I totally get the notion of not being a sheep, being able to think for one’s self, not follow every instruction dutifully without questioning whether it is in one’s best interest.
On the other hand, not following instructions simply because of a rebellious attitude, is a net negative that can have grave consequences individually & collectively.
The stay at home directives by the Jamaican Government and the ensuing acts of defiance in some communities, has roots in a culture that has been left to fester for way too long. It is one of total defiance, and living outside the boundaries of the law.
As for the stay at home orders themselves, the government has been measured in its leadership, not acting in a draconian way, but steadily balancing the economic needs of the country against the need to ensure there is no massive spread of the COVID-19 virus among the 2.8 million citizens.
In articulating that point, Prime Minister Andrew Holness said: “We cannot shut down the economy; this would create another type of crisis where people cannot access the goods and services they need.”
I totally agree with the Prime Minister’s assessment, additionally, we are a country with an exponentially large percentage of the population that is not living from paycheck to paycheck, they are living from one meal to the next.
For these poorer folks, staying at home is a luxury they simply cannot afford.
[Like the woman in the Bible who told the prophet that all she had was some flour in a barrel and some oil to make one meal for her and her son, after which they would die from hunger], those folks have to make a decision whether to stay home and die from hunger, or risk getting infected by going out and hustling for their next meal.
The Prime Minister is also correct when he said: “We are not placing a dollar value on life; every life is important, but for the Government to be effective in protecting your life we still need to have revenues. Cutting off economic activity lessens the ability of the Government to spend on increasing the capacity of the health care system. The government, therefore, has to balance carefully.”
Remarkably, the opposition PNP was silent as the administration embarked on this measured approach, balancing saving lives and ensuring that there remained some economic activity.
All while dealing with the ignorance of some in certain communities who blatantly flouted the stay at home orders, not because they needed to get out to work and purchase food, but because they wanted to party and demonstrate that they could openly, brazenly and defiantly, disobey rules and regulations.
The Opposition party could have decided to set aside politics just this once and acted in the interest of the nation’s greater good, rather than in the interest of scoring cheap political mileage.
That, however, would have been too much to ask of the PNP, to stand with the government and demand that people obey the stay at home orders as best they could.
That did not happen.
It is for those reasons that the recent statements of the former chief medical officer, PNP caretaker for St Catherine East Central Winston De La Haye, calling for a full lockdown of the country seems spurious at best.
Speaking to the media De La Haye argued:
“We need to move from chasing the virus to preventing infection. There is one way of doing that, and I’ll hasten to say as a public health official, it is clear to me that at this point we need to ensure, in an appropriate way, that we shut the country down”.
“What’s going to happen is that we’ve started with St Catherine; next is likely to be Kingston and St Andrew, then another parish, and another moving around the mulberry bush. As obtained in Italy, the experience has been there… let’s not repeat those mistakes. Now is the time to make plans, adequate plans, not in the manner in the experiment of Tuesday night with St Catherine, adequate plans to shut the country down.”
De La Haye a psychiatrist, seems to need to have his head examined.
A total lockdown of the country cannot happen without the economy suffering serious contraction. Already the country is forced to look at going back to the International Monetary Fund to secure funding.
As my readers know quite well, I am at odds with the government on that issue as I believe that the country’s financial health can be remedied if the Government took certain steps to remediate the intransigent and burgeoning violent crime epidemic currently plaguing the country.
Nevertheless, those are concerns for another time. For the reasons I stated about the poverty levels in the country, it is also an impossible task of asking the entire country to stay at home when they have no food to eat, and in many cases, they don’t even have drinking water.
Forcing people to stay inside under those conditions is a prescription for open revolt.
Could that be what the opposition party wants to see for its own political viability?
Mike Beckles is a former Jamaican police Detective corporal, businessman, researcher, and blogger.
He is a black achiever honoree, and publisher of the blog chatt-a-box.com.
He’s also a contributor to several websites.
You may subscribe to his blogs free of charge, or subscribe to his Youtube channel @chatt-a-box, for the latest podcast all free to you of course.