Editor Does Not Get It Either.…

Editorial: Mr Dalley Should Do As He Says
Jamaica gleaner.

Published:Thursday | June 4, 2015
THE GOVERNMENT is final­ly telling pub­lic-sec­tor unions the truth. But talk­ing about its dan­ger, or hold­ing it above their heads like the sword so feared by Damocles is not the solu­tion. The answer is for the admin­is­tra­tion to muster the courage to cut away the problem.

Our ref­er­ence is to the warn­ing by Horace Dalley, the Government’s wage nego­tia­tor, that there would have to be a cut of up to 15,000 pub­lic-sec­tor jobs if the Government were to acqui­esce to the wage demands of state employ­ees, some of whom, like the police, have asked for as much as 200 per cent. Most, how­ev­er, are more mod­est at around 30 per cent, over two years. The Government’s offer is a five per cent hike on basic pay.

Mr Dalley and his boss, Finance Minister Peter Phillips, have cor­rect­ly placed the mat­ter of the wage nego­ti­a­tions in the con­text of the eco­nom­ic reform project being under­tak­en by the Government, with tute­lage from the International Monetary Fund. The pro­gram­me’s pri­ma­ry aim is to bring the fis­cal accounts into bal­ance and to place the coun­try’s unsus­tain­able debt on a down­ward tra­jec­to­ry. An impor­tant bench­mark of the pro­gramme is for the Government to run a fis­cal sur­plus of 7.5 per of gross domes­tic prod­uct (GDP).

ANAEMIC GROWTH

The reforms, of course, make sense. For as the sen­si­ble often point out, Jamaica’s inep­ti­tude at man­ag­ing its finances con­tributed to its high lev­els of bor­row­ing, lead­ing to a bal­loon­ing debt that was head­ing towards 150 per cent of GDP. The Government’s gour­man­dis­ing on debt left lit­tle room for pri­vate invest­ment in the real econ­o­my. The result: anaemic growth.

Adjustments, such as those being under­tak­en, are nei­ther easy nor pain­less, to which Jamaicans will read­i­ly attest. But the more egre­gious wrong, over the longer term, would be for the Government to retreat from the project and to raise pub­lic-sec­tor salaries with­out doing more.

INEFFICIENT, BLOATED CIVIL SERVICE.

First, we believe that gov­ern­ment work­ers ought to be paid sub­stan­tial­ly more, but in the con­text of an effi­cient, pro­duc­tive entre­pre­neur­ial pub­lic sec­tor that func­tions as a part­ner with, and facil­i­ta­tor of, the pri­vate sec­tor. We do not, how­ev­er, believe that this can be achieved — that is, bet­ter paid, effi­cient pub­lic bureau­cra­cy — with the bloat­ed civ­il ser­vice whose pro­duc­tiv­i­ty con­tin­ues to decline at a rate faster than most oth­er cat­e­gories of Jamaican workers.

Yet, as a group, rel­a­tive to their per­for­mance, pub­lic-sec­tor work­ers can­not claim to have done all that bad­ly. In the past decade, since the 2004-05 fis­cal year, the Government’s wage bill, minus pen­sion pay­ments, despite two rounds of wage freezes, has risen by 157 per cent, not far (around 10 per­cent­age points) behind the move­ment in the con­sumer price index.

Indeed, even at only the pro­ject­ed five per cent increase, the pub­lic-sec­tor wage bill would, this fis­cal year, con­sume 36 per cent of the gov­ern­ment rev­enue and 26 per cent of all its pro­ject­ed spend. When inter­est cost is added to the wage bill, that eats up 65 per cent of the rev­enue, leav­ing not much to do little.

We agree with Audley Shaw, the shad­ow finance min­is­ter. Public sec­tor should be paid more. But that can’t hap­pen with their bulging num­bers. Genuine pub­lic-sec­tor reform is urgent, includ­ing tak­ing the scalpel to the sec­tor and, with sur­gi­cal pre­ci­sion, excis­ing the bloat, unnec­es­sary and the waste­ful. This, clear­ly, is not a polit­i­cal­ly easy task. It is the right one.

.….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….

REALLY ?

MB
MB

How can a Socialist Government take a Scalpel to the bloat­ed pub­lic sec­tor when it’s entire phi­los­o­phy is one of Government doing for peo­ple what they should do for themselves.

The present Administration does not under­stand how a mar­ket econ­o­my works, as such it becomes impos­si­ble for the coun­try to claw it’s way out of the present cri­sis it’ faces.
Anyone who believes the present path dic­tat­ed by the IMF is a path to rebuild­ing the Nation’s econ­o­my is delusional.
The path laid out by the fund is designed to ensure the coun­try is able to pay back to the fund what it owes with interest.
Of course if the peo­ple were wide-eyed they would real­ize this is an unsus­tain­able path to nowhere.
Wherever the IMF is hap­py social dis­or­der becomes the nat­ur­al order.
I wish the Editor would explain how this path will lead to pros­per­i­ty, or even a seri­ous reduc­tion of the nations debt.

HERE ARE SOME SUGGESTIONS TO THE SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT OPERATING IN KINGSTON AND THE ADMINISTRATIONS OPERATIVES AT THE EDITORIAL BOARD OF THE GLEANER COMPANY.

(1) REDUCE CRIME
You accom­plish this by telling your sup­port­ers that there are no safe havens any place, in any Garrison con­trolled by your party.
Then dis­man­tle the Garrisons.
No PM Miller, Garrisons do not have to have walls.
Equip, train, and pay the police.
Cut the bloat­ed pub­lic sec­tor workforce.
Yes that includes polit­i­cal hacks who are a drain on the coun­try’s mea­ger resources, . Yes fam­i­ly mem­bers and friends are included.
Pass laws com­men­su­rate with the rapid­ly chang­ing times . Penalties should put seri­ous offend­ers behind bars for long peri­ods of time . Seek to reha­bil­i­tate non-vio­lent offenders.

(2) ELIMINATE BUREAUCRACY.
Cut unnec­es­sary restric­tions on imports, there­by remov­ing the pro­tec­tion accord­ed cer­tain sec­tors of the pri­vate sector.
A pri­vate sec­tor should be open­ly com­pet­i­tive. Those who can­not com­pete will be weed­ed out.
An open com­pet­i­tive pri­vate sec­tor dri­ves down prices to consumers.
(3) ELIMINATE CORRUPTION.
Remove fam­i­ly friends and loy­al­ists from the pub­lic sec­tor pay­roll. Slash non-essen­tial work­ers , orga­nize to get them loans so they may go to school or do start up businesses.
(4) LOWER TAXES.
Self explanatory.
(5) BROADEN TAX NET.
Bring more small oper­a­tors into com­pli­ance this will relieve the bur­den on PAYE workers.
(6) DIVERSIFY ENERGY SOURCES.
Jamaica has no short­age of sun and wind. Have Industry and Commerce get off their fat rear-ends and go seek investors who are inter­est­ed in help­ing to devel­op our Solar and wind capa­bil­i­ties. There is no rea­son Jamaica should be addict­ed to dirty oil.
(7) MAINTAIN AND BUILD THE NATION’S VITAL INFRASTRUCTURE.
Developing roads , water and elec­tric­i­ty , reduces urban sprawl, encour­ages rur­al devel­op­ment and builds the economy.
Adopt these sim­ple steps and watch Private sec­tor invest­ment flood our coun­try. Do these and guar­an­teed we have to turn some investors away.
There is no rea­son Jamaicans should be liv­ing in a pover­ty-strick­en crime infest­ed hell-hole.
That is how a nation is built , not on pseudo/​socialist give-aways.

Doctors Worried About Falling Ill Too — Jamaica Medical Doctors Association

As police divi­sions across the island con­tin­ue to be affect­ed by the ‘sick out’ of hun­dreds of Jamaica Constabulary Force mem­bers, the Jamaica Medical Doctors Association (JMDA) has come out to express its sol­i­dar­i­ty with the cops. 

In a release the JMDA says it stands with their fel­low civ­il ser­vants and hope that a cure can be found quick­ly to rem­e­dy their illness.

SEE FULL RELEASE BELOW

In an envi­ron­ment where so many of our fel­low civ­il ser­vants are unwell, the Members of the [Jamaica] Medical Doctors Association stand in sol­i­dar­i­ty with them and hope that a cure can be found quick­ly to rem­e­dy their ill­ness. The doc­tors are also con­cerned as to whether ill­ness now being suf­fered by the Police Officers is contagious.

President of the Jamaica Medical Doctors Association Dr. Alfred Dawes not­ed: “As doc­tors we can­not be com­fort­able with so many of our col­leagues falling it. It seems the cur­rent con­di­tions are caus­ing ill­ness­es to affect them and we hope that there can be a rem­e­dy to these ail­ments soon”.

The President added that the JMDA is in full sup­port of Civil Servants and stand ready to assist in their capac­i­ty as doc­tors if this ill­ness con­tin­ues: “Doctors are not immune and any­thing that affects our col­leagues in the Public Sector might soon begin affect­ing doc­tors too. We hope this sit­u­a­tion does not occur as the coun­try can­not afford Doctors falling ill”.

Dr. Alfred Dawes
President of the Jamaica Medical Doctors Association.
Doctors Worried About Falling Ill Too — Jamaica Medical Doctors Association

Jamaica Govt. To Police Refuse To Work, We Confiscate Your Property.….

Patrick Atkinson
Patrick Atkinson

The Jamaican Government through it’s Attorney General Patrick Atkinson, has secured an Injunction from the Supreme Court intend­ed to force sick police offi­cers back to work.
The gist of the Injunction is that the police is to cease and desist from it’s indus­tri­al action for a peri­od of 28 days and return to the bar­gain­ing table with the Government.
Sounds like a fair bit of adju­di­ca­tion right?
Not so fast… Atkinson buoyed by what he thought was the final blud­geon­ing tool with which he would crush the low­ly rank-and-file cops, declared that fail­ing to com­ply with the Injunction would be tan­ta­mount to con­tempt of court with penal­ty includ­ing Government con­fis­ca­tion of police offi­cers property.
Clearly this cor­rupt Government of the intel­lec­tu­al­ly chal­lenged Simpson Miller is look­ing to start a civ­il war in the Island nation.

Raymond Wilson
Raymond Wilson

Simpson Miller and her band of incom­pe­tents, must know that despite plac­ing it’s func­tionar­ies in crit­i­cal posi­tions of civ­il soci­ety , includ­ing the courts, that it would be ask­ing for war were they to try to enforce that Injunction.
In fact the Jamaican Newspapers are report­ing that over 1,000 cops had report­ed sick out of a force of 12.000. After the Injunction was issued over 3.000 offi­cers report­ed sick.
News flash to the lack­eys on the Supreme Court, if a Doctor say the cops are sick, guess what ?
They are sick and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it.
What cheek?
Confiscation of property?
This Administration, just wel­comed Barack Obama the President of the United States to Jamaica. The Central Intelligence Agency is patent­ly aware that Jamaica is inher­ent­ly cor­rupt. The Agency is also aware that the régime does not sup­port or respect police offi­cers and the rule of law.
Why did Obama legit­imize the Portia Simpson Miller Government by vis­it­ing Jamaica at this time?
There is no oth­er expla­na­tion oth­er than his desire to push the Homosexual Agenda on Jamaica.

