MORE PEOPLE LENDING THEIR VOICES TO THE CALL TO REVAMP. REVIEW. RE-AUTHORIZE THE (INDECOM) ACT:

1454678_10200939988521602_1751407521_n

I have writ­ten about the need to repeal , review and re-autho­rize the INDECOM Act on suc­ceed­ing days. There has been live­ly debate on the sub­ject on Social media. I have dili­gent­ly sought to be bal­anced regard­ing the Law, acqui­esc­ing to the need for police over­sight, while at the same time delin­eat­ing out the bad parts of the law which needs fix­ing. I am heart­ened to see that there are oth­er peo­ple involved in think­ing through this issue ratio­nal­ly, not guid­ed by hatred for law-enforce­ment or oth­er per­son­al vendettas.

49118damioncrawforda20111026gt_300

Damion Crawford 

Tourism State Minister, Damion Crawford, has drawn the ire of Twitter users after call­ing for the clo­sure of the Independent Commission of Investigations (INDECOM). http://​go​-jamaica​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​r​e​a​d​_​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​.​p​h​p​?​i​d​=​4​9​118.@shavarstar @jaevionn INDECOM has & will con­tin­ue to cause the police to not be proac­tive or even reac­tive but inactive.

True to form, this cre­at­ed a firestorm from crit­ics of the police sur­round­ing the tweet much the same way they have argued with me. It would do crit­ics of the police a great ser­vice to step back and rec­og­nize this is not about the police it is about the secu­ri­ty of an entire peo­ple. I have con­sis­tent­ly called for rank and file police offi­cers to stand down , not just because of the law, but because of the per­son head­ing the agency in ques­tion, who clear­ly has his own agenda.

Many who yelp the loud­est at calls for a revamp­ing and re-autho­riza­tion of the law, have no inter­est in the prob­lems the Act pos­es. Many have friends who have been tak­en out by police. Some have dirty hands. In fact many refuse to edu­cate them­selves about the Law and what’s in it, choos­ing to form opin­ions from oth­er peo­ple’s com­ments, and their hatred for law enforce­ment. They refuse to do a line item assess­ment of the ques­tions raised with this law. As such they have for all intents and pur­pos­es dis­qual­i­fied them­selves as seri­ous stake-hold­ers in this debate.

One of the most com­mon argu­ment to come out of this debate is” Oh if the Cops are act­ing with­in the con­fines of the law what do they have to fear” ? This state­ment is rife with naïveté’.

♦ Every case in which police uses lethal force is inves­ti­gat­ed with pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al intent. Not just cas­es where there are alle­ga­tions of abuse. No oth­er work­ers risk impris­on­ment sim­ply for doing their job. Yet the brain-dead-head of INDECOM Terrence Williams points to the Netherlands as a source of prece­dent, claim­ing that it is uncon­sti­tu­tion­al for the police to actu­al­ly inves­ti­gate the killing of a cit­i­zen killed by police. What does Holland’s laws and prac­tices have to do with Jamaica?

♦ Criminals force , coerce, pay , threat­en and intim­i­date pro­fes­sion­al mourn­ers to lie about see­ing cops kill peo­ple in cold blood, gen­er­al­ly there are incred­i­ble amounts of evi­dence which shows that none of the demon­stra­tors could pos­si­bly have seen what they claim to have seen. This is the most lethal weapon crim­i­nal-dons have in their arse­nal against law enforce­ment offi­cers. Second is (JFJ’s ) smear cam­paign and (INDECOM’s)zealotry.

 The entire­ty of the law which seri­ous­ly infringes offi­cers rights, safe­ty, and abil­i­ty to do the job they are sworn to do, makes the law more of a prob­lem than a solu­tion to the issue of police excess.

What makes me piss angry is read­ing some of the garbage writ­ten by some of the know-noth­ings who pon­tif­i­cate about this issue while they live in coun­tries where police offi­cer are empow­ered and pro­tect­ed so they may do their jobs effec­tive­ly. The fact is once crim­i­nals know that peo­ple stand behind their law enforce­ment offi­cers they have a dif­fer­ent atti­tude toward break­ing the laws. Which enables soci­eties to fine-tune civ­il and human rights safe­guards, not the reverse.

REPEAL AND REPLACE THE INDECOM ACT: Part 2.

1-22-im-rightphoto-3914

AUGUST 098The above was the title of yes­ter­days Blog-Post, unfor­tu­nate­ly many peo­ple who respond­ed to the arti­cle chose to see only the word (repeal). I do how­ev­er val­ue the dis­cus­sions we had on this issue and the thoughts shared by every­one. Today I want to expand on the INDECOM Act. It is said that a bad law is worse than no law. The INDECOM Act, is a bad law. For clar­i­fi­ca­tion pur­pos­es I must address one par­tic­u­lar crit­i­cism regard­ing the arti­cle, that is that I am opposed to INDECOM. My quar­rel is not with the Agency, my issue is with the way the law was writ­ten. As I have con­sis­tent­ly said, the law was not prop­er­ly though out. It is impos­si­ble to accuse me of being against INDECOM when I am advo­cat­ing repeal­ing , re-doing, and re-autho­riza­tion of the law.

If crit­ics of my posi­tion feel that they need a law which will put police offi­cers in their place as dumb, illit­er­ate, big-foot­ed morons, who could get noth­ing else to do so they joined the force, then this con­ver­sa­tion is not for them. You are free to have that con­ver­sa­tion with like-mind­ed folks as your­selves. If how­ev­er we want to find a way around the issues of alleged police excess­es and what are char­ac­ter­ized as bla­tant abuse of cit­i­zens rights, then we should have a debate about that. What we should not do how­ev­er, is design a sys­tem which makes vic­tims of one side, even as we seek to assuage anoth­er. I will not re-lit­i­gate the points I raised yes­ter­day which the Federation chair­man has also raised . Sufficient to say that the par­lia­ment was not total­ly brain-dead when it autho­rized the Act. Membes were at least sober enough to give the law a shelf life. This gives them the oppor­tu­ni­ty to revis­it and repair parts of the law which aren’t work­ing so well. Let me be clear INDECOM did not come into exis­tence because some­one came up with the idea that it was good to have trans­paren­cy in a Government Agency. If that was the case Jamaica would be hum­ming as a cul­tur­al and eco­nom­ic hub to be envied. download (9)The law came into exis­tence because Police offi­cers con­tin­ue to betray the oath they took, with fright­en­ing fre­quen­cy and impuni­ty. This turned those with the worst intent into legit­i­mate crit­ics of the depart­ment. The depart­ment is then placed in an unen­vi­able ‚unten­able posi­tion. The voic­es of sup­port­ers are often drowned out respond­ing to crit­ics some of whom should be in jail.For those obsessed with the idea that Jamaican police offi­cers are opposed to what they refer to as (pres­sure groups) Oversight, they could­n’t be fur­ther from the truth. They also accuse the fed­er­a­tion Chairman of every­thing , includ­ing being opposed to INDECOM. That is also a lie. I have spo­ken to many offi­cers who wel­come over­sight. What they are opposed to is an agency with inves­ti­ga­to­ry pow­ers and an agen­da con­trary to it’s man­date. That is what INDECOM is . Terrence Williams is not a cred­i­ble head for that agency his friends and asso­ciates are Carolyn Gomes and oth­ers who are known anti-police agi­ta­tors. In a Country of laws Williams would have been fired when he had that Press con­fer­ence with Gomes. One of the foun­da­tion tenets of jus­tice is that it must not only be done , it must also appear to be done. Williams breached that trust of fideli­ty in his quest and desire to self-aggrandize.

There is absolute­ly noth­ing wrong with hav­ing a seaper­ate inde­pen­dent Agency with the same pow­ers as the Police. In fact it is need­ed, com­pe­ti­tion deliv­ers a bet­ter prod­uct to the cus­tomers, the Jamaican peo­ple. One of the rea­sons I have called for the INDECOM law to be repealed and re-done is exact­ly for that rea­son. I believe this new agency should inves­ti­gate all crimes, not just police abus­es. This will draw crit­i­cisms that it would be a dupli­ca­tion of efforts. To those I ask ” is the FBI’s job a dupli­ca­tion of efforts”? Lets have a clean un-encum­bered INDECOM ‚empow­er it to inves­ti­gate crimes includ­ing police, it guar­an­tees a bet­ter law enforce­ment prod­uct through com­pe­ti­tion. When INDECOM mem­bers fall afoul of the law they are sub­ject to being arrest­ed by police. When Police offi­cers fall afoul they are sub­ject to the same treat­ment, what’s not to like it works well for oth­er countries.

REPEAL AND REPLACE THE INDECOM ACT: In The Interim Officers Should Stand Down.

Jamaican Flag

10734218_10203187417145913_1187502936954276739_n-e1456464036486-64x90

Jamaican Flag

download (9) The com­mis­sion­er of INDECOM is empow­ered to direct both secu­ri­ty agency heads, to car­ry out and effect change to their respec­tive agen­cies , even though they are ulti­mate­ly respon­si­ble for the effec­tive­ness of their agen­cies. If this was not so poten­tial­ly dam­ag­ing it would be laugh­able. Whose idea was this? This autho­riza­tion by leg­is­la­tors is a clear abdi­ca­tion of leg­isla­tive respon­si­bil­i­ty. If changes are to be made by these impor­tant Agencies those changes should only be made by the peo­ple’s rep­re­sen­ta­tives in the cab­i­net after much con­sul­ta­tions and debate. This pow­er is now shoved into the purview of an ego­tis­ti­cal nar­cis­sist, Terrence Williams who seem to have a seri­ous Napoleonic com­plex. ♦ Sections of the Act lit­er­al­ly forces police offi­cers to self incrim­i­nate, it forces them to give state­ments prompt­ly when they are forced to use force even as they are trau­ma­tized and should have the ben­e­fit of coun­sel. This clear­ly is not a con­sti­tu­tion­al insert, and leg­is­la­tors should know that. It is anti­thet­i­cal to a per­sons right against self-incrim­i­na­tion. The Police and it’s Union should have guar­an­tees under the laws against self-incrim­i­na­tion. This is not a giv­en under Jamaica’s Banana-Republic Kangaroo-left­ist lib­er­al courts. ♦ The Act gives (inde­com) the pow­er to inves­ti­gate all cas­es of shoot­ing, fatal or oth­er­wise . This gives the impres­sion that every instance where the police uses force regard­less of pro­pri­ety, the police are left look­ing like sus­pects. Layout1_1_PSBR3ditorsFoAM  This par­tic­u­lar area of the law is not just counter pro­duc­tive to good law enforce­ment it is a colos­sal waste of time and mon­ey. It does a seri­ous dis-ser­vice to police offi­cers who, even when they risk their lives are left look­ing like crim­i­nals sus­pects and open to con­coct­ed crim­i­nal charges.This is borne out by the very find­ings of the very agency which is tasked with these inves­ti­ga­tions. In a sub­mis­sion to Parliament (inde­com) head Terrence Williams report­ed that in the major­i­ty of cas­es inves­ti­gat­ed by his office, police offi­cers act­ed prop­er­ly in the actions they took. What then is the need for all cas­es of police shoot­ings to be inves­ti­gat­ed in light of those com­ments, if not to intim­i­date and Hog-tie police hands?The police fed­er­a­tion chair­man stat­ed that (inde­com )approach­es all cas­es from a pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al per­spec­tive. That hap­pens when you allow a nar­cis­sist to under­take an impar­tial task. There are no instances in the Industrialized world and I dare­say any place else, where police offi­cers are sec­ond-guessed in the law­ful exe­cu­tion of their duties, or sub­ject to inves­ti­ga­tions for doing their jobs. Investigations are ini­ti­at­ed when there are cred­i­ble rea­sons to con­duct inves­ti­ga­tions. Jamaican cops are sub­ject­ed to mak­ing life and death deci­sions against some of the world’s most deranged killers, if they sur­vive they like­ly risk lengthy impris­on­ment because the demon killed is con­nect­ed to the very peo­ple who write the leg­is­la­tion. this can­not be allowed to stand. In fact the police fed­er­a­tion chair­man has detailed the effect this is hav­ing on offi­cers he represents.

