The mistake the cops made in Spalding yesterday was in not shooting the attacking mob leaders dead!!!
Attack a police officer in any country on this planet and if you live to regret it you will really regret it, I mean really regret it. In America attacking a police officer even without a weapon could be automatic death, and if you survive to talk about it, you will have years in prison to consider your actions. I recently watched a video of a woman who attacked Russian cops with her hands and their response was brutish. Literally shocking was the level of force the officers employed to the attacker who was a woman no less. Whether we agree with the level of force employed by the officer under attack is neither here nor there. Wrong or right that is his/her call to make when he/she feels his/her life threatened. Every officer of the law, like everyone else, has an expectation that they will finish their shift and go home to their families without being assaulted, abused or worse. He/she alone gets to make that call and the laws should back that officer fully everywhere.
Why is it then that Jamaicans living at home feel that they have a license to attack police officers who are doing their jobs? Before we examine those reasons, it is important to acknowledge that when Jamaicans set foot overseas, they are keenly conversant that what they do at home will not fly in other countries. Even within the CARICOM region in which Jamaicans are supposed to be able to travel relatively freely, member states still sometimes nuance the rules of the CARICOM charter to allow their law-enforcement to be particularly wary and vigilant to the presence of Jamaicans traveling to their countries. The record of criminal activity is undeniable and there should be no conversation around what are undeniable facts. In the past police officials have ridiculed Jamaicans who complain about the treatment they receive when they visit their country and are singled out for special treatment, “this is not Jamaica.“ Clear references that they will not tolerate the kind of lawlessness which exist in Jamaica in their countries.
There is no secret that Jamaica is and has always been a very violent and lawless country. In response to the lawlessness and violence, the strategy has been to tighten control over the police service, effectively rendering officers “paper tigers” through a series of legislation under the guise that they are transforming the police force into professional police services. Now, there is a conversation to be had around the reasons behind the strategy to muzzle and handcuff the police. Not the least of which is the corrupt nature of the politicians who populate both political parties. A police department beholden to them and incapable of conducting intelligent investigations is incapable of stopping their rapacious assault against the people’s resources.
Rather than change the paradigm after the militia uprising of 2010 in support of drug lord Christopher Duddus Coke both political parties doubled down on stupid, or should I say doubled down on criminal acquiescence and gave the country INDECOM. That is the legacy of the Duddus supporter Orett Bruce Golding, who was forced from office for standing in the way of the extradition of a known drug lord and criminal kingpin, who has been accused of being a merciless murderer. After the security forces liberated Tivoli Gardens from the control of that scum kingpin and annexed it to the rest of the Island, both political parties banded together to condemn the security forces for acting decisively toward the kingpin and his militia. Although the Americans prevailed in having Coke extradited, the message to the criminal underworld was clear. “We are with you don’t worry”.
The incident in Manchester yesterday in which a bus driver felt emboldened to psychically attack a uniformed police officer doing his job, and the ensuing mêlée and destruction of property by the band of dumb animals must be laid squarely at the feet of the political class. My problem with the actions of the officers is that because of fear that the Government has instituted in them through INDECOM as a harassment agency, the officers missed an opportunity to send a clear message. Jamaica has far too many opinionated idiots to function as a modern society. My only problem with the cops involved is that they retreated, that’s not police training. Police training dictates that in situations like the one they faced they stand their ground back to back, train their weapons to the head of the lead attackers and as soon as they step forward to cause harm to them, methodical and systematical shoot to kill. Let’s see how many would keep stepping forward. That’s what I fault the officers with, but they do not make them like they used to.
Here are some of the rioters who destroyed government property
At the end of the day what we need to do is to ignore the continuous talking from the shitheads and come to the realization that there is no prosperity to be delivered by the JLP, and damn sure no alternative growth path by the criminal supporting PNP in this madness and chaos. That is why we need to shut INDECOM down now, send Hamish Campbell home and take back our country from this madness. If any of these officers are charged with anything there should be hell to pay by INDECOM. The fact that Jamaica continues to struggle with corruption according to Transparency International is proof positive that the facts are on our side and not on the side of the Island’s leadership. The fraudulent witnesses whom I have been writing about for years, who are nurtured and promoted by the criminal supporting press must not be allowed to place another police officer on suspension. If INDECOM continues to be a clear enhancer of this kind of assault on our police, steps must be taken to ensure that INDECOM does not destroy the life of another hard-working police officer. The same methodologies which are applied to INDECOM should be applied to those who support that criminal enhancement agency. No country which supports criminals at the expense of its law enforcement agents can be successful, corrupt country, no investment. Jamaica’s criminal politicians surely cannot continue to fool the majority of the people forever.
Most importantly, through the proliferation of smartphones and CCTV cameras, the lie which the anti-police media gave legitimacy to are being exposed. The real question after many years in which lying criminals turn up to give false evidence against the police must be, how many police officers lives have been ruined as a result? This writer has been making the case that this practice which is aided and abetted by the media has resulted in a lot of the cases against officers ended up failing to meet the most basic prosecutorial standards because they were fraudulent from the start.
Not too long ago I wrote about the fact that the Democratic party and the moderates who run it, still cling to the misguided idea that they can continue to be Republican-lite and still hold together the varied mosaic coalition which now defines the party. For a long time, the Democratic party straddled the fence on social issues, by avoiding the liberal label, managing to win national office, but losing badly to Republicans at the state and local levels. Not standing up for social justice as the party should, even as the Republican party has made clear that it stands opposed to any kind of social justice and consolidates itself into a white people’s political party. The rise of Donald Trump to take over what was left of the party transformed by Newt Gingrich, and the silent acquiescence of the whipped into shape remainder of the elected Republicans, made it clear that the Republican party is now a white power party.
The truth is that many Democratic strategists and talking heads have missed the signs just as badly as the politicians have. The old coalition of so-called blue-collar workers, code for (uneducated whites), which formed the core of the old Democratic party, has been shattered by the power of targeted strategies bankrolled by billionaires like Charles and David Koch. In States like Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan assaults against Unions by bought and paid for Republican politicians like Scott Walker, who was recently defeated in Wisconsin, and Rick Snyder in Michigan, all but rendered the unions powerless as states under Republican leadership adopt right to work laws which eviscerated the unions.
As the political landscape continues to shift, many of those so-called blue-collar workers have moved on to the Republican party which has sold them a bill of goods based on the color of their skin. For the most part identity politics have taken over for those voters, even though their interest is more aligned with the policies of the Democratic party. White identity politics present a stronger pull than the pocketbook needs these voters had which were better addressed by Democratic policies.
If I said it once, I must have said it a thousand times, the Republican party has clearly defined lines of demarcation. The Democratic party bleeds voters to Bernie Sanders, Jill Stein and every other fly-by-night who comes along because progressives who once supported the Democratic party no longer wants a tepid party which is still searching for its own identity. Yet the party still struggles with its messaging, even after Ralph Nader gave us George Bush and Bernie Sanders gave us Donald Trump, the Democratic party and its boneheaded strategists still cling to the idea that the party needs to stick with centrist wishy-washy policy positions. Television talking heads who are unable to read the tea leaves yap about the need for the party to maintain a centrist position, despite the clear and decisive upset win in New York by Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, the rise of Stacy Abrams in Georgia, Andrew Gillum’s and Beto Orourke’s near win in Florida and Texas respectively, but most of all the repudiation of Claire McCaskill in Missouri.