The Police Federation, the Union which rep­re­sents Rank and file mem­bers of the depart­ment had already indi­cat­ed it“s will­ing­ness to go back to the bar­gain­ing table to dis­cuss the issue of salaries and ben­e­fits. The Government for it’s part, had all the time in the world to come up with a pack­age for pub­lic sec­tor work­ers that was less insulting.
Using the courts as an intend­ed tool of intim­i­da­tion to pub­lic sec­tor work­ers is dis­grace­ful. It’s also illu­mi­nat­ing to the nation the con­tempt the Kleptomaniac inept admin­is­tra­tion has for ordi­nary work­ing people.

Peter Bunting Minister of National Security Obviously not in command of the facts shows himself less than capable once again
Peter Bunting Minister of National Security
Obviously not in com­mand of the facts shows him­self less than capa­ble once again

According to a reli­able sources the infla­tion rate in Jamaica was record­ed at 4.40 per­cent in April of 2015.
Over a 12 month peri­od Jamaica’s Inflation rate fluc­tu­ates between a low of 4 and a high of 9.7%.
A pay increase of 3% in the first year does not even cov­er the cost of inflation.
Adopting a pos­ture of a plan­ta­tion own­er to pub­lic sec­tor work­ers is not exact­ly a pre­scrip­tion for social order.
It is impor­tant that these very Police Officers, Nurses, Teachers and oth­er pub­lic sec­tor work­ers, remem­ber the way the Government respond­ed to their legit­i­mate demand for a liv­able wage.
The cops demand is even more just, in light of what they face daily.
They should nev­er for­get nor for­give this out­ra­geous affront.

Police And Their Families Are A Lot Of Votes : They Better Remember This Dis.…

Derrick Smith
Derrick Smith

Opposition Spokesperson on National Security Derrick Smith has unleashed a scathing response to the Government’s Injunction in the Courts designed to force mem­bers of the police depart­ment on sick-out back to work.
I gen­er­al­ly nev­er agree with any­thing Smith had to say. I was­n’t con­vinced that Smith who pre­vi­ous­ly held the National Security Portfolio was suf­fi­cient­ly sup­port­ive of the Police.
Many of my friends dis­agree with me on that but I reserve the right to be wrong.
I must admit how­ev­er that Smith’s com­ments are spot on.

SMITH STATED:
The tem­po­rary injunc­tion the Government has secured from the Supreme Court bar­ring the police from tak­ing indus­tri­al action not only serves to inten­si­fy the esca­lat­ing wage nego­ti­a­tion cri­sis, but brings the “arro­gance and bul­ly­ing tac­tics being employed by the Government into sharp focus”.

The Government’s move to com­pel the police back to work by way of an injunc­tion will not improve the deep­en­ing indus­tri­al rela­tions row and bring us no clos­er to restor­ing nor­mal­i­ty.” “In fact, the injunc­tion only serves to fur­ther pro­voke the police and inten­si­fy the antag­o­nism that char­ac­ter­izes the rela­tion­ship between the police and the Government at this time. Instead of resort­ing to bul­ly tac­tics and fur­ther oppress­ing the hard-work­ing men and women of the con­stab­u­lary, the Government needs to move quick­ly in mak­ing a bet­ter offer and ulti­mate­ly arriv­ing at a settlement,”.

Cops face incredible odds
Cops face incred­i­ble odds

My sen­ti­ments exact­ly , but what real­ly excit­ed me about Derrick Smith’s com­ments is this.
“What I find most dis­turb­ing is that the Government sat seem­ing­ly unper­turbed and allowed the sit­u­a­tion to esca­late to the point where the Police Federation felt it had no option but to mobi­lize its mem­bers in stag­ing a sick-out. What is even more dis­turb­ing is that the nation­al secu­ri­ty min­is­ter, who, if no one else in the Government does, should have the inter­ests of the police at heart, has expend­ed no dis­cernible effort in advanc­ing their wel­fare, but saw it fit to resort to bul­ly­ing tac­tics on Tuesday by call­ing on them to return to work.”

Not only has Bunting showed he does not care about the plight of the work­ing cops on the beat, some of whom pro­vide 24 hour secu­ri­ty to him at the risk to their own lives, he total­ly mis­quot­ed the per­cent­age Government offered to rank and file cops.
If Minister Bunting had noth­ing pos­i­tive to say all he had to do is sim­ply remain silent.

A great Jamaican proverb taught me by my great aunt is (yu must tek sleep mark death) .
The police depart­ment is a large block of votes. Police offi­cers have incred­i­ble sway and influ­ence on mem­bers of their fam­i­lies, that includes how they vote.
I hope they learn and have mem­o­ries like Elephants.
In some con­stituen­cies the dif­fer­ence between win­ning and los­ing is a few dozen votes. The votes of offi­cers can be the dif­fer­ence in return­ing Jamaica to sanity.
Whether Derrick Smith is gen­uine in his broad­side against the Government, or he is sim­ply pos­tur­ing, his com­ments are nonethe­less correct.

The Police depart­ment has over 12.000 mem­bers . Members of the Gazetted Ranks who are mem­bers of the civ­il ser­vice are not sub­ject to this wage dis­pute. Rank and file mem­bers must extri­cate them­selves from the typ­i­cal “licky-licky “men­tal­i­ty which has char­ac­ter­ized the way they look at the polit­i­cal game and make deci­sions that will ulti­mate­ly ben­e­fit them and their fam­i­lies going forward.
This par­ty has nev­er placed nation­al secu­ri­ty on the front burner.
This wage dis­pute is not the only indi­ca­tor that the admin­is­tra­tion does not care about them.
Members com­plain they do not have uni­forms nor boots , how dis­grace­ful is that?
The Peoples’ National Party has always been a par­ty which want­ed crime to flour­ish as a kind of a “wink-and-a-nod” to it’s sup­port­ers when they are in office.
It’s a kind of pay back to the peo­ple. One of the many unscrupu­lous things they do to win and hold onto state power.
The Police have a choice to make.…

Smith Slaps Government’s Court Action Against ‘sick’ Cops

Derrick Smith
Derrick Smith

KINGSTON, Jamaica — Opposition Spokesman on National Security Derrick Smith says that the tem­po­rary injunc­tion the Government has secured from the Supreme Court bar­ring the police from tak­ing indus­tri­al action not only serves to inten­si­fy the esca­lat­ing wage nego­ti­a­tion cri­sis, but brings the “arro­gance and bul­ly­ing tac­tics being employed by the Government into sharp focus”.

Smith said: “The Government’s move to com­pel the police back to work by way of an injunc­tion will not improve the deep­en­ing indus­tri­al rela­tions row and bring us no clos­er to restor­ing normality.”

In fact, the injunc­tion only serves to fur­ther pro­voke the police and inten­si­fy the antag­o­nism that char­ac­teris­es the rela­tion­ship between the police and the Government at this time. Instead of resort­ing to bul­ly tac­tics and fur­ther oppress­ing the hard-work­ing men and women of the con­stab­u­lary, the Government needs to move quick­ly in mak­ing a bet­ter offer and ulti­mate­ly arriv­ing at a set­tle­ment,” Smith’s state­ment said.

He added: “What I find most dis­turb­ing is that the Government sat seem­ing­ly unper­turbed and allowed the sit­u­a­tion to esca­late to the point where the Police Federation felt it had no option but to mobi­lize its mem­bers in stag­ing a sick-out. What is even more dis­turb­ing is that the nation­al secu­ri­ty min­is­ter, who, if no one else in the Government does, should have the inter­ests of the police at heart, has expend­ed no dis­cernible effort in advanc­ing their wel­fare, but saw it fit to resort to bul­ly­ing tac­tics on Tuesday by call­ing on them to return to work.”

Like our Facebook page Smith slaps Government’s court action against ‘sick’ cops

New Bill Says It’s Time To Track The Data On Police Shootings

Brandon Payton, right, of Baltimore, fist-bumps a National Guardsman standing outside of City Hall as protesters march by to demonstrate the police-custody death of Freddie Gray, Thursday, April 30, 2015, in Baltimore. (AP Photo/David Goldman) | ASSOCIATED PRESS
Brandon Payton, right, of Baltimore, fist-bumps a National Guardsman stand­ing out­side of City Hall as pro­test­ers march by to demon­strate the police-cus­tody death of Freddie Gray, Thursday, April 30, 2015, in Baltimore. (AP Photo/​David Goldman) | ASSOCIATED PRESS

Two Democratic sen­a­tors intro­duced a bill this week aimed at chang­ing what for­mer Attorney General Eric Holder once called the “unac­cept­able” lack of data on the sub­ject of police shootings.

Sens. Barbara Boxer (D‑Calif.) and Cory Booker (D‑N.J.) on Tuesday intro­duced the Police Reporting of Information, Data and Evidence Act (PRIDE), which would require states to report to the Justice Department any time a law enforce­ment offi­cer is involved in a shoot­ing and any instance where an offi­cer or a civil­ian is seri­ous­ly hurt or killed as a result of the use of force. States would also have to report details like the age, race and loca­tion of any vic­tims; whether or not the civil­ians present were armed; and how many civil­ians and offi­cers were involved.

Too many mem­bers of the pub­lic and police offi­cers are being killed, and we don’t have reli­able sta­tis­tics to track these trag­ic inci­dents,” Boxer said in a state­ment Tuesday. “This bill will ensure that we know the full extent of the prob­lem so we can save lives on all sides.”

There is cur­rent­ly no com­pre­hen­sive fed­er­al pro­gram that col­lects data on law enforce­ment-involved shoot­ings and use of force, mak­ing that infor­ma­tion essen­tial­ly impos­si­ble to find. The FBI’s uni­form crime report only includes police-involved killings that are con­sid­ered “jus­ti­fi­able homi­cides” — that is, killings that law enforce­ment offi­cials con­sid­er excus­able, like a civil­ian who is killed while com­mit­ting a felony. These inci­dents are report­ed by police on a vol­un­tary basis, mean­ing there are like­ly many more that hap­pen than we have an offi­cial record of.

In her state­ment Tuesday, Boxer not­ed that there’s also no com­pre­hen­sive report­ing on how many offi­cers are killed in the line of duty. This year, 54 offi­cers have been killed in the line of duty, 14 of them shot and killed by sus­pects, accord­ing to num­bers from the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund.

Meanwhile, thus far in 2015, U.S. police have shot and killed at least 385 peo­ple, or about 2.5 peo­ple a day, accord­ing to a recent Washington Post esti­mate. And The Guardian — which is mak­ing its own sus­tained effort to track police-killing sta­tis­tics — puts the year-to-date total even high­er, at 408.

On Monday, The Guardian unveiled a project called “The Counted,” a crowd­sourced data­base that aims to tal­ly police- and oth­er law enforce­ment-involved deaths and record vital details of the incidents.

The data­base culls news from local reports, sub­mit­ted tips (ver­i­fied by The Guardian) and oth­er pub­lic data. Guardian reporter Jon Swaine told The Huffington Post that the info arrives “in drips and drops,” mean­ing that entries may be added, removed or revised as new infor­ma­tion becomes available.

