If Warranted Officers Should Not Hesitate To Use Lethal Force To Protect Themselves When They Are Being Hampered During Arrests

The Police high com­mand which includes the Inspectorate Branch seems ded­i­cat­ed to one pur­pose only, that is to assist the work of the crim­i­nal sup­port­ing law INDECOM to fur­ther cre­ate hes­i­tan­cy with­in the rank and file of the police depart­ment dri­ving crime even high­er in the process.

I have writ­ten exten­sive­ly about the lack of clar­i­ty com­ing from the police high com­mand as it relates to cit­i­zens respon­si­bil­i­ty to stay away from inter­fer­ing in arrests.
Despite the many arti­cles I have writ­ten bemoan­ing the of lack lead­er­ship on this, the hier­ar­chy of the incom­pe­tent polit­i­cal­ly slav­ish police force has not lift­ed a fin­ger to give guid­ance to young offi­cers left out to dry. It has done noth­ing to edu­cate the pub­lic that they place them­selves at risk when they inter­fere with arrests.
Most impor­tant­ly it has done noth­ing to lob­by for tougher penal­ties for those who inter­fere with arrests.

A recent pic­ture of a young woman with a lethal weapon.

For all intents and pur­pos­es, the police high com­mand is demon­stra­bly a use­less lap dog to the gov­ern­ment and spe­cial inter­ests to the dis­tinct per­il of the young offi­cers who are giv­en bas­kets to car­ry water.
I am at the point now where I would not be mad to see the entire bas­ket of deplorable incom­pe­tents from the gazetted Ranks fired, with the excep­tion of a few.

An offi­cer mak­ing an arrest have every right to ensure that his per­son is secure. There are count­less videos which show peo­ple active­ly inter­fer­ing in arrests, in many cas­es caus­ing the escape of the pri­ma­ry offender.
These videos depict­ing these events does not begin to scratch the sur­face of this real and present dan­ger offi­cers face when they make arrests.

The Inspectorate and the oth­ers with­in the high com­mand are gen­er­al­ly polit­i­cal hacks, oth­ers who could­n’t find employ­ment else­where so they park their behinds in the force because they attained a degree.
Many nev­er made an arrest, nev­er wrote up a charg­ing doc­u­ment, nev­er pre­sent­ed a sworn affi­davit to a pros­e­cu­tor to remove a sin­gle crim­i­nal from society.
Yet these frauds sit in judg­ment of the actions real cops take as they deal with the ani­mals who refuse to sub­mit to arrests.

This is what offi­cers face when they go out to make arrests they do need support.

The Inspectorate and the remain­der of the high com­mand only claim to fame is to issue press releas­es about dis­ci­plin­ing hard work­ing cops.
I call on Commissioner George Quallo to forth­with cause all gazetted offi­cers who sit behind desks to go out on foot patrol in the urban centers.
There is no such thing as SSP or ACP, in real­i­ty, all are constables.
It is uncon­scionable for these dead weights to con­tin­ue to sit and pon­tif­i­cate to the press with­out hav­ing to face the vile crea­tures who break the laws and the illit­er­ate punks who mil­i­tate on their behalf.

As I have said many times offi­cers have a right to expect a wide arc around them for their safe­ty when­ev­er they are mak­ing an arrest, their very lives depend on it.
They should nev­er sur­ren­der that safe­ty to the throngs of ani­mals who get involved when they make arrests, they should nev­er sur­ren­der it for INDECOM, not for the Inspectorate Branch and damn sure not for any politician.
Officers should ensure that if they feel threat­ened that they use appro­pri­ate force to secure their safe­ty, that includes lethal force if it is warranted.
When I was a serv­ing offi­cer if you inter­fered with me when I was mak­ing an arrest you would cer­tain­ly regret ever doing so.
But then again we had an air of author­i­ty which made this kind of non­sense lit­er­al­ly impossible.
You put your hands on me and shit just got real­ly seri­ous. Our coun­try needs to stop with this col­lud­ing with crim­i­nal and law­less behav­ior and throw down the gauntlet.
This shit must stop now.

The coun­try is gone to the dogs or more appro­pri­ate­ly the dogs are run­ning the streets. The Police force is incred­i­bly inept and corrupt.
The young offi­cers are out on the streets on their own. The lead­er­ship of the force is inca­pable of lead­ing the force and are inca­pable of pro­vid­ing the secu­ri­ty the nation needs.
It is high time I believe to start over. The force needs an infu­sion of police offi­cers, not grand­standers, posers and Media whores.
Over to you Commissioner Quallo and Andrew Holness.

Robert Mugabe In Detention After Military Takes Control Of Zimbabwe

YouTube player

Please JCF, Show A Little Bit Of Common Sense And Outside The Box Thinking…

If a so-called Don gets killed one way or the oth­er, it is prob­a­bly a safe bet that there are going to be oth­er crim­i­nal thugs at his interment.
If that is true, depend­ing on the noto­ri­ety of the scum which was erad­i­cat­ed, it is rea­son­able to pre­sume that they will have guns with them.

There is a gen­er­al unwrit­ten rule which cops across the globe have stuck to as it relates to places of wor­ship and moments in which fam­i­lies are in grief, they are treat­ed with a cer­tain degree of deference.
That def­er­ence is gen­er­al­ly giv­en to some degree, as long as those attend­ing funer­als for the deceased crim­i­nals do not them­selves break the laws.

In a coun­try like Jamaica where crim­i­nals are pre­dis­posed to doing exact­ly what they please it ought to be in the inter­est of law enforce­ment to be much more proac­tive in its approach.
You know the thugs are going to be at the funer­als and you know they are like­ly going to bring their weapons and in far too many cas­es are going to use them to offer salutes to the imbe­cile who met his just due.
Why would the police not have resources in place to deal appro­pri­ate­ly with this practice?

The police must not only show strength in deal­ing with the scourge of law­less­ness and brazen deprav­i­ty we see in the killings, it must demon­strate cun­ning and dex­ter­i­ty in coun­ter­ing those who would unleash their brutish brand of bar­barism on the nation.
Simply put, the Police must keep crim­i­nals off bal­ance in order to have a chance at suc­cess. As it stands crim­i­nals have the Police off bal­ance and that does not bode well for law-abid­ing Jamaicans.

Alleged gang­ster going home in style…

The Police must have under­cov­er cops at funer­als. Apart from guns and ammu­ni­tion which are like­ly to be at these events they are a poten­tial trea­sure trove of intel­li­gence for law enforcement.
These are the events which bring out crim­i­nals aligned to crim­i­nals, these are the times the police should bring out the cam­eras to make the connections.

This intel­li­gence is crit­i­cal in forg­ing link­ages and are invalu­able to future investigations.
Is it too much to expect the Police to show a lit­tle bit of crit­i­cal thinking[not a great deal which may actu­al­ly make the force seem like a real police depart­ment] sic, just enough to con­vince the peo­ple to keep this department?

I mean come on Commissioner Quallo, you have a large bunch of paper push­ers who should­n’t even be on your staff, why are they not being required to pro­duce results?
Policing to a large extent is com­mon sense, it is a chess game which requires offi­cers to pre­empt the moves of those who would break the laws and be one step ahead of them.
Presently the JCF is not play­ing chess, it is still learn­ing to play checkers.

Having served in the depart­ment for a decade I have seen the lethar­gy and lack of imag­i­na­tion, I have seen the lack of for­ti­tude and the lack of fol­low up.
Despite the much-hyped improve­ments to the force since I served in the ear­ly 90’s, there has not been much evi­dence to sup­port the hype.
The depart­ment is work­ing with expo­nen­tial­ly more than we ever hoped to have back in my days, and under­stand­ably the chal­lenges the force faces today are greater.

With that said, I under­stood when I served that we could accom­plish a great deal more and we could have been far more effec­tive if we had effec­tive lead­er­ship in my time.
The same is true today, the police depart­ment has not demon­stra­bly shown that it can be trust­ed to pro­duce results over and above that which it already does.

Jamaican Parliament A 6th Grade Civics Class On ID Law…

If one can over­look the juve­nile nature of the the­atrics which pass­es for a leg­isla­tive process in the Jamaican Parliament then we may take a moment to cel­e­brate the pas­sage of a National Identification Bill in the Senate.
If you are won­der­ing what I’m jab­ber­ing about, you decide whether this is dia­logue fit­ting of a delib­er­a­tive body in this day and age.
During delib­er­a­tions on sec­tions three and four, tem­pers flared. Opposition sen­a­tor K.D. Knight ref­er­enced the activ­i­ties as a “kan­ga­roo Senate” after Senator Lambert Brown was denied an oppor­tu­ni­ty to speak to the motion seek­ing to allow the sit­ting to go beyond the 4:20 time.

If you ever won­der why I’m so dis­mis­sive and dis­re­spect­ful of the process and the prac­ti­tion­ers, it is because of these old dinosaurs which con­tin­ue to con­t­a­m­i­nate the process which irks me.
In response Senate President Tom Tavares Finson flew into the usu­al rage, stat­ing that he took offense to Knight’s call­ing the sit­ting a kan­ga­roo Senate. “I know when I leave my yard I don’t come here to pre­side over any kan­ga­roo Senate,” Tavares-Finson said. Knight would lat­er apol­o­gize, say­ing he was forced to make such a com­par­i­son. Finson would also find him­self apol­o­giz­ing, as he said it was point­ed out to him that he “hissed his teeth or kissed his teeth” dur­ing the sitting.

I am not one steeped in the inner work­ings of the leg­isla­tive pro­to­cols of the Jamaican Parliament but suf­fic­ing to say that the lan­guage seems more suit­ed to anoth­er venue and the process­es more appro­pri­ate for a 6th-grade civics class we’ll take this vic­to­ry for the rule of law nontheless.

