​b​y​-​t​h​e​-​r​i​g​ht/

If I said it once, I must have said it a thou­sand times, the Republican par­ty has clear­ly defined lines of demar­ca­tion. The Democratic par­ty bleeds vot­ers to Bernie Sanders, Jill Stein and every oth­er fly-by-night who comes along because pro­gres­sives who once sup­port­ed the Democratic par­ty no longer wants a tepid par­ty which is still search­ing for its own iden­ti­ty.
Yet the par­ty still strug­gles with its mes­sag­ing, even after Ralph Nader gave us George Bush and Bernie Sanders gave us Donald Trump, the Democratic par­ty and its bone­head­ed strate­gists still cling to the idea that the par­ty needs to stick with cen­trist wishy-washy pol­i­cy posi­tions.
Television talk­ing heads who are unable to read the tea leaves yap about the need for the par­ty to main­tain a cen­trist posi­tion, despite the clear and deci­sive upset win in New York by Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, the rise of Stacy Abrams in Georgia, Andrew Gillum’s and Beto Orourke’s near win in Florida and Texas respec­tive­ly, but most of all the repu­di­a­tion of Claire McCaskill in Missouri.

The Democratic par­ty today has as its most loy­al base African-Americans, who con­tin­ue to vote in over­whelm­ing num­bers in sup­port of Democratic can­di­dates wher­ev­er they are. Including in the ruby red state of Alabama.
Yet the par­ty has failed to address the needs of its most loy­al base. Something no one could ever accuse Republicans of doing.
Despite the soci­etal and social ills which con­front the African-American com­mu­ni­ty, police vio­lence and abuse, pover­ty, hous­ing, and lend­ing dis­crim­i­na­tion and the long list of mal­adies asso­ci­at­ed with being black in America, the par­ty has remained silent as “Black lives mat­ter” has been cast in the media as a pseu­do-ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tion.
Still, the par­ty fail to under­stand why the likes of for­mer Starbucks CEO, bil­lion­aire, Howard Schultz would see an open­ing which gives him the idea he could be the next bil­lion­aire President(assum­ing that Trump is).
Democrats are com­plain­ing that Schultz would inex­orably siphon off votes from them osten­si­bly hand­ing a sec­ond term to Donald Trump.
How about posi­tion­ing the par­ty in a clear direc­tion, so that the likes of Schultz see no open­ing to run for pres­i­dent and more impor­tant­ly sup­port your base.
How about not hav­ing to beg peo­ple not to run?

In a recent arti­cle, the New York Times con­tend­ed that the Democratic can­di­dates have all expressed sor­row for posi­tions they took in the past as the diverse coali­tion which makes up the par­ty is far less for­giv­ing of can­di­dates who do not under­stand their com­plex needs.
Despite the clear lurch to the right the Republican par­ty has tak­en, the Democratic par­ty still mean­ders along as the par­ty which isn’t the Republican par­ty. Devoid of char­ac­ter, devoid of a clear iden­ti­ty.
Recent reports indi­cate that because of the clear pro­gres­sive stance many new house mem­bers and state rep­re­sen­ta­tives have tak­en, for­mer vice pres­i­dent Joe Biden is still weigh­ing whether he can mount a viable can­di­da­cy for the nom­i­na­tion of his par­ty.
Real Democratic vot­ers do not want a wishy-washy Republican-lite par­ty. They need a polit­i­cal par­ty which rep­re­sents their interest.

Kamina Johnson-Smith Ignores Data To Push Feminist Agenda…

Kamina Johnson-Smith

In an address to the University of the West Indies Leaders Engaged, Activated, and Dedicated Annual Breakfast held at The Knutsford Court Hotel in New Kingston on January 27th, Government Senator Kamina Johnson-Smith sought to allay the grow­ing con­cerns that women are being employed at twice the rate of men.

Johnson Smith insist­ed that space has to be made for women who have been shack­led by cul­tur­al norms.
I don’t think to pro­mote women in a sit­u­a­tion where women have not been pro­mot­ed before in a space that has been pre­dom­i­nant­ly male, that it means male mar­gin­al­iza­tion.
“I am always quite sur­prised at how easy it is for con­ver­sa­tions to change nowa­days to male mar­gin­al­iza­tion when you are speak­ing about male empow­er­ment.

One of the rea­sons we can­not solve prob­lems for our peo­ple is that we refuse to accept facts as facts and work from those base­lines.
Former President Barack Obama lament­ed the very same thing after leav­ing office.
Speaking to Republican intran­si­gence and the rea­sons noth­ing gets done Obama argued,“When we can­not agree on a base­line of facts, it is lit­er­al­ly impos­si­ble to accom­plish any­thing.“
In Jamaica, like in the US, politi­cians are will­ing to ignore data, facts which do not sup­port their nar­ra­tive are dis­card­ed as opin­ions and left to die on the work­room floor and poli­cies are devel­oped which end up hav­ing the oppo­site effect of what they were intend­ed.
All because pol­i­cy-mak­ers have their own agen­das which gen­er­al­ly does not line up with the will of the majority.

It is impor­tant to con­sid­er that while Johnson-Smith was heap­ing scorn on the data which had been released by the Statistical Institute of Jamaica, show­ing that female work­ers are being employed at twice the rate of men.
And while address­ing a group of peo­ple from the University of the West Indies, that very insti­tu­tion is hav­ing severe prob­lems field­ing a bal­anced slate of fresh­man stu­dents each year.
Someone in that group could have direct­ed the Senator to the ghast­ly fresh­man num­bers at the UWI each year in which females are up to 85% of the fresh­man class, year after year.

file:///C:/Users/excellence/Downloads/C.P.8d%20-%20Statistical%20Five-Year%20Review%20of%20Trends%20in%20Enrolment%20and%20Graduation%20(1).pdf

There are expo­nen­tial­ly more all-girls schools in Jamaica than boy schools.
There are also myr­i­ad agen­cies ded­i­cat­ed to the sup­port and uplift­ment of girls and women. I have list­ed a few here for the ben­e­fit of the Senator’s edu­ca­tion and fideli­ty to truth.
(1) The Bureau of Women’s Affairs (gen­der affairs)Act as a cat­a­lyst to ensure that the Government address­es the prob­lems that con­front women, giv­en the impact of patri­archy and sex­ism. 
(2) Woman Incorporated (Crisis Centre) Offering cri­sis coun­sel­ing, refer­ral ser­vices, and a 24-hour hot­line. The issues addressed by Woman Inc. include rape, incest, domes­tic vio­lence, domes­tic cri­sis, and sex­u­al harass­ment.
(3) Sistren Theatre Collective  Brings pres­sure to bear on soci­ety to change neg­a­tive stereo­types of women.
(4) Women’s Centre Of Jamaica Foundation  Objective is to moti­vate young moth­ers to choose edu­ca­tion instead of con­tin­u­ous moth­er­hood. 
(5) Women’s Media Watch The orga­ni­za­tion works to improve the images of women in the media.
(6) Women’s Resource And Outreach Centre Provides a place for women and youth in the Lyndhurst and Greenwich com­mu­ni­ty to learn the route self-empow­er­ment.

This list does not begin to scratch the sur­face but it gives clear and unequiv­o­cal exam­ples of the dis­par­i­ty in sup­port ser­vices and to whom they are ded­i­cat­ed.
It would be inter­est­ing to have the good Senator or one of her lack­eys fur­nish me with a list of equiv­a­lent ser­vice orga­ni­za­tions ded­i­cat­ed to the uplift­ment and sup­port of boys and men.

Image result for ghetto youths with sagging pants
These are American youth, but wher­ev­er the youth is ignored the con­se­quences are dire.



(1) The Bureau of Women’s Affairs 
The bureau’s man­date to act as a cat­a­lyst to ensure that the Government address­es the prob­lems that con­front women, giv­en the impact of patri­archy and sex­ism
(2) Woman Incorporated (Crisis Centre)
Offering cri­sis coun­sel­ing, refer­ral ser­vices, and a 24-hour hot­line. The issues addressed by Woman Inc. Includes rape, incest, domes­tic vio­lence, domes­tic cri­sis, and sex­u­al harass­ment. 
(3) Sistren Theatre Collective
Brings pres­sure to bear on soci­ety to change neg­a­tive stereo­types of women.
(4) Women’s Centre Of Jamaica Foundation 
Established in response to the high lev­el of teenage preg­nan­cy 
(5) Women’s Media Watch 
Works to improve the images of women in the media as one way of reduc­ing vio­lence.
(6) Women’s Resource And Outreach Centre (WROC)
Provides a place for women and youth in the Lyndhurst and Greenwich com­mu­ni­ty to learn the route to self-empowerment. 

In a typ­i­cal fam­i­ly in which resources are scarce, the boy is left to fend for him­self while the sin­gle moth­er, or both par­ents ded­i­cat­ed them­selves to send­ing the girls to school.
Jamaica’s youth is in cri­sis, but nowhere is it more evi­dent than in the male pop­u­la­tion.
The sad real­i­ty is that the women are get­ting an edu­ca­tion and the boys are seek­ing com­men­su­rate pow­er and respect through the bar­rel of a gun.
How will the nation move for­ward when a Government Senator ignores empir­i­cal data in order to push a fem­i­nist agen­da which is exact­ing incred­i­ble costs on the coun­try in blood and trea­sure?
In the push to lev­el the play­ing field and estab­lish equi­ty, the fem­i­nist move­ment does not care about any out­come except the out­comes which jus­ti­fy quo­tas in wom­en’s favor, regard­less of the con­se­quences.
A ris­ing tide rais­es all boats. If we are to have a bet­ter and just soci­ety we work for a soci­ety in which all are treat­ed equal­ly.
While the women take on jobs clear­ly some are not cut out for in the quest for polit­i­cal cor­rect­ness the men stand on the cor­ners crush­ing weed in the mid­dle of their hands.
Later on, soci­ety pays dear­ly when they decide to take out their anger for their lack of rel­e­vance and the per­cep­tion that the game is rigged against them.
Guess what it is.

