Murder Conviction Overturned After Black Jurors Excluded

This writer has con­sis­tent­ly stat­ed in this medi­um that cor­rupt cops, pros­e­cu­tors, and judges are the great­est threat to our sys­tem of jus­tice. In this case, a poten­tial­ly guilty man was set free, but the appel­late court saw the case dif­fer­ent­ly than the tri­al judge.

The Oregon Court of Appeals has reversed the mur­der con­vic­tion of a Portland man after find­ing that pros­e­cu­tors dis­missed two men from the jury pool because they were Black, the same race as the defen­dant. The jury, which ulti­mate­ly had no Black mem­bers, found Darian L. McWoods guilty of mur­der by abuse in the death of his 15-month-old daugh­ter, Kamaya Flores, dur­ing a tri­al in Multnomah County Circuit Court in 2018.

In the rul­ing released Wednesday, Presiding Judge Josephine Mooney found that while Multnomah County Senior Deputy District Attorney Amanda Nadell offered race-neu­tral rea­sons to strike both prospec­tive jurors, those argu­ments were only a “pre­text.” “Racial dis­crim­i­na­tion in the selec­tion of jurors is harm­ful,” Mooney wrote. “The state did not seek to strike sim­i­lar­ly sit­u­at­ed jurors who were not Black.” McWoods’ defense attor­ney at tri­al, Josephine Townsend, chal­lenged both dis­missals under the “Batson” rule, refer­ring to a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court deci­sion pro­hibit­ing the exclu­sion of prospec­tive jurors based on their race. In an inter­view, Townsend not­ed Nadell didn’t use for-cause chal­lenges to remove the two Black jurors. For-cause chal­lenges require evi­dence that the juror in ques­tion can’t be impar­tial. Instead, both strike-outs pro­posed by Nadell were peremp­to­ry chal­lenges — mean­ing the pros­e­cu­tor didn’t have to offer a ratio­nale. After Townsend object­ed, Nadell raised var­i­ous prob­lems with the jurors’ answers to questionnaires.

Judge Christopher Marshall accept­ed both dis­missals with­out com­men­tary. But accord­ing to the appel­late rul­ing, Nadell mis­char­ac­ter­ized one of the dis­missed juror’s answers to the ques­tion­naire, claim­ing he had rat­ed the police as dis­hon­est when in real­i­ty he indi­cat­ed that offi­cers were usu­al­ly truth­ful. In both cas­es, the appeals court found that non-Black jurors had offered sim­i­lar respons­es to the ques­tion­naire as those of the dis­missed jurors. “If you have a cook­ie cut­ter jury,” Townsend said, “you’re not going to have the breadth of diver­si­ty, or the same lev­el or range of life expe­ri­ences that you can mea­sure against the evi­dence and the facts.”

Nadell’s super­vi­sor at the time, Amity Girt, served as the lead pros­e­cu­tor on the case, and Townsend recalled the two work­ing in con­cert. Girt has since entered pri­vate prac­tice. She did not respond to a request for com­ment. In a state­ment, Multnomah County District Attorney’s Office spokesper­son Elisabeth Shepard said the Court of Appeals opin­ion would be used “to fur­ther edu­cate and inform our role in the admin­is­tra­tion of jus­tice.” “The Multnomah County District Attorney’s Office is a learn­ing orga­ni­za­tion that strives to car­ry out our respon­si­bil­i­ties with integri­ty and humil­i­ty,” she said. “We are com­mit­ted to the ongo­ing pur­suit of a safer, more equi­table sys­tem.” At tri­al, pros­e­cu­tors said the tod­dler died of “com­pres­sion asphyx­i­a­tion,” mean­ing the tod­dler was crushed until she could not breathe. Authorities had pre­vi­ous­ly deter­mined that Flores’ died of methadone poi­son­ing and that McWoods had either inten­tion­al­ly giv­en her the sub­stance or that she took it unknow­ing­ly, as the father had a habit of mix­ing drugs into Capri Sun fruit drinks.