For years I have per­son­al­ly called for a nation­al iden­ti­fi­ca­tion sys­tem as part of the process of law enforce­ment account­abil­i­ty and bet­ter rep­re­sen­ta­tion of all Jamaicans.
Though the process is not ful­ly com­plete all Jamaicans once edu­cat­ed on the ben­e­fits of the law should be encour­aged by this law.

There are not many pieces of leg­is­la­tion which has come out of the Parliament which has been good for the Jamaican people.
The (INDECOM Act) as well as a Contractor’ Generals Act (with­out pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al pow­ers) are just a cou­ple which read­i­ly comes to mind.
I have not read the bill and as such, I am still skep­ti­cal about it because of local law­mak­ers propen­si­ty to load up these bills with amend­ments which gen­er­al­ly end up water­ing down the bill.
This bill I under­stand is no dif­fer­ent, and as such there are already much hand­wring­ing about it from some quarters.

Nevertheless, it is 2017, there can be no legit­ime expla­na­tion for not hav­ing a National Id law in place.

The Government has placed the cart before the horse as was to be expect­ed. It will now bear respon­si­bil­i­ty for explain­ing to the peo­ple the mer­its of this new legislation.
The People’s National Party now under the lead­er­ship of Peter Phillips has once again demon­strat­ed that the par­ty has no con­cept of Governance.

What I find most juve­nile about the way the leg­isla­tive process is approached are the things which become stick­ing points which should be eas­i­ly overcome.
One such triv­ial issue which result­ed in a major brouha­ha was who should bear the cost of replac­ing the card if it became dam­aged by an enti­ty to which it was pre­sent­ed upon request, or if it was not delib­er­ate­ly destroyed by a holder.

You lose the damn card or destroy it you bear the cost of its replace­ment peri­od, what is so dif­fi­cult about that?
I promised that I would not men­tion Peter Phillips but it appears the new­ly mint­ed leader of the oppo­si­tion have no con­cept of what Jamaica needs as a nation in the 21st century.

Peter Phillips oppo­si­tion leader

Phillips as did the hap­less Portia Simpson Miller hangs his hat on crit­i­ciz­ing what­ev­er the Government does in the hope of gain­ing trac­tion from any failures.
Peter Phillips must know that as a mem­ber of the International com­mu­ni­ty Jamaica must be able to iden­ti­fy its cit­i­zens fail­ing which they will not be able to leave the coun­try going forward.

The inabil­i­ty to account ade­quate­ly for cit­i­zens lands nations in the failed states cat­e­go­ry whether we agree or not, just ask Sudan, Somalia, et al.
Jamaicans line up to give up every­thing for­eign nations demand just for a chance to enter their coun­tries and on the rare instances, they are allowed to enter they have to give up much more to be iden­ti­fied and account­ed for by law enforcement.
The Government must go full tilt with this process and ensure that all Jamaicans are identified.

This is a good first step in the right direc­tion despite the crit­ics, naysay­ers and Monday morn­ing quarterbacks.

Decent Christians And The Politics Of The Right

Professor of Women, Gender, & Sexuality Studies, Oregon State University

How do peo­ple who think of them­selves as decent Christians sup­port politi­cians like Donald Trump and Roy Moore? How do they cham­pi­on poli­cies that dis­crim­i­nate and dis­ad­van­tage and some­times even do violence?

Part of the answer may lie in their decen­cy itself.

Latin American the­olo­gian Marcella Althaus-Reid iden­ti­fied decen­cy as a con­cept uti­lized with­in colo­nial­ism and patri­archy to ensure main­te­nance of the social order that ben­e­fit­ed wealthy, white, male col­o­niz­ers.* What was out­side the approved behav­iors of wealthy white men became “inde­cent.”

Althaus-Reid notes in Latin American cul­ture refer­ring to a man as decent means he is eco­nom­i­cal­ly hon­est and prop­er in his social exchanges. A decent woman is one who doesn’t engage in sex­u­al behav­ior out­side monog­a­mous het­ero­sex­u­al mar­riage. She says these decen­cy codes con­trol men and women’s behav­iors, polit­i­cal­ly and per­son­al­ly, and keep dom­i­nant social, polit­i­cal, eco­nom­ic, and reli­gious struc­tures intact. Christianity has often par­tic­i­pat­ed in and rein­forced these norms of decen­cy and the oppres­sive insti­tu­tions they sustain.

Decency assumes nar­row­ly cir­cum­scribed stan­dards as defined by the dom­i­nant social order. People who uphold and abide by these stan­dards are then decent people.

If we fol­low Althaus-Reid’s log­ic about the gen­der­ing of decen­cy, we also rec­og­nize that women and men, LGBQ and straight, cis-gen­der and trans/​gender non-con­form­ing peo­ple, whites and peo­ple of col­or are held to dif­fer­ent stan­dards of decen­cy. Men are decent when they obey the law and when they con­form to the care­ful­ly craft­ed patri­ar­chal scripts of white, het­ero­sex­u­al male gen­der and sex­u­al behav­ior. Women are decent when they avoid sex­u­al behav­ior out­side nor­ma­tive het­ero­sex­u­al mar­riage (although the sex­u­al dou­ble bind means they still must present them­selves as sex­u­al­ly allur­ing to men while main­tain­ing their purity).Read more here: https://​www​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​e​n​t​r​y​/​d​e​c​e​n​t​-​c​h​r​i​s​t​i​a​n​s​-​a​n​d​-​t​h​e​-​p​o​l​i​t​i​c​s​-​o​f​-​t​h​e​-​r​i​g​h​t​_​u​s​_​5​a​0​8​8​0​9​d​e​4​b​0​c​c​4​6​c​5​2​e​6​b74

You Want Courtesy And Respect From The Cops, How About Giving Courtesy And Respect?

Within the Serengeti of chaos that the Jamaican cul­ture has devolved, is still the inces­sant chat­ter about Police cus­tomer ser­vice, or to put it more suc­cinct­ly the lack thereof.
Built into that non­sense notion is a belief that despite com­ing from a cor­rupt, aggres­sive and dis­re­spect­ful pop­u­la­tion and despite forced to deal with the worse of the worse, offi­cers must be the equiv­a­lent of saints while cit­i­zens bear no bur­den to be respectful.

YouTube player

The infer­ence inher­ent in the con­stant gnash­ing of teeth is still a con­found­ing and retard­ed one-sided expec­ta­tion that crass dis­re­spect­ful behav­ior must be reward­ed with cour­tesy as long as the dis­re­spect and crass­ness are direct­ed at police officers.

On the one hand, there are those from the self-styled “upper crust” who believe that laws do not apply to them. They have no respect for the laws and by exten­sion, they have no regard for those who enforce the laws.

Then there is the oth­er sub­sec­tion or the sup­posed “low­er tier” which believes that vio­lence and dis­re­spect should be direct­ed at offi­cers and offi­cers should retreat from their aggres­sive behavior.
Insofar as polic­ing is con­cerned since it’s incep­tion, to present day and going far into the future that is a dan­ger­ous posi­tion to take.
Officers have every expec­ta­tion that they should go home after the end of their shift, they have no respon­si­bil­i­ty to absorb ver­bal or phys­i­cal abuse for doing their job.

Having a cour­te­ous soci­ety is and should be in the inter­est of all Jamaicans, nev­er­the­less, it is incom­pre­hen­si­ble that the entire­ty of boor­ish behav­ior would be laid at the feet of the police when Politicians, judges, lawyers, doc­tors, nurs­es, and oper­a­tives from every stra­tum of the soci­ety demon­strate the same gut­ter behavior.

YouTube player

The Police which has earned more than it’s fair share of demer­its con­tin­ue to be the scape­goats of every talk­ing head regard­less of the issue under discussion.
The real ques­tion is how do we extract from a dirty pool, clean water with­out the process of fil­tra­tion and con­stant purification?
And if we place the puri­fied water back into the same dirty pool does­n’t that once puri­fied water return to its for­mer state of impurity?

The unmis­tak­able fact is that rude behav­ior should not be tol­er­at­ed from any indi­vid­ual which deals with the public.
With that said mem­bers of the pub­lic have a respon­si­bil­i­ty to con­duct them­selves with the great­est cour­tesy and respect when deal­ing with ser­vice providers.
It is a two-way street.

YouTube player

Maybe Jamaicans need to under­stand that no one cares about their con­ver­sa­tions when they barge into spaces pub­lic and pri­vate talk­ing at the top of their voic­es on cell phones.
How about speak­ing soft­ly while on the phone, how about hang­ing up the phone when you enter a place of business?
How about join­ing the line at the back? How about wait­ing to board the bus and if it’s full await the next bus? How about not yelling over those stand­ing in line?
How about giv­ing some of that which you crave?

You know you want respect, how about giv­ing respect and act­ing respectfully?
The aver­age Jamaican is over­ly opin­ion­at­ed and underinformed.
Those who con­sid­er them­selves from the upper-crust com­plain that offens­es are being com­mit­ted in front of offi­cers and they do noth­ing about it.
Realistically when offi­cers act with cour­tesy they are ignored and phys­i­cal­ly assaulted.(social media plat­forms are filled with instances of such assaults, which only hap­pen to Jamaican cops ).

YouTube player

When they do act with force in order to gain com­pli­ance they are cas­ti­gat­ed as brutish vio­lent, aggres­sive and abusive.
It’s a no-win sit­u­a­tion in which the police is damned if they do and damned if they don’t.
What the Albert Einsteins in the soci­ety fail to under­stand is that respect is a two-way street in which you get as much as you give.

