SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS, A Misnomer..

12002824_10204945833425221_401427015886358774_n

No amount of con­dem­na­tion and dis­gust would be enough in respond­ing to what we wit­nessed on an ama­teur video shot by a stu­dent in a Columbia South Carolina Schoolroom as school offi­cials and stu­dents stood and sat in numb silence as a state trained , paid and sanc­tioned Thug assault­ed a 16 year old girl in the most vicious way pos­si­ble under the guise and author­i­ty of law enforcement.
As nau­se­at­ed and dis­gust­ed as the world is at this vicious dis­play of bar­barism is, if stu­dents had not tak­en out their cell phones and record­ed this inci­dent no one would have been any wis­er, this stu­dent and her class­mates would have been assault­ed, trau­ma­tized and vic­tim­ized with­out con­se­quence to the offend­er. Life would have gone on as usu­al as it always has.

Life would have gone on as usu­al because for almost four hun­dred years this is exact­ly how black peo­ple have been treat­ed in this coun­try. As I said in pre­vi­ous articles,whatever hap­pened in that class­room which pre­cip­i­tat­ed the call­ing of the police, can­not be dis­cussed in the same con­text in which we dis­cuss what hap­pened after the police entered the room.
If we do so we unwit­ting­ly give tac­it sup­port to the bru­tal crim­i­nal bar­bar­i­ty and dis­gust­ing dis­play of dis­re­spect we all witnessed .

So when the head of the FBI James Comey comes out and blames cit­i­zens for video­tap­ing atroc­i­ties com­mit­ted against them by these bru­tal thugs in uni­form as the rea­son for the rise in crime this is what he wants to keep from you.
Clearly this was a crime and it should be pros­e­cut­ed if and when it is pros­e­cut­ed it will in fact add to the crime statistics.
The only thing James Comey did not say to the Police Chiefs and the Nation is that much of the crime is being com­mit­ted by those who are sworn to pro­tect and serve.

It was a telling moment at least for the 47 mil­lion Black cit­i­zens of this coun­try when the head of the Federal Bureau of Investigations came out and blamed them for non-vio­lent­ly record­ing police abuse against their per­sons , rather than speak to the atro­cious behav­ior we are wit­ness­ing in front our eyes.
For those in our com­mu­ni­ty who have his­tor­i­cal­ly seen the FBI as Savior against the forces of tyran­ny Comey’s speech must give you pause.

SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS

As we sort through this shock­ing event which hap­pened to the abused teenage girl and every oth­er stu­dent par­tic­u­lar­ly stu­dents of col­or we do a tremen­dous dis­ser­vice to them if we do not view what hap­pened to her in the greater con­text of the school to prison pipeline which the states have been run­ning in this coun­try essen­tial­ly turn­ing reg­u­lar dis­ci­pli­nary mat­ters into crimes and our school age chil­dren into criminals .

They start­ed with the sleigh of hand by not accept­ing that what they have done is mil­i­ta­rize schools with police. Somehow they fig­ured smart peo­ple would not be par­tic­u­lar­ly pleased with hav­ing gun-tot­ing cops hav­ing any­thing to do with their chil­dren inside their classrooms.
So what they did was to place gun-tot­ing cops into the class­rooms among your kids, only they cre­at­ed a more palat­able name for them. All of a sud­den the juiced up sher­if­f’s deputy is no longer a cop he is a school resource offi­cer.

What resource does he/​she bring to the school you decide ?
Students around the globe attend class­es at dif­fer­ent lev­els with­out hav­ing armed cops in their schools and they do just fine that’s the way it’s always been.
America cre­at­ed it’s own night­mare with it’s insane insa­tiable appetite and affin­i­ty for guns.
But as insane as that is that is not the big­ger issue. The real issue is the Country’s con­tin­ued obses­sion with crim­i­nal­iz­ing and incar­cer­at­ing its minori­ties by attack­ing stu­dents of col­or in the places where they should feel safest.

Make no mis­take about it there is a tac­tic yet explic­it accep­tance of this class­room to prison approach by the states and by a large sub­set of the white population.
Did I say a large sub­set of whites?
Yes a large per­cent­age of the white pop­u­la­tion is so hate­ful of Blacks that they will sup­port every harm which is brought about on the per­son of black people.
It is nev­er about their sup­port for police , in fact they are abused just as bad­ly by police . The fact is that they have devel­oped a pol­i­cy of “the ene­my of my ene­my is my friend”.
They are not sup­port­ing police they are sup­port­ing assault on Black peo­ple, it does not mat­ter whether it’s the police, the Russians or ISIL any­one who hates and is will­ing to assault Blacks are friends of theirs.

We see it in the data as it relates to how black stu­dents are dis­ci­plined with­in the school systems.
It is evi­dent in sus­pen­sion and expul­sion rates even though there is absolute­ly no data which sug­gests that black stu­dents are more dis­rup­tive in school.

We waste our time talk­ing about the action of the cop if the con­ver­sa­tion is not cen­tered on why state gov­ern­ments are turn­ing schools into police posts. Cops ought not be in class­rooms unless some­one pulls a gun or oth­er weapon on some­one else and they are called.
This act of Government which places cops in schools is designed to intim­i­date young peo­ple into acqui­esc­ing to Government’s demands or else. It has noth­ing to do with safety.

Most of us attend­ed schools in which there were no cops or any­where on the prop­er­ty , how many oth­er nations engages in this prac­tice oth­er than the United States?
I can tell you not many if at all…
Black America wise up the fir­ing of this cop alone will change nothing.

Bully Chris Christie Gets His Just Due…

The oversized bloviating bully..
The over­sized blovi­at­ing bully..

It is gen­er­al­ly not my habit of com­ment­ing too much on low down politi­cians because writ­ing about them gen­er­al­ly have the oppo­site effect of sham­ing them, it usu­al­ly brings them more atten­tion. For most politi­cians there is gen­er­al­ly no bad pub­lic­i­ty they are gen­er­al­ly extreme nar­cis­sists who take what­ev­er atten­tion they can get good or bad.

On this occa­sion I will break with that rule sim­ply to talk about the low down loud-mouth bul­ly who serves as Governor of New Jersey.
Chris Christie defies log­ic , It nev­er quite dawned on me what log­ic Jersey Democrats used in vot­ing for this retard­ed loud-mouth school­yard bul­ly in a total­ly blue state?
The guy is noth­ing but a Rudolph Giuliani 2.0 on steroids. He is uncouth, abra­sive, arro­gant and a down­right liar.
Maybe it can be chalked up to the sup­posed rough and tum­ble notion of the New York/​New Jersey per­sona “feg­gud about it”.
But even so the vot­ers them­selves are get­ting tired of this punk and many are ask­ing him to resign . I mean he is nev­er there he’s always out chas­ing the elu­sive dream of becom­ing President of the United States.
No one begrudges the fat man the right to chase his dream but when a police offi­cer gets shot and he goes on National Television to blame the President of the United States for the shoot­ing it is beyond disgraceful.

President Obama
President Obama

I total­ly get that Christie needs trac­tion in a 16 per­son field in which he hard­ly gets to answer a ques­tion. What bet­ter way to try to gar­ner some atten­tion than attack­ing the President of the United States?
But to bla­tant­ly lie to gain shock val­ue shows the depths the over the riv­er over­weight thug is will­ing to go to to boost his wan­ing pres­i­den­tial ambitions.
As I said he is exact­ly like Giuliani, both were Federal Prosecutors who lack the intel­lect to be objective.
Neither of these bul­lies are capa­ble of mak­ing ratio­nal dis­tinc­tions between wrong and right as far as cops are concerned.
For these two Cops can do no wrong .
It was part of the rea­sons no one is talk­ing about President Giuliani. The so-called “America’s Mayor” is now a mere footnote.
Like Giuliani Christie will crash and burn. There is no way either of these two school­yard thugs could be allowed anywhere

Rudolph Giuliani
Rudolph Giuliani

near the nuclear codes. It is that same arro­gance which got him boot­ed from a Amtrak qui­et car .

Chris Christie was report­ed­ly kicked out of an Amtrak train car Sunday for yelling on his cell phone in one of the train service’s “qui­et cars.”The Garden State gov­er­nor, known for his blunt and at times loud style, was spot­ted by fel­low pas­sen­gers in the qui­et car on a 9:55 a.m. Amtrak train trav­el­ing from Washington, D.C. to New York, accord­ing to Gawker. The strug­gling 2016 can­di­date “got on last minute yelling at his two Secret Service agents I think because of a seat mix-up, sat down and imme­di­ate­ly start­ed mak­ing phone calls on the qui­et car,” pas­sen­ger Alexander Mann told Gawker. Christie appeared to be in the midst of an intense con­ver­sa­tion and was heard repeat­ing phras­es includ­ing “this is frickin’ ridicu­lous” and “seri­ous­ly?” accord­ing to Mann.
‘This is frickin’ ridicu­lous’: Chris Christie gets boot­ed from Amtrak qui­et car for being too loud while on cellphone 

We salute Amtrak for putting this bul­ly in his place imag­ine this guy hav­ing pow­er to use the world’s ‚most pow­er­ful military?
If he is yelling at Agents now as a fad­ing can­di­date imag­ine if he was to ever become President.…

Political Lies About Police Brutality

Video record­ings of police offi­cers bat­ter­ing or even mur­der­ing unarmed black cit­i­zens have val­i­dat­ed long­stand­ing com­plaints by African-Americans and changed the way the coun­try views the issue of police bru­tal­i­ty. Police offi­cers who

Harry Campbell
Harry Campbell

might once have felt free to arrest or assault black cit­i­zens for no cause and explain it away lat­er have been put on notice that the truth could be revealed by a cell­phone video post­ed on the Internet.
This kind of pub­lic scruti­ny is all to the good, giv­en the dam­age police bru­tal­i­ty has done to African-American com­mu­ni­ties for gen­er­a­tions and the cor­ro­sive effect it has on the broad­er soci­ety. Yet the peel­ing away of secre­cy on these indis­putably uncon­sti­tu­tion­al prac­tices is now being chal­lenged by politi­cians who want to soft-ped­al or even ignore police mis­con­duct while attack­ing the peo­ple who expose it or raise their voic­es in protest against it. This trend is like some­thing straight out of Orwell.

Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey — the increas­ing­ly des­per­ate pres­i­den­tial can­di­date who is going nowhere fast — took this pos­ture on Sunday when he accused President Obama of encour­ag­ing “law­less­ness” and vio­lence against police offi­cers by acknowl­edg­ing that the coun­try need­ed to take both police bru­tal­i­ty and the “Black Lives Matter” protest move­ment seriously.

