Look For JLP To Retroactively Add More Power To INDECOM It Created

Look for JLP to retroac­tive­ly add more pow­er to INDECOM it created.

He will be suc­cess­ful, he has the back­ing of the polit­i­cal direc­torate. (Rear Admiral Hardley Lewin for­mer Commissioner of Police)
The polit­i­cal direc­torate is the group of indi­vid­u­als which makes deci­sions for a coun­try, in the case of Jamaica it includes mem­bers of both the JLP and the PNP.

I have been turn­ing over in my mind this state­ment from the for­mer Rear Admiral, turned Police Commissioner and a cou­ple of things came to mind.
(a)Lewin seems to be say­ing that his tenure at the helm of the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF)was a fail­ure because he did not receive the req­ui­site lev­el of sup­port from his polit­i­cal superiors.
(b) Acknowledging that the very same peo­ple who he inferred did not pro­vide him the sup­port he need­ed has now decid­ed to pro­vide that mate­r­i­al sup­port and oth­er­wise to Anthony Anderson.

Terrence Williams
Commissioner of INDECOM

In post-Colonial Jamaica, there have been 16 Commissioners of police begin­ning with N A Crosswell, and cul­mi­nat­ing with George Quallo.
I would haz­ard that each of those gen­tle­men could make the very same claim, par­tic­u­lar­ly those who came much lat­er after 1962.
Nevertheless, it is rather telling to hear some­one who spent his life in the Army and rough­ly 2‑years at the helm of the Constabulary insin­u­ate that the polit­i­cal direc­torate does not sup­port the rule of law.

What is even more crit­i­cal and ger­mane to this con­ver­sa­tion is that with­in our fledg­ling, yet envi­able par­lia­men­tary demo­c­ra­t­ic sys­tem, there are politi­cians who have had their United States Visas yanked because of alleged crim­i­nal con­duct and or affiliations.

So what has changed which has brought about this sup­posed epiphany which would cause the same polit­i­cal direc­torate to now throw its sup­port behind this new­ly announced Commissioner of Police?
Surely, they are not hav­ing a come-to-Jesus moment because they see the writ­ing on the wall.
If that was the case they would have had that moment of [wokeness][sic] from as far back as 2010 when the thugs all but took over the country.

Alexander Williams for­mer JLP Spokesman on Justice and Justice Reform, and broth­er of Terrence Williams have before crit­i­cized the DPP on behalf of INDECOM

http://​www​.jamaical​abour​par​ty​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​t​i​m​e​-​p​a​r​l​i​a​m​e​n​t​-​c​r​e​a​t​e​-​w​o​r​k​i​n​g​-​f​r​a​m​e​w​o​r​k​-​d​p​p​-​a​n​d​-​o​t​h​e​r​-​a​g​e​n​t​s​-​j​u​s​t​i​c​e​-​w​i​l​l​i​ams

I don’t claim to have the answers to these ques­tions, yet we could argue that they see him as one of them. They may even want to deal a death knell to the JCF as we know it, in fact, there have been whis­per­ing to that effect in recent times.
On the oth­er hand, there have been a cou­ple of shoot­ings which has direct­ly impact­ed the polit­i­cal class in recent times, albeit that it has­n’t reached any of the real­ly big fish yet, unfortunately.

The new­ly elect­ed head of the Police depart­ment major gen­er­al Anthony Anderson takes office today, there are rum­blings that he may bring mem­bers of the JDF senior man­age­ment team to the Deputy Commissioner’s rank which would effec­tive­ly side­line the senior offi­cers at that lev­el and sti­fle career offi­cers of the department.
I am unable to ver­i­fy the verac­i­ty of these alle­ga­tions so I will refrain from spec­u­lat­ing fur­ther in the inter­est of hon­esty and integrity.

Delroy Chuck

One thing is sure is that as was to be expect­ed the tra­di­tion­al ene­mies of the police are up in arms. The Nation’s anti-law enforce­ment Justice Minister Delroy Chuck has stepped for­ward to make it clear that Parliament did intend to give INDECOM the pow­er to arrest and pros­e­cute police officers.
On the face of it, we could shrug off the fact that Delroy Chuck should nev­er be in any gov­ern­ment posi­tion due to his sup­port of gun­men killed by the police. It speaks vol­umes about the abil­i­ties of the par­lia­men­tar­i­ans who draft­ed and debat­ed the INDECOM bill before it became law. It makes a strong case that they were intrin­si­cal­ly unable to com­mu­ni­cate their intent on paper in clear and unam­bigu­ous ways.

The Gleaner Editorial page could not wait to jump on the band­wag­on of sup­port for the froth­ing mouth deranged Terrence Williams, declar­ing, Give INDECOM The Powers in their Monday online publication.
The larg­er issue here it seems is that this JLP Administration is decid­ed­ly focused on the destruc­tion of the Constabulary force and are blind­ed by the taste of power.

Bruce Golding gave the nation INDECOM and all it’s side effects, as well as the Tivoli affair and God knows what else?

The JLP sat in oppo­si­tion for an unprece­dent­ed 14 12 years look­ing into Jamaica House like the rest of us. The JCF is a large orga­ni­za­tion and I hope for its sake that it also has an expan­sive mem­o­ry. In the mean­time, the Police should begin to exert its influ­ence in ways that hurt peo­ple who are against them in their pocketbooks.
That should begin at all lev­els includ­ing not spend­ing mon­ey pur­chas­ing goods and ser­vices of com­pa­nies which adver­tise on the Jamaica Gleaner.

The time will come soon enough when police offi­cers, their fam­i­lies, and their sup­port­ers once again get to chose a gov­ern­ment. It would be anoth­er decid­ed affront to the Police by this admin­is­tra­tion as it seeks to find new ways to demor­al­ize the police and fur­ther place the lives of law-abid­ing Jamaicans at risk.

If that pro­vi­sion is added to the INDECOM act retroac­tive­ly, at a time when the court just ruled that it was nev­er there, it will be a water­shed moment in our coun­try’s mod­ern history.
The Jamaican peo­ple have clear­ly had enough time to see the destruc­tive pow­er of INDECOM over the past 8‑years. Andrew Holness him­self has argued the law needs revis­it­ing, yet there are pow­er­ful forces in the coun­try mar­shaled in sup­port of this law because the sta­tus quo suits their fidu­cia­ry interest.
They have also had 8‑years to see the harm a polit­i­cal­ly moti­vat­ed law and a polit­i­cal­ly moti­vat­ed flunky at its head can do.