Wilson said mem­bers report­ed great men­tal stress brought on just by think­ing about their per­son­al wel­fare and inabil­i­ty to finance legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion. According to the Police Federation head, INDECOM has been using coer­cion to com­pel mem­bers to give state­ments with­out the ben­e­fit of per­sons hav­ing legal con­sul­ta­tion. According to Wilson, the fre­quent demands by INDECOM for mem­bers, espe­cial­ly oper­a­tion sup­port units that play a crit­i­cal role in high crime areas, to vis­it their offices in pur­suance of their inves­ti­ga­tions have sig­nif­i­cant­ly deplet­ed the oper­a­tional strength of these units.“The man­ner and method­ol­o­gy employed by INDECOM could seri­ous­ly com­pro­mise nation­al secu­ri­ty espe­cial­ly if con­fi­den­tial sources are revealed,” Wilson added. He said there were clear instances which sug­gest­ed that INDECOM in their quest to pros­e­cute police offi­cers would go to any length to obtain infor­ma­tion, even if it means com­pro­mis­ing con­fi­den­tial sources. Read more: http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​C​o​p​s​-​g​e​t​t​i​n​g​-​u​n​f​a​i​r​-​t​r​e​a​t​m​e​n​t​-​f​r​o​m​-​I​N​D​E​COM – says-Wilson_15358222#ixzz2jnLUfVSG.

This law is a bad piece of leg­is­la­tion. There needs to be vig­i­lant police over­sight, this law is not the answer. The INDECOM Act needs to be repealed, there needs to be seri­ous dis­cus­sions involv­ing all stake-hold­ers. Serious police sci­ence research data must be applied con­fig­ur­ing such facts to Jamaica’s unique sit­u­a­tion. Jamaican researchers should be exclud­ed from this process because of their lack of under­stand­ing of law enforce­ment com­plex­i­ties and it’s impor­tance to a sta­ble soci­ety. As the inept Government empow­ers an over­sight agency to harass law-enforce­ment crime con­tin­ues to head north. Fewer and few­er peo­ple are return­ing to the coun­try to live. Less and less invest­ment dol­lars are head­ing to the coun­try. In fact reports show that over the last decade the num­ber of return­ing res­i­dents have been cut by 50% . This is not hap­pen­ing in a vac­u­um, the lead­er­ship of the coun­try is show­ing seri­ous inabil­i­ties to gov­ern the coun­try. Continued ero­sion of the rule of law is unacceptable.
This law places offi­cers lives at risk , caus­es the unin­tend­ed con­se­quences of mas­sive loss of civil­ian lives and embold­ens crim­i­nals. It should be repealed and replaced.

BLACK INTROSPECTION NEEDED:

th (14)There has been sev­er­al reports in the news recent­ly of black shop­pers being detained after mak­ing pur­chas­es in Barneys and Macy’s a cou­ple of New York city depart­ment stores. In fact it was seri­ous enough for Barney’s NY. CEO to meet with the Reverend Al Sharpton and oth­er com­mu­ni­ty lead­ers to dis­cuss the issue,at his National Action Network Offices in Harlem NY.

NEW YORK (AP) — A black actor on the HBO dra­ma series “Treme” said Friday he was stopped by police because of his race while shop­ping at Macy’s — the third dis­crim­i­na­tion alle­ga­tion made this week by a black shop­per against a depart­ment store. Robert Brown, who sued Macy’s in state Supreme Court in Manhattan, said in his law­suit he was detained by police at the flag­ship Herald Square store on June 8 after employ­ees con­tact­ed author­i­ties about pos­si­ble cred­it card fraud.http://​www​.sfgate​.com/​e​n​t​e​r​t​a​i​n​m​e​n​t​/​t​e​l​e​v​i​s​i​o​n​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​B​l​a​c​k​-​a​c​t​o​r​-​N​Y​C​-​M​a​c​y​-​s​-​s​t​o​p​p​e​d​-​m​e​-​b​e​c​a​u​s​e​-​o​f​-​r​a​c​e​-​4​9​2​6​6​1​4​.​php

Two black Barneys New York cus­tomers, Trayon Christian and Kayla Phillips, said this week they were detained by police after mak­ing expen­sive pur­chas­es. Christian sued Barneys, say­ing he was accused of fraud after using his deb­it card to buy a $349 Ferragamo belt in April. Barneys said Thursday it had retained a civ­il rights expert to help review its pro­ce­dures. Sharpton vowed to put shop­ping at Barneys “on hold” if the retail­er fails to respond ade­quate­ly to the alle­ga­tions.http://​www​.nhreg​is​ter​.com/​a​f​r​i​c​a​n​-​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​n​s​/​2​0​1​3​1​0​2​6​/​s​h​a​r​p​t​o​n​-​t​h​r​e​a​t​e​n​s​-​b​a​r​n​e​y​s​-​s​t​o​r​e​-​b​o​y​c​o​t​t​-​o​v​e​r​-​a​l​l​e​g​e​d​-​p​r​o​f​i​l​ing.

The New York Police Department, Barneys New York and Macy’s are all com­ing under fire, with law­suits already filed or pend­ing by the shop­pers who say they were detained by author­i­ties after try­ing to make per­fect­ly legal pur­chas­es. “It’s stun­ning and rep­re­hen­si­ble that black peo­ple should have to fear arrest in order to go out shop­ping,” said Donna Lieberman, the exec­u­tive direc­tor of the New York Civil Liberties Union.http://​www​.msnbc​.com/​h​a​r​d​b​a​l​l​/​s​h​o​p​-​a​n​d​-​f​r​i​s​k​-​i​n​c​i​d​e​n​t​s​-​r​e​p​r​e​h​e​n​s​i​ble.

Aren’t these the same issue which were front and cen­ter 50 years ago which led to the march on Washington? Sure there is a black fam­i­ly in the White House. Yes blacks may now use the same ele­va­tors, eat at the same restau­rants , sit at the front of the bus, and it’s okay to look direct­ly into the face of a white man, it’s even okay for the broth­ers to have their tro­phy white woman with­out wor­ry­ing too much about get­ting lynched. So what hap­pened to black Americans, why are we still guilty until proven inno­cent by virtue of our skin color?

I know I will get skew­ered, but a $349 Ferragamo belt. Would these shop­pers walk into a black-owned busi­ness and make a sim­i­lar pur­chase? Some will argue that is com­plete­ly irrel­e­vant to what hap­pened to these shop­pers. Maybe, maybe not. You see, I believe there is a deep­er prob­lem here . Let’s for a moment allow our­selves to dream a hypo­thet­i­cal dream, may we?

It’s the 60’s, our peo­ple are fac­ing an uphill bat­tle, racial inequal­i­ty, sit-ins at lunch coun­ters, free­dom rides, Vietnam ‚Bull O’Connor’s , Bull O’Connor’s thugs and dogs, water-hoses, lynch­ings , Klu-klux-‘klan, King shot, Kennedy shot, Malcolm shot, Kennedy shot. Medgar shot, chaos .!!!! Civil Rights Act signed by Lyndon Johnson. Johnson decides not to run for Office , went back to Texas. Shouldn’t all of that cause blacks to come togeth­er? Shouldn’t blacks take a page from the Europeans who fled Hitler and seri­ous­ly band togeth­er start­ing their own Banks, Restaurants , Social Clubs, Department Stores? Don’t tell me blacks had no mon­ey many have done great things with less than what black America had.

By the year 2015, African-Americans will be spend­ing $1.1 tril­lion a year on prod­ucts and ser­vices. Currently, the Black pop­u­la­tion in the U.S. has a buy­ing pow­er of near­ly $1 tril­lion – a fig­ure larg­er than the gross domes­tic prod­uct of most coun­tries in the world. The num­ber of African-American house­holds earn­ing $75,000 or more has grown by 63.9 per­cent in the last decade, a rate greater than that of the over­all pop­u­la­tion.http://​www​.triceed​ney​wire​.com/​i​n​d​e​x​.​p​h​p​?​o​p​t​i​o​n​=​c​o​m​_​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​&​v​i​e​w​=​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​&​i​d​=​1​0​1​8​:​n​n​p​a​-​n​i​e​l​s​e​n​-​r​e​l​e​a​s​e​-​b​l​a​c​k​-​c​o​n​s​u​m​e​r​-​r​e​p​o​r​t​-​a​s​-​n​e​w​-​e​m​p​o​w​e​r​m​e​n​t​-​t​o​ol-

The truth is, black America refus­es to take charge of its own des­tiny. Even when we earn sig­nif­i­cant sums of mon­ey we have not demon­strat­ed the matu­ri­ty and the judi­cious stew­ard­ship nec­es­sary to keep any of what we earn. In fact we have shown that we are a craven peo­ple dri­ven by com­mer­cial lust. It seem we are uncom­fort­able hold­ing wealth. There have been seri­ous ques­tions asked about this sub­ject, I am yet to see a sci­en­tif­ic study which explains this phe­nom­e­non. Some of you will quick­ly point to Oprah Winfrey Sean(JZ) Carter and a few oth­ers as proof that my state­ment lacks mer­it. Let’s see how far you get pay­ing your bills on their wealth. They are the excep­tion not the norm. Someone pur­chas­ing a belt for $349 Ferragamo may not seem like con­trib­u­tor to the prob­lem. To me it goes to the heart of the prob­lem. The peo­ple who detained that shop­per felt cor­rect­ly or incor­rect­ly that per­son was not wealthy enough to make that pur­chase. That assump­tion may have been race-trig­gered, lets assume it was. If it was as a con­se­quence of race, then it was rep­re­hen­si­ble. Let’s make all the noise we can muster about the evils of that assump­tion. Then let us look at ourselves.

How much wealth does the belt-buy­er have to have made that buy? What a seri­ous eval­u­a­tion of what I pro­posed reveals, is that whether we com­plain from now into per­pe­tu­ity or not, the issue remains the same. The two issues are inter­con­nect­ed, because we have no wealth we get dis­re­spect­ed and pro­filed. Ask your­selves this, would a young Jewish or Asian per­son have been pro­filed in the same way? They are not white right? So maybe there was more to the assump­tion than just eth­nic­i­ty. Could it be that there some log­ic that gen­er­al­ly young black peo­ple do not have that kind of clean dis­pos­able income to be so indulgent?

Maybe Blacks need to start com­ing togeth­er to start busi­ness­es. We should show less incli­na­tion to pur­chase the garbage every­one cre­ates. Maybe blacks need to start sup­port­ing black busi­ness­es and stop show­ing hatred for oth­ers who own and oper­ate busi­ness­es. Maybe blacks need to stop try­ing to buy accep­tance with their hard earned mon­ey. Sure they smile at you before they take your mon­ey, then they talk about you as soon as you leave. There is no real pow­er if it has no eco­nom­ic back­ing. That is the rea­son we get treat­ed the way we are treat­ed . We do not keep wealth, we are mere­ly a con­duit for mon­ey, a well lubri­cat­ed conduit.

There are no short­age of sto­ries depict­ing the plight of black NBANFL, Boxers and Rap stars who after fin­ish­ing their careers are flat broke. In one instance an ath­lete made as much as a quar­ter of a bil­lion dol­lars over the course of a decade long career. Why should any­one feel sym­pa­thy for these peo­ple who go out and buy expen­sive cars, man­sions, jew­el­er, and oth­er mate­r­i­al things way in excess of what they need. Some throw away tens of thou­sands of dol­lars in strip clubs in a sin­gle night. At some point we sim­ply have to stop say­ing that peo­ple who high­light this idio­cy are haters. It is not hat­ing, if some­one wants you to keep your money.