The Democratic party today has as its most loyal base African-Americans, who continue to vote in overwhelming numbers in support of Democratic candidates wherever they are. Including in the ruby red state of Alabama. Yet the party has failed to address the needs of its most loyal base. Something no one could ever accuse Republicans of doing. Despite the societal and social ills which confront the African-American community, police violence and abuse, poverty, housing, and lending discrimination and the long list of maladies associated with being black in America, the party has remained silent as “Black lives matter” has been cast in the media as a pseudo-terrorist organization. Still, the party fail to understand why the likes of former Starbucks CEO, billionaire, Howard Schultz would see an opening which gives him the idea he could be the next billionaire President(assuming that Trump is). Democrats are complaining that Schultz would inexorably siphon off votes from them ostensibly handing a second term to Donald Trump. How about positioning the party in a clear direction, so that the likes of Schultz see no opening to run for president and more importantly support your base. How about not having to beg people not to run?
In a recent article, the New York Times contended that the Democratic candidates have all expressed sorrow for positions they took in the past as the diverse coalition which makes up the party is far less forgiving of candidates who do not understand their complex needs. Despite the clear lurch to the right the Republican party has taken, the Democratic party still meanders along as the party which isn’t the Republican party. Devoid of character, devoid of a clear identity. Recent reports indicate that because of the clear progressive stance many new house members and state representatives have taken, former vice president Joe Biden is still weighing whether he can mount a viable candidacy for the nomination of his party. Real Democratic voters do not want a wishy-washy Republican-lite party. They need a political party which represents their interest.
In an address to the University of the West Indies Leaders Engaged, Activated, and Dedicated Annual Breakfast held at The Knutsford Court Hotel in New Kingston on January 27th, Government Senator Kamina Johnson-Smith sought to allay the growing concerns that women are being employed at twice the rate of men.
Johnson Smith insisted that space has to be made for women who have been shackled by cultural norms. “I don’t think to promote women in a situation where women have not been promoted before in a space that has been predominantly male, that it means male marginalization. “I am always quite surprised at how easy it is for conversations to change nowadays to male marginalization when you are speaking about male empowerment.”
One of the reasons we cannot solve problems for our people is that we refuse to accept facts as facts and work from those baselines. Former President Barack Obama lamented the very same thing after leaving office. Speaking to Republican intransigence and the reasons nothing gets done Obama argued,“When we cannot agree on a baseline of facts, it is literally impossible to accomplish anything.“ In Jamaica, like in the US, politicians are willing to ignore data, facts which do not support their narrative are discarded as opinions and left to die on the workroom floor and policies are developed which end up having the opposite effect of what they were intended. All because policy-makers have their own agendas which generally does not line up with the will of the majority.
It is important to consider that while Johnson-Smith was heaping scorn on the data which had been released by the Statistical Institute of Jamaica, showing that female workers are being employed at twice the rate of men. And while addressing a group of people from the University of the West Indies, that very institution is having severe problems fielding a balanced slate of freshman students each year. Someone in that group could have directed the Senator to the ghastly freshman numbers at the UWI each year in which females are up to 85% of the freshman class, year after year.
There are exponentially more all-girls schools in Jamaica than boy schools. There are also myriad agencies dedicated to the support and upliftment of girls and women. I have listed a few here for the benefit of the Senator’s education and fidelity to truth. (1) The Bureau of Women’s Affairs (gender affairs)Act as a catalyst to ensure that the Government addresses the problems that confront women, given the impact of patriarchy and sexism. (2) Woman Incorporated (Crisis Centre) Offering crisis counseling, referral services, and a 24-hour hotline. The issues addressed by Woman Inc. include rape, incest, domestic violence, domestic crisis, and sexual harassment. (3) Sistren Theatre Collective Brings pressure to bear on society to change negative stereotypes of women. (4) Women’s Centre Of Jamaica Foundation Objective is to motivate young mothers to choose education instead of continuous motherhood. (5) Women’s Media Watch The organization works to improve the images of women in the media. (6) Women’s Resource And Outreach Centre Provides a place for women and youth in the Lyndhurst and Greenwich community to learn the route self-empowerment.
This list does not begin to scratch the surface but it gives clear and unequivocal examples of the disparity in support services and to whom they are dedicated. It would be interesting to have the good Senator or one of her lackeys furnish me with a list of equivalent service organizations dedicated to the upliftment and support of boys and men.
These are American youth, but wherever the youth is ignored the consequences are dire.
(1) The Bureau of Women’s Affairs The bureau’s mandate to act as a catalyst to ensure that the Government addresses the problems that confront women, given the impact of patriarchy and sexism. (2) Woman Incorporated (Crisis Centre) Offering crisis counseling, referral services, and a 24-hour hotline. The issues addressed by Woman Inc. Includes rape, incest, domestic violence, domestic crisis, and sexual harassment. (3) Sistren Theatre Collective Brings pressure to bear on society to change negative stereotypes of women. (4) Women’s Centre Of Jamaica Foundation Established in response to the high level of teenage pregnancy (5) Women’s Media Watch Works to improve the images of women in the media as one way of reducing violence. (6) Women’s Resource And Outreach Centre (WROC) Provides a place for women and youth in the Lyndhurst and Greenwich community to learn the route to self-empowerment.
In a typical family in which resources are scarce, the boy is left to fend for himself while the single mother, or both parents dedicated themselves to sending the girls to school. Jamaica’s youth is in crisis, but nowhere is it more evident than in the male population. The sad reality is that the women are getting an education and the boys are seeking commensurate power and respect through the barrel of a gun. How will the nation move forward when a Government Senator ignores empirical data in order to push a feminist agenda which is exacting incredible costs on the country in blood and treasure? In the push to level the playing field and establish equity, the feminist movement does not care about any outcome except the outcomes which justify quotas in women’s favor, regardless of the consequences. A rising tide raises all boats. If we are to have a better and just society we work for a society in which all are treated equally. While the women take on jobs clearly some are not cut out for in the quest for political correctness the men stand on the corners crushing weed in the middle of their hands. Later on, society pays dearly when they decide to take out their anger for their lack of relevance and the perception that the game is rigged against them. Guess what it is.
The young Jamaican male has become the caricature of what the feminist movement casts him to be. Pants sagging off his ass, Guinness stout under one arm, while he crushes dried Ganga in his palm. A good for nothing male product of the patriarchy who sires multiple children, none of whom he supports. He is violent and spontaneous and is predisposed to using violence as a means of conflict resolution. Sounds about right ‑right? Well, if you think the murder statistics are frightening now, swallow the nonsense of Kamina Johnson-Smith and ignore the data. I’ll hope to see you on the other side of the revolution.
Is there anyone else as annoyed as I am at the US Senator from South Carolina, no, not the Black one, the one who called himself a friend of John McCain but has become Donald Trump’s water boy, (speaking of Lindsay Graham). What the hell happened to this guy? Was he always this full of it while John McCain was alive or has something sinister happened to Lindsay Graham?
Every year thousands and thousands of raids are carried out in neighborhoods across the country by the thousands of militarized police departments. These militarized raids are generally carried out in black and brown neighborhoods, sometimes with devastating consequences for residents of the properties on which these raids are executed. Far too often the information which precipitated the raids are faulty, and even fraudulent, resulting ostensibly in devastating consequences for innocent victims who are left to pick up the pieces.