The young Jamaican male has become the car­i­ca­ture of what the fem­i­nist move­ment casts him to be.
Pants sag­ging off his ass, Guinness stout under one arm, while he crush­es dried Ganga in his palm.
A good for noth­ing male prod­uct of the patri­archy who sires mul­ti­ple chil­dren, none of whom he sup­ports.
He is vio­lent and spon­ta­neous and is pre­dis­posed to using vio­lence as a means of con­flict res­o­lu­tion.
Sounds about right ‑right? Well, if you think the mur­der sta­tis­tics are fright­en­ing now, swal­low the non­sense of Kamina Johnson-Smith and ignore the data.
I’ll hope to see you on the oth­er side of the revolution. 

Lindsay Graham Makes An Ass Of Himself By Berating The FBI

Is there any­one else as annoyed as I am at the US Senator from South Carolina, no, not the Black one, the one who called him­self a friend of John McCain but has become Donald Trump’s water boy, (speak­ing of Lindsay Graham).
What the hell hap­pened to this guy? Was he always this full of it while John McCain was alive or has some­thing sin­is­ter hap­pened to Lindsay Graham?

Every year thou­sands and thou­sands of raids are car­ried out in neigh­bor­hoods across the coun­try by the thou­sands of mil­i­ta­rized police depart­ments. These mil­i­ta­rized raids are gen­er­al­ly car­ried out in black and brown neigh­bor­hoods, some­times with dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences for res­i­dents of the prop­er­ties on which these raids are exe­cut­ed.
Far too often the infor­ma­tion which pre­cip­i­tat­ed the raids are faulty, and even fraud­u­lent, result­ing osten­si­bly in dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences for inno­cent vic­tims who are left to pick up the pieces.

I have nev­er ever heard Lindsay Graham con­demn the police for act­ing inap­pro­pri­ate­ly or abus­ing their pow­ers.
In 2014 Cops in Georgia act­ing as if they were sol­diers on a bat­tle­field crit­i­cal­ly injured 19-month-old Bounkham Phonesavanh — known as “Baby Bou Bou.”
Serving a late-night “no-knock” war­rant on May 28, 2014, at a home where they believed Bou Bou’s father’s nephew, a sus­pect­ed meth deal­er, was stay­ing when they lobbed a flash-bang grenade inside. The nephew was­n’t home, and the grenade — designed to dis­ori­ent its tar­get — land­ed in Bou Bou’s crib.
The cops lied to the court but were nev­er­the­less found not guilty for almost killing the inno­cent child.
Lindsay Graham did not have a word of con­dem­na­tion for the overzeal­ous wannabe sol­diers who almost killed an inno­cent baby.
But the South Carolina Senator has writ­ten to the FBI demand­ing answers on why the agency did not sim­ply ask Roger Stone the Trump asso­ciate to turn him­self in.

Lindsay Graham

The FBI turned up in force and arrest­ed Roger Stone ear­ly in the morn­ing as they do in most oth­er cas­es when they need to arrest crim­i­nal sus­pects.
That includes Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s per­son­al lawyer.
I believe any­one not liv­ing under a rock already knows who Roger Stone is.
I mean the guy is as old as a rock and has prid­ed him­self as a polit­i­cal dirty trick­ster of sorts from as far back as the Reagan years, maybe as far back as Nixon’s days.
Finally, Stone’s luck has run out and he has been indict­ed by Special Counsel Robert Muller’s team for his part in the ongo­ing inves­ti­ga­tions into alleged Russian col­lu­sion with the Trump cam­paign in the 2016 General elec­tions.
Why is Lindsay Graham stick­ing his nose into an active inves­ti­ga­tion over which he has no con­trol?
To begin with, the FBI has evi­dence that Graham does not have.
Lindsay Graham, though a US Senator, has no juris­dic­tion, author­i­ty or con­trol over either the FBI, or the Muller Investigations and as such the agency do not have to even respond to Senator Grahams posturing.

If we set aside those raids in which law enforce­ment break down doors only to real­ize that the infor­ma­tion on which they act­ed was false or mis­lead­ing.
And if we set aside the cas­es in which they break down doors and arrest real sus­pects in the all too famil­iar mil­i­tary-style raids, we would still be left with the hun­dreds and hun­dreds of peo­ple of col­or, gen­er­al­ly young black men who are mur­dered by police across the coun­try each year and Lindsay Graham has nev­er found his voice to speak out against those atroc­i­ties.
What Lindsay Graham is doing as a result of his grand­stand­ing is demand­ing a sep­a­rate set of rules for white men with pow­er.
No knock raids and raids like that car­ried out at Roger Stone’s house, you know where the FBI agents knocked and demand­ed that Stone open the door should only hap­pen to “those peo­ple”, peo­ple of col­or and poor peo­ple who do not mat­ter.
The FBI, I am sure, have sev­er­al rea­sons why they did not ask Roger Stone to report to be arraigned.
Not the least of which could be that he may poten­tial­ly destroy evi­dence ger­mane to their inves­ti­ga­tions.
Roger Stone has dared the agency to come and arrest him. He had T‑shirts made up dar­ing the Muller team and have told every­one who would lis­ten that he expect­ed that he would be indict­ed.
Guess what, they may have done just that.
Roger Stone may also have posed a flight risk, we do not know and nei­ther does the Senator from South Carolina.
All in all Roger Stone deserved no more def­er­ence that the guy on the street. Yet he was quick to tell the truth that the FBI Agents were real­ly quite cour­te­ous to him.
Lindsay Graham in seek­ing to be Trump’s water boy, is mak­ing a roy­al jack­ass of him­self.
John McCain would not rec­og­nize Lindsay Graham as a result of just how low he has sunken.

Couple Trying To Purchase Gun Murdered(graphic Image)

THIS HAPPENED LAST WEEK

Detectives assigned to the Spanish Town Criminal Investigation Branch are prob­ing the cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing the shoot­ing deaths of a man and a woman on Old Harbour Road in Spanish Town, St Catherine on Thursday. Those killed are 21-year-old Vaughn Smith, oth­er­wise called ‘Mr. Cool’, and 19-year-old Serena Kerr, both of Shelter Rock in Spanish Town. The police say about 2:30 p.m, res­i­dents heard explo­sions in the area went to inves­ti­gate and dis­cov­ered the bodies.The police say Smith and Kerr were found lying in blood with gun­shot wounds to the upper body.

As per usu­al, the report to the police is just that it will take time for a full inves­tiga­tive nar­ra­tive to take shape., so we await the results of a full inves­ti­ga­tion.
In the mean­time, the streets are talk­ing and the sto­ry being told while sad caus­es one to won­der what was the dece­dent Vaughn Smith’s inten­tion?
Word on the streets is that Vaughn encour­aged Serena to accom­pa­ny him to go pur­chase a gun and that did not go so well.
Unconfirmed reports indi­cate the young cou­ple was robbed of their cash and then mur­dered by the men who were sup­posed to sell them the weapon/​s.

It is always sad when some­one los­es his or her life, nev­er­the­less, these are some of the con­se­quences of those kinds of actions.
If the report­ing is cor­rect, one has to assume that the inten­tion of the deceased were less than pure.
As trag­ic as this case is, it may very well be a case of ear­ly karma.

Kamala Harris Deserves Better Than Sexist Criticism About Her Personal Life

The 2020 presidential candidate has faced down creepy gossip about a past relationship for 20 years. It should stop — now.
By Joan Walsh


Democratic women had a lot to cel­e­brate this week­end. With the for­mal entrance of California Senator Kamala Harris to the 2020 pres­i­den­tial race, it was offi­cial: Three of the top prospects are women. Although Senators Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand have mere­ly said they’re explor­ing a run, both women drew big crowds on their first trip to Iowa, which holds its first-in-the-nation cau­cus­es next February 3. (Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard has also announced, but she has yet to hold a cam­paign event or con­firm hir­ing staff.) Warren’s strong start led The Guardian’s Ben Jacobs to anoint her as the Iowa “fron­trun­ner,” even as nation­al polls show for­mer vice pres­i­dent Joe Biden and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders in the lead.

Kamala Harris, at least tem­porar­i­ly, blew by Warren on Sunday, draw­ing a crowd of more than 20,000 to her home­town of Oakland, California, for her offi­cial announce­ment. To be fair, since nei­ther Gillibrand nor Warren has declared, they have not yet invest­ed the mon­ey or advance work into stag­ing this kind of super-event. It wasn’t just the ador­ing crowds, though: I’ve been cov­er­ing Harris for 16 years, since her first race for San Francisco dis­trict attor­ney in 2003, and I’ve nev­er seen her so inspir­ing, quot­ing Frederick Douglass and Bobby Kennedy.