Unfortunately for Jamaican offi­cers who strive to do the right thing in uphold­ing their oaths even some who served in this cesspool of crim­i­nal acqui­es­cence are now skeptics.
Well over a quar­ter cen­tu­ry ago being a young beat cop in South parade, West Street, Heywood streets required grit and determination.
Every arrest had to be made with force, today the lev­el of hos­til­i­ty and dis­re­spect met­ed out to offi­cers is vast­ly and expo­nen­tial­ly, multiplied.

There is no short­age of vil­lage lawyers who have opin­ions on what police should have done in the heat of the moment, to those opin­ion­at­ed know-noth­ings I ask where have you served your coun­try, what would you have done as an offi­cer faced with any of the sce­nar­ios in the post­ed videos?

Jamaicans have a choice to make if they want to return the coun­try to any mod­icum of civility.
Stop look­ing at the oth­er per­son to be civ­il and cour­te­ous. You be cour­te­ous and civ­il and maybe, just like a peb­ble in a brook, there will be a rip­ple effect.
Just maybe the cour­tesy and civil­i­ty you give to that offi­cer on the street or on the phone will be rec­i­p­ro­cat­ed. You are the change you seek instead of look­ing to oth­ers to give you what you crave.

The change you seek begins with you. Police work is dirty, it’s some­times ugly and yes some­times cops step out of line, there should be no tol­er­ance for that but they need all the sup­port they can get to do a thank­less shit­ty job that many who crit­i­cize them would not and can­not do.
Let’s stop the crit­i­ciz­ing and give them the sup­port they need as they place their lives on the line to pro­tect your mis­er­able hide.

Aggressive,smart Policing Needed To Stop Extortion And Other Serious Crimes Not Patsy Policing…

Nothing gets my blood boil­ing like hear­ing police offi­cers who are empow­ered to enforce the laws make state­ments regard­ing crime which amount to surrender.

The Spanish Town Bus park has long been a source of extor­tion accord­ing to cit­i­zens, bus oper­a­tors, and police.
In fact, the Klans-man and One order Gangs have shed much blood for con­trol of the park which has been a source of illic­it cash­flow for gang­sters for many years.

Before we address this issue it is impor­tant that there be a recog­ni­tion of this fact, crim­i­nals are always on the prowl for new and inno­v­a­tive ways to exploit weak spots in the appa­ra­tus of the nation’s security.
Thus far, as is evi­denced by the wave of seri­ous crime plagu­ing the coun­try, gang­sters are not hav­ing many prob­lems in find­ing those breach­es in the levy.

The Jamaican Police have a propen­si­ty for allow­ing small issues which could eas­i­ly be stamped out to metas­ta­size into can­cer­ous tumors which even­tu­al­ly require major oper­a­tions some­times with dis­as­trous consequences.
That is a fail­ure of lead­er­ship, period.

The Problem of extor­tion in bus parks, Lotto-scam­ming, and truth­ful­ly the esca­la­tion of some major crimes could have been eas­i­ly con­trolled if not erad­i­cat­ed, had the police act­ed with deter­mi­na­tion and dis­patch in deal­ing with those problems.

Word on the street is that Police are always involved in crimes like the illic­it Lotto-scam­ming which has mush­roomed into an inter­na­tion­al cri­sis. In fact, in a recent batch of alleged scam­mers extra­dit­ed to the United States, one police offi­cer was among the sus­pects hand­ed over to the Americans.
The prob­lem how­ev­er in instances as these is a fail­ure on the part of the senior man­age­ment tier of the force to gath­er intel­li­gence on these occur­rences in a time­ly man­ner and move deci­sive­ly toward erad­i­cat­ing these can­cer­ous crimes from the country.

SSP Powell

Unfortunately for law-abid­ing Jamaicans, it appears that the last peo­ple to know whats real­ly hap­pen­ing with crime are the peo­ple tasked with its eradication.
Such is the case with the prob­lem of the extor­tion rack­et in the Spanish Town bus Park and the response of the Police com­man­der Senior Superintendent Anthony Powell who has respon­si­bil­i­ty for St Catherine North Police Division.

According to cit­i­zens, bus oper­a­tors are forced to pay a $5,000 to extor­tion­ists, in a rack­et which allows so-called [shot­ta busses] to jump the line, load and go.
It is alleged that the dri­vers of oth­er bus­es, don’t escape the extor­tion­ists, as they are forced to pay $2,500 to use the park anyway.
According to local report­ing, It is believed that bus dri­ver Ervin McLeggan, who was mur­dered in the bus park last Tuesday, was on that “shot­ta bus” list but was removed after a meet­ing among the gangsters.

There are reports that bus oper­a­tors do not report the extor­tion to the police and that because they do not report these inci­dents the police can­not act on it.
The larg­er issue it seems to me is that the police are inex­cus­ably inept if they are not aware of the long­stand­ing prob­lem of extor­tion in the Spanish Town bus park.

The response com­ing from Senior Superintendent Anthony Powell is that cit­i­zens rea­son­able demand for a police post will not solve the problem.
He insists he is unaware of any shot­ta-bus list, that part is quite under­stand­able as the police are always last to know whats going on.

Powell said a team had looked at the facil­i­ty and had rec­om­mend­ed the instal­la­tion of closed-cir­cuit tele­vi­sion cam­eras and oth­er mea­sures. He also not­ed that a police post was in the park before, but it was “burnt down by crim­i­nals”. “The police don’t nec­es­sar­i­ly need a post there because they should be out there in the field,” Powell said, adding that the police were, in fact, in the park when gun­men attacked McLeggan on Tuesday morn­ing. “Police are always present in the park, it is just that they were not sit­u­at­ed to engage the trig­ger­man, and he man­aged to escaped.”

What a bunch of bull-shit?
It is real­ly quite sim­ple to sug­gest (1) that crim­i­nals burnt the police post to the ground and as a result, one is not nec­es­sar­i­ly whats need­ed in light of a pro­lif­er­a­tion of crime at the facil­i­ty is remark­able pure­ly on the face of it.
That’s exact­ly why a police post should be placed there with cops who take no non­sense from any­one who is not sup­posed to be in the park.

On the oth­er hand, closed cir­cuit cam­eras are always a wel­come addi­tion to law enforce­ment efforts but they in no way absolve the police of their enforce­ment obligations.
Whats most regret­table about Powell’s state­ments are that there were offi­cers in the park but they weren’t sit­u­at­ed to engage the trig­ger man and so he escaped.

If killers can sum­mar­i­ly take some­one’s life in a sit­u­a­tion where offi­cers are present (regard­less of where they are sit­u­at­ed in the gen­er­al vicin­i­ty) and escape, what chance does the nation have in this exis­ten­tial fight in which it is engaged?

SSP Anthony Powell and I entered the police train­ing school togeth­er we grad­u­at­ed togeth­er, I applaud his ser­vice to our nation, how­ev­er, I part com­pa­ny with his think­ing on this issue. Said Powell,  “The police don’t nec­es­sar­i­ly need a post there because they should be out there in the field.”

No SSP Powell, the Police need to be where crimes are being com­mit­ted in the same way you place fire­men to fight a fire where there is a fire, not just out there in the field.

Where Is The Precedent For Training Cops In Regular Colleges?

After decades of mis­man­age­ment and med­dling in law enforce­ment, there is now an epi­dem­ic of crime fac­ing the Island.
Both Political par­ties bear respon­si­bil­i­ty for politi­ciz­ing the process of law enforce­ment, both par­ties bear respon­si­bil­i­ty for the law­less­ness in the country.

Yet decades after repeat­ed instances of state-sanc­tioned law­less­ness like the 1963 Coral Gardens Rasta upris­ing which result­ed in the deaths of Police Officers, through to the events which neces­si­tat­ed the secu­ri­ty forces incur­sion into Tivoli Gardens not much has been learned.

The unde­ni­able fact is that the Police depart­ment is more learned than at any oth­er time in the 185-year his­to­ry of the Constabulary.
At the same time, the depart­ment has nev­er been more inept at car­ry­ing out the most basic func­tions which police are required to do dai­ly and as a mat­ter of course.

Truthfully the Police can be let off the hook for some of its inad­e­qua­cies, as a mat­ter of fact, no police force is required to work with such sec­ond-guess­ing and crit­i­cisms from lawyers and experts some trained at the intel­lec­tu­al ghet­to and oth­ers sim­ply by the ghetto.

The con­stant crit­i­cism and sec­ond-guess­ing cou­pled with the specter of prison hang­ing over them has made offi­cers ten­ta­tive, unsure, and afraid to make even the sim­plest arrests.
The down­side to this is that those who would break the laws are expo­nen­tial­ly embold­ened and are made increas­ing­ly aggres­sive, not just in the lev­el of bru­tal­i­ty they unleash on their vic­tims but in their aggres­sive atti­tude against those who enforce the laws.

The lax, lib­er­al atti­tude of the courts in what can only be con­strued as adver­sar­i­al pos­tur­ing against the peo­ple’s busi­ness in case after case, has only giv­en the forces of law­less­ness ammu­ni­tion in its war against the rule of law.

Most of all, every Tom, Dick, and Harry who has nev­er served in any­thing much less risked their lives a sin­gle day has grandiose opin­ions and have writ­ten the­ses on what needs to be done to return the coun­try to a state of normalcy.

So now the University of the West Indies (Intellectual ghet­to à la the late Wilmott Mutty Perkins) has offered to help train and in the process house police recruits. Other insti­tu­tions of high­er learn­ing have also stepped for­ward to offer their ser­vices to train police officers.

The lat­est being the Montego Bay Community College in St James.
For the record, there is noth­ing wrong with hav­ing edu­cat­ed cops, in fact, the times demand that we have smarter cops.