I have heard all the excus­es . ” Oh they take a lot of tax from them” Oh they nev­er had mon­ey so they don’t know how to han­dle mon­ey, they trust­ed the wrong peo­ple” . These are noth­ing but excus­es . Lets call stu­pid and reck­less what they are. When you are blessed with that kind of wealth you have a duty to be a good stew­ard of it . You have duty to set up edu­ca­tion funds and oth­er invest­ments for your chil­dren. You have a duty to take care of your tax oblig­a­tions. And you have a duty to make sure that you put your mon­ey in a place where you can live off the mon­ey that your mon­ey make for you.

We can­not con­tin­ue to have the pur­chas­ing pow­er of a large indus­tri­al­ized nation , yet invis­i­ble as a force to be reck­oned with . We must stop fill­ing America’s pris­ons, we must guard our right to vote, we must stop hav­ing chil­dren and refuse to take care of them. We must band togeth­er and show we are nobody’s neg­a­tive car­i­ca­ture, or sad­ly we face extinc­tion. These are the issues which should be dis­cussed in our church­es and com­mu­ni­ty orga­ni­za­tions, these are the issues we must face .We can no longer bury our heads in the sand and pretend .

Let Examine Shootouts

th_JamaicaFlag

All too often we hear the term Police shoot-out, in Jamaica this takes on par­tic­u­lar res­o­nance because of the high instances of vio­lent con­fronta­tion between police and mem­bers of the pub­lic which results in civil­ian death.Over the years there has been much said about this phe­nom­e­non both local­ly and inter­na­tion­al­ly. Various Agencies and Organizations have done their own stud­ies and made analy­sis most of which are slant­ed sen­sa­tion­al­ist opin­ions which has very lit­tle basis in facts or are at best poor­ly arrived at one sided con­clu­sions. A quick Google search (police in Jamaica) bears this out.

When we hear the term shoot-out what leaps to mind is an image of a clas­sic depic­tion of police and crim­i­nal both armed and a shoot-out occurs , lets see who sur­vives. In fact that mis­con­cep­tion is so ingrained in our psy­che that it forms the basis for seri­ous cri­tique and leg­is­la­tion in Jamaica which are hav­ing seri­ous con­se­quences on how law enforce­ment offi­cers car­ry out their func­tions and how they are judged when they do. The clas­sic wild-west men­tal mis­con­cep­tion of what qual­i­fies as a shoot-out con­tin­ues to inform the debate sur­round­ing police use of force in the country.

Needless to say pol­i­cy papers have been writ­ten, new Agencies formed which have over­sight of police actions and assump­tions are con­tin­u­ous­ly made about police shoot-outs with­out an in-depth look at how we arrive at those shoot­ing sta­tis­tics. For one, no one both­ers to ask law enforce­ment offi­cers about their expe­ri­ences in these mat­ters. Despite sup­posed changes in the edu­ca­tion­al require­ments par­tic­u­lar­ly for the gazetted ranks they are still treat­ed as night-watch­men. Because of these inequities in the way this issue is per­ceived and the inac­cu­ra­cies in the pub­lic sphere, I have con­sis­tent­ly sought to shine a light on the facts in the inter­est of fairness.

Out of that debate was born Jamaicans for Justice (JFJ), The Independent Commission of Investigations (INDECOM), The office of Public Defender and oth­ers. Consensus being, that dras­tic police over­sight is need­ed to cur­tail alleged police excess­es. No one can rea­son­ably say that police in Jamaica has act­ed pro­fes­sion­al­ly or have not engaged in actions that are gross­ly anti­thet­i­cal to what are expect­ed of police offi­cers. As such even when offi­cers are killed defend­ing the very lives of cit­i­zens the con­ver­sa­tion cen­ters on beyond the pale alleged actions of police. Of course many who speak the loud­est are moti­vat­ed not by the need to see a pro­fes­sion­al agency root­ing out crime but are influ­enced by deep seat­ed hatred for cops because of crim­i­nal con­nec­tions or worse, or may have had crim­i­nal kit and kin tak­en out by police.

Many state­ments have been made regard­ing the issue of police use of force, many are cor­rect, many are ill-informed out­ra­geous alle­ga­tions which has no basis in facts, or are oth­er­wise col­ored by nefar­i­ous inter­est. No com­ment was as out­ra­geous as the one made by Carolyn Gomes , the pedi­atric doc­tor who heads (JFJ) and Earl Witter a Lawyer, who heads the tax-pay­er fund­ed Public defend­ers office, that not enough police offi­cers are get­ting killed com­men­su­rate with the amount of civil­ians killed by police. I con­tin­ue to be out­raged by this state­ment, not because of what it sounds like they are say­ing , (“that more cops should get killed”), but by their absolute igno­rance of what con­sti­tutes a shoot-out in a police sense. I am forced to con­tin­ue a cru­sade against this ill-informed men­tal­i­ty which is result­ing in seri­ous harm and death to Jamaican cops . I have heard all kinds of expla­na­tion of what Gomes and Witter could have meant or may have meant. One per­son had this to say.

quote:

I real­ly think this “not enough police offi­cers are being killed” state­ment by the JFJ pres­i­dent was most unfor­tu­nate, if only that she should have known bet­ter that those who mis­con­strue the real gist of the state­ment had the pow­er to make their opin­ions fly.
The edi­to­r­i­al as post­ed was a per­fect exam­ple of some­one under­stand­ing, but pre­tend­ing not to understand.
The fact is, each shoot­ing by the police should rep­re­sent an instant where there was a life and death strug­gle, between law enforce­ment and vio­lent, armed crim­i­nals. This, it should be not­ed, must NOT be con­fused with law enforce­ment com­ing into CONTACT with armed crim­i­nals. All police shoot­ings are orig­i­nat­ed from con­tact with some ele­ment of the cit­i­zen­ry, whether it be vio­lent, armed crim­i­nals, domes­tic abusers, vehi­cle traf­fic vio­laters, scam/​fraudists, etc. HOW MANY OF THESE CONTACTS, even with the armed crim­i­nals, actu­al­ly saw a LIFE AND DEATH STRUGGLE which result­ed in vic­to­ry and life for the police, and defeat and death for the criminal?
How many? This is where those who sup­port the Police’s moral­ly dis­eased pol­i­cy of “if yu have a gun, yu gwine dead” take a stand against Dr. Gomez and her state­ment. The edi­to­r­i­al not­ed that around fifty police offi­cers have been killed since 2002 ( I per­son­al­ly lodge a caveat that it is more). The police have killed well over 2000 peo­ple since that time. Well, since it is around fifty police dead, and each shoot­ing should basi­cal­ly rep­re­sent a vio­lent, life and death strug­gle between police and vio­lent, armed and fir­ing crim­i­nals, how MORE police­men have not been killed? In police shoot­ings where mul­ti­ple per­sons- as much as SEVEN AND EIGHT — have been killed, NOT ONE police offi­cer has ever been killed. How come? The real irony of this is how we have made our­selves con­ve­nient­ly igno­rant of the truth. The truth is, the police use AMBUSH TACTICS in MOST con­tact cir­cum­stances to sur­prise, ren­der help­less, and EXECUTE these pur­port­ed­ly “armed and vio­lent” crim­i­nals. There are 2 prin­ci­ples we over­look, in order to fur­ther over­look the pre­dom­i­nant­ly lie we hear in police shoot­ing reports:
1) The BEST WAY to face peo­ple with firearms on a REPEATED AND REGULAR basis AND COME BACK ALIVE is to AMBUSH, RENDER HELPLESS AND EXECUTE them.
2) How do police in Jamaica typ­i­cal­ly die? They’re AMBUSHED. When you’re ambushed, you are made sig­nif­i­cant­ly help­less by virtue that time is seri­ous­ly against your effort(s) to react to the threat. Those cap­i­tal­iz­ing with­out mer­cy on your demise — DESPITE YOUR DEMISE — would have basi­cal­ly exe­cut­ed you. That’s how police and crim­i­nals die in Jamaica. They typ­i­cal­ly ambush each other.
 Sure, we know about the sup­posed supe­ri­or­i­ty that police pos­sess through train­ing, but that train­ing should have made them aware that the typ­i­cal gun­fight between armed par­ties last only 2.5 sec­onds, the aver­age dis­tance between com­bat­ants starts at around eight-to ten feet apart, and end between 15 to 25 feet apart, and ALL COMBATANTS WILL GET HIT. The police know that a gun­fight does­n’t go like in the movies, but they fig­ure that YOU don’t have to know. They fig­ure you can keep on watch­ing TV, so they’ll catch you on the 7 ‘O‑Clock News. That is WHY Dr. Gomez asked the ques­tion that if police and crim­i­nals were fight­ing each oth­er fair and square, how come more police ain’t dead? A smart Jamaican would not be look­ing JUST at the dis­par­i­ty in num­bers between police and crim­i­nal dead, per se. They would have eas­i­ly deduced that the police force is an armed, legit­i­mate group, who sim­ply ambush their tar­gets more than their tar­gets ambush them. No MATTER wh
o is the big­ger force, if you come to fair gun­fight, a LOT OF PEOPLE from BOTH SIDES are going to die. Again, Dr. Gomez knows this, but she has some hope still that not all police­men are stu­pid enough to think that ALL Jamaicans are stu­pid. The first rule of the gun­fight­er is that you must NEVER GO TOFAIR FIGHT.

I thank my friend, I did not name you as the per­son who wrote this impas­sioned assess­ment because I did not obtain your per­mis­sion to do so. I wish to thank you for your syn­op­sis which forms the heart of my argu­ment. This assess­ment is well put togeth­er, it seem to make per­fect sense, in fact to some­one not in the know, it would be dif­fi­cult to argue with what’s in it. Like math how­ev­er, one may mul­ti­ply 10 x 10 and arrive at 100, to a casu­al observ­er there is noth­ing to argue about 10 x 10 =100. If the method­ol­o­gy used in arriv­ing at the num­bers 10 was how­ev­er incor­rect, fraud­u­lent, decep­tive or oth­er­wise unscrupu­lous then the 100 total is wrong despite it’s appearance.

Once we divorce our­selves of the ill-con­ceived notion of what char­ac­ter­izes a shoot-out, we allow our­selves to be more informed on the sub­ject which should impact our per­cep­tions. As I said before what leaps to mind when we hear shoot-outs involv­ing police has no rela­tion­ship to Hollywood’s west­ern-movie drama­ti­za­tion. Laws giv­ing police the right to use lethal force are gen­er­al­ly the same in the west­ern Industrialized world. Officers may use dead­ly force In defense of the their own lives or that of anoth­er. These laws are designed by coun­tries seri­ous about law enforce­ment and copied by coun­tries like Jamaica with an under­stand­ing of the com­plex­i­ties sur­round­ing the need for offi­cer safety.

Those com­plex­i­ties includes, though not con­fined to the fact that an offi­cer may use lethal force to neu­tral­ize a sub­ject whom he believes is about to cause him seri­ous harm or worse. Even though in the end the sub­ject was unarmed. What mat­ters is the fear in the offi­cer’s mind at the time he used said force. Now that use of force can­not be just that the offi­cer is fear­ful, the fear must be imme­di­ate and be caused by some­thing , ie a sub­ject pulling some­thing from his waist-band when ordered to show his hand. An offi­cer has no duty to await get­ting shot, before using dead­ly force under such cir­cum­stances as is believed by many in the Jamaican community.