When we have chil­dren in cages cry­ing for their moth­ers and fathers, don’t you dare call it bor­der secu­ri­ty,” she declared mid-speech. “That’s a human-rights abuse and that’s not our America.” I don’t have a can­di­date; I hope to stay neu­tral in this thrilling and his­toric 2020 race at least until 2020 — but Sunday was a great day for Democratic women, who­ev­er you sup­port.
Except when it wasn’t: The day began with the right wing buzzing over a sup­posed bomb­shell from for­mer San Francisco may­or Willie Brown, “con­firm­ing” what has nev­er been a secret, in his gad­fly week­ly col­umn for the San Francisco Chronicle: that he dat­ed Harris in the mid-1990s, when he was run­ning for may­or. “Extramarital affair with Kamala Harris?” Fox News blared. “Former San Francisco Mayor, 84, admits it hap­pened.” TownhallRedStateWorldNetDailyAmerican Thinker and a host of oth­er wingnut sites piled on, some more per­vy than oth­ers (I won’t give them the traf­fic by link­ing). But main­stream out­lets picked up the news, too. “Willie Brown on Kamala Harris: ‘We dat­ed. I influ­enced her career,’” USA Today told us. NBC polit­i­cal reporter Jonathan Allen con­fessed on Twitter that “both Republicans & Democrats have whis­pered ‘Willie Brown’ to me in recent weeks when the sub­ject of Harris’ run has come up. That’ll hurt her, they say.” Allen, cor­rect­ly, went on to pre­dict the whis­pers will “back­fire” on Harris’s oppo­nents. But the whis­per­ing — and shout­ing — is appalling, on so many levels. 

For one thing, it shows the short mem­o­ries and/​or dis­turb­ing lazi­ness of many polit­i­cal reporters: Brown can’t “admit” to any­thing that’s been well known in San Francisco polit­i­cal cir­cles since it was going on, in the mid-1990s. Harris’s rela­tion­ship with Brown came up fre­quent­ly when she ran for DA in 2003. In fact, it was an enor­mous issue: She faced down charges that he’d helped her career — and he prob­a­bly did; what suc­cess­ful pol hasn’t had help from some­one pow­er­ful? — and giv­en her two plum state-com­mis­sion assign­ments. Worse than that were the lurid rumors about their rela­tion­ship I heard “on back­ground” — from oth­er Democrats. It was sex­ist and appalling — the sex lives of California Democrats like Brown him­self, and many of his con­tem­po­raries, bur­nished their leg­ends. Harris’s roman­tic past was sup­posed to shame and side­line her. It sick­ened me, and I wrote that at the time. In the end, it was her own work in the San Francisco and Alameda County DA’s offices, not Brown’s “help,” that con­vinced vot­ers to take a chance on Harris, and reject the aging pro­gres­sive incum­bent Terence Hallinan (who was him­self accused of sex­u­al harass­ment by sev­er­al women while he served on the Board of Supervisors; he set­tled with one out of court).
Now, some are claim­ing that Harris is hid­ing her past with Brown; appar­ent­ly, she didn’t men­tion him in her new book, The Truths We Hold: An American Journey. Newsflash: This hap­pened almost a quar­ter-cen­tu­ry ago. She was around 30. No one has an oblig­a­tion to dis­cuss the men they dat­ed that long ago. Early in her career, she was open about it: She had to be. The night Brown was elect­ed as may­or she shared the stage, and famous­ly pre­sent­ed him with a base­ball cap embla­zoned “Da Mayor.” (You can eas­i­ly find the pho­to on the Google.)

Others are tak­ing a mor­al­iz­ing approach: Brown was “mar­ried,” so she con­duct­ed an extra­mar­i­tal affair. Newsflash: While liv­ing in the San Francisco Bay Area and even work­ing under Speaker Willie Brown in the California State Assembly, it took me years to learn that the Democratic leader was still mar­ried. That’s because he was a noto­ri­ous wom­an­iz­er, who used to joke that his age, com­bined with his girlfriend’s, could nev­er break 100 (at 84, he bet­ter have relaxed those rules, lest he breaks the law). He nonethe­less remained close to his wife; he report­ed­ly promised he would nev­er divorce her. Still, the late, leg­endary colum­nist San Francisco colum­nist Herb Caen even pre­dict­ed Brown and Harris would mar­ry.
Read more here: https://​www​.then​ation​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​k​a​m​a​l​a​-​h​a​r​r​i​s​-​w​i​l​l​i​e​-​b​r​o​wn/





Why Now, Why Is America Interfering In Venezuela?

The cri­sis in Venezuela should be worked out by the Venezuelan peo­ple and should under no cir­cum­stances be engi­neered by any for­eign pow­er.
At the moment the United States is con­duct­ing an aggres­sive inves­ti­ga­tion into alleged Russian inter­fer­ence into its 2016 elec­tions.
As such, the US has no author­i­ty to tip the scales in Venezuela one way or the oth­er and nei­ther does any oth­er nation. 

Nicolas Maduro

What is right for the United States must also be right for the rest of the world.
But you would­n’t know it from lis­ten­ing to über -war-hawk John Bolton, Donald Trump’s nation­al secu­ri­ty advis­er.
Bolton, a well-known war­mon­ger who would nev­er allow an oppor­tu­ni­ty to go to war to go unex­ploit­ed, wormed his way into the Trump admin­is­tra­tion and got the job he want­ed, that of nation­al secu­ri­ty advis­er.
Donald Trump cam­paigned on pulling America out of what he called “stu­pid wars,” in his unique inco­her­ent gib­ber­ish, Trump man­aged to artic­u­late a pol­i­cy which indi­cat­ed that he did not believe in an America in which the coun­try is the police­man of the world.


Juan Guaidó

Despite those self-serv­ing protes­ta­tions by Trump, his admin­is­tra­tion has moved to rec­og­nize Juan Guido’s deci­sion to declare him­self inter­im pres­i­dent of Venezuela.
The Trump admin­is­tra­tion has also tak­en steps to hand to Juan Guido the accounts that Venezuela has out­side the coun­try.
Those moves are designed to top­ple the pres­i­den­cy of Nicolas Maduro.
Regardless of what one thinks of Nicolas Maduro’s pres­i­den­cy or the way he acquired it, it is incon­ceiv­able to imag­ine a sce­nario in which the United States would allow a for­eign pow­er to active­ly decide who is pres­i­dent of the United States.
Or is it?
Without for­eign cur­ren­cy, Venezuela can­not con­duct busi­ness and the Venezuelan econ­o­my will osten­si­bly collapse.

John Bolton

Donald Trump preach­es America First, he rarely invokes democ­ra­cy and human rights and has expressed glow­ing admi­ra­tion for dic­ta­tors such as Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un.
Siding with Juan Guido sup­pos­ed­ly to restore democ­ra­cy in Venezuela rings hol­low.
The Atlantic argued: Asked to explain the president’s anom­alous stance on Maduro dur­ing a con­fer­ence call with reporters on Wednesday, a senior admin­is­tra­tion offi­cial, speak­ing on con­di­tion of anonymi­ty, not­ed that both Venezuela and the United States are bound to a multi­na­tion­al char­ter they adopt­ed in 2001 that enshrines rep­re­sen­ta­tive democ­ra­cy as the pre­vail­ing polit­i­cal sys­tem in the Western hemi­sphere. But the ratio­nale rang hol­low. If we’ve learned one thing from Trump’s pres­i­den­cy, it’s that he doesn’t feel the least bit teth­ered to inter­na­tion­al agree­ments when he believes they aren’t in the nation­al inter­est.

Asked about the poten­tial of a mil­i­tary incur­sion into Venezuela, John Bolton remarked to the press that the President has main­tained that all options are on the table.
Bolton tried to make the case that such actions would be to pro­tect Americans in Venezuela.
All options should not be on the table if America sim­ply brings its diplo­mats home. Countries kick diplo­mats out all the time. This time should be no dif­fer­ent.
As the cri­sis in Trump’s pres­i­den­cy height­ens it seems like yet anoth­er wag-the-dog mil­i­tary exer­cise could be in the works to dis­tract atten­tion away from a floun­der­ing pres­i­den­cy.
America has a chief exec­u­tive who has been named as a co-con­spir­a­tor in a felony. There is a pro­duc­tive and ever threat­en­ing Special Counsel inves­ti­ga­tion which seems set to engulf Donald Trump.
His bor­der wall inspired Government shut­down end­ed after 35 days with the Democrats hold­ing fast under the lead­er­ship of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s lead­er­ship.
With lit­tle to no leg­isla­tive accom­plish­ments to point to and anoth­er pres­i­den­tial cam­paign begin­ning to take shape on the hori­zon.
The sad yet dan­ger­ous irony in all of this is that a pres­i­den­cy which came into exis­tence on the promise to extri­cate America from stu­pid wars,[sic] may very well be con­tem­plat­ing start­ing anoth­er stu­pid war, with the express intent of build­ing pub­lic sup­port for a pres­i­den­cy many deem illegitimate.

How The People Got Conned Into Being Dead/​right…

Horace Chang

It is a tragedy that Jamaica’s lead­ers stick their noses into places where they ought not to, yet are total­ly clue­less about how to fix the exis­ten­tial crises the Island faces at home.
The Prime Minister trav­elled all the way to apartheid Israel to hob­nob with the racist, mega­lo­ma­ni­ac Benjamin Netanyahu last year. And of course the pathet­ic oppo­si­tion (PNP) is dead set on it’s sup­port for the Venezuelan wannabe strong­man Nicolas Maduro.


While Jamaica sticks it’s nose into inter­na­tion­al affairs which it has no busi­ness doing, the unchecked killings con­tin­ue unabat­ed across the coun­try as a result of poli­cies enact­ed by both the gov­ern­ing (JLP) and the oppo­si­tion(PNP).
Front and cen­ter of the debate is how to con­trol the spate of killings across the Island, the vast major­i­ty of which nev­er gets solved.