Swaine said the April shoot­ing of South Carolina man Walter Scott offers one exam­ple of how an entry can morph as new details come to light: Initial reports based on police infor­ma­tion paint­ed a dras­ti­cal­ly dif­fer­ent pic­ture than the real­i­ty the pub­lic saw a day lat­er when video of the inci­dent was released.

Though law enforce­ment-involved shoot­ings have cap­tured the most media atten­tion, Swaine said “The Counted” will also include cas­es like that of Baltimore’s Freddie Gray, who died from a spinal cord injury sus­tained dur­ing a vio­lent ride in a police van.

Swaine said The Guardian hopes “The Counted” will bol­ster efforts by local media, res­i­dents and oth­ers look­ing to bet­ter under­stand fatal police and civil­ian encoun­ters. Already, he said, out­lets in Los Angeles and New Orleans have used the tool to explore their own local num­bers. He not­ed that the map­ping tool can also help users see when inci­dents are clus­tered in par­tic­u­lar geo­graph­ic areas of a city.

Swaine said The Guardian plans to keep “The Counted” going at least through the rest of the year.

[Guardian Editor-in-Chief Katharine Viner and I] were both sur­prised that there was no com­pre­hen­sive report of police fatal­i­ties,” said Swaine. “It was a gap we could fill and it fit with The Guardian’s, what you might call, ethos. It’s part of The Guardian’s tra­di­tion: skep­ti­cism of author­i­ty, skep­ti­cism of the police force.“New Bill Says It’s Time To Track The Data On Police Shootings

Police Federation Accepts Dalley’s Invitation

Peter Bunting Minister of National Security Obviously not in command of the facts shows himself less than capable once again
Peter Bunting Minister of National Security
Obviously not in com­mand of the facts shows him­self less than capa­ble once again

The Jamaica Police Federation says it has accept­ed the Government’s offer to resume wage negotiations.

Horace Dalley, the Minister with­out Portfolio in the Ministry of Finance, who is lead­ing the nego­ti­a­tions for the gov­ern­ment, wrote to the Federation yes­ter­day invit­ing it to attend a meet­ing sched­uled at the Ministry for Friday after­noon. Meanwhile, chair­man of the police fed­er­a­tion Sergeant Raymond Wilson has tak­en issue with the asser­tion by nation­al secu­ri­ty min­is­ter Peter Bunting that police per­son­nel have been offered a 6.5 per cent increase in year one and 5.5 per cent in year two.

Bunting explained the increas­es for both years include a 3.5 per cent annu­al incre­ment which every JCF mem­ber receives. But Sergeant Wilson says this annu­al incre­ment is not a new ben­e­fit and was already cal­cu­lat­ed into the lev­el of ero­sion expe­ri­enced by cops since their last increase. He says not every mem­ber of the force will be enti­tled to the incre­men­tal increase as an indi­vid­ual can only have six such increas­es at each rank. He says this means that a police­man who has already spent six years at a par­tic­u­lar rank will not have this increase to look for­ward to unless he is pro­mot­ed or is approved for senior­i­ty allowance. Police Federation Accepts Dalley’s Invitation

Jamaican Govt Declares War On Police Department..

download (11)FULL STATEMENT FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL:

The Attorney General of Jamaica wish­es to advise that an injunc­tion was tonight obtained from the Supreme Court against the Executive Members of the Jamaica Police Federation and all mem­bers of the Federation.

Pursuant to the Order of the Court per­mit­ting the order to be broad­cast over a com­mer­cial broad­cast­ing sys­tem oper­at­ing in Jamaica, or by pub­li­ca­tion in at least one dai­ly news­pa­per cir­cu­lat­ing in Jamaica, the Attorney General now pub­lish­es the terms of the order as follows:
1. The Respondents be appoint­ed to rep­re­sent the mem­bers of the Jamaica Police Federation.

2. The Respondents be restrained from con­tin­u­ing any indus­tri­al action in the form of with­hold­ing their ser­vices or otherwise.

3. The Respondents and all the mem­bers of the Jamaica Police Federation be restrained for a peri­od of twen­ty eight (28) days from caus­ing and/​or attempt­ing to cause and/​or car­ry­ing out acts to cause dis­af­fec­tion amongst the mem­bers of the Constabulary Force and/​or induc­ing and/​or attempt­ing to induce and/​or car­ry­ing out acts to induce mem­bers of the Constabulary Force to with­hold their services.

4. A manda­to­ry injunc­tion instruct­ing the mem­bers of the Force who are with­hold­ing their ser­vices by way of “sick out” and/​or oth­er indus­tri­al action to report for their shifts/​for work as and when sched­uled or due to do so until fur­ther order of the court or for a peri­od of twen­ty eight (28) days whichev­er is earlier.

5. The Order here­in be pub­lished, either by broad­cast­ing same on at least two sep­a­rate occa­sions over a com­mer­cial broad­cast­ing sys­tem oper­at­ing in Jamaica, or by pub­li­ca­tion in at least one dai­ly news­pa­per cir­cu­lat­ing in Jamaica and that this be deemed ser­vice of Notice of the said Order on the Respondents and all the said mem­bers of the Jamaica Police Federation.

6. The appli­ca­tion will be fur­ther con­sid­ered by the Court on the 18th day of June 2015 at 10:00 a.m. or so soon there­after as coun­sel may be heard.

The Attorney General reminds the Executive and Membership of the Jamaica Police Federation that fail­ure to com­ply with the terms of the Supreme Court Order will result in them being in con­tempt of court and liable to hav­ing their assets being confiscated.

Gov’t Obtains Injunction Against The Police Federation

Senior police officers on duty in Cross Roads St Andrew Monday as some junior officers staged a sick out
Senior police offi­cers on duty in Cross Roads St Andrew Monday as some junior offi­cers staged a sick out

The gov­ern­ment has obtained an injunc­tion from the Supreme Court against the Executive of the Police Federation and all its mem­bers. The injunc­tion bars them from con­tin­u­ing any indus­tri­al action in the form of with­hold­ing their ser­vices. In a state­ment issued short­ly after mid­night, the Attorney General said all mem­bers of the Federation are restrained for a peri­od of 28 days from with­hold­ing their services.

All police offi­cers who are with­hold­ing their ser­vices by way of “sick out” and/​or oth­er indus­tri­al action have to report for work until a fur­ther order of the court, or for a peri­od of 28 days, whichev­er is ear­li­er. The Attorney General has warned the Executive and mem­ber­ship of the Police Federation that fail­ure to com­ply with the terms of the Supreme Court Order will result in them being in con­tempt of court and liable to hav­ing their assets being con­fis­cat­ed. Gov’t obtains injunc­tion against the Police Federation

The Threat Level Was Very High..(DCP) Blake

Deputy Commissioner of Police Clifford Blake
Deputy Commissioner of Police Clifford Blake

THE THREAT LEVEL WAS VERY HIGH
Deputy Commissioner of Police Clifford Blake tes­ti­fied yes­ter­day that police per­son­nel would have been mas­sa­cred if they had gone into Tivoli Gardens with­out the aid of the Jamaica Defense Force.

This is a crit­i­cal and use­ful assess­ment by Blake, how­ev­er in the inter­est of clar­i­ty it is impor­tant to expand on what that means. The police need­ed the assets of the Military not just it’s man­pow­er but the armor need­ed for force protection.
Blake spoke to that under ques­tion­ing, stat­ing that the police’s focus was the safe­ty of its offi­cers and law-abid­ing cit­i­zens, and cor­rect­ly so.
It is par­tic­u­lar­ly dif­fi­cult to min­i­mize casu­al­ty in what was a war when the ter­rain is against you. In war­fare the forces which occu­py the high ground always has the tac­ti­cal advantage.
Tivoli Gardens like some oth­er Government built hous­ing devel­op­ments are high rise struc­tures , when peo­ple liv­ing in these enclaves are allowed to flirt the rules and thumb their noses at the rule of law what we get is what hap­pened there in 2010.
As a front line cop I took fire in sev­er­al of Jamaica’s Garrisons, Tivoli Gardens included.
What real­ly piss­es me off is pre­ten­tious know-noth­ings who have vary­ing ideas of how the police and mil­i­tary should have han­dled, what was clear­ly an act of war declared on the authen­tic­i­ty of the Jamaican state by forces loy­al to Coke.
It is very easy for peo­ple who wet their pants at the sound of a car back-fir­ing to get on their com­put­ers and be arm-chair generals.
One thing Jamaican cops nev­er lack is bravery.
What they lack are resources , sup­port from their polit­i­cal lead­ers and a nation deserv­ing of their sacrifice.
Deputy Commissioner of police Glenmore Hinds cap­tured it exact­ly when he said “the Jamaican peo­ple are for­ev­er indebt­ed to the secu­ri­ty forces”. Many laid down their lives so that the pre­ten­tious Monday morn­ing Quarter-Backs can con­tin­ue to have the free­dom to grandstand.
Without their sac­ri­fice Jamaica would be a total­ly dif­fer­ent place..

As We Contemplate The Proliferation Of Homosexuality And Transgender Acceptance Being Forced Down Our Throats..

Jesus is coming soon
Jesus is com­ing soon

Romans 1:18 – 32New International Version (NIV)

God’s Wrath Against Sinful Humanity

18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heav­en against all the god­less­ness and wicked­ness of peo­ple, who sup­press the truth by their wicked­ness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the cre­ation of the world God’s invis­i­ble qual­i­ties — his eter­nal pow­er and divine nature — have been clear­ly seen, being under­stood from what has been made, so that peo­ple are with­out excuse.

21 For although they knew God, they nei­ther glo­ri­fied him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their think­ing became futile and their fool­ish hearts were dark­ened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glo­ry of the immor­tal God for images made to look like a mor­tal human being and birds and ani­mals and reptiles.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the sin­ful desires of their hearts to sex­u­al impu­ri­ty for the degrad­ing of their bod­ies with one anoth­er. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and wor­shiped and served cre­at­ed things rather than the Creator — who is for­ev­er praised. Amen.

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shame­ful lusts. Even their women exchanged nat­ur­al sex­u­al rela­tions for unnat­ur­al ones. 27 In the same way the men also aban­doned nat­ur­al rela­tions with women and were inflamed with lust for one anoth­er. Men com­mit­ted shame­ful acts with oth­er men, and received in them­selves the due penal­ty for their error.

28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worth­while to retain the knowl­edge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wicked­ness, evil, greed and deprav­i­ty. They are full of envy, mur­der, strife, deceit and mal­ice. They are gos­sips, 30 slan­der­ers, God-haters, inso­lent, arro­gant and boast­ful; they invent ways of doing evil; they dis­obey their par­ents; 31 they have no under­stand­ing, no fideli­ty, no love, no mer­cy.32 Although they know God’s right­eous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only con­tin­ue to do these very things but also approve­of those who prac­tice them.

New International Version (NIV)Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.®Used by per­mis­sion. All rights reserved worldwide.