The pres­i­dent is absolute­ly right. This move­ment focus­es on the irrefutable fact that black cit­i­zens are far more like­ly than whites to die at the hands of the police. The more the coun­try ignores that truth, the greater the civic dis­cord that will flow from it.

The recent remarks of James Comey, the direc­tor of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, were not as racial­ly poi­so­nous as Mr. Christie’s, but they were no less incen­di­ary. In a speech at the University of Chicago Law School on Friday, Mr. Comey said that height­ened scruti­ny of police behav­ior — and fear of appear­ing in “viral videos” — was lead­ing offi­cers to avoid con­fronta­tions with sus­pects. This, he said, may have con­tributed to an increase in crime.

There is no data sug­gest­ing such an effect, and cer­tain­ly Mr. Comey has none. But his sug­ges­tion plays into the right-wing view that hold­ing the police to con­sti­tu­tion­al stan­dards endan­gers the pub­lic. Justice Department offi­cials who have made a top pri­or­i­ty of pros­e­cut­ing police depart­ments for civ­il rights vio­la­tions — and who dis­pute that height­ened scruti­ny of the police dri­ves up crime — were under­stand­ably angry at Mr. Comey’s speculations.

His for­mu­la­tion implies that for the police to do their jobs, they need to have free rein to be abu­sive. It also implies that the pub­lic would be safer if Americans with cell­phones nev­er start­ed cir­cu­lat­ing videos of offi­cers bat­ter­ing sus­pects in the first place.

A day after Mr. Comey made his remarks, The Times pub­lished a lengthy inves­ti­ga­tioninto racial pro­fil­ing and abu­sive police behav­ior in Greensboro, N.C., the third-largest city in the state. After review­ing tens of thou­sands of traf­fic stops and years of arrest data, Times reporters found that the police pulled over African-American dri­vers at a rate far out of pro­por­tion to their share of the local dri­ving pop­u­la­tion. The police searched black motorists or their cars twice as often as whites — even though whites where sig­nif­i­cant­ly more like­ly to be caught with drugs and weapons.

Greensboro police offi­cers were more like­ly to pull black dri­vers over for no rea­son and more like­ly to use force if the dri­ver was black, even when the dri­ver offered no phys­i­cal resis­tance. A black Greensboro man who near­ly lost his job as a result of ask­ing an offi­cer why he was being ordered out of his car dur­ing a night­mar­ish encounter said: “Every time I see a police offi­cer, I get a cold chill. Even if I need­ed one, I wouldn’t call one.”

This is the kind of treat­ment that some Americans rou­tine­ly face at the hands of their police depart­ments. Mr. Comey’s spec­u­la­tions about alleged pres­sure on offi­cers to stand down shows that he hasn’t begun to grasp the nature of the problem.
Read more : Political Lies About Police Brutality

Would This Happen To A White Student In Her Classroom ?

YouTube player

This assault hap­pened yes­ter­day October 26th to a stu­dent in her Columbia South Carolina class room …
Reports indi­cate the girl was asked to leave the class after using her cell­phone she did not, upon which Administrators were called and she still sat in her seat.
That is when they brought in the Thug and this was the result. Judge for your­selves whether you would allow this to hap­pen to your child.
This hap­pened in a class­room involv­ing a female stu­dent . This was not a ter­ror­ist about to blow up some­thing . If a girl can­not be safe in her own class­room from the thug­gish assault of the State where can she be safe.
Does any­one see where we are as a peo­ple in what is clear­ly a police state gone awry?
FBI DIRECTOR: VIOLENT CRIMES ARE UP BECAUSE POLICE OFFICERS CAN’T BE AS ABUSIVE WITH CELL PHONE VIDEOS EVERYWHERE

Just two days ago the FBI direc­tor James Comey had the nerve to blame peo­ple who video­tape cops abus­ing oth­er cit­i­zens for the rise in some cat­e­gories of crime in the country.
To begin with he cit­ed absolute­ly no data which sup­ports his argu­ments but that did not stop him from mak­ing the ridicu­lous and uncon­firmed state­ment anyway.
What makes Comey’s com­ments more omi­nous and dis­turb­ing is the fact that the FBI is count­ed on at the fed­er­al lev­el to inves­ti­gate inci­dents of police abuse of cit­i­zens. The ques­tion now is what is the qual­i­ty of the Investigations being done by the FBI in cas­es where police com­mit crimes against citizens?

Personally I always won­dered about the basis for Black peo­ple’s faith in the FBI to be impar­tial or thor­ough in light of the Agency’s his­to­ry in deal­ing with the community.
The FBI has con­sis­tent­ly had an adver­sar­i­al rela­tion­ship with the African-American com­mu­ni­ty despite rhetoric to the contrary.
Just recent­ly in Ferguson Missouri as African-American peo­ple were in the streets demon­stra­tion sys­tem­at­ic Police abuse White Anti-African-American mer­ce­nar­ies were walk­ing around heav­i­ly armed the FBI was there spy­ing on the demonstrators.

Comey
Comey

James Comey, direc­tor of the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) admit­ted to the House Judiciary Committee (HJC) that his agency spied on the Ferguson protests with aer­i­al craft because of the requests from local law enforce­ment. Comey clar­i­fied his rev­e­la­tion by stat­ing that the FBI does not “fly planes around America look­ing down to see if some­body might be doing some­thing wrong”; how­ev­er that is exact­ly what the FBI did at Ferguson. And because of this, the FBI did not obtain war­rants before engag­ing because of a loop­hole in the process that rests on the notion that “planes do not cap­ture or record the con­tents of any com­mu­ni­ca­tions on the ground.” Comey added: “The law is pret­ty clear that you don’t need a war­rant for that kind of conversation.”

Oath Keepers
Oath Keepers

The planes used by the FBI appar­ent­ly were tasked with watch­ing spe­cif­ic sus­pects who were alleged­ly thought to be involved in crim­i­nal activ­i­ty and under inves­ti­ga­tion for ter­ror­ism and espi­onage when the Ferguson police depart­ment asked the FBI to assist them in “devel­op­ing situation[s]” such as riots. Comey vehe­ment­ly stat­ed that the planes were not con­duct­ing sur­veil­lance, and yet the FBI sent air­craft to Ferguson in August of 2014 to watch over the protests against police because of the shoot­ing of Michael Brown. And then the FBI helped out again in Baltimore dur­ing the Freddie Gray protests. The direc­tor of the FBI explained that his agency will be deployed “if there is tremen­dous tur­bu­lence in a com­mu­ni­ty, it’s use­ful to every­body — civil­ians and law enforce­ment — to have a view of what’s going on. Where are the fires in this com­mu­ni­ty? Where are peo­ple gath­er­ing? Where do peo­ple need help? And some­times the best view of that is above rather than try­ing to look from a car in the street.” Director Admits FBI Spies on African Americans & Muslims From the Sky

Whenever Police abuse cit­i­zens we hear the con­stant drum­beat about what hap­pened before which pre­cip­i­tat­ed the incident?
Let me explain some­thing on that issue, police do not have a right to mete out pun­ish­ment , it is the duty of a court of law to make that determination.
There is a com­mon mis­con­cep­tion which is prac­tised by police and their apol­o­gists in the main street Media when­ev­er inci­dents like these occur . Which is to cre­ate a smoke screen, cre­ate a nar­ra­tive that some­thing else may have occurred which we are not aware of.
This sideshow is intend­ed to deflect atten­tion away from what we saw with our eyes so we may wan­der off into the weeds of hypotheticals.
That is where they want the dis­cus­sion to be cen­tered, away from what we saw with our eyes, delv­ing instead in “maybes and what ifs”.
What we saw in that clip is inde­fen­si­ble regard­less of what may or may not have tran­spired pre­vi­ous­ly. It does not require an inves­ti­ga­tion he should be fired forthwith.

The main stream media will of course engage in a process of char­ac­ter assas­si­na­tion on the stu­dent, and char­ac­ter san­i­ta­tion of the cop.Any attempt to dis­cuss what this female stu­dent may have done pri­or to the assault on her with­in the con­text of the cops actions is a grave dis­ser­vice to what he did and must be seen as a clear attempt to jus­ti­fy his thug­gish bru­tal behavior.
In this medi­um we speak to the dis­re­spect too many cops have when they are deal­ing with peo­ple of col­or and black peo­ple in general.
They sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly refer to grown black men as “bud or guy” while refer­ring to white men as ” sir”.
Many cops are a mere hair trig­ger from using force when they deal with peo­ple of col­or. In many cas­es they active­ly esca­late sim­ple things so they can law­ful­ly assault Black cit­i­zens . Whatever they do or say pri­or to using force is mere­ly a “cov­er your ass” in the event of scrutiny.
The FBI of course will Investigate and this guy will be found to have act­ed law­ful­ly and the police state’s assault will continue.
This is the state which hate and fear built.

FBI And Its Divisive, Disruptive And Downright Dangerous Role It Has Historically Played In The African American Community.

12002824_10204945833425221_401427015886358774_n

One of the things I learned over the last 24 years liv­ing in the United States is the absolute arro­gance of white men . Whether it is a ques­tion of invad­ing the sov­er­eign Iraqi Nation and cre­at­ing ISIL in the process or whether it is their response to the Black Lives mat­ter move­ment as it relates to police exces­sive behav­ior their atti­tudes are the same.

Most of us oth­er peo­ple argue points based on mer­its , pros and cons, we defend our posi­tions based on the inher­ent feel­ing that we are right and justified.
Not so with the American white male.
He nev­er quite got around to explain­ing how Christopher Columbus man­aged to dis­cov­er land peo­ple were liv­ing on in orga­nized soci­eties before he hap­pened upon those lands.
He makes no attempt to explain or address the fact that the “Moors” Black Africans had arrived set­tled here beside Native Indians and lived peace­ful­ly with the Natives since around the 12th century.
The ques­tion of his lack of fideli­ty to the numer­ous treaties he signed with the Indians and dis­hon­ored is nev­er broached or discussed.

So it’s no sur­prise that when he refers to America in the con­text of Immigration or the Black Lives mat­ter move­ment he nev­er both­ers to speak to the strug­gles of either group he sim­ply dou­bles down on what he sees as his right to the land and his right to do with the world what he sees fit.
It’s not just his right to do with the entire United States as he sees fit. He also believes in his absolute right to con­trol the entire globe.