The thugs who take life when they feel like it, has long demon­strat­ed that they are no longer afraid or con­cerned about the police.
Additionally, the sup­posed awe that they once har­bored at the sight of the mil­i­tary in the streets has long fad­ed.
On that score, the old adage ” familir­i­ty breeds con­tempt” is appro­pri­ate. Soldiers have been doing some polic­ing duties for years. The shock and awe at the sight of the mil­i­tary on the streets are replaced with shrugs and yawns. 


The nation’s laws are made by imper­fect peo­ple, many of whom are heav­i­ly invest­ed in the per­son­al out­comes, coun­try be damned.
Trial lawyers with no alle­giance to the coun­try dou­ble as leg­is­la­tors. They pass laws which fur­ther ham­strung the police and empow­er those who would be their future clients.
But it’s not just as sim­ple as tri­al lawyers being leg­is­la­tors, it is as seri­ous as actu­al leg­is­la­tors being active crim­i­nals.
The pathet­ic excuse for a nation­al secu­ri­ty min­is­ter (Horace Chang) stands before a crowd in St James and tells the police not to infringe on the rights of any of the peo­ple in the parish (
sur­round­ed by his police detail).
Not that he need­ed the police detail, the real secu­ri­ty are the goons in the gar­risons whom their poli­cies pro­tect.
He had not one syl­la­ble of [charge] to the peo­ple to obey the laws, to be respect­ful of the police and to help the police in their fight against crime.



Of course, this should come as no sur­prise, Horace Chang is in charge of one of the tough­est gar­risons in the parish of St James if not the entire Island.
The peo­ple who head the nation­al secu­ri­ty appa­ra­tus are also in charge of the [fave­las] in which the crim­i­nals have safe-haven with dan­ger­ous high pow­ered weapons.
No, this is not about par­ty pol­i­tics, the Opposition leader also over­sees a gar­ri­son in which the num­ber of votes cast always exceed the num­ber of elec­tors liv­ing in the constituency.


It has nev­er been that the police were inca­pable of deal­ing with the killings. What has tran­spired over the years is that the two polit­i­cal par­ties have embarked on a process which under­mines the rule of law in the coun­try while they pil­fer from the scarce resources which ought to go toward run­ning the coun­try.
They rel­ish in tak­ing away choice from the pop­u­la­tion, which is large­ly illit­er­ate and total­ly behold­en to the polit­i­cal dog­ma they are fed.
In order to pull that scam on the mass­es they need­ed a scape­goat and so the police found itself caught between the two gangs which run the coun­try and those which enforces the code on the streets.


Because we can­not afford to vio­late their human and civ­il rights.
By the 22nd of Janauary last year 100 homi­cides were report­ed to the police.
That num­ber meant that just under 5 Jamaicans were killed each day.
This year has start­ed off on a gal­lop as well but nev­er mind peo­ple are dying every­where right?
I won­der how those peo­ple feel about their human rights, or bet­ter yet, I won­der how they feel about los­ing the most pre­cious gift ever giv­en, the gift of life?
I guess we will nev­er know.

Chucky Brown Sentenced



See the source image



Ex-Police Constable Collis Chucky Brown has been sen­tenced to life in prison in the so-called death squad case. His sen­tence stems from three counts of mur­der and wound­ing with intent.
He must serve 51 years in prison before he is eli­gi­ble for parole.
More to come.….

PNP Wrong On Venezuela As It Is Wrong On So Much More..

Nicolas Maduro

It is hard to imag­ine a case in which the People’s National Party has made a greater ass of itself than get­ting involved in the events in Venezuela on the side of ille­git­i­mate President Nicolas Maduro.
It is remark­able, yet total­ly pre­dictable that the (PNP) would mis­take a man who rigged the vote and made him­self President to be a [duly elect­ed] president.

As is to be expect­ed the local media hous­es also jumped onto the band­wag­on in sup­port of Maduro under the same guise.
The fact that the United States to a large extent have sup­port­ed and may have been instru­men­tal in Mr Juan Guaido declar­ing him­self inter­im pres­i­dent, may be play­ing a part in the PNP’s deci­sion to sup­port Maduro.
However it is not just the US which has sup­port­ed the move by Guaido, so too has Canada, and quite a few Latin American and European coun­tries.

Arguing for sup­port of Maduro The Observer Editorial page head­lined (A plea for Venezuela).
Simply put, nations that sub­scribe to the ide­al of democ­ra­cy can­not, on one hand — and right­ly so we believe — dis­miss Mr Nicolas Maduro’s claim to the pres­i­den­cy, then turn around and embrace Mr Guaido’s announce­ment. For Mr Guaido, in mak­ing that claim, is act­ing in like man­ner to his polit­i­cal foe.

In an Editorial which lit­er­al­ly sup­ports the deci­sion not to sup­port Maduro’s pres­i­den­cy, but for the para­graph say­ing Jamaica should, the Editors made plau­si­ble and con­vinc­ing argu­ments as to why Maduro should not be pres­i­dent, includ­ing the fol­low­ing.
Readers will recall that in 2014 after a fall in oil prices sparked a major eco­nom­ic cri­sis for Venezuela, Mr Maduro’s Government greet­ed anti-gov­ern­ment protests with force, result­ing in the deaths of 43 peo­ple. In 2017, when pro­test­ers, in four months of demon­stra­tions, called for Mr Maduro to step down, 125 peo­ple were killed. Also, 18 months after the Opposition won con­trol of the National Assembly by a land­slide in December 2015, Mr Maduro, in a bla­tant dis­play of his dis­re­gard for democ­ra­cy, cre­at­ed a Constituent Assembly tasked with rewrit­ing Venezuela’s con­sti­tu­tion. That move was regard­ed as designed to super­sede the National Assembly in order to legit­imize his grip on power.

The Editorial laid out a case by case basis for exact­ly why Nicolas Maduro should not be pres­i­dent, while claim­ing that quote:Nations that sub­scribe to the ide­al of democ­ra­cy can­not, on one hand — and right­ly so we believe — dis­miss Mr. Nicolas Maduro’s claim to the pres­i­den­cy.
It is exact­ly that kind of regres­sive think­ing which caused the PNP to crit­i­cize the Government’s stance against the Maduro régime.
It is for those rea­sons that the PNP’s Lisa Hanna was out mak­ing state­ments to the media in sup­port of Nicolas Maduro.
And it is that kind of lack of crit­i­cal think­ing by the PNP which has kept the coun­try immersed in pover­ty over the years and got the coun­try into the morass it did in the 70’s.
It is that kind of unin­tel­li­gent thought process which caus­es the PNP to with­draw it’s sup­port from the Government’s appli­ca­tion of the lim­it­ed states of emer­gency.
If the steps Nicolas Maduro took to acquire and main­tain con­trol of the gov­ern­ment in Venezuela are ille­gal then his claim to the pres­i­den­cy are no more legit­i­mate than that of Juan Guaido.

Without going into too much details, here is an ultra brief syn­op­sis of Nicolas Maduro’s polit­i­cal life.
After enter­ing a con­sti­tu­tion­al cri­sis when the Supreme Tribunal removed pow­er from the National Assembly, months of protests occurred in 2017, lead­ing Maduro to call for a rewrite of the con­sti­tu­tion and result­ing in at least 153 deaths. The Constituent Assembly of Venezuela was elect­ed into office 30 July 2017, with the major­i­ty of its elect­ed mem­bers being pro-Maduro.[24][25] On 20 May 2018, Maduro was reelect­ed into the pres­i­den­cy in what the Atlantic Council and Financial Times described as a show elec­tion[26][27] which had the low­est vot­er turnout in Venezuela’s mod­ern his­to­ry.[28] Like Chávez, Maduro has been accused of author­i­tar­i­an lead­er­ship,[29] with main­stream media describ­ing him as a dic­ta­tor, espe­cial­ly fol­low­ing the sus­pen­sion of the recall move­ment that was direct­ed towards him.(Wikipedia).

The People’s National Party has con­sis­tent­ly hitched it’s wag­on to despot­ic ille­git­i­mate gov­ern­ments and ide­olo­gies in the same way it has made deci­sions which has had demon­stra­bly cat­a­stroph­ic con­se­quences for Jamaica since 1962.
In some cas­es the PNP could sim­ply have remained silent, as it should have in the Nicolas Maduro’s case.
But the PNP has nev­er been known to exer­cise good judge­ment. Not when Michael Manley hitched his wag­on to Fidel Castro,who had hitched his wag­on to a dying Soviet empire.
Not even in exer­cis­ing good judge­ment in eschew­ing and dis­card­ing the clenched fists, stu­pid berets and using the moniker “com­rade”.

Businessman/​Ex-cop Died In Spring Hill Crash(graphic Imagery)

Marvin Douglas a for­mer con­sta­ble of the Jamaica Constabulary Force and for­mal­ly of the Trelawny Division now a busi­ness man in fal­mouth died a few hours ago in a motor vehi­cle crash along the Spring Hill high­way in the parish.

The late Ex-con­sta­ble Marvin Douglas


Senior Cop Escaped Death From Attackers With High Powered Weapons


We are told that a Detective Inspector of Police in charge of scenes of crime Investigations at the Spanish Tow Police sta­tion nar­row­ly escaped death at his home.
Detective Inspector Harris was attacked by gun­men who shot up his car.
In what seems to have been an attempt­ed rob­bery attempt, the men alleged­ly tailed the cop from the bank where he report­ed­ly went to trans­act busi­ness.
Several m16 shells were recov­ered from the scene of the inci­dent and the cop is report­ed to have escaped seri­ous injury.

