One of the many criticisms which dogged former Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller during her two stints as PM was her many overseas trips.
Though a non-supporter of Mrs Miller and her party, at the time I stated my belief that her travels and meetings with foreign heads of states were a crucial part of her job description.
Nevertheless ‚I believed then, as I do now ‚that those overseas trips must be geared at extracting maximum benefits for the Jamaican people, as it must to be the presumption that foreign leaders are having those meetings to get maximum advantage for their nations.
As such I was constrained in my criticisms of the former Prime Minister on her foreign trips. I believed she had the right to pursue economic and other opportunities for Jamaica.
I also believe that it is the right of the new Prime Minister of Jamaica to do the very same thing as part of his duties as chief executive officer of the country.
We should never lose sight of the fact that countries do not have friendships , they have interests.
As we applaud moves aimed at securing opportunities for our people we can ill-afford to be starry-eyed politically, about the fact that foreign Leaders invite other leaders because they believe that forming, or strengthening bonds, or even the mere optics of such meetings, advances their agendas.
Benjamin Netanyahu a master of manipulation, and the art of the optics ‚was not shy about thanking Andrew Holness for not joining a UNESCO vote against Israel. (already acknowledging that Israel wants to show it has friends which support it’s policies) .
So in this particular case the interest of Israel was already served.
It would be foolhardy to believe that his Invitation to the Jamaican PM was intended to be anything more than an, “in your face” photo-op to UNESCO.
In the end Jamaica may stand to lose more than it gains from this visit.
The vote of which Netanyahu spoke, was the UNESCO’s World Heritage committee vote, it was convened in Istanbul Turkey.
According to Israel the resolution was designed to, (in their words) “erase any Jewish connection to Jerusalem”.
The following countries are on the executive: Angola, Azerbaijan, Burkina Faso, Croatia, Cuba, Finland, Indonesia, Jamaica, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Tunisia, Turkey, United Republic of Tanzania, Vietnam and Zimbabwe.
For years Israel has lobbied to break the almost monolithic vote of the African continent in it’s support for the Palestinian people in their struggle against Israeli occupation and oppression.
This is of course with the exception of Tanzania, which has always voted with other non-African nations in support of the state of Israel. These include Croatia, Finland, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, or at least abstain, according to the (Jerusalem Post).
Jamaica’s vote with Israel came as a result of massive lobbying from Israel.
The Question now must be ‚what will Jamaica derive from this vote which will certainly raise eyebrows from quarters opposed to Israel on principle?
I have no problem with the PM looking at outside models which may be emulated.
As Andrew Holness said , Jamaica has long looked at Israel’s advances in agriculture, technology etc as a model which can be applied to Jamaica.
Nevertheless it is important to note that the Obama administration, for the first time in Israel’s history, pulled America’s veto protection which shielded the state of Israel from UN condemnation for it’s continued illegal land-grab , and settlement building.
Every time that Israel takes a bit more of Palestine through it’s illegal building of settlements, it automatically extends outward it’s perimeter of defense, which it states is necessary for the defense of Israel.
That is the reason the last two American Presidents, George W Bush and Barack Obama, both insisted that in order for the peace process to be enhanced Israel must stop the illegal building of settlements on Palestinan lands.
It must also be noted that Israel’s policies toward the Palestinian people and it’s treatment toward African Jews (real Hebrew people) has drawn strong condemnation from across the globe, to include former President Jimmy Carter, who contends the Israeli state is the closest thing to an Apartheid state.
As we speak many Hebrew people daring to return to Israel are spat upon and abused, many are locked up in a monster prison in the Negev desert.
It’s important that as we seek to bolster and create new relationships we do not align ourselves with interests which are antithetical to our core values.
Democracy is not what any one country say it is, democracy is an ever evolving concept.
Even in the United States the World’s second largest democracy we see now, that the cherished principle called democracy is in danger. When those not even yet in office are showing that democracy is what they say it is.
Read, comment, and share.