He speaks about remov­ing and replac­ing Governments and Administrations as if it’s his duty and job to do so , the unspo­ken under­stand­ing being America’s right to dic­tate to every­one else.
Just last Sunday Tony Blair the Conservative Former British Prime Minister speak­ing to CNN’s Fareed Zakaria took the unprece­dent­ed step[ of apol­o­giz­ing for his role in the Iraq war.
The apol­o­gy was not with­out the ever present white male arrogance .….…..
Quote ‚“I apol­o­gise for the fact that the intel­li­gence we received was wrong. “I also apol­o­gise for some of the mis­takes in plan­ning and, cer­tain­ly, our mis­take in our under­stand­ing of what would hap­pen once you removed the régime.”
You won’t get even that from Bush or the war crim­i­nal Dick Cheney.
On that note I salute the Canadian peo­ple for rec­og­niz­ing and demon­strat­ing that the rea­son peo­ple respect their coun­try is not because it throws its weight around the world in wars of choice but because it has a his­to­ry of not doing so.
The unmis­tak­able rejec­tion of Stephen Harper speaks vol­umes about the sophis­ti­ca­tion of the Canadian vot­er on this par­tic­u­lar subject.

FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY STILL UNSURE IF WHITE SUPREMACIST’S ATTACK IN CHARLESTON WAS TERRORISM

But the gall of them, who gives them the right to decide who rules in these coun­tries ? They nev­er quite got around to explain­ing that either . So we are left to assume and maybe more defin­i­tive­ly con­clude that the col­or of their skin gives them that authority.
The FBI Director says Police are feel­ing scared they don’t want to get out of their cars that’s the rea­son some crimes are trend­ing up is that Police are scared to do their jobs because they are under more scruti­ny because cit­i­zens are video­tap­ing their activities.
The infer­ence being that Police can­not do their jobs unless they abuse and kill peo­ple indis­crim­i­nate­ly despite hav­ing access to the best and most sophis­ti­cat­ed sup­port struc­ture prob­a­bly of any nation.
The tragedy in all of this is that for the vast major­i­ty of peo­ple of col­or who have been abused by the sys­tem the FBI and the Federal appa­ra­tus was seen as a Savior of sorts. I nev­er quite rec­on­ciled that notion con­sid­er­a­tion the his­to­ry of the FBI and the divi­sive, dis­rup­tive and down­right dan­ger­ous role it has played in the African American Community historically.
I guess when you are a drown­ing man you clutch at straws.
Simply put Black peo­ple’s faith in the FBI as an inde­pen­dent inves­tiga­tive Agency was always mis­placed. Blacks plac­ing their faith in the FBI as an impar­tial play­er between them and the police was always an exer­cise in stu­pid­i­ty and futil­i­ty. Comey sim­ply con­firmed what I always believed.

Whites take own­er­ship of America and the world , blacks can­not even say this is my coun­try and not blink, in fact they sim­ply nev­er say it. Guess what if you don’t take own­er­ship the oth­er guy will. As such white men con­tin­ue to tell them do not look up at me , don’t you dare look in my eyes and there­in lies the problem.

Jamaica Should Vote “NO” On CCJ

Justices of the CCJ......
Justices of the CCJ.…..

Speaking at a Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) Area Council One meet­ing in St Andrew Opposition spokesper­son on jus­tice Delroy Chuck cau­tioned oppo­si­tion sen­a­tors against embar­rass­ing them­selves by sup­port­ing the Simpson Miller Administration in mak­ing the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) the final court of appeals for Jamaica.

In address­ing the crowd of laborites Chuck said “If one, two, or eight [JLP] sen­a­tors make the error [and vote for the bills], not only would they be embar­rass­ing them­selves, but what they would do is cause the Labour Party to expend mon­ey to take these three bills to the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal, [and the] Privy Council,”.

Chuck argues fur­ther ‚“Let me make it even fur­ther clear. If one, two, or all eight of them go ahead and sup­port the bills, the leader of the Jamaica Labour Party, the spokesper­son on jus­tice, and the Jamaica Labour Party will take those three bills to the Constitutional Court, right up to the Privy Council, to show that they are a mock­ery to the Jamaica Constitution,” “The only way the CCJ can be the final appel­late court is when we put it to the peo­ple and we say to the peo­ple ‘do you want the CCJ or you want a final Jamaican court’ and let the peo­ple of Jamaica make that decision,”.

I am no fan of Delroy Chuck but even a bro­ken clock is right twice dai­ly, the only way the CCJ should be rat­i­fied as the final court of appeal for Jamaica is to put it on the bal­lot and let the peo­ple decide. I have very lit­tle con­fi­dence in the abil­i­ty of the Jamaican elec­torate to make sound deci­sions but it is their coun­try they should own the decision.
I agree with Chuck on this and I have said so pre­vi­ous­ly it should be placed on the bal­lot so the peo­ple can own the decision.
I believe accept­ing the prison deal with Britain should also be a bal­lot issue. I know that some will be quick to remind us that lead­ers are elect­ed to lead . My response to that is that no one per­son or group of peo­ple has all the answers as such large deci­sions such as the Prison deal and the (CCJ) deci­sion should be the deci­sion of voters.

The Jamaicagleaner​.com is report­ing that one Jamaica Labor Party Senator is lean­ing toward sup­port­ing the Government motion>When asked about it Arthur Williams is report­ed to have said Chucks state­ments will have no impact on the way he will vote. Big sur­prise there [sic]
Delroy Chuck warned if the issue is passed the next JLP Administration would sim­ply reverse it.
If they put the CCJ in sec­tion 110 of the Constitution, the next JLP gov­ern­ment, which will be in pow­er lat­er this year or next year … when­ev­er the elec­tions are called, we are going to use a sim­ple major­i­ty to remove it,”

It is remark­able that the PNP would be seek­ing to push the CCJ on the Jamaican peo­ple in light of the con­di­tions of the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem in the country.
One does not have to be a legal lumi­nary to rec­og­nize that what Jamaica should be work­ing on at this time is improv­ing the con­di­tions of court build­ings, upgrad­ing and invest­ing in equip­ment which will ensure bet­ter deliv­ery of ser­vice and most impor­tant­ly improv­ing the capa­bil­i­ties of the police so that a greater per­cent­age of crim­i­nals can be removed from the streets and placed where they belong.
I have not heard a mean­ing­ful argu­ment for the removal of the Privy Council as the final appel­late court beyond the one about sov­er­eign­ty and independence.
On that issue I say, look how well we have han­dled our affairs since our so-called independence[sic].

Since we have not heard any mean­ing­ful argu­ments for the CCJ beyond that, one is tempt­ed to ascribe sin­is­ter motives to the PNP’s push for it.
Less and less peo­ple have rea­sons to believe in the Government’s abil­i­ty to deliv­er fair and ade­quate jus­tice to them. One of the issues I have raised on this sub­ject is that part of the prob­lem with our sys­tem of jus­tice on the Island is that Prosecutors , Defense Lawyers and Judges all pret­ty much come from the same farm.
They are large­ly all part of the very same small club, from post­grad­u­ate to grad­u­ate stud­ies. Does any­one in their right mind believe phone calls are not made which have seri­ous impli­ca­tions on verdicts?

The CCJ which is based in Trinidad, does not have Trinidad as a mem­ber to date, that ought to say some­thing about the idea in and of itself.
Thus far only Barbados, Belize and Guyana retain the CCJ as their final court of appeals .
I am not sug­gest­ing by any mea­sure that the CCJ is cor­rupt or inca­pable. What I am say­ing is that for those with mal-intent it is much eas­i­er to get to, and I do not mean geographically.
Jamaica can­not afford to have any fur­ther ero­sion of trust in its abil­i­ty to deliv­er jus­tice to it’s cit­i­zens. The con­se­quences will be dire and far reach­ing if we go down this path.

Senators Warned — Chuck Predicts Embarrassment For Opposition Members If They Vote For CCJ

Chuck
Chuck

The par­lia­men­tary Opposition has ratch­eted up its resis­tance to the Government’s push to have the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) installed as the nation’s final appel­late court, declar­ing yes­ter­day that it is pre­pared to mount a con­sti­tu­tion­al chal­lenge all the way to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the United Kingdom.

And if that fails, Delroy Chuck, the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) spokesman on jus­tice, has warned that the par­ty would “use a sim­ply major­i­ty of Parliament” to ditch the CCJ if it wins State pow­er in the next gen­er­al elections.

The only way the CCJ can be the final appel­late court is when we put it to the peo­ple and we say to the peo­ple ‘do you want the CCJ or you want a final Jamaican court’ and let the peo­ple of Jamaica make that deci­sion,” Chuck vowed yes­ter­day dur­ing a Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) Area Council One meet­ing in St Andrew.

Chuck, who is also an attor­ney, warned that if any JLP sen­a­tor broke ranks and vot­ed with their gov­ern­ment coun­ter­parts, they are going to be embarrassed.

If one, two, or eight [JLP] sen­a­tors make the error [and vote for the bills], not only would they be embar­rass­ing them­selves, but what they would do is cause the Labour Party to expend mon­ey to take these three bills to the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal, [and the] Privy Council,” Chuck cautioned.

Let me make it even fur­ther clear. If one, two, or all eight of them go ahead and sup­port the bills, the leader of the Jamaica Labour Party, the spokesper­son on jus­tice, and the Jamaica Labour Party will take those three bills to the Constitutional Court, right up to the Privy Council, to show that they are a mock­ery to the Jamaica Constitution,” he said.

Members of the House of Representatives have already vot­ed by a two-thirds major­i­ty to pass three bills that are aimed at hav­ing the CCJ replace the Privy Council as the coun­try’s final appel­late court. The bills are now being debat­ed in the Senate and will need the vote of at least one oppo­si­tion sen­a­tor and all 13 gov­ern­ment sen­a­tors for them to be passed.

But, accord­ing to Chuck, the JLP’s pend­ing legal chal­lenge is based on the view that the bills “do not sit well with the Jamaican Constitution”. He pre­dict­ed that none of the eight oppo­si­tion sen­a­tors would vote in favour of them.

However, for­mer Justice Minister K.D. Knight dis­agreed, argu­ing that the move to have the CCJ entrenched through a two-thirds major­i­ty would sat­is­fy the scheme of the Constitution as well as a pre­vi­ous Privy Council rul­ing on the issue.

Knight, who is an attor­ney-at-law, also took aim at calls by the par­lia­men­tary Opposition for a ref­er­en­dum that would make the CCJ deeply entrenched in the Constitution.

This request for it to be deeply entrenched real­ly has nei­ther a log­i­cal foun­da­tion nor a legal one,” he told The Gleaner yesterday.

Opposition Senator Arthur Williams, who many believe is like­ly to break ranks and vote in favour of the bills, said yes­ter­day that his col­league’s com­ments would have no bear­ing on how he votes.