I have never ever heard Lindsay Graham condemn the police for acting inappropriately or abusing their powers. In 2014 Cops in Georgia acting as if they were soldiers on a battlefield critically injured 19-month-old Bounkham Phonesavanh — known as “Baby Bou Bou.” Serving a late-night “no-knock” warrant on May 28, 2014, at a home where they believed Bou Bou’s father’s nephew, a suspected meth dealer, was staying when they lobbed a flash-bang grenade inside. The nephew wasn’t home, and the grenade — designed to disorient its target — landed in Bou Bou’s crib. The cops lied to the court but were nevertheless found not guilty for almost killing the innocent child. Lindsay Graham did not have a word of condemnation for the overzealous wannabe soldiers who almost killed an innocent baby. But the South Carolina Senator has written to the FBI demanding answers on why the agency did not simply ask Roger Stone the Trump associate to turn himself in.
Lindsay Graham
The FBI turned up in force and arrested Roger Stone early in the morning as they do in most other cases when they need to arrest criminal suspects. That includes Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s personal lawyer. I believe anyone not living under a rock already knows who Roger Stone is. I mean the guy is as old as a rock and has prided himself as a political dirty trickster of sorts from as far back as the Reagan years, maybe as far back as Nixon’s days. Finally, Stone’s luck has run out and he has been indicted by Special Counsel Robert Muller’s team for his part in the ongoing investigations into alleged Russian collusion with the Trump campaign in the 2016 General elections. Why is Lindsay Graham sticking his nose into an active investigation over which he has no control? To begin with, the FBI has evidence that Graham does not have. Lindsay Graham, though a US Senator, has no jurisdiction, authority or control over either the FBI, or the Muller Investigations and as such the agency do not have to even respond to Senator Grahams posturing.
If we set aside those raids in which law enforcement break down doors only to realize that the information on which they acted was false or misleading. And if we set aside the cases in which they break down doors and arrest real suspects in the all too familiar military-style raids, we would still be left with the hundreds and hundreds of people of color, generally young black men who are murdered by police across the country each year and Lindsay Graham has never found his voice to speak out against those atrocities. What Lindsay Graham is doing as a result of his grandstanding is demanding a separate set of rules for white men with power. No knock raids and raids like that carried out at Roger Stone’s house, you know where the FBI agents knocked and demanded that Stone open the door should only happen to “those people”, people of color and poor people who do not matter. The FBI, I am sure, have several reasons why they did not ask Roger Stone to report to be arraigned. Not the least of which could be that he may potentially destroy evidence germane to their investigations. Roger Stone has dared the agency to come and arrest him. He had T‑shirts made up daring the Muller team and have told everyone who would listen that he expected that he would be indicted. Guess what, they may have done just that. Roger Stone may also have posed a flight risk, we do not know and neither does the Senator from South Carolina. All in all Roger Stone deserved no more deference that the guy on the street. Yet he was quick to tell the truth that the FBI Agents were really quite courteous to him. Lindsay Graham in seeking to be Trump’s water boy, is making a royal jackass of himself. John McCain would not recognize Lindsay Graham as a result of just how low he has sunken.
Detectives assigned to the Spanish Town Criminal Investigation Branch are probing the circumstances surrounding the shooting deaths of a man and a woman on Old Harbour Road in Spanish Town, St Catherine on Thursday. Those killed are 21-year-old Vaughn Smith, otherwise called ‘Mr. Cool’, and 19-year-old Serena Kerr, both of Shelter Rock in Spanish Town. The police say about 2:30 p.m, residents heard explosions in the area went to investigate and discovered the bodies.The police say Smith and Kerr were found lying in blood with gunshot wounds to the upper body.
As per usual, the report to the police is just that it will take time for a full investigative narrative to take shape., so we await the results of a full investigation. In the meantime, the streets are talking and the story being told while sad causes one to wonder what was the decedent Vaughn Smith’s intention? Word on the streets is that Vaughn encouraged Serena to accompany him to go purchase a gun and that did not go so well. Unconfirmed reports indicate the young couple was robbed of their cash and then murdered by the men who were supposed to sell them the weapon/s.
It is always sad when someone loses his or her life, nevertheless, these are some of the consequences of those kinds of actions. If the reporting is correct, one has to assume that the intention of the deceased were less than pure. As tragic as this case is, it may very well be a case of early karma.
The 2020 presidential candidate has faced down creepy gossip about a past relationship for 20 years. It should stop — now. By Joan Walsh
Democratic women had a lot to celebrate this weekend. With the formal entrance of California Senator Kamala Harris to the 2020 presidential race, it was official: Three of the top prospects are women. Although Senators Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand have merely said they’re exploring a run, both women drew big crowds on their first trip to Iowa, which holds its first-in-the-nation caucuses next February 3. (Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard has also announced, but she has yet to hold a campaign event or confirm hiring staff.) Warren’s strong start led The Guardian’s Ben Jacobs to anoint her as the Iowa “frontrunner,” even as national polls show former vice president Joe Biden and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders in the lead.
Kamala Harris, at least temporarily, blew by Warren on Sunday, drawing a crowd of more than 20,000 to her hometown of Oakland, California, for her official announcement. To be fair, since neither Gillibrand nor Warren has declared, they have not yet invested the money or advance work into staging this kind of super-event. It wasn’t just the adoring crowds, though: I’ve been covering Harris for 16 years, since her first race for San Francisco district attorney in 2003, and I’ve never seen her so inspiring, quoting Frederick Douglass and Bobby Kennedy.
“When we have children in cages crying for their mothers and fathers, don’t you dare call it border security,” she declared mid-speech. “That’s a human-rights abuse and that’s not our America.” I don’t have a candidate; I hope to stay neutral in this thrilling and historic 2020 race at least until 2020 — but Sunday was a great day for Democratic women, whoever you support. Except when it wasn’t: The day began with the right wing buzzing over a supposed bombshell from former San Francisco mayor Willie Brown, “confirming” what has never been a secret, in his gadfly weekly column for the San Francisco Chronicle: that he dated Harris in the mid-1990s, when he was running for mayor. “Extramarital affair with Kamala Harris?” Fox News blared. “Former San Francisco Mayor, 84, admits it happened.” Townhall, RedState, WorldNetDaily, American Thinker and a host of other wingnut sites piled on, some more pervy than others (I won’t give them the traffic by linking). But mainstream outlets picked up the news, too. “Willie Brown on Kamala Harris: ‘We dated. I influenced her career,’” USA Today told us. NBC political reporter Jonathan Allen confessed on Twitter that “both Republicans & Democrats have whispered ‘Willie Brown’ to me in recent weeks when the subject of Harris’ run has come up. That’ll hurt her, they say.” Allen, correctly, went on to predict the whispers will “backfire” on Harris’s opponents. But the whispering — and shouting — is appalling, on so many levels.
For one thing, it shows the short memories and/or disturbing laziness of many political reporters: Brown can’t “admit” to anything that’s been well known in San Francisco political circles since it was going on, in the mid-1990s. Harris’s relationship with Brown came up frequently when she ran for DA in 2003. In fact, it was an enormous issue: She faced down charges that he’d helped her career — and he probably did; what successful pol hasn’t had help from someone powerful? — and given her two plum state-commission assignments. Worse than that were the lurid rumors about their relationship I heard “on background” — from other Democrats. It was sexist and appalling — the sex lives of California Democrats like Brown himself, and many of his contemporaries, burnished their legends. Harris’s romantic past was supposed to shame and sideline her. It sickened me, and I wrote that at the time. In the end, it was her own work in the San Francisco and Alameda County DA’s offices, not Brown’s “help,” that convinced voters to take a chance on Harris, and reject the aging progressive incumbent Terence Hallinan (who was himself accused of sexual harassment by several women while he served on the Board of Supervisors; he settled with one out of court). Now, some are claiming that Harris is hiding her past with Brown; apparently, she didn’t mention him in her new book, The Truths We Hold: An American Journey. Newsflash: This happened almost a quarter-century ago. She was around 30. No one has an obligation to discuss the men they dated that long ago. Early in her career, she was open about it: She had to be. The night Brown was elected as mayor she shared the stage, and famously presented him with a baseball cap emblazoned “Da Mayor.” (You can easily find the photo on the Google.)