UPDATE TO THIS STORY

At about 10am Detective Inspector Devon Harris, of the tech­ni­cal ser­vices divi­sion with­drew cash from the bank and drove home and parked in his dri­ve­way.
He alight­ed from the car when he noticed a grey hatch­back motor car dri­ving towards him, he became sus­pi­cious and stood in front of the car one man alight­ed from the rear seat of the car with a M16 rifle, and opened fire at him.
He took eva­sive action upon which two oth­er men with hand­guns also alight­ed from the car and they too opened fire at Inspector Harris.
Detective Inspector Harris ran into a near­by premis­es and hid him­self.

They went into the Inspector’ car and stole his lap­top- bag con­tain­ing his HP lap­top com­put­er val­ued at five hun­dred and fifty us dol­lars (US $550). The gun­men made good their escape.
Insp Harris suf­fered no gun­shot injuries but suf­fered cuts and bruis­es to his hands and knees from hav­ing fall­en dur­ing the encounter.

Hebrew Israelites (no Need For The Word Black)

I am not exact­ly why some peo­ple feel the need to refer to “woke” black peo­ple who have come to the real­iza­tion that we are the true Israelites, God’s cho­sen people.


Black Hebrew Israelites are in the news after a January 18 video showed mem­bers of an uniden­ti­fied sect inter­act­ing with stu­dents from Covington Catholic.
 Win McNamee/​Getty Images 



Follow this sto­ry here: https://​www​.vox​.com/​i​d​e​n​t​i​t​i​e​s​/​2​0​1​9​/​1​/​2​2​/​1​8​1​9​3​3​5​2​/​b​l​a​c​k​-​h​e​b​r​e​w​-​i​s​r​a​e​l​i​t​e​s​-​c​o​v​i​n​g​t​o​n​-​c​a​t​h​o​l​i​c​-​p​h​i​l​l​i​p​s​-​m​a​g​a​?​f​b​c​l​i​d​=​I​w​A​R​2​0​j​L​n​n​G​-​z​U​m​m​p​7​7​u​h​_​l​z​K​M​y​m​G​U​0​N​4​T​D​4​9​P​l​-​d​L​D​Z​S​Q​j​h​W​4​6​c​y​x​-​b​g​I​lR8

A No-case Result In A Case Brought By INDECOM Is Not The Same As A Case Brought By The Police

Terrence Williams

There is a seri­ous con­ver­sa­tion to be had about the false sense of secu­ri­ty and brain­wash­ing Jamaicans are lulled into. An anti-police mind­set which cre­ates the per­cep­tion that an agency that was cre­at­ed to harass the police is in their best inter­est.
Just today threats were made by gangs that peo­ple in the once qui­et town of Mandeville will be slaugh­tered one each day if a gang­ster arrest­ed by the police is not released forth­with.
When the fake lay­ers of peace and con­tent­ment are peeled away Jamaica has a very seri­ous prob­lem with crim­i­nals and it is not get­ting bet­ter.

When a case which is brought by the police gets dis­missed by the courts for want of pros­e­cu­tion it is not the same as a case in which a police offi­cer was charged for a crime and walked free because the pros­e­cu­tion can­not sub­stan­ti­ate the case it brought.
The Jamaica Constabulary Force is tasked with inves­ti­gat­ing crimes which involve 2.8 mil­lion Jamaicans and every sin­gle for­eign­er who ever set foot not just on Jamaican soil but may have com­mit­ted a crime against our coun­try 12 miles away from our coun­try’s shores.
As an over­sight agency INDECOM is tasked with inves­ti­gat­ing a secu­ri­ty appa­ra­tus of approx­i­mate­ly 12,000 peo­ple not count­ing the Corrections Department.
Most alle­ga­tions against the secu­ri­ty forces were, and still, are forced by gang lead­ers, or as they were called (area lead­ers). Common lowlife scum­bags, san­i­tized, pack­aged and sold to the Jamaican peo­ple by what pass­es for a media.
Fake mourn­ers became the norm, wail­ing away at the sup­posed killings of their choir­boy friends whom they watched get­ting mur­dered by the police as he slept in his bed at 3 in the morning.[sic]
Innocent com­mu­ni­ty lead­ers, or as one anti-police agi­ta­tor Horace Levy labeled them, (cor­ner crews) not dan­ger­ous gang­sters.
That is not to say that the break­down in the nation’s social order and the neglect of the police over a peri­od of sev­er­al decades has­n’t result­ed in many peo­ple who should nev­er be police offi­cers becom­ing police offi­cers.
As a con­se­quence, the poor qual­i­ty of those can­di­dates nat­u­ral­ly end­ed up in out­comes which are anti­thet­i­cal to a good police depart­ment and the good of the coun­try overall.


On the 7th of this month Detective Corporal Kevin Adams, Constable Carl Bucknor, and District Constable Howard Brown had their 8‑year night­mare come to a spec­tac­u­lar end when Queen’s Counsel Caroline Hay told the court, the pros­e­cu­tion would be unable to negate the defense’s posi­tion of self-defense. 
The three police offi­cers were charged with the mur­der of Andrew Bisson in a police oper­a­tion on September 5, 2011.
The Investigations were under­tak­en and con­duct­ed by INDECOM.
During the tri­al the judge, Chief Justice Byran Sykes spoke to the grave reser­va­tions he had about the case against the offi­cers.
Justice Sykes observed (1) [ that it seemed that the accused offi­cers were being tar­get­ed by the Independent Commission of Investigations (INDECOM)].
(2) Chief Justice Bryan Sykes, the tri­al judge expressed con­cern about whether the accused police­men were afford­ed an objec­tive and fair inves­ti­ga­tion?

On Tuesday, January 22nd, 2019 Sergeant David Hutchinson and Constable Kenneth Daley were before the very same Judge Bryan Sykes. The two were charged with mur­der in a July 2013 inci­dent fol­low­ing an inves­ti­ga­tion by INDECOM into the fatal shoot­ing of a teenag­er, Derrick Bolton, and anoth­er man.
Like the case on January 7th, pros­e­cu­tors told the court that they could not pro­ceed against the accused as they could not pro­duce the pros­e­cu­tion wit­ness­es.
The offi­cers were charged after 8 peo­ple were fatal­ly shot in an area of Saint Catherine and the police respond­ed and con­front­ed the two, who were report­ed­ly mem­bers of the noto­ri­ous Klansman gang.

The com­mon inves­tiga­tive thread in these two most recent cas­es in which offi­cers who have been charged with mur­der and have spent years await­ing tri­al, in some cas­es while locked away like com­mon crim­i­nals is INDECOM.
In response to charges by police offi­cers that INDECOM was charge ‑hap­py and was charg­ing offi­cers then doing inves­ti­ga­tions, Terrence Williams the head of the agency in 2016 sought to debunk claims he and his agency were abus­ing the pow­ers giv­en to the agency.
He argued that the com­mis­sion’s oper­a­tions does not allow for charges to be laid with­out prop­er inves­ti­ga­tions being car­ried out.
“The INDECOM Act oper­ates in a way that before any­body can be charged, it must come through the direc­tor of com­plaints and then be seen by me.

The design of the INDECOM Act is to ensure that all inves­ti­ga­tions are super­vised by some­body with senior legal qual­i­fi­ca­tion and expe­ri­ence. So the com­plaint that is being made is com­plete­ly off the mark, based on sys­tems. Further, it is not our prac­tice to charge per­sons before the case is com­plet­ed, Williams told the Gleaner at the time.
So much for adher­ing to the dic­tates of the law!

In 2016 Terrence Williams told the same news­pa­per that
“of the six cas­es that have been com­plet­ed, mean­ing cas­es placed before the courts since the cre­ation of the agency in 2008, only one per­son was acquit­ted, and there is one where the DPP felt the case should not go on. We have five cas­es where there have been con­vic­tions, includ­ing one case with eight peo­ple.”
Only that there was no truth to Terrence Williams’ state­ments.
In Manchester, INDECOM charged a police offi­cer with using his hel­met to hit a man.
Case dis­missed.
Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Jason Anderson, who is assigned to the Major Organised Crime and Anti-Corruption Agency (MOCA), has been charged with dis­charg­ing a firearm with­in 40 yards of a pub­lic road, con­trary to Section 23 of the Firearms Act and assault at com­mon law. Charged by INDECOM.
Case dis­missed.
There are oth­er cas­es that have also result­ed in dis­missals all of which are cas­es brought against the police by INDECOM.

Hamish Campbell


The aver­age Jamaican has been raised, schooled and indoc­tri­nat­ed into hat­ing law enforce­ment. Even some who have worked as police offi­cers because they may have been unable to get jobs in the pri­vate econ­o­my has been known to be vehe­ment­ly against the very dis­ci­pline which puts food on their table.
The ques­tion of hav­ing cops opposed to the rule of law is cer­tain­ly more per­va­sive now than it was before.
With so many peo­ple enter­ing the depart­ment from the left-lean­ing University of the West Indies the prob­lem is now a seri­ous threat to the nation’s secu­ri­ty.
Enemies of polic­ing now doing polic­ing.
It can­not be overem­pha­sized that nei­ther of the two major polit­i­cal par­ties wants a com­pe­tent police depart­ment which is capa­ble of doing the type of inves­tiga­tive work which would have end­ed in the arrest of politi­cians involved in the Petrojam scam, Outameani, the Iran sug­ar deal, the Cuban light­bulb scan­dal, and the host of oth­er thefts in which bil­lions of dol­lars sim­ply dis­ap­peared.
That is why INDECOM serves the inter­est of both polit­i­cal par­ties.
That is the rea­son they do not care that Deputy Commissioner of INDECOM British trans­plant Hamish Campbell was alleged to have plant­ed evi­dence on an inno­cent black man while he worked in his home country.