Holness Should Give Gammon A Talking-to , Maybe Show Him The Door.…

The Jamaica Labor Party has strug­gled with a per­cep­tion prob­lem for ages.
Correctly or incor­rect­ly, there is a per­cep­tion that the Party is a par­ty of rich mulat­toes from uptown, who have no idea how the mass­es live.
This is not exact­ly true. I am a poor dark skinned boy from North East Saint Catherine who was raised on good con­ser­v­a­tive val­ues, yet I saw my val­ues enshrined in the poli­cies of the Labor Party.
With that said it does not mat­ter that it is not the true if that per­cep­tion is allowed to go unchallenged.
It is worse when those jock­ey­ing for pow­er, should the par­ty ever see elect­ed office again, con­tin­ue to do every­thing in their pow­er to show arro­gance and a sense of supe­ri­or­i­ty and enti­tle­ment to others.

Gammon
Gammon

I ran across this let­ter in the Jamaica Gleaner writ­ten by a promi­nent JLP wannabe elect­ed official.Normally I would not pay any atten­tion to this non­sense , but this guy seem to have a real sense of enti­tle­ment, I have had a cou­ple of dust-ups with him on social media on pre­vi­ous occa­sions. He has always demon­strat­ed a sense of enti­tle­ment and arrogance.
I thought I would incor­po­rate the entire­ty of his let­ter to the Gleaner and com­ment on it.
My inten­tion is not to beat up on this guy up but to maybe expose him so that he may see the fol­ly of his ways. Maybe Andrew Holness will cor­ral him or bet­ter yet get rid of him.

Here’s what he wrote .

This is an open letter to the commissioner of police, Dr Carl Williams.

Re: (1) The func­tion­ing of the Half-Way-Tree Police Station on Saturday, May 23, 2015; (2) attor­neys-at-law required to pro­duce iden­ti­fi­ca­tion cards from the General Legal Council.

I wish to share my expe­ri­ence with your con­sta­bles on Saturday, May 23 at approx­i­mate­ly 4 p.m. at the Half-Way Tree Police Station.

(A) Facts

(1) That day, I was called ear­ly in the after­noon by a con­cerned cit­i­zen with respect to the tak­ing into cus­tody of Glenroy Ricardo Walker on Friday, May 22, along Anderson Road in Woodford Park in St Andrew by Jamaica Constabulary Force con­sta­bles. I was told he was being held at the Half-Way Tree Police Station.

(2) I was asked to attend upon the Half-Way Tree Police Station to ascer­tain: (i) whether Mr Walker was actu­al­ly in cus­tody there and (ii) what he was being charged for.

(3) On arriv­ing at the Half-Way Tree Police Station, I parked by the hold­ing area to the back of the said sta­tion. I went to the two plain-clothes per­sons seat­ed at the desk and intro­duced myself. No one seat­ed intro­duced them­selves as would be com­mon courtesy.

(4) I was asked by the two seat­ed per­sons to show iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. I told them I did­n’t have any iden­ti­fi­ca­tion from the General Legal Council (GLC) to iden­ti­fy myself as an attor­ney-at-law. I was told by the man and the woman that I had to pro­duce an iden­ti­fi­ca­tion card.

(5) I stat­ed that lawyers did­n’t get IDs from the GLC and repeat­ed that I did­n’t have any such ID. I pro­ceed­ed to ask if they had in their cus­tody one Glenroy Ricardo Walker.

(6) The two plain-clothes con­sta­bles told me they did­n’t know that name and that I was to go to the front of the Half-Way Tree Police Station for more infor­ma­tion. Another female cor­po­ral then sat on the bench by the female plain-clothes con­sta­ble and in an unpleas­ant tone asked me my name. I gave my name again and she, too, asked me for identification.

(7) I repeat­ed to her that I did­n’t have any iden­ti­fi­ca­tion from the General Legal Council to prove I was an attor­ney-at-law. She then told me I was not allowed in that area and I had to leave now.

(8) I then went to the front of the Half-Way Tree Police Station, where­upon I called back the con­cerned cit­i­zen who had called me ear­li­er that after­noon about Mr Walker to ascer­tain if he had his infor­ma­tion in fact cor­rect. The con­cerned cit­i­zen gave me a tele­phone num­ber for one Superintendent Bailey and told me that that was where Mr Walker had been tak­en into custody.

(9) After call­ing but not get­ting through to the num­ber, Supt Bailey called me on my cel­lu­lar with­in a very short peri­od of time. I told him who I was, he had no clue who I was either, and after explain­ing all in para­graphs (1), (2) and (5) above, I asked him if he could help. He was quite unhelpful.

(10) I then pro­ceed­ed to ask for the super­in­ten­dent in charge of the sta­tion at the front desk and was told that that offi­cer was not there.

(11) I was then direct­ed to a sergeant seat­ed in a room by the front desk and I again told him who I was and asked if he had Mr Walker in cus­tody. He, too, asked me for iden­ti­fi­ca­tion and I had to repeat I did­n’t have any iden­ti­fi­ca­tion from the General Legal Council (GLC) to iden­ti­fy myself as an attorney-at-law.

(12) He then told me I had to check with the con­sta­bles at the back of the Half-Way Tree Police Station to ascer­tain if Mr Walker was actu­al­ly in their custody.

(13) Obviously get­ting nowhere with any con­sta­ble at the sta­tion, I left hav­ing wast­ed approx­i­mate­ly 30 min­utes at the said station.

(14) On Tuesday, May 26, I then spoke to the con­cerned cit­i­zen who had called me ear­li­er the after­noon on Saturday, May 23. He told me that Mr Walker had been released from cus­tody that same day.

(B) Issues

(1) Are attor­neys-at-law now required to pro­duce iden­ti­fi­ca­tion cards at the Half-Way Tree Police Station, or any oth­er police sta­tion, for that mat­ter, when they attend upon police sta­tions to see clients or poten­tial clients.

(2) How is it that per­sons tak­en into cus­tody at the Half-Way Tree Police Station are not record­ed in your cus­tody book so that attor­neys-at-law can know if their clients and/​or poten­tial clients are in the cus­tody of the State, i.e., a police station?

© Submissions

(1) Attorneys-at-law should not be told they have to leave any area of the police sta­tion unless they pose a threat to the safe­ty of police con­sta­bles and/​or indi­vid­u­als in custody.

(2) Attorneys-at-law should not have to pro­duce any iden­ti­fi­ca­tion cards from the General Legal Council to prove they are attor­neys-at-law to any police con­sta­ble when an attor­ney-at-law attends upon a police sta­tion seek­ing infor­ma­tion about cit­i­zens who are in cus­tody of the State/​police sta­tions and who are clients and/​or poten­tial clients of those attorneys-at-law.

(D) Closing Comments

(1) The breach­ing of con­sti­tu­tion­al rights of Jamaican cit­i­zens by mem­bers of the Jamaica Constabulary Force and their dis­re­spect­ful behav­iour towards attor­neys-at-law will not only make your job and those of your con­sta­bles extreme­ly dif­fi­cult, but will under­mine trust and con­fi­dence in the whole admin­is­tra­tion of jus­tice in Jamaica.

- Kent Gammon is an attor­ney-at-law and deputy oppo­si­tion spokesman on justice.

Clearly this guy is a law onto him­self, he could have pro­duced his dri­ver’s licence he did not think the police should demand one.
Secondly he stat­ed quote: Attorneys-at-law should not be told they have to leave any area of the police sta­tion unless they pose a threat to the safe­ty of police con­sta­bles and/​or indi­vid­u­als in custody.
♦ (1) Does Kent Gammon have his name and title imprint­ed on his stu­pid fore­head? If not why should the police believe he is who he say he is.
Guaranteed, had they allowed him the access he demand­ed with­out ID, his let­ter would have been about sup­posed lax in the sys­tem of security .
♦(2)  Attorneys-at-law should not have to pro­duce any iden­ti­fi­ca­tion cards from the General Legal Council to prove they are attor­neys-at-law to any police con­sta­ble when an attor­ney-at-law attends upon a police sta­tion seek­ing infor­ma­tion about cit­i­zens who are in cus­tody of the State/​police sta­tions and who are clients and/​or poten­tial clients of those attorneys-at-law.
What a Jackass , you damn well bet­ter believe you must pro­duce Identification , who the hell do you think you are that every­one should know who you are?
♦ (3) What I find most dis­turb­ing was this state­ment by Kent Phillip Gammon : The con­cerned cit­i­zen gave me a tele­phone num­ber for one Superintendent Bailey and told me that that was where Mr Walker had been tak­en into cus­tody. (9) After call­ing but not get­ting through to the num­ber, Supt Bailey called me on my cel­lu­lar with­in a very short peri­od of time. I told him who I was, he had no clue who I was either, and after explain­ing all in para­graphs (1), (2) and (5) above, I asked him if he could help. He was quite unhelpful.

Gammon’s petu­lant lit­tle out­burst is not about police being a law onto them­selves, by his very own admis­sion, he threw a hissy-fit because none of the cops knew who he was or want­ed to kiss his ass.
Not the Constable, Not The Commanding Officer Fitz Bailey.
Gammon’s let­ter is cer­tain­ly not about any­thing the police did wrong .
It’s all about try­ing to make sure more peo­ple know who he was.
An epic fail .
This guy, by his atti­tude will be a drag on the par­ty . Elections are com­ing up pret­ty soon, the par­ty does not need to have the likes of Kent Phillip Gammon drag­ging it down.
It cer­tain­ly does not need him mak­ing ene­mies with the Police department.
I sug­gest Gammon hum­ble him­self and get his behind off his high horse, if he does­n’t, Andrew Holness should do it for him by show­ing him the door pronto.

FBI Flies Secret Surveillance Planes Over U.S. Cities Jack Gillum, Eileen Sullivan, Eric Tucker /​AP

The federal agency said the aircrafts are used for specific, ongoing investigations

(WASHINGTON) — The FBI is oper­at­ing a small air force with scores of low-fly­ing planes across the coun­try car­ry­ing video and, at times, cell­phone sur­veil­lance tech­nol­o­gy — all hid­den behind fic­ti­tious com­pa­nies that are fronts for the gov­ern­ment, The Associated Press has learned.

The planes’ sur­veil­lance equip­ment is gen­er­al­ly used with­out a judge’s approval, and the FBI said the flights are used for spe­cif­ic, ongo­ing inves­ti­ga­tions. In a recent 30-day peri­od, the agency flew above more than 30 cities in 11 states across the coun­try, an AP review found.

Aerial sur­veil­lance rep­re­sents a chang­ing fron­tier for law enforce­ment, pro­vid­ing what the gov­ern­ment main­tains is an impor­tant tool in crim­i­nal, ter­ror­ism or intel­li­gence probes. But the pro­gram rais­es ques­tions about whether there should be updat­ed poli­cies pro­tect­ing civ­il lib­er­ties as new tech­nolo­gies pose intru­sive oppor­tu­ni­ties for gov­ern­ment spying.

U.S. law enforce­ment offi­cials con­firmed for the first time the wide-scale use of the air­craft, which the AP traced to at least 13 fake com­pa­nies, such as FVX Research, KQM Aviation, NBR Aviation and PXW Services. Even basic aspects of the pro­gram are with­held from the pub­lic in cen­sored ver­sions of offi­cial reports from the Justice Department’s inspec­tor general.