Others are taking a moralizing approach: Brown was “married,” so she conducted an extramarital affair. Newsflash: While living in the San Francisco Bay Area and even working under Speaker Willie Brown in the California State Assembly, it took me years to learn that the Democratic leader was still married. That’s because he was a notorious womanizer, who used to joke that his age, combined with his girlfriend’s, could never break 100 (at 84, he better have relaxed those rules, lest he breaks the law). He nonetheless remained close to his wife; he reportedly promised he would never divorce her. Still, the late, legendary columnist San Francisco columnist Herb Caen even predicted Brown and Harris would marry. Read more here: https://www.thenation.com/article/kamala-harris-willie-brown/
The crisis in Venezuela should be worked out by the Venezuelan people and should under no circumstances be engineered by any foreign power. At the moment the United States is conducting an aggressive investigation into alleged Russian interference into its 2016 elections. As such, the US has no authority to tip the scales in Venezuela one way or the other and neither does any other nation.
Nicolas Maduro
What is right for the United States must also be right for the rest of the world. But you wouldn’t know it from listening to über -war-hawk John Bolton, Donald Trump’s national security adviser. Bolton, a well-known warmonger who would never allow an opportunity to go to war to go unexploited, wormed his way into the Trump administration and got the job he wanted, that of national security adviser. Donald Trump campaigned on pulling America out of what he called “stupid wars,” in his unique incoherent gibberish, Trump managed to articulate a policy which indicated that he did not believe in an America in which the country is the policeman of the world.
Juan Guaidó
Despite those self-serving protestations by Trump, his administration has moved to recognize Juan Guido’s decision to declare himself interim president of Venezuela. The Trump administration has also taken steps to hand to Juan Guido the accounts that Venezuela has outside the country. Those moves are designed to topple the presidency of Nicolas Maduro. Regardless of what one thinks of Nicolas Maduro’s presidency or the way he acquired it, it is inconceivable to imagine a scenario in which the United States would allow a foreign power to actively decide who is president of the United States. Or is it? Without foreign currency, Venezuela cannot conduct business and the Venezuelan economy will ostensibly collapse.
John Bolton
Donald Trump preaches America First, he rarely invokes democracy and human rights and has expressed glowing admiration for dictators such as Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un. Siding with Juan Guido supposedly to restore democracy in Venezuela rings hollow. The Atlantic argued: Asked to explain the president’s anomalous stance on Maduro during a conference call with reporters on Wednesday, a senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, noted that both Venezuela and the United States are bound to a multinational charter they adopted in 2001 that enshrines representative democracy as the prevailing political system in the Western hemisphere. But the rationale rang hollow. If we’ve learned one thing from Trump’s presidency, it’s that he doesn’t feel the least bit tethered to international agreements when he believes they aren’t in the national interest.
Asked about the potential of a military incursion into Venezuela, John Bolton remarked to the press that the President has maintained that all options are on the table. Bolton tried to make the case that such actions would be to protect Americans in Venezuela. All options should not be on the table if America simply brings its diplomats home. Countries kick diplomats out all the time. This time should be no different. As the crisis in Trump’s presidency heightens it seems like yet another wag-the-dog military exercise could be in the works to distract attention away from a floundering presidency. America has a chief executive who has been named as a co-conspirator in a felony. There is a productive and ever threatening Special Counsel investigation which seems set to engulf Donald Trump. His border wall inspired Government shutdown ended after 35 days with the Democrats holding fast under the leadership of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s leadership. With little to no legislative accomplishments to point to and another presidential campaign beginning to take shape on the horizon. The sad yet dangerous irony in all of this is that a presidency which came into existence on the promise to extricate America from stupid wars,[sic] may very well be contemplating starting another stupid war, with the express intent of building public support for a presidency many deem illegitimate.
It is a tragedy that Jamaica’s leaders stick their noses into places where they ought not to, yet are totally clueless about how to fix the existential crises the Island faces at home. The Prime Minister travelled all the way to apartheid Israel to hobnob with the racist, megalomaniac Benjamin Netanyahu last year. And of course the pathetic opposition (PNP) is dead set on it’s support for the Venezuelan wannabe strongman Nicolas Maduro.
While Jamaica sticks it’s nose into international affairs which it has no business doing, the unchecked killings continue unabated across the country as a result of policies enacted by both the governing (JLP) and the opposition(PNP). Front and center of the debate is how to control the spate of killings across the Island, the vast majority of which never gets solved.
The thugs who take life when they feel like it, has long demonstrated that they are no longer afraid or concerned about the police. Additionally, the supposed awe that they once harbored at the sight of the military in the streets has long faded. On that score, the old adage ” familirity breeds contempt” is appropriate. Soldiers have been doing some policing duties for years. The shock and awe at the sight of the military on the streets are replaced with shrugs and yawns.
The nation’s laws are made by imperfect people, many of whom are heavily invested in the personal outcomes, country be damned. Trial lawyers with no allegiance to the country double as legislators. They pass laws which further hamstrung the police and empower those who would be their future clients. But it’s not just as simple as trial lawyers being legislators, it is as serious as actual legislators being active criminals. The pathetic excuse for a national security minister (Horace Chang) stands before a crowd in St James and tells the police not to infringe on the rights of any of the people in the parish ( surrounded by his police detail). Not that he needed the police detail, the real security are the goons in the garrisons whom their policies protect. He had not one syllable of [charge] to the people to obey the laws, to be respectful of the police and to help the police in their fight against crime.
Of course, this should come as no surprise, Horace Chang is in charge of one of the toughest garrisons in the parish of St James if not the entire Island. The people who head the national security apparatus are also in charge of the [favelas] in which the criminals have safe-haven with dangerous high powered weapons. No, this is not about party politics, the Opposition leader also oversees a garrison in which the number of votes cast always exceed the number of electors living in the constituency.
It has never been that the police were incapable of dealing with the killings. What has transpired over the years is that the two political parties have embarked on a process which undermines the rule of law in the country while they pilfer from the scarce resources which ought to go toward running the country. They relish in taking away choice from the population, which is largely illiterate and totally beholden to the political dogma they are fed. In order to pull that scam on the masses they needed a scapegoat and so the police found itself caught between the two gangs which run the country and those which enforces the code on the streets.
Because we cannot afford to violate their human and civil rights. By the 22nd of Janauary last year 100 homicides were reported to the police. That number meant that just under 5 Jamaicans were killed each day. This year has started off on a gallop as well but never mind people are dying everywhere right? I wonder how those people feel about their human rights, or better yet, I wonder how they feel about losing the most precious gift ever given, the gift of life? I guess we will never know.
Ex-Police Constable Collis Chucky Brown has been sentenced to life in prison in the so-called death squad case. His sentence stems from three counts of murder and wounding with intent. He must serve 51 years in prison before he is eligible for parole. More to come.….
