How Shimon Peres Outwitted The U.S. To Bring Nukes To Israel

Renowned for his decades-long quest for peace in the Middle East, Shimon Peres’s great­est tri­umph was his cun­ning and suc­cess­ful plan to bring nuclear weapons to Israel.
Christopher Dickey

CHRISTOPHER DICKEY

09.28.16 4:12 AM ET

PARIS —Shimon Peres is rec­og­nized as a great states­man and will be remem­bered after his death ear­ly Wednesday morn­ing at age 93 as a pas­sion­ate advo­cate of peace between Israel’s Jews and the Arabs of the Middle East.

With a longer view, his­to­ri­ans will note that he man­aged to become prime min­is­ter twice and pres­i­dent of the State of Israel, but he nev­er clear­ly won the pow­er­ful pre­mier­ship in pop­u­lar or par­lia­men­tary votes. He was always admirable, but in the end, proved almost une­lec­table, a bril­liant rhetori­cian, but not near­ly as suc­cess­ful a politi­cian as, say, long-serv­ing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Even as a peace­mak­er, or per­haps espe­cial­ly as a peace­mak­er, Peres could artic­u­late bril­liant­ly and beau­ti­ful­ly the desires for peace, the rea­sons for peace, the ben­e­fits of peace, and indeed he shared the Nobel Peace Prize with then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and the PLO’s Yassir Arafat. But Peres could not bring home the goods, and the rel­a­tive calm that exists in Israel and the occu­pied ter­ri­to­ries for the moment is far from the peace that Peres so often and so elo­quent­ly described.

So it is iron­ic that his great­est sin­gle accom­plish­ment — the one that has pro­tect­ed his nation decade after decade in the sav­age land­scape of the Middle East, is one the Israeli gov­ern­ment still, as a mat­ter of form, will not acknowl­edge. Because it was Peres who brought home to Israel the nuclear weapons and the bal­lis­tic mis­siles that were and, for bet­ter or worse, still are the ulti­mate guar­an­tor of its survival.

One key to the Israeli nuclear-weapons pro­gram launched in the mid-1950s was France, where the young Peres — still in his thir­ties and serv­ing as the direc­tor gen­er­al of Israel’s defense min­istry — cul­ti­vat­ed a vast array of impor­tant polit­i­cal and sci­en­tif­ic contacts.

The oth­er key was the sys­tem­at­ic decep­tion of the United States, which at first opposed Israel’s devel­op­ment of a nuclear-weapons capa­bil­i­ty, then failed to con­nect the dots that showed that’s what it was doing, then tried to buy it off with a huge increase in con­ven­tion­al weapons ship­ments, and final­ly, in 1969 accept­ed tac­it­ly what it had failed to pre­vent explicitly.

Avner Cohen’s book Israel and the Bomb, pub­lished in 1998, still offers some of the most detailed and thought­ful infor­ma­tion about what he calls Israel’s “nuclear opac­i­ty,” the refusal to admit what the world knows and what is, in fact, a vital source of deter­rence. To study that his­to­ry of 60 years ago is also to under­stand why Israel is so sus­pi­cious of Iran’s nuclear decep­tions. It’s been there, done that, and Peres led the way.

That said, Israel’s per­ilous sit­u­a­tion in the 1950s was huge­ly dif­fer­ent than it is now. Today it is seen, right­ly, as the region’s pre-emi­nent mil­i­tary pow­er, with sol­id, mas­sive, unequiv­o­cal back­ing by the United States. Read more here: http://​www​.thedai​ly​beast​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​2​0​1​6​/​0​9​/​2​8​/​h​o​w​-​s​h​i​m​o​n​-​p​e​r​e​s​-​g​o​t​-​n​u​k​e​s​-​f​o​r​-​i​s​r​a​e​l​.​h​tml