No mat­ter how much you adore INDECOM and hate the police, it is pret­ty dif­fi­cult to ignore the obser­va­tions of the nations most senior jurist.
(1)That it seemed that the accused offi­cers were being tar­get­ed by the Independent Commission of Investigations (INDECOM)].
(2) Concerned about whether the accused police­men were afford­ed an objec­tive and fair inves­ti­ga­tion.
What is absent from this whole con­ver­sa­tion is a fair and just appre­ci­a­tion for the fact that these case are being approached and pros­e­cut­ed in a man­ner which is inju­ri­ous to police offi­cers and worse is dan­ger­ous to the nation’s secu­ri­ty.
Furthermore, the duplic­i­tous silence by what pass­es for an orga­nized media, or worse the fail­ure to put two and two togeth­er and report to the peo­ple the dan­ger they are in by allow­ing for the con­tin­u­a­tion of INDECOM
Because the sta­tus quo serves the inter­est of both polit­i­cal par­ties voic­es like mine will go unheed­ed.
Nevertheless, as the coun­try bounces from one dan­ger­ous sit­u­a­tion to anoth­er and as the gangs con­sol­i­date their pow­er, the peo­ple like sheep, are led to believe that the num­ber one prob­lem they face is threats to their human rights.
In the mean­time, Superintendent Wayné Cameron and his offi­cers are on high alert in Manchester, despite the forces arrayed against them this offi­cer and his men and women are deter­mined and vig­i­lant­ly out there pro­tect­ing the lives of the cit­i­zens with their own lives.
Undeterred by threats from gang­sters who would turn our beau­ti­ful Island into a Sub-Saharan waste­land, spilling inno­cent blood if their demands are not met.

LIKE AND SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Judge Blocks Wisconsin GOP’s Lame-duck Voter Suppression: “Not A Close Question”

Judge strikes down Scott Walker’s vote-suppression measure, but Republicans will fight on — at taxpayer expense

A fed­er­al judge ruled last week that Wisconsin Republicans vio­lat­ed a fed­er­al court order by approv­ing restric­tions on ear­ly vot­ing and oth­er elec­tion issues dur­ing a lame duck ses­sion before the new Democratic gov­er­nor was sworn in.
U.S. District Judge James Peterson blocked a law signed by out­go­ing Republican Gov. Scott Walker that lim­it­ed ear­ly vot­ing to two weeks before the elec­tion and restrict­ed in-per­son absen­tee vot­ing and the forms of ID that can be used to vote.
Peterson wrote that the leg­is­la­tion vio­lat­ed a 2016 court order that blocked the state from mak­ing sim­i­lar changes.“This is not a close ques­tion,” Peterson wrote. “The three chal­lenged pro­vi­sions are clear­ly incon­sis­tent with the injunc­tions that the court has issued in this case.”In that case, Peterson ruled that the state’s vot­er ID and lim­its on in-per­son absen­tee vot­ing were uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, the Wisconsin State Journal report­ed. The case was appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals which is yet to rule on the mat­ter.The state argued that the new laws were dif­fer­ent from the 2016 leg­is­la­tion, which Peterson rejected.

If the court accept­ed defen­dants’ argu­ment, it would mean that a leg­isla­tive body could evade an injunc­tion sim­ply by reen­act­ing an iden­ti­cal law and giv­ing it a new num­ber,” he wrote.
The elec­tion restric­tions were part of a larg­er set of bills passed by Wisconsin Republicans dur­ing last year’s lame duck ses­sion that were signed by Walker right before he was replaced by new­ly-elect­ed Democratic Gov. Tony Evers. Progressive groups Citizen Action of Wisconsin and One Wisconsin Institute sued over the moves.
Evers said after the rul­ing that he as “glad to see that a fed­er­al [court] again struck down the GOP’s uncon­sti­tu­tion­al attacks on our right to vote.”
A sec­ond law­suit filed by pro­gres­sive groups, includ­ing the League of Women Voters, Disability Rights Wisconsin and Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, that was filed in the same court is seek­ing to have all the new laws passed by Republicans dur­ing the lame-duck ses­sion void­ed, argu­ing that the ses­sion was ille­gal. A judge is yet to rule on the case but experts told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Read more here:https://​www​.salon​.com/​2​0​1​9​/​0​1​/​2​2​/​j​u​d​g​e​-​b​l​o​c​k​s​-​w​i​s​c​o​n​s​i​n​-​g​o​p​s​-​l​a​m​e​-​d​u​c​k​-​v​o​t​e​r​-​s​u​p​p​r​e​s​s​i​o​n​-​n​o​t​-​a​-​c​l​o​s​e​-​q​u​e​s​t​i​on/




How Jamaica Allowed Crime To Take Over And Will Eventually Become Like Central America.….

I got to think­ing recent­ly and I arrived at a cou­ple of con­clu­sions (1) The gangs doing the killings are still oper­at­ing with impuni­ty. (2) The num­ber of gangs seems to be on the increase. And (3) just how easy it was for the peo­ple to be influ­enced that good no-non­sense polic­ing atti­tude toward dan­ger­ous crim­i­nals was bad for them and the coun­try. And so I want to have a lit­tle talk with you my read­ers, rather than just talk at you.

HOW DID WE GET HERE?

It is impor­tant to remem­ber where we are com­ing from and where we are so that we may make informed deci­sions which will impact where we are going in the way we want to.
Because as the cliché goes, “if you don’t know where you are going you are already there”.
Now it is impor­tant to remem­ber that Jamaica has always been a high crime coun­try.
This is so because of the way polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence by the two polit­i­cal par­ties (a) cer­at­ed gar­ri­son com­mu­ni­ties, ren­der­ing them no go for law enforce­ment and havens for mur­der­ers and oth­er crim­i­nals. (b)Lack of resources for law enforce­ment and lack of prop­er train­ing also played a role. © The revolv­ing door for crim­i­nals cre­at­ed by the courts result­ed in apa­thy and in some cas­es crim­i­nal com­plic­i­ty by law enforce­ment.
I will attempt to show you the tra­jec­to­ry of mur­ders over the years in order to demon­strate how cer­tain fac­tors both inter­nal­ly and exter­nal­ly have helped to shape the tra­jec­to­ry of the most seri­ous crimes in our coun­try.
Jamaica record­ed the fol­low­ing num­ber of homi­cides over the fol­low­ing years.

Year# of Murders
1970152
1971145
1972170
1973227
1974195
1975266
1976367
1977409
1978381
1979351
1980899
1981490
1982405
1983424
1984484
1986449
1987442
1988414
1989439
1990543
1991561
1992629
1994690
1995780
1998953
1999849
2000887
20021045
2003975
20041471
20051674
20061340
20071574
20081601
20091680
20101428
20111125
20121097
20131200
20141005
20151192
20161350


In the year 2017, 1,616 mur­ders were report­ed to the author­i­ties. And 2018 result­ed in around 1455 homi­cides, give or take a cou­ple either way.
Now, though these homi­cide num­bers are stark, I believe they are fun­da­men­tal­ly flawed, because they only rep­re­sent killings in which vic­tims of gun­shot wounds, stab­bings, and oth­er vio­lent assaults die imme­di­ate­ly.
Not all vic­tims of vio­lent attacks die imme­di­ate­ly and so there may be anoth­er 10, 20, or even 30% more deaths which can rea­son­ably be attached to those annu­al homi­cide num­bers.
At the risk of mak­ing myself part of the nar­ra­tive which is absolute­ly not my intent, I wish to point out that between the start of the sta­tis­tics above and when I left the force in 1991 mur­ders were far too many but not over­ly astro­nom­i­cal.
When we jux­ta­pose the num­bers which exist­ed between 1982 when I joined the depart­ment (405) and 1989 (439) and the facts I laid out about polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence and lack of resources ham­string­ing the police you will also notice that homi­cides remained gen­er­al­ly steady.
We may go back and look at the years 1980 to 1981, and we will notice that those years rep­re­sent­ed the elec­tion year 1980 and 1981 the year a new admin­is­tra­tion took office and so those num­bers were anom­alies as far as the homi­cide num­bers went.
Older Jamaicans will recall the 1980 elec­tions in which an esti­mat­ed 899 Jamaicans lost their lives, large­ly as a result of polit­i­cal vio­lence and 1981 although the num­bers had dropped pre­cip­i­tous­ly to 490, those 1981 num­bers still rep­re­sent­ed a high, for a good sev­en (7) year peri­od and nev­er again reached or exceed­ed [490] until 1990 when the num­bers jumped dras­ti­cal­ly con­sid­er­ing the pre­vi­ous sev­en-year sta­bil­i­ty to 543 homi­cides.
By 1991 the year I exit­ed the force all bets were off homi­cides had moved up to 561.
Gone were the good old days in which mur­der­ers knew that it was not their streets.
So what hap­pened you ask, why is it that between the time you served and the time you left mur­ders got out of con­trol Mike?
Was it you keep­ing all those shot­tas under con­trol?
I wish I could take cred­it for it (smile) but we have to seri­ous­ly look at what hap­pened in our coun­try which caused basi­cal­ly (8) eight years of sta­ble homi­cide numbers?

