Police Dogs Wrong More Than 50% Of The Time Has Become Walking Search Warrants Around The Constitution…

A study in Illinois sug­gests that police dogs used in stops to deter­mine whether a vehi­cle has drugs or oth­er con­tra­band result­ed in those con­tra­band being in the vehi­cle only 27% of the time.
This means that 73% of the time, police alleges that the dog made a pos­i­tive hit on a vehi­cle; cit­i­zens’ rights are being abrogated.
The dogs’ effi­ca­cy is actu­al­ly worse than a coin flip which is a 50 – 50 chance.
Yet police are allowed to con­tin­ue pre­tex­tu­al stops and work around the fourth amend­ment to the US constitution.
Experts con­cerned about this prac­tice have had sea­soned dog train­ers observe videos in which police use canines to deter­mine whether to search a vehi­cle, and those train­ers have indi­cat­ed time, and again they saw clear indi­ca­tions that a dog was being cued to alert.

This leaves the motorist at the mer­cy of these cor­rupt offi­cers who, in many cas­es, plant drugs where there was none and ruin the lives of the peo­ple they do not like.
Writing for WashingtonPost​.com on February 4th, 2019, Radley Balko wrote; nar­cotics-detect­ing dogs and their han­dlers aren’t very good at dis­cern­ing the pres­ence of ille­gal drugs. Multiple analy­ses of drug-dog alerts have con­sis­tent­ly shown alarm­ing­ly high error rates — with some close to and exceed­ing 50 per­cent. In effect, some of these K‑9 units are worse than a coin flip.
Balko wrote; While dogs are indeed capa­ble of sniff­ing out illic­it drugs, we’ve bred into them anoth­er over­rid­ing trait: the desire to please. Even drug dogs with con­sci­en­tious han­dlers will read their han­dlers’ unin­ten­tion­al body lan­guage and be alert accord­ing­ly. Then, many drug dogs are not alert­ing to drugs but their han­dlers’ sus­pi­cions about the pres­ence of drugs.
Add law enforce­ment racial ani­mus toward Black peo­ple into the mix, and dri­ving on the streets becomes dan­ger­ous for peo­ple of col­or in America.
Police con­tin­ued abuse of cit­i­zens of col­or in the United States is enhanced by the US Supreme Court out of touch with real­i­ty rul­ings that con­tin­ue to give police end-runs around the US Constitution to abuse the rights of cit­i­zens of color.
In his 2019 arti­cle Radley Balko cit­ed numer­ous cas­es where the USSupreme Court appeared unmind­ful of the harm police is doing to inno­cent Americans even in the face of mount­ing evi­dence that in most cas­es where dogs cue to drugs in a vehi­cle search­es turns up noth­ing ille­gal. The court seemed incu­ri­ous about impor­tant mat­ters such as how often the cer­ti­fi­ca­tion orga­ni­za­tion fails a K‑9 team? Who deter­mines whether the K‑9 unit pass­es?
https://​www​.wash​ing​ton​post​.com/​o​p​i​n​i​o​n​s​/​2​0​1​9​/​0​2​/​0​5​/​s​u​p​r​e​m​e​-​c​o​u​r​t​s​-​a​l​t​e​r​n​a​t​i​v​e​-​f​a​c​t​s​-​a​b​o​u​t​-​d​r​u​g​-​s​n​i​f​f​i​n​g​-​d​o​gs/My friend told me his young son; a Medical stu­dent drove from Kentuck, where he attends school to the Hudson Valley, New York, to spend Christmas with the family.
I had an imme­di­ate pan­ic attack; I have known the young man since he was real­ly young. My con­cern was not that he would have any prob­lems with rob­bers or any oth­er crim­i­nals, but the dan­gers he faced from police who will use any pre­text to pull over a young man of col­or, esca­late the stop into vio­lence which usu­al­ly results in the per­son of col­or dead at the hands of police.
The US Supreme Court and low­er Federal Court’s intran­si­gence on main­tain­ing a police state regard­less of the con­se­quences on some cit­i­zens have ren­dered drugs dogs a sure hit because police and the courts say they are reliable.
Balko’s arti­cle describes police dogs as a search war­rant on a leash.
Police do as they please sim­ply by call­ing canines and their han­dlers to do the end-run around the fourth amend­ment to the con­sti­tu­tion. Don’t both­er look­ing to the courts for redress; for the courts, the con­sti­tu­tion means noth­ing as long as states and munic­i­pal­i­ties have the abil­i­ty to seize prop­er­ty and ille­gal­ly keep it.
It is not about law enforce­ment; it is about ille­gal­ly strip­ping prop­er­ty from peo­ple of col­or and allow­ing police to keep those monies and valuables…
Your con­sti­tu­tion­al rights are of no con­se­quence to the courts.
.
.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.