Knight also chimed in say­ing Chuck’s asser­tion “does not have the log­i­cal force that would cause any­body to change an opinion”.

With JLP del­e­gates urg­ing him on, Chuck also made it clear that if the JLP’s legal chal­lenge to the CCJ bills was unsuc­cess­ful, that would not be the end of the issue.

If they put the CCJ in sec­tion 110 of the Constitution, the next JLP gov­ern­ment, which will be in pow­er lat­er this year or next year … when­ev­er the elec­tions are called, we are going to use a sim­ple major­i­ty to remove it,” he emphasised.

Mek all the con­sti­tu­tion­al lawyers in Jamaica tell us we can’t do it. I, as one con­sti­tu­tion­al lawyer, say we can do it and we will do it,” he insisted.
Story orig­i­nat­ed here : Senators Warned — Chuck Predicts Embarrassment For Opposition Members If They Vote For CCJ

FBI Director: Violent Crimes Are Up Because Police Officers Can’t Be As Abusive With Cell Phone Videos Everywhere

Comey
Comey

Police offi­cers are ter­ri­fied that if the pub­lic sees how they do their work, they will be less able to do that work effec­tive­ly. That men­tal­i­ty seems to have made its way all the way to the FBI Director who said Friday that the increased pres­ence of cell phone video may be con­tribut­ing to the increase in vio­lent crime.

James Comey said that he has been told by offi­cers that the increas­es in vio­lence in major cities is tied to “the era of viral videos.”

I don’t know whether this explains it entire­ly, but I do have a strong sense that some part of the expla­na­tion is a chill wind blow­ing through American law enforce­ment over the last year, and that wind is sure­ly chang­ing behav­ior,” he said.

Comey said the offi­cers he has spo­ken with have told him that they feel “under siege.”

They told me, ‘We feel like we’re under siege and we don’t feel much like get­ting out of our cars,’” said Comey.

For more on this, read the arti­cle from CBS News titled: “FBI direc­tor: Cellphone cam­eras may part­ly explain rise in vio­lent crime.
See sto­ry here : FBI Director: Violent Crimes Are Up Because Police Officers Can’t Be As Abusive with Cell Phone Videos Everywhere

DC Police, The FBI, And Their Secret Agreement To Hide Cell Phone Spying By Jason Leopold

 DC Police, the FBI, and Their Secret Agreement to Hide Cell Phone Spying
DC Police, the FBI, and Their Secret Agreement to Hide Cell Phone Spying

In August 2012, the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) in Washington, DC entered into a secret agree­ment with the FBI.

The MPD was promis­ing not to dis­close any details about its use of a high­ly con­tro­ver­sial antiter­ror­ism sur­veil­lance tech­nol­o­gy known as a Stingray. About the size of a suit­case, the Stingray sim­u­lates a cell phone tow­er and inter­cepts mobile phone calls and text messages.

The MPD also agreed that if the depart­ment learned that any tech­ni­cal details about the sur­veil­lance tech­nol­o­gy was at risk of being exposed dur­ing a judi­cial pro­ceed­ing, MPD would con­tact the FBI so the bureau could ask MPD to “seek dis­missal of the case” in order to con­tin­ue pro­tect­ing the over­all secre­cy of the Stingray.

The unusu­al and poten­tial­ly ille­gal arrange­ment between the FBI and MPD was memo­ri­al­ized in a six-page non-dis­clo­sure agree­ment (NDA) signed by MPD Assistant Chief Peter Newsham [pdf at the end of this sto­ry] after the police depart­ment request­ed “cer­tain wire­less col­lec­tion equipment/​technology” — what is com­mon­ly called the Stingray — man­u­fac­tured by Harris Corporation, a Florida-based defense contractor.

Consistent with the con­di­tions on the equip­ment autho­riza­tion grant­ed to Harris Corporation by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), state and local law enforce­ment agen­cies must coör­di­nate with the Federal Bureau of Investigation to com­plete this non-dis­clo­sure agree­ment pri­or to the acqui­si­tion and use of the equipment/​technology autho­rized by the FCC autho­riza­tion,” states the August 17, 2012 NDA sent to Newsham by the FBI.

The Explosion Of Christianity In Africa

gl151_smIn the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry, Christianity in Africa explod­ed from an esti­mat­ed pop­u­la­tion of eight or nine mil­lion in 1900 (8 to 9%) to some 335 mil­lion in 2000 (45%), mark­ing a shift in the “cen­ter of grav­i­ty of Christianity” from the West to Latin America, parts of Asia and Africa. We thank the Overseas Ministries Study Center (OMSC) for the infor­ma­tion and mate­r­i­al used in this issue. Statistical infor­ma­tion pro­vid­ed by David Barrett.

At the turn of the 20th cen­tu­ry, Christianity was vir­tu­al­ly nonex­is­tent in many parts of Africa but is now the faith of the major­i­ty, as the fol­low­ing fig­ures demonstrate:

Congo-Zaïre
Angola
Swaziland
Zambia
Kenya
Malawi
% Christians in 1900
1.4%
0.6%
1.0%
0.3%
0.2%
1.8%
% Christians in 2000
95.4%
94.1%
86.9%
82.4%
79.3%
76.8%

Other African coun­tries with a sig­nif­i­cant Christian pop­u­la­tion are:

Seychelles 96.9%
Saint Helena 96.2%
Sao Tomé & Principe 95.8%
Cape Verde Islands 95.1%
Namibia 92.3%
Burundi 91.7%
Congo-Brazzaville 91.2%
Lesotho 91%
Gabon 90.6%
Uganda 88.7%
South Africa 83.1%
Rwanda 82.7%
Spanish North Africa 80.3%
Equatorial Guinea 76.6%
Central African Republic 67.8%
Zimbabwe 67.5%
Botswana 59.9%
Cameroon 54.2%
Ethiopia 57.7%
Ghana 55.4%
Eritrea 50.5%
Tanzania 50.4%
Madagascar 49.5%
Nigeria 45.9%
Togo 42.6%

The African Story: Amazing Growth, Unthinkable Persecution
In the 20th cen­tu­ry alone, there have been some 1.8 mil­lion Christian mar­tyrs in Africa. This fig­ure does not take into account the esti­mat­ed 600,000 Christians who have died in the geno­ci­dal con­flicts in Rwanda and Burundi, nor does it ful­ly account for the more than two mil­lion deaths in the 17 years of Sudanese civ­il war waged by the mil­i­tant Islamist gov­ern­ment on the pre­dom­i­nant­ly Christian pop­u­la­tion of the south.

The Dictionary of African Christian Biography
The spread of the faith in Africa rep­re­sents per­haps the most dra­mat­ic advance in all Christian his­to­ry, and yet the names and sto­ries of per­sons chiefly respon­si­ble are large­ly unknown. The Dictionary of African Christian Biography (DACB), spon­sored by the Overseas Ministries Study Center in New Haven, Connecticut, is an effort to rec­ti­fy this by gath­er­ing sto­ries of the founders and builders of the African church and offer­ing them free over the inter­net. We con­sid­er this a most sig­nif­i­cant project, and Christian History Institute was eager to help. So last year we assist­ed in the advance of The Dictionary of African Christian Biography. We urge you to vis­it their web­site and make use of the mate­ri­als: www​.dacb​.org.

An Historical Overview by Michèle Sigg of DACB

The Christian Church has been con­tin­u­ous­ly present on the African con­ti­nent since the days of Christ. While the his­to­ry of African Christianity is mul­ti­fac­eted in its region­al devel­op­ment, it is, nev­er­the­less, pos­si­ble to dis­cern four gen­er­al phas­es in the plant­i­ng and matur­ing of the African Church.

Part 1: The Genesis of the Church The Ancient Church in Egypt and Ethiopia
During the first three cen­turies after Christ, Africa was a major cen­ter of Christian thought and activ­i­ty. Origen was from Alexandria in Egypt, while Tertullian and Augustine were from North Africa. By the end of the third cen­tu­ry, Christians in the east­ern Magrib were in the major­i­ty. Sadly, Christianity in much of North Africa vir­tu­al­ly dis­ap­peared as Islam advanced in the fol­low­ing cen­turies. In Egypt and in Ethiopia, how­ev­er, it had tak­en deep root, and was thus able to sur­vive the Islamic jug­ger­naut and con­tin­ues to this day.

Part 2: The Continuation of the Sub-Saharan Church The European Contribution
While the Portuguese intro­duced a Catholic form of Christianity to the Kongo Kingdom (cen­tral Africa) between the six­teenth and eigh­teenth cen­turies, there were few, if any, last­ing results. Only at the end of the eigh­teenth cen­tu­ry did the Evangelical Revival begin to bring to Africa an influx of mis­sion­ar­ies whose labors would pro­duce the first fruits of an endur­ing Christian pres­ence in Sub-Sahara Africa.
With Western civ­i­liza­tion came not only the good inten­tions of Christianity, how­ev­er, but also the appalling­ly dev­as­tat­ing transat­lantic slave trade and the inevitable excess­es of com­mer­cial greed man­i­fest in the white for­eign­ers’ insa­tiable appetite for Africa’s nat­ur­al resources. Before authen­tic Christianity could sink its roots deep into African soil, these evils had to be fought.

Two great British cham­pi­ons from the nine­teenth cen­tu­ry were Thomas Fowell Buxton and Henry Venn, nei­ther of whom ever set foot on African soil. While Buxton sought to ful­ly erad­i­cate the slave trade by encour­ag­ing local com­mer­cial and agri­cul­tur­al ini­tia­tives in its place, Venn is respon­si­ble for lay­ing down the prin­ci­ples of the “indige­nous church” where­by the nascent African church began to come of age.

Part 3: Passing the Mantle The First African Leadership
For the next two hun­dred years, African Christians had to strug­gle against racism and Western spir­i­tu­al impe­ri­al­ism. But, as Venn had writ­ten, if the African church were to mature and estab­lish itself, mis­sion­ar­ies had to move on once the seed was sown, leav­ing indige­nous lead­ers to build the church. Samuel Ajayi Crowther was the first African to be appoint­ed bish­op by the Anglican Church. He is the sub­ject of our next issue.

Part 4: “Pentecost” The African Church Seeks Its Own Language
The seeds of the Sub-Saharan church had been plant­ed by Western mis­sion­ar­ies. Now, as the Gospel spread through­out the nooks and cran­nies of the con­ti­nent, African Christianity began to define itself on its own cul­tur­al terms. Reformers with­in the mis­sion­ary church­es as well as inde­pen­dent church lead­ers called for change in the insti­tu­tion­al­ized church. This led to both reform, on the one hand, and to the birth of thou­sands of “African Initiated Churches” (AICs) on the other.
See more here :The Explosion of Christianity in Africa

KHLOÉ & LAMAR: ROMANCE REWIND

Following Lamar’s drug over­dose and sub­se­quent recov­ery, Khloé decid­ed to call off their divorce and get back togeth­er.