However, at this present time out­sourc­ing police train­ing to peo­ple who are not police offi­cers, peo­ple have no expe­ri­ence in law enforce­ment or law enforce­ment prac­tices and pro­ce­dures is stu­pid, ridicu­lous and will have dis­as­trous con­se­quences for the nation in the future.
Remember that the JCF is more edu­cat­ed now that it has ever been in its his­to­ry, yet crime is at the high­est it has ever been in our history.
So clear­ly hav­ing police offi­cers with Assc, Bachelors, Masters and PhD’s is not going to solve the Island’s crime problem.

What the nation needs are police offi­cers who know how to do the job of polic­ing effec­tive­ly and a polit­i­cal class which rec­og­nizes that it must get its grub­by lit­tle fin­gers out of law enforcement.
The crime prob­lem the nation faces now will be dwarfed going for­ward if law enforce­ment can­not get it’s col­lec­tive act together.

Mass shoot­ings, acts of ter­ror­ism and oth­er transna­tion­al crimes have already shown their ugly heads on the Island, they will not go away because we wish them away.
Jamaica needs a com­pe­tent police force trained by police offi­cers who know policing.
That’s it!

Jamaica’s non­sen­si­cal pos­ture which has been pro­mul­gat­ed by the nit-wit elites who make pol­i­cy have always been that sim­ple solu­tions should be dis­card­ed and replaced with hifa­lutin alien con­cepts they read about hap­pen­ing in oth­er parts of the world.
In many cas­es, those con­cepts and prac­tices are as fake and unwork­able as their fake upper Saint Andrew Accents.

There is an expan­sive cam­pus out there in Twickenham Park which is quite enough to train the Island’s police offi­cers effi­cient­ly and effectively.
What is in short­age is a lack of qual­i­ty can­di­dates, mod­ern police train­ing tech­niques and the sup­port nec­es­sary for those young recruits to do the job they are asked to do.

More and more cops are announc­ing they have earned degrees, com­mend­able indeed, yet despite these per­son­al advance­ments crime con­tin­ue to increase.

The nation is not being served in this regard, let’s be real if this was ever going to be solved by advanced degrees we would have hit that plateau with the ele­va­tion of Dr. Carl Williams to the rank of Commissioner of Police.
Those in pow­er con­tin­ue to apply fix­es to prob­lems which do not exist rather than apply the fix­es nec­es­sary to alle­vi­ate those prob­lems which do exist.

Liberian-American Candidate Becomes First Black Mayor In Montana History

FBMD01000ac00300007013000059280000b12a0000432d0000a0390000ea5d00004c610000f9650000bc6a00007cb20000

A for­mer refugee who came to Montana more than 20 years ago was elect­ed to lead its cap­i­tal city, Helena, becom­ing the first black per­son to become may­or in the state’s history.

Wilmot Collins oust­ed four-term Jim Smith in Tuesday night’s may­oral race, cap­ping off a night of his­toric firsts through­out the country.

After last night’s his­toric firsts for many lead­ers across the coun­try, Wilmot is con­fi­dent that the future of this coun­try favors a union of peo­ple from all dif­fer­ent walks of life,” a cam­paign spokesper­son told the Daily News in a statement.

Most impor­tant­ly, Wilmot is hon­ored to be grant­ed the oppor­tu­ni­ty to go to work for the hard­work­ing and inspir­ing cit­i­zens of Helena!”

The spokesper­son con­firmed he’ll be the first black can­di­date in Montana’s his­to­ry to win a may­oral election.

Collins came to the U.S. 23 years ago, flee­ing civ­il war in his native Liberia. He went on to become an American cit­i­zen and worked in the state’s Department of Health and Human Services, spe­cial­iz­ing in child protection.

But he wasn’t the lone new­ly elect­ed offi­cial to make his­to­ry Tuesday night.

Ravinder Bhalla

Voters in Hoboken select­ed Ravinder Bhalla as the city’s first Sikh may­or, beat­ing out five oppo­nents to lead the New Jersey city.

First open­ly trans­gen­der African American woman elected

His vic­to­ry Tuesday night end­ed a cam­paign marred in the last few days by racist fly­ers that accused the cur­rent coun­cil­man of being a terrorist.

We’ve been through a bruis­ing campaign…but now is the time we come togeth­er and see who we can work with to bring this city for­ward,” the Garden State native said Tuesday night.

MANDATORY CREDIT; WASHINGTON TIMES OUT; NEW YORK TIMES OUT; THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER OUT; USA TODAY OUT; NO LICENSING EXCEPT BY AP COOPERATIVE MEMBERS

Danica Roem became the first openly transgender woman to win a seat in Virginia’s legislature.

(JAHI CHIKWENDIU/​AP)

Danica Roem

Danica Roem became the first open trans­gen­der per­son to win a seat in Virginia’s House of Delegates.

The for­mer reporter defeat­ed 13-term incum­bent Del. Bob Marshall.

Democrat Ralph Northam elect­ed gov­er­nor of Virginia

She faced a tough run as Marshall’s cam­paign attacked her gen­der iden­ti­ty along the trail.

MANDATORY CREDIT; ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS OUT; KARE11/TENGA AND NBC AFFILIATES OUT; WCCO AND CBS AFFILIATES OUT; KMSP AND FOX AFFILIATES OUT; KSTP AND ABC AFFILIATES OUT; TPT AND PBS AFFILIATES OUT

Andrea Jenkins is the first transgender black woman to win an election in the U.S.

(CARLOS GONZALEZ/​AP)

Andrea Jenkins

Andrea Jenkins also made his­to­ry, becom­ing the first black trans­gen­der woman elect­ed in the United States.

She won a seat on the Minneapolis City Council, col­lect­ing 73% of the Eighth Ward’s votes.

As an African American trans-iden­ti­fied woman, I know first­hand the feel­ing of being mar­gin­al­ized, left out, thrown under the bus,” she report­ed­ly said Tuesday night. “Those days are over. We don’t just want a seat at the table, we want to set the table.”

Mayor de Blasio defeats Malliotakis to earn sec­ond term

Durkan is the first woman to become mayor in Seattle in more than 90 years.

Durkan is the first woman to become mayor in Seattle in more than 90 years.

(ELAINE THOMPSON/​AP)

Jenny Durkan

Seattle on Tuesday elect­ed a woman as may­or for the first time since the 1920s — and just the sec­ond in the Coffee City’s history.

That was a giv­en, how­ev­er, since her oppo­nent was also a woman. But she also made his­to­ry as Seattle’s first open­ly les­bian mayor.

Twenty-one can­di­dates ini­tial­ly ran for may­or ear­li­er this year fol­low­ing the res­ig­na­tion of embat­tled Mayor Ed Murray. Read more @ http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/liberian-american-candidate-black-mayor-montana-article‑1.3619163

Dan Rather On Trump: “It’s Never Been This Bad”

The journalism legend is fed up with Donald Trump and says the office of the presidency has zero nobility left

We’re bet­ter than this,” jour­nal­ist Dan Rather told Salon’s Andrew O’Hehir on “Salon Talks,” refer­ring to President Donald Trump and the deep divi­sions in American pol­i­tics today.

The leg­endary inves­tiga­tive jour­nal­ist and anchor has inter­viewed every pres­i­dent since Eisenhower and cov­ered near­ly every major polit­i­cal event in recent U.S. his­to­ry: Watergate, President John F. Kennedy’s assas­si­na­tion, 911, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the jail­ing of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The list goes on.

Rather occu­pied the anchor chair at “CBS Evening News” for 24 years. Now 86, he is the author of the new book “What Unites Us: Reflections on Patriotism,” which is out this week.

What’s miss­ing from the pres­i­den­cy today is “nobil­i­ty,” Rather said. “Our great pres­i­dents, the best pres­i­dents,” he added, “Washington, Lincoln, Teddy Rosevelt, right on through, had a cer­tain noble approach to the office, which we have zero of that now.”

Rather, who calls him­self an “opti­mist by nature,” remains hope­ful that America will get through these dark times. “While we’re in an extreme­ly dif­fi­cult peri­od now, a per­ilous time for the coun­try,” he said. “We need to remind our­selves, we’ve come through a lot worse before.”

But, Rather cau­tioned, change won’t hap­pen mag­i­cal­ly. Read more @ : https://​www​.salon​.com/​2​0​1​7​/​1​1​/​0​8​/​d​a​n​-​r​a​t​h​e​r​-​o​n​-​t​r​u​m​p​-​i​t​s​-​n​e​v​e​r​-​b​e​e​n​-​t​h​i​s​-​b​ad/

Breaking The Laws With The Best Intentions Is Still Criminal.….

For every claim, there may be a coun­ter­claim, for every glow­ing trib­ute one offer about an indi­vid­ual some­one may have remained silent with a sto­ry which is not so complimentary.

Such is the sto­ry regard­ing Dr. Jephtah Ford a med­ical doc­tor who for decades oper­at­ed a prac­tice on Red Hills Road in Kingston 8.
Ford and his twin broth­er Jeptah are col­or­ful fig­ures who are icon­ic not just by virtue of their med­ical prac­tice but by virtue of their involve­ment in politics.

Jephthah Ford has a long and sto­ried his­to­ry on Red Hills Road and in the wider Jamaica sole­ly on the basis of his med­ical prac­tice. Throw in his con­nec­tions and a life of pol­i­tics and the guy is freak­ing rock star.
You do not spend years and years in a neigh­bor­hood doing busi­ness and not build up a well of goodwill.,
At the same time, Ford has anoth­er side unknown to many, known to some who do not care as long as he stretched his hand and gave them a gift or a pat on the back

Many oth­ers know the man Jephthah Ford and their view of him is not so favorable.
Yet Jamaica is a coun­try in which one can have a Robin Hood per­sona and no one cares. Jamaica is the coun­try which roman­ti­cized ThreeFinger Jack.
It is the Country which roman­ti­cizes Lester Lloyd Coke, Christopher dud­dus Coke, Coppa, Rigen, Sandokan, and a long list of anoth­er scum­bag murderers.

