America’s tortured, racist past created organizations like the National Association For The Advancement Of Colored People(NAACP). The(CLU) was founded on February 12th, 1909, in New York City, while the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) came 11-years later, on January 19th, 1920, founded in 1920, again in New York City. A good barometer of their success is the level of attacks against these organizations, even as it is rather revealing to see the parties that attack these organizations. The New York City Police Department(NYPD) and some of its sycophants have made themselves bitter adversaries to the ACLU) for decades now.
ACLU Since the nation’s founding, the fabric of American society has been woven with deeply racist policies, practices, and attitudes that harm Black and Indigenous people of color. These policies have led to an unequal system where white people have both implicit and explicit advantages because of the color of their skin, leading to better opportunities in jobs, education, and housing.
Please view the video to see why the work of these organizations is critical from now on.
NAACP To make our vision a reality, we will: Ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of all citizens. Achieve equality of rights and eliminate race prejudice among the citizens of the United States. Remove all barriers of racial discrimination through democratic processes.
Yesterday I talked about Judges as I registered my support for the Commissioner of Police. The Commissioner spoke, albeit years late and still tongue in cheek as he parsed his words, overly careful not to offend. He finally spoke out about the liberal judges allowing dangerous convicted criminals back onto the streets(my words). On the other hand, I have consistently maintained that the little bureaucrats that work in the various government agencies operate as demigods. They are so drunk on power that they oftentimes forget to do their jobs. Flossing and media-hogging have become a way of life for these little tadpoles in this dirty little pond. For years I complained about INDECOM, The Public Defender, The Judiciary, and other public bodies that operate not as important parts of a unit but as free-standing units divorced from the body. Terrence Williams’s tenure as head of INDECOM made the public office a grandstanding stage for self-promotion; Earl Witter and others have also hogged the limelight as they sought out the microphones to get their names in the newspapers. Unfortunately, when all is said and done, the public has precious little to show for either of the two gentlemen’s tenure at their respective posts. https://mikebeckles.com/commissioner-anderson-speaks-out-against-judges-late-and-half-hearted-well-kinda/
Public Defender Arlene Harrison-Henry (JIS photo)
So no one should be surprised that the present Public Defender, Arlene Harrison-Henry, is no different from others. If they have anything to do with an issue generating interest or discussion, they will milk it for whatever it’s worth to get all of the eyeballs they can get on themselves. Knowing how these public servants operate, I called on the police commissioner to immediately conduct a swift and thorough investigation into the allegations that a Rastafarian woman was allegedly trimmed against her will at the Four Paths Police Station in Clarendon weeks ago. Doing so would have earned some degree of veneration for the police, as opposed to the scorn that would be heaped on them were the investigations to drag on. It would also deny the grandstanders a soapbox, at least for the long term.
Here is the thing, the Public Defender has her powers granted to her by the Jamaican Parliament, so too does the Commissioner of Police. As a security Agency, the Police have every right to have proper protocols followed at its facilities. The Public Defender has every right to be allowed access to conduct her investigations, but that right does not supersede her need to follow protocol. These little matters warrant no fuss, but these little bureaucrats are like little mongrels pissing on every tree trying to establish territory and authority. In the same way that the Public Defender found the time and necessity to write to complain to the Police Commissioner why did she not write to let him know that she and her officers would be visiting the station as part of the investigatory process and that they would need access not open to ordinary members of the public? I believe that the Commissioner of Police would have not only flung the gates open for her, but he would also have provided an escort for her and her team. But following protocol and avoiding the kerfuffle would not have generated any excitement as she went about doing whatever she needed to do, creating false disagreements does. Jamaicans need these agencies to be there as bulwarks against tyranny from all quarters; it is, therefore, imperative that the people who head these important agencies operate less in the limelight and more behind the scenes to carry out the mandate they were given. A Government Agency fighting with another government Agency in another Agency of Government does no one any good. Enough with the grandstanding already and get on with the task at hand.….
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
Let me add my voice to that of Police Commissioner Antony Anderson who had an epiphany that the light and sometimes no sentences given to serious offenders is fuelling crime on the Island. Let me be very clear; I support Anderson’s stance because this has been the stance of pretty much every cop who served in the JCF, including this writer. My problem with Anderson’s statements is that they are years late, and still, he parses words arguing that he is not pointing fingers at any judges or the justice system; who the hell are you speaking to then? What a lame-ass thing to say; it just goes to show that these officials value their positions more than they do the survival of our nation. Seriously, do you care that much that you will not be invited to any more of their little functions were they down cocktails and nibble on delicacies as they converse in fake accents? Mister Commissioner, as I am sure you know, I have repeatedly called for harsher sentences for violent offenders and people arrested with guns. One of my issues with your appointment is that [you] should have only accepted the job of commissioner of police under the guarantee that the issue of appropriate sentencing would be immediately addressed. Speaking out, now that almost a thousand (991) have again been murdered this year, smacks of you trying to deflect blame from yourself.
I believe that you are not responsible for the killings, and I also believe that you are doing your best, but that is exactly the problem. Commissioner Antony Anderson was also the nation’s first National Security Adviser. A post created by the Holness Administration seemingly for Anderson should have advised his boss as an adviser that this issue is a national security threat. But in reality, Commissioner Anderson did not, and could not, because you see,- mister Anderson was never a cop, so even though he was advising the Prime Minister on National Security, one of the burgeoning threats was outside his understanding because as he had no training or experience in law enforcement.
Anderson spoke to specific issues; roughly 1,000 people were released from prison each year, between 430 to 480 of them became re-offenders within two and a half years“In an environment where 92 percent of our people killed last week were killed with a gun, it cannot be adequate. When I reviewed 16 cases from the beginning of the year, none of those cases of illegal possession were the persons required to go to jail. It was either a fine, a suspended sentence, or probation. This is real, and I am not blaming anyone, but it is just how our system works, and the reason it hasn’t been effective in deterring is that it doesn’t deter.”In another case involving three women, two from Westmoreland and the other from St Elizabeth, the commissioner said they were robbed and wounded but still managed to help investigators build a strong case. He said they went to court and testified, only to see the men walking around the following day, even though they were convicted. “The very next day after these persons were convicted, those perpetrators are walking past the same women in the community. Something is wrong, and I have a problem with that. That is not a nice process. You have to keep reliving and talking about the thing that impacted you. What about that will deter that criminal from offending or give these women confidence that the State is fair and just. These people I am talking about are people who were convicted.” “What we see as a feature of these conflicts is that gangsters are more willing now; if they can’t get the persons, they are after to go after the family and associates of these gangsters and go after all of them collectively, particularly in the lower part of St Andrew, Kingston, and Clarendon, and more recently Westmoreland and earlier in the year in St James.”The Commissioner lamented.
Commissioner Anderson’s statements are a day late and a dollar short. Even though he made factual statements years later than he should, he still refuses to stand up to the morons who sit in judgment of these vicious killers and shooters. Regardless of the bullshit, they try to feed the people about sentencing guidelines and time spent in jail; these unelected shitheads are carrying out an antithetical ideology to the Jamaican people’s interest. The people must demand that the Legislature pass laws that protect them from the gun-toting criminals and their associates on the bench.
.
.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
These days, I hardly spend time talking about what the JCF could be doing better; there are far more pressing issues in my adopted homeland. I try to speak to the hypocrisy of how the United States uses its resources to help fight against transnational crime as a tool of sorts of dictate to developing nations on what they can and cannot do to their criminals. Nevertheless, I cannot pretend not to see that some of the issues that plagued the JCF over three decades ago are still evident despite the continued talk of transformation of the force. I understand that there are resource shortages and probably will be for a very long time into the future. Those shortages include human resources, equipment, tools, legislation, adequate pay, better working conditions, training, leadership, motivation, and a simple common sense…The latter seeming to be the resource in the shortest supply.
One of the pressing issues facing the country is the issue of corruption. It is cancer that corrodes all Government agencies, stifles progress, and frustrates the population. This happens because the legislature is far too lazy, incompetent, and moronic to pass laws that set clear timelines in which government functions must be addressed. For example, a person applying for a birth certificate should receive it in a set time. Same idea for passports, police records, and other documents that the people depend on to get on with their lives. There is no excuse for these things not to be clearly set in law and policy and enforced rigidly. Failure to implement these common-sense legislative processes is a breeding ground for corruption. It allows low-level bureaucrats to frustrate the public who really need these documents and coerces them to pay bribes. These shortcomings are within the remit of the elected officials who lack imagination, commonsense, and the knowledge to draft and pass meaningful legislation to advance the nation’s interest.
