As was expected, members of the private Bar have come out swinging against Prime Minister Andrew Holness’s announcement of the Government’s intention to have the Bail Act amended.
Mr Holness made the disclosure in his budget presentation on Tuesday, but did not elaborate, stating only that the intention was for an amendment to the act “such that persons charged with murder will be ineligible for bail under certain circumstances”.
Without details of the Government’s proposal, we are unable to give our view one way or the other. However, readers of this column will know that we have often argued the point that bail is too easily granted to some accused individuals and that there needs to be a review of the law.
We cannot forget the brutal murder of Special Constable Troy Foster in Malvern, St Elizabeth, in January 2013 by gunmen who engaged a police patrol in the town.
After the shooting, it emerged that one of the gunmen — Tyrone Edmond, who was also shot dead in that encounter — was out on bail, having been charged with the murder of 60-year-old pensioner, Mr Cecil Bennett in Top Hill, St Elizabeth, in 2010.
We also remember very well that in August 2012 one of the three suspects held for the cold-blooded murder of 26-year-old used car dealer Mr Michael Rochester was on bail. The suspect, the police reported, was facing charges of murder and shooting with intent.
There have been myriad cases in which offenders on bail have committed serious crimes, including murder. Indeed, one infamous gang leader, who was arrested and charged for a triple murder, was released on bail only to be arrested again and charged with a fourth murder three months later. But, surprisingly, he was granted bail again.
After all that, who can blame the police and indeed public prosecutors for feeling frustrated? Indeed, the police have often lamented that the ease with which some accused individuals are granted bail is hobbling their crime-fighting efforts.
We recall some years ago Assistant Commissioner of Police Wray Palmer expressing a desire on behalf of the Police Officers’ Association that the courts review the administration of bail.
“We need to consider the freedom of a violent criminal versus the security of the nation,” Mr Palmer said at the time.
It is a view that was shared by former Prime Minister PJ Patterson who, in 2005, called for a review of the policy governing bail.
“There are too many cases of too may persons who have been bailed intimidating witnesses or committing other offences,” Mr Patterson told senior journalists at a Jamaica House news briefing.
This problem, we note, is not unique to Jamaica for, in October 2012, British newspapers published Government data showing that every 10 days a murder is committed in Great Britain by offenders on bail.
According to those statistics, at least 37 criminals were convicted of murder while on bail for another offence in the year 2011 — an average of three every month.
In addition, the data showed that in 2011, a total of 65,627 criminals were convicted for a new offence they had committed while on bail.
While the figures here in Jamaica are not as frightening, we cannot ignore the reality to which they speak.
Jamaica needs to get to the point where the principles of justice and the rights of individuals are observed, while the safety of the community is protected.
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/editorial/There-is-need-for-a-tougher-Bail-Act_62193