In Jamaica, the nation which has an 84% cor­rup­tion rat­ing accord­ing to Transparency International, those who hand out the good­ies are the sec­ond com­ing of Jesus Christ personified.

Ford

That is metaphor­i­cal­ly speak­ing, whether Jephthah Ford is a Robin-hood type per­son­al­i­ty depends on who you speak to.
So it’s not out of the ordi­nary in a coun­try like Jamaica where pol­i­tics and the big man per­sona earns a Doctor Jephthah Ford type plau­dits and praise in the com­mu­ni­ty in which he oper­ates and beyond, regard­less of his alter ego dual personality.

It’s not extra­or­di­nary that politi­cians and Police, Pastors and Peasants are lin­ing up, call­ing for a non-cus­to­di­al sen­tence for Ford who was recent­ly con­vict­ed on two counts of attempt­ing to per­vert the course of justice.
None of that mat­ters in Jamaica as long as the trans­gres­sor is con­nect­ed and benev­o­lent it does not mat­ter what bad he/​she does, it’s all a‑okay.
To those who tes­ti­fy on his behalf he is a hero, to the police offi­cers who patrol the streets who are not blind­ed by par­ty pol­i­tics Ford rep­re­sents the worse of his profession.
To the silent who have been wronged not just by Ford but by the [shit-stym] which nur­tures and cul­ti­vate the Jephthah Fords, they don’t think that six months is enough.

Ford has had a tumul­tuous rela­tion­ship with many cops, good cops who cor­rect­ly believe that no Doctor should treat a per­son who com­mits crimes and turn up to him with gun­shot wounds and not noti­fy police.
Many will quick­ly say he has an oblig­a­tion to treat every­one, they may also say he treats crim­i­nals because his life could poten­tial­ly be in dan­ger from those criminals.
I say speak to the cops involved in those cas­es past and present and see if Ford was a Robin Hood. Get their opin­ions on whether he was doing it because of his hip­po­crat­ic oath?

This is big­ger than Ford how­ev­er, it demon­strates the rot­ten core of a deca­dent soci­ety which has sur­ren­dered all mod­icum of decen­cy and integri­ty and gone astray.
It does not mat­ter what an indi­vid­ual does in the dark as long as he steps into the light with clean hands it’s all good.
This not to sug­gest that Jephthah Ford is a mon­ster but nei­ther is he Mother Theresa. Jamaicans have a his­to­ry of cod­dling the most per­verse and despi­ca­ble human crea­tures all because they hand out a few trin­kets and a few bot­tles of beers.

If I treat a bunch of peo­ple kind­ly what does any of it have to do with any­thing if I com­mit a crime,? Should I sim­ply walk free because of my pre­vi­ous good deeds?
Throw in the peo­ple I treat­ed shit­ty and the ques­tion is what right do I have to expect def­er­ence from the jus­tice sys­tem when I com­mit myself?
It makes absolute­ly no sense, what do Ford’s per­ceived good deeds have to do with the courts’ decision?
The court has a duty to hear them but the court is duty bound to bal­ance what­ev­er char­ac­ter evi­dence may be prof­fered on his behalf against the greater good of the com­mu­ni­ty and it’s respon­si­bil­i­ty to the fideli­ty of the rule of law.

The court was beyond gra­cious in tap­ping Ford on the wrist with two six-month sen­tences to run concurrently.
In my esti­ma­tion, the court should have sent a strong mes­sage with this sen­tence, which would encour­age oth­er police offi­cers to fol­low suit in avoid­ing cor­rup­tion and those who would cor­rupt pub­lic officials.
The courts have an oblig­a­tion to do it’s part in the equi­table dis­pen­sa­tion of jus­tice regard­less of one’s affil­i­a­tions and connections.

Was there any won­der that Christopher Coke was nev­er con­vict­ed of a crime in Jamaica?
What hap­pened to the Kern Spencer cor­rup­tion case? It was the same sto­ry when Al Miller was pros­e­cut­ed for his crimes and found guilty.
Prison can­not be only for the poor­est class of peo­ple while the big man receives a tap on the wrist.
What hap­pened to FINSAC? Is there any won­der that ordi­nary peo­ple feel they have the right to ignore the nation’s laws?
Unless this coun­try ignores the cries for lenien­cy on the rare occa­sions when renowned peo­ple are caught red-hand­ed there will be hell to pay as the coun­try is engulfed more and more with crim­i­nal­i­ty, because the men­tal­i­ty of the peo­ple is becom­ing increas­ing­ly per­verse and twisted.

The laws are there for the pro­tec­tion of all Jamaicans, no one is big­ger than the laws no one is sub­servient to the laws.
All we have to do is to do our best to avoid break­ing them.
Good inten­tions are not a free pass for break­ing the laws, at best it may mit­i­gate one’s sen­tence but no one should expect that regard­less of their crimes they will be allowed to go home, that is not jus­tice and it should not hap­pen in this case.

Attorney Gives Notice Of Appeal Against Ford’s 6 Months Custodial Sentence: First Step In Getting The Case Tossed…

So the court slapped Jephthah Ford with a six-months cus­to­di­al sen­tence on each of the two counts of attempt­ing to per­vert the course of jus­tice charges he was con­vict­ed on.
In the greater scheme of things this offend­er should have been sent a strong mes­sage by the court that cor­rupt­ing pub­lic offi­cials is a seri­ous crime.
As was to be expect­ed and as I pre­dict­ed, the courts gave the defen­dant a tap on the wrist.

Dr. Jephthah Ford

What I found curi­ous is that the defen­dan­t’s attor­ney Bert Samuels all but admit­ted that his client broke the laws Quote: “He has allowed his good inten­tion to cloud his bet­ter judg­ment.”
Samuels said the fore­gone while [petion­ing the court for a non-cus­to­di­al sentence.
According to report­ing Bert Samuels told the court that he acknowl­edged his client com­mit­ted a seri­ous offense but lec­tured the court that it involved no vio­lence and result­ed in no mon­e­tary val­ue to Ford as if that negates the seri­ous­ness of the offens­es. He said Ford’s action was out of a desire to assist, but con­ced­ed that this was a wrong intervention.

After Samuels made his sub­mis­sion the court announced the sen­tence of six months in prison on each of the two counts as charged to run (con­cur­rent­ly) mean­ing he would only serve six months or less in prison.

Now here’s the kick­er, there is much talk of too many cas­es clog­ging up the ros­ters at all lev­els of the jus­tice sys­tem to include the appeals court.
Yet imme­di­ate­ly Samuels learned that Ford was going to spend time in prison, despite his own admis­sion that his client com­mit­ted the crimes, and despite admit­ting to the court that the crimes his client com­mit­ted were seri­ous crimes, Bert Samuels announced he would be fil­ing an appeal.
This was the very same Attorney who asked the court to impose a fine on his client.

Now to the casu­al observ­er, this seems ridicu­lous, gen­er­al­ly, an appeal may only be suc­cess­ful if the defen­dant can show new evi­dence which was sup­pressed by pros­e­cu­tors or wrong­do­ing on the part of inves­ti­ga­tors and or pros­e­cu­tors. Samuels admit­ted that his client com­mit­ted the crimes in his summation.
On what grounds then will his appeal be enter­tained except because of who his client is?

The idea in this case as I said in a pre­vi­ous arti­cle, is to do what­ev­er it takes to make sure that Ford does not spend a day in jail, that’s okay that’s what defense lawyers are sup­posed to do.
There was no sug­ges­tion of police impro­pri­ety, there was no sug­ges­tion of pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al impro­pri­ety. In fact, Bert Samuels con­ced­ed his client com­mit­ted the crimes he was charged with committing.
But dur­ing the appeals process which will drag on and on, new alle­ga­tions of impro­pri­ety will begin to creep into the nar­ra­tive until the appeals court make a deci­sion to toss the case.

I will be watch­ing this case as it lan­guish­es in the appeals court and Jephthah Ford con­tin­ues with his life unobstructed.
Justice demands that some­one keep and an eye open, fair­ness and our Democracy demand that we keep a can­dle­light on so that the dark forces of injus­tice are kept at bay.
I will be watch­ing this one.

INDECOM’s Abuse Of Power Clear As Day In This Case

For as long as INDECOM has exist­ed I have called for the repeal of the law and if nec­es­sary a com­pre­hen­sive review of the prin­ci­ples which neces­si­tat­ed the law in the first place with the view to the pas­sage of a bet­ter law.

The sup­port­ers of INDECOM are vehe­ment­ly opposed to any­one touch­ing the law regard­less of the harm it is caus­ing. Those sup­port­ers range from inside Jamaica House to PNP HQ and places beyond.
The ques­tion which must be asked then is, why are they opposed to a com­pre­hen­sive top to bot­tom review of the law?
If the law is right­eous it will stand any scruti­ny so there is noth­ing to fear.

The fact of the mat­ter is that sup­port­ers of the law know full well that the law is bad. Aspects of the law may even be uncon­sti­tu­tion­al but they would rather keep a bad law in place which injuries police offi­cers than do the work to change it.
One of the talk­ing points used by pro­po­nents of the law is that if offi­cers act appro­pri­ate­ly they have noth­ing to fear from hav­ing INDECOM there.
Many peo­ple out­side the cir­cle of pow­er of pol­i­tics and law enforce­ment who sim­ply want checks and bal­ances in the sys­tem fall vic­tim to this lie because they do not under­stand the minu­tia of how a bad law like INDECOM may have dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences for offi­cers who do exact­ly what they are sup­posed to do and are crim­i­nal­ized by a law which should nev­er have been autho­rized in its present state.