Actress Maureen O’Hara Dies At 95

Irish-American actress Maureen O'Hara has died. She was 95.
Irish-American actress Maureen O’Hara has died. She was 95.

Irish-American actress Maureen O’Hara has died. She was 95.

The Parent Trap star’s fam­i­ly con­firmed to The Irish Times that she passed away from nat­ur­al caus­es in her sleep on Saturday.

The FitzSimons fam­i­ly (O’Hara was born Maureen FitzSimons) issued a state­ment, say­ing, “Maureen was our lov­ing moth­er, grand­moth­er, great-grand­moth­er and friend. She passed peace­ful­ly sur­round­ed by her lov­ing fam­i­ly as they cel­e­brat­ed her life lis­ten­ing to music from her favorite movie, The Quiet Man.”

Per the Irish Times, the fam­i­ly praised O’Hara, who received an hon­orary Academy Award in 2014, for hav­ing brought “unyield­ing strength and sud­den sen­si­tiv­i­ty to every role she played.”.

Her char­ac­ters were feisty and fear­less, just as she was in real life,” the fam­i­ly’s state­ment con­tin­ued. “She was also proud­ly Irish and spent her entire life­time shar­ing her her­itage and the won­der­ful cul­ture of the Emerald Isle with the world.”

O’Hara’s fam­i­ly not­ed in their state­ment that while she “cher­ished her pri­va­cy, she always appre­ci­at­ed the expres­sions of good will from peo­ple around the world and from all walks of life. She espe­cial­ly loved it when chil­dren recog­nised her from her role in Miracle on 34th Street and asked her: ‘Are you the lady who knows Santa Claus?’ She always answered: ‘Yes I am. What would you like me to tell him?’ ”

APP: Download the E! Online app to get the lat­est celebri­ty news on the go!

The late actress’s fam­i­ly, which includes her daugh­ter Brownyn FitzSimons, said, per The Irish Times, “While we mourn the loss of a very won­der­ful woman, we also cel­e­brate her remark­able life and hope that it serves as an exam­ple to young peo­ple around the world, espe­cial­ly in Ireland, to work hard to make their dreams come true and to always have the courage to stand up for themselves.”

The fam­i­ly not­ed, per The Irish Times, that for those wish­ing to hon­or O’Hara, they “have a sim­ple request: vis­it Ireland one day and think of her.”
See more here : Actress Maureen O’Hara Dies at 95

From Home Guards And Brigadistas We Arrive At This Place..

12002824_10204945833425221_401427015886358774_n

Criminals com­mit minor offences if they get away with it they com­mit more seri­ous breach­es. Still no con­se­quences ? They grad­u­ate to more seri­ous felonies.
Eventually they do as they please know­ing that no one will hold them account­able for their actions. This is true of both the aver­age thug and the thugs who wear suits to work bang on desks or those who occu­py boardrooms .
From Rigen to Sandokan, from Copper to Natty Morgan to Dudus and beyond the process of evo­lu­tion has been the same .
None of these blythes on human­i­ty was swat­ted down when they start­ed in their life of crime.
Eventually the aspi­ra­tions of young men is to become a Gangster and their glo­ri­fi­ca­tion makes our lit­tle girls yearn to be their lovers.. This is true across the Globe. This is why the Scarface per­sona is so revered in Latin culture.
Out of that emanat­ed Pablo Escobar.Griselda Blanco.Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman.Carlos Lehder.Amado Carrillo Fuentes. and count­less others .

The fact that the home coun­try of these mur­der­ous scums were allowed to per­pet­u­ate their crim­i­nal activ­i­ties with impuni­ty have had dis­as­trous con­se­quences for those coun­tries, not just as it relates to the loss of life but in the dam­age done to their indi­vid­ual cultures.
In some coun­tries cit­i­zens who make con­scious deci­sions to cause harm to oth­ers do so know­ing their actions will result in swift and deci­sive con­se­quences from authorities.
In coun­tries like Malaysia , Vietnam, Indonesia and oth­ers in Asia, mere­ly traf­fick­ing in dan­ger­ous drugs is enough to get one a date with the executioner.
Never mind in mid­dle Eastern coun­tries where Religious Theocracies are far more pro­hib­i­tive. Responses from those Governments are much swifter and more bru­tal in deal­ing with those accused of crimes.

Day and night the killings go on unabated....
Day and night the killings go on unabated.…

No sane per­son could rea­son­ably want that kind of jus­tice sys­tem for our west­ern style Parliamentary democ­ra­cy in Jamaica.
Yet the unabat­ed shed­ding of blood has prompt­ed many to call for a return of cap­i­tal punishment.
Those opposed to cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment argues it is not a deterrent.
I nev­er quite under­stood what met­ric is used in the mea­sure­ment of deterrence !
How does one mea­sure the amount of peo­ple who made deci­sions not to kill because they do not want to face lethal Injection, a fir­ing squad or hangman?
Those so deterred prob­a­bly will nev­er tell, so to sug­gest cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment is not a deter­rent is pure cockamanie.
Frankly how­ev­er we must fig­ure out a way to catch mur­der­ers and oth­er crim­i­nals. If we can’t catch them because we do not know how to, then any talk of cap­i­tal or any oth­er form of pun­ish­ment is pre­ma­ture gibberish

The great­est deter­rent is catch­ing crim­i­nals. When you catch them right away you remove them from cir­cu­la­tion. That dis­suades oth­ers from crim­i­nal involve­ment and indulgence.
It also changes the tra­jec­to­ry of the younger Generation who would poten­tial­ly see crime as a viable or attrac­tive life choice.
In our coun­try we nev­er got tough on crime we encour­aged, glo­ri­fied and roman­ti­cized it .
We allowed some “pre­ten­tious glo­ri­fied idiots” to tell us what kinds of laws we should have and how we should enforce them.
Our Government became the per­son­i­fi­ca­tion of cor­rup­tion so much so that law­mak­ers will not pass laws which will ensnare them. We allowed oth­er nations to tell us what we can and can­not do with our crim­i­nals because we are behold­en to them for loans and handouts.
So they make demands which grow crime keep­ing us even more depen­dent on them. Of course they do not employ any of their demands in their own coun­tries where they are hawk­ish on crime.
So Jamaica is forced to drop cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment even though the United States still kills peo­ple dai­ly using cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment and police take care of the rest with­out trial.
Britain and Canada has a cam­era and oth­er resources in every rab­bit hole so no crime goes unpunished .
Yet They are the first to tell Jamaica you can­not use cap­i­tal punishment.
Now my posi­tion is nei­ther for nor against cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. In fact I would rather not see cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in Jamaica based on the present state of the crim­i­nal jus­tice system.

After Independence Jamaica was pret­ty much left on its own, the whites pret­ty much left the coun­try some remained and have long died out how­ev­er the mulat­toes and the new­ly mint­ed black “bour­jois” imme­di­ate­ly picked up where the British landown­ers had left off. The mulat­toes real­ly did not mind the police deal­ing deci­sive­ly with crime it was the “neva si cum si” blacks who believed and rein­forced a dif­fer­ent type of colo­nial struc­ture , one not based on col­or per se but one based on edu­ca­tion as a class identifier.
Prime Minister Hugh Lawson Shearer who col­lo­qui­al­ly and fig­u­ra­tive­ly in an effort to show his unbri­dled oppo­si­tion to crime told the police to shoot first and ask ques­tions lat­er in ref­er­ence to vio­lent crime which had begun to rear it’s ugly head.
He was ridiculed and pil­lo­ried by the new­ly emerg­ing black upper class for seek­ing to empow­er the police.
So in 1972 Michael Manley emerged the win­ner of nation­al elections.
Known crim­i­nals were ele­vat­ed to mem­bers of his per­son­al secu­ri­ty detail, the bad man cul­ture had final­ly attained officialdom..
They accom­pa­nied him on for­eign trips and the duly con­sti­tut­ed pow­er and author­i­ty of the chief Constable was sup­plant­ed with two para-mili­tia type appa­ra­tus­es one called the Home Guards and the oth­er the Brigadistas.

Make no mis­take about it the home guards were large­ly local hacks. The Brigidistas were well trained, marx­ist indoc­tri­nat­ed in Cuba by the Castro Government and released back onto the Island under Michael Manley.
It was at that time that what Jamaicans knew as crime evolved into some­thing much more sophis­ti­cat­ed and sinister.
Police Stations were assault­ed , police offi­cers mur­dered and the killers were casu­al­ly shut­tled out of the coun­try to safe havens in Cuba and oth­er marx­ist enclaves and lat­er even unsus­pect­ing coun­tries like Canada and the US to name a few.
This writer spent count­less nights in the Wareika hills hunt­ing down these killers who were wreak­ing ter­ror on the once inno­cent Island

The all too familiar profile of a police officer laying down markers at another murder scene ......
The all too famil­iar pro­file of a police offi­cer lay­ing down mark­ers at anoth­er mur­der scene .…..

Once pris­tine com­mu­ni­ties were turned into zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sions for polit­i­cal gain. Jamaicans once friends and neigh­bors became blood ene­mies as they watched their com­mu­ni­ties upend­ed and reduced to lit­er­al battlefields.
For the entire peri­od of Michael Manley’s dis­as­trous tenure as head of our coun­try to present day the only time crime trend­ed south­ward was the peri­od between 1980 and 1988 when Edward Seaga’s served as Prime Minister.
This does not mean that Seaga had clean hands in the mil­i­ta­riza­tion of our coun­try. He played a role which saw com­mu­ni­ties loy­al to the Labor Party become mil­i­ta­rized as well in order to sur­vive the vio­lence from the oth­er side.
Tivoli Gardens, Rema and a few oth­ers took on new mean­ing. Of course the Labor Party’s Garrisons were few and far between when com­pared to the vol­ume the PNP had.
My analy­sis as it relates to crime trends does not include the peri­od between the time Bruce Golding took over as Prime Minister from Portia Simpson Miller and when Andrew Holness lost to her in 2011.