The FBI’s avi­a­tion pro­gram is not secret,” spokesman Christopher Allen said in a state­ment. “Specific air­craft and their capa­bil­i­ties are pro­tect­ed for oper­a­tional secu­ri­ty pur­pos­es.” Allen added that the FBI’s planes “are not equipped, designed or used for bulk col­lec­tion activ­i­ties or mass surveillance.”

But the planes can cap­ture video of unre­lat­ed crim­i­nal activ­i­ty on the ground that could be hand­ed over for prosecutions.

Some of the air­craft can also be equipped with tech­nol­o­gy that can iden­ti­fy thou­sands of peo­ple below through the cell­phones they car­ry, even if they’re not mak­ing a call or in pub­lic. Officials said that prac­tice, which mim­ics cell tow­ers and gets phones to reveal basic sub­scriber infor­ma­tion, is rare.

In this photo taken May 26, 2015, a small plane flies near Manassas Regional Airport in Manassas, Va. The plane is among a fleet of surveillance aircraft by the FBI, which are primarily used to target suspects under federal investigation. Such planes are capable of taking video of the ground, and some _ in rare occasions _ can sweep up certain identifying cellphone data. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
In this pho­to tak­en May 26, 2015, a small plane flies near Manassas Regional Airport in Manassas, Va. The plane is among a fleet of sur­veil­lance air­craft by the FBI, which are pri­mar­i­ly used to tar­get sus­pects under fed­er­al inves­ti­ga­tion. Such planes are capa­ble of tak­ing video of the ground, and some _ in rare occa­sions _ can sweep up cer­tain iden­ti­fy­ing cell­phone data. (AP Photo/​Andrew Harnik)

Details con­firmed by the FBI track close­ly with pub­lished reports since at least 2003 that a gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance pro­gram might be behind sus­pi­cious-look­ing planes slow­ly cir­cling neigh­bor­hoods. The AP traced at least 50 air­craft back to the FBI, and iden­ti­fied more than 100 flights since late April orbit­ing both major cities and rur­al areas.

One of the planes, pho­tographed in flight last week by the AP in north­ern Virginia, bris­tled with unusu­al anten­nas under its fuse­lage and a cam­era on its left side. A fed­er­al bud­get doc­u­ment from 2010 men­tioned at least 115 planes, includ­ing 90 Cessna air­craft, in the FBI’s sur­veil­lance fleet.

The FBI also occa­sion­al­ly helps local police with aer­i­al sup­port, such as dur­ing the recent dis­tur­bance in Baltimore that fol­lowed the death of 25-year-old Freddie Gray, who sus­tained griev­ous injuries while in police cus­tody. Those types of requests are reviewed by senior FBI officials.

The sur­veil­lance flights com­ply with agency rules, an FBI spokesman said. Those rules, which are heav­i­ly redact­ed in pub­licly avail­able doc­u­ments, lim­it the types of equip­ment the agency can use, as well as the jus­ti­fi­ca­tions and dura­tion of the surveillance.

Details about the flights come as the Justice Department seeks to nav­i­gate pri­va­cy con­cerns aris­ing from aer­i­al sur­veil­lance by unmanned air­crafts, or drones. President Barack Obama has said he wel­comes a debate on gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance, and has called for more trans­paren­cy about spy­ing in the wake of dis­clo­sures about clas­si­fied programs.

These are not your grand­par­ents’ sur­veil­lance air­craft,” said Jay Stanley, a senior pol­i­cy ana­lyst with the American Civil Liberties Union, call­ing the flights sig­nif­i­cant “if the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment is main­tain­ing a fleet of air­craft whose pur­pose is to cir­cle over American cities, espe­cial­ly with the tech­nol­o­gy we know can be attached to those aircraft.”

During the past few weeks, the AP tracked planes from the FBI’s fleet on more than 100 flights over at least 11 states plus the District of Columbia, most with Cessna 182T Skylane air­craft. These includ­ed parts of Houston, Phoenix, Seattle, Chicago, Boston, Minneapolis and Southern California.

Evolving tech­nol­o­gy can record high­er-qual­i­ty video from long dis­tances, even at night, and can cap­ture cer­tain iden­ti­fy­ing infor­ma­tion from cell­phones using a device known as a “cell-site sim­u­la­tor” — or Stingray, to use one of the product’s brand names. These can trick pin­point­ed cell­phones into reveal­ing iden­ti­fi­ca­tion num­bers of sub­scribers, includ­ing those not sus­pect­ed of a crime.

Officials say cell­phone sur­veil­lance is rare, although the AP found in recent weeks FBI flights orbit­ing large, enclosed build­ings for extend­ed peri­ods where aer­i­al pho­tog­ra­phy would be less effec­tive than elec­tron­ic sig­nals col­lec­tion. Those includ­ed above Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota.

After The Washington Post revealed flights by two planes cir­cling over Baltimore in ear­ly May, the AP began ana­lyz­ing detailed flight data and air­craft-own­er­ship reg­is­tra­tions that shared sim­i­lar address­es and flight pat­terns. That review found some FBI mis­sions cir­cled above at least 40,000 res­i­dents dur­ing a sin­gle flight over Anaheim, California, in late May, accord­ing to Census data and records pro­vid­ed by the web­site FlightRadar24​.com.

Most flight pat­terns occurred in counter-clock­wise orbits up to sev­er­al miles wide and rough­ly one mile above the ground at slow speeds. A 2003 newslet­ter from the com­pa­ny FLIR Systems Inc., which makes cam­era tech­nol­o­gy such as seen on the planes, described fly­ing slow­ly in left-hand­ed patterns.

Aircraft sur­veil­lance has become an indis­pens­able intel­li­gence col­lec­tion and inves­tiga­tive tech­nique which serves as a force mul­ti­pli­er to the ground teams,” the FBI said in 2009 when it asked Congress for $5.1 mil­lion for the program.

Recently, inde­pen­dent jour­nal­ists and web­sites have cit­ed com­pa­nies traced to post office box­es in Virginia, includ­ing one shared with the Justice Department. The AP ana­lyzed sim­i­lar data since ear­ly May, while also draw­ing upon air­craft reg­is­tra­tion doc­u­ments, busi­ness records and inter­views with U.S. offi­cials to under­stand the scope of the operations.

The FBI asked the AP not to dis­close the names of the fake com­pa­nies it uncov­ered, say­ing that would sad­dle tax­pay­ers with the expense of cre­at­ing new cov­er com­pa­nies to shield the government’s involve­ment, and could endan­ger the planes and integri­ty of the sur­veil­lance mis­sions. The AP declined the FBI’s request because the com­pa­nies’ names — as well as com­mon address­es linked to the Justice Department — are list­ed on pub­lic doc­u­ments and in gov­ern­ment databases.

At least 13 front com­pa­nies that AP iden­ti­fied being active­ly used by the FBI are reg­is­tered to post office box­es in Bristow, Virginia, which is near a region­al air­port used for pri­vate and char­ter flights. Only one of them appears in state busi­ness records.

Included on most air­craft reg­is­tra­tions is a mys­te­ri­ous name, Robert Lindley. He is list­ed as chief exec­u­tive and has at least three dis­tinct sig­na­tures among the com­pa­nies. Two doc­u­ments include a sig­na­ture for Robert Taylor, which is strik­ing­ly sim­i­lar to one of Lindley’s three hand­writ­ing patterns.

The FBI would not say whether Lindley is a U.S. gov­ern­ment employ­ee. The AP unsuc­cess­ful­ly tried to reach Lindley at phone num­bers reg­is­tered to peo­ple of the same name in the Washington area since Monday.

Law enforce­ment offi­cials said Justice Department lawyers approved the deci­sion to cre­ate fic­ti­tious com­pa­nies to pro­tect the flights’ oper­a­tional secu­ri­ty and that the Federal Aviation Administration was aware of the prac­tice. One of the Lindley-head­ed com­pa­nies shares a post office box open­ly used by the Justice Department.

Such elu­sive prac­tices have endured for decades. A 1990 report by the then-General Accounting Office not­ed that, in July 1988, the FBI had moved its “head­quar­ters-oper­at­ed” air­craft into a com­pa­ny that wasn’t pub­licly linked to the bureau.

The FBI does not gen­er­al­ly obtain war­rants to record video from its planes of peo­ple mov­ing out­side in the open, but it also said that under a new pol­i­cy it has recent­ly begun obtain­ing court orders to use cell-site sim­u­la­tors. The Obama admin­is­tra­tion had until recent­ly been direct­ing local author­i­ties through secret agree­ments not to reveal their own use of the devices, even encour­ag­ing pros­e­cu­tors to drop cas­es rather than dis­close the technology’s use in open court.

A Justice Department memo last month also express­ly barred its com­po­nent law enforce­ment agen­cies from using unmanned drones “sole­ly for the pur­pose of mon­i­tor­ing activ­i­ties pro­tect­ed by the First Amendment” and said they are to be used only in con­nec­tion with autho­rized inves­ti­ga­tions and activ­i­ties. A depart­ment spokes­woman said the pol­i­cy applied only to unmanned air­craft sys­tems rather than pilot­ed airplanes.

_​_​_​

Associated Press writ­ers Sean Murphy in Oklahoma City; Joan Lowy and Ted Bridis in Washington; Randall Chase in Wilmington, Delaware; and news researchers Monika Mathur in Washington and Rhonda Shafner in New York contributed 

JCF. JTA. JCTU And Others Can Force New Elections If They Come Together, But Will They.…

Three per cent in the first year and an additional two per cent in the second

Horace Dalley
Horace Dalley

year of a new two-year deal.

That is the Government’s offer to pub­lic sec­tor workers.
Police offi­cers, teach­ers nurs­es and others.
Additionally the Jamaica Confederation of Trade Union Workers which rep­re­sents over 40,000 work­ers is hop­ing for meet­ings with Horace Dalley Minister with­out port­fo­lio in the finance Ministry to deal with a sim­i­lar wage offer from the Government.
The Governments offer is par­tic­u­lar­ly appalling to pub­lic sec­tor work­ers as it is sup­posed to end the Government imposed freeze on pub­lic sec­tor wages imposed by the International Monetary Fund.

Meanwhile accord­ing to the Jamaica Observer National Security Minister Bunting is urg­ing the Federation to dis­con­tin­ue the appar­ent protest action that com­menced last night.
The Federation Chairman Raymond Wilson, has pushed back stat­ing that the exec­u­tive is oblig­ed to respect the man­date of the body to take action if their demands for a rea­son­able offer is not met.

Bunting’s declared , “This behav­ior is not appro­pri­ate for an essen­tial ser­vice; it expos­es the pub­lic to unnec­es­sary risk; and may dam­age the pro­fes­sion­al image of the JCF that has seen sig­nif­i­cant improve­ments in recent years.”

Raymond Wilson
Raymond Wilson

Ironically Bunting has no chas­tise­ment for the inep­ti­tude of the Administration which con­tin­ues on a path which clear­ly is not work­ing for the Jamaican people.

The con­tin­u­ance of a pseu­do-social­ist eco­nom­ic agen­da, Genesised in con­tin­ued tax­a­tion of the over bloat­ed pub­lic sec­tor work­force, cou­pled with mas­sive bor­row­ing to fill the ever increas­ing gap between GDP and bud­getary require­ments is a pre­scrip­tion for mas­sive Inflation and what we have seen with the inevitable worth­less­ness of the Nation’s currency.