The instances of the abuse of INDECOM are many the lat­est being the case of assault INDECOM brought against Corporal Delroy McDuffus and Constable Adrian Beckford, who was attached to the Morant Bay Police Station six years ago. McDuffus and Beckford were arrest­ed and charged by INDECOM for alleged­ly assault­ing a man dur­ing a road­block that was mount­ed by res­i­dents in the Whitehorse com­mu­ni­ty in the parish.The com­plainant was arrest­ed by the police after he was report­ed­ly seen block­ing the road­way and was ordered to move away from the scene but refused and resist­ed the police’s attempt to remove him.

This case should nev­er have been brought in the first place, there was no evi­dence out­side the com­plainan­t’s words to go by.
Point num­ber one is that he was arrest­ed for refus­ing to move away from the scene after he was caught block­ing a pub­lic thoroughfare.
If he refused the police com­mand to do as he was told why would we not believe he had to be forcibly sub­dued by the police in order to effect the arrest?
It is exact­ly because of abus­es of this nature that I am allud­ing to when I crit­i­cize the INDECOM law as a flawed law entrust­ed to a dem­a­gogue to execute.
Additionally, the police can­not sue INDECOM for wrong­ful arrest even when they act with haste, with­out due-care, a lack of cau­tion and maybe mal­ice as is seem­ing­ly the case here.
Police offi­cers are sued for doing exact­ly what they are tasked with doing and are being arrest­ed and treat­ed as crim­i­nals for doing so. INDECOM faces no legal jeop­ardy for abus­ing it’s powers.

If police offi­cers are unnec­es­sar­i­ly rough or abu­sive to a sus­pect they are arrest­ing, offi­cers involved in the arrest open them­selves up to legal jeopardy.
On the oth­er hand, police offi­cers have tremen­dous lee­way as it relates to use of force when they are mak­ing arrests.
For the record and for the edi­fi­ca­tion of those who opine on this sub­ject with­out objec­tiv­i­ty or the nec­es­sary knowl­edge, that lat­i­tude includes the pow­er to take life.

Regardless of the rea­son for the arrest if an offend­er fights with an offi­cer that offi­cer has the right under the law to use the force nec­es­sary to make the arrest. Without the ben­e­fit of video evi­dence which showed that offi­cers, in this case, act­ed against their oath in mak­ing the arrest the case brought against the offi­cers should nev­er have been brought.
Even with video evi­dence, it is incred­i­bly dif­fi­cult to argue with the force used by an offi­cer in the heat of arrest­ing a bel­liger­ent suspect.
After the sus­pect is cuffed, offi­cers are at much more legal expo­sure if alle­ga­tions of unnec­es­sary force are alleged.
That was not the case here,

On the basis of cas­es as these INDECOM is oper­at­ing with­out account­abil­i­ty a license to com­mit more egre­gious breach­es against offi­cers with­out any account­abil­i­ty or with­out incur­ring any penalty.
This law needs to go.

Our Duty To Eschew Pagan Worship, Idolatry And Tell The Good News Of Jesus Christ

If there is a God who cre­at­ed the Universe and all that’s in it, regard­less of what we per­ceive him to be, and if he is omnipo­tent, then we must con­clude he knows our hearts and what we are about to do before we do the things we do.

Daniel 4:35 All the inhab­i­tants of the earth are account­ed as noth­ing, But He does accord­ing to His will in the host of heav­en And among the inhab­i­tants of the earth; And no one can ward off His hand Or say to Him, ‘What have You done?

The Church has a duty and a respon­si­bil­i­ty to be set apart from the world, in the world but not of the world.
What that means is that the body of Christ, all of us who have accept­ed his yoke should have lives reflec­tive of Jesus Christ. Our lives will nev­er be per­fect but as chil­dren of the high­est God, we must strive to walk as Jesus Christ did.

Galatians 5:16 – 17 But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not car­ry out the desire of the flesh.
The urge to have appeal in today’s world has influ­enced parts of the body of Christ Jesus to make deci­sions which are anti­thet­i­cal to what Jesus and the scrip­tures com­mand­ed us to do.

The need to be hip, not out­dat­ed, rel­e­vant, has brought things into our places of wor­ship and into our lives which ought not to be there.
We have no author­i­ty to change the unchang­ing word of God to please any­one. We were not com­mand­ed to change or water down God’s word in order to have more appeal to prospec­tive converts.
The writ­ten Word of God reveals His will and its eter­nal truth. Even though writ­ten by sin-cor­rupt­ed man, it was authored by the Holy Spirit (2 Pet. 1:20, 21). Thus attempts to find dif­fer­ences between God’s will and His writ­ten Word are foolish.

Not through books which seeks to explain the Bible, not through adopt­ing things and fads, not through the process of san­i­tiz­ing pagan cus­toms and then pre­tend­ing they are not the very same customs.
God knows our hearts, the Holy Spirit is in our hearts, it is that lit­tle voice which nudges us to do the right thing.
So there is real­ly no san­i­tiz­ing things we know are sin­ful and then pre­tend­ing that we are doing them or cel­e­brat­ing cus­toms we know we should­n’t be celebrating.

Halloween’s ori­gins date back to the ancient Celtic fes­ti­val of Samhain (pro­nounced sow-in). The Celts, who lived 2,000 years ago in the area that is now Ireland, the United Kingdom, and north­ern France, cel­e­brat­ed their new year on November 1. In addi­tion to caus­ing trou­ble and dam­ag­ing crops, Celts thought that the pres­ence of the oth­er­world­ly spir­its made it eas­i­er for the Druids or Celtic priests, to make pre­dic­tions about the future. 
To com­mem­o­rate the event, Druids built huge sacred bon­fires, where the peo­ple gath­ered to burn crops and ani­mals as sac­ri­fices to the Celtic deities. During the cel­e­bra­tion, the Celts wore cos­tumes, typ­i­cal­ly con­sist­ing of ani­mal heads and skins, and attempt­ed to tell each other’s for­tunes. http://​www​.his​to​ry​.com/​t​o​p​i​c​s​/​h​a​l​l​o​w​e​e​n​/​h​i​s​t​o​r​y​-​o​f​-​h​a​l​l​o​w​een

1 John 2:15

Don’t love the world or any­thing in the world. If any­one loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
If you know in your heart that some­thing is wrong and not of God no amount of wash­ing it, san­i­tiz­ing it and repack­ag­ing it will make it Godly.
We have a duty to eschew pagan cus­toms, not cleanse them then pre­tend they are harm­less, or that we only engage in them because we want to make the chil­dren happy.
We have a duty to do the exact oppo­site which is to train up our chil­dren in the way they should go so that when they are old they may not depart from it.
Proverbs 22: 6 Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it.

The body of Christ is stronger when we stand out not when we stand down, the light of God shines through and reach­es out to the unsaved when we are set apart from the ways of the world even though we are in the world.
I urge the Church to get back to teach­ing the ways of Christ, embrac­ing humil­i­ty of spir­it, less empha­sis on mon­ey, and a healthy teach­ing and explain­ing the Gospel of Jesus Christ our Lord.
Money is impor­tant in our dai­ly lives, I know many Christians will have the num­ber of times mon­ey is men­tioned in the Bible ready at their fin­ger­tip as a means to make their point of why so much time is spent ask­ing for mon­ey, yet it is impor­tant that we do not give the impres­sion that we are sell­ing a path­way to Christ.
Christ paid it all, he died pen­ni­less­ly, I am not sug­gest­ing that we should live impov­er­ished lives. Far from it, nev­er­the­less the church must find ways to speak less about mon­ey and more about the Gospel.
The Devil is crafty, let us not allow him to use us to bring any more of his prac­tices into our places of wor­ship and assembly.
Let us see the Devil for what he is and stand with the full armor of God against this onslaught. Let us not be unwit­ting par­tic­i­pants toward the enhance­ment of Satan’s Kingdom.
Ephesians 6:12  For we wres­tle not against flesh and blood, but against prin­ci­pal­i­ties, against pow­ers, against the rulers of the dark­ness of this world, against spir­i­tu­al wicked­ness in high places.

Two Take-aways From The Elections Yesterday

TWO CRUCIAL ISSUES IN THE BY ELECTIONS HELD YESTERDAY IN JAMAICA

Dunn the JLP’s candidate

Issue #1

The elec­tion of Dr. Norman Dunn a son of south-east Saint Mary sends a strong mes­sage to those in the lead­er­ship of both polit­i­cal par­ties who would para­chute can­di­dates into con­stituen­cies and force them onto vot­er that this prac­tice will not be tolerated.
Bringing in can­di­dates and ask­ing peo­ple to vote for them is not democ­ra­cy, allow­ing cit­i­zens to chose their own rep­re­sen­ta­tives is the begin­ning of the demo­c­ra­t­ic process.

Channelling the 1970’s George Nooks song “my father born ya” a pejo­ra­tive pop­u­lar­ized against Edward Seaga by the PNP, it should be stan­dard pro­to­col cod­i­fied in law, that only Jamaicans who live in Jamaica for a pre­scribed peri­od of time may be elect­ed to the Parliament.

The JLP though offend­ed by the 1970’s dis­par­age­ment of Edward Seaga, [a true son of Jamaica in every sense except by birth]by the Manley cam­paign , made the very same mis­take neces­si­tat­ing a by-elec­tion in 2009 for can­di­dates Vaz, Mair, Stern and Robinson.
It’s time now for the Legislature to act deci­sive­ly to fix this loop-hole in the laws so that there are no ambi­gu­i­ties as to who qual­i­fies to sit in the nation’s parliament.