It is hard to imagine a case in which the People’s National Party has made a greater ass of itself than getting involved in the events in Venezuela on the side of illegitimate President Nicolas Maduro. It is remarkable, yet totally predictable that the (PNP) would mistake a man who rigged the vote and made himself President to be a [duly elected] president.
As is to be expected the local media houses also jumped onto the bandwagon in support of Maduro under the same guise. The fact that the United States to a large extent have supported and may have been instrumental in Mr Juan Guaido declaring himself interim president, may be playing a part in the PNP’s decision to support Maduro. However it is not just the US which has supported the move by Guaido, so too has Canada, and quite a few Latin American and European countries.
Arguing for support of Maduro The Observer Editorial page headlined (A plea for Venezuela). Simply put, nations that subscribe to the ideal of democracy cannot, on one hand — and rightly so we believe — dismiss Mr Nicolas Maduro’s claim to the presidency, then turn around and embrace Mr Guaido’s announcement. For Mr Guaido, in making that claim, is acting in like manner to his political foe.
In an Editorial which literally supports the decision not to support Maduro’s presidency, but for the paragraph saying Jamaica should, the Editors made plausible and convincing arguments as to why Maduro should not be president, including the following. Readers will recall that in 2014 after a fall in oil prices sparked a major economic crisis for Venezuela, Mr Maduro’s Government greeted anti-government protests with force, resulting in the deaths of 43 people. In 2017, when protesters, in four months of demonstrations, called for Mr Maduro to step down, 125 people were killed. Also, 18 months after the Opposition won control of the National Assembly by a landslide in December 2015, Mr Maduro, in a blatant display of his disregard for democracy, created a Constituent Assembly tasked with rewriting Venezuela’s constitution. That move was regarded as designed to supersede the National Assembly in order to legitimize his grip on power.
The Editorial laid out a case by case basis for exactly why Nicolas Maduro should not be president, while claiming that quote:Nations that subscribe to the ideal of democracy cannot, on one hand — and rightly so we believe — dismiss Mr. Nicolas Maduro’s claim to the presidency. It is exactly that kind of regressive thinking which caused the PNP to criticize the Government’s stance against the Maduro régime. It is for those reasons that the PNP’s Lisa Hanna was out making statements to the media in support of Nicolas Maduro. And it is that kind of lack of critical thinking by the PNP which has kept the country immersed in poverty over the years and got the country into the morass it did in the 70’s. It is that kind of unintelligent thought process which causes the PNP to withdraw it’s support from the Government’s application of the limited states of emergency. If the steps Nicolas Maduro took to acquire and maintain control of the government in Venezuela are illegal then his claim to the presidency are no more legitimate than that of Juan Guaido.
The People’s National Party has consistently hitched it’s wagon to despotic illegitimate governments and ideologies in the same way it has made decisions which has had demonstrably catastrophic consequences for Jamaica since 1962. In some cases the PNP could simply have remained silent, as it should have in the Nicolas Maduro’s case. But the PNP has never been known to exercise good judgement. Not when Michael Manley hitched his wagon to Fidel Castro,who had hitched his wagon to a dying Soviet empire. Not even in exercising good judgement in eschewing and discarding the clenched fists, stupid berets and using the moniker “comrade”.
Marvin Douglas a former constable of the Jamaica Constabulary Force and formally of the Trelawny Division now a business man in falmouth died a few hours ago in a motor vehicle crash along the Spring Hill highway in the parish.
We are told that a Detective Inspector of Police in charge of scenes of crime Investigations at the Spanish Tow Police station narrowly escaped death at his home. Detective Inspector Harris was attacked by gunmen who shot up his car. In what seems to have been an attempted robbery attempt, the men allegedly tailed the cop from the bank where he reportedly went to transact business. Several m16 shells were recovered from the scene of the incident and the cop is reported to have escaped serious injury.
UPDATETOTHISSTORY
At about 10am Detective Inspector Devon Harris, of the technical services division withdrew cash from the bank and drove home and parked in his driveway. He alighted from the car when he noticed a grey hatchback motor car driving towards him, he became suspicious and stood in front of the car one man alighted from the rear seat of the car with a M16 rifle, and opened fire at him. He took evasive action upon which two other men with handguns also alighted from the car and they too opened fire at Inspector Harris. Detective Inspector Harris ran into a nearby premises and hid himself.
They went into the Inspector’ car and stole his laptop- bag containing his HP laptop computer valued at five hundred and fifty us dollars (US $550). The gunmen made good their escape. Insp Harris suffered no gunshot injuries but suffered cuts and bruises to his hands and knees from having fallen during the encounter.
I am not exactly why some people feel the need to refer to “woke” black people who have come to the realization that we are the true Israelites, God’s chosen people.
Black Hebrew Israelites are in the news after a January 18 video showed members of an unidentified sect interacting with students from Covington Catholic. Win McNamee/Getty Images
There is a serious conversation to be had about the false sense of security and brainwashing Jamaicans are lulled into. An anti-police mindset which creates the perception that an agency that was created to harass the police is in their best interest. Just today threats were made by gangs that people in the once quiet town of Mandeville will be slaughtered one each day if a gangster arrested by the police is not released forthwith. When the fake layers of peace and contentment are peeled away Jamaica has a very serious problem with criminals and it is not getting better.
When a case which is brought by the police gets dismissed by the courts for want of prosecution it is not the same as a case in which a police officer was charged for a crime and walked free because the prosecution cannot substantiate the case it brought. The Jamaica Constabulary Force is tasked with investigating crimes which involve 2.8 million Jamaicans and every single foreigner who ever set foot not just on Jamaican soil but may have committed a crime against our country 12 miles away from our country’s shores. As an oversight agency INDECOM is tasked with investigating a security apparatus of approximately 12,000 people not counting the Corrections Department. Most allegations against the security forces were, and still, are forced by gang leaders, or as they were called (area leaders). Common lowlife scumbags, sanitized, packaged and sold to the Jamaican people by what passes for a media. Fake mourners became the norm, wailing away at the supposed killings of their choirboy friends whom they watched getting murdered by the police as he slept in his bed at 3 in the morning.[sic] Innocent community leaders, or as one anti-police agitator Horace Levy labeled them, (corner crews) not dangerous gangsters. That is not to say that the breakdown in the nation’s social order and the neglect of the police over a period of several decades hasn’t resulted in many people who should never be police officers becoming police officers. As a consequence, the poor quality of those candidates naturally ended up in outcomes which are antithetical to a good police department and the good of the country overall.
On the 7th of this month Detective Corporal Kevin Adams, Constable Carl Bucknor, and District Constable Howard Brown had their 8‑year nightmare come to a spectacular end when Queen’s Counsel Caroline Hay told the court, the prosecution would be unable to negate the defense’s position of self-defense. The three police officers were charged with the murder of Andrew Bisson in a police operation on September 5, 2011. The Investigations were undertaken and conducted by INDECOM. During the trial the judge, Chief Justice Byran Sykes spoke to the grave reservations he had about the case against the officers. Justice Sykes observed (1) [ that it seemed that the accused officers were being targeted by the Independent Commission of Investigations (INDECOM)]. (2) Chief Justice Bryan Sykes, the trial judge expressed concern about whether the accused policemen were afforded an objective and fair investigation?
On Tuesday, January 22nd, 2019 Sergeant David Hutchinson and Constable Kenneth Daley were before the very same Judge Bryan Sykes. The two were charged with murder in a July 2013 incident following an investigation by INDECOM into the fatal shooting of a teenager, Derrick Bolton, and another man. Like the case on January 7th, prosecutors told the court that they could not proceed against the accused as they could not produce the prosecution witnesses. The officers were charged after 8 people were fatally shot in an area of Saint Catherine and the police responded and confronted the two, who were reportedly members of the notorious Klansman gang.
