(indecom Act) A Crime Enhancement Law, Police Must Protect Their Own Lives.….

mb
mb
This writer have written several articles regaling the police department and more specifically the Commissioner of Police since news broke that a well known criminal had snuffed out the life of two police officers at poor-man’s corner in the parish of St Thomas just before Christmas of 2015.

Before I go any fur­ther let me pre­empt the inevitable asser­tion that “no life is more impor­tant that anoth­er so the police should go after all killers whether they be cop killers or not” . We have heard that argu­ment too many times ‚I no longer want to respond to it. No one is say­ing police lives are more impor­tant , what we are say­ing is that the police stand between they who would kill us and us .
If the police are all killed there is no buffer, so we have to care about those who risk life and limb for us.

See also: https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​t​h​r​e​e​-​m​o​n​t​h​s​-​l​a​t​e​r​-​n​o​-​w​o​r​d​-​d​u​p​p​y​-​f​i​l​m​-​a​l​l​e​g​e​d​-​c​o​p​-​k​i​l​l​e​r​-​s​t​i​l​l​-​l​o​se/

I doubt seri­ous­ly whether my low­ly yelp­ing had any­thing to do with the police’ push to find this alleged cop-killer Marlon Perry o/​c (dup­py film), but it is a wel­come sight to see that the police are active­ly search­ing for him that’s what matters.
I would imag­ine there is cred­i­ble intel­li­gence which would sup­port the police’s the­o­ry that this alleged mur­der­er is, or was in the parish of Manchester.
As a mat­ter of fact the cap­ture of Kevon Eldermire, oth­er­wise called ‘(Harry Patta) in the parish may be a good indi­ca­tor that even if Perry isn’t/​wasn’t in the parish at least the intel­li­gence had credibility.
Perry’s sup­posed escape from a drag­net is rea­son for the police to reeval­u­ate how they go about these oper­a­tions. For decades our police oper­a­tions have been inside out events which gives sus­pects the abil­i­ty to escape once they elude the ini­tial push.
Many for­mer offi­cers still sub­scribe to this way of doing things, I don’t.
Operations should be an out­side in event, tight­en­ing the cir­cle until the subject/​s is encir­cled with no place to go.
This can­not be some­thing decid­ed at the sta­tion lev­el or at the time the oper­a­tions offi­cer decides to lead sev­er­al dozen or sev­er­al hun­dred offi­cers on an operation.
These tac­tics must be taught at the train­ing acad­e­my and rehearsed at the sta­tion and divi­sion­al lev­els con­tin­u­al­ly so that when the need aris­es every offi­cer fits into the plan like pieces of a jig-saw puz­zle. Every offi­cer must know exact­ly what to do in the event of every giv­en poten­tial scenario.

The soon­er jus­tice is brought to this per­son the bet­ter it is for the police depart­ment, which at this time must first and fore­most look after offi­cer safe­ty before con­sid­er­ing any­one else.
let’s face it, bring­ing Perry in will not mean that the fam­i­lies of the two slain police offi­cers are guar­an­teed jus­tice. The reverse is true, the case will sim­ply drag on while the courts release him back onto the streets to kill again. In the end there will be a ver­dict but not one which works for the fam­i­lies of the dead cops.
The ver­dict will be that the case is thrown out for want of prosecution .
For those inter­est­ed in the truth, that is a tac­tic used to sub­vert the process of jus­tice it is a tri­ad of col­lu­sion which includes the accused crim­i­nal and their inter­est, their defense attorney/​s and the bench.
If the case drags on long enough pros­e­cu­tion wit­ness­es are either killed , have emi­grat­ed, for­got­ten the sequence of events to which they gave depo­si­tions, or have lost inter­est in the case. Case closed .….

Ironically there are high­ly placed peo­ple in Government who are unwit­ting­ly or com­plic­it­ly call­ing for cas­es over 5 years old to be purged from the court dock­ets, exact­ly what crim­i­nals and their bene­fac­tors want. Exactly what is not need­ed , it would be fuel to the fire of cor­rup­tion and incom­pe­tence in the crim­i­nal court system.
Officers may chose to be wary of going the extra mile when it comes to how they approach oth­er mur­ders as it relates to the (inde­com act).
When it comes to the killing of their col­leagues they should throw out any wari­ness and send a clear mes­sage it won’t be tolerated.
The peo­ple can clam­or for what they want, it’s up to them to deter­mine how much of their loved ones inno­cent blood is shed before they real­ize the (inde­com act) is caus­ing the esca­la­tion of crime on the Island.
Until they do offi­cers can run out the clock with­out expos­ing them­selves to undue harm.
The (inde­com act) has embold­ened crim­i­nal­i­ty on the Island , it is an un-belled cat that no rea­son­able per­son or enti­ty there wants to acknowl­edge was a bad idea whose time has come.

In the mean­time an empow­ered crim­i­nal under­world has unleashed it’s new found pow­er on police, killing offi­cers and defy­ing their abil­i­ty to enforce the nations laws.
Police offi­cers must deter­mine whether they will cow­er in fear or go out and exter­mi­nate the ver­mins (inde­com) be damned .