However, as I have asked over the years, “what stops the police from stamping out the fraud at the Registrar Generals’ office or the Motor Vehicle’s Department”? How difficult is it to set up stings and arrest the rogue motor vehicle examiners, rogue Custom Agents, and other leeches who enter public service to rip off the public? I’ll hazard a guess; it isn’t that the police hierarchy lacks imagination (it does), but the force is itself far too corrupt to care about the culture of corruption that now characterizes Jamaican culture, which it has a sworn duty to try to correct. No one wants a job from which they cannot steal. I was nauseated several days ago when someone showed me a video on a social media platform of a Jamaican cop asking a couple in an automobile, “have you done any good deeds for those who protect and serve today” the occupants of the car realizing the pathetic attempt at a bribe solicitation handed the cop a few bucks, laughed at him and drove away. Police officers demeaning their uniforms by begging, soliciting bribes, or as the old vernacular goes, “cutting,” is a reprehensible practice that demeans the entire force, even if was an isolated incident. In Jamaica this reprehensible and shameful practice isn’t.
Rather than set an example for the nation to follow, the JCF continues to be an agency largely for show, form over substance. Members of the JCF now have more degrees than a thermometer, yet neither the force nor the country benefits from the advanced learning of these officers who sit atop the hierarchy of the JCF doing nothing but [flossing]. Instead of helping to seriously address the problems, the force has surrendered to being a part of the overall problem. The extent to which graft, corruption, and crime have hobbled the nation’s growth and development may all be attributed to and laid squarely at the feet of the various government agencies, the JCF being no exception.
.
.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
Whether we like it or not, all of us come with a sell-by date, like yogurt, we eventually expire and must be tossed out if not out of desire, out of how impossible it is for anyone to be around us. Despite our stamped sell-by date, it is rather difficult when our loved ones creep up to that date when we eventually have to say goodbye. Sadness, shock, abandonment, hurt, disappointment, and a whole range of other emotions engulf us even as we reconcile that, given time, death is something assigned to all of us. Some of those very emotions washed over me yesterday as several former colleagues texted me the news that our mentor and friend, Detective Deputy Superintendent Noël Asphall, had passed.
Having graduated from the Police Academy in December of 1982 as a member of the first batch to commence and complete training at the Twickenham Park training facility, I would be involved in other firsts in my decade-long career in the JCF. Having been dispersed to the Beat & Foot Patrol on West Street downtown Kingston in time for the Christmas holiday, I was shocked a mere three months later that I would be among a small group of young officers to be sent to the Mobile Reserve. It was the first time officers not trained specifically for, and by the Mobile, Reserve would be dispersed to that division. It was not something I desired nor wanted, so I did not arrive at that facility a happy camper. At the time, the Mobile Reserve was branded as a place for big officers who could swing a baton in times of riot. It was rumored to be a place where careers went to die if for nothing else, the sheer number of officers stationed there. I was a slightly built guy, 5 feet 8 inches tall on a good day and weighing at best with my boots on 155 pounds. I did not feel that I had any business there-neither did I want to be there. Despite my animus toward the place, I moved from the regular ho-hum of the daily grind to a sector that suited my style better; I was a member of the forty-something strong Ranger Squad. It was from that squad that, in my mind, I was rescued as one of four officers to go to Constant Spring CIB because the popular Cornwall (Bigga ) Ford was being transferred to CIB Headquarters. The four were E Marston, Allen Gauntlett, Keith Scully, and Michael Beckles.
Deputy Superintendent Noël Asphall
It was there that I started to enjoy my work as a police officer under the tutelage and guidance of Detective Inspector Noël Asphall, a man we affectionately called (stomach), just never to his face. (smile) A man who wasn’t perfect, only because perfection and human fallibility made that an impossibility. Mister Aspall was a big man, not overly tall, but he had a commanding presence, the kind of presence that causes everyone in the room to stop doing what they were doing when he walked in compared to someone like me, who no one looked up at. Mister Asphall’s presence and how we reacted around him could never be misconstrued as out of fear or disdain; we all respected and loved him. His strict discipline, guidance, caring nature, and the way he guided and protected us were something many of today’s leaders can only hope to emulate. His ability to motivate caused us to work extremely long hours without additional compensation in service to the residents of Saint Andrew North and our country overall. That will be his enduring legacy. Under Noël Asphall’s guidance, the Saint Andrew North Detectives became the envy of the entire country. It was not a function of who the Area commanding officer was, nor who the Divisional officer was. Neither was it because of who the Divisional crime officer was at any given time. During my time, we had Rudolph Dwyer, Garnett Daley, and Anthony Hewitt as Detective Area Crime officers at different intervals; all had their positives, but it was Noël Asphall who got us to produce what we did.
One of my esteemed former colleagues was kind enough to supply me with a list of officers who served in mister Asphall’s CIB. Speaking of Detective Seargeant Keith Scully who is still serving. We reminisced this morning about the positives of the man we privately called (Stomach) but to his face affectionately referred to as (Spec). We talked about those who served with us under his tutelage and guidance; I list some here. We all mourn your passing, sir. Female Detectives Yasmin Ankle & Webber the men Devon Watkiss, Cornwall Ford, Colin Pinnock, Wilford Gayle, Dayton Henry, Dean Taylor, Donald McInnis, Barrington Campbell, Dadrick Henry, Linval Henry, George Henry, Altimorth Campbell, Elwin Cameron, Eric Dawes, Sylvanus Ellison, Keith Scully, Michael Beckles, Allen Gauntlet, Walter Grant, Élan Powell, Errol Mcleish, Shane Foster, D Foster, Tony Frye, C Greene, Artel Antonio Morgan, Glasford Dacres, Leroy Hanson, Fitz Tracey, Carlton Henry, Leroy Hanson, Allan Campbell, and more.…… Any officer I may have omitted to mention, please forgive me; it has been 30 plus years since I left. The respect and love Mister Asphall commanded far exceeded the detectives who were his charge; uniformed cops from far and wide loved and respected him. That love and respect were evident in the way members of the public reacted to his presence. We will forever miss this towering leader who, without trying, demonstrated through his life work that doing the job of a police officer is not about hype or fancy degrees- He got the job done by the characteristics I attributed to him. Walk good sir. In 1991, when I decided to call it quits, you called me aside and told me that you were pained to see me go, that you would miss me but that if you were at my age, you would have made the same decision I was making. We spent many hours together both on and off the job, many of them at your grandad’s place in Brandon Hill, you called me your son, and I will miss you like hell. Part of who I am today is a result of the man you were. My condolences to his beloved wife Sonia and the rest of his family. Rest well, sir, until we meet again.….….
.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
Jack of all trades master of none.… I usually travel with my camera, which elicits derision and laughter from my kids, who insist that their I phone cameras are far superior to my old Kodak Easy Share Z981. The logic being that I should discard my camera or opt for something more up-to-date, modern, and expensive. But I don’t think so. I’m old school, even though full disclosure, I do have an iPhone 7‑plus, oaky that’s old too, but there again is the dilemma, do I discard my perfectly good iPhone 7‑plus because they have several iterations after my model’s release?
View of the Hudson River from the Vanderbilt Mansion in historic Hyde Park, New York
So here is my question to those of you who heap scorn and derision on my old phone and camera. Please tell me this; if Apple made a phone without a model number- just an I phone without any number or alphanumeric designation, wouldn’t you try to keep your phone for as many years as possible, knowing that you would only replace your device with another of what you are replacing? Sure you would!
Apple and all of the companies that manufacture your electronic devices know that. That is why they include numbers and alphanumeric characters to get you programmed into the idea that a newer, better model is just around the corner. And we all know what happens when we try to get the newest model anything; we put ourselves in debt for items that make us no money. Imagine if we begin to invest the money we waste on the newest gizmos and invest in our future, in stocks, bonds, real estate?
We would be able to leave something to our children the type of wealth the Vanderbilts left, and if not that much wealth, who cares? At least we would have left our children a starting block from which to start the race of life. Anything that allows them a chance, so they do not begin the race of life flat-footed.
Our Lab ‑Mix Bud.
