As Jamaicans, it seems that wherever we live outside our native Jamaica, we tend to make parallels with Jamaica on every issue we discuss.
Crime has been one of the most topical issues discussed among Jamaicans in the diaspora and at home. For members of the diaspora who genuinely have an interest in a crime-free Jamaica, the steepest hill to climb is the consistent push-back from our contemporaries at home who continue to argue that (crime de every weh), translation, crime is everywhere.
As such, the ever-increasing violent crime statistics have not engendered disgust, revulsion, or the will to fight back. The population has settled into a dangerous state of acceptance, a new normal of how things are.
So much affects how we can bring this monster under control, including whether there is a desire to in the first place because there is money involved for the players or whether the diaspora has the standing to demand change in our country.
I would posit that the diaspora does have the standing, considering that it pours an incredible amount of financial resources into the country, making itself the number two largest stream of foreign money flowing into the country.
On that basis, the diaspora does not only deserve a seat at the table; it needs to have several seats at the table.
Money talks bullshit walk! Those who think that because they were never able to leave, left, and were sent back, or chose [not] to leave makes them patriots need to take several seats to the side, not at the table.
Patriotism is not about where you live or whether you could leave, or whether or not you chose to leave.
Over the years, I have written several articles in which I said that a large part of the problem Jamaica faces with crime comes from the nation’s high tolerance for it.
As I said previously, one of the more strident arguments against my insistence that crime is far too high in Jamaica has been that.….…yup, “crime de every weh
Of course, they then compare the United States, crime situation, which of course exposes a significant misunderstanding of how crime statistics are looked at, or even how misguided that comparison is based on several factors..”.
Two of the factors that are not considered are (a)the size of the American population of 320 million compared to its violent crime statistics when compared to ( Jamaica’s 2.8 million) and its violent crime statistics.
(b)The size of the United States,3.8 million square miles (9.8 million square kilometers)compared to Jamaica,10,992 km² (4,244 sq mi).
When all of the data is tabulated in the United States and averaged among the American population of 320 million, it shows that though the United States is indeed a violent country, it is nowhere even remotely close to Jamaica when it comes to violent crime.
Violent crime is exponentially high in some areas of the United States while almost unheard of in some areas in the country’s vast expanses. Crime is indeed a topic of discussion in America, not because it is an existential issue for the country but because it makes good political fodder for one side of the political divide, which would rather see the police have free rein to murder innocent black and brown Americans.
ACQUIESCENCE
Generally, when there is a high crime rate in a country or parts of a country, the root causes are that those who should stop it are complicit in it. Nowhere is this more true than in the United States and Jamaica though not for the same reasons.
The high crime rate in both countries may be attributed to the same acquiescence, lack of will, and complicity which I alluded to.
In Jamaica, though the present administration may be somewhat better on crime than its predecessor, it is nowhere near where it should have been on this issue. Sure, they have upgraded police stations and changed other amenities; however, the laws have not been strengthened. Neither have the administration pledged the requisite support the security forces need to do their jobs effectively.
It is nearly impossible to explain just how important that support is to the fight against violent criminals and crime syndicates.
Jamaica’s national murder toll of 755 is five percent higher than the 716 tallied for the corresponding period in 2020, one Jamaican daily reports.
In the United States, with its 17,985 law enforcement agencies, the issue is not that there is the same kind of support for criminality through the various levels of governance.
The issue for America is that the Constitution guarantees in the second amendment that Americans have a right to bear arms. This is the only amendment to the constitution that many Americans have fealty to.
Not the right to peaceably protest, not the right to free speech, not the right to practice one’s religion, not the right not to have Government invade your private space without a warrant, not the right not to have your property seized by the government.
None of that, only the right to bear arms applies-at least to the Republican party.
The right to bear arms for the Republicans is a gift that keeps on giving because to its [followers] (it is now a cult), it is their protection that will allow them to maintain white supremacy, even if it means overthrowing the government as they tried to do on January 6th, 2021.
In both countries, it is the lack of will to address specific areas that generate violent criminal activity that continue to cause or aid violent crime producers.
Stop the wanton sale of guns in America and, as for Jamaica, give the police the support they need, and violent crime begins to trend south.
.
.
.
SHARE
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.