Every day average American citizens face these corrupt actors, and they complain if they are lucky to survive the encounter with them. Their complaints usually have to be made to the very same corrupt Agency, albeit another department created to give the illusory effect of transparency and impartiality. Complaints are generally ruled unfounded or unsubstantiated.
On the odd occasion that the evidence of wrongdoing is so overwhelming that it cannot be ignored, the offender gets a slap on the wrist; as you will see in the case below that the victory to the abused party is a pyrrhic one.
New York City has a Civilian Complain Review Board (CCRB) that is mandated to investigate abuses by the 36,000-plus police department; somehow however,the creators the body forgot to give the board power to punish offenders.
So the board’s findings have to be submitted back to the Police Commissioner for action. In case you are wondering why American police officers act with such impunity, wonder no more; they act with impunity because they have near blanket immunity.
There are those who believe that adding more officers of color will change the behavior of police, but that is far from the case. In California, the LA Sheriff”s office is populated heavily with Hispanics, and that department is plagued with outright criminal gangs operating in that department under the color of law.
In Miami, Florida, the Miami police department is also heavily Cuban American, and that department is probably one of the worst in the country.
The cops who murdered Tyre Nichols in Tennesee were all black, and so was Mister Nichols. In incident after incident, we see police of all races acting in ways more unlawful and outrageous than ordinary civilian criminals.
In almost all cases, there are other officers standing around or engaging in criminal conduct against civilian members of the public, yet no one intervenes to stop the criminal conduct.
Where are the supposed good cops?
So the issue is not about just the race or color of police these days. The very construct of policing in the United States is so badly broken that it cannot be repaired; it has to be dismantled and reimagined. They are not about to do that, so the public will continue to be at the mercy of these undisciplined state actors. (mb)
.»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»>
By Thomas Tracy New York Daily News.
Police watchdogs hit the NYPD’s highest-ranking uniformed officer with an abuse of authority charge for intervening in the detention of a retired cop accused of threatening a group of teens with a gun.
The Civilian Complaint Review Board said Saturday it had substantiated the charge against NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey. Under CCRB guidelines, “substantiated” means the board believes there is “sufficient credible evidence” that Maddrey “committed the alleged act without legal justification. It’s now up to Police Commissioner Keechant Sewell to determine Maddrey’s penalty. If Sewell imposes a penalty, Maddrey could refuse to accept it, triggering a disciplinary hearing, officials said.
Maddrey was accused of showing up at the 73rd Precinct stationhouse on Nov. 24, 2021 following a clash between retired NYPD Officer Krythoff Forrester and three teens in Brownsville.
Police had taken Forrester into custody after the teens stated he had chased them with a gun after they struck a security camera at his family’s storefront business with a basketball. Forrester used to work with Maddrey and began dropping his name to arresting officers, according to The City, which first reported the charges. A short time later, Maddrey, who was chief of the NYPD’s Community Affairs Division at the time, and Brooklyn North Deputy Chief Scott Henderson showed up at the stationhouse. Within a few hours, Forrester was let go without charges. Forrester was then sent home, officials said.
An NYPD spokesman said at the time that Maddrey ordered a full investigation, but Forrester was let go after the teens’ allegations couldn’t be confirmed. The department’s Internal Affairs Bureau also investigated allegations that Maddrey ordered Forrester cut loose, but found no wrongdoing. When asked about the incident in March, Mayor Adams backed Maddrey’s intervention, claiming Maddrey had “handled it appropriately.” The CCRB decision counters the NYPD probe. “After carefully reviewing the evidence, the full board deliberated this case and substantiated misconduct against Chief Maddrey,” Arva Rice, interim chair of the CCRB said in a statement Saturday. Working off the NYPD’s disciplinary matrix, which outlines penalties for accused abuses, the CCRB recommended Maddrey receive a command discipline, which comes with a maximum loss of 10 vacation days, CCRB officials said. MK Kaishian, the attorney representing the three teens, called for Maddrey’s resignation.
She said Maddrey “leveraged his power to spring a former colleague who had terrorized children with a gun, but he allowed those same children to be vilified and discredited in the media by his allies in the aftermath of his misconduct.” “It is essential that other concrete steps are taken to address Chief Maddrey’s conduct, which has been defended by police and other influential actors in NYC precisely because selective enforcement is a feature of a system that serves the powerful at the expense of all others,” Kaishian said. Maddrey ran afoul of police department rules in 2017, when he was docked 45 vacation days for failing to report an incident in a Queens park where he waved off responding officers who saw an alleged lover point a gun at him. That case was brought by internal NYPD investigators, without CCRB involvement.
Aside from the case involving the Brownsville teens, Maddrey has been investigated four times by the CCRB during his decades-long police career, city records show. All four cases involved accusations of abuse of force. None of the cases were substantiated. Emails to both Maddrey and the NYPD for comment were not immediately returned. Since being made police commissioner last year, Sewell has reduced, set aside or ignored hundreds of police misconduct penalties recommended by the Civilian Complaint Review Board, according to criminal justice advocates and a study conducted by the Legal Aid Society. In a message to police officers in December, Sewell said she has rejected CCRB discipline recommendations more often than other recent police commissioners, claiming that some of the police watchdog group’s rulings were “manifestly unfair” to officers.