Kings County, Brooklyn district attorney Kenneth Thompson began to impanel a grand jury to decide the fate of Officer Peter Liang, the man who shot and killed 28-year-old Akai Gurley.
Gurley was killed when Officer Peter Liang and his partner, also new to the force, were patrolling a pitch-dark stairwell with flashlights late Thursday, police said. Gurley, 28, was leaving his girlfriend’s apartment after she had braided his hair, according to the girlfriend, who is not his daughter’s mother.
Police said the officers walked down the stairs onto an eighth-floor landing when Gurley and his girlfriend opened a stairwell door one floor down, after giving up on waiting for an elevator. Police said Liang, patrolling with his gun drawn, fired without a word and apparently by accident, hitting Gurley from a distance of about 10 feet.
Community Organizations including the grassroots organization BK Nation, has demanded that Mayor Bill de Blasio and Police Commissioner William Bratton bring things to an end:
BK Nation through a Representative Kevin Powell said ‚“We do not believe this was an accident, but a pattern of reckless disregard for the lives of young men of color in our community”.
Regardless of what happens this will anger some groups. Residents and local African-American groups argue this case is just one more example of the low value Police place on the lives of young men of color, particularly black men.
Police Agencies and their supporters will point to the tremendous risks officers face daily as they patrol high crime Housing projects across the nation.
Both sides of the argument has merit. Police have demonstrated scant regard for the lives of Young men of color, and African Americans in particular.
On the other hand it is incredibly nerve-racking for officers who patrol these crime ridden housing projects. After all no one deserves to be killed simply because they went to work.
Regardless of the NYPD’s protocol to it’s officers regarding how patrols should be done mistakes were made which may be directly or indirectly attributable to the death of Akai Gurley.
Questions remain.
♦ Why two junior officers were on patrol by themselves?
♦ Why were they doing vertical patrols,( going from ground to roof, if they were told not to, as alleged?
♦Why did officer Liang have his gun drawn?
♦Did the opening of the door below the officers constitute enough of a fear factor to cause Officer Liang to believe he and his partner were in danger?
♦ If Officer Liang’s partner did not un-holster his weapon , it could reasonably be construed that any perceived fear Liang had may not have been anchored in reality.
Despite all of this, and the tragedy of the loss of this young man and the trauma to his family , I believe it would be another tragedy were he to be indicted .
With what we know so far about this shooting, it would appear that Officer Liang and his partner may have ignored Department guidelines. Liang may not have the nerves or judgement required of a good officer, but I see no intent to harm.
When every aspect of what we know is considered, taking police side into consideration, Officer Liang may need retraining, or even more severe departmental penalty to include but not confined to dismissal.
Despite the harm some officers do, we must be mindful that Cops face incredible risks while we sleep at nights. We need to remind ourselves that Officers are people too, they make mistakes.
It would be tragic were the law to punish this officer in light of what we know, because of some of the actions of other police officers.
Lets not throw out the baby with the bath-water.