We could do simple things like investing in inexpensive burial insurance that in some instances cost less than $30 per month to ward off the need for Gofundme efforts when a loved one dies. Allowing that to come from a checking accounts is almost painless as you almost don’t notice it; the price of a can of soda per day will result in $30’000 when that loved one dies. Money enough to give them a decent burial and leave some money for you who took that proactive step to look into the future.
Sounds preachy? I hope not, but articulating the best path forward is not always palatable to all of us. I also understand that some of us really do not want to be bothered with planning for the eventualities that will occur as sure as night follows day. So if these words of advice offend you, I apologize for offending you; clearly, this is not for you.
Anyway, the advice was free, and so was the scenery. Do enjoy the scenery, even if you did not care about the advice.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
Twenty years after the events of September 11th, 2001, America is out of Afghanistan, out of Iraq, and in a lot of trouble internally. Out of the events of September 11th, 2001 came the cliché Americans were indoctrinated by the Bush Administration to adopt, “If you see something, say something.” As much as I disliked the Bush presidency, its actors, and its policies, I do not hold the view that they created that doctrine with mal-intent.” At the heightened fears of another terror attack, the idea was for each person to be an extra pair of eyes and ears in vigilance against what they perceived was sustained and orchestrated Islamic terror crusade against the United States. Not a bad idea since the security forces cannot be everywhere and are limited in numbers; it made sense that the average citizen would be the eyes and ears of the security forces. Little did African-Americans know that when Bush and Chaney created that doctrine, white men and women would weaponize it, turning Police into weapons of assault against them.
By now, we are all familiar with the many ways that this simple idea of calling the authorities in case you see something that draws your suspicion was weaponized and used by white people against Blacks. The old idea that no tragedy should go unexploited was in full effect; Blacks became the new enemy for the soldiers who had returned from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and had woven their ways into police departments across the country. The police made themselves the protectors of white fragility. White men and women took it upon themselves to be the decider where Black people existed or whether they existed at all. Whether it was a small Black child selling bottled water, a Black family grilling in the park, a young Black college student sitting in a college dorm, they called police because the Black people had no right to be where they were. Police were not shy about acting as race soldiers; they killed indiscriminately and still do, regardless of the spotlight that has been directed at them. Elijah McClain walking down the street, Philando Castile driving home from work with his family, Botham Jean sitting in his house, Eric Graner selling loose cigarettes, Alton Sterling selling CDs, John Crawford, Atatiana Jefferson murdered as she played video games with her nephew in her own home. The list grows each day, all murdered by police. The male and female Karen Meme was born, but this has been no laughing matter to Black people. White people re-upped on the old idea that police departments are their private armies to exact punishment and even death on others they do not like, usually people of a darker hue. From 12 ‑year-old Tamir Rice gunned down in a Cleveland Park as he played with his toy gun, to Elijah McClain murdered, choked, and injected with Ketamine as he skipped home from the store listening to music, cops have been happy to be cop prosecutors, judges, and executioners.
As outrage grew after George Floyd was killed by Derek Chauvin and his cohorts in Minnesota, citizens all across America took to the streets in protest; at the same time, America’s law enforcement agencies came together, not to change their practices, but as a de facto opposition force to the Black Lives Movement that had begun to solidify across the country, opposed to police violence against minority communities. The American Civil Liberties Union(ACLU) reports that since the murder of mister Floyd, Police still kill about three people a day, and58 percent of police killings this year began when officers responded to an incident like traffic enforcement or a mental health need. Black people are still three times as likely to be killed by police than white people and 1.3 times more likely to be unarmed when they are. (In short, what has not changed since George Floyd’s murder is that communities of color continue to be patrolled by massively funded — $115 billion a year — and heavily armed police forces that disproportionately stop, arrest, jail, abuse, traumatize, and kill people of color. It continues a generations-old status quo of racial injustice, while alternatives that reduce harm and violence — medical and mental health care, schools, housing, employment, social services, and more — remain woefully underfunded. What has changed in the last year, from coast to coast, in big cities and small, is that the movement to reduce police role, power, and resources is steadily gaining ground and building power. The focus is shifting from what is done after the police have already committed harm and toward preventing it from happening in the first place”, the (ACLU) said…
After the irrational killing of people of color by police culminated in George Floyd’s killing, Americans of all ages, races, and creeds went into the streets to register their disgust. The Trump administration encouraged police to be more brutal, even suggesting that the military open fire on protesters. Trump and his Attorney General William Barr ordered Federal officers to tear gas and beat protesters in Lafayette Park, effectively removing legitimate protesters from the area so that he could have a photo opp in front of a church where he held up a Bible-albeit upside down. The year 2020 was a year of the COVID-19 Pandemic; Americans were sequestered in their own homes and were able to concentrate on the horrors of what was occurring under the guise of law enforcement. Conscientious Americans stepped into the streets to register their disgust; black, white, and brown, from across valleys, hamlets, and towns, they came in droves to say, “we do not want this. But police did not change their ways; instead, as the movement intensified, police became more brutal, more lethal. Even more shocking than their refusal to change was that officers saw themselves as the opposition to the Black Lives Matter Movement, and they certainly acted as a violent opposition. They drove their patrol cars into protestors, beat, shot, pepper-sprayed, and committed all kinds of crimes against legitimate protestors who dared to stand up to the state tyranny they exemplified.
It simply isn’t possible to understand the criminal justice crisis in the United States without properly understanding how these officers of the court, ostensible stewards of justice, have worked for decades to build a system of overcriminalization, blatant race-based discrimination, rampant police brutality, and mass incarceration. (David S. D’Amato)
Where else in the world are police officers convicted of crimes allowed to continue serving as police officers except the United States? Is it any wonder then that cops commit felonies indiscriminately against the people they are sworn to protect with impunity? Imagine being a law enforcement officer and being allowed to plead down from a felony committed as an officer and allowed to remain a police officer! I spent a decade as a police officer in Jamaica from 1982 to 1992; I laugh at this because no officer of the Jamaican Constabulary Force in its long history has ever committed a felony was ever allowed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor and remain an officer. In fact, in my time, a misdemeanor conviction meant instant dismissal from our department. Is it any wonder then that American police officers steal drugs from dealers, steal their dirty money, sell the drugs back to other dealers, plant drugs on people they do not like, lie in their statements, lie on the witness stand, falsify evidence, brutalize and murder innocent unarmed citizens? They are regular gangs of bullies roaming around to see who they can rob and steal from as part of the concept of policing for profit that is a staple in American policing…U.S. policing has also drawn controversy over excessive fines, fees, and asset forfeiture, a widespread practice in which departments profit from seizing the assets of citizens, many of whom are never charged with a crime.
At least 630 police officers have been convicted of a crime in California over the past decade — an average of more than one every week. Nearly a fifth of those officers are still working or on the job more than a year after sentencing. Their convictions range from driving under the influence to sex offenses — some with minors — to domestic abuse and assault. Officers charged with felonies that would bar them from carrying a gun and, consequently, from working as a police officer frequently plea down to lesser offenses that enable them to keep their gun — and their job. And even officers who are terminated from one department often continue working as cops by jumping from one department to the next. The United States’ own Council on Foreign Relations reports the following.
Other advanced democracies organize, fund, train, arm, and discipline their police officers differently than the United States does.
Many countries, including the United States, struggle with police brutality and tense relations between law enforcement and minority communities.
The United States far exceeds most wealthy democracies in killings by police, and officers seldom face legal consequences.
Why do you think that the United States seldom disciplines its police officers when they run afoul of the laws? Could it be that the answer is right there in the Council’s second paragraph? Could it be that policing is still tantamount to slave catching as it was when the idea was first conceptualized despite all of the talks about American exceptionalism and American advancement? Researchers estimate that one in ten police calls in the United States is related to mental health. Approximately one-fifth of people shot and killed by police in 2019 showed signs of mental illness. This means that twenty (20) percent of all the people they killed in 2019 were people experiencing mental health issues. It is not that the officers do not know that most of these people are experiencing mental issues, they are often told by their dispatch or told by relatives on arrival. Shooting a distraught person down in cold blood is done as soon as they can contrive a legal justification to fit their narrative that they were in fear for their lives. In some cases the victim they gun down is stark naked and unarmed.