Whether it is a gun­men killing six in Hanover and torch­ing their home injur­ing anoth­er four or men alight­ing from a car and open­ing fire on a car on hope road in broad day­light with­out fear of appre­hen­sion the stark real­i­ty is that they were con­fi­dent there will be no consequence.
That con­fi­dence and cav­a­lier atti­tude is what gives them the con­fi­dence to mur­der police offi­cers. They have no fear of get­ting caught . And of course if they are ever caught they know darn well they will have more peo­ple and orga­ni­za­tions mil­i­tat­ing on their behalf than against them and that includes some who sit on the Courts.

We got to this place because we got a bunch of peo­ple in Jamaica who are the most pre­ten­tious ass­holes. Let’s call a spade a spade.
They sit in their lit­tle gat­ed com­mu­ni­ties behind grill gates, one room grilled from the oth­er and they blovi­ate and pon­tif­i­cate about everything.
Every Doctor, Lawyer, busi­ness­man, every damn thief has an opin­ion on law enforce­ment and how it must be shack­led . Every arrest is dis­sect­ed and every police encounter with the pub­lic under­goes a postmortem .
“The Police bway dem mus­si nu know dem place, how dem fi arrest di big man” nev­er mind that their crony is a damn criminal.
The Police were char­ac­ter­ized as “krow­bait” and “jankru” on morn­ing tele­vi­sion because one crack addict­ed tele­vi­sion news­cast­er was accost­ed buy­ing crack in Barbican square. “Yup” How dare the Police enforce the laws.

But none of this mat­ter much when con­sid­ered against the fact that those who hold high Political offices lead throngs of motor­cy­cle brig­ands to polling sta­tions and casu­al­ly steal bal­lot box­es in precincts not favor­able to them and yes they do worse things too.
So now our lit­tle Island of 2.7 mil­lion is teth­er­ing on the brink of eco­nom­ic col­lapse, most of the com­pa­nies which sur­vived Manley’s onslaught dur­ing the 70’s and were rein­forced and reen­er­gized under Seaga have sim­ply fold­ed under the triple weight of extor­tion from the Government, the Trade Unions and those out­side Gordon House.
Throw in bungling bureau­cra­cy and inane restric­tions, exor­bi­tant ener­gy prices, oth­er oper­a­tional costs, the killing of busi­ness own­ers and the Island is now a place no one looks to when they want to invest.
So the con­stant unsub­stan­ti­at­ed rhetoric you hear that the Island is now poised for invest­ment and devel­op­ment makes sense only to the dis­ori­ent­ed polit­i­cal hacks who par­rot those talk­ing points come near elec­tion time.

There is a rea­son one does not go to a fire­house when he needs repairs done to his car. We also do not go to the teacher when we need to have a her­nia removed, we go to a med­ical doctor.
We got a lit­tle too big for our britch­es, a lit­tle knowl­edge turned us into com­plete fools, we went down a path from which we don’t know how to get out. Interestingly rather than seek redemp­tion and hum­ble our­selves we dou­ble down on stupidity.
So when Golding cre­at­ed (inde­com) to deal with alleged police excess­es under much pres­sure from inter­est groups, he did­n’t both­er to use his office to make sure that there would be the right bal­ance in that bit of legislation.
A bal­ance which would allay the fears and con­cerns from cer­tain aggriev­ed sec­tions of the pop­u­la­tion, while ensur­ing that police offi­cers are pro­tect­ed against per­se­cu­tion and witch hunts when they take steps to pro­tect the country.
He allowed one argu­ment to hold sway and the nation end­ed up with a bad law.
Rather than repeal it they will stub­born­ly delude them­selves it is a good law which cor­rals police excesses.
They will not say we made a mis­take in draft­ing debat­ing and pass­ing this and it is cost­ing peo­ple their lives, they sim­ply have not yet reached that lev­el of sophis­ti­ca­tion. They will hold stead­fast to the talk­ing points that Police shoot­ings have gone down and that is what is important.

However when the ill-advised law and the Napoleonic com­mis­sion­er are held up to the light nei­ther pass­es muster.
(1) Contrary to the baloney fed the pub­lic that the (inde­com) Act is pos­i­tive­ly respon­si­ble for the reduc­tion in police shoot­ing crim­i­nals the truth lines up more with the fact that the police have sim­ply cho­sen not to engage.
In fact the police did not engage the gun­men on Hope Road just this week accord­ing to our sources even as gun­men shot up a car injur­ing the driver.
Why should they? Why should they engage and be treat­ed like crim­i­nals have their weapons tak­en, hav­ing to leave their offices to go give state­ments to a non-police agency intent on mak­ing crim­i­nals of them?
Why should they risk pros­e­cu­tion sim­ply for doing their jobs because a self aggran­diz­ing crea­ture intent on grab­bing pow­er wants to climb on their backs or slide in their blood to big­ger and bet­ter things for him­self? There is no rea­son to engage so they sim­ply don’t.
Therein lies the rea­son police shoot­ings are down.
Criminals haven’t stopped killing peo­ple the police have sim­ply stopped shoot­ing back. The soon­er the peo­ple real­izes this and demand the dis­band­ment of (inde­com) the bet­ter off they will be.

(2) More police offi­cers have been shot and wound­ed and indeed killed since the (inde­com act) came into exis­tence than at any oth­er time. Criminals are embold­ened and they are act­ing with raw impunity.
The killings are too many to seri­ous­ly contemplate.
So this year more Jamaicans will be killed than last year and it will con­tin­ue until the dum­b­ass politi­cians say to the oth­er shit­heads “shut up”, then repeal (the inde­com act) seri­ous­ly go back to the draw­ing board and come up with a piece of leg­is­la­tion which makes sense.
It is nev­er too late to say we were total Jackasses.….…..

At This Pace Jamaicans Will Be Running Away To Haiti Soon

Eighteen (18) infants have died between June and September this year from health­care-asso­ci­at­ed infec­tions at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) in Kingston and Cornwall Regional Hospital (CRH) in Montego Bay accord­ing to the Jamaican media.

Fenton Ferguson
Fenton Ferguson

No one knows more about the unbear­able grief which comes from los­ing one’s child than this writer . The immea­sur­able grief is so much that many com­mit sui­cide, oth­ers are ruined emo­tion­al­ly for life and oth­ers sim­ply quit after their child has died.
It is against that back­drop that this medi­um wish­es to asso­ciate with the pain and suf­fer­ing of those par­ents as they grieve this loss and suf­fer a pain that cuts to the core.

In most soci­eties the per­son who heads the health sec­tor would resign as a mark of respect for those par­ents and for not fig­ur­ing out that some­thing was amiss.
There has been a sig­nif­i­cant amount of calls for the Minister of health Fenton Ferguson to step aside in light of these deaths which clear­ly could have been avoided.
He has stead­fast­ly refused to step aside claim­ing he could not have fixed a prob­lem of which he was unaware.
This is not the first time that Ferguson a Dentist by trade has come under scruti­ny and for his lack of aware­ness of what ails the nation’s health care deliv­ery system.
Many of his crit­ics did so against the chick v out­break which plagued the Island just months ago. Some argue that the fact that he is a den­tist and not a med­ical doc­tor has some­thing to do with what they char­ac­ter­ize as his incompetence.
I dis­agree that one has to be a med­ical doc­tor in order to be a good min­is­ter of health which is an admin­is­tra­tive job.
Ferguson has at his dis­pos­al a vast cadre of com­pe­tent med­ical doc­tors with whom he can consult.

 Dr. Alfred Dawes.
Dr. Alfred Dawes.

In fact we under­stand that a recent audit was done of the health ser­vices and Ferguson hid the results from the country.
Additionally it has been report­ed that a promi­nent young Doctor Alfred Dawes who head­ed the Jamaica Medical Doctors Association (JMDA) has been black­list­ed by the Portia Simpson Miller Government because he spoke out about the con­di­tions in the health sec­tor on the Island.
The Medical Doctors Association report­ed their experiences .

We have flies in the oper­at­ing the­atre. We have to reuse sin­gle-use instru­ments that aren’t dis­posed of but [are] washed and placed in antibac­te­r­i­al solu­tion and used on anoth­er patient,”. Pads and pen­cils used with elec­tro­sur­gi­cal machines, which sends elec­tri­cal cur­rent to blood ves­sels to stop bleed­ing, are also reused. “The pen­cils are soaked in dis­in­fec­tant and reused till they stop work­ing,” the doc­tor said. However, he point­ed out that the reused pen­cils run the risk of burn­ing the patient and caus­ing elec­tri­cal fires. Another doc­tor said they often prac­tise what they term ‘social­ist med­i­cine’ as left­overs from an indi­vid­u­al’s surgery are used on some­one else. “We have a mesh that is used to fix her­nias. We ask patients to buy them as the hos­pi­tal always runs out. When we don’t use all of the ster­ile mesh in the surgery for the patient who bought it, we soak it in dis­in­fec­tant and use the left­over on a patient who could­n’t afford to buy their own,” According to the Jamaicaobserver​.com.

The Prime Minister thus far has been nowhere in sight, in fact the only time she is heard from these days is when she shows up to cozy up to Foreign lead­ers, latch on to the suc­cess­es of sports stars, or curse out the Opposition. In her absence the People’s National Party’s Youth Organization the “Comrade farm” or “D league” of the Governing admin­is­tra­tion has stepped to the fore attempt­ing to address the issue of the deaths of the infants.

PNPYO ACCUSES JLP OF POLITICISING HEALTH CARE

The Opposition “must imme­di­ate­ly remove their favourite polit­i­cal­ly coloured lens­es and call a spade a spade”. Kledsiella is well known as one of the most com­mon hos­pi­tal bugs, caus­ing pos­si­ble fatal ill­ness­es world­wide. “Kledsiella’s spread among neonates does not aver­age above six per cent in Jamaica, includ­ing the deaths this year, and while sta­tis­tics will not bring back the lives of some of our youngest Jamaicans, we still fare bet­ter than some more eco­nom­i­cal­ly suc­cess­ful coun­tries, such as Brazil with a 50 per cent affect­ed rate of its neonates”

With cultlike fervor they celebrate as if they know no better...
With cult­like fer­vor they cel­e­brate as if they know no better…

In oth­er words as the Party leader usu­al­ly say to those who oppose her igno­rant non­sense, “Shut up”.
It could have been much worse.
If ever there was any doubt where Jamaica is head­ing under the stew­ard­ship of the present Administration and its sub­sidiaries there need be no fur­ther questions.
The met­ric used in Jamaica is the low­est com­mon denom­i­na­tor, as such our coun­try does not mea­sure itself against the suc­cess of oth­ers we rate our­selves against the fail­ure lev­els of others.
Notwithstanding this glar­ing lack of vision, wis­dom and car­ing, hun­dreds of Thousands of Jamaicans will dress up in orange col­ored cos­tumes like “junkanoo” per­form­ers and they will jubi­lant­ly march into polling sta­tions come next nation­al elec­tions. Some may go even fur­ther, they will wound and even kill those who have oppos­ing polit­i­cal views.
In fair­ness the oth­er side will do the very same.
In the end the slow yet steady slide below the pover­ty line will con­tin­ue. Soon Jamaicans will be run­ning away to Haiti. They sim­ply do not know they deserve better.