Former PM Edward Seaga


THE SEAGA ADMINISTRATION
I gen­er­al­ly get killed(no not lit­er­al­ly) laugh, for dar­ing to write about pol­i­tics or the way I see it through my own eyes grow­ing up and liv­ing thir­ty (30) years of my life in my coun­try.
Many peo­ple are offend­ed they say talk only about law enforce­ment.
I gen­er­al­ly laugh at that because right here in this arti­cle we see just how pol­i­tics impacts every oth­er area of our lives.
Edward Phillip George Seaga won the 1980 gen­er­al elec­tions on a plat­form of con­ser­vatism.
It was easy for Seaga’s mes­sage to res­onate against the Manley mes­sage of self-suf­fi­cien­cy and nation­al pride.
Any mes­sage that was oppo­site to Manley’s would have res­onat­ed, peo­ple were hun­gry, store shelves were emp­ty, crime and vio­lence were every­where.
Seaga’s vic­to­ry was a dev­as­tat­ing blow to Michael Manley and the (PNP), his Conservative Jamaica Labor Party won 51 of the then 60 seats in the par­lia­ment. Many laborites sus­pect­ed Manley lost his seat but was allowed to keep it.
No evi­dence of that ever sur­faced but the whis­per­ing con­tin­ued for years.

Many Jamaicans who grew up dur­ing my time which is the 70’s and real­ly came of age in the ’80s will quick­ly argue that all politi­cians in Jamaica are cor­rupt, dis­hon­est, mon­sters.
I have no facts to counter those asser­tions but I will say that even if not total­ly true, what­ev­er Jamaicans say does have some truth in there some­where.
Edward Seaga cre­at­ed the satel­lite com­mu­ni­ty of Tivoli Gardens. Those who know a lit­tle about Jamaica’s his­to­ry will recall that Tivoli Gardens rose out of the God for­got­ten slums pre­vi­ous­ly known as (Back-o-wall).
Tivoli Gardens was a mod­ern apart­ment com­plex with ameni­ties like a park, com­mu­ni­ty cen­ter, a state of the art clin­ic etc.
[Full dis­clo­sure], my first child was born at that clin­ic because it was rumored to be the very best in the Island at the time.
Seaga was might­i­ly proud of what he cre­at­ed in that com­mu­ni­ty as he ought to be.
However, like an over-dot­ing par­ent, he failed to see that the child he gave life to was turn­ing bad.
And that was an egre­gious error in judg­ment, that baby became a mon­ster. When a child becomes that it reflects bad­ly on the par­ents.
Because of Seaga’s fail­ure to rein in Tivoli Gardens, he will for­ev­er and for the remain­der of his days be sad­dled with the infamy that that com­mu­ni­ty came to rep­re­sent.
And that is all too sad because when it came to law and order Edward Seaga nev­er stood in the way of the police doing their jobs, save and except for his delin­quent baby Tivoli Gardens.
The data demon­strates that it was under Edward Seaga’s tenure that homi­cides lev­eled off and remained con­stant.
Edward Seaga demit­ted office in (1988) and Michael Manley was back at the helm of our gov­ern­ment.
By 1990, just one year into Manley’s tenure, homi­cides jumped from (439) into the new ter­ri­to­ry of (543.

Percival James Patterson for­mer PM presided over years of cor­rup­tion and failed leadership

Homicides con­tin­ued at a mer­ry clip under Michael Manley and con­tin­ued so after he ced­ed pow­er to his inept deputy Percival Patterson.
By (2002) still with the PNP in pow­er, homi­cides had reached (1045).
In just over twelve(12) years under PNP lead­er­ship, homi­cides in Jamaica had increased by (238.041%).
We can argue along the mar­gins polit­i­cal­ly, what we can­not deny is the data.

A NEW NARRATIVE

In 2007 Orett Bruce Golding a for­mer min­is­ter of con­struc­tion under Seaga who had left the JLP and helped to form the then third par­ty the National Democratic Movement or (NDM) had returned to the JLP and was able to eke out a slim major­i­ty for the JLP.
The JLP vic­to­ry seemed at the time to be vot­er malaise and exhaus­tion from the PNP’s 1412 unbro­ken years in office and the back­ward direc­tion of the coun­try.
By (2011) Golding was forced to resign from entan­gle­ments with the Christopher Coke mat­ter.
Andrew Holness took over the lead­er­ship of the par­ty and the Government and soon sought his own man­date against the Portia Simpson Miller-led (PNP).
Holness was defeat­ed at the polls on the 5th of January 2012 and Miller served as the Prime Minister until fresh elec­tions were called on the 3rd of March 2016.
Andrew Holness’ par­ty won the elec­tions, albeit by a razor-thin one seat major­i­ty which was lat­er strength­ened by two by/​elections in which the rul­ing (JLP) pre­vailed.
The moral of the sto­ry sur­round­ing the peri­od which includ­ed Simpson Miller, Bruce Golding and Andrew Holness is sim­ply this.
Both polit­i­cal par­ties are respon­si­ble for the events as they occurred in that time peri­od and so we are left to ana­lyze what event or series of events caused both par­ties to become com­plic­it or incom­pe­tent, or both, in deal­ing with vio­lent crimes.

HUMAN RIGHTS

If I pre­tend­ed that the Jamaican police have not engaged in atro­cious behav­ior I would be lying.
If I pre­tend­ed that politi­cians, judges, lawyers, pros­e­cu­tors, and par­sons and peo­ple in every dis­ci­pline haven’s as well I would be lying.
And if I pre­tend­ed that peo­ple in lit­er­al­ly every dis­ci­pline, in every nation across the globe haven’t done the same thing.…again I would be lying.
The real­i­ty of the fore­gone is that peo­ple, regard­less of their jobs are only peo­ple who are prone to excess­es and abus­ing their pow­ers.
When that hap­pens the soci­eties in which they oper­ate must take steps to rem­e­dy those trans­gres­sions and put in place safe­guards to guard against recur­rence.
So if you have bad Pastors you do not tear down the church.
With the mul­ti­ple reports about Priest sex­u­al­ly assault­ing lit­tle boys the pow­ers that be has­n’t got­ten rid of the Catholic Church, they are work­ing to fix it.
When our police make mis­takes we fix the prob­lems and we sup­port our police, we should not tear them down.
Unfortunately, that is not what we do in Jamaica, we tear down our police and that pro­vides a wide open­ing to those who would ben­e­fit from the break­down in the rule of law.

Remember Flo O’Connor?

As ridicu­lous as the lack of sup­port for the police is, the sin­gle great­est issue in my esti­ma­tion is the influ­ence the so-called human rights lob­by has been able to wield in our coun­try.
The faith­ful obser­vance of and fideli­ty to human rights are fun­da­men­tal tem­plates of any demo­c­ra­t­ic soci­ety.
Nevertheless, human rights and nation­al secu­ri­ty are two fun­da­men­tal­ly dif­fer­ent issues, nei­ther of which are dis­pens­able or mutu­al­ly exclu­sive in a demo­c­ra­t­ic soci­ety.
Given that human rights lob­bies are not as vis­i­ble or influ­en­tial in the pow­er­ful democ­ra­cies, and since there is a kind of default pre­sump­tion that they are the tem­plate for good demo­c­ra­t­ic soci­eties, we tend to ignore the gross human rights trans­gres­sions which occur in these pow­er­ful nations.
Police abuse of peo­ple of col­or is the num­ber one human rights issue which has affect­ed peo­ple of col­or in the United States, Britain, and Canada today as it always has.
There is hard­ly any response or state­ments much less any mean­ing­ful steps tak­en on behalf of a sin­gle aggriev­ed par­ty any­where in any of the named pow­er­ful devel­oped coun­tries.
There has been zero advo­ca­cy on behalf of any killed or injured by police here in the United States to my knowledge.

Carolyn Gomes


SO WHY THE DEVELOPING WORLD?

The human rights lob­by in the devel­op­ing world in which Jamaica finds itself are gen­er­al­ly fund­ed by sup­port­ers or par­ent lob­bies in the west­ern pow­er cen­ters which are in turn fund­ed by dark mon­ey.
A coun­try which under­mines its law-enforce­ment is a coun­try with high crime sta­tis­tics. Jamaica’s crime-fight­ing efforts are direct­ed at its police offi­cers, not at the vio­lence pro­duc­ers.
Not that there can­not be an effec­tive crime-fight­ing mech­a­nism in place and vig­i­lant police over­sight simul­ta­ne­ous­ly.

Why would larg­er coun­tries want crime to increase in the devel­op­ing world?
Larger west­ern coun­tries are lenders to poor­er devel­op­ing coun­tries. They desta­bi­lize those nations because they need to keep them bor­row­ing.
A coun­try inun­dat­ed with crime has next to zero chance of climb­ing its way out of pover­ty.
Jamaica has made many tac­ti­cal mis­takes, not the least of which has been allow­ing the inter­na­tion­al human rights lob­bies to worm their influ­ence into the body politic of the coun­try.
It’s a ver­i­ta­ble dis­as­ter at this point as lit­er­al­ly every bit of leg­is­la­tion which is sup­posed to ben­e­fit the Jamaican peo­ple has to pass muster with human rights lob­bies which take orders from either the United States, Canada, or Great Britain.
Why would either of these nations care about human-rights?
They don’t!
They under­stand full well that the ques­tion of human rights is some­thing the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion will sign onto. What poor cit­i­zen­ry will not be enam­ored with the idea of a group of peo­ple who are pro­tect­ing them from the pow­er of the state?
Jamaica has long flirt­ed with wannabe police watch­dogs the likes of Flo O’Connor and oth­ers, but the coun­try com­plete­ly sold out to Carolyn Gomes and Jamaicans for Justice(JFJ).
If the safe­ty and secu­ri­ty of Jamaicans were attend­ed to with the same dili­gence and fer­vor as the influ­ence the crim­i­nal enhance­ment lob­bies have had on the deci­sion mak­ing of our coun­try we would have a very good country.

dai­ly scenes in Mexico, dai­ly scenes in Jamaica

THE END GAME

Ultimately, what will hap­pen is that the state will com­plete­ly lose con­trol. We are not far from that point, we had a glimpse of that in 2010.
In Guatemala, Mexico, Colombia, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Brazil. and Venezuela, right here in our hemi­sphere we have seen the effects of their gov­ern­men­t’s com­plic­i­ty and cow­ardice in con­fronting the dan­gers posed by gangs which lat­er metas­ta­sized into mur­der­ous drug car­tels.
Unless the Jamaican peo­ple come out from the fog cast by the crime enhance­ment lob­by Jamaica will see peo­ple leav­ing on old rick­ety rafts and old canoes try­ing to find safe har­bor.
It can still be stopped but time is run­ning out.