The common investigative thread in these two most recent cases in which officers who have been charged with murder and have spent years awaiting trial, in some cases while locked away like common criminals is INDECOM. In response to charges by police officers that INDECOM was charge ‑happy and was charging officers then doing investigations, Terrence Williams the head of the agency in 2016 sought to debunk claims he and his agency were abusing the powers given to the agency. He argued that the commission’s operations does not allow for charges to be laid without proper investigations being carried out. “The INDECOM Act operates in a way that before anybody can be charged, it must come through the director of complaints and then be seen by me. “The design of the INDECOM Act is to ensure that all investigations are supervised by somebody with senior legal qualification and experience. So the complaint that is being made is completely off the mark, based on systems. Further, it is not our practice to charge persons before the case is completed, Williams told the Gleaner at the time. So much for adhering to the dictates of the law!
In 2016 Terrence Williams told the same newspaper that “of the six cases that have been completed, meaning cases placed before the courts since the creation of the agency in 2008, only one person was acquitted, and there is one where the DPP felt the case should not go on. We have five cases where there have been convictions, including one case with eight people.” Only that there was no truth to Terrence Williams’ statements. In Manchester, INDECOMcharged a police officer with using his helmet to hit a man. Case dismissed. Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Jason Anderson, who is assigned to the Major Organised Crime and Anti-Corruption Agency (MOCA), has been charged with discharging a firearm within 40 yards of a public road, contrary to Section 23 of the Firearms Act and assault at common law. Charged by INDECOM. Case dismissed. There are other cases that have also resulted in dismissals all of which are cases brought against the police by INDECOM.
Hamish Campbell
The average Jamaican has been raised, schooled and indoctrinated into hating law enforcement. Even some who have worked as police officers because they may have been unable to get jobs in the private economy has been known to be vehemently against the very discipline which puts food on their table. The question of having cops opposed to the rule of law is certainly more pervasive now than it was before. With so many people entering the department from the left-leaning University of the West Indies the problem is now a serious threat to the nation’s security. Enemies of policing now doing policing. It cannot be overemphasized that neither of the two major political parties wants a competent police department which is capable of doing the type of investigative work which would have ended in the arrest of politicians involved in the Petrojam scam, Outameani, the Iran sugar deal, the Cuban lightbulb scandal, and the host of other thefts in which billions of dollars simply disappeared. That is why INDECOM serves the interest of both political parties. That is the reason they do not care that Deputy Commissioner of INDECOM British transplant Hamish Campbell was alleged to have planted evidence on an innocent black man while he worked in his home country.
No matter how much you adore INDECOMand hate the police, it is pretty difficult to ignore the observations of the nations most senior jurist. (1)That it seemed that the accused officers were being targeted by the Independent Commission of Investigations (INDECOM)]. (2) Concerned about whether the accused policemen were afforded an objective and fair investigation. What is absent from this whole conversation is a fair and just appreciation for the fact that these case are being approached and prosecuted in a manner which is injurious to police officers and worse is dangerous to the nation’s security. Furthermore, the duplicitous silence by what passes for an organized media, or worse the failure to put two and two together and report to the people the danger they are in by allowing for the continuation of INDECOM. Because the status quo serves the interest of both political parties voices like mine will go unheeded. Nevertheless, as the country bounces from one dangerous situation to another and as the gangs consolidate their power, the people like sheep, are led to believe that the number one problem they face is threats to their human rights. In the meantime, Superintendent Wayné Cameron and his officers are on high alert in Manchester, despite the forces arrayed against them this officer and his men and women are determined and vigilantly out there protecting the lives of the citizens with their own lives. Undeterred by threats from gangsters who would turn our beautiful Island into a Sub-Saharan wasteland, spilling innocent blood if their demands are not met.
Judge strikes down Scott Walker’s vote-suppression measure, but Republicans will fight on — at taxpayer expense
A federal judge ruled last week that Wisconsin Republicans violated a federal court order by approving restrictions on early voting and other election issues during a lame duck session before the new Democratic governor was sworn in. U.S. District Judge James Peterson blocked a law signed by outgoing Republican Gov. Scott Walker that limited early voting to two weeks before the election and restricted in-person absentee voting and the forms of ID that can be used to vote. Peterson wrote that the legislation violated a 2016 court order that blocked the state from making similar changes.“This is not a close question,” Peterson wrote. “The three challenged provisions are clearly inconsistent with the injunctions that the court has issued in this case.”In that case, Peterson ruled that the state’s voter ID and limits on in-person absentee voting were unconstitutional, the Wisconsin State Journal reported. The case was appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals which is yet to rule on the matter.The state argued that the new laws were different from the 2016 legislation, which Peterson rejected.
“If the court accepted defendants’ argument, it would mean that a legislative body could evade an injunction simply by reenacting an identical law and giving it a new number,” he wrote. The election restrictions were part of a larger set of bills passed by Wisconsin Republicans during last year’s lame duck session that were signed by Walker right before he was replaced by newly-elected Democratic Gov. Tony Evers. Progressive groups Citizen Action of Wisconsin and One Wisconsin Institute sued over the moves. Evers said after the ruling that he as “glad to see that a federal [court] again struck down the GOP’s unconstitutional attacks on our right to vote.” A second lawsuit filed by progressive groups, including the League of Women Voters, Disability Rights Wisconsin and Black Leaders Organizing for Communities, that was filed in the same court is seeking to have all the new laws passed by Republicans during the lame-duck session voided, arguing that the session was illegal. A judge is yet to rule on the case but experts told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Read more here:https://www.salon.com/2019/01/22/judge-blocks-wisconsin-gops-lame-duck-voter-suppression-not-a-close-question/
I got to thinking recently and I arrived at a couple of conclusions (1) The gangs doing the killings are still operating with impunity. (2) The number of gangs seems to be on the increase. And (3) just how easy it was for the people to be influenced that good no-nonsense policing attitude toward dangerous criminals was bad for them and the country. And so I want to have a little talk with you my readers, rather than just talk at you.
In the year 2017, 1,616 murders were reported to the authorities. And 2018 resulted in around 1455 homicides, give or take a couple either way. Now, though these homicide numbers are stark, I believe they are fundamentally flawed, because they only represent killings in which victims of gunshot wounds, stabbings, and other violent assaults die immediately. Not all victims of violent attacks die immediately and so there may be another 10, 20, or even 30% more deaths which can reasonably be attached to those annual homicide numbers. At the risk of making myself part of the narrative which is absolutely not my intent, I wish to point out that between the start of the statistics above and when I left the force in 1991 murders were far too many but not overly astronomical. When we juxtapose the numbers which existed between 1982 when I joined the department (405) and 1989 (439) and the facts I laid out about political interference and lack of resources hamstringing the police you will also notice that homicides remained generally steady. We may go back and look at the years 1980 to 1981, and we will notice that those years represented the election year 1980 and 1981 the year a new administration took office and so those numbers were anomalies as far as the homicide numbers went. Older Jamaicans will recall the 1980 elections in which an estimated 899 Jamaicans lost their lives, largely as a result of political violence and 1981 although the numbers had dropped precipitously to 490, those 1981 numbers still represented a high, for a good seven (7) year period and never again reached or exceeded [490] until 1990 when the numbers jumped drastically considering the previous seven-year stability to 543 homicides. By 1991 the year I exited the force all bets were off homicides had moved up to 561. Gone were the good old days in which murderers knew that it was not their streets. So what happened you ask, why is it that between the time you served and the time you left murders got out of control Mike? Was it you keeping all those shottas under control? I wish I could take credit for it (smile) but we have to seriously look at what happened in our country which caused basically (8) eight years of stable homicide numbers?
