Noam Chomsky: The GOP Is A Radical Insurgency; It’s Not A Political Party

Jewish-American scholar and activist Noam Chomsky talks during his meeting with Palestinian youth activists in Gaza City, Friday, Oct. 19, 2012. Chomsky crossed from Egypt yesterday for his first visit to Gaza. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)
Jewish-American schol­ar and activist Noam Chomsky talks dur­ing his meet­ing with Palestinian youth activists in Gaza City, Friday, Oct. 19, 2012. Chomsky crossed from Egypt yes­ter­day for his first vis­it to Gaza. (AP Photo/​Adel Hana)

MIT Professor Noam Chomsky recent­ly gave his assess­ment of the Republican race for the White House with for­mer real­i­ty-TV star Donald Trump lead­ing the pack after a speech at New York’s The New School this week­end and the renowned polit­i­cal thinker sur­mised that the Grand Olé Party has become too extreme to still be con­sid­ered a legit­i­mate American polit­i­cal party.

“Republicans have just drift­ed off the spec­trum,” Chomsky declared in response to a ques­tion about what the “antics” of Trump say about American exceptionalism.

Noting the remark­ably sim­i­lar hawk­ish blus­ter against the Iran nuclear deal from sup­pos­ed­ly “seri­ous” can­di­date Jeb Bush and recent­ly depart­ed (from the cam­paign trail, not life) hope­ful Scott Walker, Chomsky said the Republican 2016 field is “off the spec­trum of not only inter­na­tion­al opin­ion, but even rel­a­tive sanity.”

I think we should rec­og­nize that the oth­er can­di­dates are not that dif­fer­ent,” from Trump, Chomsky offered. “If you take a look at — just take a look at their views. You know, they tell you their views, and they’re astonishing.”

Chomsky went on to cite a 2013 essay by con­ser­v­a­tive Norm Ornstein and Brooking’s fel­low Thomas Mann decry­ing the devo­lu­tion of the Republican Party to a “rad­i­cal insurgency”:

You can tell that even by the votes. I mean, any issue of any com­plex­i­ty is going to have some diver­si­ty of opin­ion. But when you get a unan­i­mous vote to kill the Iranian deal or the Affordable Care Act or what­ev­er the next thing may be, you know you’re not deal­ing with a polit­i­cal party.

In a recent inter­view with Indian mag­a­zine, Frontline, Chomsky iden­ti­fied the GOP’s race-bait­ing and big­ot­ed pan­der­ing to cap­ture an ever shrink­ing nativist elec­torate as the cause for why the Republican pres­i­den­tial pri­maries have become “spec­ta­cles remote from the main­stream of mod­ern society”:

It is impor­tant to bear in mind that the Republicans have long aban­doned the pre­tense of func­tion­ing as a nor­mal par­lia­men­tary par­ty. Rather, they have become a “rad­i­cal insur­gency” that scarce­ly seeks to par­tic­i­pate in nor­mal par­lia­men­tary pol­i­tics, as observed by the respect­ed con­ser­v­a­tive polit­i­cal com­men­ta­tor Norman Ornstein of the right-wing American Enterprise Institute. Since Ronald Reagan, the lead­er­ship has plunged so far into the pock­ets of the very rich and the cor­po­rate sec­tor that they can attract votes only by mobi­liz­ing sec­tors of the pop­u­la­tion that have not pre­vi­ous­ly been an orga­nized polit­i­cal force, among them extrem­ist evan­gel­i­cal Christians, now prob­a­bly the major­i­ty of Republican vot­ers; rem­nants of the for­mer slave-hold­ing States; nativists who are ter­ri­fied that “they” are tak­ing our white Christian Anglo-Saxon coun­try away from us; and oth­ers who turn the Republican pri­maries into spec­ta­cles remote from the main­stream of mod­ern soci­ety — though not the main­stream of the most pow­er­ful coun­try in world history.

Story orig­i­nat­ed here : Noam Chomsky: The GOP is a rad­i­cal insur­gency; it’s not a polit­i­cal party