Basic U.S. training programs take twenty-one weeks on average, whereas similar European programs can last more than three years. In Finland and Norway, recruits study policing in national colleges, spending part of the time in an internship with local police, and earn degrees in criminal justice or related fields. With hundreds of police academies, the United States lacks national standards for what recruits should learn. U.S. academies tend to emphasize technical skills rather than communication and restraint. According to a 2013 U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics report, academies on average spent the most time — seventy-one hours — on firearm skills, compared with twenty-one hours on de-escalation training (which teaches how to use conversation and other tactics to calm a situation without using force) and crisis-intervention strategies. In Germany, firearms training focuses on how to avoid using force. Japanese officers are trained in martial arts.
The United States far surpasses most wealthy democracies in police killings. U.S. police killed an estimated 7,638 people between 2013 and 2019. (According to the same database, they killed another 1,125 people in 2020.) In comparison, at least 224 people died in encounters with Canadian police between 2013 and 2019. Some countries, such as Finland and Norway, have gone years without police killings. A study done by the US Department of Justice found that the lack of data on police crime is clearly a problem; since the development of strategies to mitigate police crime in the least requires that they be documented and described in some systematic and generalizable manner. You can’t fix what you don’t know. If you do not want to fix it you do not keep a record of it; that has been the strategy of the United States on police violence. If there is no data to look at there is no problem, no data means they cannot be confronted with the facts. Failure to document in a unified and systemic way the violence committed by law enforcement in the United States has emboldened police to continue to act with impunity in minority communities. Most of the almost 18,000 police departments are allowed to withhold even basic information regarding officers’ personnel records, much less to document and hold officers accountable for committing crimes. After the George Floyd killing, a few local legislatures have moved to make officer’s personnel records available when accused of crimes. Rather than throw the book at them when they commit felonies, local prosecutors who receive political endorsements from police unions fraternize with officers and allow dangerous criminal cops to plead guilty to misdemeanors so they can stay in uniform. Consequently, dirty cops are allowed to remain in departments and pose a grave danger to the minority communities throughout the country.
As the issue of police crimes become more under the microscope, it is important to know that [still], there is no Federal database that compiles the number of people who are killed one way or another by police each year, much less the number of crimes police officers are committing and are allowed to plead down to misdemeanors by corrupt local prosecutors with the acquiescence of local equally corrupt judges. In her academic article “Can You Be a Good Person and a Good Prosecutor?” law professor Abbé Smith implored lawyers “committed to social and racial justice” not to join a prosecutor’s office, urging them to think carefully about the moral implications of that choice. Smith was ahead of her time. When she wrote the article almost 20 years ago, the question was a provocative one, one that few were asking. She demonstrated then what more Americans than ever are beginning to understand now: Prosecutors play an integral, even central, role in a profoundly corrupt and immoral system that has unjustifiably destroyed the lives of millions of Americans. Judges, too, are deeply implicated in the moral crimes of this system but, like prosecutors, are highly regarded in polite society; indeed, the role of a judge is arguably among the most honored positions in American society. We think of judges as people who have especially good judgment and a strong moral compass. But to prod the reality of the criminal justice system even a little is to reveal the cold, callous cruelty of the people charged with upholding justice and the rule of law. It isn’t that judges and prosecutors have merely turned a blind eye to the rot of systemic racism and injustice at the heart of the criminal justice system. Rather, they have been actively complicit in advancing and reinforcing this system, working directly at odds with efforts to reform it. Given the tiny fraction of criminal cases that proceed to trial, judges have effectively abdicated their role, allowing prosecutors to coerce defendants into plea bargains whose terms force defendants to give up their most important constitutional rights.
These judges are parties to an imposture, carrying on the pretense that criminal defendants enjoy the benefits of an adversarial process and a presumption of innocence. On the contrary, criminal cases have been reduced to mere administrative proceedings in which defendants (even completely innocent ones) accept long, harsh sentences under duress. Judges also routinely fail to scrutinize questionable evidence offered by prosecutors, including, notably, false testimony from police officers who lied under oath (the widespread phenomenon even has its own little name, “testilying”). They virtually always uphold illegal searches and arrests, agreeing with police officers in finding that there was probable cause, thus making the existing constitutional standard effectively meaningless. Prosecutors are unique among advocates; their client is the state, and the stakes are unusually high, as a victory for their client frequently means the forcible deprivation of a citizen’s liberty. Thus do their ethical obligations reflect this categorical difference, at least in theory and on paper. “A prosecutor’s duty is to seek justice, not merely to convict,” according to the American Bar Association’s model ethical rules. Prosecutors can behave much less ethically than other lawyers, largely because they have little incentive to take their ethical duties seriously. There are notoriously very few consequences for prosecutor misconduct, and of course, prosecutors know it. They cannot be held civilly liable for their acts as prosecutors, and state bars (the same organizations that have written so many nice-sounding words in the wake of George Floyd’s murder) almost always refuse to hold them to account.(Excerpt is taken from the Hill.com)
I know you felt that was is a system that was set up to ensure justice, unfortunately, that is an incredible lie. The system has precious little to do with the dispensation of justice; is a system designed to cement and further white power and white control over everyone else. Every tentacle, every fibrous vein was designed to function to the detriment of the Black race. We are merely getting a tiny glance into its inner workings, those of us who bother to care that is. For the rest, it’s coonery and buffoonery, as usual, shucking jiving right back into bonded servitude…
.
.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
California is one of the few U.S. states without a way to strip bad officers of their badges. The Kenneth Ross Jr. Police Decertification Act will change that.
On Wednesday, California lawmakers moved forward legislation that can cause law enforcement officers to lose their badges. The legislation is awaiting a signature from Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has favored police reform in the past.
According to the Associated Press, the Kenneth Ross Jr. Police Decertification Act, a bill originally introduced a year ago by Democratic state Sen. Steven Bradford, aims to stop officers from simply changing departments after being found guilty of misconduct. The bill will create a new certification that can be permanently revoked by an 18-member council called the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
Bradford named the bill after 25-year-old Kenneth Ross, a Black man killed by an officer in Los Angeles County back in 2018. According to AP, the officer was cleared of wrongdoing in Ross’ case but was previously involved in three other shootings.
‘Not Going to Do This Anymore’: Fed-Up Prosecutor Is Done With BS Traffic Stops, John Choi, the Minnesota prosecutor who charged the cop who killed Philando Castile, is already earning enemies for his groundbreaking new policy.
By Andrew Boryga…
John Choi said he will never forget July 6, 2016 — the day 32-year-old Philando Castile was shot and killed by a St. Anthony Police Department officer during a simple traffic stop over a broken taillight. When asked for his license and registration, Castile told officer Jeronimo Yanez he had a licensed gun. Yanez, fearful Castile might reach for it, told him not to. But despite Castile’s insistence that he was not reaching for the gun, Yanez fired seven shots from close range, killing him. Later, Yanez and another officer in the car believed Castile resembled a robbery suspect before they pulled him over. Choi, the Ramsey County Attorney in Minnesota who charged Yanez for the shooting and later saw Yanez acquitted by a jury, told The Daily Beast he’s never stopped thinking about the way Castile’s interaction with Yanez began — over an innocuous infraction. Choi said it’s the sort of traffic stop that Black people like Castile, who’d been stopped over 40 times before his death, are subject to daily by police officers often fishing for drugs, guns, and an easy arrest. In honor of Castile, Choi announced Wednesday his office would no longer prosecute felony cases resulting from minor traffic stops for violations like an expired registration, overly tinted windows, or broken lights. The change, Choi said, is a deliberate attempt to cut down on what he said are unnecessary stops by police of people of color that too often spiral into fatal incidents. “I’m not going to do this anymore,” Choi told The Daily Beast. “I am not going to perpetuate these unjust practices that disproportionately impact my community.”