Young Woman Allegedly Take Own Life In Despair.…

The body of 29-year-old Nordia Markland was found hang­ing from a beam at her house last Saturday at around 4 a.m. on Shannon Lloyd Crescent in Clarendon. 

The fam­i­ly of the deceased are trau­ma­tized by the fact that a video show­ing miss Markland’s body dan­gling from the beam has been doing the rounds on social media.
They are also upset that peo­ple who have seen the video has char­ac­ter­ized her as wicked and has cre­at­ed their own nar­ra­tive as to the rea­son she alleged­ly took her own life. 



Distraught rel­a­tives say miss Markland was depressed after the death of her father, she had to bury a cousin short­ly after.
We have the video but have opt­ed not to post it out of def­er­ence and respect to her and her fam­i­ly.
Mental ill­ness and depres­sion are real issues which affect untold num­bers of peo­ple, many of whom suf­fer in silence. 

The grief and deep depres­sion which would cause some­one to see no way out forc­ing them to ulti­mate­ly take their own life can­not be reduced to some­one’s opin­ion of the deceased.
It must be under­stood against the pre­cious nature of life and the sheer hope­less­ness which the vic­tim must have felt which caused him/​her to end that one pre­cious life.

Racist Shows Up To Harass Black Woman At Press Conference Announcing He Won’t Be Charged For Harassing Black Woman

There is some­thing about some of us Jamaicans, not all I have to admit. But there is a kind of fire which burns in our bel­lies. A fire which would cause us rather die on our feet than live on our knees.
Maybe it is that west African Coromantee, blood which flows through our veins, that which heats up when we hear about inci­dents like the fol­low­ing.
Incidents which in most cas­es draws not even a bit of care much less anger from others.

Imagine some­one harass­ing you to the point that you are forced to quit your job? Imagine that you have nev­er both­ered that person/​s?
You see, it is hard for me to fath­om because I was always of the opin­ion that no one, no man or woman, have a greater right to be on this plan­et than I do.
On that basis, I will not tread on your space but so help me God if you ever tread on my space.
After all, we all have just one life and what’s the point of liv­ing it if you can­not live it in peace?


Kiah Morris (left), Max Misch (right)
Screenshot: AP/​Twitter



At a press con­fer­ence, Monday, Vermont’s chief law enforce­ment offi­cer almost com­plet­ed one of the great­est per­for­mances of white­s­plain­ing in recent his­to­ry as he announced that he wouldn’t file charges against a white nation­al­ist who alleged­ly stalked, harassed and ter­ri­fied one of the state’s only black law­mak­ers.
As Vermont Attorney General T.J. Donovan described the volu­mi­nous evi­dence, he point­ed out that he didn’t have enough evi­dence. He explained how hate speech was a mat­ter of free speech. He explained that the harass­ment against the black fam­i­ly was bad, but that it wasn’t a crime. All the while, the woman was the tar­get of the inces­sant acts of hate stood beside him as he shucked and jived.


Then the racists showed up.
According to WNYT, On Monday, Vermont Attorney General T.J Donovan held a press con­fer­ence at the Congregation Beth El syn­a­gogue in Bennington, Vt. to announce that, instead of fil­ing charges, he would instead release a 10-page report on the racial harass­ment of for­mer State Rep. Kiah Morris, the state’s only black woman state rep­re­sen­ta­tive who resigned in September after alleged­ly being harangued by white suprema­cist Max Misch, who describes him­self the man who “be rep­re­sent­ing dem white muh­fuck­az of Bennington.”

Seven Days Vermont reports:

The press con­fer­ence went off the rails when Bennington res­i­dent Max Misch entered the room as Morris answered a tele­vi­sion reporter’s ques­tion about the AG’s probe. Misch had been sub­ject to a year­long pro­tec­tive order in 2016 pro­hibit­ing him from con­tact­ing Morris over a series of racist tweets, mes­sages and online com­ments he aimed at her.

Misch wore a black long-sleeve shirt bear­ing the image of alt-right icon Pepe the Frog. Many in the room began shout­ing “No, no, no!” and “Out!” when he arrived.

This is not safe,” one per­son shout­ed. “Why is this ass­hole allowed to come in here?” some­one else in the crowd said.

Because it’s America,” anoth­er attendee replied. “We have to lis­ten to every­one, whether we like it or not. But we don’t have to put up with it.”

Also in atten­dance was Kevin Hoyt, a failed Republican can­di­date who has accused Morris and her hus­band of incit­ing oth­ers to paint him as a Nazi. Hoyt says he is a vic­tim of reverse racism after his request for a stalk­ing order of pro­tec­tion against Morris’ hus­band was reject­ed by a judge. The hunt­ing expert and gun advo­cate has repeat­ed­ly insin­u­at­ed that Morris and her hus­band were fab­ri­cat­ing their claims to make Vermont look like a state that tol­er­ates racism.

I call bull­shit on Ms. Morris!” yelled Hoyt. “As a polit­i­cal oppo­nent who was accused of being a Nazi, I think we’re hear­ing one side of the sto­ry … I was called a Nazi, I was called a white suprema­cist. Obviously, racism exists in Vermont … I ques­tion to what degree, though.”

After win­ning a House seat in the state leg­is­la­ture, Morris gave up her re-elec­tion bid before resign­ing in September, cit­ing her husband’s open-heart surgery com­bined with Hoyt and Misch’s con­tin­ued online cam­paign of harass­ment. Citing tweets that told her to “Go back to Africa, it’s the only place you’ll ever be safe,” The Attorney general’s report list­ed forty-eight sep­a­rate racial inci­dents where Morris had been threat­ened and attacked, including:

  • A mes­sage to Morris’ hus­band inform­ing him that he should put his wife “in her place,” or the mes­sen­ger would do it for him;
  • A tweet that read: “You will nev­er silence me. Every time you attend a polit­i­cal ral­ly at the Four Corners or anoth­er local venue and I’m aware of the event, I will troll the hell out of you and the oth­er sub­ver­sives there. Maybe I’ll bring a friend or three with me too;”
  • Someone paint­balling Morris’ car and spray paint­ing a swasti­ka on a tree near Morris’ home;
  • Another tweet said, “Stop push­ing ‘social jus­tice’ on your near­ly entire­ly White con­stituen­cy in Bennington, VT. Go back to Chicago if you want to engage in SJW [Social Justice Warrior] bull­shit. We will con­tin­ue to fight against your efforts to make our town/​state look more like your mon­grel son;”
  • Multiple reports to police of strange men and sus­pi­cious vehi­cles in the ceme­tery behind Morris’ home;
  • A break-in at the Morris home where Morris’ husband’s neck­ties were stolen and found in the ceme­tery (Police did not fin­ger­print or swab the crime scene);
  • Morris’ child care provider report­ing a man sit­ting in a car out­side the home film­ing the Morris residence;

Donovan con­clud­ed that there was not enough evi­dence to charge Misch with any crimes, not­ing that there was a lack of evi­dence. “No Vermont court has specif­i­cal­ly con­sid­ered whether com­mu­ni­ca­tions like those sent to Ms. Morris could be con­strued as ‘true threats,’” Donovan’s find­ings read, adding:

In this case, the online com­mu­ni­ca­tions that were sent to Ms. Morris by Max Misch and oth­ers were clear­ly racist and extreme­ly offen­sive However, the First Amendment does not make speech sanc­tion­able mere­ly because its con­tent is objec­tion­able. The ques­tion here is whether the mes­sages, in con­text, were com­mu­ni­cat­ing a seri­ous expres­sion of an intent to harm Ms. Morris or her fam­i­ly. The fact that a num­ber of mes­sages were direct­ed at her role as an elect­ed offi­cial rais­es the issue of whether they were intend­ed to express polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion through the use of hyper­bole and insult, as not­ed in the case law above. Therefore, there appears to be insuf­fi­cient evi­dence to pur­sue crim­i­nal charges under Vermont law.

Kiah Morris was a vic­tim of racial harass­ment. Relatively few Vermonters have had any of these expe­ri­ences, and very few have had these expe­ri­ences in the con­text of vicious racial harass­ment,” Donovan said, accord­ing to the Washington Post. But, he added, “the Constitution does not per­mit us to pros­e­cute racist speech because we find it offensive.”

Meanwhile, Morris stood in the face of her harassers and the attor­ney gen­er­al, not­ing that law enforce­ment offi­cers had shrugged off her claims.“For two years, we lived in my husband’s child­hood home, feel­ing unsafe, nev­er sleep­ing peace­ful­ly because we had to be vig­i­lant,” said Morris, “We did every­thing we were told to do. We report­ed as we should, held noth­ing back and trust­ed in a sys­tem that was insuf­fi­cient and inept at address­ing and repair­ing the harm done.” So there you have it. It was just polit­i­cal expres­sion and free speech, which is apt­ly expressed in the Vermont state motto:

Freedom and Unity.