Whose Job Was It To Take The Microphone From Pastor Jasper Williams?

Allowing the micro­phone to long-wind­ed sis­ter Agatha dur­ing tes­ti­mo­ny on Sunday morn­ing church ser­vice, and hav­ing to gen­tly prod it from her hands is always a risky endeavor.
In the inter­est of time and com­mon sense, the pas­tor has to make the deci­sion to cut sis­ter Agatha’s micro­phone or phys­i­cal­ly take it from her trem­bling hands.

But who takes the micro­phone from the hands of the Pastor in the inter­est of time, or more impor­tant­ly in the inter­est of com­mon sense?
Who makes the deci­sion to say “take his micro­phone”, when the Pastor clear­ly drunk from hav­ing the lime­light decides to make a spec­ta­cle and a fool of himself?

We are told that the Late Queen of soul Aretha Franklin asked the Reverend Jasper Williams a Georgia Pastor to eulo­gize her. Reverend Williams took the oppor­tu­ni­ty to delve into some crit­i­cal areas of black life with­out lay­ing out con­text or adding both sides of the argu­ments which would have insu­lat­ed him from the back­lash he is receiv­ing. By doing so he left out excul­pa­to­ry facts which go to the defense of the African-American com­mu­ni­ty which is con­stant­ly being maligned.

This does not mean that Reverend Williams’ com­ments should be ignored, nev­er­the­less speak­ing with­out the impor­tant prin­ci­ple of bal­ance does give rise to the pos­si­bil­i­ty of being tuned out or a neg­a­tive back­lash which drowns out the intend­ed message.
Pastor Williams spoke to a few issues to which I will attempt to add some perspective.

(1) Quote: There was a time when we as a race had a thriv­ing econ­o­my.

There nev­er was a time when African-Americans as a race had a thriv­ing econ­o­my, there have been pock­ets of eco­nom­ic progress in small places like Rosewood Florida, Tulsa Oklahoma and a few oth­er places where Black entre­pre­neur­ial spir­it had pro­duced some mea­sure of eco­nom­ic suc­cess and pride, but that was nev­er allowed to be built out or trans­lat­ed across the broad­er spec­trum of black America.

(2) Quote:” We got what we fought for, we got what we marched for, but with the birth of inte­gra­tion there also came the loss of not only the loss of the black com­mu­ni­ty’s econ­o­my we also lost our souls. Where is your soul black man?
As I look in your house there are no fathers.

Pastor Williams’ broad sweep­ing gen­er­al­ized state­ments makes the assump­tions that there was a thriv­ing black econ­o­my across America which is not sup­port­ed by any his­tor­i­cal data. As I point­ed out ear­li­er there were pock­ets of black eco­nom­ic activ­i­ty much of which was destroyed by white mob vio­lence and through the imple­men­ta­tion of oth­er more sub­ver­sive mea­sures. However, this was in no way true of the wider African-American population.
The idea that there are no black fathers in black homes sound like a right-wing talk­ing point rather than the state­ments of a cau­tious learned man of God.

(3) Quote: Seventy per­cent of our house­holds are led by our pre­cious, proud, fine black women, but as proud, beau­ti­ful and fine as our black women are, one thing black women can­not do,.…… a black woman can­not raise a black boy to be a man.

Pastor, there are sev­er­al rea­sons why house­holds are becom­ing far dif­fer­ent from what obtained decades ago, not the least of which is the def­i­n­i­tion of what con­sti­tutes a fam­i­ly nowadays.
As the roles of women change in soci­ety and women are more and more rep­re­sent­ed in the work­force, so too has the per­cep­tion of what con­sti­tutes a fam­i­ly changed over time.
The con­cept of sin­gle-par­ent house­holds is not a phe­nom­e­non sole­ly in the black com­mu­ni­ty, it tran­scends all eth­nic groups, sin­gle-par­ent house­holds led by women are on the rise.
Is there a dis­pro­por­tion­ate rep­re­sen­ta­tion of sin­gle moth­er run house­holds in the black com­mu­ni­ty? The answer is a resound­ing yes.
We can­not speak to the 70% of black women who are hav­ing chil­dren out of wed­lock or the high inci­dents of women-run house­holds in the black com­mu­ni­ty with­out address­ing the rav­aging effects of the prison indus­tri­al com­plex, mass crim­i­nal­iza­tion and incar­cer­a­tion of young black males, or the oth­er soci­etal road­blocks affect­ing the black com­mu­ni­ty across America.