Valerie Castile, Philando’s mother, praised Choi for the change and said she hopes it inspires other county prosecutors and police departments to do the same. She told The Daily Beast her son’s broken tail light was simply an “excuse” to pull him over, just as he’d been pulled over dozens of times before. “You went from a simple traffic stop to a murder,” she said. “He ended up being murdered because of a broken taillight.” Despite the praise from some corners, Choi told The Daily Beast he’s been working behind the scenes to get police departments in his county onboard with the change. The hope, he said, is that his new strategy isn’t just a top-down decision. Still, one that would also inspire departments to amend their own internal policies and practices — which experts said often train police to stop drivers of color and those in high crime areas with low-level traffic stops in the hopes of finding drugs or guns. But Allison Schaber, the president of a union representing Ramsey County Sheriff Office deputies, told The Daily Beast that Choi’s new policy “is another example of the Ramsey County Attorney’s Office circumventing the legislative process to satisfy his own political ambitions.” Schaber said Choi furthers the “misnomer” that valid traffic stops for small violations “are anything less than legal stops that target activity already deemed illegal.” Like others critical of Choi’s change, Schaber said she believes the new policy will only lead to more crime. “County Attorney Choi should focus on reducing the crime wave his constituents are currently experiencing instead of trying to find more ways to justify criminal behavior.” Brian Peters, the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers union executive director, fired a missive at Choi during the press conference, calling the policy “absurd” and “a slap in the face” to victims of crime. “Ramsey County residents be warned: those that break the law won’t even get a slap on the wrist — they’ll get a high-five from the county attorney and be left to commit more and more serious offenses,” he said in a statement on Facebook.
Choi said Peters’ statement was an “outdated model” of values that led the country to amass incarceration crisis and racial disparity in the criminal justice system. Choi told The Daily Beast that after meeting with police chiefs in his county in June, about half the chiefs seemed willing to make their own changes due to his decision. On Wednesday, ahead of Choi’s announcement, Chief Todd Axtell of the St. Paul Police Department announced a new set of guidance that aligns with Choi’s decision, according to an email to his staff obtained by The Daily Beast. Axtell said he would direct patrol officers to prioritize enforcement on reducing crashes, injuries, and death by focusing on violations related to speeding, reckless driving, driving under the influence, and running lights. He said that minor violations like expired tabs, a single burned-out headlight or taillight, small windshield cracks, lack of license plate lights, and small objects hanging from mirrors are “illegal and important to note.” Still, he said that they have little effect on the safety of citizens. “I want to be perfectly clear: We should not use these violations as a primary reason for a traffic stop unless there’s an articulable public safety concern,” Axtell wrote. The Roseville Police Department has also made public their support of Choi’s decision. In a press release on Wednesday, the department acknowledged that focusing on “equipment violations” disproportionately affects communities of color and “undermines law enforcement’s legitimacy.” The release states that on August 1, the department changed their traffic policy, and “absent other factors,” they will no longer enforce “equipment violations, expired registrations, or other non-moving violations that do not create a public safety concern or a dangerous condition.” (This story originated at the Daily Beast)
»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»>
If the American voter were an intelligent electorate, the Republican party would no longer be viable. Alas, it really isn’t, so the people’s enemies continue to create maintain the structures that have made America one of the worst Human Rights offenders in human history. Yes, I said it; talking about human rights and human rights are two different things. After keeping other people in bonded servitude for hundreds of years, refusing to pay them for their ancestor’s blood and labor, and instituting another form of slavery since the Civil War, America is by far the world’s greatest human rights offender in my book. The actions America took, immediately after reconstruction to institute the black codes, redlining, jim crow, the prison industrial complex, and other white power laws which are intact today, makes it clear that America has no legal or moral authority to speak to any other nation about human rights abuses when it is itself still one of the greatest offenders. Only in America can police officials decide what the laws will be. This kind of tail-wagging the dog scenario is only possible because the American police officer, white or black, enforces whiteness. I speak out against complicit prosecutors and judges daily; I have carried this story with great pride and joy because it does not validate my concerns about prosecutors and judges being complicit with murderous cops. It shows that I have been on to something that runs much deeper. Thank you, Prosecutor Choi.…..
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
As part of our decision to continue to shine a light on American police corruption, brutality, Racism, and murderous practices, here is another example of America’s finest. The following is a case in which they murdered Ronald Green then lied to his family that he died in a traffic accident. They covered up evidence, and when it was discovered that they murdered mister Green an African-American man, as you must have imagined, they commenced an investigation and found themselves not guilty.….Look at these demented subhuman creatures literally killing Ronald Greene.
Well, why don’t I let you see for yourself?
Louisiana State Trooper Accused of Hiding Body Camera Video From Ronald Greene Case Will Not Be Disciplined…
An internal investigation into the Louisiana State Police has concluded that Lt.John Clary, an officer accused of hiding body camera footage of the brutal beating and death of Black motorist Ronald Greene, will not be disciplined or charged. In a statement from the state police spokesman, the administrative investigation determined that no evidence proved or disproved the allegations that Clary lied about the footage or purposely hid it. According to ABC affiliate WBRZon Tuesday, the internal affairs investigation concluded in July. When Ronald Greene died in police custody after attempting to elude a traffic stop in May 2019, officers told his family that he died after his car crashed into a tree. Both the family and medical examiner noticed that Greene’s severe injuries showed a lot more than a car crash had happened that night. Still, Clary, according to the Associated Press, told detectives that he didn’t have anybody’s camera footage from the incident. Then last year, a graphic videomiraculously emerged showing that Greene was beaten, choked, dragged, and tased by officers. Clary’s body camera took it.NOLA reports that Clary’s footage was missing from the investigative file sent to Union Parish District Attorney John Belton in 2019 and only turned up this past March after a State police training instructor told investigators that it existed.
A federal civil rights investigation is underway into Greene’s death, along with the beatings of at least three other Black motorists by troopers with Monroe-based Troop F in 2019 and 2020. The troop, with about 60 members covering a dozen northeast Louisiana parishes, is almost entirely White.
When Clary arrived, Greene was already shackled and facedown on the roadside. Master Trooper Kory York was straddling Greene and holding him down while he moaned and howled.
Clary’s video shows troopers finally propping up Greene, who had gone limp and stopped breathing by the time emergency technicians arrived, according to a report by Trooper Albert Paxton, a State Police detective assigned to the case. Clary gave a statement saying troopers sat up Greene and “held his head up so he could get a clear airway,” but his video shows otherwise, Paxton wrote.
Computer logs show that Clary, the highest-ranking trooper on the scene that night, downloaded the footage from his body camera a few hours after Greene died, along with those of DeMoss and Hollingsworth. But according to Paxton, the videos Clary gave him that day ended up including three copies of his dashcam video and none from his body camera.
Clary also claimed he’d reached the scene only after “everything was over,” and that he didn’t have body-camera video, the report said.
In February, State Trooper Kory York was suspended without pay after the body camera footage showed him kicking and dragging Greene by his leg shackles. According to AP, Chris Hollingsworth, who has since died in a car crash, was caught on audio from his body camera bragging about beating and choking Greene.
State troopers were also involved in the police brutality cases of Aaron Bowman and Antonio Harris.
Over the weekend, Clary was seen guarding LA Tech head football coach Skip Holtz at a team game with Mississippi State on national television. That’s pretty high profile for someone who allegedly lied about bodycam footage and quietly got away with it.
Let’s take a moment to realize that if Clary continued to forget about his body camera footage conveniently, Greene’s family and the public would still be left questioning his death. It feels a bit cheap that he’s getting off without discipline, but you can’t expect great results when the police are told to investigate themselves.
The idea behind the actions of these race soldiers is to cause maximum hurt to Black people. Almost a decade ago, the FBI, which is itself no paragon of virtue, warned that white supremacists and skinheads were infiltrating and taking over police departments. Nothing was done about it; now imagine that those people are well entrenched in the almost 18,000 police departments across all 50 states almost two decades later. Their way of thinking and actions has become the culture that now guides how police react to Black and Brown citizens across the country. Added to that is the continued militarization of these police forces, which are mere militias with badges and the power to act under the color of law. Shocked? Don’t be shocked; get involved. This is classic American policing; they brutalize and murder Black Americans, then lie about their crimes, prosecutors in most cases know that they commit crimes, and they move mountains to cover the tracks of those murderous cops. The Judges are no better; they accept the word of dirty cops and use that tainted evidence to convict people of color, then give Blacks, in particular, exponentially more prison time for the same crime than they do white defendants. These murderous beasts mute the sounds and turn off bodycams that are supposed to record their contacts with the public, and yet they suffer no consequences for these actions, which clearly are criminal. The average person who takes steps to conceal a crime is charged with felonies, not so for these protected murderers operating under the color of law. Even with clear evidence that this murder co-conspirator Cleary, was part of the murder conspiracy, neither he nor the other murderous heathens have been held accountable by the so-called justice system (MB)
The New York Police Department has always been a gang; it has been a racist gang populated with white interlopers from Long Island, Staten Island, and Queens since its inception. The history books are full of tales of corruption, racism, and lawlessness; City of New York residents are forced to pay for this criminal gang of welfare leeches to brutalize them. Unfortunately for people of color who live in New York City, this lawless, unaccountable gang does as it please, and no one in authority has the power to bell the cat.……no, not even the Mayor, this gang long belled him.