Dr. Shane Alexis

Dunn’s roots in the Parish will not make him a good rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the peo­ple, that rests with Dunn and Dunn alone.
The man­date giv­en him as a son of the soil is a sol­id repu­di­a­tion of Dr. Shane Alexis, a Canadian cit­i­zen who has a Grenadian pass­port but could­n’t both­er get­ting a Jamaican Passport.
It should be remem­bered that this imbroglio may have cost the PNP that seat, as that seat has been a depend­able PNP seat for a long time.
Moving from a one-seat major­i­ty 32 – 31 to 33 – 30 gives the gov­ern­ing JLP the nec­es­sary breath­ing room it need­ed to push its agenda.
That breath­ing room, how­ev­er, should be used to imme­di­ate­ly put the ped­al to the met­al in erad­i­cat­ing vio­lent crime.
The JLP sim­ply can­not expect to con­tin­ue to talk about what crime used to be under the PNP, they took over the reins of gov­ern­ment in March of 2016.

Issue #2

Mark Golding

The oth­er chal­lenge to our demo­c­ra­t­ic process is the fact that there were elec­tions process­es in three con­stituen­cies but essen­tial­ly there was only a sin­gle elec­tion which had any credibility.
By-elec­tions held in the St. Andrew Southwestern seat made vacant by the for­mer par­ty leader Portia Simpson Miller and the Southern St. Andrew seat vacat­ed by Omar Davies due to retire­ment were the two seats also being com­pet­ed for as well.

Angela Brown-Burke

The ele­va­tion of Mark Golding and Angella Brown Burke to these seats should give nei­ther of these two indi­vid­u­als any sense of accom­plish­ment in these heav­i­ly gar­risoned constituencies.
Regardless of what they have to say they ought to be ever mind­ful that they are line-bene­fac­tors of two con­stituen­cies which were stacked with PNP sup­port­ers years ago at the expense of oth­er voters.
Those who occu­py these be they JLP or PNP ought to take no pride in rep­re­sent­ing those con­stituen­cies, the peo­ple who live in com­mu­ni­ties which are zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sions are worse for where they live.
Garrison com­mu­ni­ties are usu­al­ly more impov­er­ished and under­served than oth­er constituencies.

It was refresh­ing to hear Prime Minister Andrew Holness pro­claim in 2014,“Zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sion are incom­pat­i­ble with free­dom and aspects of our pol­i­tics are an affront to lib­er­ty.” “It is time to end gar­ri­son pol­i­tics now”. 
Since then not much has hap­pened toward the process of dis­man­tling the gar­risons, the time is now for those com­mu­ni­ties to be opened up so that the lives of all Jamaicans can be better.

Failing to do so leaves large swaths of the Jamaican peo­ple slaves of the polit­i­cal par­ties. Failing to do so erodes our democ­ra­cy and make the result of elec­tions an exer­cise in pro­vid­ing answers we already have.
It dimin­ish­es our coun­try and our insti­tu­tions and ulti­mate­ly ren­ders us all slaves to the very insti­tu­tions we cre­at­ed and the peo­ple we ele­vate to serve us.
 

A Few Points We Easily Could Have Missed..

I will be brief as I vent on a few items which made the news recent­ly in my beloved Jamaica.
In the mean­time, I want decent law-abid­ing Jamaicans who sim­ply want a good and peace­ful life to know just how the peo­ple they put in charge of their affairs are deceiv­ing them using the police as scapegoats.

The Police have to sim­ply walk away as they have no means of get­ting their sto­ries told and the pow­ers that be in con­junc­tion with the com­plic­it deceit­ful media is all too will­ing to car­ry the mes­sage for the liars.
It shows how some activist judges, crim­i­nal lawyers and oth­ers come togeth­er to defame and dis­man­tle the sys­tem because of their dis­dain for the police.

Item # 1 Murder Case Collapses After Cops Are Caught Lying.

Anthony ‘Bugussu’ Powell, a 56-year-old hig­gler beats a mur­der rap.
According to the com­plaint in an affi­davit more befit­ting a dying dec­la­ra­tion, on January 26, 2010, 43-year-old Richard Burke was shot in the back of the neck while he was stand­ing at the inter­sec­tion of East Street and Tower Street in down­town Kingston.
The police tes­ti­fied that they vis­it­ed Burke at the Kingston Public Hospital on the day of the inci­dent and he said it was Bugussu (Powell) who shot him.

According to the police, they returned to the hos­pi­tal the fol­low­ing day and spent two hours tak­ing a state­ment from Burke, but he could not sign it because he was par­a­lyzed. A police­man signed as a wit­ness to the state­ment, which was not com­plet­ed because they claimed that Burke said he had a headache. The police also claimed that on the third day, they returned to the hos­pi­tal to com­plete the state­ment and Burke asked if they had caught Bugussu yet.

Two of Burke’s rel­a­tives also told the court that he had told them that Bugussu had shot him before he died on the evening of the third day that he was in the hos­pi­tal. During cross-exam­i­na­tion, the doc­tor who treat­ed Burke told the court that she did not see any police vis­it­ing at the time they claimed, and from the injury, he had suf­fered, he could not give a state­ment for two hours when the police claimed he did. The doc­tor said that based on the nature of the surgery, Burke was not able to speak and, there­fore, could not give a state­ment last­ing two hours the next day, as claimed by the police.

In doing what they do best whether they are paid or oth­er­wise, the tri­al judge Evan Brown said the case was a “trav­es­ty of justice”.
There was no evi­dence that the police offi­cers knew the accused Anthony Bugussu before they got the case, since they did not know the accused there was no way that they could have had mal­ice against him.

Additionally, fam­i­ly mem­bers of the deceased told the court that their loved one told them that he was indeed shot by the accused Anthony Bugussu,
Dying dec­la­ra­tions are sacro­sanct by law in most munic­i­pal­i­ties and it ought to be in Jamaica accord­ing to Jamaican law.
Yet on the tes­ti­mo­ny of one Doctor who may have lied or who may have sim­ply got­ten the facts wrong the clear-cut mur­der case was tossed and the defen­dant was set free.

Worse yet, the Judge, defense, and attor­ney decid­ed to pile on the police, sole­ly on the evi­dence of one per­son who could have been lying or have got­ten her facts wrong.
What was the motive of the police for charg­ing the accused con­sid­er­ing that there is no evi­dence that they knew the offend­er and as such could have zero mal­ice toward him?
Why was the tes­ti­mo­ny of the Doctor giv­en more cre­dence over the fam­i­ly mem­bers and inves­ti­gat­ing officers?

Item # 2 Corporal Melvin Smith killed in Mandeville town cen­ter try­ing to stop the rob­bery of a motor cycle.

Cpl. Melvin Smith

No damn motor­cy­cle is worth an offi­cer’s life, so it was­n’t the motor­cy­cle which caused Corporal Melvin Smith to inter­vene on see­ing a rob­bery in progress. It was the call of duty and the com­mit­ment to serve. Corporal Smith was shot sev­er­al times as he attempt­ed to appre­hend a rob­ber who had just stolen a motor­cy­cle in the Mandeville town cen­ter. The own­er of the motor­cy­cle was also shot and remains hos­pi­tal­ized in sta­ble condition.
This offi­cer gave his life while in the same breath the Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck con­tin­ues on his mis­sion to defame them using all of the tools at his disposal.
I urge the fam­i­ly of this fall­en offi­cer to shun and rebuff all attempts at plat­i­tude com­ing from INDECOM in this their hour of grief.

Item# 3 Cpl Marsh of the Trelawny Division goe to New York for treatment.

Corporal Marsh and col­leagues on his way out of the Island.

Corporal Marvin Marsh who was shot in his leg at his home on September 18th this year was told that he may lose his leg if he does not get treat­ment abroad.
Corporal Marsh who was injured in his right leg was treat­ed at the Mandeville Hospital, read­mit­ted and is now forced to leave the Island because he can­not receive the treat­ment or one of the med­ica­tion he needs on the Island.
According to reports, the con­di­tion of Corporal Marsh’s leg con­tin­ues to dete­ri­o­rate and his fam­i­ly and col­leagues were giv­en the grim news that if he did not receive the treat­ment he would lose his leg.
Corporal Marsh is now in the United States through the quick work and ded­i­ca­tion of his col­leagues at the Federation and his family.
We wish him well.

Item#3 Joking With Our Jails — INDECOM Still Concerned About The Treatment Of Persons In Police Lock-Ups

Terrence Williams

Amidst the death of Cpl Smith and the sense of good­will which has begun to turn toward the Police Chief Media pros­ti­tute and anti-police antag­o­nist, Terrence Williams made a grab for some media atten­tion as well.
Knowing full well that if the police are able to get their act togeth­er no one cares about him he went back to the tra­di­tion­al well.

He argued that this is not the case at many police sta­tions island­wide, and indi­cat­ed that since 2010, INDECOM has received 131 com­plaints of unlaw­ful deten­tion and 59 com­plaints of undu­ly long deten­tion. The Mandeville Police Station account­ed for 16 of the com­plaints, the most from any indi­vid­ual sta­tion over the peri­od, while 12 were from per­sons held at the Constant Spring Police Station and 11 from detainees at the Half-Way-Tree lock-up. Williams said that per­sons are often sub­ject­ed to over­crowd­ing and inhu­mane con­di­tions in lock-ups as some cops use delay tac­tics to keep them behind bars.
Williams said that since 2010, it has received almost 200 com­plaints from per­sons detained by the police.