That right of self defense is not just extend­ed to law enforce­ment in Jamaica, every cit­i­zen may use dead­ly force to defend him/​herself in like man­ner. If some­one approach­es anoth­er mem­ber of the pub­lic even in the streets with his hand under­shirt , giv­ing the impres­sion he has a weapon, threat­ens that per­son and attempts to rob him , that per­son has the right to use lethal force to repel that assault, even though it is lat­er deter­mined that the per­son was not armed with a weapon, the belief in that per­son­’s mind that he/​she was in immi­nent dan­ger is enough.

Jamaican crim­i­nals are excep­tion­al­ly vio­lent, Police depart­ment like the (NYPD ) the (RCMP) and British law enforce­ment are painful­ly aware of this . NYPD offi­cers revised the way they treat­ed Jamaican crim­i­nals when one of their own was mur­dered while he sat in his patrol car in Queens. Over the last three decades lit­er­al­ly every front-line Jamaican cop has been shot, some on sev­er­al dif­fer­ent occa­sions. Many have been killed, Even more have sur­vived being shot-at a mul­ti­plic­i­ty of times. I am no stranger to this, I have been shot at many times , and was shot once. These instances of life and death occur­rences are not abstract num­bers on a spread sheet to be debat­ed. They are actu­al instances of seri­ous injury and death to actu­al peo­ple who went out to do the job they are asked to do. As such this issue can­not be left to lob­by groups and peo­ple with agen­das to decide.

Police depart­ments and oth­er secu­ri­ty agen­cies are faced with the unpleas­ant , un-envi­able task of hav­ing to deal with tak­ing the life of some­one they thought was armed , only to dis­cov­er the per­son was­n’t , or the per­ceived threat was not real. Yet even as they do, they have to go back to work and take the same actions the next day because they sim­ply can­not wait to find out whether the guy grop­ing in his waist-band intend to kill him. Just recent­ly Capital police in Washington DC used what they called jus­ti­fi­able lethal force to stop a woman in a speed­ing car near the White House and lat­er the Capitol build­ing. In the end it turned out the woman was not armed , and was prob­a­bly suf­fer­ing from a men­tal con­di­tion. Whether we believe the lev­el of force applied was incon­sis­tent with the threat posed by her, is imma­te­r­i­al , we sim­ply do not know what offi­cers tasked with pro­tect­ing those insti­tu­tions were think­ing at the time, tak­ing into con­sid­er­ing the world we now live in.

The night I was shot I was not part of any over­whelm­ing force lay­ing in wait to ambush any­one, as per my friend ill-informed analy­sis. I was a young offi­cer accom­pa­ny­ing a man home, he was ter­ri­fied that he was about to lose his life to a young punk who want­ed to kill him. In actu­al­i­ty we were ambushed and shot. When we read some­thing in a book or online, it does not qual­i­fy us to make qual­i­ta­tive judge­ment on an issue , it gives us a cur­so­ry idea how things pos­si­bly work not make us an author­i­ty. Even when we are trained in a par­tic­u­lar dis­ci­pline we don’t always know every­thing we need to know. Imagine when we have no for­mal train­ing, yet we seek to make alle­ga­tions and opin­ions facts. This brings us back to Carolyn Gomes and the (JFJ). How could Gomes com­pe­tent­ly argue about what con­sti­tutes jus­ti­fi­able homi­cide when she has no train­ing in polic­ing, nei­ther is she a lawyer. Does hav­ing a med­ical doc­tor­ate qual­i­fies her to speak with author­i­ty on every sub­ject? The answer is absolute­ly not , as such her state­ment was incen­di­ary and mali­cious. It is cost­ing offi­cers their lives.

carolyn gomes

Gomes:

Asking a doc­tor how to put out a fire would be ludi­crous. Asking a doc­tor how polic­ing is done and what con­sti­tutes jus­ti­fi­able homi­cide is equal­ly as ludi­crous. Here is an exam­ple.https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​m​y​w​p​b​l​o​g​/​?​p​=​144. Presidents , Prime Ministers and heads of Corporations bring in experts to advise them on what to do before they make deci­sions. Gomes should con­sid­er being more judi­cious and restrained before she opens her mouth to make unsub­stan­ti­at­ed alle­ga­tions. So too are peo­ple who speak with­out the appro­pri­ate infor­ma­tion. However, every instance of Extra judi­cial killing by law enforce­ment must be con­demned. If we remain silent we are all at risk.

CRIME: THE TERRIBLE TOLL ON JAMAICA:

Every day we read of grue­some killings, no one is spared, not the old and indi­gent, not even babies. For the most part Jamaicans have blamed every­one for crime includ­ing the tooth fairy. Yet they fail to hold the peo­ple they place in pow­er to make deci­sions on their behalf respon­si­ble. Don’t you dare chal­lenge the con­ven­tion­al wis­dom which defends the sta­tus-quo . They come at you from all angles accus­ing you of every­thing short of trea­son. Yet the crime sta­tis­tic con­tin­ues to climb and the cost con­tin­ues to pile up. If a team does poor­ly you don’t fire the team, you change the lead­er­ship, lat­er if nec­es­sary you make changes to the team. Yet Jamaicans con­tin­ue to do the same thing over and over,expecting dif­fer­ent results. The def­i­n­i­tion of insanity.

Of course they don’t need to hold their elect­ed offi­cials respon­si­ble for their incom­pe­tence, they cre­ate prox­ies to absorb the blame, so they blame the police. If you have cred­i­ble Government , you get cred­i­ble law-enforcement.The Governing par­ty has occu­pied pub­lic office for the lion’s share of the last two decades. As such it is lit­er­al­ly impos­si­ble for any per­son not brain-dead ‚to blame the polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion for the coun­try’s ills. When I crit­i­cize the Government I don’t do so because I am giv­ing endorse­ment to the oppo­si­tion. I do so because it is com­mon sense to hold account­able those who are empow­ered to act.

The Governing par­ty how­ev­er has been par­tic­u­lar­ly clever, in plant­i­ng oper­a­tives in crit­i­cal sec­tors of the soci­ety. They hold senior Civil ser­vice posi­tions made pos­si­ble by nepo­tism and hand­outs. This does not mean that all senior gov­ern­ment work­ers are polit­i­cal hacks. Their plants in oth­er sec­tors , includ­ing media and acad­e­mia has tak­en a seri­ous toll on our coun­try. Some of their shills have tak­en flight yet oth­ers have stayed and are still affect­ing the debate. Today’s Jamaica Observer Editorial page was titled :

Returning to those dark days of bru­tal mur­ders: The Editorial summed up the present sit­u­a­tion thus: We don’t believe that the Administration is clue­less about how to solve this prob­lem. What we sus­pect is that our leg­is­la­tors are afraid to imple­ment the tough mea­sures nec­es­sary to sig­nif­i­cant­ly cut the crime rate, because they might be unpop­u­lar with cer­tain sec­tions of the soci­ety. Read more: http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​e​d​i​t​o​r​i​a​l​/​R​e​t​u​r​n​i​n​g​-​t​o​-​t​h​o​s​e​-​d​a​r​k​-​d​a​y​s​-​o​f​-​b​r​u​t​a​l​-​m​u​r​d​e​r​s​_​1​5​3​3​7​5​0​0​#​i​x​z​z​2​j​2​p​L​7​eTE.

You think?

The Editorial page is far more lib­er­al with its assump­tions than I could ever be . I am not so sure they know what to do. Granted that they do how­ev­er why would they change any­thing? They have fan­cy SUV’s , pala­tial man­sions, and all the perks of state pow­er, includ­ing free access to the cook­ie-jar. Most of all they have the inept police depart­ment to take the fall for them. Don’t be fooled the PNP did not hold state pow­er for 1812 years because they are nec­es­sar­i­ly stu­pid. Yes a dis­cor­dant oppo­si­tion had a part to play. What has tru­ly been behind their dom­i­nance how­ev­er is their abil­i­ty to fool the poor. According to the Editorial: The Caribbean Human Development Report 2012, pre­pared by the United Nations Development Programme, has told us that crime costs Jamaica more than $529 mil­lion a year in lost income. That’s over half a Billion American Dollars in direct loss revenue.The total cost in trea­sure to the coun­try is incal­cu­la­ble. Yet the lead­ers have refused to take the steps nec­es­sary to bring the coun­try into com­pli­ance with inter­na­tion­al norms. If the rather sharp indict­ment of the Editor’s com­ments are cor­rect, then the Administration has once again cho­sen to put pol­i­tics ahead of coun­try. This lends cre­dence to their adage that Jamaica is PNP coun­try. As a Jamaican I will con­tin­ue to say Jamaica does not belong to the PNP , nei­ther does it belong to the JLP, our coun­try belong to our peo­ple you and me. So to the hyper-par­ti­sans who feel oblig­at­ed to defend incom­pe­tence , remove your blind­ers because our coun­try is loos­ing out big time.

JAMAICAN GOV. TIES COPS HANDS EVEN AS THEY ARE BEING MURDERED.

excellence portraits 209THE PROBLEM

Serious crimes con­tin­ue to increase in Jamaican, over the National Heroes cel­e­bra­tion (7) per­sons were mur­dered. These mur­der fig­ures how­ev­er do not evoke alarm or fear in the minds of Jamaicans who have come to accept the killing of their neigh­bors as par for the course. Jamaicans use every ratio­nal­iza­tion to explain away these shock­ing mur­der fig­ures. Excuses range from, peo­ple gets killed every­where to, the per­son who got killed must have done some­thing to deserve his head get­ting sev­ered from his body. They make these excus­es even as they con­struct more grill for­ti­fi­ca­tions with the false belief ‚that they will be safe behind lay­ers of iron which only fur­ther imprison them .Of course this offers no real secu­ri­ty from the maraud­ing mur­der­ers who prey at will.

1481_10202459191348868_2019567643_t

Portrait of the lat­est cop to be slaugh­tered in Jamaica by hoodlums.W/Spl/Cons Arianna Henry.

Since 2002 fifty (50) Officers have been mur­dered direct­ly in the line of duty , with far more killed which are not cat­e­go­rized as “in the line of duty”. The trou­ble with that char­ac­ter­i­za­tion is that, crim­i­nals are increas­ing­ly sophis­ti­cat­ed, they opt to attack a sin­gle offi­cer and not take on a num­ber of offi­cers. This strat­e­gy on their part is far more effec­tive in accom­plish­ing their anar­chis­tic desires in exact­ing revenge on police offi­cers. As repug­nant as that strat­e­gy is , it would be far less effec­tive if the coun­try was one which stood solid­ly behind it’s law enforce­ment offi­cers. Conversely what the peo­ple have sad­dled them­selves with for decades is a par­ty which offers them cot­ton can­dy, which is sweet to the taste but does noth­ing to sat­is­fy their hunger. The present Administration has a leader who is at best intel­lec­tu­al­ly chal­lenged and at worse a dunce. No amount of white-wash is going to cov­er up that glar­ing fact.

CONTRIBUTORS

The par­ty which forms the Administration has had a his­to­ry of prob­lems with the rule of law , dat­ing back to the 1970’s . At its core the People’s National Party (PNP) is a par­ty which pan­ders to the base instincts of the least edu­cat­ed , least priv­i­leged. This strat­e­gy allowed them to con­trol state pow­er for an unprece­dent­ed 18 years with a four (4) year break, then con­tin­ue to present day. Members of the Police depart­ment are a large part of that prob­lem, many mem­bers are no dif­fer­ent from their civil­ian coun­ter­parts who vote against their own eco­nom­ic self-inter­est. As such they share in the blame for what is hap­pen­ing to the force and indi­vid­ual police offi­cers. This analy­sis is not an endorse­ment of any polit­i­cal par­ty, it is more-so a sweep­ing indict­ment of a polit­i­cal cul­ture which has failed dis­mal­ly in address­ing the fun­da­men­tal basic needs of the peo­ple. As a con­se­quence, the coun­try has been reduced to a laugh­ing-stock. The best achieve­ments of our peo­ple inter­na­tion­al­ly, are now called into ques­tion and sub­ject to ridicule.