It’s So Much Easier To Criticize When You Don’t Have To Face The Bullets.…

12002824_10204945833425221_401427015886358774_n

Like so many oth­ers David Simmons arrived in Kingston with pre­con­ceived notions about the things he heard about Policing in Jamaica. Simmons from Barbadoes was hired by the Simpson Miller gov­ern­ment to chair the Commission look­ing into the actions of the secu­ri­ty forces when they went to arrest Tivoli Overlord Christopher (Dudus)Coke on an extra­di­tion war­rant in 2010.

SEE ALSO INQUIRY SHOULD BE ABOUT PNP’S REFUSAL TO SUPPORT SECURITY FORCES

It’s impor­tant to have account­abil­i­ty in Government . Government cor­rup­tion across the Globe has lit­er­al­ly oblit­er­at­ed peo­ple’s trust and con­fi­dence in the abil­i­ty of their Governments to serve their best interest.
Jamaica a small devel­op­ing Nation has done more than it’s fair share in destroy­ing the faith of it’s cit­i­zen­ry that their best inter­est are being addressed in mean­ing­ful ways.

So no well mean­ing Jamaican can seri­ous­ly say that in the inter­est of trans­paren­cy a com­pe­tent pan­el should not be empan­elled to exam­ine events which occurred which result­ed in the deaths of over sev­en­ty Jamaicans.
Jonah believed the peo­ple of Nineveh was unde­serv­ing of God’s love and car­ing because of their wicked ways , so he dis­obeyed God’s com­mand to go and issue them a warn­ing to turn from their wicked ways.
Many of us are like mind­ed, we saw the peo­ple express­ing their undy­ing love and devo­tion to Dudus Coke and pledg­ing to lay down their lives for him.

Mostly female residents of Tivoli Gardens march along Spanish Town Road in support of Mr. Coke.
Mostly female res­i­dents of Tivoli Gardens march along Spanish Town Road in sup­port of Coke.

It is not out of the realm of ratio­nal­i­ty to say well they had their wish.
nev­er­the­less as a peo­ple we can­not allow vengeance or pet­ty polit­i­cal dif­fer­ences to destroy our coun­try for our chil­dren and our chil­dren’s children.

Critics with an under­stand­ing of Jamaica’s pol­i­tics say the Enquiry is being under­tak­en with a view to gain polit­i­cal points. This may be true but it’s still nec­es­sary to have these enquiries in a demo­c­ra­t­ic society.
I too share that view I believe the over M$140 spent so far could have been put to bet­ter use.
In the end noth­ing new will emerge which most Jamaicans don’t already know .

SEE MORE HEREVaz blasts Tivoli com­mis­sion chair­man over damn­ing state­ment; demands apology

David Simmons
David Simmons

David Simmons arrived in the Island and right off the bat he formed opin­ions and expressed his bias­es against the Police and Military. In the con­text of his func­tion I believed he over­stepped his bound on sev­er­al occa­sions in a forum which requires tact, dis­cre­tion, cir­cum­spec­tion and most impor­tant­ly impartiality.
Simmons failed dis­mal­ly in his utter­ances and has been chas­tised by sev­er­al for shoot­ing off at the mouth with­out ade­quate­ly engag­ing his brain.

After spend­ing just a lit­tle time in Jamaica and see­ing the crime sta­tis­tics dai­ly David Simmons have had a “come to jesus moment” , an awak­en­ing if you will.
Responding to media reports that the num­ber of mur­ders report­ed this year has sur­passed the num­ber report­ed for the cor­re­spond­ing peri­od last year.
Simmons said , “This is a nev­er end­ing spi­ral, it has to stop. Jamaica has to pull back from this,” 
Oh, what’s this I hear? It’s not as peachy and rosy as you thought?

It’s always easy to com­ment and pass asper­sions when you don’t have to face the bullets.
Imagine if you were a mem­ber of the secu­ri­ty forces who faced those mili­ti­a­men who risked life and limb for that ungrate­ful unde­serv­ing nation?
I guess your com­ments would be lot more mea­sured , cir­cum­spect and respect­ful , but then again when you don’t have to face the bul­lets because oth­ers have vol­un­teered to do it on your behalf it’s easy to criticize.

PNPYO Accuses JLP Of Politicising Health Care

PNPYO-logo_w319KINGSTON, Jamaica — The People’s National Party Youth Organisation (PNPYO) has lashed out at the Opposition, telling them not to politi­cise health care.

The Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) and its affil­i­ates have called for the sack­ing of Health Minister Dr Fenton Ferguson over the out­break of health care-asso­ci­at­ed infec­tions at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) and Cornwall Regional Hospital which have claimed the lives of 18 babies since June.

However, the PNPYO said in a release last evening that the Opposition “must imme­di­ate­ly remove their favourite polit­i­cal­ly coloured lens­es and call a spade a spade”.

The organ­i­sa­tion explained that kled­siel­la is well known as one of the most com­mon hos­pi­tal bugs, caus­ing pos­si­ble fatal ill­ness­es worldwide.

Kledsiella’s spread among neonates does not aver­age above six per cent in Jamaica, includ­ing the deaths this year, and while sta­tis­tics will not bring back the lives of some of our youngest Jamaicans, we still fare bet­ter than some more eco­nom­i­cal­ly suc­cess­ful coun­tries, such as Brazil with a 50 per cent affect­ed rate of its neonates” the PNPYO argued.

The Opposition, in its call for Dr Ferguson’s sack­ing, also said it doubts the minister’s claim that he act­ed as soon as he was informed of the situation.
Read more here : PNPYO accus­es JLP of politi­cis­ing health care

Kerry Urges End Of Inflammatory Rhetoric In Talks With Israel’s Netanyahu

Kerry urges end of inflammatory rhetoric in talks with Israel's Netanyahu
Kerry urges end of inflam­ma­to­ry rhetoric in talks with Israel’s Netanyahu

Remarks from US Secretary of State come after Israeli PM suggested mufti of Jerusalem persuaded Hitler to kill Jews

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry called Thursday for an end to inflam­ma­to­ry Israeli-Palestinian rhetoric dur­ing a meet­ing with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which took place as the death toll from a recent surge of vio­lence again climbed. Speaking to reporters ahead of talks with the Israeli PM, Kerry made no ref­er­ence to Netanyahu’s sug­ges­tion this week that Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem dur­ing the 1940s, per­suad­ed Adolf Hitler to exter­mi­nate the Jews. Those com­ments, which come after three weeks of Israeli-Palestinian vio­lence, have attract­ed wide crit­i­cism from, among oth­ers, Israeli oppo­si­tion politi­cians and Holocaust experts, who accused the prime min­is­ter of dis­tort­ing the his­tor­i­cal record. Meanwhile, the cycle of vio­lence con­tin­ues in Israel and the occu­pied Palestinian ter­ri­to­ries. On Thursday, a Palestinian was shot dead dur­ing an alleged stab­bing attack Israeli at a bus stop west of Jerusalem.

Israeli police said on Thursday that the two sus­pects attempt­ed to get on a chil­dren’s school bus in Beit Shemesh, a major­i­ty ultra-ortho­dox area. After they were asked why they were doing so, they attempt­ed to stab an Israeli at the bus stop at which point they were shot by the police, wit­ness­es said. The Israeli, a 25-year-old man, was mod­er­ate­ly injured in the attack, police said. The injured men were tak­en to hos­pi­tal, with the sec­ond sus­pect said to be in a crit­i­cal con­di­tion. Since Oct. 1, a total of 52 Palestinians — includ­ing sus­pect­ed attack­ers, unarmed demon­stra­tors and bystanders — have been killed by Israeli sol­diers or set­tlers, while eight Israelis have been killed in Palestinian attacks. Israeli forces have been accused of using exces­sive force against pro­test­ers and sus­pect­ed attack­ers. Rights groups have said “dis­pro­por­tion­ate vio­lence” has been used against Palestinian chil­dren, with at least 10 killed in the violence.

Among the caus­es of the tur­moil are Palestinians’ anger at what they see as Jewish encroach­ment on the al-Aqsa mosque com­pound in Jerusalem’s Old City, Islam’s holi­est site out­side Saudi Arabia, which is also revered by Jews as the loca­tion of two ancient tem­ples. “It is absolute­ly crit­i­cal to end all incite­ment, to end all vio­lence and to find a road for­ward to build the pos­si­bil­i­ty, which is not there today, for a larg­er process,” Kerry told reporters as he and Netanyahu posed for pic­tures. Kerry said he hoped that the two men could agree on steps “that take us beyond the con­dem­na­tions and beyond the rhetoric.” Diplomats hold out lit­tle hope for any resump­tion of broad­er Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, which col­lapsed in 2014. Netanyahu blamed the Palestinians for the recent surge in killings, sin­gling out Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. “There is no ques­tion that wave of attacks is dri­ven direct­ly by incite­ment. Incitement from Hamas, incite­ment from the Islamist move­ment in Israel, and incite­ment, I am sor­ry to say, from President Abbas,” he said.

A senior U.S. State Department offi­cial told reporters that Kerry hopes to per­suade both sides to “tamp down” their rhetoric dur­ing a four-day trip to Europe and the Middle East in which he also plans to meet Abbas and Jordan’s King Abdullah. His tone mir­rored that of German Chancellor Angela Merkel at a joint news con­fer­ence with Netanyahu on Wednesday evening. “We have to do every­thing to calm down the sit­u­a­tion and in this spir­it I think all sides need to make a con­tri­bu­tion,” she said. It is not clear why Netanyahu launched into the issue of the then-Mufti of Jerusalem, Husseini. His remarks come with Israeli-Palestinian ten­sions at a new peak, notably over the Jerusalem holy site over­seen by the cur­rent mufti. Israel says it respects the sta­tus quo, which allows tourists and non-Muslim vis­i­tors to enter the Al Aqsa com­pound at some hours but for­bids non-Muslim prayer.