Former PM Edward Seaga
THESEAGAADMINISTRATION I generally get killed(no not literally) laugh, for daring to write about politics or the way I see it through my own eyes growing up and living thirty (30) years of my life in my country. Many people are offended they say talk only about law enforcement. I generally laugh at that because right here in this article we see just how politics impacts every other area of our lives. Edward Phillip George Seaga won the 1980 general elections on a platform of conservatism. It was easy for Seaga’s message to resonate against the Manley message of self-sufficiency and national pride. Any message that was opposite to Manley’s would have resonated, people were hungry, store shelves were empty, crime and violence were everywhere. Seaga’s victory was a devastating blow to Michael Manley and the (PNP), his Conservative Jamaica Labor Party won 51 of the then 60 seats in the parliament. Many laborites suspected Manley lost his seat but was allowed to keep it. No evidence of that ever surfaced but the whispering continued for years.
Many Jamaicans who grew up during my time which is the 70’s and really came of age in the ’80s will quickly argue that all politicians in Jamaica are corrupt, dishonest, monsters. I have no facts to counter those assertions but I will say that even if not totally true, whatever Jamaicans say does have some truth in there somewhere. Edward Seaga created the satellite community of Tivoli Gardens. Those who know a little about Jamaica’s history will recall that Tivoli Gardens rose out of the God forgotten slums previously known as (Back-o-wall). Tivoli Gardens was a modern apartment complex with amenities like a park, community center, a state of the art clinic etc. [Full disclosure], my first child was born at that clinic because it was rumored to be the very best in the Island at the time. Seaga was mightily proud of what he created in that community as he ought to be. However, like an over-doting parent, he failed to see that the child he gave life to was turning bad. And that was an egregious error in judgment, that baby became a monster. When a child becomes that it reflects badly on the parents. Because of Seaga’s failure to rein in Tivoli Gardens, he will forever and for the remainder of his days be saddled with the infamy that that community came to represent. And that is all too sad because when it came to law and order Edward Seaga never stood in the way of the police doing their jobs, save and except for his delinquent baby Tivoli Gardens. The data demonstrates that it was under Edward Seaga’s tenure that homicides leveled off and remained constant. Edward Seaga demitted office in (1988) and Michael Manley was back at the helm of our government. By 1990, just one year into Manley’s tenure, homicides jumped from (439) into the new territory of (543.
Percival James Patterson former PM presided over years of corruption and failed leadership
Homicides continued at a merry clip under Michael Manley and continued so after he ceded power to his inept deputy Percival Patterson. By (2002) still with the PNP in power, homicides had reached (1045). In just over twelve(12) years under PNP leadership, homicides in Jamaica had increased by (238.041%). We can argue along the margins politically, what we cannot deny is the data.
A NEWNARRATIVE
In 2007 Orett Bruce Golding a former minister of construction under Seaga who had left the JLP and helped to form the then third party the National Democratic Movement or (NDM) had returned to the JLP and was able to eke out a slim majority for the JLP. The JLP victory seemed at the time to be voter malaise and exhaustion from the PNP’s 141⁄2 unbroken years in office and the backward direction of the country. By (2011) Golding was forced to resign from entanglements with the Christopher Coke matter. Andrew Holness took over the leadership of the party and the Government and soon sought his own mandate against the Portia Simpson Miller-led (PNP). Holness was defeated at the polls on the 5th of January 2012 and Miller served as the Prime Minister until fresh elections were called on the 3rd of March 2016. Andrew Holness’ party won the elections, albeit by a razor-thin one seat majority which was later strengthened by two by/elections in which the ruling (JLP) prevailed. The moral of the story surrounding the period which included Simpson Miller, Bruce Golding and Andrew Holness is simply this. Both political parties are responsible for the events as they occurred in that time period and so we are left to analyze what event or series of events caused both parties to become complicit or incompetent, or both, in dealing with violent crimes.
HUMANRIGHTS
If I pretended that the Jamaican police have not engaged in atrocious behavior I would be lying. If I pretended that politicians, judges, lawyers, prosecutors, and parsons and people in every discipline haven’s as well I would be lying. And if I pretended that people in literally every discipline, in every nation across the globe haven’t done the same thing.…again I would be lying. The reality of the foregone is that people, regardless of their jobs are only people who are prone to excesses and abusing their powers. When that happens the societies in which they operate must take steps to remedy those transgressions and put in place safeguards to guard against recurrence. So if you have bad Pastors you do not tear down the church. With the multiple reports about Priest sexually assaulting little boys the powers that be hasn’t gotten rid of the Catholic Church, they are working to fix it. When our police make mistakes we fix the problems and we support our police, we should not tear them down. Unfortunately, that is not what we do in Jamaica, we tear down our police and that provides a wide opening to those who would benefit from the breakdown in the rule of law.
Remember Flo O’Connor?
As ridiculous as the lack of support for the police is, the single greatest issue in my estimation is the influence the so-called human rights lobby has been able to wield in our country. The faithful observance of and fidelity to human rights are fundamental templates of any democratic society. Nevertheless, human rights and national security are two fundamentally different issues, neither of which are dispensable or mutually exclusive in a democratic society. Given that human rights lobbies are not as visible or influential in the powerful democracies, and since there is a kind of default presumption that they are the template for good democratic societies, we tend to ignore the gross human rights transgressions which occur in these powerful nations. Police abuse of people of color is the number one human rights issue which has affected people of color in the United States, Britain, and Canada today as it always has. There is hardly any response or statements much less any meaningful steps taken on behalf of a single aggrieved party anywhere in any of the named powerful developed countries. There has been zero advocacy on behalf of any killed or injured by police here in the United States to my knowledge.
Carolyn Gomes
SOWHYTHEDEVELOPINGWORLD?
The human rights lobby in the developing world in which Jamaica finds itself are generally funded by supporters or parent lobbies in the western power centers which are in turn funded by dark money. A country which undermines its law-enforcement is a country with high crime statistics. Jamaica’s crime-fighting efforts are directed at its police officers, not at the violence producers. Not that there cannot be an effective crime-fighting mechanism in place and vigilant police oversight simultaneously.
Why would larger countries want crime to increase in the developing world? Larger western countries are lenders to poorer developing countries. They destabilize those nations because they need to keep them borrowing. A country inundated with crime has next to zero chance of climbing its way out of poverty. Jamaica has made many tactical mistakes, not the least of which has been allowing the international human rights lobbies to worm their influence into the body politic of the country. It’s a veritable disaster at this point as literally every bit of legislation which is supposed to benefit the Jamaican people has to pass muster with human rights lobbies which take orders from either the United States, Canada, or Great Britain. Why would either of these nations care about human-rights? They don’t! They understand full well that the question of human rights is something the general population will sign onto. What poor citizenry will not be enamored with the idea of a group of people who are protecting them from the power of the state? Jamaica has long flirted with wannabe police watchdogs the likes of Flo O’Connor and others, but the country completely sold out to Carolyn Gomes and Jamaicans for Justice(JFJ). If the safety and security of Jamaicans were attended to with the same diligence and fervor as the influence the criminal enhancement lobbies have had on the decision making of our country we would have a very good country.
daily scenes in Mexico, daily scenes in Jamaica
THEENDGAME
Ultimately, what will happen is that the state will completely lose control. We are not far from that point, we had a glimpse of that in 2010. In Guatemala, Mexico, Colombia, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Brazil. and Venezuela, right here in our hemisphere we have seen the effects of their government’s complicity and cowardice in confronting the dangers posed by gangs which later metastasized into murderous drug cartels. Unless the Jamaican people come out from the fog cast by the crime enhancement lobby Jamaica will see people leaving on old rickety rafts and old canoes trying to find safe harbor. It can still be stopped but time is running out.