Jamaica has had a long flir­ta­tion with vio­lence, some of our nation­al heroes are remem­bered and so des­ig­nat­ed exact­ly because of their propen­si­ty for vio­lence or the dis­rup­tion of estab­lished order. Whether we see that as a fruit­ful path for a coun­try is a point for live­ly legit­i­mate debate. What is clear is that if you sow corn you will def­i­nite­ly not reap toma­toes. As such when we cel­e­brate killing and car­nage we will reap a har­vest of may­hem and destruc­tion. We are reap­ing that har­vest of may­hem and destruc­tion now. Our entire con­tem­po­rary cul­ture is designed around killing. The media not to be out­done has signed on to the crazi­ness, incor­po­rat­ing the crass, degen­er­a­tive, mur­der ver­nac­u­lar into seri­ous jour­nal­is­tic dis­course. Dance-hall music is sig­nif­i­cant­ly influ­en­tial that it informs soci­etal norms (vis a vis infor­ma fi dead).In short killing and the use of firearm is such a large part of Jamaican cul­ture that, to be good one has to be shat[sic] shat mean­ing good. Twisted yes, true yes.

Because of the pop­u­lar­i­ty of the gun and anti-con­for­mi­ty cul­ture, our peo­ple have deter­mined for decades that the way to fame and for­tune is by estab­lish­ing the moniker (rude bway)for them­selves. All of us have fed that mon­ster, when we cel­e­brate mur­der music, when we buy films depict­ing killing and car­nage, when we sign on to vio­lence as the only means to con­flict res­o­lu­tion, and yes when we wan­ton­ly extra-judi­cial­ly kill even the most vile cretins. Wherever car­cass­es exist, scav­engers are nev­er far off. It is no sur­prise then that oppor­tunists of all stripes would emerge in Jamaica , pur­port­ing to cham­pi­on the cause of the poor and dis­pos­sessed. Some emerge in the name of Human Rights, oth­ers pur­port to be able to “man­age peace” what­ev­er that means? The entire Governmental struc­ture is large­ly made up of immoral hus­tlers and thieves.

The police depart­ment which is tasked with pro­tect­ing the rights and safe­ty of cit­i­zens allowed itself to be reduced to a cesspool of graft , bribes and cor­rup­tion, it remained obliv­i­ous to calls to trans­form itself even as it sunk deep­er into irrel­e­vance. Those who ran the depart­ment lacked the depth to rec­og­nize that if the depart­ment con­tin­ued on that path it would one day wake up and find it was relieved of it’s pow­er. That day is here. Even as I and oth­ers scream that the way to fix the crime prob­lem is to recruit, train equip,supervise and pay offi­cers, that train has already left the sta­tion. The Political direc­torate, nev­er a fan of poor peo­ple’s off­spring hav­ing such pow­ers ‚were more than will­ing to sub­vert that pow­er. Enter (INDECOM)Independent Commission of Investigations>The prob­lem for the police is that the notion of inde­pen­dence in that body is a mis­nomer. It is nei­ther inde­pen­dent nor a cred­i­ble Investigative body. It is a bunch of Elitist who hates police offi­cers, they are aligned to the Anti-police antag­o­nist group (JFJ) Jamaicans for Justice, anoth­er mis­nomer. Together these two bod­ies in con­junc­tion with the office of Public defend­er forms a tri­ad of aggres­sion against law enforce­ment in the coun­try which has ginned up such sen­ti­ment against the con­stab­u­lary that the chick­ens have nat­u­ral­ly come home to roost. The killing of police offi­cers is now an almost dai­ly occur­rence. The head of JFJ and the pub­lic defend­er stat­ed cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly that police accounts of fatal shoot­ings can­not be believed because not enough offi­cers are being shot. These are the peo­ple with whom the head of INDECOM hang out and grant press con­fer­ences. For my Readers who are not from Jamaica, it is impor­tant that you under­stand that the office of pub­lic defend­er is a gov­ern­ment office . It’s offi­cials are paid with tax dol­lars. These are the peo­ple who argue that not enough cops are being killed. Now they have their wish.

Commissioner Admits Jamaica Is Criminal Paradise!

Jamaica records one of the high­est mur­der rate in the world. This tiny Island of 2.7 mil­lion peo­ple kill each oth­er at such an alarm­ing rate many nations do not want Jamaicans on their shores. Even with­in the Caricom com­mu­ni­ty there is dis­crim­i­na­tion against Jamaicans seek­ing to enter oth­er Islands in search of employ­ment . Jamaicans are seen as loud abra­sive and excep­tion­al­ly vio­lent. Even as we seek to dis­pel that notion it seems we do very lit­tle to dis­prove it by our very actions.

I have writ­ten exten­sive­ly about the gaps with­in the leg­isla­tive real­i­ties and crime reduc­tion in our coun­try. Simply put our laws are archa­ic they do very lit­tle in the way of deter­rent to crime. Some intel­lec­tu­als, com­mu­ni­ty orga­ni­za­tions and oth­er sec­tors of the soci­ety have argued stri­dent­ly for social inter­ven­tion as a rem­e­dy to the Island’s crime epi­dem­ic. I dis­agreed with that notion when I exit­ed the law-enforce­ment stage in 1991 as a young man, I still dis­agree today. Papering over a bad wall does not make a sound wall , it is still a bad wall. The police depart­ment is a part of the prob­lem also, just not the entire problem.

Some of my for­mer col­leagues argue that the police depart­ment has evolved, offi­cers are more focused, the upper cadre of the JCF are more edu­cat­ed and moti­vat­ed. This may all be true, and thank­ful­ly so, but a police depart­men­t’s man­date is to erad­i­cate crime, not be more won­der­ful in con­ver­sa­tions or seem­ing smarter​.It would be nice if we can have a crime free soci­ety and a smart police force. An edu­cat­ed police depart­ment and a crime rid­den soci­ety does no one any good.

As a small busi­ness own­er I am patent­ly aware that no com­pa­ny may point to its effec­tive­ness if it is los­ing mon­ey. So too, the Constabulary as a unit, may not point to inter­nal changes claim­ing suc­cess, if it fails at it’s core man­date of reduc­ing and con­trol­ling crime. An edu­cat­ed Police force is no use to the coun­try if it fails to put that edu­ca­tion to use, lob­by­ing the leg­is­la­ture for the tools it needs to deliv­er the ser­vices it promis­es. Education in that con­text then, can­not be an end but must be the means to an end. One of the prob­lem with the way crime is approached in Jamaica is, a dis­con­nect in under­stand­ing that crimes com­mit­ted as a con­se­quence of social and eco­nom­ic ills can­not be approached the same way orga­nized crime is han­dled, or vice ver­sa. Commissioner Owen Ellington allud­ed to this recently.

images (6)

We have seen where very recent­ly, very, very high-pro­file mul­ti­ple-mur­der, gun­run­ning, drug-traf­fick­ing indi­vid­u­als have estab­lished them­selves in Jamaica. They have opened offices, they have relo­cat­ed fam­i­lies here, they have trans­ferred huge amounts of finan­cial resources into Jamaica because they are see­ing Jamaica as a soft spot that can be exploit­ed,” the police com­mis­sion­er told a meet­ing of the Internal and External Affairs Committee at Gordon House in down­town Kingston Tuesday.http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​E​l​l​i​n​g​ton – Int-l-criminals-view-Jamaica-as-a-safe-haven_15314056

Some of the mis­in­formed who des­ig­nat­ed hard­ened crim­i­nals “cor­ner crews“have vest­ed inter­est in trib­al­ism, no trib­al­ism no job, no legit­i­ma­cy for them. Whether the Commissioner knew this all along or this is a moment of awak­en­ing for him (a come to jesus moment) is refresh­ing. Former street cops like myself and many oth­ers under­stood this con­cept decades ago. There is one solu­tion for seri­ous offend­ers and that is a very heavy-hand­ed approach. The Commissioner’s words will have fall­en on deaf ears as the leg­is­la­tors in Jamaica are in many cas­es defense coun­sel to the crim­i­nals and in some cas­es they are them­selves inte­gral parts of crim­i­nal gangs. Wherever there is low crime , leg­is­la­tors have enact­ed tough no-non­sense leg­is­la­tion on behalf of their con­stituents. This requires will and char­ac­ter, two things no one would accuse Jamaica’s politi­cians of possessing.

IT’S MORE THAN POLITICS, IT’S RACIAL:

AUGUST 191It behooves the American peo­ple to stop and fig­ure out what is behind the mas­sive cam­paign to demo­nize, de-fund and do way with Obama Care? Why have the Koch broth­ers invest­ed mil­lions in Ad cam­paigns to get young peo­ple not to sign up? Why have their tools in the Republican cau­cus been so dead set on destroy­ing the coun­try just to repeal a law which has been cer­ti­fied con­sti­tu­tion­al? Why do Republicans want to do away with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)? What’s behind their cam­paign to move moun­tains to make sure that the Keystone Pipeline is approved, who stand to ben­e­fit? Why have Republicans denied sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence that man has done sig­nif­i­cant dam­age to our envi­ron­ment? Why do they pre­tend not to see notable changes in tem­per­a­tures around the world and huge deple­tion of the Polar ice caps?

Have peo­ple stopped to won­der who is behind this relent­less cam­paign to keep Immigrants out? Who wins when Black and Latino Americans are pre­vent­ed from vot­ing? Does Nullification ben­e­fit cit­i­zens in states which does­n’t obey Federal law? Who ben­e­fits when lunatics on the right talk about seces­sion? A whole is no more than the sum of its partsSo how does America ben­e­fit when some talk about lov­ing their coun­try while simul­ta­ne­ous­ly talk­ing about dimin­ish­ing it with seces­sion and nullification? 

There is a kind of brain-dead stu­pid­i­ty which runs the gamut of the Republican right fueled by hatred of President Obama. This removes com­mon sense from every con­ver­sa­tion. This begs the ques­tion, is this blan­ket obstruc­tion based on pol­i­cy dif­fer­ences, or is it a clear attempt to nul­li­fy Obama’s Presidency? There is a clear feel­ing among the right that Obama is attempt­ing to redis­trib­ute wealth to his peo­ple. Mitt Romney’s 47% com­ment behind closed-door was an indi­ca­tion of that. The demo­niz­ing of Food-stamp recip­i­ents. Not pass­ing a new Farm Bill . Opposition to the afford­able Care Act. Opposition to Immigration Reform, are more than enough evi­dence to con­vince any­one not sure of Republican motives.

How do you nul­li­fy 8 years of American his­to­ry? You can’t. You can­not un-kill Osama Bin Laden. You can­not un-end the Iraq war. You can­not un-end the war in Afghanistan. You can­not undo the mir­a­cle which has hap­pened to the 3 big car com­pa­nies. You can­not undo the resur­gence of the stock mar­ket. You can­not undo what Obama did to save the American econ­o­my. You can­not undo the dec­i­ma­tion of Al-Qaeda. You can­not undo the things which Obama has done so far. What you can do is to gum-up the works which in their esti­ma­tion will reduce him to a fail­ure. How can they reduce some­one already a phe­nom­e­nal suc­cess, by any stan­dard to fail­ure? They can’t . Such is the luna­cy of racial big­otry, it is root­ed in absolute igno­rance. That is exact­ly what they are doing, it’s more than politics.