Jamaica’s con­tin­ued ties to the International Monetary Fund is inim­i­cal to growth and devel­op­ment. It should be clear to the most ardent sup­port­er of the Administration that five year wage freeze on pub­lic sec­tor wages accom­plished noth­ing to which the coun­try could pin it’s hat as worth­while for the pain felt by these most essen­tial workers.
As I have said repeat­ed­ly the International Monetary Fund is not in the busi­ness of nation-build­ing. Whatever for­mu­la the fund laid down for Jamaica was nev­er intend­ed to grow Jamaica’s econ­o­my which would result in a sub­se­quent wean­ing of the coun­try from the fund.
Fund poli­cies and loan require­ments are geared sole­ly to ensur­ing that con­di­tions are met so the fund can get it’s mon­ey back with mas­sive interest.

Jamaica has a deci­sion to make, since there is no marked gain from the 5 years of pain, we have to decide whether con­tin­u­ing with the fund is a fea­si­ble path for our country.
Clearly Government’s wage offer after the wage freeze, is nowhere near enough to com­pen­sate for infla­tion over those five years, much less to raise the stan­dard of liv­ing of the work­ing poor.
This means that pub­lic sec­tor work­ers are slip­ping deep­er and deep­er into pover­ty with each deval­u­a­tion of the currency.

Public sec­tor work­ers can halt this slide but it will not be accom­plished in Jamaica’s polit­i­cal­ly trib­al­ized envi­ron­ment, which ben­e­fits the Government.
A work stop­page of all pub­lic sec­tor work­ers at the same time would have a greater cumu­la­tive effect , rather that the rag-tag approach which they have tak­en over the decades.The Governing par­ty is acute­ly aware of the con­se­quences that would have on it’s abil­i­ty to stay in pow­er with­out call­ing fresh elections.
The peo­ple need new nation­al Elections now so they may chose their own path forward.
The Governing People’s National Party has done a mas­ter­ful job of plac­ing loy­al­ists in posi­tions of pow­er in lit­er­al­ly every area of nation­al life, effec­tive­ly chok­ing off a com­ing togeth­er of forces which would force it to come to the bar­gain­ing table with a respectable and a respect­ful offer for the coun­try’s pub­lic sec­tor workers.

Bruce No Longer “call Me Caitlyn”

Caitlyn Jenner
Caitlyn Jenner

W YORK, N.Y. — Speaking pub­licly for the first time since com­plet­ing gen­der tran­si­tion, Caitlyn Jenner com­pares her emo­tion­al two-day pho­to shoot with Annie Leibovitz for the July cov­er of Vanity Fair to win­ning the gold medal for the decathlon at the 1976 Olympics. She tells Pulitzer Prize – win­ning V.F. con­tribut­ing edi­tor and author ofFriday Night Lights Buzz Bissinger, “That was a good day, but the last cou­ple of days were bet­ter.… This shoot was about my life and who I am as a per­son. It’s not about the fan­fare, it’s not about peo­ple cheer­ing in the sta­di­um, it’s not about going down the street and every­body giv­ing you ‘that a boy, Bruce,’ pat on the back, O.K. This is about your life.”

Jenner tells Bissinger about how she suf­fered a pan­ic attack the day after under­go­ing 10-hour facial-fem­i­niza­tion surgery on March 15 — a pro­ce­dure she believed would take 5 hours. (Bissinger reveals that Jenner has not had gen­i­tal surgery.) She recalls think­ing, “What did I just do? What did I just do to myself?” A coun­selor from the Los Angeles Gender Center came to the house so Jenner could talk to a pro­fes­sion­al, and assured her that such reac­tions were often induced by pain med­ica­tion, and that sec­ond-guess­ing was human and temporary.

Introducing Caitlyn Jenner. Read her reveal­ing sto­ry and see the exclu­sive pho­tos — before the issue hits news­stands on Tuesday, June 9. Subscribe for dig­i­tal access.

Jenner tells Bissinger the thought has since passed and not come back: “If I was lying on my deathbed and I had kept this secret and nev­er ever did any­thing about it, I would be lying there say­ing, ‘You just blew your entire life. You nev­er dealt with your­self,’ and I don’t want that to happen.”

Bissinger spent hun­dreds of hours with the man the world knew as Bruce Jenner over a peri­od of three months, and then count­less hours with Caitlyn, also attend­ing the pho­to shoot with Leibovitz at Jenner’s Malibu home.

Bissinger apol­o­gizes to Jenner for repeat­ed pro­noun con­fu­sion and asks whether she is sen­si­tive about it. “I don’t real­ly get hung up,” she tells him. “A guy came in the oth­er day and I was ful­ly dressed — it’s just habit, I said, ‘Hi, Bruce here,’ and I went, Oh fuck, it ain’t Bruce, I was screw­ing up doing it.”

Bissinger speaks exten­sive­ly with Jenner’s four chil­dren from his first two mar­riages — Burt, 36, and Cassandra, 34, with first wife Chrystie, and Brandon, 33, and Brody, 31, with sec­ond wife Linda — and describes an insen­si­tive father who had been absent for years at a time. Jenner open­ly acknowl­edges mis­takes made with them as Bruce, and express­es gen­uine regret. Says Burt, “I have high hopes that Caitlyn is a bet­ter per­son than Bruce. I’m very much look­ing for­ward to that.”

Watch a behind-the-scenes video of Annie Leibovitz’s pho­to shoot, as Caitlyn dis­cuss­es how much liv­ing ful­ly as a woman means to her.

For the Jenner chil­dren, the issue of the tran­si­tion has become a non-issue. They were already aware of their father’s iden­ti­ty as a woman when he told them indi­vid­u­al­ly about the tran­si­tion — Burt and Cassandra had learned from their moth­er rough­ly 20 years ear­li­er, when they were 13 and 11; Brandon had assumed it because of the obvi­ous phys­i­cal changes he had observed; and Brody was told by his moth­er when he was 29. They tell Bissinger they feel both hap­pi­ness for their father and inspi­ra­tion at his brav­ery, and they all still see their dad as their dad regard­less of any gen­der label. Brandon said he was a lit­tle tak­en aback when he saw Caitlyn for the first time after surgery and she pulled her top up to reveal her new breasts. “Whoa, I’m still your son,” he remind­ed her.

As part of the tran­si­tion, Jenner start­ed host­ing small gath­er­ings called “girls’ nights” with wine and food where Jenner could dress as desired and feel nat­ur­al in the pres­ence of women, and it was there that her daugh­ter Cassandra met Caitlyn for the first time. “I was just ner­vous that I wouldn’t make her feel com­fort­able,” Cassandra tells Bissinger. “I was wor­ried I wouldn’t say the right things or act the right way or seem relaxed.” But almost all of it melt­ed away when she got there. “We talked more than we ever have. We could just be girls together.”

Despite the renewed rela­tion­ship with their father, the Jenner chil­dren have refused to par­tic­i­pate in Caitlyn’s docu-series for the E! net­work, set to debut this sum­mer, for­go­ing finan­cial gain in favor of pre­serv­ing their father’s lega­cy. Initially, Caitlyn was “ter­ri­bly dis­ap­point­ed and ter­ri­bly hurt,” but has come to accept their deci­sion. For her part, Caitlyn is pre­pared for the crit­i­cism that it’s a pub­lic­i­ty stunt: “‘Oh, she’s doing a stu­pid real­i­ty show. She’s doing it for the mon­ey. She’s doing this, she’s doing that.’ I’m not doing it for mon­ey. I’m doing it to help my soul and help oth­er peo­ple. If I can make a dol­lar, I cer­tain­ly am not stu­pid. [I have] house pay­ments and all that kind of stuff. I will nev­er make an excuse for some­thing like that. Yeah, this is a busi­ness. You don’t go out and change your gen­der for a tele­vi­sion show. O.K., it ain’t hap­pen­ing. I don’t care who you are.”

U.S. Police ‘kill More Than 2 People A Day:’ Analysis

DELLWOOD, MO - MARCH 13: Crime scene tape remains in the rubble of a business that was destroyed during November rioting on March 13, 2015 in Dellwood, Missouri. The rioting broke out after residents learned that the police officer responsible for the killing of Michael Brown would not be charged with any crime. Few of the businesses destroyed in the rioting in Dellwood and nearby Ferguson have reopened. Two police officers were shot Wednesday while standing outside the Ferguson police station observing a protest. Ferguson has faced many violent protests since the August death of Michael Brown.  (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Police killings a real phe­nom­e­non in America

In an alley in Denver, police gunned down a 17-year-old girl joyrid­ing in a stolen car. In the back­woods of North Carolina, police opened fire on a gun-wield­ing moon­shin­er. And in a high-rise apart­ment in Birmingham, Alabama, police shot an elder­ly man after his son asked them to make sure he was okay. Douglas Harris, 77, answered the door with a gun.

The three are among at least 385 peo­ple shot and killed by police nation­wide dur­ing the first five months of this year, more than two a day, accord­ing to a Washington Post analy­sis. That is more than twice the rate of fatal killings tal­lied by the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment over the past decade, a count that offi­cials con­cede is incomplete.

These shoot­ings are gross­ly under-report­ed,” said Jim Bueermann, a for­mer police chief and pres­i­dent of the Washington-based Police Foundation, a non­prof­it orga­ni­za­tion ded­i­cat­ed to improv­ing law enforce­ment. “We are nev­er going to reduce the num­ber of police shoot­ings if we don’t begin to accu­rate­ly track this information.”

A nation­al debate is rag­ing about police use of dead­ly force, espe­cial­ly against minori­ties. To under­stand why and how often these shoot­ings occur, The Washington Post is com­pil­ing a data­base of every fatal shoot­ing by police in 2015, as well as of every offi­cer killed by gun­fire in the line of duty. The Post looked exclu­sive­ly at shoot­ings, not killings by oth­er means, such as stun guns and deaths in police custody.

Using inter­views, police reports, local news accounts and oth­er sources, The Post tracked more than a dozen details about each killing through Friday, includ­ing the victim’s race, whether the per­son was armed and the cir­cum­stances that led to the fatal encounter. The result is an unprece­dent­ed exam­i­na­tion of these shoot­ings, many of which began as minor inci­dents and sud­den­ly esca­lat­ed into violence.

Among The Post’s findings:

  • About half the vic­tims were white, half minor­i­ty. But the demo­graph­ics shift­ed sharply among the unarmed vic­tims, two-thirds of whom were black or Hispanic. Overall, blacks were killed at three times the rate of whites or oth­er minori­ties when adjust­ing by the pop­u­la­tion of the cen­sus tracts where the shoot­ings occurred.
  • The vast major­i­ty of vic­tims — more than 80 per­cent — were armed with poten­tial­ly lethal objects, pri­mar­i­ly guns, but also knives, machetes, revving vehi­cles and, in one case, a nail gun.
  • _Forty-nine peo­ple had no weapon, while the guns wield­ed by 13 oth­ers turned out to be toys. In all, 16 per­cent were either car­ry­ing a toy or were unarmed.
  • The dead ranged in age from 16 to 83. Eight were chil­dren younger than 18, includ­ing Jessie Hernandez, 17, who was shot three times by Denver police offi­cers as she and a car­load of friends alleged­ly tried to run them down.

