Yesterday I wrote about Horace Chang’s response to a diaspora group’s statement that it would not hand over any money it raises to the government, that it intends to go toward crime-fighting.
The minister’s response was heartbreaking for me. When his statements are unpacked, the gist of it is that he is unappreciative of any help to stem the tide of killings and other violent crimes in our country. His comments are reminiscent of things we would expect to hear decades ago.
It seemed to be about bragging rights for funds allocated to the JCF by his government, rather than getting all the help he can to end the scourge of violence once and for all.
Make no mistake about it; the Andrew Holness administration has been head and shoulders over any People’s National Party Administration ever.….. So when this administration’s efforts are compared to any PNP administration, they are light years above anything the PNP has done.
However, a low bar hardly gives the government anything to brag about. If reasonable people were in charge of crime in our country, Jamaica would be well on its way to becoming a developed country based on the rates of investments and returns of people in the diaspora.
The collusion and incompetence of both political parties have stuck Jamaica in a time warp of criminality, perpetual poverty, and decay.
https://mikebeckles.com/changs-response-to-diaspora-groups-statements-ignorant-and-unhelpful/
The sad reality is that the PNP’s record on crime-fighting has been so abysmal, the bar so low, that anything the Holness Administration does on crime is vastly superior to the PNPs tenure on crime.
And so when Horace Chang brags about his government spending $54 billion on the police over the past four years, at 13. 5 billion annually, he misses the important concept that what the JCF needs is not just money but other critical support mechanisms.
That support can come in the form of critical training that some may have, ideas on how to tap into gang activities from former members who have a wealth of information to simple human resources help, and a range of other ways that people can be of help.
Only a fool makes it difficult to receive the help that would solve some of his own problems; Horace Chang’s statements, even though some may think they are reasonable, lacks the most basic understanding of how things get done in the 21st century.
Most of all, the minister’s statement that he doesn’t know anyone who made any [sensible] offer that the administration rejected is curious at best. Many people who served in the JCF have offered up their time and money to help; the Minister clearly has no idea how to coördinate or exploit that help, and so he makes excuses.
Then again, when it is up to people like Chang to determine what is sensible, are we surprised that he made those comments?
INDECOM
Those of you who have been loyal readers and supporters of this medium must know that I have been a vociferous opponent of INDECOM, the watchdog agency formed in 2010 by the Bruce Golding administration with the support of the PNP.
You also know that I have militated against the neophyte agency from the start, not because I am opposed to police oversight; far from it, the police should not police themselves. On the contrary, good oversight is good for both the citizens and the police.
However, police oversight must be delicately looked at with a keen eye on what we ask them to do and at what peril they carry out those tasks.
With that in mind, police oversight demands a certain degree of understanding of not just the difficulties, but the nuanced nature of the risks officers face as they carry out their duties.
Because of those realities, I have been against not the formation of INDECOM but the framework of the act, which I read thoroughly.
From the beginning, I argued that as the Act was written, it was unconstitutional, that it infringes on the rights of officers, and that it would be a massive driver of violent crime and lawlessness in our country.
I have been proven right on all fronts.
Since then, they have had to tailor parts of the law, and certain actions taken by the courts as it pertains to convictions of officers have been reversed. Additionally, when the venom of the agency’s first commissioner, Terrence Williams, was thrown into the mix, a perfect storm of anti-law enforcement brewing was set in motion that could only result in crime being where it is today.
Police officers left the force in droves, and those that remained shouldered arms even as I personally pleaded with the Andrew Holness Government to jettison Terrence Williams and his poison so that the security forces can once again begin the arduous task of taking back the streets from the murderous gangs roaming about unchecked.
So there we are, minister Chang; you are lying when you say that you have not ignored any sensible suggestions. Unless, of course, you believed that (a) Terrence Williams was doing a good job, or (b) keeping him there since 2010 to the time he was forced to step aside ten (10) years later was indicative of your taking advice.
The harm done under Williams for the decade he was allowed to placate criminals while tearing down the police department must be laid squarely at the feet of the government that appointed and enabled him.
It is important to note that the JCF is once again confronting the killers. In fact, they are confronting them immediately after they carry out their dastardly killings.
The force has a very long way to go in how it carries out those tactical encounters; the lack of training and coördination is glaringly evident. Even so, we salute the officers when they act to put a dent in this crime scourge.
Hopefully, officers will get better training, so they will look less like untrained gangsters just firing wildly and more like trained officers dealing confidently and expeditiously with a violent situation.
I salute the JCF, even as I beg the government to shed the arrogance and accept help.….…. We need intelligence to go with the technology so that the killers can be apprehended before they kill.
And yes, we need different training.
I can only wonder how more effective we would have been if we had the technological help available today in the early ’90s when I was a serving member.
.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
Do you believe in extra-judicial killings?