Israel’s New Racism: The Persecution Of African Migrants:

images (1)

It would be inter­est­ing to hear peo­ple who sup­port the state of Israel views on what is hap­pen­ing in the so-called Holy land. African Jews are find­ing their way back to the land of Israel only to be denied the basic dig­ni­ty that Jews of lighter hues take for grant­ed. One can­not turn on the Television and not find reminders of the Jewish holo­caust before and dur­ing the sec­ond world war.

Ironically the very peo­ple who fled per­se­cu­tion and death are now vis­it­ing racial apartheid on Jews of African ances­try. http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​d​P​x​v​4​A​f​f​3​I​A​&​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​=​s​h​are. I urge you watch this video and form your own opin­ion on what you have wit­nessed. Never mind that most of the peo­ple who live in Israel are peo­ple and their off­spring who were exiled from Europe dur­ing Hitler’s Jewish cleans­ing of Germany. This is shock­ing what is hap­pen­ing in this place called Israel .

The state of Israel was estab­lished in 1947 at the mouth of the Suez Canal by the United States and Britain and armed with nuclear weapons to pro­tect America’s and Britain’s oil and oth­er hege­mon­ic inter­est. This Apartheid is iron­ic con­sid­er­a­tion that in America and oth­er parts of the world, Jews and their sup­port­ers con­stant­ly blan­ket the air­waves beg­ging for mon­ey for the so-called Jewish State. They do so even as they keep the flames of vic­tim-hood burn­ing, as a means of lever­ag­ing more and more mate­r­i­al wealth and sym­pa­thy over the holocaust.

At this moment Israel is active­ly engaged in round­ing up Africans and plac­ing them in con­cen­tra­tion camps, label­ing them “Infiltrators”. From the Prime Minister on down the attack on African Jews is sys­tem­at­ic. Benjamin Netanyahu the Likud right-wing Prime Minister is a pro­po­nent of cleans­ing Israel of African Jews , argu­ing that if the lev­el of Africans in Israel exceeds 30% Israel will become a bi-nation­al state which means los­ing its Jewish char­ac­ter. Never mind that the world’s largest bi-nation­al state the United States con­tributes $3 bil­lion of our tax dol­lars to prop up that racist apartheid sys­tem. http://​ifamer​i​can​sknew​.org/​s​t​a​t​s​/​c​o​s​t​_​o​f​_​i​s​r​a​e​l​.​h​tml Currently over two thou­sand African Jews are being held in the Negev desert in what many say is the largest prison in the indus­tri­al­ized world. There is no data point­ing to African Jews threat­en­ing the state with the bogey-man “Terrorism”, in fact there is evi­dence African Jews are large­ly pro-Israel.

Are the chris­t­ian pas­tors aware of whats hap­pen­ing even as they preach to their flock about sup­port­ing Israel? Or is the Apartheid sys­tem in Israel par for the course , com­men­su­rate with slav­ery and Jim crow in America? If so, this leaves black pas­tors with a lot of explain­ing to do.http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​e​t​X​A​m​-​O​y​lQQ Here is a lit­tle bit of per­spec­tive for those who talk about the so-called Israel and the peo­ple who now claim it as some kind of ances­tral home­land that they were forced from thou­sands of years ago.

TALK RADIO INFLUENCE ON THE RIGHT:

I decid­ed to do some­thing last night which I nev­er did before. I want­ed to hear what peo­ple on the Political right hear from talk radio. So I turned to one of the AM fre­quen­cies. Those are the Stations which pol­lute the air­waves with the most vile bel­li­cose garbage. That’s what pass­es for infor­ma­tion to almost 50% of the Country’s pop­u­la­tion. These Stations are a source of infor­ma­tion and are home to the likes Of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Ted Nugent, Glen Beck, Laura Ingram and a whole host of oth­er hate-mon­gers. I must tell you I am sur­prised that the Country is not plunged into yet anoth­er civ­il-war. The tone and tenor of the rhetoric is indis­tin­guish­able from Hitler’s 1937 – 1938 speech­es deliv­ered from the Reichstag. How peo­ple can hate that much is beyond my com­pre­hen­sion! In the absence of facts they con­coct their own truths. They devise a nar­ra­tive, spins and sells it to their lis­ten­ers who in turn assim­i­late and regur­gi­tate it as fact. The most ludi­crous con­spir­a­cy the­o­ries are pro­mul­gat­ed as irrefutable facts.

These big­ot­ed talk­ers don’t care that the lies they tell may be dis­proved imme­di­ate­ly. They know their lis­ten­ers are not inter­est­ed in find­ing out whether what they are told are true. The fab­ri­cat­ed lies are all they need, hatred of Obama is the accel­er­ant which fuels their fire. They talk inces­sant­ly about the Constitution yet many of them are unaware of what’s in the Constitution.

images (12)

At a march a few days ago one igno­rant big­ot Larry Klayman had this to say about the twice elect­ed President of the United States, in front of the White House.

I call upon all of you to wage a sec­ond American non­vi­o­lent rev­o­lu­tion, to use civ­il dis­obe­di­ence, and to demand that this pres­i­dent leave town, to get up, to put the Quran down, to get up off his knees, and to fig­u­ra­tive­ly come out with his hands up,” said Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, a con­ser­v­a­tive polit­i­cal advo­ca­cy group.

Here’s the rub. Even if this moron was right about the President being a Muslim. Even if he was right that the President had a Quran. Even if he was right about the President of the United States being on his knees pray­ing to Allah. None of the afore­men­tioned would have being a dis-qual­i­fi­er for this or any oth­er President from hold­ing the office of President. The United States Constitution’s only cri­te­ria for the Presidency is that a per­son must have been born in the United States and have attained the age of thir­ty-five (35)years old, that’s it . What these Racial and Religious big­ots suc­ceed in doing is show­ing the world just how igno­rant they are. Ignorant about the very doc­u­ment at the cen­ter of their despot­ic unright­eous hate-filled cru­sade. Yet they have mil­lions of une­d­u­cat­ed hate-filled hearts cling­ing to their every word, hun­gry for more and more hate filled rhetoric.

Thursday morn­ing and it’s time for the cir­cu­lar fir­ing squad, time for can­ni­bal­ism, the chief tar­get of their ire Mitch McConnell the Minority leader of the Senate. I guess McConnell is a lib­er­al now. Helping to craft leg­isla­tive com­pro­mise to avert a colos­sal implo­sion of the World’s econ­o­my ren­ders him a Lefty. This is the lev­el of igno­rant kamikaze fanati­cism which now large­ly make up the Confederate/​Republican Party from the high­est lev­el to the grass-roots.

WILL AMERICA DEFAULT ON IT’S DEBTS FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY?

images

When the Confederate/​Republican Party decid­ed to block every pro­gram Obama endorsed or rec­om­mend­ed even if it was their idea, it was planned. When Mitch McConnell and his cronies in the Senate mount­ed a record num­ber of fil­i­buster block­ing Obama’s agen­da, it was planned. Standard & Poors S&P) down­grad­ed the U.S. fed­er­al gov­ern­ment from AAA (out­stand­ing) to AA+ (excel­lent) on August 5, 2011. S&P was direct in its crit­i­cism of the gov­er­nance and pol­i­cy-mak­ing process, which took the U.S. to the brink of default as part of the 2011 U.S. debt-ceil­ing cri­sis that same week: That action by Confederate Republicans was planned. Then Democratic Mass: Senator John Kerry referred to this as the “Tea Party down­grade,” blam­ing Republican intran­si­gence regard­ing rev­enues and dis­re­gard for the con­se­quences of a default. He seem to get it. The present impasse was planned , at the last moment the only hope the Country has of not default­ing is pinned on dis­cus­sions between Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his counter-part Mitch McConnell, whose sole pur­pose was to make sure Barack Obama was a one term President.

BWdZOG4CAAA8f9J

These two men do not work well togeth­er, from reports they don’t even seem to like each oth­er. Now the hope of a Nation rests with them com­ing to a deal which will be palat­able to both sides. There is just one tiny prob­lem. Whatever deal the two Senate lead­ers come up with (if they do) ‚still has to be vot­ed on and passed by the House of Representatives where the prob­lem start­ed. All of this action which Obama calls brinkman­ship could have been avoid­ed. Why would the Tea-Party con­trolled House of Representatives go through all it has in cre­at­ing the shut­down which fur­loughed hun­dreds of thou­sands of fed­er­al work­ers to capit­u­late now?

The Tea-Party and their Acolytes have already demon­strat­ed their inten­tions to force the nation to default, they are telling every­one who will lis­ten that default won’t be cat­a­stroph­ic, and may even be a good thing accord­ing to one Congressman. I am not opti­mistic that a deal will be reached by the sen­ate lead­ers, then allowed to be vot­ed on in the House. Over the last 5 years of Obama’s Presidency The Speaker of the house John Boehner has shown zero lead­er­ship in stand­ing up to the destruc­tive ele­ments with­in his cau­cus. Boehner has sub­se­quent­ly ren­dered him­self a paper tiger, who has cho­sen to sur­ren­der prin­ci­ples to remain speaker.

Obama has spent a lot of time talk­ing to peo­ple in cities and towns all across America, yet it remains unclear whether Obama has been able to con­vey the required mes­sage to the pop­u­lace. Speaking direct­ly and clear­ly is the best way to com­mu­ni­cate to peo­ple, ask Bill Clinton. Obama has yet to effec­tive­ly tell America that what is hap­pen­ing is because of his race and not his poli­cies. Even some among his base are speak­ing ill about him. When your ene­my con­fig­ures the nar­ra­tive it will not be kind to you.

TWO US SENATORS AT MARCH WHICH OPENLY FLAUNTS CONFEDERATE FLAG:

BWfYvyjIUAAPqpg

Yesterday there was a ruckus in front of the White House . The offi­cial sto­ry fed to the American peo­ple was that they were march­ing in sup­port of mil­i­tary vet​er​ans​.It was billed as a mil­lion vets march, the march how­ev­er turned out to be a colos­sal dud . There are ques­tions regard­ing whether many who turned up were in fact vet­er­ans. Heading the cha­rade were two elect­ed US Senators . Mike Lee of Utah and Ted Cruz of Texas.

TedCruz-Gage

Ted Cruz.

download

Mike Lee.

Yup, elect­ed offi­cials of the American Government active­ly par­tic­i­pat­ing in a march at which the Confederate flag was proud­ly dis­played in front of the White House, along with racist posters. Thugs in the group of Confederate anar­chists heaped bar­ri­cades in front in the White House fence as a mark of dis­re­spect to the President. Some of the anar­chists tus­sled with police. 

BWdpX0AIQAAsHeO

Front and cen­ter of the shame­ful , dis­gust­ing débâ­cle was the failed quit­ter who parad­ed as Governor of Alaska for awhile Sarah Palin. These are the types who head the move­ment which are mak­ing life mis­er­able for mil­lions fur­loughed from their jobs. Palin the igno­ra­mus and two sit­ting American Senators par­tic­i­pat­ed in a march which open­ly waved the Confederate flag in front of the White House.

BWdZOG4CAAA8f9JPalin. Lee . Cruz.

This is so shame­ful , I am ashamed for them. Really it is shock­ing that these crea­tures which calls them­selves human beings, civ­i­lized human beings no less, could be so woe­ful­ly illit­er­ate. The entire world is look­ing at America destroy her­self. No Country can do that . America is doing it to her­self. One Revolutionary war to chart a nation, one civ­il war to define a nation , the next war will be to destroy a nation. This war may not be fought with guns and bay­o­nets. The next war is being waged with self-inflict­ed defaults, and shut-downs and. Drip ‚drip, drip,bleeds America to death, while the Chinese watch and wait. Racism was here from the begin­ning, it has eat­en away at this nation all through­out. Don’t be fooled by Obama’s elec­tion. Racism the can­cer will destroy us or maybe the Chinese will get us first, either way we are doomed.