The Post analy­sis also sheds light on the sit­u­a­tions that most com­mon­ly gave rise to fatal shoot­ings. About half of the time, police were respond­ing to peo­ple seek­ing help with domes­tic dis­tur­bances and oth­er com­plex social sit­u­a­tions: A home­less per­son behav­ing errat­i­cal­ly. A boyfriend threat­en­ing vio­lence. A son try­ing to kill himself.

Ninety-two vic­tims — near­ly a quar­ter of those killed — were iden­ti­fied by police or fam­i­ly mem­bers as men­tal­ly ill.

In Miami Gardens, Florida, Catherine Daniels called 911 when she couldn’t per­suade her son, Lavall Hall, a 25-year-old black man, to come in out of the cold ear­ly one morn­ing in February. A diag­nosed schiz­o­phrenic who stood 5‑foot‑4 and weighed bare­ly 120 pounds, Hall was wear­ing box­er shorts and an under­shirt and wav­ing a broom­stick when police arrived. They tried to stun him with a Taser gun and then shot him.

The oth­er half of shoot­ings involved non-domes­tic crimes, such as rob­beries, or the rou­tine duties that occu­py patrol offi­cers, such as serv­ing warrants.

Nicholas Thomas, a 23-year-old black man, was killed in March when police in Smyrna, Georgia, tried to serve him with a war­rant for fail­ing to pay $170 in felony pro­ba­tion fees. Thomas fled the Goodyear tire shop where he worked as a mechan­ic, and police shot into his car.

Although race was a divid­ing line, those who died by police gun­fire often had much in com­mon. Most were poor and had a his­to­ry of run-ins with law enforce­ment over most­ly small-time crimes, some­times because they were emo­tion­al­ly troubled.

Both things were true of Daniel Elrod, a 39-year-old white man. Elrod had been arrest­ed at least 16 times over the past 15 years; he was tak­en into pro­tec­tive cus­tody twice last year because Omaha police feared he might hurt himself.

On the day he died in February, Elrod robbed a Family Dollar store. Police said he ran when offi­cers arrived, jump­ing on top of a BMW in the park­ing lot and yelling, “Shoot me, shoot me.” Elrod, who was unarmed, was shot three times as he made a “mid-air leap” to clear a barbed-wire fence, accord­ing to police records.

Dozens of oth­er peo­ple also died while flee­ing from police, The Post analy­sis shows, includ­ing a sig­nif­i­cant pro­por­tion — 20 per­cent — of those who were unarmed. Running is such a provoca­tive act that police experts say there is a name for the injury offi­cers inflict on sus­pects after­ward: a “foot tax.”

Police are autho­rized to use dead­ly force only when they fear for their lives or the lives of oth­ers. So far, just three of the 385 fatal shoot­ings have result­ed in an offi­cer being charged with a crime — less than 1 percent.

The low rate mir­rors the find­ings of a Post inves­ti­ga­tion in April that found that of thou­sands of fatal police shoot­ings over the past decade, only 54 had pro­duced crim­i­nal charges. Typically, those cas­es involved lay­ers of damn­ing evi­dence chal­leng­ing the officer’s account. Of the cas­es resolved, most offi­cers were cleared or acquitted.

In all three 2015 cas­es in which charges were filed, videos emerged show­ing the offi­cers shoot­ing a sus­pect dur­ing or after a foot chase:

  • In South Carolina, police offi­cer Michael Slager was charged with mur­der in the death of Walter Scott, a 50-year-old black man, who ran after a traf­fic stop. Slager’s attor­ney declined to comment.
  • In Oklahoma, reserve deputy Robert Bates was charged with sec­ond-degree manslaugh­ter 10 days after he killed Eric Harris, a 44-year-old black man. Bates’s attor­ney, Clark Brewster, char­ac­ter­ized the shoot­ing as a “legit­i­mate acci­dent,” not­ing that Bates mis­tak­en­ly grabbed his gun instead of his Taser.
  • And in Pennsylvania, offi­cer Lisa Mearkle was charged with crim­i­nal homi­cide six weeks after she shot and killed David Kassick, a 59-year-old white man, who refused to pull over for a traf­fic stop. Her attor­ney did not return calls for comment.

In many oth­er cas­es, police agen­cies have deter­mined that the shoot­ings were jus­ti­fied. But many law enforce­ment lead­ers are call­ing for greater scrutiny.

After near­ly a year of protests against police bru­tal­i­ty and with a White House task force report call­ing for reforms, a dozen cur­rent and for­mer police chiefs and oth­er crim­i­nal jus­tice offi­cials said police must begin to accept respon­si­bil­i­ty for the car­nage. They argue that a large num­ber of the killings exam­ined by The Post could be blamed on poor policing.

We have to get beyond what is legal and start focus­ing on what is pre­ventable. Most are pre­ventable,” said Ronald Davis, a for­mer police chief who heads the Justice Department’s Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

Police “need to stop chas­ing down sus­pects, hop­ping fences and land­ing on top of some­one with a gun,” Davis said. “When they do that, they have no choice but to shoot.”

As a start, crim­i­nol­o­gists say the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment should sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly ana­lyze police shoot­ings. Currently, the FBI strug­gles to gath­er the most basic data. Reporting is vol­un­tary, and since 2011, less than 3 per­cent of the nation’s 18,000 state and local police agen­cies have report­ed fatal shoot­ings by their offi­cers to the FBI. As a result, FBI records over the past decade show only about 400 police shoot­ings a year — an aver­age of 1.1 deaths per day.

According to The Post’s analy­sis, the dai­ly death toll so far for 2015 is close to 2.6. At that pace, police will have shot and killed near­ly 1,000 peo­ple by the end of the year.

We have to under­stand the phe­nom­e­na behind these fatal encoun­ters,” Bueermann said. “There is a com­pelling social need for this, but a lack of polit­i­cal will to make it happen.”

For the vast major­i­ty of depart­ments, a fatal shoot­ing is a rare event. Only 306 agen­cies have record­ed one so far this year, and most had only one, the Post analy­sis shows.

However, 19 depart­ments were involved in at least three fatal shoot­ings. Los Angeles police lead the nation with eight. The lat­est occurred May 5, when Brendon Glenn, a 29-year-old home­less black man, was shot after an alter­ca­tion out­side a Venice bar.

Oklahoma City police have killed four peo­ple, includ­ing an 83-year-old white man wield­ing a machete.

We want to do the most we can to keep from tak­ing someone’s life, even under the worst cir­cum­stances,” said Oklahoma City Police Chief William Citty. “There are just going to be some shoot­ings that are unavoidable.”

In Bakersfield, California, all three of the department’s killings occurred in a span of 10 days in March. The most recent involved Adrian Hernandez, a 22-year-old Hispanic man accused of rap­ing his room­mate, dous­ing her with flam­ma­ble liq­uid and set­ting fire to their home.

After a man­hunt, police cor­nered Hernandez, who jumped out of his car hold­ing a BB gun. Police opened fire, and some Bakersfield res­i­dents say they are glad the offi­cers did.

I’m relieved he can’t come back here, to be hon­est with you,” said Brian Haver, who lives next door to the house Hernandez torched. “If he came out hold­ing a gun, what were they sup­posed to do?”

Although law enforce­ment offi­cials say many shoot­ings are pre­ventable, that is not always true. In dozens of cas­es, offi­cers rushed into volatile sit­u­a­tions and saved lives. Examples of police hero­ism abound.

In Tempe, Arizona, police res­cued a 25-year-old woman who had been stabbed and tied up and was scream­ing for help. Her boyfriend, Matthew Metz, a 26-year-old white man, also stabbed an offi­cer before he was shot and killed, accord­ing to police records.

In San Antonio, a patrol offi­cer heard gun­shots and rushed to the park­ing lot of Dad’s Karaōke bar to find a man shoot­ing into the crowd. Richard Castilleja, a 29-year-old Latino, had hit two men and was still unload­ing his weapon when he was shot and killed, accord­ing to police records.

And in Los Angeles County, a Hawthorne police offi­cer work­ing over­time was cred­it­ed with sav­ing the life of a 12-year-old boy after a fran­tic woman in a gray Mercedes pulled along­side the offi­cer and said a white Cadillac was fol­low­ing her and her son.

Seconds lat­er, the Cadillac roared up. Robert Washington, a 37-year-old black man, jumped out and began shoot­ing into the woman’s car.

He had two revolvers and start­ed shoot­ing both of them with no words spo­ken. He shot and killed the mom, and then he start­ed shoot­ing at the kid,” said Eddie Aguirre, a Los Angeles County homi­cide detec­tive inves­ti­gat­ing the case.

The deputy got out of his patrol car and start­ed shoot­ing,” Aguirre said. “He saved the boy’s life.”

- — - -

In about half the shoot­ings, police were respond­ing to non-domes­tic crim­i­nal sit­u­a­tions, with rob­beries and traf­fic infrac­tions rank­ing among the most com­mon offens­es. Nearly half of blacks and oth­er minori­ties were killed in such cir­cum­stances. So were about a third of whites.

In North Carolina, a police offi­cer search­ing for clues in a hit-and-run case approached a green and white mobile home owned by Lester Brown, a 58-year-old white man. On the front porch, the offi­cer spot­ted an ille­gal liquor still. He called for back­up, and drug agents soon arrived with a search warrant.

Officers knocked on the door and asked Brown to secure his dog. Instead, Brown dashed upstairs and grabbed a Soviet SKS rifle, accord­ing to police reports.

Neighbor Joe Guffey told a local TV reporter that he was sit­ting at home with his dogs when the shoot­ing start­ed: “Pow, pow, pow, pow.” Brown was hit sev­en times and pro­nounced dead at the scene.

While Brown alleged­ly stood his ground, many oth­ers involved in crim­i­nal activ­i­ty chose to flee when con­front­ed by police. Kassick, for exam­ple, attract­ed Mearkle’s atten­tion because he had expired vehi­cle inspec­tion stick­ers. On the day he died, Kassick was on felony pro­ba­tion for drunk­en dri­ving and had drugs in his sys­tem, police and autop­sy reports show.

After fail­ing to pull over, Kassick drove to his sister’s house in Hummelstown, Pennsylvania, jumped out of the car and ran. Mearkle repeat­ed­ly struck Kassick with a stun gun and then shot him twice in the back while he was face-down in the snow.

Jimmy Ray Robinson, a.k.a. the “Honey Bun Bandit,” had robbed five con­ve­nience stores in sin­gle a week in cen­tral Texas, grab­bing some of the sticky pas­tries along the way. Robinson, a 51-year-old black man, fled when he spot­ted Waco police offi­cers stak­ing out his home.

Robinson sped off in reverse in a green Ford Explorer. It got stuck in the mud, and four Waco offi­cers opened fire.

They think they can out­run the offi­cers. They don’t real­ize how dan­ger­ous it is,” said Samuel Lee Reid, exec­u­tive direc­tor of the Atlanta Citizen Review Board, which inves­ti­gates police shoot­ings and recent­ly launched a “Don’t Run” cam­paign. “The pan­ic sets in,” and “all they can think is that they don’t want to get caught and go back to jail.”