First of all, I encour­age offi­cers who are forced to arrest sus­pects to take them to Terrence Williams’ home and house them there.
If the Police do not do their jobs this scribe chat if they do their job this scribe chat, where are the police sup­posed to put these suspects?
All across the world police are forced to some­times keep vio­lent sus­pects in cus­tody for a lit­tle over the times pre­scribed by statute.
In many cas­es, this is done using inge­nious ways like charg­ing the sus­pect for the lit­tle weed he had when he was held on sus­pi­cion of murder.

Even though detec­tives would gen­er­al­ly not both­er with the weed charge under nor­mal cir­cum­stances if they had all of the evi­dence, they are forced to charge the sus­pect for it in order to buy time.
In many cas­es, this is a valu­able tool for the safe­ty and pro­tec­tion of the cit­i­zen­ry, espe­cial­ly in a coun­try like Jamaica which is a crim­i­nal revolv­ing door even for the most vio­lent mur­der­ers who are sum­mar­i­ly giv­en bail regard­less of the num­ber of peo­ple they kill.
Finally on this, in a coun­try like Jamaica with the lev­el of crim­i­nal­i­ty and the anti-police envi­ron­ment which exist there, it is absolute­ly shock­ing that in sev­en years there have only been 200 complaints.

At that rate, there is a grand shock­ing total of 2.380 reports to INDECOM per month. If the Police can have num­bers this good in all of it’s oper­at­ing cat­e­gories Jamaica would be in great shape.
Nevertheless, the atten­tion-grab­bing Terrence Williams is a drown­ing man who is quite des­per­ate to grab at any straw he can. That makes him dan­ger­ous and he must be called out for the lying decep­tive dem­a­gogue that he is.

Item#4 Mark Rickets Article. Mark Ricketts | It’s A Disgrace How We Treat The Police (Part 2) — Jamaica’s Crime Cop-Out.

Justice Minister Delroy Chuck

Some months ago, the min­is­ter of jus­tice, in a rather unfor­tu­nate pre­sen­ta­tion cap­tured on TV, used sleight of hand trick­ery, depict­ing move­ment of an invis­i­ble object from the right hand to the left, accom­pa­nied by the words, that’s the sort of thing the police will do.
In so far as the medi­um is the mes­sage, the imagery being rein­forced is that the JCF is insti­tu­tion­al­ly cor­rupt, is inclined to exces­sive use of force, and is not enti­tled to respect. Listen to the ‘curse-out’ the police get if they insist on giv­ing a tick­et for an offence.
Last Monday, most peo­ple saw on TVJ instances of police pow­er­less as they were jos­tled and arm-wres­tled by motorists they had stopped for infrac­tions. It was a dis­grace, affirm­ing that law­less­ness has no bound­aries. http://​jamaica​-glean​er​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​c​o​m​m​e​n​t​a​r​y​/​2​0​1​7​1​0​2​9​/​m​a​r​k​-​r​i​c​k​e​t​t​s​-​i​t​s​-​d​i​s​g​r​a​c​e​-​h​o​w​-​w​e​-​t​r​e​a​t​-​p​o​l​i​c​e​-​p​a​r​t​-​2​-​j​a​m​a​i​c​a​s​-​c​r​i​m​e​-​cop

This sto­ry needs noth­ing it speaks clear­ly and unequivocally.
I am thrilled to see that there are oth­er peo­ple now will­ing to actu­al­ly speak out favor­ably about the police. For years after leav­ing the Police depart­ment I have sought to speak out against the police when they mess up and hold them up when they deserve our praise.
The fun­da­men­tal prob­lem which exists is that there are peo­ple in polit­i­cal lead­er­ship, (in both polit­i­cal par­ties) who are active­ly tear­ing down the JCF when their jobs are exact­ly that they should be build­ing up the department.
Delroy Chuch is chief among equals in that regard.

After The Campaigning “Dunn”

On Monday, October 30th vot­ers in the St.Mary South East Constituency will go to the polls to chose a mem­ber of Parliament to rep­re­sent them in the House of Representatives.
The seat became vacant after the sit­ting People’s National Party Member of Parliament Dr. Winston Green passed away. Green had won the seat against the Jamaica Labor Party chal­lenger Dr.Norman Dunn by a mere five(5) votes on the last go around.
This elec­tion has much sig­nif­i­cance for both polit­i­cal par­ties. At issue is a sig­nif­i­cant fact that the Governing JLP would like a bit of breath­ing room over and above the one seat it has in the 63 seat Legislature.
At present, the JLP has 32 seats to the PNP’s 31, win­ning the St Mary South East seat would be a tremen­dous boost to the Andrew Holness led JLP which would be up 33 seats to the PNP’s 30.

Norman Dunn the JLP’s candidate

Conversely, was the PNP to retain that seat the par­ty would retain the sta­tus quo and retain a sit­u­a­tion which keeps Andrew Holness and the JLP look­ing over their shoulders.
Retaining the seat would mean that vot­ers want the PNP to be strong and vig­i­lant in Opposition. Winning that seat would indi­cate a will­ing­ness on the part of at least the peo­ple in that con­stituen­cy to give Holness some lever­age to advance his agenda.

In the 26 years since I left Jamaica not much has changed for the better.
Politics is con­duct­ed the very same way, parochial­ly, and appeal­ing to the most base instincts of the poor­est of our people.
Patching roads by the light of trucks at the last moment, hand­ing out box lunch­es and red stripe beer ‚de-bush­ing exer­cis­es, due to the upcom­ing elec­tions is an insult to the intel­li­gence of the peo­ple, yet those prac­tices form part of the real­i­ty of elec­tion­eer­ing Jamaica style.

Dr. Shane Alexis of the PNP

Positively, it is wor­thy of note that polit­i­cal killings are a thing of the past although mur­der has gone up overall.
The trav­el­ing motor­cades and rev­el­ry asso­ci­at­ed with the cam­paigns lend a bit of nos­tal­gia, a feel­ing rem­i­nis­cent of a sim­pler space in time.
Yet despite the pas­sage of time, it appears that not much has changed since the first nation­al elec­tions were held on the Island.

PM Holness walks bar feet with supporters.

Patronage, Poverty, and Puffery seem to dom­i­nate, despite the pas­sage of time. In the end, the Jamaican peo­ple are still where Jamaica start­ed in 1962 when the nation was first giv­en its independence.
Bad roads, no roads, no lights, no potable water, yet ever the polit­i­cal junkies’ peo­ple flock to cam­paign events hang­ing from the sides and steps of vehi­cles, endan­ger­ing their lives for a few moments of an adren­a­line rush.

On Tuesday they go back to their lives as they were before, gone will be the long line of cam­paign vehi­cles, bod­ies hang­ing off with total oblivion.
Gone will be the horns and loud music one man will be the win­ner, the oth­er the los­er, what will be left is the hor­rid defac­ing imagery of orange and green paint splashed crude­ly on build­ings and walls and even trees to make their point.
Stacks of stick­ers, flags, and cam­paign posters will remain, the only reminder of the cam­paign past.

Phillips a dinosaur of pol­i­tics must take some of the blame for the state of affairs not just in that con­stituen­cy but Island-wide.

The images of our nation’s chief exec­u­tive and the can­di­date walk­ing bare feet across streams is not an endear­ing image as I believe they were intend­ed, rather they rep­re­sent the lack of atten­tion which has been placed on the peo­ple’s busi­ness since 1962.
In fair­ness to the Prime Minister, this can­not be laid at his or Dunn’s bare feet.[no pun intended]
What kind of real pro­tec­tion are those bare feet offi­cers able to give to the Prime Minister con­sid­er­ing the weapons in the hands of ordi­nary crim­i­nals and their brazen­ness today?
There need to be change rem­i­nis­cent of where we are in time, none of this is it and the Jamaican peo­ple are worse off for it.

The Emerging Face Of Hate

White suprema­cists, neo-Nazis and fas­cists descend­ed on a Middle Tennessee town Saturday for a “White Lives Matter” ral­ly, strik­ing fear into com­mu­ni­ties des­per­ate to avoid the kind of vio­lence that vis­it­ed Charlottesville, Virginia, near­ly three months ago.

Jeff Schoep, sec­ond from the left, is head of the National Socialist Movement, a neo-Nazi group. He and three oth­er NSM mem­bers met HuffPost out­side their hotel in the Nashville area.

On Friday evening, a HuffPost reporter met Jeff Schoep, head of the National Socialist Movement, in a hotel park­ing lot in the Nashville area. Standing with three NSM sub­or­di­nates, two of them armed, Schoep too seemed fix­at­ed on chang­ing the optics of orga­nized white suprema­cy in America. No more swastikas, he said. No more shout­ing racial epithets.

But it’s hard to teach an old Nazi new tricks. When a pair of young black men start­ed tak­ing pho­tos of the Nazis hang­ing out in a hotel park­ing lot talk­ing to some jour­nal­ists, a mid­dle-aged NSM mem­ber wear­ing SS light­ning bolts on his jack­et said, “Get out of here, n****rs.”

The Islamic Center of Murfreesboro, fear­ing that it could be tar­get­ed, pre­pared to can­cel ser­vices and reli­gious class­es. Earlier this year, two young men were arrest­ed for wrap­ping bacon around the front door of the mosque (pork, the con­sump­tion of which is for­bid­den in Islam, is a com­mon weapon of Islamophobes) and spray-paint­ing pro­fane anti-Muslim mes­sages on the building’s exterior.

Since it opened in 2012, the mosque has received a bomb threat and been the tar­get of arson. Women in head­scarves out­side the cen­ter have been harassed. In 2010, over 300 anti-Muslim pro­test­ers marched on the mayor’s office here, chant­i­ng “No Shariah in the USA!” and demand­ing that the town not allow the Islamic cen­ter to be built at all.

The sto­ry orig­i­nat­ed @ Huffingtonpost​.com.