THE CONFEDERACY SHOWING IT’S TRUE COLORS.

BWfYvyjIUAAPqpg

This was in front the White House yesterday.

America enters week (3) three of a fed­er­al shut-down orches­trat­ed by a minor­i­ty of the minor­i­ty par­ty in one of the three branch­es of the Government. So much for best mod­el of Government when a minor­i­ty seg­ment can hold the major­i­ty of the Federal Bureaucracy hostage. So much for a sys­tem which allows one ego-mani­a­cal Senator to grind the coun­try to a halt.

Over the last few blogs I have sys­tem­at­i­cal referred to the Republican Part as the Confederate/​Republican Party. Some of you have asked why I believe the Republican Party is to be seen in the same light as the old Confederacy? I point you to the poli­cies which obtained after the Civil War . 

Jim Crow Laws enact­ed then . Stand your ground laws now. Chain Gangs then. Prison Industrial com­plex now. Poll Tax and mas­sive vot­er sup­pres­sion then. Voter Id Laws,poll-tax) obsta­cles to vot­ing now. Talks of nul­li­fi­ca­tion and seces­sion then. Talks of nul­li­fi­ca­tion and seces­sion now. Talks of States Rights then. Talks of states Rights now. Lynchings then. Increased police and vig­i­lante killings now.

There is ample evi­dence which, if not ignored shows that the Republican Party now rep­re­sents the Southern Confederacy. Does any­one believe this fuss in the Nation’s Capitol is about (Obama-Care), The Affordable Care Act? If you do you are woe­ful­ly mis-informed . The peo­ple who dreamed up this conun­drum do not think so , they have since dropped that talk­ing point after clos­ing the Government down and now blame Obama for the shut-down. Many in the Lame-stream-Media laments that Republicans had no strat­e­gy to get out of the impasse they cre­at­ed, I dis­agree. Ted Cruz the present day Joe McCarthy, is a lot of things , stu­pid not being one of them. As I wrote before, House and Senate Republicans may have been blind vic­tims to Pied-Piper Ted Cruz’ strat­e­gy , but Cruz knew exact­ly what he want­ed to do.

TedCruz-GageTed Cruz.

Once Cruz had the coun­try grind to a halt he went on the road. He gath­ered the usu­al rab­ble, Sarah Palin and oth­ers sur­round­ed by the most vile big­ots and pro­ceed­ed to blame Obama for the shut-down he ini­ti­at­ed. What that says is, Cruz has zero respect for the intel­li­gence of the peo­ple he wants to leads as pres­i­dent. Cruz believes you are too stu­pid to see through his strat­e­gy which is as clear as day if you open your eyes. The Confederate/​Republican Party is unable to rec­on­cile that a black man is sit­ting atop the Federal Bureaucracy. They are unable to accept a black man at the zenith of pow­er cre­at­ed by over 400 years of racial priv­i­leged. What we are wit­ness­ing is actions of a spurned lover. If I can’t have you, no one else will, I will take you down with me in a heap of ashes”.

That is what the calls of “we want our coun­try back” and “impeach Obama” are all about.

BIG MONEY KOCHS BLINK:

la-pn-government-shutdown-deadline-sunday-tv-news-shows-20130929

This is day 10 of the Confederate/​Republican shut down of the Federal Government. This shut down is hav­ing dis­as­trous con­se­quences for the Country both in eco­nom­ic terms and on the lives of Americans employed by the Feds, there are also resid­ual con­se­quences yet to be report­ed on. CNN reports more than 9 mil­lion moth­ers and their babies are at risk as WIC grinds to a halt.http://​www​.cnn​.com/​2​0​1​3​/​0​9​/​3​0​/​p​o​l​i​t​i​c​s​/​g​o​v​e​r​n​m​e​n​t​-​s​h​u​t​d​o​w​n​-​u​p​-​t​o​-​s​p​e​e​d​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​h​tml.The Los Angeles Times details how a shut down affects the coun­try and the lives of ordi­nary Americans .http://​www​.latimes​.com/​n​a​t​i​o​n​/​p​o​l​i​t​i​c​s​/​p​o​l​i​t​i​c​s​n​o​w​/​l​a​-​p​n​-​g​o​v​e​r​n​m​e​n​t​-​s​h​u​t​d​o​w​n​-​q​-​a​n​d​-​a​-​2​0​1​3​0​9​3​0​,​0​,​5​5​6​4​5​3​1​.​s​t​ory. The risk to the coun­try and peo­ple are stark and dra­mat­ic. Families unable to bury mil­i­tary fam­i­ly mem­bers killed in com­bat. Babies and moth­ers unable to source basic nutri­tion­al sus­te­nance. Parks and Monuments shut­tered. Families put at risk of fore­clo­sure , unable to pay their mort­gage commitments.The list goes on and on. Despite the pain they are caus­ing to the coun­try the band of extor­tion­ist oper­at­ing in the House have decid­ed to hold fast to their demands. Which start­ed about de-fund­ing and repeal­ing the Affordable Care Act , to “we will not be dis­re­spect­ed , we have to get some­thing out of this, we don’t even know what that is”. That has since evolved into whin­ing about bud­get issues. They sim­ply refuse to budge from their non­sen­si­cal extor­tion­ist demands.

None of the pain mat­tered to Confederate/​Republicans, why would they care it’s just the lit­tle peo­ple who are hurt­ing. But an even big­ger prob­lem is loom­ing. The Federal debt lim­it needs to be raised, this is not more Federal spend­ing , it sim­ply allows the Government to pay the bills already autho­rized by the Congress. But most impor­tant­ly a default by the Government would mean that the faith investors both local and for­eign have in America as a place to invest would poten­tial­ly be a thing of the past. That would impact every­one , but it would cause seri­ous harm to the big fat cats many of whom are fund­ing the present chaos in the coun­try, obliv­i­ous and ill-informed of the unin­tend­ed con­se­quences of their actions.

download

Charles a David Koch. Billionaire fun­ders of the Tea-Party hoax.

ΤHEN OCT .9thKoch Industries to sen­a­tors: We haven’t lob­bied to ‘defund ObamaCare

Koch Industries dis­missed accu­sa­tions it has endorsed the Republican tac­tic of link­ing lan­guage to de fund Obama Care to gov­ern­ment spend­ing bills. “Koch has not tak­en a posi­tion on the leg­isla­tive tac­tic of tying the con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion to de-fund­ing Obama Care nor have we lob­bied on leg­isla­tive pro­vi­sions de fund­ing Obama Care,” Philip Ellender, Koch’s gov­ern­ment and pub­lic affairs pres­i­dent, wrote in a let­ter to Senate law­mak­ers Wednesday. Koch Industries is a con­glom­er­ate of com­pa­nies includ­ing Dixie Cups, Lycra and Brawny paper tow­els — all owned by the bil­lion­aire Koch broth­ers. Charles and David Koch, a recent New York Times report says, have been fun­nel­ing mon­ey into the GOP’s effort to destroy President Obama’s health­care law. They have been major back­ers of the Tea Party move­ment, which has led the push to de fund Obama Care in Congress.http://​the​hill​.com/​b​l​o​g​s​/​b​l​o​g​-​b​r​i​e​f​i​n​g​-​r​o​o​m​/​n​e​w​s​/​3​2​7​4​4​9​-​k​o​c​h​-​i​n​d​u​s​t​r​i​e​s​-​t​o​-​s​e​n​a​t​o​r​s​-​w​e​-​h​a​v​e​n​t​-​l​o​b​b​i​e​d​-​t​o​-​d​e​f​u​n​d​-​o​b​a​m​a​c​are.

OCTOBER 10th. Republicans to give President assur­ance of a clean Continuation Resolution Bill to fund the Government, albeit for anoth­er 6 Weeks.…. Wow.

If you ever won­dered whether you mat­tered? That ques­tion is now answered. Charles and David Koch Billionaire fun­ders of the Tea-Party and oth­er right-wing groups now real­ize the con­se­quences of their actions will hit them where it hurts , in their pock­et-books. They dis­tance them­selves, the pup­pets in House runs to the pres­i­dent tail between their legs. The Speaker of the house says they will offer to extend the debt ceil­ing if the President will agree to cuts, that would poten­tial­ly leave the Government still shut­tered. Joy-Anne Reid of the Grio​.com char­ac­ter­ized it this way . “So they have decid­ed not to release the hostage, only not to shoot the hostage, at least until Thanksgiving”. The big mon­ey pup­peteers pulled back when they real­ized they are about to feel finan­cial pain, the lit­tle ide­o­log­i­cal Puppets in the Congress runs to strike a deal.

NO

So they go to the White House to meet the pres­i­dent still hold­ing hostage the American peo­ple. The President said “No” 

GLEANER’S BROADSIDE AGAINST POLICE SHOWS THE DEPTH TO WHICH ONCE PROUD PUBLICATION HAS SUNK:

Every day Jamaica slips deep­er into the abyss of crim­i­nal­i­ty, which will ulti­mate­ly earn it failed state des­ig­na­tion. Never mind that though, there is an ever abun­dant litany of opin­ions by Jamaicans on what needs to be done in terms of mak­ing the job of law enforce­ment more dif­fi­cult. Social-Media is rife with instances of know noth­ing grand-stand­ing Jamaicans offer­ing opin­ions as facts, even when they have no idea about what they speak. The News papers are no bet­ter. The once Prestigious Gleaner is now a shell of it’s for­mer glo­ry, reduced to opin­ions and sen­sa­tion­al­ist garbage when it isn’t engaged in par­rot­ing the talk­ing points of the PNP Administration.

It was no sur­prise that it pub­lished this out­rage , penned by one of its jour­nal­ist George S Davis.http://​mobile​.jamaica​-glean​er​.com/​g​l​e​a​n​e​r​/​2​0​1​3​1​0​0​9​/​c​l​e​i​s​u​r​e​/​c​l​e​i​s​u​r​e​2​.​php. In his arti­cle Davis ref­er­eed to the Police Federation Chairman Raymond Wilson as quote: ” a rab­ble-rouser” close quote. By infer­ence that makes the Police “rab­ble”. dar­ing to stand for their con­sti­tu­tion­al rights to due process and fair play under the law has earned them that dubi­ous title from the Gleaner. In no oth­er Democracy would this be allowed . This shows that Jamaica is not ready for prime time and will invari­ably sink deep­er into the abyss of crime and pover­ty before peo­ple wake up to the real­i­ties sur­round­ing their existence.

I will not give this George Davis unde­served atten­tion, it would be doing a dis-ser­vice to Police Officers to ele­vate the com­ments of this moron. suf­fi­cient to say this is fur­ther evi­dence of the den­i­gra­tion of the Gleaner from what was once the Prestigious Publication in the Caribbean to now an incon­se­quen­tial dish-rag wor­thy of the likes of George Davis.

I once again call on all Rank and File Police offi­cers to stand down and allow the gov­ern­ment to get its Legislative house in order. The Indecom Act is a trav­es­ty which needs revis­it­ing. Batt’s rul­ing does no harm to Police. The Judge’s Ruling says Police can­not “Arbitrarily” stop and search motorists vehi­cles. That is noth­ing new. Officers nev­er had that right and should­n’t. “Probable-cause” is the oper­a­tive term in stop­ping and effect­ing a search. The Government owes Police Officers more than talk . Police offi­cers must not be asked to do their jobs with their hands tied behind their backs. Jamaica’s politi­cians are not very bright, but sure­ly they can copy a piece of leg­is­la­tion from Barbados or Trinidad which offers over­sight of police while empow­er­ing cops to do what is asked of them.