- — - -

The most trou­bling cas­es began with a cry for help.

About half the shoot­ings occurred after fam­i­ly mem­bers, neigh­bors or strangers sought help from police because some­one was sui­ci­dal, behav­ing errat­i­cal­ly or threat­en­ing vio­lence. Sometimes police were called just because some­one was wor­ried about some­one else’s welfare.

Take Shane Watkins, a 39-year-old white man, who died in his mother’s dri­ve­way in Moulton, Alabama.

Watkins had nev­er been vio­lent, and fam­i­ly mem­bers were not afraid for their safe­ty when they called Lawrence County sheriff’s deputies in March. But Watkins, who suf­fered from bipo­lar dis­or­der and schiz­o­phre­nia, was off his med­ica­tion. Days ear­li­er, he had declared him­self the “god of the fifth ele­ment” and demand­ed whiskey and beer so he could “cleanse the earth with it,” said his sis­ter, Yvonne Cote.

Then he start­ed threat­en­ing to shoot him­self and his dog, Slayer. His moth­er called Cote, who called 911. Cote got back on the phone with her moth­er, who watched Watkins walk onto the dri­ve­way hold­ing a box cut­ter to his chest. A patrol car pulled up, and Cote heard her moth­er yell: “Don’t shoot! He doesn’t have a gun!”

Then I heard the gun­shots,” Cote said.

Lawrence County sheriff’s offi­cials declined to com­ment and have refused to release doc­u­ments relat­ed to the case.

There are so many unan­swered ques­tions,” she said. “All he had was a box cut­ter. Wasn’t there some oth­er way for them to han­dle this?”

Catherine Daniels called police for the same rea­son. “I want­ed to get my son help,” she said. Instead, offi­cers Peter Ehrlich and Eddo Trimino fired their stun guns after Hall hit them with the met­al end of the broom­stick, accord­ing to inves­tiga­tive documents.

Please don’t hurt my child,” Daniels plead­ed, in a scene cap­tured by a cam­era mount­ed on the dash of one of the patrol cars.

Get on the f — ing ground or you’re dead!” Trimino shout­ed. Then he fired five shots.

Police spokesman Mike Wright declined to com­ment on the case. Daniels said no one from the city has con­tact­ed her. “I haven’t received any­thing. No apol­o­gy, nothing.”

But hours after her son was killed, Daniels said, offi­cers inves­ti­gat­ing the shoot­ing dropped off a six-pack of Coca-Cola.

I regret call­ing them,” Daniels said. “They took my son’s life.”

- — - -

Washington Post staffers Ted Mellnik, John Muyskens and Amy Brittain con­tributed to this report.

Police Make Threats But Can They Do Much About Government’s Offer.….

Raymond Wilson
Raymond Wilson

If we can­not com­mand it we will demand it. If you can’t open your eyes as a Government and see the need to give us ade­quate com­pen­sa­tion, then rest assured we may have to open those eyes for you,”.
Sergeant Raymond Wilson Police Federation Chairman who also serves on the National Housing Trust Board, pulled no punch­es in demand­ing a bet­ter wage increase offer than that present­ly on the table.
“I I just want you to stop and think for a while, what is real­ly five per cent after wait­ing for so long? Is that what the Government real­ly wants to offer?”.
Many mem­bers of the rank-and file though in agree­ment that the Government’s 5% offer is gross­ly inad­e­quate, roll their eyes at Wilson Many mem­bers believe Wilson is a blow-hard that gives off a lot of heat and shed no light.
None of the Officers I spoke to have any idea how Wilson plans on mak­ing good on his threats if the Government does not budge. In fact some are quite will­ing to see the back of Wilson who they say has not accom­plished any­thing on their behalf.
Despite their dis­af­fec­tion, Wilson was just recent­ly returned as pres­i­dent of the Federation.

That aside, the real ques­tion is just how much can the Government afford to pay pub­lic sec­tor work­ers in this finan­cial crunch. Conventional wis­dom sug­gest there is not much more on the table if the International Fund has any­thing to do with it, and it does.

- Commissioner of Police, Dr Carl Williams, is this ...
- Commissioner of Police, Dr Carl Williams …

So what are Police , Teachers, Nurses and oth­er pub­lic employ­ees to do?
Threats aside, not much.
The Miller Administration knows these work­ers depend on the mea­ger stipend they are paid with­out which their cir­cum­stances would be much more dire.
The International Monetary fund dic­tates to the Administration just what per­cent­age of the bud­get may go to pay­ing pub­lic sec­tor wages.

Many of these pub­lic sec­tor work­ers have time and again gone to the polls to elect and re-elect this PNP par­ty to form the Government despite it’s abysmal track record of han­dling the economy.
The police as oth­er Jamaicans must sub­se­quent­ly take some respon­si­bil­i­ty for the predica­ment in which it find itself.
Police Commissioner Carl Williams is slat­ed to meet with the Federation today, as is cus­tom­ary for decades, Government dis­patch­es the Commissioner to go talk down to the rank and file about it’s lack of abil­i­ty to pay more.
In the end they will not be get­ting much more if any­thing above that 5% offer if at all.
Commissioner Carl Williams on the oth­er hand earns between $8 and $10 mil­lion annually.
A police constable’s basic pay is J$581,701 each year, a stun­ning just over US$5,000 each year.
It will be dif­fi­cult to weed out cor­rup­tion from the Ranks if offi­cers do not see a sub­stan­tial increase in their abil­i­ty to feed their families.

The Question Of Night Noise : Big Battle Rages…

Jodi-ann stewar
Jodi-ann stew­art

In-art­ful? Yes !
Could her state­ments be con­strued to be Racist. No !
Classicism ? Maybe !
Then again maybe not it depends on where your head is.
Jodi Stewart-Henriques, also called Jinx, is the wife of Reggae singer Sean Paul. Recently Henriques took to social media to crit­i­cize World cham­pi­on sprint­er Usain Bolt>
Quote ‚” Between the bikes … , loud, hor­rid music, par­ties and screams, I hon­est­ly wish he would go back to where he came from. He’s a hor­ri­ble neigh­bour. I can­not wait to move,”.
She went on to say she report­ed the mat­ter to the Police but because of Bolt’s stature no action has been taken .
True to form when one cop was approached about whether Ms. Henriques actu­al­ly made reports to the Constant Spring Police about night nois­es attrib­uted to Usain Bolt, one cop alleged­ly laugh­ing­ly said “No, sah. That’s news to me … . However, I’ll ask my col­leagues. A weh dem a try do to the athlete?” .
Right that’s how pro­fes­sion­al Police offi­cers ascer­tain whether a report was made to the police.

Henriques obvi­ous­ly frus­trat­ed with the lack of action had much more to say about Jamaica’s Ambassador , world renowned sprint­er Usain Bolt. “So unfair and dis­re­spect­ful. I’ve hon­est­ly lost all respect for him. He takes his nasty behav­iour with him every­where … . So many peo­ple love him and he’s such a poor exam­ple of how to behave. I hon­est­ly can’t blame the set of UPT (uptown) that have him as pop­py show in par­ties or on their boat. He’s the ulti­mate par­ty clown,”.
The reac­tion from Jamaicans was vis­cer­al and viscous.
How dare this no name thing of a per­son crit­i­cize our God Usain Bolt.
One woman said her com­ments were aimed at show­ing “how unim­por­tant Jinx is”.
Ironically the total gist of their crit­i­cism of Ms, Henriques was that she was Racist, class-ist and a bigot.
No one both­ered to give cre­dence to her desire to be able to sleep in peace at night>
Another com­ment­ed that she should have no com­ment because Sean Paul her hus­band makes his mon­ey from mak­ing noise at peo­ple’s heads.

Where can Jamaicans now aspire to live where they may enjoy peace and quite and be able to enjoy their lives if they do not want Spanish Town Road in their neighborhoods?
Even as we con­demn what we con­strue to be clas­si­cism and and stretch­ing every bound­ary by alleg­ing racism, I believe we must also give cre­dence to her con­cerns and not sim­ply brush them aside because the sub­ject of her ire is one of our heroes.
If Usain Bolt is guilty of cre­at­ing night nois­es as she alleges, Bolt should be a good neigh­bor and con­form to the stan­dards of the com­mu­ni­ty.
What kind of coun­try is this where peo­ple can­not com­ment on the qual­i­ty of their neighborhood?
The abil­i­ty to run fast does not give him the right to run rough-shod over his neighbors.

It’s not a mat­ter of where you come from , most of us are from rather hum­ble begin­nings.
Its how we learn to adapt to new sur­round­ings.
A house is more than just a place where we live, for most peo­ple their home is the largest invest­ment they will ever
make in their life­time.
They have a right to ensure that the actions of oth­ers do not dimin­ish the val­ue of their prop­er­ty.
And that is sep­a­rate from just the qual­i­ty of life con­cerns she allud­ed to.

Night nois­es have been a prob­lem in our coun­try for decades, unfor­tu­nate­ly for some ordi­nary peo­ple who just want to go to sleep they dare not open their mouths for fear of being shout­ed down or mur­dered. Even when I was a cop , report­ing nigh-time noise pol­lu­tion to some police sta­tions and offi­cers were a waste of time.
For the most part if the dance was not a police ven­ture, the police could be found dressed in uni­form at the dance with Heineken in hand, com­plaint be damned.
It took some real Police offi­cers to step in and pull the plug allow­ing work­ing peo­ple to sleep so they could get up and go to work the next day.
This large­ly unchecked mon­stros­i­ty metas­ta­sized to the point peo­ple wish­ing to go to work at 7:am hav­ing gone sleep­less all night, was bur­dened fur­ther by not being able to dri­ve their cars as their streets are blocked-off by mon­strous sound sys­tem speak­er box­es and hun­dreds of scant­i­ly clad gyrat­ing bodies.
No action from the Police.……

Yes she may have been in-art­ful in the way she spoke out in frus­tra­tion. Bigoted and racist I doubt that. What I do know is that when we accuse oth­ers of being of no name recog­ni­tion, even as we accuse them of class-ism , we need to take a good hard look in the mirror.
The prob­lem of night-time noise pol­lu­tion is only one of the many types of pol­lu­tion which has tak­en over Jamaica
Add Auto-repairs on every street cor­ner and a pro­lif­er­a­tion of zinc-shanties in once pris­tine neigh­bor­hoods add to the mad­ness that was once the beau­ti­ful Island of Jamaica.
This issue is big­ger than both Usain Bolt and Jinx.
Jinx’s tirade is rep­re­sen­ta­tive of a lot of peo­ple’s frus­tra­tion over many decades.
People who are not well rest­ed can­not produce.
Kids who stay up at night because of loud music sleep in class. Kids who sleep in class do not do well.
Poor stu­dents makes poor workers.
Is there any won­der our coun­try is mired in the morass of pover­ty and deprivation?
Or is every­thing ire mon tun it up an pas di rum?
Obviously if you are an ordi­nary per­son and not a inter­na­tion­al star you should not open your mouth , no mat­ter what they do to you.
Such Ignorance»»»»