From time to time, we talk about the cruelty and barbarism of American Police particularly to members of the African American Community; when they are wrong, this medium tolerates no cp-splaining on behalf of police who overstep their bounds and abuse members of the public or even show disrespect toward the public. However, having watched this particular video and seen how this officer spoke to the suspect in her charge, I found nothing untoward in how she treated him. In fact, I thought she was extremely courteous and accommodating to his needs as she transported him to jail. On finding out that he had passed out, she immediately commenced chest compression while shouting for help. I honestly do not see what she could have done differently, except to stop at the time he said he felt like he was about to pass out, which could have been a ploy that would potentially allow him to flee her custody or do potential harm to her. Nevertheless, the foregone are my opinions only others may see this much differently. (MB)
After the family of a Black man who died in police in 2019 filed a wrongful death suit against three Texas officers, police camera footage of the moments leading up to the man’s death has been made public.
Darren Boykin, 23, died in police custody in August 2019 after Texarkana College police officers confronted him in a campus building under the suspicion that he had been involved in a theft. Boykin reportedly fled the officers and ran a half-mile before he was apprehended off-campus.
After Texarkana Police contacted Boykin and learned he had a felony warrant in Ohio, officers took him into custody. They transported him to jail, whereupon he was discovered unresponsive before he could be booked. Boykin was then taken to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead.
According to a lawsuit filed by Boykin’s mother, Keisha Boykin, in the U.S. District Court in Texarkana, Texas, on Aug. 29, officers ignored Boykin’s complaints of distress and denied him medical care“.
It was clear that this wasn’t just someone who happened to die. It was someone who was complaining that they were in distress, that they needed help and they were in a situation where they couldn’t provide themselves with that care,” said attorney James Roberts, an attorney for the family, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported
Darren Boykin, 23, died in police custody in August 2019 after Texarkana Police arrested him on a felony warrant. (Photo: Arkansas Online/YouTube screenshot)
Texarkana Police Officers Jerrika Weaver and Brent Hobbs, and their supervisor during the arrest, Sgt. William Scott is named as the defendant in the lawsuit.
The high temperature in Texarkana reached 91 degrees on Aug. 29, 2019, the day Boykin died after trying to flee Texarkana College Police on foot.
Boykin was lying down, handcuffed and breathing heavily before officers carried him to a patrol car. Responding Texarkana Police discovered that Boykin had an Ohio driver’s license and a felony warrant in the state. Boykin told officers he’d been in Texarkana for about six months. Texarkana officers Weaver, Hobbs, and Scott, discussed Boykin’s complaints about not being able to breathe on different occasions, but the officers never acted on his concerns.
“Being the sergeant and supervisor on scene, defendant Scott had the ability to call for medical assistance or direct defendant Hobbs or defendant Weaver to call for medical assistance for Darren,” the lawsuit says.
Video footage of the incident shows Boykin sitting in the back of the patrol car. “Please help me,” Boykin said.
OK, can you help me back here?” Boykin said before complaining about his leg. Weaver replied, “I’m gonna help you get your way down to the jail.”
Weaver offered to roll the window down, then agreed to keep the air conditioning on after Boykin said an open window would make it hotter in the vehicle.
“I’m gonna pass out,” Boykin said. Weaver told Boykin to “lean against the glass,” saying he’d be all right as Boykin appeared to lose consciousness in the back seat and no longer responded to Weaver’s questions.
“You know you’re still going to jail, either way, right?” Weaver said. “You know someone that passes out isn’t able to stop themselves from falling forward, right? Fun fact,” she added, as Boykin continued not to respond.
When the patrol car arrived at the Bowie County jail, Weaver told Boykin she wasn’t going to drag him inside. “Come on, quit playing,” she said.
When Boykin continued not to respond, Weaver pulled him out of the vehicle and began performing CPR.
“You know how he’s got the felony faint in the backseat? ‘Oh, I’m gonna pass out.’ He’s fine. He kept saying he was tired, his legs hurt, he kept wanting to lay down. Normal stuff when you’re getting charged with felonies,” Weaver told medical personnel when they arrived.
Boykin was transported to a hospital and pronounced dead.
According to the lawsuit, Boykin died because officers “deliberately chose not to provide medical care” and showed “deliberate indifference” to his distress.
A custodial death report prepared by the Texarkana College Police says Boykin’s death was “natural” and notes “complications of sickle cell trait,” as found at autopsy.
Texarkana Police declined to comment on the matter, citing pending litigation. The lawsuit alleges civil rights violations and seeks punitive damages and compensation for Boykin’s suffering and his mother’s mental anguish.
After Gregory McMichael and his son Travis murdered Amhaud Arbury in 2020, aided by their neighbor William(Roddy) Bryan, this writer argued that the case was mishandled by the then prosecutor Jackie Johnson who clearly had shown favoritism toward the two killers, one of whom was a former cop who worked in her office as an investigator. Well, we are happy to see that your humble servant was not the only person who thought that Jackie Johnson had committed crimes in the way she handled the investigations until it blew up in her face.
Here is prosecutor Jackie Johnson with Gregory McMichaels, one of the white supremacist killers of Ahmaud Arbery.
However, it was not only Johnson, whom I personally believed was criminally culpable; I also believe the prosecutor from the neighboring county, George Barnhill, may have also committed criminal acts to protect the father and son murder team. Below is a video and a link to an article I did discussing the ins and outs of the corruption as I saw it then, even as much of the conversation was centered on the killing itself.
Jackie Johnson is accused of directing police not to arrest one of the suspects and showing “favor and affection” to another. Ms. Johnson has previously denied any wrongdoing in her handling of the case. The Georgia attorney general’s office indictment claims Ms. Johnson “knowingly and willfully” hindered police officers from arresting suspect Travis McMichael.
Jackie Johnson was just indicted for interfering with the investigations in the Ahmaud Arbery case; she is only the tip of the iceberg; it runs the gamut all the way up the judicial food chain.
It also alleges that Ms. Johnson showed “favor and affection” to Travis’ father, Gregory McMichael, a former district attorney employee. In the indictment, Jackie Johnson also failed to treat Mr. Arbery and his family “fairly and with dignity” by not disclosing she had sought the help of another district attorney, George Barnhill. Those of you who bother to take the time to read or listen to the content on this medium will recall that I have consistently pointed out that though police are the actual killers, prosecutor’s offices and judges are equally as guilty of the corrupt racism; plaguing American policing.
As a consequence of Jackie Johnson’s conduct, police did not charge the McMichaels until the shooting gained widespread attention and sparked nationwide protests. Jackie Johnson was voted out of office later that year after the national uproar over the case. In the meantime, I will continue to shine a light on the prosecutors who not only shield corrupt, murderous cops they hinder full and transparent investigations into their criminal conduct.
Not only was the former military killer not held accountable, but he was also promoted to sergeant after shooting Dontrell Stephens four times. Dontrell Stephens was unarmed.
Gut-wrenching? Yes. A tear-jerker?.….….….sure!!! As a former cop, when I first read this story, I wept openly. I wept because in my decade long service as a law-enforcement officer in a country that has been characterized as the fifth most violent country in the world, one that has borne the brunt of America’s manipulation when it comes to policing, I have had hundreds, probably thousands of experiences like the one in which Dontrell Stephens was murdered. Yet, I never once shot a single person in any of those encounters. I said encounters in which Dontrell Stephens was killed because that demented, demonic beast that shot him that day intended to kill him on the spot. His psychical death 8‑years ‑later was just a delayed event. Adams Lin is characterized as a militaristic cop who carries extra magazine clips above what his department requires. When questioned about it, he replied, “As we say in the Army, ‘We pray for peace, but we train for war.” This is the most direct statement we have heard from a killer cop that American policing badly needs revamping. They are trained killers, not peace officers. These degenerates do not belong on our streets; they see parts of the population as their enemy to be exterminated. Since shooting Dontrell Stephens, Adams Lin has been promoted to sergeant. It is the typical path for an aggressive cop who wants to be promoted or commended; shoot, kill or maim a Black person, and you are promoted rather than held accountable. It happens all the time across the Country in departments small and large; from Ferguson, Missouri to Westchester County New York to Palm Beach, Florida, and all places in between, aggressive killer cops shoot and kill an unarmed Black person and lies about being afraid for their life and rather than be imprisoned for betraying their oaths and lying, they are promoted and held up as heroes. It is atypical of any other [gang] that has certain rites as part of their initiation process; murder a Black person, and you have demonstrated that you are one of us. The Black community will have to decide whether it will sit around and allow this to continue or whether it will get up forty-plus million strong and put an end to the genocide. Mike Beckles.….….….….…
Killer cop Adams Lin, called militaristic by lawyers, a military veteran who carried extra magazines over department requirements.