LIKE THE PIED PIPER OF HAMELIN REPUBLICANS FOLLOWED TED CRUZ:

There is a group of peo­ple in this coun­try who are opposed to President Obama, not because of pol­i­cy but because of race. They fun­da­men­tal­ly believe in the pale­ness of their skin and what it ought to mean, in terms of enti­tle­ments and gov­er­nance of this coun­try. That is at the heart of the fight being waged, not just in Washington but in States all across America. It has noth­ing to do with Obama-care, it has every­thing to do with Obama. After Obama won re-elec­tion a group of Confederate/​Republicans got togeth­er to fig­ure out a way to de-fund the Affordable Care Act, the sig­na­ture domes­tic accom­plish­ment of Obama . The idea is a stu­pid and sui­ci­dal irra­tional one ‚but no one ever accused Confederate/​Republicans of being smart. Devious, cal­cu­la­tive, dis­hon­or­able, igno­ran­ly racist, just not smart.

Even if Confederate/​Republicans could some­how man­age to get a repeal/de-fund bill through the Senate, they are for­get­ting that Obama is still the pres­i­dent . He would sim­ply veto the damn thing. So what is the end game for these loonies? There is none . Their goal is sim­ply to cause chaos , wreck the econ­o­my and hope to be returned to pow­er, reward­ed for the car­nage they caused. Obama sad­dled with the blame.

This oppo­si­tion to Obama has gone through stages: Candidate Obama dealt with.

♦1) Jeremiah Wright.

♦2) Forced to make speech on Race in America>

♦3) Birther debate.♦

After Obama was elected.

♦4) Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell dec­la­ra­tion that his sole mis­sion is to make Obama a one term President.

♦5) Birther debate.

♦6) Skip Gates débâcle.

♦7) Joe Wilson you lie.

♦8) Obstruct as much as possible.

♦9) Prevent Obama’s Re-election.

♦10) Challenge Obama-care in the Supreme Court.

♦11) De-fund Obama-care.

♦12) Cause total chaos.

download (3)

Billionaire Funders of chaos in America Charles and David Koch:

Behind this brand of Politics are two broth­ers Charles and David Koch who are fund­ing a cam­paign against Obama, they are bank-rolling efforts to derail Obama’s objec­tives to the tune of tens if not Hundreds of mil­lions of dol­lars. This did not hap­pen in a vac­u­um . This was made pos­si­ble by Supreme Court Decision Citizens United. This deci­sion opened the flood gates of spe­cial inter­est mon­ey into the polit­i­cal process under the guise of free speech. Charles and David Koch are not the only ones who are bank-rolling efforts to negate your vote, they are the face of it. These guys do not believe in Government they have stark lib­er­tar­i­an beliefs which basi­cal­ly say those who can­not make it on their own will be weed­ed out nat­u­ral­ly. Never mind that it’ s easy for them to feel that way, they were born with dia­mond spoons in their mouths, thanks to a bil­lion­aire father.

download (1)

Tea Party Express Chairperson Amy Kremer.

On the face of it the Tea-Party seem like a grass-roots orga­ni­za­tion con­cerned about Government spend­ing, It’s National chair­per­son is a woman who looks like a reg­u­lar soc­cer mom. Don’t believe the lie, this group of frauds were absolute­ly silent when George Bush was wag­ing two wars on a cred­it card and giv­ing tax-breaks to mil­lion­aires and bil­lion­aires. behind this cha­rade are spe­cif­ic groups which are well orga­nized and fund­ed, these includes Conservative Club for growth. Freedom Works. Tea Party Express. The Heritage Foundation.Conservative Victory Project and oth­ers. Those won­der­ing where are the sane Republicans in light of recent devel­op­ments must remem­ber that notion is an oxy­moron. Mitt Romney the last Republican Presidential Candidate the man who stat­ed he was an inde­pen­dent dur­ing the Reagan years , ran as a “severely”[sic] Conservative Republican. That is the lev­el of luna­cy which is now the clown-show called the Republican Party, which I pre­fer to call the Confederate party.

images

Ted Cruz:

What rea­son­able Republican? They got rid of Dick Lugar in Indiana, Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania, oth­er ide­o­log­i­cal zealots were pushed into races they had no chance of win­ning , this cost them dear­ly in Delaware, North Dakota and Montana. So they allowed Ted Cruz and Mike Lee, two Tea-Party Senators to walk them into this tun­nel about de-fund­ing Obama care. The tun­nel did not have an open­ing. Cruz in his sig­na­ture self-aggran­diz­ing zealotry, did not both­er to ensure there was a way out, he sim­ply marched them in like the pied piper of Hamelin. This sto­ry is often ref­er­enced in con­nec­tion with charis­mat­ic lead­er­ship, i.e. to com­pare some­one to the Pied Piper is to indi­cate that they lead unwit­ting fol­low­ers to their doom.

download (2)

Now caught in a Tunnel from which they can­not return, Confederate/​Republicans have closed the Government, demand­ing that Obama come to the table, so they can debate de-fund­ing his health care law, or delay it for a year until they win the Senate so they can repeal it. Basically a no win embar­rass­ment for Obama. He blinked before, why would they not get their way this time? Obama always gives them what they want! Thus far Obama has stood firm, they did not see this com­ing, he always caves, they have no plan B. The con­ver­sa­tion has now being shift­ed to talks about bud­get deficits and just sit­ting down to have a dis­cus­sion about hav­ing a dis­cus­sion.. The shame­less neo­phyte Senator from Texas, Ted Cruz locked the Government down, then have the nerve to tell mil­i­tary Veterans the President did it. This guy is a shame­less dem­a­gogue . At issue how­ev­er is what Confederate/​Republicans think about the aver­age American, they believe they are too stu­pid to under­stand the issues. This guy has shades of Joe McCarthy, this coun­try would be wise to pay spe­cial atten­tion to him, he can cause a lot of harm before he is through, just like McCarthy did.

OBAMA, JACKIE ROBINSON OF AMERICAN PRESIDENCY.

images (71)

President Barack Obama is the Jackie Robinson of the American Presidency . Obama under­stands as Robinson did, what his place in his­to­ry will be. He knows his trail-blaz­ing sprint to the top was not going to be with­out hur­dles. He under­stands well, that those who erect bar­ri­ers in his way will be mere foot-notes when the pages of his­to­ry are writ­ten. Like oth­er American patri­ots before him , he under­stands the igno­rance of intel­lec­tu­al cave-dwellers will only make his sto­ry that much more interesting.

Jack Roosevelt Robinson was born in Cairo, Georgia in 1919 to a fam­i­ly of share­crop­pers. His moth­er, Mallie Robinson, sin­gle-hand­ed­ly raised Jackie and her four oth­er chil­dren. They were the only black fam­i­ly on their block, and the prej­u­dice they encoun­tered only strength­ened their bond. From this hum­ble begin­ning would grow the first base­ball play­er to break Major League Baseball’s col­or bar­ri­er that seg­re­gat­ed the sport for more than 50 years. Jackie Robinson’s life and lega­cy will be remem­bered as one of the most impor­tant in American his­to­ry. In 1997, the world cel­e­brat­ed the 50th Anniversary of Jackie’s break­ing Major League Baseball’s col­or bar­ri­er. In doing so, we hon­ored the man who stood defi­ant­ly against those who would work against racial equal­i­ty and acknowl­edged the pro­found influ­ence of one man’s life on the American cul­ture. On the date of Robinson’s his­toric debut, all Major League teams across the nation cel­e­brat­ed this mile­stone. Also that year, The United States Post Office hon­ored Robinson by mak­ing him the sub­ject of a com­mem­o­ra­tive postage stamp. On Tuesday, April 15 President Bill Clinton paid trib­ute to Jackie at Shea Stadium in New York in a spe­cial cer­e­mo­ny.http://​www​.jack​ier​obin​son​.com/​a​b​o​u​t​/​b​i​o​.​h​tml.

During his major league car­rear Robinson endured the sear­ing heat or racial igno­rance in ball-parks all over America as well as from many with whom he shared a lock­er-room. Robinson was ridiculed, jeered and even spat upon. Today Robinson’s con­tri­bu­tion to his coun­try is incal­cu­la­ble. Many who today invoke Robinson’s name should hang their heads in shame. They use Robinson’s name as they do Doctor King’s to fur­ther their own agen­das. It is the con­tin­ued shame of America to eat it’s great­est lead­ers and cel­e­brate it’s worst dem­a­gogues. Lincoln, Kennedy, Kennedy, King, Malcolm X, Evers , the list of dis­tin­guished Americans sac­ri­ficed is long and var­ied . In the same breath Jefferson Davis, Bull O’Connor, George Wallace and Strom Thurmond Joe Arpio are heroes.

Obama is part­ly to be blamed for the pick­le the coun­try is in, just not in the way some would like to explain it. The pre­vi­ous occa­sion on which the con­fed­er­ate Republicans took the Nation hostage he nego­ti­at­ed with them. This embold­ened them to again adopt this dan­ger­ous, regres­sive, tac­tic as bar­gain­ing lever­age. Here’s the rub, why would the pres­i­dent nego­ti­ate with the Confederate/​Republicans on his sig­na­ture domes­tic achieve­ment ? What prece­dent would he be set­ting for future pres­i­dents by cav­ing to extor­tion? This hostage tak­ing is by one fac­tion, of one house, of one branch of Government. Their job is to fund the Government. How dare they take the entire coun­ty hostage?

Why would Democrats nego­ti­ate with the Confederate/​Republicans after they have closed the Government down to extract what they want from the pres­i­dent? John Boehner the confederate/​Republican Speaker of the house, act­ing like a thug, demands the President nego­ti­ate an end to the impasse he cre­at­ed. Really ? His and his cronies actions are tan­ta­mount to a hostage tak­er who calls the police demand­ing that the cops nego­ti­ate with them so they may extract a ransom.

If ever there was a case of pow­er going to the head of politi­cians this is it. This is the most egre­gious case of abuse of pow­er I have ever seen in my life­time. It is craven, arro­gant, it bor­ders on sedi­tious. In law, sedi­tion is overt con­duct, such as speech and orga­ni­za­tion, that is deemed by the legal author­i­ty to tend toward insur­rec­tion against the estab­lished order.‎The sad thing is, the Confederate/​Republicans don’t even know what they want out of this dan­ger­ous , regres­sive gam­bit. Quote :” We will not be dis­re­spect­ed We have to get some­thing out of this. And I don’t know what that even is.”

downloadRep. Marlin Stutzman (R‑Ind.)

images

Don’t for­get that this is a man­u­fac­tured cri­sis which is hurt­ing the nation’s econ­o­my and affect­ing the lives of hun­dreds of thou­sands , if not mil­lions of Americans. The anar­chis­tic confederate/​Republicans sim­ply don’t care. This has been their tac­tic for decades, when they don’t have their way, they sim­ply shut the gov­ern­ment down. Remember this car­toon dur­ing the Clinton Administration? These mis­fits should be run out-of-town but they won’t be, these are the elect­ed lead­ers who rep­re­sent spe­cif­ic ger­ry­man­dered con­gres­sion­al dis­tricts in red states. The only cri­te­ria to get­ting elect­ed it seem, is absolute rabid stu­pid­i­ty. Elected Representatives mir­ror the vot­ers who elect them. We have seen and heard some of the things some of these vot­ers say and do, it is no won­der dur­ing the boon years of the Clinton Administration most of the peo­ple liv­ing in cer­tain geo­graph­i­cal areas would ask what boon? They sim­ply refuse to open their minds to new pos­si­bil­i­ties . Racism is one of the cor­ro­sive ten­ta­cle still stran­gling them. These are the same peo­ple who wrap them­selves in the Flag and try to con­vince you they are patri­ots. They are not, they have sold their votes to spe­cial inter­est, coun­try be damned. They are the ones who have the nerve to ques­tion the nation­al­i­ty of oth­ers , they are frauds.