The body of 29-year-old Nordia Markland was found hanging from a beam at her house last Saturday at around 4 a.m. on Shannon Lloyd Crescent in Clarendon.
The family of the deceased are traumatized by the fact that a video showing miss Markland’s body dangling from the beam has been doing the rounds on social media. They are also upset that people who have seen the video has characterized her as wicked and has created their own narrative as to the reason she allegedly took her own life.
Distraught relatives say miss Markland was depressed after the death of her father, she had to bury a cousin shortly after. We have the video but have opted not to post it out of deference and respect to her and her family. Mental illness and depression are real issues which affect untold numbers of people, many of whom suffer in silence.
The grief and deep depression which would cause someone to see no way out forcing them to ultimately take their own life cannot be reduced to someone’s opinion of the deceased. It must be understood against the precious nature of life and the sheer hopelessness which the victim must have felt which caused him/her to end that one precious life.
There is something about some of us Jamaicans, not all I have to admit. But there is a kind of fire which burns in our bellies. A fire which would cause us rather die on our feet than live on our knees. Maybe it is that west African Coromantee, blood which flows through our veins, that which heats up when we hear about incidents like the following. Incidents which in most cases draws not even a bit of care much less anger from others.
Imagine someone harassing you to the point that you are forced to quit your job? Imagine that you have never bothered that person/s? You see, it is hard for me to fathom because I was always of the opinion that no one, no man or woman, have a greater right to be on this planet than I do. On that basis, I will not tread on your space but so help me God if you ever tread on my space. After all, we all have just one life and what’s the point of living it if you cannot live it in peace?
Kiah Morris (left), Max Misch (right) Screenshot: AP/Twitter
At a press conference, Monday, Vermont’s chief law enforcement officer almost completed one of the greatest performances of whitesplaining in recent history as he announced that he wouldn’t file charges against a white nationalist who allegedly stalked, harassed and terrified one of the state’s only black lawmakers. As Vermont Attorney General T.J. Donovan described the voluminous evidence, he pointed out that he didn’t have enough evidence. He explained how hate speech was a matter of free speech. He explained that the harassment against the black family was bad, but that it wasn’t a crime. All the while, the woman was the target of the incessant acts of hate stood beside him as he shucked and jived.
Then the racists showed up. According to WNYT, On Monday, Vermont Attorney General T.J Donovan held a press conference at the Congregation Beth El synagogue in Bennington, Vt. to announce that, instead of filing charges, he would instead release a 10-page report on the racial harassment of former State Rep. Kiah Morris, the state’s only black woman state representative who resigned in September after allegedly being harangued by white supremacist Max Misch, who describes himself the man who “be representing dem white muhfuckaz of Bennington.”
The press conference went off the rails when Bennington resident Max Misch entered the room as Morris answered a television reporter’s question about the AG’s probe. Misch had been subject to a yearlong protective order in 2016 prohibiting him from contacting Morris over a series of racist tweets, messages and online comments he aimed at her.
Misch wore a black long-sleeve shirt bearing the image of alt-right icon Pepe the Frog. Many in the room began shouting “No, no, no!” and “Out!” when he arrived.
“This is not safe,” one person shouted. “Why is this asshole allowed to come in here?” someone else in the crowd said.
“Because it’s America,” another attendee replied. “We have to listen to everyone, whether we like it or not. But we don’t have to put up with it.”
Also in attendance was Kevin Hoyt, a failed Republican candidate who has accused Morris and her husband of inciting others to paint him as a Nazi. Hoyt says he is a victim of reverse racism after his request for a stalking order of protection against Morris’ husband was rejected by a judge. The hunting expert and gun advocate has repeatedly insinuated that Morris and her husband were fabricating their claims to make Vermont look like a state that tolerates racism.
“I call bullshit on Ms. Morris!” yelled Hoyt. “As a political opponent who was accused of being a Nazi, I think we’re hearing one side of the story … I was called a Nazi, I was called a white supremacist. Obviously, racism exists in Vermont … I question to what degree, though.”
After winning a House seat in the state legislature, Morris gave up her re-election bid before resigning in September, citing her husband’s open-heart surgery combined with Hoyt and Misch’s continued online campaign of harassment. Citing tweets that told her to “Go back to Africa, it’s the only place you’ll ever be safe,” The Attorney general’s report listed forty-eight separate racial incidents where Morris had been threatened and attacked, including:
A message to Morris’ husband informing him that he should put his wife “in her place,” or the messenger would do it for him;
A tweet that read: “You will never silence me. Every time you attend a political rally at the Four Corners or another local venue and I’m aware of the event, I will troll the hell out of you and the other subversives there. Maybe I’ll bring a friend or three with me too;”
Someone paintballing Morris’ car and spray painting a swastika on a tree near Morris’ home;
Another tweet said, “Stop pushing ‘social justice’ on your nearly entirely White constituency in Bennington, VT. Go back to Chicago if you want to engage in SJW [Social Justice Warrior] bullshit. We will continue to fight against your efforts to make our town/state look more like your mongrel son;”
Multiple reports to police of strange men and suspicious vehicles in the cemetery behind Morris’ home;
A break-in at the Morris home where Morris’ husband’s neckties were stolen and found in the cemetery (Police did not fingerprint or swab the crime scene);
Morris’ child care provider reporting a man sitting in a car outside the home filming the Morris residence;
Donovan concluded that there was not enough evidence to charge Misch with any crimes, noting that there was a lack of evidence. “No Vermont court has specifically considered whether communications like those sent to Ms. Morris could be construed as ‘true threats,’” Donovan’s findings read, adding:
In this case, the online communications that were sent to Ms. Morris by Max Misch and others were clearly racist and extremely offensive However, the First Amendment does not make speech sanctionable merely because its content is objectionable. The question here is whether the messages, in context, were communicating a serious expression of an intent to harm Ms. Morris or her family. The fact that a number of messages were directed at her role as an elected official raises the issue of whether they were intended to express political opposition through the use of hyperbole and insult, as noted in the case law above. Therefore, there appears to be insufficient evidence to pursue criminal charges under Vermont law.
“Kiah Morris was a victim of racial harassment. Relatively few Vermonters have had any of these experiences, and very few have had these experiences in the context of vicious racial harassment,” Donovan said, according to the Washington Post. But, he added, “the Constitution does not permit us to prosecute racist speech because we find it offensive.”
Meanwhile, Morris stood in the face of her harassers and the attorney general, noting that law enforcement officers had shrugged off her claims.“For two years, we lived in my husband’s childhood home, feeling unsafe, never sleeping peacefully because we had to be vigilant,” said Morris, “We did everything we were told to do. We reported as we should, held nothing back and trusted in a system that was insufficient and inept at addressing and repairing the harm done.” So there you have it. It was just political expression and free speech, which is aptly expressed in the Vermont state motto:
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.