Nearly eight years after Dontrell Stephens was shot by police and left paralyzed, the 28-year-old has died. According to The Palm Beach Post, Stephens died due to complications from paralysis. He reportedly passed away on Sunday, August 29. Dontrell had an unfortunate and difficult life. His attorney Jack Scarola said to The Palm Beach Post, “It was a variety of issues, including bed sores. I hope that as a consequence of the resolution of his case that he had some relief. But whatever relief he had was very short-lived.” In June of 2020, Stephens eventually received a settlement for $6 million. Nearly $1 million of his settlement went to outstanding medical bills, WPTV reports. On Sept. 13, 2013, Dontrell Stephens was riding his bicycle when a police officer’s car was following him. The dashcam video, obtained by The Palm Beach Post, showed the police car pulls him over. Stephens got off his bike and walked toward the deputy. Seconds later, the deputy shot Stephens four times. Stephens could be seen running away as the bullets struck him. Stephens, 20 at the time, was carrying a cellphone and was unarmed.
county Sheriff Ric Bradshaw defended the deputy’s actions during a press conference at the time. “Stop what you’re doing and comply with us,” he told reporters. “There’s nothing in the rules of engagement that says we have to put our lives in jeopardy to wait to find out what this is to get killed.” West Palm Beach attorney Jack Scarola maintained the deputy’s account of the incident conflicts with what is shown in the video. “There are no records of any commands ever made to Dontrell Stephens,” explained Scarola, according to WPTV. “The deputy’s recorded statements following the shooting were absolutely false. Internal affairs completely ignored that evidence,” he also said. Scarola had no details about funeral arrangements.
The following historical narration was pulled from (History.com) in totality. Thanks for your indulgence. (MB)
This needs no introduction; they hardly dress like this anymore. They wear suits, police uniforms, stiletto heels, and short skirts.
In the lead-up to the liberation of enslaved people under the Thirteenth Amendment, abolitionists argued about the fate of slaves once they were freed. One group argued for colonization, either by returning the formerly enslaved people to Africa or creating their own homeland. In 1862 President Abraham Lincoln recognized the ex-slave countries of Haiti and Liberia, hoping to open up channels for colonization, with Congress allocating $600,000 to help. While the colonization plan did not pan out, the country set forth on a path of legally mandated segregation. The first steps toward official segregation came in the form of “Black Codes.” These were laws passed throughout the South starting around 1865 that dictated most aspects of Black peoples’ lives, including working and living. The codes also ensured Black people’s availability for cheap labor after they abolished slavery.
Police have always been the enforcement arm of racial oppression in America.
Segregation soon became an official policy enforced by a series of Southern laws. Through so-called Jim Crow laws (named after a derogatory term for Blacks), legislators segregated everything from schools to residential areas to public parks to theaters to pools to cemeteries, asylums, jails, and residential homes. There were separate waiting rooms for whites and Black people in professional offices, and, in 1915, Oklahoma became the first state even to segregate public phone booths. Colleges were segregated, and separate Black institutions like Howard University in Washington, D.C. and Fisk University in Nashville, Tennessee were created to compensate. Virginia’s Hampton Institute was established in 1869 as a school for Black youth, but with white instructors teaching skills to relegate Black people in service positions to whites.
During Jim Crow, they waved the Confederate flag. Today over fifty years after those laws have been dismantled, the descendants of the degenerates who waved those flags still wave them and other flags supporting killer cops and other degenerates like Donald Trump.
The Supreme Court and Segregation
In 1875 the outgoing Republican-controlled House and Senate passed a civil rights bill outlawing discrimination in schools, churches, and public transportation. But the bill was barely enforced and was overturned by the Supreme Court in 1883. In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson that segregation was constitutional. The ruling established the idea of “separate but equal.” The case involved a mixed-race man who was forced to sit in the Black-designated train car under Louisiana’s Separate Car Act.
Black Codes
Black codes were restrictive laws designed to limit the freedom of African Americans and ensure their availability as a cheap labor force after slavery was abolished during the Civil War. Though the Union victory had given some 4 million enslaved people their freedom, the question of freed blacks’ status in the postwar South was still very much unresolved. Under black codes, many states required Black people to sign yearly labor contracts; if they refused, they risked being arrested, fined, and forced into unpaid labor. Outrage over black codes helped undermine support for President Andrew Johnson and the Republican Party. When slavery ended in the United States, freedom still eluded African Americans who contended with the repressive set of laws known as the black codes. Widely enacted throughout the South following the Civil War—a period called Reconstruction—these laws both limited the rights of Black people and exploited them as a labor source. In fact, life after bondage didn’t differ much from life during bondage for the African Americans subjected to the black codes. This was by design, as slavery had been a multi-billion dollar enterprise, and the former Confederate states sought a way to continue this system of subjugation.
This image speaks to the genetic degeneracy I spoke of earlier.
“They may have lost the war, but they’re not going to lose power civically and socially,” says M. Keith Claybrook Jr., an assistant professor in the Department of Africana Studies at California State University, Long Beach. “So, the black codes were an attempt to restrict and limit freedom.” Losing the Civil War meant the South had little choice but to recognize the Reconstruction-era policies that abolished slavery. By using the law to deny African Americans the opportunities and privileges that white people enjoyed, the one-time Confederacy could keep these newly liberated Americans in virtual bondage. White planters in these states denied Black people the chance to rent or buy land and paid them a pittance. The 1865 ratification of the 13th Amendmentprohibited slavery and servitude in all circumstances “except as a punishment for crime.” This loophole resulted in Southern states passing the black codes to criminalize activities that would make it easy to imprison African Americans and effectively force them into servitude once more
The Ku Klux Klan march in a parade on Larimer Street in Denver, Colorado, on May 31, 1926. They wear hoods and robes as spectators look on. Parked automobiles line the street. A sign on a building reads: “Western Clothing Co.” (Denver Post archive photo)
First enacted in 1865 in South Carolina and Mississippi, the black codes varied slightly from place to place but were generally very similar. They prohibited “loitering, vagrancy,” Claybrook says. “The idea was that if you’re going to be free, you should be working. If you had three or four Black people standing around talking, they were actually vagrant and could be convicted of a crime and sent to jail.” In addition to criminalizing joblessness for African Americans, the codes required Black people to sign annual labor contracts that ensured they received the lowest pay possible for their work. The codes contained anti-enticement measures to prevent prospective employers from paying Black workers higher wages than their current employers paid them. Failing to sign a labor contract could result in the offender being arrested, sentenced to unpaid labor, or fined. Fees were the easiest way to reinstitute servitude, as African Americans earned so little that paying a steep fine was out of the question for most of them. Failure to pay fines allowed the state to order them to work off their balances, a debt peonage system. Typically this work was agricultural in nature, just as Black Americans had performed while enslaved.
If you are going to lecture other nations on human rights, you damn sure better have your human rights record intact. And so when America decides to become the arbiter on what human rights look like, it was and is always fair that those countries look at what America’s human rights record looks like. It is, therefore, no surprise that Russia, China, Iran, and others laugh at the United States’ record on human rights when challenged on their record. It is noble to be a voice that speaks out against human rights abuses globally. Still, nobility without accountability is called hypocrisy .….…and that is where nations are drawing the lines.
In seeking to cement its authority on the rest of the world, part of what the United States has done has been to cut funding to countries whose security forces it has deemed to be in contravention of acceptable international norms. Many small countries, including Jamaica with limited resources, have struggled to maintain order and deal with the mass influx of illegal American guns flooding the Island through their porous borders. In dealing with those transnational challenges, the security forces have sometimes had to resort to unconventional means and, in the process, seen funding from the United States cut and the visas of individual officers revoked.