More impor­tant­ly, when we speak about black women in the neg­a­tive we must endeav­or to acknowl­edge that In America despite the chal­lenges, Black women in the 2009 – 2010 aca­d­e­m­ic year, received a high­er per­cent­age of degrees with­in their race/​ethnic group than did women in any oth­er major group. So, for exam­ple, of all the MA degrees award­ed to Black stu­dents, Black women got 71% of them. In com­par­i­son, White women only got 62% of all White MA degrees. (source. https://​fam​i​lyinequal​i​ty​.word​press​.com/​2​0​1​6​/​0​6​/​0​7​/​n​o​-​b​l​a​c​k​-​w​o​m​e​n​-​a​r​e​-​n​o​t​-​t​h​e​-​m​o​s​t​-​e​d​u​c​a​t​e​d​-​g​r​o​u​p​-​i​n​-​t​h​e​-​us/)

I am not too far away from Pastor Williams on this issue of “can­not raise black men”, but I do not agree when he says “can­not.
I say should not. This is a sub­ject on which I opine reg­u­lar­ly, there are myr­i­ad issues in this ques­tion which requires some clarification.
On the one hand, we must first come to a con­sen­sus on whether the ques­tion of what con­sti­tutes “Man” remains the tra­di­tion­al inter­pre­ta­tion. Is he still the drag­on-slay­er, pro­tec­tor, provider, strong dis­ci­pli­nar­i­an, a fence around the fam­i­ly? Or have that char­ac­ter­i­za­tion migrat­ed to the more docile fem­i­nist male who is more def­er­en­tial to his woman, and is in many cas­es reduced to the car­i­ca­ture of a use­less idiot with an ATM card?

There is no ques­tion that when two good and decent peo­ple come togeth­er and raise their chil­dren the right way those chil­dren have a bet­ter shot at life. Study after study has allud­ed to that, per­son­al­ly, I did not need a study to val­i­date what God had already cre­at­ed and sanctified.
As such, it fol­lows there­fore that when the father is miss­ing from the home the task of the moth­er becomes expo­nen­tial­ly more dif­fi­cult because she can­not teach what she has nev­er known. She was not a father.

This is true in the reverse, a moth­er is the bet­ter par­ent to teach her daugh­ter how to be a woman, regard­less of how great a dad may be.
I need to reit­er­ate that in every case one good par­ent is far bet­ter than two bad ones, so to the skep­tics who are quick to grav­i­tate to “well what about two bad par­ents or one bad par­ent of a two-par­ent house­hold”? To you, I say in every sit­u­a­tion, I am talk­ing about sit­u­a­tions in which peo­ple act as God intend­ed us to.

There is also the ques­tion of a moth­er’s love and ten­der­ness, (which I can­not speak to, (I was not raised by my moth­er). It is true that far too many women are unable to fig­ure out that show­er­ing kids with good­ies and allow­ing them to do as they please is not love, but is bet­ter viewed as an abdi­ca­tion of respon­si­bil­i­ty, a form of child neglect.
I raised my boys to under­stand that some­times no is the right answer(RIP) [Kodi Beckles], you under­stood that con­cept very well.
I raised my chil­dren to under­stand that when I told them “no,” it was out of love, not out of a desire to be mean or punitive.
I demon­strat­ed to them that I have nev­er seen a sign any­where which says please do as you please.
Saying “no,” where appro­pri­ate, is exact­ly the right thing to do, some­thing many black women are yet to learn or understand.