Palestinians say that ultra-Orthodox and nation­al-reli­gious Jews are exploit­ing the rules to enter the area, called the Noble Sanctuary by Muslims and the Temple Mount by Jews, in grow­ing num­bers and sur­rep­ti­tious­ly pray there, in breach of the sta­tus quo. Israel says it expels any­one who prays, but the prac­tice con­tin­ues and some Israel gov­ern­ment min­is­ters have been open about encour­ag­ing Jewish access to the area, say­ing all monothe­is­tic reli­gions should have the right to pray. U.S. offi­cials say they hope a change in the rhetoric over the holy site could help ease ten­sions more generally.
Read more here:Kerry urges end of inflam­ma­to­ry rhetoric in talks with Israel’s Netanyahu

Many Jamaican Lawyers Are Not Above Board, They Should Not Expect To Get Special Treatment When They Break The Laws…

12002824_10204945833425221_401427015886358774_n

This is the third Article in a row in which I am respond­ing to events in Jamaica which involves mem­bers of the Bar Association.

During the years I served in the (JCF) Jamaica Constabulary Force I became friends with sev­er­al decent and hard­work­ing mem­bers of the Legal Fraternity.
In fact a cou­ple of my good friends kind­ly assured me they would defend me “pro-bono” if ever I need­ed to be defend­ed legal­ly as a result of the pur­suits out my duties as a police officer.
Those assur­ances will for­ev­er remain in my heart. The kind­ness and thought­ful­ness of those assur­ances still warms my heart even though I left law enforce­ment over two decades ago.

YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN :https://​mike​beck​les​.com/​t​h​e​s​e​-​a​s​s​w​i​p​e​s​-​b​e​l​i​e​v​e​-​t​h​e​-​l​a​w​s​-​o​f​-​t​h​e​-​c​o​u​n​t​r​y​-​s​h​o​u​l​d​-​n​o​t​-​a​p​p​l​y​-​t​o​-​t​h​e​m​-​t​h​i​s​-​i​s​-​w​h​y​-​t​h​e​-​l​i​t​t​l​e​-​m​a​n​-​c​o​m​m​i​t​s​-​c​r​i​me/

Such was the extent of the friend­ships which devel­oped as a result of the mutu­al respect and admi­ra­tion we had for each oth­er from work­ing togeth­er though work­ing at dif­fer­ent ends of the spectrum.
I also built rela­tion­ships with some mem­bers of the bench who are still serv­ing today and I am indeed proud of those asso­ci­a­tions as I fun­da­men­tal­ly believe those pro­fes­sion­als were of the high­est cal­iber and still remain so.
From my per­spec­tives oth­ers were sim­ple bul­lies who hid behind the clown cos­tumes and hurled abuse at those who could not defend themselves.
Those abus­es con­tin­ue to this day and in many cas­es have increased exponentially.

Over the years we have seen sit­u­a­tions in which mem­bers of the Legal fra­ter­ni­ty have brought the once proud and pris­tine fra­ter­ni­ty into seri­ous ques­tion. Some mem­bers can­not seem to avoid com­mit­ting lar­ce­ny as ser­vants, fraud­u­lent con­ver­sions, or mis­ap­pro­pri­at­ing their clien­t’s monies.
Every year as I have point­ed out in recent arti­cles sev­er­al are struck from the list of those allowed to prac­tice law on the Island.
The General legal Council pro­vides a detailed list which pro­vide the names of those so dis­barred . One must bear in mind that list includes only those bad lawyers who have been caught and found to have com­mit­ted seri­ous and egre­gious breach­es of their sacred trust.
Disbarred Attorneys

The same is true of the Police ser­vice in which I spent 10 of my for­ma­tive adult years.
As we seek to look at the behav­ior of some mem­bers of the Bar it is impor­tant to observe that Lawyers become Judges. No one goes to School to become a Judge.
Judges are appoint­ed from the pool of lawyers which prac­tices law both on the side of the Prosecution and the Defense.
Most Western Industrialized nations tend to pick their Judges from the Prosecution side, the same can­not be said for Jamaica.
This may or may not have some­thing to do with the per­cep­tion that it is almost impos­si­ble to gain con­vic­tions in Jamaica’s crim­i­nal courts, par­tic­u­lar­ly when the accused is connected.

SEE ALSOhttps://​mike​beck​les​.com/​t​h​e​-​p​r​o​b​l​e​m​-​w​i​t​h​-​j​a​m​a​i​c​a​s​-​g​r​u​n​g​-​g​a​ds/

I made the afore­men­tioned obser­va­tions against state­ments made by President of the bar Association of Jamaica Donovan Walker and an alleged Investigation which has been com­menced by Zaila McCalla the Island’s Chief Justice into an inci­dent in which an Attorney was arrest­ed at the Supreme Court in Kingston.
In his state­ment Walker said he spoke to the Commissioner of Police and the Minister of Justice about the arrest which he saw as problematic .
Stating quote : “Arresting an offi­cer of the court with­in the precincts of the Supreme Court build­ing sends a bad sig­nal ‚the action may be seen as an act of con­tempt, the dig­ni­ty of the courts must be observed by all offi­cers of the court, includ­ing the police”.

This writer main­tains that the laws of the Country must be upheld and respect­ed indeed by every­one in the coun­try. In a Democracy no per­son is greater than the oth­er. As such the laws must be applied fair­ly and equi­tably across the board.
I fun­da­men­tal­ly believe there is no bet­ter place to arrest a per­son than in the very halls of jus­tice , if the Supreme Court does con­sid­er itself a hall of jus­tice as it once was.
The President of the Bar Association has from the report­ing been able to secure the com­mence­ment of an inves­ti­ga­tion into what is clear­ly a jus­ti­fi­able and prop­er arrest.
He argues that the arrest in the con­fines of the court could be viewed as con­temp­tu­ous with­out pro­vid­ing one iota of evi­dence in sup­port of that scur­rilous assertion.
The enforce­ment of Jamaican laws can­not be con­fined to the poor­est of the poor and the least con­nect­ed only, and it cer­tain­ly can­not be sub­ject to the whims of a gen­tri­fied Bureaucrat.

Supreme Court building
Supreme Court building

The great­est imped­i­ment to our sys­tem of Justice is not where alleged crim­i­nals are arrest­ed it rests with the appli­ca­tion of the law. Most impor­tant­ly it rests with the per­cep­tion the pub­lic has of the peo­ple who are sworn to uphold those laws.
Judges, Attorneys and Police offi­cers have a duty to com­port them­selves in a dig­ni­fied manner.
Allegations of Police mis­con­duct is well doc­u­ment­ed based on their numbers.
Instances of mis­con­duct by Lawyers are not as well know or ampli­fied, prob­a­bly because their num­bers are not as voluminous.
Judges engage in unlaw­ful con­duct how­ev­er their num­bers are sig­nif­i­cant­ly less than the num­ber of prac­tis­ing lawyers.
Juxtapose that with the fact that the high­er a per­son is posi­tioned in Jamaica the less like­ly he will ever be accused much less charged or con­vict­ed of a crime.

I will now intro­duce to you a let­ter which appeared in the Jamaica Daily Gleaner of Oct.22nd 2015 ..
This let­ter was writ­ten by one of the Country’s pre-emi­nent legal minds whom from his let­ter believes fun­da­men­tal­ly in the quote: world class qual­i­ty of the nation’s legal minds.

Lloyd Barnett, O.J., B.A., LL.B.(Hons.), LL.M., Ph.D.(London), of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister-at-Law, is a practising attorney in Jamaica
Lloyd Barnett, O.J., B.A., LL.B.(Hons.), LL.M., Ph.D.(London), of Lincoln’s Inn, Barrister-at-Law, is a prac­tis­ing attor­ney in Jamaica

In a let­ter to the Editor pub­lished on October 19, Glen George Wilson gives as a rea­son for keep­ing the Privy Council as our final Court of Appeal that the lawyers of the Caribbean will con­tin­ue to ben­e­fit from par­tic­i­pat­ing in delib­er­a­tions with oth­er world-class legal minds. The objec­tive of hav­ing Caribbean lawyers exposed to world-class legal minds will be more read­i­ly achieved by the accep­tance of the CCJ’s appel­late juris­dic­tion because at present only a very lim­it­ed num­ber of lawyers have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to appear in the Privy Council so as to have delib­er­a­tions with oth­er ‘world-class legal minds’. Since there are world-class legal minds with­in the Caribbean, the CCJ as an itin­er­ant and more acces­si­ble court would offer more and bet­ter oppor­tu­ni­ties for that participation.

Power To Legislate

The sec­ond rea­son Wilson gives is that the CCJ will use its pow­er to leg­is­late from the bench and so the vot­ers could be ignored. He has giv­en no basis for this sur­mise and there is no evi­dence in the CCJ’s 10 years of adju­di­ca­tion to sup­port it. But why does Williams feel that the CCJ would be more prone to leg­is­late from the bench than the Privy Council? Certainly, the CCJ will be in a bet­ter posi­tion to sense the will of ‘the vot­ers’ than the Privy Council, as Lord Hoffman, an emi­nent Law Lord and Privy Councillor advised us.

Lloyd G. Barnett .
Attorney-at-law

This let­ter is a clas­sic demon­stra­tion of what we have sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly main­tained in this medi­um , that at the high­est lev­el in Jamaica it is all about self and not the long-term wel­fare and well­be­ing of the country.
Of course Jamaica has no short­age of world ‑class legal minds that is nev­er in question.
Jamaicans are over­achiev­ers, what­ev­er we set our minds to we excel at it even when we seek to self-destruct.
That is not the issue, the issue is that bright legal minds like the Goodly Dr Lloyd Barnett is will­ing to cajole and coax our coun­try into get­ting rid of the Privy Council and replac­ing it with the CCJ.

It is clear from this let­ter that what’s upper­most and of para­mount impor­tance to the Author Dr Barnett as indeed many oth­ers is not the future of our nation and the rule of law but the pro­mo­tion and aggran­dize­ment of the legal fraternity.
No Jamaican lawyer can rea­son­ably pick up the phone and call the Privy Council in England with a view to influ­enc­ing a rul­ing one way or the other.
Can we say the same about the crim­i­nal Justice sys­tem in Jamaica?
if we dis­card the Privy Council will Jamaicans be able to say to them­selves they are com­fort­able that the process is untar­nished and with­out collusion?
Are Jamaicans con­fi­dent they are get­ting jus­tice at home when Prosecutors, Defense Lawyers and tri­al Judges were trained at the same law school, attend the same func­tions and are mem­bers of the same social clubs?
If Jamaicans believe they are get­ting untar­nished jus­tice I have a bridge I would like for them to con­sid­er purchasing.
These are just a few of the pow­er­ful voic­es lob­by­ing for the CCJ which ulti­mate­ly will be a grand old social club for the good old boys.
Jamaicans need to see this for what it is and eschew it.