A bloodied Miles Davis (center) with attorney Harold Lovett (right) and patrolman Gerald Kilduff (left) in the 54th Street Precinct in New York City after Davis was arrested for assault in 1959. Mister Davies went on to perform after being beaten and lied about wearing the bloody clothes.
But were those hamfisted approaches always justified given America’s own heavy-handed approach to dealing with its own citizens who commit far less serious transgressions? Is the American approach legitimate given America’s shameful history regarding how it has handled its African-American and Native-American population, or even what it did to the Japanese population during World War II? But while America’s history on race relations has been anything but good, its continued oppression of racial minorities legislatively is even more shocking, as the world watches in horror the playing ou of veritable execution daily of American citizens by agents of the state. It is not just that state agents kill; the level of callousness and brutality that characterizes those killings make them nauseating.
Patrolman Gerald Kilduff (right) rides with jazz musician Miles Davis (left) in 1959 to St. Clare’s Hospital, where Davis’ injuries were treated. NYDAILYNEWSARCHIVEVIAGETTYIMAGES
Surely, state actors who act with such impunity must be confident in the system they serve to protect them from accountability, and it sure does. New York Times writers John Florio and Ouisie Shapiro wrote in 2020, “A famed Black artist is beaten by two police officers in Midtown Manhattan and falsely charged. It sounds like it could be any one of countless news stories from the past year, but in fact, we’re talking about 1959. The artist was Miles Davis. in the eyes of the American public, Davis was an icon. In the eyes of the New York City Police Department, he was Black”.
Miles Davis was arrested after patrolman Gerald Kilduff, who had ordered him to move from the sidewalk, and another cop brutally attacked Davis and assaulted him. Davis was hit on the head with a blackjack and arrested. HALMATHEWSON/NY DAILYNEWSVIAGETTYIMAGES
The savagery of American police is not manifested only in the everyday killings, usually of unarmed citizens. People experiencing mental breakdowns running around naked are not spared a barrage of bullets; it is manifested in the beatings that occur with such frequency that they do not get covered by the media. Today, thanks to cellphones with cameras and the power of social media, citizen journalists can showcase the gruesome barbarism and the callous animalistic savagery of what passes for policing in the United States. As that happens and the world becomes more sensitized to what has really been happening while American lectures them for far lesser transgressions, I have cautioned that across America and even at the Federal level, expect that legislatures will begin taking away the right to film cops. Already police have been approaching innocent citizen journalists claiming to divide their attention between what they are doing and the camera person filming them. They know that the person filming poses no threat to them except when they break the laws. Still, by continually claiming that it is a security issue to them and the victim they stop and abuse, Republicans will begin drafting laws supposedly to protect the people stopped; when cleary those laws will be aimed at giving police more cover to commit more atrocities against those they hate.
.
.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
MBListen to the audio version of written commentary in media below.
Over the years, I have heard many people complain about the Democrat Party; some allege that the party is no different than the Republican Party. Whether or not this is true is not for me to decide; sufficing to say that the Democrat party also has a lot of white people in it, and we have to simply come to terms with the fact that what looks like a majority of white people seem to have a serious sense of insecurity about who they are; hence they tell themselves that they are somehow superior to others. So racism is certainly not reserved only for the neanderthals that have opted to join that cult. One notable point of interest is the lack of visible action and the sense of nonchalance Senate Democrats have in the face of the barn-burning urgency around voting rights and a woman’s right to choose. Shaping the infrastructure putting America back into the dark ages is the Roberts Supreme court, which destroyed the 1965 Voting Rights Act in 2013 in its infamous and disgraceful Shelby County, Alabama Vs. Holder during Barack Obama’s Presidency; and It’s a loud and clear decision not to respond to several appeals against the onerous Texas Law that makes it a crime for doctors to perform an abortion on a woman after six weeks.
Whether one agrees with abortions in principle or not is hardly the point. The central issue is whether or not a woman has a right to make decisions regarding her own body. A question that has been settled law since the landmark decision of Roe Vs. Wade was handed down by an earlier supreme court on January 22, 1973. The Roberts Court of 9 justices is tilted 6 – 3 in favor of Republicans, which brings up the other question of why are Democrats afraid to use power when they have it to save the country from returning to the dark ages by appointing at least three more associate justices to the court? The Roberts’ court, which consists of Republicans John Roberts, Uncle Clarence Tom-Ass, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amey Coney Barrett, has no respect for precedent stare decisis be damned.
Liberal justice Sonia Sotomayor has been relegated to writing scathing dissents to their regressive decisions; decisions aimed at returning the country to the 1950s era before the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1965 Voting Rights Act, and the rights women fought for to have control over their own bodies. The Robert’s court is working to overturn Roe v Wade, and it will succeed in undoing almost five decades of settled law. This court has no respect for precedent, no respect for stare decisis. It is a right-wing workaround the will of the people. Since Republicans cannot win elections fairly, they have stacked the courts and all but created an instrument of minority rule in the court. For all intents and purposes, the country is now being run by a cabal of unelected judges who are oblivious to the majority’s will and the intent of the constitution. They upended the 56-year-old long-settled Voting Rights Act during Obama’s presidency, and now, by refusing to protect Roe V Wade, the 48-year-old precedent, they have allowed Texas to start the process of dismantling the rights and protections that every woman has been given by God, one that no government should have the power to interfere in. With regards to the 5 – 4 decision not to block the unconstitutional attack on women’s rights, Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued another scathing opinion after the right-wing majority of Clarence Tom-Ass, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amey Coney-Barrett, decided to aid Texas, by not stepping in to protect a woman’s right to chose. John Roberts, in this instance, sided with the court’s liberal minority.
Siad Justice Sotomayor; “The Court’s order is stunning.” “Presented with an application to enjoin a flagrantly unconstitutional law engineered to prohibit women from exercising their constitutional rights and evade judicial scrutiny, a majority of Justices have opted to bury their heads in the sand. … The Court’s failure to act rewards tactics designed to avoid judicial review and inflicts significant harm on the applicants and on women seeking abortions in Texas.” Said Justice Stephen Breyer; “The new law’s reliance on private individuals rather than prosecutors to handle enforcement, which would come through civil suits, should not immunize it from litigation in the courts.” “I recognize that Texas’s law delegates the State’s power to prevent abortions not to one person (such as a district attorney) or to a few persons (such as a group of government officials or private citizens), but to any person. But I do not see why that fact should make a critical legal difference.” [Politico] opined that Justice Elena Kagan devoted much of her dissent to criticizing the court for its increasing reliance on its emergency docket to make decisions of great significance to the country, without the benefit of full briefing or oral arguments. Said Justice Elena Kagan, “Today’s ruling illustrates just how far the Court’s ‘shadow-docket’ decisions may depart from the usual principles of the appellate process.” “The majority’s decision is emblematic of too much of this Court’s shadow-docket decision-making — which every day becomes more unreasoned, inconsistent, and impossible to defend.”
Seems to me, as I often say, the very court that ought to be the protector of the Constitution is the very institution that is the greatest violator of said constitution out of political and ideological considerations. However, here is a bit of irony in Chief Justice John Roberts’ dissenting opinion. Roberts called the Texas legislation “not only unusual but unprecedented.” His dissent was more reserved than that of the liberals, but he expressed concern that blessing a scheme like the one adopted in the Lone Star State could create a model for other states seeking to have laws of dubious constitutionality kick in for some period of time. That is exactly the point, but the right-wing robed idiots on the court have fallen in lockstep. However, the greatest irony is reserved for Roberts himself, who worked assiduously to gut the 1965 Voting Rights Act using the most dubious and ridiculous arguments, which opened up the floodgates allowing States to pass a phalanx of anti-voting rights laws across the country. Of course, this bit of irony is lost on Chief Justice John Roberts. The enemies of Democracy and Human Rights are getting what they want, and that’s a direct result of what Mitch McConnell pulled off on the country when he unlawfully blocked Merrick Garland from being elevated to the US Supreme Court. By doing so, the most corrupt, vile racist to become president in our lifetime was able to appoint Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amey Coney-Barrett to the highest court to turn America back to a time when white men made all of the decisions, including whether other people are allowed to vote, or whether a woman who is raped can flush the seed of her rapist from her body and soul.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.