Society is lit­tered with rules, no park­ing, no speed­ing, no entry, no stand­ing, no back­ing up, no over­tak­ing, no loi­ter­ing, no vend­ing, no this, no that. Saying no to your chil­dren where it is need­ed is prepar­ing them for society.
Failing to pre­pare them for soci­ety is doing them a grave dis­ser­vice, the con­se­quences of which we see play out in far too many cir­cum­stances where had they fol­lowed sim­ple instruc­tions the result would have been different.
No, ma’am, he is not your baby, he is grown.
No, my man, your moth­er’s house is not yours and it cer­tain­ly isn’t a crib. Grow up!

Quote: “If you chose to ask me today, do black lives matter?
Let me answer like this no, black lives do not mat­ter, black lives will not mat­ter black lives ought not to mat­ter, black lives should not mat­ter, black lives must not mat­ter until black peo­ple start respect­ing black lives and stop killing our­selves”.

Lets first acknowl­edge that we do not know whether the great Queen of Soul, our dear­ly beloved sis­ter Aretha Franklyn had seen this ser­mon and okayed it before her passing.
Let us also acknowl­edge that she may have know exact­ly the kind of ser­mon that the Reverend Jasper Williams would preach and that may have informed her deci­sion to choose him to deliv­er her eulogy.

The late Great Senator John McCain had enough time and con­vic­tion to speak to us in death, his choic­es of for­mer Presidents, Obama and Bush spoke volumes.
Two men of oppos­ing par­ties, two men who defeat­ed him in his quest for the Presidency to eulo­gize him sent a pow­er­ful mes­sage of bi-partisanship.
John McCain decried what he called the lack of reg­u­lar order. Regular order means doing things the right way, observ­ing the rules of the game with due care and def­er­ence. Choosing Bush and Obama to speak at his funer­al ser­vice embod­ies that ideal.

In as much as the loss of every life is regret­table, and in as much as the inci­dents of black and black crime is evi­dent, par­tic­u­lar­ly in inner-city com­mu­ni­ties, it is short-sight­ed to ignore the socio-eco­nom­ic con­di­tions which cre­ate these maladies.
Each eth­nic group in America expe­ri­ences same race vio­lence than vio­lence per­pe­trat­ed on them by oth­er races.
This is not an excuse for vio­lent behav­ior but again to sim­ply pull out black on black vio­lence and trum­pet it while ignor­ing the caus­es is self-serving.

Saying Black live mat­ter and deal­ing with black on black crime are not mutu­al­ly exclu­sive issues. Generally when blacks kill they are arrest­ed and made to pay the price. That is what the Police is there for.
When the police kill black peo­ple with­out just cause and peo­ple protest those killings, they are jus­ti­fied in argu­ing that black lives do mat­ter. Anyone who finds that offen­sive is part of the prob­lem and not part of the solution.

Again, Pastor Jasper Williams seems to have either bor­rowed his talk­ing points from FOX, or he has sim­ply co-opt­ed them with­out doing the nec­es­sary research before incor­po­rat­ing them into his sermon.
There are right and wrong ways to go about speak­ing to our com­mu­ni­ty. Do not talk down to our peo­ple because you get a mega­phone. Let us remem­ber the way Bill Cosby talked down to the com­mu­ni­ty, he was not the first, he cer­tain­ly will not be the last.

In the case of the good­ly Pastor Jasper Williams, whose job was it to take his micro­phone? Make your words soft and sweet Pastor Williams, you may have to eat them. You knew you were on the biggest stage of your life and you chose to say what you did. You made a con­scious deci­sion to be divi­sive and dis­parag­ing at a time when heal­ing and com­ing togeth­er was required and for that, you were a total fail­ure, sir. It was not about you but you made it so!
Fame and pow­er do not change a man, they sim­ply illu­mi­nate who he real­ly is, said a real­ly wise man.