How College Admissions Are Affected By Racially Biased School Discipline

POSTED ON

CREDIT: AP PHOTO/JIM MONE
CREDIT: AP PHOTO/​JIM MONE

College admis­sions take a cru­cial fac­tor into account that could be cre­at­ing enor­mous racial bias, but it’s not grades or extracur­ric­u­lar activ­i­ties or even SAT scores. It’s a student’s dis­ci­pli­nary record.

A new sur­vey by The Center for Community Alternatives shows that 46 per­cent of col­leges gath­er infor­ma­tion on dis­ci­pli­nary records on their indi­vid­ual appli­ca­tion mate­ri­als and 27 per­cent col­lect that infor­ma­tion from Common Applications. Only 27 per­cent of the 408 col­leges and uni­ver­si­ties that respond­ed did not use that information.

The inclu­sion of dis­ci­pli­nary records in col­lege admis­sions is impor­tant, in part, because the extent to which teach­ers dis­ci­pline stu­dents often depends on the stu­dents’ race. Numerous stud­ies show that stu­dents of col­or are like­ly to be pun­ished more severe­ly than white stu­dents. Children as young as 6 years-old have been arrest­ed by police offi­cers after throw­ing tantrums in the class­room and eighth grade stu­dents have even been threat­ened by offi­cers for minor incidents.

Racial bias­es become clear­er in sit­u­a­tions that involve less severe, more sub­jec­tive offens­es, said Max Marchitello, pol­i­cy ana­lyst for pre-K-12 edu­ca­tion pol­i­cy at the Center for American Progress.

Being sus­pend­ed or expelled real­ly increas­es the like­li­hood you’ll drop out. It’s a huge prob­lem and a lot of stud­ies show that the dis­par­i­ty, the dis­pro­por­tion­al­i­ty, only hap­pens with sub­jec­tive offens­es. So the idea that col­lege admis­sions could deny some­one on a pure­ly sub­jec­tive ques­tion seems kind of crazy,” Marchitello said. “It’s only with manda­to­ry actions that you see par­i­ty, where, for exam­ple, some­one does drugs in the bath­room or brings a gun to school. Only in those sit­u­a­tions do you see what you expect to see, a one-to-one pro­por­tion­al­i­ty between enroll­ment and offense. Otherwise, once it’s up to indi­vid­ual adult actors, you see pret­ty dra­mat­ic race biases.”

According to the U.S. Department of Education, black and Hispanic stu­dents made up more than70 per­cent of school-relat­ed arrests or refer­rals to law enforcement.

The report shows a lack of an actu­al for­mal, writ­ten pol­i­cy on how to treat dis­ci­pli­nary infor­ma­tion in admis­sions poli­cies, with 75 per­cent of schools report­ing that they don’t have a writ­ten pol­i­cy. Yet, 89 per­cent of col­leges said it influ­ences admis­sions decision-making.

Some of the most com­mon fac­tors in the auto­mat­ic denial of an appli­ca­tion with a dis­ci­pli­nary his­to­ry were school-based arrests, assault result­ing in injury, bul­ly­ing, dis­trib­ut­ing ille­gal drugs and pos­ses­sion of a weapon. However, advo­cates say the com­bi­na­tion of school resource offi­cers and the pop­u­lar­i­ty of zero tol­er­ance poli­cies, which dis­ci­pline stu­dents severe­ly for rel­a­tive­ly minor offens­es, may be to blame for increased dis­ci­pline of stu­dents of color.

Police pres­ence in schools increased after the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Policing Services (COPS) start­ed the “COPS in Schools” grant pro­gram, which was launched in 1999 after the Columbine High School shoot­ings. The num­ber of school resource offi­cers in pub­lic schools rose from 9,400 in 1997 to 14,337 in 2003 and the per­cent­age of stu­dents who report­ed see­ing secu­ri­ty guards and assigned police offi­cers in schools increased from 54 per­cent in 1999 to 69 per­cent in 2007, accord­ing to a 2011 Justice Quarterly analy­sis by Chongmin Na and Denise Gottfredson.

Zero tol­er­ance dis­ci­pli­nary poli­cies dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly affects black stu­dents, accord­ing to a Harvard University study by Stephen Hoffman, which was pub­lished in 2012. At some schools, offi­cers issue tick­ets to chil­dren. At South Bend, Indiana schools, where black stu­dents com­pose 34 per­cent of enroll­ment, black stu­dents received more than sev­en out of 10 cita­tions issued dur­ing the past few school years. In Texas, stu­dents have been sent to court for offens­es such as fights on the school bus. Officials in Connecticut began screen­ing cas­es where stu­dents were in tick­et­ed in schools after kids went to court for drink­ing soda and “dress­ing improperly.”

A 2013 Congressional Research Service report by Nathan James and Gail McCallion cast some doubt on the effec­tive­ness of zero tol­er­ance poli­cies and school resource offi­cers. The dis­cus­sion of police involve­ment in schools was renewed after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shoot­ing. The report read, “Research sug­gests that the pres­ence of [school resource offi­cers] might result in more chil­dren being involved in the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem for rel­a­tive­ly minor offens­es, and this, in turn, can result in oth­er neg­a­tive con­se­quences, such as high­er rates of sus­pen­sion or a greater like­li­hood of drop­ping-out of school.”

One of the oth­er major prob­lems with col­leges using a student’s dis­ci­pli­nary his­to­ry in admis­sions is that schools’ def­i­n­i­tions of a severe infrac­tion vary wide­ly depend­ing on the dis­trict, the report from The Center for Community Alternatives notes. Some schools say that stu­dents push­ing each oth­er while in line qual­i­fies as “an extreme­ly vio­lent act,” and oth­ers clas­si­fy weapons pos­ses­sion as “not at all violent.”

However, many stu­dents have no idea that their dis­ci­pli­nary records are being released to schools or that col­leges are reject­ing their appli­ca­tion due to said his­to­ry, accord­ing to the sur­vey. Only 21 per­cent of the schools sur­veyed would auto­mat­i­cal­ly noti­fy the stu­dent that their dis­ci­pli­nary his­to­ry was the rea­son for the denial. Most of the time, how­ev­er schools require stu­dents ask why they received a rejec­tion, and even though 75 per­cent of schools had an appeals process in case stu­dents were reject­ed for that rea­son, less than half were told by admis­sions that they even had the option.

Common appli­ca­tions ask stu­dents to answer truth­ful­ly on all ques­tions so when a stu­dent checks the box for a his­to­ry of dis­ci­pli­nary infrac­tions, they have an oppor­tu­ni­ty to answer why they received an infrac­tion and spec­i­fy what kind of infrac­tion it was lat­er in the appli­ca­tion. If they sim­ply didn’t arrive to class on time or brought soda to class, they should make that clear in the appli­ca­tion, said Deena Maerowitz, an edu­ca­tion­al con­sul­tant who helps guide stu­dents though admis­sions appli­ca­tions and for­mer asso­ciate direc­tor of admis­sions at Columbia University Business School. When Maerowitz advis­es stu­dents with a dis­ci­pli­nary his­to­ry, she advis­es them to explain how it has helped their per­son­al growth and what they have learned from the situation.
How College Admissions Are Affected By Racially Biased School Discipline